Open in TheBrain

THEIS Thomas Future Nanoelectronics

<p>Jun 06, 2011 09:26 PM &#160;(this was 3 years ago)

this talk was part of a conference prob. at google

&#160;

THOMAS THEIS &#160;Direc of Phys Sci at IBM T J Watson Resch Center

&#160;

how do we implement right error correction at correct levels

(as things we small, will have incr variation in the devices)...

&#160;

industry doing new litho generation every 2 years or better; &#160;&#160;EUV is crucial...

&#160;

topics: &#160;&#160;extension of silicon CMOS tech

&#160;

search for the ultimate FET

&#160;

prospects for ADIABATIC switching and reversible logic &#160;(real change from what we do today);

&#160;

5:20 Moore's Law is in good shape... no slow down evident in density of devices

&#160;

he predicts... will increase exponentially for another 10 years...

&#160;

still, we r approaching some limits...

resistive losses in quiescent states; &#160;thermionic emission loses;

&#160;

real issue is allowable power dissipation... &#160;electric bill to cool and run the servers for 2 years = the cost of the servers;

&#160;

gating close to limits &#160;as gate length drops

(electric bill at server farms is = &#160;to all servers in 2-3 years)

as gate length shrinks... big economic constraints on power dissipation;

&#160;

big change &#160;8:15 &#160;in 2004; &#160;cannot buy 7-8 ghz cpu;

if they could do it, they would... cannot do it;

&#160;

gate oxide is not scaling;

&#160;

there is a work around &#160;9:50... &#160;replace 1 nano think... with &#160;hafnium;

&#160;

The solution: &#160;high-k / metal gate... &#160;&#160;extendable to 22 nm and beyond...

will produce big reducs in passive power

&#160;

prob this talk was given in 2008... &#160;&#160;&#160;

he said FinFET was predicted confident. by Intel execs in 2008.

&#160;

The quest for the ultimate FET...

&#160;

he shows a great carbon nanotube device from there Swiss lab... vertical semiconduc FET...

&#160;

sl: &#160;5 nano gate &#160;from carbon nantube

&#160;

sl: &#160;promise of carbon nanotubes: &#160;&#160;could get 950 Ghz switching for a 50 nm channel.

&#160;

go to wire-like geometry; &#160;&#160;narrow channel, wire like device... carbon nanotubes;

&#160;

vertical nanowire FET &#160;made of carbon NT... made at their Zurich lab;

&#160;

sl &#160;future direction in nantube... &#160;CNT = carbon nanotubes &#160;harvest growth &#160;then suspend them and

wrap a gate around them with CVP;

&#160;

grow a 5 nano wire and wrap a gate all around it; &#160;&#160;&#160;carbon NT... ultimate provided by nature;

estimate that you might get 950 Ghz &#160;but cannot build it ;

&#160;

sl &#160;&#160;dual-gate CNTFET &#160;&#160;great nonlinearity of gate to get strong control of current in the channel;

&#160;

ferroelectric...

&#160;

ultra-thin chnalle and wrap-around gate structure; &#160;wrap around gate &#160;on a single NTube;

&#160;

but &#160;FETs will approach the kT limit

&#160;

23:30 &#160;FETs &#160;approaching kT limit...

&#160;

Bob Keyes &#160;(emeritus at IBM REs) &#160;keeps track of data: &#160;energy used per clock cycle in a computation

he shows energy dropping on a line...&#160;

limit is the energy stored in the device - the ambient thermal noise... cannot compue beyond that limit...

must store 30 kT &#160;(say) to computer reliably;;

&#160;

What do u do when u hit the wall of thermal noise;

&#160;

minute 26

&#160;

Can we operate FETs near or below the kT limit...

(u could use refrigeration... but it is not efficient... must add cost of fridge + device);

total power has to go down (including refrigeration)

&#160;

2 paths: 1) &#160;conventional &#160;abrupt method &#160;E = 1/2 CV2

&#160;

2) &#160;reversible logic &#160;(do it slowly) &#160;

if willing to do things slowly then u can do things with minimal energy (or no energy)

&#160;

Adiabatic omputing... &#160;50% raise their hands... &#160;change it abruptly with lots of energy or

conserve the energy... &#160;&#160;abrupt method is a square wave...

&#160;

quasi static... if willing to do things slowly... have been built and tested... &#160;Dave Frank is an expert (IBM research)

&#160;

have a sinusoidal clock instead of a square wave clock.

&#160;

reversible pipeline &#160;reversible logic...

&#160;

retractile cascade, &#160;reversible pipeline logic... &#160;explored in the 1990s

&#160;

High Q distrib clock is hard to build;

&#160;

to make this work, the clock needs to be really really slow like 1000X as slow;

&#160;

why not commercial? &#160;just do this by lowering clock speed and lower voltage BUT

&#160;

but look at work of Dave J Frank &#160;eg at MIT Workshop on Reversible Computation Feb 14 2005

superconductivity is the answer &#160;(only need to reduce speed by 10X);

&#160;

can get 1 over time3, with superconductor... depends on device physics.

&#160;

George Bourianoff &#160;The Future of Nanocomputing &#160;IEEE Computer 36 pp44-53...

&#160;

new state vectors &#160;(rather than using charge) &#160;Nanoelectronic Initiative...

new devices with difft. state vectors is repres bits;

use spin vectors or electric fields...

electric fields

use computational state vector other than electronic charge

&#160;

magnetic systems: &#160;spins are decoupled environment... &#160;

they WANT to be oscillators... they r high Q systems;

nanoscale &#160;oscillators have been fabricated;

device just wants to sit there and oscillate;

&#160;

how wud we build a new device that is good for reversible logic...;

&#160;

what people r talking abt is doing 10 or 20 or 50 &#160;logic steps seq. &#160;&#160;before reading it out...

which inevitably causes energy dissipation...; &#160;no one is talking about building a computer

is fully reversible... but rather... do 2, or 10 or 100 logic steps before reading it out... but quite difficult;

&#160;

he is v optimistic that it will happen but not in 5 yrs... that's for sure...

&#160;

short channel device helps... reduces &#160;gate capacitance... also &#160;get &#160;better ballisticity &#160;(better current)

&#160;

as FINFET &#160;gets smaller, it will force us to reduce the voltage, which will reduce the clock speed;

&#160;

assumption with future finfet... is that &#160;as we drop realy small, we will use massive parallelism to&#160;

make up for a REDUCTION in clockspeed.

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

1) &#160;conventional logic

&#160;

&#160;</p>

Attachments