Open in TheBrain

Think like a Babylonian! With "centimal" base 100 arithmetic

Let's try to understand Babylonian sexagesimal (base 60) arithmetic by modifying our own Hindu Arabic system just a little! We'll use base 100, and work in a true floating point fashion, just like the Babylonians did (1900 - 1600 B.C.E.). But multiplication and addition don't work exactly as we are used to! Is this system superior to our own base 10 system? That is an interesting question.

This new arithmetical system can give us a deeper understanding of the completely remarkable, far ahead of its time, mathematics of an ancient Mesopotamian civilization, now buried under the sands of Iraq.

A big thanks to all my Subscribers, Members of the Wild Egg Maths channel, and Patreon supporters!

Video Content:

00:00 Introduction

3:11 Digits

05:39 Converting from centimal to decimal

15:26 How to evaluate products of digits?

19:15 Tables of squares

25:00 Addition of centimal numbers requires alignment

*

Here are all the Insights into Mathematics Playlists:

Elementary Mathematics (K-6) Explained: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?

list=PL8403C2F0C89B1333

Year 9 Maths: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Ancient Mathematics: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Wild West Banking: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Sociology and Pure Mathematics: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Old Babylonian Mathematics (with Daniel Mansfield): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?

list=PLIljB45xT85CdeBmQZ2QiCEnPQn5KQ6ov

Math History: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Wild Trig: Intro to Rational Trigonometry: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

MathFoundations: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Wild Linear Algebra: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Famous Math Problems: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Probability and Statistics: An Introduction: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Boole's Logic and Circuit Analysis: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Universal Hyperbolic Geometry: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Differential Geometry: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Algebraic Topology: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Math Seminars: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

And here are the Wild Egg Maths Playlists:

Solving Polynomial Equations: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Exceptional Structures in Maths and Physics via Dynamics on Graphs" https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Triangle Centres: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLBGX...

Six: An elementary course in pure mathematics: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Algebraic Calculus One: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Algebraic Calculus Two: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

0:11

hello everyone i'm Norman Wildberger we're looking at the sociology of pure mathematics

0:17

especially now at number systems and trying to position the way we think about numbers in terms

0:23

of sort of a broader picture of historically what's been going on and i've been telling you

0:28

about the Egyptians and the Babylonians and i want to um clarify a little bit that the Babylonian

0:35

situation that's very interesting and it's not so easy for a sociological type person to get a

0:43

hang of what's going on there because there are these um these obstacles that first of all we're

0:48

we're talking about entirely different culture and the way they approach arithmetic is very

0:53

very different but even more so the fact that they're working in this base 60 system means that

0:59

most of us don't have a lot of experience with arithmetic so i'm going to propose a variant of

1:04

our arithmetic today which will be a great aid i am sure in being able to understand more clearly

1:13

how the Babylonians thought at least this is my attempt at doing that okay so i'm going

1:18

to introduce what i call sentimental or base 100 arithmetic so this is a new a new sort of

1:25

point of view but it's not just changing the base i'm also going to go back to a an old babylonian

1:31

point of view so let me remind you that with our ordinary hindu arabic numbers which of

1:36

course a base 10 system here's a big number if i want to read this number i'm going to look at it

1:43

you know here here's ones here's thousands there's millions there's billions there's trillions

1:51

after trillions comes quadrillions so i would read this as 67 quadrillion 149 trillion 25 billion

2:02

488 million 665 thousand and 313 and when you when you hear that you start to realize that actually

2:13

our number system is not just a base 10 system it's also partially a base 1000 system

2:19

because each of these sort of triples here is in some sense a digit between 1 or between 0 and 999.

2:29

so we have sort of two levels going on here the base 10 level and this larger base 1000 level

2:35

which is usually not really acknowledged but you can see it very clearly here so what i'm

2:42

going to propose today is in some sense a kind of a compromise between base 10 and base 1000.

2:46

we're going to look at base 100 okay but i'm going to approach it in a in a true floating point uh

2:53

fashion just like the old Babylonians from around 1900 to 1600 bc would have proceeded with their

2:59

sexismal system so by getting our head around this system it'll be much easier for you to appreciate

3:06

the remarkable base 60 system that they had okay so base 100 means we're going to have to have

3:12

digits from 1 to 99. the old Babylonians did not have a special digit representing zero so that's

3:21

actually excluded in our world just digits from 1 to 99 what we call 99. now this is the way that

3:30

a Babylonian scribe would approach that problem well we use the two symbols that the Babylonians

3:36

used a vertical stroke representing one and a wedge opening to the right representing ten

3:41

so then here would be the digits one through nine there'd be 10 this would be 11 12 13

3:48

14 and so on up to 1920 all the way then to 30 then eventually to 90. right in the sexagesimal

3:58

world you're not allowed to use nine tens the maximum number of tens that ever appear is five

4:05

but this is sentimental so it's a little bit bigger so we can go all the way up to uh 99 okay

4:10

so these would be the 99 digits that a Babylonian scribe would want to write down in for our system

4:19

but this is too onerous okay so it's a lot easier for us to use the standard Hindu Arabic numbers

4:26

that we are familiar with 1 through 99 although you know might be easier for us but for somebody

4:32

who's not familiar with this this system it would be probably harder and maybe this would be sort of

4:39

simpler and easier to understand okay so then what is a sentimental number well a sentimental number

4:45

is just a string of these digits put together uh separated by commas and we'll use commas because

4:54

that's a little bit more in keeping with what i showed you in our first slide where we had

4:59

these groups of three decimal digits separated by commas representing thousands millions

5:05

billions etc so i want you to think about this as being some kind of variant of that instead of

5:10

grouping things by groups of three with commas we're separating with groups by groups of two

5:17

all right but it's a true floating point system so you should not think of this as being the ones and

5:24

this is the hundreds and this is 100 squareds etc that's only one possibility we're not saying where

5:29

the decimal point or rather the sentimental point is here right that's just a sentimental number

5:35

that can be interpreted in a number of different ways so now that we have sentimental numbers

5:39

which are just these strings of sentible digits separated by commas we can maybe convert them to

5:47

our more familiar decimal Hindu Arabic numbers but there's a number of ways of doing that depending

5:52

on where we think of the decimal place as being so that's not specified in the sentimental world

6:00

so this sentinel number 5 43 92 17 could be interpreted well one way would be to think of

6:07

this as being like ones this is hundreds this is hundred squares this is a hundred cubes so then

6:13

we would just get five four three nine two one seven so that's directly just translatable that

6:20

would be five million four hundred thirty nine thousand two hundred and seventeen but we could

6:25

also perhaps think of the the the sentimental point if you like as being there which case

6:31

this would be sort of representing the integer part and this would be representing a fractional

6:35

or sentimental part then it would correspond to i guess 5 54 392 0.17 or maybe we think of

6:47

the sentimental point as being right there and then then the interpretation will be 543.9217

6:55

okay now one of the advantages in having this flexibility where we not actually

7:03

thinking about having a sentimental point is that multiplication becomes simpler

7:09

because we don't have to worry about where to put a final central point because there is no

7:13

final sentimental point so let's let's talk about multiplication so suppose we want to multiply

7:20

these two sentimental numbers okay 23 17 times 41 52. how are we going to find out what that is

7:31

well what we're going to think about is doing essentially a number of multiplications of

7:39

just single digits so these digits here this 52 and this 17 if we multiply them

7:47

we're going to get 8 84 okay which corresponds in in our language to

7:54

52 times 17 equals 884 okay but as a centimeter scribe we would say 52 times 17 equals 884

8:05

another product 52 times 23 well just that product by itself

8:10

is 11 96 41 times 17 is 697 and 41 times 23 is 943. so these are just perhaps you might

8:23

like to think of them as sort of entries in this hundred by hundred multiplication table

8:29

that records all possible products of the digits here and digits here actually for us it's not

8:36

really a hundred by hundreds it's more a 99 by 99 because actually zero is not allowed as a digit

8:45

of course these just correspond to familiar or easily checkable things in the hindu arabic world

8:52

so 41 times 17 is actually 697 so you know it's the same kind of information as we usually have

8:59

so that makes it a lot easier to understand what's going on so how are we going to multiply these two

9:05

numbers well we have the individual products of the digits so we are going to kind of wanting to

9:11

put them together so that's our inclination is to you know figure out how to do it on the page but

9:16

almost surely that's not how they did it they did not do their computations on their clay tablets

9:21

they did their computations somewhere else and we don't really know so the best guess is probably

9:27

that they use something like an abacus okay so here's a more modern abacus but we can still

9:32

just use it for illustration purposes so what we're going to do is think about putting a number

9:38

uh on the abacus sort of from the right so because you know we're starting with the smaller things

9:43

here they're going to move over here so for example 2317 we'd represent that with a okay

9:49

a seven on the last column okay maybe these are five let's say these are ones okay so we would

9:54

move one of those up and that's a five and then two of these up okay so that would be like seven

9:59

so i've recorded a seven and then in the next uh the next uh you know digit of one i would

10:06

put a one there no if i just wanted to record 23 uh 17. so there's a 17 and then i was let's uh

10:13

that's five sorry that's one there and then three there whoops three there and there's two okay

10:21

so that might that might be a representation of 23 17 sort of roughly something like this

10:26

okay so in order to make this product they wouldn't have to actually put these things down

10:32

because these would be uh you know on on in front of them we want to write down the the result so

10:39

let's say we multiply 52 by 17 first so we figure out somehow maybe we've memorized it maybe we look

10:45

it up somehow but we have to know what the basic digit multiplication is so in this case it's 884

10:53

or 884 but we'll just think of it as 884. so we have to record an 884 on the last three of these

11:00

columns so we put a 4 on this one and an 8 on this one 8 on this one and then we do another

11:05

digit multiplication say 41 times 17 and or maybe 52 times 23 that's that 1196 so now we have to put

11:14

1196 we have to add 1196 to what we already have with our 884 now that involves moving over two

11:23

because where we're moving over a digit so we have to basically move over a digit there's actually

11:29

commas here which i perhaps should put but i'm not putting them okay so that means that this

11:34

1196 is going to be added and we're not going to use these last two columns here we're going to add

11:41

we're going to add that you know in these columns here these four columns here

11:45

so we can take the existing stuff and add 1196 with whatever abacus technology we've learned

11:52

okay and then that's going to be the total up to that point and then we do the next digit maybe 41

11:58

times 17 which is 697. so then we would have to add 697 again that actually would be aligned to

12:03

the same same one as before so i guess it would be still those four of these three in this case

12:09

so we would be adding something to these three columns to add 697 and then finally the 41 times

12:15

23 that's 943 so we have to add 943 again but again we have to sort of move over the right

12:20

number of columns two two so we have to move over to two so we sort of be adding uh from here okay

12:29

so we could do that and it would you know if you're skilled with an abacus of course as

12:36

in previous generations many Chinese, Japanese, Korean you know people students would have learned

12:42

you know they can compute with an advocate much faster than we can compute uh by by hand or with

12:49

pen and paper so it's a very powerful system there's no reason why the Babylonians could

12:53

not have you know mastered the use of something like that although we don't know exactly what

12:58

they're doing so i'd like to compare that with the same calculation in a more familiar Hindu Arabic

13:05

framework this is what you might find in some primary school classroom where the way we do it

13:11

is we also multiply digits but now the digits are just from the 10 by 10 multiplication table which

13:16

we've memorized so 2 times 7 you have to know what that one is so it's 14 there's a 4 there

13:21

and 1 comes up so you have to do all these individual products 4 times 4 16 individual

13:26

multiplications have to be sort of put into this okay but the the individual multiplications are

13:32

smaller because they're just sort of single digit multiplications so here we only have four

13:38

digit multiplications but any one of them is more onerous of course we end up getting the same total

13:45

maybe i should also have mentioned that once we when we get these digits we've done this on the

13:49

calculator okay but this is my attempt at doing it by by hand using paper the way we've been taught

13:57

you know you have to add up the columns and so on but they wouldn't have done that they would have

14:03

just you know done it on their abacus or counting board or whatever and then looked at the final

14:08

result and then just transcribed the final result so notice that when i go from this to the final

14:14

result i have to modify this 0 1 because 0 1 is not a digit in our system we have to just

14:20

replace it with 1. so the final answer is 9 62 184 and here's the Hindu Arabic equivalent and okay

14:28

which one is more work well they're pretty close to being comparable but you see that they look

14:34

quite different and so i think it's an interesting computational question here for those of you maybe

14:40

with a computer science uh programming background can we say anything about the relative merits of

14:46

these things right there's a trade-off here we're doing a lot of small calculations and here we're

14:51

doing fewer big calculations so there's probably scenarios where each of these maybe has advantages

14:59

but i think it's interesting to think about this uh sort of from a computational point of view

15:06

could you could you get some computer architecture which runs not on a sort of decimal

15:13

or binary equivalent uh you know sort of arithmetic but that that jumps up to sentimental

15:19

or some kind of binary equivalent maybe they already do this that could be please let me know

15:24

if that's the case all right but a big question here is how do you actually multiply these digits

15:32

do you memorize a 99 by 99 multiplication table well this is the same issue that we

15:37

have with the Babylonian story there it's 60 or 59 by 59 but it's still

15:43

quite onerous and i remind you that we don't really know how they do their multiplications we

15:49

don't really know but we think that we have some ideas and one of the ideas is to use

15:56

this particular relation which was well known to them that if you have two numbers m and n

16:01

and you're interested in their product m times n then one way of getting at it is through this

16:06

identity that it's equal to n plus m over 2 all squared minus n minus m over 2 all squared so

16:15

for example with 41 times 23. we're going to use this rule we calculate this is the average so you

16:22

add them up which is 64 and divide by 2. so that's 32 this is 32 squared and this one is

16:30

the difference divided by 2. okay the difference is 20 no the difference is 18 and divided by 2 is

16:39

is 9 so it's 9 squared 32 squared minus 9 squared 32 squared well you have to look that up or

16:46

let's say you know that that's 10 24 9 squared is 81. you take the difference you get 943.

16:56

now here's a way of thinking about that here's m and here's n let's suppose that

17:00

m is smaller than n okay so the average is just the number that's in between them that's equally

17:05

far from either of them and this n minus m over 2 that represents well this whole

17:13

difference is n minus m so n minus m over 2 is is that separation or that separation

17:19

so another way of thinking about it is that this second one is the the separation between

17:24

either of these numbers and this average okay so for example once we found that the average is 32

17:31

up here then the next one we just look at the difference between 41 and 32 that's 9 or the

17:37

difference here that's also 9. okay so we don't actually have to do this calculation so much

17:43

but what do you do when you are multiplying say an odd number by an even number so this works fine if

17:48

you have two odd numbers or two even numbers what if you have one of each say 29 times 84. well what

17:55

you could do is you could because what you don't want to really apply this formula because then you

18:00

get you know when you add these two numbers you can get an odd number and then you have

18:04

to divide it by 2 and square it so that's that's more problematic so you could pull out a factor

18:08

of 2 here write it as 2 times 29 times 42 and then you can in fact pull out another factor

18:14

of 2 write it as 4 times 29 times 21. and now you have two odd things so you could do the same thing

18:21

as the rule suggests you take the average which is the number that's sort of equally close to both

18:27

of them that's 25 okay the difference between 25 in either of these is 4 so 25 squared minus

18:34

4 squared is 625 minus 16 which is 609 and then we have to multiply by 4 we get 24 36

18:44

so what this rule allows us to do is to reduce the calculation of a product with calculation of two

18:55

squares okay so if we're on top of squares or if we you know have some table or resource that tells

19:04

us quickly what squares are then we can actually use this quite efficiently to calculate products

19:15

okay so now we come to the table of squares which is an essential table

19:20

for the old babylonians will also be important for us as modern sentimental

19:24

arithmeticians so we have numbers down here and they're squares adjacent numbers and they're

19:31

squares numbers and they're squares 1 squared is 1. 2 squared is 4. 3 squared is 9. 4 squared is

19:37

16 5 squared is 25 6 squared is 36 7 squared is 49 a squared is 64. 9 squared is 81 10 squared equals

19:45

well not a hundred because there isn't really a hundred it's just one okay that's the way the

19:54

floating point point of view is towards 101 they're the same thing they're just

20:00

represented by a single vertical stroke what about 11 squared well 11 squared is 121

20:08

1 comma 21. 12 squared is 144. 13 squared is 169. 14 squared is 196. 15 squared is 2 25.

20:19

16 squared is 2 56 17 squared is 289 18 squared is 3 24 19 squared is 361 and 20 squared is 4.

20:31

these will be a little bit less familiar to most people everyone's memorized these in

20:36

primary school these are a little bit less familiar but actually it's very useful to

20:41

know what what 17 squared is et cetera so let's do one more column 21 squared is 441

20:48

22 squared is 484 23 squared is 529 24 squared is 576. 25 squared is 625.

20:57

26 squared is 676. 27 squared is 729 28 squared is 784. 29 squared is 841 and 30 squared is 9.

21:13

of course this is information that you can immediately you know

21:17

value this is the same as saying 24 squared is 576. it's the same information in fact 576 is

21:24

often stated as 576 right with recognizably the same thing okay and here's 30s and 40s i want

21:34

to draw a particular attention to the the last ones here so once we get to 46 squared it's 2116

21:42

which ordinarily we would say 2116 but it's just 21 16. and 47 squared is now 22 9

21:55

but there's no zero here because 0 9 is not a digit 9 is the digit similarly 48 squared is 23

22:03

  1. 49 squared is 24 1. so if we wanted to convert this to decimal we would say okay this is 2401

22:12

we would sort of implicitly put a zero in there but that's not needed and 50 squared is 25.

22:23

okay and here's the second half of the table of squares i'm not going to go through it all but

22:28

here it is for you to admire 51 squared is 26 1 52 squared is 27 4. we have that same phenomena that

22:35

i already mentioned 53 squared is 28 9 and then 54 squared is 29 16 and so on 60 squared is 36

22:45

the 60s the 70s the 80s down to the 90s 96 squared is 92 16 97 square is

22:54

94 9 98 squared is 96 4.99 squared is 98.1 and 100 why isn't this 100 well

23:03

100 is equal to 1 in our system and so what's 100 is the same as one squared one squared is one

23:13

so involved here we we're going to memorize this table that would involve memorizing 99 things

23:20

and it's probably you know interesting to stare at it and see if there's any patterns i mean

23:26

there's some things that are that are sort of repeating the 96 the 69 these these things that

23:31

are that are happening here at the end are there's some some repetition um a square never ends in in

23:39

three for example right you never see the final number b3 then the final numbers are always

23:44

rather predictable in fact either the same across each of these columns the final numbers

23:48

are always 1 four nine six five and then or six nine same ones we just had six nine four one

23:58

um so yeah that's the table of squares and so you could imagine that it would

24:04

be possible for a young person to memorize this there's really 99 things to to memorize

24:08

although some of them are quite long so it would be definitely some some serious

24:13

amount of work to memorize this then it's an interesting question okay suppose that you got

24:18

some young people and you trained them this way you you got them to memorize this table

24:22

maybe you got them to perform digit calculations with using this device

24:33

you'd have to still teach them how to use some mechanical device say an abacus to

24:40

to deal with this sentimental arithmetic

24:43

and so then it's an interesting question well you know what would the result be how would

24:47

that compare with our current system is this really so outlandish or are there actually

24:53

potentially interesting reasons why we might want to uh to go this way okay so that's multiplication

25:00

what about addition well we've already seen some addition because in the course of our

25:04

doing our multiplication we've had to add these various products of digits that we've obtained

25:09

and what i did there is i i put them in in certain positions with respect to each other and i'm sort

25:14

of suggesting that we're going to end up using our abacus or counting board or whatever it is to to

25:20

perform those additions because that's reasonably easy to do with such a mechanical device

25:25

but from a theoretical point of view it's important to realize that if you have two

25:29

sentimental numbers say 44 37 2 and 98 95 asking what is the sum that's an ambiguous question

25:38

because we don't know the relative sizes of these things so it's not so much a question of knowing

25:46

where the sentimental points are in each of them it's more a question of knowing how the two

25:52

sentimental numbers align where we maybe think of putting one on top of the other so for example one

25:59

possible alignment might be this one here 44 37 to 98.95 maybe the 98 is comparable with the 44

26:07

and the 95 is comparable with the 37. okay then we can perform the operation with an abacus very

26:16

simply but on on the boards much the same 2 7 plus 5 is 12. you raise to put the 1 up there

26:23

you get a 13 you have to put a 1 there you get a 13 you have to put a 1 there you get 14 and

26:29

you get this so you get 1 43 32 2. let me do this one over here which is just a little bit different

26:36

okay so two other things to add 92 86 57 plus 4 13 45 and let's do the same thing so 5 plus 7 is 12.

26:47

i'll put a 1 up there 4 plus 5 is 9 plus 1 is 10. so we put a 0 there put a 1 up there we get

26:56

7 plus 3 is a 10. so we put a 0 there at 1. 8 plus 2 is 10 so we put a 0 there

27:04

and put a 1 up there and then we get a 7 and a 9. okay so we would put commas like this

27:11

but this really is not in sentimental form for two reasons first of all 0 2 is not a digit and

27:22

0 0 is not a digit so what we would want to do is we would want to rewrite this

27:28

so there would be a 97 comma okay let's not let's think about what we're going to

27:34

put in the middle here but this final one is just going to be two all right

27:42

so what are we going to put in the middle well the answer is we're not going to put anything in the

27:47

middle because we don't have a digit representing zero the pap loans didn't have a digit for

27:52

representing zero they just left a space of course they didn't have commas they but they just had

27:56

these digits arranged in a line and there were spaces between them so if there was a sufficient

28:03

amount of space they would know that there's going to be that's representing uh an absence of

28:09

of a digit okay so okay that might look a little bit strange to us but hey that's just a it's

28:15

just a space are our computers are capable of making spaces okay so there's an introduction

28:22

to sentimental arithmetic but we still have some ways to go because we still have to answer the the

28:30

serious question how do you do division and that's where things get interesting so i'll talk about

28:37

that in my next video i hope you'll join me for that i'm Norman Wildberger thanks for listening.

Attachments