World’s First "Bioprocessor" Made Using Human Brain Tissue
Why do these scientists want to create computers out of living brain tissue?
- Because of "climate change" and energy efficiency.
Excerpt from The Corbett Report
Slaves in a Jar
OK, let’s recap: over the past month, the mockingbird media mouthpieces have begun warning in unison about a looming energy apocalypse as the AI industry begins consuming massive amounts of power. Then, out of the blue, a plucky Swiss tech startup (with private funders) arrives with a solution: a "Neuroplatform" that can save massive amounts of energy by using living human brain tissue to process information!
So far, so weird. But here’s where it gets creepy: when the FinalSpark brainiacs talk about using living human tissue to create this "bioprocessor", that isn’t a figure of speech. The "brain organoids" used in this "living computer" – developed, as their research paper tells us, "from Human iPSC-derived Neural Stem Cells" – are, in fact, alive.
This pesky little fact raises some deep moral quandaries – the type of "brain in a jar" ethical dilemmas that are, naturally, completely overlooked by the FinalSpark bioengineers and the fawning corporate press covering the story.
To wit:
- If these brain computers are in fact composed of living human brain tissue, do they count as living beings, with all the same rights and considerations we would extend to any other living creature?
- They can perform calculations and process information … so what if they’re sentient? Can they be aware of their surroundings? Do they feel pain or suffering?
- How are these living creatures made to do this computing, anyway? And what if these helpless slave computer brains – created in the lab for the sole purpose of processing information for their masters - didn’t want to do the scientists bidding?
Well, at least that final question has already been asked and answered, according to one recent report on FinalSpark’s Neuroplatform.
After accessing the provided login/password, researchers gain the ability to remotely send electrical signals to neurons and receive their responses. It is then the responsibility of researchers to devise optimal algorithms for controlling the behaviour of the organoids.
Users can mimic memory function by using periodic electrical stimulation to reinforce synapses through repetition, thus making desired pathways stronger.
Researchers do this by training the organoids through a reward system. The organoids are rewarded with dopamine, the neurotransmitter responsible for pleasure (and addiction).
Meanwhile, as “punishment,” the organoids are exposed to chaotic stimuli, such as irregular electrical activity.
Yes, you read that correctly. Stripped of all the niceties and polite circumlocutions, these researchers are alternately doping and torturing this brain tissue to force it to process information for them. If we consider for a moment that these lab-grown human brain organoids are in fact living creatures, then this entire system should be sending shivers down your spine.
In his own article on the subject, independent researcher Michael Snyder eschews the "organoids" euphemism and calls these beings what they are – "enslaved mini-brains". He then puts this "reward and punishment" training system in its proper perspective:
If the enslaved mini-brains do what they are supposed to do, they are rewarded with lots of pleasure. If the enslaved mini-brains do not do what they are supposed to do, they are hit with lots of "irregular electrical activity".”In other words, these miniature human brains are tortured until they learn to obey. Reading that should literally make you sick. What these scientists are doing is so incredibly evil.
Amazingly, neither the FinalSpark scientists themselves nor the public relations men masquerading as pop-sci "journalists" have addressed these concerns or even shown any interest in the philosophical implications of growing living human tissue in a lab and forcing it to do their bidding.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Now, there is one hopeful thing in all of this: if you still do feel that sense of creepiness when you think about or read about or see this technology, then that is a good thing. That means you still have your head screwed on straight even in the face of so much propaganda designed to convince us to give in to the Trans(human) Agenda.
Embrace that feeling of creepiness. Do not lose your sense of disgust at this technology. You will need to cling on to that so that you can forcefully and powerfully reject this technology and everything and everyone associated with it. Those who are seeking to break down this distinction and desensitize us to this "living" computer idea are our ideological enemies. If we ever stop seeing them as the enemy in this struggle, that is when we lose our humanity altogether.
Having said that, this is not some theoretical warning about some far-off, hypothetical threat. It is here. Now. These technologies already exist.
"Self-healing" cyborgs covered in lab-grown living skin.
And, of course, organic slave computers.
Welcome to the world of 2024, everyone! God help us all.