Open in TheBrain

Web Credibility Fogg Slides

<p>Jun 07, 2011 11:09 PM

&#160;

creators &#160;want &#160;websites with optimal levels of credibility

&#160;

consumers... what to believe on the Web... aka info quality

&#160;

CREDIBILIT =

&#160;

Truthful, unbiased, trustworthy, good, honest &#160;&#160;TRUSTWORTHY

&#160;

&#160;

Note: &#160;Update your site's content often... &#160;people assign more credibility to sties that show

they've been recently updated.

&#160;

If possible, avoid ads on your site... &#160;use restraint with promotional content.

&#160;

2600 comments; &#160;most were abt &#160;DESIGN LOOK (not content)

info design, &#160;info focus, &#160;company motive, &#160;usefulness and accuracy, &#160;name recog and reputation.

&#160;

People Eval of web site credibiltiy:

SIMPLE PROSE &#160;many charts and tables

&#160;

Example &#160;Health websites in study

&#160;

eg NIH website... &#160;lack of marketing makes it more credible; &#160;important, &#160;professional

no ulterior motives; &#160;vocab seems to come from an expert

&#160;

as opposed to Thriveonline... &#160;too many ads, &#160;greeting cards, &#160;pop-ups... no sources &#160;etc.

&#160;

BJ Fogg &#160;P-I Theory = Prominence Interpretation Thy

&#160;

PROMINENCE = &#160;what THINGS DID PEOPLE NOTICE

&#160;

INTERPRETATION = &#160;what &#160;ABSTRACT judgments they made abt website elements

&#160;

KEY SLIDE = &#160;SLIDE 47 &#160;Prominence-Interpretation Theory

&#160;

1) &#160;person must first notice something &#160;and then

2) &#160;decide the value or meaning of that element &#160;(good or bad &#160;(useful or repugnant etc) &#160;=

&#160;

credibility impact

&#160;

Fogg's Maxim for Credible Design

&#160;

To Increase the credibility impact of a website, find what elements your target audience inperprets most

favorably and make those elements most prominent.

&#160;

$ types of credibility: &#160;presumed, &#160;reputed, surface, earned

&#160;

Presumed &#160;&#160;we believe them b/c of genl assumptions we &#160;hold.

&#160;

decreases credibility: &#160;domain has .org

info is constantly updated

international brand name

&#160;

decr cred &#160;aol domain name; &#160;rarely update, &#160;unknown brand

&#160;

REPUTED cred... &#160;reference from a 3rd party

&#160;

your doc refferred u to this site; &#160;it won an awared; &#160;an authorative site links to it;

reverse: &#160;a political group y don't like endorse it.

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;</p>

Attachments