Natural Resources Group
President Mark Larson is President of Natural Resource Group, LLC (NRG), headquartered in Minneapolis. Mark has worked in the energy business for more than 25 years. His day-to-day working knowledge of evolving trends in oil & gas, electric transmission and renewable energy has allowed him to help fuel NRG's growth to become an industry leader. Mark is a Professional Geologist and he can be found working with energy clients on acquisitions and planning new infrastructure. In addition to his 17 years at Natural Resource Group, his career includes positions at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Washington, DC, consultant to the Governor's Office in Minnesota and membership in the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America Foundation and the National Energy Services Association.
NO NEWS ON GREENPEACE LEGAL HIT (ON APPEAL) BUT THIS IN YAHOO NEWS BOOST:
- [
The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel
Greenpeace judge might just beat the Dutch
9 days agoIt crossed my mind this week when a North Dakota judge ordered Greenpeace to pay the substantial damages awarded by a jury for the group's organization and funding of protests at the Dakota Access pipeline.](https://www.gjsentinel.com/opinion/columns/greenpeace-judge-might-just-beat-the-dutch/article_5d4a688d-b7e7-4e22-af19-7b065b0dd0c3.html)
- [
Yahoo
Greenpeace judge might just beat the Dutch
Mar 6, 2026 Updated Mar 7, 2026
By GREG WALCHER
My granddad had a great expression when something was remarkable or astonishing: “Well, that just beats the Dutch!” It was a linguistic heirloom of the 17th century when England and the Netherlands were commercial and naval rivals. Something had to be extreme to surpass even the Dutch, so that eventually became a common saying even on the American frontier.
It crossed my mind this week when a North Dakota judge ordered Greenpeace to pay the substantial damages awarded by a jury for the group’s organization and funding of protests at the Dakota Access pipeline. The pipeline owners, Energy Transfer Partners, sued and the jury found Greenpeace guilty of conspiracy, trespass, nuisance and tortious interference. The latter refers to a standoff that lasted months, with protesters chaining themselves to equipment, destroying pipeline parts, and throwing feces and burning logs at workers. The chaos delayed the project and cost pipeline owners an estimated $7.5 billion. The jury originally awarded damages totaling $666.9 million, which the judge eventually reduced by half.
Greenpeace lawyers said, “We will be requesting a new trial and, failing that, will appeal the judgment to the Supreme Court of North Dakota,” but they certainly aren’t banking on that. Instead, the group appealed the verdict — not to any court in North Dakota, but to a Dutch court. Greenpeace International filed suit in the District Court of Amsterdam, asking it to overrule the American court. I am not making this up.
In ordinary appeals, a higher court is asked to review a lower court’s ruling. But here, Greenpeace is asking a Dutch court to review an American case under a European Union “directive” written to protect protesters against lawsuits. It is the first time anyone has tried to apply it outside Europe, though, and obviously Dutch courts have no authority in America. Greenpeace USA’s parent organization, Greenpeace International (which was also found liable in the case), is headquartered in the Netherlands, but of course it is not accused of any crime there.
The pipeline company, meanwhile, is appealing the judge’s reduction of the jury-awarded damages, which didn’t come close to reimbursing the money the protesters and their funders cost the project, its owners, employees, and especially customers.
In a financial court filing, Greenpeace USA certified that it does not have the money to pay, saying it will not be able “to continue normal operations if the judgment is enforced.” The organization reported $1.4 million in cash, and total assets of $23 million. Its leaders say the court-ordered damages would put Greenpeace out of business. How sad. This is the group that fueled today’s anti-automobile crusade with its now-famous 1990 New York Times ad, admonishing Americans, “It wasn’t the Exxon Valdez captain’s driving that caused the Alaskan oil spill. It was yours.”
Despite the bankruptcy threat, and notwithstanding any appeal to any foreign court, Judge James Gion said this week he will order Greenpeace to pay the judgment. That will touch off a round of appeals in the state Supreme Court, and it may take some time to be resolved. Whether or not the award is eventually paid, whether or not it puts Greenpeace out of business, it may at least caution some activist groups against going too far with these protests, which often lead to vandalism and violence. And rather than just arresting a few protesters, it is time the law focuses at least some scrutiny on those who fund and organize them.
Greenpeace tried to claim its employees had little or no involvement in the pipeline protests, and nothing to do with Energy Transfer’s construction delays. But at the time, an email from its own U.S. executive director boasted about the “massive” support it provided to the protests. According to trial evidence, that included funding and training the protestors and giving them the tools and equipment to chain themselves to pipeline machinery. No wonder the jury’s nine-figure verdict included $400 million in punitive damages.
Apparently, the group’s backup plan, in case the North Dakota Supreme Court fails to take pity on them, is the District Court of Amsterdam. The wording of the European law, upon which that filing is based, implies that its courts have power to relitigate cases — even in other countries — where they think parties have been subjected to “abusive court proceedings,” or “excessive” claims.
Maybe the European Union wants to regulate the entire world, but my guess is the North Dakota courts couldn’t care less what an Amsterdam district judge thinks. Doesn’t that just beat the Dutch!
*Greg Walcher is president of the Natural Resources Group and author of “Smoking Them Out: The Theft of the Environment and How to Take it Back.” He is a Western Slope native. Email him at gregwalcher@gmail.com.
GGL 3 26
[### Lobbyists - Client Profile: Royal Dutch Shell
OpenSecrets
https://www.opensecrets.org › federal-lobbying › clients](https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/clients/lobbyists?cycle=2007&id=D000042525)
Lobbyists representing Royal Dutch Shell, 2007 ; Dawson & Assoc, $60,000, Shell Frontier Oil & Gas, Greg Walcher, No Revolving Door Profiles ; Dawson & Assoc ...Read more
[### LETTER: Columnist didn't disclose industry ties
Post Independent
https://www.postindependent.com › letter-to-the-editor](https://www.postindependent.com/opinion/letter-to-the-editor/letter-columnist-didnt-disclose-industry-ties/)
My question to Mr. Walcher and for the public to consider is this: If fracking is safe why is industry spending its money to send paid spokespeople, like Mr.
Missing: DAWSON | Show results with: DAWSON
[### Congressional Record
Congress.gov
https://www.congress.gov › CREC-1998-11-12](https://www.congress.gov/105/crec/1998/11/12/144/152/CREC-1998-11-12.pdf)
Dawson ... Greg Walcher, president of Club 20, a western ... regulation by decreasing competition, which will ultimately reduce passengers' choices and ...
[### Technical Review for the Probable Maximum Precipitation ( ...
Colorado Department of Education
https://hermes.cde.state.co.us › OBJ › download](https://hermes.cde.state.co.us/islandora/object/co%3A30880/datastream/OBJ/download/Technical_review_for_the_probable_maximum_precipitationPMPsite-specific_study_for_Cherry_Creek_Reservoir___final_report.pdf)
Aug 4, 2003 — Greg E. Walcher. Executive Director. Rod Kuharich. CWCB Director. Dan McAuliffe. Deputy Director. Page 298. - 2 -. Flood Protection • Water ...Read more
[### 2020-09-11 Bluewater Oil Terminal MARAD Comments Regulations.gov
https://downloads.regulations.gov › attachment_1](https://downloads.regulations.gov/MARAD-2019-0094-0412/attachment_1.pdf)
Sep 11, 2020 — MARAD has a duty to preserve and protect the quality of the coastal and marine environment. The construction and operation of the proposed ...Read more
753 pages
[### Todd Wynn
U.S. Department of the Interior (.gov)
https://www.doi.gov › doi.gov › files › uploads](https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/todd_wynn_calendar_jan_1_2018_-_july_17_2018_redacted.pdf)
Jan 1, 2018 — Where: Todd will call Greg. Calendar: Todd Wynn. Who: Todd Wynn, Greg Walcher. Description: Of course. Any time that works for you; I'm fairly ...Read more
226 pages