The Climate Web | E - REDD/REDD+

E - REDD/REDD+

2015 Infographic - beef subsidies in Brazil

2015 Infographic - timber subsidies Indonesia

2015 Infographic palm oil subsidies in Indonesi

2015 Infographic soy subsidies in Brazil

Forest Protection

2009 Availability of REDD Reductions Under Different Scenarios

2015 2020 MAC curve for forest loss, multiple studies5

2015 Drivers of forest loss in the tropics 2000-2010

2015 Forecasted Deforestation Emissions to 2050

2015 Forecasted forest loss business as usual

2015 Impact of Carbon Prices on Forecasted Forestry Emissions

2015 MACC curves, this study, multiple time periods

2015 REDD Finance vs. agricultural and biofuels subsidies in Brazil and Indonesia

2015 The commodities putting forests at risk

2019 Potential emissions reductions through REDD+ through FCPF carbon fund and more 2015-2035

2021 Sustainable forests investment portfolio 2015-2020

2022 Changes in deforestation and degradation rates resulting from REDD+ projects over their first 5 years of operation

2022 Effectiveness of REDD+ projects relative to background deforestation rates for 40 REDD+ project sites in humid tropical forests

2022 Location of 81 verified carbon standards projects in the Americas, Africa, and Asia and Oceania analyzed for project effectiveness at reducing deforestation and degradation

2022 Mean deforestation rates 5 years after versus 5 years before REDD+ project commencement in the 10-km leakage belt

2022 Means and 95% confidence intervals in 40 REDD+ projects for 3 postimplementation periods - reductions in annual deforestation and degradation rates and percent reductions in deforestation and degradation rates

REDD Income Potential vs. Governance Index

REDD Income Potential vs. Human Development Needs

Where is REDD in the McKinsey Curves?

'Options' to Solve Concerns/Risks

A link between international funding and reduced deforestation has yet to be proven

Experts don't want to give up on REDD

International programs have performed poorly

Maybe REDD hasn't really had a chance yet

Stakeholders

The bottom line

The fate of FIFA's offset project

There has been no comprehensive analysis of REDD performance

Top Concerns/Risk

Will be benefits of offsets ever be measurable?

Land Use TOC

Solutions - Nature Based TOC

E - Biological Sequestration

E - Land Use Based Offsets

E - Land Use Change

I:REDDandREDD+

Agricultural land use per person

Land use per 100 grams of protein

I:AfforestationReforestation

I:AgriculturalImpacts

I:AgriculturalSectorMitigation/Adaptation

I:Agroforestry

I:Bamboo

I:BECCSBiomassEnergwithCCS

I:Biochar

I:BiomassEnergy

I:Bioplastic

I:BoundingLandUseOutcomes

I:CarbonFarming

I:CarbonPricingandLandUseChange

I:CDRCarbonDioxideRemoval

I:Composting

I:ConservationAgriculture

I:DietandClimate

I:EcosystemRestoration

I:EvaluatingCarbonSequestration

I:EvaluatingEcosystemRestoration

I:EvaluatingForestryInterventions

I:EvaluatingForestryOffsets

I:EvaluatingLandUseSolutions

I:EvaluatingNatureBasedSolutions

I:EvaluatingProtectedAreas

I:EvaluatingREDDandREDD+

I:FarmlandRestoration

I:FLRForestLandscapeRestoration

I:ForestrySector (Deep Dive)

I:Grasslands

I:Halophytes

I:IndigenousPeoples (Audience)

I:IntegratedLandscapeManagement

I:Irrigation

I:LandBuying

I:LandDegradationNeutrality

I:LandUseAlbedoChange

I:LandUseandOceanCO2SinksSaturate

I:LandUseEmissions

I:LandUseMACCs

I:LandUsePathways

I:LandUseRequirements

I:LandUseSectors

I:LandUseSolutions/Technologies

I:LULUCF Land use, land-use change and forestry

I:ManagedGrazing

I:NACNaturalAssetCompanies

I:NaturalandManagedSystemsImpacts

I:NatureBasedInvesting

I:NaturePositiveGoal

I:OceanBiomassRestoration

I:Peat

I:RegenerativeAgriculture

I:Rice

I:Silvopasture

I:SolutionasSoilCarbon

I:TemperateForestRestoration

I:TropicalDeforestation

I:TropicalForestRestoration

I:TropicalStapleTreesinAgriculture

I:WetlandConservation

I:WomensEmpowerment

S - Agriculture Sector

S - Agriculture Sector Adaptation

S - Agriculture Sector Emissions and Mitigation

S - Agriculture Sector Futures

S - Agriculture Sector Impacts

S - Biomass Energy

S - Evaluating Market Mechanisms

S - Evaluating Voluntary Measures

S - Forest Adaptation

S - Forest Landscape Restoration

S - Forestry Emissions and Mitigation

S - Forestry Offsets

S - Impacts - Forestry

S - Land Use Emissions and Mitigation

S - Land Use Futures

S - Land Use Sectors

S - Negative Emissions

S - REDD and REDD+

S - Soil Carbon (not Forests)

S - Wine and Climate

N - Agriculture and Forestry Adaptation

N - Agriculture Impacts

N - Agriculture Innovation

N - Carbon Negative

N - Climate and Wine

N - Food Security

N - Forestry Mitigation

N - Land Use Change

N - Land Use Offsets

N - Land-Based Emissions and Sequestration

N - REDD and REDD+

N - Soil Carbon Sequestration

T - Carbon Offset Networks

T - Agricultural Sector

T - AgricultureAdaptation

T - Ecosystem Restoration

T - Ecosystem Services

T - Forestry

T - Land Use Solutions

T - Market Mechanisms

T - Nature-Based Solutions

T - REDD/REDD+

V - Forestry Impacts

E - Agricultural Mitigation

E - Agricultural Sector

E - Agricultural Sector Responses

E - Agriculture Impacts

E - Agriculture Sector Adaptation

E - COP21 Forestry

E - Forestry Emissions

E - Forestry Sector

E - Land Use Mitigation Potentials

E - Land-Use MACCs

E - NBS Nature Based Solutions

E - NCS NBS Barriers and Limits

E - Negative Emissions Technologies

Supporting Information - Natural Climate Solutions

2011 WWF_Living Forests Report Chapter 2 Forests and Energy

1994 Potential for Carbon Uptake Through Agroforestry

1994 Potential for Carbon Uptake Through Forest Regeneration

1994 Potential for Slowing Deforestation to 2050

2009 Forestry emissions to 2100

2016 Cumulative sequestration and leakage as a function of the time credits are claimed

2016 Forest NPP with temperature change

2016 Historical forest expansion compared to MCS benchmark5

2016 Role of land use in the MCS

2016 Stylized dynamics of carbon sequestration over time

2016 The impact of temperature on forest area is likely to vary substantially for different forest biomes

2017 Global Reforestation Potential Map

2017 MACC curve for national forestry based on EPA analysis

2017 Mandatory vs. Voluntary forestry MACC curves

2017 NCS as fraction of needed reductions by 2030, 37% through 2030, 20% through 2050, and 9% through 2100

2017 New research points to magnitude and immediacy of natural climate solutions

2018 Regional breakdown of estimated carbon emissions and uncertainties from deforestation 1990-2015

2018 There is no one-size fits all to estimating agriculture-driven deforestation

2018 Tropical forest lost 2001 to 2017

2019 Climate change is likely to have a dramatic impact on tree cover by 2050 in many parts of the world, particularly in the tropics and far north.

2019 Global MACC curve for reforestation and avoided deforestation

2019 Tree cover and forest loss in Brazil 2002 to 2018

2019 Tree cover and tropical forest loss 2000's vs. 2010's

2019 Under current climatic conditions there are large opportunities to expand tree cover across many parts of the world.

2020 NBS projects/actors in Europe

2021 Key NBS for addressing CC impacts in the forestry sector and their benefits and trade-offs

2022 Example of one large timber company’s properties and offset project

2022 Tracking carbon changes and harvest rates in offset projects compared with other private forests

Avoided Coastal Impacts

Avoided Forest Conversion

Avoided Grassland Conversation

Avoided Peat Impacts

Avoided Woodfuel

Biochar

Coastal restoration

Conservation Agriculture

Emissions trading programs all designed in a similar way

Fire Management

Forecasted vs delivered carbon sequestration

200X Global land use change GIF 1700 - 199

Grazing - Animal Management

Grazing - Optimal Intensity

Grazing – Feed

Grazing – Legumes

Improved Plantations

Improved Rice

Key considerations in including forestry offsets

Leakage and additionality in forestry mitigation

Natural Forest Management

Nutrient Management

Offsets are generally a small slice of cap and trade reductions

033 Overview of REDD+ funding scenarios

Peat restoration

Potential forestry offset revenues

Potential forestry offset revenues in OR

Reforestation

Trees in Croplands

How can potential investment risks be mitigated?

Reversing deforestation and land degradation requires challenging the very fundamentals of a global economy and governance that centralizes power in the hands of governments and capitalist corporations.

The 20 NCS by cost-effectiveness

The 20 NCS by individual measure

The 20 NCS by per hectare impact - and millions of tons per country

The 20 NCS by realistic mitigation potential - 310 billion tons by 2050

The 20 NCS by Sector

Headings - Extracted Materials

E - REDD/REDD+

Extracted Graphics | Extracted Ideas

Aviation Offsets and Deforestation