This Is Our Stand Against Tyranny
1.19M subscribers
SUBSCRIBED
Mark Levin wants you to take a stand against tyranny and vote for the re-election of President Donald Trump. The 2020 election will determine the course of our republic. Be the Paul Reveres and Thomas Paines of the modern era and encourage friends, family members, and colleagues to vote. In this episode, travel back in time as Mark explores the history of our republic, the philosophy of the founding fathers, and how the progressives of the early 20th century have led us to where we are today. Subscribe to BlazeTV today with our BEST DEAL EVER for $30 off to watch all of Mark Levin shows: https://blazetv.com/levin► Subscribe to BlazeTV YouTube! https://bit.ly/2KJHuwu► Join BlazeTV! https://get.blazetv.com/► Sign up for our NEWSLETTER: https://theblaze.com/newslettersConnect with us on Social Media: http://twitter.com/BlazeTVhttp://instagram.com/TheBlazeTVhttp://facebook.com/BlazeMedia
00:00
this is a different election we need to
00:02
keep the senate
00:04
we need to take the house we need to win
00:06
the presidency
00:07
we need to send a message throughout the
00:09
land and throughout the world
00:11
and we need to stand firm for our
00:12
republic
00:14
or we're going to lose it this is where
00:17
freedom rings if you believe in america
00:21
if you believe in the constitution the
00:24
constitution empowers us
00:27
it's a new day america's back america's
00:30
back and america is going to get strong
00:32
again
00:32
we're going to defend america and we're
00:34
going to defend our interests
00:36
liberty's voice levin tv
00:39
show america i'm mark levin and this is
00:41
levin tv
00:43
this is the most important living tv i
00:45
have ever done
00:46
in the four and a half years we've been
00:47
doing this
00:49
let me tell you a little story we
00:52
decided to do
00:53
this levin tv before we've been part of
00:56
conservative review before we were part
00:59
of blaze tv just live in tv at the time
01:03
we decided to do this and i decided to
01:05
do this because
01:07
we're on a mission and the mission is to
01:10
save this republic to advance the cause
01:12
of this republic to educate as many
01:14
people as we can
01:15
to the principles that undergird the
01:17
society
01:19
now we knew because we're a digital
01:21
subscription
01:23
operation that our reach would be
01:25
limited
01:26
but still the reach can be far enough as
01:29
we have significant number of
01:31
members here that the work can get
01:33
passed from one to the other
01:36
and so whether it's levin tv
01:39
or my radio show or life liberty and
01:42
levin or my books
01:43
my goal is always the same to expand the
01:47
cause of human liberty of individualism
01:50
of the principles and the declaration
01:52
and in the constitution
01:55
so why is this the most important tv
01:57
that i've ever done
01:59
because in a few days people are going
02:02
to vote many of you have already been
02:04
voting
02:04
and many people apparently are going to
02:06
vote after election day but still
02:07
election day
02:09
is next tuesday november 3rd 2020 will
02:12
be remembered
02:14
for 100 years maybe 200 years it is the
02:17
election that determines the course of
02:19
this republic
02:20
in fact it's the election that
02:21
determines whether we remain a republic
02:23
america is so unique and so special
02:27
sometimes we need to step back and think
02:29
about it
02:30
the ideas that formulate this country
02:34
were ideas that were generated for
02:36
thousands of years
02:39
the judeo-christian principles and
02:42
belief system
02:44
moving into the reformation moving into
02:48
western enlightenment
02:50
all of these are part of what would
02:52
become america
02:54
now how do we know this because the
02:56
founders wrote about it
02:59
john adams wrote extensively thomas
03:02
jefferson obviously wrote extensively
03:05
james madison hamilton they all were
03:08
brilliant
03:09
they all wrote they all spoke and so we
03:12
know what they relied on
03:14
and they talked about our
03:16
judeo-christian belief system
03:19
they talked about western enlightenment
03:21
they talked about athens and rome
03:24
they talked about britain and the best
03:27
parts of the british parliamentary
03:28
system
03:30
even though it was a monarchy they read
03:33
locke
03:34
they read montesquieu they read cicero
03:38
and plato and aristotle in particular
03:41
they knew their contemporary adam smith
03:45
edmund burke for whom they had enormous
03:49
respect
03:50
and so they pulled from these ideas
03:52
ancient and modern at the time
03:55
religious and non-religious and they
03:58
said what kind of society can we create
04:01
that does what that respects
04:04
individual human beings and yet creates
04:08
a society a civil society in which they
04:10
can function
04:13
the declaration of independence how did
04:15
this come to be
04:17
you know the revolutionary war not
04:19
officially it actually broke out in new
04:20
england
04:21
well before 1776 and this is where
04:25
names like sam adams and others
04:28
are remembered by so many of you and the
04:30
battles that would take place
04:32
in boston in the boston harbor this is
04:35
where you'll remember
04:37
some of the great stories about paul
04:40
revere
04:41
about the battle of lexington and
04:43
concord
04:45
this actually occurred before we had an
04:47
official declaration
04:49
of independence and you know many people
04:52
outside of new england said well why do
04:54
we need to
04:56
go to war with britain first of all it's
04:58
a folly
04:59
it's the most powerful military on the
05:01
face there secondly
05:03
that's new england who cares what goes
05:04
on in new england some of the southern
05:06
states felt that way
05:08
some of the mid-atlantic states felt
05:09
that way
05:11
but as the british kept tightening and
05:13
tightening control
05:15
over new england they started to
05:17
threaten other areas of the country
05:19
like philadelphia and it had an effect
05:22
on the south as well
05:24
so in the second continental congress
05:26
the second continental congress
05:28
they met in philadelphia to try and
05:31
debate the issue and figure out what to
05:32
do and delegates were sent from every
05:35
state
05:36
and they went to philadelphia and they
05:37
met in the pennsylvania assembly house
05:39
and what's interesting about the
05:41
pennsylvania assembly house
05:43
is that's not only where the declaration
05:45
was ultimately agreed to
05:47
and signed but that's also with the
05:50
constitution would be drafted over a
05:53
five five and a half month period
05:55
in the summer of 1787.
05:58
in any event it was quite daunting
06:02
and all the states decided that they
06:04
would in fact
06:06
fight for independence against the
06:09
british crown
06:11
now they had to agree on a document you
06:13
see the revolutionaries wanted to tell
06:15
the whole world what they were doing
06:18
and so jefferson was chosen by a
06:21
committee
06:23
the committee included john adams and
06:24
livingston among others
06:26
to write the first draft and he wrote
06:29
the first draft
06:31
and among other things he borrowed from
06:32
john locke he barred from
06:36
george mason who four to five weeks
06:39
earlier had written the virginia
06:40
declaration of rights
06:43
and he came up with his draft of the
06:45
declaration and i went through several
06:47
iterations and then finally came out as
06:50
the one that you've seen
06:53
all the parts of the country came
06:56
together
06:56
and declared independence and they had
06:59
to sign this document
07:01
the signing the document would be their
07:03
death warrant
07:05
if the most powerful military on the
07:06
face the earth were to win this
07:08
war which was very likely or to capture
07:12
any of these men they would execute them
07:14
in some of the most horrible ways to set
07:16
an example
07:18
and they signed him and the great john
07:19
hancock also boston
07:22
he signed and he signed his name as big
07:24
as he possibly could
07:26
and the others followed suit and the
07:29
declaration of independence
07:31
was announced on july 4th
07:35
- this began
07:38
in earnest what would be the birth of
07:40
the united states of america not 1619
07:44
- now this declaration of
07:48
independence
07:50
says in part when in the course of human
07:53
events
07:54
becomes necessary for one people to
07:56
dissolve the political
07:58
bands which have connected them with
08:00
another
08:01
and to assume among the powers of the
08:02
earth the separate and equal station
08:04
to which the laws of nature and nature's
08:06
god entitle them
08:08
a decent respect to the opinions of
08:10
mankind requires that they should
08:11
declare the causes
08:13
which impel them to the separation hence
08:16
the declaration the declaration to the
08:19
whole world and what
08:20
what the people were doing the colonists
08:22
were doing
08:23
and then famously we hold these truths
08:27
to be self-evident
08:29
that all men are created equal that they
08:32
are endowed by their creator
08:33
with certain unalienable rights that
08:36
among these are life
08:37
liberty and the pursuit of happiness
08:40
that to secure these rights
08:42
governments are instituted among men
08:45
deriving their just powers from the
08:47
consent of the government
08:49
that whenever any form of government
08:51
becomes destructive of these ends is the
08:54
right of the people to alter or to
08:56
abolish it
08:57
to institute new government laying its
08:59
foundation
09:00
on such principles and organizing its
09:02
powers in such form
09:04
as to them shall seem most likely to
09:07
affect their safety and happiness
09:10
prudence prudence indeed will dictate
09:13
the government's long established should
09:15
not be changed
09:16
for light and transient causes and
09:19
accordingly all
09:20
experience has shown that mankind
09:23
are more disposed to suffer while evils
09:26
are sufferable
09:27
than the right themselves by abolishing
09:29
the forms to which they are
09:31
accustomed but when a long train of
09:33
abuses and usurpations
09:36
pursuing invariably the same object
09:38
events is a design to reduce them under
09:41
absolute despotism it is their right
09:44
it is their duty to throw off such
09:46
government
09:47
and to provide new guards for their
09:50
future security
09:52
such has been the patient sufferance of
09:54
these colonies
09:55
and such is now the necessity which
09:58
constrains them
09:59
to alter their former systems of
10:01
government the history of the president
10:03
king of great britain
10:04
has a history of repeated injustices and
10:07
user patients
10:08
all having a direct object the
10:10
establishment of an absolute tyranny
10:12
over these states
10:13
to prove this let facts be submitted to
10:16
a candid world
10:20
and so war ensues
10:23
that war goes on for over eight years
10:27
and of course the commander of the
10:28
forces is george washington
10:32
george washington loses almost every
10:34
single battle that they're in
10:36
but he wins the battles he must
10:40
and there were times when he was down to
10:42
a couple thousand troops
10:45
and i want you to keep something else in
10:47
mind the people the colonists themselves
10:50
about a third of the colonists supported
10:52
the war about a third of the colonists
10:54
did not support the war
10:56
and about a third of the colonists were
10:58
basically
11:00
undecided much like happens in all the
11:02
polling that goes on now in our country
11:05
in fact in some of the cotton producing
11:07
southern states
11:09
they supported britain because they made
11:10
their money by selling cotton to the
11:12
british
11:14
and they would become problematic
11:16
because they would raise militia
11:19
to fight the colonists who were fighting
11:22
for independence
11:24
the vast majority of the deaths during
11:27
the american revolution
11:29
occurred on the prison ships the british
11:32
were brutal
11:34
when they would capture militiamen or
11:36
regular army
11:38
they put them on these massive ships
11:41
where they would be feeding them rancid
11:43
beef if if anything
11:45
uh they would get the worst kinds of
11:47
illnesses they had no treatment
11:48
whatsoever and these were basically
11:50
death boats
11:52
uh they would live in their own feces it
11:54
was just horrific
11:56
and yet they fought on they fought on
12:01
and so to jump to the constitutional
12:04
convention
12:06
this constitutional convention was
12:09
really the second attempt to come up
12:10
with a document
12:12
the first convention such as it was took
12:14
place
12:15
in maryland and all the states did not
12:18
send delegates
12:20
and they tried to have some kind of a
12:23
discussion about what this national
12:24
government would look like
12:26
they were concerned about the articles
12:28
of confederation because obviously the
12:31
federal government the national
12:32
government was utterly ineffective
12:35
and they were having a number of
12:37
problems as a result of the articles of
12:38
confederation
12:40
the difficulty raising a military
12:43
they had difficulty putting national
12:45
laws in place
12:46
they had difficulty financing raising
12:48
any monies whatsoever
12:50
and they had huge debt from the war
12:54
there were great problems in resolving
12:56
disputes
12:57
among them between the states so it just
12:59
wasn't working the way it needed to work
13:02
and so delegates were sent to
13:04
pennsylvania to fix the articles of
13:05
confederation as it turns out
13:07
they couldn't be fixed so they started
13:10
anew
13:12
and they came up with a document that
13:15
represented among other things
13:17
the thinking of montesquieu the thinking
13:20
of montesquieu
13:21
was based on a thousand years of human
13:23
experience
13:25
they had two concerns here one was they
13:28
didn't want a government
13:30
centralized and powerful they had dealt
13:31
with a monopoly
13:33
they didn't want a dictatorship on the
13:35
other hand they didn't want a mob
13:38
around the same time of the american
13:39
revolution you had the french revolution
13:42
and what was taking place during the
13:44
french revolution was
13:46
terror blood in the streets death for
13:49
death's sake
13:51
the french revolution differed from the
13:52
american revolution
13:54
in that the french wanted to destroy the
13:56
existing society
13:58
not just the governing system but the
14:01
existing society
14:03
because they thought it was unjust the
14:05
americans never wanted to destroy their
14:07
society
14:08
they were defending their society
14:10
against what they believed was the
14:12
was the monarchy was the tyrannical
14:14
monarchy
14:16
what they were fighting for was a just
14:18
government and just laws to be applied
14:20
equally
14:22
we come up with this constitution and i
14:24
mentioned bondusky he wasn't the only
14:26
one
14:26
but he was very prominent montesquieu
14:29
argued
14:31
that you need really three separate
14:33
branches of government he talked about
14:35
the executive the judicial
14:36
and the legislative and so you balance
14:40
the powers between these three entities
14:42
the legislative representing the
14:44
people the judiciary which adjudicates
14:46
dispute and the executive which executes
14:49
in its simplest terms and he felt
14:52
that this way you can have a functioning
14:56
government but you protect yourselves
14:59
against a centralized power and you
15:01
protect yourself against factions
15:03
with a mob so you don't have direct
15:05
democracy
15:07
in our constitution article one sets up
15:10
congress
15:12
article 2 the presidency the executive
15:14
branch in article 3
15:16
we have the judiciary so you have these
15:18
three branches of government but
15:20
government's bigger than the branches
15:21
themselves and the constitution
15:23
addresses a number of issues but the
15:24
constitution was not
15:26
intended to address every aspect of life
15:28
with a civil society
15:30
why because the constitution
15:33
sets the limits up on government not the
15:36
limits on
15:37
the individual the states don't have
15:40
their authority
15:41
the individual still has his power over
15:43
himself
15:44
and herself so again it's not intended
15:47
to
15:48
be a laundry list of every aspect of
15:50
society to control it
15:52
and manage it that was not the idea the
15:54
idea was what kind of government do we
15:56
want and we want the individual to be
15:58
free within the context of this just
16:02
and balanced government that's the
16:05
purpose of the constitution
16:07
terms of the bill of rights the bill of
16:09
rights would come later why
16:11
because arguments were made that it's
16:13
impossible to list
16:14
all the rights that belong to the
16:16
individual vis-a-vis government
16:18
what happens if we leave some out then
16:20
it might be viewed as
16:22
as something the government can control
16:25
well later it was decided no
16:27
we need a bill of rights it was decided
16:29
that because a number of states
16:31
during the ratification process would
16:33
not ratify unless there were certain
16:36
stated protections enshrined in the
16:38
constitution
16:39
they didn't want to start the
16:40
constitutional process all over again
16:44
so what did they do well they promised
16:47
john adams promised
16:48
madison promised hamilton promised that
16:51
they would come
16:52
after the fact that they would amend the
16:54
constitution
16:56
to provide for they didn't call the bill
16:57
of rights but these these individual
16:59
rights vis-a-vis
17:00
the federal government when the federal
17:03
congress met the first time the
17:05
federal congress met the first congress
17:08
as they were doing their business they
17:10
pretty much ignored the promise that
17:11
they had made to the states
17:14
but james madison didn't forget the
17:16
father of the constitution
17:19
and he asked the full house of
17:20
representatives to meet as a committee a
17:22
whole and come up with these
17:24
these these amendments to the
17:26
constitution which they had borrowed
17:28
mostly from the states
17:29
originally uh well they decided not to
17:32
have
17:33
a committee of the entire house and they
17:35
set up a committee to do exactly that
17:38
and madison was in charge of that
17:39
committee they came up with 17
17:42
amendments
17:44
they sent him to the senate the senate
17:45
whittled it down to 12.
17:47
the house adopted the 12 and they sent
17:48
him to the states the states whittled it
17:50
down to 10
17:52
absolutely crucial protections for the
17:54
individual
17:57
the first amendment free speech
18:01
freedom of the press crucial to a free
18:03
society
18:05
freedom to exercise your religion
18:08
the government is to stay out of
18:10
religious decisions
18:12
the right to associate to assemble
18:15
these are things that were denied them
18:17
under the crown and they viewed these as
18:19
absolute human rights
18:20
feasibility the government the second
18:22
amendment the right for the individual
18:24
to bear arm and the right for the states
18:25
to have a militia
18:28
that wasn't passive it was they'd just
18:31
gone through a war
18:32
they wrote the declaration they wanted
18:35
to be the people to be armed
18:36
to protect themselves to be honest with
18:38
you against tyranny
18:40
and they wanted the states to have the
18:41
same power with the militia
18:44
you go through due process rights equal
18:46
protection rights
18:47
um the takings clause that nobody ever
18:50
talks about if you're going to use
18:51
somebody's property
18:53
to make a road or to build a library or
18:55
whatever it is
18:56
the person has a right to to
18:58
compensation
18:59
for the market value of that property
19:02
and it goes on and on and on
19:04
warrants you must have probable cause
19:08
speedy trials couldn't have general
19:11
warrants he had to have specific
19:13
warrants against an individual
19:15
often ignored as the ninth amendment i
19:17
argue that the ninth amendment
19:18
incorporates the declaration of
19:20
independence it's about individual
19:21
liberty
19:22
the ninth amendment which is probably
19:24
why it is ignored by the courts and of
19:25
course the the crucial federalism
19:27
uh amendment which is the tenth
19:29
amendment because they felt the power
19:31
and all you know ultimately should be
19:35
with the states and ultimately
19:36
that was the way it was supposed to work
19:40
why am i walking this you through this
19:42
for the last half hour
19:46
this is your declaration this is your
19:49
constitution
19:51
they're not self-executing
19:54
they're not self-executing
19:58
if you believe in them and you revere
20:00
them
20:01
and you believe our country should
20:03
adhere to them it's up to you
20:06
these are documents they don't do it on
20:09
their own
20:10
we can't rely on politicians we can't
20:13
even rely on many of our fellow citizens
20:15
anymore
20:16
the reliance is on we have sent
20:20
men and women to war
20:24
all over the world to protect these
20:27
documents
20:28
your liberty your individualism
20:32
your property your family
20:36
your way of life we fought a civil war
20:38
in this country
20:40
people say oh big deal you know civil
20:43
war we were a nation founded in 1619.
20:45
these are all lies we fought a civil
20:49
war and as we continue to calculate the
20:52
casualties because there is so many
20:54
it is now believed not six hundred
20:56
thousand not seven hundred thousand
20:58
that there were eight hundred and fifty
21:00
thousand casualties
21:03
almost half a million men lost their
21:05
lives
21:06
fighting to keep this union and to end
21:09
slavery
21:11
today that would be five to six
21:14
million men over a
21:18
four four and a half year period think
21:19
about that
21:21
affected every aspect every family in
21:23
this country
21:24
and of course the future of the nation
21:27
what were they fighting for
21:30
this abraham lincoln would constantly
21:34
refer to the declaration
21:35
he did the constitution but the
21:37
declaration for moral authority
21:39
remember the declaration lays out the
21:41
principles of this country
21:43
the constitution lays out the supreme
21:46
law of the land
21:47
and he would refer repeatedly to the
21:48
declaration of independence over
21:50
and over and over again
21:54
but something happened in the late 1800s
21:57
and the early 1900s
22:01
karl marx had become very popular
22:05
about a half a century before throughout
22:07
europe
22:08
particularly germany and britain but his
22:11
ideology began to spread the more he
22:13
wrote
22:14
it was considered an international
22:16
ideology
22:17
it wasn't enough for one area
22:20
or one state or one country to embrace
22:23
what would be called communism but it
22:26
was an international movement
22:29
this began to bleed into american
22:32
intellectual
22:32
and social circles among academics
22:36
and elites and intellectuals
22:40
and in america became known as the
22:42
progressive movement
22:44
the progressive movement i call it the
22:46
progeny
22:47
of the uh of the marxist movement it's
22:49
an americanization of marxism
22:52
and it's not by accident that some of
22:54
the early intellectuals who promoted
22:56
progressivism
22:57
uh would later become very fond of the
22:59
russian revolution
23:02
some of them even embraced early on
23:04
stalin
23:06
but this whole idea this whole concept
23:08
began to bleed into the american system
23:11
and there were several leading
23:12
intellectuals one of them would be
23:14
woodrow wilson
23:16
before woodrow wilson was president of
23:17
princeton before he was
23:19
governor of new jersey obviously before
23:21
he was president of the united states
23:23
he would write a lot as a scholar and an
23:26
intellectual
23:27
and what did he attack well he attacked
23:30
the constitution the governing system
23:33
but he attacked the declaration of
23:34
independence i wrote about this in
23:36
rediscovering americanism
23:39
why did he attack the declaration of
23:40
independence
23:42
because he said the first part that i
23:44
read to you is fine it's the second part
23:46
we need to focus on
23:47
all the issues that the colonists had
23:51
with the crown he said that was a
23:55
declaration for the time
23:57
for 1770 it's not a declaration for now
24:01
1900 1918 1905 1890 whatever
24:05
we're a different country we're
24:07
different people and we have a right to
24:08
make our own
24:10
declarations of needs and rights uh to
24:14
our own government and our own society
24:15
so while that's a very interesting
24:17
document the declaration of independence
24:18
doesn't have a hell of a lot to do with
24:20
what goes on today
24:21
all this talk about unalienable rights
24:23
and natural law he said that's all swell
24:26
but it's meaningless
24:27
that's just fodder for revolutionaries
24:30
but that doesn't really apply to today
24:32
and he wasn't the only one who argued
24:34
but why because he wanted you to look
24:38
at society and governing differently
24:42
you see he borrowed from rousseau and
24:44
hagel and certainly marks
24:47
all three of which believed and wrote as
24:49
the progressive does today
24:52
what's this individual stuff what's this
24:55
free will stuff
24:57
you're part of something bigger we need
25:01
to look at the
25:02
the communal that is the community we
25:05
need to look at the general will
25:07
we need to look at the general good and
25:09
for self-realization for the individual
25:11
to have self-really realization and
25:13
fulfillment
25:15
they need to basically surrender
25:18
their individual motivations their
25:21
individual desires their material
25:23
interests
25:24
they need to surrender it to the state
25:28
first to a movement the progressive
25:30
movement
25:31
then to the state and this is how the
25:34
state will become more just the state
25:36
will be more reflective of what
25:37
individuals in the collective
25:39
as an aggregate want so the point is to
25:42
devour the individual and devour the
25:44
individual's unique identity
25:48
and they have to tax success what else
25:51
do they have to attack
25:53
the constitution why
25:57
progressives have to attack the
25:58
constitution because the constitution
26:00
limits the power of government
26:03
it divides it creates checks it gives
26:06
specific powers to each part
26:08
talks about the ninth and the tenth
26:10
amendment individual rights and
26:12
and state sovereignty it was woodrow
26:14
wilson who came up with the
26:15
with the line and i paraphrased that we
26:18
have a living and breathing constitution
26:20
and he explains what he means he says a
26:23
human body
26:24
can't work when organs are divided
26:27
against
26:27
the body and divided against themselves
26:30
competing
26:32
so the the government in the country is
26:34
much like the human body
26:36
it's living and breathing and so all
26:39
these parts need to work together
26:41
not fight with each other not check each
26:43
other not balance each other but they
26:45
need to function together
26:47
so he's the one that that coined the
26:49
living and breathing constitution what
26:51
he meant by that
26:52
is kill the constitution
26:55
and so he also argued that the
26:56
constitution
26:58
the way it is set up makes progress
27:00
almost impossible
27:02
makes modernity almost impossible so
27:05
what did he say
27:07
among other things he wrote that the
27:09
judiciary is key
27:10
keep in mind the judiciary is not
27:11
elected these are lifetime appointments
27:13
he says the judiciary is key the control
27:16
of the judiciary is key
27:18
because through the judiciary the
27:20
so-called referees
27:22
we can control outcomes what the
27:24
legislature does what the presidency
27:26
does what the states do
27:28
so it's crucial to control the judiciary
27:32
now what does that mean that means the
27:36
judiciary is
27:37
in communist terms really a political
27:39
pull-up era that needs to reflect the
27:41
power of the state
27:43
the power of the state you see the
27:45
fights going on over the judiciary
27:47
you see schumer and the democrats why
27:49
they fight over the judiciary
27:51
because they've known for over 100 years
27:53
that's where the action is you see the
27:54
fight over the supreme court
27:56
they're not kidding if they can't get
27:58
their way on the supreme court
28:00
they will expand it and they will pack
28:02
it why
28:03
well woodrow wilson tells you why
28:06
because in the end these referees
28:08
need to impose their will and what is
28:10
their will it needs to be the will of
28:12
the progressive
28:14
and when you look at the past 100 years
28:16
particularly last 80 years
28:17
you see that in court decisions
28:21
whether it is so-called climate change
28:23
whether it's regulation
28:25
whether it's obamacare whatever it is
28:27
the courts are involved in
28:28
in many many areas that the founders and
28:30
the in the framers never intended
28:32
for which the progressives always
28:33
demanded
28:35
always demand it what else do they do
28:39
well as they centralize the power of
28:40
government more and more to socially
28:42
engineer
28:43
we the people because remember this is
28:45
ultimately
28:46
a philosophy or ideology that finds its
28:50
roots in marxism
28:52
they need to talk about their their
28:54
tyranny and their centralization of
28:55
government in the context
28:57
of the popular will on the people and
28:59
this is this is the difficulty a lot of
29:01
people have
29:02
it seems contradictory it's
29:05
contradictory as a matter of logic but
29:07
it's not contradictory as a matter of
29:09
propaganda
29:11
so the more centralized the more
29:14
of a police state you create the more
29:16
they argue that they're doing the
29:18
people's will
29:20
and the people have to surrender
29:21
remember what i said earlier they have
29:22
to surrender more and more their liberty
29:25
more more their property to the state so
29:27
what do you see
29:30
this what in the world is this
29:33
i mean the declaration constitution fit
29:36
in this
29:37
what in the world is this
29:41
this is the 110 page
29:44
biden sanders i call it modern day
29:46
communist manifesto
29:49
which gets into every part of our
29:51
culture
29:52
and our society which will affect every
29:55
walk of life
29:56
including each and every one of you
29:59
from health care to energy
30:03
to immigration to the economy and
30:08
on and on this document
30:11
tells you what they intend to do to you
30:14
to the culture and to the country you
30:17
know what they intend to do
30:20
burn this they intend to burn the
30:23
declaration of the constitution
30:25
you know how often individual liberty
30:28
is mentioned in this document not once
30:32
free market capitalism property rights
30:36
they're only mentioned the context of
30:38
attacking them and destroying them
30:41
think about what taxes are this is
30:44
filled with massive tax increases
30:46
increase massively the personal federal
30:48
income tax increase
30:50
massively the corporate income tax
30:51
increase massively the capital gains tax
30:54
increase massively the death tax farmers
30:56
and so forth who want to pass their
30:58
property
30:59
keep in mind what labor is
31:03
labor is the physical and intellectual
31:07
time that you spend working
31:11
and you spend most of your life working
31:15
and so when you work and you earn
31:18
something
31:19
you know back in the old days
31:22
prior to currency and everything you
31:23
work for food you work for land you work
31:25
for protection
31:27
today with currency obviously when you
31:29
work for something if somebody takes 20
31:31
30 or 40 of it you're giving away
31:35
20 30 40 of your life's work
31:38
of your life's work
31:42
and so taxation should be something
31:45
that's done with the greatest of care
31:47
but it's not under this document
31:51
depending on where people live some of
31:53
our fellow americans are going to be
31:54
paying over 60
31:55
in taxes to their state local and
31:57
federal government
31:59
that's unbelievable what do you think
32:01
the revolutionaries would say about that
32:05
they're going to control what kind of
32:06
materials you use in your house
32:09
they're going to troll control carbon
32:11
dioxide they call it carbon pollution
32:12
but carbon dioxide is not pollution
32:16
that's carbon dioxide if we had plants
32:19
they'd be inhaling it to create oxygen
32:21
i think we learned that in the third
32:22
grade science class didn't we so carbon
32:25
dioxide unlike monoxide is not a
32:27
but they want to control it they want to
32:29
control the atmosphere they believe they
32:31
can control the atmosphere
32:32
they call that greenhouse gases ladies
32:34
and gentlemen without greenhouse gases
32:36
we're dead
32:37
greenhouse some of us who live in the
32:39
north or colder areas
32:41
in the winter you drive and you'll see
32:43
greenhouses water water in greenhouses
32:45
plants that's how terrible greenhouse
32:48
it's the atmosphere recreated in a
32:50
greenhouse there's nothing wrong with
32:51
greenhouses there's nothing wrong with
32:53
the atmosphere
32:54
and there's nothing we can do about it
32:56
anyway
32:58
so all throughout this document
33:01
it's an attack on the way we live
33:04
it's socialism it's centralism
33:08
it's anti liberalism
33:12
it is a it is completely alien to the
33:15
declaration
33:16
and the constitution if they're elected
33:20
we will live by this document
33:25
not by these documents these documents
33:29
all the blood
33:31
all the fighting carrying flag are
33:33
flagging the war
33:35
all all that our ancestors have done all
33:38
that men and women surrounding us today
33:40
veterans have done to protect this
33:42
document
33:44
will be for naught because we won't live
33:47
under these documents anymore we'll live
33:49
under this document
33:51
and they've already told us they're
33:53
going to change the supreme court
33:55
they're going to change the supreme
33:57
court franklin roosevelt tried to change
33:59
the supreme court and his own party put
34:00
him down
34:02
his party won't put biden down this time
34:05
so they're going to basically burn down
34:07
the institution of the supreme court
34:10
they want to destroy the united states
34:11
senate
34:13
by simply adding two areas the district
34:16
of columbia and puerto rico
34:18
that's four democrat senators who'll be
34:20
democrat senators forever
34:22
think about this as a footnote you can't
34:24
just add the district at columbia our
34:25
constitution
34:26
breaks out the district of columbia as a
34:28
federal enclave
34:29
but they plan to do it anyway they plan
34:32
to do it anyway
34:34
so that would be four democrat senators
34:36
that would mean the republicans really
34:37
would
34:38
probably never have a chance to to
34:40
regain the majority there
34:42
they want to get rid of the filibuster
34:44
rule and the filibuster rule is not in
34:45
the constitution but it's been used by
34:47
the senate since almost the beginning of
34:49
the republic
34:51
why remember what i said they were
34:53
opposed to a parliament they were
34:55
opposed to
34:56
direct democracy they were opposed to
34:57
mob rule the only in the original
35:00
writings of the constitution the only
35:02
body that's directly elected is the
35:03
house of representatives the senators
35:05
were chosen by the state legislatures
35:07
not even the governors were involved so
35:10
that was changed with the 17th amendment
35:12
so now we have the
35:12
correct election of centers i think a
35:14
big mistake
35:16
but they will they will destroy the
35:18
senate
35:19
and they basically want to destroy the
35:21
senate they believe they can hold the
35:23
house for most of the
35:24
rest of the century they can get rid of
35:26
the filibuster rule
35:28
they will pass whatever legislation they
35:30
want if they have a democrat president
35:33
they will be able to change the supreme
35:34
court and then their aims are going to
35:36
be the electoral college
35:39
what does that mean why let's make it
35:41
simple
35:42
the electoral college was necessary or
35:44
there wouldn't be a constitution why
35:46
because
35:47
some areas of the country are heavily
35:48
populated
35:50
some areas of the country are not for
35:53
instance the areas of the country that
35:54
actually grow our food and provide it
35:56
for us
35:57
they're not heavily populated the areas
35:59
of the country that actually
36:01
drill for natural gas and oil and
36:03
actually provide it to us so we can
36:04
function
36:06
they're not heavily populated and so
36:09
those
36:09
areas of the country need representation
36:11
as well
36:12
maybe not because of the numbers of
36:14
people who live there but because of
36:15
what they do
36:17
they are providers more than users in
36:19
the cities we have more users than
36:21
providers when it comes to food
36:23
and natural gas and so forth and so it
36:26
was a way of uniting the country to make
36:28
sure the country wouldn't unravel
36:29
it was a way of making sure cities
36:32
wouldn't control
36:33
what we now call suburbs and back then
36:35
farmers in rural areas
36:37
it was a way of trying to ensure peace
36:40
and tranquility in the nation
36:42
because uh the small states and the less
36:44
populated states were never going to
36:46
join the union
36:47
and be and be lorded over by
36:50
by new york and back then philadelphia
36:52
and so forth if we get rid of the
36:54
electoral college that's exactly what
36:56
will happen
36:57
the heavily populated areas of the
36:59
country the heavily populated areas
37:02
within states will control
37:05
what happens in the rest of the country
37:07
okay so you're not a country anymore
37:10
so that is a huge problem but keep in
37:12
mind what's intended here
37:14
to control the supreme court
37:16
ideologically
37:18
to fundamentally alter the united states
37:20
senate so it's more the congress is more
37:23
like a parliament a democrat party
37:25
parliament to destroy the legislative
37:28
making process so they can ram through
37:30
whatever they want
37:31
and then to have power through the
37:32
electorate forever
37:34
so i have power through the courts
37:36
forever powering this in the state
37:38
in the senate forever and power through
37:40
the election process
37:42
forever you know we call that tyranny
37:46
you know we call that mindset
37:48
totalitarianism
37:50
the democrat party has become the vessel
37:54
through which tyranny is being exercised
37:59
this document right here the candidate
38:03
through which
38:05
the democrat party intends to achieve
38:07
these things
38:08
is joe biden who is really a very nasty
38:12
and incompetent individual as his entire
38:15
public career has demonstrated he's a
38:18
figurehead
38:20
kamala harris being the most radical
38:24
member of the united states senate even
38:26
with others who are truly radical
38:28
she is the most radical why do you think
38:31
she is his running mate this is
38:34
very very serious times we live in
38:38
now voting is not just oh i'm going to
38:40
vote
38:41
voting in for the presidential election
38:43
is a binary choice
38:45
one or the other and this choice is very
38:48
very easy
38:49
because donald trump embraces our
38:52
constitution he embraces our principles
38:54
he loves this country
38:55
he's not looking for ways to
38:57
fundamentally transform it and this is
38:59
one of the reasons he's so hated and
39:00
despised
39:01
not because of tweets not because the
39:03
way he talks
39:05
they were going after donald trump
39:07
during the election
39:08
when the man barely came down the
39:10
escalator they were spying on his
39:12
campaign
39:13
they were trying to remove him from
39:15
office in a coup
39:16
criminal investigations based on no
39:19
predicate
39:20
then a phony impeachment and now of
39:23
course the effort to defame and destroy
39:25
him
39:26
as we all vote and get ready to vote he
39:28
is the only
39:30
candidate that stands between us and
39:32
those of us who love this
39:34
and them those who do not this is a
39:38
different election
39:39
we need to keep the senate we need to
39:41
take the house
39:42
we need to win the presidency we need to
39:45
send a message throughout the land and
39:46
throughout the world
39:48
and we need to stand firm for our
39:50
republic
39:51
or we're going to lose it
40:02
you