Open in TheBrain

Erin Maguire Thehill



--

GOP POL OP

DECLARED HIMSELF RIGHT [NO SAID SCI WERE]

CELEBRITY

An Inconvenient Truth' Predictions DEBUNKED — Al Gore Was WRONG: Erin Maguire | RISING - YouTube

An Inconvenient Truth' Predictions DEBUNKED — Al Gore Was WRONG: Erin Maguire | RISING

75,542 views Jun 18, 2026 #ClimateChange #AlGore #ErinMaguire

OPINION: Erin Maguire gives her monologue on the 20th anniversary of Al Gore's documentary 'An Inconvenient Truth,' and looks back at the predictions he made about climate change. #AlGore #ClimateChange #ErinMaguireAbout Rising: Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day's political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day's political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country's most important political newsmakers.

0:05

5 seconds

All right, welcome back to Rising Aaron. What is on your mind today?

0:08

8 seconds

Yes, let's get into it. 20 years ago, former Vice President Al Gore released An Inconvenient Truth. 20 years ago, it

0:16

16 seconds

was 2006. I was 17 years old, getting ready to graduate from the Aquinus Institute of Rochester, blasting Fallout

0:23

23 seconds

Boy in my pickup truck. A lot can change in 20 years. The film won an Oscar. It helped earn Gore a Nobel Peace Prize or

0:30

30 seconds

peace prize prize. Yep. Schools showed it to children. News organizations treated it as required viewing. And this

0:38

38 seconds

week, 20 years later, Al Gore declared victory.

0:42

42 seconds

When you see the film, do you feel like it still holds up?

0:45

45 seconds

Unfortunately, yes. And the scientists were dead right.

0:50

50 seconds

Right. Those are his words. But before we hand out another trophy, let's remember what actually made this movie famous. Because Al Gore didn't become a

0:59

59 seconds

global celebrity for observing that temperatures might gradually raise over time. He became famous for the warnings,

1:05

1 minute, 5 seconds

the predictions, the timeline, the visuals of a very possible reality.

1:11

1 minute, 11 seconds

Those weren't side notes. Those were the headlines. Those were the claims that transformed an inconvenient truth from a

1:18

1 minute, 18 seconds

documentary into a movement. History remembers Gore standing on that stage declaring that within a decade there would be no more snow on Mount

1:27

1 minute, 27 seconds

Kilimanjaro. Two decades later there's still snow on Kilamanjaro. In fact, there is now double the ice coverage.

1:35

1 minute, 35 seconds

Gore famously declared Glacier National Park would become quote the park formerly known as Glacier. Federal agencies put up signs warning visitors

1:44

1 minute, 44 seconds

the glaciers would be gone by 2020. You know what happened in 2020? They took the signs down because the glaciers were

1:52

1 minute, 52 seconds

still there. An Inconvenient Truth predicted an ice-free Arctic within years. At Copenhagen in 2009, Gore cited

2:00

2 minutes

a 75% chance of an ice-free Arctic within 5 to 7 years. The Arctic still

2:07

2 minutes, 7 seconds

has summer ice. And the researcher Gore cited said afterward he didn't even know where the 75% figure came from. The

2:16

2 minutes, 16 seconds

record remembers dramatic graphics of a 20 foot sea level rising, flooding Manhattan, Miami, San Francisco, not in

2:24

2 minutes, 24 seconds

centuries, in the near future. Those cities are still standing. Gore described in an inconvenient truth how

2:32

2 minutes, 32 seconds

much cities, including New York City and the grounds of the World Trade Centers, would be underwater. He talked about how

2:39

2 minutes, 39 seconds

scientists could map the water overtaking cities and coastlines with certainty, even saying, quote, "A lot of people live there." To add fear to the

2:48

2 minutes, 48 seconds

visuals of these areas overrun with water. And that's what bothers me about this anniversary celebration. You don't grade predictions based on intentions.

2:57

2 minutes, 57 seconds

You grade them based on outcomes. You compare what was said to what actually happened. When you do that, the claim

3:05

3 minutes, 5 seconds

that Gore was dead right on all important elements becomes very difficult to defend because the important elements weren't buried in an

3:13

3 minutes, 13 seconds

appendix. They were the claims that made the movie famous. In fact, even a British high court reviewing the film

3:20

3 minutes, 20 seconds

just one year after its release, not 20 years later, one year, concluded that schools needed to provide students with

3:28

3 minutes, 28 seconds

additional guidance of nine distinct scientific inaccuracies and what the co court called partisan political views. A

3:38

3 minutes, 38 seconds

court didn't say the film couldn't be show. A court didn't say climate change wasn't real. It said students needed more information because of the partisan

3:46

3 minutes, 46 seconds

framing by Gore. Yet somehow that never became the story because the goal wasn't skepticism. The goal was persuasion.

3:55

3 minutes, 55 seconds

And that's the same unagnowledged story 20 years later. The left never seems to be held to the standards of accountability for reality because in

4:03

4 minutes, 3 seconds

modern politics there appears to be no penalty for being wrong in your prediction if your prediction was scary enough. For 20 years, the left, the

4:13

4 minutes, 13 seconds

media, Hollywood, academia, and the environmental movement told Americans to trust them because they followed the science, because they dealt in facts.

4:22

4 minutes, 22 seconds

Now, 20 years later, one of the biggest icons of the movement is still insisting that movie got it right. Not mostly

4:29

4 minutes, 29 seconds

right, not directionally right, dead right. And maybe that's the most inconvenient truth of all. The

4:38

4 minutes, 38 seconds

remarkable part isn't that he got some things wrong. Everybody gets things wrong. The remarkable part is that after

4:45

4 minutes, 45 seconds

20 years of mist timelines, exaggerated certainty, and moving goalpost, we're still expected to pretend he was dead, right? The snow still on Kilimanjaro.

4:55

4 minutes, 55 seconds

The glaciers are still in Glacier National Park. New York City still stands. There's a parade going on there today. The only thing that disappeared was the reckoning.

5:06

5 minutes, 6 seconds

The big point here I think is that I know ABC they're saying oh most of this was right the that's not what made the movie famous was that Al Gore was tepid

5:14

5 minutes, 14 seconds

and saying oh it's gradual. It was these images of Kilimanjaro with no snow, Glacier Park empty, all these big the

5:22

5 minutes, 22 seconds

New York City and ground zero being flooded and that didn't come to fruition. But now 20 years later, we're supposed to celebrate and pretend, wow,

5:29

5 minutes, 29 seconds

what a monumental movie of greatness and the environment and it was a huge part of the environmental movement and the work we saw by the left and Democrats in

5:37

5 minutes, 37 seconds

this country for ever since the last 20 years. I just find that to be the hardest part of an inconvenient truth.

5:44

5 minutes, 44 seconds

I'm for protecting the environment, even if it's overexaggerated so that we can make sure that our kids kids kids have a good life here. And so if we

5:52

5 minutes, 52 seconds

overexaggerated to protect them even more and we went too far, let's bring it back in. But I certainly don't want to do what the opposite what this administration is doing is paying wind

6:01

6 minutes, 1 second

farms that are being built offshore to be removed and actually paying the companies to take them down and not protect the country from fossil fuel

6:08

6 minutes, 8 seconds

usage at an overt amount. And so this is like what's happening right now with the president. He's getting rid of wind farms.

6:13

6 minutes, 13 seconds

Wind farms are are are proven to show that they do not make a mass so then we're going to rely on fossil fuels which then deteriorates.

6:21

6 minutes, 21 seconds

And so but the point is the president is not proposing ideas to protect the environment and the administration is not proposing ideas to protect the environment. If they are, I'd surely

6:28

6 minutes, 28 seconds

like to hear them. But I don't mind that he got most things right. Like you said, I don't care that he said I got all right. Okay. He can believe what he wants to believe. But the earth is

actually getting hotter. No, but you named one. You named Mount W. Let me finish this. May I finish?

6:42

6 minutes, 42 seconds

He said dead right. That's the problem though. You got to admit that dead right is dead wrong.

6:46

6 minutes, 46 seconds

May he could say whatever he wants. But the fact that change came after his documentary is the point that I care about most. And so the earth did get

6:53

6 minutes, 53 seconds

warmer. CO2 gases did get trapped in the environment. We did talk about melting ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland

7:02

7 minutes, 2 seconds

and how that's still happening even though you have one example description of Greenland at the time. if he went too far. My point is that we the things that he named are happening just not at the

7:10

7 minutes, 10 seconds

rapid pace that that he suggested. And so no, it means that we still need to protect the environment. So if we instituted an overall correction, we can

7:18

7 minutes, 18 seconds

reel it in, but we don't have to then go back to what we used to rely on to speed up the process of deteriorating our environment.

7:24

7 minutes, 24 seconds

Everybody's arguing that we need to go back. But also this overcorrection we took didn't hold those who are the most

7:31

7 minutes, 31 seconds

nefarious actors about greenhouse gas emissions through the left ever. We're not going The left did not go after India and hold them to account for

7:39

7 minutes, 39 seconds

greenhouse gas emissions that did not go after China, the two largest nations that pursue and have greenhouse gas

7:46

7 minutes, 46 seconds

emissions. No, we demanded it here. And it cost jobs. and the president. There's no reason we can't protect the environment and have natural gas and do

7:55

7 minutes, 55 seconds

fracking and believe in energy independence and dominance. You can do both at the same time. It's 2026 in the United States. We've got the technology to send people to the dark side of the

8:03

8 minutes, 3 seconds

moon. I feel we can do both at the same time. But Al Gore continues to be lauded and that movie for how correct it was.

8:10

8 minutes, 10 seconds

And we all need to acknowledge dead right was dead wrong. Him saying, "Well, you're saying okay, well maybe he overexaggerated.

8:16

8 minutes, 16 seconds

He's getting some stuff right on our test. You got a zero." Why do you want him to say he's dead wrong? Because if he got, let's say he got 80% on a test, did he not still do well to push the conversation forward?

8:26

8 minutes, 26 seconds

Because that's not what he did, though.

8:27

8 minutes, 27 seconds

He gave the definitive. He said dead right. He gave the definitive. That is why that's a zero. Dead right is dead

8:35

8 minutes, 35 seconds

wrong. He said the definitive. And that's the issue. And people continue to say that. That was the headline of that ABC piece. That was the sign.

8:42

8 minutes, 42 seconds

And Al Gore said about his own documentary that he got it dead right.

8:45

8 minutes, 45 seconds

Yes. And you know what? That's what they continue to put out there. That the inconvenient truth movie was dead right.

8:52

8 minutes, 52 seconds

That's the problem. We continue to pursue in these headlines and clicks an opportunity to try and push push the

9:00

9 minutes

cultural environmental lobby of the left for the sake of their own, not for the betterment of man. And so right now,

9:07

9 minutes, 7 seconds

what they are doing is pursuing an ideology and not pursuing the facts because putting that headline out is dead wrong. Even if it's a clip and a portion of what he said.

9:17

9 minutes, 17 seconds

That's what he said.

9:17

9 minutes, 17 seconds

But but to put that out. Now what he said though to to not provide the context on it in the headline, you need to provide both sides. This was a

9:25

9 minutes, 25 seconds

celebration of a movie where it was talking about New York City flooding.

9:29

9 minutes, 29 seconds

We've been watching beautiful shots of the Knicks parade. And I have not seen a person in a rain boot or a canoe on the streets of New York City and Manhattan.

9:38

9 minutes, 38 seconds

The way he talked about it. Greenland, if you go back and watch it, he showed that country dramatically decreasing in size by now. That didn't happen. And if

9:45

9 minutes, 45 seconds

you're trying to argue that the overcorrections might have prevented this, it didn't because India and China still remained the largest and most nefarious people when it came to climate

9:54

9 minutes, 54 seconds

change in this country, in this world, globally. It was not Al Gore and Inconvenient Truth that somehow stopped all of this. The nefarious actors were

10:03

10 minutes, 3 seconds

still acting nefariously. And so you continue to say and allow him to say that this movie got it right isn't a

10:10

10 minutes, 10 seconds

fact. And we need to call that out because the more we perpetrate the inconvenient truth that Al Gore got it wrong and that he used hyperbole to try

10:20

10 minutes, 20 seconds

and scare people instead of doing what he should have done which hey you want to talk about greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. You need to talk about it globally and you need to talk about going after the other countries

10:28

10 minutes, 28 seconds

which Democrats didn't want to do. So I just you got to call it out for what it is and that's what I'm saying here.

10:34

10 minutes, 34 seconds

Maybe I'm disconnected from the attachment to Al Gore here or his movie The Inconvenient Truth. And I'm more connected to the idea that we did something about trying to protect the

10:42

10 minutes, 42 seconds

country, the environment, and climate change. And I'm more inclined to say that when we put Lee Zelden in position and he's slowly deteriorating some protections that we had for our environment, then that's problematic.

10:52

10 minutes, 52 seconds

And that not might not be the response.

10:53

10 minutes, 53 seconds

We have to be able to strike a balance between overcorrecting and not doing anything, right? And so if if Al Gore wants to

11:01

11 minutes, 1 second

keep saying he's right for egotistical reasons, I don't really care. I care about the actions being taken place.

11:07

11 minutes, 7 seconds

He's not even a leader in the party. He didn't win an election. He didn't uh he's not in Congress. He's not making any laws. So if he wants to go on as an

11:14

11 minutes, 14 seconds

individual in this country and say my documentary that won all these awards is still great, he can do that. But if we are striking a balance trying to figure

11:21

11 minutes, 21 seconds

out Yeah. I care about the climate change portion, the actual story. And that's what this is about though. And while you're talking about you're talking about overcorrection and that we

11:29

11 minutes, 29 seconds

might have overcorrected, have you ever thought that what Lee Zeldon might be rolling back are the overcorrections that went too far are the ones you know the waters of the United States rule

11:38

11 minutes, 38 seconds

that exists? It tries to regulate things the size of puddles on farmers property by the federal government. That is

11:45

11 minutes, 45 seconds

ridiculous oversight in an attempt to push forward this climate change narrative when puddles and small ponds

11:52

11 minutes, 52 seconds

on farmers property are now being overrun by the federal government. That is where climate change became overreach and you continue to see it in the United

12:01

12 minutes, 1 second

States and it's detrimental to the people in this country. That there's no reason the federal government should be watching puddles and small ponds on

12:10

12 minutes, 10 seconds

farmers property. So, you should also consider that if Lee Zeldon's rolling things back, it might be because it was too far reached in the first place. And

12:19

12 minutes, 19 seconds

for the media to continue to give even Al Gore the oxygen to make such a false statement about what that movie was,

12:26

12 minutes, 26 seconds

that's a problem as well. Also, real quick aside, my favorite Al Gore fact, all of the vice presidents of the United States are the president of the Senate.

12:34

12 minutes, 34 seconds

They all get a bust in the capital. Al Gore doesn't have his yet. You want to know why?

12:38

12 minutes, 38 seconds

Why? Because of this movie. No, obviously because he put on too much weight after the vice presidency and wanted to lose it before he got his little bus made allegedly. One of my favorite facts.

12:48

12 minutes, 48 seconds

Okay. [laughter] Well, so I mean, but you want to talk about ego seems to be the man of Al Gore.

12:53

12 minutes, 53 seconds

And I said he's an individual. He can go on ABC. No, I'm saying right now he lives as an individual among us. Yes, he's former vice president. But my point

13:00

13 minutes

is that he can go on TV and say he's not in office right now, but the media shouldn't continue to give him oxygen to continue to espouse that

13:08

13 minutes, 8 seconds

his movie was dead right when New York City is not a canoe land today. It is still full of streets and not flooded and they didn't hold the people to

13:16

13 minutes, 16 seconds

account who are actually the most nefarious actors when it comes to climate damage and change.

13:21

13 minutes, 21 seconds

So even if you have people like Bill Gates who recently said, you know, I went a little bit too far. People condemned him like, no, you shouldn't even saying that years ago. What can

13:29

13 minutes, 29 seconds

people do who went too going too far trying to protect the No, but Bill Gates said, "You know what? I'm scaling back some of my predictions from He said that

13:36

13 minutes, 36 seconds

in the last few months and I Robbie and I sat here and argued about he should have never Bill Gates should have never been involved in this conversation." It's like, what can people do? They said they went too far. They said they got it

13:45

13 minutes, 45 seconds

dead right. Nobody's happy. That's why I'm saying let's talk about the environment. But also this led to, if you want to talk about the environment, this led to an environmental movement

13:53

13 minutes, 53 seconds

and cause in the United States that was based on a hyperbolic movie that ended up being inaccurate. And so there were

14:01

14 minutes, 1 second

several things in the movie that were true that I named. So if twice a day, if action came from that, then what's

14:08

14 minutes, 8 seconds

the problem? because the overregulation and the continued pursuit of fidelity to climate change and that if you do not believe in what that movie specifically

14:16

14 minutes, 16 seconds

espoused, then you are the problem and that you do not believe in science.

14:22

14 minutes, 22 seconds

Well, those are all the arguments I've heard from the left. But right now, science says Glacier National Park still

14:28

14 minutes, 28 seconds

exists. Science says Greenland still exists. Science says California still exists and it's not underwater. That's the inconvenient truth of this movie.

14:37

14 minutes, 37 seconds

That's the incontinent truth of the whole climate change lobby. This whole environmental movement. I am for protecting the environment of the United

14:44

14 minutes, 44 seconds

States. I love this country. We are a beautiful diverse environmental nation.

14:49

14 minutes, 49 seconds

We are also rich in environmental resources. We can be good stewards of both. But we can't do it at the behest and continuing to push false narratives

14:57

14 minutes, 57 seconds

and false facts because he was the former vice president. You can challenge it, too. And that's what this was about.

15:03

15 minutes, 3 seconds

All right. All right. Senator Bernie Sanders is introducing legislation [music] to give the American public ownership in AI companies. We'll be right back.

---

ggl

Erin Maguire is a Partner at Perspective Strategies, an integrated public affairs and influence firm. With over 15 years of high-level political experience, her clients benefit from her expertise in crisis management, media strategy, and political positioning. [1, 2, 3]

Prior to joining Perspective Strategies, Maguire’s professional background included:


li SCRAPE

More profiles for you

[

Ryan Taylor

CEO of 440 Strategies & Partner at Perspective Strategies](https://www.linkedin.com/in/ryanjosephtaylor/)

With experience on Capitol Hill, K Street, and the campaign trail, Ryan Taylor knows how Washington works. In the 20 years prior to starting 440 Strategies, Ryan was a senior leader at one of Washington's top 10 bipartisan public affairs firms, and served as a senior advisor and communications strategist to four U.S. Senators and a member of Congress. Additionally, he served a term as President of the U.S. Senate Press Secretaries Association - Capitol Hill's largest and oldest bipartisan staff organization.

Ryan's media relations and public affairs expertise is focused on crafting strategies and messages that resonate with policymakers, voters, and the press. His deep understanding of the political process has been instrumental time and again in advising numerous high-profile clients and coalitions navigate Washington.

He is regularly featured on outlets like Fox News Channel, Bloomberg, POLITICO, and McClatchy. He graduated from the University of Wyoming.

Perspective Strategies is committed to uncovering unique perspectives that may not always be immediately apparent, helping clients achieve their public affairs, external relations, or political goals. Drawing on his extensive campaign and advocacy experience, as well as his personal background, and media relations, Dan Meyers identifies unconventional allies, builds strategic coalitions, and develops tailored approaches for crises or campaigns of any size. At Perspective Strategies, we take pride in partnering with organizations of all sizes, working closely with stakeholders to ensure the best possible outcomes for our clients.

I am very excited to join Stephen Aaron and Ryan Taylor as a partner at Perspective Strategies. From high-stakes communications and media ...

Risk: Our client faced a severe competitive disadvantage due to unequal enforcement of EPA consent decrees, a regulatory burden on just two of the nation's five carbon black producers.

Narrative Development: We developed a narrative highlighting the market distortions created by EPA, how status quo was increasing pollution, and the noncompetitive environment was also going to mean massive job losses and higher prices. This perspective of current EPA actions created pressure on EPA to change status quo or risk antagonizing constituents and Members of Congress.

airbnb cuba?

Website

www.perspectivestrategies.com

Dan Meyers began his career in the heart of American politics, serving as a domestic and international press advance representative for the White House under President George W. Bush. That early experience—traveling the world and coordinating high-stakes communications on behalf of the President—sparked a lifelong passion for public affairs, storytelling, and the power of strategic influence.

Today, Dan is a well-respected public affairs and advocacy consultant, thought leader, and a valued member of APCO’s International Advisory Council. He is known for his calm, confident leadership and sharp instincts in complex, high-pressure environments.


[

Chris Hartline

Partner](https://www.linkedin.com/in/chris-hartline-85207822/)

Message


[

Robert Uithoven

Partner at Axiom Strategies](https://www.linkedin.com/in/robert-uithoven-48b57b59/)

Message


[

Joseph Chelak

Political Campaign and Communications Professional](https://www.linkedin.com/in/josephchelak/)

Message


[

Ashley Nicole Williams

Founder and CEO, Blairstone Strategies | Operator | Strategist | Advisor | Former White House and State Department](https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashley-nicole-williams/)

Message


[Joseph Verruni · 3rd

Strategic Communications | AI-Enabled Organizational Transformation | C-Suite Partner & Team Builder](https://www.linkedin.com/in/joseph-verruni/)

Message


[

Alex Finland

Driver Eight Media, LLC](https://www.linkedin.com/in/alex-finland-b240044a/)

Message


[

Karen Abercrombie

Freelance Writer](https://www.linkedin.com/in/khabercrombie/)

Follow


[

Brendan Buck

Chief Communications Officer | PCMA](https://www.linkedin.com/in/brendanbuck/)

Message


[

Michawn N.

Strategic Communications Executive | Crisis Communications & Rapid Response | Public Policy & Reputation Management | Organizational Leadership](https://www.linkedin.com/in/michawn-nastro/)

Message


[

Jennifer DeCasper

Executive Director at National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC)](https://www.linkedin.com/in/jennifer-decasper-8a80a5376/)

Message


[

Scott Guthrie

Vice President at Axiom Strategies](https://www.linkedin.com/in/scott-guthrie-435b88bb/)

Message


[

Andy Colgan

Senior Director of Development](https://www.linkedin.com/in/andy-colgan-39032633/)

Message


[

Rachael Brand Craven

Fintech Partner at Hunton](https://www.linkedin.com/in/rachaelbrand/)

Message


[Kevin Fairbrother · 3rd

Director Of Rapid Response at CRC Advisors](https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevin-fairbrother-358314b0/)

Message


[

Roee Ruttenberg

*** If I'm adding you, it's because you were in the StudiGo, or because I think you should be in the StudiGo! ***

StudiGo owner. Innovator of the Live Studio Remote News Van. The original mobile studio.](https://www.linkedin.com/in/roeeruttenberg/)

Message


[

Mary Morgan Bell

Operations + Organization + Mandarin Skills](https://www.linkedin.com/in/marymorgangreen/)

Message


[

Jeff Roe

Founder at Axiom Strategies | Political Science, Government](https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeff-roe-8955103/)

Message


[

Kirsten Kukowski

President at K2 & Co](https://www.linkedin.com/in/kirsten-kukowski/)

Message


[

Sacora Black

Remote Administrative Assistant](https://www.linkedin.com/in/iamhelpassist/)

Follow


wiki 2 26

...

The Hill TV


---

THE HILL

OUTKICK GUTFIELD

A Rochester, New York native and graduate of the University of Connecticut, Maguire began her career at the 2008 Republican National Convention

Erin Maguire - Perspective Strategies (May 2026-), Partner - Biography | LegiStorm

Activities and notes: Equestrian team

Activities and notes: Varsity equestrian team

Employment History

Partner

Vice President, Communications

Communications Director

Donald John Trump

Principal Deputy Communications Director

Donald John Trump

Deputy Communications Director

Rep. Kevin McCarthy (**R**-CA)

Press Secretary

Rep. Kevin McCarthy (**R**-CA)

Press Secretary

Sen. John Barrasso (**R**-WY)

Internal Communications Adviser

Account Manager

Event Coordination Aide

Paul Davis Ryan

New Media Director

Ronald Harold Johnson (Ron)

Southwest Field Director

Volunteer Coordination Intern


LI

erin-maguire-aa437b360

The Aquinas Institute of Rochester is a Catholic, private, college preparatory, co-educational school educating in the Basilian tradition, serving students in grades 6 -12. Our mission is to teach all students goodness, discipline, and knowledge, supported through gospel values, within a comprehensive curricular and co-curricular program that will prepare them to be responsible and caring citizens.