Open in TheBrain

Spatial Working Memory Lehnert & Zimmer 2006

<p>Apr 30, 2011 11:51 PM

&#160;

Auditory and visual spatial working memory &#160;Lehnert and Zimmer &#160;2006

Saarland Univ &#160;Germany

&#160;

TRIPARTITE WORKIGN MEMORY MODEL &#160;(Baddely and Hitch 74 and

Baddely and Lgie 1999): &#160;two mechs for tempr storage and maint of ifnormation:

the PL = phonological loop and the

VSSP &#160;Visual Spatial Sketchpad &#160;&#160;(further divided into the VISUAL CACHE and the INNER SCRIBE);

&#160;

inner scribe &#160;is an active rehearsal process that refreshes info held in the cache.

&#160;

VISUAL CACHE &#160;stores not only visual but static spatial info &#160;(eg the spatial layout of objects)

&#160;

INNER SCRIBE is involved in the maintenance of DYNAMIC SPATIAL INFO.

&#160;

However, &#160;the source of a heard sound can usu be located easily.

&#160;

So, &#160;&#160;their experiment... &#160;how are spatial locations of sounds temporarily remembered.

&#160;

results support the notion that at some level, &#160;auditory and visual inputs share a component relevant

for the maintenance of spatial info in working memory.

&#160;

suggestion is that this is &#160;SPATIAL ATTENTION

&#160;

RESUTS section..

&#160;

We therefore believe that OBJECT FILES represent location info by referring to a common

repres of the egocentric environmental space shared by all modalities.

&#160;

used. Rather, we think<b> object files represent location in-</b><b>formation by referring to a common representation of&#160;</b><b>the egocentric environmental space shared by all modali-</b><b>ties</b>. For each attended item perceived in any modality,an <b>object file exists that can be considered to represent </b><b>episodic working memory</b>. The object files are transient units consisting of active entries in domain-specific long-term memory structures, plus an additional componentthat temporarily binds these structures as long as the ob-&#160;ject file is active. This additional component might be at-tention (Treisman, 2006). Each file binds a multitude of&#160;heterogeneous information, only part of which is provided&#160;&#160;by modality-specific structures. When memorizing an au-ditory item location, for instance, the bound memory con-tent would consist of sound information, location informa-tion, and some conceptual information (to the extent that&#160;

&#160;

&#160;</p>

Attachments