E - Internal Business Carbon Pricing
E - Company-Specific Carbon Pricing
2008 Utility scenarios for carbon prices vary widely
2013 29 Companies Disclose an Internal Carbon Price
2014 150 major corporations - 29 in US, have an internal carbon price
2015 Carbon prices used by 19 companies disclosing price
2015 Companies using internal carbon prices
2015 Consumer Discretionary
2015 Global 500 advocacy on carbon pricing
2015 How are companies engaging on government carbon pricing
2015 How shadow prices drive decision-making
2015 Information Technology
2015 Internal carbon prices vary significantly based on whether a "fee" or a "shadow price"
2015 Internal carbon pricing various sectors are using
2015 Internal voluntary carbon prices by sector
2015 Most Common Benefits and Challenges
2015 Recommended pricing reporting guidance
2015 Selected companies with a carbon price
2016 1,249 companies are pricing or planning to price carbon
2016 37 companies reported a direct link between carbon pricing and tangible change
2016 Exxon's proposed internal carbon price trajectory
2016 Internal carbon pricing
2016 Mandatory vs. internal carbon prices for several jurisdictions
2016 Sectoral responses to carbon pricing survey
2017 Internal carbon prices of utilities publicly disclosed to CDP compared to Paris-compatible carbon prices for 2020
2018 Companies using carbon pricing or preparing to
2018 Estimates of global SCC at different discount rates 2015-2050
2018 Growth of internal carbon pricing
2018 Growth of internal carbon pricing 2014-2017
2018 Power sector internal carbon price levels
2020 Carbon proxy price as a share of energy cost
2020 Financial viability of projects with and without a proxy carbon price
2021 Carbon price ranges by industry
2021 Carbon price ranges by region
2021 Carbon price ranges by type of price
2021 Carbon prices differentiated by GHG scope, implicit price, shadow price
2021 Commonly disclosed carbon pricing regulations
2021 Company objectives for internal carbon pricing based on current or expected emissions regulation: 2020
2021 Company objectives for internal carbon pricing: 2020
2021 Correlation between internal carbon pricing and other climate actions 2018-2020
2021 Growth of internal carbon pricing
2021 Growth of internal carbon pricing by region 2018-2020
2021 Industries regulated for carbon or expecting requlation within three years
2021 Industries regulated for carbon or expecting to be regulated -- by region
2021 Internal carbon pricing varies within and between industries and regions
2021 Internal carbon pricing: number of companies currently and planning to use
2021 Number of companies currently subject to regulation and expecting regulation
2021 Share of companies by region using or planning to price carbon 2018-2020
2021 Share of companies pricing or planning to price carbon 2018-2020
2021 Types of internal carbon prices used
2021 Use of carbon pricing by industry sector
2022 Companies vary widely in “profit per ton of GHG emissions.”
Attributes of carbon fee pricing
Attributes of carbon shadow pricing
Common elements of establishing an internal carbon rice
Emissions Reductions vs. Emissions
European company carbon prices
Internal carbon pricing in North America - 1
Number of companies planning to price carbon up 23% from 2015
Setting a corporate price on carbon
CDP: median internal carbon price disclosed by companies in 2020 was US$25 per metric ton of CO2e, with companies in Asia and Europe implementing average price of US$28
Companies disclosed that they use internal carbon prices to address current or future regulation that could increase the cost of emissions and have a financial impact on their business.
Of nearly 6,000 companies surveyed on carbon pricing in 2020, more than 2,000 - representing over US$27 trillion in market capitalisation - disclosed that they currently use an internal carbon price or plan to implement one within the next two years.
Puma GHG Valuation: $87/ton (methodology attached)
Decision Making - Business TOC
E - Carbon Pricing Extracts
E - Internal Business Responses
Infographic - Carbon Pricing in Canada
I:BusinessCarbonPricingAdvocacy
I:CarbonOffsetsandCarbonPricing
I:CarbonPricingandEmissionsReductions
I:CarbonPricingandTechnologyInnovation
I:CarbonPricingHistoryandTrends
I:CarbonPricinginScenarioPlanning
I:CarbonPricingPoliticalFeasibility
I:CarbonPricingviaCarbonMarkets
I:CarbonPricingwithComplementaryPolicies
I:ConsumptionBasedCarbonPricing
I:CurrentDamagesasCarbonPrice
I:EvaluatingCarbonPricing
I:RCCRiskCostofCarbonasCarbonPrice
I:SVMASocialValueofMitigationAction
I:TargetBasedCarbonPricing
S - Adaptation Decisionmaking
S - Assessing Climate Investment Risk
S - Assessments of Business Climate Risks
S - Best Business Practices for a Climate Response
S - Business Adaptation/Resilience
S - Business Case for Climate Response
S - Business Climate Responses Sources
S - Business Commitments Strategies
S - Business Decision-Making with Climate Uncertainty
S - Business Greenwashing
S - Business Opposition to Climate Action
S - Business Positioning and Advocacy on Climate Action
S - Business Response as Risk Management
S - Carbon Price Forecasts
S - Carbon Pricing Futures
S - Carbon Pricing History and Trends
S - Carbon Pricing in the Electricity Sector
S - Carbon Pricing Policy as Business Risk
S - Carbon Pricing Sources
S - Carbon Pricing System Design
S - Climate as Opportunity
S - Climate Change Scenario Planning
S - Climate Policy Advocacy by Business
S - Current State of Climate Risk Reporting
S - Customer/Public Activism as Business Risk
S - Decision-making Under Uncertainty
S - Decision-Making Futures
S - Evaluating Business Responses
S - Evaluating Carbon Pricing
S - Evaluating Investment and Climate Change
S - Fossil Fuels and Fossil Free Investing
S - Impacts of Pricing Carbon
S - Internal Corporate Carbon Pricing
S - Investing Under Uncertainty
S - Investor Best Practices on Climate
S - Investor Climate Policy Advocacy
S - Managing Investments Against Climate Risk
S - National and Global Carbon Pricing
S - Policy Outcomes as Business Risk
S - Risk Disclosure as Business Response
S - SCC Social Cost of Carbon
S - Sectoral Risk Disclosure
S - State and Local Carbon Pricing
S - Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
S - Why and How of Pricing Carbon
N - Business Climate Responses
N - Business Commitments Strategies
N - Business Litigation and Liability Risk
N - Business Policy Advocacy
N - Business Policy Opposition
N - Business Risk Management
N - Carbon Price Forecasting
N - Carbon Pricing Advocacy
N - Carbon Pricing Impacts
N - Carbon Pricing News - Topical
N - Carbon Pricing Trends
N - Culture Change (Business)
N - Evaluating Carbon Pricing
N - Internal Carbon Pricing - Business and Other
N - Investor Expectations
N - Market Structure Risk
N - Readiness/Adaptation for Physical Risks
N - SCC Social Cost of Carbon News
N - Skeptical of Business Action/Potential
T - Business Climate Response Networks
T - Business Declarations
T - Carbon Pricing Individuals
T - Carbon Pricing Networks
V - Investing and Climate
E - Business Carbon Pricing Advocacy
E - Business Climate Response Extracts
E - Business Emissions Reductions
E - Business Leadership Role in Mitigation
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Business Policy Opposition
E - Business Resilience/Adaptation
E - Business Response Best Practice
E - Business Response Examples
E - Cap and Trade Performance
E - Carbon Markets Performance
E - Carbon pricing politics
E - Carbon Pricing Coverage
E - Carbon Pricing History and Trends
E - Carbon Pricing Impacts
E - Carbon Pricing in Practice
E - Carbon Pricing Required for Emissions Targets
E - Carbon Pricing Revenues and Use
E - Carbon Pricing Scenarios and Forecasts
E - Case for Carbon Pricing
E - Climate Impact on Returns
E - Climate Impacts on Corporate Ratings
E - Climate Opportunities
E - Critiquing Business Responses
E - Efficient Optimal Carbon Pricing
E - Evaluating Business Responses
E - Evaluating Carbon Pricing
E - Evaluating Risk Disclosure
E - Explaining Business Responses
E - Implicit Carbon Price of Policies and Measures
E - Negotiating a Global Carbon Price
E - Pension Fund Risk and Risk Management
E - Policy Advocacy/Opposition
E - Principles of Risk Management
E - Responses by Business Sector
E - Revenue Neutral Carbon Tax
E - Risk Disclosure Best Practice
E - Risk Disclosure Materiality
E - Risk Disclosure Rules
E - Risk Disclosure Scenarios
E - Risk Disclosure Timeline
E - Risk Management Barriers
E - Risk Management Strategy
E - Science-based targets
E - Sectoral Carbon Pricing and Pathways
E - Visualizing Risk Management
2010 1. What are companies accomplishing with carbon management plans?
2012 The study concluded that policy and technology change in risk, but impacts almost irrelevant
2015 Departments involved in addressing climate risks
2015 Other ways to get to same objective, e.g. $30/ton carbon tax
2015 Other ways to get to same objective, e.g. $30/ton carbon tax
2015 The 2oC portfolio approach
2015 Translating a 2oC scenario into a 2oC benchmark - 12
2016 Carbon price impact stress-testing approach
2016 Comparison of relevant signposts within physical climate scenarios
2016 Horizontal vs. vertical perspective on carbon pricing
2016 Horizontal vs. vertical perspective on carbon pricing
2016 Impact of policy distortions on apparent abatement cost
2016 Impact of policy distortions on apparent abatement cost
2016 Impact of WAIS collapse by 2200 modest in terms of suggested SCC
2016 Impact of WAIS collapse by 2200 modest in terms of suggested SCC
2016 Linking real assets to financial portfolios (9)
2016 Low carbon impact smart beta portfolio
2016 Mapping GHG productivity along value chains
2016 Mapping GHG productivity along value chains
2016 Objectives of the report
2016 Oil production costs vary widely
2016 Oil production costs vary widely
2016 Overview of carbon pricing by the numbers
2016 Overview of carbon pricing by the numbers
2016 Position of companies on introducing carbon pricing
2016 Position of companies on introducing carbon pricing
2016 Potential price impact of global carbon price after revenue recycling
2016 Prices in existing carbon pricing initiatives
2016 Relative sector impact on PBT by 2020
2016 Risks are long-term, investment focus short-term
2016 Testing 2D alignment for real assets
2016 Testing the alignment of real assets with a 2D target (4)
2016 There is no demand for long-term analysis (19)
2016 Transition scenarios - IEA outlook to 2040
2016 Voluntary vs. mandatory ways to respond to scenario challenges
No more concurrent uploads are allowed - wait until at least one has finished.
Headings - Extracted Materials
E - Internal Business Carbon Pricing
Extracted Graphics | Extracted Ideas