Open in TheBrain

MOA, Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics Bennett

<p class="MsoNormal" >&#160;

Nov 4 2010 &#160;I hear DAVID BENNETT today... 3rd floor clonf room of KAVLI &#160;at SLAC.

&#160;

spectroscopy of nearby earths might show life

&#160;

radial veloctiy ,,,&#160;&#160; changes cause red and blue shift of light from&#160; star ... most common method of

detecting exoplanets &#160;a la &#160;Geoff Marcy..

&#160;

Kepler good for short period orbits.

mostly HOT, INNer planets&#160; (short period)

&#160;

direct detection is rare and hard to do.

&#160;

Keck&#160; angular differential imaging &#160;??

do subtraction to get rid of starlight... only works for v young planets,

say with &#60; 104 difference in brightness btwn star and planet.

&#160;

he shows graph with Y axis of&#160; earth masses from&#160; 0.1&#160; to 103 and above

X axis&#160; is&#160; semi-major axis&#160; in AU from 0.001 to&#160; 100 AU&#160; both r log scales.

&#160;

so, &#160;how big the planet in earth masses on the Y axis

and how far away is the planet from its star on X axis.

&#160;

Most detected planets are &#160;really &#160;big and close in.

&#160;

this is a great and key graph with all known exoplanets &#160;he shows &#160;perhaps a 1000 points.

&#160;

microlensing is best for&#160; AU =1 and mass = 1

&#160;

he shows dopplers in black&#160; (most of these and the Kepler ones are all in the v heavy &#160;quadrant and most are

v v close to their star... so these all crowd into the upper L of the graph.

&#160;

next graph is normalized to the snowline .. which is defined to be&#160; 2.7 AU &#160;(permanent liquid water/ methane/ammonia

even at v low pressure)

but this is at 10 million years after they form.

&#160;

detection efficiencies for planets is a function of how big they are and how close in they are.

&#160;

can use to estim how prevalent the planets r.

&#160;

Saturn mass planets are present in abt 1/3 of the systems.

&#160;

11 published discoveries from microlensing.

&#160;

get weird lensing if u have a big planet.

&#160;

magnification determined by caustics.

&#160;

planetary caustics.

&#160;

look at that time when magnification is highest; &#160;(ie when there is the most lensing for that object)

he repeatedly shows a beautiful video of the kind of signal they look for....

its like passing a marble thru the bottom of a wine glass where at some point get rapidly changing image.

&#160;

einstein 1936 ... gravit lensing &#160;einstein rings.

&#160;

if sl offset then see major image&#160; (bigger arc) and minor

&#160;

resol is 1 arc sec

&#160;

ogle=2005-blg-390lb&#160; was lowest mass exoplanet seen by microlensing.

&#160;

in galactic bulge, only 2 stars in a million are actual being microlenses.

therefore u need to look at lots of stars.

&#160;

MOA-II&#160; 1.8 m telescope

in New Zealnad.

&#160;

OGLE = optical grav lens experiment.

polish group.

&#160;

galactic bulge is 30&#160; degr S of the equator ... thats where they look,

so these r all located in S hemisphere.

&#160;

amateur astronomers r v helpful&#160; cuz they just wait for big mag event.

&#160;

einstein radius crossing time&#160;&#160; t sub E&#160; is the main thing u observe.

&#160;

can calculate mass when u can get&#160; angular einstein radius (can do that if u have separated observers)

&#160;

ogle-2006-blg-109lb,c&#160;&#160;&#160; (jupiters and saturns around a star)

&#160;

"saturn " gives a lrg caustic cuz its close to einstein ring...&#160; jupiter is further away, so smaller signal.

&#160;

Why space-based microlensing

&#160;

typical&#160; lens-source relative proper motion is&#160; only abt&#160; 5 mas per year , ie milliarcsecs per year.

&#160;

lens star has difft color than the source star.

&#160;

curve of detection moves way way down&#160; toward v v low mass planets&#160; when moved into space.

&#160;

mpf&#160;&#160; vs&#160; kepler

&#160;

rocks with no volatiles is bad;&#160;&#160; for life&#160; want&#160; rocks + volatiles&#160; (water etc)

&#160;

want ir detectors for&#160; mpf focal plane concept. &#160;infrared is best.

&#160;

MPF&#160; combined with jdem-omega dn NISS by decadal survey to make wfirst.

&#160;

??&#160; merge with esa-euclid??

&#160;

videos by d. bennett&#160;&#160; showing microlensing of a traversing planet.

&#160;

kepler.. main noise source r&#160;&#160; sunspots&#160; travelling around imitating a planet.

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;</p>

Attachments