S - Maritime Sector

S - Maritime Sector Adaptation

S - Maritime Sector Emissions

S - Maritime Sector Mitigation

S - Maritime Sector Policy Conversation

N - Maritime Sector

E - Maritime Risk

E - Maritime Sector Impacts

E - Port Adaptation

E - Shipping and black carbon

E - Maritime Risk

E - Maritime Sector Impacts

E - Port Adaptation

E - Shipping and black carbon

2010 Global survey of Port administrators

2011 136 Ports Identified with Populations >1 Million

2012 The 20 leading operators of container ships

2018 Climate score vs. engagement intensity

2018 Climate scores for the 20 most active IMO countries on GHG emissions

A lot more maritime reductions available by 2030

a. Why shipping's role in GHG emissions is important

An example of tail risk in the maritime sector

Climate change, changes in impact variables, areas of risk to ports

Climate positions of key shipping trade groups

Company scorecards for shipping's stance on climate policy

Diesel particulate filters

EBITDA under alternative SLR scenarios

Economic implications of adaptive vs. one-off adaptation vary

Emulsified fuels

Estimated black carbon control efficiency and cost per technology

Global economic impacts of CC on Port revenues

Global shipping is very concentrated, and therefore vulnerable

Large fraction of oil and gas goes through choke points

Natural resources account for over 80% of sea-borne trade

Nuclear powered ships are in our future?

Overall CC costs in 2030 compared to baseline

Overall CC costs in 2050 compared to baseline

Overcall CC costs in 2100 compared to baseline

Points of vulnerability

Positioning around complicated relationships

Sea-water scrubbing

Shipping's Impacts on Climate Forcing

Significant maritime reductions are available today

Slide valves

So many of the emissions reductions in shipping are profitable, but they won't happen

Summary of Port risk assessment, assuming no adaptation

The relative impact of maritime emissions are growing rapidly in the U.S.

Water in fuel emulsification (WiFE)

Where maritime emissions reductions will come from

Executive Summary for Black Carbon

IMO GHG rules are pending

Why maritime has competitive advantage?

E - Agriculture Sector Adaptation

E - Aviation Sector Responses

E - Climate Industry

E - Electric Sector Responses

E - Energy Sector Adaptation

E - Finance Sector Responses

E - Insurance Sector Responses

E - Investment Sector Responses

E - Manufacturing Adaptation

E - Mining Sector Responses

E - Water Adaptation

Christina Leeds, an Amtrak spokeswoman: “Elevation or relocation of the infrastructure is likely to be expensive, disruptive, or impractical, and given the current levels of federal and state funding for Amtrak and the Northeast Corridor, well beyond our means.”

Stephen Gardner, Amtrak executive vice president and chief commercial officer: “We don’t see any fundamental risks to the integrity of the corridor” from climate change.

2008 Different sectors face very different risk/opportunity profiles

2009 An agriculture based example of how adaptation policies and measures filter down from national to farm

2012 Adaptation in Health

2012 Adaptation in Natural Ecosystems, Agriculture, and Coastal Zone

2012 Adaptation in Water Resources, Infrastructure

2012 significance of risk distributed across sectors - UK companies - # of companies

2012 significance of risk distributed across sectors - UK companies - percentage

2015 Managing carbon asset risk

Managing and Adapting to Extreme Event Risk is a Complicated Picture

Oil and gas

Amtrak de-emphasized the threat of climate change in its public documents, even scrubbing the phrase entirely from its most recent five-year strategic plan.

Amtrak’s 2018 five-year strategic plan made no mention of climate change