Open in TheBrain

WORKING Memory SHORT Term STM WM

<p class="default">07:23 PM, August 07, 2007&#160;

&#160;Working Memory in Wiki ... a key article with a lot of meat!&#160;

&#160;See espec the Baddeley and Hitch model: <b>phonological loop and visual sketch pad</b>&#160;

&#160;

May 16, 2010 10:16 AM

&#160;

<b>Working memory is the executive and attentional aspect of short-term memory involved in the interim integration, processing, disposal, and retrieval of information. Working memory tasks include the active monitoring or manipulation of information or behaviors</b>.

&#160;

coined by Miller, Galanter and Pribram. &#160;in the 60s. &#160;Atkinson/ Shiffrin &#160;68.

&#160;

Most theorists today use the concept of working memory to replace or include the older concept of short-term memory

&#160;

The central executive (see <a class="mw-redirect" href="/wiki/Executive_system" title="Executive system">executive system</a>) is, among other things, responsible for directing <a href="/wiki/Attention" title="Attention">attention</a> to relevant information, suppressing irrelevant information and inappropriate actions, and for coordinating cognitive processes when more than one task must be done at the same time.

&#160;

Working Memory in the brain...

&#160;

May 01, 2011 11:16 AM

&#60;&#60;I revisit this topic because of the LINK BTWN CONSC and WORKING MEMORY.

If consc is a diffuse, attractor network, then where and how is memory stored???&#62;&#62;

&#160;

QV &#160;<b>Baddeley model of working memory:</b>

multicomponent model of WM. &#160;PL = phonolog loop: &#160;info is refreshed by a rehearsal loop...

keep a 7 digit phone number going;

VSSP = &#160;visuospatial sketch pad &#160;for vision; &#160;mental maps and visual images;

2 compoents: &#160;visual subsystem (shape, color, texture) and a spatial subsystem for location.

&#160;

The cenetral exec direct attn to relevant info.

Baddeley (2000) &#160;added a 4th compoent: &#160;the episodic buffer, &#160;which holds reps that INTEGRATE phono, visual,and

spatial info &#160;(and semantic info etc). &#160;It is episodic because it BINDS info into a unitary episodic repres.

(but this is a temporary store as opposed to Tulving's &#160;concept of episodic memory &#160;&#60;&#60; which is LT&#62;&#62;

&#160;

COWAN &#160;

regards working memory not as a separate system, but as a part of <a href="/wiki/Long-term_memory">long-term memory</a>. Representations in working memory are a <b>subset of the representations in long-term memory</b>. Working memory is organized into two embedded levels. <b>The first level consists of long-term memory representations that are activated. </b>There can be many of these, there is <b>no limit to activation of representations in long-term memory</b>. The second level is called the <b>focus of attention. The focus is regarded as capacity limited and holds up to four of the activated representations</b>.

&#160;

Some researchers have argued<sup id="cite_ref-18" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-18">[19]</a></sup> that <b>working memory capacity reflects the efficiency of executive functions, most notably the ability to maintain a few task-relevant representations in the face of distracting irrelevant information</b>. The tasks seem to reflect individual differences in <b>ability to focus and maintain attention, particularly when other events are serving to capture attenti</b>on.

&#160;

Others have argued (Halford) that the capacity of working memory is better characterized as <b>the ability to mentally form relations between elements, or to grasp relations in given information</b>....

&#160;

Experimental Studies of WM: &#160;Frequently REREAD this section... it is excellent and important.

&#160;

what is the nature of the capacity limit?

One is that there is a<b> limited pool of cognitive resources needed to keep representations active a</b>nd thereby available for processing, and for carrying out processes.<sup id="cite_ref-21" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-21">[22]</a></sup> Another hypothesis is <b>that memory traces in working memory decay within a few seconds, unless refreshed through rehearsal, </b>and because the speed of rehearsal is limited, we can maintain only a limited amount of information.<sup id="cite_ref-22" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-22">[23]</a></sup>

&#160;

Yet another idea is that r<b>epresentations held in working memory capacity interfere with each othe</b>r.<sup id="cite_ref-23" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-23">[24]</a></sup>

There are several forms of <a title="Interference theory" href="/wiki/Interference_theory">interference</a> discussed by theorists:

retrieval competition &#160;and &#160;FEATURE STEALING or overwriing (in items that are similar)...

&#160;

Time-based resource sharing model: &#160;amt of forgetting depends on COGNITIVE LOAD... attn demands.

&#160;

&#60;&#60;it seems obvious to me that BOTH &#160;cognitive load and feature similarly/ interference are at work.

What is optimal for remembering is.. &#160;1) LOW cognitive load (lots of time for attention/ rehearsal/ refreshing

AND &#160;2) NO or minimal interference... &#160;do NOT try to learn two similar articles, eg... they will interfere.&#62;&#62;&#62;

&#160;

&#160;

WM in the BRAIN

genetics: &#160;&#160;&#160;ROBO1 &#160;for the phono loop. (severe dyslexia in one Finnish family due to familiar of axons to cross

midline &#160;; &#160;this is NOT really a clue to normal functioning of WM, &#160;since this is a sledge hammer)

&#160;

physiology... &#160;this is good; &#160;&#160;&#160;DELAYED MATCHING TASK: &#160;spatial WM in monkey:

3 card monte like experiment: &#160;&#160;food under a cup... &#160;monkey must decide which cup after a shutter comes down.

depends on PFC neurons... &#160;also &#160;delay-active neurons in posterior parietal cortex, thalamus, caudate and GP.

&#160;

Goldman-Rakic... &#160;DLPFC &#160;connects with all these regions... &#160;circuits within PFC can maintain WM thru networks

of excit pyramidal cells firing.

&#160;

LOCALIZATION: &#160;fMRI confirms &#160;role of PFC in WM.

but WM is scattered all over the cortex; &#160;&#160;spatial memory more in R hemisphere; &#160;verbal and object more in L;

&#160;

WM &#160;recruits a network of PFC and parietal areas. &#160;TMS interferes.

&#160;

ROLE of PFC: &#160;controlling attn, &#160;slecting strategies, and manip info in WM &#160;but

parietal cortex is involved with MAINTENANCE of WM &#160;(possible also a role for parietal cor in exec fxn).

&#160;

Acute and chronic STRESS impairs WM

&#160;

NEURAL MAINTENANCE: &#160;persistent firing of certain neurons in the delay period of WM to keep reps active.

How is binding accomplished? &#160;&#160;synchrony, maybe. &#160;oscillation in theta band &#160;(4 to 8 hz)

theta does incr during WM load.

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;</p>

Attachments