Open in TheBrain

CHICHILNISKY, EJ Retinal Processing Mar 9, 2015

<p class="MsoNormal" >CHICHILNISKY, EJ&nbsp; Retinal Processing Mar 9, 2015

(This is an outstanding lecture on a crucial topic and presents

a surprising new view of retina (and hence, of the brain.)</p>

<p>

EJ presents an intro for the bioengr students to the work of Fred Rieke

who will present his work on Thursday Mar 12th in Clark S360.</p>

<p>

EJ is from&nbsp; Depts of Neurosurg and Ophthalmology.

(He recently came to Stanford from UCSD.)</p>

<p>

This is a seminar in BioX at Clark S361 at noon.</p>

<p>

These talks start at 12:15&nbsp; (and lunch is at noon.)</p>

<p>

he pron. Rieke&nbsp; REE-key.&nbsp; (a former UCSD colleague.)</p>

<p>

he begins...</p>

<p>

how to understand neural circuits....</p>

<p>

he shows a collection of them...</p>

<p>

fly visual system

superior colliculus for&nbsp; orienting toward space...

HC hippocampus for memory

Cadherin-defined sensory tracts

worm mechanosensory system

olfactory system...</p>

<p>

one v accessible system is the retina...</p>

<p>

vision... our most important sense modality...

and <b>uniquely approachable.</b>

<b>can dissect it and probe it in vivo</b>.</p>

<p>

EJ is in the HEPL Bldg&nbsp; (Hanson Appl Physics)&nbsp; with Daniel Palanker.</p>

<p>

visual processing...&nbsp; seems effortless...

how&nbsp; to navigate&nbsp; to catch a frisbee amidst a crowd of players.</p>

<p>

Illusions...&nbsp; two identical squares in visual intensity;

one on a light background and the other on a dark background.</p>

<p>

so, even brightness is entirely non-trivial.</p>

<p>

more illusions from Adelson in 2000... seeing squares thru a transparent strip.</p>

<p>

he says&nbsp; stimu LIE&nbsp; (not lee);</p>

<p>

about 1M&nbsp; nerve fibers from EACH eye.</p>

<p>

shows&nbsp; layers of retina...&nbsp; PRs = photoreceptors on the outside (away from the light)</p>

<p>

PRs&nbsp; connect to interneurons then to the RGCs&nbsp; which to to brain.</p>

<p>

the view he presents is quite difft than the textbook view...</p>

<p>

&nbsp;

PR, horizontal, bipolar, amacrine, then RGCs...</p>

<p>

4 types of PRs;&nbsp; 2 horiz types;&nbsp; 15 bipolar types,&nbsp; 25 amacrine types

&nbsp; and about 20&nbsp; RGC types.</p>

<p>

4PRs:&nbsp; 3 types of cones and 1 type of&nbsp; rod.</p>

<p>

horiz and amacrine are&nbsp; laterally oriented&nbsp; and

15 types of bipoalr cells connect&nbsp; front to back (in the visual stream)</p>

<p>

huge amt of visual processing in retina.</p>

<p>

105M photoreceptors:

5M cones&nbsp; and 100M&nbsp; rods

and 1M&nbsp; RGCs.</p>

<p>

so, massive convergence of info to RGCs...(100 to 1)</p>

<p>

graded potentials mainly exist in the retina (ie no spiking)&nbsp; (until you get to RGCs)</p>

<p>

(I ask abt&nbsp; graded potentials in the brain...

&nbsp;he thinks there are spikes in mammals simply because of size...

spikes are used for distance communication.

(graded potentials seem to be the case with worms, flies, etc... small brains)</p>

<p>

<b>RPE layer is dark black </b>&nbsp;(and will not xmit light... so, that's a reason why PRs are in the back (and not the front) but that's not the case in some animals.</p>

<p>

diversity of cells&nbsp; (as above)&nbsp; really matters!

<b>20 difft RGCs... shape, morphology, connectivity, function, patterns of projection in brain and its light response properties...&nbsp; all v distinct</b>...

and&nbsp;&nbsp; each&nbsp; type has a full image!&nbsp; (each RGC type entirely TILES the retina!)</p>

<p>

shows RGCs from monkey&nbsp; (Dacey 2004)&nbsp; versus

mouse&nbsp; (Volgi in 2009)</p>

<p>

RGCs are the output&nbsp; of the retina.</p>

<p>

(and they may have difft genetic markers)</p>

<p>

RGCs&nbsp; huge diff. in size, connectivity etc.</p>

<p>

difft patterns of connectivity of the RGCs to the interneurons&nbsp; (to the amacrine cells)</p>

<p>

IPL is inner plexiform layer&nbsp; (it is adjacent to the RGC layer)</p>

<p>

IPL has&nbsp; many strata where amacrines (specific ones)&nbsp; connect to specific RGCs.</p>

<p>

<b>retina is&nbsp; really 20 different, tightly interwoven&nbsp; parallel circuits</b>.</p>

<p>

projections are difft (in&nbsp; LGN and elsewhere)</p>

<p>

<b>each RGC&nbsp; uniformly tiles visual space</b>.</p>

<p>

shows&nbsp; ON alpha RGCs from cat&nbsp; (from wassle in 1983)</p>

<p>

he shows that&nbsp; the difft types of&nbsp; horiz/ amacrine etc.&nbsp; all have complete tiling....</p>

<p>

so,&nbsp; each of these 20 RGCs capture difft and multiple visual reprs of the world.

and they project to multiple targets.</p>

<p>

<b>each RGC type is a little machine...(with a reproducible output</b>, just like a circuit)</p>

<p>

temporal resol of 1.2 msec !</p>

<p>

and very reproducible...</p>

<p>

shows&nbsp; on to off&nbsp; etc.

and see highly repeatable spiking pattern

ON parasols are&nbsp; exactly the same but at a difft location</p>

<p>

and totally difft than an OFF parasol..

and different than an ON midget&nbsp; and OFF midget etc.</p>

<p>

all&nbsp; ON parasols are carbon copies of one another&nbsp; and different from&nbsp; OFF parasols...

and difft from small bistratified.</p>

<p>

Q are the visual fields fluid or determined&nbsp; ;&nbsp; A: it seems to be determined.</p>

<p>

Gauthier&nbsp; in 2009... from a jigsaz puzzle repr of visual space...</p>

<p>

now what happens to this info...</p>

<p>

from Kuffler in 1953...</p>

<p>

RGC... center surround...&nbsp; highlighting&nbsp; contrast....</p>

<p>

yes... has brought (Kuffler) into the modern age.. it IS the case... but there is much more.</p>

<p>

Barlow&nbsp; 1964...

DS = direction-selective&nbsp; RGCs...</p>

<p>

only specific&nbsp; cell types do this.

(and some&nbsp; respond to color)</p>

<p>

also&nbsp; object-motion&nbsp; sensitive RGCs... which

respond to object jittering around...</p>

<p>

may be sensit to object moving with respect to background...</p>

<p>

looming motion&nbsp; (eg&nbsp; prey animal... with looming owl)</p>

<p>

mouse... mainly navigates with whiskers and smelll.</p>

<p>

why use rabbit retina:&nbsp;&nbsp; easy to get retina out.</p>

<p>

monkey...&nbsp; v similar to us... front mounted eyes&nbsp; (macaques)</p>

<p>

Rieke&nbsp; studies macaque monkey intermediate layers&nbsp; (rare lab that studies this)</p>

<p>

intermediate layers are v hard to study... not accessible.

&nbsp;does retina tell us abt the brain...</p>

<p>

need source of retinas...&nbsp; primate&nbsp; retinas... greatest hope of studying human retina.</p>

<p>

&nbsp;

* &nbsp;summary</p>

<p>

multiple parallel complete visual images sent to the brain...</p>

<p>

so,&nbsp; brain&nbsp; may be THAT specific also... (as opposed to willy-nilly connections)</p>

<p>

see this same lesson in fish tectum&nbsp; (specific layers)</p>

<p>

same in&nbsp; lamination of&nbsp; V1....</p>

<p>

could well replicate in the brain</p>

<p>

<b>midgets&nbsp; are&nbsp; half the RGCs</b>&nbsp; (but&nbsp; when driving down the highway,&nbsp; the motion cells are impt)</p>

<p>

I ask about the retinal implant: he says it will be in patients in abt a year&nbsp; Daniel Palanker...&nbsp; this is the leading prosthetic system&nbsp; but (even it) does not pay heed to difft RGC types.</p>

<p>

is the brain a universal learning machine or is it specific...</p>

<p>

we have much better access to retina than other guys have to the brain,

so we are 30 years ahead of the CNS guys.</p>

<p>

Q... plasticity in the retina

A&nbsp; some... adaptation&nbsp; (but less than you would expect)...</p>

<p>

&nbsp;</p>

<p>

&nbsp;</p>

Attachments