Open in TheBrain

Classical to Quantum

Classical to Quantum | Special Relativity and green complex numbers | Wild Egg Maths

Unlisted

Wild Egg Maths

6.27K subscribers

Join

Subscribed

720

5

Share

62 views Oct 1, 2023

Chromogeometry is a relatively recent discovery of mine which holds that there is a remarkable three fold symmetry in planar metrical geometries, between the usual blue Euclidean geometry, and two relativistic ones, called red, and green. Correspondingly there is a triple of complex number systems, the blue, red and green complex numbers.

While the latter two are not fields, they nevertheless share important properties with the more familiar everyday complex numbers all undergraduates learn about. The red and green complex numbers are particularly important for physics, as they underlie the geometry of Einstein's special relativity (SR).

In this video we are particularly interested in the linear algebra of transitions between the red and green geometries, corresponding to covariant and contravariant concepts in physics.

In many ways the blue and red geometries are parallel, and in other ways the red and green are parallel. However the green geometry, and associated algebra, is in some ways simpler than the other two. This provides us actually a powerful tool to study even Euclidean geometries.

In this video we introduce the green complex numbers, closely related to what physicists sometimes call null coordinates in SR.

A special thanks to Patreon supporters and Members of the Wild Egg maths channel.

0:00

hello everyone thanks for joining me on

0:02

this adventure towards quantum mechanics

0:05

we're looking at special relativity and

0:08

we've been thinking about blue complex

0:10

numbers and red complex numbers

0:12

I've told you those are intimately

0:14

connected now there's another version of

0:17

the red or relativistic Story coming

0:19

from Chromo geometry there's actually a

0:21

three full symmetry so there's a third

0:23

kind of geometry the green geometry and

0:26

an Associated Third Kind of complex

0:28

number the green complex numbers and

0:31

that's what we're going to talk about

0:32

today and the relationship between the

0:35

red and the green plays a key role so

0:38

there's a kind of a transformation to go

0:40

from red coordinates to Green

0:42

coordinates that's That's essential it's

0:45

really at the heart of what's happening

0:47

with special relativity on the

0:49

mathematical side

0:51

okay

0:52

the role in physics is that it's

0:55

connected with what physicists call null

0:57

coordinates in special relativity

1:00

okay so we're going to start just with a

1:03

pair of numbers t x so that's what a

1:06

green complex number is going to be for

1:08

us today and that stands for T times 1

1:11

plus x times K or just t plus x k for

1:15

short and we're going to think about

1:17

this as representing this two by two

1:19

matrix it's a diagonal matrix now with

1:22

entries T minus X here and t plus X here

1:26

C sub G will refer to this realm of

1:29

green complex numbers so this is another

1:31

sub algebra of the two by two matrices

1:35

and now we have three different

1:37

sub-algemas and pleasantly they're sort

1:39

of associated in a nice way with these

1:41

four basis vectors of the two by two

1:44

matrices the identity Matrix there this

1:46

Matrix which we could call i 0 1 minus

1:49

one zero this one J zero one one zero

1:52

and this one K now minus one zero zero

1:55

one so that's exactly what we need to

1:57

make this thing here expressible as

2:00

T times one plus x times k

2:04

now in other places I might use a

2:06

slightly different notation for example

2:08

you could also think of K as being one

2:10

minus one this will be convenient for us

2:12

with the applications to physics that we

2:15

have in mind

2:16

now algebraically K squared is the same

2:19

as J squared equals one so this sub

2:22

algebra is really isomorphic to the red

2:25

complex numbers span by one and J so we

2:28

have these three complex numbers the

2:29

span of these two and then the span of

2:31

these two and then the span of these two

2:33

okay and so that's a you know

2:37

so they're very natural almost canonical

2:40

structure that's sitting inside our two

2:42

by two Matrix world so we can adopt the

2:46

algebraic structure of the two by two

2:47

matrices and just restrict them to this

2:51

sub algebra of green complex numbers we

2:55

get that the sum is just the obvious

2:57

thing t x plus Ry is t plus r x plus y

3:00

the scalar multiplication is as expected

3:03

and the multiplication is exactly as it

3:06

is in the red story so TX times r y

3:09

equals t r plus x y

3:12

comma t y plus RX

3:16

and then just in parallel to what

3:19

happens in the red story

3:21

or in fact the blue story The Complex

3:23

conjugate of TX is defined to be T minus

3:26

X and then when we multiply complex

3:28

number say Z by Z Star TX times T minus

3:32

X then we get t squared minus x squared

3:35

times 1 which we'll just write as t

3:36

squared minus x squared and that's the

3:38

quadrants of Zed and then the quadrant

3:42

satisfies the usual fundamental property

3:45

that we know and love quadrants of z w

3:47

equals quadrants of Z times quadrants of

3:49

w and it allows us to define the notion

3:52

of inverse Z inverse equals one over the

3:54

quadrant of Z times Z Star provided that

3:56

the quadrants of Z is not equal to zero

4:01

and

4:03

geometrically well here is the familiar

4:08

looking story but now with basis vectors

4:11

1 and K

4:13

okay so

4:15

um

4:16

in terms of this basis Vector the

4:19

quadrants is t squared minus x squared

4:21

so then we have quadrants of Z equals

4:22

zero and the quadrants of Z equals one

4:24

this hyperbola with two branches as

4:27

before

4:29

but you know so it looks like it's

4:32

exactly the same as complex numbers in

4:35

the red story but it's it's not

4:37

crucially so

4:39

um

4:40

there's something different about this

4:42

green geometry which actually in some

4:45

ways makes it even easier to compute

4:47

with than the red one even though

4:49

algebraically they're pretty well sort

4:51

of isomorphic but nevertheless this

4:54

three-fold symmetry then becomes a a

4:57

large kind of motivating understanding

5:01

and in fact somewhere else I'll have to

5:03

talk about my student Kevin lamonta's a

5:07

remarkable work on super Catalan numbers

5:09

and integral formulas integrating over

5:14

over spheres in in in quite a general

5:17

fashion

5:19

um over over finite Fields as well which

5:22

really exploits this Chromo geometry

5:25

story of we have a blue geometry we have

5:28

a red geometry we have a green geometry

5:30

we can go from the blue to the red just

5:32

by a change of sign and we can go from

5:34

the red to the green by this

5:36

transformation that we're going to talk

5:38

about now and how probably the the green

5:41

story is in some ways simpler

5:43

arithmetically than the other two okay

5:46

so let's talk about change of basis for

5:49

green complex numbers there is an

5:51

alternate basis which appears very

5:53

naturally in this particular context

5:55

which simplifies the arithmetic

5:58

dramatically so here's the identity

6:00

Matrix one here is the K Matrix minus

6:04

one zero zero one and together they span

6:07

the diagonal matrices but the diagonal

6:10

matrices also have another very natural

6:12

basis just the matrices with a single

6:16

one in either the top left quarter or

6:20

the bottom right corner let's call them

6:22

N1 and N2 so this is an alternate basis

6:26

for this sub algebra that means we can

6:29

look at how the arithmetical operations

6:31

look like in this basis as well as in

6:35

this basis so the relationship between

6:37

the two is pretty simple to see the

6:40

identity Matrix is just the sum of N1

6:42

plus N2 while K is minus N1 plus N2 and

6:46

conversely if we wanted to express these

6:48

ones in terms of those ones well then N1

6:51

is this one minus this one over two well

6:55

N2 is this one plus this one over two

6:59

so we have these sort of two different

7:01

kind of Transformations they're inverses

7:03

to each other so this one here we can

7:05

express it in this sort of interesting

7:08

Matrix form but the elements of this

7:11

Vector here are not numbers they are

7:13

themselves vectors okay so this is a

7:16

vector whose components are the vector

7:19

is one

7:20

and K and here's another Vector whose

7:24

components are the vectors N1 and N2

7:27

and this statement here is just saying

7:29

that this column Vector 1K is

7:33

obtained by multiplying by The Matrix

7:35

one one minus 1 1 on the left of N1 and

7:39

  1. so we get N1 plus N2 for 1 and minus

7:43

N1 plus N2 for K and then inverting

7:48

we just bring this to the other side and

7:50

invert it the inverse of this is this

7:53

Matrix here the determinant is one minus

7:55

minus one or two so there's a one-half

7:57

and then you need to change those and

8:00

multiply these diagonal Elements by

8:02

minus one getting one minus one one one

8:05

so then N1 M2 equals one half one minus

8:08

one one times one k this is a matrix way

8:11

of writing those things

8:13

okay so we have these two bases now and

8:17

that means that correspondingly we have

8:19

actually two ways of thinking or looking

8:21

at the story here so here's the story

8:24

that we started with with basis elements

8:26

one and K in the usual sort of

8:29

horizontal vertical and horizontal

8:31

positions and in that story N1 and N2

8:35

are over here so N1 is the um one minus

8:40

K over two so it's halfway between 1 and

8:43

minus K and N2 is 1 plus K over 2 so

8:46

it's halfway between 1 and K

8:49

but we can take this picture and just

8:51

rotate it and just rotate it

8:55

um

8:55

a an eighth of a turn okay so then these

9:00

black axes go to here so we get one here

9:03

and K here and then N1 is here and N2 is

9:07

here we might call these axes say Z1 and

9:10

Z2 just to give them some names okay as

9:12

opposed to the T and X axes

9:16

so from this point of view we're

9:17

thinking of N1 and N2 as sort of the

9:20

fundamental basis vectors and expressing

9:23

everything in terms of linear

9:25

combinations of N1 and N2 where over

9:27

here we think about 1 and K as being the

9:30

the basis and we're expressing

9:31

everything in terms of multiples of 1

9:33

and K so we have this transformation

9:37

the advantage of this thing here is that

9:39

the multiplication is much simpler in

9:43

in these coordinates than it is in these

9:46

coordinates so I want to go rather

9:47

carefully through the change of

9:49

coordinates here because it's a little

9:51

bit subtle we're touching base with what

9:53

physicists refer to as covariant and

9:56

contravariant vectors or tensors

9:59

this is a very simple example but

10:01

there's sort of like two different ways

10:03

that we can think about a transform you

10:06

think about transforming the basis

10:08

vectors themselves or we can think about

10:11

transforming the coordinates

10:13

that are required to express an

10:15

arbitrary Vector in terms of those basis

10:17

vectors it's kind of a complementary

10:19

aspect or almost like a duality between

10:22

these two different ways of looking at

10:24

things and this particular change of

10:27

coordinate is right at the heart of

10:30

special relativity as I'm going to

10:31

explain to you

10:33

reasonably shortly okay so we really

10:36

want to understand exactly the

10:38

arithmetic involved here even though

10:40

it's very very Elementary

10:43

okay so we started with a green complex

10:45

number Z say TX and I remind you that

10:48

was T times 1 plus x times K we saw that

10:51

we could rewrite things because one is n

10:54

1 plus N2 and K is minus N1 plus N2 so

10:57

we can rewrite this thing as

10:59

T minus x times N1 plus t plus x times

11:03

N2

11:05

so that's a linear combination of N1 and

11:07

N2 say alpha 1 N1 plus Alpha 2 and 2.

11:13

so these are the new coordinates Alpha

11:15

One Alpha two are the new coordinates

11:17

with respect to the basis N1 N2 and I

11:20

should point out that you know this

11:21

thing here this this thing that we're

11:23

talking about as a matrix okay it's a

11:25

diagonal matrix whose entries are just

11:28

alpha 1 on the top and Alpha 2 on the

11:32

bottom

11:33

okay that's all

11:36

this is telling us how to go from the

11:40

coordinates in the 1K basis to the

11:43

coordinates in the N1 and two bases so

11:46

to summarize what we've just done the

11:48

Alpha One Alpha 2

11:51

are obtained from the TX by multiplying

11:54

by this same Matrix that we've seen

11:56

before but now

11:57

on the right

11:59

so TX times 1 1 minus 1 1. so T minus X

12:03

that's giving us the Alpha One and t

12:06

plus X is giving us the alpha 2.

12:08

and if we want to invert that whether we

12:11

multiply by the inverse of this Matrix

12:12

which we've already seen before but we

12:14

multiply it on the right so we get TX

12:17

equals Alpha One Alpha two times here is

12:19

that inverse Matrix one half one minus

12:21

one one

12:24

foreign

12:25

so to give you an example here is the

12:28

story again now but now reoriented so

12:30

that our null basis vectors are in the

12:33

sort of central position so we have N1

12:36

in here and N2 here

12:38

there's one

12:39

there is K

12:41

so here is some

12:43

um

12:44

green complex number say N1 plus 2n2 so

12:49

in the N1 N2 coordinates it's one in

12:52

this direction and two over in this

12:55

direction so because we're using square

12:57

brackets here to distinguish the round

12:59

brackets here this would be the one

13:01

comma two

13:03

now if we wanted to rewrite it in terms

13:06

of 1 and K well geometrically that means

13:10

you have to re-express it you have to

13:11

tilt your head and you have to write

13:12

this Z now as a combination of this

13:14

basis vector and this basis Vector okay

13:16

so it turns out to be three halves of

13:19

one plus one half times K or three

13:24

halves comma one-half and how could we

13:27

get that okay well so this would this is

13:30

like the um the T okay and that's like

13:33

the X so there's T and X we're starting

13:35

off with one two and we multiply by this

13:38

thing here so one two

13:41

um one times one that's three and that's

13:43

divided by two so that's three halves

13:44

and one two uh minus one plus two that's

13:47

one divided by two so that's a half okay

13:49

so just going from here to Here by

13:51

multiplying by that Matrix on the right

13:55

and in terms of the quadrants okay the

13:59

quadrants well in

14:01

the 1K coordinates you take these

14:05

coefficients three halves and one half

14:06

you take three halves squared minus one

14:08

half squared which is um

14:11

uh two but another way of doing it is in

14:14

terms of the alpha coordinates the

14:17

quadrants is even simpler it's just the

14:19

product of alpha one times Alpha two

14:22

right because we're talking about the

14:23

determinant of this Matrix so it's just

14:25

Alpha One times Alpha two so in these

14:27

coordinates it's one times two

14:32

so please make sure that you understand

14:34

this example a very simple

14:37

perhaps you know one of the most simple

14:40

kinds of change of basis stories that we

14:43

can discuss just a two-dimensional

14:46

situation with very simple

14:47

transformation matrices but of crucial

14:51

importance for a special relativity

14:54

so let's look at this transform which is

14:56

operating at two different levels at the

14:59

level of changing basis vectors and also

15:02

changing coordinate

15:04

vectors really so the physicists refer

15:07

to this distinction as covariant and

15:10

contravariant so there's a green complex

15:13

number Z equals TX in the usual initial

15:16

coordinates involving 1 and K and here's

15:19

another way of expressing what that is

15:21

if we allow this sort of curious usage

15:25

of a basis Vector where the basis

15:29

vectors themselves are in a vector so in

15:31

my linear algebra course I do this

15:32

occasionally so you may have seen this

15:35

before it's an interesting kind of thing

15:38

to do but this is like a regular Matrix

15:42

multiplication TX 1K you get T times 1

15:46

plus x times K that's giving us that

15:48

combination

15:50

now the same

15:52

number complex number can also be

15:54

written in terms of the N1 and N2

15:56

coordinates say with coefficients or

15:59

coordinates Alpha One and Alpha 2. in

16:01

that case we write it with square

16:02

brackets just to distinguish it between

16:04

you know this one here okay

16:06

and what that is is taking this Vector

16:11

Alpha One Alpha two of numbers and

16:13

multiplying it by this column Vector

16:14

again of basis vectors it's just another

16:17

way of saying it so

16:20

the there's a relationship between this

16:24

column vector and this column Vector

16:25

okay given by some transformation and

16:28

there's also a corresponding

16:29

relationship between this coordinate

16:32

vector and this coordinate Vector given

16:33

by another transformation and these two

16:36

Transformations are are very closely

16:38

connected and we can sort of see that

16:40

here let's introduce say l to be this

16:43

two by two Matrix that we've seen before

16:45

1 1 minus one one and its inverse is one

16:48

half one minus one one

16:50

so what we've seen is that

16:53

if you take this Alpha One Alpha 2 and

16:56

you take the TX and you ask what's the

16:58

relation the answer is this one here is

17:00

obtained from this one here the TX by

17:03

multiplying on the right by L right

17:07

and

17:11

on the the basis Vector side this one k

17:14

okay is obtained from this one by

17:18

multiplying by L on the left

17:21

so there's corresponding inverse

17:23

statements perhaps I should write those

17:26

down just for completeness so the

17:28

inverse statements would be t x equals

17:32

Alpha One

17:33

Alpha 2 times

17:36

l

17:38

inverse

17:40

and inverting this one

17:43

N1 N2

17:45

equals inverting

17:49

we have to multiply by L inverse on the

17:52

on the other side so we put an L inverse

17:54

on this side

17:55

times 1 k

17:59

so the role of the L is involved in

18:02

going from coordinates

18:05

here to coordinates here but also from

18:09

basis vectors here to basis vectors

18:12

there

18:13

and if you do both of them at once you

18:15

see that they cancel out if you want to

18:17

go from here to here for example if you

18:19

want to replace if you take TX and you

18:21

multiply Inside by L then you're going

18:23

to get Alpha One Alpha 2. but to get

18:25

something that's the same as what you

18:27

started you need to multiply by L times

18:29

L inverse so if you put an L times L

18:31

inverse then the TX times L is this one

18:35

here

18:35

while the L inverse times 1K

18:39

over here is N1 N2

18:42

right so that's why this is equal to

18:45

this because you go from this one to

18:47

this one by sticking in l and an L

18:49

inverse in there and doing those two

18:52

Transformations together

18:55

Okay so we've touched base with this

18:58

third important geometry and algebra the

19:01

green complex numbers for which the

19:04

multiplication ultimately is a little

19:06

bit simpler because in this basis the

19:09

multiplication is just a point wise

19:11

multiplication right so so

19:14

arithmetically

19:16

this is a much simpler kind of Realm to

19:18

deal with so that's why physicists like

19:21

this because it's a nice transformation

19:23

that after you've done the

19:24

transformation the algebra simplifies

19:26

dramatically

19:28

now we're in a really good position to

19:30

understand what special relativity is

19:32

really all about

Attachments