E - NBS Nature Based Solutions
E - NCS NBS Barriers and Limits
2014 Agroforestry as Opportunity
2014 Broadleaf wood products vs nonwood substitutes
2014 CATF_Forestry and Climate Systems_12
2014 CATF’s Science-Driven Forestry Advocacy
2014 Forestry options for the next 20-30 years
2014 Forestry’s potential
2014 Forests and climate change mitigation
2014 Forests play a critical role
2014 Substituting wood for high energy materials
2014 The questions facing forest management
2014 Urban forestry as opportunity
2014 Wildland forests as opportunity
2014 Wood products as opportunity
2014 Wood products vs. non-wood substitutes
2014 World is losing forests at alarming rate
2017 NCS as fraction of needed reductions by 2030, 37% through 2030, 20% through 2050, and 9% through 2100
2017 NCS mitigation potentials in 2030 - GT per year
2017 New research points to magnitude and immediacy of natural climate solutions
2017 Top ten natural climate solutions with greatest potential to cost-effectively reduce annual GHG emissions
2018 Climate mitigation potential of 21 natural climate solutions in the US
2019 Climate mitigation potential from nature based solutions
2019 Potential emissions reductions through REDD+ through FCPF carbon fund and more 2015-2035
2020 Examples of recent corporate funding pledges for nature and climate
2020 Global distribution of nations that include NBS in adaptation or mitigation component of NDCs
2020 Global distribution of studies examining effectiveness of NBS
2020 Guidelines for successful and sustainable NBS
2020 Most reported climate impacts addressed by various NBS intervention types shown in heat map and as Sankey diagram
2020 NBS projects/actors in Europe
2020 Regional variations in the types of ecosystems included in adaptation components of NDCs
2020 Reported effectiveness of NBS in addressing six most reported climate impacts
2021 Climate mitigation potential of NBS
2021 Comparison of NBS mitigation potential, adaptation benefits, biodiversity benefits, and food security benefits
2021 Examples of nature-based solutions for CC adaptation and disaster risk reduction
2021 Explicit use of nature-based solution terms, references to CC adaptation and disaster risk reduction, and level of support - European policies
2021 Explicit use of nature-based solution terms, references to CC adaptation and disaster risk reduction, and level of support - global policies
2021 Forests as example of limited NBS finance compared to other financial flows 2010-2017
2021 Heat mitigation by use of green roofs in Germany
2021 Key climate hazards to European sectors and examples of potential options for NBS to address hazards
2021 Key NBS for addressing CC impacts in coastal areas and their benefits and trade-offs
2021 Key NBS for addressing CC impacts in the forestry sector and their benefits and trade-offs
2021 Key NBS for addressing CC impacts on agriculture and their benefits and trade-offs
2021 Key NBS for addressing CC impacts on urban areas and their benefits and trade-offs
2021 Key NBS for addressing CC impacts on water management and their benefits and trade-offs
2021 Nature-based solutions could reduce global peak temperature and suppress warming beyond 2100 if ambitious and designed for longevity
2021 NBS solutions 65-85% of market by 2030
2021 Overview of nature-based concepts to climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction
2021 Societal challenges and nature-based solutions for CC adaptation and disaster risk reduction
2021 Sustainable forests investment portfolio 2015-2020
2022 Blue carbon projects are lagging other NBS
2022 Nature-based solutions MACC
2022 Ocean based emissions avoidance and removals
Lack of funding for nature-based solutions
Nature based solutions deliver a lot of reductions, although declining over time
The temperature impact of responsible nature restoration options is very limited
Ecosystem based adaptation and NBS are vulnerable to climate change
Five ecosystem restoration pathways
It is important to value the noncarbon benefits of NBS
Nature based solutions could supply the entire voluntary carbon market in the period to 2030
Nature-based solutions can play key roles in net-zero strategies
NBS credits will dominate carbon markets
Responsible NBS focuses on restoring degraded lands, rather than large-scale land-use change
The 20 NCS by cost-effectiveness
The 20 NCS by individual measure
The 20 NCS by per hectare impact - and millions of tons per country
The 20 NCS by realistic mitigation potential - 310 billion tons by 2050
There is an implicit assumption that NBS carbon will remain permanently stored
E - Biological Sequestration
E - Land Use Based Offsets
I:NBSNatureBasedSolutions (Deep Dive)
2011 WWF_Living Forests Report Chapter 2 Forests and Energy
2016 Cumulative sequestration and leakage as a function of the time credits are claimed
2016 Stylized dynamics of carbon sequestration over time
2017 MACC curve for national forestry based on EPA analysis
2017 Mandatory vs. Voluntary forestry MACC curves
2022 Example of one large timber company’s properties and offset project
2022 Tracking carbon changes and harvest rates in offset projects compared with other private forests
Emissions trading programs all designed in a similar way
Forecasted vs delivered carbon sequestration
Key considerations in including forestry offsets
Leakage and additionality in forestry mitigation
Offsets are generally a small slice of cap and trade reductions
033 Overview of REDD+ funding scenarios
Potential forestry offset revenues
Potential forestry offset revenues in OR
How can potential investment risks be mitigated?
No more concurrent uploads are allowed - wait until at least one has finished.
Headings - Extracted Materials
E - NBS Nature Based Solutions
Extracted Graphics | Extracted Ideas