Explorations with q-series
49 views Mar 19, 2023
The Gaussian q-binomial coefficients have another interpretation in terms of Young diagrams contained in a rectangle, and inversion numbers of associated paths. We give an introduction to this interesting and important chapter of combinatorics, and then connect this interpretation of Gaussian q-binomial coefficients with the one discussed in the previous video, relating to counting subspaces of a vector space over a finite field F_q of size q. It turns out that the key to connecting these two seemingly quite different interpretations is the row-echelon forms for subspaces.
[
Wild Egg Maths](https://www.youtube.com/@WildEggmathematicscourses)
0:00
hello everyone I'm Norman walburger thanks for joining me on this exploration of Q Series my last video I
0:07
talked about gaussian Cube binomial coefficients and the connection with counting subspaces in a vector space
0:14
over a finite field today I want to discuss a quite different interpretation of these
0:21
interesting objects in the direction of combinatorics associated to Young diagrams and paths
0:30
and Associated areas to such paths and we're also going to be touching on a
0:36
notion of inversion which plays a role a big role in the theory of the symmetric group
0:42
okay so let's start by defining a partition of a natural number n to be a
0:47
list of strictly positive natural numbers in decreasing order which sum to
0:54
n so for example if n is equal to 15 we could write 15 as 5 plus 5 plus 3 plus 2
1:00
then these numbers five five three two in that order so decreasing or at least
1:06
weekly decreasing in the sense that they could be the same is a partition of 15.
1:13
okay now associate to such a partition there's actually a physical uh thing
1:19
that we can create called a young diagram and it has rows of lengths the numbers
1:25
involved reading from left to right and putting those rows from top to bottom
1:31
and the rows are left Justified so corresponding to 5532 we have this young
1:37
diagram five and this first row five in the second row three in the next row and
1:42
two in the fourth row now we say that this young diagram has
1:48
shape five five three two and its total size is well the total number of squares
1:54
that it has which is the number n that we're talking about in 15. now occasionally there's a variant of
2:00
this that's used called the fairer's diagram that's usually the case when instead of using squares like this we
2:07
have little dots okay in terms of
2:12
the convention for a notation the squares in the young diagram are read
2:18
using standard Matrix conventions where we read the row number first and then
2:24
the column number second so the that we're reading from top to bottom as far as rows are concerned we're reading from
2:30
left to right as far as columns are concerned so in this example here this particular entry here would be the one
2:36
three entry because it's in the row number one and then column number three this thing here isn't the two one entry
2:41
because it's in row two and column one I probably should also say that there is
2:48
actually another convention around for young diagrams this is sometimes called the English convention okay and there's
2:55
also a French convention where we sort of Stack the the rows from the bottom to
3:00
the top so just to alert you to there's a bit of a Divergence in the literature
3:06
okay another interesting concept Associated to a young diagram is
3:12
the hook length of a square okay that's the sum of the number of squares to the right below and also the square itself
3:20
so for example in this diagram here this square right here okay has one to the
3:27
left and including itself that's two this five here is five because it's
3:32
Counting this Square this Square this Square this square and the square so there's a hook okay this one's six
3:39
because there's one two three four five six so these are the various hook lengths of the squares in this young
3:47
diagram those numbers turn out to be important in in representation Theory certain
3:53
counting problems associated to what are called tableau so a young Tableau is a filling of the
4:01
squares of a young diagram with strictly positive natural numbers now we're not actually going to be using Tableau here
4:07
in this lecture but I just want to alert you to the notation because it is an
4:13
important sort of Allied concept to that of a young diagram usually one introduces young diagrams in order to
4:19
talk about young Tableau so I just want to briefly mention this I will talk more about these things at some other point
4:25
probably in the context of representations of either the symmetric group or the general linear group or
4:34
representations more generally so actually this would be a young Tableau because we filled up the squares with
4:41
natural numbers but there's some special kinds of young Tableau that are particularly interesting the stat a
4:48
standard young Tableau is a situation where we put in the numbers from 1 to n
4:53
if there are altogether n boxes or n squares okay and and E so each number is
4:59
occurring exactly once and furthermore the numbers are strictly increasing along both rows and columns so if you go
5:06
down a row the numbers are increasing if we go across a column the numbers are increasing so listen here is an example
5:13
this uh this young diagram has size 15 and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
5:24
that's a young Tableau for that young diagram and these turn out to be very important
5:30
in the representation theory of the symmetric group s n
5:36
there's another kind of young Tableau that are very important
5:41
they're going to call the semi-standard young Tableau in this case we're filling the uh the squares also with with
5:48
natural numbers say natural numbers from 1 to to R Maybe here's R of five and the
5:57
the young diagram should have no more than R rows so no more than five
6:04
rows and the rule is that the number should be increasing down the column so
6:10
strictly increasing okay strictly increasing down the columns but weekly increasing along the rows
6:19
that means they can stay the same for a little while before they start increasing so one one two three four
6:24
that's a weekly increasing sequence as is two two three five five three four
6:29
four etcetera but down the columns they are strictly increasing and these kinds
6:35
of young Tableau are important in the representation theory of the general linear group or the special linear group
6:44
now I just have to very quickly mention there's a another kind of Tableau called
6:49
quasi-standard Tableau which were introduced by DDA Arnel Nadia Bell
6:55
Baraka and myself some years ago and uh I'm not going to tell you what these
7:00
things are but at this point but I will tell you about them some other time they're very important variants that
7:05
play a crucial role in understanding certain aspects of representation theory of Lee algebras
7:12
okay so today I want to focus on young diagrams which appear in a rectangle
7:20
okay so we're going to fix a rectangle of size say k by n and our convention is
7:26
that that means that we have K rows and N columns so this is k equals three and
7:32
n equals four again it's a rectangle and we're just going to look at the Young diagrams which fit into this rectangle
7:40
which fit inside it so here in blue one two three four five
7:45
six seventy seven squares in blue that's a young diagram that's sitting inside
7:53
the rectangle it's sitting kind of in a Justified way so that it's bumping up
7:58
against the left side of the rectangle and bumping up against the top of the rectangle so it's sort of in the top
8:04
left corner if you like okay the shape of this diagram is three three one
8:14
now Associated to such a young diagram
8:19
inside the rectangle there's a path a path from the bottom
8:25
left corner to the top right corner in this case this path in red okay and what
8:33
is this path right well it's just the border between the squares which are
8:39
involved in the young diagram and the complement in other words those squares which are not contained in
8:47
the young diagram okay so here we have this this path this border path which
8:53
separates the rectangle into two pieces one of which is the young diagram that
8:59
we're considering now such a path will consist of K plus n
9:04
segments because there's K rows and N columns so to go from here to here we're
9:12
going to have to go up the K row so we're going to go across the N column so
9:17
all together there are K plus n segments in this case one two three four five six
9:24
seven and so it's natural for us to label these little segments okay by the
9:32
numbers one through seven just in order so this is segment one segment two segment three segment four segment five
9:40
segment six and segment seven okay and each of these segments is of
9:45
one of two kinds it's either a right segment namely it's going horizontally to the right or it's an up
9:52
segment going vertically up so for example in this example here here's just the path itself one three four and seven
10:01
are the right edges or right segments and the up edges or up segments are
10:07
numbers two five and six
10:13
okay so now if we think about it for a second we see that such a path is actually uniquely determined by either
10:19
one of these sets so in particular by the set of right edges if you know what
10:24
the right edges are then you know what the up edges are because they're the other ones okay and uh these these
10:33
numbers are telling you when you should go right so if it have the set one three four seven it means that we're going to
10:38
go right on the first segment and also right on the third and
10:44
the fourth and the seventh so it means on the other ones we're going to be going up so it's quite clear what the
10:49
path is if we know the set of right edges and this set of right edges can be
10:55
in principle any any subset of of the seven possible segments that has four
11:02
elements because to go from here to here we are going to have to go right four times
11:08
okay so of the seven steps that we're taking four of them have to be right steps
11:13
and so there are seven choose four which is seven times six times five or
11:19
three times two times one that's uh 35 such sets and therefore that's the same as
11:27
the number of such paths that we're considering and therefore also the same as the number of young diagrams that fit
11:33
inside this K by n rectangle so we have a
11:40
a couple of different ways now of seeing the usual binomial coefficients okay
11:46
like seven choose four here as counting objects which are reasonably familiar
11:52
okay you're used to thinking of seven choose four as counting the number of subsets of four things from seven things
11:59
that's that's very familiar but maybe a little bit less familiar is to think of
12:04
this number is also counting the number of paths from this lower left to the upper right corner of this rectangle
12:12
this three by four rectangle and correspondingly it also is really counting the number of young diagrams
12:18
which are above and then sort of to the left of this path that we're choosing so
12:24
all these quantities are being counted by the same binomial coefficients
12:30
something else that we can associate to such a path okay which is also important
12:36
which is a permutation of n in the example seven so this is obtained by
12:42
listing in order all the right edges followed by all the up edges so in the
12:48
example the right edges were 1 3 4 7 the up edges were two five six okay there
12:55
they are one three four seven on the right edges two five and six are the up
13:00
edges so we can make a permutation by listing the right edges first and then
13:06
the up edges after that we get one three four seven two five six
13:15
now this kind of permutation okay of course
13:24
there are seven factorial permutations that's a lot more than 35 but the the
13:29
permutations that we're obtaining this way have a particular property namely that there's only one inversion
13:37
um uh spot in them there's only maybe inversion is not
13:44
actually the right word here um there's only one decrease probably that would be a better word so um forget about this
13:50
inversion here I should have said there's really only one decrease so we're going up one three four seven
13:57
we're going up and then we're going down to two five and then going up five to six because the edges that are right are
14:04
listed in order increasing order and the up edges are also listed in increasing
14:10
order so the only possibility when we're actually going down like seven is bigger
14:15
than two we're going down from seven to two is right at this step the the place where the the right edges are separated
14:22
from the down edges okay so uh maybe okay the
14:28
permutations obtained this way have inversion set I'm not again I'm not sure if I should be using inversions that probably I should be using descent set
14:34
instead so I think about this as descent set instead contained in in four so only
14:39
at this point here are we allowed to go down
14:45
actually when we're not uh absolutely required to go down because if we had the sequence one two three four five six
14:51
seven that would also be a legitimate sequence that would not have a descent at that point but if we are going to
14:57
have a descent in this um in this permutation it has to appear right at this point from the fourth at
15:03
the fourth element down okay so we now have another kind of
15:10
combinatorial object that essentially being counted by these classical binomial coefficients now this uh this
15:19
permutation uh supports a notion of inversion number okay it's a more proper
15:25
use of the word inversion so let me Define that the inversion number of a permutation okay what is that it's the
15:33
minimal number of swaps required to get it into the sort of standard increasing form one two three up to n
15:41
and more precisely perhaps inversions of Pi it's the number in this set the set
15:48
of this should be a bracket here the set of i j where I is less than J and these
15:54
numbers are between 1 and n including one and then so I should be less than J and Pi of I
16:01
where Pi is the permutation Pi by is bigger than Pi of J okay so for example in this example here
16:09
the uh the inversions in in this permutation one three four seven two
16:15
five six we look for two numbers in this range say like two three where two is less
16:24
than three okay which are inverted in the permutation so in the permutation if
16:29
you look for two and three three comes before two all right so two three is a kind of inversion pair for this
16:36
permutation and other inversion pairs involve four two and four that's an
16:42
inversion pair a two and seven they've been reversed five and seven and six and
16:49
seven okay but for example one five is not an inversion pair because one and five are appearing in the same order as
16:56
their natural increasing order three seven is not an inversion pair etcetera so there are five inversion pairs in
17:04
this um in this permutation okay and so this
17:09
number inversion in inv of Pi is five in this case
17:16
okay so let me look at some examples using the three by four rectangle to
17:23
illustrate these various ways of thinking about uh these young diagrams and you know
17:31
possibilities for them just contained in this three by four rectangle here okay so here is actually
17:38
the one that we started with so it's this path here with right edges one
17:45
three four and seven okay here's the corresponding permutation one three four
17:50
seven and then two five six and in versions of this this Lambda Lambda is
17:57
the is the young diagram up here three three one okay uh the inversion number for that is five
18:04
here's a very particularly simple one where the path just goes right for four
18:11
steps and then up for three steps in this case the the set the subset is just the set one
18:18
two three four the initial four right steps and the actual corresponding permutation for it is just the simplest
18:25
one sort of the identity permutation one two three four five six seven and the inversion number of that is obviously
18:31
zero and the corresponding young diagram has shape four four here it is
18:38
surprising the entire rectangle here's another example where we're going up and then we're going right right up right
18:45
right up okay so the young diagram here shape four two
18:52
the subset that's corresponding to the right
18:57
edges segment two segment three segment five and segment six and then the
19:03
corresponding permutation two three five six the right edges and then one four
19:09
seven the up edges and how many inversions are there there's four plus two why is that well
19:16
see this one here if we wanted to get it you know back to where it started we'd have to pass it across the six the five
19:24
the three and the two so there's four inversions involved with
19:29
this one the number of inversions involved with four well there's two of them because we have to move it past the
19:35
six and the five okay and the Seven there's no inversions Associated to that so if there's four plus two and note
19:43
that four plus two is also the number of um squares that are appearing below here
19:51
in fact if we go back to this thing here we see that something similar is happening here that if we look at the
19:56
inversions the inversions actually can be counted in the following way so these guys here are increasing order
20:03
if we want to put the two five and six in sort of standard increasing order we have to move the two down we have to
20:09
move the two down three steps past the seven past the four past the three so there are three inversions sort of
20:16
coming from the number two that sort of corresponds to this row here and then
20:21
five well five has to be moved past seven so there's one move one version Associated to five and
20:28
six also has to be moved past the seven so another inversion for that so that sort of corresponds to
20:34
those two things let's have a look at this other sort of extreme case where we're going up first and then right so now the right Edge set
20:42
is four five six seven the permutation is four five six seven followed by one
20:47
two three and now the inversions are
20:52
what well the one has to be moved across all four of them in order to get in position then the two has to be moved
20:59
also across all four of these and the three has to be moved also across all four of these so we get four plus four
21:05
plus four which is twelve and that's the same as this uh
21:11
this sort of set of squares which are to the right and and below are path
21:18
and in this case here we're going up and then right right right right and then up
21:23
up so the the set is two three four five okay that's the the subset of four
21:30
things from Seven that uh that determines that this this path the
21:37
corresponding permutation is two three four five one six seven and the inversions well we
21:44
have to move the one over that takes four steps and that's all that's required corresponding to that four
21:50
there in this case here the um the Young diagram has shape four four in this
21:56
diagram here the young diagram is is sort of invisible as shape zero okay
22:02
so these are just some of the uh I guess 35 all together that you could tabulate
22:09
and it's useful to spend some time just tabulating more of these things so you get a sense of the the strong
22:17
correlation between these different objects which are all being counted by
22:23
the standard binomial coefficient in this case seven choose four okay so we
22:28
could be talking about young diagrams we could be talking about paths we could be talking about subsets
22:35
we could be talking about permutations that have a particular descent position
22:45
okay and now a sort of an interesting observation that I've already alluded to
22:50
that the inversion number of a path is the area in unit squares under the path
22:56
of the number okay now this inversion number of four here is really counting the number of
23:03
squares underneath it here similarly this 6 is counting the number
23:09
of squares here and to give you an idea for that so suppose we took this one here okay
23:14
listening here and let's just look at this particular uh part of it we're right from here to here we're going up
23:22
and then right suppose we change that okay so we suppose we change that so that up uh is uh is that is that four
23:30
there and that right is is at five so both we change that so to go you know
23:36
across here and up there well in that case this this thing would look like two
23:43
three four
23:49
um six so there'd be a two three four six here and and uh a one five seven so
23:56
basically the four and the five would have changed places okay so
24:02
um what that's going to do is going to through add another inversion in into
24:08
the into the mix okay because uh well actually in this case we're
24:14
going to reduce the inversion because if we replace the if we interchange the four and the five then currently they're
24:20
responsible for an inversion because 5 is bigger than four but if we interchange them then that in that
24:25
inversion is is lost so we have one less and that corresponds exactly to this
24:30
little square here that we are sort of evaporating if we change this little
24:36
path to this one here okay so it's some kind of idea of why this works but it's definitely a good
24:42
exercise to convince yourself of this and a good way to do that is just to
24:47
work through a lot of these things here and sort of do a lot of counting and sort of see how it goes and by the time
24:52
you've done close to 35 you will probably have a very good idea of why this works okay so now we can get to this new
25:02
interpretation of the gaussian Q binomial coefficients okay
25:08
so um we've seen that the classical binomial coefficients say m choose R
25:14
corresponds to the number of subsets of size R from a set of size m
25:20
and in terms of these rectangles it's the number of paths
25:25
shape right and up in a rectangle of size M minus r cross R so our example
25:33
was seven um choose four so that corresponds to a 3 times 4 rectangle
25:41
so we could Define say p m r to be the
25:46
set of such paths like right up pass in the rectangle of
25:52
size M minus r cross R so we can think about a combinatorial object which is
25:57
the set of all such paths okay well then
26:04
what M choose R is okay one way of saying what it is is
26:09
we're counting the number of such things and you know from our point
26:15
of view it's sort of like a in in sort of uh box arithmetic language
26:21
if you allow me to just momentarily do this basically what we're doing is we're replacing each of these paths with zero
26:27
thinking of having an M set this is a set but we can think of as an amp set and we're just replacing each element by
26:34
zero and once you've done that then basically you've counted the number of of such paths so for example when we
26:42
have um m equals four at R equals two then we're talking about a two by two square
26:48
and here are the six possible paths from the lower left to the upper right
26:55
this one here this one here this one here this one here this one here and
27:00
this one here here are the associated um
27:05
subsets okay corresponding to the right edges here the right edges are numbers three and four here they are two and
27:12
four here they are two and three here they are one and four here they are one and three and here they are one and two
27:19
okay and when we also record the corresponding
27:27
permutations okay that's the permutation you get by listing the right edges first
27:33
three four and then the up Edge is one two and here two four and then one three and then here two three and one four
27:39
here one four and two three here one three and two four here one two followed by three four okay so this set the four
27:47
choose two what that is counting is just counting the number of elements in this set just replacing each of them by zero
27:54
in a box arithmetic point of view I've been following the math foundations series on unboxed arithmetic but in any
28:02
case that's sort of obvious what we're doing we're just counting these things okay now
28:10
the proposition now is that these gaussian binomial coefficients are also
28:18
counting these these objects in in this set but
28:24
counting in a somewhat more sophisticated way what we're doing is we're looking at the inversions
28:32
of of uh of these paths so let me explain
28:37
that so the we have this inversion operator okay it takes a path and
28:43
assigns a number to it so we could if we're sort of happy with working with multi-sets think about applying
28:51
something like inversion to the entire set so this is a multi-set of paths or
28:58
permutations if you like and we can apply the inversion function to this
29:04
this set or this mset by applying it to each individual element
29:11
okay so what are you we're going to get well we have to count the number of
29:16
inversions of each of these things so let's just count how many inversions does this thing have well one way of
29:23
seeing that is just to count the number of squares to the right and under this thing so this one has four this thing
29:29
here has an inversion number of three this one two this one two this one one
29:37
and this one zero okay so the inversion number of this permutation is four this
29:43
one is three two two one zero so what we get when we apply the inversion to this
29:50
set is we get this m set 4 3 2 2 1 0
29:56
we're just recording the numbers which correspond to the inversions of each of the individual elements of this
30:02
set now from a box arithmetic point of view and I do
30:08
hope that you're watching those box arithmetic videos this is
30:15
an M set okay which is an mset of natural numbers and so it corresponds to
30:22
a polynomial or poly number and if you haven't watched those what
30:27
we're just doing here is we're just interpreting each of these numbers here as a power of alpha so there's an alpha
30:34
to the four represented by this thing an alpha cubed an alpha squared an alpha squared an alpha and an alpha to the
30:40
zero or one so we add them all up we get 1 plus Alpha plus two alpha squared plus Alpha cubed plus Alpha to the fourth
30:48
so we can do something a little bit more sophisticated if we do the simplest
30:55
thing we're just counting the number in in this set of paths a little bit more sophisticated is we count or compute the
31:04
inversion numbers of each of them all right now if we take this polynomial
31:10
and we uh evaluated at one we're going to get one
31:15
plus one plus two plus one plus one we're going to get six that's basically reverting to the counting
31:20
if we evaluate a q which just means replacing the alpha with Q then we get what we usually call the gaussian Q
31:28
binomial coefficient 4 choose two Q which is the polynomial 1 plus Q Plus 2q
31:36
squared plus Q cubed plus Q to the fourth
31:41
Okay so this is a way of thinking about what the
31:47
the step from ordinary binomial coefficients to gaussian binomial coefficients involves instead of just
31:54
sort of counting the number of possible paths okay we're counting the we're
32:01
calculating the inversion numbers of each of these paths or if you prefer geometrically we're counting areas that
32:08
are obtained by all these paths okay we're looking at how much what's the area of this path what's the area
32:13
this path what's the area of this path and recording those various areas in this polynomial or polynomial
32:22
so now we have two quite different interpretations of these gaussian Q binomial coefficients
32:29
on the one hand M choose r q counts the number of r-dimensional subspaces of an
32:36
M dimensional Vector space over the finite field fq and on the other hand
32:41
it's a generating function for inversions or perhaps areas of paths in
32:47
an M minus r times r rectangle
32:53
so our natural question is can we somehow connect these two things directly so in come to Torx when we have
33:00
two sets that are sort of maybe the same size or counted by the same number
33:07
it's natural to try to ask whether we can establish a natural bijection between the the sets that sort of
33:13
explains you know why these two things are going to be counted by the same numbers
33:19
so I think this is not well understood and so I'm going to give you my take on
33:26
on what the connection is so I do believe that there's a connection and the key is to consider these row Echelon
33:32
forms as intermediaries between these two things okay so let me remind you
33:37
that uh let's say in the the case when we have four dimensions and we're looking
33:44
at two dimensional subspaces that um we have row Echelon forms okay
33:50
um so let's just look at this thing here okay so we may remember that if we have
33:58
um four-dimensional space okay over some finite field and we saw that two-dimensional subspaces of that could
34:05
be put into row Echelon form so again using gaussian elimination and that
34:10
these raw Echelon forms had these six different types or shapes okay and each
34:16
one of these shapes sort of corresponds to a power of Q because if we look at rho Echelon matrices of this kind
34:24
there's sort of a four-dimensional family of them because these Stars can be substituted with any one of the Q
34:31
numbers in the field so there's Q to the fourth different possibilities for a row
34:36
Echelon form of this kind well over here there's Q cubed possibilities for row
34:42
Echelon form of this kind and so on okay so what I want to do is I want to
34:48
connect this subspaces of four-dimensional space with this story
34:54
of paths in a two by two rectangle and what we're going to do is we're simply going to
34:59
um let me perhaps explain just about here so we're going to remove these leading columns the leading columns are
35:06
the columns in this raw Echelon form that pass through the leading entries of
35:12
the rows namely the ones that start the rows okay and um
35:17
so when we're going to chop off those columns wherever they are and then we're going to separate the remaining entries
35:24
into the zeros and the stars and we're going to see that we're going to get paths so let's see how that works in
35:31
this example here so here if we chopped off these two columns here then we would
35:36
just get this two by two Matrix of All Stars okay
35:42
maybe it's not so clear let's go to this next one momentarily so here we remove this First Column and this third column
35:48
we get this remainder star star zero star now if we want to separate the
35:54
stars from the zeros okay then this path now going from the top
36:00
uh left to the bottom right in red here okay that's separating the stars from
36:05
the zero over here there weren't any zeros so we could put that um that
36:10
corresponding path like this over here after we've removed these two columns we get star star 0 0 for the Matrix and
36:18
then the path that separates the zeros from the stars of this one over here we remove these two internal columns we get
36:24
zero star and zero star and here's the corresponding separating path for this one we remove these two columns
36:31
we have zero star zero zero they're separating path is this one and here uh
36:37
we remove these ones here we just get a Matrix of zeros and the the path is this one here
36:43
so in each case what we've done we've obtained a path in a two by two Matrix
36:51
that separates one side from the other end the path goes from the top left to the bottom
36:57
right and this way we associate paths to subspaces
37:04
with areas to the right corresponding to powers of Q so see the the power of q that um that we
37:13
were that we're getting is essentially counting uh the the area to one on one
37:18
side of of these paths okay so we could go from this picture to the other one if
37:24
we sort of rotated everything by a quarter turn okay if we rotated
37:29
everything by a quarter turn then we would end up with a path from the uh bottom left to the top right and then
37:37
these uh these star areas here would just be the um the stuff below or to the right of
37:43
the past that we've already been considering so the fact that um the the areas of those past or these
37:51
inversion numbers are exactly corresponding to in the sub base case the degrees of freedom of the
37:58
possibilities of our plugging in values of Q okay so uh
38:05
in sort of an exact correspondence why these two things are going to be the
38:11
same so uh that's a pretty interesting kind of
38:17
enlargement of the world from ordinary binomial coefficients to these Q binomial coefficients and and it's it's
38:24
quite a natural and pleasant kind of enlargement