Open in TheBrain

IZHIKEVICH Eugene SPIKES 29 Jan 2013

<p class="MsoNormal" >IZHIKEVICH Eugene SPIKES 29 Jan 2013</p>

<p>

he is trying to hire researchers for his lab:&nbsp;</p>

<p>

he has 21 people;&nbsp; trying to hire more&nbsp; ? 19 more...</p>

<p>

&nbsp;

2006 he started scholarpedia!</p>

<p>

also began encyc of computational neurosci....</p>

<p>

<note to myself: reread nick steinmetz article on frontal eye fields></p>

<p>

&nbsp;

was at NSI neurosci instit with Gerry Edelman</p>

<p>

<b>how do our brains work?... SPIKES!</b></p>

<p>

he believes it : <b>spikes and not rates </b>&nbsp;(but there is no proof)

&nbsp; this is a religion with him!</p>

<p>

&nbsp;

spike timing:</p>

<p>

he shows a plot of 100 neurons firing on avg 1 per sec&nbsp; (so all at 1 hz&nbsp; but

it it's spike timing... then it's <b>100 factorial!&nbsp;&nbsp; 100160&nbsp; (because it's all order dependent...</b>

can convey far more information... and, of course, that is true.)</p>

<p>

<b>spike timing is everything</b>...</p>

<p>

he says 100B neurons and 1 Quad synapses...

&nbsp;it HAS to use&nbsp; spike timing for neural computations!</p>

<p>

&nbsp;

PLAN for today:&nbsp;&nbsp; everything is spike timing&nbsp; (NOT rates!!!)</p>

<p>

Gordon Shepard 1981...

spikes are ubiquitous...</p>

<p>

he shows cells that spike... including the following!

pumpkin cells&nbsp; (from a stem)

skin cells

during egg fertilizaiton...</p>

<p>

rat pancreas,

paramecium...</p>

<p>

HH (Hodgkin-Huxley) formalism&nbsp; based on conductances...</p>

<p>

neurons r dynamical systems...</p>

<p>

can explain resonances, inhibition..</p>

<p>

his book dynamical systems in neurosci...</p>

<p>

he shows how good his model is... (cannot tell model from real data)</p>

<p>

we know HOW spikes are generated.&nbsp; but not WHAT they r for!!!</p>

<p>

spiking is reduced to firing rate by most neurosci... Big Mistake!</p>

<p>

firing rate... most dangerous misconcep in neurosci...</p>

<p>

&nbsp;

muscles may not care abt spike timing (probably)</p>

<p>

&nbsp;

coding of tactile stimuli...</p>

<p>

must saccade or touch to know where things are...</p>

<p>

&nbsp;

he shows LGN responses in cat

2 cats years apart.. shown a movie...&nbsp; spiking timing is exactly the same!

reinagel and clay reid 2002</p>

<p>

&nbsp;

simon thorpe.. RSVP rapid series visual processing...</p>

<p>

STDP&nbsp; obviously depends on spike timing</p>

<p>

&nbsp;

combinatorial richness of encoding...

can downstream neuron tell the difference...</p>

<p>

&nbsp;

axonal conduction delays...

in rabbit its perhaps&nbsp;&nbsp; 50 ms</p>

<p>

1/4 of neurons are typically doing nothing..

avg firing rate = 0.1 hz...</p>

<p>

if you insert one extra spike into his whole brain model in his PNAS paper then the behavior of the model

diverges in a quarter of a second&nbsp; (inserting only one extra spike!!) .</p>

<p>

every spike matters</p>

<p>

but peter lathma answered in a letter</p>

<p>

sensit to perturbations in vivo implies high noise and suggests rate coding in cortex!!</p>

<p>

nature&nbsp; july 2012</p>

<p>

he cites a study in which one single spike in a nerve =>&nbsp; feeling in finger...</p>

<p>

genl anesthetics...&nbsp; scramble timing... perhaps</p>

<p>

when scramble conduc delays... the groups all disappear...</p>

<p>

vesicle release is probabilistic....</p>

<p>

&nbsp;

sureya... do u compute in a chaotic system with lots of noise?</p>

<p>

polychronous system...&nbsp; precision is embed cuz of strong connectivity...

&nbsp;</p>

Attachments