Equity

after hearing Unspun 92, and catching up on the comments, see there's another dimension being missed in re to "natural law" and the "bible".

heard Clint Richardson when he was interviewing a fellow named "Ken W." and now see he has has a book (STRAWMAN). Clint, and others, may get stuck in the idea of "common law" like so many "Bible" advocates in the movement to find solutions to what the legal community in control of the modern political system has created.

may I suggest the Bible is defining a singular authority in Romans 13, divided into two major 'covenants' (or administrations) of "the law". One could say "common law" would represent the "old covenant" (Rev. 13:1-7) and "equity" would reflect the "new covenant" (Rev. 13:8-10).

what if one investigates the origins of "equity" from the king's chancellors in England (to answer the people's cries for justice from an unforgiving rigid "common law" system) would one come to understand "Why Equity Always Prevails - whenever there is a conflict between law and equity"?? - <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtOV8counzRtSM-7Wyi0CMZxmetkRuQZ/">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtOV8counzRtSM-7Wyi0CMZxmetkRuQZ/</a>

another dimension must be defined to understand the nature of the political system in "America" (U.S.of A. vs U.S. - Loss of Legal Memory of the American State):

“The authors recognize that for the reader to maintain political control in respect to today’s Composite state circumstances, the reader must be able to assert control in all negotiations. Such negotiations must be preparatory to agreements and contracts and include capacity, choice of law form, time, place, space and plane. to be politically effective such negotiations must be undertaken with a high state of knowledge and learning by the parties seeking political control. The authors argue, today, the legal community is the actual party in control, in relation to the level of political and legal knowledge of other parties. The legal community’s pre-selected “democratic” political choice is the actual controlling condition precedent. The authors argue this political control is unwittingly silently accepted by many people who, given alternative political and legal knowledge and understanding, would never accept the legal community’s political orthodoxy. Failing negotiations, the democratic political presumption is certain to operate.” (footnote 40, pg 197, U.S.ofA. vs U.S. - <a href="https://www.facebook.com/usofavsus/">https://www.facebook.com/usofavsus/</a> )

many more things could be discussed in context of the theme of Unspun 92 and its respondents, but to summarize: if one starts with an understanding of "equity" in relation to "natural law" -

1. one may come to see the origins of 'equity' from the Bible -- specifically how the new covenant administrates "natural law" for those who are called to be "self-governing" (via equity & private trust expression) and "own no man anything but love one another" as a "royal priesthood" of a set-apart nation.

2. as opposed to the nescient who are legally and equitably seen as: volunteers, infants, wards, and decedents of a belligerent occupation by a corporation called the "UNITED STATES" (see: Lieber Code - general orders 100) over the original "Republic" established by the constitution for the "united States of America" as amended in 1791.

One doesn't have to "expatriate" as Clint suggests from the US occupation, because it is defined as only existing until peace is regained. So the goal should peace with the occupation: IOWs -- the so called "fictional (US) courts" are for "decedents" (i.e. volunteers by "invisible contracts") who've abandoned their estates to a fictional mind-control (aka: governed-mind/government) corporation called the UNITED STATES, and if one doesn't correct the 'death record' (CoLB) with registrar (where the surrender of deed happened) then one is a "ward" of the STATE (i.e. incompetent) because the 'dead' (decedent) has no 'will' nor 'conscience' to self-govern (control one's own mind) to create peace.

Equity

Attachments