Space Systems Engineering Self-Study Sequence
title: Space Systems Engineering Self-Study Sequence
aliases:
- SSE Self-Study
- SSE Study Plan
tags:
- space/systems-engineering
- education/self-study
created: 2026-10-23
duration: "~36 weeks at 6–8 h/week"
primary_texts:
- "NASA Systems Engineering Handbook, SP-2016-6105 Rev 2 (NASA SEH)"
- "Wertz, Everett & Puschell (eds.), Space Mission Engineering: The New SMAD (SME)"
- "Fortescue, Swinerd & Stark, Spacecraft Systems Engineering (FSS)"
supplementary_texts:
- "Curtis, Orbital Mechanics for Engineering Students"
- "Vallado, Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications"
- "Sutton & Biblarz, Rocket Propulsion Elements"
- "Gilmore (ed.), Spacecraft Thermal Control Handbook"
- "Pisacane (ed.), Fundamentals of Space Systems"
- "ECSS-E-ST-10C and ECSS-E-ST-10-02C (Verification)"
related:
- "[[Space Systems Engineering Curriculum]]"
Space Systems Engineering Self-Study Sequence
A phased path through the [[Space Systems Engineering Curriculum]]. It assumes an engineering degree or equivalent: comfort with calculus, basic dynamics and some scripting.
Running design project
Each phase produces one artefact for a single reference mission that you carry through to a self-run PDR. The capstone then becomes the accumulation of real work rather than a separate exercise. Pick something scoped enough to finish, for example:
- a Mars telecom relay smallsat in areostationary orbit
- a 6U–12U LEO Earth-observation CubeSat
- a lunar orbiting pathfinder
Keep everything in a project folder (e.g. Projects/SSE Reference Mission/) and link each artefact back to the phase that produced it.
Abbreviations: NASA SEH = NASA Systems Engineering Handbook; SME = Space Mission Engineering: The New SMAD; FSS = Fortescue, Swinerd & Stark.
Phase 0 — Orientation (weeks 1–2)
Goal: a mental model of the whole life cycle before going deep on anything.
- NASA SEH Ch. 1–3: fundamentals, the SE engine, the NASA project life cycle
- Skim NPR 7123.1 to see how the handbook maps to mandatory requirements
- Space Systems Engineering curriculum site (spacese.spacegrant.org): first lecture modules on the systems perspective
- Skim the SME table of contents and chapter introductions for the shape of the mission-design method
Artefact: a one-page mission statement for the reference mission (objective, user, rough timeline).
Phase 1 — Front-end SE: needs, ConOps, requirements (weeks 3–7)
Goal: turn a mission idea into a verifiable requirements set.
- NASA SEH §4.1 Stakeholder Expectations Definition
- NASA SEH §4.2 Technical Requirements Definition, plus Appendix C on writing good requirements
- NASA SEH §6.2 Requirements Management
- SME: mission characterisation and concept-of-operations chapters
- INCOSE Guide to Writing Requirements, or the SEBoK requirements articles
Artefacts:
- Needs, goals and objectives (NGOs)
- ConOps covering mission phases, operational modes and a timeline
- Mission-level requirements (~20–40), each with rationale and verification method
- A traceability matrix from NGOs to requirements
Checkpoint — self-run MCR/SRR
Can every requirement be traced to a need? Is each one verifiable and free of design solutions?
Phase 2 — Space environment and astrodynamics (weeks 8–13)
Goal: enough orbital mechanics and environment knowledge to choose and justify an orbit.
- FSS: space environment chapter; SME: space environment and survivability chapter
- Curtis Ch. 1–8: two-body problem through orbital manoeuvres and interplanetary trajectories
- Vallado as the reference for perturbations (J2, drag, SRP) and propagation
- Install NASA GMAT and work through its tutorials: LEO propagation, Hohmann transfer, B-plane targeting
Artefacts:
- Orbit trade study: at least two candidate orbits scored against Phase 1 requirements
- Δv budget with margin, covering launch dispersion, insertion, station-keeping and disposal
- Environment summary: radiation dose estimate, eclipse durations, thermal extremes
Phase 3 — Architecture and system budgets (weeks 14–18)
Goal: a functional and physical architecture with closed budgets.
- NASA SEH §4.3 Logical Decomposition, §4.4 Design Solution Definition
- NASA SEH §6.3 Interface Management, §6.8 Decision Analysis
- SME: spacecraft design and sizing chapters, budgets and margins policy
- Optional MBSE: model the architecture in SysML (Cameo or a SysML v2 tool) or Capella (Arcadia method, open source)
Artefacts:
- Functional flow block diagram and N² diagram
- Product breakdown structure (PBS)
- Mass, power, link and data budgets with explicit contingency (e.g. per AIAA S-120 or your chosen margins policy)
- Top-level ICD list
Phase 4 — Subsystems (weeks 19–28)
Goal: first-order sizing of every subsystem, with interactions closed against the Phase 3 budgets. Allow about one week per subsystem block.
| Week | Subsystem | Reading | Sizing output |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | [[Propulsion]] | FSS propulsion; Sutton & Biblarz (selected chapters) | Propellant mass, thruster selection |
| 20–21 | [[ADCS and GNC]] | FSS attitude control; SME ADCS chapter | Disturbance torques, actuator sizing, pointing budget |
| 22 | [[Electrical Power System]] | FSS power; SME power chapter | Array area (EOL), battery capacity (DoD) |
| 23 | [[Thermal Control]] | Gilmore (selected); FSS thermal | Hot/cold case single-node model, radiator area |
| 24 | [[Structures and Mechanisms]] | FSS structures; launch vehicle user's guide | Primary structure concept, frequency requirement |
| 25 | [[Communications and TT&C]] | FSS telecommunications; SME comms chapter | Link budget closed with margin |
| 26 | [[Command and Data Handling]] + [[Flight Software]] | FSS OBDH; Pisacane C&DH | Data budget, mode diagram, FDIR concept |
| 27 | [[Payloads]] | Mission-specific literature | Payload requirements allocation |
| 28 | Integration week | — | Re-close all budgets, update ICDs |
Budgets will break
Expect week 28 to reopen earlier decisions. Iterating is the systems engineering work, not a failure of it. Record each change in the decision log.
Phase 5 — Verification, reliability and operations (weeks 29–32)
- NASA SEH Ch. 5: product realisation (implementation, integration, verification, validation, transition)
- ECSS-E-ST-10-02C Verification: model philosophy, qualification vs acceptance
- GSFC-STD-7000 (GEVS): environmental test levels and sequences
- NASA SEH §6.4 Technical Risk Management
- SME: mission operations and ground segment chapters
Artefacts:
- Verification matrix for every requirement (method, level, phase)
- Model philosophy and environmental test flow
- FMECA on the most critical subsystem
- Risk register (top 10, with 5×5 scoring and mitigations)
- Operations concept: ground stations, contact plan, anomaly response
Phase 6 — Capstone: self-run PDR (weeks 33–36)
- NASA SEH §6.7 Technical Assessment; Appendix G (review entrance and success criteria)
- Assemble a PDR data package from Phases 1–5
- Assess it against the PDR success criteria. Ideally, get an external reviewer (a Mars Society or local space-industry contact, or an online forum)
Artefacts:
- PDR package: ConOps, requirements, architecture, budgets, subsystem designs, verification plan, risk register
- Review findings (RIDs) and a closure plan
Progress log
| Phase | Started | Completed | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Orientation | |||
| 1 Front-end SE | |||
| 2 Environment & astrodynamics | |||
| 3 Architecture & budgets | |||
| 4 Subsystems | |||
| 5 V&V, reliability, ops | |||
| 6 Capstone PDR |