Brownie
see fema and katrina
OMG
3. Fox News Turned To Disgraced Former FEMA Director Michael Brown To Deny Climate Change, Baselessly Attack FEMA Policy As “Orwellian”
On the May 6 edition of Fox News’ Your World with Neil Cavuto, Cavuto invited Michael Brown, the disgraced former director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to attack FEMA for requiring that states applying for disaster preparedness funds produce plans that consider the impacts of climate change. Brown, whose claim to fame is botching the response to Hurricane Katrina, questioned the need for the policy by disputing that “man has much impact” on climate change, and echoed the misleading “climate is always changing”talking point by asserting: “[W]e’ve always had tornadoes, we’ve always had floods, we’ve always had hurricanes, and we’re always going to.” Brown also described the new FEMA policy is an “Orwellian” ploy meant to force the federal government’s “vision of climate change” on to states. Later, Brown admitted on Twitter that he is a “denier” when it comes to climate change.
==
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/08/28/3692721/the-reinvention-of-brownie
Michael D. Brown sounded incredulous. I had just asked him about how his life was going now, and he said it was going well. I said I was glad.
“No you’re not. You think I’m an idiot,” he countered. “That I was the total screw-up.”
A lot of people do think Brown is a screw-up. He’s the guy at the center of that infamous quote from the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: “Brownie, you’re doing a heck of a job.”
If you don’t remember it, it was said 10 years ago this week by President George W. Bush, a few days after Katrina devastated the Gulf Coast. At the time, “Brownie” was the director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and his reputation in the media was that he wasn’t doing a “heck of a job” at all. In fact, he was facing serious criticism for his handling of the federal government’s response. One notable failure was a $100 million stockpile of ice that never got delivered, ordered by FEMA for stranded victims’ food and medicine. The agency’s former practice of delivering ice for non-medical purposes during emergencies is one that Brown strongly opposes today.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/02/us/nationalspecial/stumbling-stormaid-effort-put-tons-of-ice-on-trips-to-nowhere.html?_r=1
“It was a program where we spent tens of millions dollars a year on ice! That’s a waste of money,” he said. “It’s not a government responsibility to make sure an individual American citizen is able to keep their bologna cold in the refrigerator.”
Brown resigned as FEMA’s director shortly after the “Brownie” quote hit the press. But he remained adamant that his reputation had been unfairly tarnished, as he does to this day. On our phone call, Brown said the the perception that he’s a “total screw-up” is incorrect. “We actually did a good job despite all the negative press, considering everything that was going on,” he insisted.
“Did I make mistakes? Of course,” he said. “Has everybody? You bet.”
Whether Brown deserved the intense criticism he faced is a question that’s been beaten nearly to death by media reports over the years. But what’s rarely been explored is what happened to him in the 10 years since. Soon after the storm, Brown did something many considered surprising — he decided to continue emergency management work, as a consultant. A 2006 New York Times profile of Brown and his foray into disaster aid consulting mentioned two projects — a consulting job with a company called OnScreen Technologies, and an unpaid position helping St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana, secure federal grants for its cleanup effort. Neither panned out successfully.
“He was supposed to do work here [in St. Bernard], but the Parish council at the time decided that they didn’t want to do anything with him, because of his reputation,” said Henry Junior Rodriguez, the president of St. Bernard Parish at the time. “He offered to help us, and the council just, at the time, didn’t think it was appropriate.”
As for OnScreen, Brown had been working with the company on a product called RediAlert, a portable, LED sign for emergencies. The product was intended for first responders, who could use the battery-powered sign to deploy emergency messages in remote locations. It had a perforated face, so relatively high winds could blow through it and not damage it.
OnScreen announced that Brown would join the company to build awareness for RediAlert in an April 2006 press release. But Michael Kline, who worked for a company called Accord Industries and marketed RediAlert, recalls meeting Brown and briefly discussing the product much earlier, at a trade show in Orlando a few months after Katrina.
There were still places underwater when I met him.
“He had just been fired,” Kline said. “When I met him, people were on their way to Texas to be temporarily housed while they fixed the levies. There were still places underwater when I met him.”
The plan, Kline said, was for RediAlert to be a national product, but it just never took off. Kline doesn’t blame Brown. “It never quite caught on,” he said.
Brown, for his part, admitted that some of the products he worked on fizzled. “There were failures,” he said. “[RediAlert] was an example of someone who thought they had built a better mousetrap, but the marketplace wasn’t there for it.” He noted that one of the companies for which he served on the board of directors went through bankruptcy during his time with them. “I picked up a few clients, and they paid good money,” he said of his post-Katrina consulting career. “But I gotta tell you, I just didn’t enjoy it. It was not fun.”
What eventually brought Brown out of consulting was talk radio. Brown said around the time he and his wife moved back to Colorado to start his business, he was invited to fill in on a Saturday program for iHeartMedia, a San Antonio-based radio network that boasts more than 850 stations nationwide. Brown said that eventually turned into a bigger evening show, which led to an even bigger afternoon drive-time show. Now he offers controversial opinions on topics like global warming (“I doubt whether man has much impact“) and Black Lives Matter (“absolute dip-wads“). It’s turned out to be an interesting choice, considering that in his interview with ThinkProgress he slammed the “echo chambers” of media today.
“If there’s one thing I do, it’s trying to convince my listeners to become discerning consumers of news,” he said. “Don’t just read National Review.”
He also still appears occasionally on television news shows to talk about emergency management. This year on Fox News, for example, he railed against a new FEMA policy that requires states to include consideration of climate change in their disaster mitigation plans. He said he also delivers about four speeches per year on the topic. And with a Bush running in 2016 again, it’s hard not to make him part of the election. Brown recently appeared in a campaign video for Jeb Bush, which touts the presidential candidate as a competent and trustworthy leader in hurricane relief.
Katrina gave me a great opportunity to reinvent myself.
Now he seems to have found his true calling in punditry. “Having been through what I’ve been through, I wasn’t going to waste anymore time with stuff I didn’t like,” he said. “I’m not going to spend the rest of my life in a job that I just don’t enjoy.”
Talking about his first appearance on radio, he beamed. “It was very fortunate that the radio gods loved what I was doing, and I loved what I was doing on the radio. And now it’s a small, syndicated program that I make good money at and I love doing it.”
“Katrina gave me a great opportunity to reinvent myself. And I’ve done that,” he said. “Katrina probably made me a little more adamant. I frankly don’t care what people think, because I know what I did, how I did it, and I know the mistakes I made. I’ve owned up to those mistakes.”
==
| Friday, September 09, 2005 | Friday, September 09, 2005 | Friday, September 09, 2005 | Friday, September 09, 2005 | Friday, September 09, 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Now it makes sense: the interns are in charge | Now it makes sense: the interns are in charge | Now it makes sense: the interns are in charge | Now it makes sense: the interns are in charge | Now it makes sense: the interns are in charge |
For those of you without a TIME subscription, here is the entireinvestigative piece, which I exerpted on the main site. Read it an weep (and while you're at it, read this equally disturbing report from WaPo. Opening paragraph: "Five of eight top Federal Emergency Management Agency officials came to their posts with virtually no experience in handling disasters and now lead an agency whose ranks of seasoned crisis managers have thinned dramatically since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks...") Wow. I can't wait to hear how the White House and their friends on talk radio and Freeperville spin this one...
By DAREN FONDA AND RITA HEALY
Before joining FEMA, his only previous stint in emergency management, according to his bio posted on FEMA's website, was "serving as an assistant city manager with emergency services oversight." The White House press release from 2001 stated that Brown worked for the city of Edmond, Okla., from 1975 to 1978 "overseeing the emergency services division." In fact, according to Claudia Deakins, head of public relations for the city of Edmond, Brown was an "assistant to the city manager"from 1977 to 1980, not a manager himself, and had no authority over other employees. "The assistant is more like an intern," she told TIME. "Department heads did not report to him." Brown did do a good job at his humble position, however, according to his boss. "Yes. Mike Brown worked for me. He was my administrative assistant. He was a student at Central State University," recalls former city manager Bill Dashner. "Mike used to handle a lot of details. Every now and again I'd ask him to write me a speech. He was very loyal. He was always on time. He always had on a suit and a starched white shirt."
Brown's lack of experience in emergency management isn't the only apparent bit of padding on his resume, which raises questions about how rigorously the White House vetted him before putting him in charge of FEMA.Under the "honors and awards" section of his profile at FindLaw.com — which is information on the legal website provided by lawyers or their offices—he lists "Outstanding Political Science Professor, Central State University". However, Brown "wasn't a professor here, he was only a student here," says Charles Johnson, News Bureau Director in the University Relations office at the University of Central Oklahoma (formerly named Central State University). "He may have been an adjunct instructor," says Johnson, but that title is very different from that of "professor." Carl Reherman, a former political science professor at the University through the '70s and '80s, says that Brown "was not on the faculty." As for the honor of "Outstanding Political Science Professor," Johnson says, "I spoke with the department chair yesterday and he's not aware of it." Johnson could not confirm that Brown made the Dean's list or was an "Outstanding Political Science Senior," as is stated on his online profile. Speaking for Brown, Andrews says that Brown has never claimed to be a political science professor, in spite of what his profile in FindLaw indicates. "He was named the outstanding political science senior at Central State, and was an adjunct professor at Oklahoma City School of Law." Under the heading of "Professional Associations and Memberships" on FindLaw, Brown states that from 1983 to the present he has been director of the Oklahoma Christian Home, a nursing home in Edmond. But an administrator with the Home, told TIME that Brown is "not a person that anyone here is familiar with." She says there was a board of directors until a couple of years ago, but she couldn't find anyone who recalled him being on it. According to FEMA's Andrews, Brown said "he's never claimed to be the director of the home. He was on the board of directors, or governors of the nursing home." However, a veteran employee at the center since 1981 says Brown "was never director here, was never on the board of directors, was never executive director. He was never here in any capacity. I never heard his name mentioned here."
Brown's FindLaw profile lists a wide range of areas of legal practice, from estate planning to family law to sports. However, one former colleague does not remember Brown's work as sterling. Stephen Jones, a prominent Oklahoma lawyer who was lead defense attorney on the Timothy McVeigh case, was Brown's boss for two-and-a-half years in the early '80s. "He did mainly transactional work, not litigation," says Jones. "There was a feeling that he was not serious and somewhat shallow." Jones says when his law firm split, Brown was one of two staffers who was let go. — With reporting by Jeremy Caplan, Carolina A. Miranda/New York; Nathan Thornburgh/Baton Rouge; Levi Clark/Edmond; Massimo Calabresi and Mark Thompson/Washington God help us... Tags: hurricane katrina, katrina, CNN, kyra phillips, media USTIN, Texas — As those silver-tongued poets at the Pentagon put it, we are in a target-rich environment. One cannot — honestly, one simply cannot — pass up the Brownie memos. The e-mails sent to and from "Heckuva Job" Michael Brown, head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency during and after Hurricane Katrina, are too absurd, too please-tell-me-they-made-this-up awful. As Katrina sent a 30-foot wall of water toward Mississippi, Brownie, steeped in disaster relief work at his former job with the International Arabian Horse Association, asked a top aide the burning question:"Tie or not for tonight? Button-down blue shirt?" Fashion was quite the FEMA priority under Brownie. On the day Katrina hit, his press secretary wrote of his appearance on television: "My eyes must certainly be deceiving me. You look fabulous — and I'm not talking the makeup." Brownie replied: "I got it at Nordstroms. ... Are you proud of me?" An hour later, he added: "If you'll look at my lovely FEMA attire, you'll really vomit. I am a fashion god." After Brownie's appearance with President Bush at a post-Katrina press conference, the press aide spotted an emergency: "Please roll up the sleeves of your shirt, all shirts. Even the president rolled his sleeves to just below the elbow. ... You just need to look more hardworking. ... ROLL UP THE SLEEVES." The only FEMA worker in New Orleans in the first days after the hurricane was Marty Bahamonde, who e-mailed Brownie describing the situation as "past critical": people dying, food gone, water going, the homeless and hungry massing in the streets. Brownie replied: "Thanks for the update. Anything specific I need to do or tweak?" Thanks for the update? Anything I need to tweak? Three hours after receiving this message about hunger and thirst in New Orleans, Brownie's aide was on the food case, e-mailing colleagues on the need to free up enough time in the director's schedule for him to have dinner because restaurants in Baton Rouge were crowded and "he needs more than 20 or 30 minutes." This prompted Bahamonde to e-mail a co-worker, "I just ate an MRE (military rations) and crapped in the hallway of the Superdome along with 30,000 other close friends, so I understand her concern about busy restaurants." I guess all that would be a lot funnier it weren't for what the Pentagon poets call "collateral damage." But at least we don't have to worry about Brownie: The administration signed him up as a $148,000-a-year consultant to FEMA. Our chief executive is a graduate of Harvard Business School, and his Cabinet is studded with former CEOs. | This was supposed to be the "management administration" — government was to be run like a big business, meetings would start on time, not like those slack Clinton years. These folks are giving management a bad name. Back in Iraq, the $30 billion appropriated for the reconstruction of Iraq is running out. According to a New York Times article on the report by the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction, "Officials in charge cannot say how many planned projects they will complete, and there is no clear source for the hundreds of millions of dollars a year needed to operate the projects that have been finished. ... (The report describes) an array of projects that went awry, sometimes astonishingly,like electrical substations that were built at great cost but never connected to the country's electrical grid." After two-and-a-half years and $30 billion, electricity in Baghdad is on intermittently, just as it was two-and-a-half years and $30 billion ago. So you figure, "Of course nothing's getting done — there's an insurgency, the country's sliding into chaos." Let's look to Afghanistan, where peace reigns. How goes the rebuilding there? Oops. According to The New York Times, a New Jersey company got the contract to build 96 health clinics and schools by September 2004. To date, nine clinics and two schools have been completed and passed inspection. The company told the Times it is hard to get good help in Afghanistan — they have to use Afghani construction companies. After four years of reconstruction in Afghanistan, the United States has spent $1.3 billion, and according to American and Afghani sources, nobody's sure where the money is and how it's been spent — and the net result is between unimpressive and pitiful. The agency in charge, the U.S. Agency for International Development, says things are moving right along and defends its programs. One of the funnier legacies of the Nixon administration was an accounting award named after Maurice Stans, a secretary of commerce and chairman of the finance committee for Nixon's re-election, who kept suitcases of cash in his office and pled guilty to five misdemeanors relating to mishandling money. In that fine tradition, the Bushies should establish a management award named the Heckuva Job Brownie Prize. It would go to the person who makes the best suggestion for improving government management — like, "Roll up your sleeves, it makes you look like you're working." To find out more about Molly Ivins and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. blog SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2005 FEMA Chief Worked for McVeigh's Lawyer by Fintan Dunne, BreakForNews.com, 10 Sept 2005 Disgraced FEMA chief, Michael Brown once worked for Stephen Jones, the prominent Oklahoma lawyer who was the lead defense attorney in the Timothy McVeigh case.
Jones has acted for former employees of the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, and the National Security Council staff. But that's just the workaday rountine of a carreer mired in state security issues. He has defended cases involving allegations of terrorism, domestic subversion, espionage, electronic surveillance, wiretapping, and computer surveillance. His bio states:
Of topical interest is that Jones was once a legislative assistant to Congressman (now Secretary of Defense) Donald Rumsfeld. And back in the last century, Jones was a personal research assistant to Richard M. Nixon, and represented Nelson Rockefeller's political Interests in Oklahoma. He also worked on Rockefeller's 1964 and 1968 national campaigns for the presidency. It's an impressive biography. It must have made Timothy McVeigh feel that with representation like that, he had absolutely nothing to worry about. Big mistake. Almost as big a mistake as appointing Mike Brown to be head of FEMA. If it was truly a mistake --and not just a clever contrivance, the more skeptical of you might say. Because, in retrospect, Jones is now scathing of Brown's talents when working for him. He told Time magazine:
"There was a feeling that he was not serious and somewhat shallow." Ouch. Jones sang a similar song to the St Petersburg Times:
The agents quickly corrected him. This was a national post in Washington, deputy director of FEMA, the arm of the federal government that prepares for and responds to disasters around the United States. Jones looked at the agents, "You're surely kidding?" With ex-employers like that --who needs enemies. Not Brown. Now I know that you 'conspiracy theorists' will be also saying to yourself that Stephen Jones might be a safe pair of hands for such a sensitive case as McVeigh's. Not to mention being safe hands for the many cases involving national security he has handled. You probably reckon he must be pretty well connected -where it matters. Here's an example of this thinking:
|
And Jones is someone with a very interesting background himself. He has represented many ex- and retired spies, and previously worked for Richard Nixon, Nelson Rockefeller and Donald Rumsfeld.