Select files to upload
or use drag and drop
Select files to upload
or use drag and drop
Select files to upload
or use drag and drop
Select files to upload
or use drag and drop
Select files to upload
or use drag and drop
Business Policy Advocacy and Opposition TOC
I - BoundingImpactsofBusinessResponses
I - BusinessLeadingChange
I - BusinessOppositionasCausalFactor
I - BusinessPolicyOpposition
I - BusinessWon'tStepUp
I - PolicyFootprints
I - PolicyOppositionbyHighInfluenceCompanies
I - PrivateEnvironmentalGovernance
I - SixBusinessAmericas?
I - SolutionasBusinessAction
I - TradeAssociationPolicyOpposition
S - Business Commitments Strategies
S - Business Opposition to Climate Action
S - Business Positioning and Advocacy on Climate Action
S - Business Stepping Up
S - Climate Policy Advocacy by Business
S - Investor Climate Policy Advocacy
S - Voluntary Carbon Offset Markets
N - Business and a Low Carbon Transition
N - Business Commitments Strategies
N - Business Initiatives
N - Business Policy Advocacy
N - Business Policy Opposition
N - Carbon Pricing Advocacy
T - Business Advocacy
E - Business Carbon Pricing Advocacy
E - Business Leadership Role in Mitigation
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Business Policy Opposition
E - Science-based targets
Chief Executive Officers
S - Best Business Practices for a Climate Response
S - Business Case for Climate Response
S - Business Commitments Strategies
S - Business Opposition to Climate Action
S - Business Positioning and Advocacy on Climate Action
S - Business Response and Firm Performance
S - Business Stepping Up
S - Climate Policy Advocacy by Business
S - Climate Policy Under Uncertainty
S - Communicating w Policy-Makers
S - Ecocide in International Law
S - Green Jobs
S - Investor Climate Policy Advocacy
S - Media Coverage
S - Public Beliefs and Knowledge
S - Risk Disclosure as Business Response
N - A Policy Tipping Point?
N - Business and a Low Carbon Transition
N - Business and Denial
N - Business Best Practice
N - Business Climate Responses
N - Business Commitments Strategies
N - Business Initiatives
N - Business Policy Advocacy
N - Business Policy Opposition
N - Business Responding to Pressure
N - Business Risk Management
N - Business Risk Perceptions
N - Can/Will Business "Step Up"
N - Carbon Pricing Advocacy
N - Conservative Perspectives
N - Culture Change (Business)
N - Green Jobs
N - Greenwashing - Climate
N - Litigation and Liability News
N - Risk Disclosure News
N - Shareholder Resolutions/Litigation
N - Skeptical of Business Action/Potential
T - Business Advocacy
V - Business and Climate Videos
C - Business and Climate Cartoons
E - Business Carbon Pricing Advocacy
E - Business Leadership Role in Mitigation
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Business Policy Opposition
E - Business Support for TCFD
E - Critiquing Business Responses
E - Evaluating Business Responses
E - Green Jobs
E - Internal Business Responses
E - Responses by Business Sector
Decision Making - Business TOC
S - Adaptation Decisionmaking
S - Assessing Climate Investment Risk
S - Assessments of Business Climate Risks
S - Best Business Practices for a Climate Response
S - Business Adaptation/Resilience
S - Business Case for Climate Response
S - Business Climate Responses Sources
S - Business Commitments Strategies
S - Business Decision-Making with Climate Uncertainty
S - Business Greenwashing
S - Business Opposition to Climate Action
S - Business Positioning and Advocacy on Climate Action
S - Business Response as Risk Management
S - Business Stepping Up
S - Climate as Opportunity
S - Climate Change Scenario Planning
S - Climate Policy Advocacy by Business
S - Current State of Climate Risk Reporting
S - Customer/Public Activism as Business Risk
S - Decision-making Under Uncertainty
S - Decision-Making Futures
S - Evaluating Business Responses
S - Evaluating Investment and Climate Change
S - Fossil Fuels and Fossil Free Investing
S - Internal Corporate Carbon Pricing
S - Investing Under Uncertainty
S - Investor Best Practices on Climate
S - Investor Climate Policy Advocacy
S - Managing Investments Against Climate Risk
S - Market Mechanisms
S - Policy Outcomes as Business Risk
S - Risk Disclosure as Business Response
S - Sectoral Risk Disclosure
S - Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
N - Brand Risk
N - Business Climate Responses
N - Business Commitments Strategies
N - Business Litigation and Liability Risk
N - Business Policy Advocacy
N - Business Policy Opposition
N - Business Risk Management
N - Culture Change (Business)
N - Investor Expectations
N - Market Structure Risk
N - Readiness/Adaptation for Physical Risks
N - Skeptical of Business Action/Potential
T - Adaptation Tools
T - Business Advocacy
T - Business Climate Response Networks
T - Business Declarations
T - Business Initiatives
V - Investing and Climate
E - Business Carbon Pricing Advocacy
E - Business Leadership Role in Mitigation
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Business Policy Opposition
E - Business Resilience/Adaptation
E - Business Response Best Practice
E - Business Response Examples
E - CC and Equity Value
E - Climate Branding
E - Climate Impact on Returns
E - Climate Impacts on Corporate Ratings
E - Climate Opportunities
E - Climate Risk and ERM
E - Critiquing Business Responses
E - Evaluating Business Responses
E - Evaluating Risk Disclosure
E - Explaining Business Responses
E - Internal Business Carbon Pricing
E - Pension Fund Risk and Risk Management
E - Principles of Risk Management
E - Responses by Business Sector
E - Risk Disclosure Best Practice
E - Risk Disclosure Materiality
E - Risk Disclosure Rules
E - Risk Disclosure Scenarios
E - Risk Disclosure Timeline
E - Risk Management Barriers
E - Risk Management Strategy
E - Risk Reporting
E - Science-based targets
E - Visualizing Risk Management
E - Business Climate Response Extracts
E - Board of Director Role and Responsibility
E - Business Case
E - Business Commitments/Targets
E - Business Leadership Role in Mitigation
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Business Policy Opposition
E - Business Resilience/Adaptation
E - Business Response Best Practice
E - Business Risk Disclosure Topics
E - Business Scenario Planning
E - Business Support for TCFD
E - Climate Opportunities
E - Critiquing Business Responses
E - Evaluating Business Responses
E - Explaining Business Responses
E - Internal Business Responses
E - Private Sector in Green Growth
E - Responses as Risk Management
E - Responses by Business Sector
E - Risk Disclosure Best Practice
E - Science-based targets
E - Visualizing Risk Management
2012 How does the private sector fit into adaptation solutions?
2021 Estimated emissions cuts by large companies with net zero targets
2021 Not all business responses are created equal
Brown capital versus green capital
We'll adapt! is a great "alternative vision"
1. Public short-term net carbon footprint targets
2. Targets linked to renumeration
3. Review of progress
4. Alignment with TCFD recommendations
A focus on client understanding
And not just talking about climate change, but doing something about it to reduce emissions profile
At 45, I am hell bent on helping lending a voice of reality and pragmatism to what is often characterized as a scientific debate
At Entergy 14 years, lawyer and MBA.
Banks and other investors will be racing to find impactful and creditworthy businesses in which to invest climate capital. This could lead to the rapid scaling up of climate-focused businesses, and as a result a wholesale transformation of the competitive landscape in ‘green’ technologies and manufacturing.
By forcing Parties to “revisit” their NDCs before next year’s COP, the Pact will induce some countries to reconsider their targets and redraw their emissions pathways. And this will cascade down to business, likely pushing many organizations to accelerate their own decarbonization plans.
By laying out the “45% by 2030” emissions target in black and white, the Pact has set a clear benchmark for evaluating the credibility of businesses’ climate transition plans. Those that fail to integrate this target could find themselves the target of climate activists, investors, and even legislators.
Companies were eager to show their support in Glasgow, with countless industry booths and appearances by corporate elites like Microsoft Corp. co-founder Bill Gates and BlackRock Inc. Chief Executive Officer Larry Fink.
Decided to abandon discussion of mitigation. The topic was "dead to us" in 2010.
Decided to really stick to risk management point of view. How to assess the risk of SLR, etc. That's where their adaptation study came from.
Don't care whether you believe in climate science. But we need to look at this through a risk management lense
Entergy tired of being demonized for suggesting market mechanisms, China test, for rejection of the science.
Had to pass the China test. Have to be looking globally, can't just do things to feel good about our actions
I am pessimistic. In electric industry very different interests and constituencies.
I'm not bringing great news. But my pessimism doesn't detract from my enthusiams for helping make progress on this issue
John Kerry: “Not only are companies ahead of government, but companies understand that their future is tied to having a stable marketplace.”
Katrina's hitting helped change the conversation
Nick Molho, executive director of Aldersgate Group: the outcome of COP26 “made it crystal clear to businesses that they need to move away from fossil fuels.”
Purely from a risk management perspective, how do you go about assessing the risk of doing nothing?
Reason carbon tax discussion is dead is because in hierarchy of needs we're dealing with economic pain
Skeptics argue that the whole accord rests on a massive bet that the world's biggest polluters will eliminate all their net emissions in the next few decades and say the recent surge in coal mining in China, India and Australia proves just how hard this is going to be.
Suffering is the only thing that will move the needle beyond the prisoners dilemma
Ten Principles for Voluntary Corporate Action
The conversation the next 10-20 years is about "consequence management." We will have to deal with consequences and sacrifices
The end game requires a transition. Too much econ incentive to fight EPA efforts on NSPS. There will be pushback
There is going to be a fight no matter what direction we turn
Truth of matter is the gas has displaced coal - taking credit for this is like rooster taking credit for the sunrise
Two tipping points. Climate point of no return. And political tipping point - usually driven by suffering.
Wayne Leonard has been talking about climate science for more than a decade
We are already seeing the suffering.
We're trapped globally in a prisoners dilemma. U.S. is in a "do loop." We're fighting over incremental investment today for a future generation. Far easier to maintain status quo.
What would success look like if we were successful?
E - Business Risk and Opportunity Management Extracts
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Business Policy Opposition
E - Climate Stress Testing
E - COP21 and Business
E - Critiquing Business Responses
2016 Climate action mosaic
2017 Model evaluated various scenarios for business response, profit, etc.
CCRA model stock and flow diagram
Climate Change Risk Assessment Model CCRA causal loop diagram
Paper proposes a 4-step methodology constructing siimulation models
Typical categories of climate related risks and opportunities
E - Climate Risk Response
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Climate Investment Products
E - ESG Investing
E - Investment Opportunities
E - Investment Sector Responses
E - Investors Need Public Policy
E - Low Carbon Investing
2007 Government Policies Fall Into 4 Key Areas
2007 How climate change could affect companies' financial statements (part 1)
2008 Nuclear is the cheapest option if we price carbon
2011 Adapting to "deep uncertainty" is a key investment challenge
2015 Investor action requires a strong 3rd leg
2015 Manager universe addressing climate risk/opportunity
2021 Overview of the FSB’s roadmap for addressing climate-related financial risks
2022 Work of the FSB re climate-related risks: assessment of vulnerabilities
2022 Work of the FSB re climate-related risks: development of appropriate supervisory and regulatatory approaches
2022 Work of the FSB re climate-related risks: disclosures
2022 Work of the FSB re climate-related risks: priorities to address data gaps
Corporate Impact
ESG standard setting organizations
NASDAQ Global Water Index
NASDAQ Green Economy Index
Key Players and Stakeholders, Materiality as Investment Risk and Investor Concerns
The FSB roadmap focuses on four interrelated areas: disclosures, data, vulnerabilities, and regulatory tools
E - Non-State Actors and Actions
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Personal Decisionmaking - Individual Activism
E - Policy Advocacy/Opposition
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Business Policy Opposition
4-Quadrant approach to policy footprint
2012 Caterpillar - An example of contradictory positioning
2012 Conoc-Phillips - An example of contradictory positioning
2012 Corporate affiliations with pro- and con- climate entities can get complex
2012 Exxon - An example of contradictory positioning
2012 How did lobbying expenditures change 2002-2010?
2012 lSpotting contradictory corporate statements and actions
2012 Ratio of pro to anti-climate political spending
2014 200 Companies Are Engaging Policy-makers to Support Carbon-pricing Legislation
2015 Elements of responsible corporate engagement on climate policy
2015 Global 500 advocacy on carbon pricing
2015 Leaders and laggards from the top 35 trade associations
2016 Overall performance of the companies studied
2017 How the world's 250 largest industrial companies engage with climate policy
2018 90% of World's Largest Companies Have Trade Association Links to Policy Opposition
2018 Climate Lobbying has evolved, by basic narrative remains the same
2018 Potential A-List companies
2018 The A-List of Climate Policy Leaders
2018 The most misaligned company and trade association positions
2018 Trade associations and their climate policy footprint
2018 Why climate lobbying matters
2021 Growing awareness and momentum on climate issues makes near-term forceful policy response more likely
Climate positions of key shipping trade groups
Companies influence the conversation in multiple ways
Company scorecards for shipping's stance on climate policy
2018 Corporate Climate Lobbying Landscape
Did companies change their engagement on climate change in response to the 2011 study?
How automakers are influencing regulators
How the IMO is captured by corporate interests
2018 Lobbying is often the biggest impact a company has on climate change
Role of corporate representatives in UN processes
2016 The 4-cell grid of business climate leadership
The 50 most influential
I - BusinessPolicyAdvocacy
I - PolicyAdvocacy
Headings - Extracted Materials
E - Business Policy Advocacy
Extracted Graphics | Extracted Ideas
Influencing Policy - Individual Actions
2015 Support for a carbon price from business groups, politicians, and individual companies
Potential Leaders - 20 in Contention
The A-List of 20 Policy Leaders
5 of 8 Rankings Include Questions or Criteria on a Company's Public Policy Positions
Apple has been notably supportive of climate change action
Business advocacy of societal risk management
CDP Climate Change Score asks questions, but doesn't penalize companies for lobbying against climate policy
Climate change not a priority for many CEOs
Climate policy support by the top 100 industrial corporations, 2015
COP21 signaled a significant shift
Corporate Knights Global 100 automatically excludes companies that lobby to block climate poliy
Other standards don't penalize companies for lobbying against policy, or reward companies for supporting policy
Still the case the companies are MIA on climate lobbying
Business Policy Advocacy and Opposition TOC
I - BoundingImpactsofBusinessResponses
I - BusinessLeadingChange
I - BusinessOppositionasCausalFactor
I - BusinessPolicyOpposition
I - BusinessWon'tStepUp
I - PolicyFootprints
I - PolicyOppositionbyHighInfluenceCompanies
I - PrivateEnvironmentalGovernance
I - SixBusinessAmericas?
I - SolutionasBusinessAction
I - TradeAssociationPolicyOpposition
S - Business Commitments Strategies
S - Business Opposition to Climate Action
S - Business Positioning and Advocacy on Climate Action
S - Business Stepping Up
S - Climate Policy Advocacy by Business
S - Investor Climate Policy Advocacy
S - Voluntary Carbon Offset Markets
N - Business and a Low Carbon Transition
N - Business Commitments Strategies
N - Business Initiatives
N - Business Policy Advocacy
N - Business Policy Opposition
N - Carbon Pricing Advocacy
T - Business Advocacy
E - Business Carbon Pricing Advocacy
E - Business Leadership Role in Mitigation
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Business Policy Opposition
E - Science-based targets
Chief Executive Officers
S - Best Business Practices for a Climate Response
S - Business Case for Climate Response
S - Business Commitments Strategies
S - Business Opposition to Climate Action
S - Business Positioning and Advocacy on Climate Action
S - Business Response and Firm Performance
S - Business Stepping Up
S - Climate Policy Advocacy by Business
S - Climate Policy Under Uncertainty
S - Communicating w Policy-Makers
S - Ecocide in International Law
S - Green Jobs
S - Investor Climate Policy Advocacy
S - Media Coverage
S - Public Beliefs and Knowledge
S - Risk Disclosure as Business Response
N - A Policy Tipping Point?
N - Business and a Low Carbon Transition
N - Business and Denial
N - Business Best Practice
N - Business Climate Responses
N - Business Commitments Strategies
N - Business Initiatives
N - Business Policy Advocacy
N - Business Policy Opposition
N - Business Responding to Pressure
N - Business Risk Management
N - Business Risk Perceptions
N - Can/Will Business "Step Up"
N - Carbon Pricing Advocacy
N - Conservative Perspectives
N - Culture Change (Business)
N - Green Jobs
N - Greenwashing - Climate
N - Litigation and Liability News
N - Risk Disclosure News
N - Shareholder Resolutions/Litigation
N - Skeptical of Business Action/Potential
T - Business Advocacy
V - Business and Climate Videos
C - Business and Climate Cartoons
E - Business Carbon Pricing Advocacy
E - Business Leadership Role in Mitigation
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Business Policy Opposition
E - Business Support for TCFD
E - Critiquing Business Responses
E - Evaluating Business Responses
E - Green Jobs
E - Internal Business Responses
E - Responses by Business Sector
Decision Making - Business TOC
S - Adaptation Decisionmaking
S - Assessing Climate Investment Risk
S - Assessments of Business Climate Risks
S - Best Business Practices for a Climate Response
S - Business Adaptation/Resilience
S - Business Case for Climate Response
S - Business Climate Responses Sources
S - Business Commitments Strategies
S - Business Decision-Making with Climate Uncertainty
S - Business Greenwashing
S - Business Opposition to Climate Action
S - Business Positioning and Advocacy on Climate Action
S - Business Response as Risk Management
S - Business Stepping Up
S - Climate as Opportunity
S - Climate Change Scenario Planning
S - Climate Policy Advocacy by Business
S - Current State of Climate Risk Reporting
S - Customer/Public Activism as Business Risk
S - Decision-making Under Uncertainty
S - Decision-Making Futures
S - Evaluating Business Responses
S - Evaluating Investment and Climate Change
S - Fossil Fuels and Fossil Free Investing
S - Internal Corporate Carbon Pricing
S - Investing Under Uncertainty
S - Investor Best Practices on Climate
S - Investor Climate Policy Advocacy
S - Managing Investments Against Climate Risk
S - Market Mechanisms
S - Policy Outcomes as Business Risk
S - Risk Disclosure as Business Response
S - Sectoral Risk Disclosure
S - Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
N - Brand Risk
N - Business Climate Responses
N - Business Commitments Strategies
N - Business Litigation and Liability Risk
N - Business Policy Advocacy
N - Business Policy Opposition
N - Business Risk Management
N - Culture Change (Business)
N - Investor Expectations
N - Market Structure Risk
N - Readiness/Adaptation for Physical Risks
N - Skeptical of Business Action/Potential
T - Adaptation Tools
T - Business Advocacy
T - Business Climate Response Networks
T - Business Declarations
T - Business Initiatives
V - Investing and Climate
E - Business Carbon Pricing Advocacy
E - Business Leadership Role in Mitigation
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Business Policy Opposition
E - Business Resilience/Adaptation
E - Business Response Best Practice
E - Business Response Examples
E - CC and Equity Value
E - Climate Branding
E - Climate Impact on Returns
E - Climate Impacts on Corporate Ratings
E - Climate Opportunities
E - Climate Risk and ERM
E - Critiquing Business Responses
E - Evaluating Business Responses
E - Evaluating Risk Disclosure
E - Explaining Business Responses
E - Internal Business Carbon Pricing
E - Pension Fund Risk and Risk Management
E - Principles of Risk Management
E - Responses by Business Sector
E - Risk Disclosure Best Practice
E - Risk Disclosure Materiality
E - Risk Disclosure Rules
E - Risk Disclosure Scenarios
E - Risk Disclosure Timeline
E - Risk Management Barriers
E - Risk Management Strategy
E - Risk Reporting
E - Science-based targets
E - Visualizing Risk Management
E - Business Climate Response Extracts
E - Board of Director Role and Responsibility
E - Business Case
E - Business Commitments/Targets
E - Business Leadership Role in Mitigation
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Business Policy Opposition
E - Business Resilience/Adaptation
E - Business Response Best Practice
E - Business Risk Disclosure Topics
E - Business Scenario Planning
E - Business Support for TCFD
E - Climate Opportunities
E - Critiquing Business Responses
E - Evaluating Business Responses
E - Explaining Business Responses
E - Internal Business Responses
E - Private Sector in Green Growth
E - Responses as Risk Management
E - Responses by Business Sector
E - Risk Disclosure Best Practice
E - Science-based targets
E - Visualizing Risk Management
2012 How does the private sector fit into adaptation solutions?
2021 Estimated emissions cuts by large companies with net zero targets
2021 Not all business responses are created equal
Brown capital versus green capital
We'll adapt! is a great "alternative vision"
1. Public short-term net carbon footprint targets
2. Targets linked to renumeration
3. Review of progress
4. Alignment with TCFD recommendations
A focus on client understanding
And not just talking about climate change, but doing something about it to reduce emissions profile
At 45, I am hell bent on helping lending a voice of reality and pragmatism to what is often characterized as a scientific debate
At Entergy 14 years, lawyer and MBA.
Banks and other investors will be racing to find impactful and creditworthy businesses in which to invest climate capital. This could lead to the rapid scaling up of climate-focused businesses, and as a result a wholesale transformation of the competitive landscape in ‘green’ technologies and manufacturing.
By forcing Parties to “revisit” their NDCs before next year’s COP, the Pact will induce some countries to reconsider their targets and redraw their emissions pathways. And this will cascade down to business, likely pushing many organizations to accelerate their own decarbonization plans.
By laying out the “45% by 2030” emissions target in black and white, the Pact has set a clear benchmark for evaluating the credibility of businesses’ climate transition plans. Those that fail to integrate this target could find themselves the target of climate activists, investors, and even legislators.
Companies were eager to show their support in Glasgow, with countless industry booths and appearances by corporate elites like Microsoft Corp. co-founder Bill Gates and BlackRock Inc. Chief Executive Officer Larry Fink.
Decided to abandon discussion of mitigation. The topic was "dead to us" in 2010.
Decided to really stick to risk management point of view. How to assess the risk of SLR, etc. That's where their adaptation study came from.
Don't care whether you believe in climate science. But we need to look at this through a risk management lense
Entergy tired of being demonized for suggesting market mechanisms, China test, for rejection of the science.
Had to pass the China test. Have to be looking globally, can't just do things to feel good about our actions
I am pessimistic. In electric industry very different interests and constituencies.
I'm not bringing great news. But my pessimism doesn't detract from my enthusiams for helping make progress on this issue
John Kerry: “Not only are companies ahead of government, but companies understand that their future is tied to having a stable marketplace.”
Katrina's hitting helped change the conversation
Nick Molho, executive director of Aldersgate Group: the outcome of COP26 “made it crystal clear to businesses that they need to move away from fossil fuels.”
Purely from a risk management perspective, how do you go about assessing the risk of doing nothing?
Reason carbon tax discussion is dead is because in hierarchy of needs we're dealing with economic pain
Skeptics argue that the whole accord rests on a massive bet that the world's biggest polluters will eliminate all their net emissions in the next few decades and say the recent surge in coal mining in China, India and Australia proves just how hard this is going to be.
Suffering is the only thing that will move the needle beyond the prisoners dilemma
Ten Principles for Voluntary Corporate Action
The conversation the next 10-20 years is about "consequence management." We will have to deal with consequences and sacrifices
The end game requires a transition. Too much econ incentive to fight EPA efforts on NSPS. There will be pushback
There is going to be a fight no matter what direction we turn
Truth of matter is the gas has displaced coal - taking credit for this is like rooster taking credit for the sunrise
Two tipping points. Climate point of no return. And political tipping point - usually driven by suffering.
Wayne Leonard has been talking about climate science for more than a decade
We are already seeing the suffering.
We're trapped globally in a prisoners dilemma. U.S. is in a "do loop." We're fighting over incremental investment today for a future generation. Far easier to maintain status quo.
What would success look like if we were successful?
E - Business Risk and Opportunity Management Extracts
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Business Policy Opposition
E - Climate Stress Testing
E - COP21 and Business
E - Critiquing Business Responses
2016 Climate action mosaic
2017 Model evaluated various scenarios for business response, profit, etc.
CCRA model stock and flow diagram
Climate Change Risk Assessment Model CCRA causal loop diagram
Paper proposes a 4-step methodology constructing siimulation models
Typical categories of climate related risks and opportunities
E - Climate Risk Response
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Climate Investment Products
E - ESG Investing
E - Investment Opportunities
E - Investment Sector Responses
E - Investors Need Public Policy
E - Low Carbon Investing
2007 Government Policies Fall Into 4 Key Areas
2007 How climate change could affect companies' financial statements (part 1)
2008 Nuclear is the cheapest option if we price carbon
2011 Adapting to "deep uncertainty" is a key investment challenge
2015 Investor action requires a strong 3rd leg
2015 Manager universe addressing climate risk/opportunity
2021 Overview of the FSB’s roadmap for addressing climate-related financial risks
2022 Work of the FSB re climate-related risks: assessment of vulnerabilities
2022 Work of the FSB re climate-related risks: development of appropriate supervisory and regulatatory approaches
2022 Work of the FSB re climate-related risks: disclosures
2022 Work of the FSB re climate-related risks: priorities to address data gaps
Corporate Impact
ESG standard setting organizations
NASDAQ Global Water Index
NASDAQ Green Economy Index
Key Players and Stakeholders, Materiality as Investment Risk and Investor Concerns
The FSB roadmap focuses on four interrelated areas: disclosures, data, vulnerabilities, and regulatory tools
E - Non-State Actors and Actions
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Personal Decisionmaking - Individual Activism
E - Policy Advocacy/Opposition
E - Business Policy Advocacy
E - Business Policy Opposition
4-Quadrant approach to policy footprint
2012 Caterpillar - An example of contradictory positioning
2012 Conoc-Phillips - An example of contradictory positioning
2012 Corporate affiliations with pro- and con- climate entities can get complex
2012 Exxon - An example of contradictory positioning
2012 How did lobbying expenditures change 2002-2010?
2012 lSpotting contradictory corporate statements and actions
2012 Ratio of pro to anti-climate political spending
2014 200 Companies Are Engaging Policy-makers to Support Carbon-pricing Legislation
2015 Elements of responsible corporate engagement on climate policy
2015 Global 500 advocacy on carbon pricing
2015 Leaders and laggards from the top 35 trade associations
2016 Overall performance of the companies studied
2017 How the world's 250 largest industrial companies engage with climate policy
2018 90% of World's Largest Companies Have Trade Association Links to Policy Opposition
2018 Climate Lobbying has evolved, by basic narrative remains the same
2018 Potential A-List companies
2018 The A-List of Climate Policy Leaders
2018 The most misaligned company and trade association positions
2018 Trade associations and their climate policy footprint
2018 Why climate lobbying matters
2021 Growing awareness and momentum on climate issues makes near-term forceful policy response more likely
Climate positions of key shipping trade groups
Companies influence the conversation in multiple ways
Company scorecards for shipping's stance on climate policy
2018 Corporate Climate Lobbying Landscape
Did companies change their engagement on climate change in response to the 2011 study?
How automakers are influencing regulators
How the IMO is captured by corporate interests
2018 Lobbying is often the biggest impact a company has on climate change
Role of corporate representatives in UN processes
2016 The 4-cell grid of business climate leadership
The 50 most influential
I - BusinessPolicyAdvocacy
I - PolicyAdvocacy