Open in TheBrain

conservative action league


stranahan/feed html

http://leestranahan.com/category/staffergate/feed/

>National Right To Work Committee Allegations

The allegations made against the National Right to Work committee are stark and consistent with the months of reporting I’ve done on the group — it claims that they operated secret printing presses, coordinated illegally with candidates and operated a number of deceptive front groups.
This complaint is being filed against National Right to Work Committee and its affiliates, agents, officers, and directors for violations of Montana campaign finance and practices laws. For many years, the National Right to Work Committee has operated a secret political mail operation. The National Right to Work Committee owns its own printing presses and has the ability to produce thousands of mailings

in less than a few weeks. During the 2008, 2010, and 2012 election cycles the National Right to Work Committee through its affiliates and agents mailed thousands of pieces of election material to Montana voters. The National Prolife Alliance, National League of Taxpayers, National Association of Gun Rights, National Gun Owners Alliance, and Western Tradition Partnership/American Tradition Partnership are nothing more than front groups/agents of the National Right to Work Committee and act under the direction of the National Right to Work Committee.

Although the National Right to Work Committee has taken various steps to conceal the connection of the front groups/affiliates, there is enough publically available information to suggest a connection between the National Right to Work Committee and entities identified above. The National Right to Work Committee is located at 8001 Braddock Road, Suite 500 in Springfield, VA 22160. The National Prolife Alliance is located at 5211 Port Royal Road, Suite 500, Springfield, VA 22151. It is believed these addresses are for the same office building. The office building where the National Right to Work Committee is located is at the intersection of Braddock Road and Port Royal Road in Springfield, Virginia. An analysis of Google Maps shows the same office building is used for both addresses.

The connection between these entities is more apparent when reviewing other publically available information. According to documents submitted to the Federal Elections Commission, the treasurer for the National Prolife Alliance PAC is Steve Antosh. Mr. Antosh's personal residence is 3237 Fairfax, VA. (Fairfax County Treasurer Records). This is the same address as the National League of Taxpayers. The President of the National Gun Owners Alliance is Dennis Fusaro who was also a prominent member of the National Right to Work Committee. The National Gun Owners Alliance has also used the same mailing address as the National League of Taxpayers.

Christian Lefer is the officer of Montana Citizens for Right to Work. Montana Citizens for Right to Work is financed by the National Right to Work Committee. See National Right to Work IRS Tax Returns. Mr. Lefer has also acted as an agent of Western Tradition Partnership/American Tradition Partnership. On information and belief, the National Right to Work Committee contributed to and/or financed the political operation of Montana Citizens for Right to Work/Western Tradition Partnership/American Tradition Partnership. These entities have never filed any of the necessary paperwork required by Montana law and have never disclosed any contributions and/or expenditures. The complaint filed by Bruce Tutvedt shows a flyer paid for by the National Association for Gun Rights. The bulk mail postage stamp shows the flyer originated from the same mail house as the mailers sent by Western Tradition Partnership. It is believed the mailers were produced by Christian Lefer and/or Direct Mail and Communications

Lefers, Donny Ferguson May Face Multi-Million Dollar Fines
Both complaints is seeking remedies including hefty fines and other injunctions from the LeFers, Ferguson, National Right to Work President Mark Mix and others because it says they are personally liable under Montana law:

==

unrelated? 4 cases?

https://transition.fec.gov/pdf/cca.pdf

ANTOSH v. FEC (84-1552 and 84-2737) On August 30, 1984, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order granting the FEC’s motion to dismiss Antosh v. FEC Antosh v. FEC (Civil Action No. 84-1552) and denying the plaintiff’s motion to fi le a supplemental complaint. (Civil Action No. 84-1552) and denying the plaintiff’s motion to file a supplemental complaint. On September 13, 1984, the court issued an opinion explaining the ruling. Following the court’s order, Mr. James E. Antosh fi led a second suit with the court on September 6, 1984 (Civil Action No. 84-2737). The second suit included a request by the plaintiff that the district court certify two constitutional claims to the U.S. Court of Appeals. On January 5, 1988, the court ruled that Mr. Antosh lacked standing in his second suit to seek the court’s certifi cation of his constitutional questions to the appeals court. The court granted a motion by the FEC to dismiss the counts of his complaint which included the constitutional questions. On March 24, 1988, the district court issued an order granting a further motion by the FEC for a summary judgment in the second suit. The court’s order dismissed the remaining two counts of Mr. Antosh’s complaint. First Suit Mr. Antosh, a registered voter in Oklahoma, is president of Shawnee Garment Manufacturing, Inc. On December 2, 1983, he fi led an administrative complaint with the FEC alleging that the separate segregated funds of three international unions were affi liated with the AFL-CIO’s political action committee (PAC)1 within the meaning of 2 U. S.C. §441a(a)(5).Mr. Antosh claimed that the four political committees had failed to disclose their affi liation in their respective Statements of Organization and, in making contributions to several political committees, had exceeded their single $5,000 contribution ceiling. (See 2 U.S.C. §§433(b)(2) and 441a(a)(2)(A)


https://montanafreepress.org/:{2018/03/12/}:right-to-work-shady-activities/

no lmx many

CAMPAIGN SPENDING / ELECTIONS / NEWS / POLITICS / MARCH 12, 2018

Complaint: Dark Money Right to Work Group Engaged in Illegal Political Activities

Republican Kalispell Rep. Frank Garner files complaint against group, which was at the center of allegations of illegal third-party influence in state primaries in 2008, 2010 and 2012

HELENA — A group at the center of one of the biggest elections scandals in modern Montana history is actively engaged in the 2018 election, while hiding its activities and spending, according to a complaint filed with state elections regulators.

:{

}:

Kalispell Republican Rep. Frank Garner said in a complaint filed March 6 with the Montana Commissioner of Political Practices that a field operative for Montana Citizens for Right to Work is actively recruiting candidates to run against him in House District 7. Garner said that activity is illegal because the group has not registered with state elections officials as required by law.

Kalispell Republican Rep. Frank Garner filed a complaint against an operative for Montana Citizens for Right to Work for what he says are illegal campaign activities. Courtesy photo.

“It appears as if these groups are back and are trying to corrupt our election system once again,” Garner wrote in his complaint.

The complaint stems from a meeting that Montana Citizens for Right to Work assistant director Al Chan allegedly held on Feb. 28 in Kalispell with members of the Flathead County Libertarian Party. According to Kalispell resident Dan Nelson, who said he was at the meeting, the purpose of the confab was for Chan to recruit candidates to run against Garner in the June 5 Republican primary. Nelson later provided Garner with a detailed written account of the meeting, which Garner attached to the complaint.

“Al [Chan] said he did not like Garner and talked about him being a liberal and listed off several bills Garner either supported or was against in what seemed to be a negative fashion,” Nelson stated in his account. “Only one of the bills and issue [sic] he talked about as it was related to Garner was related to the Right to Work issue. Al said he also had a personal beef with Frank Garner and implied he had met him before and didn’t like him. Al did not specify what his issue was or why.”

Garner said in an interview that Chan contacted him in February and tried to set up a meeting. Garner said he refused to meet with Chan because of Right to Work’s shady history with Montana elections.

Chan did not return multiple requests for comment via phone and email.

Calls and emails to Randy Pope, executive director of the Belgrade-based Montana Citizens for Right to Work, also went unanswered.

:{

}:

Montana Citizens for Right to Work, along with its national affiliate, the National Right to Work Committee, was at the center of wide-ranging political corruption scandal in Montana covering the 2008 to 2012 election cycles. Tens of thousands of pages of documents obtained by the state Commissioner of Political Practices revealed how the national anti-union group oversaw the activities of American Tradition Partnership, the group at the center of allegations of illegal third-party influence in Montana Republican primary campaigns in 2008, 2010 and 2012.

Montana Commissioner of Political Practices Jonathan Motl reviews documents in the basement of his Helena office that connect the National Right to Work Committee to political campaign activities in Montana during the 2010 Republican primary election. Photo by John S. Adams, Montana Free Press.

The lengthy investigation spanned years and resulted in former Commissioner of Political Practices Jonathan Motl in 2014 pursuing nine Republican candidates on allegations of illegal coordination and failure to report campaign contributions stemming from the 2010 Republican primary elections.

:{

}:

Five Republican plaintiffs eventually settled with Motl, and two others had default judgments entered against them. The settlements and judgments included financial penalties and signed admissions by some of the candidates that they violated state elections laws by illegally coordinating with third-party political groups.

Bozeman Republican Rep. Art Wittich, was among those who faced illegal coordination allegations.

After a protracted legal battle, Wittich faced a four-day trial in the spring of 2016 that featured testimony from former Right to Work staffers who helped run the network of private and non-profit companies involved in the massive campaign scheme.

At the trial’s conclusion, a jury found Wittich broke Montana law by illegally coordinating with Right to Work-connected groups during his 2010 Senate primary campaign. A judge ordered Wittich to pay $68,232.58 in fines. In a 5-0 decision in August 2017, the Montana Supreme Court affirmed the jury’s verdict.

One final candidate, Terry Bannan, of Belgrade, is still facing allegations of illegal campaign coordination stemming from the 2010 Right to Work scandal. Wittich is representing Bannan in those legal proceedings.

:{

}:

The Commissioner of Political Practices is currently suing Montana Citizens for Right to Work and its affiliated organizations for their alleged illegal activities in the 2010 and 2012 elections cycles. That case has not yet been scheduled for trial.

Documents obtained by the Montana Free Press indicate that Montana Citizens for Right to Work has been actively participating in Montana elections since as far back as2008. However, state records show the organization has not registered with the Commissioner of Political Practices, nor has it reported any political activities or election-related spending since at least 2012.

Under Montana campaign finance laws, political committees must file a statement of organization “within five days after appointing a campaign treasurer or making an expenditure to support or oppose a candidate or ballot issue, whichever occurs first.”

The extent of Montana Citizens for Right to Work’s political activities during the six years is unclear, but evidence obtained by the Montana Free Press suggests the group was spending money on election-related activity in the state.

Page 186 of Documents detail Right to Work's involvement in MT DocumentCloud

Page 186 of Documents detail Right to Work's involvement in MT

Contributed to DocumentCloud by John Adams of Montana Free Press • View document

Anonymous hit counter for DocumentCloud

On his LinkedIn page — which as of March 6 had been removed from the popular professional networking website — Al Chan listed his job as “Assistan [sic] Executive Director at Montana Citizens For Right To Work,” a Bozeman-based position he stated he has held since January.

Chan’s LinkedIn profile also stated he worked for the National Right to Work Committee out of Bozeman from August 2014 through December 2014. Chan lists his work experience during that time as “strategic campaign consulting, executing campaign strategies, and secur[ing] pledges from state House/Senate candidates via survey program.”

[Editor’s Note: See DocumentCloud viewer at the bottom of this story to examine additional documents, including Chan’s résumé.]

Chan previously worked for the National Right to Work Committee in Washington statefrom April 2016 to January 2018, according to his online resume, which was also recently removed.

Chan also listed a three-and-a-half-month stint as a “Right to Work Committee” field staffer based in Manhattan, Montana during the 2014 election season.

According to his resume, as a Montana field staffer in 2014, Chan:

“Met with candidates for state house and senate for the purposes of candidate recruitment and candidate vetting”;

“Secured pledgesto support Right-to-Work legislation from state house/senate candidates via a survey program”;

“Facilitated mass communications with pro-Right-to-Work voters in targeted state house/senate districts via direct mail.”

Chan also listed having worked as a Livingston-based Right to Work field staffer from Sept. 2 to Nov. 15, 2012, during which time he “facilitated mass communications with pro-Right-to-Work voters in targeted state house/senate districts via direct mail.”

Right to Work was not registered as a political committee, and none of these activities were reported to the state, according to Commissioner of Political Practices records.

Sarah Arnold, a former Right to Work staffer, testifies during the 2016 trial of Art Wittich, a former Republican lawmaker a jury found illegally coordinated with the organization during his 2010 Senate primary campaign. Photo courtesy Kim Reed.

Sarah Arnold, a former Right to Work staffer who provided in-depth testimony about the inner workings of the Right to Work campaign machine during the Wittich trial, said in an interview Friday that it’s inconceivable Chan could have executed the tasks he claims to have done in Montana in 2012 and 2014 without spending money.

“It sounds to me like they’re asking for another complaint,” Arnold said when reached Friday at her home in Colorado. “They [Right to Work] are clearly trying to do something under the radar, which is shifty. This definitely sounds to me like they’re trying to keep things hidden, given their previous work.”

Arnold said when she worked for Right to Work,direct mail survey campaignsalone cost upward of 60 cents per mail piece. That cost did not include time and labor expenses, Arnold said.

“You can’t do direct mail without spending money,” Arnold said. “At minimum you have to pay for postage and printing.”

Federal tax records indicate that salaries were paid toMontana Citizens for Right to Work employees by a group called Conservative Action League, which lists its address as a post office box in Springfield, Virginia.

Montana Citizens for Right to Work sends out surveys like this one to candidates running for office. The group then uses the responses to the survey to vet candidates and attack candidates who don’t respond or don’t support “Right to Work’s” agenda, according to former Right ot Work staffers. Courtesy photo.

According to IRS 990 records,Conservative Action League received $820,000 from the National Right to Work Committeebetween 2014 and 2016. IRS 990 records for 2017 were not immediately available.

It’s unclear how much money the Conservative Action League spent in Montana in salaries or other grants. According to records from 2014 and 2015, the group paid at least $154,182 to “Western States Right to Work,” which is the group that includes Montana Citizens for Right to Work.

Arnold said when she worked in Montana for the Right to Work-affiliated groups she was paid directly by the National Right to Work Committee.

“I’m not sure why they would put it through another group unless the other group is trying to hide something,” Arnold said.

Garner was not aware of the group’s source of funding until contacted by the Montana Free Press.

“People have to decide if they want to be represented by citizen legislators — people they see in the street or in their grocery store every day — or if they want to be represented by dark money groups funded out of a P.O. Box in Virginia,” Garner said. “That’s why I felt I had to bring this information to the commissioner. This isn’t my first run-in with dark money groups, but this is my first complaint. Enough is enough.”

Americans for Prosperity went door to door on March 3 handing out flyers criticizing Kalispell Republican Rep. Frank Garner for his support of increasing the gas tax to help fund highway construction. Photo: AFP-Montana’s Facebook page.

Garner has been in the crosshairs of dark money political groups since 2015, his freshman year in the House.

In February of that year, in the midst of the legislative session, the Koch Brothers-funded Americans for Prosperity held a “town hall” meeting in Garner’s district and didn’t invite the lawmaker to attend. According to the Flathead Beacon, a crowd of about 100 people attended the event at the Red Lion Inn in Kalispell. Some of them received word about the gathering through the postcard mailers, which read, “Tell Frank Garner to stand with us and vote no on ObamaCare’s expansion in Montana.”

Garner came under attack from AFP again over the weekend when the group went door-to-door handing out postcards criticizing Garner for his support of a 2017 bill to increase the gas tax. That measure passed the Republican-controlled House 57-43.

:{

}:

Robert Welzel, of Kalispell, filed in January to challenge Garner in the Republican primary. Candidate filing closes March 12.

:{

}:

Garner is expected to face an aggressive third-party campaign between now and the June 5 primary election.

“It would be nice if we were on a level playing field,” Garner said of the outside spending by third-party groups.

:{

}:

Garner said as a part-time citizen legislator, he’s required to report who supports his campaign, including their name, occupation and address. The same is not true for dark money groups who are not required to report the names of their donors or, in some cases, their expenditures.

“In this case, you have groups whose avocation it is to promote their mission, with unlimited amounts of money, who don’t have to tell us who their donors are, and in many cases what their expenses are, as long as they are engaged in so-called issue advocacy,” Garner said. “If we allow dark money groups to spend unlimited amounts of money against people in an elected office, with no controls, no regulations, and aren’t required to follow the rules, then we might as well give them our seats and let them vote for us.”



http://www.nonprofitfacts.com/VA/Conservative-Action-League.html

Table of contents:

Organization representatives - add corrected or new information about Conservative Action League »

Non-representatives - add comments about Conservative Action League»

Conservative Action LeagueConservative Action League
Employer Identification Number (EIN)541935622
Name of OrganizationConservative Action League
In Care of NameSteve M Antosh
AddressPO BOX 1082, Springfield, VA 22151-0082
SubsectionCivic League
Ruling Date11/1999
DeductibilityContributions are not deductible
FoundationAll organizations except 501(c)(3)
OrganizationCorporation
Exempt Organization StatusUnconditional Exemption
Tax Period12/2014
Assets$25,000 to $99,999
Income$500,000 to $999,999
Filing Requirement990 (all other) or 990EZ return
Asset Amount$68,979
Amount of Income$566,692
Form 990 Revenue Amount$566,692
National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities (NTEE)Arts, Culture and Humanities: Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Amount of income in 2014: $566,692 (it was $319,523 in 2013)

Conservative Action League:$566,692
Other organizations performing similar types of work:$85,930

Assets in 2014: $68,979 (it was $236,926 in 2013)

This organization:$68,979
Other organizations performing similar types of work:$50,502

Expenses in 2013: $270,533

Conservative Action League:$270,533
Other organizations performing similar types of work:$96,681

Income to expenses ratio in 2013: 2.1

Conservative Action League:2.1
Other organizations performing similar types of work:1.1

Number of employees in 2013: 7

This organization:7
Other organizations performing similar types of work:5

Grants share in income in 2013: 99.8%

This organization:99.8%
Other organizations performing similar types of work:99.4%