The Climate Web
Preview
Open in TheBrain
The Climate Web 10/5/2026
Chief Executive Officers - TOC
E - Internal Business Responses
E - Business Emissions Reductions
E - Science-based targets
Parents
Business Policy Advocacy and Opposition TOC
Climate Change Officers - TOC
Decision Making - Business TOC
E - Business Climate Response Extracts
E - Business Emissions Reductions
Children
2008 Autodesk's approach to GHG Target Setting
2008 The Four Steps of C-FACT
200X BT intends to meet its target with several measures
200X The required CO2 intensity reduction required to achieve an 80% reduction in absolute emissions
2015 But there is a long way to go. Looking at 70 of the larger public companies, responsible for 9% of global emissions, graph characterizes their targets
2015 Most company targets expire too soon
2016 GHG emissions and emissions pathways
2017 Companies setting science-based targets
2020 Key dimensions of net-zero corporate targets
2020 Net zero emissions at the global level
2020 Taxonomy of climate mitigation tactics and outcomes
2oC benchmark vs. science based targets
Close to 1000 companies are setting science-based emission reduction targets. It’s time to provide guidance on net zero targets
Corporate net zero targets are inconsistent
Corporate Science Based Targets an important step forward
Defining “net zero” for corporate purposes
More than half of the global economy is covered by net-zero commitments
Nature-based solutions can play key roles in net-zero strategies
Net zero targets should drive the transformation needed for global climate and sustainability goals
Offsets can play two roles in net-zero strategies
The 3% solution
The IPCC’s definition of net zero
Why are Science-Based Targets Relevant Now?
Jumps
I - SBTiScienceBasedTargets (Deep Dive)
I - ScienceBasedTargetCommitments