Open in TheBrain

Problem Solved: Unfriendly AI Monica Humanity HPlus

<p>Jan 24, 2011 09:22 AM

&#160;

article in hplusmagazine.com &#160;on Dec 15 2010.

&#160;

Monica Anderson

&#160;

opening: &#160;future chess playing computer can predict chess moves but gets destroyed

by fire sprinklers when some Grand Marnier gets spilled.

Nobody can predict that... world is too complex.

&#160;

<b>The purpose of intelligence is prediction.</b>&#160;&#160;

&#160;

Humans have used their minds to<b> predict the behavior of sabertooth tigers, the right day in spring to plant the crops, and the behavior of opponents in games like chess and tennis</b>.&#160;

&#160;

<b> Predictive capabilities actually predate chess by hundreds of millions of years</b>.

&#160;

&#160; An animal running on a rocky beach needs to predict <b>where its legs will land </b>and when to start activating the leg muscles to handle each impact.&#160; Here, the prediction reaches only milliseconds into the future.&#160; Often this is enough.&#160;

&#160;

<b>The ability to better predict what an opponent will do in a fight to the death</b>

<b> </b>conveys the ability to parry a strike in time rather than milliseconds too late.&#160; But better than that, the first rule of street fighting is <b>"Be Somewhere Else"</b>.&#160; <b>Predicting that a fight is imminent is more useful than predicting the first blow</b>.

&#160;

<b>&#160; Predation requires intelligence, but more superior intelligences develop safer techniques like scavenging, ambushing, pack hunting, weapons, traps, and Trojan Horses</b>.

&#160;

<b>An evolutionary arms race has ratcheted intelligence level</b>s ever since the first brain-like nerve clusters appeared.&#160;

&#160;

&#160;Longer term predictions, predictions that are more often correct, and predictions that are more specific about the outcome all provide evolutionary advantages for superior predictors.&#160; <b>As our ancestors started living in larger tribes, the ability to predict the behaviors of potential mates and rivals made a big difference for who got to breed.</b>

&#160;

<b>Intelligence-based mate selection </b>was one key factor in the explosive increase of intelligence levels in our species.

&#160;

The Libet Delay ... she claims its a half a second... &#160;no , no , no wrong... but idea is right.

&#160;

Predictive capability selects the winners among <b>frogs darting their tongue against flies and among flies avoiding tongues</b>.

&#160;

The world is TOO COMPLEX for any intellig systems (let along logic-based system) to make longe range predictions.

&#160;

But predict we must. &#160;Planning is just a prediction that includes our own actions.

&#160;

<b>We quickly and subconsciously hypothesize a few alternative actions, predict some of their possible outcomes, and then select the action that we predict will bring about the most desirable outcome.</b>&#160; This is an error-prone process, but since it's the best we can do, this is what we do.&#160; And we do this <b>many times every second</b> since <b>every muscle activation is preceded by a low-level, subconscious prediction of its effects</b>.

&#160;

Three major kinds of reasoning: &#160;deductive, inductive &#160;and abductive.

&#160;

Abductive reasoning: (Guessing possible causes for an event; &#160;B happened; A might have caused it) QV.

&#160;

Monica: &#160;key point: &#160;AIs that are generally intelligent will be &#160;ABDUCERS... &#160;predicters... making guesses.

&#160;

Don't base your images on Spock or Data or the Hal-9000

&#160;

An AI should be able to browse the web and UNDERSTAND what it reads.

&#160;

Monica's preferred definition of AI:

&#160;

<b>"The ability in a computer to easily do most everyday mental tasks that are easy for humans"</b>.&#160;

&#160;

(recall Rod Brooks list:

&#160;

1) &#160;object recognition/ classification of a 2 year old

2) &#160;speech understanding of a 4 year old

3) &#160;motor capabilities &#160;(tying laces) of a 6 year old

4) &#160;social understanding (theory of mind) of an 8 year old.

&#160;

(That's the real AI program).

&#160;

Stanley the Stanford DARPA Grand Challenge car can drive on its own but that understanding

is not suited for enjoying the movie &#160;Herbie: &#160;The Love Bug.

&#160;

Brains are forced to use abduction simply because it's the only thing that works at all in our complex mundane reality.

&#160;

Monica does not think that the SCARY POSSIBILITY of &#160;Super AI is anything to be worried about...

can't happen (in her opinion) cuz they will always be fallible. &#160;We will always be able to unplug it using just

a community human experts + 10 last generation AIs. &#160;(I'm not sure).

&#160;

My view: &#160;humans will become incr. marginalized and controlled as &#160;computers comprise a larger portion of the

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;</p>

Attachments