Open in TheBrain

Intel IDF 2016 Shenzhen Intel Optane SSD

<p>Jan 20, 2017 04:15 PM &nbsp;Russ presents...</p>

<p>

this is from Intel IDF: 16 &nbsp;&nbsp;first section: &nbsp;. talking about existing 3d NAND multilayer</p>

<p>

starts with <b>3D NAND:.</b>...&nbsp;</p>

<p>

floating gate memory tech: &nbsp;traps electrons; &nbsp;a cube of mem cells</p>

<p>

4B pillars: &nbsp;each pillar has 32 layers... &nbsp;3 bits of info at each memory cell &nbsp;(intersection)</p>

<p>

384B bits of info on one die...</p>

<p>

in the future stack more vertical layers, or more levels in each cell or closer together;</p>

<p>

breakthru in cost and capacity; &nbsp;by 2017 &nbsp;</p>

<p>

terabyte of info &nbsp;in a chip that is 1.5 mm thick chip for a notebook</p>

<p>

<b>SSD &nbsp;up to 15 Tbytes </b>&nbsp;and &nbsp;a petabye in one server in a 19 inch rack!!! in one unit.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

new &nbsp;non-vol tech....#D XPOINT &nbsp;</p>

<p>

1000X faster than NAND; &nbsp;1000X more durable than NAND and 10X density of DRAM;</p>

<p>

3d &nbsp;but no transistors (unlike NAND); &nbsp;byte accessible;

cross point... &nbsp;&nbsp;vary voltage.... &nbsp;eliminate xsistors;

1000S &nbsp;faster than NAND... for system &nbsp;memory;

pattern recog; &nbsp;deep learn &nbsp;or genome seq; &nbsp;</p>

<p>

Ian comes &nbsp;out &nbsp;to greet Russ;</p>

<p>

contrasts NAND &nbsp;to &nbsp;thunderbolt 3; &nbsp;NAND SSD vs &nbsp;Optane &nbsp;3d xpoint...</p>

<p>

25 gigabytes; &nbsp;&nbsp;one minute &nbsp;vs &nbsp;&nbsp;15 seconds &nbsp;for copy of data.; &nbsp;4X as fast...</p>

<p>

&nbsp;</p>

<p>

&nbsp;</p>

<p>

&nbsp;</p>

<p>

&nbsp;</p>

<p>

&nbsp;

&nbsp;</p>

Attachments