Open in TheBrain

EMF Mind Control

<p class="MsoNormal">A. CNN TV: A demonstration by <strong>Dr. Elizabeth Rauscher</strong> and <strong>Dr. William van Bise</strong>, directed magnetic signals into the brain of reporter Chuck DeCaro. They created visual images as in a hallucination. This program also features <strong>Dr. Robert O. Becker</strong>, two time Nobel prize nominee, scientist and researcher of electromagnetic radiation effects on the body and author of <em>Body Electric</em>, summarized, “The government has never disproved the psychological effects of electromagnetic radiation. ”Dr. Robert Becker commented “that this is a substantial step forward in the understanding how the visual system works” and would be a powerful weapon if used on fighter pilots while trying to fly."

<em>Nature </em><strong>1998</strong><em>Advances in Neuroscience May Threaten Human Rights</em>

"..at the annual public meeting of the French national bioethics committee held last week in Paris... <strong>Jean-Pierre Changeux</strong>, the chairman of the committee and a neuroscientist at the Institut Pasteur in Paris, told the meeting that understanding the working of the human brain is likely to become one of the most ambitious and rich disciplines of the future. But neuroscience also poses potential risks, he said, arguing that advances in cerebral imaging make the scope for invasion of privacy immense. Although the equipment needed is still highly specialized, it will become commonplace and capable of being used at a distance, he predicted. That will open the way for abuses such as invasion of personal liberty, control of behaviour and brainwashing. These are far from being science-fiction concerns, said Changeux, and constitute "a serious risk to society". "Denis LeBihan, a researcher at the French Atomic Energy Commission, told the meeting that the use of imaging techniques has reached the stage where "we can almost read people's thoughts".

<em>Signal Magazine</em><strong>2001</strong><em> Decoding Minds</em>

"We are at the point where this database has been developed enough that we can use a single electrode or something like an airport security system where there is a dome above our head to get enough information that we can know the number you’re thinking,"

<em>The Washington Times</em><strong>2002</strong><em>NASA Plans to Read Terrorist’s Minds at Airport</em>

"Airport security screeners may soon try to read the minds of travelers to identify terrorists. Officials of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA] have told Northwest Airlines security specialists that the agency is developing brain-monitoring devices in cooperation with a commercial firm, which it did not identify. Space technology would be adapted to receive and analyze brain-wave and heartbeat patterns, then feed that data into computerized programs 'to detect passengers who potentially might pose a threat,' according to briefing documents obtained by The Washington Times. NASA wants to use 'noninvasive neuro-electric sensors,' imbedded in gates, to collect tiny electric signals that all brains and hearts transmit. Computers would apply statistical algorithms to correlate physiologic patterns with computerized data on travel routines, criminal background and credit information from 'hundreds to thousands of data sources,' NASA documents say. ...Robert Park, spokesman for the American Physical Society stated, <strong>'We’re close to the point where they can tell to an extent what you’re thinking about by which part of the brain is activated, which is close to reading your mind. ...The idea is plausible, he says, but frightening</strong>'.

<em>Science Digest&nbsp;</em>

"we have discovered that just before a person says a particular word, the brain emits waves peculiar to that word alone. ...These waves are the same from person to person."

<em>Science Digest</em><strong>1981</strong><em>Machines that read Minds</em>

"Indeed, CIA spokespeople have admitted ‘following’ ERP [This is the waveform that the brain characteristically emits after absorbing an external event] research, perhaps the way the agency followed LSD research in the 1950s. ...With remote monitors, such an instrument would be a spy’s dream." It is naive to think that the CIA has not exploited this research.

<em>Nature</em><strong>1998</strong><em>Advances in Neuroscience May Threaten Human Rights</em>

"<strong>we can almost read people’s thoughts</strong>".

I.<em> New Scientist</em>, 12-11-<strong>1999</strong> Vol. 164, No. 2216 page 25 by Graham-Rowe, Ducan, described the technology as a computer programmed under the notion that most people behave in predictable ways when walking to their car. This behavior is transferred into a mathematical pattern and the computer recognizes it as such.

"Anyone who deviates from this set pattern, such as someone who walks in circles or who lurks in shadows, will set off an alarm..."

This is just a small example of human behavior and how it is studied scientifically. No doubt with the political will and the money of national security defense, as victims are alleging, human behavior has been studied and is controlled by government technology.</p>

<p>

<strong>Military interest or funding</strong>

A. Yes, government funded. <em>U.S News and World Report</em>, Jan 3-10, 2000, John Norseen, <em>Reading Your Mind and Injecting Smart Thoughts</em> by Douglas Pasternak, p. 67

“...It sounds crazy, but Uncles Sam is listening. the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and the Army’s National Ground Intelligence Center have all awarded small basic research contracts to Norseen, who works for Lockheed-Martin’s Intelligent Systems Division. Norseen is waiting to hear if the second stage of these contracts -portions of them classified-come through. "</p>

Attachments