Open in TheBrain

Theology Explained Vol 1

THEOLOGY;

EXPLAINED AND DEFENDED,

IN A

SERIES OF SERMONS ;

BY

TIMOTHY DWIGHT, S. T. D. LL. D.

LATE PRESIDENT OF YALE COLLEGE.

WITH A

MEMOIR

OF

THE LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

IN FOUR VOLUMES.

FOURTH EDITION .

VOL. I.

NEW- HAVEN ;

PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY S. CONVERSE.

STEREOTYPED BY A. CHANDLER .

1825.

DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT, ss.

BE IT REMEMBERED, That on the fifth day of January, in the

forty- second year of the Independence of the United States ofAmer-

ica, Timothy Dwight, and William T. Dwight, both of said District ;

Administrators of the Rev. Timothy Dwight, now deceased, and late.

of the said District, have deposited in this office the title ofa book,

the right whereof they claim as Administrators as aforesaid, and

Proprietors, in the words following, to wit :

" Theology ; explained and defended, in a Series of Sermons ; by Timothy Dwight,

S. T. D. LL. D. late President of Yale College. With a Memoir of the Life of

the Author. In five Volumes. Vol. I. "

In conformity to the Act of the Congress of the United States, entitled, " An Act

for the encouragement of learning, by securing the copies of Maps, Charts , and

Books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies, during the times therein

mentioned. "

R. I. INGERSOLL,

Clerk of the District of Connecticut.

Atrue copy of Record, examined and sealed by me.

R. I. INGERSOLL,

Clerk of the District of Connecticut.

MEMOIR

OF THE

LIFE OF PRESIDENT DWIGHT.

MEN of letters pass their lives in a course so tranquil and uni-

form, it is generally supposed, as to furnish but few incidents for

the labours of the biographer or the entertainment of his readers .

Mankind are attracted rather by what is brilliant in character and

daring in action, than by the less splendid achievements of learning

andpiety. The exploits of the hero are recounted with applause

while he is living, and after his death are enrolled with admiration

on the records ofnations ; but the Minister of CHRIST must usually

wait to receive his honours in eternity , and expect the due esti-

mate of his labours only as they are written on the tablet of the

skies. There are, however, exceptions to this remark. Sometimes

the good man, by the uncommon powers of his mind, by peculiar

incidents in his life, by having exerted a commanding influence on

the interests of the public, or by having acquired an unusual share

in their affections ; presents the most attractive subject of biogra-

phy. Contemporaries indulge a strong desire to view more mi-

nutely the life and character of the man, whose living excellence

they have often felt and acknowledged ; and posterity receive with

admiration the history of one who so widely blessed a preceding

generation.

The AUTHOR of the following Discourses claims a high rank

among men of this class. The testimonies, far and wide, given by

the public to his excellence, the heart -felt sorrow so extensively

occasioned by his death , and the honours so profusely poured up-

on his memory ; persuade us that we shallbe listened to with lively

interest, while we attempt, in the following Memoir, to sketch

the most important incidents of his life, and to delineate the most

striking traits of his character.

TIMOTHY DWIGHT was born at Northampton , in the county of

Hampshire, state of Massachusetts, on the 14th day of May, A. D.

  1. His parents were Timothy and Mary Dwight. The first

ancestor of his father's family in this country, John Dwight, came

from Dedham in England, and settled at Dedham in Massachusetts,

in 1637. From him, the subject of this Memoir was descended in

the oldest male line ; and he was able to look back on each indi-

vidual in that line, including five generations, and reflect that he

4 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

was a member of the Church of Christ, and had a fair reputation

for piety. His father received his education at Yale College,

where he entered on his bachelor's degree in 1744. He was by

profession a merchant, and owned a handsome landed estate in

the town in which he lived. He was a man of sound understand-

ing, of fervent piety, and of great purity of life. His mother was

the third daughter of Jonathan Edwards, for many years the minis-

ter of Northampton, and afterwards president of Nassau-Hall-

well known in this country and in Europe as one of the ablest di-

vines of the last century. She possessed uncommon powers of

mind , and for the extent and variety of her knowledge, has rarely

been exceeded by any of her sex in this country. Though mar-

ried at an early age, and a mother at eighteen, she found time,

without neglecting the ordinary cares of her family, to devote her-

self with the most assiduous attention to the instruction of this son,

and her numerous family of children, as they successively claimed

her regard. Perhaps few instances can be found, in which this

great duty has been performed with more scrupulous fidelity, than

in the case now under consideration. With a mind originally vi-

gorous and discriminating, she had been accustomed from infancy

to the conversation ofmen of literature, who resorted in great num-

bers to her father's house ; and thus was forcibly taught the im-

portance of that learning, the effects of which she had so often had

opportunity to witness. It was a maxim with her, the soundness

of which her own observation through life fully confirmed, that

children generally lose several years, in consequence of being con-

sidered by their friends as too young to be taught. She pursued

a different course with her son . She began to instruct him almost

as soon as he was able to speak ; and such was his eagerness as

well as his capacity for improvement, that he learned the alphabet

at a single lesson ; and, before he was four years old, was able to

read the Bible with ease and correctness . His father was so ex-

tensively engaged in mercantile and agricultural pursuits, that he

was necessitated to confide the care of his family, and particularly

the superintendence of the early education of his children, chiefly

to their mother. With the benefit of his father's example constant-

ly before him, enforced and recommended by the precepts of his

mother, he was sedulously instructed in the doctrines of religion,

as well as the whole circle of moral duties. She taught him, from

the very dawn of his reason, to fear God and to keep his com-

mandments ; to be conscientiously just, kind, affectionate, charita-

ble, and forgiving ; to preserve, on all occasions and under all

circumstances, the most sacred regard to truth ; and to relieve the

distresses and supply the wants of the poor and unfortunate. She

aimed, at a very early period , to enlighten his conscience, to make

him afraid to sin, and to teach him to hope for pardon only through

the righteousness of CHRIST. The impressions thus made upon

his mind in infancy were never effaced.

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR . 5

Agreat proportion of the instruction which he received before

he arrived at the age of six years, was at home with his mother.

Her school -room was the nursery. Here, he had his regular hours

for study as in a school ; and twice every day she heard him re-

peat his lesson. Here, in addition to his stated task, he watched

the cradle of his younger brothers. When his lesson was recited,

he was permitted to read such books as he chose, until the limited

period was expired . During these intervals, he often read over

the historical parts of the Bible, and gave an account of them to

his mother. So deep and distinct was the impression which these

narrations then made upon his mind , that their minutest incidents

were indelibly fixed upon his memory. His relish for reading was

thus early formed, and was strengthened by the conversation and

example of his parents. At the age of six, he was sent to the

grammar-school, where he early began to importune his father to

permit him to study Latin. This was denied, from an impression

that he was too young to profit by studies of that description, and

the master was charged not to suffer him to engage in them. It

was soon found to be in vain to prohibit him : his zeal was too

great to be controlled. Not owning the necessary books, he availed

himself of the opportunity when the elder boys were at play to

borrow theirs ; and, in this way, without his father's knowledge or

the master's consent, studied through Lilly's Latin Grammar twice.

When his master discovered the progress he had made, he applied

earnestly to his father, and finally obtained a reluctant consent

that he might proceed; though every effort short of compulsion was

used to discourage him. He pursued the study of the languages

with great alacrity, and would have been prepared for admission

into College at eight years of age, had not a discontinuance of

the school interrupted his progress, and rendered it necessary for

him to be taken home, and placed again under the instruction of

his mother. By her , his attention was now directed to the study

of Geography and History. With no other help than Salmon's

Grammar, the only work on the subject then to be procured in the

country, and a set of valuable maps of the four quarters of the

globe, under the faithful tuition of his mother, he became tho-

roughly versed in the former science. In the latter , his father's

library furnished him with the requisite books ; and the wisdom and

affection of his mother with the necessary - guidance. He was pre-

viously familiar with the historical parts of the Bible. She first

turned his attention to Josephus and Prideaux, and the more mo-

dern history of the Jews. After this he read Rollin, Hooke's His-

tory of Rome, Histories of Greece and England, and accounts of

the first settlers of New- England, and their wars with the Indians .

Often has he been heard to say, that almost all his knowledge of

Geography and History was acquired at this period ; and it is be-

lieved, that few persons have possessed a more extensive or accu-

rate acquaintance with either of these sciences. This domestic

6 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

education rendered him fond of home and of the company of his

parents, and led him to feel a livelier interest than is usual with

boys of the same age, in the conversation of those who were older

than himself. It also saved him from the school-boy coarseness

and effrontery, often thought, in this rough world, anecessary but by

no means an ornamental appendage of the youthful character.

His father was particularly fond of the society of men of edu-

cation and intelligence ; and his hospitable house was the well-

known resort of gentlemen of this character. To no one of the

family were they more welcome, than to his son. Even at this

very early period of life, while listening to their conversation on

the character of the great men of the age, both in the colonies and

in Europe, a deep and lasting impression was made upon his

mind; and he then formed a settled resolution, that he would make

every effort in his power to equal those, whose talents and charac-

ter he had heard so highly extolled.

In his twelfth year, he went to Middletown, for the purpose of

pursuing his studies, under the late Rev. Enoch Huntington, a

gentleman of high classical attainments. He boarded in the

family, and devoted himself to his books with unusual assiduity

and success. Not content with the time regularly allotted to study

in the school, he spent most of his leisure hours at home in intense

application. So entirely was his mind absorbed by his books,

that it was no uncommon thing for the members of the family to

pass through his room, and even to call him by name, without being

perceived by him. During his residence at Middletown, his con-

duct was marked with the strictest propriety, his manners were

amiable and affectionate, his attention to his studies was intense and

unremitted, and his progress in them rapid and honourable. When

he left Middletown, he had acquired a very accurate knowledge of

the Latin and Greek languages ; and had read not only those clas-

sical authors which were necessary for admission into College,

but those also which were studied during the two first years of a

collegiate life .

In September, 1765, when he had just passed his thirteenth

year, he was admitted as a member of Yale College. At that time,

unfortunately, the freshman class had no stated tutor ; but were

dependant for their instruction , sometimes upon one officer of col-

lege, and sometimes upon another: a state of things too irregular

and unsettled to produce any substantial benefit to the pupil.

During the winter, he had the misfortune to break his arm ; and,

for several months in the spring and summer, he was prevented by

sickness from pursuing his studies. Near the close of the Col-

legiate year, President Clap resigned his office ; and the students

for a short time were dispersed: a series of calamities, by which

the year was in a considerable measure lost to him as a student.

The discipline of College had been for several years chiefly anni-

hilated. Loose opinions on morals and religion, prevailed ex-

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 7

tensively in the country, and their pernicious influence was too

obviously felt in the various seminaries of learning. Owing to the

bad state of the College commons, the students had been indulged

in the practice of providing entertainments at their rooms . This

naturally produced a great degree of inattention to their studies,

and gave rise to scenes of revelry and riot, in the highest degree

injurious to the pursuits of literature. It is not surprising, that in

such a state of things the practice of gambling had become un-

happily prevalent in College. Under all these disadvantages,

young Dwight gained considerable reputation for genius and ac-

quirements. His information and address rendered his society

generally pleasing. It was courted, even by members of the

higher classes, who strongly solicited him to join them in their

pernicious amusements. But the instructions of his parents had

made so deep an impression upon his mind, that no importunities

of this nature could prevail upon him to engage with them in gam-

bling. He was at length so far wrought upon, however, as to

play for amusement; and, not being necessitated to study his les-

sons, gradually yielded to their solicitations, until much of his time

was wasted in this manner. In no instance, however, did they in-

fluence him to play for money, or to stake even a farthing. Yet

playing for amusement had so far become a habit, that when he

returned to College, upon the commencement of his second year,

he entered upon the practice with considerable ardour. From this

danger he was fortunately rescued by the exertions of his tutor

andkinsman, the Hon. Stephen Mix Mitchell, late Chief Judge of

the Supreme Court of Connecticut ; to whom, for this and many

other acts of kindness, shown him while a member of College, he

ever after acknowledged himself to be most deeply indebted.

During the sophomore year, he was badly poisoned ; by reason of

which he was confined at his father's house four months, and obli-

ged to discontinue his studies during that period.

It is apparent, from the foregoing recital, that the two first years

of his collegiate life must have been in a great measure lost.

On commencing his junior year, he devoted himself seriously to

study. He was now fifteen : had lost a great part of the two pre-

ceding years, and had but two remaining, in which he might hope

to redeem his loss, and lay the foundation for future usefulness and

respectability. He entered on the studies of the year with great

zeal, and pursued them with unremitting assiduity and perseve-

rance. At that time College-prayers were attended at half past five

o'clock in the morning, in the winter, and at half past four in the

summer . He began the year by qualifying himself , every morn-

ing, to construe and parse a hundred lines in Homer before pray-

ers . This lesson, which formed no part of the regular College- ex-

ercises, was, of course, acquired by candle-light ; and his object

in attending to it was, to render himself more thoroughly master of

the Greek language, than he could expect to become in the com-

8 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

monround of studies pursued by his class. The lesson, as he ad-

vanced, was gradually increased to a much larger quantity. His

eyes being seriously affected by this intense application, at such

unseasonable hours, it is not improbable that the foundation was

thus early laid of that weakness in them, which caused him so

much distress during the remainder of his life .

In addition to the ordinary pursuits of the year , he devoted a

considerable portion of his time to the improvement of his hand-

writing; and by dint of his own exertions, attained a degree of

excellence in penmanship, that has rarely been equalled . So ele-

gant, indeed, was his writing, that it was with difficulty distinguish-

ed from the handsomest engravings. We have seen several of the

Diplomas which he wrote for his particular friends, and think some

of them decidedly more beautiful than the usual copper-plate im-

pression.

This is the earliest period in which he is known to have paid

any attention to poetry and music. The date of his first poetical

composition cannot be precisely ascertained. Two or three spe-

cimens, however, are preserved, which bear the date of 1767, and,

of course, were written when he was fifteen years of age. His

attachment to music, particularly sacred music, was ardent. His

voice was at once melodious and powerful ; and his ear exquisite-

ly discriminating. He began a collection of church music in the

course of the year, but left it unfinished, probably because it in-

terfered with his more severe and important pursuits .

This may, with propriety, be considered as the era of his ex-

cessive devotion to study, and the acquisition of knowledge. At

the commencement of the year he formed a resolution, to which

he faithfully adhered during the remainder of his collegiate life, to

employ fourteen hours each day in close application to his studies .

Such intense and unwearied diligence, with the aid of his natural

genius, soon established his reputation as a scholar, and placed

him among the first of his class. He received the degree of

Bachelor of Arts in the year 1769, when he was a little past seven-

teen years of age. At the Commencement, but a single appoint-

ment was made from the class which received the degree of

Bachelors . Before giving it out , the President sent for Dwight

and Strong , * and informed them that, in the view of the officers of

College, they were at the head of the class, and equally deserving

of the appointment ; but as Strong was the elder of the two, it

would be given to him at that time, and to Dwight when the class

entered on the degree of Masters.

Ashort time after leaving College, he was employed to take

charge of a grammar-school, at New-Haven. Inthis situation he

continued two years, highly esteemed as an instructer, both by his

pupils and their parents. This was the commencement of that

The late Dr. Strong, of Hartford.

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 9

course of life, which, with very little interruption, he pursued for

nearly fifty years : a course of life, in which Providence had pe-

culiarly qualified him to excel. Probably few men have lived,

who, in the same mode, have rendered more eminent services to

mankind.

During these two years, he made great advancement in litera-

ture and science. His time was regularly divided, and occupied :

six hours in each day in school; eight hours in close and severe

study ; and the remaining ten hours in in exercise and sleep.

In September, 1771, when he was past nineteen, he was chosen

a tutor in Yale College. In this situation he remained for six

succeeding years, performing its duties with distinguished success

and reputation.

When he entered upon the office, more than half the members

of his class were older than himself; and the freshman who waited

upon him was thirty-two years of age. * Notwithstanding a cir-

cumstance generally so disadvantageous, he proceeded in the

discharge of his official duties with firmness and assiduity ; and, in

a short time, gained a reputation for skill in the government and

instruction of his class rarely known in the former experience of

the College. It ought here to be observed, that the study of the

classics and of the mathematics had been for a number of years

vigorously pursued, owing to the exertions of several superior

men; and the discipline of the seminary raised to a higher stand-

ard. His associates were men of distinguished talents ; and by

their united efforts the institution soon acquired a new and most

important character. The study of rhetoric had been, till then, in

a great measure neglected. The period from 1771 to 1777, will

ever be considered as forming an era in the history of the College.

Through the exertions and influence of Howe, Trumbull, and

Dwight, a taste for those pursuits was excited, the effects of which

havebeenexperienced to the present time. The " art of speaking"

had previously been thought scarcely worthy of attention. Of so

much importance, however, was it considered by these gentlemen,

that they not only taught it to their respective classes, but, fromtime

to time, went upon the College stage to enforce their precepts by

their example. Poetry was cultivated by them, especially by

Trumbull and Dwight, with all the enthusiasm ofgenius. It was in

the first year of his tutorship, at the age of nineteen, that the subject

of this memoir commenced writing the CONQUEST OF CANAAN, a

regular epic poem, founded upon the portion of sacred history to

which its title refers, and which was finished inthe year 1774, when

he was twenty- two years of age.

No tutor was ever more faithful in the instruction of his class.

His attention to their oratory, has been mentioned. In addition to

*DAVID BUSHNELL, a man of strong mechanical genius, and the inventor of

"the Submarine Boat ."

VOL. I.

10 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

M

the customary mathematical studies, he carried them through sphe-

rics and fluxions, and went as far as any of them would accompa-

ny him into the Principia of Newton. He also delivered to them a

series of lectures on style and composition, on a plan very similar

to that contained in the Lectures of Blair, which were not publish-

ed until a considerable time afterwards . His application to study

during the time he remained in office was intense. He began to

study so early in the morning as to require candle-light, and con-

tinued the employment until late at night.

While a tutor, he was inoculated for the small-pox. The disease

affected him mildly ; but, upon his recovery, he too soon resumed

his former habit of severe application to study. Long before this ,

his eyes had been greatly weakened, and probably for that reason

were more sensibly affected by the small-pox. On being subject-

ed to such rigorous exercise, before they had recovered their na-

tural energy, they were so far injured as to cause him, through life,

a great degree of pain and embarrassment.

In theyear 1772, he received the degree of Master ofArts. On

that occasion he delivered, as an exercise at the public Commence-

ment, " A Dissertation on the History, Eloquence, and Poetry of the

Bible. " This production, composed and delivered by a youth of

twenty, on a subject then so new and of such high interest, was re-

ceived by the audience with the strongest marks of approbation. A

copy was immediately requested for the press ; and it was after-

wards re-published, both in this country and inEurope. We have

seen it mentioned, in several instances, with very high respect, on

the other side of the Atlantic. It is now rarely to be met with.

Those who have read it, need not be informed, that it was an effort

of no common character. It unfolded, at that early age, the bolder

features of the author's mind ; and evinced uncommon maturity of

judgment and taste. The style is dignified and manly, and formed

bya standard truly classical. The field of thought was new in this

country. The Lectures of Lowth, if then published, were not

known on this side of the Atlantic ; nor do we know of any anywork,

except the Bible itself , to which the author appears to have been

indebted for his plan or his illustrations . The knowledge of cri-

ticism displayed in it is profound; the conceptions are bold and ori-

ginal; the images are beautiful and distinct ; and the very spirit

which breathes in the Sacred Writers, appears to animate his own

mind. This was his only effort, in public, which his father ever wit-

nessed.

At a subsequent period, during his residence in College as a

tutor, he engaged deeply in the study of the higher branches of the

Mathematics . Among the treatises on this science to which his

attention was directed , was Newton's Principia, which he studied

with the utmost care and attention ; and demonstrated, in course ,

all but two of the propositions, in that profound and elaborate work.

This difficult but delightful science, in which the mind is always

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 11

guided by Certainty in its discovery of truth, so fully engrossed his

attention, and his thoughts, that, for a time, he lost even his relish

for poetry ; and it was not without difficulty that his fondness for it

was recovered.

During the second year of his tutorship, he attempted, by re-

stricting his diet, to remove the necessity for bodily exercise, and

yet to secure himself from the dulness incident to a full habit and

inactive life. He began by lessening the quantity of his food at

dinner, and gradually reduced it, until he confined himself to

twelve mouthfuls. After a six-month's experiment of this regimen,

being still somewhat dissatisfied with its effects, and feeling less

clearness of apprehension than was desirable, he confined himself

for a considerable period to a vegetable diet, without, however,

increasing the quantity. His other meals were proportionally

light and abstemious.

After this system of study and diet had been pursued about a

twelve-month, his health began insensibly to decline, and his con-

stitution, naturally vigorous, to give way. During the summer

of 1774, he first perceived the reality of this change, but had no

suspicion of the cause. Though he had suffered several distressing

attacks of the bilious colic before the College- Commencement, yet

after the vacation he renewed the same course of regimen and of

application to study. But a short time had elapsed before these

attacks were repeated with increased violence ; and his friends

becoming seriously apprehensive of the consequences, informed

his connexions of his situation . His father, on his arrival at New-

Haven, found that his disorder had indeed made dreadful ravages

in his constitution. His frame was emaciated, and his strength so

far reduced, that it was with extreme difficulty he could be con-

veyed to Northampton. When he left New-Haven, his friends

and his pupils took leave of him, as they supposed, for the last

time; and he had himself relinquished all hope of recovery. In

the course of two months he had nineteen severe attacks of the

disease. An eminent physician, whom he now consulted, after

successfully administering to his immediate relief , recommended

to him, among other things, a daily course of vigorous bodily ex-

ercise, as the only means of restoring his constitution to its primi-

tive vigour. He followed his advice, and, within a twelve-month,

walked upwards of two thousand miles, and rode on horseback

upwards of three thousand. To his perseverance in this system,

he was probably indebted for his recovery, as well as for the un-

interrupted health and vigour of constitution which he enjoyed for

the ensuing forty years .

In the year 1774, Mr. Dwight united himself to the College

church. At this time, it was his expectation to pursue the prac-

tice of law ; and, towards the close of his residence in College as

a tutor, his studies were directed towards that object.

The first class which he instructed entered on the degree of

12 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

Bachelors in September, 1775, the year before the declaration of

independence. At that time he delivered them a " Valedictory

Address, " every where sparkling indeed with brilliant imagery,

but every where fraught also with strong thoughts and noble con-

ceptions. In two points of view it deserves notice : It unfolds to

his pupils the duty of fixing on a very high standard of character

as intelligent and as moral beings, in a manner which proves at

once that this was literally the rule which governed his own con-

duct , and that he was admirably qualified to influence others to

adopt it ; it also communicates to them views of the growth and

ultimate importance of this country, which were at once new,

noble, and prophetic.

In March, 1777, he was married to Miss Mary Woolsey, the

daughter of Benjamin Woolsey, Esquire, of Long-Island, the

class-mate, room-mate, and intimate friend of his father. They

had eight sons, of whom six survive their father. Mrs. Dwight is

still living .

InMay of the same year, College was broken up. The students

left New- Haven at the commencement of the vacation, and pur-

sued their studies during the summer under their respective tutors ,

in places less exposed to the sudden incursions of the enemy. Mr.

Dwight retired with his class to Weathersfield, and remained with

them till September. Early in June he was licensed as a preacher,

by a committee of the Northern Association, in his native county

of Hampshire, in the state of Massachusetts. Beside instructing

his class during the summer, he preached on the Sabbath at Ken-

sington, a parish in Weathersfield.

The following fact is a striking proof of the respect and affec-

tion with which he was regarded by the students. It being well

ascertained that the existing head of the College would relinquish

his connexion with it , the students, as a body, drew up and sign-

ed a petition to the Corporation, that he might be elected to the

Presidency. It was owing to his own interference, that the appli-

cation was not formally made.

He left College early in September, and soon after was appoint-

ed Chaplain to General Parsons' brigade, which was a part of the

division ofGeneral Putnam , in the army of the United States. In

the British army and navy, this office is too often filled by men

who are distinguished only for their ignorance and profligacy.

We are also compelled to admit, that, during our late war, this

was most extensively true of those who held the same stations

among our own forces. But in our war of the revolution the very

contrary was the fact. The generous enthusiasm which then per-

vaded the country, not only prompted our young men of honour

in civil life to take the field, but induced many of our clergy, of

the first reputation for piety and talents, to attach themselves to

the staff . The soldier of the revolution need not be told how

animating were their sermons and their prayers, nor how correct

and exemplary were their lives.

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 18

Mr. Dwight joined the army at West Point in October , 1777.

Although the scene was entirely new to him, he was not idle nor

inattentive to the business which now devolved upon him. He

performed the appropriate duties of his office with strict punctu-

ality , and with uncommon reputation. The troops who composed

the brigade were, principally, Connecticut farmers ; men who had

been soberly educated, and who were willing to listen to the truths

of the Gospel, even in a camp. On the Sabbath, they heard him

with profound attention. During the week, they beheld him ex-

erting himself , as far as lay in his power , to instruct them in morals

and religion. Several of his discourses delivered to the whole

army, owing partly to their intrinsic merit, and partly to the feel-

ings of the times, gained him high reputation with the American

public. He also wrote several patriotic songs, which were uni-

versally popular. They were favourite songs with the soldiers,

and contributed not a little to kindle their enthusiasm in the cause

of freedom . One of them, his " Columbia," will not soon be for-

gotten: it opened the eyes of his countrymen on a prospect new,

brilliant, and delightful ; and exhibited in distinct vision the rising

glories of our infant empire. His connexion with the army enabled

him to form an extensive acquaintance with many officers of dis-

tinction; and among them he had the satisfaction to rank the com-

mander in chief . That great man honoured him with flattering

attentions . Mr. Dwight ever remembered his kindness with lively

gratitude, and entertained for his character and services, military

and civil, the highest respect and veneration.

He remained in the army a little more than a year , when the

news of his father's death, which reached him near the close of

October, 1778, rendered it necessary for him to resign his office ,

in order to console his mother under that severe affliction, and to

assist her in the support and education of her numerous family.

On leaving the army, he received from his brother officers, parti-

cularly from Generals Putnam and Parsons, as well as from the

soldiers of the brigade, the most grateful testimonies of respect

and kindness .

His father, in the midst of health and usefulness, had gone in

the summer of 1776 to the Mississippi, for the purpose of provi-

ding a settlement in that country for two of his sons, by whom he

was accompanied. Himself , with his brother-in-law, General

Lyman, had grants from the crown of a large tract of land, in the

southwest angle of what is now the state of Mississippi, comprising

the present township of Natchez , and a considerable extent of

adjacent country. Here he commenced a settlement under pros-

perous circumstances ; but, near the close of the following year,

fell a victim to the disease of the climate . He died at Natchez .

His two sons, in company with the other adventurers, crossed

the country through the wilderness in the dead of winter ; and,

after innumerable dangers and hardships, reached the sea-coast

14 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

of Georgia in safety. An account of this expedition will be found

in the Travels of President Dwight. Rarely have we met with a

more interesting or melancholy story. The original papers con-

taining the grant were unhappily lost; and the family have never

been able to substantiate their title to the land. Mr. Dwight's

personal grant was a considerable part of the township of Natchez .

He left a widow and thirteen children, ten of whom were under

twenty-one years of age. The subject of this memoir was the

eldest, and on him devolved the care of the family, at a period

whenthe situation and circumstances of the country rendered the

task peculiarly difficult and laborious . From the time of his en-

tering on the Bachelor's degree at College, to his leaving the

army, he had subjected his father to no expense for his own sup-

port. The intelligence of his death, in consequence of the peculiar

circumstances of the country, did not reach the family until near a

twelve- month after the event had happened. Upon receiving the

information, he, with as little delay as possible, removed his own

family to Northampton, and undertook the performance of the new

duties which providentially had devolved upon him, with the great-

est promptitude and cheerfulness. In this situation he passed five

years of the most interesting period of his life ; performing in an

exemplary manner the offices of a son and a brother, and of a guar-

dian to the younger children. Here, he was emphatically the staff

and stay of the family. The government and education of the

children, as well as the daily provisions for their wants, depended

almost exclusively on his exertions. The elder as well as the

younger were committed to his care, and loved and obeyed him as

their father. The filial affection and dutiful respect and obedience

which he exhibited towards his mother, and the more than frater-

nal kindness with which he watched over the well- being of his bro-

thers and sisters, deserve the most honourable remembrance. To

accomplish this object, he postponed his own establishment for

life, and a provision for his family. To accomplish , it, though

destitute of property, he relinquished in their favour his own

proportion of the family estate ; laboured constantly for five

years with a diligence and alacrity rarely exampled; and con-

tinued his paternal care and exertions and liberality long after

his removal from Northampton. Often have we heard his mother,

who died only ten years since, acknowledge, in language of elo-

quent affection and gratitude, his kindness and faithfulness, and

honourable generosity to her and to her children. The respect

which she felt and manifested towards him, though perhaps not

his inferior in native powers of mind, resembled the affection of a

dutiful child towards her father, rather than the feelings of a mo-

ther for her son. During this period, he laboured through the

week upon the farm, and preached on the Sabbath to different

vacant congregations in the neighbouring towns. He also esta-

blished a school at Northampton, for the instruction of youth of

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 15

both sexes, which was almost immediately resorted to by such a

number of pupils, that he was under the necessity of employing

two assistants. At the same time, owing to the dispersed condition

of the College at New-Haven, and to his established character as an

instructer, a part of one of the classes in that seminary repaired to

Northampton, and placed themselves under his care as their pre-

ceptor. To them he devoted his own immediate attention, until

they had completed their regular course of collegiate studies . The

school was continued during his residence there, and uniformly

maintained an extensive and distinguished reputation. At the same

time, he preached almost without intermission upon the Sabbath,

with increasing popularity. For about one year, commencing

with the winter of 1778-1779, he supplied the vacant congrega-

tion of Westfield ; the year following, that of Muddy- Brook, a pa-

rish of Deerfield ; and the year after, that of South Hadley. He

often mentioned it to the honour of the people of Muddy-Brook,

that they paid him for preaching, not in the depreciated currency

of the country, but in specie, or wheat at the specie price, at his

election. The compensation which he received for preaching,

as

well as the profits of his school, were all expended in the support

ofthe common family.

Astrong disposition was manifested, from time to time, by the

inhabitants of Northampton, to employ him in civil life. In the

county conventions of Hampshire he repeatedly represented the

town ; and, in connexion with a few individuals, met and resisted

that spirit ofdisorganization and licentiousness which was then un-

happily prevalent in many parts of the county, and which had too

visible an influence in an assembly often fluctuating and tumultu-

ous. It was owing eminently to his exertions, and those of his

colleague, the Hon. Joseph Hawley, in opposition to the current

ofpopular feeling, and to no small weight of talents and influence,

that the new constitution of Massachusetts was adopted by the

convention of the most important county in the state. Twice he

consented to serve the town as their representative in the state

legislature. This was in the years 1781 and 1782, just before

the close of the war of independence ; when subjects of an inte-

resting and perplexing nature, growing out of the great controver-

sy in which the country had so long been engaged, extensively

agitated the public mind, and engrossed legislative attention .

Every thing was then , in a sense, unsettled . That war had

sundered not only the cords which fastened the colonies to the mo-

ther country , but those, also, which bound them to each other. The

old foundations were, in a sense, destroyed ; and new ones were

to be established. Many of the old laws and regulations were to

be altered ; and others, accommodated to the state of freedom and

independence, were to be devised and instituted. A sense of sub-

ordination and obedience to law, was, also, to be cherished, in-

stead of a spirit of licentiousness then widely prevalent. Inthis

16 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR

situation, inexperienced as he was in the business of a politician,

or a legislator, he at once became one of the most industrious and

influential members of that body, and was greatly admired and dis-

tinguished for his talents and eloquence. All his exertions were

on the side of good order and good morals ; and indicated a steady

attachment to the principles of rational liberty, and decided hos-

tility to licentiousness. On one occasion he was enabled to prove

his devotion to the interests of learning. Apetition for a grant in

favour of Harvard College was before the legislature . At that

time such grants were unpopular. That spirit of honourable libe-

rality, which now happily characterizes the legislature and people

of that commonwealth, was then far from being universally ope-

rative. During his occasional absence from the house, the peti-

tion had been called up; and, after finding but few, and those not

very warm advocates, had been generally negatived. On taking

his seat, Mr. Dwight, learning what had occurred, moved a recon-

sideration of the vote. In a speech of about one hour in length,

fraught with wit, with argument, and with eloquence, and received

with marked applause on the spot , from the members and the

spectators, he effectually changed the feelings of the house, and

procured nearly a unanimous vote in favour of the grant. It gave

him high pleasure thus to confer an obligation on that respectable

seminary : an obligation which was gratefully acknowledged by

its principal officers, as well as by many others of its friends.

At this period, he was earnestly solicited by his friends to quit

the profession in which he had engaged, and devote himself to pub-

lic life. In the winter of 1782—1783, a committee from the dele-

gation of Hampshire, waited upon him with assurances from that

delegation, that, if he would consent, their influence should be ex-

erted to secure his election to the continental Congress : a place

in the gift of the legislature. The late Governor Phillips, of An-

dover, who was his friend and fellow-lodger, though a man of dis-

tinguished piety, gave it as his own unqualified opinion, that he

ought to listen to these proposals and remain in civil life ; assuring

him, also, with several of the most influential members of both

houses, of their cordial support. But he had become so thoroughly

weaned from his first intention of practising law, and was so much

attached to the clerical profession , and so convinced of its supe-

rior usefulness, that nothing could change his resolution to devote

his life to the latter. Having preached occasionally while attend-

ing the legislature, in Boston, and the neighbourhood, he received

invitations, accompanied with flattering offers, as it regarded com-

pensation, to settle as a minister, in Beverly and Charlestown ;

both of which, however, he declined. In the month of May, 1783,

he was invited, by an unanimous vote of the church and congrega-

tion of Greenfield, a parish in the town of Fairfield, in Connecticut,

to settle as their minister. This invitation he accepted, on the

20th ofJuly, in the same year. On the 5th of November follow

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR 17

ing, he was regularly ordained over that people ; and for the suc-

ceeding twelve years remained their pastor.

The annual compensation which he received at Greenfield was

a salary of five hundred dollars, the use of six acres of parochial

land , and twenty cords of wood. They also gave him a settle-

ment of one thousand dollars . From his extensive acquaintance

with men of consideration in literature and politics throughout the

country, and a native propensity to hospitality, it was very ap-

parent that he could not expect to support a growing family, and

the expenses incident to his standing in the community, upon such

an income. To supply the deficiency, he immediately established

an academy at Greenfield, which he superintended himself; devo-

ting six hours regularly every day to the instruction of his pupils .

In a short time , youths in great numbers, and of both sexes, not

only from various parts of New-England, but from the middle and

southern states , as well as from abroad, resorted to his school.

This institution was commenced and carried on absolutely without

funds, and depended solely on his own character and exertions .

He supported it during the whole period of his residence there

with unexampled reputation. We know of no similar institution

in this country, thus dependant, which has flourished so long, or to

such a degree. During the twelve years of his residence there,

he instructed upwards of one thousand pupils. Numbers of them

were carried through the whole course of education customary at

College. In his school he adopted, to a considerable degree, one

part of the Lancasterian mode of instruction ; making it extensive-

ly the duty of the older scholars, who were competent, to hear the

recitations of the younger. Many of his pupils were regularly

boarded in his family; so that its usual collective number was from

twenty to twenty-five. It ought to be mentioned that his female

pupils were instructed in many of the higher branches of literature,

whichhad not, here, previously been taught to their sex ; and that

under his auspices, on the delightful spot where he resided, began

that superior system of female education which is founded on the

principle, that women are intelligent beings, capable of mental

improvement, and which is at present extensively prevalent.

Even to this day, however, in very few of the higher female

schools, are they carried through the same extensive and solid

course of study which was pursued by his pupils. Probably to the

exertions and influence of no one individual are the ladies of our

country so extensively indebted. No man thought more highly

of the sex ; no man loved better the company of women of refine-

ment and intelligence ; and no man did more to exalt the female

character.

Beside the instruction of his school, he preached steadily twice.

every Sabbath ; and regularly visited his people. He also culti-

vated , with his own hands, a large kitchen, fruit , and flower garden.

Living but a few rods from the public road, in a most delightful

VOL. I. 3

11

18 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

village, and having numerous family connexions, and very many

friends and acquaintance, he saw and entertained an almost unin-

terrupted succession of company; greater, we are led to believe,

than any individual whom we have known in the state. Among

these were many strangers of respectability, from various and dis-

tant parts of the country. Greenfield was the resort of learning,

of talents , of refinement, and of piety ; and his own hospitable

doors were ever open to welcome the stranger as well as the

friend. We believe the instances to be rare, in which a single in-

dividual has been the centre of such extensive attraction to men

of superior character, or so entirely altered the aspect of society

in the region around him.

When it is considered that, from his leaving College as a tutor,

his eyes were so weak as not only to preclude him almost entirely

from reading and writing, but to cause him, very frequently, ex-

treme pain and distress ; it will naturally be concluded, that he

must have passed a very industrious and laborious life. Such,

however , was his capacity for every kind of business in which he

was engaged, that he was able to devote as much time as was

necessary to the calls of company and friendship, as well as to

perform the extra-parochial duties of a minister to his people.

Previous to his settlement at Greenfield, his character as a preach-

er stood high in the public estimation. During the period of his

residence there, he gained a reputation not often equalled in this

country.

Having experienced the disadvantages of too abstemious as well

as too sedentary a life when engaged as tutor in College, he be-

came ever afterwards extremely attentive to his health. For the

purpose of guarding himself against the recurrence of his former

sufferings in this respect, he used a great deal of bodily exercise.

He not only walked and rode, but he worked steadily and vigor-

ously in his garden and on his land.

Being unable from the weakness of his eyes to write, he very

early discovered that he must perform his stated duties as a preach-

er without notes, or abandon his profession. A very few experi-

ments convinced him that he was able to adopt the former course ;

and he pursued it for many years almost exclusively. That course

was, to write the heads of his discourse, and the leading thoughts

ofwhich it was to be composed, and to fill up the body of it at the

time of delivery. What was committed to writing occupied him

but a few minutes. Under all the disadvantages which he expe-

rienced from the weakness of his eyes, and notwithstanding the

variety of his avocations and duties, he composed and preached,

while at Greenfield, about one thousand sermons, which,deducting

the time he was absent during that period, will differ very little

from two each week.

In the year 1785, he published the Conquest of Canaan. This

work was begun, as has been remarked, when he was nineteen years

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 19

of age, and finished in his twenty-third year. Proposals for printing

it were issued in 1775, and upwards of three thousand subscribers

procured; but the circumstances of the country, just then com-

mencing the war of independence, which lasted till 1783, post-

poned its publication. Afew additions were made to the poem

between that time and its appearance in 1785 ; but the great body

of it was published as it was written in 1773.

In 1787, Mr. Dwight received the degree of Doctor of Divinity

from the College at Princeton, New Jersey. He was then thirty-

five years of age .

In 1791 , he was appointed by the governor of the state to

preach the election sermon, before the legislature, at Hartford.

In the year 1793, he published a sermon on the Genuineness

and Authenticity of the New Testament ; and in the following year,

a poem in seven parts, called after the place of his residence,

" GREENFIELD HILL." The Conquest of Canaan, and Greenfield

Hill, were both re-published in England.

During his residence at Greenfield, he cultivated an extensive

acquaintance and intercourse, not only with the Congregational

Clergy of New-England, but with many in the Presbyterian Church

in New- York and the states farther south. This fact often enabled

him to exert an auspicious influence in removing the prejudices

which unhappily existed in many of both classes ; as well as in

various instances directly to promote the great interests of morals

and religion. Among other subjects which early engaged his at-

tention, was that of a more intimate union of the Congregational

and Presbyterian Churches throughout the United States. On this

subject he entered into an extensive correspondence with the more

influential clergy, both in Connecticut and New- York. A propo-

sition for this object was made by him, early in the year 1790, in

the particular Association of which he was a member. It was

carried from that body to the General Association of Connecticut,

which, in June of that year, met at his house. That venerable

body proposed it in form to the General Assembly of the Presby-

terian Church and the General Convention of Massachusetts . The

two former bodies appointed each a committee of three to form and

establish articles of union. This committee, of whom Dr. Dwight

was one, met at New-Haven in September, 1791 , and most harmo-

niously and happily executed their commission. To the union

then agreed on , the associated churches of Massachusetts, New-

Hampshire, and Vermont, have since acceded : an event that has

been attended with very beneficial consequences to religion and

the Church.

In the year 1794, he was invited by the Consistory of the Re-

formed Dutch Church in the city of Albany, to remove to that place

and settle as their minister. The application was unanimous, and

the compensation which they offered was considered, at the time ,

as liberal; but it was not accepted, for reasons which were deem-

ed by him satisfactory.

20 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

دو

In May, 1795, the Presidency of Yale College became vacant

by the death of the Rev. Dr. Stiles. In fixing on a successor, it

may with propriety be said, that towards Dr. Dwight the attention

ofthe community was universally directed. The high reputation

as an instructer, which he had gained whilst a tutor, and which he

had maintained and enlarged since he left the College, was so uni-

versally known and acknowledged, that there was no difficulty in

determining the question which now devolved upon the Corpora-

tion. They had nothing to do but to pursue the course pointed

out by public opinion, which, in this case, was clearly and dis-

tinctly marked. Accordingly, he was, with great unanimity, ap-

pointed to fill that important and respectable station; was inaugu-

rated in September of that year, and presided at the public Com-

mencement; and, in December following, removed his family to

New-Haven. The people of his parish with whom he had lived

for twelve years in uninterrupted harmony, heard of his appoint-

ment with extreme regret. They loved their pastor, and they

were proud of him, and they could not consent to give him up.

Never have we known a parish part with their minister with more

reluctance .

We are now entering upon a very interesting period in the life

of Dr. Dwight. Owing to a variety of causes which it is not ne-

cessary to enumerate, the state of Yale College at the time of his

accession to the office of President, was in many respects unhappy.

Destitute in a great degree of public or private patronage, its num-

bers were reduced, its discipline was relaxed, a looseness of moral

and religious sentiment had become fashionable, and its reputation

had been for some time on the decline through the community.

One of the greatest evils under which it suffered, was an extensive

prevalence of infidelity among the students. This pernicious spi-

rit had been derived from the circumstances of the country at the

close of the preceding war. As was natural , it found easy access

to the minds of a collection of youths , who were fascinated with

ideas of mental as well as political independence, and who were

easily induced to shake off what they considered the shackles of

habit and superstition. The degree to which it prevailed may be

conjectured from the following fact. A considerable proportion

of the class which he first taught, had assumed the names of the

principal English and French infidels, and were more familiarly

known by them than by their own. Under circumstances like

these, he entered upon the duties of his office as PRESIDENT OF

YALE COLLEGE.

The talents which he possessed for the instruction and govern-

ment of youth were now called into full exercise. A thorough

reformation in the system of discipline was early commenced, and

accomplished with as much expedition as the nature of the case

would admit. Infidelity was assailed by argument, and vanquish-

ed, and vice was disgraced, and in a great measure banished from

the College.

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 21

He took upon himself the instruction of the senior class, pursuing

a system which produced the most beneficial effects. " The public

(says Professor Silliman) have been little aware of the extent and

diversity of the labours of President Dwight, in this Institution.

He has, in fact , discharged the duties of four offices, either of which

' s, ordinarily, considered as sufficient to engross the time and

talents of one man. He has been charged with the general super-

intendence and responsibility constituting the appropriate duties of

the presidency ; like his predecessors, he instructed the senior

class in their peculiar studies, but on a much more enlarged plan ;

he voluntarily discharged, to a great extent, the duties of a pro-

fessor of Belles- Lettres and Oratory ; and he has been charged

also with those of a professor of Theology. " *

His mode of instructing was peculiarly his own. His long ex-

perience in this employment, had made him thoroughly acquainted

with the youthful character, and enabled him to teach as well as to

govern young men, with extraordinary success . " The students

( says Professor Silliman) habitually expected the senior year with

much interest, as one in which they looked for the most valuable

instructions ; nor were they disappointed. President Dwight de-

lighted much in the peculiar studies which it was his duty to eluci-

date. Although these studies were prosecuted by the students in

appropriate text-books, the order of which he observed in his re-

citations, he always thought for himself with much independence,

but with a respectful deference to the opinions of men of eminence.

Still the opinions of the authors in question he sometimes found

reason to controvert, and while he candidly stated his own views,

with the grounds of them, he enjoined upon his pupils the same

independence of mind, and was willing that they too should differ

from him, and think for themselves . The recitations of the senior

class were, in fact, although not in name, a series of familiar lec-

tures ; and the driest parts of logic and metaphysics were rendered

interesting by the ample illustrations of the President, enlivened by

agreeable and apposite anecdote, and by sallies of sprightliness,

which, while they took nothing from his dignity , greatly relieved

the tedium of long discussions.

" Into his recitations and discussions he also threw a vast fund

of practical instruction, on almost every subject of life, manners,

and human business ; for few men have ever observed more care-

fully and extensively ; few have conversed more largely, and been

more in contact with the world, in all its innocently accessible

points.

" His object was not only to instruct the young men under his

care in the particular sciences which came before them, but to fit

them, by repeated counsels, and by information pressed upon them

with parental solicitude, for the various scenes into which they

were to pass in life .

Address, p. 15.

22 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

" In discussing the various subjects which customarily came be-

fore the senior class, especially those connected with the decision

of disputed questions, it was usual for the President to assume a

considerable range of statement and argument ; and all those who

have had the happiness to attend on his instructions, will remem-

ber, that not on a few occasions, his mind was kindled with his sub-

ject ; till, excited by the re-acting stimulus of his own thoughts and

communications, he has spoken even more eloquently, and with a

more finished touch of feeling, than was usual in his regular writ-

ten discourses .

" It was never any part of his plan merely to discharge his duty :

he did it with his whole mind and heart ; and thought nothing ade-

quately done, till all was done that the case admitted of . Till the

increase of professorships rendered it unnecessary, he heard the

senior class recite twice as often as had been customary, and on

most occasions his recitations were of double the length that would

have been required."

In the year 1795, when President Dwight entered upon the du-

ties ofhis office in the College, the whole number of students was

one hundred and ten. Almost immediately after his accession ,

they began to increase, and in the course of his presidency amount-

ed to three hundred and thirteen ; an increase unexampled in any

similar institution in this country.

It has been remarked, that at the time of his accession to the pre-

sidency, infidelity was fashionable and prevalent in the College.

To extirpate a spirit so pernicious and fatal , he availed himself ofan

early and decisive opportunity. Forensic disputation was an im-

portant exercise of the senior class. For this purpose they were

formed into a convenient number of divisions ; two of which dispu-

ted before him every week, in the presence of the other members

of the class, and of the resident graduates. It was the practice for

each division to agree upon several questions, and then refer them

to the President to select which he thought proper. At that time

infidelity was extensively prevalent in the state, and in the coun-

try ; and an impression existed generally among the students, that

Christianity was supported by authority, and not by argument ;

and that their instructers were afraid to investigate the question

respecting the Divine inspiration of the Scriptures, in the field

of open and fair discussion. One of the questions presented by

the first division was this : " Are the Scriptures of the Old and New

Testament the Word of God? " To their surprise the President

selected it for discussion; told them to write on which side they

pleased, as he should not impute to them any sentiments which they

advanced as their own ; and requested those who should write on

the negative side of the question to collect and bring forward all the

facts and arguments which they could produce : enjoining it upon

them, however, to treat the subject with becoming respect and re-

verence. Most if not all the members of the division came forward

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 23

as the champions of Infidelity. When they had finished the dis-

cussion, he first examined the ground they had taken ; triumphant-

ly refuted their arguments ; proved to them that their statement

of facts was mistaken or irrelevant ; and, to their astonishment,

convinced them that their acquaintance with the subject was wholly

superficial. After this, he entered into a direct defence of the di-

vine origin of Christianity, in a strain of powerful argument and

animated eloquence which nothing could resist. The effect upon

the students was electrical. From that moment Infidelity was not

only without a strong hold, but without a lurking place. To es-

pouse her cause was now as unpopular as before it had been to

profess a belief in Christianity. Unable to endure the exposure

of argument, she fled from the retreats of learning, ashamed and

disgraced.

His system of discipline was peculiarly his own; and has from

its success commanded entire and universal approbation. The

College laws, in force when he entered on the Presidency, were

the same which were generally in being before his admission to

College as a student. They were compiled by President Clap

from the statutes of the English Universities ; were made for other

times, and for a very different state of society. Without proposing

in the outset any serious alterations in the written code of laws, he

effectually changed the whole system of administration. The go-

vernment of College became as really new, as if every statute had

been altered. A single clause at the end of the chapter on

" Crimes and Misdemeanors," furnished him and his companions

with authority to introduce and tojustify this change, and became, in

a sense, the only written law in force. The purport of this clause

was, that , as the laws of the College were few and general, the

Faculty might proceed, in all cases not expressly provided for, ac-

cording to their best discretion . The intercourse between the offi-

cers and the students was placed on a new footing : the latter

were addressed and treated as young gentlemen, and no other

marks of respect were demanded of them, than those which gentle-

men of course render to each other. The distinctions between the

classes, so far as they were unnecessary and odious, were prevent-

ed. That degrading servility to which, under the authority of long

established usage, the freshman class had been subjected, was

abolished. The practice of inflicting fines for infractions of the

laws, was abrogated ; and it is not known that resort was ever

had to that species of punishment for absence from prayers or re-

citation, or for any other offence of a character not more heinous .

Instead of pursuing a course which seemed only calculated to in-

flict a penalty on the parent, he wished to adopt one which should

prevent the necessity of every kind of penalty, by preventing of-

fences. In the room of pecuniary exactions for neglect of study,

and other violations of duty, he substituted private remonstrance.

Appeals were made to the conscience of the delinquent, as well as

24 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

to his hopes and fears : appeals founded on the guilt of his con-

duct, on his love of reputation, the happiness of his parents, and his

prospects in life . These appeals were almost always successful.

Whenthey failed , early notice ofthis fact was given to the parent.

Iftheir united remonstrances were unavailing, the offender was pri-

vately informed that his connexion with College had ceased. This

course was principally pursued during the freshman year ; at the

close of which, the class was regularly relieved of those who had

manifested a settled disposition to be idle and vicious. It was his

sincere endeavour to save the character of the young offender. If

an offence was private, its punishment, if possible, was private ; and

this, whether the delinquent was permitted to remain a member

of College or not. Many of his pupils can remember how kindly

and honourably he conducted towards them when he had discover-

ed their misconduct.

The system of matriculation, which he introduced, has proved

highly efficacious and salutary. According to this system, those

who are found, upon examination, to possess the requisite literary

attainments, do not at once become members of College. To be

members in full standing, their names must be entered in the

" Matriculation Book;" and this cannot be done until they have

established a fair character for correct moral deportment and ap-

plication to study. Before this takes place, they are liable to be

sent home at any moment. An important favour, also, was con-

ferred on parents living at a distance, by requiring their children

to have guardians to regulate their expenses .

He encouraged the students, especially those of the senior class,

in all their difficulties and troubles, to come to him for advice and

assistance. In every such case, the instructer was forgotten in the

friend and father. He entered into their interests and feelings, just

as if they were his own ; and while he yielded the necessary relief ,

he endeared himself to them permanently by his kindness. The

members of the senior class, who wished to engage for a season,

after leaving College, in the business of instruction, applied to him

regularly to procure them eligible situations. So lively was the

interest which he took in their welfare, and so willing and active

his exertions in their behalf , that few such applications failed of

being successful. He remembered the feelings of a young man

just leaving College, without a profession, without property, and

with no means of support but the blessing ofGod and his own ex-

ertions. Nothing gave him higher pleasure than to encourage the

heart of every youth so situated , to save him from despondence, and

to open to him the road to property, to usefulness, and to honour.

The number of his students whom he thus essentially befriended,

if stated, would almost exceed belief . With others, who were in

more affluent circumstances, he would enter into a free and confi-

dential conversation on their plan of life, explain to them their pe-

culiar dangers, and lead them to aim at eminence in their profes-

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 25

sions, and to form for themselves a high standard of moral excel-

lence. The respect and affection manifested towards him by his

pupils, (after leaving College ) whenever they visited New-Haven,

as well as when they met him abroad, was a sufficient reward for

all his efforts to serve them, if he had not found a still higher re-

ward in doing good. We will only add, that his pupils fami-

liarly spoke of him, with reference to this subject, by the most

honourable appellation, " THE YOUNG MAN'S FRIEND . "

There can be no higher evidence of his qualifications for the

important place which he filled, than is furnished by the effects of

his presidency. Yale College was founded by a number of pious

clergymen without property, who had little to bestow upon it but

a few books on theology. It has always struggled forward through

great difficulties and embarrassments for the want of those funds

which are indispensably necessary to its highest prosperity. Those

at a distance, who know nothing of the Institution but its extensive

reputation, would indeed be astonished were they told how small

is the amount of benefactions which it has received. The men of

wealth, in the state where it is situated, have not sufficiently re-

alized its importance to bestow upon it their bounty. The state,

also, though at times she has assisted it, has not yet rivalled the

munificence of her neighbours on the North and West towards

their seminaries of learning. In her public funds, she is, in pro-

portion to her population, the richest state in the Union ; yet the

College, emphatically her ornament and her glory, has but too

sparingly enjoyed her patronage. We have already seen its

situation, when Dr. Dwight was inducted into the presidency.

Under all these disadvantages, in his hands, and by his unwearied

assiduity and exertions, and those of his companions in office, it

assumed a new appearance. Its numbers increased, its discipline

was revived and invigorated, its morals were purified, and its rela-

tive character greatly elevated.

The period during which he presided over the College was at-

tended with peculiar difficulties . Ageneral sentiment of insubordi-

nation, growing out of the political situation of the civilized world ,

had seized the minds of the young as well as the old. High notions

of freedom and personal independence prevailed among all ages.

And the first impulse, to which in many instances the minds of

youths as well as of men were disposed to yield, was resistance

to authority. Many of our higher seminaries of learning have wit-

nessed its effects in scenes of riot and insurrection, which have, for

the time, subverted their authority, and destroyed their usefulness .

Yale College wholly escaped these evils. No general combina-

tion of the students to resist its government, ever occurred during

his presidency. This fact is to be ascribed to the wisdom and

firmness of the President and his associates in office. He well

knew that the tranquillity of such an institution must depend on the

respect and affection of the students, and the steady watchfulness

VOL. I. 4

26 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR .

of its officers . Deeply read in the human character, and empha-

tically so in the character of youngmen, he foresaw the approaches

of the storm which so extensively prevailed, and provided in season

the means of defence and security. On every occasion of this

kind, he derived the utmost benefit from one trait of his character,

his energy ; a trait which no man ever possessed in a more emi-

nent degree. His decision and inflexibility to his purpose cannot

besurpassed.

At the commencement of his presidency, the professorship of

theology was vacant. The Corporation proposed to appoint him,

in form, to the office. For the first ten years, he would consent to

none but an annual appointment. In 1805, it was made perma-

nent. During the whole period, he preached twice every Sabbath,

with almost no assistance from his brethren, and very rarely hav-

ing an opportunity to exchange with the neighbouring clergy.

Early in the year following his induction, he commenced the deli-

very of a series of lectures on the Evidences of Divine Revelation .

This was no part of the duties of either office ; but, owing to the

extensive prevalence of infidelity in the country at that period, he

viewed it as necessary to guard his pupils against the contagion.

These lectures were not written out; the weak state of his eyes

forbad his employing them for such a purpose. After collecting

materials for about fifty, the same difficulty compelled him to de-

sist, and prevented him from delivering even the whole of that num-

ber. They were on a plan entirely new, and were listened to with

great interest. Had not the battle with Infidelity been fought, and

the victory won, we should regret, still more than we now do, that

they were left unfinished. No one, not personally acquainted with

the facts, can realize how great, at this period, were his sufferings

from weakness of sight. For years it was with extreme difficulty

that he could read or write even a sentence . He was greatly

alarmed, for a long period, with the symptoms of an approaching

gutta serena. Repeatedly the pressure on the brain was so great

as to produce momentary blindness, and obviously to threaten

apoplexy. Occasionally, for weeks together, the anguish of his

eyes was so intense that it required powerful exertion to draw off

his mind to any other object. And often, after attempting in vain

to sleep, he has risen from his bed, and, to promote a free perspi-

ration, has walked for miles in the middle of the night.

In the prosecution of his duties as professor of divinity, he early

began to deliver the lectures in these volumes . His practice was

to preach one on the morning of each Sabbath in term time. By

this arrangement he finished the course once in four years . Thus

each student, who completed his regular collegiate period, had an

opportunity to hear the whole series. He first conceived the plan

of the work at Greenfield. While there, he completed it in short

notes in about one hundred sermons, and delivered them twice to

his people before his removal. At New- Haven, he twice went

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 27

through with them in the same state ; frequently, however, adding

to their number, and altering their arrangement.

In 1805, when he was permanently appointed Professor of The-

ology, the Corporation allowed him fifty pounds per annum to em-

ploy an amanuensis. Though the compensation was trifling, yet

the place was coveted, and regularly applied for, a length of time

before it became vacant. He began immediately to write out these

Lectures ; and wrote one a week during term time, or forty a year

until they were completed. If not prevented, he commenced this

task on Monday morning. His progress depended, with the ex-

ception of casual interruptions, on the rapidity of the amanuensis ;

which always fell short of the rapidity with which he dictated.

Sometimes, though rarely, the sermon was finished in a single day ;

usually in the course of the second day. The remainder of the

week was employed in writing his Travels, and Occasional Ser-

mons . When interrupted by company, if propriety did not forbid,

he would proceed with two trains of thought by the hour together ;

conversing with the company, and also dictating to the amanuensis.

By a standing rule of the College, the President annually de-

livers a valedictory sermon, on the Sabbath preceding the Com-

mencement, to the candidates for the Bachelor's degree. Perhaps

no part of his clerical labours excited more public attention, or

were listened to with a livelier interest, than the sermons delivered

on these occasions .

In the year 1797, he was applied to by the General Association

of Connecticut to revise Dr. Watts' version of the Psalms ; to ver-

sify such as he had omitted ; and to make a selection of Hymns

suited to the general purposes of public worship. The work was

completed in 1800, and laid before a joint committee of that body

and of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church ; by whom

it was approved, and recommended to the use of the Congrega-

tional and Presbyterian Churches throughout the United States .

In the performance of this difficult task, he made alterations, of more

or less consequence, in a considerable number of Dr. Watts'

Psalms ; and composed thirty - three entire psalms, containing about

twelve hundred and fifty lines .

From the time he recovered his health, after the severe attack

of colic already mentioned, he habituated himself to a steady course

of vigorous bodily exercise. While at Greenfield, notwithstanding

the multitude of his avocations, he walked, and rode on horseback,

extensively ; and constantly cultivated a large fruit and kitchen

garden with his own hands . For this particular species of labour

he had a high relish . His garden was distinguished for its beauty

and its productiveness : for the excellence of its vegetables, the

abundance and delicacy of its fruits, and the choice variety of its

flowers . Nor did the habit cease with him after his removal to

New-Haven. He there pursued the same course -making it his

constant practice, through the whole season for gardening, to work

28 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

at least anhour every morning before breakfast. In other parts

of the year, he walked much and daily ; rode frequently ; and often

in the winter, when no other mode of exercise was convenient, he

would cut his firewood. On this subject he exhibited the strictest

uniformity and perseverance ; and both by precept and example

inculcated upon his pupils the necessity of a similar course .

With

reference, in a considerable degree, to the same object, in the year

1796, he commenced journeying on horseback, or in a sulky, du-

ring the College vacations, particularly in May and September.

This practice he continued through the remainder of his life, ex-

cept the last year ; when he was severely attacked by the disease

bywhich it was terminated. In these various journeys, it is com-

puted that he rode about twenty thousand miles. His excursions

were chiefly confined to the New -England states, and the state of

New-York. He experienced the highest gratification from the

beauties of scenery ; and scarcely a spot can be named within

those limits , where those beauties are to be found in high perfection,

which he did not visit and describe. For his own amusement, he

took notes of the most material occurrences of his severaljourneys ;

and afterwards wrote them out, for the gratification of his family.

This suggested to him the idea of collecting materials, from time

to time, for one or more volumes of travels ; in which should be

comprised, not only an account of the climate, soil, mountains, ri-

vers, scenery, curiosities, and general face of the country over

which he passed, but of the state of society, of manners, morals,

literature, and religion ; the institutions, civil, literary, and reli-

gious ; and the character of the governments and laws, of the

abovementioned states . To the performance of this task he was

greatly prompted by the very unfair and illiberal accounts, which are

given of us by foreigners, who have done little else than caricature

both the country and its inhabitants . In his opinion, also, there

was something peculiar in the circumstances of this country, which

would render its history interesting to the philosopher, the states-

man, and the Christian. These circumstances arose from the sin-

gular character and romantic history of the aborigines ; from the

recent date of its settlement by civilized inhabitants ; from the cha-

racter, views, and history, of its first settlers ; from the advance-

ments it had made in wealth, science, the arts ; the character of its

government, laws, and institutions ; and, in short, from its progress

in all the great objects of a civilized and Christian community, in

the course of a hundred and eighty years .

On these journeys he visited great numbers of the most intelli-

gent and respectable inhabitants of those tracts of country over

which he travelled; and derived, from his conversation with them,

a great collection of facts relative to the general state of morals,

manners, and religion. The information thus gained was arranged,

reduced to writing, and prepared for publication : the whole form-

ing materials for three octavo volumes. It is believed, by those

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 29

who have had an opportunity to examine the manuscripts, that no

work has appeared which contains so much correct information

concerning the subjects of which it treats, as this. It is also be-

lieved that, should it ever be published, it will have the effect of re-

deeming our national character from the abuse and calumnies which

have been heaped upon it by foreign travellers .

These journeys also enabled him to form an acquaintance with

great numbers of the clergy, and many other persons of a religious

character, in the states through which he travelled ; and to ascer-

tain the moral and religious condition of the people. This informa-

tion was of the highest moment to him, both as it respected his feel-

ings and his pursuits. By these means, and by his extensive cor-

respondence, he became possessed of more knowledge, general and

local, of the religious state and interests of the country, than almost

any other man ; and, by the aid of this knowledge, he was able to

originate, and still oftener to aid, the execution of very numerous

and extensive schemes of charity and benevolence .

To enumerate the various literary, charitable, and pious institu-

tions , which he was active in founding, or promoting, would be a

laborious employment. Some of the principal ones may be men-

tioned. By his exertions and influence, aided by those of distin-

guished men around him, " THE CONNECTICUT ACADEMY OF ARTS

AND SCIENCES " was established. This was done in the year 1799 ;

and the association was incorporated by the legislature of that

state in October of the same year. One of the great objects in

view was, to procure a Statistical Account of Connecticut.

This

he had much at heart, and flattered himself he should be able to

accomplish. For this purpose, the Academy printed and distribu-

ted a list of inquiries to men of intelligence, throughout the state,

and to encourage and stimulate others to assist in the execution of

the plan. Notwithstanding the weakness of his eyes, he wrote the

account of New-Haven at an early date, which the Academy after-

wards published. Accounts of a few other towns were furnished

by other gentlemen. But, as it proved less easy than he imagin-

ed, to obtain the performance of a task attended with some labour

and no profit, the business languished in hands far less occupied

than his own, and the principal object was never accomplished.

He was a zealous promoter of the establishment, and the exer-

tions , of the Missionary Society of Connecticut ; an institution pre-

eminent in this country for its zeal and success in the great cause

for the promotion of which it was founded. To its funds, also, he

was a liberal contributor -having devoted to their increase the pro-

fits of his edition of the psalms and hymns sold in that state. The

amount of moneys received from this source, by the Society, ex-

ceeded one thousand dollars .

He was one ofthe projectors ofthe Society for Foreign Missions,

established in the year 1809, at Boston, Massachusetts ; and until

his death was one of its active and influential officers .

30 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

Such was the fact, also, with regard to the Theological Seminary,

at Andover, in that state. From its commencement, he was one of

the visiters of that school, and annually attended to the duties of his

office with great engagedness and punctuality. For it, his labours,

his counsels, and his prayers, were ever ready ; and in its pros-

perity he was not less interested than in that of the College over

which he presided.

From the time of the establishment of the most illustrious and

sublime charity that has ever engaged the attention, or drawn forth

the exertions and the wealth of the pious and benevolent " THE

BRITISH AND FOREIGN BIBLE SOCIETY " -it was the ardent wish of

President Dwight, to see a similar institution established in the

United States . Although a friend and promoter of smaller and

more circumscribed institutions, he viewed the subject on a large

scale, and was strongly impressed with the idea, that a National

Society would be much more efficient, and far more extensively

useful. Although he was prevented by sickness from being pre-

sent at the establishment of " THE AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY," du-

ring the last year of his life ; yet it was an object which not only met

with his cordial approbation, but had the benefit of his warmest

encouragement, and his earnest prayers ; and it was a consoling

consideration to him that he lived to see it accomplished, and

making rapid progress towards extensive usefulness and re-

spectability.

In addition to the foregoing institutions, a long list of more con-

fined, but active and operative societies, formed for the purposes

of piety and charity, had the benefit of his exertions, and the

weight of his influence and patronage. According to his resources,

he contributed largely and cheerfully ; his services he rendered to

an extent rarely equalled in this country ; and in his endeavours to

promote their usefulness and success, he was never weary.

Throughout his whole ministerial life, and especially while head

of the College, he was resorted to by clergymen, from various

parts of the country, for his advice and counsel on the subject

of their professional concerns . Vacant parishes applied to him for

his assistance in procuring ministers . In all associations of the

clergy, local and general, of which he was a member, he was ac-

tive and influential ; able in devising, and firm in accomplishing

measures for the advancement of religion, and for the good of the

community. His services were extensively sought as a peacema-

ker, in removing difficulties between ministers and their people,

and in restoring harmony in churches. Applications for private

teachers, and instructers of public schools, from almost all parts

of the United States, were made to him in immense numbers . The

infant seminaries of our country often requested his assistance in the

selection of their presidents, professors, and tutors . These various

applications, not only occupied much of his time, but subjected

him to a laborious correspondence, and to no inconsiderable ex

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 31

pense. Yet his ardent desire to do good, by improving the educa-

tion of the young, by diffusing valuable knowledge, by advancing

the literary character of the country, and by promoting the pros-

perity of the church of Christ, rendered these gratuitous services

for others not irksome, but pleasant.

During the period of his presidency, he was often called to

preach, at the ordination of ministers, at the funerals of distin-

guished individuals, and on other public and extraordinary occa-

sions. Many of these sermons were printed. The following

is a catalogue of these productions, and of various others of a

different character published during that period.

In 1797, he published two Discourses on the nature and danger

of Infidel Philosophy, addressed to the candidates for the Baсса-

laureate in Yale College. And a sermon at the funeral of the

Rev. Elizur Goodrich, D. D.

In 1798, a Sermon, entitled " The Duty of Americans at the pre-

sent Crisis, " delivered at New- Haven, on the 4th of July in that

year.

In 1800, a Discourse on the character of Washington .

In 1801 , a Discourse on some events of the last century.

In 1804, a Sermon on the death of Mr. Ebenezer G. Marsh.

In 1805, a Sermon on Duelling.

In 1808, a Sermon on the opening of the Theological Institution

in Andover, and the ordination of the Rev. Eliphalet Pearson,

D. D.

In 1809, a Sermon occasioned by the death of Governor Trum-

bull.

In 1810, a Charity Sermon, preached at New-Haven.

In 1812, The Dignity and Excellence of the Gospel -a Dis-

course delivered at the Ordination of the Rev. Nathaniel W. Tay-

lor.

A Discourse, in two parts, on the Public Fast, in the same year.

A Discourse, in two parts, on the National Fast, in the same

year. In 1813, a Sermon, before the American Board of Commission-

ers for Foreign Missions.

Observations on Language, published in the Memoirs of the

Connecticut Academy of Sciences, in 1816.

An Essay on Light, also published by that Institution the same

year.

In the years 1810, 1811, 1812, and 1816, he published several

important articles in two religious periodical publications in New-

England.

In every situation in life, President Dwight was distinguished for

hospitality. At New-Haven he was still more liable to company

than at Greenfield ; and very few men, in any profession, or em-

ployment, in that state, ever entertained more, and no one with

more absolute kindness and liberality. Agreat proportion of re

32 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

spectable strangers, almost all clergymen and persons of a religious

character, visiting or passing through that town, were desirous of

being introduced to him. It is believed that very few, who en-

joyed the opportunity, ever left him without being gratified with

the interview. Notwithstanding the variety and importance of his

avocations, he was never unprepared to entertain strangers, or to

enjoy the conversation of his friends .

Twice, during his presidency, the Corporation thought it expe-

dient to state the circumstances of the College to the legislature ;

and to show that body the extreme inconvenience under which it

laboured, for the want of buildings to accommodate the students .

They had multiplied to such a degree, that about one third of the

whole number were obliged to take rooms in the town; and, of

course, were placed out of the immediate inspection, and control,

of its officers : -a state of things almost necessarily productive of

evil to the Institution. He was appointed one of the agents of the

Board to present their statement. It will scarcely be believed that

these applications were unsuccessful. On both these occasions ,

his address to that honourable body was universally admired as

a distinguished specimen of forensic eloquence. It drew, from all

who heard it, the strongest expression of applause .

But notwithstanding the failure of these applications, the reputa-

tion of the College was extended, and its numbers increased, be-

yond all former example. Though in want of the requisite build-

ings, though chiefly destitute of funds and of patronage, it still flou-

rished ; and was considered, throughout the country, as inferior to

no seminary of learning in the United States. Students from every

part of the Union were to be found in it ; and from some of the

southern states, a great proportion of the whole number who were

educated at the north. The College thus derived, from the ta-

lents and exertions of its government, that reputation and advan-

tage, for which it ought, in a far greater degree, to have been in-

debted to the liberality of the state.

By such long continued and unintermitted application to literary

and scientifical pursuits, it would be natural to expect, that at the

age of sixty- three, his constitution would have begun to experi-

ence some marks of decay and infirmity . Such, however, was

not the fact. The regularity of his habits, his temperate manner

of living , and the uniform course of exercise which he pursued ;

all united to invigorate his constitution, and render him, at that

age, more active and energetic than most men of forty. No ap-

parent declension was discernible in the powers either of his body

or his mind. His understanding was as vigorous, his imagination

as lively, and his industry and exertions as uniform and efficient,

as they had been at any former period. In September, 1815, he

undertook a journey into the western parts of the state of New-

York. When he reached Catskill, he made an excursion to the

summit of the neighbouring mountains, with the same views, and

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 33

for the same purposes, as he had visited so many similar objects

in New-England. After travelling westward as far as Hamilton

College , he relinquished the idea of proceeding farther in his jour-

ney, in consequence of the state of the roads, which had been

rendered extremely heavy and disagreeable by the extraordinary

equinoctial storm of that year. As usual, he preached every Sab-

bath on thatjourney, and was thought by his friends never to have

discovered more force of intellect, or higher powers of eloquence,

than on these occasions. This was the last journey that he ever

made. On the meeting of College in October, he resumed his

customary labours in the chapel, and in the recitation-room, and

performed them with his usual vigour, until the month of Febru-

ary ; when he was seized with the first threatening attack of the

disease to which he finally became a victim. That attack was

severe and painful, to a degree of which those who did not witness

it can have no conception. It made rapid and fearful ravages in

a constitution which had increased in strength and firmness for

more than sixty years, and which promised, to human expectation ,

to last to a " good old age. " His patience, as well as his faith ,

were now brought to a most severe and heart-searching test. The

pain which he endured, and endured with unyielding fortitude ,

was beyond the powers of description. For several weeks, during

the month of April, scarcely any hopes were entertained, either

by himself , his friends, or his physicians, of his recovery. Amidst

all his sufferings, not a murmur, not a repining expression, escaped

from his lips . His mind was perfectly clear, and his reason un-

clouded. Patience under suffering, and resignation to the will of

God, were exhibited by him in the most striking and exemplary

manner, from day to day. His conversation was the conversation

of a Christian, not only free from complaint, but, at times, cheerful

and animated ; his prayers were fervent, but full ofhumility, sub-

mission, and hope .

At the end of twelve weeks his disease assumed a more favour-

able appearance. By surgical aid, he gained a partial relief from

his distress ; and his constitutional energy, still unbroken, raised

the hopes of his friends that he might recover. He was unable to

preach in the chapel until after the May vacation . On the 2d of

June, he delivered to his pupils a sermon, composed for the occa-

sion during his sickness, from Psalm xciv. 17, 18, 19 : " Unless the

LORD had been my help, my soul had almost dwelt in silence.

When I said, My foot slippeth ; thy mercy, O LORD, held me up.

In the multitude of my thoughts within me, thy comforts delight my

soul. " After a pertinent and solemn introduction, and an allusion

to his own sickness and sufferings, the dangerous situation in which

he had recently been placed, and the little probability there was,

for a time, that he should recover, he proceeded to make a practical

use of the doctrine, and the subject. The scene was peculiarly

impressive and affecting. In no instance, during his presidency,

VOL. I. 5

34 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

until then, had he been kept from his pulpit by sickness, or any

other cause . The change in his countenance and general appear-

ance, was great and alarming. The plan of the discourse was

new, the thoughts were deeply interesting, the language plain, but

forcible, the manner of delivery solemn and impressive. The

mind can scarcely imagine a case in which an audience, comprised

ofyouths, full of feeling, and ardent in the pursuit of reputation and

happiness, would be more deeply affected than this must have

been , whenhearing from the lips of their revered pastor and teacher

the following truths, on the true character of worldly good :

" To him who stands on the brink of the grave, and the verge

of eternity, who retains the full possession of his reason, and who

at the same time is disposed to serious contemplation, all these

things become mightily changed in their appearance. To the eye

of such a man, their former alluring aspect vanishes, and they are

seen in a new and, far different light.

" Like others of our race, I have relished several of these things,

with at least the common attachment. Particularly, I have coveted

reputation, and influence, to a degree which I am unable to justify.

Nor have I been insensible to other earthly gratifications ; either to

such as, when enjoyed with moderation, are innocent ; or, such as

cannot be pursued without sin.

"But in the circumstances to which I have referred, all these

things were vanishing from my sight. Had they been really valua-

ble in any supposable degree, their value was gone. They could

not relieve me from pain; they could not restore me to health ;

they could not prolong my life ; they could promise me no good in

the life to come. What then were these things to me ?

" A person, circumstanced in the manner which has been spe-

cified , must necessarily regard these objects, however harmless, or

even useful, they may be supposed in their nature, as having been

hostile to his peace, and pernicious to his well -being. In all his

attachment to them, in all his pursuit of them, it is impossible for

him to fail of perceiving, that he forgot the interests of his soul, and

the commands of his Maker ; became regardless of his duty, and

his salvation ; and hazarded, for dross and dirt, the future enjoy-

ment of a glorious immortality. It is impossible not to perceive,

that in the most unlimited possession of them, the soul wouldhave

been beggared, and undone ; that the gold of the world would not

have made him rich ; nor its esteem honourable ; nor its favour

happy. For this end he will discover, that nothing will suffice but

treasure laid up in heaven; the loving-kindness of God; and the

blessings of life eternal .

" Let me exhort you, my young friends, now engaged in the ar-

dent pursuit of worldly enjoyments, to believe, that you will one

daysee them in the very light in which they have been seen by me.

The attachment to them which you so strongly feel, is unfounded,

vain, full of danger, and fraught with ruin. You will one day view

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 35

them from a dying bed. There, should you retain your reason ,

they will appear as they really are. They will then be seen to

have two totally opposite faces. Of these you have hitherto seen

but one: that, gay, beautiful, and alluring, as it now appears,

will then be hidden from your sight ; and another, which you have

not seen, deformed, odious, and dreadful, will stare you in the face,

and fill you with amazement and bitterness. No longer pretended

friends , and real flatterers : they will unmask themselves, and ap-

pear only as tempters, deceivers, and enemies, who stood between

you andheaven ; persuaded you to forsake your God, and cheated

you out of eternal life. "

" But no acts of obedience will then appear to you to have me-

rited, in any sense, acceptance with God. In this view, those acts

of my life concerning which I entertained the best hopes, which I

was permitted to entertain; those, which to me appeared the least

exceptionable, were nothing, and less than nothing. The mercy

ofGod, as exercised towards our lost race through the all-sufficient

and glorious righteousness of the Redeemer, yielded me the only

foundation of hope for good beyond the grave. During the long

continuation of my disease, as I was always, except when in pa-

roxysms of suffering, in circumstances entirely fitted for solemn

contemplation, I had ample opportunity to survey this most inte-

resting of all subjects on every side. As the result of all my in-

vestigations, let me assure you, and that from the neighbourhood

of the Eternal World, Confidence in the Righteousness of CHRIST,

is the only foundation furnished by earth, or heaven, upon which,

whenyou are about to leave this world, you can safely, or willingly,

rest the everlasting life of your souls. To trust upon any thing

else, will be to feed upon the wind, and sup up the east wind. You

will then be at the door of eternity ; will be hastening to the pre-

sence of your Judge ; will be just ready to give up your account

of the deeds done in the body ; will be preparing to hear the final

sentence of acquittal or condemnation ; and will stand at the gate

of heaven or of hell . In these amazing circumstances you will

infinitely need -let me persuade you to believe, and to feel, that

you will infinitely need -a firm foundation, on which you may stand,

and from which you will never be removed. There is no other

such foundation, but the Rock of Ages . Then you will believe,

then you will feel, that there is no other. The world, stable as it

now seems, will then be sliding away from under your feet. All

earthly things on which you have so confidently reposed, will re-

cede and vanish. To what will you then betake yourselves for

safety ? "

On the 17th of June, the same year, the General Association of

Connecticut met at New-Haven. It was a meeting of unusual in-

terest, and he was able to be present during most of their delibera-

tions. He rejoiced to see the actual establishment of the Domestic

Missionary Society of that state for building up its waste churches ;

36 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

in forming the plan of which, he cheerfully lent his assistance.

The year preceding was eminently distinguished for revivals of

religion; and he listened, with a heart overflowing with joy and

gratitude, to the account of this glorious work of God. After the

recital, the Eucharist was celebrated; and upwards of one thou-

sand communicants, including about seventy clergymen, received

the elements . He was invited by the Association to break the

bread. Though pale and enfeebled by disease, and obviously

exhausted by strong emotion , he consented . His prayer on that

occasion was eminently humble, spiritual, and heavenly. It anni-

hilated the distance between the Church in heaven and the Church

around him; and, for the moment, they were together. The ad-

dress, which blended the affecting considerations customarily

growing out of the sacrament, with others derived from the tri-

umphs of the cross to which they had just been listening, left an

impression on the audience which probably will not disappear but

with life.

Although the disease with which President Dwight was afflicted,

and by which his life had been so seriously threatened, was not

removed; yet the severity of it was so far relaxed, that he was

able, through the summer, to preach steadily in the chapel, to hear

the recitations of the senior class , and to attend to a class of theo-

logical students who were pursuing their studies under his direction.

Still, he was not in a situation to pass a day, without resorting re-

peatedly to the surgical operation, by the aid of which he had in

the first instance gained relief from his excruciating distress . But

his mind was not idle during the intervals of his professional and

official labours . In addition to the sermon which has been men-

tioned, he wrote, during this season, several essays on the Evi-

dences of Divine Revelation, derived from the writings of St. Paul,

and on other subjects --the whole forming matter for a considera-

ble volume. The last of these essays was finished three days

before his death. He also wrote the latter half of a poem of

about fifteen hundred lines -a work of the imagination, the sub-

ject ofwhich is, a contest between Genius and Common Sense, on

their comparative merits -the question referred to and decided by

Truth. He had projected a series of essays on moral and literary

subjects, under the title of " The Friend ," to be published in the

manner of the Spectator, once a week, in a half sheet. Several

numbers were written, as an exercise , for the purpose of satisfying

himself , by the experiment, how many he could compose in a given

space of time, without interfering with his other duties. He had

also projected a periodical publication , to combine the common

characteristics of a Review and Magazine, but upon a much more

extensive plan than any single work of the kind that has appeared

in this country, or even in Europe. A prospectus of this publica-

tion he had drawn up ; and it was his determination, had his life

been spared, and his health such as would admit of it, to have

2

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 37

commenced it without delay; engaging himself to furnish one

quarter of the original matter in every number. It was, however,

apparent to his friends, and probably to himself , that unless he

should succeed in gaining relief from the disease which hung about

him, his constitution, strong and vigorous as it was, must in the end

give way to such uninterrupted pain and suffering. His patience

and fortitude, and even his cheerfulness, did not forsake him; but

fearful inroads were daily making upon his strength. His mind

did not lose its activity or its vigour; but his flesh and strength

daily wasted so rapidly away, that it was not to be expected that

he could survive many renewed attacks of the distress which his

disease occasioned. He presided at the Commencement, in Sep-

tember, and performed the ordinary duties on that occasion.

In the six weeks vacation, his health appeared to amend : and

he was able usually to attend church, and to walk out occasionally

during the week. On the sixth of October, he preached all day,

and administered the sacrament in one of the churches in the town;

and in the other, in the afternoon of the 13th, before the executive

and the great part of the legislature of the state, he bore his pub-

lic solemn testimony, in the delivery of the CXXI. sermon of

the following series, against the unhallowed law authorizıng di-

vorces .

On the third of November, the second Sabbath in the term, he

preached in the morning and administered the sacrament. Those

who heard him will long recollect that his text was, Matt. v. 16,

Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good

works, and glorify your Father who is in heaven. It was his last

sermon; and the administration of the Lord's supper, which fol-

lowed it, his last public act as a minister of Christ.

" Although the paleness of his countenance filled every one with

anxiety, it was observed," says Professor Silliman, " that he ut-

tered himself with his usual force and animation ; and in perform-

ing the communion-service, he appeared much softened and af-

fected; nor was he sensible of uncommon fatigue in consequence

of so long a service.

" He began, as usual, to hear the senior class ; and persevered,

although often with extreme inconvenience, in hearing them at in-

tervals, for three or four weeks . He often came into the recitation-

room languid, and scarcely able to support himself , expressing his

intention to ask only a few questions, and then retire ; but, insen-

sibly kindling with his subject, his physical system seemed tempo-

rarily excited by the action of his mind, and he would discourse

with his usual eloquence and interest, and even throw a charm of

sprightliness and brilliancy over his communications. He met the

senior class, for the last time, on Wednesday, Nov. 27th. He

caught cold, was worse from the exertion, and did not go out again.

"He still continued to hear the theological class at his house.

Their last recitation was only a week before his death; his suffer-

38 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

ings were extreme ; his debility scarcely permitted him to utter

himself at all; but again his mind abstracted itself from its sym-

pathy with an agonized frame ; and in a discourse of one hour and

ahalf on the doctrine of the Trinity, he reasoned and illustrated

in the most cogent and interesting manner, and left an indelible

impression on the minds of his pupils. It was his last effort in his

delightful employment of instruction. "

During his confinement, however , he was not idle ; his mind was

as active as when he was in sound health. Probably there are

very few periods of his life, of the same length, in which he wrote

more than from June to December.

He continued in this state of labour and suffering, until Tuesday

the 7th of January. He had been recently afflicted by the death

of his friends : the Rev. Nathan Strong, D. D. of Hartford, who

was also his class-mate ; and the Rev. Azel Backus, D. D. Presi-

dent of Hamilton College, in the state of New-York. Upon

hearing of the death of Dr. Strong, he remarked, that the lights of

his class were nearly extinguished ; alluding to the death of that

gentleman and those of the Rev. Charles Backus, of Somers, and

the Rev. David Ely, D. D. of Huntington. With the latter gen-

tleman, in addition to the friendship that had subsisted between

them from their youth, he had been associated , with the utmost

harmony, throughout the whole period of his presidency, as a

member of the corporation of the College. On Tuesday the

symptoms of his diseasę appeared more favourable than they had

done at any time previous ; and his family and physicians were

led to entertain very strong hopes that it had passed its crisis, and

was experiencing a happy change. On the following morning

however, as he got out of bed, he was seized with a strong nervous

affection, which shook his whole frame, and gave rise, in a short

time, to the most alarming apprehensions. This paroxysm was

succeeded by a high fever, and a constant propensity to drowsi-

ness . When the physicians visited him at ten o'clock in the fore-

noon, they found it necessary to bleedhim. Hecontinued strongly

affected by these various symptoms through the day. His pulse

was quick, his face in some measure flushed, his brain in a consi-

derable degree affected, and he felt a continued drowsiness, and,

at times, severe turns of pain from his local disease. In the eve-

ning he became more wakeful, and the severity of his distress in-

creased. In order to relieve him from the pain, a moderate quan-

tity of laudanum was administered. He did not converse much

on Wednesday ; his excess of suffering, with the affection of the

brain, put it out of his power.

He was restless a considerable part of the night, but gained an

hour or two of sleep, owing, probably, to the opiate which he had

taken. On Thursday morning he got out of his bed, was dressed,

and sat in his chair through the day. He was not so much inclined

to drowsiness as on the preceding day ; but frequently groaned

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 39

from extreme pain and distress, and did not enter much into con-

versation through the day. At the same time, he answered all ques-

tions put to him, with clearness and promptitude ; inquired parti-

cularly of his friends and neighbours, as they called to see him,

concerning their health and that of their families, and showed the

same affectionate interest in their welfare, that he had uniformly

manifested through life. At evening he attempted to make his

usual family prayer, and proceeded for a few minutes with clear-

ness and propriety ; but a paroxysm of pain rendered him incapa-

ble of utterance, and he desisted. This was the last attempt he

made to pray in the family.

Through Thursday night , he became more disturbed and dis-

tressed, resting but little ; and in the morning it was apparent,

from his symptoms, generally, and the change of his countenance

and voice, that his end was rapidly approaching. From the great

strength of his constitution, and the peculiar excitement of his

nervous system caused by his disease, and perhaps, from the effect

which it had produced upon his mind, it was apprehended by his

family , that he was not aware of his approaching dissolution. The

fact was, therefore, announced to him, accompanied with a sug-

gestion, that if he had any wishes to express, or directions to give,

with regard to his worldly concerns, it was to be feared that it was

necessary to attend to the subject without delay. He received the

intelligence with great calmness ; and, as soon as his situation

would permit, proceeded to express his wishes on the subject.

Under the paroxysms of pain, his mind was more prone to wan-

der than it had been the two former days. It recurred, however,

to a clear and unclouded state, when the paroxysm ceased. At

short intervals through the day, when he was the most nearly free

from pain, he conversed on various subjects in his usual manner.

Subjects connected with the great object of his labours, his de-

sires, and his prayers through life -the out -pouring of the Spirit

ofGod, revivals of religion, the propagation of Christianity, and

the dissemination of the Scriptures were not only near his heart,

but, when mentioned, kindled his feelings and awakened his de-

votion. A day or two previous to his being taken so unwell,

he had received from the Rev. Dr. Marshman, at Serampore, a

very elegant printed specimen of a Chinese translation of the Scrip-

tures. Onthis subject, he was peculiarly interested, and express-

ed himself feelingly and with force, on the progress of evangelical

truth among the heathen.

In the course of Friday evening, at his request, the eighth chapter

ofthe epistle to the Romans was read to him. He listened to it

with great attention, remarked upon a mistranslation in one or two

places ; spoke with much fervour of pious emotion on the subject

of the chapter ; and, at the close of it, exclaimed , “ O, what a glo-

rious apostrophe ! " He also made a number of remarks on the

opinions and sentiments of some of the English divines, particu-

larly Clark and Waterland, on the doctrine of the Trinity.

G

40 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

The subject of his approaching dissolution was again intro-

duced in the afternoon of that day. He said he was not aware

that it was very near ; that he had yet a great deal of strength ;

but still it might be so, as strong constitutions did sometimes sud-

denly give way. Upon being reminded that his religious friends

would be gratified to learn his views and feelings at the prospect

ofdeath, he began to make some remarks upon the great and pre-

cious promises of the gospel, when he was seized with a paroxysm

of distress, which prevented him from proceeding. A few hours

before his death, the subject was, for the last time, mentioned.

He appeared to comprehend the object in view; and, though he

spoke with difficulty, he answered, with entire clearness, that in the

extreme sickness with which he was visited in the spring, during

some weeks of which he had no expectation of recovering, he

had experienced more support and comfort from religion, and the

promises of the gospel, than he had ever realized at any former

period of his life . " Had I died then, (said he) that fact would

doubtless have been considered as affording strong evidence of the

sincerity and reality of my faith ; but, as I recovered, it probably

made but little impression." It was a sentiment often inculcated

by him, that it was more safe to rely upon the tenor of a person's

life, as evidence of the true state of his religious character, than

upon declarations made upon a death- bed. In the above-mentioned

remark, there is little reason to doubt that he alluded to that sub-

ject, and intended that it should apply to his former sentiments .

After this, he requested his brother to read to him the 17th of

John. While listening to the latter verses of the chapter, he ex-

claimed, " O, what triumphant truths! " Afterwards the 14th, 15th,

and 16th chapters were read to him. He listened attentively, and

spoke with lively interest on various passages. His mind evi-

dently wandered while the last chapter was reading, and it was

not completed.

A few hours before his death, one of his friends observed to him,

that he hoped he was able, in his present situation, to adopt the

language of the Psalmist : "Though I walk through the valley of the

shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for THOU art with me -Thy rod

and thy staff they comfort me. " He immediately replied, " I hope

so. " For several of his last hours, his organs of speech were so

much affected, that it was with difficulty he could articulate dis-

tinctly. Many of his words could not be understood. There is,

however, no doubt, that, during that period, his mind was uncloud-

ed, and his thoughts were fixed on death and heaven. He was

occupied a great part of the time in speaking, sometimes in an

audible voice, and sometimes in a whisper. Repeated instances

occurred, in which his expressions were clearly understood. In

all ofthem, his language was that of prayer and adoration. The

belief that he was engaged in that delightful Christian duty was

confirmed, by the peculiarly solemn and devotional expression of

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 41

his countenance. His eyes appeared to be fixed on that celestial

world, whose gates, it is humbly trusted, were just opening to re-

ceive his departing spirit into the mansions of everlasting rest, pre-

pared for him in his Father's house. That he enjoyed the use of

his reason until a short time before his death, was satisfactorily

manifested by his answer to one of his friends, who was sitting by

him, and who asked him if he knew him. Upon which, he imme-

diately turned his eyes towards him, looked him full in the face,

and said, " Yes," with so much distinctness , as to satisfy those

who were present that he perfectly understood the question, and

the answer.

He did not appear, for several hours previous to his death, to

suffer much pain; but continued to breathe shorter and shorter,

until a few minutes before three o'clock, on Saturday morning,

the 11th of January, when he expired, without a struggle or a

groan. The death of President Dwight spread a deep and general sor-

row, not only through the state, but through New-England, and

extensively through the Union. Beloved by relatives, esteemed

by his friends, revered by his pupils, and highly honoured by his

countrymen, his loss was universally considered as a great public,

as well as private calamity. In the city where he had so long re-

sided, and where his worth was universally acknowledged, he was

sincerely and feelingly lamented. His funeral was attended on

Tuesday, the 14th of January, by a large concourse of people from

New- Haven and the neighbouring towns, and a respectable num-

ber of the clergy from different parts of the state. As a mark of

respect, the stores and shops in the city were shut, and business

suspended. The scene was solemn and impressive. A deep

gloom pervaded the whole assembly, and every one present felt

himself a mourner. The various religious services exhibited the

fullest evidence of the affection and respect which the reverend

gentlemen who officiated, entertained for his private virtues, as well

as their deep sense of the loss which the Church, the College, and

the community, had sustained in his death. In many places, in dif-

ferent parts of the country, sermons were delivered on the occa-

sion. In New-York and Albany, meetings were held by the alumni

of the College, resident in those cities , where various public mani-

festations of their sense of his virtues, their regret for his death,

and respect for his character, were exhibited. Indeed, we know of

but one instance that has occurred in this country, in which such

extensive public expressions of sorrow for the death of any indi-

vidual , or respect for his memory, have appeared.

It cannot be expected, that the character of so great and good

a man, can be fully exhibited in a sketch like the present. A

mere outline is all that its limits will admit.

The life of President Dwight, approaching within a few years to

the duration allotted by Infinite Wisdom as the ordinary term of

VOL. I. 6

42 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

the life of man, passed during one of the most important periods

which has occurred since the era of Christianity. The truth of

this remark will be admitted, in whatever light the subject may be

considered, whether literary or scientific, political or religious . In

each particular he was called to act, and in most of them a very

industrious and distinguished part. In order to ascertain his true

character, it may be well to view him as a man of genius and a

scholar ; as an instructer ; as a preacher ; and as a man.

For native powers of mind, he will doubtless be ranked among

the first men in the history of our country. The proofs in sup-

port of this remark need not be sought from any individual source ,

or from his attainments in any single walk of literature or science.

They may be found in every pursuit in which he was engaged,

and be gathered in every stage of his progress, from the cradle to

the grave. In the acquisition of knowledge, we have seen that

the earliest efforts of his mind, even in infancy, were singular and

extraordinary ; and that his talents were as strongly marked at this

early stage of his existence, as perhaps at any subsequent period of

his life. At every school in which he was placed, though common-

ly the youngest member, he was at the head of his class. In Col-

lege, notwithstanding his extreme youth and the many other em-

barrassments through which he had to struggle, he was surpassed

by none of his companions. His acquisitions,during the eight suc-

ceeding years after he left College, although he was constantly oc-

cupied in the business of instruction, and a considerable part of the

time was afflicted with disease and debility, and in a great measure

deprived of the use of his eyes, were extensive and profound ; not

confined to a single science, or to one branch of literature, but

comprehending the mathematics and logic, the languages and phi-

lology, as well as rhetoric and poetry.

The loss of the use of his eyes, at the early age of twenty-

three, is not to be regarded merely as a calamity by which he was

deprived of the capacity for reading and study ; but in connexion

with the fact that it constantly subjected him to severe and almost

uninterrupted suffering. With this insurmountable embarrassment

he was obliged to struggle through life. During the great part of

forty years he was not able to read fifteen minutes in the twenty-

four hours ; and often for days and weeks together, the pain which

he endured in that part of the head immediately behind the eyes,

amounted to anguish. His life, it will be remembered, was devo-

ted to a learned and laborious profession, and to literary and scien-

tific pursuits . The knowledge which he gained from books after

the period above mentioned , was almost exclusively at second

hand ,by the aid of others: aprocess slow, tedious, anddiscouraging.

Yet he has ever been esteemed one of the best informed men this

country has produced. Industry was indeed one of his most stri-

king characteristics ; but it was the industry of a mind conscious of

its powers, and delightingin their exercise. All his exertions were

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 43

the effort of easy action. They cost no labour, and occasioned no

fatigue. His perception was clear and rapid, his discernment acute,

his invention rich, his taste correct and delicate, his imagination

brilliant, his wit genuine, his judgment solid, his views comprehen-

sive, and his reasoning faculties powerful and commanding. Never

was a mind under better discipline. All his stores of thought were

arranged in exact method, and every faculty was ready at the mo-

ment. This was true, in conversation, in his lectures to his class,

and in his public addresses. No emergency, however sudden or

pressing, appeared to surprise him or to find him unprepared. In

repeated instances , on the Sabbath, when his notes were by acci-

dent left at home, and he did not discover it until a few moments

before he was to use them ; he has, in the instant, taken a new

subject of discourse, and formed his plan so happily, and executed

it so well, that none of the audience conjectured the fact, or sus-

pected the want of preparation. His mind always rose with the

occasion, and was always equal to it. It appeared to view every

demand upon it as an obvious call of God. Trusting in Him, it

marched directly to its purpose, without even observing those dif-

ficulties which might have proved insurmountable to others .

In one particular, he excelled most men of any age: -in the en-

tire command of his thoughts. Having been driven by necessity

to pursue his many avocations without the use of his eyes, his

memory, naturally strong, acquired a power of retention unusual

and surprising. It was not the power of recollecting words, or

dates, or numbers of any kind. It was the power of remembering

facts and thoughts : especially his own thoughts . When an event

in history or biography, or a fact or principle in science, was once

known, he appeared never to forget it. When a subject became

once familiar to his mind, he rarely, if ever, lost its impression. In

this respect his mind resembled a well arranged volume ; in which

every subject forms a separate section, and each view of that sub-

ject a separate page. He perfectly knew the order of the sub-

jects ; could turn to any page at will ; and always found each im-

pression as distinct and perfect as when first formed.

When engaged in the composition of sermons, or any other lite-

rary performance, not only did the conversation of those around

him not interrupt his course of thinking, but while waiting for his

amanuensis to finish the sentence which he had last dictated, he would

spend the interval in conversing with his family or his friends, with-

out the least embarrassment, delay, or confusion of thought. His

mind took such firm hold of the subject which principally occupied

it , that no ordinary force could separate it from its grasp. He was

always conscious of the exact progress which he had made in every

subject. When company, or any other occurrence, compelledhim

to break off suddenly,it would sometimes happen that he did not re-

turn to his employment until after the expiration of several days .

On resuming his labours, all he required of his amanuensis was, to

1 ,

44 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

read the last word, or clause, that had been written ; and he in-

stantly would proceed to dictate as if no interruption had occurred.

In several instances he was compelled to dictate a letter at the

same time that he was dictating a sermon. In one, a pressing ne-

cessity obliged him to dictate three letters at the same time. He

did so. Each amanuensis was fully occupied ; and the letters

needed no correction but pointing.

Asingle fact will exhibit, in a striking light, the comprehension

of his mind, and the admirable method of its operations . The

reader is requested to examine the " Analysis," at the close of this

Memoir ; and to observe how extensive, and yet how logical, is the

plan of his lectures. This Analysis was formed from the lectures

themselves, since his decease. He wrote no plan of them himself;

but in completing them, relied exclusively on the scheme of thought

which existed in his own mind. We have rarely seen any work,

even of much less extent, unless some treatise on mathematical or

physical science, in which the perfection of mathematical arrange-

ment is so nearly attained. It ought to be added, that the following

volumes are published as they were dictated to the amanuensis ;

with almost no corrections except those which were owing to the

mistakes of the penman, or the illegibility of his hand.

To conceive, to invent, to reason, was in such a sense instinctive,

that neither employment appeared to fatigue or exhaust him. After

severe and steady labour, his mind was as prepared for any species

of exertion, as if it had done nothing : for the activity and spright-

liness of conversation ; for the closer confinement of investigation ;

or for the excursive range of poetry. Almost all his poetry, writ-

ten subsequently to the age of twenty-three, was dictated to an

amanuensis, after the unintermitted application of the day. Not

unfrequently, in an autumnal or winter evening, would he compose

from fifty to sixty lines in this manner. The first part of his "Ge-

nius andCommon Sense " is in the stanza of " The Faery Queene, "

the most difficult stanza in English poetry. Repeatedly has he

been known to dictate four of these stanzas, or forty- four lines, in

the course of such an evening ; and chiefly without any subse-

quent corrections .

The earliest of his poetical productions that has been preserved,

though written at the age of fifteen, bears the characteristic marks ,

both in style and thought, of his later and more mature composi-

tions . While he was connected with the College, either as a stu-

dent or a tutor, he wrote and published several small poems, on

various subjects, which were very favourably received at the time,

and are still admired, for sweetness of versification, as well as for

delicacy and purity of sentiment.

The early age at which he wrote the Conquest of Canaan is to

be rememberedin forming our estimate of the poem. It is not be-

lieved that the history of English poetry contains the account

of any equal effort, made at so early an age. The subject of the

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 45

poem has been objected to, as not sufficiently interesting to render

such a performance popular with the great body of readers. At

the time of its publication there was, undoubtedly, some ground for

this remark. It was published a short time after the peace of 1783 :

a period unhappily characterized by an extensive prevalence of in-

fidelity, as well as of loose sentiments with regard to morals. In

this state of things , no poem founded on a scriptural story, however

meritorious in itself , however happy its plan, or brilliant its image-

ry, or interesting its incidents, or distinct its characters, or noble its

sentiments, could fail to be in a degree unpopular ; especially if

breathing the purest morality, and the most exalted piety. Had its

appearance been postponed to a period within the last fifteen years ,

during which time infidelity has given place to a reverence for the

Bible, and a general regard for the doctrines which it contains ,

there is little reason to doubt that its reception would have been

still more flattering to the author, and more just to its own merit as

a work of genius . The Conquest of Canaan contains abundant

evidence of rich invention, of harmonious versification, of a brilliant

fancy, of strong powers of description, of a sublime imagination,

ofvigorous thought, and of the most pure and virtuous sentiment.

In addition to his attainments in classical learning, and the

sciences in general, President Dwight had acquired a vast fund

of information on almost all the concerns of human life . His ac-

quaintance with books was extensive : comprising not only those

appropriate to his profession as a minister, and his office as presi⚫⚫

dent of the College, but on all important and interesting subjects.

He was thoroughly read in ancient and modern history, geography,

biography, andtravels. Few works of this description, especially

those of the two last classes, escaped his attention. With the pur-

suits of agriculture, he was practically as well as theoretically con-

versant. In the cultivation of his garden he took peculiar plea-

sure, and displayed an uncommon degree of skill and science. Of

his extensive knowledge on these subjects, his poem, called

" Greenfield Hill," affords satisfactory evidence. One part of that

work, entitled " The Farmer's Advice to the Villagers," contains a

body of information, and of sound advice, addressed to that va-

luable class of men, of the utmost practical utility. In truth, it is

difficult to name a subject, of any considerable importance, con-

nected with the common pursuits of men in the business of life,

which he had not made the subject of accurate observation and

close thought ; on which he had not collected many valuable facts ;

or about which he was not able to communicate much that was in-

teresting and useful.

It has been seen, that a large proportion of President Dwight's

life was devoted to the instruction of youth. From the age of se-

venteen to sixty-four, he was scarcely ever entirely disengaged

from that employment ; and there were not more than two years

of that period, in which he did not pursue it as his constant busi

46 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

ness . His first effort afforded a sure promise of that high degree

of excellence, in this interesting employment, to which he after-

wards attained. In the course of his life, he assisted in educating

between two and three thousand persons.

In the great change produced in the College, during his tutor-

ship, by his efforts and those of his associates, his own exertions

were of primary importance. He continued much longer in the

office of tutor than they did, and, of course, had a greater opportu-

nity to execute the plans for improvement which they had jointly

devised, and put in operation.

It was unquestionably a fortunate circumstance for him, when he

entered upon the presidency, that the public had full confidence in

⚫his capacity to fulfil its duties. It is, however, to be remembered,

that this confidence was not, in any measure, founded upon mere

expectation, or calculation. It rested upon a thorough acquaint-

ance with his experience and success in the arduous and difficult

business of instruction. The possession of this confidence, ena-

bled him to commence his labours in the institution according to

his own ideas of usefulness and practicability ; and to adopt such

a course of measures as the exigency of the case required. And to

his independence and energy, his industry and devotion to his du-

ty, is the College eminently indebted for the high character to

which it was elevated, amidst all its difficulties , and embarrass-

ments, at the time of his accession, and during his continuance in

" the office .

One of his most important qualifications as the head of such an

institution, was an intimate knowledge of the character and feelings

of young men, which, by long observation, he had acquired. The

possession of this knowledge, so indispensably necessary, and yet

so rarely to be met with, enabled him to direct his efforts in the ad-

ministration of the government, and the application of discipline

in the most judicious and efficacious manner to accomplish the ob-

jects in view . Those objects were, the peace and reputation of the

College, and the character and highest interests of the students.

Having adopted a system which was, in its nature and tendency,

parental, he watched over the conduct and welfare of his academi-

cal children with affection and solicitude . So successful was he

in the application of this system, that the youths who were placed

underhis care, loved and revered him as an affectionate father.

When admonition or censure, or even more severe measures, at

any time became necessary ; his course of proceeding was in a

high degree efficacious and salutary. These admonitions andcen-

sures were delivered in a manner, affectionate, indeed, but plain

and searching ; and rarely failed of producing their intended effect.

Many a youth, whose conduct had subjected him to the discipline

of the College, has found his stubborn temper subdued, his heart

melted into contrition, and himself compelled to submission and

obedience, by the private, solemn, but pathetic and eloquent re-

monstrances of his kind and affectionate teacher.

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 47

President Dwight's talents as an instructer, were no where more

conspicuous than in the recitation-room of the senior class .

The year commenced with the study of rhetoric, in which the

lectures of Blair were the text-book. The questions naturally

arising from the lesson were first answered, and the principles of

the author freely examined. This usually occupied not more than

half an hour ; and was succeeded by a familiar extemporaneous

lecture on the subject, which filled up the residue of the two hours

commonly devoted to his recitations. This lecture was often en-

livened by anecdote and humour, and interspersed with striking il-

lustrations . It frequently exhibited lively sallies of the imagina-

tion, and occasionally high specimens of eloquence. Yet it was in

fact, though not in form, a regular dissertation, a connected chain

of powerful reasoning, calculated to leave a distinct and permanent

impression on the mind. When the course of rhetoric was com-

pleted, that of logic and metaphysics succeeded ; in which the re-

gular text-books were Duncan and Locke's Essay on the Human

Understanding. After this followed ethics ; when Paley's Moral

Philosophy was studied. In these recitations , also, a similar me-

thod was adopted. These three courses occupied three days in

the week through the year. On each of these days the class ex-

hibitedwritten compositions. Two more were devoted to forensic

disputation . The discussions of the students were commonly writ.

ten, but at times extemporaneous . When these discussions were

finished , the President closed the debate in an argument giving

a comprehensive view of the question ; and occupying, according

to its importance, sometimes the space of half an hour, and some-

times that of several recitations . The series of questions thus dis-

cussed usually involved the more important disputable points in

science, politics, morals, and theology. Many of his decisions,

as specimens of reasoning and eloquence, were not surpassed by

his happiest public efforts. On Saturday, Vincent's " Exposition

of the Shorter Catechism" was recited. The lesson terminated in

a few minutes, and was followed by a theological lecture on the

subject. At the close, he heard declamations. The students re-

gularly looked forward to the senior year as peculiarly interesting

and important ; in which their minds were to be disciplined and

furnished for action. No compulsion was necessary to secure their

presence in the recitation-room. Even those who had previously

been indolent, attended of choice. In each of the four courses of

rhetoric, logic and metaphysics, ethics and theology, as taught in

Vincent ; he spent more time in instructing his class, than is cus-

tomarilyspent in the regular lectures of professors in those sciences .

In addition to this, he was the stated preacher twice on the Sab-

bath ; addressed the students at length in the theological chamber

on Saturday evening ; superintended the general administration of

the College government ; wrote, by the assistance of his pupils or

of a regular amanuensis, almost allthe works which he ever wrote ;

48 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

and attended, with marked punctuality, to all the calls of civility and

friendship. It ought here to be remembered, that for the first

twenty years of his Presidency he was rarely able to read so much

as a single chapter in the Bible in the twenty-four hours.

One important feature of his administration was the selection of

his assistant officers of the faculty. The professorship of Theolo-

gy, it has been mentioned, was occupied by himself. The others

were filled with much younger gentlemen than had been usual,

the education of nearly all of whom he had superintended ; and

with whose talents and qualifications he was thoroughly acquainted.

The advantages of this course were numerous, and the wisdom of

it has been fully proved and acknowledged. The College faculty

entertained perfect confidence in one another, and entire harmony

of opinion as to the system of government. The welfare of the

College was a common interest ; to promote which, they lent their

whole united influence. In its administration, they always moved

as one man . The experience, judgment, and energy of the Pre-

sident, and the active and vigorous co-operation of his younger as-

sociates , had the happiest effects on its good order and regularity,

even in times the most turbulent and threatening. The conse-

quence was, that Yale College was tranquil, at a period well re-

membered, when almost every other public seminary in the Union

was shaken to its centre.

As a minister and preacher of the gospel, it is not easy to con-

vey an adequate idea of his characteristic excellence. Having

been been compelled, from the weakness of his eyes, to adopt the plan

of preaching without notes ; his sermons, except those designed

for extraordinary occasions, were for the first twenty years chiefly

unwritten. Usually, he barely noted the general divisions, and

some of the most important and leading ideas. There is no doubt,

that this mode had its peculiar advantages ; nor that his style and

manner, as an extemporaneous preacher, were more popular and

captivating, than at a later period, when his discourses were written

at length. When unconfined by notes, the whole field of thought

was before him. Into that field he entered ; conscious where his

subject lay, and by what metes and bounds it was limited ; and

enjoying also that calm self -possession and confidence of success,

which trial alone can give, and which every successive effort had

only served to increase. Within these limits, his powers had full

scope, his imagination was left to range at will, his feelings were

kindled, and his mind became in the highest degree creative. Its

conceptions were instantaneous ; its thoughts were new and stri-

king ; its deductions clear and irresistible ; and its images, exact

representations of what his eye saw, living, speaking, and acting.

When we add, that these were accompanied by the utmost fluency

and force of language, a piercing eye, a countenance deeply

marked with intellect, a strong emphasis, a voice singular for its

compass and melody, an enunciation remarkably clear anddistinct,

:

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 49

a person dignified and commanding, and gestures graceful and

happy; we need not inform the reader, that his pulpit efforts, at this

period, possessed every characteristic of animated and powerful

eloquence. Many instances of its effects upon large audiences

are remembered, and might easily be mentioned, which were most

striking proofs of its power over the feelings and the conscience .

In the formation of his sermons, he pursued a course, in a great

degree, original. Texts familiar by common use among preachers ,

to the minds of his audience, would form the subject of discourses ,

new, solemn, and impressive. The truth to be illustrated was

often new ; the arrangement and arguments were new, the images

were always new, and the thoughts peculiarly his own. The very

weakness of his eyes , which occasioned him so much pain and

self -denial, was, in some respects , advantageous . He could not

himself read the sermons of others. Religious books of a differ-

ent class were read aloud in his family on the Sabbath. And

most rarely indeed was he permitted to listen to the sermons of his

brethren. Thus, deriving no assistance from the efforts of others ,

he was compelled to depend exclusively on the resources of his

own intellect. Happily these were rich and inexhaustible. It is

probably owing to this fact, that his sermons bear the characteristic

stamp of his own mind ; and are, throughout, in the highest sense,

his own. In this respect, in a fair claim to originality of thought,

of method, and of illustration, it is confidently believed, that the

sermons of President Dwight need not shrink from a comparison

with those of any other writer.

In his extemporaneous efforts, though his fancy was ever visibly

active, still it was controlled by judgment and taste. They were

indeed more richly ornamented with imagery than most of his

written sermons ; yet figures were introduced, not merely because

they were beautiful, but for the purpose of illustration or impres-

sion. His own views of the duty of a minister of Christ, in this re-

spect, are happily conveyed in several of the discourses in these

volumes ; and still more fully in some of his occasional sermons .

He considered him bound to forget himself , and remember nothing

but the purpose for which he is sent : the salvation of his hearers.

Every attempt at display, every attempt to exhibit his own talents,

or taste, or fancy, or learning, in a preacher, was, in his view , an

obvious prostitution of his office to private and unhallowed pur-

poses. His rules and his conduct were in this respect harmonious.

After his appointment to the office of professor of theology, in

1805, when he began steadily to employ an amanuensis, he turned

his attention more to writing his sermons at length. The frequent

calls upon him to preach at different places, on extraordinary ос-

casions, and a disposition to render his systematic discourses to the

students as nearly correct and perfect as possible, probably had

influence with him in the adoption of this course. HisSystematic

Sermons had cost him much labour and research. They were fa-

VOL. I. 7

50 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR

vourite discourses with the public at large, and with his pupils ;

many of whom took notes of them every Sabbath. He thought,

if they possessed the merit ascribed to them, that they ought to be

written out. Other considerations also had their weight. He ob-

served an increasing attachment, in some parts of the country, to a

florid and highly embellished style of composition: in his

own

view, owing to a vitiated taste ; involving a substitution of orna-

ment for thought, and of sound for sense ; and wholly subversive

of the very end of preaching. This mode of writing was gaining

popularity among his own pupils ; and he felt desirous, as far as

possible, to counteract it. Knowing the efficacy of a teacher's

example on the conduct of those under his care, he determined

carefully to avoid every thing of this nature in his own discourses ;

and to subject his mind, naturally fond of imagery, to a severer

discipline than it would submit to in the moment of extemporane-

ous effort.

The discourses in these volumes obviously required, in this re-

spect, as well as in others, peculiar care. Their primary object is

to explain and prove the great truths of theology ; and their se-

cond, to enforce them on the conscience, and show their practical

influence on the heart and life. They are not merely theological

lectures ; but are, in the strictest sense, sermons . Yet, as the pur-

pose in the body of each discourse is the discovery of truth, the

use of figurative language, except for illustration, would there have

been improper. In the application, it might be admitted to en-

force and enhance it. The reader will, we think, admire the good

sense displayed in this particular. In the division of the subject

he will never find figurative language introduced. The body of

the discourse, if , as is most commonly the case, the subject be

înerely argumentative, is almost equally destitute of it. If , how-

ever, it be a subject rather requiring description and enhancement

than proof; as in the discourses on heaven, on the holy angels, on

the creation of the earth and of man, on the resurrection, the last

judgment, and the future happiness of the righteous ; it will be seen

that the author's mind rises with his subject. Having heard those

discourses to which we have just now referred, we have ever

viewed them as distinguished models of sacred eloquence.

The series of Theological Sermons was written out at the close

of 1809. After completing it , he wrote out many of his miscella-

neous sermons, both doctrinal and practical. These were inten-

tionally less pruned than the former, but more so than his earlier

efforts . There is little reason to doubt, that these, should they

ever be published, will prove more entertaining, to the mass of

readers, than the discourses in these volumes. They discover

equal talent, present a greater variety of subject and of manner,

and usually require less mental exertion in the perusal. Among

them are the sermons preached on the Sabbath preceding the Com-

mencement, to the candidates for the Baccalaureate. They were

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 51

addressed to his immediate pupils, when just about to leave the in-

stitution ; to bid an adieu to him as their instructer, and to each

other as companions, and to engage in the busy scenes of life .

Over their conduct he had long watched with unremitting care ;

and for their present and future welfare, he felt the highest degree

of solicitude . They contain an accurate development of the hu-

man character, and of the temptations, follies, and vices of the

world; as well as the purest moral and religious sentiments, en-

forced with the feeling and fervency of parental affection, and ac-

companied by the parting counsels of a wise and experienced

preceptor and friend .

Ofthe miscellaneous sermons at large, our limits forbid us to at-

tempt a delineation. We will mention one of them, which appears

to have been conceived in a peculiarly auspicious moment ; and

has been eminently followed with the blessing of God. His stu-

dents will realize that we intend the discourse on Jeremiah viii .

20 : The harvest is past, the summer is ended, and we are not saved.

In two instances, the delivery of it was obviously the commence-

ment of a revival of religion among his pupils ; in the first of which

nearly half of them were united to the College Church . Similar

consequences have been ascribed to its delivery on two other oc-

casions, in different places. Never have we witnessed effects on

mixed audiences equally solemn and powerful, from any sermon,

as in several instances from this . Many beside his pupils ascribed

to it their first impressions on religious subjects .

His sermons were uncommonly intelligible to all classes of peo-

ple. His division of his subject was natural, neat, and easily re-

membered. His style, though at times highly ornamented and ele-

vated, was still plain and perspicuous ; and his delivery, though

occasionally rapid , was clear and distinct. Owing to these quali-

ties, the illiterate, and persons of ordinary capacity, were able to

understand him without difficulty.

Another characteristic of his preaching was, a constant regard to

practical effect . Even the sermons which compose these volumes ,

the object of which was, primarily, to exhibit to his pupils a com-

plete system of Christian doctrines, will be found, in their applica-

tion, to have this discriminating character. It was impossible for

him to enter the desk but as the herald of reconciliation. He could

not fail to discover his affecting sense of the greatness of the Being

who sent him, or of the infinite importance ofthe message which

he brought. And his most obvious purpose was to accomplish the

salvation of those to whom it was delivered.

It is believed, on the best evidence, that this purpose was, to an

unusual extent, accomplished by his preaching. Immediately be-

fore the commencement of his presidency, the College Church,

among the students, was almost extinct ; it came at last to consist

ofonly two members, and, soon after his accession, it dwindled to

a single person. During the greater part of his continuance in of-

52 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

fice it embraced at least one fourth ; in various instances one third;

and in one, upwards of one half of the students . Perhaps no ob-

ject of contemplation afforded him higher pleasure, towards the

close of life, than the number of his pupils who had become, or

were intending to become, preachers ; especially when he remem-

bered how frequently the labours of the former had been crowned

with success .

In the performance of the other exercises of public worship, he

greatly excelled. His manner of reading the Scriptures, and sa-

cred poetry, was peculiarly happy and impressive. In the appro-

priateness, variety, fluency, copiousness, fervency, and elevation of

prayer, as it regarded subjects, sentiment, and language, he was

nearly without a rival. Entirely free from form, from tiresome re-

petition, and from lukewarmness, and under the influence of the

deepest abasement and prostration of soul, his heart appeared to

be melted, and " his lips to be touched as with a live coal from off

the altar, " when he was engaged in this sublime and delightful duty .

But his usefulness as a minister was not confined to his labours

in the pulpit. He was emphatically the friend, the counsellor, and

the guide of his younger brethren in the sacred profession. In the

language of one of his pupils, " He was, indeed, a father to New-

England -her moral legislator. His life is an era in her history.

To the churches of his persuasion in that country, he was a guar-

dian, a friend, a counsellor. In the hour of trial, they found sup-

port in his firmness, assistance in his wisdom, and encouragement in

his prayers . As a peacemaker, he was eminently blessed ; for his

advice was asked, and given in the spirit of Christian humility and

justice. " Great numbers of the clergy had, first or last, been his

pupils : hehad been their friend and adviser, as well as their in-

structer ; and they felt the most implicit confidence in his disposi-

tion, and his capacity, to assist them in their embarrassments and

difficulties . For this purpose they resorted to him with perfect

freedom, and were received with the utmost kindness and respect.

He entered at once into their interests and feelings ; and the ser-

vices whichhe rendered them were numerous andimportant. Ha-

ving the advantage of long observation and experience, an exten-

sive acquaintance with the state of the country, and the character,

wants, and condition, of its inhabitants; and being the centre of ap-

plication for the supply of instructers, both literary and religious,

for a wide extent ofcountry ; he was able to adapt his opinions to

the exigencies ofthe various cases in which he was consulted ; and

to furnish those who sought it with employment and support. Few

imagine howmany parishes in New -England, New- York, and else-

where, have, through his agency, been furnished with clergymen.

In short, his character, as a preacher, may be summed up in the

language of the writer last alluded to : " While he shunned not

to declare the whole counsel of God, he strengthened his argu-

ments by illustrations from the history ofnations, and the biography

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 53

of individuals . His application of Scripture doctrines and texts to

the ever-varying aspect of human life ; his insight into the ground-

work of character, and the motives to action ; his admirable sketch-

es, as it were, with the very pencil, and in the very colouring of the

inspired writers, distinguished him from the mere commentator on

texts, and the sentimental moralist. Of his eloquence, as with most

other great orators, few can judge correctly, but those who have

heard him. They will never forget him, either in this world or

the next. To simplicity in manner and matter, he added dignity;

to ease, he added energy; to fervour, he added humility. Preach-

ing too often seems, with ministers, the work of a day or an hour ;

but with him it was the work of Eternity. He preached as a sin-

ner and dying man himself; he preached as in the presence ofGod,

and of the spirits ofjust men made perfect ; he preached as though

he saw his crown of glory ever before him ; as though he heard the

Saviour saying, " Well done, good and faithful servant, enter thou

into the joy of thy Lord. " " His sermons were not adorned with

as many decorations of taste and ornaments of imagination as those

of some other distinguished pulpit orators. But in the primary

qualities of real eloquence, his sermons were eminently rich : in

powerful appeals to the heart, in vivid pictures of vice and virtue,

sketched from the life ; in awful denunciation ; in solemn remon-

strance ; in fervent intercession. "

It remains only to view President Dwight, as a man, in the vari-

ous walks of private life, exhibiting the virtues which peculiarly

adorn that interesting station. And perhaps, no part of the task

which has been undertaken in this account, has been more difficult

of execution. " It is rare, " says Professor Silliman, who had been

long and intimately acquainted with him in private as well as in

public life, " that a man so great and splendid in the public eye, is

in private life so desirable : for to his particular friends, his society

was delightful, and the only effect of long and intimate acquaintance

with him was, to exact towards him every sentiment of respect, ad-

miration, and affection . " " In the domestic and social circle, " says

another of his pupils, " Dr. Dwight will ever be remembered with

the tenderest affection, and the most sincere regret. " " In private

society, " says a third, " Dr. Dwight possessed uncommon powers

to please and to instruct. With an inexhaustible stock of know-

ledge on almost every subject, and an ease of communication to

which a parallel can hardly be found, he easily accommodated his

remarks to the character and means of improvement of those with

whom he conversed; and seldom failed to excite the highest re-

spect and admiration. From the weakness of his eyes, andhis con-

sequent inability to employ himself much in reading, except by

the assistance of others, he was led to devote more ofhis time to

the society of his friends, than, perhaps, in other circumstances, he

would have judged expedient. He ever considered the diversi-

fied conversation of a social circle, as affording the most rational.

54 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

and, at the same time, the most entertaining of all amusements."

" A disappointment (says a fourth) is often felt, on our introduction

to men who have attained eminence for talents and piety. By

habits of seclusion and abstraction, they have, perhaps, lost the

ability to mingle with interest in the concerns of the passing day .

It was not so with President Dwight. In his manners he was, in

the highest degree, dignified, affable, and polite. Like Johnson,

he shone in no place with more distinguished splendour, than in

the circle of the friends he loved; when the glow of animation

lighted up his countenance , and a perpetual stream of knowledge

and wisdom flowed from his lips. As his had been a life of obser-

vation and reflection, rather than of secluded study, his acquisi-

tions were all practical ; they were all at hand, ready to enrich and

adorn his conversation. In theology and ethics, in natural philo-

sophy and geography, in history and statistics, in poetry and phi-

lology , in husbandry and domestic economy, his treasures were

equally inexhaustible. Interesting narration, vivid description ,

and sallies of humour ; anecdotes of the just, the good, the generous ,

the brave, the eccentric ; these all were blended in fine proportions

to form the bright and varied tissue of his discourse. Alive to all

the sympathies of friendship, faithful to its claims, and sedulous in

performing its duties, he was beloved by many from early life,

with whom he entered on the stage, and whom, as Shakspeare

says, he " grappled to his soul with hooks of steel." It is no

small proof of his amiableness, that all who gained the most inti-

mate access to him, whether associates, or pupils, or amanuenses,

admired, revered, and loved him most. "

These various testimonies, written by so many different persons,

all having the best means of judging, while they evince his excel-

lence in private life, also show how impossible it must be, in a

sketch like the present, to give an adequate view of the character

of a man so greatly distinguished in every public station which

he was called to occupy ; so justly admired in the circle of his

friends ; and so tenderly beloved in the bosom of his own family.

The purity of his sentiments and language was equally remark-

able and exemplary. In conversation, he not only observed the

strictest delicacy himself , in his remarks, and allusions, and anec-

dotes ; but, by an influence at once silent and perceptible, induced

every one else to do the same. The same is true of his writings .

It is believed, that in the whole of his voluminous works there can-

not be found a single sentence which is not consistent with the most

refined purity. Nor, after an intimate acquaintance of more than

forty years, is the instance recollected in which he has been heard

to utter an expression, or thought, which would have excited

the apprehensions of innocence, or wounded the ear of female

sensibility.

He was, from infancy, distinguished for the most conscientious

regard to truth . This was obvious in every day's conversation.

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 55

He never allowed himself to exaggerate, nor in any degree to mis-

represent. In no situation, whether surprised by strong tempta-

tion, or urged by the most pressing necessity, would he sanction

the slightest deviation from absolute verity. Equally sincere was

he in his professions. The kindness and services which he ren-

dered, always exceeded the expectations which he had intention-

ally raised. He had too much self -respect to keep any man in

the dark as to his opinions or principles. He entertained none

which he was not willing to communicate to the world , and his

declarations concerning them were mathematically true.

No less was he remarkable for the most scrupulous regard to

decorum. His manners were those of the polished gentleman-

characterized by ease, grace, and dignity. There was no distance,

no reserve, no visible consciousness of superior intellect. His po-

liteness was not a mere exterior. It was the great law of kind-

ness, " Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself , " exemplified in

his daily intercourse with those around him. It was, thus, univer-

sal -appearing in his countenance, his conversation, and his con-

duct, exhibited equally towards persons of every condition, and de-

licately regarding the characters, the circumstances, the feelings ,

and the prejudices of those who were present. All men were easy

and happy in his company. Amidst all his avocations and labours,

he was ever ready to attend to the calls of hospitality, of civility,

and of friendship ; calls which were multiplied upon him to an un-

precedented degree, but which were never suffered to pass by un-

heeded. The courteousness of his manners was exemplified in

his intercourse with the poor and the humble, as well as with those

in more elevated stations, by his treating them at all times with

kindness, listening to their wants, and, as far as lay in his power

administering to their necessities .

His charities were unceasing, and, in proportion to his resources,

rarely surpassed. The beggar at the door never went empty

away. Those who suffered in silence, he continually sought out ,

and sent them unsolicited relief . Those whom the providence of

God had suddenly impoverished, never applied to him for help in

vain . To religious charities, to the education of young men of

piety , to the distribution of Bibles, to the support of missions, to

the assistance of destitute churches, he loved peculiarly to contri-

bute. The only privilege of the affluent which he coveted, was

the good which they might do with their wealth, and the pleasure

which they might enjoy in doing it .

No man ever loved his friends with more sincerity or constancy,

or with warmer affection. His house, his hand, and his heart,

were always open to welcome them. He never deserted them in

distress, or because they were the objects of reproach and calum-

ny. Instead of this, he chose rather to withdraw from those who

attacked them, however numerous , or wealthy, or powerful. To

their failings he was kind -never, by even a remote allusion, giv-

56 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

ing others reason to suppose that he observed them. Their ex-

cellencies he loved to acknowledge. The characteristics, in his

view, which ought especially to govern in the choice of intimate

friends, were not talents, nor learning, nor wealth, nor influence,

nor polish, nor fashion: they were sincere affection, tried personal

worth, and refinement of the mind. In this respect few have been

more happy. In his intercourse with his friends and with others,

all his purposes were kind, and generous, and honourable. He

would not condescend to wear disguise, nor to associate with those

before whom it was necessary.

Personal independence, and decision of character, were in-

wrought in the very texture of his mind. He was afraid of no man.

The history of his life presented no vulnerable points, and he

knew that reproach and slander could not do him injury. While

he received intelligence and advice from every quarter, and would

change his purpose if a sufficient reason was given ; yet, without

such a reason, no influence nor entreaties, no flattery nor threats ,

could induce him to change it. His purpose was his duty. Mo-

tives of a higher nature than any which present objects can afford,

led him to embrace it, and no other motives could prompt him to

relinquish it. For this , he was ready at all times, if it became ne-

cessary, to sacrifice the objects which are usually most valued: the

friendship of any friend ; the civilities and courtesy of the rich, the

fashionable, and the powerful ; and the applause of the many. The

formation of his opinions on religious subjects, he appeared ever

to consider as a transaction exclusively between God and himself .

Aiming to leave other things wholly out of view, he resorted to the

Bible as the perfect standard of faith, and as absolutely obligatory

on the conscience ; believing that his own mind was darkened by

many errors, and needed the illumination of the Spirit of light.

Various opinions, ardently embraced when a youth, he afterwards

relinquished, from a conviction that they were unfounded. His

sentiments, on all important religious subjects, will be found in

these volumes. What he believed to be true, he would preach, in

all the extent in which he received it, leaving the consequences

with God. His views ofChristian catholicism, and of the import-

ance of truth, will be found in several of the following sermons .

His feelings, and conversation, and conduct, towards those who

differed from him, were evangelically liberal. Virtue he described

as " voluntary obedience to truth, " and vice, as " voluntary obe-

dience to error. " He held the Scriptures to be a plain intelligible

revelation of the will of God ; and every man who has them, to be

equally responsible for his faith as for his practice. No considera-

tions wouldinduce him to be civil to error, as such ; or to narrow

the distinction between error and truth. While he treated those

whom he believed to embrace errors (even fundamental ones) with

kindness ; on all proper occasions,he exposed their errors without

hesitation and without fear. The value of their applause and their

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 57

friendship was " less than nothing," in comparison with the value of

truth, and of a clear conscience before God.

All who have attempted to draw this character have mentioned

him as eminently disinterested. Fewmen have originated more nu-

merous or more important institutions or measures . Yetit is be-

lieved, that in no instance whatever was he even suspected to con-

nect a private selfish end, his own personal benefit, or the ad-

vancement of any member of his family, with that which was

avowed and ostensible. The purposes which he professed were

the only purposes he had in view. To accomplish them, he could

not stoop to management and finesse. They were honourable pur-

poses. He declared them with the sincerity of truth, and pursu-

ed them with the dignity of virtue. So perfectly known was his

character in this respect, that the instance probably cannot be

named, in which any man ventured to approach him for his assist-

ance in a manner which was not direct and honourable .

The love of money appears to have had no influence over his

mind. He viewed wealth not as a blessing in itself , but in the good

which it enabled its possessor to do to himself , his family and others.

He had a right " to eat and to drink, and to enjoy the good of his

labour under the sun," and to make adequate provision for his fa-

mily; but the residue was vested in his hands to promote the well-

being of his fellow-men. These were his principles. Were the

amount of property that he relinquished for the benefit of the In-

stitution over which he presided to be stated, those who know how

limited were his resources, would view the degree in which they

were reduced by his liberality as literally romantic.

His temper was ardent and natively impetuous, but under the dis-

cipline of kindness and of principle it had been chiefly subdued.

If its impetuosity was ever manifested, it was against conduct which

was base and dishonourable. If at any time, through misinforma-

tion, he had been led to form incorrect views of men or of conduct ;

when convinced of it, no man more cheerfully retracted his error.

His ardour was daily conspicuous in his friendships, his love of rec-

titude, and his zeal in doing good. Though ardent, he was amia-

ble and affectionate, and possessed an almost child-like simplicity

and tenderness of heart. Never have we known the individual,

whose feelings were more uniformly or more powerfully excited by

the recital of a tale of distress, of a kind and honourable action, or

of an account of the triumphs of the cross.

The interest which he took in the great and splendid Christian

charities which characterize the present era, was extinguished only

with the lamp of life. While able to converse, the establishment,

labours, and success of Bible Societies and Missionary Societies,

maintained their hold upon his heart. Such was the excitement

which, from time to time, during the few last days of his life, the

accounts of their success produced upon his mind, that it was suffi-

cient forthe moment to control the influence of his disease; to bring

VOL. I 8

58 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

back his thoughts, occasionally bewildered by the intenseness of

his sufferings, to entire collectedness ; and to enable him to give

vent to his feelings in the lively and animated language of fervent

and pious gratification .

Inthe nearest relations of private life, President Dwight was an

example of almost all that is excellent and praiseworthy. As a

son, he manifested towards his parents, on all occasions, the most

dutiful and cheerful obedience and the most reverential affection .

So true is this remark, that his mother declared, a short time before

her death, that she did not know the instance in which he ever dis-

obeyed a parental command, or failed in the performance of a filial

duty. As a husband and a father, his life was eminently lovely.

It was an uniform display of conjugal affection and paternal ten-

derness : a daily exemplification of the great principle of benevo-

lence, " It is more blessed to give than to receive. " His highest

earthly enjoyment was found at the fireside, in the bosom of his fa-

mily. Their happiness was his own; and to promote it , no exer-

tions were too great. As a brother, it has been seen he was affec-

tionate and generous ; supplying to his numerous brothers and sisters,

as far as the nature of things would admit, the severe loss they had

sustained in the morning oftheir lives, in the death of an excellent

father. As a friend and neighbour, let the united testimony of the

various communities in which at different periods of his life he re-

sided, give his character. Rarely indeed does an instance occur,

in which the influence of individual example has been more bene-

ficially experienced. It was not merely that he was kind to his

neighbours, polite and hospitable to strangers, and charitable to the

poor; and that, as far as in him lay, he followed peace with all men:

there was a moral charm that uniformly surrounded him, which was

felt in every circle, and spread its benign influence through the re-

gion in which he dwelt.

His sentiments with regard to personal religion, are every where

unfolded in the following work ; but especially in the sermon on

the Nature of Faith ; in those on Regeneration ; and in those on

the Two Great Commandments. We have met with no other ac-

count of these subjects, which has appeared to us equally definite

and satisfactory. Religion he viewed as having its seat only in the

heart ; and himself , and all men, by nature, as entirely destitute of

it ; and remaining so voluntarily until renewed by God the Holy

Ghost. Wherever it existed, he supposed it to be comprehended

in love ; and proved to exist only by the fruits of love visible in

the life . His views of his own attainments as a Christian were un-

affectedly humble. On this subject he was reluctant to converse ;

conceiving that real piety is unostentatious, and that mere profes-

sions are of little value. Rarely, if ever, has he been known to

mention it when numbers were present ; and not often before a

single Christian friend. He never spoke of himself as a Christian.

His humility in this respect was striking in his sermons and his

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 59

prayers : when speaking of the Christians present, never including

himself among them. His declarations on this subject, in health

and in sickness, always were, that he did not know that he had any

personal interest in the mediation of Christ ; that the promises of the

Gospel were great and glorious ; that he was usually free from dis-

tressing doubts and apprehensions ; and that his hopes were often

bright and supporting. He loved retirement for religious medita-

tion, self -examination, and secret prayer ; and spent, it is believed,

a portion of every day in the discharge of these duties. His pray-

ers in the family and in public exhibited, so far as the human mind

canjudge, unusual evidence of contrition, self -abasement, trust, re-

signation, gratitude, and love. We have not known the individual

whose powers to instruct, or to interest, in conversation, were supe-

rior to his ; yet it was his highest pleasure to converse on religious

subjects, and where propriety permitted it, on experimental reli-

gion. Such was the state of his thoughts and feelings at all times

in company, that his mind seemed willing to enter on the contem-

plation of religion at every opportunity. It was not , however,

mere speculation. It was a living exhibition of the various affec-

tions of piety and benevolence as they came warm from the heart .

His life was a steady course of cheerfulness, as well as of sub-

mission ; and this, under trials well calculated to determine the

character. Probably no man, without actual experience, can

realize how great a trial of patience it is to endure pain in the

eyes every day for more than forty years, uninterrupted except by

the hours of sleep, and often intense and agonizing ; to be depri-

ved by it , for weeks together, of a great part of his necessary

sleep ; to be cut off , absolutely, from the pleasure of reading ;

and to be continually threatened by it with blindness , and, oсса-

sionally, with apoplexy. Not only, however, did he not murmur

nor repine -he was resigned. He was more-he was universally

cheerful and happy ; and always ready to contribute to the hap-

piness of those around him. He chose rather to remember his

blessings than his afflictions ; and felt that he had not deserved the

least mercy. Nay, his very afflictions he viewed as among his

greatestblessings.

Death often invaded his peace. He lost a father in the prime

oflife and usefulness, whom he ever mentioned with the highest

reverence ; three brothers, at the age of manhood, whom he ten-

derly lamented ; a mother, endeared to him by every consideration

which could affect the heart of filial piety ; two sisters, for whom

he felt no ordinary warmth of attachment ; and a son, a youth of

fine promise, at the age of nineteen, just after he had completed his

education. The effect of these repeated strokes was obviously

such as a Christian should desire. Their evident tendency was to

soften the heart, to subdue the will, to loosen the attachment to ter-

restrial good, to enliven the conscience, and to assist the soul in its

assumption of the heavenly character. This was peculiarly obser

60 LIFE OF THE AUTHOR.

vable of the death of his son. It occurred before the termination

of a remarkable revival of religion among the students of the semi-

nary ; during which he was believed to have become possessed of

personal piety. Had he lived, he intended to have been a clergy-

man. He died at a distance from home ; and his father did not ar-

rive in season to be present at his funeral. Rarely have we wit-

nessed parental sorrow equally intense and permanent. Rarely

could he mention his son without a faltering voice, and cheeks suf-

fused with tears .

Those who witnessed his sufferings during the two last years of

his life, were not more struck with their severity , nor with the for-

titude which he discovered under them, than with the marked effect

of them upon his mind. Often, for months together, the pain

which he endured was not only unintermitted, but , in its severest

forms , spasmodical. During the continuance of these convulsions ,

which recurred frequently during the day, so intense was the an-

guish, that the sweat would roll down his forehead for many mi-

nutes together in continued streams. Yet such was his fortitude,

that though compelled at times to groan from severity of distress ,

he never once forgot himself so far as to murmur or complain .

But while these sufferings thus ravaged the body, and prepared it

for dissolution, their effect upon the soul was obviously salutary.

Accustomed, for many years, to the daily contemplation of death ,

he now witnessed its gradual approach with serenity and peace.

In the midst of his sorrows he found consolations " that were nei-

ther few nor small. " He grew continually more and more hum-

ble, gentle, meek, and resigned ; more and more disposed to give

up every trust but in his Saviour. Though his intellect retained

all its vigour, yet his temper became, in an eminent degree, that

of a lovely child. His affections were exquisitely tender. Their

native character seemed entirely gone, and they resembled the af-

fections of heaven. His views, his hopes, his purposes, and his

joys, were heavenly; and nothing terrestrial seemed to remain, ex-

cept his earthly tabernacle, which was just ready to be laid in the

grave, there to rest in hope. When called to pass the dark valley,

his Shepherd appeared to be with him . His rod and His staff , they

comforted him. Though frequently bewildered through excess of

pain , yet no distressing fear assailed him. He saw the presence

of the grim Destroyer with tranquillity and hope ; yielded up his

soul without a struggle ; and, as we trust with undoubting confi-

dence, found a glorious welcome into the " house not made with

hands ; eternal in the heavens. "

His life was eminently useful and lovely. His death was peace-

ful and happy to himself , but most widely and deeply lamented by

his countrymen at large, as well as by his family, his many friends ,

and the Church of Christ. His eternity, we trust, will pass among

angels and the spirits of the just, in their immortal progress in

knowledge, happiness, and virtue .

LIFE OF THE AUTHOR. 61

Over the grave of President Dwight, the Corporation of the

College have erected a neat marble monument, on which is the

following inscription : Hic Sepultus jacet

Vir ille admodum reverendus

Timotheus Dwight, S. T. D. LL. D.

Collegii Yalensis Præses,

et ejusdem

Sacrosanctæ Theologiæ Professor ;

Qui

De Literis, de Religione, de Patria

Optime meritus ;

Maximo suorum et bonorum omnium

Desiderio,

Mortem obiit,

Die XI. Januar. Anno Domini

MDCCCXVII.

Ætatis suæ

LXV .

On the opposite side.

Ecclesiæ Greenfieldiensis Pastor

Annos XII.

Collegii Yalensis Tutor

VI.

Præses

XXII .

Senatus

Collegii Yalensis

Hoc Saxum Ponendum

Curavit.

ANALYSIS OF THE WORK.

SYSTEM OF DOCTRINES .

A. Doctrines of Natural Religion.

a. Existence of God;

•

I. Direct Proofs of it. Mark xii . 32.

II . Atheistical Objections and Schemes of Doc-

Sermon.

1

2

trine considered. Ps . xiv. 1 .

III . Comparative Influence of Atheism and Chris- 3

tianity. Ps . xiv. 1. §

b. Unity of God. 1 Cor. viii. 4. 4

c. Attributes of God ;

I. Eternity, Ps. cii . 24-27 . 5

II . Immutability,

III . Omnipresence, Ps. cxxxix. 1-12. 6

IV . Omniscience,

V. Omnipotence, Gen. xvii . 1 . 7

VI . Independence,

VII. Benevolence ;

I. As proved by the Works of Creation and

Providence . 1 John iv. 8.3

8

II. As exhibited by Revelation. 1 John iv. 8.

VIII. Justice. Deut. xxxii. 4.

IX . Truth. Psalm cxvii. 2.

X. Mercy. Psalm ciii. 8.

XI. Wisdom. 1 Tim. i. 17.

d. Decrees of God. Job xxiii. 13.

e. Sovereignty of God. Jer. x. 23 .

9

10

11

12

13

14 , 15

16

f. Works of God;

I. OfCreation,

I. Heaven,

  1. Air,
  2. Starry Heaven,

17

•

  1. Supreme Heaven,

IV. Holy Angels ;

i. Their Rank,

ii . Their Attributes, Col. i. 16. 18 , 19

iii . Their Employments,

v. Fallen Angels. Jude 6. 20

II. Earth ;

  1. The Globe itself . Gen. i. 1 . 21

64 ANALYSIS.

  1. Man;

i. Body,

ii . Soul, Gen. i. 26, 27. 22

• 1. Its Nature,

  1. Soul not Material. Gen. ii. 7. 23
  2. Soul not a chain of Ideas and Ex-

ercises . Gen. ii. 7. }24

iii . Chief End of Man. 1 Cor. x. 31 . 25

II . Of Providence ;

I. Probation of Man. Gen. ii. 15-17.

II. Temptation,

Gen. iii . 1-6. 27

III . Fall,

IV. Sentence. Gen. iii. 14-19 .•

26

28

V. Depravity of Man ;

  1. Its Universality,

i. Proved from Revelation and Facts.

29

Rom. v. 12.

ii . Proved from Man's rejection of the

30

Word of God. Jer. viii. 9 .

II . Its Degree. Eccl. viii. 2.

III . Its Derivation-From Adam. Rom. v. 20. 32

IV. Remarks upon it. Rom. vi. 12.

31

33

VI. Man cannot be justified by the Law of

God. Rom. iii . 20. }

34

B. Doctrines peculiar to the Christian Religion; or the

Mediatorial System.

a. The Character of Jesus Christ the Mediator ;

I. He is the True and Perfect God;

I. He is spoken of as such in the Scriptures,

  1. The Names of God are there given

35

Him. Rom. viii. 3, 4.

  1. The Attributes, 5 ofGodare there ascribed

III . The Actions, {

to Him. Rom. viii . 3, 4.

}

36

•

.

IV. Divine Relations are there

said to be sustained by Him.

•

v. Divine Worship is there re-

quired to be rendered, and is

Rom. viii .

3, 4.

}

37

actually rendered to Him.

II. The Deity of Christ is the only

ground of consistency in the

scheme of Redemption,

III . The Jews otherwise are not

chargeable with guilt in putting >Rom. viii .

Him to death,

383 , 4.

•

IV. The Prophets and Apostles can-

not otherwise be vindicated from

the sin of leading mankind into

Idolatry,

•

ANALYSIS. 65

V. Objections answered. 1 Cor. iii . 20.

-

VI. Objections to the doctrines of the Unita-

39

40

rians . 1 Cor. iii. 20.

VII. Objections to their manner of conducting

41

the Controversy. 1 Cor. iii. 20.

II . He is Man. Or the Incarnation of Christ.

42

Rom. viii . 3 .

b . The Covenant under which Christ acted : that of

43

Redemption. Is. liii. 10. (

c. The Offices which Christ sustained ;

I. His Prophetical Office,

I. His Personal Preaching ;

  1. The Necessity of his executing the Office

of a Preacher. Luke xxiv. 19 .

}

44

  1. The Things which he taught. Johnvii. 46.

III . The manner of his Preaching. John vii. 46.

45 46

IV. The Consequences of his Preaching.

John vii . 46.

II . His Preaching by his Apostles ; }

47

  1. The Fact that they preached the Gospel )

of Christ. Mark xvi. 15, 16, 20.

48

  1. The Necessity of their preach-

ing it,

  1. The things which they preached,

IV. The Consequences of their

Mark

xvi . 15,49

16, 20.

preaching ,

II . His Priestly Office ;

I. Origin, Office, and Character of

a Priest,

Ps. cx. 4. 50

II. Proofs of Priesthood of Christ,

III . His Character as a Priest. His Holiness ;

• 1. In what it was exemplified ;

i. In his Piety,

Heb.

•

ii. In his Performance of the Duties

vii. 51

which he owed Mankind,

}26.

iii. In his Self- Government. Heb. vii . 26 .

52

  1. Its importance ;

i. To the Distinction of his Cha-

racter, Heb .

ii. To enable him to magnify the -vii . 53

Law ofGod, 26.

iii. To give the necessary efficacy

tohis sufferings for Mankind, J

iv. To his setting before men an example

of righteousness. 1 John ii. 5. }54

• IV. His Atonement ;

VOL. I. 11. Its Necessity, 9

Rom. iii . 24-26. 55

66 ANALYSIS.

III . Its Reality,

IV . The manner in which it was Rom. iii . 56

performed , 24-26.

v. Its extent,

VI . Objections answered. Rom. iii. 24-26. 57

V. Intercession of Christ. Heb. vii. 24, 25. 58

III . His Kingly Office. Eph. i. 20-22. 59

d. The Miracles of Christ. Acts ii. 22 . 60

e. The Resurrection of Christ. Acts iii. 15. 61, 62

f . The Amiableness of Christ in publishing the Gos- ) 63

pel to Mankind. Is. lii. 7.

g. The Consequences of Christ's Mediation ;

I. Justification ;

I. The Nature: or in what it consists,

Rom.

II . The Source : the Free Grace of God,

{Rom . }

64

.24 .3

III . The Means : Faith in Christ ;

  1. Duty of believing. Rom. iii . 28.

-

65

  1. Nature of Faith. Rom. iii. 28 .

66

  1. Influence of Faith in our Justification .

Rom. iii . 28.

67}

rv . Reconciliation of Paul and James Jam.

on this subject, ii. 68

v. Influence of Works on our Justifi- 24.

cation ,

VI. Justification by Faith does not lessen the

69

Motives to obedience . Rom. iii . 31 .

II . Regeneration ;

I. The Agent in effecting it : The HOLY GHOST ;

  1. His Character. Tit. iii. 5 .

70

  1. Testimonies to the Doctrine of the Trinity

from the ancient Christians, Jews, and 71

Heathen . Is . xlviii . 16 .

III . His Agency. Tit. iii . 5.

II. Its Necessity, John iii. 3.

72

73

III . Its Reality,

IV. Its Nature. John iii. 3 .

74

V. Its antecedents. Acts xvi . 29, 30 .

75

VI. Its Attendants generallyconsidered. Eph . }

76

  1. Faith . See Sermon 66,
  2. Repentance. Matt. xxvii. 3-5.

77

  1. Love ;

i . Its Nature,

ii . Evidence of its existence,

Gal. v. 22. 78

iii . Its consistency with providing peculi-

arly for our own. 1 Tim. v. 8.

79

iv. Its consistency with our seeking salva-

80

دو

tion. Rom. ii. 6, 7.

ANALYSIS . 67

IV. Complacency. John xiii. 34. 81

VII. Its Consequences ;

  1. Adoption. 1 John iii. 2. 82
  2. Sanctification. 1 Thess . v. 23 . 83

III . Peace of Conscience . John xiv. 27. 84

IV . Joy in the Holy Ghost. Rom. xiv. 17. 85

v . Increase of Grace. (Prov. iv . )

VI. Perseverance unto the End.{

  1. } 86, 87

VIII. Its Evidences ;

  1. What are not evidences . 2 Cor. xiii . 5. 88
  2. What are real evidences. 2 Cor. xiii. 5. 89

III . Difficulties attending the application of} 90

these evidences to ourselves. 2 Cor. xiii. 5.

SYSTEM OF DUTIES.

A. Duties of Natural Religion .

a . Character of the Law of God. Psalm xix . 7 .

91

b. In what it is summed up ;

I. In the two great Commandments :

I. The First Great Commandment ;

  1. Love to God. Mark xii. 28-30.
  2. Reverence of God. Job xxviii. 28 .

III . Humility. 1 Peter v. 5 .

..IV. Resignation. Luke xxii. 41, 42 .

92

93

94

95

II . The Second Great Commandment ;

  1. What it requires. Mark xii . 31 .

96

  1. Its Effects ;

i. On Personal Happiness.

ii . On Public Happiness.

•

III . Its Foundation : Utility.

II . In the Decalogue ;

I. The First Commandment.

II . The Second Commandment.

Acts xx. 35. 97

Acts xx. 35. 98

Acts xx. 35. 99

Ex. xx. 3 . 100

Ex. xx. 4-6. 101

III. The Third Commandment ;

  1. The Nature of Profaneness .

Ex. xx. 7. 102

  1. The Guilt of Profaneness .

Ex. xx. 7. 103

III. The Danger of Profaneness. Ex. xx. 7. 104

IV. The Fourth Commandment ;

  1. The Perpetuity, S ( of the Sabbath. )
  2. The Change, { } 105, 106

Ex. xx. 8-11 .

  1. Objections answered. Heb. iv. 9 .

107

IV. How the Sabbath is to be observed. )

Is . lviii. 13, 14. }

v . Reflections on the Sabbath . Ex. xx. 11 .

108

109

V. The Fifth Commandment ;

  1. Duty of Children. Ex. xx. 12.
  2. Duty of Parents. Ex. xx. 12.

III . Duty of Rulers. Ex. xx. 12.

110

111, 112

113

{

68 ANALYSIS.

IV. Duty of Subjects. Ex. xx. 12.

114

VI. The Sixth Commandment ;

  1. Killing; when lawful. Ex. xx. 13.

115

  1. Murder.

III . Duelling . Ex. xx. 13.

IV . Suicide . Ex. xx. 13.

v. Drunkenness . Ex. xx. 13 .

116

117

118

VII. The Seventh Commandment ;

  1. The Origin, Nature , and Benefits of 119

Marriage. Ex. xx. 14.

  1. Lewdness . Ex. xx. 14.

120

III. Polygamy. Matth. 19.3-11 .

121

IV. Divorce.

VIII. The Eighth Commandment ;

  1. Idleness .

II. Prodigality .

Ex. xx. 15. 122

III . Fraud. Ex. xx. 15.

IV. Gaming. Ex. xx. 15.

123

124

IX. The Ninth Commandment ;

• 1. Nature and Importance of Truth. Ex. 125

xx. 16.

  1. Nature and Causes of Lying. Ex. xx. 126

16.

  1. Mischiefs and Preventives of Lying. 127

Ex. xx. 16 .

IV . Slander. Ex. xx. 16. X. The Tenth Commandment ;

  1. Contentment. Ex. xx. 17.
  2. Charity. 1 Tim. vi. 17-19 .

III . Avarice. 1 Tim. vi. 9, 10.

IV . Ambition . Rom. xii. 16.

c. Man's Inability to obey the Law of God.

128

129

130

131

132

Rom. 133

viii. 17.

B. Duties of the Christian Religion . a. Mode of Restoration to the Spirit of Obedience :

By Faith and Repentance. Acts xx. 20, 21 .

}134

b. Means of Restoration, or Means of Grace.

I. Ordinary Means of Grace.

I. Generally considered ;

  1. Proofs that there are such Means. )

1 Cor. iv. 15.

135

  1. What they are.

•

III . What is their Influence .

}

1Cor. iv. 15. 136

IV. Objections answered.

1 Cor. iv. 15.

137

II. Particularly considered ;

•

  1. Hearing of the Word of God. Luke 138

viii. 18.

ANALYSIS. 69

  1. Prayer ;

i. Nature of Prayer.

ii . Seasons of Prayer. 1 Thes. v. 17. 139

iii . Obligations to Prayer.

iv. Usefulness of Prayer ;

  1. To the Suppliant. 1 Thes. v. 17.
  2. To Families . Eph. vi. 10.

140

141

  1. To Communities .

v. Efficacy of Prayer in procuring

142

blessings .

vi. Encouragements to Prayer.

vii . Objections to Prayer. Job xxi. 15.

143

viii . Forms of Prayer. Math. vi. 9-13 .

144

III . Intercourse with Religious Men. Prov . 145

xm. 20.

IV. Religious Meditation. 146

•

v. Religious Education of Children ;

• i. Duty of Educating Children reli-

giously. Prov. xxii. 6. )

147

•

ii . Manner in which it is

to be done.

iii . Motives to this duty. }

Prov . xxii . 6 . 148

II . Extraordinary Means of Grace ;

I. Who are to use them : or the Church of Christ.

I. Ordinary Members of the Church :

Their Character. 2 Cor. vi. 14. 149

}

•

  1. Officers of the Church :

•

i. Ministers ;

  1. Who are Ministers. 1 Pet. v.

1-3. } 150, 151

•

  1. Duties of Ministers ;
  2. Preaching ;

• 1. End ofPreaching. Matth .

  1. Nature of Preaching. xxvill . 152
  2. Subjects ofPreaching. 19.
  3. Manner of Preaching. 153
  4. Study.

• 3. Conducting the Ordinances of

Divine Worship.

  1. Presiding over and directing .

theDiscipline ofthe Church .

1 Thess . iii . 2 .

154

  1. Instructing the flock in pri-

vate.

ii. Deacons. Acts vi. 1-6.

II. What they are ;

  1. Baptism ;

i. Reality, ( of Baptism .

{

ii . Design, Mat. xxviii. 19. }

155

156

10 ANALYSIS .

iii . Subjects of Baptism ;

  1. Believing Adults.

Matt . 157

  1. Infant Children of Be- xxviii .

158

lievers. 19 .

  1. No Infants but those of believers . 159

• iv . Mode of Administration.

  1. Lord's Supper ;

i . Nature and Design.

Mark xiv .

ii . Qualifications of Com-

160

22-25.

municants.

iii . Disposition with which Mark xiv.

to be attended .

161

22-25 .

iv. Motives to the attendance .

III . Discipline of the Church.

Mat. xviii. 162

15-18 .

SYSTEM of Dispensations consequent on the State of

Probation.

A. Death. Psalm xc. 3. 163

B. Consequences of Death .

a. Immediate Consequences. Eccl. xii . 7. 164

b. Remoter Consequences ;

  1. Resurrection of the Body. 1 Cor. xv. 16 . II . Final Judgment. 2 Pet. iii. 10. 165

166

III . Punishment of the Wicked :

I. Its Duration. Matt. xxv. 46. • II . Its Nature . 2 Pet. ii. 12 . 167

168

IV . Rewards of the Righteous :

I. New Creation. 2 Pet. iii. 13. 169

II. Happiness of Heaven. Rev. xxi. 1-3. 170, 171

Conclusion. Prov. viii . 6. 172,173

专

CONTENTS OF THE FIRST VOLUME.

Page

MEMOIR of the Life of the Author, 3

Analysis of the Work, 63

SERMON I. Direct Proofs of the Existence of God. -Mark xii. 32. 76

SERMON II. Atheistical Objections and Schemes of Doctrine consider-

ed.-Ps. xiv. 1 . 87

SERMON III . Comparative Influence of Atheism and Christianity. -P3.

xiv. 1. 100

SERMON IV. Unity of God. -1 Cor. viii. 4. 114

SERMON V. Eternity and Immutability of God.-Ps. cii. 24-27. 128

SERMON VI. Omnipresence and Omniscience ofGod.-Ps. cxxxix. 1-12.

140

SERMON VII. Omnipotence and Independence of God. -Gen. xvii. 1.

153

SERMON VIII . Benevolence of God as proved by the Works of Creation

and Providence. -1 John iv . 8. SERMON IX. Benevolence of God as exhibited by Revelation.--1 John iv. 8. 181

SERMON X. Justice ofGod. -Deut. xxxii. 4. SERMON XI. Truth of God. -Ps. cxvii. 2. SERMON XII . Mercy of God.-Ps. ciii . 8. SERMON XIII . Wisdom of God. -1 Tim . i. 17. SERMON XIV. Decrees of God. -Job xxiii. 13. SERMON XV. Same subject continued. --Job xxiii. 13. SERMON XVI. Sovereignty of God. -Jer. x. 23. 166

192

202

215

226

238

251

264

SERMON XVII. Heaven. The Air . Starry and Supreme Heavens.

Gen. i. 1. 278

SERMON XVIII. Holy Angels, their Rank and Attributes . Col. i. 16. 291

SERMON XIX. Holy Angels, their Attributes and Employments . Col. i.

  1. 303

SERMON XX . The Fallen Angels. -Jude 6. SERMON XXI. Creation of the Earth . -Gen. i. 1. SERMON XXII. Creation of Man. Body. Soul ; its Nature. -Gen. i. 26, 27. 341

SERMON XXIII. The Soul of Man not material . Gen. ii. 7. 317

329

354

SERMON XXIV. The Soul of Man not a chain of Ideas and Exercises .

Gen. ii. 7. 366

SERMON XXV. The Chief End of Man. - 1 Cor. A. 31. SERMON XXVI. The Probation of Man. Gen. ii . 15-17. SERMON XXVII. The Temptation and Fall of Man. Gen. iii. 1-6.

SERMON XXVIII. The Sentence pronounced on Man. Gen. iii. 14-19.

379

392

404

420

SERMON XXIX. Depravity of Man. Its Universality, proved from Reve-

lation and Facts. Rom. v. 12. -435

SERMON XXX. Depravity of Man . Its Universality, proved by Man's

rejection of the Word of God. Jer. viii. 9. SERMON XXXI . Depravity of Man. Its Degree. -Eccl. viii . 2. 448

461

SERMON XXXII. Depravity of Man. Its Derivation from Adam . -Rom.

v. 20. 477

SERMON XXXIII. Depravity of Man. Remarks. Rom. vi. 12. 489

72 APPENDIX.

Page

SERMON XXXIV. Man cannot be justified by Works of Law. Rom. iii. 20. 505

SERMON XXXV . Divinity of Christ. Proved from the Names given to

Him. Rom. viii. 3, 4.

518

SERMON XXXVI. Divinity of Christ.

Proved from the Attributes and

Actions ascribed to Him. Rom . viii. 3, 4. 532

SERMON XXXVII. Divinity of Christ. Proved from Divine Relations

sustained by Him, and from Divine Worship required and rendered to

Him. Rom. viii . 3, 4.- 546

SERMON XXXVIII. Divinity of Christ. Proof . -This the only ground of

Consistency in the scheme of Redemption. Rom. viii. 3, 4. 562

SYSTEM

OF

DIVINITY.

VOL. I. 10

SERMON I.

EXISTENCE OF GOD .

MARK xii . 32. -There is one God.

THE existence of God is the basis of religion. This truth

will be evident, if we remember, that the word religion always de-

notes either a system of truths , of which God is the great subject ;

or a system of affections and conduct, of which He is the supreme

object. If we can prove to ourselves the existence of a God; that

is, of a Being, by whom we were created, and by whom the uni-

verse is governed ; some such system of truths, affections, and

conduct, must be also capable of being proved. To such a Being

we and the universe must sustain important relations ; and out of

these relations, must necessarily arise to intelligent beings a variety

of duties, immediately, and alway owed to him. Were there no

such Being, there could be no such relations nor duties. Were

the existence of such a Being incapable of proof , the existence of

the relations and duties would be equally incapable of being pro-

ved. Happily for us, and accordantly with his own wisdom, GOD

has not, in this most interesting case, left himself without ample

witness.

In the text , the existence of God is declared , in the plainest

and most direct terms. I shall, therefore, proceed immediately to

the examination of the subject.

The foundation of all reasoning, concerning beings and events,

and ultimately, concerning attributes and relations also, is a sup-

posed, or acknowledged, connexion between cause and effect. By

cause, (it will be observed, that I am speaking of what is called

the efficient cause) I intend, that something, be it what it may, which

produces , or is supposed to produce, existence, or any change of ex-

istence ; and without which, the existence, or the change, would not

have been. Between this something styled cause, and the some

thing styled effect, all mankind, except a few sceptical or atheisti

cal philosophers, have agreed, that there is an inseparable con

nexion. As this connexion has been denied by these philoso-

phers, and as it is the foundation of all our reasonings on this, and

every other subject ; a consideration of it, and of the evidence

which attends it, will undoubtedly be a proper part of the present

discourse .

In the first place, it will be admitted by these philosophers , as well

as all other men, that we have no knowledge of any existence, or any

change, which has taken place without a cause. All beings, and all

EXISTENCE OF GOD. 1

76 [SER. I.

events, so far as our acquaintance with them has hitherto extended,

have been produced by some agency, or influence, extraneous to

themselves, and have never sprung up into existence casually, or

without such agency, or influence. There is, therefore, not the

least reason furnished by experience, or by any thing which we

know, why we should believe existence to be casual ; or why we

should doubt an inseparable connexion between cause and effect.

On the contrary, all the experience, all the knowledge of man,

lends its whole influence to the doctrine, that existence has been

invariably caused. The supposition, therefore, that existence is

uncaused, or that the connexion between cause and effect is not

inseparable and invariable, is perfectly gratuitous, and without a

shadow of support. How absurd and ridiculous it is, for a man,

professing to be a reasoner and a philosopher, to found his opi-

nions, or his arguments, in any case, and especially in the most

important case possible, on a mere supposition, I need not explain.

2dly . All mankind have acknowledged, in the clearest manner,

and in every way of which the subject was susceptible, the insepara-

ble nature of this connexion.

The language of every nation is formed only on this plan. In

every language, there are not only many words directly expressing

ideas of this subject ; such as cause, efficiency, effect, production,

produce, effectuate, create, generate, &c. or words equivalent to

these; but every verb in every language, except the intransitive im-

personal verbs, and the verb substantive, involves, of course, causation

or efficiency ; and refers always to an agent, or cause, in such a man-

ner, that, without the operation of this cause or agent, the verb would

have no meaning. In this manner have mankind declared, in the

very structure of their languages, not only that they perceived, and

acknowledged this connexion, but that it formed so considerable

and essential a part of their thoughts, as to necessitate them to

think in this manner only. Thus, to think, to speak, to sit, to run,

to strike, to write, to love, to hate, all denote effects, and refer to an

agent, or cause of those effects ; and without such reference, would

not contain, nor express, any meaning whatever.

I have observed above, that all mankind have agreed in the ac-

knowledgment of this connexion, except a few atheistical and

sceptical philosophers . These men have, indeed, denied this con-

nexion in form ; but they have acknowledged it, as fully as all

others, in their customary language. On every subject, except

creation, or giving existence, they have spoken exactly as other

men speak ; and the connexion between cause and effect, is as of-

ten declared in their conversation and writings, and as much relied

on, as in those of other men. This fact is clear proof , that they

admit this connexion in all cases, except those which respect the

existence and government of God, in the same manner as the rest

ofmankind. In truth, language is so constructed, that it is impos-

sible to write, or speak, in a different manner.

*

EXISTENCE OF GOD.

SER. I.] 77

Children, so soon as they begin to speak at all, inquire more

anxiously, and more universally, concerning causation and efficien-

cy, than concerning any other subject of investigation. Every

one, conversant with them, must have observed, that they almost

continually inquire, who did this, that, and the other thing ; or pro-

duced the several changes, of which they are witnesses ? Who

made themselves, and the various objects around them ? In this

manner, they teach us, that this is, to man, the natural and the only

natural mode of conceiving : for all children think and speak in this

manner.

Nor, are the views of mankind less forcibly evident concerning

this subject, in their actions . No man ever acted, without regard-

ing himself as a cause ; and without expecting to produce some

change in himself , or in the objects around him, by his efficiency ;

nor made use of any instrument , without expecting from it a de-

gree of efficacy , which should produce some change, or other, not

to be looked for without it. Thus, all men eat and drink ; lie down,

and act, universally, with a design to effectuate certain changes in

themselves, or other objects : and atheists, as truly, and uniformly,

as any other men. Thus, also, children act, from the beginning.

Indeed, were men not to act in this manner, they would never act

at all. No proof of absolute and universal conviction, concerning

this , or any other subject, can be more perfect.

3dly. We learn this connexionfrom experience ; and in two ways ;

by the testimony of our senses , and by the inspection of our minds .

Causes operate without us, and within us ; and produce their

proper effects in both cases. Those which operate without us,

produce their effects before our senses ; and so far our knowledge

of the connexion between cause and effect, arises from sensitive

testimony. Those which operate within us , produce their effects

before the eye of the mind only ; and so far our knowledge of this

connexion is intuitive. I as clearly perceive, that I think, reflect,

remember, choose, wish, love, and hate ; that by a determination of

my will, I turn my thoughts from one subject to another ; and trans-

fer my affections and my conduct, voluntarily, from one object to

another, and from one course to another ; as, that I exist. I also

perceive this in the same manner, and with the same certainty ; viz .

with the bare inspection of the mental eye ; commonly termed, intui-

tion , and acknowledged to be attended with the highest possible cer-

tainty. Mr. Hume is, therefore, totally erroneous in his assertion,

that the connexion between cause and effect exists , or rather is per-

ceived, only in the names ; and that, if we would call both by the

name, events, we should not suppose any connexion to exist be-

tween them.

This opinion is sufficiently refuted by the fact, that these names ,

and not that of events, have been given to them . Mankind never

give names without ideas ; nor form any names, which do not ex-

press such ideas, as they really have ; nor suppose themselves to

EXISTENCE OF GOD.

78 [ SER. I.

have ideas, which they have not ; or different ideas from those,

which they really have. Wherever names have been given, the

very ideas, which they denote, have certainly existed in the minds

of those, by whom they were given .

The thing which we really perceive in this case, is, however,

merely the fact, that cause and effect are thus connected ; and not the

nature of the causation, or efficiency, on which the connexion is

founded. That I , and not something else, think, and act, in such

manners as have been recited, and that but for me the thought and

action would not have existed, I perceive intuitively ; but I do not

perceive at all why, or by what power, I think, and act. The nature

ofthis subject lies, in every case, beyond the bounds of the human

capacity. Yet this infers not, in any degree, any want of evidence ,

attending the fact. The contrary opinion would be attended with

this absurdity : that we cannot perceive one thing without perceiving

at the same time another, totally diverse, and, in the view of the mind,

entirely separated : an absurdity which cannot need to be exposed

byme.

4thly. The mind cannot realize the fact, that existence, or change,

can take place without a cause .

This is, at least, true with respect to my own mind. I have very

often made the attempt, and with no small pains-taking, but have

never been able to succeed at all. Supposing other minds to have

the same general nature with my own, Iconclude, that all others

will find the same want of success . If nothing had originally ex-

isted, I cannot possibly realize, that any thing could ever have ex-

isted. Causes, absolutely the same, must, in the same circumstances ,

produce absolutely the same effects . This is, I think, certainly self-

evident, and admitted as such. An absolute want of cause involves

an absolute sameness of an opposite kind ; and must, with nearly the

same evidence, continue for ever. The necessity of causes to all

the changes of being is, so far as I know, universally admitted.

Mr. Hume, particularly, talks as commonly, or rather as uniformly ,

in this manner, as any Christian does ; and not only argues from

cause to effect, and from effect to cause, as much as other men,

but discusses this subject abundantly, and gives directions, and

principles, for this kind of argumentation. Indeed, without admit-

ting it, neither he, nor any other man, could argue at all. But, if

no change can take place without a cause, how can it be supposed,

that existence can take place without a cause ? Certainly less vio-

lence is done to our reason by supposing a being to be changed in

some respect or circumstance without a cause, than to begin to ex-

ist without a cause .

5thly. No absurdity can be greater than to argue with a man who

denies this connexion.

He himself , in speaking, exhibits himself as the cause of all the

words uttered by him, and the opinions communicated ; and, in the

act of arguing, admits you to be a similar cause . If his body be

EXISTENCE OF GOD.

SER . I.] 79

not a cause, and your eyes another, you cannot see him. If his

voice, and your ear, be not causes, you cannot hear him. If his

mind and yours, be not causes, you cannot understand him. In a

word, without admitting the connexion between cause and effect,

you can never know that he is arguing with you, or you with him .

With these observations premised, which you will see to be in-

woven with this and all other subjects of discussion, I observe, in

the first place, that the existence of things , universally, proves the

heing of GOD.

The argument which leads to this conclusion is, for substance,

conducted by Mr. Locke in the following manner : Every man

knows, with absolute certainty, that he himself exists. He knows,

also, that he did not always exist , but began tobe. It is clearly

certain to him, that his existence was caused, and not casual ; and

was produced by a cause, adequate to the production. By an ade-

quate cause, is invariably intended, a cause possessing and exert-

ing an efficacy sufficient to bring any effect to pass. In the pre-

sent case, an adequate cause is one possessing and exerting all the

understanding necessary to contrive, and the power necessary to

create, such a being as the man in question. This cause is what

we are accustomed to call GOD. The understanding necessary to

contrive, and the power necessary to create, a being compounded

ofthe human soul and body, admit of no limits . He who can con-

trive and create such a being, can contrive and create any thing.

He who actually contrived and created man, certainly contrived

and created all things .

This argument is, in my view, perfectly conclusive : nor has it

been, norwill it ever be, answered, except with sophistry, or sneers .

I will not insist, that every step of it is attended with what logicians

call intuitive evidence : nor, that it amounts to what is, in the logical

sense, an absolute demonstration. But it is, in every step, attended

with such evidence as excludes all rational doubt ; and approaches

so near to the character of demonstration as to leave the mind

completely satisfied. At the same time, it is opposed by no coun-

ter evidence.

2dly. The state of existing things completely proves the being of

GOD.

The manner in which the argument, derived from this source, is

conducted by Bishop Berkeley, is clearer, and more happy, than

any other within my knowledge ; and is substantially the follow-

ing : We acknowledge the existence of each other to be unquestiona-

ble; and, when called upon for the evidence, on which this acknow-

ledgment is founded, allege that of our senses ; yet it can by no

means be affirmed with truth, that our senses discern, immediately,

any man. We see, indeed, a form ; and the motions and actions

of that form ; and we hear a voice, communicating to us the

thoughts, emotions, and volitions, of an intelligent being. Yet it is

EXISTENCE OF GOD.

80 [ SER . I.

intuitively certain, that neither the form, the motions, the actions,

the voice, the thoughts, nor the volitions, are that intelligent being ;

or the living, acting, thinking thing, which we call man. Onthe

contrary, they are merely effects, of which that living, acting thing,

denoted by the word man , is the cause.

The existence of the

cause, or, in other language, of the man, we conclude from the ef-

fects , which he thus produces. In the same manner, and with the

like certainty, we discover the existence of God. In the universe

without us, and in the little world within us, we perceive a great

variety of effects, produced by some cause, adequate to the pro-

duction. Thus the motions of the heart, arteries, veins, and other

vessels ; of the blood and other juices ; of the tongue, the hands,

and other members ; the perception of the senses, and the actions

ofthe mind ; the storm, the lightning, the volcano, and the earth-

quake ; the reviviscence and growth of the vegetable world ; the

diffusion of light, and the motions of the planetary system, are all

effects ; and effects of a cause, adequate to the production. This

cause is God ; or a being, possessed of intelligence and power,

sufficient to contrive and bring them to pass. He, with evidence

from reason, equally clear with the testimony of the Scriptures,

thundered marvellously with his voice ; holdeth the winds in his fists ,

sendeth lightnings with rain ; looketh on the earth, and it trembleth ;

toucheth the hills , and they smoke ; melteth the mountains like wax,

at his presence ; causeth the outgoings of the morning and the even-

ing to rejoice ; and maketh his sun to arise on the evil and the good.

Him, also, we are bound to praise, because we are fearfully and

wonderfully made by him ; our substance was not hid from him,

when we were made in secret . His eyes saw our substance, yet being

imperfect, and in his book all our members were written, which in

continuance, were fashioned by him, when as yet there were none of

them . He also breathed into our nostrils the breath of life ; and the

inspiration of the Almighty hath given us understanding.

Should it be said, that these things are the natural and necessary

result of certain inherent powers of matter and mind, and therefore de-

mand no extrinsic agency ; I answer, that this objection affects the

conclusion, only by removing it one step farther back in the course

of reasoning. That matter should have possessed these powers

eternally, without exerting them, is impossible ; and that it should

have exerted them from eternity is equally impossible. As I can-

not enter into the consideration of these two positions at the pre-

sent time ; as I intend soon to resume it, and believe, that I shall be

able to demonstrate both of them ; I shall, for the present only,

take them for granted. If they are true, it follows irresistibly,

from both of them united, that the properties and the exertions, of

matter , are derivedfrom an extrinsic cause ; and that that cause is pos-

sessed of intelligence and power, to which no bounds can be assigned.

The same argument, conducted in a more general and popular

manner , may be thus exhibited. The agency of God is clearly

EXISTENCE OF GOD.

SER. 1. ] 81

and certainly seen in the preservation and government of all things .

The existence of all the forms and states of being, which we be-

hold in the universe, is plainly derived ; because it is a change in

the former state of things, commencing, continuing, and termina-

ting; and, as it is impossible that any being should commence its

own existence, derived certainly from an extrinsic and adequate

cause. This cause can be no other than God.

Thus the production, existence, and structure, of vegetables and

animals ; their growth, perfection, and decay ; their functions and

operations ; are all plainly effects of boundless intelligence and

power. The universe, of which we are inhabitants, is plainly a

system, made up ofparts, fitted to each other, and arranged and

proportioned, so as to make one great and glorious whole. The

parts also, are, to say the least, in immense multitudes, subordi-

nate, but wonderful systems .

To pass by the mineral kingdom, in which, however, there are in-

numerable proofs of design, art, and arrangement, fitting the parts

of it , by a happy subserviency, to the accomplishment of many

illustrious and valuable ends, but demanding more time than can be

allotted, at present, to the consideration of them ; I observe, that

every organized being, every vegetable and every animal, is a complete

system within itself . Each has all the parts and faculties which are

suited to the purposes of its existence, purposes obvious, useful,

and wonderful ; and yet regularly and completely accomplished.

Thus grass is exactly fitted to adornthe earth with beauty, and to

become food for the sustenance of an innumerable multitude of

animals. Thus hortulan productions, fruits, grains, and various

kinds of animals, are fitted to become food for mankind. Thus trees

are fitted to yield their shade, and to become useful materials for

furniture, fencing, and building. Thus the earth, the air, the rain,

and the sunshine, are suited to the production of vegetable life, of

action, warmth, and comfort ; together with innumerable other

things, necessary to preserve and invigorate man. Thus the sun

is fitted to shine ; the planets to receive light from his beams ; and

the whole system, to move on with regularity andharmony, and to

accomplish all the great and glorious purposes for which it was

contrived.

In every one of these things, even the least of them, there is a

skill and power manifested, which, were any other skill and power

employed in labouring to bring them to pass, infinitely transcend

the efficiency of all beings, except God. In every one of them,

and in all parts of every one, He is seen in this efficiency, and is

thereforepresent in all. In all, and throughout all, he acts. Every

moment, in every place, and with respect to every being, he pre-

serves, conducts, and manages,

ges, all the parts of this stupendous

machine, this vast universe, this immense kingdom, which he hath

made for himself , and not for another. Power and skill, literally

infinite, are every moment conspicuous in every being

VOL. I. 11

82 [ SER . I

EXISTENCE OF GOD.

This mode of arguing is so natural to man, that we find it adopt-

edby the most ignorant nations, as well as the most enlightened ;

bythe child , as well as the man of grayhairs. In every age, and

in every country, it has struck the mind with a force so great, and

in a manner so satisfactory, that it has probably precluded, in most

minds, the apprehension of any necessity for further investigation .

Ask any plain man, whom you meet, why he believes, that there is

a God; even the poor Indian, whose mind, in the language of the

poet , is wholly " untutored, " and he will tell you, that he sees him

in the clouds, and hears him in the wind. All men believe the

things around them to be effects , or works ; and all believe them to

be the works of a God; of a being, whose power andunderstanding

transcend all limits . Nor has any man ever doubted the sound-

ness of this conclusion, but under the influence of a wish, that it

might not be true, nor without a laborious effort to convince him-

self , that it was an error. So true is it that the fool, and the fool

only, hath said in his heart, " There is no God. "

The arguments, which Atheists have employed against this doc-

trine, so far as they are of sufficient importance to merit an answer,

I propose to consider hereafter ; and will conclude this discourse

with the following

REMARKS.

1st. How great, awful, and glorious, a being is God!

From the things , which have been said, it is evident, that there

as , ever has been, and ever will be, a Being, from whom all things

derived their existence ; on whom all depend for their continuance :

and by whom all are conducted in the order and harmony, visible

in the universe. Of what character does this exhibition declare

him to be possessed ?

He is plainly self - existent . All other beings are derived, and

begin to be. He only is underived, and without beginning of days,

or end of years ; the same yesterday, to- day , and for ever. Of

course, his manner of being is wholly unlike that of all crea-

tures ; totally superior, and utterly incomprehensible. Hence he

says, and says truly, I am ; and there is none beside me.

Hence

he styles himself , I AM THAT I AM, JAH, and JEHOVAH ; that is,

EXISTENCE, to which there is nothing like, and nothing second.

Plainly also, he is Almighty. The power, which gave existence,

is power, which can know no limits. But to all beings in heaven,

and earth, and hell, he gave existence, and is therefore seen to

possess power which transcends every bound. The power,

which upholds, moves, and rules the universe, is also clearly illi-

mitable. The power, which is necessary to move a single world,

transcends all finite understanding. No definite number of finite

beings possess sufficient power to move a single world a hair's

breadth; yet God moves the great world, which we inhabit, 68,000

miles in an hour -two hundred and sixty times faster than the

EXISTENCE OF GOD.

SER . I.] 33

swiftest motion of a cannon ball. Nor does he move this world

only , but the whole system, of which it is a part ; and all the

worlds, which replenish the immense stellary system, formed of

suns innumerable, and of the planets which surround them. All

these he has also moved from the beginning to the present mo-

ment ; and yet he fainteth not, neither is weary .

Nor is this a full description of his amazing agency. He works

every moment in every part of this vast whole ; moves every atom ;

expands every leaf; finishes every blade of grass ; erects every

tree ; conducts every particle of vapour, every drop of rain, and

every flake of snow ; guides every ray of light ; breathes in every

wind; thunders in every storm ; wings the lightning ; pours the

streams and rivers ; empties the volcano ; heaves the ocean ; and

shakes the globe. In the universe of minds, he formed, he pre

serves, he animates, and he directs, all the mysterious and won-

derful powers of knowledge, virtue, and moral action, which fill

up the infinite extent of his immense and eternal empire. In his

contrivance of these things, their attributes, and their operations,

is seen a stupendous display of his immeasurable knowledge and

wisdom. All these existed in the Immense Eternal Mind, as in a

vast storehouse of glorious ideas and designs ; and existed from

everlasting. In them the endlessly diversified character of uncre-

ated wisdom, beauty, and greatness, has begun to be manifested,

and will continue to be manifested, with increasing splendour, for

ever.

What, we cannot but ask, must be the Knowledge of him, froin

whom all created minds have derived both their power of know-

ing, and the innumerable objects of their knowledge ? What must

be the Wisdom of him, from whom all things derive their wisdom ;

fromwhom the emmet, the bee, and the stork, receive the skill to

provide, without an error, their food, habitation, and safety ; and

the prophet and the seraph, imbibe their exalted views of the in-

numerable, vast, and sublime wonders of creation, and of creating

glory and greatness ? What must be the Excellence of him who

gives birth to all other Excellence ; and will improve, refine, and

exalt, that Excellence in every virtuous mind, throughout ages

which will begin for ever ?

2dly. How plainly are all beings absolutely dependent on God for

their existence, their attributes , and their operations !

Allbeings are just what he pleases, and can do what he pleases ,

and permits, and nothing more. Should he command the clouds

that they should not rain ; how soon would the vegetable and ani-

mal worlds perish ; and man accompany his kindred worms to the

dust? Should he withhold any power, it must cease to be exercised ;

and we could neither speak, think, nor move : the human race

would be changed into statues ; and the world be a dreary waste ;

a desert of solitude, silence, and despair.

How vain, then, must be all resistance to God ! The very power

EXISTENCE OF GOD.

34 [SER . I.

to resist, the will, the wish, cannot rise into being, unless supplied,

and supported, by him. The universe of men and angels, the

worlds above and beneath, united, could not contend against him

for a moment. All are nothing and less than nothing, in his sight.

With a word he called the whole into being. With infinite ease

he could, with a word, return the whole to its original nothing ; and

with another word, could raise up a second universe in its stead.

3dly. Of this universe God must, of necessity, be the sole and ab-

solute proprietor .

No property is so perfect, as that which arises from creation.

Whatever we make, or fashion, is our property, in the highest de-

gree in which any thing can be ours . God, it is to be remember-

ed, not only made, but created ; not only made the work, but the

materials . Hence his property is plainly superior and paramount

to all other; and he is a proprietor in a higher sense than any other

being can be. His property, also, extends to all beings animate

and inanimate, rational and irrational, to atoms, vegetables, ani-

mals, men, and angels, in the same absolute manner.

Hence it is evident, that he has an absolute right to dispose of

all beings as he pleases ; and particularly to require, on the most

reasonable grounds, that all rational beings voluntarily devote

themselves to his service, with such affections, in such a manner,

and with such conduct, as are conformed to his will. This right

is complete and supreme, and cannot be denied, nor questioned,

without sin ; without plain and palpable injustice . All disobedience

to his pleasure is evidently unjust, in the same manner, as when we

withhold the property of our fellow-men, and in a degree incalcu-

lably greater ; while obedience, on the other hand, is nothing more

than barely rendering to God the things which are God's .

4thly. Of the same universe he is, of course, the only Ruler.

The nature of this vast work, and the wisdom and power dis-

played in it, prove, beyond debate, that it was made for some end

suited to the greatness and number of the means which are em-

ployed. This end is such, and so important, that it was proper

for him to create and uphold an universe for its accomplishment.

This end, originally so valuable as to induce him to commence

and continue this mighty work, must ever be equally valuable in

his view. But it can never be accomplished, except by his own

government of all things. No other being can govern them at all .

All created power, wisdom, and goodness, is infinitely unequal to

such a task, even for one day, or one moment. But He can rule

the work for ever, and with infinite ease ; and can, and will thus ac-

complish the endwhich he proposed from everlasting.

For this end, every thing was created the least as truly as the

greatest ; the atom, as the world; the worm, as the angel. His

providence therefore extends, with absolute evidence, to all . Each,

however minute, however momentary, is really necessary in its

place, and for its time. Each, therefore, needs to be conducted,

EXISTENCE OF GOD.

SER. 1. ] 85

throughout its existence, to the purpose for which it was made.

His care extends, therefore, and must extend, to minims, ephemera ,

and atoms, as truly, and as exactly, as to the concerns of cherubs

and seraphs in the heavens.

Accordingly, we actually behold him alike animating the blade,

the stem, and the leaf , in the vegetable kingdom ; living in the

mite and the insect, the bird and the beast ; thundering marvel-

lously with his voice ; sending lightnings with rain ; rolling the

billows of the ocean; making the earth to quake at his presence ;

shining in the stars, glowing in the sun, and moving with his hand

the various worlds which compose the universe. At the same time,

his presence and agency are more sublimely visible in the universe

of minds, in all the amazing powers of thought, affection, and mo-

ral action, in the knowledge, virtue, and enjoyment, of the myriads

which form the peculiar kingdom of JEHOVAH.

5thly. It is equally evident that this end must be Himself.

Before God made the universe, there was nothing beside him .

Whatever motive prompted him to this great work, must, of course ,

have been found in himself; because, beside him there was nothing.

It must, also, have been found in himself , because, when other be-

ings existed, all were nothing in comparison with him ; and, there-

fore, in the same comparison, undeserving of his regard. But

this end could not respect any change in himself; any increase,

diminution, or alteration, of his greatness, power, and glory. It

was, therefore, the manifestation of himself alone which could be

the end of this mighty work. Himself is the sum of excellence ;

ofall that is great, or wise, or good. The manifestation of him-

self is , therefore, only the manifestation of boundless excellence to

the creatures which he has made. The manifestation of all attri-

butes, though capable ofbeing made in declarations, is principally

discerned in actions . Excellence, therefore, is discovered, chiefly,

by doing what is great, and wise, and good. All this is so evident,

as to need no illustration .

God, when he intended to disclose his perfections to the uni-

verse, intended, therefore, to exhibit them, chiefly, by an endless

course ofaction, in which wisdom, greatness, and goodness, should

be supremely, and most clearly, discovered. The highest blessed-

ness, he has told us, and therefore the greatest glory, is found in

communicating good , and not in gaining it ; in giving, and not in

receiving. To this decision Reason necessarily subjoins her own

Amen. The great design of God in all things is, therefore, to do

good, boundlessly, and for ever ; and in this conduct to disclose

himself , as the boundless and eternal good.

It must, of necessary consequence, be supremely pleasing to

him, that his intelligent creatures voluntarily unite with him , in

loving, and promoting, this divine purpose ; while all opposition

to it must be supremely displeasing. How important then must

it be to us, that we cheerfully coincide with his perfect pleasure

86 [ SER. I

EXISTENCE OF GOD.

in this great end, and devote to the advancement of it all our facul-

ties. Should we resist his designs, so excellent, so dear to him ;

how unworthy in itself , and provoking to him, must be the con-

duct. What terrible consequences must spring from the exertion

of such power and knowledge, exerted to manifest his anger

against those who thus disobey his will, and oppose his designs !

What must they not feel ! What ought they not to fear!

On the contrary, what an universe of good, immense and end-

less, may he be expected to provide for those, who voluntarily

unite with him in this glorious design, and cheerfully perform his

pleasure. Such good he can make, and give, and repeat for ever,

with a wish, and with a word. To make, and give it, is his delight

and glory. It will, therefore, be done. In this wonderful work,

how divinely great and good does God appear ! How deserving

of all admiration, love, homage, obedience, and praise. How

amazing the wonders, which he has done ! How much more amaz-

ing the transcendent purpose, for which they were done ! Who

would not fear, who would not bless, who would not adore, that

glorious and fearful name, JEHOVAH OUR GOD ; the Being self-

existent, eternal, and immense ; and without beginning, limits, or

end; united with eternal and immeasurable wisdom and power ;

from whom are derived all worlds, and all their inhabitants ; on

whom all depend ; and by whom all are preserved, governed, and

blessed, and conducted with supreme wisdom and goodness to an

end, immortal and divine ? Blessing, and honour, and glory, and

power, be unto Him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb

for ever and ever .

SERMON II.

ATHEISTICAL OBJECTIONS AND SCHEMES OF DOCTRINE CONSIDERED .

PSALM XIV . 1-The fool hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.

IN the preceding discourse, I endeavoured to prove the exist-

ence of God by arguments which have appeared to men of great

distinction for learning and wisdom, to be not only satisfactory, but

unanswerable. Plain men, also, though comprehending them im-

perfectly, have admitted both the force of the arguments them-

selves ; and the point which they are intended to establish ; with-

out a question, and almost without an exception. Yet it cannot be

denied that there have been atheists, speculative as well as prac-

tical. A few of them may have existed in the uneducated classes

of mankind, but almost all have been found among those who, pro-

fessedly at least, have been more or less learned.

But to whatever class these persons may belong, and whatever

pretensions they may make to knowledge and wisdom, they are in

the text universally characterized by folly. The fool, says David,

hath said, there is no God. In other words, every man who says

this, is a fool ; and the assertion is the result of his folly only.

It is remarkable that this assertion is declared to be made in the

heart of the fool ; that is, to flow from his wishes, and not from his

understanding. For the words, there is, in the translation, there is

nothing in the original. Hence, it has been supposed by some

commentators, that the passage ought to be rendered, let there be no

GOD. Whether this rendering be admitted, or not, there can be no

doubt that the chief reason why the assertion is adopted at all, is

the indisposition of the heart to acknowledge the existence of the

Creator.

That we easily believe what we wish to believe, is a truth so ob-

vious, as to have passed into a proverb. He who hates the con-

trol, disreslishes the character, and dreads the inspection, judgment,

and retribution of his Maker, and intends to persevere in a course

of sin ; will find no refuge from anxiety and alarm, and no source

of quiet in sinning so comfortable, or in his view so safe, as the be-

lief , that there is no God. It is not strange, therefore, that this be-

lief has been cherished by such beings as mankind are; and par-

ticularly by such beings as atheists have universally been.

Still, this conduct cannot be denied to be folly of a very gross

kind. As our belief can make no difference in the fact; as ifGoD

exists, he will continue to exist ; as our danger from his anger

against our sins, is exactly the same whether we believe it or not ;

as our quiet in sin will in this case only cheat us into ruin ; and as

ATHEISTICAL OBJECTIONS AND

88 [ SER . II.

the little consolation which we find in the indulgence of this belief,

will only enhance our wretchedness by adding to it the anguish of

disappointment; no sober man will hesitate to pronounce this con-

duct foolish in the extreme . To him, who walks over the edge of

a precipice, what benefit can it be to shut his eyes ? What greater

stupidity can there be, than to shut our eyes, when this conduct

will prove the certain means of conveying us to this scene of ab-

solute destruction ?

Atheists have, however, determined to encounter this hazard, and

boldly resolved that there is no GOD. Against the doctrine of the

divine existence they have raised up several objections, which they

declare to be satisfactory, at least, to themselves. These they have

also formed into a scheme, and presented it to the public with a

face of bold assurance . Even this has not satisfied them. They

have triumphed, in the most open manner, in the supposed inge-

nuity of their efforts ; and in the boasted strength of their argu-

ments, have ridiculed the arguments of their antagonists ; and have

treated the doctrines not only of Christianity, but even of Theism,

with contempt. It is the design of this discourse, to examine the

objections of these men, and the principal doctrines with which they

have been connected.

The first of these objections which I shall mention, is that Crea-

tion is so great a work, as to make it seem impossible, even for God

to accomplish it.

This was the great difficulty in the mind of Aristotle. This sin-

gular man, in the early parts of his life, found his thoughts so much

perplexed with this consideration, that he for a time gave up the

doctrine of creation, and determined that the universe, as to its sub-

stance at least, had existed from eternity. I cannot help remark-

ing here the difference between him and the modern opposers of

the divinity of Christ. Arians and Socinians have very generally

insisted, that creation is so easy a work, as to afford no proof of

divine agency; and declared, that , even if Christ did in fact create

all things, this fact does not infer his divinity. To Aristotle it ap-

peared too difficult a work, even for God himself to perform .

To this objection we are furnished with a conclusive answer.

Goddoes actually, and daily, create the human soul in innumerable

instances ; and the creation of the soul evidently demands all the

power, necessary to the creation of matter. He who can give ex-

istence to the soul, can plainly give existence to any thing. As I

propose in the progress of these discourses to discuss at large the

immateriality of the soul, I shall at present take it for granted.

This objection is also completely overthrown by the fact, that God

upholds , moves, and governs the universe. Had Aristotle known the

doctrines of the Copernican astronomy, and beheld God moving

with entire and unabated ease, the systems of worlds, which com-

pose the universe ; his capacious mind would , I think, have been

irresistibly led to admit, that the hand which moves them, could with

SCHEMES OF DOCTRINE CONSIDERED.

SER II.J 89

1

the same ease have created them. Indeed this great man appears ,

in the later parts of his life, not to have placed any serious reliance

on this objection.

2dly. It is objected, that the state of the world is such, as to for-

bid the belief , that it is the work of a God.

" The world," says the objectors, " is full of imperfection, and of

suffering. The course of nature is such, as to entail upon all its

animated inhabitants, pain, disease, and death. Nor is the moral

state of things materially different from the natural. Depravity,

in all its odious forms, appears to have existed from the beginning ;

and has ever constituted, to say the least, no small part of the cha-

racter of mankind." God, on the part of all enlightened men, who

believe in the existence of such a being, and particularly on that

of Christians, is declared to be possessed of infinite perfection.

Cana being of such perfection be supposed to be the author of so

imperfect, incongruous, and deformed a work ? Is it not plain, that

God either did not make the world, or that he has forgotten it, and

left it wholly to the control of chance ?

To this objection, which is attended with a degree of specious-

ness, and fitted to awaken fretfulness, where it will not produce

conviction, I answer, in the

1st. place, that all the real weight of it lies in the existence of

moral evil ; a subject, which Ishall have occasion to examine, when

I come to discourse on the benevolence of God, and on the apostacy of

man.

2dly. The whole force of this objection lies in the inexplicableness

of certain things which it alleges ; and amounts to no more than this ,

that there are several things in the world, the nature, use, and end,

of which we cannot understand. The argument contained in it , if

resolved into a general principle, will stand thus. Nothing, the na-

ture, use, and end, of which we cannot understand, can be the

work of God. This argument needs only to be proposed, to be ex-

ploded; for it is absolutely certain, that God can do very few things,

whose nature, use, or end, can be comprehended by us. It is equal-

ly certain, that, according to this rule of concluding, the same thing

may, at the same time, be proved to be, and not to be, the work of

God. One man may distinctly comprehend the nature of a thing,

and discern in it certain proofs of divine workmanship. Another

man may, at the same time, be wholly ignorant of the nature of the

same thing ; and his ignorance will, according to this rule, be de-

cisive proof , that it is not a divine work. The same man, also,

may, according to this rule, in the different periods of childhood

and manhood, be able to prove a thing to be, and not to be, wrought

by the hand of God. The evidence of the divine agency, and the

want of it, are here placed, not in the nature of the work, but in

the nature of the optics by which it is perceived : an absurdity too

palpable to need any further discussion. The real proof in this,

and every other case, must, if it be found at all , be found in some-

VOL. I. 12

ATHEISTICAL OBJECTIONS AND

90 [ SER. II

thing which we know, and not in our ignorance. But it has not

been , and cannot be shown, that in the existing world there is any

thing inconsistent with the doctrine, that it was created, and is go-

verned byGod. It is readily acknowledged , that in the system of

which we are a little part, mystery and inexplicableness are found

everywhere, and in every thing, in the view of such minds as ours.

At the same time, it is also certain, that nothing else can be ration-

ally looked for in the works of Him, whose ways are higher than

our ways as the Heavens are higher than the earth. The mysteries

alleged , instead of being an objection against the doctrine, that

the world was made by God, are a strong presumptive argument in

its favour.

3dly. The direct proof of the divine agency in the formation and

government of this very world, found in innumerable things which

itself contains , is hitherto unanswered, and is plainly unanswerable.

This, having its foundation in what we know, can never be affected

in any manner by what we do not know ; or, in other words, by

the mere inexplicableness of the objects around us.

Universally, until we know thoroughly the nature, use , and end

of the things, on which the objection is founded, it must be a mere

and miserable presumption, that they have not such a nature, use,

and end, as are worthy of God.

The Doctrines which Atheists have connected with these objec-

tions, and which are deserving of any serious attention, are the fol-

lowing :

I. That things have existed in an eternal series :

II. That their existence is Casual : and

III. That all distinct, or separate beings , owe their existence to the

Powers and Operations of matter.

These I shall consider in the order specified.

I. It is asserted by Atheists, that there has been an Eternal Series of

things . The absurdity of this assertion may be shown in many ways.

1st. Each individual in a series is an unit. But every collection

of units, however great, is with intuitive certainty , numerable ; and

therefore cannot be infinite.

2dly. Every individual in the series, ( take for example, a series of

men) had a beginning. But a collection of beings, each ofwhich had

a beginning, must, however long the series , have also had a beginning.

This likewise, is intuitively evident. Should it be said, that the

first in each series had not a beginning, but was from everlasting ;

which is the only possible method of evading the answer already

given ; I reply, that, according to this supposition, the first in each

series was uncaused and self -existent; and, containing in itself the

principles of eternal existence, could never have ceased to be. At

the same time, an endless multitude of finite self -existent beings

must be admitted on this supposition, possessed in all instances of

few and feeble active powers, and in most instances of none but

SCHEMES OF DOCTRINE CONSIDERED .

SER. II .] 91

such as are merely passive. Thus, for example, there must have

been an eternal Man, an eternal Lion, an eternal Eagle, an eter-

nal Oak, an eternal Rose, eternal Grass ; and in a word, as many

eternal self - existent Beings, as there are kinds, and sorts of exist-

ences in the world : for no being of one kind can possibly pro-

duce, or bring into existence, a being of any other kind. Of

course, there must have been one, eternal and self -existent, at the

head of every existing series ; and at the head of every series of

animated beings, an eternal self - existent pair. From these, also,

the whole series must have sprung without any contrivance, and

in most instances, without any consciousness. All this, with a train

of absurdities following it, literally endless, must be admitted on

this supposition. For what purpose must all this be admitted ?

Truly , to relieve us from the difficulty of admitting the existence of

One self -existent being. At the same time, the existence of such

a finite self - existent being is a mere hypothesis, without a shadow

of support.

Beyond this , all such beings must have lived, as we do, through

a succession of years, and their whole existence must be made up

of parts, or divisions, succeeding each other. These parts are a

collection of units ; and are therefore numerable.

Should it be said, that saints and angels in heaven are immortal,

and will therefore exist through an infinite duration ; that this du-

ration will also be made up of successive parts ; and that, of

course, there may be an infinite duration made of successive parts :

I answer, that there is a total difference between these cases.

In

the former, the supposed infinite duration is completed: in the lat-

ter, it will never be completed. It is true, that saints and angels

will never cease to be : but it will never be true, that they have

lived infinitely , or through an infinite duration. An endless addi-

tion of parts may be supposed ; but an infinite sum of parts, which

have actually had existence, is a self - contradiction.

3dly. It is justly observed by the learned and acute Dr. Bentley,

that, in the supposed infinite series, as the number of individual

men is alleged to be infinite ; the number of their eyes must be twice,

the number of their fingers ten times, and the number of the hairs

on their heads many thousand times, as great as the number of men .

What, then, must be the number of the hairs on the bodies of ani-

mals ; of leaves on the trees ; and of blades of grass on the earth ?

According to this supposition, then, there is an almost endless mul-

titude of numbers, greater, and many of them incalculably, than

an infinite number. To such palpable absurdities are we reduced

by supposing an infinite succession.

4thly. It is also observed by the same excellent Writer, that all

these generations of men were once present. One of the individu-

als, viz. the first, existed at an infinite distance from us. His son,

whomay be supposed to have been forty years younger, was either

at an infinite, or at a finite distance from us. Ifat an infinite, then

ATHEISTICAL OBJECTIONS AND

92 ISER. II

the infinite distance of his father was forty years longer than the

infinite distance of the son . If the son was at a finite distance

from us, then forty years, added to a finite distance, will make it

infinite.

It is unnecessary, that I should dwell any longer on this compli-

cation of folly .

The same arguments are, with the same force, applicable to all

possible successions . Every succession is in its nature made up of

parts, each of which has a beginning. Ofcourse we see intuitively,

that the whole has had a beginning.

The only subject, on which rests even a seeming obscurity in

this respect, is what is called continued motion. Some persons have

considered motion of this kind; such, for example, as that of the

planets, as not being successive ; because, when viewed in the

gross, the successive parts were not separable by the human mind.

Divide the circuit, as a wheel is divided by its cogs, or teeth ; or

fix upon a number of stars, by which the planet shall successively

pass; and the delusion, occasioned by the continuity of the parts,

will vanish in a moment. It will be seen of course, and with per-

fect distinctness, that motion, in all its forms, is as truly a succes-

sion of changes as successive thought, or successive being.

II . Atheists assert, that the existence of things is Casual.

In this assertion the connexion between cause and effect, and the

very existence of causation, are denied, so far as the production ofbe-

ingis concerned. All beings are supposed not to have been produ-

ced, or caused, but to have happened : their existence being sup-

posed to be a mere contingency. Some, perhaps most of those,

who have adopted this system, have, however, at the same time

believed matter to be eternal. On this scheme of existence I ob-

serve in the

1st. place, that it is a mere hypothesis, unsupported by any evi-

dence whatever. The doctrine of casual, or contingent existence,

precludes all reasoning by its very nature. The very demand of a

reason from him, who adopts it, is itself an absurdity ; because he

declares to you in the very nature of the doctrine, that neither the

existence, northe doctrine, admits of the application of any reason .

Of course, the fact, that existence has happened in any case, is in

its own nature capable of being evidenced only by testimony, and

of this evidence it is in fact incapable, because no witness was

ever present at such a contingency. The doctrine, therefore ,

stands on exactly the same ground with that of all other mere as-

sumptions ; such as, that the soul of man is blue, or triangular ;

that the inhabitants of Jupiter walk with their heads downward;

or that the Sun is a body of melted glass .

2dly. The abettors of this doctrine have, in their endeavours to

form a system, founded on it, been driven, unavoidably, into a con-

tinued succession of absurdities .

Epicurus, the principal vender of this system, supposed, that in-

SER . II . ] SCHEMES OF DOCTRINE CONSIDERED.

93

numerable solid atoms existed from eternity in infinite space ;

that they were of different sizes and figures, and were all separa-

ted from each other ; and that they were originally quiescent , or mo-

tionless . When it was objected, that they must , then, have remain-

ed for ever motionless ; he invented for them a conatus ad motum ;

an endeavour, or tendency towards motion ; which he declares to have

been inherent in them eternally. When it was objected, that, un-

less they were moved eternally by this conatus, they could never

have moved at all ; he avoided this difficulty by determining, that

they had moved from eternity, in parallel directions . It was ob-

jected again, that with this motion they would never have approach-

ed any nearer to each other. To escape this difficulty, he gave

them a motion, in a small degree oblique. The cause of their mo-

tion he declares to be their weight ; and their direction to be down-

ward : not knowing, that there is no weight, where there is no

attracting body ; and that every direction towards the centre of the

earth is downward. I will not pursue this mass of absurdities any

farther; and will only observe, that those, who have followed him,

have not rendered the system a whit better than they found it.

3dly. The actual state of things is a complete refutation of this

doctrine.

Regularity is a direct and perfect proof of the absence of casual-

ty in the formation of that, in which the regularity exists ; and the

whole system of things is, in its parts, and their union in a whole,

one immense and multiform system of regularity.

The twenty-four letters of the alphabet, small as the number is,

are proved arithmetically to be capable of more than six hundred

thousand millions of billions, of different horizontal arrangements.

Were they to be thrown up into the air, and to fall in any supposed

order, the chances against their falling, a second time, in the same

order, are at least as great a number, as that which has been speci-

fied; and just so many chances exist against their falling in any

givenposition.

In the human frame there are probably more than a million of

parts, greater and smaller ; all of which we behold united in a

perfect and mostregular system. The relative horizontal positions

only , of which these are capable, must be expressed by more than

a million of arithmetical figures ; their vertical and oblique posi-

tions must be expressed by several millions more ; and all these

combined, must be expressed by the multiplication of these immense

sums with each other. The chances, therefore, against such an

union of the parts of the human body, as actually exists, even af-

ter we suppose the several parts actually formed, would be such,

as would be expressed by this aggregate of figures : a number,

which all the human race, who have existed since the Mosaic date

ofthe creation, would not have been able to count, had they busied

themselves in no other employment, during their lives . In addi-

tion to this, the number of chances against the original formation

ATHEISTICAL OBJECTIONS AND

94 [ SER. 11.

ofthese parts is immensely greater, than against the fact of their

coming together. Nor are we yet at the end of the climax : for

we perfectly well know, that, if all the parts were actually and per-

fectly formed, they could neither put themselves together, nor be

united by any human skill, or labour, however long employed.

Beyond all this, if they were all formed, and all perfectly united, so

as to constitute exactly, both within and without, a human frame ; it

would still be a mere corpse, without life or motion. Were we to

admit, still further, that the frame, thus formed, might become pos-

sessed of life ; it would yet be destitute of a soul, and therefore in-

finitely distant from the intelligent being, whom we call man.

All these difficulties must be surmounted, a second time, in order

to the existence of mankind ; one of each sex being originally,

and absolutely, necessary to the existence of succeeding genera-

tions. In the same manner, the same process must be repeated,

in order to the production of every kind of animals ; and in most

cases in order to the production of the kinds of trees, shrubs, and

plants.

He, who can believe this system, can believe any thing ; andhis

faith must undoubtedly be the nearest approximation to casualty,

which has been hitherto recorded in the history of man.

The body of man is a system, made up of parts, wonderfully nu-

merous and diversified, and still more wonderfully united and ar-

ranged. Every one of them is regularly found in all the bodies of

men , in its own place ; and that, the best place possible. The hair

of the head, which, for aught that appears, might as naturally have

grown on the face, grows only where it is needed to cover the ce-

rebrum and cerebellum, so tender and vital, from the injuries of both

heat and cold; and to become, at the same time, a beautiful orna-

ment. The eyes are placed where only they are needed, or could

be materially useful to direct the hands and the feet : the teeth, where

alone they could serve their great purpose of mastication : the

throat, immediately behind and beneath them, where alone it could

answer its own purpose of receiving the food after it has been chew-

ed, mixedwith the saliva, and thus prepared for digestion : the stom-

ach, beneath the throat, or more properly beneath the œsophagus,

to receive through it the food thus prepared, and render it useful to

the preservation of life by digestion. In the same manner, the

heart is situated in exactly that position, with respect to the lungs ,

andthe greater arteries and veins, in which it communicates to them,

and through them to the whole body, in the most advantageous

manner, the blood, which is the great instrument of sustaining life.

The Lungs, also, are in the same happy manner connected with

the throat by the trachea, so as to receive, and decompose, the air

on which we live, after it is admitted into the nostrils . The great

bone of the Neck and Back, commonly called the Spine, is so form-

ed, and placed, as to sustain the body in an erect posture ; as to de-

fend , inamanner indispensably necessary, the spinal marrow, so

SCHEMES OF DOCTRINE CONSIDERED.

SER . II. ] 95

essential to life ; and as, through orifices in the vertebræ, of which

it is composed, to permit the nerves to pass, and give sensation to

every part of the body; and as, at the same time, to enable us to

bend into every useful position. The tongue is so constructed, and

posited, as to answer exactly its various important purposes, par-

ticularly tasting and speaking; the hands, where alone they could

be employed, in their innumerable uses ; and the feet, where alone

they could enable us to stand, or walk.

This course of illustration might be pursued through a volume,

or rather through many volumes ; and the more minutely and ex-

tensively it was pursued, the more clearly would it evince, at every

step, a design most wonderful in itself , originally and exactly form-

ed, and perfectly executed ; every part of which is with the great-

est felicity fitted to the important ends of human existence .

Let us now , for a moment, consider what would be the conse-

quences of mere casualty with regard to this subject. Suppose the

eyes, only, placed ( where they might as easily have fallen by

chance, as in their proper place ) in any one of those innumerable

positions, furnished by the body ; for example, on the top of the

head, or on the soles of the feet : What would have become of the

man ? Suppose the mouth, the throat, the trachea, the lungs, the

stomach, or the heart, to have been removed even a very little dis-

tance from their present places. How soon must life, if we sup-

pose life at first to exist, be extinguished ? Or rather, how impos-

sible must it have been for life to exist at all ? Were the hands and

feet to interchange positions ; were the thumb to grow from the

back of the hand ; orthe joints of the fingers to be turned outwards ,

nearly every purpose, which man is fitted to accomplish, must be

entirely prevented. The truth is ; all the parts of the human body

are ofhigh importance to our well-being, both as to their structure,

and their position ; and very many of them are in both respects ab-

solutely indispensable. A very small change in any one of these

would be equally fatal to comfort, and to life.

Whence, then, has it come to pass, that, in so many millions of

the human race, all the parts of the human body are exactly form-

ed, and exactly placed, in their proper and relative position ? that

the blood has flowed in its thousand channels, and regularly re-

turned to the fountains, in all its various courses ? that the food has

ever been digested; the processes of secretion carried on with

exactness ; the juices separated without mixture ; and the nutri-

ment of the whole Body conveyed to every part, however minute ;

and however distant ? that the organs of sensation have ever

been formed ; and the bones, muscles, and sinews, furnished with

strength, and the nerves with sensitive perception ; and that thus

the Body has become a frame, a tenement, suited to the inhabita-

tion of an intelligent mind ?

Let me further ask, has mere casualty been the source of contri-

vance, of thought, ofvolition, of virtue ? Has an immaterial Exist

96 [ SER . II.

ATHEISTICAL OBJECTIONS AND

ence possessed of these wonderful powers, started into being by a

mere contingency ? That the soul is immaterial , I shall, as I have

before observed, attempt to prove in another discourse, and shall

therefore take it, here, for granted. Will it be held, that souls are

also progenitors, and propagate each other, after chance has

given birth to the first in the series ?

The first proofs of design, viz. the provision of means, adapted

evidently to the accomplishment of ends, are also found in every

animal Body ; in every organized structure ; in the mineral King-

dom, to a vast extent ; and universally in the figure, positions, mo-

tions , and appurtenances, of the worlds composing the planetary

system. Their magnitudes, their distances from the Sun ; the po-

sition of their axes; their diurnal and annual revolutions ; their

furniture of moons ; the central station, size, and splendour, of the

vast luminous world, around which they roll ; the regularity and

harmony of all their motions ; are overwhelming proofs of design

and wisdom, such as can be attributed only to a boundless and un-

created Mind.

III. Atheists assert, that the several beings, found in the Universe,

owe their existence to the operations ofMatter.

In opposing this scheme we return again to arguments, derived

from the connexion between cause and effect for here a cause is

not only supposed, but directly alleged by the Atheist ; and is re-

garded by him as being adequate to the production of all beings .

It will be my business to prove from the inadequacy, and the con-

sequent inefficacy, of the alleged causes, that it was not the real

source of existence to the beings, visible in the world around us.

For the accomplishment of this purpose, I observe in the

1st. place, that Matter is acknowledged by the Atheist, with whom

Iam now arguing, to be destitute of Intelligence : it being the great

object of his scheme to prove, that his own existence, and that

of other beings, was not derived from an Intelligent cause .

2dly. The eternal existence of Matter is a merely gratuitous sup-

position ; unsupported by any evidence whatever.

3dly. If we admit, that Matter existed from eternity, its proper-

ties , and operations , must all have been also eternal .

As the properties of Matter are inherent in it ; they must, in the

case supposed, have been eternally inherent. Of course whatever

powers Matter possessed, it possessed them eternally : there being

no cause, intrinsic or extrinsic, to increase, lessen, or alter them.

Hence it is certain that they must have operated from eternity, in

every way, in which they could operate at all. All the beings,

therefore, and all the changes, which its operations could produce ,

it must have produced from eternity. Hence it is plain, that there

must have been an eternal and infinite series of Men, of Animals,

of Vegetables, of Motions, and of Changes of every other kind, in

the universe . But this has been demonstrated to be a self- contra-

diction. The premises, whence it is derived, are therefore false .

SCHEMES OF DOCTRINE CONSIDERED.

SER. II . ] 97

That Matter should have possessed these powers from Eternity,

without exerting them, and that it should have exerted them from

Eternity, are thus proved to be, as I asserted in the former dis-

course, plain impossibilities. It follows, then, undeniably, that, if

Matter existed eternally in one uniform state, that state was entire-

ly quiescent ; and that no change , however small, could ever have

taken place in it, but from an extrinsic cause. Thus, the suppo-

sition of the eternal existence of Matter, is so far from accounting

for the existence of the beings, and the changes, in the Universe,

that it will not account for any thing ; not even for the least change

in the position, or circumstances, of an atom.

4thly. There is no fact, which gives even the appearance of plau-

sibility to this scheme.

The only facts, which, so far as I know, have ever been seri-

ously alleged to this purpose, are the production of insects, and

plants, by what is called equivocal generation : according to which,

by the mere fermentation of various kinds of matter, the insect is

supposed to be produced without a parent, and the plant without a

seed.

To this I answer,

(1st.) That this is , at best, a mere supposition : no evidence having

been ever furnished of the fact which it alleges .

( 2dly .) Francisco de Redi, and Malpighi, two eminent Italian

philosophers, have, by a long train of ingenious and accurate experi-

ments, unanswerably proved, that equivocal generation is a ground-

less hypothesis ; and that no Matter, in any process of fermentation,

will produce an insect without a parent, or a plant without a seed.

As, therefore, all the powers and operations of matter must, if

eternal, be eternally the same ; and as matter now produces no

such beings, as alleged ; it follows unanswerably, that matter was

never the cause of any such productions .

5thly. Innumerable facts directly refute this scheme.

1st. That this world, in its present, form, was not eternal, is cer-

tain ; because its surface is continually changing, and approxima-

ting, towards a level. If we suppose one particle only to have

descended from the higher towards the lower parts of the surface in

an age, or in a million ofages ; the whole, unless counteracted by op-

posing causes ( and in most places there is no trace ofsuch causes)

must have become an entire level, at a period, too distant to be

conceived by any mind, or expressed by any numbers. Yet mil-

lions of tons annually descend towards the centre. The date of

the Earth, in its present state, must, therefore, have begun at a

time not far distant.

2dly. If , contrary to truth, we admit gravitation to be an inherent

property of Matter, it could not possibly have caused the revolutions

oftheplanets.

Let the planets be placed at any supposable place, and distance,

within the reach of the Sun's attraction; the only direction, in which

VOL. J.

131

ATHEISTICAL OBJECTIONS AND

98 [ SER. II

they could possibly move, would be a straight or right line to-

wards the Sun; because this is the only direction, in which his

gravitation, and theirs , can possibly act. It is easily, and mathe-

matically, proved, that to the circular motion of the planets round

the Sun a projectile force, or impulse, acting in the direction of a

tangent to theplanetary orbit, was originally indispensable. So far,

therefore, would the planets have been from moving in their pro-

per orbits round the Sun, by the mere power of gravitation, that

they could only have fallen directly to the Sun. Should it be said,

that the planets have moved eternally in their present orbits ; and

that the Earth, for example, has performed an infinite series of re-

volutions ; it must also be said, that the Moon, in her circuit round

the Earth, has performed a series thirteen times, and the Earth, in

its rotation round its axis, a series 365 times, as great, as that in-

finite series .

3dly. The diurnal motions of the planets, the positions of their

axes, and the attendance of their satellites , which accord with no re-

gularity, or proportion, to their magnitudes, or their distances from

the Sun, and cannot be explained in any consistency with mere mate-

rial principles , prove themselves, unquestionably, to have been de-

rivedfrom an extrinsic and intelligent cause.

6thly. From a sufficiently regular course of observations, em-

ployed on the eclipses of the Sun and Moon, and a series of cor-

rect calculations concerning them, it is proved by Ferguson, that

the ancient eclipses, noted in history, took place at times, differing

sensibly from those, which the calculations require ; that these dif-

ferences of time regularly diminish, as the times approach nearer

to us ; and that the orbit of the Moon was, therefore, more distant

from the Earth, formerly, than it is now. Hence it is certain, that

the Moon's motion round the Earth, instead of having been eternal,

has existed only during a little period.

In the lastplace, for I will not dwell on this atheistical dream any

longer, if all these impossibilities were removed, and all these proofs

given up, another would still remain, which completely refutes this

scheme; viz. that Matter cannot be the cause of Intelligence.

Quod non habet, dare non potest : what a cause does not contain or

possess, it cannot communicate ; is a maxim, or self - evident propo-

sition. That Matter, therefore, which cannot think, will, or origi-

nate motion, should communicate thought, volition , and motivity, is

plainly impossible.

Thus have I considered the only atheistical schemes of existence,

which merit any serious attention. Were I disposed to exhibit the

abettors of these schemes in a ridiculous and contemptible light ;

the efforts of Anaximander, Epicurus, the Egyptian Philosophers,

the Count de Buffon, and many others both ancient and modern, to

explain the origin and progress of things, would furnish me with

ample materials. But such an exhibition would ill become this

sacred place. I shall only add, that the existence ofthe veryMatter.

SCHEMES OF DOCTRINE CONSIDERED .

JER. 11.] 99

to which so much is attributed, and on which such reliance is

placed, by atheistical philosophers, can never be evinced. I my-

self believe, indeed, that it exists ; but I also know, that its exist-

ence cannot be proved. REMARKS.

From these observations it is evident, in the

1st. place, that Atheism in all its forms is a specimen of the most

absolute credulity.

The three great atheistical schemes of existence, here recited,

and undoubtedly the best which have been formed, are founded on

mere assumptions, or gratuitous hypotheses, unsupported by a par-

ticle of argument, or evidence. But to adopt a mere assumption,

especially in a case of infinite importance, is credulity in the ex-

treme, and folly which cannot plead even a pretence. More than

this, each of these schemes is refuted by direct demonstration.

Beyond even this, they are unanswerably proved not only to be

false, but to be impossible. Still the Atheist goes on quietly with

his faith in these hypotheses ; and resolves to believe, in defiance

ofdemonstration, and impossibility.

2dly. There are still men, in considerable numbers, and of no

small ingenuity, who profess themselves Atheists ; and who thus prove

that Atheism has its seat in the heart, and not in the understanding.

Nothing can be more evident, than that these doctrines can never

have been embraced from argument, or conviction, or by an unbi-

assed understanding. They were, therefore, certainly adopted

under the influence of the heart ; and believed, only because they

were loved, or because God was dreaded and hated. Thus the

heart is the true source of the belief that there is no God ; and he is

afool, who, governed by its wishes, thus believes against all rea-

son and evidence.

3dly. As such men have thus believed under such an influence ;

so, if we indulge such wishes, we may be given up by God to these,

or any other, fatal doctrines, and of course to destruction .

The great danger lies in the heart ; and in its hostility to God

andhis character. What we wish we easily believe ; and what we

dread, or hate, we easily disbelieve. As we dread the anger of

God against sin, and against ourselves particularly as sinners, and

all his designs to punish it ; as we hate to renounce it, and its plea-

sures; we contrive easily, and naturally, to disbelieve his designs,

character, and existence. Especially is this the case, whenGod,

provoked by our rebellion and opposition, gives us up to a repro-

bate mind.

How greatly ought we then to fear this mass of guilt, danger,

and ruin ! How earnestly ought we to watch, and strive, and pray

that we fall not into this train of temptations and miseries ! Let us

resolve to receive the truth, at all events, however humbling or

painful, in the love ofit. And may God grant that it may make us

free from the bondage of corruption, and translate us into the glo-

rious liberty of his Children. Amen.

SERMON III.

COMPARATIVE INFLUENCE OF ATHEISM AND CHRISTIANITY .

PSALM xiv. 1. -The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt ;

they have done abominable works ; there is none that doeth good.

IN my last discourse, I considered the objections of Atheists

against the being and government of God; and those doctrines

concerning the origin and existence of things, which they have

substituted for the doctrines of Theism and the Scriptures, on this

most important subject. The objections I endeavoured to prove

unsound and nugatory, and the doctrines to be mere hypotheses,

demonstrably false, and plainly impossible . Hence I concluded

them to be the doctrines of the heart, and not of the intellect.

Hence also I concluded, that he who embraces them is, according

to the language of the text, a fool. There is no more absolute

folly than to believe doctrines because we love them, and to re-

ject doctrines because we hate them: or, in other words, to suffer

our inclinations to govern our understanding.

The consequences of these doctrines, or of Atheism generally,

are in the text declared in these words, They are corrupt ; they

have done abominable works : there is none that doeth good. In

other words, Atheists are corrupt ; they do abominable works :

there is none of them that doeth good. This character of Atheists ,

seen by the Psalmist, and declared by the Spirit of God, three

thousand years ago, has not changed for the better, at any period,

down to the present day. They have ever been corrupt; they

have ever done abominable works ; there has never been among

them a single good or virtuous man .

It cannot but be an useful employment to examine this interest-

ing subject, and to learn, from such an examination, the manner in

which these false principles, dictated and embraced by a bad heart,

contribute, in their turn, as powerful causes, to render that heart

still more corrupt ; to fill the life with abominable actions ; and to

prevent every one, who embraces these doctrines, from assuming

the character of virtue .

Before I enter upon the direct discussion of this subject it will

be proper to observe, that Virtue is nothing but voluntary obedience

to truth ; and Sin nothing but voluntary obedience to falsehood.

Or, more generally, virtue and sin consist in a disposition or pre-

paration of the heart, flowing out into acts of obedience, in the re-

spective manners which I have mentioned. From these definitions

which, it is presumed, cannot be successfully denied, it is evident,

that every false doctrine, which is relished by the heart, will, of

COMPARATIVE INFLUENCE, & c .

SER . III. 101

course, govern its affections and volitions ; and will, therefore, con-

trol the conduct. Nor is it less evident, that, in the present case,

the doctrine in question, being embraced only because they are

loved , will eminently influence the heart which has dictated them,

and eminently affect all the moral conduct.

It will also be clear to all persons, accustomed to the investiga-

tion of moral subjects, that the character of a man must, at least in

a great measure, be formed by his views of the several subjects, with

which he is acquainted. As these are expanded, magnificent, and

sublime ; or narrow, ordinary, and grovelling ; the taste, the cha-

racter, and the conduct, will be refined and noble, or gross and

contemptible. A man, accustomed to an exalted sphere of life ,

and to a regular intercourse with great objects, will assume of course

a dignity and greatness of mind, and a splendour of personal cha-

racter, which cannot be assumed by him, whose views have ever

been limited to a few and small objects, and whose life has been

passed in actions of no significance. There is something princely,

ofcourse, in men even of moderate endowments, when properly

educated for the inheritance of a throne. There is every thing di-

minutive, of necessity, in him, who is trained only to be a camp-

boy or a shoe-black .

When men are educated to contemplation, and science, it may not

unnaturally be imagined, that their minds, allowing for the differ-

ence of their endowments, will, from the similarity of their pursuits ,

be formed into a similarity of character. This, however, is, to a

great extent, a mistaken opinion. The very objects, with which

such men are equally conversant, may, from their respective modes

of viewing them, become totally unlike, and even contradictory, in

their apprehension. It will not be questioned, that the mind of a

Heathen, studying, with the views of a Heathen, the polytheism of

Greece and Rome, would be affected very differently from the mind

of a Christian, investigating the same subject. The manner, in

which we regard any object of inquiry, may differ from some other

manner almost as much, as any two objects of inquisition may differ

from each other. The views of him, who regards the firmament

as a great blue canopy, and the stars as little sparks of light, differ

from the views of the Astronomer, who considers the firmament as

a boundless expansion, and the stars as an innumerable multitude

of Suns, almost as widely, as the two objects of contemplation

differ. The manner, therefore, in which human contemplations are

directed, may be very various, although the objects are the same.

In truth it is not the grandeur or diminutiveness of the objects,

but the greatness or littleness of the views entertained of them,

which affect, and form, the character.

The taste, or relish, of the mind, particularly, will, in a great

measure, if not wholly, be formed by this cause. The mind, by an

early habit accustomed to little views, will soon learn to relish no

other. Accustomed from the beginning to a connexion with gro-

9

COMPARATIVE INFLUENCE OF

102 [ SER. III .

velling objects only, it soon ceases to be pleased with any other

objects . Accustomed to form diminutive and debased schemes of

action, it becomes easily, and finally, disgusted with every thing of

an enlarged and superior nature.

As these things are true of all the views, entertained by Man;

so they are especially true of those, which may be called original,

and fundamental ; which involve all subordinate ones ; which di-

rect every future course of thought ; and to which the mind thinks

it necessary to reconcile every succeeding purpose, relish, and opi-

nion. If the stem, here, be a mere twig ; the branches must be

poor and diminutive indeed. Thus, he, the basis of whose religion

was an idol, must form a system of theology and ethics, dismally

lean and contemptible .

All the motives to human conduct are found, either in the Objects,

with which we converse ; or in the VIEWS, with which we regard

them. If the objects, or the views, be low and debased, low and

debased motives, only, will arise out of them. But motives origi-

nate all our conduct, regulate its progress, and determine its nature.

If they be low and debased, the conduct will partake of the same

characteristics, and will of course be grovelling, unworthy, and

odious.

Thus the objects, with which we are conversant, and the views

which we form of them, will determine both the internal and exter-

nal character of Man.

It will be remarked, that I have considered this subject, inde-

pendently of the peculiar doctrines of Christianity ; and for this

reason ; that I am arguing with those, who deny a divine Reve-

lation.

These things being premised, I assert, in accordance with the

text, that the proper, natural, and necessary influence of Atheism is

to contract, and render grovelling, the views, to corrupt the character,

and to deform the life of Man. The truth of this assertion I shall

attempt to illustrate under the following heads :

I. The views, which the Atheist forms of the Natural World :

  1. His views of the Moral World :
  2. His views of the Future World :

All these I shall, also, from time to time, compare with the views,

which the Christian entertains of the same subjects .

  1. I shall consider the views , which the Atheist forms of the Na-

tural World.

In this consideration, I am disposed to allow the Atheist all the

advantages which he can derive from endowments or acquisitions.

He may, with my consent, be, what I well know he can be, a

Chymist, a Botanist, a Mineralogist, or an Anatomist. He shall, if

he pleases, be a Mathematician, a Natural Philosopher, an Astrono-

mer, a Metaphysician, or a Poet. Imean, that he may be any, or

all, of these, so far as one man, ofhis opinions, can be reasonably

supposed to sustain the several characters specified. I will not

ATHEISM AND CHRISTIANITY.

SER. III.J 103

even avail myself of the celebrated remark of Lord Bacon, that a

little Philosophy will make a man an Atheist, but a great deal will

make him a Christian : although I entertain not a doubt of its truth.

My business is not to dwell on minute things, but to show the nature

of those which are of higher importance.

The Atheist, then, may with enlarged understanding, and skill,

contemplate the structure of the heavenly Bodies. He may, with

the eye of a Naturalist, explore the organization of the vegetable

kingdom; may analyze the chymical principles, and combinations,

of plants and minerals ; and may trace, to use his own language,

the hidden walks of Nature in her mysterious progress through the

system . Or, with the imagination of the Poct, and the science of

the Astronomer, he may be fascinated with the beauty, splendour,

and sublimity, of the landscape, or delighted with the distances,

magnitudes, motions, harmony, and magnificence, of the planetary

and stellary systems ; still his views of all these, and all other,

natural objects, although in his mind the most illustrious objects

which exist, will be poor and pitiable.

All of them, in his opinion, ove their being to fate, accident, or

the blind action of stupid matter. They exist for no end ; and ac-

complish none. They spring from no wisdom ; and display none.

They are, therefore, what they would have been, had they been

made, and moved, by an Intelligent Cause, without any purpose,

or design , in their creation : a vast apparatus of splendour and

magnificence, assembled together for nothing: an immense show,

in which nothing was intended, and from which nothing can be

gained. The Mind , in surveying them, asks instinctively, and irre-

sistibly, How came this train of wonders into being ? and is an-

swered with nothing but perplexity and folly, but doubt and de-

spair. In the same manner it inquires, Of what use will this mighty

assemblage of worlds and their furniture prove ? The only reply

is, Ofnone. All, with all their motions, furniture , and inhabitants,

are the result, and under the control, of that iron-handed necessity,

which exists in the blind operations of unconscious Matter ; that

gloomy Fate of the Heathens, to which they sullenly submitted be-

cause they deemed it inevitable ; and which, while it showered ca-

lamities in abundance, cut off every hope, and every effort, for the

attainment of deliverance. To the wretch, whose mind is effectu-

ally imbued with this scheme of things, the Universe is changed

into a vast Prison, where himself and his companions are confined

by bolts and bars, forged by the hand of blind, immoveable, and

irresistible Destiny ; where no heartis found topity their sufferings ,

and no hand to lend relief ; where no eye looks with sympathy, and

no ear listens with tenderness ; where the walls reach to heaven,

and are hung with clouds and midnight ; and where every effort to

escape, conducts the miserable tenants only to the sullen cavern

of Despair.

Should the Atheist , sick with the forlorn and hopeless contem-

COMPARATIVE INFLUENCE OF

104 [ SER. III .

plation, turn his eye from this scheme of things to his only alter-

native, the doctrine of Chance, he will find himself equally distant

from refreshment, and from hope. Here, himself and all other

beings in Earth, Sea, and Sky, with all their properties and ope-

rations, are mere accidents, involved and perplexed in their move-

ments, like the particles ofdust in a whirlwind. In his view, if he

understand his system, and will think consistently with himself , his

thoughts, volitions, and efforts, the continuance of his own being,

and that of all other things, are mere casualties, produced by no

cause, upheld by no support, directed by no wisdom, and existing to

no purpose. Mere abortions, precarious in the extreme, possessed

only of a doubtful and fluctuating existence, they tremble and

flutter, in a dreadful state of suspense, over the gloomy abyss of

Annihilation. All , here, is doubt anddiscouragement. Not a plan

can be rationally formed, not ahope, consistently indulged. Where

every thing is to happen, if it exist at all ; or where the result of

the casualty, is with the same probability, seen to be any thing or

nothing ; it is plain, that nothing can be expected. Against every

expectation, the chances are millions of millions to one ; for every

supposable thing is as likely to exist as any other.

Should it be said, that the Atheist refutes these declarations, by

his conduct ; because he lives, and acts, like other men, and is no

more influenced than others by a regard either to fate, or chance :

I answer, that the objection is erroneous. The Atheist, instead of

refuting these observations, refutes himself . He denies his ownprin-

ciples ; and avails himself of the principles which he opposes. If

he understands his own scheme ; he cannot but know, that the ne-

cessity of existence, which he professes to believe, is irreconci-

lable with all freedom of mind, with all voluntariness, with all con-

trivance . He knows, that connexion cannot spring from chance ;

that order cannot arise out of accident ; that whatever exists for-

tuitously, exists independently of all things else, and can never be

connected with any other thing, by any moral or useful relation.

If , therefore, he would think and act rationally, he would neither

contrive, expect, fear, nor hope ; neither build, nor plant ; neither

reap, nor gather ; but would yield himself up to the control of ir-

resistible Destiny, or to the capricious disposal of Contingence.

The works of God, are in their own nature beautiful, magnifi-

cent, sublime, and wonderful ; and by every eye, which sees them,

their nature must in some degree be discerned. It is readily ad-

mitted, therefore, that the Atheist himself , if he be not a sot, must

in some degree perceive the sublimity and splendour, which are in-

herent in the Earth and the Heavens . But from these illustrious

attributes he subtracts immensely, when he denies, that they owe

their origin to an intelligent and eternal Mind ; whenhe denies, that

they are moved, and ruled , by infinite perfection ; and that by the

same perfection, they are conducted to a divine and glorious end,

apurpose infinitely excellent and desirable. Without this conside

ATHEISM AND CHRISTIANITY.

SER. IIY . ] 105

ration, all their lustre becomes feeble and fading ; a dim taper,

gradually declining on the sight towards a final extinction. At the

same time, by attributing their existence to Fate, Chance, or Mat-

ter, he contracts their greatness, and lowers their elevation, to a

measure equally humble and painful ; and covers even the bright

lights of Heaven with a shroud of gloom and obscurity .

When the Christian beholds the Earth and the Heavens, how

different are his views of the same illustrious objects ! To him the

vast congregation of Worlds, is the immense and eternal empire of

the Self -existent and Omnipresent JEHOVAH, contrived by his

boundless wisdom, chosen by his boundless goodness, and execu-

ted by his boundless power. This single thought, like the rising of

the Sun, upon this benighted World, imparts to the Universe, in a

moment, a diffusive and illimitable splendour, investing, explaining,

and adorning all the beings of which it is composed. On all, the

sublime impression of Design, is instamped as a living image, glow-

ing in living colours. The Universe becomes a vast assemblage

of Means, directed to an immortal Purpose ; arranged in perfect

order ; adjusted with exact symmetry ; and operating with com-

plete harmony : and all, from the glory of that purpose, and the

perfection of their arrangement, symmetry, and operations, derive

an elevation and grandeur, of which they are otherwise utterly in-

capable.

God, before whom all beings are as nothing, is invested, by his

perfections, with a greatness and sublimity, in comparison with

which, all other magnificence, separately considered, becomes less

than nothing and vanity. Eternal, Omnipresent, and Immutable

Power, Wisdom, and Goodness, are objects so high, so vast, that

all the Worlds and Suns, which they have created, diminish, when

compared with them, to the drop of the bucket, and the small dust

of the balance. But in the view of the Christian, these worlds, and

every thing which they contain, derive a glorious lustre, from being

an immediate exhibition of these attributes, and of the incompre-

hensible Being, in whom they reside. Wherever the Christian casts

his eyes, he sees all things full of God. The omnipresent, all- cre-

ating, and all-ruling JEHOVAH lives, and moves, and acts, in every

thing which meets his view. In the Spring, he comes forth in his

beauty and beneficence, clothes the naked World in the richest at-

tire, and awakens universal life andjoy. In the Summer, and the

Autumn, he openeth his bountiful hand, and satisfieth the wants of

every living thing. In the Winter, he hath his way in the whirlwind,

and in the storm, and the clouds are the dust of his feet. The Hea-

vens recall to the mind of the Christian the day when God said,

Let there be a firmament ; and there was a firmament : In the Sun,

still resounds that Voice, which commanded, Let there be light, and

there was light.

In themean time, all things, borne on, in the view of theAtheist,

in a blind and relentless career by irresistible Necessity, or dancing

VOL. I. 14

COMPARATIVE INFLUENCE OF

106 [ SER. III

in fortuitous and endless mazes, like the imaginary Atoms supposed

by him to have produced them, and therefore dark, cheerless, and

hopeless, are, in that of the Christian, directed by the Wisdom,

Power, and Goodness of the Creator ; and therefore, to him, full

of expectation, hope, and comfort. Wherever he is, there God is .

His ear is always open to his prayers ; His eye, to his dangers, sor-

rows, and fears ; His hand, extended to supply, to relieve, to com-

fort, and to save. An Almighty friend is every where found by him,

in the crowd and in solitude, by night and by day ; never absent ;

never forgetful ; never unkind ; never incumberedby any concerns,

which will prevent his wants from being regarded ; nor surrounded

by any difficulties, which can hinder them from being supplied.

Between this friend and him, time and place can never intervene :

he is every where, and is every where to him a God.

In this vast particular, the difference between the views of the

Atheist and those of the Christian, I need hardly observe, is incal-

culable and immense. The efficacy of these views on the Mind

must, it is obvious, be proportioned to their nature.

2dly. I will now examine the views, which the Atheist forms of

the Moral World.

The Moral World is the World of Minds, or of Intelligent being .

The importance of this World will, in some good measure, be con-

ceived from these considerations ; that the individuals, who com-

pose it, are the only beings, by whom good can be contrived, or

done; and the only beings, by whom it can to any extent be en-

joyed. Of this World, the conceptions of the Atheist are, in a far

greater degree, inferior to those of the Christian.

The only object, which the Atheist knows in the Moral World,

is Man; and Man, lowered to the humblest possible level of intel-

lectual existence. His origin, in the view of the Atheist , is the

same with that of a Mushroom ; and his character, that of a mere

animal. He is the subject of no moral government ; insusceptible

ofmoral obligation ; incapable therefore of virtue, excellence, and

loveliness ; possessing attributes, which, like himself , are the off-

spring, and under the control, of Necesssity, or Chance ; united

to his fellow- men by nothing but Time and Place; insulated in all

his interests , and those the interests of a swine only ; without the

knowledge, or the existence, of law or government, merit or reward ;

and born merely to breathe, to eat, to drink, to sleep , to propagate

his kind, to decay, and to die. How obvious is it , that on these

views of Man, there can be erected no personal worth, enjoyment,

or hope ; no common good ; no sense of rectitude ; and no efforts

for the promotion of general happiness .

Personal worth is all dependent on the existence of laws, and

government, formed by one, who has a right to enact the former ,

and administer the latter ; a right founded on the relations, which

he sustains to those who are under his government. To these re-

lations, also, must the laws and the government be conformed in

ATHEISM AND CHRISTIANITY .

SER. III . ] 107

such a manner, as that that, and that only, shall be enacted, which

requires the conduct, suited to these relations, and promotive of

general and individual happiness. In the same manner must be

directed the rewards, punishments, and administrations . But on

the scheme of the Atheist, there is no such ruler, and no such right

to rule ; there are no such relations, and no such duties. Recti-

tude, the sum of personal worth, consists in rendering voluntari-

ly , that which others have a right to claim. But on his scheme, no

claim can be founded, and none exists . There is, therefore, no-

thing due: of course, no duty can be performed, and no rectitude

experienced. Hence that high, unceasing, and refined enjoyment.

which attends the sense of rectitude, can never be found by the

Atheist.

As theAtheist is without rectitude, or moral principle; and des-

titute of the sense, and enjoyment, of it ; so it is plain, that his

whole conduct must be directed by a regard to mere convenience ;

or rather by a regard to what his passions, unrestrained, rendered

intense by habitual indulgence, and fastening their view only on the

present object, may deem convenient. In other words, his conduct

must be dictated merely by the existing passion and appetite ; and

must, therefore, be that very conduct, which has produced almost

all the miseries and complaints of Mankind.

If this scheme be true, all men ought undoubtedly to be govern-

ed by it . What would become of such a world; and of the Atheist

himself in the midst of such a world ? No man, it is evident, could

exercise confidence towards any other man. The loss of the en-

joyment, furnished by this single delightful emotion, an enjoyment

absolutely indispensable even to comfort and to safety, would

infinitely overbalance every good, which Atheists ever found.

Without confidence, no society can be happy. Without confidence,

no society, no friendship, no union, no connexion, between intelli-

gent beings can exist. Even thieves and robbers, as has ever been

proverbially acknowledged, cannot, without confidence, form even

their dreadful state of society. The world, dispossessed of it ,

would become an image of hell; and distrust, jealousy, wrath, re-

venge, murder, war, and devastation, overspread the Earth. In the

midst of millions, the Atheist would find himself in a desert. His

situation would be that of a hermit ; his character, that of a fiend.

By day, he would hide himself inhis den: by night, he would prowl,

as a wolf , for the prey, on which he was to live.

To such a World, it is obvious Hope, which, in the language of

the Poet, comes to all, could never come. On Hope, even as the

World now is, men in a great measure live. The prospect of

something better to-morrow, brightens all the comforts of man,

and tinges with light, the clouds of melancholy and affliction, to-day.

Were all the enjoyments of human life to be fairly reckoned up ;

it is not improbable, that those which Hope brings in her train,

would be the greatest mass, both in number and value. But in

COMPARATIVE INFLUENCE OF

108 [ SER . HI.

these, the Atheist could not share ; because from Fate or Chance,

nothing can be rationally expected; and because, from his fellow-

men, governed by his doctrines, there could arise nothing but dan-

ger, distrust, and fear.

Should it be said, that this situation of things would be so abso-

lutely intolerable, that Mankind, unable to exist in it, would be

compelled to unite in society, and establish government : I admit

the conclusion; and perfectly accord with the premises, from which

it is drawn. But what would be the Nature of this government ;

and on what basis would it be founded ? Its basis would plainly be

dire necessity, existing in the impossibility of living without it ; and

its operations would be only those of force. The Rulers would feel

no sense of rectitude, possess no virtue, and realize no moral obli-

gation. To all these things their fundamental principles would be

hostile, and would render the very thought of them ridiculous .

God is the only acknowledged source of moral obligation ; but to

them there would be no God, and therefore no such obligation.

Conformity to his laws is the only rectitude ; but to these men

there would be no such laws, and therefore no rectitude. Conve-

nience, of course, or, in better words, Passion and Appetite, would

dictate all the conduct of these Rulers. The nature of a govern-

ment directed by Passion and Appetite we know, imperfectly, by

the histories of Caligula, Nero, and Heliogabalus ; and more tho-

roughly, though still imperfectly, in those of Danton, Marat, Robes-

pierre, and their associates. Who could be willing to see such a

tissue of madness, cruelty, misery, and horror, woven again ?

The subjects of such a government would, at the same time,

be, in the same manner, under the influence of the same doctrine.

Their conduct would accordingly be an exact counterpart to that

of their rulers. Appetite would change every man into a swine ;

and Passion, into a tiger. Right would neither be acknowledged,

nor be felt, nor exist . Whatever was coveted would be sought,

and obtained, if it could be done with safety. Whatever was ha-

ted, would, so far as safety would permit, be hunted, and destroyed.

To deceive, to defraud, to betray, to maim, to torture and to butch-

er , would be the common employment, and the common sport.

The dearest and most venerable relations would be violated by

incestuous pollution ; and children, such of them, I mean, as were

not cast under a hedge, thrown into the sea, or dashed against the

stones ; would grow up without a home, without a parent, without

a friend. The world would become one vast den ; one immeasu-

rable sty; and the swine and the wolf would be degraded, by a

comparison with its inhabitants .

Should it be doubted whether even Atheism would terminate in

such doctrines, and such practices ; the means of removing the

doubt are at hand. HOBBES, SHAFTESBURY, and other English in-

fidel writers, some of whom have disclaimed the character of Athe-

ists , and wished at least to be considered as embracing Theism.

ATHEISM AND CHRISTIANITY.

SER . III .] 109

have directly declared, that there is no right, except that which the

Leviathan, or civil magistrate, pronounces to be such ; and that

rectitude, instead of being founded in the nature of things, or in the

will of God, is the result of human institutions, and arbitrary deci-

sions, merely. Little consideration is necessary, to enable us to

discern , that this single principle involves all the consequences ,

which I have attributed to Atheism , dissolves at once all obligations

to duty, annihilates virtue, and crumbles the bands which hold so-

ciety together. Accordingly НоBBES declares it to be lawful to do,

and to get, whatever we can with safety ; and multitudes of his co-

adjutors and followers have taught, that pollution in almost every

form is lawful and desirable, and that animal enjoyment is the only

real good. The infidels of the French school, who have not found

it necessary, like the English, to regard any appearances, have

openly denied, and ridiculed, all the fundamental principles of mo-

rality, as well as of piety. I have been informed by what I esteem

good authority, that a numerous assembly of French Literati, being

asked in turn, at one of their meetings, by their president, whether

there was any such thing as moral obligation, answered, in every

instance, that there was not. This happened a little before the

French Revolution. Since the commencement of that stupendous

event, as well as in very many instances before, the body of French

Infidels have not only denied all the obligation, which bind us to

truth, justice, and kindness, but pitied and despised, as a contempt-

ible wretch, bewildered by ignorance and folly, the man, who be-

lieves in its existence .

The only instance, in which Infidels of any description have

possessed the supreme power and government of a country, and

have attempted to dispose of human happiness according to their

own doctrines and wishes, is that of France, since the beginning of

the Revolution. If we consider this government as established

over a nation, educated for ages to the belief and obedience of ma-

ny doctrines of Christianity, and retaining, as to a great majority

ofthe people, the habits formed by that education, the state of that

nation will evince, beyond a question, that all, which I have said, is

true without exaggeration. France, during this period, has been a

theatre of crimes, which, after all preceding perpetrations, have

excited in the mind of every spectator, amazement and horror .

The miseries, suffered by that single Nation, have changed all the

histories of the preceding sufferings of Mankind into idle tales, and

have been enhanced, and multiplied, without a precedent, without

number, and without a name. The Kingdom appeared to be changed

into one great Prison ; the inhabitants converted into felons ; and

the common doom of Man commuted for the violence of the sword

and the bayonet, the sucking-boat and the guillotine. To contem-

plative men it seemed for a season, as if the Knell of the whole

nation was tolled, and the World summoned to its execution, and

its funeral . Within the short time of ten years, not less than three

COMPARATIVE INFLUENCE OF

110 [SER. IIJ .

millions of human beings are supposed to have perished, in that

single country, by the influence ofAtheism. Were the world to

adopt, and be governed by, the doctrines of France, what crimes

would not Mankind perpetrate ; what agonies would they not

suffer?

Let us now turn our view from this prospect of guilt and desola-

tion, this dark and final abyss of sin and ruin, where no solitary

virtue gleams, where no ray of hope or comfort trembles, through

the profound midnight ; and refresh the wearied sight by casting

amomentary glance over the moral world of the Christian. Here,

at the head of the vast chain of moral being, reaching like Jacob's

ladder from Earth to Heaven, sits on the throne of infinite domi-

nion, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, the God of Jacob ;

the God of all, who, like them, believe, worship, and obey their

Creator. In him, the Self - existent and Infinite Mind, the Christian

beholds unceasingly, an object of boundless sublimity, grandeur,

beauty, and loveliness ; commanding by the disclosure of his

character, and exhausting, all finite admiration, complacency,

love, and praise ; expanding every view, refining every affection,

and ennobling every attribute. From the immediate contempla-

tion of this glorious Being, raised to a superiority and distinction,

of which he could otherwise have never conceived, he casts his

eyes abroad into the Universe, which that Being has created.

There he beholds an endless train of Intelligent minds reflecting,

with no unhappy lustre, the beauty and glory of their Maker.

From the pre-eminent dignity of the Archangel, through the glow-

ing zeal of the Seraph, and the milder wisdom of the Cherub ;

through the high endowments of Moses, Isaiah and Paul ; down to

the humble but virtuous inhabitant of a cottage, one spirit lives,

and breathes, and actuates, in all ; and that spirit is divine. Each

wears, and exhibits, in his own manner, and that manner a delight-

ful and useful one, the image and beauty of JEHOVAH. All, though

of different magnitudes, diffuse a real light ; all are stars, though

one star differeth from another star in glory. All are the subjects

of virtuous affections; all are fitted to admire and adore, to glorify

and enjoy, their Creator : all are formed, and disposed voluntarily,

to fill up their existence with doing good, with promoting indivi-

dual enjoyment and increasing universal happiness : all are bound

together as children of one God and brethren of each other, by love

the bond ofperfection . Every one, therefore, is lovely in the sight

ofhis Maker.

To this Universe of Minds the Christian believes, that the Crea-

tor, who is of course the rightful lawgiver, has given laws, for the

direction of its members, which require perfect conduct, and ensure

to it perfect happiness. These laws extend to all the thoughts,

words, and actions, alike ; and regulate each with unerring pro-

priety. Their obligation is, and is acknowledged to be, divine ;

nothing can sunder, nothing can lessen it. This, instead of being

ATHEISM AND CHRISTIANITY.

SER. III .] 111

a source of regret to him, is his delight ; for what these laws re-

quire is better than any thing else ; and more fraught with self -ap-

probation, worth, and enjoyment. Of course, in all the relations

and situations in life, as a parent or a child, a neighbour or a friend,

a magistrate or a subject, he feels himself , on the one hand, irre-

sistibly obliged, and, on the other, entirely delighted, to obey their

dictates. As these dictates reach every moral being, in every si-

tuation, and with respect to every action, they provide of course,

and universally, for that conduct, in every being, which is com-

mendable and desirable .

Here an immoveable foundation is laid for peace within, fordig-

nity of mind, for real and enduring enjoyment, in the recesses of

solitude ; and for the endless train of duties and blessings, neces-

sary to the happiness of Society. A Ruler, formed in this manner,

will govern only to bless. Subjects of the same character will

obey, because rectitude demands their obedience, and because

their obedience will insure the happiness both of themselves and

their Rulers .

3dly. I will now examine the views, which the Atheist forms of the

Future World.

On this subject, a few observations only will be necessary. The

whole of the Atheist's Creed, with respect to the future world, is

comprised in the following summary : That his body, begun by

Chance or Necessity, is continued without design, and perishes

without hope ; and that his soul is a mere attribute of his body,

useless and worthless while he lives, and destined at his death to

rottenness and corruption : " Death an eternal sleep " he engraves

on the gate-posts of every church-yard ; and consigns, by his man-

date , the numerous inhabitants to the dark and desolate regions of

annihilation.

By this sweeping sentence, which he passes on all the human

race, he takes away from himself, and his fellow-men, every mo-

tive, furnished by the fear of future punishment, or the hope of fu-

ture rewards, to virtuous, upright, and amiable conduct.

From these three sources, expressed by the several heads of

discourse, arise all motives, and all tendencies, to virtuous conduct;

to truth, justice, and kindness, between man and man. From the

two former, we have already seen, the Atheist derives neither mo-

tives nor tendencies to this conduct. The source, under conside-

ration, is to him, if possible, still more barren of both. There is ,

therefore, nothing in this scheme, which will prevent him from do-

ing evil, or induce him to do good. How deplorable, then, is his

system, if it may be called a system of doctrines !

On the other hand, how glorious are the Christian's views of the

future world ! From the promise of his Creator he learns, that his

body, sown here in corruption, weakness , and dishonour, shall be

raised, beyond the grave, in incorruption, power, and glory, with so

many attributes of Mind, or Spirit, as to be denominated by him .

COMPARATIVE INFLUENCE OF

112 [ SER. III.

who made it, a spiritual body . Ever young, active, andundecay-

ing, it shall be reunited to the immortal mind, purified from every

stain, and every error. This perfect man shall be admitted, with

an open and abundant entrance, into the Heaven of Heavens, the

peculiar residence of Infinite majesty, and the chosen seat of Infi-

nite dominion. In this noblest of all habitations, this mansion of

everlasting joy, he shall be united with an innumerable multitude

ofcompanions like himself , sanctified, immortal, and happy. En-

rolled among the noblest and best beings in the Universe, a child,

a priest, a king, in the house of his heavenly Father, his endless

and only destination will be to know, love, serve, and enjoy God;

to interchange the best affections, and the best offices, with his glo-

rious companions ; and to advance in wisdom, virtue, and happi-

ness, for ever.

In the Future World of the Christian, therefore, motives, endless

in their number, and infinite in their power, excite him unceasingly

to all the conduct, which can make him useful and lovely, which

can promote the happiness of his fellow -creatures, or secure the

approbation of his God.

Thus have I taken a summary, comparative view of these two

schemes of existence. In that of the Christian, an intelligent Mind,

possessed of boundless power, wisdom, and goodness, existed

from everlasting; commanded into being the Universe of Matter,

and the Universe of Minds ; is present in every place ; sees, with

an intuitive survey, every thing ; controls all things with an al-

mighty and unerring hand; and directs all to the accomplishment

of the divine and eternal purpose, for which all were made.

Over the Universe of Minds, destined to an immortal existence,

he exercises a moral and eternal government ; and prescribes laws,

which require the best conduct, and insure the greatest happiness .

To obedience he promises an endless reward ; to disobedience he

threatens an endless punishment. From this great source, the

Christian sees himself derived; to this glorious end, believes him-

self destined ; and in this sublime scheme, is presented with all mo-

tives to make him good, and with all means to make him happy.

The Atheist, on the contrary, supposes all things derived from

chance, or necessity ; originated without design ; existing to no

purpose, and terminating, whenever they do terminate, by the co-

ercion of Fate, or the sport of Accident, as they began. Himself

he regards as a lump of organized Matter ; without a Mind ; with-

out law or government, except that of Fate or force ; without

moral action ; incapable of obligation or rectitude ; united to his

fellow- men only by Time and Place ; formed only to animal enjoy-

ment; and destined to perish with his kindred brutes. By this

scheme, all that is glorious, divine, and lovely, in that of the Chris-

tian, is annihilated; and all which, in the natural world, cannot be

annihilated, and which possesses an inherent greatness and subli-

mity, is miserably contracted anddegraded. Nothing is left to ex-

ATHEISM AND CHRISTIANITY.

SER. III . ] 113

pand his views, refine his affections, or ennoble his conduct. Mo-

tives to virtue, dignity, and usefulness, he obliterates from the crea-

tion. In the future World, he finds no such motives ; for to him

the future world is nothing. His evil passions, in the mean time,

( for such passions, whencesoever derived, he possesses) are let

loose without restraint, to rage and riot without control. Of all

motives to do evil, his scheme is prolific ; of motives to do good, it

is absolutely barren. At the same time, it is founded on mere hy-

pothesis, sustained by no evidence, and believed, against demon-

stration and impossibility.

Thus it is, I think, unanswerably evident, that he, who hath said,

There is no God, is a Fool ; that his Atheism is a scheme, dictated

only by an evil heart ; that it corrupts, of course, the whole moral

character ; that it is productive of all abominable works ; and that

it completely precludes the performance of any thing that is good.

}VOL. I. 15

SERMON IV.

UNITY OF GOD .

  1. CORINTHIANS, viii. 4. There is none other God but one.

IN the three preceding sermons, I have attempted to prove the

Existence ofGod; to refute the Objections, and expose the systems,

of Atheists ; and by an examination of the necessary Influence of

these systems on the intellect, heart, and life, compared with that

of the Christian system, to show the malignant efficacy of the for-

mer, and the desirable consequences of the latter.

The text is a direct declaration of the Unity of God; the next sub-

ject of discourse in the order which I have proposed.

That there is but one God, is a doctrine acknowledged in this

country by every man. No attempt, therefore, to prove the sound-

ness of this doctrine by arguments, can be necessary, in order to

produce conviction of its truth. My design, in choosing it for the

subject of the present discourse, is, to exhibit the manner, in which

we become possessed of it, and the evidence, with which it is attended.

In pursuing this design, I shall inquire in the

I. place, What arguments are presented to us by the works of

Creation and Providence in support of this doctrine :

II . What views men have entertained concerning it, under the di-

rection ofReason :

III. What has been the influence of Revelation on the reception and

continuance of this doctrine .

I. I shall inquire, what arguments are presented to us, by the works

of Creation and Providence, in support of this doctrine.

In answer to this inquiry, I observe, that the works of Creation

and Providence furnish to Reason, unaided by Revelation, the fol-

lowing considerations .

1st. The human mind, whenever it has admitted the being of One

infinite God, has plainly found a difficulty in admitting the existence

ofmore.

This argument I have chosen to express in these general terms ,

because I am aware, that different menhave thought differently con-

cerning this subject. This, indeed, is not at allto be wondered at,

whenweremember the peculiarly abstruse nature ofthose doctrines ,

which respect Infinity . The only conception, which the human

mind is capable of forming concerning infinity, is that it exists .

This fact we distinctly understand ; and from it we can argue

with success ; but the nature of the thing, which is infinite, or, in

more proper language, the nature of infinity itself , we cannot un-

derstand, nor can we argue from it at all. As the idea cannot enter

UNITY OF GOD.

SER . IV.] 115

our minds ; so it is plain, we can never compare it with any other

idea ; for it is self -evident, that an idea, which we have not, can

never, by us, be compared with another idea. Of course, no pro-

position can be formed by us, in this case, and no argument found-

ed , or conducted , with any knowledge, or evidence. In every

such case, where men think that they conceive, argue, conclude,

and demonstrate, they deceive themselves ; and will, if they ex-

amine, find, that they have formed propositions without ideas, or

mere collections of signs without any thing signified ; so far at

least as they are concerned.

Multitudes of mankind have considered it as obviously impos-

sible, that two infinite beings should exist . As an infinite being

and finite beings can, however, coexist in time and place, I sce

no decisive evidence, that two infinite beings cannot coexist. In

truth, there is no perceptible difficulty, arising from the nature of

the case, in supposing, that Spirits, or immaterial beings, can oc-

cupy the same place, at the same time. The contrary opinion

seems, at least, to attribute to Spirits a property , or mode of be-

ing, substantially the same with what is called Solidity, or Impene- .

trability, in Matter.

Others, and , so far as I know, all who have acknowledged onc

infinite God, have regarded the acknowledgment of more as an

absurdity. In this sentiment have concurred the Patriarchs, Jews ,

Christians, Mohammedans, and all those modern Infidels , who

have not denied the existence of such a God. These classes of

men have, with one voice, renounced the idea of more than one

such God. Such a general accordance in men, differing in other

respects so widely, clearly indicates , that the admission of one infi-

nite God brings with it , to the human mind, serious difficulties

against the admission of more ; and plainly implies, that more can-

not be admitted by the mind without violence done to the under-

standing.

Some degree of force is lent to this argument by Polytheism .

Wherever more Gods than one have been acknowledged ; it is re-

markable, that none of them has been considered as Infinite.

The ideas of Polytheistical nations concerning their Gods have,

I confess, been confused and contradictory. But it appears to me

evident, that no such nation, and no individual holding a plurality

ofGods, has ever introduced an infinitely perfect Being into a re-

ligious Creed. From this fact it would seem, that the idea of infi-

nite Perfection was, in the view of the human mind, incompatible

with Polytheism .

Several ancient Nations, as well as individuals, particularly the

Persians, Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Greeks, according to Plutarch,

agreed in the acknowledgment of two Gods. Plutarch himself

also, and according to his testimony Plato, in his old age, together

with the Pythagoreans, acknowledged two Gods ; the one the author

of Good, the other the author of Evil. From the account given

UNITY OF GOD.

116 [ SER. IV.

ofthis subject, taken in all its parts, it would seem, however, that

the evil God, or Δημιεργος, was inferior to the Αγαθαργος, or good God.

Two equal original causes seem not to have been received into any

scheme of Theology ; much less two infinite original Causes. That

such was generally the fact, if not universally, will, I presume, be

acknowledged without a question .

From allthese facts, taken together, it may, I think, be fairly

concluded, that the sense of the human mind has every where been

against the admission of more than one Infinite God.

2dly. Although the proofs of the existence ofGod are complete, yet

there is no proof of the existence ofmore than one God.

The argument for the being of God, which I mentioned as ex-

hibited in the happiest manner by Mr. Locke, proves unanswerably

the being of one eternal, self -existent Cause, possessed of sufficient

Intelligence to contrive, and sufficient Power to create, the Uni-

verse of worlds, and all which it contains. The existence of one

such Cause completely removes from the mind every difficulty, and

satisfactorily accounts for every thing. But this argument proves

nothing concerning the existence of a second Cause ; nor does it

possess the smallest influence to persuade us that a second exists.

The argument, which I mentioned as managed with peculiarfe-

licity by Bishop Berkeley, exhibits in a different manner, but with

conclusive evidence, one universally present and universally acting

Power; animating, directing, and controlling all things : but it fur-

nishes not a single trace of evidence, that there is a second.

From the existence of Evil, a considerable number of men have,

I acknowledge, imagined, that there was reason to suppose the ex-

istence of a second Original Cause. They appear to have argued

in this manner : " The good and perfect Cause cannot be the

source of Evil. Particularly, he cannot, in any sense, be concern-

ed, or connected, with the existence of Moral Evil. Such Evil,

however, exists ; and has, therefore, been produced. Of course,

there must have been some other Cause, beside the good and per-

fect one . "

This argument is specious, but plainly unsound. For, should it

be admitted, as perhaps it safely may be, that Evil cannot proceed

immediately from the perfect God ; yet no argument can be alleged,

to prove, that he cannot with entire propriety create such moral

Beings, as, left to themselves, may yield to temptations , necessari-

ly existing in the nature of things, and thus fall into Sin. In any

supposable world, Pleasure may of course attend transgression ;

because Good may and must exist, (if Good exist at all) which can-

not be lawfully enjoyed. The Good, which lawfully belongs only

to others, may be seen, coveted, and seized ; and thus for the time

enjoyed. Finite Beings may, therefore, be induced by the present

prospect of this Pleasure to transgress ; or in other words, to sin.

It has not hitherto been shown ; I presume it cannot be shown ;

that God is by his perfections obliged to prevent the existence of

UNITY OF GOD.

SER. IV.] 117

Moral Evil, originated in this manner, nor of Natural Evil, as its

proper punishment.

Should it be said, that the perfections of God cannot fail to ope-

rate in such a manner, as to produce the greatest good; I acknow-

ledge it. Still it cannot be proved, nor be rendered in any degree

probable, that the greatest possible Good will not be found in a

System, into which Evil has admission . That, in such a System,

great Good may exist, is unquestionable. The Scriptural Scheme

ofRedemption proves, unanswerably, to all who believe the Bible,

that Good will, and, to those who do not believe it, that Good may,

spring, in a world where evil is found, greater than any other,

which can be imagined by the human Mind. This argument is,

therefore, wholly lame with respect to the purpose, for which it is

introduced; and furnishes not the least reason for supposing such

a second Cause.

3dly. If there were more Gods than one, it is incredible, that no

proof should be furnished of their existence .

As no Intelligent being can act at all, without an end in view,

for which he acts ; so, as has been heretofore observed,* the end,

proposed by the Creator of all things, must have been found in

himself , and could have been no other, than the manifestation of

his own Glory. The end of the Creation of man must of course

have been, that he should coincide with this great design in the ex-

ercise of all his faculties ; that he should discern it with his under-

standing, relish it in his affections, and promote it with his active

powers. But, if more Gods than one were concerned in the Crea-

tion of Man, and of the Universe, it is evident, that this, the only

supposable end of their acting at all, cannot, so far as respects

Man, be possibly accomplished. That Man may either discern ,

or relish, the excellence, or, in the exercise of his active powers,

promote, the designs of his Creator, it is absolutely necessary,

that he should be furnished with some knowledge, and therefore

with some proof , of his existence .

To his Creator, Man is indebted for existence, and is therefore

his property. Of course, Man is absolutely his subject ; right-

fully governed by his will ; rightfully subjected to his Law ; right-

fully disposed of , at his Pleasure ; and therefore wholly bound to

coincide, voluntarily, with all his designs. From the Creator, also ,

Man derives all his blessings ; and is, therefore, under the highest

obligations to exercise towards Him unceasing gratitude, and to

perform all the actions, which gratitude can dictate, or inspire .

Finally, the Creator of Man must be, of course, a Being infinitely

great and glorious ; and in this character claims from him, as an

Intelligent creature, his highest adoration, love, complacency, and

praise. In these several methods, and in these only, is Man capa-

ble of glorifying his Creator. In these, therefore, is found the

See Sermon 1 .

UNITY OF GOD.

118 [SER. IV.

whole, and the only, end, which his Maker could propose in crea-

ting Man.

But to Man's performance of all, or any, of these services, it is

absolutely necessary, that he should know the Being, who created

him, and become acquainted, in some degree at least, with his cha-

racter : and to this knowledge the previous knowledge of his exist-

ence is indispensable. To an unknown Being, Man cannot be

conscious of indebtedness or obligation. By an unknown Being,

he cannot be voluntarily governed. To the laws of an unknown

Being, he cannot be voluntarily subject. To an unknown Being,

he cannot be thankful. The character of an unknown Being, he

can neither adore, admire, love, nor praise. If , then, his Creator

be unknown, and necessarily unknown, Man cannot possibly, how-

ever virtuously he may be disposed, fulfil the only purpose, for

which he was made. Of course, his Creator has, in the case sup-

posed, made Man for a single end ; and has yet so ordered the

state of things, as to preclude him from any possibility of answer-

ing this end. In other words, he has created Man solely to ac-

complish a certain purpose ; and has, at the same time, on his own

part , prevented that purpose from any possibility of accomplish-

ment.

What I have here said of one Creator, or one God, is, with ex-

actly the same force, applicable to two, or three, or more Creators.

If two or more Gods, sustaining the same character of Infinite

Perfection, have been concerned in the Creation, and Providence,

of this world ; it is unquestionable, that they made the World, and

Man upon it, for some end ; and that this end must have termina-

ted, as I have already in substance remarked, in themselves ; or,

in other words, must have been the manifestation of their own

glory. In the same degree it is evident, that Man must have been

alike indebted to them all for his being and his blessings ; must be

subject to their laws and government ; must be bound voluntarily

to coincide with their designs ; and must owe them equal adoration,

wonder, love, and praise. In order to the possibility of his fulfil-

ling this end, and performing these duties, it is absolutely necessa-

ry, that he should know his obligations to them ; and to this know-

ledge it is absolutely necessary, that he should know their exist-

ence. Whence then, if two or more such Beings exist, to whom

Man is equally indebted for his being and his blessings, has it come

to pass, that he is precluded, by a natural impossibility, from dis-

covering the existence of any more than one ? Whence is it, that

all his sense of obligation for these high benefits ; whence is it,

that his gratitude, his voluntary subjection to divine government,

his voluntary coincidence with the divine designs, his love, his re-

verence, his complacency, and his obedience, due alike to all his

glorious Authors and Benefactors ; are by absolute necessity, and

without a possibility of its being otherwise, confined to one ?

Whence is it, that Man is so situated as to make the very attempt,

UNITY OF GOD.

SER. IV.] 119

the very design, to render any part of this service to any other, be-

sides one God, a crime, an act of impiety, ingratitude, and rebel-

lion ? Whence is it, that his other Creators, who formed him, only

that he might render to them these solemn acts of regard, have

furnished him with no trace of their agency, with no proof even of

their existence ; and have thus put it out of his power to render

them any regard whatever ?

As this state of things must, if it exist, have been produced by

the voluntary act of these supposed Gods, it will, I think, be con-

ceded, that these questions, taken in their connexion with the pre-

ceding observations, can admit of no answer. If this opinion be

just, it will also be conceded that this argument from Reason, for

the Unity of God, is not far from being conclusive .

4thly. The Unity of Design, and Agency, in Creation and Provi-

dence, furnishes another argument in proof of the existence of but

one God.

So far as we are able to understand the works of Creation and

Providence, we discern a general simplicity, and harmony, in the

nature, and operations of all things. Amid the immense compli-

cation, which surrounds us, we perceive one set of laws, in accord-

ance with which all things proceed in their course. The same

causes produce, uniformly, the same effects in every place, and pe-

riod. Vegetables spring from the same seed ; germinate by the

same means ; assume the same form; sustain the same qualities ;

exist through the same duration ; and come to the same end. Ani-

mals , also, are born in one manner ; and exhibit the same life,

powers, and tendencies. Man has one origin, form, life, system of

faculties, character, and termination. All things in this world are,

in one regular manner, made subservient to his use and happiness ;

and are plainly fitted by one design, and conducted by one agency,

to this end. Day and night uniformly return by a single power,

and with exact regularity. With the same regularity, and simpli

city, the seasons pursue their circuit. The Sun shines, illuminates ,

warms, and moves the planets by a single law, and with exact uni-

formity. By one law, the planets keep their orbits, and perform

their revolutions. The face of the Heavens is but one ; and the

oldest sphere, which is known, presents to our view the same con

stellations, which we now behold, in the nightly firmament.

Thus all things, so far as our knowledge extends, present to our

view a single design, regularly executed by a single agency. But

unity of design is a proof of one designer, and unity of agency,

of one agent.

This argument has ever struck the minds of thinking men, with

no small force. Were we able to comprehend the Universe, and

to discern perfectly the manner, in which all the parts of it are

conducted, it is not improbable, that this argument would be com-

plete. In the present state of our knowledge, it must be confessed,

that its influence is less satisfactory than is here supposed. Where

UNITY OF GOD.

120 [SER. IV.

there is ignorance, there may, and naturally will be, doubt ; and,

where there is doubt, there will not be complete satisfaction. Its

whole force, however, is lent to the doctrine, that there is but one

God. Against the existence of two infinite Beings of opposite cha-

racters and designs, it is, I think, unanswerable. Should it be al-

leged, that it is no proof against the existence of two or more Infi-

nite Beings, of the same character and designs, I admit the allega-

tion ; but observe, that the beings alleged, having, according to the

supposition, exactly the same knowledge, disposition, and power,

must, of course, exercise exactly the same agency ; and would,

therefore, constitute but one Supreme Agent, or one God.

I will not assert, that these arguments amount to a demonstra-

tion; yet it cannot be denied, that they are attended with high pro-

bability. The third of them, in my view, cannot be shaken. Uni-

ted, they reasonably require our belief of one God only; and at

the same time evince, that the existence of more Gods than one,

is a mere hypothesis, the admission of which is, of course, a con-

temptible absurdity. I shall now inquire,

II. What views Men have entertained of this doctrine, under the

direction of Reason .

In answer to this inquiry, it may be observed,

1st. That all the ancient Nations , of whose religious opinions we

have a distinct account, appear, in the early periods of their existence,

to have acknowledged one God.

Among these nations, may be mentioned the Persians, Hindoos ,

Chinese, Tartars , Chaldeans , Phenicians , Canaanites , Arabians

Egyptians , and Romans. Thus Abimelech, Pharaoh, Job , his three

friends, Elihu, Melchizedeck, Nahor, and Laban ; Zerdusht or Zo-

roaster, Lao Kiun, Confucius, the ancient Brahmans, the author of

the Orphic Hymns, and Numa Pompilius ; all appear to have be-

lieved in the original and perfect Cause of all things .

gs . The people

of the Thebaid, or Upper Egypt, for a long time, worshipped this

God alone . From these facts, connected with many others, which

cannot now be mentioned, particularly from the fact, that Noah

lived three hundred and fifty years after the flood, and that Shem

lived five hundred and twelve years, ( according to the chronology,

which I choose to adopt) it may be assumed as a certainty, that all

ancient Nations acknowledged One God.

2dly. All these Nations, and all others with them, except the Jews ,

some sooner and some later, fell into the gross Idolatry of Poly-

theism .

By the labours of Sir William Jones and Mr. Bryant, it appears

to me evident, that the polytheistical system was originally one and

the same. From the united accounts of other writers concerning

this subject, I am equally satisfied , that it continued to be one ; not

however, without many modifications and varieties, introduced into

it by superstition, ignorance, accident, caprice, and several other

causes .

UNITY OF GOD.

SER. IV . ] 121

This System, I consider, as originated by that body of men, who

followed Nimrod into the plains of Shinar, and built the tower of

Babel; and who, being principally descendants of Cush, were

called Cushites , through many succeeding generations. Indeed a

part of their descendants, inhabiting the mountains of Habesh, on

the Southwestern border of the Red Sea, call themselves by that

name, at the present time . These people, in consequence of their

dispersion by means of the confusion of their language, and of se-

veral subsequent attacks, made upon them by the descendants of

Shem and Japheth, in two successive instances, under the command

of Chedarlaomer, and afterwards by the Egyptians, were dispersed

ultimately into Persia, Hindoostan, and the countries eastward of

it ; into Canaan, Egypt, the Lesser Asia, Thrace, and all the coun-

tries bordering on the Mediterranean. Wherever they went, they

spread their Polytheistical Idolatry, which in this manner ultimately

filled the World. The Confusion of Tongues I place four hundred

and eleven years after the Deluge .

From these two facts, compared, I deduce this important doc-

trine ; that the knowledge of one God, was, among all ancient Na-

tions , derived in fact from traditionary instruction ; and that the only

result of such investigations , as the Reason of Man entered into con-

cerning this subject, was either Polytheism or Atheism. While this

traditionary instruction was conveyed, and received, without mix-

ture, Mankind acknowledged and worshipped JEHOVAH, the living

and true God. But, so soon as the tradition became corrupted, the

knowledge and worship of the true God became corrupted also,

and by degrees vanished. Traces of both, indeed, remained for

periods, differing in different Nations ; but their perfection was lost

and forgotten.

The nearer we approach to Noah, the nearer we invariably

come to the pure and perfect character, the unperplexed know-

ledge, and the unblemished worship, of JEHOVAH. The farther

we recede from this Patriarch, the deeper we find ourselves regu-

larly sinking into the abyss of Polytheism. Were the Unity and

Perfection of God inferred by Reason from the works of Creation

and Providence, this progress would of course be inverted. The

traditionary state would be the state of obscurity, imperfection, and

error; because, then, Men reasoned less, and believed upon author-

ity more. As Philosophy advanced, and Investigations multiplied ;

as the subject was more frequently taken up in form, and profess-

edly examined, and discussed ; the proofs of the Unity and Per-

fection of God would be accumulated ; and the knowledge of

this great subject rendered, progressively, more clear, certain, and

unobjectionable. The fact, however, has been uniformly contrary

to this representation. As Tradition has declined, this knowledge

has declined with it. As it has been corrupted, the knowledge has

beencorrupted : where it has been lost , the knowledge has been

also lost.

VOL. I. 16

UNITY OF GOD.

122 [ SER. IV.

The origin of Polytheism, is found in human reasonings only.

In Asia and in Europe alike, Philosophy has devised, extended,

and established, this miserable system ; and, as Philosophy has

been advanced, the errors of Polytheism have been enhanced and

multiplied, or have terminated in Atheism. In the most flourishing

state of Philosophy in Greece, Rome, Egypt, Persia, and Hindoostan,

Polytheism has been the most absurd, its errors the most numerous,

and its worship the most abominable. The doctrines of the Ame-

rican Savages concerning God, Religion, and Duty, are far less

perplexed, censurable, and ridiculous, than those of these learned

Countries . Nor were their own doctrines in any measure deserv-

ing of such severe condemnation before, as at, and after, the pre-

valence of their Philosophy. Atheism appears to have been the

offspring of Philosophy alone. If we except the Bos- jesmans, the

lowest and most persecuted people of Caffraria, and more unable,

and unlikely, to preserve traditionary knowledge than any other

Nation in the World, (and concerning even these there is doubt )

and if we add to them the other Caffres, there is no solid reason to

believe, that Atheism was ever adopted by plain, unlearned men,

or admitted by the exercise of common sense. Nor, if we allow

this people to be ignorant of a God, is it true, that they have adopt-

ed Atheism. Their Ancestors may have lost the knowledge of God;

and they may not have recovered it. But Atheism is a thing totally

diverse from the mere want of the knowledge of a God. It is the

disbelief and rejection of God, after the idea, and the character, of

God, have been presented to the mind, and proofs furnished of his ex-

istence . Atheism, in this its proper sense, has probably never

been adopted by plain, unlettered men. But, in this sense, it has

been originated, defended, and glorified in, by many sects of Phi-

losophers, in many ages, and in many countries.

To the account, which I have here given, of the result of hu-

man reasonings on the subject of this discourse, it may perhaps be

objected, that Pythagoras , Thales, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle,

held, and taught, the doctrine of one God. I admit the assertion

with some qualifications ; but deny, that it is any objection to what

I have said. It is well known, that Pythagoras and Thales, the

founders of the Ionic and Italic sects of Philosophy, were the parents

ofall the Philosophy of the Greeks. It is equally well known, that

these two men founded their doctrines, concerning subjects of this

nature, chiefly on traditions, which they collected from different

nations with intense assiduity. Pythagoras , particularly, travelled

in quest of information in Theology and Morals into Egypt, Judea ,

Babylon, Persia, and Hindoostan . Of this we are directly informed

by Jamblichus, Diogenes Laertius, and Porphyry ; and, also, by

Hindoo records , now in being . Porphyry particularly declares, that

he resided seven years on Mount Carmel. Thales, also, whose

mother was a Phenician woman, travelled into Syria, Phenicia, and

probably into Judea. Some ofthe followers of these distinguished

UNITY OF GOD.

SER. IV.] 128

men, adhered more, some less, and others not at all, to the system

ofdoctrines, and the scheme ofphilosophizing, which they pursued.

Those, who adhered most to their doctrines, and the traditions on

which they were founded, entertained the most correct and defen-

sible opinions concerning God. Those, who wandered farthest

from them, entertained the most erroneous opinions. Plato and

Socrates were of the former class ; and Aristotle of the latter. Plato

resided twelve years in Egypt, where he conversed extensively with

both Egyptians and Jews. In different parts of his writings he has

abundantly taught us, that his best doctrines were derived from

traditions , holden by Barbarians, or foreigners ; of whom he dc-

clares, in one place, that " they were more ancient than the Greeks ,

and lived nearer to the Gods." But even he, and his master So-

crates, when they left their traditionary knowledge, began to wan-

der from truth ; and taught a collection of idle dreams, which they

dignified with the name of Philosophy. The correctness of some

oftheir doctrines, therefore, furnishes not the least objection against

the observations which I have made.

It may be further objected, that in asserting the results of Rea-

son, on this subject, to be what I have said, I lower the importance

and usefulness of Reason to a degree beneath what Candour and

Justice will warrant ; and in a manner discordant with the very ac-

count, which I have given, concerning this subject, in the former

part of the present discourse.

In answer to this objection, it is to be observed , that the account,

which I have here given, is a mere recital of a matter of fact ;

namely, of what Reason has actually done relative to this doctrine ;

and not an explication of what Reason is able to do. With this

subject I have, at present, no concern. Still I cannot but observe,

that, when we appeal to Reason as a guide in subjects of Theolo-

gy, its true character, as such a guide, can be estimated only by

the decisions, which it has actually made. A man reasoning , as he

actually is, under the real influence of his passions, prejudices, and

biasses, and not, as he might be, divested of them, exhibits his true

character as a reasoning being, and the actual extent, and power,

of his Reason. This observation is equally true of all men. We

are, therefore, to look only at what Reason has actually done, to

learn what it can be expected to do.

Whether I have exhibited Reason in a more disadvantageous

light than is just, I will leave my Audience to judge, after I have

recited a very few, out of the endless multitude of absurdities ,

taught by Philosophy. The three* great arguments of Ocellus

Lucanus, Aristotle, and the modern Platonists, against the Creation

of the World, are these :

1st. It is inconceivable, that thing's should ever have been in any

other state, than that in which they are.

Stillingfleet's Origines Sacræ.

UNITY OF GOD.

124 [ SER. IV.

2dly. There is no other way of Production, but generation.

3dly. God is not a free agent ; but produced the World by a ne-

cessity of Nature.

The first of these arguments is a falsehood; and, if it were true,

would be ridiculously alleged ; because it cannot in the remotest

manner affect the point in question .

The second is a mere assumption, taken gratuitously from the

birth and progress of Vegetables and Animals ; and might with the

same propriety be employed to prove, that men could never exist,

unless they had been originally planted in the ground, and sprang

up under the nutritive influence of the Earth, Rain, and Sunshine.

Yet Ocellus was so satisfied of it , that he believed the Earth to

have been thus generated ; to have grown from an infantine to an

adult size ; and to be destined to decline, and dissolve, like an ani-

mal body; and all this, in direct contradiction to his main principle,

the eternity of the World. Aristotle, who derived his doctrines on

this subject from Ocellus, supposed, that, if the first matter were

not created, it must have been generated by some preceding mat-

ter ; and so on, ad infinitum ; not perceiving, that he was here

teaching a self -contradiction, for sound Philosophy. Plato taught

that Ύλη, or the Chaos, was the source of moral evil ; and in this

opinion was followed by a multitude of others . These doctrines,

taught by Philosophers of the first rank, will, I presume, exonerate

me from this charge, but I could fill a volume with specimens of a

similar nature. I will only add to them that memorable declara-

tion of Cicero ; Nihil tam absurdum, quod non dixerit aliquis Phi-

losophorum . * With respect to that part of the objection, that my

own observations are discordant, I answer, that under the first head

of discourse, I have alleged such arguments, as we, possessed of

all the advantages derived from Revelation, are enabled to gain

from the works of Creation and Providence. We already know

the existence and character of God. These were the very points

in question with the philosophers, whom I have named. The Re-

velation, to which we are indebted for this knowledge, has also en-

abled us to reason on these subjects in a manner, which was im-

possible to them, great as their abilities were. The arguments,

which I have alleged, therefore, except perhaps the last, were

probably never thought of by these men. Indeed, I do not know,

that the third of them is found in any book whatever.

3dly. No nation, which had lost the knowledge of one God derived

from tradition, has been ever known to regain it, unless by the aid of

Revelation .

The Ancients plainly derived this knowledge from Noah ; and,

when they had lost it , fell, universally, into hopeless Polytheism.

Nor is there a single exception to the remark, that, whenever Re-

velation has not revived this knowledge, mankind remain Polythe-

ists to the present hour.

Cicero de Nat. Deorum.

مه

UNITY OF GOD.

SER. IV. ] 125

It is scarcely necessary for me to observe, that Jews, Christians,

Mohammedans , and Infidels , have derived this knowledge wholly

from the Scriptures .

4thly . No account exists of any individual, who by the mere exer-

cise of his Reason discovered the existence of one God.

Immense multitudes of great and learned men have, in different

ages, employed themselves laboriously in speculations of a theolo-

gical nature. Had any one of them made the discovery in ques-

tion; an event so important, so new, so singular, so honourable,

could not have been unnoticed, or unrecorded, amid thousands of

discoveries , of infinitely less consequence and distinction, carefully

treasured up in the volumes of History. In truth, the idea of one

perfect God is neither so obvious, nor so pleasing, to such minds as

ours, as, when once lost, to be with any probability ever recovered

again by the mere efforts of Reason. When known, and admitted,

by the early descendants of Noah, it was soon lost ; and without

the direct aid of succeeding Revelation, would have been lost for

ever. In the same manner, the Israelites wandered, notwithstand-

ing the presence of the Shekinah, and the awful denunciations of

their prophets, continually fulfilled before them; notwithstanding

the wonderful miracles, which they beheld, and the terrible punish-

ments which they suffered, almost yearly, into Polytheism and Idola-

try. Such a God, as, when known by us, we are unwilling to ac-

knowledge and to worship ; a God, whom we do not like to retain

in our knowledge ; we cannot be supposed, with any probability, to

seek after, when unknown ; nor to search with earnestness for ar-

guments to prove his being, or perfections .

III. I shall now inquire, what has been the influence of Revelation

on the reception, and continuance, of this doctrine.

On this subject I observe

1st. That God revealeth himself to Adam, and to the succeeding

Patriarchs, down to the time of Moses .

2dly. In the written Revelation, begun by Moses, and completed by

the succeeding Prophets andApostles , the existence of the one perfect

God is declared by himself, in every manner, from the beginning to

the end ; and made the foundation of all the doctrines , precepts, and

ordinances , contained in the Sacred Volume.

3dly. This doctrine is directly attested by a great variety of mira-

cles , wrought, either immediately or ultimately, as testimonies to this

truth.

4thly. All the declarations, of this import, are proved by the cha-

racter of the Testifier, as unfolded in the works of Creation and

Providence .

5thly . The same declarations are evinced to be true by the charac-

ter of the Testifier, as unfolded in the Scriptures .

On this Character I shall have occasion to dwell particularly

hereafter. At the present time, I can only observe summarily,

that it is evinced by the perfect accordance of his declarations

with facts :

ملا

is

126 [ SER . IV.

UNITY OF GOD.

Of his promises, with his performance of them ;

Of his predictions, with their fulfilment ;

Of his precepts, with absolute rectitude ; and

Ofhis doctrines, so far as they can be examined by us, with

truth.

It is also illustrated, in a glorious manner, by the perfect holiness

of the scheme of worship prescribed, and of the system of Pro-

vidence recorded.

In all these several ways, one Eternal, self -existent, immutable,

and perfect JEHOVAH, is directly and abundantly declared on the

one hand; and on the other, all Gods, beside him, are proved with

the same evidence to be false and imaginary. The character, given

of this great and awful Being, is such, as to banish from the mind

the remotest suspicion of a second ; even if a second were not di-

rectly denied. All perfections are ascribed to him ; and all things

declared to proceed from him, and to be under his absolute control.

The Universe is exhibited as nothing in comparison with him, as

holden in existence and harmony by his hand, and as formed to be

the instrument of his glory.

This evidence, furnished by Revelation of the Unity of God,

is such, that it preserved this doctrine among the Patriarchs ; and

in spite of all their tendencies to Idolatry, continued it among the

Jews , till the Babylonish captivity ; and after that event, esta-

blished it beyond a question. Since the completion ofthe Christian

Canon, there has been, among those, who have acknowledged its

divine origin, scarcely a debate on the subject ; Christians, with

the exception of a few gross Heretics, who never deserved the

name of Christians, having with a single voice acknowledged, and

worshipped, the one JEHOVAH, the only living and true God. They

have not probably regarded these arguments, as amounting to a

logical demonstration ; but they have justly regarded them, as re-

moving every rational doubt, and as furnishing them, when coming

to God , with an immoveable foundation for believing with full as-

surance, that he is, and that he is the rewarder of all them that dili-

gently seek him .

Two REMARKS shall conclude this discourse .

1st. This doctrine of the Unity of God strongly exhibits the wick-

edness of Mankind.

The one perfect God was anciently, and fully, known to all Na-

tions ; and has been, since, often declared to a great part of the

habitable World. Yet singular, solemn, and interesting, as this

great object is, and impossible as it seems, that it should be lost by

any man, who has once possessed it, it has still been wantonly for-

gotten, or wilfully rejected, by the great mass of mankind. In the

place of JEHOVAH have been substituted Gods innumerable, sinful,

stupid, blind, deaf , and dead ; and these have been zealously wor-

shipped in preference to the glorious Creator of all things. Man

has made his Gods, and then prostrated himself before them.

UNITY OF GOD.

SER. IV.] 127

The true and only reason of this conduct is, that men loved not

to retain God in their knowledge. No higher proof of Corruption

can be given than this . God is infinitely excellent and lovely.

Agood mind naturally regards him as infinitely more desirable

than all other objects ; and delights to contemplate, love, and obey

him, in entire preference to all other enjoyments . Agross and

guilty mind, therefore, is the sole cause of this apostacy and rebel-

lion . The degree of this guilt is strongly seen in the completeness

ofthe Apostacy. Godhas been totally banished ; and creatures,

totally opposite to him in every attribute, have been worshipped in

his stead. Thus the mind has loved to recede as far as possible from

its Maker ; and not only refused its proper love and homage to

him, but rendered them to the vilest and most unworthy of his

creatures .

2dly. From the observations made in this discourse, appears , in

the strongest light, the necessity of Revelation .

Revelation, as I have shown, originally began, and has always

continued, the knowledge of the true and living God in the world.

This is infinitely the most important of all knowledge, and the most

absolutely indispensable to the well-being of Man. From God,

all the good, which will ever be enjoyed, must be derived. But

no permanent or solid good can be expected from him, unless he

be pleased. To be pleased, he must be obeyed, and to be obeyed,

he must be known. But without revelation he has never been

known in this World. Thus to the attainment of permanent and

solid good, Revelation is indispensably necessary, and infinitely

important.

The love ofGod, also, is wholly built on the knowledge of his

existence and character. But the love of God is the best of all

characteristics, the foundation of all other good, and in itself the

best good. Thus, in order to our moral and natural good, to our

holiness and happiness alike, Revelation is supremely necessary

to Man. *

See these subjects further pursued in the Sermon on the Second Command-

ment.

SERMON V.

ATTRIBUTES OF GOD-ETERNITY AND IMMUTABILITY OF GOD.

*

PSALM cii . 24-27.....I said, O my God, Take me not away in the midst of my days :

thy years are throughout all generations. Of old hast thou laid the foundation of

the Earth ; and the Heavens are the work of thy hands . They shall perish, but

thou shalt endure ; yea , all of them shall wax old like a garment ; as a vesture

shalt thou change them, and they shall be changed : But thou art the same, and thy

years shall have no end.

IN the preceding discourses, I have evinced, by such argu-

iments, as appear to me conclusive, the existence of God; considered

the objections and schemes of Atheism and the influence of those

schemes on the understanding, heart, and life, of Man, compared

with that of the Christian System, and examined the manner, in

which the Unity of God is presented to us by Reason, and by Revela-

tion. I shall now proceed to consider such attributes of this great

and glorious being, as demand a particular discussion. Those,

which naturally claim our first attention, are his Eternity and Im-

mutability ; subjects so intimately connected, as to be most advan-

tageously considered together, in the manner in which we find them

in the text.

After a series of discouraging and distressing thoughts on his

own troubles, and repeated supplications to God for deliverance ;

and after various hopes, and predictions, of the kindness of God

to himself, and to the Church, recited in the context ; the Psalmist

takes up his final consolation in the perfections, particularly in the

power, wisdom, goodness , eternity, and immutability of his Creator.

In the text, these are exhibited, as certain proof , that the children

ofGod shall endure for ever, and their seed be established before him .

In the sublime language of this divine writer, the foundation of the

Earth and the formation of the Heavens are presented to us, as

the handiwork of JEHOVAH ; who is considered as building the

Universe, as a man erects his own habitation. With no less mag-

nificence is the same wonderful Agent represented, as taking these

Heavens and folding them up as a decayed garment is folded by

its owner ; and laying them aside, as useless to any future purpose.

In this imagery there is obviously a direct reference to the consum-

mation of all things ; when the present Heavens and Earth, being

set on fire, shall be dissolved, andflee away ; and no place be foundfor

them any more. Mutable in their own nature, and destined to tem-

porary purposes only, they will be continued while their use con-

tinues, and then perish for ever. To this changing character of

even these great and splendid works of his hands, the Psalmist

studiously contrasts the character of God. They shall perish , bul

IMMUTABILITY OF GOD.

SER. V.] 129

thou shalt endure ; yea, all of them shall wax old as doth a garment,

and as a vesture shalt thou change them, and they shall be changed :

but thou art the same ; and thy years shall have no end.

In these words, is presented to us, not only a direct assertion, but

a highly poetical, sublime, and glorious exhibition, of the Eternity

and Immutability of God ; strongly impressed on the mind by the

contrast, which it forms to the vanishing character of these great

works of his hands . The passage is indeed declared by the Apos-

tle Paul, to be a description of the character, and agency, of the

Lord Jesus Christ, the second person in the divine Trinity. But

to us, who regard Christ as being unquestionably God, it has ex-

actly the same import, as if applied to the Father, or to the God-

head at large. In this light I shall, therefore , consider it ; and

proceed, under its guidance, to examine these illustrious attributes

of the Creator.

I. God is Eternal ; or, in other words , his existence is without

beginning, or end.

Of this doctrine the text is a direct assertion, and therefore a

complete proof : but it is only one, among a vast multitude of such

assertions in the Scriptures. No attribute of God is perhaps more

frequently declared, more variously recited, or more universally

diffused, throughout the sacred pages. In the very first verse of

Genesis it is said, In the beginning God created the Heavens and the

Earth. He existed, therefore, before the beginning of created

things ; or, in other words, from everlasting. In the last chapter

ofthe Apocalypse, Christ solemnly declares this character of him-

seli : I am Alpha and Omega, saith he, the beginning and the end-

ing, the first and the last. In the xc. Psalm, and 2d. verse, the

divine writer exclaims, Before the mountains were brought forth, or

ever thou hadst formed the Earth, and the World, even from Ever-

lasting to Everlasting, thou art God. I lift my hand to Heaven, says

God, Deut. xxxii. and 40th, and say, I live for ever. Iam ; that

is, I exist alike in all times and places, in Eternity and Immensity.

JEHOVAH and Jah : that is, Existence illimitable by space or du-

ration ; are, you well know, the peculiar and incommunicable

names of the Godhead ; in accordance with which the Eternal God,

and the Everlasting God, are current Phraseology of the Scriptures .

From this source, then, it cannot be necessary to adduce any fur-

ther proofs of the doctrine.

To this full evidence from the Scriptures, Reason subjoins her

fullest attestations . That God existed before all things, has been

heretofore, as I trust, sufficiently proved. The Universe was

plainly derived from him, the first or original Cause. Consequently

he was uncaused, underived, and, of course, from Eternity, or with-

outbeginning.

That God will for ever exist is plain, also, from Reason, beyond

dispute. He cannot be supposed to terminate his own existence.

Without insisting on the natural impossibility of this fact, it may be

VOL. I. 17

ETERNITY AND

130 [ SER . V.

safely asserted to be morally impossible. The Being, who has all

good in his power, possession, and enjoyment, must be infinitely

delighted with perpetual life, or existence. The contemplation of

his perfections, designs, and works, the purpose of accomplishing

eternally the supreme good of the Universe, the manifestation of

his infinite beauty, glory, and loveliness, to the intelligent system,

for ever rising, enlarging, and improving, and the complete assu-

rance, that all his pleasure will be accomplished, constitute at once

an aggregate of happiness, which must be regarded by him with

immense complacency, and render his existence infinitely desi-

rable in his own eyes .

It is scarcely necessary to observe, that creatures can in no way

affect the existence, or the happiness, of God; for , being abso-

lutely dependent on him, they can be, and do, nothing, but what he

permits . From these considerations it is plain , that Godmust con-

tinue to exist for ever.

II . God is immutable.

By this I intend, that he is subject to no change in his manner

of being, his perfections, thoughts, desires, purposes, or determi-

nations.

This doctrine, also, is directly asserted in the text. They shall

be changed ; but thou art the same. It is also declared in various

other passages of the Scriptures : I am the Lord ; I change not.

Mal. iii . 6. Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above,

and cometh down from the Father of lights , with whom is no varia-

bleness , neither shadow of turning. Jam. i. 17. Jesus Christ, the

same yesterday , to- day, andfor ever. Heb. xiii . 8.

In these passages we are taught, not only that there is no

change in God ; but no variableness ; no capacity or possibility of

change.

Of this doctrine, also, Reason furnishes to him, who admits the

existence of an Intelligent Cause of all things, an absolute demon-

stration. God gave being to all things. Of course he contrived

them all. Every being, and every event, which has been, is, or

will be, together with all their qualities and operations, existed in

his mind; or, inthe beautiful language of David, were written in

his book, and what day they should be fashioned, when, as yet, there

was none of them. * They can, therefore, furnish to him not a sin-

gle new thought, or idea. His thoughts were the cause of these

beings and events. They, therefore, cannot be the cause of his

thoughts. Hence it is manifest , that neither from himself , nor from

his creatures, can God receive a single new thought. But, if no

change can exist in his thoughts, it is obvious, that none can exist

in his desires, designs, or determinations. New desires must be

originated, and new designs and determinations formed, if they

should exist at all, in consequence of some new views of the Mini .

Psalm cxxxix. 16. Margin.

IMMUTABILITY OF GOD.

SER. V.] 131

in which they exist ; some change in the object viewed; or in the

manner, in which the mind regards the object. As all the works

ofGod are thus proved to have been, according to the declaration

of St. James, Acts xv. 18, known unto him from the beginning ; it

is evident, that no such change is possible to him. His desires ,

designs, and determinations, must, therefore, be precisely the same

for ever.

From these considerations it follows, that the Eternity of God

is a totally different thing from that, which is ascribed to created,

particularly to Intelligent, beings. The Scriptures attribute Eter-

nity in a certain sense to Angels and Men ; but this is wholly un-

like the Eternity of God. All creatures change incessantly ; and

no idea can be formed of their duration, but that of a continual

succession of changes. Their thoughts, desires, purposes, and

determinations, together with their existence, are, and can be, no

other than a continued series of changes. God, on the contrary ,

is not, and cannot be, the subject of the least possible change.

His Eternity is , of course, all one present time. To him there is

no past, and no future ; nothing old, and nothing new ; nothing

gone, and nothing to come. Past and future are modes of created

existence only ; and have no application, no possible reference, to

the Creator.

This glorious and sublime truth, though thus demonstrated by

Reason, seems to have been first and alone communicated by Re-

velation. One day, saith St. Peter, is with the Lord as a thousand

years, and a thousand years as one day. The Apostle does not

here speak, as he has sometimes been supposed to speak, in com-

parative, but in absolute, language. He does not declare, that,

because the Eternity of God is such an amazing duration, a thou-

sand years will be so lost in this abyss, as to be comparatively the

same thing with one day. On the contrary, he intended to declare

what he actually declares ; that a thousand years are to God ex-

actly the same thing with one day. In his existence there is no

long, nor short , duration ; nothing fleeting ; nothing successive.

His duration is a mere and eternal Now. In our own existence,

the clearest resemblance to the duration of God is found in the

contemplation of a single, present moment of our being ; without

taking at all into view the succession even of that, which immedi-

ately follows .

This doctrine is , also, most sublimely exhibited in that singular

declaration of Isaiah, Thus saith THE HIGH AND LOFTY ONE, that

inhabiteth Eternity, that is, He, who fills Eternity at once ; who in-

habits it, just as he also inhabits Immensity. As he is present in

all the regions of Immensity at once ; and does not come from the

West, pass by the present place of our existence, and go to the

East ; so he fills Eternity at once; and does not come from the

Past, go by the Present, and enter the Future.

The same transcendently glorious mode of existence is also sub-

1

' ETERNITY AND

132 [ SER. V.

limely indicated in the incommunicable names of God, I AM, and

JEHOVAH ; that is, EXISTENCE, present in every place, and through

every period of duration, alike.

REMARKS .

1st. How great and glorious a character of God is presented to

us by these perfections .

Before the Mountains were brought forth, or ever he had formed

the Earth and the World, even from everlasting to everlasting, he is

God. Possessed of perfect excellence, contemplating with Infinite

complacency his glorious attributes, and containing in himself a

boundless sufficiency for the accomplishment of every thing great

and desirable, he saw, that it was becoming his character to un-

fold his perfections, and communicate his goodness, to an endless

and innumerable race of beings. From an Infinite height, he took

a survey of the immeasurable vast of possible beings ; and in an

expansion without limits, but desolate and wild, where nothing was,

called into existence with a word the countless multitude of Worlds,

with all their various furniture. With his own hand he lighted up

at once innumerable suns, and rolled around them innumerable

worlds . All these he so dispersed, and arranged, as that all re-

ceived light, and warmth, and life, and comfort ; and all, at the

same time, he stored, and adorned, with a rich and unceasing va-

riety of beauty and magnificence, and with the most suitable means

of virtue and happiness. Throughout his vast empire, he sur-

rounded his throne with Intelligent creatures, to fill the immense

and perfect scheme of being, which originally existed with infinite

splendour in his own incomprehensible Mind. Independent of all

possible beings and events, he sits at the head of this Universe,

unchanged, and incapable of change, amid all the successions,

tossings, and tumults, by which it is agitated. When empires are

overthrown, or Angels fall ; when Suns are extinguished, and Sys-

tems return to their original nothing ; he is equally impassive and

unmoved as when sparrows expire, or the hairs fall from our heads.

Nothing can happen, nothing can be done, beyond his expectation,

or without his permission. Nothing can frustrate his designs, and

nothing disappoint, or vary, his purposes. All things, beside him,

change, and fluctuate without ceasing. Events exist, and vanish.

Beings rise, and expire. But his own existence, the thoughts

which he entertains, the desires which he admits, the purposes

which he forms, are the same yesterday, to - day, and for ever.

Throughout the coming vast of Eternity, also, and the boundless

tracts of Immensity, he sees with serene complacency his own

perfect purposes daily and invariably advancing, with a regular

fulfilment, towards their absolute completion. Inits own place, in

its own time, and in its own manner, each exists in exact obedience

to his order, and in exact accordance with his choice. Nothing

IMMUTABILITY OF GOD.

SER. V.] 133

lingers, nothing hastens: but his counsel exactly stands, and ali ,

his pleasure will be precisely accomplished.

2dly. How necessary are these attributes to the character of God,

as the Ruler of all things .

By his Eternity this glorious Being is always in existence, to know

and to bring to pass, to approve, or to condemn, to reward, or to

punish, whatever he pleases, and whatever is done by his Intel-

ligent creatures . As an Eternal Being, only, can he form plans of

existence and administration, which shall extend through Eternity,

and propose designs, invested with boundless perfection. As an

Eternal Being, only, is he qualified to execute those designs in an

everlasting progress, and to complete for ever the Infinite good,

which he has begun.

By means of his Eternity only, is he able to offer to his creatures

eternal rewards, and place before them infinite motives to obedience

and virtue : rewards and motives, in their nature, differing im-

mensely from all others. Without this attribute, with whateve

wisdom the system of his works was planned, however bright and

benevolent the designs, which he formed, however just and excel-

lent his administrations, while they continued ; still, at a period

comparatively near, the splendour, and the promise, of this day-

spring, would set in darkness ; and the Sun of glory, and of good,

be extinguished for ever. The Universe of matter and of minds,

holden in being by his hand, would at an untimely day, find that

hand withdrawn, and itself , with all the prospects formed, the hopes

indulged, and the blessings enjoyed , by the unnumbered hosts of

Intelligent beings, sink at once into the Abyss of Annihilation.

By his Immutability, God is possessed of immeasurable dignity

and greatness ; and fitted to be entirely feared, loved, honoured,

and obeyed, by all his Rational creatures . The humble and im-

perfect dignity of created beings is entirely dependent for its ex-

istence on stability of character. Infinite dignity cannot belong to

a character, which is not literally unchangeable. Created dignity is

completely destroyed by fickleness : the least mutability would

destroy that, which is uncreated. The least possible change would

be a change from perfection to imperfection ; a change infinite in

itself , and infinitely for the worse. God, if changed at all, would

cease to be God, and sink down from his infinite exaltation of being

and character towards the humble level of imperfect creatures .

Howdifferently, in this case, would his nature, his laws, his designs,

and his government, appear to us ! Were the least change to com-

mence, who can divine its consequences, or foresee their progress,

and their end ? Who can conjecture what would be its influence on

his character, his designs, or his conduct ? Who can foretel the

effects, which it would produce on the empire which he has created,

and on the innumerable beings by which it is inhabited ? Who

does not see, at a glance, that God could no longer be regarded

with that voluntary and supreme veneration, now so confessedlyhis

ETERNITY AND

134 SER. V

due, because he had descended from his own infinite dignity, and

was no longer decked with majesty and excellency, nor arrayed in

glory and beauty ? Who does not feel, that a serious apprehension

ofsuch a change would diffuse an alarm through all virtuous beings ,

and carry terror and amazement to the most distant regions of the

Universe?

By his Immutability, God is qualified to form, and to pursue, one

great plan of Creation and Providence ; one harmonious scheme of

boundless good; and to carry on a perfect system, in a perfect

manner, without variableness or shadow of turning. An Immutable

God, only, can be expected to do that, and nothing but that, which

is supremely right and desirable ; to make every part of his great

work exactly what it ought to be ; and to constitute of all the parts

a perfect whole. In this immense work, one character is thus every

where displayed ; one God; one Ruler ; one Sun of Righteousness ;

enlightening, warming, and quickening, the innumerable beings, of

which it is composed. Diversities, indeed, endless diversities , of

his agency, exist throughout the different parts of this work ; but

they are mere changes of the same light ; the varying colours and

splendours of the same glorious Sun.

Without this uniformity, this oneness of character, supreme dig-

nity could not exist in the great Agent. Without this consistency,

safety could not be found ; reliance could not be exercised ; by his

creatures. God is the ultimate object of appeal to Intelligent be-

ings ; the ultimate object of confidence, and hope. However

injured, deceived, or destroyed, by his fellow-creatures, every ra-

tional being still finds a refuge in his Creator. To him, ultimately,

he refers all his wants, distresses, and interests. Whoever else

may be deaf to his complaints, he still is assured, that God will

hear. Whoever else withholds the necessary relief of his suffer-

ings, or the necessary supplies of his wants, still he knows, that

God will give. This consideration, which supports the soul in

every extremity, is its last resort, its final refuge. Could God

change; this asylum would be finally shut ; Confidence would ex-

pire; and Hope would be buried in the grave. Nay, the immor-

tal Mind itself , unless prevented by an impossibility, inherent in its

nature, would languish away its existence, and return to its original

Nothing.

It ought, here, by no means to be forgotten, that this glorious

attribute, so absolutely indispensable to the government of all

things, is in an illustrious degree manifested in that government.

The laws of Nature, as they are customarily called ; or, as they

are, in much better language, styled in the Scriptures, the Ordi-

nances of Heaven; are eminent and affecting displays of the Immu-

tability of God. These laws are no other than rules, or methods,

which God has formed for the guidance of all things, and in con-

formity to which he is pleased to act . Thus, by the Attraction o

Gravitation, all the Atoms, ofwhich the material Universe is com

IMMUTABILITY OF GOD.

SER . V.] 135

posed, are drawn towards each other, by a power, diminishing

exactly in proportion to the increase of the squares of the distances

between them. By this law, Atoms are united into Worlds, and

Worlds into Systems. By this law, Moons perform their revolu-

tions round the Planets ; and Planets and Comets round the Sun.

By this law, Summer and Winter, seed-time and harvest, so useful

and so necessary to Mankind, regularly perform their successions .

In the same regular manner the Planets revolve around their Axes ;

and furnish us with the delightful, and indispensable, vicissitudes of

day and night. By other laws, equally uniform, the vegetable

world is regulated from its first implantation in the soil to its full

growth, and thence to its final decay. By others, still, Animals

are born ; arrive at maturity ; decline ; and die. The Mind, also,

with all its faculties and operations, is by similar laws governed,

and conducted towards a future Immortality. Thus, independently

of the few miraculous events, originally inwoven in the great Sys-

tem, as useful, indubitable, and intentional, proofs of the immediate

agency of God for particular, important purposes, all things are

directed, each in its own manner, by fixed, uniform laws. These,

like their Author, have been unchanged from their commencement.

In the language of the scoffers in the last days, mentioned by St.

Peter, All things have continued as they were from the beginning of

the Creation : and instead of proving, according to their Atheistical

suggestions, the failure of the promise of his coming, they clearly,

and only, display the immutability of the Creator. This divine

Attribute we are thus enabled to trace in the regularity, manifested

by the progress of the vegetable, animal, and mineral kingdoms ;

in the steady confinement of the Ocean within its bounds; the per-

manency of the mountains ; and the stability of the Earth . We

readit . it, in lines which cannot be mistaken, in the exact and won-

derful revolutions ofthe planets; in the unaltered position, aspect,

influence, and glory, of the Sun; and in the uniform stations and

brilliancy of the Stars. In all, one immutable purpose, one uniform

agency, is every where seen ; and must, if Reason be permitted to

decide, be every where acknowledged.

This agency of God is remarkable in all cases, where we are able

to understand its nature, for its extensive efficacy ; producing at the

same time, and by the same thing, many important consequences . In

this respect it is in a great measure a contrast to our agency ; which

usually employs many things to bring to pass a single consequence.

Thus the uniformity of this agency, together with the regularity

and stability which it gives to the Universe at large, is the founda-

tion of almost all our knowledge. From this source are derived the

two great principles, that the same causes produce the same effects ,

and that at similar causes produce similar effects . These principles

are the basis of all our analogical reasoning, and of the analogy

from which we reason . This analogy runs through Creation and

Providence ; and is the source, whence we derive almost all the

ETERNITY AND

136 [ SER. V.

knowledge, which we possess, of the works of God. It extends

alike to the natural and the moral world ; and without it we could

hardly be said to know any thing. In this manner, therefore, is

displayed, not only the Immutability, but also in a glorious manner

the Wisdom of God.

3dly. By these attributes , the character of God is peculiarly ren-

dered awful in the sight of wicked beings .

By his Eternity he will exist for ever ; and they cannot but know,

that he will exist for ever, to execute his threatenings against all

the impenitent workers of iniquity. By his immutability every hope

is forbidden, that he will change any purpose, which he has formed,

or fail to accomplish any declaration, which he has made. If he has

ever been infinitely opposed to sin, and to sinners ; this opposition

cannot but be always, and unchangeably, the same. Of course,

impenitence cannot rationally indulge a single hope of escaping

from the punishment, which he has denounced. All rational beings

are, from this source, presented, continually, with a character of

God inconceivably awful. Dreadful, indeed, will God be, in this

character, to the finally impenitent. How will they abide in the day

of his anger ? How will they stand in the fierceness of his eternal

indignation ? A fearful looking for of judgment must that be,

which is derived from a full conviction, that all the threatenings,

denouncedby God in the Scriptures, against sinners dying without

repentance, and faith in the Lord Jesus, will be exactly executed.

Atthe same time, this awful character will contribute as much per-

haps, if not more than any thing else in the divine kingdom, to pre-

serve righteous beings in a state of unchanging obedience. Obe-

dience cannot be the result of constraint and coercion. The num-

ber and nature, the power and presence, of motives, only, can pro-

duce, or continue, in the minds of moral beings, a disposition to

obey. Among these, the immutable hatred of God to sin, and his

immutable determination to execute vengeance on obstinate sinners,

are pre-eminently cogent; and, united with his unchangeable love

to holiness, and his unchangeable determination to reward it, may

be regarded as the chief means of retaining virtuous beings in their

allegiance and duty. At the same time, these motives have a pri-

mary and commanding influence, in the present world, to produce

the awakening, conviction, and conversion, of wicked men. Know-

ing the terrors of the Lord, says the Apostle Paul, we persuade men.

Knowing the terrors of the Lord, Men are actually persuaded to turn

from the error of their ways, and save their souls alive.

4thly. These attributes , especially, render God the object of su-

preme confidence to virtuous beings .

Confidence, every man knows, can never, though chiefly an

emotion of the heart, exist rationally, or permanently, unless firm-

ly founded in the conviction of the understanding. Ofcourse, the

Being, who is rationally confided in, must be seen, with solid con-

viction, to possess those qualities, on which Confidence may safely

IMMUTABILITY OF GOD.

SER. V.] 137

repose. Immutability of character, and the immutability of pur-

pose and conduct resulting from it, are undoubtedly the only ob-

jects, in which rational beings can ultimately confide. ABeing

possessing these attributes must, if he loves holiness at all, love it

invariably and for ever. That which he loves he will bless, of

course . All his designs to reward those who possess it, must be

unchangeable ; all his declarations true ; and all his promises ex-

actly fulfilled. That faithfulness, by which they are fulfilled, is no

other than the Moral Immutability of God, and an essential part of

his infinite glory. On this character every virtuous being places

an entire and safe reliance ; a hope, which can never make him

ashamed. However vast, however rich, however incredible in ap-

pearance, the promises of future happiness may seem to such minds

as ours ; we know, that they are the promises of Him, who can

neither deceive, nor change ; and that, therefore, every one of them

will be carried into complete execution. According to these ob-

servations, the Immutability of God is directly asserted in the Scrip-

tures to be the only foundation of safety to righteous men. Iam

Jehovah, says God in the passage already quoted from Malachi ; I

change not ; therefore, ye sons of Jacob are not consumed. The

backslidings and provocations even of the best men in this World

are, in all probability, great enough to shake any purposes of kind-

ness in any mind, which is not absolutely incapable of change.

The eternal God is the true and final refuge of his children, only

because he cannot change. Amid all their wanderings, their unbe-

lief , their hardness of heart, and their multiplied transgressions,

they have hope and security, because his truth is as the great moun-

tains , steadfast and immovable ; and his promises endure for ever.

WereGod, contrary to this glorious character, to begin to change,

what a mighty difference would be introduced into his being, his

attributes, and his conduct ! As he is possessed of all power, know-

ledge, and goodness, it is intuitively certain, that he cannot have

more . Of course, any change must be a diminution of one or

other of these attributes; and God must, in the case supposed, be-

come less powerful, less knowing, or less good. How fearful to

all virtuous beings in the Universe, must such a change be ! How

plain is it, that it might, for ought that appears, be the beginning

of a course of mutability, endless in its progress ! that Godwould

ever after exist, as a successive changeable being ; have no fixed

purposes ; and be devested of that unalterable faithfulness, on

which, now, his Intelligent creatures rest with confidence and safety !

What might not in this case be dreaded, in the everlasting change

of his administrations, by all who love good, either in the Creator,

or in his creatures !

5thly. How great encouragements do these attributes to God fur-

nish to Prayer !

All encouragement to Prayer is derived from these two conside-

rations ; that God has required it of us as a duty, and that he has

VOL. I. 18

ETERNITY AND

138 [ SER. V.

promised blessings in answer to our prayers. Were he a mutable

God , it wouldbe impossible for us to know, that what was his plea-

sure yesterday, would be his pleasure to-day ; that what he had re-

quired yesterday, he would not prohibit to-day ; or that what he

promised yesterday, he would be willing to perform at any future

period.

It is impossible to determine, that a mutable God would not alter,

not his conduct only, but his views, his principles of action, and the

rules by which he governed his Creation. What he now loved,

he might hereafter hate : what he now approved, he might hereaf-

ter condemn: what he now rewarded, he might hereafter punish.

Ofcourse, virtuous beings, now loved, approved, and rewarded, by

Him, might one day be hated, condemned, and punished. Wicked

beings, on the contrary, now the objects of his hatred, and de-

clared to be hereafter the objects of his punishment, might one day

become the objects of his friendship and favour ; and triumph over

the good in a manner equally unreasonable and dreadful.

Of these changes we could gain no possible knowledge, unless

he should choose to communicate them to us by an immediate Re-

velation. From his mode of being, so diverse from ours, we could

learn and conjecture nothing. From his past designs and admini-

strations we could never argue, at all, to those which were future.

Equally barren of instruction would be the Nature of things : for

we could never be assured, that he would, or would not, regard this

subject ; or in what manner he would regard it at any period to come.

Even if he should reveal his designs, and his pleasure ; we could

never be certain, that he had revealed them truly ; and if we were

assured of this fact, the Revelation could be of no material use,

except for the moment. What is disclosed he might at any time

revoke : and nothing could be known to be acceptable to him any

longer , than during the moment, in which the disclosure was made.

In the mean time, his powerand his knowledge would still be such,

that no hope could be indulged of either resistance or escape. Ex-

istence would in this case be, therefore, a dreadful succession of

suspense ; and immortal being, so far as we can discern, undeserv-

ing of a wish.

In such a situation of things, what encouragement would remain

for prayer ? The humble and faithful suppliant, coming to God

with a firm belief , that he is , and that he is the Rewarder of them

that diligently seek him, might find the manner of his praying, the

spirit with which he prayed, and his prayers themselves, unaccept-

able and odious . The things heretofore most proper to be urged,

might hereafter be the least proper. The considerations, which

once ensured success, might at another time ensure rejection.

The prime, the only, motives to prayer would, therefore, be taken

away.

In the same manner the whole use of this duty, as it is intended

to affect advantageously the character of the suppliant, would be

IMMUTABILITY OF GOD .

SER. V.] 139

finally removed. The great use of prayer, in this view, is to esta-

blish in the heart a humble dependence on God, and a firm confi-

dence in him . Confidence, as I have already observed, would, in

the case supposed, be shaken and destroyed : and, without confi-

dence, dependence would possess neither use nor worth. In the

present state of things, these attributes constitute the proper, and

the only proper, temper of the soul for the reception of blessings ;

the spirit which is eminently beautiful and lovely in the sight of

God, and which is accordingly chosen by him as the proper object

ofhis unchangeable favour. In the case supposed, these attributes

could not be united ; because Confidence could not exist : since

the mind could not but perceive, that a changing God might, and

probably would, in the infinite progress of things, become the sub-

ject of infinite change. If , therefore, it could feel satisfied, or safe,

for a hundred or a thousand years, it would still rationally fear,

that at some unknown and more distant period of Eternity, the or-

der of all things would be inverted ; and its former obedience and

former prayers rise up at this dreaded season in the character of

crimes, and prove the cause of its future suffering. Dependence,

therefore, existing solitarily, would degenerate into anxiety and

alarm; and, instead of being the means of union between the soul

and its Maker, would become a wall of dreadful separation .

The Immutability of God has often, but erroneously, been ima-

gined to involve Inexorability in his character. The Scriptural

Account of this great Being is, on the contrary, that he is immuta-

bly exorable ; or, in other words, that he is immutably disposed to

hear and answer Prayer. His own words are, Every one that ask-

eth receiveth ; and he that seeketh findeth ; and to him that knocketh

it shall be opened. This and this only, is his true character, agree-

ably to which the system of his dispensations is immutably esta-

blished. In this system, infinite encouragement is holden out to

every suppliant, and to every faithful Prayer. Here the petitioner

knows, that what is once acceptable to God will always be accept-

able ; and that the things, which he has once required, he will re-

quire for ever. His faith, therefore, is built on the Rock of Ages ;

and, with whatever violence the rains may descend, the winds

drive, or the floods beat, their rage and fury will assault him in

vain.

SERMON VI.

OMNIPRESENCE AND OMNISCIENCE OF GOD.

PSALM CXXXIX . 1-12 .... O Lord, thou hast searched me and known me . Thou know-

est my down- silting, and my up -rising ; thou understandest my thought afar off.

Thou compassest my path, and my lying down ; and art acquainted with all my

ways. For there is not a word on my tongue, but , lo , O Lord, thou knowest it alto-

gether . Thou hast beset me behind and before, and laid thine hand upon me. Such

knowledge is too wonderful for me; it is high ; I cannot attain unto it. Whither

shall I go from thy Spirit ? or whither shall I flee from thy presence ? If I ascend

up into heaven , thou art there ; if I make my bed in hell, behold thou art there . If

Itake the wings of the morning, and dwell in the uttermost parts ofthe sea ; Even

there shall thy hand lead me, and thy right hand shall hold me. If I say, Surely

the darkness shall cover me ; even the night shall be light about me. Yea, the dark-

ness hideth not from thee ; but the night shineth as the day : the darkness and the

light are both alike to thee.

IN my last discourse, I considered the Eternity and Immutabi-

lity ofGod . As motivity, or active power, the power by which all

motion and action are originated, cannot be conceived to reside

in any other than an intelligent being ; the Knowledge of Godbe-

comes naturally the next subject of investigation. As his Presence

is most intimately connected with his Knowledge; it will be ad-

vantageously united with it in a discourse of this nature. Accord-

ingly these attributes are frequently joined together by the divine

writers.

In the text, the Knowledge and Presence of God, usually termed,

from their extent, his Omniscience and Omnipresence, are in the

fullest manner declared. The Psalm, of which the text is a part,

is one of the most remarkable Poetical compositions, ever seen in

this World ; and, did the time permit, would richly repay the la-

bour of an extensive, critical investigation. In comparison with it ,

the most admired odes of heathen antiquity are the mere effusions

of children.

My audience cannot but have observed, that the manner, in

which these perfections are attributed to God, is not that of plain,

logical discussion. The subject is assumed as a thing granted and

acknowledged; as a thing equally removed beyond debate and

doubt. The writer, animated with the most enthusiastic ardour,

ofwhich a sublime imagination is capable, seizes these great themes

ofhis attention ; and, amid his enraptured contemplation of them,

pours out a succession of the boldest and loftiest conceptions, that

were ever uttered concerning these subjects. Himself , his thoughts,

his words, his actions, he declares, with a mixture of awe and ex-

ultation, to be all perfectly known to God. From this knowledge,

he at the same time informs us, there is no possible escape. Should

he ascend into Heaven, or make his bed in Hell; should he, borne

OMNISCIENCE OF GOD.

SER. VI . ] 141

on the sun-beams, hurry, with their celerity, into the distant re-

gions of the West ; still God would be present in all these and all

other places alike. Were he still further to place his hope of a

secure retreat in the darkness of night ; he perceives the night to

shine in the presence of God as the day, and the darkness and the

light to be both alike unto him .

With these views of the Psalmist, those of every other divine

writer on this subject exactly conspire ; and all, with a single

voice, attribute these perfections to Jehovah. Thus Jeremiah,

xxiii . 23, 24 : Am Ia God at hand, saith the Lord, and not a God

afar off?

Can any hide himself in secret places , that I shall not see him ?

Do not Ifill heaven and earth, saith the Lord ?

The heaven and the heaven of heavens cannot contain thee. Great

is the Lord, his understanding is infinite .

In accordance with this doctrine only, is all our obedience, par-

ticularly our worship, prescribed in the Scriptures. We worship

and obey God every where ; and are commanded thus to do; be-

cause God is every where present, to see, and know, and accept

our services, to protect our persons, and to supply our wants. It

ought to be here observed, that these attributes are directly ascribed

to all the persons of the Trinity. Thus CHRIST says of himself ,

Where two or three are gathered together in my name, there I am in

the midst of them. Again, Lo, I am with you alway, even unto the

end of the world. Peter says to him, John xxi. 17, Lord, thou

knowest all things . Christ says of himself , And all the churches

shall know , that Iam he, who searcheth the reins and the hearts,

Rev. ii. 23. And again, Mat. xi. 27, No one knoweth the Son, but

the Father, neither knoweth any one the Father, save the Son, and he ,

to whomsoever the Son will reveal him .

The Omnipresence of the Spirit of Grace is emphatically asserted

inthe question, contained in the seventh verse of the text ; Whither

shall I go from thy Spirit ? especially, as connected with the an-

swers following . The Spirit of Glory and of God resteth upon you,

that is, Christians universally, saith St. Peter, 1 Epist. iv. 14. Your

body, saith St. Paul to Christians, is the temple of the Holy Ghost,

1 Cor. vi. 19; and, The Spirit searcheth all things, even the deep

things of God, 1 Cor. ii . 10.

These attributes of God are also demonstrated, and holden out

continually to our inspection, by Reason and Experience .

In every part of the Universe, to which we turn our eyes, we

discern in the inanimate, animated, and intelligent, worlds, most

evident proofs of an agency, which it is impossible rationally to

attribute to any other being but God. In the motions and powers

of the Elements ; in the growth, structure, and qualities, of Vege-

tables and Animals ; and in the thoughts, volitions, and actions, of

Minds, we perceive a casual influence, and efficiency, totally dis-

tinguished from every other ; as distant from that of man, as the

OMNIPRESENCE AND

142 [SER. VI.

agency of man from the movements of an Atom. This character

is never mistaken by Savages ; nor even by children, when once

informed of the character of God.

This agency is conspicuous in all places, at all times, and in

all things ; and is seen in the Earth, the Ocean, the Air, and the

Heavens, alike. Equally evident is it in the splendour and life-

giving influences of the Sun; in the motions, order, and harmony,

ofthe Planetary system ; and in the light and beauty of the Stars ;

as in the preservation, direction, and control, of terrestrial things .

No agent can act where he is not. As, therefore, God acts

every where ; he is every where present. In this agency, contri-

vance and skill, to which no limits can be set, are every where

manifested: it is of course, equally, and unanswerably, a proof of

the Omniscience of God.

This attribute of God is also inferred, with absolute certainty,

from his Omnipresence. As God exists every where, so he is in all

places the same God; all eye ; all ear ; all intellect. Hence it is

impossible, that he should not know every thing, in every place,

and at every time.

Again: all things are derived from God; and received their na-

ture, attributes , and operations, from his contrivance, as well as

from his power. All things were, therefore, known to him, ante-

cedently to their existence. Nor are possible things less perfectly

known to him, than those which are actual. Nothing is possible,

but what he can bring to pass ; and whatever he can bring to pass

he cannot but know.

REMARKS

1st. How majestic, awful, and glorious , a manifestation of God

is furnished to us by this passage of Scripture, thus considered !

We are here taught, that God is essentially present to all places,

and to all beings. We are taught, that he is equally at hand, and

afar off; that he is equally present in this world, and in the hea-

vens ; that he dwells alike throughout the universe of being, and

the uninhabited regions of Immensity. In all places, also, he is

JEHOVAH ; the same God; possessing the same attributes ; and

operating with the same wonderful agency. From the same pas-

sage we also learn, irresistibly, that he comprehends, at the same

moment of time, and with the same intuitive survey, every thing

possible and actual ; that Eternity past and future is perfectly

present to his eye ; and that no distance of place, or duration, can

be any thing to him ; that no retreat can conceal, and no darkness

cover, any being, or event, from his sight. The mind of man is

here exhibited as equally open to his view with the body ; the

thoughts and affections, as the words and actions ; Hell, as equally

naked and present to him, as Heaven ; and the destroyer, and the

Seraph, as alike without a covering. It is indubitably certain,

therefore, that he is able to attend, and actually attends, to all

OMNISCIENCE OF GOD.

SER. VI.] 143

things at the same moment ; to the motions of a seed, or a leaf, or

an atom ; to the creepings of a worm, the flutterings of an insect,

and the journeys of a mite ; to the excursions of the human mind,

and the efforts of an Archangel ; to the progress of a world, and

the revolutions of a System .

2dly. How necessary are these attributes to the government of all

things . This interesting article may be advantageously illustrated in the

following particulars. In the

First place, God is eminently qualified by these attributes for the

preservation of all things .

The Universe is a work of stupendous greatness ; composed of

worlds innumerable by us ; and inhabited by beings, still more

emphatically surpassing number. The characters, and kinds, of

these beings, are incomprehensibly various ; and their circum-

stances , beyond measure, more various . As these are hourly ex-

isting, and advancing in an endless progress, they demand a pro-

vidence minute, comprehensive, and enduring without a limit.

Every one of these is, also, a part of one immense whole. Each

has its station allotted to it ; the part which is to act, the duties

which it is to perform, and the purposes to which it is intended to

be subservient ; together with powers, and circumstances, suited

to the accomplishment of them. Should one being fail of fulfilling

its appointed end ; a chasm, a defect, would of course be found in

the System, which could not be remedied. No finite measure can

correctly determine the importance and danger of such a defect,

however minute it may seem to a created understanding. Even

the improper fall of a leaf , nay, the improper position of an atom ,

may, for ought that appears, be followed by consequences injuri-

ous, in the course of Eternity, both to the character ofthe Creator

and the good of his creatures. The motions of a fly are capable

of terminating the most important human life, or of changing all

the future designs of a man, and altering the character, circum-

stances, and destiny, of his descendants, throughout time and Eter-

nity. Such defects may, unless prevented by him, continually

take place in every part of his vast kingdom. It is, therefore, in-

dispensably necessary, that he should be present to every being,

at every moment, to perceive, and regulate, every event ; to further

every part of his infinite designs ; and to prevent every obstruction

and failure. An exact, unremitted attention, on his part, is neces-

sary to the greatest and to the least alike ; a knowledge intimate,

entire, and perfect, of all their relations, changes, and circum-

stances .

Of this attention, this consummate knowledge, the presence of

God is the real foundation. In consequence of his presence in all

places, he sees, that every thing is contained in its own proper

sphere of being, and action; and discerns every approach towards

exposure, and towards defect. Hence his great work is always ,

OMNIPRESENCE AND

144 [ SER. VI.

guarded, advanced , and prospered. In this world , his presence,

attention and knowledge, are indispensable, to renew, refine, and

strengthen in virtue, the souls of his children ; to guide them in the

path of duty ; to relieve their distresses ; to supply their wants ;

and to brighten their hopes of a blessed immortality.

Equally indispensable is it, to advance the general cause of truth

and righteousness ; to befriend his Church in all its interests ; to

prevent the gates of hell from prevailing against it ; to confine re-

bellion within the destined bounds ; and to inflict the proper judg-

ments on the works of iniquity. In a word, his presence is indis-

pensable here, to bring light out of darkness , order out of confusion,

and good out of evil.

In the world of punishment his presence is equally necessary, to

confine the prisoners of his wrath ; to render to every impenitent

sinner the reward due to his crimes ; to teach the abominable na-

ture, and the deplorable consequences, of sin ; and to show his

unchangeable hatred of iniquity .

In the various worlds, where virtue and happiness reside, he is

necessarily present, to inspire, invigorate, and quicken, the obedi-

ence of their inhabitants ; to distribute the innumerable and diver-

sified rewards, which he has annexed to obedience ; and cause to

arise and shine the endless varieties of beauty and loveliness, of

which that happy spirit is capable .

In Heaven, the brightest and best of those worlds, he is indis-

pensably present, to perfect that glorious system of virtue and hap-

piness, which he has ordained through the mediation of his Son,

and promised to all the Redeemed. There he has instituted a per-

fect scheme of dispensations, which is the consummation, and the

crown, of all his works. There every inhabitant receives, and

loves, and keeps, his own place, duties, and enjoyments ; and con-

secrates with all his heart, without weariness, and without end, his

exalted faculties, and immortal life, to the sublime purposes of glo-

rifying his Maker, and advancing the universal good. To this end ,

God there lives in every being, in a manner wholly peculiar ; and

diffuses a peculiarly quickening influence through every object.

Hence the River, which proceeds from his throne, is styled the Wa-

ter of Life ; and the trees,which grow on its banks, bearing twelve

manner offruits, are named Trees ofLife. The body he animates

with vigour, youth, and beauty, which cannot decay : the mind he

informs with a divine and supernal quickening, which empowers it

to advance without intermission, and with incomprehensible ce-

lerity , in knowledge, virtue, and enjoyment. In that world, God

unfolds himself in infinite diversities of beauty, glory, and majesty ;

enables them to see eye to eye, and to behold his face in righteous-

ness. In that world he exhibits, with clear and unalterable con-

viction , that the great work, which he has made, the system ofdis-

pensations, which he has chosen , is a perfect work ; a system of

perfect wisdom and goodness ; in which no real good is wanting,

OMNISCIENCE OF GOD.

SER . VI. ] 145

and into which nothing, which upon the whole is evil, is admitted.

Particularly, he manifests the transcendent wonders of forgiving,

redeeming, and sanctifying love ; and the supreme desirableness

of restoring, through the Redeemer, apostate sinners to the cha-

racter and privileges of the children of God. Here, also, he un-

folds in a perfect manner the inherent tendency of virtue to make

Intelligent minds wiser, better, and happier, for ever.

It is hardly necessary to remark, that, unless God were present

in heaven, all these divine purposes must necessarily fail of being

accomplished.

Secondly. The presence of God is equally indispensable, to sup-

ply the innumerable wants of his creatures .

In every other world, as well as in this, every creature is de-

pendent on God for life, and breath, and all things. Here, as we

well know, all creatures wait upon God, that they may receive their

supplies in due season . That which he giveth them they gather : he

openeth his hand, and satisfieth the wants of every living thing. He

hideth his face ; they die, and return to their dust. These wants

are endless in number, kind , and degree ; exist every moment in

every creature ; are natural and spiritual ; and respect alike both

time and Eternity. When God gives, creatures receive : when he

withholds, they are destitute. Where he is not, where he gives not,

there good is never found. But, if these wants are to be supplied,

they must be known ; and, to know them, he must be present.

Hence he must exist in every place, and in every being.

Thirdly. His presence is indispensable, that he may know the Mo-

ral Characters of his Intelligent creatures .

The actions of Intelligent beings are of a moral nature ; or, in

other words, deserving of praise or blame, reward or punishment.

These are originated in the soul ; and in the soul receive their

whole moral character. Hence, in order to know the true nature

ofthe conduct of such beings, God must continually reside in every

soul, to discern the rising motives, the commencing affections, and

the infant designs ; to trace them through their progress, and to

witness their completion. In this manner he searches the hearts,

and tries the reins; and discerns, intuitively, the moral nature of

all the conduct. All words he is present to hear, and all actions

to behold. In this manner is he perfectly qualified to perform

those great acts of governing the universe, and judging, and re-

warding, his Intelligent creatures, according to their works .

3dly. From the Omniscience and Omnipresence of God it is evi-

dent, that all things must come to pass either by his choice, or per-

mission.

As God is thus ever present in all places, and to all things ; it is

impossible, that he should not know whatever comes to pass, or is

about to come to pass. But of every possible thing it is truly said,

that its existence is, upon the whole, either desirable or undesirable .

If it be desirable, or undesirable, God cannot but be perfectly ac-

VOL. I. 19

OMNIPRESENCE AND

146 [ SER. VI.

quainted with its true nature, in either case ; because he cannot

fail to see every thing as it is. If he sees any thing to be, upon

the whole, desirable ; it is impossible, that he should not choose its

existence ; if he sees it to be undesirable ; he cannot but choose

that it should not exist. If there is in the nature of things a foun-

dation, for preferring the existence of any thing to its non-exist-

ence ; he cannot fail to discern this fact, and choose accordingly,

that it should exist and thus, vice versa. Whatever he chooses

should not exist, cannot. Whatever he chooses should exist, must

exist of course .

The same things are equally true, of the time and place, modes

and circumstances, events and attributes, in connexion with which

beings exist, as of the beings themselves ; for there is nothing, be-

side his choice, which could originally give these, or any of them,

birth. If , for example, it has appeared to him good to endue crea-

tures, in any case, with such powers, as constitute an efficiency

properly their own, and permit them afterwards to accomplish by

this efficiency whatever will result from the nature and tendency of

such powers ; then this will be the mode, in which such creatures

will exist, and act ; and in this manner all those things, which re-

sult from their existence and action, will take place. Should he, at

the same time, see it to be desirable, that himself should exert a

controlling, regulating, coinciding, or assisting, influence, with re-

gard to the agency of such beings ; then this influence will for the

same reason be exerted.

But, whatever be the manner, in which events are introduced

into existence, whether by his single, immediate agency, or by the

instrumentality of created beings, nothing can take place, which is

contrary to, or aside from, his choice, or permission : unless some-

thing can escape his knowledge, or overcome his power.

4thly. It is evident, from what has been said, that God attends to

every Individual being, and his concerns, as perfectly, as if there

were no other being .

Not a small number of men, and among them many Philoso-

phers, and, what is more strange, many professed Christians, have

believed, and taught, that God cannot be supposed to attend to the

concerns of Individuals ; but that he regards only the greater af-

fairs of empires, worlds, and systems .

This opinion springs, not improbably, from three sources : first,

Want of examination : secondly, an apprehension, that it is beneath

the dignity of Godto regard things of such minuteness : thirdly , a

dread in the mind of such attention, on the part of God, to its own

concerns , because they will not bear divine inspection .

The first and third of these articles need no comment. The

second appears to have arisen from the strong propensity in man

to think God almost, if not altogether, such an one as himself; and

is fraught with the rankest absurdities. Ifit is beneath the dignity

of the Godhead to regard individuals ; how much more was it be

OMNISCIENCE OF GOD.

SER. VI.] 147

neath his dignity to make them ? The end, for which they were

made, is unquestionably more important than themselves, who were

only means to it ; and claims proportionally a higher regard. In-

dividuals also compose empires, and worlds, and systems. If , then .

God do not attend to the concerns of individuals, he must cease of

course to attend to those of empires, worlds, and systems ; since

the affairs of these great collections of rational beings are only ag-

gregates, made up of the affairs of individuals .

The concerns of one individual often constitute the hinge, on

which all the great concerns of empires are turned . Thus the

concerns of Cyrus, Alexander, and Cæsar, changed in a great mea-

sure the situation of those states, of which they were sovereigns ;

and put a new face on a great part of the habitable world. Even

the conduct of Ravillac, altered in a great measure the state, not

only of France, but of Europe. Nay, from an early period of their

Republic, the state of the whole Roman Empire, and consequently

of a great part of mankind down to the present day, was essen-

tially changed by the cackling of a goose.

Again; God created all individuals for certain ends, in themselves

good and desirable, and of course designed by him to be accom-

plished. But these ends cannot be accomplished, unless his Pro-

vidence supply the powers and faculties, and regulate all the ac-

tions and events, necessary to their accomplishment ; and would,

therefore, be frustrated, were he not always present, and always

attentive to them, for these purposes .

Every individual, also, is a part, and exactly a desirable, proper,

and necessary part, of the great work, which Godhas begun. If

then one should fail, the whole would be disordered ; and conse-

quences would be produced , the extent, and mischiefs ofwhich, no

mind, less than infinite, could comprehend.

Each of these arguments refutes this doctrine. But we need not

recur to them, or to any of them, for this refutation. The nature

of God proves the doctrine to be false. He is every where pre-

sent ; and is all eye, all ear, all consciousness. Ofcourse he can-

not but attend to every thing, and know every thing. This is es-

sentially, and unchangeably, his character. He can no more fail

of regarding an insect, than an angel ; an atom, than a world. As

we, when our ears are open, cannot but hear; when our eyes are

open, cannot but see ; when our minds are directed to any object,

cannot but perceive ; so God, who is all mind, all perception, can-

not but perceive allthings. Among all things he cannot but per-

ceive whatever is preferable, or upon the whole desirable, in the

least, as well as in the greatest ; and cannot, without denying his

nature, fail to choose its existence, rather than that, to which it is

thus preferable . The least, also, is as truly necessary and indis-

pensable to the whole, as the greatest ; and cannot, therefore, fail

to be chosen, and accomplished.

Besides, Experience unanswerably proves the doctrine which I

OMNIPRESENCE AND

148 [ SER . VI

have asserted. None but God can form, or preserve, direct, or re-

gulate, an atom, a leaf , a mite, or an insect, any more than an an-

gel, a world, or the Universe . We see his power, wisdom, presence,

and agency, in these least things, as truly, and as constantly, as in

the greatest; and so clearly discern it to be the agency of an infi-

nite hand, as to be incapable, when we open our eyes, of mistaking

it for any other. In perfect harmony with these observations, the

Scriptures declare, that God clothes the grass of the field ; conti-

nues the life, and directs the death of sparrows ; and numbers the hairs

of our heads . What employment can, according to the opinions of

those who contend against this doctrine, be less suitable than these,

to the dignity of God? Yet these, he has been pleased to declare,

are things, about which he is employed. The truth is, this universal

attention to the several parts of the Universe is infinitely glorious

to his character. To be able to attend to the infinite multitude of

beings and events, at the same, and at all times ; to render an

entire regard to the least, without lessening at all the attention due

to the greatest ; to be able to see, that every individual continues

in his proper place and circumstances, answering the proper end

ofhis being ; to secure in this manner the well-being of the whole ;

and to do all this without weariness , or confusion ; is to possess

the highest state of being, of dignity, and of glory.

5thly. From the above considerations , how solemn, how affecting,

does our own existence appear !

This use of the doctrines, contained in the text, is made parti-

cularly, and in the most illustrious manner, by David, throughout

the psalm, from which it is taken. It cannot, therefore, fail to be

profitably made by ourselves .

From the observations contained in the preceding part of this

discourse, it is evident, that we are, at all times, and in all places

and circumstances, surrounded by God. In our walks, amuse-

ments and business, at home and abroad, when we are asleep

and when we are awake, God is with us as really, and as evidently

as we are with each other. Every thought in our own minds, every

word on our tongues , every action of our hands, is perfectly naked

to his all- seeing eye. Of what amazing importance is it, then, that

these thoughts, words, and actions, be acceptable in his sight ; be

such, as we should be willing to have him witness ; such, as he

can approve, justify, and reward ! Those certainly are the only

wise, the only prudent, human beings, who continually remember

this great truth ; and who at all times, in their amusements as well

as in their serious business, say in their hearts, Thou God seest me.

No consideration is so solemn, so affecting, so useful, as this.

None possesses the same influence to restrain the hands, or the

heart, from sin ; to produce, preserve, or quicken, obedience ; or to

awaken, unceasingly, the most profitable attention of the soul to its

everlasting welfare, or its remembrance of that awful judgment,

where all its thoughts, words, and actions, will be displayed in the

OMNISCIENCE OF GOD.

SER. VI. ] 149

light of God's countenance, and become the reason, and the measure,

of its final reward.

On the contrary, how imprudent, how sottish, how delirious, is

the conduct of him, who habitually forgets the presence of God ; of

whom it is truly said that God is not in all his thoughts ; and who,

settled upon his lees , quietly persuades himself, that the Lord will not

do good, neither will the Lord do evil. This man has either negli-

gently, or intentionally, removed from his mind the chief source of

virtuous conduct, the well-spring of hope, the great security against

temptation, the prime preventive of sin. He is left unguarded,

therefore, in circumstances infinitely dangerous ; and voluntarily

exposes himself to evils of infinite magnitude. Compared with this

man, the prodigal, who causelessly squanders a throne and an em-

pire, is a miser ; and the soldier, who, when the enemy surrounds the

citadel, sleeps at his post, is a faithful watchman.

6thly. Let every sinner remember, that God is present at the com-

mission of all his crimes .

When thoughts of rebellion, profaneness, and ingratitude, arise

inthe soul ; when thoughts of pride, envy, malice, deceit, injustice,

and cruelty deform ; and when thoughts of intemperance, levity,

and lewdness, debase it ; then God is in the polluted , guilty mind,

searching its secret chambers, and laying open to the full sunshine

all the hiding places of iniquity.

When the sinners, who are in this house, rise up in rebellion

against their Maker ; when you murmur against his government,

lay your sins to his charge, impeach his justice, mercy, and truth,

and wish that he were to exist and rule no more : When you form

impure, unjust, and fraudulent designs ; proceed to actions of vio-

lence and cruelty ; and become stout-hearted, and therefore emi-

nently far from righteousness : when you devise false doctrines

and systems, to lead yourselves, and others, astray ; deceive your-

selves, with arguments formed to justify sin, and flatter conscience

into quiet and security : when you oppose the truth of God; dis-

honour his name ; revile his Son ; grieve his Spirit ; and profane

his Sabbath and Sanctuary, his commands and ordinances : when

finally, you ensnare, pollute, and destroy, others as well as your-

selves, by carrying all your evil designs into a guilty and dreadful

execution : then, however you may imagine yourselves concealed

by the shades of solitude, or the curtains of midnight, from the

view of every eye, God is present, sees, hears, and takes an ac-

count of all your thoughts, words, and actions. Then His eye, as

aflame of fire, lights up a clear and searching day in your souls,

and around your steps ; and shows in sun-beams the iniquities,

which you devise, utter, and perpėtrate.

7thly. Let every Child of God remember, also, that his Creator is

equally present with all his conduct.

The Christian may be in his own view ; he maybe in fact ; poor,

ignorant, little, and insignificant. When he reviews himself he

OMNIPRESENCE AND

150 [ SER. VI.

may not unnaturally exclaim, Iam a worm, and no man : when he

reviews his services, he may pronounce them too worthless to be

remembered of God: when he reviews his sins, he may believe

them so great, as to cut him off from every reasonable hope of a

share in the divine attention. But, notwithstanding his insignifi-

cance, fears , and doubts, he is not forgotten here ; and will not be

forgotten in the day, when God makes up his jewels. The tears,

which he has shed ; the prayers, which he has offered up ; the two

mites, which he has consecrated to God; the cup of cold water,

which he has given to a fellow disciple ; were neither unnoticed nor

unregarded. God was present, when each act of humble and sin-

cere obedience was performed ; marked it with his eye ; recorded

it in his book ; and will acknowledge it at the final day.

From this constant, kind, and merciful regard of his Maker, no

situation, no circumstances, will preclude him, even for a moment.

However lowly, however solitary, however forgotten of mankind,

his course through life may be ; himself and his interests, his wants

and his woes, are tenderly, as well as continually, regarded by his

God.

In seasons of sorrow, of sickness , bereavement, or desertion ;

when he has lost his parents, or his children ; or is forsaken by his

former friends and companions : when the world begins to seem

to him a desert, and life to be a burden : God is then at hand, his

Father, and everlasting Friend ; and will be better to him than sons

and daughters . The Physician of the body, as well as of the soul,

will administer healing to his diseased frame ; pour the balm of

consolation into his wounded spirit ; and enable him to say, Why

art thou cast down, O my soul ! and why art thou disquieted within

me ? Hope thou in God ; for Ishall yet praise him, who is the health

of my countenance, and my God.

When those around him become hostile to his character, and to

his religion; when he himself is hated, despised, and persecuted :

when for help he looks through the world in vain, and is ready to

sink in the gulf of despair: let him remember, that God has been

present, to behold all his sufferings ; and will effectually guard him

from every fatal evil. He may indeed be persecuted, but he will

not be forsaken ; he may be cast down, but he will not be destroyed.

Let him also remember, that his afflictions , though they may seem

heavy, are but for a moment, and are, therefore, really light ; and

that they will workfor him an exceeding and eternal weight ofglory.

In seasons of temptation , when his resolution to resist , his forti-

tude to endure, his patience to suffer , his wisdom to devise means

of escape, and his diligence and faithfulness to use them, fail and de-

cline : or even when, immersed in sloth and security, he ceases to

watch over himself , and to guard against impending evil : God still

is present, to supply all his wants ; to renew his vigour ; to support

his yielding constancy ; to awaken in him new vigilance ; to quicken

in him a contrite sense of his backsliding ; to deliver him from the

1

OMNISCIENCE OF GOD

SER. VI.] 151

unequal contest ; and to bless him with returning hope, peace, and

safety.

Whenself - confidence, self-flattery, and self -righteousness, inflate ,

deform, and betray him, when no Christian friend is near, to know,

to pity, or to rescue him : God, even then, is present, to humble, to

guide, and to restore him and to enable him to find a safe path

over the otherwise insurmountable obstacles to his continuance in

the way of life .

Does he, with other humble followers of the Redeemer, mourn

in Zion the hidings of God's face, his own backslidings, or the de-

pression and sufferings of his fellow -christians ; and feel, as if both

himself and the Church were deserted and forgotten ? Let him re-

member, that, although his heavenly Father hath smitten him for

his sins with a rod, and for his iniquities with stripes ; yet his cove-

nant he will not take away, nor forget his mercy ; that the walls of

Zion are continually before him ; and that she is graven on the palms

of his hands ; that, although a woman mayforget her sucking child,

that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb ; yet will

her Redeemer not forget his Church ; and that He will keep her in

the hollow of his hand, and preserve her as the apple of his eye.

Let him remember , that JEHOVAH will soon lift upon him, and his

fellow - saints , the light of his countenance ; and will soon appoint,

unto them all, beauty for ashes, the oil ofjoy for mourning, and the

garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness .

Ishe come to a dying bed ? Is Eternity, with all its amazing

scenes, beginning to be unveiled? Is his final trial ready to com-

mence ? Is his account even now to be given ; his sentence to be

pronounced ; and his endless allotment to be fixed ? Behold on the

throne of Judgment that glorious person, who has promised, that

he will never leave him, norforsake him. He is the Judge, by whom

he is to be tried ; the Rewarder, by whom his destiny is to be fixed

for ever. This divine Redeemer will now remember him as one of

those, for whom he died ; as one of those, for whom he has made

unceasing intercession before the throne of the Majesty in the Hea-

vens .

8thly. What an affecting and amazing display will be made of the

Omniscience of God , at the last Judgment !

Onthis solemn day, all mankind will be judged according to the

deeds done in the body. That these may be the foundation of the

righteous judgment of God, it is indispensable, that they should be

known clearly and certainly : the sins, together with all their ag-

gravations and palliations ; the virtues, with all their diminutions

and enhancements. To the same end it is equally necessary, that

the system of retribution should also be perfectly comprehended ;

so that every administration of reward, both to the righteous and

the wicked, should, throughout Eternity, be measured out to each

individual exactly as his whole character demands. Of course,

the knowledge, which will here be indispensable, will be a perfect

OMNIPRESENCE &c .

152 [ SER. VI.

comprehension of this system, together with all the moral conduct,

andall the circumstances, of the innumerable beings, who will be

judged. The display of this knowledge, it is evident, will be the

greatest display announced by the Scriptures, and infinitely greater

than any other, conceivable by the human mind. This display will

be, also, far more affecting than any other for on it will depend

all the immortal concerns of the innumerable children of Adam.

Yet such a display will certainly be made, to such an extent, as to

exhibit God in the character of an upright judge, an impartial dis-

penser of good and evil to his creatures ; as to stop every mouth,

and force every heart to confess, that he is just when he judgeth,

and clear when he condemneth .

What manifestations of the human character will then be made !

How different will be the appearance, which pride, ambition, and

avarice, sloth , lust, and intemperance, will wear in the sight of God,

in the sight of the assembled universe, and in the sight of those,

who have yielded themselves up to these evil passions, from that,

which they have customarily worn in the present world. How low

will the haughty man be bowed down ! How will the splendour of

power and conquest set in darkness! How will the golden moun-

tains of opulence melt away, and leave the dreaming possessor

poor, and naked, and miserable, and in want of all things . How

will the sensualist awake out of his momentary vision of pleasure,

and find it all changed to vanity and vexation of spirit ! How little,

in innumerable instances, will the worldly great then appear ! How

contemptible the renowned ! How weak the powerful! How fool-

ish the wise men, and disputers, of this world ! On the contrary,

with what confidence and joy will the poor, despised, humble Chris-

tian lift up his head, and take his proper place in the great scale of

being, because he beholds his redemption arrived ! Here, first,

his character will be openly acknowledged, and his worth confess-

ed. Last in the present world, he will be numbered among the

first in the world to come. A feeble, faded, half extinguished lamp

on this side of the grave, he will shine forth as the sun in the king-

dom of his Father.

How differently will our own characters appear from what we

imagine them to be, during our present life. Here most of our sins

are forgotten ; there they are all recorded in the book of God's

remembrance. Here vast multitudes of them are concealed ; there

they will all be displayed in the open day. Here they are often

mistaken by self -flattery for virtues ; there they will be irresistibly

seen in all their native deformity. How delightful will it then be

to find, that they have been blotted out by the divine mercy as a

thick cloud ; that they have been expiated by the blood of the Re-

deemer ! What a consolation, what transport, will it be to find, that,

numerous and great as our iniquities have been, yet our whole cha-

racter was such in the eye of the heart-searching God, as to enti-

tle us, through the merits of Christ, to a reward of endless life and

glory!

SERMON VII.

OMNIPOTENCE AND INDEPENDENCE OF GOD .

GENESIS Xvii. 1. -I am the Almighty God.

IN my last discourse, I considered the Omnipresence and Omni-

science of God. The next subject in the natural order of discus-

sion is his Almighty Power.

In the text, this attribute is asserted directly by God himself to

Abraham, when he renewed with him the covenant of grace, and

instituted the sacrament of circumcision. In a manner equally ex-

plicit, are similar declarations made throughout every part of the

Scriptures .

The Omnipotence of God is, also, easily demonstrated by Rea-

son ; so easily, that no divine attribute has, perhaps, been so strongly

realized, or generally acknowledged. So general is this acknow-

ledgment, that a sober attempt to persuade a Christian audience of

the truth of this doctrine, would be scarcely considered as serious,

or as compatible with the dictates of good sense. An attempt to

impress this doctrine on the mind is not, however, liable to the same

objections , nor indeed to any objection. It cannot but be a pro-

fitable employment to examine, briefly, several things, in which

we find the most striking displays of this perfection. To such an

examination I shall, therefore, proceed ; and observe,

I. That the power of God is gloriously manifested in the work of

Creation.

Creation may be defined, the production of existence where

nothing was before. The power, displayed in the act of creating,

not only exceeds all finite comprehension, but is plainly so great,

as to exclude every rational limitation. It is impossible to believe,

that the power, which originally gives existence, cannot do any

thing, and every thing, which in its own nature is capable of being

done; or, in other words, every thing, the doing of which involves

not a contradiction. When we contemplate creative power; we

neither attempt, nor pretend, to form any estimate of its extent ;

but are lost in wonder and amazement at the character of him, who

gives being wherever he pleases .

On the simple act of creating, however, it is not easy for such

minds, as ours, to dwell. Asingle glance of the mind makes us

possessed of all, which we know concerning this effort of Omnipo-

tence, as it is in itself . But there are several things, relative to the

effects which it produces, capable of mightily enhancing our ideas

concerning this astonishing exertion of power. Ofthis nature is,

inthe

VOL. I. 20

OMNIPOTENCE AND

154 [ SER. VII.

1st. place, The vastness and multitude of the things which were

created.

The world, which we inhabit, is itself a vast and amazing work.

The great divisions of Land and Water; the Continents and Oceans,

into which it is distributed ; nay, the Mountains and Plains, the

Lakes and Rivers, with which it is magnificently adorned ; are,

severally, sufficiently wonderful and affecting to fill our minds, and

to engross all the power of Contemplation. Nor are our thoughts

less deeply interested by the vast multitude of plants, trees, and

animals, with which every part of the Globe is stored at every

period of time. All these, also, rise and fall in an uninterrupted

succession . When one perishes, another immediately succeeds.

No blank is permitted, and no vacuity found : but creating energy,

always operating, produces a continual renovation of that which is

lost.

When we lift up our eyes to the Heavens, we are still more

amazed at the sight ofmany such worlds, composing the planetary

system . The Comets, which surround our Sun, greatly increase

our amazement by their numbers, the velocity of their motions, and

the inconceivable extent of their circuits . It is still more enhanced

by the union of these numerous worlds in one vast system, con-

nected by a common centre, and revolving round that centre with

a harmony, and splendour, worthy of a God.

But this system, great and wonderful as it is, is a mere speck,

compared with the real extent of the Creation. Satisfactory evi-

dence exists, that every star, which twinkles in the firmament, is no

other than a Sun, a world of light, surrounded by its own attendant

planets, formed into a system similar to ours . Forty -five thousand

such stars have been counted, by the aid of the Herschellian Tele-

scope, in so small a part of the Heavens, that, supposing this part to

be sown no thicker than the rest, the same Telescope would reach at

least seventy-five millions in the whole sphere. By means of new

improvements in the same optical instrument, they have been found

to be numerous to a degree still more astonishing. Every one of

these is, in my view, rationally concluded to be the Sun, and Centre,

of a system of planetary and cometary worlds. Beyond this, I

think it not at all improbable, that, were we transported to the

most distant of the visible stars , we should find there a firmament

expanding over our heads, studded in the same manner with stars

innumerable. Nay, were we to repeat the same flight, and be

again wafted through the same distance, it is not improbable, that

we should behold a new repetition of the same sublimity and glory.

In this manner immensity appears, in a sense, to be peopled with.

worlds innumerable, constituting the boundless empire of Jehovah .

How amazing, then, must be the power and greatness of Him, who

not only telleth the number of the stars , and calleth them all by their

names, but with a word spoke them all into being.

2dly. The peculiar nature and splendour of many of these works

strongly impress on our minds the greatness of creating power .

INDEPENDENCE OF GOD.

SER. VII. ] 155

Of this nature are all those vast works in the Heavens, which I

have mentioned under the last head. To single out one of them ;

how glorious a work is the Sun ! Of what astonishing dimensions !

Of what wonderful attraction ! Possessed of what supreme, un-

changeable, and apparently immortal glory ! Of what perpetual,

and incomprehensible influence on the world, which we inhabit :

not only causing it to move around its orbit with inconceivable

rapidity, but producing, over its extensive surface, warmth and

beauty, life and activity, comfort and joy, in all the millions of be-

ings, by which it is inhabited !

Magnificent, however, as this object is, one mind is a more wonder-

ful, more important, more illustrious display of creating power, than

the whole inanimate universe. Suns with all their greatness and

glory are still without life, without consciousness, without enjoyment ;

incapable, in themselves, of action, knowledge, virtue, or voluntary

usefulness. A mind, on the contrary, is possessed of all these

exalted powers, and is capable of possessing all these sublime at-

tributes. Amind can know, love, and glorify, its Creator ; can be

instamped with his image, and adorned with his beauty and loveli-

ness ; and can appear desirable and delightful to his eye. It can

reflect , as a mirror, the glory of the Lord, ( for so ought the passage *

to be translated) and be changed into the same image, from glory to

glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord. It can love, and bless, its fel-

low- minds ; be loved, and blessed, by them ; and become an useful

and honourable instrument of advancing endlessly the universal

good of the intelligent kingdom. In all these glorious attainments

it can advance with an unceasing progress throughout Eternity.

In this progress, it can rise to the heights, where angels now dwell ;

and, passing those heights, can ascend higher, and higher, till , in

the distant ages of endless being, it shall look down on the most

exalted created excellence, which now exists, as the mere dawn-

ings of infantine intelligence. Worlds and Suns were created for

the use of minds ; but minds were created for the use of God.

3dly. The same impressions are strongly made, when we regard

God as the Author of life .

The communication of life is a creative act, entirely, and illus-

triously, superior to the mere communication of existence. In the

wonderful power, manifested in this communication, the glory of

God, in the character of the Creator, is pre-eminently displayed.

Accordingly the living God, and the living Father ; that is, the God,

who has life, originally, and independently, in himself , and is the

source of it to all living beings ; are titles, chosen to unfold espe-

cially the glory of the Divine nature. In the same manner, also,

our Saviour challenges this wonderful attribute to himself , as a

direct and unquestionable proof of his divinity. As the Father ,

saith he, hath life in himself , so hath he given to the Son to have life

in himself. As the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth ; even

2 Cor. iii . 18.

OMNIPOTENCE AND

156 [SER. VII .

so the Son quickeneth whom he will. In the same manner, it is else-

where said, It is the Spirit, that quickeneth .

The possession of life confers on every thing, which is the sub-

ject of it, a distinction, by which it is raised at once above all in-

animate matter. Even Vegetables, of which life is predicated in a

figurative sense only, derive from it a total superiority to all those

beings, which are found in the mineral Kingdom. Animal life,

which is life in its humblest degree, raises the being, in whom it

exists, totally above all those things, which are not animated, by

making them, at once, objects on which the emotions of the soul

may be employed, and subjects of pleasure or pain, happiness or

misery. Of these great distinctions, every one knows, no part of

the mineral or vegetable world is susceptible.

Rational life is an attribute, of importance and distinction far

higher still ; and is the most wonderful display of the divine ener-

gy, which the Universe contains. Indeed, it is in a sense the end,

for which all things else were created, and without which there is no

probability, that they would ever have been. In exact accordance

with the views, which I have expressed on this subject, we find a

peculiar attention rendered to it by God, in the creation of Man .

Other things had been called into being, antecedently to this event ;

and Man, as the most important of all terrestrial beings, and the

end, for which they were made, was reserved to be the closing

work. The World, his magnificent habitation, was finished, before

the Tenant was formed, by whom it was to be occupied. Then

God held a solemn consultation on this new and interesting work,

and said, Let us make man in our own image, after our likeness .

This consultation, holden by the Persons of the Godhead on the

subject of communicating rational life, plainly and affectingly de-

clares it to be a higher and more noble object of divine power, than

all those which had preceded. From this pre-eminent importance

it arises, that the termination of it, usually denominated annihila-

tion, is in the view of the mind, invested with intense gloom, and

the deepest horror ; and that immortality, or the endless continu-

ance of rational life , is an object always encircled with radiance,

and regarded with exultation and rapture .

4thly. The manner, in which the Scriptures exhibit the work of

Creation as being performed, most forcibly impresses on our minds

the greatness of Creating power .

The greatness of power is discerned not only in the magnitude

of the effects which it produces ; but in the ease, also, with which

they are produced. In this we are led rationally and indeed irre-

sistibly, to discern, that the whole of the power possessed is not

exerted; and that other and greater effects would, of course, spring

from superior efforts, of which the same power is obviously capa-

ble. When God created the Heavens and the Earth, he said, Let

there be light : Let there be a Firmament : Let the waters be gathered

into one place ; and Let the dry land appear. All these and other

INDEPENDENCE OF GOD.

SER. VII.] 157

similar commands were exactly, and instantaneously, obeyed. In

a moment, Light invested the world; the firmament arched abov

it ; the waters rolled backward into their bed ; the dry land heaved ;

and the mountains lifted their heads towards Heaven. The World

with all its furniture and inhabitants, the Heavens with all their

magnificence, arose out of nothing, at a command. How superior

to all finite comprehension must be the power of Him, who spake,

and this stupendous work was done .

II. The Omnipotence of God is divinely displayed in the Govern-

ment of all things .

The existence, and attributes, which God has given to all beings ,

He only can continue. He only holds together the innumerable

atoms, which compose the innumerable material forms, found in the

Universe; the plants and trees, the hills and mountains, the

rivers and oceans . His power is the only bond, by which worlds

are bound ; or by which they are united in the planetary systems.

This Union, this continuance of their being, is both an effect, and

a proof , of the same energy, from which they were all originally

derived. The same energy upholds all their attributes, and con-

ducts all their operations .

These beings are endless in their multitude, immensely distant

in times and places, wonderful,often, in their greatness and impor-

tance, and to finite minds innumerable in their diversities. All,

also, are parts of one vast and perfect whole ; to the perfection of

which, each, in its appointed place and time, is indispensably ne-

cessary. What a power must that be, which, at one and the same

moment, works in every vegetable and animal system in this great

world ; which upholds, quickens, and invigorates, every mind ;

which, at the same moment, also, acts in the same efficacious man-

ner in every part of the solar system, and of all the other systems

which compose the Universe ! What must be the power of Him,

who sends abroad, every moment, immense oceans of light from

the Sun, and innumerable such oceans from the Stars ; who holds

all worlds in the hollow of his hand, retains them exactly in their

places, and rolls them through the fields of Ether with unceasing,

most rapid, and at the same time perfectly harmonious motions ;

and who, thus accomplishing every purpose for which they were

made, prevents the least disturbance, error, or imperfection.

III. The Omnipotence of God is strongly impressed on our minds

by the consideration, that it is unaltered and undecaying .

These mighty exertions have been already made through many

thousand years : still they are perfectly made. They are made

without intermission, rest, or relaxation. From century to century

the energy operates night and day ; and operates now with the same

force and effect, as at the beginning. Every where it is seen ; and

is seen every where to be the same. It is, therefore, wholly un-

spent; and plainly incapable of being spent, or diminished.

In this wonderful fact is exhibited unanswerable proof of that

OMNIPOTENCE AND

158 [SER . VII .

sublime declaration of the Prophet : Hast thou not known, hast thou

not heard, that the Everlasting God, JEHOVAH, the Creator of the

ends of the Earth, fainteth not, neither is weary ?

REMARKS.

From this doctrine we learn, in the

1st. place, that God is absolutely independent.

By the absolute independence of God I intend, that he needs ,

and can need, nothing to render his ability, either to do, or to enjoy,

whatever he pleases, greater or more perfect ; but that he possesses,

in and of himself , all possible ability for both these purposes ; so

that his desires can never be opposed, nor his designs frustrated,

either from want of knowledge to discern, or power to accomplish,

whatever is desirable, or useful. The proof of this Independence

is complete, in the account which has been given of the Omnipre-

sence, Omniscience, and Omnipotence, of God. He, who contrived,

who created, and who governs, all things, can contrive, create, and

do, whatever involves not a contradiction. He must, therefore,

have all good in his power, and possession ; and can plainly

need, and receive, nothing. Every created thing he made, and gave

it just such attributes as he pleased. Every thing continues in ex-

istence for just such a time, and in just such a state, as he chooses ;

and operates in that manner only, which is prescribed, or permitted,

by him. Nothing therefore can do, or be, what is, on the whole,

contrary to his choice. Of course He cannot be disappointed of

any purpose, unless we were to suppose him pleased to be disap-

pointed ; a self - contradiction too manifest to be admitted even by

a child. According to this scheme he says of himself , My counsel

shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure. * And again, He doth ac-

cording to his will in the army of heaven, and among the Inhabitants

of the earth ; and none can stay his hand, or say unto him, What

doest thou ?

2dly. By this perfection, God is eminently qualified for the go-

vernment of all things . From what has already been said of the

manifestation of this divine attribute in the government of the uni-

verse, we cannot but perceive, that to this purpose the Omnipo-

tence of God is indispensable. The same power, which formed

this vast machine, is absolutely necessary to continue in their pro-

per places the several parts ; and to conduct the operations of the

whole to the ends, which they are destined to accomplish. By this

attribute only is God able to prevent all disorder and decay, and

to frustrate all opposition . Many of the Intelligent creatures, which

he has made, are possessed of such powers, as, ifuncontrolled by

him, might occasion important obstructions to the progress ofmany

parts of his great kingdom, and a consequent frustration, or pre-

vention, of many of his designs. The mischiefs and miseries.

See Isaiah xlvi. 10, and Dan. iv. 35 .

INDEPENDENCE OF GOD.

SER. VII . ] 159

which, in the course of Eternity, might be introduced into the Uni-

verse, might easily exceed all finite estimation. But to every one

of these beings He is able to say, and actually says, as he said, in

ancient times, to the restless ocean, Hitherto shalt thou come, but

no further.

In the same manner he is infinitely able, also, to furnish all

beings , animated and inanimate, rational and irrational, with that

energy, by which they operate to the unceasing promotion of the infi-

nite good, which he has begun to accomplish . The Kingdom of

God is a kingdom of means . With infinite wisdom and benignity

hehas chosen to adorn his Intelligent creatures with such faculties,

as enable them to become subordinate agents in the great system,

to coincide voluntarily with him in the furtherance of his perfect

designs; and thus to sustain the character of moral excellence,

and become lovely in his sight. Even the inanimate world, as a

passive instrument in his hands, and theirs, of promoting the same

designs, claims, in this manner, a species of inferior, but real, im-

portance, and shows forth the praise of its divine Author. But all

the powers and faculties, by which his creatures perform the re-

spective parts allotted to them, are continued, as well as given,

byhis Omnipotence, which in this manner is every where glorified ;

and is every where the Rock, on which is founded the great build-

ing of the Universe .

As God, by his Omniscience and Omnipotence, is possessed of

a complete sufficiency for the accomplishment of all his pleasure,

and thus rendered absolutely Independent ; it is evident, that he

must be infinitely removed from all fear, on the one hand, and from

all favouriteism, on the other. From the former of these conside-

rations it is certain, that he cannot in any degree be deterred from

the performance of any thing, which is right and good ; and

from the other, that he cannot possibly be allured to the produc-

tion of any thing which is wrong, or injurious to his creatures. To

him, who is raised above all actual and possible want, who can

do what he pleases, and has, therefore, every thing in his posses-

sion, unchangeably and eternally, there can be no private, partial

interest ; no conceivable prejudice ; no bias, no undue regard,

towards any being. His views, and his conduct, alike, must be

impartial ; public ; founded on the real state of things ; and direct-

edtowards all beings according to their proper character and real

desert. His creatures can plainly present no motive to Him to

depart from that course of conduct, which in His view is wise and

good. Here, then, in the character, and circumstances, of the

Deity, an immoveable foundation is laid for universal, perfect, and

glorious Rectitude .

From the Omnipotence of God, also, is derived that awful cha-

racter, regarded by sinful beings with supreme dread, and by vir-

tuous ones with supreme reverence. Intelligent beings are govern-

ed only by motives. In this attribute, especially as inseparably

OMNIPOTENCE AND

160 [ SER. VII.

connected with Omniscience, all such beings find most solemn and

cogent motives to fear that glorious and fearful name, JEHOVAH

their GOD ; to be terrified at the thought of sinning against him ; to

tremble at the effects of his anger ; and to abstain from rebellion

against his government. Here the Righteous find the strongest mo-

tives to resist temptation ; and the wicked, to return to their duty.

A powerless God, however lovely and excellent, could neither de-

fend his own honour, nor protect his creatures, however dutiful,

from injustice and ruin. To a Ruler of free agents, therefore,

Power is indispensable for the support of his own dignity, and the

safety and peace ofhis subjects. To the Ruler of all free agents,

Omnipotence is indispensable for the perfect establishment of his

infinite glory, and the obedience and consequent happiness of his

immense and eternal Kingdom.

3dly. How terrible an enemy to obstinate and impenitent sinners

is an Omnipotent God !

Ilove them that love me, and will cause them that love me to in-

herit substance ; I will render vengeance to mine enemies, and re-

ward them that hate me ; is language, completely descriptive of

the designs and dispensations of JEHOVAH, towards his rational

creatures. This is the only exhibition of the divine government in

the Scriptures : it is the only view, which can be satisfactorily

formed of that government by Reason. No man can, for a moment,

seriously believe, that God can love, and reward, those who hate

him ; or hate, and punish, those who love him. Such conduct would

be wholly inconsistent with the nature of an intelligent being ; and

cannot, therefore, be attributed to the Author of all intelligence.

Let me now bring this subject home to the heart of every mem-

ber of this audience. Let me ask, and let each individual solemnly

answer in his own mind, " Do you love God ? Do you desire to

please him ? Do you cheerfully obey his commandments ? Do you *

humbly and faithfully walk in his ordinances ? Or do you, with the

wicked of old, and of all succeeding ages, say unto God, Depart

from us , for we desire not the knowledge of thy ways ? What is the

Almighty, that we should serve him ; and what profit should we have

if we pray unto him ?

Call to mind, I beseech you, how many denunciations of future

vengeance against impenitent sinners are uttered in his Word. Re-

member, that all these were uttered by Him, with a perfect know-

ledge of the guilt of sin, and of the extent of the punishment which

it demands ; with a perfect conviction of the rectitude of his own

designs, and with an immoveable purpose to carry them into exe-

cution. How certain is it, then, that they will be exactly executed ;

and that the impious and the profligate, impenitent and the unbe-

lieving, will drink the dregs of divine indignation ! Consider in

how many forms of alarm these threatenings are delivered ; what

woes they contain; and what, that is terrible, they do not con-

tain! With these affecting things in view, remember that He, who

INDEPENDENCE OF GOD .

SER . VII.J 161

has denounced these woes, He, who will execute these denuncia-

tions, is the Almighty God. How fearfully able is such a God to

inflict every punishment, and to execute every threatening ! What

amazing sources of suffering are within the limits of his Omni-

science and Omnipotence ! How easily can he make every pore ,

faculty, and thought, the channel, and the seat, of inexpressible

anguish! Think, I beseech you, how utterly unable all other beings are to

deliver out of his hand. Who on Earth, or in Heaven, has an arm

like God, or can thunder with a voice like Him ? His hand can reach,

as His eye can pierce, " beyond all limit. " No caverns, no soli-

tudes, no depths of the earth or the ocean, can hide from Him the

miserable objects of his wrath. Should they ascend up into Hea-

ven ; He is there . Should they make their bed in hell ; behold,

he is there. Should they take the wings ofthe morning, and dwell

in the uttermost parts of the sea ; even there would his hand lead

them, and his right hand would hold them . Should they say,

Surely the darkness will cover us : even the night would be light

about them.

Let these most affecting things sink deep into your hearts. Re-

member, that you were made, and are preserved in life, health, and

comfort, in probation and hope, by the Almighty power of God;

and that on him you depend for every blessing present and future ,

for safety from every evil, and for final deliverance from every

danger. On his pleasure alone is your being suspended, and your

welfare. Of what importance, then, is it to every one of you, that

he should love you, and be pleased with you ; and, of course, that

you should love Him, and faithfully labour to please him ? Have

you ever brought this subject home to your hearts, and pondered

it with that solemnity, which its importance requires ? Has the

amazing interest, which you have in obtaining the favour of God,

been realized by you? Is it now a part ofyour plans for future life,

tobegin the great work of attaining his approbation at some ap-

proaching period ? Is this period fixed and known ? Are the terms

onwhich this immense possession may be gained, considered and

adopted, by you ? Have you remembered, that Christ is the

only true and living way to acceptance, with God ; and through

faith in his blood, alone, is found the justification of life ? Have you

remembered that he has said, To-day, if ye will hear my voice,

harden not your hearts ?

Areyou, on the other hand, prepared to encounter the exertions

ofthat power, which formed the earth and the heavens, when em.

ployed to inflict on you the terrible evils, threatened to all those

who displease him ? Have you devised , or can you devise, any

means of escape, or safety, in the day of visitation ; any means, to

which you dare trust your souls, and with which you dare launch

into eternity ? He has told you of one way, in which safety may

certainly be found, and which leads directly to Heaven. Do you

VOL. I. 21

162 [ SER . VII

ΟΜΝΙΡΟΤENCE AND

know any other, which terminates in that happy place, and will

conduct you to everlasting joy ?

4thly. How useful a Friend must such a God be to the Righteous .

That God is a faithful and steadfast friend to the righteous, can-

not be questioned; because they love, and labour, to please him,

and must therefore be loved of him ; and because they are the

friends and followers of his Son. Accordingly, he has disclosed in

his Word designs of mercy and goodness to them, so great, as al-

most to transcend belief , and to leave the mind rather lost in asto .

nishment than filled with expectation. He, who regards his own

character with the candour, and humility, of the Gospel ; who con-

siders how greatly and how often he has sinned, how guilty his life

must appear before God, and how utterly unworthy he is of the

least of all his mercies ; cannot but exclaim, when he casts his eye

over the promises of the Gospel, Who am I , O Lord God, that thou

hast brought me hitherto ? For thy word's sake, and according to

thine own heart, hast thou spoken all these great things to make thy

servant know them. Let thy name be magnified for ever : for now,

O Lord God, thou art God; and thy words be true ; and thou hast

promised this goodness unto thy servant ; and with thy blessing let

me be blessed for ever. *

Inthe Covenant of grace there are contained treasures of good,

to which no limit can be assigned. On this subject the Apostle

Paul , in comments ofunrivalled sublimity, has expressed the most

accurate, as well as the most exalted and astonishing, sentiments,

which can be found even in the Scriptures . All things , saith he to

Christians, are yours ; Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or the

world, or life, or death, or things present, or things to come ; all are

yours. And again, Iam persuaded, that neither death , nor life, nor

angels, nor principalities nor powers, nor things present, nor things

to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able

to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our

Lord . And again, We know, that all things dot labour together for

good to them that love God. From these declarations we learn,

that all things are the property, and the destined possession, of

the righteous ; that no being , or event, shall preclude them from

the enjoyment of this mighty inheritance ; but that , on the con-

trary, every being and every event is employed, with one vast and

united effort , to place this boundless good in their hands. What-

ever, therefore, is really needed by them; whatever is really good

for them, in the present life ; whatever can render their future im-

mortality blessed and glorious, God has covenanted to bestow on

them through the mediation of Christ.

Whenhe, who can truly say to Corruption, " Thou art myfather,"

and to the Worm, " Thou art my mother, and my sister , " turns his

eye to these wonderful promises, and to the immense assemblage

2 Samuel vii. † συνεργει .

SER . VII . ] INDEPENDENCE OF GOD .

163

of blessings, which they convey ; he is naturally lost in amaze-

ment, and prepared to believe them, only in a loose and general

manner. Scarcely can he persuade himself , that they are not the

language of bold and sublime exaggerations, of ardent and daring

hyperbole, rather than sober communications of simple truth.

Were the rewards promised, the result of his own obedience ; well

might he doubt. But, when he remembers, that God has not spared

his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, he cannot, if he would

act rationally, fail to unite with the Apostle in exclaiming, How

shall he not with him, also, freely give us all things ? The benevo-

lence, necessary to the origination, and the communication of

these blessings, is in this event proved beyond a question.

Inthe Omniscience of God we are presented with ample ability

to contrive, and in his Omnipotence with ample ability to accom-

plish, every part of this amazing sum of good. To Him, who

willed the Universe into being, it is equally easy to create great

enjoyments, as little ; many, as few ; endless, as momentary. The

vast system of Good, which he has promised, he can call into ex-

istence in a moment, with the same ease, with which he can create

an insect or an atom. Whatever he gives, his store cannot be les-

sened: nor can a preceding communication of good be, with Him,

a reason for refusing, or neglecting, to communicate again. Im-

measurably bountiful, he can never be weary of giving : immea-

surably powerful, he can never be weary of providing.

From the Omnipotence of God every righteous man may, then,

confidently expect a final deliverance from all his enemies, sorrows,

and sins ; from death, and the grave; from future pollution, and

eternal wo. He may be certainly assured, that the same glorious

and everlasting Friend will communicate to him, and to his fellow-

christians, immortal life ; will enlarge their minds with increasing

knowledge ; will improve them with ever-growing virtue ; and will

supply them with endlessly advancing happiness.

5thly. How great and glorious does God appear, as invested with

Almighty power !

Great is the Lord, says the Psalmist, and greatly to be praised.

One generation shall praise thy works to another, and shall declare

thy mighty acts . All thy works praise thee, O Lord ; and thy saints

shall bless thee. They shall speak of the glory of thy kingdom, and

talk of thy power. Thy kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and

thy dominion endureth throughout all generations . Canst thou, says

Zophar, by searching find out God ? canst thou find out the Almighty

unto perfection ? It is high as heaven, what canst thou do ? deeper

than hell, what canst thou know ? The measure thereof is longer

than the earth, and broader than the Sea. Who hath measured the

waters , says Isaiah, in the hollow of his hand ; and meted out hea-

ven with the span ; and comprehended the dust of the earth in a

measure ; and weighed the mountains in scales, and the hills in a

balance ?

164 OMNIPOTENCE AND

[ SER . VII .

The Being, who made, upholds, and governs, the Universe, dis-

closes in these acts his own proper character ; a character infi-

nitely greater and more glorious than the highest creature can sus-

tain , or comprehend. All beings are before him as nothing, and

justly accounted unto him less than nothing , and vanity.

We were not, indeed, present at the birth of this wonderful

Work. We did not behold the boundless midnight enlightened

with suns, or the desolate wilds of immensity filled with worlds and

their inhabitants. We did not hear the morning Stars sing together,

and the Sons of God shout for joy. But in the history of the Crea-

tion, dictated by the voice of God, we are presented with such

sublime views of this amazing subject, as stretch our imaginations

to the utmost, and fill our understanding with astonishing ideas. In

the same work, as it is daily seen by our eyes, we discern wonders

surpassing number and measure, and gloriously illustrating the

Power by which all are accomplished . In the history of past

events, also; in the Deluge ; the Destruction of Sodom ; the Won-

ders of Egypt, of Sinai, and of Canaan ; in the miracles of the

Prophets of Christ, and of the Apostles ; are such manifestations

of Almighty power, as cannot fail to astonish every mind, and fill

every heart with the most awful apprehensions of its Maker.

In the daily providence of God, we are also witnesses of the

amazing effects of his Omnipotence. In the rising and setting of

the sun, and the revolutions of the heavens, we behold a hand,

whose exertions disclaim all limit. We hear him, also, thundering

marvellously with his voice ; we see him sending forth lightnings

with rain, making the earth to tremble, and the mountains to fall,

pouring out rivers of fire from the volcano, and whelming cities

and countries in a general conflagration .

On the other hand, what pleasing and glorious proofs of the same

power are exhibited in its softer and gentler, its less awful, but not

less solemn exertions through the circuit of the seasons : in the

spring, particularly ; when God appears as the light of the morn-

ing when the sun ariseth, even of a morning without clouds ; and as

the clear shining of the sun after rain upon the tender herb of the

field. Then, with a hand eminently attractive and wonderful , he

diffuses life, and warmth, and beauty, and glory, over the face of

the world ; and from the death of winter, bids all things awake

with a general and delightful resurrection. The successive seasons

are replete with successive wonders, wrought by the same almighty

hand. Day unto day, indeed, uttereth speech, and night unto night

showeth knowledge, concerning this great subject. He who does

not mark these astonishing disclosures, made in heaven and in

earth, in ten thousand and ten million forms, must be a brute ; and

he, who, surveying them, does not regard God as infinitely won-

derful in counsel, and excellent in working, has indeed eyes, but he

sees not ; ears, but he cannot hear ; and a heart, but he cannot un-

derstand. Every good man, on the contrary, must admire and

INDEPENDENCE OF GOD.

SER. VII.J 165

adore Him, who doeth all these things ; must rejoice with humble

gratitude, and divine joy, in all the stupendous displays of his

goodness ; must tremble at the terrible things, which he doeth in

righteousness , when his judgments are abroad in the earth ; and

must, on every occasion, be ready to exclaim : Who is like unto

thee , O Lord : glorious in holiness, fearful in praises, doing won-

ders?

SERMON VIII.

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD PROVED FROM THE WORKS OF CREATION

AND PROVIDENCE .

1 JOHN iv. 8. -For God is love.

HAVING considered the existence , and the natural attributes , of

God, at some length ; I shall now proceed to the next subject of

theological inquiry ; viz. his moral attributes . In the order, best

suited to the method of discussion , which I have preferred, that,

which first offers itself for examination, is his Benevolence.

This perfection is ascribed to God in the text, in a singular man-

ner. It is not asserted, that God is benevolent, but that he is Benevo-

lence ; or that Benevolence is the essence, the sum, of his being and

character. The force, and beauty, of this assertion, will be felt by

every one, who attends to it, without any remarks from me.

That Αγαπη signifies the kind of Love, which in English is called

Benevolence, will not, I presume, be questioned. If any one is at

a loss concerning this fact ; he may be satisfied by reading St.

Paul's extensive definition of this word, contained in the 13th chap-

ter of the first Epistle to the Corinthians .

In canvassing this important subject, I propose to inquire in what

manner it is exhibited to us, in the

I. place, by Reason ; and

II. by Revelation.

I. Ipropose to inquire in what manner it is exhibited to us by Rea-

son.

In examining this part of the subject I shall

1st. Allege several arguments , furnished by Reason, in proof of

the Benevolence of God; and

2dly. Answer the principal Objections to this Doctrine.

The importance of the question, Whether God is a Benevolent

Being, is no less than infinite. Every thing, therefore, which seri-

ously affects it, must be of high moment to every Intelligent crea-

ture. The decisions of Reason onthis subject, undoubtedly affect

the question in a serious manner ; and are of course very interest-

ing to us. Although I can by no means admit, with many of my

fellow- men, respectable for their understanding and worth, that the

Benevolence of God is not capable of being completely proved, or

that it is not in fact completely proved, by the Scriptures, indepen-

dently of all other sources of argument ; yet I cannot help believ-

ing, that, if the proof furnished by Reason be satisfactory also,

and can be fairly exhibited as satisfactory, the minds of manymen,

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD

SER. VIII. ] 167

at least, will rest on this subject with a conviction more unmingled,

a confidence less exposed to danger and disturbance. To com-

pass this object, if it can be compassed, will, then, be very desi-

rable.

It is hardly necessary for me to observe, that the question, con-

cerning the amount of the evidence, which Reason gives concern-

ing this doctrine, has long been, and is still, disputed. It is well

known to many of this audience, that Divines and other Christians ,

as well as other men, differ in their opinions about it ; and that the

proofs of the divine benevolence from Reason are regarded by

many persons of reputation as insufficient. I have myself enter-

tained, heretofore, opinions on this subject, different from those,

which I now entertain. As I have not seen it discussed in such a

manner, as satisfied my own wishes ; I shall now consider it with

more particularity, than might otherwise be necessary.

The Self - existence , Eternity, Immutability, Omnipresence, Omnis-

cience, and Omnipotence, of God have, I flatter myself , been clearly

proved by arguments, derived from Reason. From these attributes

it has, I trust, been unanswerably evinced, that God is absolutely

independent ; that all things, which can be done, or enjoyed, are in

his power and possession; and that he can neither need, nor re-

ceive any thing. From these considerations it is evident in the

1st. place , That God can have no possible motive to be malevolent.

Itwill not be pretended, that the nature of things can furnish any

such motive . That to be malevolent is a more desirable character

or state of being, than to be benevolent, cannot be asserted, nor be-

lieved. Nor can any motive to this character be presented to God

from without himself , or from other beings . As all other beings,

together with every thing pertaining to them, are, and cannot but .

be, just what he pleases ; it is certain, that he can gain nothing to

himself by the exercise of malevolence. Finite beings may dis-

cern good in the hands of others, which they may covet, and at the

same time be hindered from possessing, unless by the indulgence

of fraud, injustice, or unkindness ; or by attacking, and injuring,

such, as prevent from gaining the beloved object. Those who pos-

sess it, they may envy, or hate. Those, who hinder them from

• gaining it, they may regard with resentment or anger ; and, under

the influence of these malignant passions, may be induced to dis-

turb their rights, and invade their happiness. But it is plain, that

these considerations can have no more application to God, than the

circumstances, which give them birth. All good is actually in his

possession : there is, therefore, nothing left for him to desire. All

beings and events are exactly such, as he chooses either to produce,

or to permit ; and such as he chose, antecedently to their existence .

He can, therefore, have nothing to fear, or to malign. As he gave

all, which is possessed by other beings ; he can evidently neither

gain , nor receive any thing. If he be malevolent, then, he must

sustain this character without a motive.

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

168 [ SER. VIII .

2dly. An Omniscient Being cannot but see, that it is more glorious

to himself, and more beneficial to his creatures, to sustain, and to ex-

hibit, a benevolent character, than its contrary : or, in other words ,

in every respect more desirable.

The glory of the Creator and the good of his creatures involve

every thing, that is desirable. That this character, in its existence

and exercise, is on both these accounts more desirable than its con-

trary, cannot be questioned. We, narrow as our faculties are, per-

fectly know this truth. It is, therefore, absolutely desirable. That

this truth must be seen by an Omniscient Being, in a manner infi-

nitely superior to that, in which we see it , hardly needs to be as-

serted.

The desirableness of this conduct, arising from the glory of the

Creator and the good of his creatures, seems to present, when we

consider it as extending through Eternity, an infinite motive to the

Creator, to cherish a benevolent character, and to manifest it in all

his conduct. To the power of this motive there is at the same time ,

no motive opposed. On the contrary, we know, and the Creator,

in a manner infinitely more perfect, knows, that the existence and

exercise of a malevolent character would be infinitely dishonour-

able to himself, and in the progress of Eternity infinitely injurious

to his creatures. Each of these considerations presents to the Crea-

tor an infinite motive to exercise Benevolence on the one hand, and

not to exercise malevolence on the other. If , then, he has in fact

exercised malevolence ; he has done it without any motive, and

against the influence of both these : each of them of infinite im-

portance.

Thus it is I think clearly certain, that God cannot be induced to

exercise a malevolent spirit, because malevolence is in itself a de-

sirable character; nor because the nature of things offers any en-

joyment, which, upon the whole, is good, to the indulgence of this

disposition ; nor because He does not perfectly know these truths.

If he is malevolent, then, he is so from an original, inherent pro-

pensity in his own nature ; a propensity, uninfluenced by truth, and

immoveable by motives.

How far such a character can be rationally supposed to be pos-

sible in a being, who has all things in his power, it is difficult to de-

termine. The observations, already made, clearly prove, that such

a being must discern with absolute certainty the infinite disadvan-

tage of indulging this spirit. The difference between rejoicing in

all his works, as means of glory to himself , with a consciousness,

that he has formed and conducted them to this exalted end, and

feeling the gloomy, dreadful pain of boundless malice, is in itself

obviously boundless. If , then, God has not chosen this enjoyment ,

he has failed to choose it, with a clear discernment, that it was in

his power, and under the influence of a disposition, which would

not yield to conviction, nor to motives, infinite in their magnitude.

That he has not exercised this disposition I shall now proceed to

show; and for this purpose observe,

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

SER . VIII. ] 169

3dly. The only conduct, which a Creator can receive with pleasure

from his creatures , must plainly be attachment, reverence, and the

voluntary obedience which they produce.

Whether the Creator be benevolent, or malevolent ; it is impos-

sible, that he should not choose to be loved, reverenced, and

obeyed. But the real Creator has so formed his works, and so

constituted his Providence, that the minds of men, irresistibly, and

of absolute necessity, esteem a benevolent being more than one of

the opposite character. I do not mean, here, that this is the dictate

of the heart ; but I mean, that it is the unavoidable dictate of the

intellect ; of the conscience and understanding. The intellect is

so formed by the Creator, that it is impossible for it to think other-

wise. Any person, who will make the attempt, will find it beyond

his power to approve of malevolence at all. If , therefore, the

Creator be malevolent, he has so formed his Intelligent creatures

in this world, that they cannot possibly esteem his character. In

other words, he has made them incapable, by a natural necessity,

of rendering to him that regard, which in itself , or in its conse-

quences, is the only possible conduct, on the part of his Intelligent

creatures , which a Creator can have proposed, when he gave them

existence.

Should it be objected, that Benevolence is estimable in the nature

ofthings ; that to see its nature is the same thing as to esteem it ; and

that, therefore , Intelligent creatures cannot avoid experiencing this

esteem : I answer, Should it be granted, as I think it must, that all

this is true, still an Omnipotent Creator might, for ought that appears ,

have formed Intelligent creatures with such optics, with powers of

understanding so directed, that they might have seen his character

in an estimable light. Hypochondriacal and insane minds are direct

proofs, that minds can exist, with directly opposite views to those,

which Intelligent creatures in this world usually experience. Nor

is there any evidence, that an Omnipotent being could not so form

Intelligent creatures, as to vary their modes of perception in any

manner, and to any extent, which pleased him . At the same time

it is perfectly obvious, that, as we are wholly passive in receiving

ideas and impressions, he might, with entire ease, have given us

just such ideas as he pleased, by presenting to us only those ob-

jects, from which they would be derived. Inthis manner he might

have prevented us from forming any conceptions of his moral

character ; and led us only to admire his Omniscience and Omni-

potence, in the stupendous works, which they are capable of pro-

ducing. This, it is believed, involves no contradiction ; and every

thing, which does not involve a contradiction, such a Being can

confessedly perform.

Should the scheme, which I have here suggested, not be admit-

ted; I answer again : There was no necessity, that he should cre-

ate Intelligent beings at all ; and there is no conceivable motive,

which could induce an infinite Being to form Intelligent creatures ,

VOL. I. 22

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

170 [ SER. VIII.

who, from their nature and their circumstances, could not possibly

esteem, but from absolute necessity must disesteem, him .

But this is not all. Men are so formed, as irresistibly to hate

and despise Malevolence. This conduct, on their part, is the un-

varying dictate of mere intellect, as well as of the heart. It is,

therefore, absolutely necessary: the unavoidable result of that

state of things, which he himself has formed ; is his own immediate

work; and, so far as we know, the only work, of an Intelligent

nature, which he has produced: being found in all men, and there-

fore justly presumable of all other Intelligent creatures. It is,

hence, unavoidably concluded to be a direct, and genuine, expres-

sion of his choice. If , then, we suppose the Creator to be a male-

volent being ; he has thus necessitated, beyond a possibility of its

being otherwise, his Intelligent creatures to hate and despise that,

which he supremely loves and approves ; viz. his own moral cha-

racter ; and to esteem and love that, which he supremely hates and

despises ; viz. the moral character, which is directly opposed to

hisown. This he has further necessitated them to do, with the

entire, and irresistible, approbation of their own understanding and

conscience ; and, therefore, without any possibility of a future con-

viction, on their part, that this conduct is wrong in them, or that

they are, on this account, guilty, blameworthy, and justly punish-

able. On the contrary, they are furnished with complete convic-

tion, that this conduct is right, praiseworthy, and rewardable ; a

conviction, which can never be removed, nor weakened; and which

will attend them through every period of their future being. Thus

he has, in the most perfect manner, and, at the same time, in the

manner most perfectly unaccountable, formed Intelligent beings so,

as effectually to prevent the only end, which he could propose in

their creation,from ever being accomplished.

4thly. The Creator has placed mankind either in a state of trial,

or a state of reward : but our present state is, on neither of these

suppositions , compatible with the doctrine, that He is malevolent.

Isay , that mankind are placed either in a state of trial, or a

state of reward; because rational creatures can exist in no possible

situation, except one of these two. If , then, we are placed in a

state of reward ; we are beyond measure more happy, and less

miserable, than is consistent with the character of malevolence in

the Creator. No man can say, or believe, that the present state

of the human race is so unhappy, as to satisfy the desires or ac-

complish the purposes, of infinite malevolence.

If we are in a state of trial ; our circumstances are equally in-

consistent with the designs of a malevolent disposer. All our op-

position to his character and designs is necessarily and perfectly

approved by our own consciences ; and all our approbation and

love towards the opposite characteristics is equally approved by

the same umpire. Inthe meantime, our approbation, or adoption,

ofmalevolence, or our disesteem, and rejection, of benevolence is

C

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD .

SER. VIII . ] 171

in the same necessary and perfect manner condemned by our con-

sciences . But these are the only kinds of conduct, in which we

can possibly be guilty of revolt, or disobedience, to a malevolent

Creator. For these only can we, then, be tried and condemned

by him. Should we, accordingly, be condemned and punished, we

shall still necessarily, certainly, and for ever discern, beyond a

doubt, that in all that, for which we are punished, we acted with

entire rectitude . Of course, whatever punishment we receive, we

shall still be supported by the entire approbation of our own minds ;

and shall, therefore, be far removed from that finished misery,

which could not fail to be destined by infinite malevolence for the

punishment of its enemies . We should know, that our conduct was

right, and excellent ; should dwell upon it with entire satisfaction ;

and should feel no small support, no contemptible alleviation of

our sufferings, in the conviction, that our punishment was unmerit-

ed, and unjust ; and that the evil, for which we suffered, existed,

not in ourselves, but in our iniquitous sovereign .

If it can be supposed, that such a Being could confer rewards

on any of his creatures ; it is evident, that he must confer them on

such, as resembled him in their disposition, and approved of his

moral character ; and for this very resemblance and approbation.

But it is perfectly easy to perceive, that the happiness, which would

constitute their reward, must be embittered by a complete convic-

tion , that the conduct, for which they are rewarded, was in itself

wrong, vile, and despicable ; that they themselves were vile and

despicable in loving and practising it ; that their happiness is

wholly unmerited; and that those, who are punished by the same

being, are far more excellent than themselves, and in truth are the

only excellent beings. Of course, their happiness must be deeply

embittered by a miserable sense of unworthiness ; by a perpetual

self - condemnation. Such must be the manner, in which this sup-

position exhibits the conduct of the Creator towards his enemies,

on the one hand, and towards his friends, on the other.

All these considerations are enhanced, by the great fact, that

God has'so constituted the world, as to make misery the only legiti-

mate and natural consequence of malevolence, andhappiness the only

natural consequence of benevolence. Inthis manner has he irresis-

tibly impressed these truths on the minds of men; exhibited them

as practical certainties, visible in all their practical concerns ; and

thus fixed them beyond removal in the minds of his Rational crea-

tures. When we remember, that these things were contrived, and

chosen, by an Omniscient being, who, of course, discerned their

real nature and import, before he chose them; we cannot but dis-

cern, that they grow necessarily out of the character of a benevo-

lent Creator, but are utterly inconsistent with the opposite charac-

ter.

5thly. The goodness of God, displayed in the present world, is a

strong argument, that he is a benevolent Being.

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

172 [ SER . VUI.

St. Paul observes, that God left not himself without witness to

the Heathens, in that he did good, and gave them rain from heaven,

and fruitful seasons, filling their hearts with food and gladness . *

In this passage God himself declares, that his goodness to man-

kind, in the several particulars here recited, is a witness to them

of his true character. What the Scriptures here declare, the Rea-

son of man has in every age approved. All nations have sup-

posed God to be a good Being ; and, whenever they have employ-

ed themselves in accounting for the origin of evil by attributing it

to the agency of superior beings, they have, in no case within my

recollection, attributed it to the Original, or Supreme, God. Him

they have uniformly believed to be a good, or benevolent, Being.

When we examine the works of Creation and Providence, we

are liable, in pursuing this argument, to a considerable degree of

perplexity, arising from the vast multitude, and perpetual com-

plication of the things to be examined. To prevent this per-

plexity, into which men fall very easily, I know of no better method,

than to lay hold of certain prominent and distinguishing features

of these works , from which we may derive correct general apprehen-

sions of their nature, without confounding ourselves by dwelling on

particulars . This , after premising, that in every part of such an

examination we must carefully separate what is done by men, from

what is done by God, I shall attempt to accomplish under the fol-

lowing heads .

1st. God makes mankind the subjects of extensive enjoyment in the

present world.

Our health, food, and raiment, are means of enjoyment to us

daily, throughout our lives. Our friends and connexions, also,

continually, and extensively, contribute to our happiness. The

pleasantness of seasons ; the beauty and grandeur of the earth and

the heavens ; the various kinds of agreeable sounds, ever fluctua-

ting on our ears ; the immensely various and delightful uses of lan-

guage; the interchanges of thought and affection; the peace and

safety, afforded by the institution of government ; the power and

agreeableness of motion and activity ; the benefit and comfort, af-

forded by the arts and sciences, particularly by those of writing,

printing, and numbering ; and the continual gratification, found in

employment ; are all, in a sense, daily and hourly sources of good

to man; all furnished, either directly or indirectly, by the hand of

God. If we consider these things with any attention, we shall per-

ceive, that some of them are unceasing ; and that others ofthem are

so frequently repeated, as almost to deserve the same appellation.

We shall also perceive, that they are blessings of high importance

to our well-being ; and that, notwithstanding this character, they

are apt to be forgotten in the list, which we form of our blessings,

and to be numbered among those, which we call things of course.

Acts xiv . 17

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

SER . VIII. ] 173

It ought to be remembered, that in this manner we are prone to di-

minish both the number and the greatness of our blessings, and the

goodness of God in bestowing them; and that we are thus apt to

regard them with a very erroneous estimation. But if we consider

the number, and the importance, of these and the like blessings ;

the frequent recurrence of some of them, and the uninterrupted

continuance of others ; we cannot fail, if influenced by a just and

candid spirit, to unite with the Psalmist in his earnest wish, that men

would praise the Lordfor his goodness, andfor his wonderful works

to the children of men.

2dly. God has furnished mankind with many alleviations , and

many remedies , for the evils , which they suffer in the present world.

Ofthis nature are the innumerable medicines, which he has pro-

vided for the relief , or the cure, of our diseases ; fire, for our deliver-

ance from the evils of cold ; shade, from those of heat ; rest, from

those of labour ; sleep, from those ofwatching; together with innu-

merable others, which cannot here be mentioned. I feel myself

obliged, however, to take notice of the attention, which God has

given to the preservation of life, of health, and of safety, in the

warnings, which our senses give us of the approach, or the exist-

ence, of injuries, in an innumerable variety of ways ; and in the

various instinctive efforts, by which we are, in a sense involuntarily,

either guarded, or relieved. Thus, on the one hand, pain warns us

ofalmost all injuries, to which our bodies are exposed, or by which

they have begun to be affected. On the other, the eye, by its

power of contracting the pupil, instinctively exercised, defends

itself from the blindness, which would otherwise necessarily ensue

from the admission of too great a quantity of light. The hands

also, and other members, are instinctively employed to defend us

from evils, in many cases, where contrivance would come too late

for our safety. To mention one more example ,; fear, the most

active and sudden of all our passions, is a continual preservative

against innumerable evils, by which we are threatened. Nor

ought I here by any means to omit the self -restoring power of our

bodies, so remarkable in recovering us from sickness, in the heal-

ing of wounds, and in the renewal of our decayed faculties .

These, and innumerable other things, of a nature generally si-

milar, are certainly strong proofs of the goodness of God to man-

kind. 3dly. The original and main design of each particular thing ap-

pears plainly to be benevolent.

This is an argument of Dr. Paley on the subject of the present

discourse ; and is certainly a sound one. The eye is made to fur-

nish us with the benefit of seeing ; the ear, of hearing ; and the

palate, of tasting. The organs of speech are manifestly intended

for the purpose of articulation ; the hands and the feet for their

well known important uses. The evils, to which these several

things are subject, are in the mean time incidental, and not parts

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

174 [SER. VIII .

of the main design. No anatomist, he observes, ever discovered

a system of organization, calculated to produce pain and disease .

But the character, the disposition of the Contriver is, undoubtedly,

chiefly seen in the main design of the contrivance ; and this is justly

observed to be universally benevolent. In the state and circum-

stances of Infants, where this contrivance is complicated with few

appendages, we see, usually, the most pure, unmingled enjoyment ;

although even here it is not a little alloyed by many mixtures, de-

rived from the agency of man.

4thly. All the blessings , experienced by mankind, are bestowed on

sinful beings .

The subject of moral evil will be further examined under the

head of objections against this doctrine. At the present time I am

only concerned with the fact, that it exists in the human race.

On

these guilty beings, then, the blessings of this world are bestowed.

It will not be denied, that the communication of good to an evil ,

ungrateful creature, is a far higher manifestation of goodness, than

the communication of the same good to a virtuous and grateful

one. As, therefore, all the blessings, found in the present world,

are in every instance given to creatures of this evil character ; the

goodness of God in giving them is enhanced beyond our compre-

hension. An impartial and contemplative mind, when observing

the conduct, and marking the character, of the human race, cannot

but be struck at the sight of such extensive beneficence, commu-

nicated unceasingly, for so many ages, tobeings of such a charac-

ter. The patience and forbearance of God, particularly, towards

such a world as this, are an illustrious proof of his benevolence.

Mankind rebel against his government ; accuse him of weakness ,

injustice, and cruelty ; murmur against his dispensations ; profane

and blaspheme his name ; refuse to him the only regard, which they

can render him, namely, reverence, love, and obedience ; and pay

this regard to men and beasts, reptiles and stocks. In the mean

time they deceive, defraud, pollute, hate, oppress, and murder, each

other ; and make it a great part of their whole employment to carry

violence, death, and devastation, through the world. All these

have also been their employment, and their character, ever since

the apostacy : a character, perfectly understood and comprehended

byGod. Still he has patiently waited on them six thousand years ;

has forborne to execute the vengeance, which this evil conduct has

universally merited ; has returned day and night, summer and win-

ter, seed-time and harvest, to this polluted world ; and has given

its inhabitants unceasingly, rain from heaven, and fruitful seasons ,

filling their hearts with food and gladness . Can our minds conceive

of a character, at once wise and just, and at the same time fraught

with higher benevolence ?

II . Ishall now attempt to answer the Objections, usually made to

this doctrine.

These are all reducible to two :

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

SER. VIII. ] 175

1st. The existence of Moral evil ; and

2dly. The existence of Natural evil.

On the existence of Moral evil I observe in the

1st. place, that God cannot be proved to be the efficient cause of sin .

It is, I think, dictated by Reason, as well as Revelation, that, no

man may say, when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God

cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man : But every

man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.

Then, when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin ; and sin, when

it is finished, bringethforth death .

It will not be disputed , that we ought not to admit the doctrine,

that God is the efficient cause of sin, until it is proved. Until this

is done, therefore, Man is unquestionably to be acknowledged as

the cause of his own sin .

2dly. It cannot be proved, that God was obliged, either by justice

or benevolence, to prevent sinfrom existing .

A state of trial supposes a liability to sin ; and it cannot be pro-

ved, that it is inconsistent with justice, or benevolence, for God to

place his rational creatures in a state of trial. The benevolence

of God, in this case, is to be estimated by a clear and complete

comprehension of all the ends, which he has in view, and of the

nature, fitness, or unfitness, of all the means to those ends . But

of such a comprehension we are not possessed ; and therefore are

certainly unable to discern, that it isinconsistent with perfect be-

nevolence to place us in such a state. If we are to be rewarded ;

it would seem necessary, as well as proper, that we should be tried;

because our own conduct is the only thing, for which we can be re

warded. That benevolence may propose such a trial, in order to

such a reward, appears to be the natural and universal dictate of

Reason.

All that Justice seems to require, in this case, is, that more and

higher motives to obedience, than to disobedience, should be pre-

sented to the mind of the probationer. This in the present case is

certainly, and invariably, the fact.

3dly. It cannot be proved, that the existence of sin will, in the end ,

be a detriment to the Universe .

Until we know what will be both the progress and the end, we

certainly can never prove this proposition ; because the means of

proof lie beyond our reach. All moral beings are governed by

motives only. What motives will, upon the whole, produce the

greatest good, united with the least evil to the Intelligent kingdom ;

and how far the fall and punishment of some moral beings may , in

the nature of the case, be indispensably necessary to the perseve-

ring obedience of the great body, cannot be determined by us .

But , until this is done, and indeed many other things of great mo-

ment to the question, it can never be proved, that the existence of

moral evil is injurious to the Universe ; or the permission of it, in-

consistent with the most perfect good-will on the part of God.

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

176 [SER. VIII

At the same time, I acknowledge myself utterly unable, and my

complete conviction, that all other men are unable, to explain this

subject so, as to give to an inquirer clear and satisfactory views, by

the light of Reason, of the propriety of permitting the introduction

of moral evil into the Intelligent system.

The only object, which I have in view, or which is necessary to

my present purpose, is to show , what I persuade myself I have

shown, that no proof can be drawn from this source against this at-

tribute in the Creator.

2dly. The existence of Natural evil is also objected against the

benevolence of God.

On this subject I observe in the

1st. place, that in considering this objection we are bound to sepa-

rate carefully the evils , which are caused by God, from those, which

are produced by men . Were this separation accurately made, we

should all be astonished to see how small would be the number of

evils, of which God is the proper author. Were we to consider

attentively the multitude of sufferings, brought upon mankind by

the evil disposition of themselves, and their fellow-men, either me-

diately or immediately, the mass would rise so much higher than

our expectations, as to disappoint every preconception, which we

had formed on this subject. Even in those cases, in which we ac-

knowledge the infliction to be derived from our Maker, we should

be astonished to see how great a proportion of our sufferings is

produced by ourselves, or by our fellow-creatures . We suffer

greatly from poverty. How large a part of human poverty is crea-

ted by sloth, profusion, intemperance, rashness, fraud, falsehood,

contention, oppression, and war ! We suffer greatly from disease .

What a vast proportion of the diseases in this world owe their ori-

gin to indolence, imprudence, intemperance, passion, and other

causes merely human! The same observations are applicable to

many other things, of the same general nature. In truth, men in

almost all cases either originate, or increase, the evils, suffered in

the present life .

2dly. The evils inflicted by God are always less, than the subjects

of them merit by their sins .

A strictly just being is a benevolent being . Certainly then, he who

inflicts less , than justice will warrant, or than the criminal deserves,

is benevolent. Ifthe general position, therefore, be true, it is per-

fectly evident , that the very evils, which are here alleged as proofs,

thatGodis notbenevolent, are unanswerable proofs, that he is. But

no sober man will for a moment pretend, that the evils, which him-

self suffers , are greater than he deserves. Every such man will

acknowledge readily, that he suffers much less than he merits. Of

course, the aggregate of human sufferings is less than is merited by

the aggregate of human guilt.

It will perhaps be here replied, that these sufferings fall as hea-

vily upon the best men, as upon the worst ; and that they experience

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

SER . VIII. ] 177

greater evils than they have deserved. If this should indeed be said,

and believed ; it can only spring from gross inattention to the sub-

ject, and gross ignorance of the demerit of sin : an inattention and

ignorance, it must be acknowledged, most unhappily common

among men. The doubt, if it exist, may be easily removed. Go

to as many such men, as you please; and every one of them will

inform you, that his own sufferings are much less than he is con-

scious of having deserved. In truth, good men never call this fact

in question ; but find themselves sufficiently employed in lamenting,

onthe one hand, their own guilt; and in thankfully admiring, on

the other, the forbearance of God.

But it will be further said, that Infants, also, are subjected to suf-

ferings ; and that, beyond any desert, which can be imputed to them.

The situation of infants, and the dispensations of Providence to-

wards them, I acknowledge to be, in many respects, mysterious, to

a degree, beyond my ability satisfactorily to explain. But I utterly

question the ability of any objector to show, that they suffer more

than they deserve. We can never know the moral state of a mind,

which possesses no means of communication with our minds, suffi-

cient to explain that state to us . Yet it is with the highest proba-

bility argued from Reason, since every infant, which advances to

the state of childhood, proves himself to be a sinful being, that in-

fants, if moral beings at all, are also sinful beings in their infancy.

The contrary conclusion, no objector can maintain. The objection,

therefore, fails entirely of proof.

Besides, it is reasonably argued, that the same God who never

afflicts adults , whose case we can understand, beyond their desert,

does not afflict infants, whose case we cannot understand, beyond

their deserts ; and that, as there are plain proofs of benevolence in

the former case, so it is justly to be presumed in the latter. This

analogical argument is the more forcible, because no reason can be

imagined, why even a malevolent being should take any peculiar

pleasure in afflicting infants .

3dly. These evils are necessary parts of a benevolent system of

dispensations towards a sinful world.

That in such a world it is absolutely necessary to check iniquity

in its progress , and prevent it FROM ACCOMPLISHING those miseries,

which it is its universal tendency to accomplish, if unrestrained, must

be granted by all men ; if the existence of the world is to be con-

tinued. For, plainly, this world, without restraints of this nature,

would in a little while come to an end. The weak would become

a prey to the strong ; the simple to the cunning ; the quiet to the

violent ; and all men to the sloth and indulgence, to the passions

and mischiefs , of themselves, or each other. So far, then, as the

natural evils of this world are necessary to restrain the wickedness

ofman, they are proofs of benevolence on the part of God. But the

proof , that there are no more such evils , than are necessary for this

purpose, is complete ; because the wickedness is not more than suf-

VCL. I. 23

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

178 [SER. VIII.

ficiently restrained. On the contrary, how often is each man con-

scious of believing, that still greater restraints are necessary to keep

evil menwithin due bounds ; and of wishing, and praying, that God

would make bare his arm for the further hindrance of evil designs,

and the more extensive protection of the distressed from the in-

justice of their oppressors .

The afflictions of this world are, also, plainly benevolent in their

intentional and actual influence on those who suffer. No means have,

probably, a more frequent or efficacious influence in reforming

wicked men, than afflictions . Prosperity, which one would expect

to see draw them to obedience, as a cord of love, not only fails of

this effect, but appears usually to harden their hearts in sin and se-

curity, and to terminate in a total alienation of their minds from all

virtuous regard to God, or to mankind. Fulness of bread was one

of the great sources of corruption to Sodom and Gomorrah. When

Jeshurun waxed fat, he forgot the God that made him, and lightly

esteemed the Rock of his salvation. Thus both nations and indivi-

duals have commonly acted in circumstances of high prosperity.

The pride and insolence of wealth, office, power, and conquest, is, as

you well know, proverbial phraseology: an unanswerable proof ,

that pride and insolence are the standing effects of prosperity.

The more we possess of worldly enjoyments, although our happi-

ness is often diminished, the stronger do our attachments to the

world become ; andthe weaker our disposition to think of our duty.

Afflictions, only, seem to break down this attachment, and to awa-

ken the attention of the soul to virtue, and to God. Even the se-

curity of life, itself , as has been proved in the case of the Antedi-

luvians, (the length of whose lives is attested by both scriptural and

profane history) can become, of course, a most powerful mean of

emboldening men to sin, and involving them in misery : and death,

at the comparatively untimely period of seventy years, has been a

most important blessing to mankind. Were men again to live a

thousand years, the same violence, corruption, and wretchedness,

which preceded the deluge, would again overwhelm the globe.

Nor do good men stand in a less absolute need of afflictions . The

same tendencies to negligence of God and their duty, although

weakened, exist still in their minds also. Before I was afflicted,

says the Psalmist, I went astray ; but now have I kept thy word.

The mind of every good man will echo this declaration. Riches,

honours, and pleasures, are all eminently seductive ; and allure the

heart insensibly after them. Afflictions teach us how vain they are,

how deceitful, and how dangerous ; pluck us by the arm in our

downward course ; and conduct us back to safety and peace. In

both of these views, also, afflictions are plainly eminent blessings ;

and in this manner it is satisfactorily evinced, that God doth not

willingly afflict, nor grieve the children of men .

All the observations, which I have hitherto made under this head,

have been intended to respect only those evils, of which in the pre-

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

SER. VIII. ] 179

per sense God is the author. They are, however, to an extensive

degree applicable to those, produced by men. These, intended

by men for evil, are very often by God converted into means of

good; who thus glorifies himself by bringing good out of the evil,

designed by his creatures .

It ought here to be added, that every human account agrees with

the Scriptures in asserting, that the world, as it camefrom the hands

of God, was only beautiful and delightful ; and that man was cre-

ated upon it in a state of perfect holiness and felicity ; that man

apostatized from this state of perfection, and became sinful, and

odious to his Maker; that in process of time all his descendants ,

one family excepted, became wholly corrupt, abandoned their duty,

perpetrated every iniquity, dishonoured God, and destroyed each

other ; that a deluge was at length brought on the Earth, to lay

waste both the world, and its polluted inhabitants ; and that in con-

sequence of this event the Earth itself was rendered comparatively

a barren and uncomfortable habitation, and its inhabitants afflicted

with many evils from the hand of God, which were before unknown.

The history of these events in the Scriptures, which I here consider

merely as a history, and not as a Revelation, is supported by such

high internal evidence ; by so uniformly concurrent a tradition ;

by so many facts in the general history of mankind ; and by so

many and so powerful proofs, found on the surface, and in the

bowels, of the Earth ; that it cannot fail to be admitted, as true, by

every candid mind. Hence, therefore, it is unavoidably concluded ,

that the evils, inflicted by God, had no existence before the Apos-

tacy of man ; and are only intended either to check, or to punish,

iniquity and rebellion. In this view they cannot evince the least

want of benevolence on the part of God, but exhibit him as wise,

just , and good.

From these considerations it is , I think, clearly evident, that the

objections specified, furnish no solid argument against the bencvo-

lence of the Creator ; and, as these involve all the objections hither-

to alleged by mankind, it is evident, that the direct arguments on

this subject remain in their full force .

The chief difficulty, attending this subject, lies in the uncertainty,

in which the future existence of the soul is seenby the light of na-

ture. As the end of all things exists beyond the grave ; and as the

twilight of Reason fcebly illuminates all objects, which lie beyond

that limit, and exhibits them dimly and doubtfully ; the mind can-

not fail, in taking a prospect of them, to feel unsatisfied with such

uncertainty concerning things so important, and yet so imperfectly

known. The whole force of the arguments on this subject is, in

my view, in favour of the soul's immortality. These arguments

are, also, of no inconsiderable strength. From this source, then,

the objector against the benevolence ofGod will find himself weak-

ened, and his antagonist strengthened: for, ifa future existence be

admitted, all, which seems irregular, improper, or mysterious, may

180 BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

[ SER . VIII .

plainly and easily be rendered proper, even to the view of crea-

tures, by means of the relation, which things in this world may

then be seen to have to those, which are future and eternal.

Such is the view of the benevolence of God, presented to my

mind by the works of Creation and Providence. I will not say,

that the arguments amount to a demonstration, in the strict, logical

sense : but they furnish the most solid foundation for rational and

immoveable confidence. Indeed, the moral character of Intelligent

beings, particularly of virtuous beings, and peculiarly that of God, is

susceptible of evidence from experience only. We consider such be-

ings as good, because they say and do that which is good, and we

are incapable of seeing, that it is impossible for them to say and do

that which is evil. Spirits are in their nature incapable of being im-

mediately discerned, except by the infinite Spirit ; whose preroga-

tive it is alone to search the heart, and try the reins . But, when such

beings do good only, and uniformly, they are concluded to be good,

on such firm and rational grounds, as can never be shaken. Nor is

this want of intuitive, or demonstrative certainty, any disadvantage

to Intelligent creatures. Intuitive, or demonstrative, certainty con-

cerning the moral character of God, might exist in every supposa-

ble case, without any useful influence on the heart, or on the life .

Nor would he, who in the possession of high probable evidence,

that God is a benevolent being, demanded a demonstration of this

truth before he would yield his heart to his Maker, be at all more

inclined to yield it, when he arrived at the demonstration. Confi-

dence, on the contrary, is always a virtuous state of mind ; being

invariably a cordial assent to that truth, which is its object. Con-

fidence in the moral character of God is a virtuous emotion, capa-

ble of reaching to any degree of excellence, predicable of rational

creatures ; and, being founded on evidence, which, like a converg-

ing series, will rise higher and higher for ever, it will increase eter-

nally in strength and excellence ; and will, more and more inti-

mately, in an unceasing progress, unite the hearts of all moral

beings to their glorious and perfect Creator.

SERMON IX.

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD, AS EXHIBITED BY REVELATION.

1 JOHN iv . 8 -For God is love .

IN my last discourse, I proposed, from these words, to consider

the Benevolence of God, as exhibited to us in the

I. place, by Reason, and

II . By Revelation .

Under the former of these heads Iproposed several direct Argu-

ments, in support of the doctrine that God is benevolent ; and also

examined the Objections usually alleged against it . I shall now

consider

The exhibition of this doctrine, furnished by Revelation .

On this subject I observe generally , that, in my own view, the

arguments in support of this doctrine, contained in the Scriptures ,

may be completely satisfactory, notwithstanding the apprehension ,

usually entertained, that the character of God must be proved, an-

tecedently to the admission of all arguments, professedly derived

from a Revelation supposed to be given by him. The Revelation

itself may, for aught that appears, be so formed, as to become an

indubitable proof of his existence, and of any, or all, of his attri-

butes. The Revelation itself is an effect ; and from its nature, the

nature of the Cause, which gave it existence, may be as satisfacto-

rily argued, as from any other effect. In other words, it may be

such an effect, as to prove the cause divine. Still more obviously

may this be the case, when the Revelation, in question, is such a com-

ment on the works of Creation and Providence, as to explain such

mysteries existing in them, and remove such difficulties, as before

prevented us from a correct judgment concerning their nature and

tendency. A text may be very difficult to be understood, and may

yet by an ingenious andjust comment be rendered perfectly plain,

even to a moderate understanding. The Scriptures therefore, which

are an extensive and explicit commentary on the works of Creation

and Providence, may so exhibit their nature to us, even if we should

suppose them incapable of exhibiting the same doctrine in a con-

vincing manner by themselves only, as to prove unanswerably,

when considered in this light, the benevolence of God.

The manner, in which Revelation exhibits the divine benevo-

lence, is the following .

1st. God directly asserts his character to be benevolent.

The text is the strongest conceivable example of this asser-

tion. Thou art good, says David, and thou dost good ; and thy

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD .

182 [ SER. IX.

tender mercies are over all thy works . There is none good but one,

saith Christ, that is, God.

2dly. He recites a great variety of specimens of his goodness to

individuals and nations ; and exhibits them as being, unquestionably,

acts of benevolence only.

It will be unnecessary for me, here to mention, particularly, the

providential dispensations of God to his Church, or to individuals ,

in order to exhibit this argument in its proper light. The history

is sufficiently known to those, who hear me, to convince them, that

a great multitude of dispensations to the Patriarchs, Jews , and

Christians, fairly, and only, sustain this character. These dispen-

sations are not only related to us, but are explained, as to their

cause, nature, and design, so as to show, beyond a doubt, their be-

nevolent nature. At the same time, he has taught us, all along, that

his blessings, in every instance, were intended as testimonies, on

his part, to the excellency of the same character, wherever it was

found in men. The whole history, therefore, is made up of exhi-

bitions of his own benevolence, his approbation of this character,

and his hatred of the opposite one, in his creatures .

3dly. He explains the whole system of his dispensations , in those

instances not recorded in the Scriptures, in the same manner.

This he does by unfolding to us his designs at large, in formal

declarations concerning this subject. These declarations contain

what may be called the general science of his Providence ; and

teach, that men, as sinful beings, are righteously afflicted by him

for their iniquities; that afflictions exist for no other cause, but to

punish, or restrain, the rebellion of mankind, or to bring them to

repentance and reformation ; that, on the other hand, he rewards

alway, and with the greatest delight, every virtuous being, and

every benevolent action.

In this manner he explains this part of his Providence, which

is, indeed, the sum and substance of it ; and diffuses a general illu-

mination over a multitude of things, which, to beings, infantine and

ignorant as we are, must otherwise be mysterious and perplexing.

4thly. He exhibits to us sin, as far more vile, and deserving of

far more punishment ; and virtue, or benevolence, as far more excel-

lent and meritorious, than our reason would otherwise have enabled

us to conceive .

In the Scriptures we are taught, in the clearest manner, that sin

is an universal opposition to God, and an universal hostility to his

benevolent designs ; and that it is universally mischievous to the

well -being of the sinner himself , and of his fellow-creatures . Thus

we learn, that it is a direct war upon the Creator, and his creatures ;

a malignant contention against all that is good, and the voluntary

source of all that is evil. Virtue, or benevolence, is, on the other

hand, exhibited as a voluntary coincidence with God in all the de-

signs, which his own loving kindness has proposed ; a delight in

his perfect character, and supreme blessedness ; and a cheerful

SER . IX . ] BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

183

promotion of the good of the universe ; unspeakably amiable and

delightful in itself , and boundlessly productive of happiness to

others. With these views, we cease to wonder, that men are af-

flicted in this world: and are surprised, only, to see them no more

afflicted.

5thly. He exhibits to us, that he is kind, not only to such beings

as are virtuous, but to such, also, as are sinners ; and that this kind-

ness in its extent and consequences is infinite .

In the Scriptures we are informed, that, notwithstanding the re-

bellion ofmankind, God is still disposed to regard them with kind-

ness; and that, to such a degree, as to proffer to them the forgive-

ness of their sins, and a restoration of their minds to the character

and privileges , from which they have fallen. To this end, as we

are further taught, he has sent his only begotten Són into this world,

to die in our stead ; and has promised, that whosoever believeth on

him shall not perish, but have everlasting life. In consequence of

his mediation, God has also sent into the world his holy Spirit, to

sanctify our souls, to purify our lives , to aid all our virtuous en-

deavours, and to conduct us in safety to the kingdom of the blessed.

In this manner he has proved to us his Mercy; the consummation

and glory of infinite good-will. When all the circumstances of this

wonderful scheme of dispensations are duly considered, even in

such a manner as that, in which we are able to consider them, we

are forced to acknowledge, that no manifestation of benevolence,

within our comprehension, can be compared to this ; and to accord

with the views, which angels formed of it, and which they ex-

pressed in their divine hymn at the birth of the Redeemer ; Glory

to God in the highest ; and on Earth peace ; good- will towards men !

6thly. In the Law, which he has given to mankind for the regula-

tion of all their moral conduct, he has required no other obedience,

except their love to himself , and to each other.

This law, which was formed by him according to his own plea-

sure, is undoubtedly a perfect expression of that pleasure. But

love is the only object of its requisitions . Towards him it is re-

quired to be supreme ; towards other intelligent beings, sincere

and universal. Of course, as he has made love the only object of

that law, by which he governs his moral creatures, it is undoubt-

edly the object, in which he supremelý delights ; and by necessary

inference, is his own moral character.

This truth is the more strongly impressed, when we remember,

that the law regards nothing else, as excellent, praiseworthy, or

rewardable. He himself informs us, that love is the fulfilling of

the law . This , then, is the only thing, which it requires ; and,

therefore, the only thing, which it esteems excellent or desirable.

In all the various exercises of duty towards God, or towards our

fellow- creatures , in whatever form they appear, or by whatever

name they are called , there is no other real principle, or perform-

ance, of duty, besides love. It is, hence, made the spring, and

AL

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD .

184 [ SER . IX.

directory of all our conduct towards friends and enemies, towards

strangers and neighbours, towards those who can requite us and

those who cannot. No being, capable of happiness, is above, or

beneath, the reception of its benefits: and every moral being is

under immoveable obligations to exercise it. Thus it is made by

the law of God the foundation, and the sum, of all good, natural

and moral ; of moral good, as being the amount of all our duty ;

and of natural good, as in this way the means of all our blessings.

Still more strongly is this truth impressed by the sanctions of this

law . By it nothing, except love, is rewarded ; and nothing, except

the opposite character, punished. The reward is no less than end-

less death. In these sanctions, God expresses in the strongest

manner his supreme delight in benevolence, and his supreme detes-

tation of its opposite. Howforcible a proof is all this , that his own

character is infinitely benevolent.

7thly. God requires the whole regard, which he claims, to be ren-

dered to him, only as a benevolent God.

In the Scriptures we are required to love, worship, and serve ;

that is, to exhibit our love in different forms, to a God of love, and to

such a God only. Whatever being God is, he undoubtedly loves

his own character ; and must of course choose, that this should be,

to creatures, the object of their approbation and love. No other

conduct is , I apprehend, consistent with the intelligent nature. But

in the Scriptures he has not required us to approve, admire, or love

himself , in any other character, except as a benevolent God. If

this, then, be not his real character, he has not required us to love,

admire, or approve his true character at all ; but another, which does

not belong to him. Of course, he has not, according to this sup-

position, required us to render this regard to himself , but to an

imaginary God ; an object, diverse from himself in every moral cha-

racteristic . All therefore, whichhe has done to enjoin, and to pro-

cure, the veneration, love, and obedience, of his creatures ; the

pomp of miracles ; the series of revelations ; the humiliation, life,

and death, the resurrection, ascension, and intercession, of Christ ;

the labours of the Spirit of Grace ; the establishment and support

ofhis Church in the world ; have all been accomplished, merely to

gain our homage, and service, to a fictitious god; and not to himself ,

the true and only JEHOVAH. To the same end have been directed,

also, his law, with its promises and threatenings, and his whole

system of Providence with its long train ofjudgments and mercies.

According to this scheme, God is exhibited, as having laboured from

the beginning for a being, which has no existence, except in fancy ;

a mere nihility ; and therefore, as labouring without an end. Ac-

cording to this scheme, therefore, all the wonderful works both of

Creation and Providence have been accomplished for no end ; and,

notwithstanding their amazing magnificence, are no other than a

solemn farce, which, he has informed us, shall endure for ever.

According to this scheme, God has been employed, from the be-

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

SER. IX . ] 185

ginning, in inducing mankind by a series of most wonderful works

to assume the most excellent of all characters, and the only really

excellent character, for no conceivable end ; and in this employ-

ment has without any reason exhibited a perpetual succession of

mere deceit and illusion. Necessity of deceit cannot exist with

God ; because, without it, he can with infinite ease accomplish what-

ever he chooses. It must then, if existing at all, exist without cause ,

or motive . He, who can believe this , can believe any thing. But

no man who understands what he believes, can seriously adopt so

gross an absurdity.

8thly. God has informed us in the Scriptures , that there is beyond

the grave an immortal state of retribution ; in which whatever seems

irregular in the present state will be adjusted according to the most

exact dictates of benevolence and equity.

At the final judgment, we are taught in the Scriptures, mankind

will be universally tried by those rules of duty, which have already

been recited, according to the means of knowing them, which God

has placed in their power. Those, who are possessed of the re-

vealed law, will be judged by the law ; and those, who are not, will

be judged without the law . In other words, every man will be judged

according to his works . At this time, the whole state of mankind

will be settled agreeably to the most consummate benevolence.

Such, as in this world have loved God and each other, will then,

through the righteousness of Christ, be acquitted of all their former

transgressions ; delivered from the punishment, which they had

merited; and rewarded with everlasting life in the kingdom of

glory. Those, who have not performed this duty, will be consign-

ed to blackness of darkness for ever. In this great transaction, and

its consequences, the mystery of the present world will be finished ;

the dispensations of God, both to the righteous and the wicked, ex-

hibited as perfectly accordant with infinite benevolence ; and the

difficulties , which to the eye of reason attend them here, explained

in such a manner, as to stop every mouth, and remove every objec-

tion .

By these several arguments the benevolence of God is, I think,

completely evinced in the Scriptures .

REMARKS.

From the considerations, which have been suggested in this dis-

course, connected with those, which have preceded it, I observe

inthe

I. place, that the benevolence of God is strictly infinite .

In the divine Mind every attribute is necessarily co- extended

with the greatness of that mind. The benevolence of God is as

truly thus extensive, as his knowledge, or his power. To his love

of happiness existing, to his desire of happiness as a thing to be

produced , no limit can be affixed. Intense and glowing beyond

degree, although perfectly serene and complacent, it furnishes the

VOL. I. 24

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

186 [ SER. IX.

most solid foundation for the truth of that remarkable declaration

in the text : God is love ; or Infinite Love is the Infinite God.

It is equally evident, that the Benevolence of God is Immutable

and Eternal. This divine Attribute, is like Omniscience and Om-

nipotence, plainly incapable of addition, or diminution. How can

it be increased ? By whom, or what, can it be lessened ? What can

put an end to its existence ? All these questions convey their own

answer.

2dly. The Benevolence ofGod cannot but be ever active.

Epicurus, and after him no small multitude of succeeding philo-

sophers, have adopted the opinion, that God is either absolutely,

or in a great degree, quiescent, or inactive ; at least so far as a great

part of what we have been accustomed to call his Providence is

concerned. Some of these philosophers have denied the provi-

dence of God absolutely. Others have denied a particular provi-

dence. But all, to whom I refer, have attributed some degree of

inactivity to the Creator. Their opinion seems generally to have

been, that, after he had ended the work of creating the Universe, and

set it in motion, he left it to take care of itself; and found his own

enjoyment in something, which demanded no active exertion on his

part. Epicurus himself taught, that the Gods , whose existence he

admitted, resided at a great distance from created beings in some un-

known, happy region ; where they passed their immortal life in a

state of absolute quiet, and pleasurable enjoyment ; without feeling

any interest in the affairs of mortals , or exercising any government,

or providence, over them. This opinion, in substance, but with se-

veral modifications, has been adopted by no small number of phi-

losophers down to the present time. They, indeed, admit the ex-

istence of one God only ; he acknowledged many : they suppose

God to be separated from human affairs only by a voluntary inat-

tention to them; he, by local distance also. The most spacious

foundation for this doctrine is the supposition, that God, being in-

finitely perfect, and, therefore, infinitely happy in himself , can have

no inducement to attend to the concerns of his creatures ; since no

such attention can at all add to his happiness . This supposition is

plainly, and wholly, erroneous ; although the terms, in which I

have expressed it, the same in which it is usually expressed, seem

to convey an unquestionable truth. It is true, that God is infinitely

perfect, and therefore, infinitely happy ; and equally true, of course,

that no addition can be made to his happiness. It is also true,

that this happiness exists in himself in a manner perfectly indepen-

dent; but it is not true, that God would be, or would ever have

been, thus perfectly happy, had he not made the Universe ; or

were he not to conduct it to the purpose, for which it was made.

Benevolence, like gold, finds its chiefvalue in its use. It is, in the

nature of the case, more blessed to give than to receive ; or to be in

any other employment, or situation.

Thehappiness ofGod is perfectlyindependent,because he is able

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

SER IX . ] 187

to devise, and execute, whatever he pleases ; and thusto accom-

plish boundless glory to himself , and boundless good to his crea-

⚫ tures, dictated by his benevolence, and comprehended by his Om-

niscience. There is nothing in the nature of the case, which fur-

nishes a shadow of evidence, that the happiness of God is, or can

be, independent of his own active exertions . As these exertions

can be all made with infinite ease, with perfect rectitude, and with

absolute certainty of success, it is impossible, that they should not

accord with the most complete independence. Benevolence is the

love of happiness, and the desire of its existence, wherever it does

not already exist. Should this happiness, thus desired, fail to ex-

ist, the frustration of the desire must be a prevention, or annihila-

tion, of the enjoyment which was found in the contemplation of its

existence, or which the fulfilment of it would have produced. If ,

then, God desired the existence of happiness in other beings ; or,

in other words, if God was benevolent, (for these phrases mean

exactly the same thing) we cannot but see, that it was impossible,

in the moral sense, for him to fail of producing it ; and that, if he

had not produced it, his happiness must have been diminished.

The very nature of the disposition, therefore, proves this doctrine

to be false, and the conduct, which it asserts of God, to be impos-

sible. With equal evidence is it proved to be false by facts . If the doc-

trine were true ; it would furnish unanswerable proof , that God

would never have created the Universe. He was just as happy in

the contemplation of his own perfections, antecedently to the crea-

tion, as at the present time ; and according to this doctrine, could

have had no inducement to create, any more than at the present

time to superintend. The existence of things could be no more ne-

cessary to his happiness, than the government of them. But he has

created them ; and has thus proved, that he took pleasure in their

existence. Of course his happiness partly consisted in the fact, that

they existed ; and would have been lessened, so far as this part ex-

tended, if theyhad not been brought into existence. Butthe universe,

and every thing which it contains, was created for some end : that is ,

itwas createdforthe purpose of bringing into existencethe happiness,

which the conscious beings, contained in it, were intended to enjoy ;

and for the pleasure, whichGod experienced in producing this happi-

ness. This truth will not be denied, unless for the sake ofdenying

it : since the contrary supposition would impute to the Creator the

most absolute folly, and would therefore be a palpable blasphemy.

Nor will it be any more denied, that the superintendency of God

over all things is absolutely necessary, every moment, in every

place, and to every being, in order to the accomplishment of this

end: all other agency , beside his, being infinitely inadequate to this

purpose. This happiness, being eternal, is an object infinitely

great and desirable ; and was, of course, infinitely desired by God.

An infinite inducement, therefore, continually exists to the conti-

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

188 [ SER. IX .

nual, and universal, agency, of God, in the government of all

things.

I know of but one seeming objection to this doctrine. It is this :

that, if the happiness of God in any degree consists either in behold-

ing, or producing, the happiness of his creatures, then it will seem

to follow, that he was less happy, antecedently to the creation, than

at the present or any future period. This conclusion, will, however,

vanish, if we call to mind, that all duration is present to God ; and

that his manner of existing excludes all possible application to him

of past and future. Whatever was, or will be, with respect to

creatures, is only, and alike, present to him. His happiness, there-

fore, is the same yesterday , to - day, andfor ever.

Epicurus, who denied a creation, was undoubtedly more consist-

ent with himself , than modern philosophers, who admit this event,

and yet deny the providence of God. If God had not thought

proper to create the Universe ; it might with some show of reason

be concluded, that he would not find any interest in governing it ;

but, if he created it, as the philosophers in question, in many in-

stances acknowledge, it is unanswerably certain, that he will un-

ceasingly conduct it by his providence to the purpose, for which it

was created.

This consideration is infinitely glorious to God. The divine dis-

position here exhibited, is infinitely unlike the boasted benevolence

of modern philosophy ; which is wholly confined to the mere con-

templation of happiness as a beautiful picture, or to the impassion-

ed exhibition of good-will in sighs, and tears, and pathetic expres-

sions ; useless to the subjects of it, and fruitless towards its objects ;

or is spent in mere unavailing wishes, in themselves wholly devoid

of efficacy or worth. This divine disposition is the boundless en-

ergy of the infinite Mind ; the intense and immeasurable love of

doing good, unceasingly, and endlessly, producing that happiness ,

in which it delights. It creates, with an activity never wearied,

and never discouraged, means to this glorious end, without number,

and beyond degree, fitted with a diversity incomprehensible to ef-

fectuate in the most perfect manner this eminently divine purpose.

It is a tree, which, planted in this distant world, reaches the highest

heaven ; adorned with branches endless in their multitude, covered

with leaves and blossoms of supernal beauty, and loaded with fruits

of life and happiness countless in their number, unceasing in their

succession, and eternal in their progress : while all the innumerable

millions of percipient beings approach, and eat, and live .

3dly . The benevolence of God is his whole moral character.

We commonly, and I think in most cases necessarily, speak of

the moral character of God, as composed of many separate attri-

butes ; of goodness, bounty, mercy, truth, justice, faithfulness, and

patience. In the same manner, also, the Scriptures unfold his mo-

ral character. In this, they have accorded with that mode of think-

ing, which is natural to us, and in which we usually think more

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD.

SER . IX .] 189

clearly, and advantageously, than in any other. The exercises of

benevolence are so numerous, and so diversified, as to need, if we

would consider them clearly, and usefully, to be arranged in differ-

ent classes, denoted by different names, and separately contempla-

ted by our minds. Still , it is also useful to remember what the

Scriptures have taught us in the text, that the whole moral charac-

ter ofGod is love, endlessly diversified in its operations and mani-

festations, but simple and indivisible in its nature ; an intense and

eternal flame of uncompounded good-will.

How glorious a character is here presented to us of the great

Ruler of all things ! Nothing less than infinite and unmingledbe-

nevolence could qualify him for the great work of replenishing his

vast kingdom with unceasing and eternal good. All good-will, in-

ferior to this , must, it would seem, be wearied, discouraged, influ-

enced to change its views by rebellion and provocation, and thus

inclined to vary its original and best designs, and to fall short of

the perfect objects, which it began to accomplish. But the love of

God , evidently without limits, is equally without variableness, or

shadow of turning. Hence, every good gift, and every perfect gift,

flows from it unceasingly, and will flow for ever.

In this view of his character, how infinitely distant is JEHOVAH

from all the Gods of the Heathen ! These imaginary beings were

not only imperfect, but were debased by every human weakness ,

and deformed by every human passion ; possessed of no fixed

character, or purpose ; contentious among themselves ; revenge-

ful towards mankind ; flattered into good humour again by their

services ; wearied by their own labours ; and invigorated anew only

by food, sleep, or pastime.

I cannot but add, How different a Saviour must he be, whose

mind is informed with this boundless love, united with its concomi-

tant perfections , from the Saviour, presented to us by Socinianism,

and its kindred systems ! Christ, as exhibited to us by these sys-

tems, is a created, and, therefore, an imperfect and mutable, being.

When Stephen was expiring, he committed his soul finally, with all

its interests, into the hands of the LORD JESUS . All his faithful

followers , at the close of their lives, adopt the same conduct.

How desirable must it be, at so solemn a period, when our all is

depending, to realize, that he, on whom we depend, is possessed of

love, great enough to comprehend even us, and to be incapable of

weariness, alienation, or change: love, in a word, the same yester-

day, to -day, and forever ! How desirable must it be to find Him,

inwhom we are required to repose confidence, as the condition of

inheriting eternal life, able, willing, and faithful, to bestow on us,

all that is meant by this divine reward.

4thly. The perfect Benevolence of God must, it is evident, delight

in greater good, more than that, which is less, and most in that,

which is supreme .

That the Omniscience of God cannot but discern all the differ-

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD .

190 [ SER. IX.

ences of good, and distinguish, with complete accuracy, and in all

cases, the greater from the less, and that which is, on the whole,

most desirable, from that which is not, will be admitted of course.

That perfect benevolence must choose this, in preference to any

other, is, unless I am deceived, equally evident. Indeed, I can

conceive of no possibility , that benevolence can, in any being, pre-

fer a smaller degree of what he thinks good to a greater. Much

less can this be attributable to God. As he knows perfectly what

is really good ; so on this only must his desire, or delight, be fixed;

and with the more intenseness in proportion to the greatness ofthe

degree, in which it does or may exist.

Should it be said, that there may be two or more systems of good,

equally perfect and desirable : I am not disposed to contendwith

him, by whom it is said. Those, who say it, ought however to re-

member, that it is said gratuitously there being no evidence, by

which the assertion can be supported. But, should it be granted,

it will not at all affect the doctrine under consideration. These

two or more systems are by the supposition equally good ; and

therefore, as an object of contemplation, or adoption, neither is in

any degree preferable to the other. That, then, which has been

actually adopted, has by this fact become preferable. In all other

respects it was equally desirable ; and, as it has been actually

commenced, it is more desirable that it should be continued, than

that it should be given up for the sake of adopting that, which was

only equal to it ; because, in that case, all, that has been already

done, must have been done in vain : conduct, which, I need not

say , would be unbecoming the divine character, and for this rea-

son, at least, wholly undesirable. The present system, or the sys-

tem actually adopted by God, is therefore, to say the least, now

the best and most perfect system of good.

The same reasoning will equally prove, that the means, which

he has employed for the accomplishment of this great end, are also

the best and most proper means, which could be chosen ; and, of

course, that the whole work of Creation and Providence, compo-

sed of the means and the end, is a perfect work, entirely suited to

his character.

5thly. It is evident, that God, who is thus benevolent, must love

the same disposition in his creatures, and hate the opposite one, un-

changeably and for ever.

That God delights with infinite complacency in his own moral

character, cannot be questioned. Benevolence in his Intelligent

creatures is a direct resemblance of this character ; his own image,

instamped on created minds ; and cannot fail, therefore, to be an

object of the same complacency, wherever it exists. He loves ,

also, his own purposes . Of course, he must love this disposition

in his creatures, because all those, in whom it exists, love the same

purposes, and voluntarily coincide with him in their endeavours to

promote them .

BENEVOLENCE OF GOD

SER. IX . ] 191

On the contrary, that disposition in his creatures, which is oppo-

site to his own, is in itself odious, in proportion as his is amiable ;

and voluntarily endeavours to oppose, and to frustrate his pur-

poses ; that is, to diminish, or destroy, the boundless good, which

he has begun to accomplish. It is not here intended, that so vast

a scheme of thought, or action, usually enters into the minds of

sinful creatures ; but that this is the real tendency of all their op-

position to his law and government. In this view, the rebellion of

sinners assumes a most odious and dreadful aspect ; and is here

seen to be a direct hostility against the benevolent character and

designs of God, and against the well -being of his Intelligent

creation.

When, therefore, he shall come to judge the world in righteous-

ness, and to render to them such rewards, as are suited to their

characters ; it is plain , that he will approve of those, and those

only, who resemble him by being benevolent ; and disapprove of

those, who have cherished the contrary disposition. The former,

he will bless, or make happy ; the latter he will punish, or make

miserable. His approbation, at the final judgment, is no other than

a testimony of the pleasure, which he takes in the moral character

of those, who are approved ; and his disapprobation, a similar tes-

timony of the displeasure, which he feels towards those who are

condemned. Of this pleasure and displeasure his rewards and

punishments are only proofs, of a still higher kind ; all founded on

the moral character of the respective beings, who are judged and

rewarded. How odious, how undesirable, then, is that disposition

in us, which God by the dictates of his infinite benevolence is in a

sense compelled thus to hate, and punish, because it is a voluntary

opposition to his own perfect character, and a fixed enmity to the

well-being of his creatures. How lovely and desirable, on the

contrary, is that disposition, which he thus loves, and will thus re-

ward, because it is a resemblance of his own beauty and excel-

lence, a cheerful accordance with all his perfect designs, and an

universal good-will to his Intelligent kingdom !

SERMON Χ.

ATTRIBUTES OF GOD . THE JUSTICE OF GOD.

DEUT. xxxii . 4. -Just and right is he .

THE end, for which the Song, of whichthis verse is a part , was

written, is expressed in the preceding Chapter, verse 19, in these

words :

Now, therefore , write ye this song for you, and teach it to the chil-

dren of Israel : put it in their mouths, that this song may be a wit-

ness for me against the children of Israel .

To this end it is perfectly suited. It is a general testimony of

the perfection of God, and of his peculiar kindness to that people.

As it strongly and unanswerably exhibits the Righteousness and

Goodness of God in all his dealings with them ; so, in the same

evident and forcible manner, it manifests their ingratitude and un-

reasonableness in rebelling against him. These it presents in the

most affecting light ; because it shows, that God clearly foreknew

all their transgressions, and, with this foreknowledge, still per-

formed for them all these blessings .

At the same time, it forewarned them of their sin and danger,

and urged on them the strongest motives to obedience. This

timely testimony was itself a most convincing and affecting proof

of his goodness, and left them without excuse.

The text is a general ascription of supreme excellence and

glory to God, in his nature, agency, and works. I will publish the

name of the Lord, Jehovah, saith Moses in the preceding verse ;

ascribe ye greatness unto our God.

This Name, or Character, is published in the verse which con-

tains the text. He is the Rock ; his work is perfect, for all his ways

are Judgment : a God of Truth, and without iniquity ; Just and

Right is he. That is, God is the Rock, or foundation, on which the

Universe stands. His work, the great work of building and go-

verning the universe, is perfect ; without imperfection, error, or

fault; comprising all things which it ought, and nothing which it

ought not , to comprise. The reason of this perfection is, that all

his ways are Judgment ; that is, are a perfect compound of wisdom,

righteousness, and goodness. Just and Right may signify the same

thing ; or, as is often the meaning of Right, so here it may natu-

rally denote the perfection of God generally considered.

DOCTRINE.

God is a Being of perfect Justice.

Before I enter upon the proof of this doctrine, it will be neces-

THE JUSTICE OF GOD.

SER. X. ] 193

sary to examine the different meanings of this term ; as, like most

other abstract terms, it is variously used.

1st. Justice, as applied to cases , in which property is concerned,

denotes the exchange of one thing for another, of equal value.

Justice, considered in this manner, affects all bargains ; the pay-

ment of debts ; and the adjustment, and fulfilment, of all contracts.

Whenever these are so made, and performed, as that an exact

equivalent is rendered for what is received, then, and then only ,

justice is done. This is called Commutative Justice .

2dly. As applied to the conduct of a Magistrate towards subjects,

it denotes exactly that treatment of the subject which his personal con-

duct merits . To reward the good subject, and to punish the bad,

according to equitable laws, and real desert, is to treat bothjustly ;

or to exhibit justice in the distributions of Government. Accord-

ingly a Ruler, conducting in this manner, is by the common voice

declared to be a just ruler. Justice, in this sense, is properly called

Distributive Justice .

3dly. Justice, in a much more extended sense than either of these,

denotes doing that, which is Right upon the whole, in all cases ; that

which is fittest and most useful to be done ; in other words, that

which will most promote the universal Good. In this sense, Justice

is, together with its corresponding term, Righteousness , used as sy-

nonymous with Benevolence or Virtue, and involves the whole of

moral excellence. This is sometimes called General Justice . This

use of the word is very frequent ; and many persons appear to

make no distinction between this sense of the word and the last

mentioned. Yet the meanings are widely different. In the former

sense, Justice is the conduct of a Ruler only ; in the latter, is ap-

plicable to all Intelligent beings : in the former, it is a course of

conduct, respecting a single object, according to his merit, or de-

merit ; in the latter, it always respects the universe.

Justice, when considered as an attribute, is the disposition , which

gives birth to these, or to either of these , kinds of conduct.

With respect to the first of these senses, we cannot easily sup-

pose a case, in which God, who is the giver of all good, can receive

any thing, for which an equivalent alent can be rendered . The nearest

resemblance to such a case, which is applicable to God, is one, in

which he requires the service of mankind in a particular manner,

and promises to reward them for such service with worldly posses-

sions. Several such instances may be found in the Scriptures.

Thus he promised the Israelites abundant worldly good, in con-

sequence oftheir faithful obedience. Thus he promised David, as

a reward for his obedience, many earthly blessings. Thus, for the

execution of his decree against Tyre, he gave Egypt into the hands

ofNebuchadnezzar .

These instances are, however, all plainly imperfect ones, for

the purpose of exhibiting a complete display of this Attribute in

the sense in question. God, in all the cases specified, exhibited

VOL. I. 25

THE JUSTICE OF GOD.

194 [ SER . X.

his bounty , and mercy, so much more strongly than mere commu-

tative justice, that we are apt to forget, that this was exhibited at

all. Nor can we suppose a case, in which this difficulty will not

arise, from the character and situation of God, as the Author and

Giver of all good, and as the Receiver of nothing from the hands

ofhis creatures .

Yet, if a case could be proposed, in which God could act, as

just in the Commutative sense, his disposition to be just, in this

sense, would be as perfect, as in either of the other senses. This

is unanswerably evident from the consideration, that he requires,

under the most awful penalties, the exercise of such justice from

the hands of his subjects. In the two last senses , the justice of

God is perpetually, and perfectly, exercised towards all his Intel-

ligent creatures.

As the Ruler of the Universe, he rewards every rational being

exactly according to his works ; except that he hath shown mercy

to numberless sinners, who had merited nothing but wrath and pu-

nishment : an exception supremely glorious to his character, and

formed in entire consistency with exact justice.

As the great friend of happiness, he has devised, also, the most

perfect happiness of his immense Kingdom, and the most perfect

means of accomplishing it. This he pursues with infinite intense-

ness of energy, without intermission, without change, and without

end.

In this sense, the Justice of God respects first, himself; and se-

condly, his creatures.

1st. God is infinitely just, as his conduct respects himself .

In an uniform series of dispensations, he exhibits to the Uni-

verse, his own character, as supremely glorious, excellent, beauti-

ful, and lovely ; and as therefore deserving all possible admiration,

confidence, love, reverence, worship, and obedience, from all In-

telligent beings . In this divine employment he has published to

Intelligent beings a glorious rule of rectitude, as the rule of his own

conduct : a rule , to which all that conduct is entirely conformed,

without variableness, or shadow of turning . To this rule he re-

quires them to conform all their conduct, also. In obeying it, are

involved their duty, interest, honour, and happiness, alike. This

he has exhibited as an unchangeable and everlasting rule ; by

which the Intelligent universe is every where, at every period, and

with respect to every thing, to be governed ; ; and which he will

never forsake, even though that universe were to be the sacrifice.

2dly. In the same sense, God is perfectly just to his creatures .

Thejustice of God to himself is the highest and first act of jus-

tice to his creatures. But for this regard to himself , they could

never venerate his character, nor render him their love, or their

confidence. As the promoter of the universal good, God can in

no way so contribute to this great and glorious end, as in unfolding

his own supremely excellent character. This is the source, and

SER. X. ] THE JUSTICE OF GOD. 195

foundation, of all virtuous, sincere, and enduring happiness. In

this conduct of God, therefore, the universe is infinitely interested.

In each particular dispensation to them, also, he directly pur-

sues the same end, in all the parts of his endlessly diversified ad-

ministration. Not a wrong, not a mistake, not a defect, finds ad-

mission into his providence, throughout eternity and immensity.

But it is chiefly as the great Ruler of all beings, that the justice

of God demands a particular consideration, at this time. In this

character, his justice is employed in the distribution of rewards to

holy and virtuous creatures, and of punishments to false and rebel-

lious subjects ofhis government.

All these distributions are made on the ground of law. Such,

as obey the law of God, are by impartial justice rewarded: those,

who disobey, are punished. The perfection of these distributions

consists in this ; that each creature is rewarded, or punished, ac-

cording to his character and conduct, exactly ; so that the reward,

or the punishment, shall be precisely proportioned to the several

degrees of virtue, or guilt, just as they have existed. In this case

all the palliations, and aggravations, of guilt, and all the means of

increasing or diminishing virtue, will enter completely into the esti-

mate of the character of each individual. Of all these, God, who

searcheth the heart, and trieth the reins , is a perfect judge. Nothing

is unknown, or forgotten, by him ; and nothing will be left out of

the estimate of character, which will be the foundation of the re-

ward, or the punishment. The proofs of the justice of God, ex-

hibited by reason, or found in the system of Providence, are not to

us, demonstrative. Yet they are well deserving of our attention.

1st. The character and circumstances of God strongly lead us to

believe in his perfect justice.

God is perfectly independent ; in the actual possession of all

possible good ; and completely secure against every possible loss,

and evil . Whatever he pleases to have exist, or done, is certainly

brought to pass; and in the precise manner, which is pleasing to

him. Hence no temptation, or inducement, to any injustice, can

exist with respect to him. Possessing all things, he can need no-

thing; contriving all things, he can fear nothing ; effecting all things ,

which he chooses, with infinite ease, and no possible obstruction,

he can never have occasion to adopt any other character, or con-

duct, but that ofperfectjustice. Injustice in our experience is al-

ways derived, and of course, from the dread of some disadvantage,

or the desire of some advantage which otherwise would not exist.

But these things have no possible application to God. Reason

sees not, therefore, how God can be under any inducement to in-

justice. But without such inducement, injustice cannot exist.

2dly. In this state of trial many exhibitions of the divine justice

are made in divine providence.

These are seen chiefly in the application of punishments and re-

wards to Nations , considered in their national capacity. Nations,

R ?

THE JUSTICE OF GOD.

196 [ SER . X.

as such, exist only on this side ofthe grave. Hence it would seem,

that in this peculiar character, as nations merely, they are with pro-

priety rewarded or punished here. Thus nations, after they have

become corrupted to a certain degree, have constantly been de-

stroyed for their national corruption. God, indeed, has usually

waited with wonderful patience, until their iniquities were full ; and

so evidently, that the ancient heathens described and painted Justice

as lame ; that is, slow in arriving. This conduct of the Creator is

highly becoming his glorious character, as a most bountiful and

merciful God towards beings, still in a state of trial .

Yet the destruction, or punishment, has been sure ; however

late it may seem to us . The Lord is not slack concerning his pro-

mise, as men count slackness ; but is long- suffering to usward ; not

willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repent-

ance.

So evident has been the justice of God in such instances, that

the heathen have strongly marked, and fully acknowledged it,

generally throughout the whole heathen world : a clear proof,

that it has struck the eye, and convinced the mind, of Common

sense.

3dly. The justice of God is conspicuous in this great fact ; that

mankind are never afflicted beyond their deserts .

In the last discourse, but one, I have observed, that this truth is

rendered evident in the only case, in which it can with the least

appearance of reason be disputed ; viz. the sufferings of virtuous

men ; by their own uniform acknowledgment, that they never

suffer even so much as they are conscious of having deserved.

But the only tendency of any mind to injustice is to withhold good,

or inflict evil, contrary to, or beyond, the desert of the recipient.

As neither of these is ever the fact ; as, on the contrary, men al-

ways receive more good, and less evil, than they have merited ; it

is plain, that the justice ofGod on the one hand, and his absolute

freedom from injustice on the other, are strongly evidenced in his

dispensations to man in the present world.

4thly. All the arguments, which I have deduced from the charac-

ter and circumstances of God, to prove, that he is benevolent, are ca-

pable of an equally forcible application to the present subject ; and

contribute, in the same manner, to prove that he is just.

As these have been so lately rehearsed, it will be unnecessary to

mention them again at the present time.

5thly. As God is benevolent, it is impossible that he should not be

just. In the last discourse I observed, that love constituted the whole

moral character of God; and that, although we were obliged for

the sake of distinctness, to consider, as the Scriptures themselves

often do, this character in different views, and under different

names ; yet it is in reality a disposition simple and indivisible : these

names denoting only its different modifications and exercises. As

THE JUSTICE OF GOD.

SER. X. ] 197

I expect hereafter to consider this subject more fully , I shall only

observe here, that, the doctrine being admitted, the benevolence of

God, if proved, as I flatter myself it has been, from the light of

Nature, is itself complete proof of the justice of God. ABeing,

willing, as a benevolent one necessarily is, to do more good to

others thanjustice demands, cannot be willing to do less ; the only

manner, in which he could possibly be unjust.

This proof of the justice of God is, I think, ample and satisfac-

tory. At the same time, in such a world as this, where the system

ofdispensations extends to so many beings, and so many events, in

themselves varied almost endlessly, and in their relations still more

numerous and diversified ; it cannot but be, that mystery should in

a great measure overspread the whole. In each individual case,

there will be much, that we cannot understand ; in the comparison

of that case with others, there will be more . A state of trial , also,

involves the doctrine, that in it a complete exhibition of justice

cannot be made. All that is just in such a state cannot be seen to

bejust ; especially by creatures, whose discernment and compre-

hension are like ours ; so limited, and so disproportioned to the ob-

jects of investigation. Amid the multitude of these objects we

are lost; by their variety we are perplexed ; by their strangeness

we are staggered; and by the relations, which they bear to each

other, often apparently very dissimilar, often seemingly inconsist-

ent, we are not unnaturally, nor unfrequently, overwhelmed with

difficulties , doubts , and distresses .

It is probable, that, except in the case of nations already men-

tioned, the dispensations of good and evil in this world are design-

ed rather as restraints on the sinful conduct ; and as encourage-

ments to the virtue, of mankind, than as full manifestations of the

justice ofGod. In this view of them, they contain abundant proofs

of wisdom, equity, and goodness, wholly suited to the state of

man. It ought at the same time to be observed, that there is no

argument, which renders it probable in any degree, that God is

notjust. What the state of Providence thus teaches, the Scriptures have

completely disclosed. The justice of God is in the Scriptures ex-

hibited to us in various methods .

1st. God has informed us in multitudes of direct declarations ,

that he is a God of consummate justice .

Allthese declarations receive the whole weight of his whole cha-

racter, as exhibited in the Scriptures ; a weight, which no mind,

that admits any part of this character, can resist.

2dly. He has displayed in the history of the Scriptures many

highly important and impressive instances of his justice, executed on

mankind, both as nations and individuals . These are very nume-

rous, and various, and, in them all, complete examples of this awful

attribute are presented to our view.

3dly. In his law, he has required all men to be just ; assuring

THE JUSTICE OF GOD.

198 [ SER. X.

them, that in this character they will be loved by him, and in the

contrary character hated ; promising them in this character glorious

rewards, and threatening them, in the contrary character, mostfear-

ful punishments .

Exactly of this nature is every command, every promise, and

every threatening. These promises and threatenings have also, as

was observed under the last head, (for these considerations illus-

trate each other) been often most exemplary executed even in the

present world. In these instances, we are not left to our own con-

jectures to interpret the dispensations of Providence ; but are di-

rectly informed of their nature by God himself . In these instances ,

therefore, the dispensations become plain and intelligible, and all

doubt is excluded.

4thly. He has informed us, that there is beyond the grave a future

being ; that in the future world he has appointed, at the end of this

system, a day, in which he will judge the world in righteousness, and

will reward every man according to his works .

5thly. He has required us to acknowledge, reverence, love, wor-

ship, and obey, him, as being Just, perfectly and infinitely. In no

other character does he require any love, homage, or service. That

God, in requiring our homage to him, should require it to a charac-

ter, not his own, is an absurdity, which can neither be admitted,

nor explained.

There is, indeed, no possible reason, which can be devised, why

any and all of these things should be done in the Scriptures, ex-

cept that God is the just Being, which he is there represented to

be. These things united comprise all the proof , which we can

reasonably wish of the justice of God, and cannot possibly be de-

stroyed, nor lessened. Accordingly no person who believed the

Scriptures to be the word of God, ever thought of doubting this

great truth.

REMARKS.

1st. How gloriously is God qualified by this attribute for the go-

vernment of all things !

In what an amiable, majestic, and dignified light is he here mani-

fested to our view ! Without this attribute all others would be vain.

ARuler he might be, because his power would easily compel all

beings to obey him. But he would be merely an arbitrary and

despotic ruler; neither venerable, nor lovely. No creature would

or could, serve him willingly, with either love or confidence. The

fear , which gendereth bondage, would be the only principle of

subjection ; nor would any subjection, or service, secure his crea-

tures from perpetual danger and distress .

What a dreadful instrument would Omnipotence be in the hands

ofanunjust being ! What evils must not all creatures fear ! What

evils would they not suffer ! What spectacles of vengeance, and

wo, would not his arm call up into being ! How instantaneously

THE JUSTICE OF GOD.

SER. X.] 199

would all hope vanish, all safety cease, all good perish ! The uni-

verse would become a desert, a dungcon, an immense region of

mourning, lamentation, and wo.

Now, all creatures are secure from every possible act of injustice

from the hands of God. Powerful as he is ; knowing all things as

he does ; these amazing attributes are employed only to discern

that, which is just and right, and to bring it in every instance to

pass . Hence, he is the universal safeguard of his unnumbered

creatures ; the rock, on which their rights and interests immove-

ably rest ; the proper and unfailing object of supreme and endless

confidence. Wrong he cannot do; Right he cannot fail to do.

Submission to his will, his law, his government, is safe ; and, when

voluntary, is assured of the regard, the approbation, and the re-

wards, which are promised to cheerful obedience.

WereGod not possessed of this glorious attribute ; his Benevo-

lence would be mere weakness. All froward, rebellious, obsti-

nate creatures would presume on his want of energy to vindicate

his own honour, and the rights of the suffering universe. Amind

formed for immortal being, naturally makes progress in all its ha-

bits, and in the strength of all its powers. An evil mind, unre-

strained by the awe, or the exertions, of Omnipotence, would na-

turally increase in its pride, selfishness , malice and cruelty ; in a

general disregard to the well-being of others, and in a supreme de-

votion to its private, separate purposes. To all who oppose, to

every thing which clashes with, these things, such a mind is of

course an enemy. Nor can any bounds be set to this enmity, or to

its effects , except by God himself . Were he to remain quiescent

inmere kindness and good wishes to the universe, the schemes of

personal greatness, oppression, rage, revenge, and fury, which

would be formed by evil beings, cannot be measured. Every evil

being would become a fiend ; and to tempt a race, to ruin a world,

and to involve a system in misery, would be familiar events in the

annals of the universe.

2dly. What reason have Wicked men to fear the justice of God ?

The wicked are secured by God's perfect justice from the suffer-

ance of any evil, which they have not deserved ; but, at the same

time, are wholly exposed to the sufferance of all such evils, as they

have deserved. These are sufficiently dreadful to excite in their

minds every degree of alarm, which man is capable of experien-

cing. The denunciations of wo in the Scriptures of truth are couched

in as awful terms, as language can furnish . The God, who is im-

mutably and eternally just, as he uttered them in conformity to strict

justice, so in executing them will conform to the same justice in the

most perfect manner.

Whatever their rebellion against God, their rejection of his Son,

their deceit, injustice, and cruelty to each other, and their pollution

of themselves, deserves, they will receive exactly at his hand, and

THE JUSTICE OF GOD .

200 [ SER. X.

will be rewarded exactly according to their works . It becomes every

impenitent sinner to ask himself , what reward he ought to expect

for a life, spent wholly in rebellion of thought , word , and action ;

with no account of voluntary obedience, and millions of accounts

of gross disobedience against his Maker ?

It is plainly a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living

God. In his hand, and within his knowledge and power, are all the

avenues to wo, all the ingredients of misery. He is equally able

to pierce the soul, and to agonize the body. There is no escape

from his power; no concealment from his eye. What then, will

become of hardened sinners ? How will the justice of God over-

whelm them in consternation and horror at the great day !

3dly. We see here the great reason , why the Scriptures are opposed,

and denied, by wicked men .

All the difficulty, which men find in admitting the Scriptures to

be the word of God, exists in this attribute. I do not remember,

that I ever heard, or read, of a single objection to the Scrip-

tural God, except what was pointed against his justice. All men

are usually willing to acknowledge his power, wisdom, goodness,

faithfulness , truth, and mercy; but few beside good men, are ready

10 acknowledge his justice.

Whence this objection ? Is not Justice a glorious and eminent-

ly divine perfection ? Can an unjust ruler be the object of appro-

bation ? Is not injustice the ground of perpetual complaint against

earthly rulers ? The secret lies wholly in this fact. We are will-

ing, nay, desirous, that rulers should be just, when justice does not

endanger ourselves, and our happiness ; but no character is so

dreaded, so hated, when justice is considered as inconsistent with

our safety, peace, and hopes . But can this be right ? Ajust ruler

must punish wicked and unjust men. We choose, that other wicked

and unjust men should be punished ; and hesitate not to say, that

the common good indispensably requires it. But we make another

law for ourselves ; and would rather that the ruler should prove

unjust, than either reform ourselves, or be punished.

The justice of God holds out to us, and to all others, certain and

dreadful punishment as the proper reward of our sins. If God be

just, we cannot , without repentance, faith, and reformation of life,

possibly escape. Between reformation and punishment there is no

alternative. Reform we will not; be punished we cannot. Hence

we believe that God is not just, because we wish this not to be his

character. Of course, we deny the Scriptures to be his word, to

free ourselves from the terror of his justice. What wretched rea-

soning is this ! How foolish, how fatal ! How foolish, because it

cannot possibly help, or save us ; since God will plainly pursue his

own counsels, and accomplish his own purposes, whether we be-

lieve his justice, or not. How foolish, because the whole purpose,

for which such reasoning is adopted, is to enable us to continue

peacefully in sin; a miserable character, and plainly exposed al-

way to a miserable end !

THE JUSTICE OF GOD.

SER . X.J 201

How fatal is such reasoning, because it will actually induce us

to continue peacefully in sin, and prevent us from repentance and

salvation !

Onwhat is it grounded ? On mere wishes. Who form, and in-

dulge them ? Wicked men only. Can God be such, as wicked

men wish him to be ? Can they suppose it ? What kind of a ruler

do wicked men wish to have rule ? A vile one . What God do

wicked men wish to have rule the universe ? A vile one . Why ?

Because such a God only can be supposed to favour them. No

good man, no Angel, ever regretted, that God was just. It is im-

possible, that a virtuous being should not rejoice in the justice of

God. The instinctive voice ofall the virtuous universe is the voice

of Angels, and of the Spirits of Just Men made perfect, in the hea-

vens, crying, Alleluia ! Salvation, and glory, and honour, and power,

be unto the Lord our God ; for true and righteous are his Judgments .

Great and marvellous are thy works, Lord God Almighty, just and

true are thy ways, thou King of Saints !

VOL. I. 26

SERMON ΧΙ.

THE TRUTH OF GOD .

PSALM CXVII. 2.--And the truth of the Lord endureth for ever.

IN my last discourse, I considered briefly the Justice of God.

I shall now proceed to make some observations concerning His

Truth, which in the text is asserted to be an eternal, and therefore

an inseparable, attribute of Jehovah.

As a prelude to these observations, it will be useful to take a con-

cise notice of the several significations of this term. The word,

Truth, denotes,

1st. A Proposition, conformed to the real state of things . Thus

St. Paul says, I speak the truth in Christ, I lie not. Rom. ix. 1 .

2dly. All such propositions, generally considered.

Thus Pilate asked Christ, What is truth ? John xviii . 38 .

3dly. That collection of such propositions, which is contained in

the Gospel, and is commonly called Evangelical truth :

Thus says our Saviour, The Spirit of truth shall guide you into

all THE TRUTH . John xiv. 13. Thus also St. Paul observes, Love

rejoiceth in THE TRUTH. 1 Cor. xiii . 8. In both these instances,

the Truth mentioned is Evangelical Truth.

4thly. Reality, in opposition to that, which is fancied, or vi-

sionary. Thus the True God denotes the real God, in opposition to the

imaginary gods of the Heathen.

5thly. The Substance, in opposition to types ./

Thus Christ calls himself the Truth ; as being the great Antitype

of all the types in the Old Testament.

6thly. Veracity, that is, a disposition always to declare Truth, or

to speak according to the real state of things .

7thly. Faithfulness, that is, a disposition always to fulfil cove-

nants, trusts , and promises .

In these two last senses, I shall consider the Truth of God as de-

clared in the text. Veracity and Faithfulness are attributes so

nearly allied, as to be considered together, with great advantage.

The former is speaking, and, as the case may be, acting, accord-

ing to a state of things, seen, or supposed, to exist. The latter is

declaring a future state of our own conduct, and afterwards acting

so, that that conduct shall be conformed to the declaration. No

moral attributes are more perfectly of a kindred nature ; nor can

we conceive of him, who possesses one of them, as in any less de-

gree possessed of the other. There is no reason, therefore, for

THE TRUTH OF GOD.

SER. XI. ] 20

making them separate subjects of examination in this series of

discourses.

It will be obvious to those who hear me, that, as the works of

Creation and Providence, consisting of beings and events merely,

furnish us with no declarations made by God ; and as every such de-

claration must in its nature be a revelation ; ; so in these works there

can be no proper specimen of his Truth, or Faithfulness. To every

direct display of these attributes, declarations are indispensably

necessary. The only way, in which the works of God exhibit, by

themselves, any manifestation of these attributes, seems to be this .

In the regular succession of causes and effects , a state of things is

formed, and continued, on which we usually, and safely, rely ; and,

so far as this is concerned, enter upon our various kinds of business

with security from disappointment . This state of things may be

justly considered as manifesting a disposition on the part of Him,

bywhom it is established, not to deceive his creatures ; but to ex-

hibit to them that conduct, on which they may place a safe reliance .

Thus we confide in the regular succession of seasons ; the return

of day and night ; the productiveness of the earth ; the efficacy of

rain and sunshine ; and, generally, in the nature, qualities, andef-

fects , of the various things, by which we are surrounded.

But, notwithstanding this want of declarations in Creation and

Providence, the proofs, by which the Truth of God is capable of

being evinced by Reason, independently of Revelation, are, I think,

satisfactory and sufficient.

I. The Truth of God, (by which I intend throughout this discourse

both his Veracity and Faithfulness) is completely evident from his

Benevolence.

In a preceding discourse, I flatter myself , I have proved the Be-

nevolence of God from the light of nature. From this attribute,

his truth is easily, and unanswerably, inferred. The happiness of

Intelligent beings is derived in a great measure from society ; nor

is it possible, that they should be equally happy in the solitary, as

in the social, state. But no society can exist without confidence ;

and no confidence without Truth. Truth, therefore, is the basis ,

on which society rests. Even thieves and robbers are obliged to

speak Truth to each other, in order to maintain their own dreadful

society. Confidence, also, is one of the most important ingredients of

happiness ; so important, that no rational being can be happy with-

out it. But without Truth, this happiness can never be enjoyed.

On the contrary, distrust would create in the mind a dreadful state

of suspense ; another name for misery. All enjoyments would be

seen to hang in doubt before the eyes ; and safety and quiet could

never be attained.

Again, Falsehood, as an attribute, renders a moral character su-

premely debased and despicable. So far as we are able to judge

from our experience, fixed, absolute falsehood in any mind infers

THE TRUTH OF GOD.

204 [ SER. XI.

absolute depravity. No vice in man is probably so universally,

and perfectly , despised, as deceit. But such depravity is utterly

inconsistent with any happiness whatever.

All these evils would attend the want of Truth in Rational crea-

tures. A general character of deceit in them would utterly de-

stroy, or prevent , the whole of their happiness. But a deceitful

character in the Creator would far more effectually destroy it. On

His character, all their happiness is ultimately founded ; and, were

He capable of deceiving them, would be destroyed. The very

sense, in them, of such depravity in Him would also completely

prevent them from being happy. If , then, He wishes their happi-

ness ; or, in other words, is benevolent ; it is impossible, that He

should not be sincere. His benevolence, like that of creatures as

described by St. Paul, rejoiceth in the Truth .

II. As God contrived, and executes , all things according to his

will, throughout eternity , it is inconceivable, that he should not speak

of them exactly as they are ; because the state, in which they are, is

exactly agreeable to his pleasure .

Truth, as I have already remarked, is, in the original sense, made

up of declarations, exactly conformed to the real state of things.

But that state of things is in every respect such, as God has cho-

sen. Declarations, therefore, conformed to the real state of things,

are also conformed to his pleasure ; while those, which are not

conformed to the real state of things, are in the same degree not

agreeable to his pleasure. It seems, of course, a contradiction in

the nature of the case, that he should not utter declarations of the

former kind ; or that he should utter declarations of the latter

kind : in other words, that he should not always speak that, which

is exactly true.

III . The Independence, and Immutability, of God, involve, by an

absolute moral necessity, his veracity and faithfulness .

The independence of God places him above all possible tempta-

tion to vary at all from his own original purposes. These pur-

poses were all at first perfectly pleasing to him. As his character

is absolutely immutable, they will for ever be thus pleasing. On

the one hand, therefore, he can have no possible motive to make

declarations, unaccordant with these purposes ; because no being,

and no event , canmake it in any sense necessary, or advantageous,

to him, to make such declarations, or disadvantageous to make

those of a contrary nature ; or to declare that which is true. On

the other hand, sustaining alway exactly the same character, which

he originally sustained, and choosing alway the same things, he

cannot but be alway pleased with the state of things itself , and

with such declarations as express it. Truth, according to what

has been here said, must be infinitely advantageous to the further-

ance of his designs ; as being the only medium, by which his Ra-

tional creatures can understand them. If they do not understand

them, it is plainly impossible that they should voluntarily coincide

THE TRUTH OF GOD.

SER. IX . ] 205

with him in promoting them. But it is a prime part of his designs,

that his Intelligent creatures should thus coincide with him. Truth,

on his part, being, then, absolutely necessary to this voluntary con-

formity of his Rational creatures to his designs ; and this con-

formity being a prime and essential part of these designs ; Truth,

the indispensable mean of accomplishing it, must evidently be of

an importance, proportioned to the designs themselves : that is, of

infinite importance. To this infinite motive to speak truth, there

is no opposing motive ; because he is perfectly secured by his in-

dependence from all danger of defeat and disappointment.

In the mean time, falsehood in him would effectually prevent the

execution of his designs, in this essential part of them ; because

it would prevent his Intelligent creatures from knowing them ; and,

therefore, from voluntarily uniting with him in their accomplish-

ment. An infinite motive to speak Truth only, is also furnished to

the Creator by this consideration.

Further, Truth is the only Moral Immutability. Falsehood is in

its own nature change of character. As every proposition, or its

converse, is necessarily true : he, who should invariably utter that,

which is false in form, would invariably indicate that, which is in

substance true. In other words, those, who heard him speak,

would invariably know, that the converse of what he declared was

true, He also, who immutably intended to deceive, would speedily

become unable to deceive at all ; because, when his character was

once known, he could never be believed. In either of these cases

his conduct would differ no otherwise, in its effects, from that of

him, who invariably uttered truth in the direct manner, except that,

as he chose a different mode of communicating truth, or did not

choose to communicate it at all, he would either be believed to de-

clare it indirectly, or would be entirely disbelieved, and disregarded.

In this manner, therefore, he would defeat his own design. Thus

immutable Falsehood is evidently a self - contradiction. So obvi-

ous is this to all men, that liars, even of the weakest minds, find it

absolutely necessary to speak truth frequently, in order to deceive.

An immutable God therefore, unless we suppose immutability con-

sistent with a continual change of conduct, cannot but be a God of

truth.

IV. The excellency of Truth, and the turpitude of falsehood, fur-

nish an infinite motive to the Creator to speak truth only.

We, limited as our faculties are, perfectly discern, that Truth is

entirely honourable and glorious to the character of an Intelligent

being. Falsehood, on the other hand, we perceive with equal

clearness to be odious, disgraceful, and contemptible. This, God

sees, unquestionably, far more clearly and perfectly than we.

Falsehood in him, we see beyond a possibility of doubt, would be

disgrace and deformity, proportioned to the greatness of his cha-

racter; and Truth in an equal proportion honour and glory. This,

also, he discerns in a manner infinitely superior to ours. By the

206 THE TRUTH OF GOD.

[ SER . XI .

infinite glory, therefore, with which he must be invested by truth,

and the infinite disgrace, in which he would be involved by false-

hood, he is presented with infinite motives to Truth, and infinite

dissuasives from falsehood.

At the same time, it appears to me evident, that the adoption of

Truth, or falsehood, by the Creator, must be followed by exactly

the same effects , which they produce in us . In the former case, he

must regard himself with entire complacency or self-approbation ;

in the latter, with an irresistible consciousness of turpitude and un-

worthiness . These views, and the emotions, with which they must

be attended, must in an infinite mind be, in either case, boundless :

an unlimited sense of excellence on the one hand, accompanied of

course with unlimited happiness ; on the other, a boundless sense

of turpitude, accompanied, for aught that I can see, with boundless

shame and wretchedness .

V. He has so formed his Intelligent creatures, that they irresisti-

bly esteem and respect Truth, and disesteem and despise falsehood.

This respect for Truth, and contempt for falsehood, is irresisti-

ble, from two causes. It is, in the first place, the necessary dic-

tate of the understanding, when employed in examining the nature

of these subjects; and is perfectly independent of any feeling, or

influence, of the heart. Knaves, as truly, and as irresistibly, as

honest men, despise knaves. No other dictate of the understand-

ing was ever found in the present world : no other is capable of

existing . Secondly, he has made Truth absolutely necessary to the hap-

piness of mankind, and invariably productive of it ; and falsehood

utterly inconsistent with our happiness, and invariably productive

ofmisery. In this great, practical lesson, he has in his providence

forced mankind to esteem and respect Truth, without a possibility

of its being otherwise ; and to disesteem and despise falsehood.

This argument strongly proves the truth of God in two methods.

In the first place, by teaching us to respect Truth, and despise

falsehood, he has irresistibly led us to respect him, if a God of

Truth ; and to despise him, if a God of falsehood. But, if he be

not a God of Truth, this fact is utterly irreconcileable with the only

end, which he can be supposed to have had in view in creating

Intelligent beings .

Secondly, he has in this manner strongly impressed on the minds

of his creatures his own character, as a God of Truth. As a Being

perfectly Independent, he could have no inducement to impress

any character on their minds, except that, which pleased him.

That, which pleased him more than any other, was unquestionably

his own character. As an Immutable Being, it cannot be sup-

posed, that he could disclose to them any character as his own,

except his real character. If , then, the character actually disclos-

ed by him as his own, is not his real character ; it must have arisen

from one of these sources : either he was afraid to disclose , his own

THE TRUTH OF GOD.

SER. XI .] 207

character, or by some other motive, inconsistent with his Indepen-

dence, was inclined to disclose a character, with which he was not

pleased; or he preferred some other character to his own ; or, in

some strange moment, and situation , incomprehensible by us,

de-

parted from his general disposition, and, denying his nature, acted

in a manner directly opposite to all his essential attributes, which

irresistibly prove him to be immutable. Neither of these will be

asserted. The Character, therefore, which he has actually dis-

closed, is his true character.

To these arguments, presented to us by reason, I shall now add

the scriptural exhibition of the Truth of God. Before I proceed

to a consideration of this subject I shall, however, attempt to re-

move a prejudice against it, which may not improbably, nor unna-

turally, arise in the minds of some of my audience. It is this, that,

as the Truth of God must be presupposed, and admitted, before we

can admit the truth of his declarations ; so it is absurd to bring those

declarations to evince his truth ; as it will be arguing in a circle. I

acknowledge this objection to be specious ; but still insist, that it

is unsound. It must undoubtedly be granted, that the mere decla-

ration on the part of any being, that he is sincere, furnishes, by it-

self , no evidence of his sincerity ; since we well know, that insin-

cere beings will as readily arrogate to themselves sincerity in this

manner, as those who are sincere. But the uniform accordance of

a man's declarations with facts is justly regarded by his fellow-

men, as the proper and satisfactory proof of his sincerity. In the

same manner may God evince his sincerity by his own decla-

rations ; and this, I shall attempt to show, he has done in the

Scriptures, in a manner, which leaves no room for a reasonable

doubt.

I will also further observe, that the Scriptures contain all the

known declarations made by God to mankind. As, therefore,

Truth can be directly made known only by declarations ; it is

reasonably presumed, that we shall find in those of the Scriptures,

plain exhibitions of the Truth of God, as, in the declarations of a

sincere man, we usually find examples and evidences of his truth.

In the last place ; I shall further premise, that we have other

means of examining the Truth of God, as manifested in his decla-

rations, beside a mere appeal to his character. This will amply

appear in the course of the following observations .

I. God has declared himself to be a God of Truth .

In this observation, I consider him only as claiming, and not at

all as proving, this character.

II. He has made a vast multitude of declarations , all ofwhich

have accorded with the facts professedly declared.

The Scriptural history is, even at this day, capable of being sa-

tisfactorily examined, as to its accordance with facts. Some part

of it is, indeed, beyond the reach of a direct examination. But, as

almost all of it can be thus examined, and has been, and can at

THE TRUTH OF GOD.

208 [ SER. XI.

any time be, proved by sufficient evidence to be true ; the Truth

ofthe rest cannot reasonably be questioned. In these declarations

the same evidence is furnished us of the truth of God, which is fur-

nished of the veracity of a man by the uniform accordance of his

declarations with the real state of things .

III. God has in the Scriptures uttered a vast number of predic-

tions , which have been exactly fulfilled.

In this manner he has not only proved his Omniscience, but his

Truth ; especially in the exact accomplishment of such predictions,

as appeared, at the time when they were uttered, strange, perplex-

ing, seemingly contradictory, and, independently of his Truth, al-

together unlikely to be fulfilled . Such, remarkably, were those

which respected the advent, the character, and the mediation, of

the Messiah. Such, also, were those, which respected his dispen-

sations to the Jewish Church and nation ; and those, which re-

spected the establishment and progress of the Christian Church.

Of the fulfilment of these and other similar predictions no expla-

nation can be given, which will not firmly establish the Truth of

God.

IV. He has declared many doctrines concerning himself and man-

kind, concerning sin and holiness , and concerning many other subjects

of less importance, all of which, so far as they are capable of being

examined by us , are exactly true .

These doctrines are God's own exhibition of the general state of

the moral world ; and of his pleasure concerning the beings, of

which it is composed. All of them are true, so far as they can be

understood by us ; and are accordingly, and perfectly, consistent

with each other. No reason can be alleged, why he should thus

disclose his pleasure to us, except that he is a God of Truth.

V. He has in the Scriptures threatened punishments , and promised

blessings , to men in this world ; and has, as the same Scriptures sa-

tisfactorily inform us, exactly inflicted those punishments, and be-

stowed those blessings , in the course of his providence .

VI. He has in the Scriptures, also, entered into particular cove-

nants with different persons , which in every instance he has com-

pletely fulfilled.

VII. He has in the moral law required Truth, and forbidden false-

hood, in man, by the most solemn possible sanctions ; viz. endless

life, and endless death .

VIII. He has strongly exemplified his love of Truth, and his ha-

tred of falsehood, by rewarding the former and awfully punishing

the latter, in various instances, recorded in the Scriptures .

IX. He has required the worship and obedience of mankind to

himself, only as a God of Truth.

In these considerations, supported, as they are in the fullest

manner, by the character of the Redeemer, there is ample proof

of the Truth ofGod: such proof , that no one, who has believed the

Scriptures to be a revelation from God , has ever called this doc-

trine inquestion.

THE TRUTH OF GOD.

SER. XI.] 209

REMARKS .

1st . How gloriously, and perfectly, is God qualified by this attri-

bute to be the Moral governor ofIntelligent creatures .

Moral government is a government by laws ; whose nature, and

sanctions, are the great inducements to obedience, and the great

means of order, peace, and happiness, to subjects ; and of honour

and reverence to the Ruler. In other words, it is a government by

motives , addressed to the understanding and affections of rational

subjects, and operating on their minds, as inducements to voluntary

obedience. No other government is worthy of God; there being,

indeed, no other beside that of mere force and coercion. Obedi-

ence to this can never be voluntary, virtuous, amiable, praisewor-

thy, or rewardable : whereas voluntary obedience sustains all these

characteristics ; and renders the subjects of it excellent and lovely

in the sight of a virtuous, or benevolent, ruler. This government,

then, is on the one hand suited to the dignity and glory of the Infi-

nite Mind ; and on the other to the character, state, and wants, of

rational beings . Without obedience to such a government they

cannot be virtuous ; and without virtue they cannot be happy.

To the existence of such a government it is absolutely neces-

sary, that the character of the Ruler should be such, as that it can,

and ought to, be approved by wise and good subjects ; and of

course a character, in which they can safely, and rationally, con-

fide. But it is impossible, that a ruler, unpossessed of Truth,

should be approved at all. Falsehood is not only a vice, a de-

fect, a deformity ; but a most odious, and contemptible, vice, in-

volving every other kind of turpitude. A liar is pre- eminently

odious and contemptible in the view of mankind; and the finished

depravity of the worst of all beings is exhibited to us by God him-

self in the memorable declaration, He was a liar from the beginning,

and the father of it. AGod of falsehood would be a monster,

whose depravity no mind, less than infinite, could comprehend ;

and who would of necessity be regarded with absolute detestation .

and horror.

But how could obedience be voluntary to a ruler, whose charac-

ter, instead of being esteemed, and' reverenced, was only disap-

proved, hated, and despised ? Who could love either him, or his

commands ? Who could voluntarily yield obedience to falsehood ?

Who could ever be pleased with subjection to a ruler, whose cha-

racter he could not respect ? The very supposition is an absurd-

ity . In a still more striking manner would it be impossible for rational

beings voluntarily to obey a Ruler, in whom they could not con-

fide; or for such a ruler to exercise a moral government over them.

Should he make laws, and in them promise rewards to obedience,

and threaten punishments to disobedience ; how could it be known,

that he would fulfil his promises , or execute his threatenings ?

VOL. I. 27

THE TRUTH OF GOD.

210 [ SER. XI.

How could it be known, that his declarations were true ; or his

character sincere ? Certainly, neither his words nor actions could

be the foundation of such knowledge. Both might as easily, and

as naturally, be supposed intentionally to disguise, conceal, or de-

ceive, as to explain and satisfy.

God, we are ever to remember, is the last appeal, resort, and hope,

of Intelligent beings. By whomsoever else the soul is deceived,

or disappointed, it rests on him with perfect reliance ; because it

considers his truth as the great mountains , and his faithfulness as en-

during for ever. If no confidence could be placed in him, none

could be placed elsewhere. Every thought, purpose, interest, con-

solation, and hope, would be afloat on the waves of a boundless

and perpetually disturbed ocean, where rest and safety could never

be found : All beings would distrust all ; and the Universe, filled

as it is with inhabitants, would become a solitude. Suspicion and

jealousy would make all beings strangers, and enemies, to each

other. Suspense would fill every mind, and hang over every en-

joyment : : a state always wretched and deplorable, but here su-

premely and finally wretched, because the suspense would be end-

less, as well as unceasing. The Mind, stretching its view through

eternity and immensity, would discern no pole-star, by which it

might steer its course ; no haven, whither it might betake itself for

safety and repose. The truth of God hushes this restless and stormy

ocean to peace. All his creatures know, or may know, that his

purposes, declarations, and promises , are eternal and immutable ;

and that, therefore, he cannot deceive their confidence, nor disap-

point their reasonable hopes ; that he is the Rock, on which is found-

ed the great building of the Universe : the foundation and the build-

ing both eternal. However uncertain therefore, however fluctuating,

may be the state of the soul with respect to creatures ; on him it

rests with perfect reliance, and final safety. Were these facts re-

versed, he could present no motives to voluntary obedience ; nor

act as the Moral Governor of rational beings. Now he is seen to

be divinely excellent ; the fortress , the high tower, the unchange-

able safety, of such beings ; and their obedience to his laws is a

voluntary and cheerful effort of the mind, begun here to continue

for ever.

2dly. We learn from these considerations how necessary Faith is

to acceptance with God.

St. Paul declares, that withoutfaith it is impossible to please God;

for he that cometh to God must believe that he is , and that he is the

rewarder of them that diligently seek him . Faith, in its first and

simple sense, is assent to probable evidence. Few of the proposi-

tions, to which we assent, are known to us, either by intuition or

demonstration. This is especially true of moral propositions ; al-

most all of which, although they are in many instances spoken of

as known by us, are in fact only believed: the evidence, by which

they are supported, being merely probable evidence. Yet on these

THE TRUTH OF GOD.

SER XI.] 211

propositions is dependent all our duty, and ultimately all our hap-

piness . Wherever the probability is clear and unimpeachable,

Reason demands, that we should readily assent to it, as being the

best evidence, which the case will admit. In the same manner Rea-

son requires, that our conduct should be regulated by it, as being

the best rule, of which we are, or in our present circumstances can

be, possessed. A reasonable disposition will, therefore, in every

such case, yield its assent to every proposition, and conform its con-

duct to every rule thus evidenced; while a proud and obstinate spirit

will refuse both ; and choose rather to take refuge in scepticism

and disobedience, than to conform to the only principles of assent,

and rectitude, which have been furnished to us by our Maker.

The faith of the Gospel is the assent of the heart, as well as of

the understanding, to the declarations, contained in the Scriptures ;

the belief of a man, who regards them with good- will, and who is

pleased with such truths as they present to the mind. The foun-

dation of faith in these declarations is a similar faith in the charac-

ter, especially the moral character of God, exhibited in them, and

evidenced both by them, and by other extraneous proof . This

character, discerned to be glorious, great and lovely, by a mind

possessed of a suitable disposition, is not in the strict sense de-

monstrated to us ; but is evinced with high and unexceptionable

probability. To the ready and cheerful admission of it, a good

and honest heart is wholly prepared, and is the only thing neces-

sary.

The Truth, or Veracity, of God, is especially that part of his

moral character, on which the faith or confidence, which is termed

Evangelical, ultimately rests. On this attribute all his declarations ,

promises, and covenants, entirely depend for their truth and cer-

tainty ; and therefore all the confidence, which creatures can place

in his character, designs, or conduct. It is indispensable, in order

to our exercising any regard towards him at all , that we believe,

that he is . This, however, we may do by the aid of arguments ,

furnished by the light of nature. To believe, that he is the rewarder

of them, that diligently seek him, is indispensable to the exercise

of any virtuous regard to him ; but this we cannot do without con-

fidence in the truth of his promises, and in the veracity of himself ,

as the promiser.

But for these promises, we could not know, that he thought of

bestowing such rewards ; unless we believed him sincere in pro-

mising, we could not believe that he would bestow them. Between

confidence in the truth of God, and distrust of his truth, there is no

alternative. It is metaphysically, as well as Scripturally, true, that

he, who believeth not God, hath made him a liar . Let me, then, ask

every person in this assembly, whether this distrust ofGod, this at-

tribution to him of so odious and contemptible a character, this last

insult, (as mankind estimate insults ) can, in his own view, possibly

be pleasing to God? Yet this is a fair description of all unbelief;

THE TRUTH OF GOD.

212 [ SER. XI.

or, as it ought rather to be termed, disbelief , or distrust. As this

conduct can never be pleasing in his sight ; so it is certain, that he,

who is the subject of it, can never be accepted of God : for nothing

is more evident, than that God will never accept him, with whom

he is not pleased. As, then, there is no medium between this cha-

racter and confidence, or faith ; it is, I think, past all doubt, that

faith is indispensably necessary to acceptance with God.

At the same time, distrust is an entire separation of an Intelligent

being from his Maker. We cannot possibly coincide voluntarily

with the designs of a being, unless we confide in his Truth and be-

nevolence, and of course in the rectitude of those designs . No

virtuous obedience can be yielded to laws, of whose rectitude we

are not satisfied ; no complacency exercised towards a character,

in which we do not confide ; no gratitude rendered for benefits ,

conferred by a suspected benefactor ; no reliance placed on pro-

mises, made by a being of doubted veracity ; and no praiseworthy

efforts made to promote designs, regarded as suspicious and unwor-

thy. Without confidence, the soul is separated of course, from its

Creator. Distrust is in its own nature enmity against him, not sub-

ject to his law, neither indeed can be . How, then, can God be

pleased with this character ; or accept him, in whom it exists ?

3dly. How greatly ought this attribute of God to terrify deceitful

men!

By deceitful men I intend, not only liars of every description,

perjured persons, and slanderers ; but fraudulent men of every

class ; hypocrites, cheats, seducers , flatterers, sophists, and all other

men guilty of intentional deception. From the character of God,

as exhibited by the light of nature only, these men have every thing

to fear, and nothing to hope. That God can be pleased with a

moral character opposite to his own, or that he will bless men with

whom he is not pleased, cannot be imagined for a moment. But

there is no moral character, more absolutely opposed to God, or

more remote from his pleasure, than that of falsehood ; falsehood in

every form ; whether of looks, declarations, arguments, or actions ;

and in every degree, from the humble pretence to the palpable lie.

Nor is any immoral conduct adopted against clearer evidence, and

more absolute conviction. Truth is a thing perfectly definite . We

always know when we speak it ; and equally well know when we

utter falsehood. It is, therefore, a sin against noon -day light ; and

is alway committed in the sunshine. How, then, must the Being,

invested with the glorious, and eminently divine, attribute of Truth,

as with a garment, regard this base and vile character, so opposed

to his own, and so hostile to the virtuę, and happiness, of his Intel-

ligent kingdom ? Miserable, indeed, must be the expectations, and

the lot, of all wilful deceivers, even if there were no Scriptures ;

or if they were not the Word of God.

But there are Scriptures ; and they are the Word of God. In

them, as we could not fail to expect, most terrible additions are

SER . XI . ] THE TRUTH OF GOD.

213

made to the alarms, rung in the ears of these transgressors, by the

voice of nature. There, his determinations to inflict signal ven-

geance on these men, are announced in every awful form by the

God who cannot lie. There he has declared, that into the holy city,

the heaven of heavens, the mansion of everlasting joy, there shall

in no wise enter any one, who loveth or maketh a lie. There he has

declared, that every liar shall have his part in the lake, that burneth

with fire and brimstone. Let every deceitful man hear, and fear,

and do no more so wickedly .

4thly. What a source of comfort, joy, and quickening, to good men,

is the truth of God!

When we think on the character even of the best men, when we

call to mind how often they backslide and sin ; how cold and stu-

pid they are in their affections, and how dull and slothful in their

obedience; with what eagerness they cleave to the world, and with

what ease they yield to temptation ; how frequently they wound

Religion, and how greatly they dishonour God; we cannot but

feel, that all the truth and faithfulness of God are indispensably

necessary to prevent him from forsaking such beings, as they are,

and incline him to conduct them safely to his eternal kingdom.

Here, created faithfulness would not suffice ; nor prove to them a

solid ground of unshaken confidence, nor of lively and supporting

hope. A higher perfection of character seems plainly necessary

in the blessed God, to enable his patience to bear with all their

faults, and his mercy to triumph over all their transgressions .

In his holy Word, he has given them promises of infinite extent,

and value. In these promises are contained blessings temporal

and spiritual ; blessings present and eternal ; blessings of the first

magnitude and of the most delightful nature ; extending alike to

the soul and the body, to all times and all places, to every want

and every situation. Whatever can be useful to them, honourable

to himself, or beneficial to the Universe, he freely proffers from his

unlimited bounty. Finally, Himself , the Sum of all good, the over-

flowing Fountain, the inexhaustible Ocean, whence every stream

of happiness flows, he engages to them, as their everlasting pos-

session. What can secure the boundless good, contained in these pro-

mises, to beings of such a character ? The unchangeable truth of

God. On this they repose with perfect safety, with a hope, which

can never make them ashamed, with a faith, which cannot be bro-

kendown . Under the shadow of this great rock in a weary land,

they sit down with unspeakable delight ; and see all these promises

advancing to a regular, constant, and certain fulfilment, throughout

the progress of never-ending being .

Here, too, they find the most persuasive inducement to faithful-

ness in his service. They know, that he cometh in clouds, and that

his reward is with him. The bruised reed, they are assured, he will

never break ; the smoking flax he will not quench ; until he shall

THE TRUTH OF GOD.

214 [ SER. XI .

have brought forth judgment unto final victory. Hence they wait on

the Lord unceasingly, and renew their strength. Hence they mount

up with wings as eagles ; They run in the Christian course, and are

not weary ; they walk, and faint not in the strait and narrow way,

which leads to life.

In the mission, life, and death, of the Redeemer, in his resurrec-

tion, intercession, and kingdom , the truth of God has set his seal

on all his promises . The covenant of grace is here seen to be an

unchangeable and everlasting covenant. In the solemn ordinance, *

immediately before us, a living, unchanging, and most affecting

memorial , we may discern a hand, which, testifying infinitely bet-

ter things than those which were disclosed to Belshazzar, writes

before our eyes, that, notwithstanding all our infirmities, if we in-

deed believe in him, we are, when weighed in the balance, notfound

wanting.

The Eucharist.

SERMON ΧΙΙ.

THE MERCY OF GOD .

PSALM ciii . 8. -The Lord is merciful and gracious , slow to anger, and plenteous in

mercy.

IN this beautiful and interesting Psalm , David, with a piety and

zeal highly becoming, calls upon his soul and all that is within

him to bless the Lord for the manifestations of his mercy. A mul-

titude of these, remarkable in their nature, and of vast importance

to mankind, he recites in the happiest language of poetry . In this

language, God is exhibited as forgiving all his iniquities , healing

all his diseases , redeeming his life from destruction, crowning him

with loving kindness and tender mercies , satisfying his mouth with

good things , and renewing his youth like the eagle's. Nor does he

confine his views to his own blessings merely ; but, like a good

man, deeply affected with the concerns of his fellow -creatures,

casts his eye abroad to the general dispensations of providence,

and rejoices in the exemplifications of this glorious Attribute to the

human race . With supreme delight he here beholds God executing

righteousness and judgment for the oppressed ; unwilling always to

chide, or to keep his anger for ever ; not dealing with mankind ac-

cording to their sins , nor rewarding them according to their iniqui-

ties . The Mercy of God he sees extended, and exalted, as the

heavens ; removing our transgressions from us, as far as the East

is removed from the West ; and pitying those who fear him, as a fa-

ther pitieth his children. This divine perfection, he further teaches

us, is an inherent and essential part of the character of God, and

is accordingly from everlasting to everlasting. Nor is it confined

to any place ; nor limited by any opposing power, or obstacle :

for the Lord hath prepared his throne in the heavens, and his king-

dom ruleth over all. With this delightful subject in such full and

strong view, he finally and most forcibly calls upon angels, who

excel in strength, upon his hosts, the ministers who do his pleasure,

and upon all the works, formed in his boundless dominion, to bless

JEHOVAH for this transcendent perfection, so illustriously manifest-

ed, in so many forms, towards an apostate and ruined world.

The text is the theme of the whole psalm ; and is a strong and

ample assertion, reiterated in various forms, according to the man-

ner of the inspired writers, when labouring to impart to others their

own vivid emotions, of this doctrine .

That God is a God ofMercy.

Mercy is the exercise of good-will towards those, who have not

merited it ; and especially towards those, who have merited anger

and punishment. In its most important sense it denotes the com-

THE MERCY OF GOD.

216 [ SER. XII.

munication of forgiveness, and consequent blessings, to such as

have been guilty of crimes ; particularly, as exercised by God to

those, who have transgressed his most holy law, provoked his an-

ger, and forfeited every claim to his favour.

In canvassing this doctrine, I shall pursue the same method,

which I have adopted in discussing the other attributes of the di-

vine character ; and consider the manner, in which it is exhibited,

I. By Reason, and,

II . By Revelation.

Reason naturally leads us to conclude, that God is merciful, be-

cause

1st. He is Benevolent.

Mercy is a modification of benevolence. It is, therefore, reason-

ably concluded concerning any benevolent being, that his dispo-

sition will, in certain cases at least, be mercifully exercised ; or

that, when certain objects are presented to his view, and solicit

his interference, he will extend his benevolence to them, although

their character is such, as not to merit this interference at his hands ;

or even such, as to deserve in some degree his anger, rejection, or

punishment. But God is boundlessly benevolent. Mercy in the

abstract, and extending to every degree which propriety and Jus-

tice will admit, must, therefore, be acknowledged by Reason to be

an essential part of the divine benevolence. What, and how great,

this extent is ; what objects it will reach, and what crimes it will

forgive ; cannot, I confess, be at all determined by us ; nor upon

what terms it will be extended to such objects, as it will actually

reach. An angel, who had transgressed the divine law, or Adam

after he had fallen, might satisfactorily determine by rational argu-

ments, that God was merciful : and yet neither would be able at

all to decide whether that mercy would be extended to him ; or if

it were thus extended, upon what terms, in what manner, and to

what degree.

2dly. Because he exercises patience and forbearance towards man-

kind.

That men are opposed to the character and government ofGod ;

that they continually dishonour his name, violate his laws, so far

as they know them, and are guilty of manifold iniquities towards

each other ; cannot be rationally questioned. The conduct, which

strict justice on the part of God, would dictate as the proper retri-

bution of these crimes, can be no other than severe and immediate

punishment. This punishment, however, we do not find executed.

On the contrary, he continues them in life, notwithstanding all their

provocations ; and surrounds them with an endless multitude of

blessings. In this part of divine providence, therefore, we find a

direct exercise of mercy ; that is, of kindness to guilty beings ; and

this repeated in instances innumerable ; instances so multiplied,

and so constantly recurring, as to constitute a primary and essen-

tial characteristic of the government of God over mankind.

THE MERCY OF GOD.

SER. XII . ] 217

3dly. Because he has formed the human mind in such a manner,

that it necessarily considers mercy as high excellence of character.

This argument, largely considered in my discourse on the bene-

volence of God, is applicable to this peculiar exercise of benevo-

lence, in almost the same manner, as to benevolence in the abstract.

It is not indeed true, that a benevolent being, destitute of mercy,

would be therefore destitute of amiableness ; because benevolence

in every form, and exercise, is unquestionably amiable. But it is

the necessary dictate of the human understanding, that Mercy is

the noblest possible exercise of benevolence , and that this attribute

is indispensable to a character of absolute perfection. Such is the

decision of the mind, as God has formed it; and the invariable re-

sult of the understanding, when employed on this subject without

passion, or prejudice. In the mean time, this attribute is indispen-

sable to the happiness, and even to the comfort, nay, to the to-

lerable existence, of mankind in the present world. Both crimes

and sufferings are here so númerous, and constitute so great a part

of the character, and of the lot , of all men, that all continually

need, and vast numbers in the most absolute manner, the exercise

of this disposition. Our circumstances, therefore, continually elu-

cidate, and enforce upon us, thejustice of this dictate of the under-

standing.

In this manner, God has, of his own choice, rendered this attri-

bute, in our view, absolutely necessary to a perfect, and there-

fore to his own, character. If , then, Mercy constitute not a part

of his character, he has necessitated us, of his own choice, to

consider his real character as destitute of perfection.

After the application of this argument in former discourses to

the other moral attributes of God, it will be unnecessary any far-

ther to insist on it here .

From these considerations it may, I think, be fairly conclu-

ded by Reason, that God is merciful. Accordingly, mankind ap-

pear to have generally regarded this as the true character of God.

Such, at least, seems to be the apprehension, which men have

formed of the object of their worship: as is evident from the very

act of rendering worship. I see not how men can be supposed

to pray to any being, of whose favour they could not entertain

either belief, or hope. But all favour from God to guilty beings

must be merciful. In worshipping him, therefore, they have, I

think, plainly expressed their hope, at Icast, that he would re-

gard them with mercy, in some indefinite degree : and this hope

they have probably derived from one, or other, of these consi-

derations .

But whether the Mercy of God will extend to the final forgive-

ness of sin, and the communication of future happiness to man; or ,

if this were to be granted, upon what terms these blessings will be

communicated ; cannot be determined by Reason, from any con-

siderations within its power. What conduct is proper for the infi-

VOL. I. 28

THE MERCY OF GOD.

218 [ SER. XII,

nite Mind to pursue towards such rebellious andguilty creatures,,

as we are ; and whether that conduct shall include any future fa-

vour to us ; can never be decided by the human understanding.

Socrates doubted whether it were possible for God to forgive sin ;

and, in my view, expressed the real ultimatum of Reason on this

subject. The sins ofmen are so causeless, so numerous, and so

great, as to leave to a sober man, solemnly considering this subject,

Little else beside a fearful looking for ofjudgment. To relieve the

distress and despondency, to which we are thus exposed, the Bible

comes to our aid; and holds out to our view the most unequivocal

proofs , not only of the existence, but also of the extent, ofthis di-

vine attribute. These are found,

1st. In the numerous Declarations, which assert this character of

God . ?

These declarations are found every where ; and are so familiar- *

ly known, that they need not now be repeated. They are also

given to us in every form, in the most forcible language, and with

the strongest images ; and defy all doubt, as well as alldenial, con-

cerning this subject. The text is as direct and ample a declara-

tion of this character of God, as can be desired, or formed ; and

the context as beautiful and forcible an illustration .

2dly. In the precepts of the Bible .

These require men to exercise mercy to each other ; and assure

them of peculiar divine approbation, and an eminently glorious

reward, for the performance of this duty. At the same time, they

threaten the most awful penalties, final condemnation and absolute

rejection, to all the unmerciful. Nay, they forbid us to hope, and

even to ask, for the forgiveness ofour sins, unless we heartily forgive

the trespasses of our fellow-men. The merciful only are entitled by

the Scriptures to the attainment of mercy ; while those of a contra-

ry character are uniformly threatened with a terrible retribution.

This species of proof is exhibited with the strongest possible

force in the account , given us by Christ, of the last judgment. In

this account, recorded in the twenty- fifth chapter of Matthew, our

Saviour mentions no other ground of the final acceptance of man-

kind, but the exercise of mercy towards their fellow-men; and no

other ground of their final rejection, but their destitution of this at-

tribute and its exercises. We know, indeed, from numerous de-

clarations, made by himself , that mercy is not the only thing, re-

quired of men by the will of God; nor the only thing, regarded by

the Judge in the acceptance, or rejection, of men at the great day.

But we are clearly taught in this account, that mercy holds the fore-

most place in human excellence, and in the divine estimation ; and

that the contrary character is the most odious depravity, and pre-

eminently the object of the divine abhorrence .

3dly. In Testimonies of the divine Approbation, given to such, as

have exercised this disposition ; and of the divine disapprobation of

such, as have exhibited the contrary character.

THE MERCY OF GOD.

SER. XII . ] 219

In the instances ofRahab, Ruth, Boaz, David towards Saul and

his house, Obadiah towards the prophets of God, Ebed -melech the

Ethiopian (or Cushite) towards Jeremiah, &c. God was pleased to

give direct and important testimonies of his favour and approbation

in blessing those, who had showed mercy to their fellow-men. On

the other hand, he manifested in the most awful manner his displea-

sure against Saul and his house, for his cruelty towards the Gi-

beonites ; against Ahab, Jezebel, Athaliah, Pashur, Herod, and many

others, for their cruelty. These are all direct proofs, that mercy is

highly acceptable to God ; and that the implacable and unmerciful

are an abomination in his sight.

4thly. In requiring all our homage and obedience to himself , as

a merciful God.

On this argument, although unanswerable in its import, I shall

not insist, because it will be easily understood from the applica-

tion, already made of it, to the moral attributes of God, consider-

ed in former discourses .

5thly. In the mediation of Christ.

CHRIST is, to us, the channel, through which the divine mercy

flows ; and his mediation the procuring cause, for which it is exer-

cised towards mankind. All the preceding arguments, therefore, so

far as they are furnished by the Scriptures , have a reference to

him, and are supremely illustrated by his mediation. This great

subject claims, of course, a distinct consideration, more extended,

and more particular, than the present occasion will permit. Such

a minute examination will , however, be the less necessary at the

present time, because the subject will recur in many forms during

the progress ofthese discourses, and because it is the commanding

theme in every desk, and the principal subject of information to

every religious audience. I shall now briefly consider the mercy

ofGod, as illustrated by the

Incarnation ,

Life, and

Death, of the Redeemer.

At this time the divinity of Christ will not be at all insisted on ;

as it will be, of course, the subject of a future investigation. It is

sufficient for my purpose, that he was, what he cannot with decency

be denied to be, the beloved Son of God, in whom he is ever well

pleased ; the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his

person ; as much better than the angels, as he has by inheritance ob-

tained a more excellent name than they ; the first born of every crea-

ture ; and the glory of God in the heavens, as well as in the earth.

When this great and wonderful person, great and wonderful be-

yond any possible estimation of such minds as ours, became incar-

nate ; he, who was rich in the best of all possessions, the unquali-

fied love of his Father, for our sakes became poor, that we through

him might become rich. He allied himself , in a manner intimate,

eternal, and inseparable, to flesh and blood, to sinners and worms

220 THE MERCY OF GOD.

SER . XII . ]

of the dust; and was not unwilling, nor ashamed, to call them his

brethren. The strength and intenseness of the purpose for which

he interfered, the greatness of his tenderness and compassion for

mankind, are exhibited, with the utmost possible force, in the great-

ness of the condescension and humiliation, which he thus volunta-

rily assumed. It ought here to be remembered, that he not only

became man, but man in the humblest circumstances ; was the son

of a poor virgin, married to a poor man ; and was born in a stable,

wrapped in swaddling clothes, and laid in a manger.

In the life of the Son of God, the same character was exhibited

in a great variety of forms. Throughout almost all his residence

in the world, that is, during his minority, and about twelve years

afterward, this glorious Person was entirely subjected to the com-

mands and government of his humble parents ; and wrought pa-

tiently in the business of a carpenter, laboriously earning his own

bread, and theirs, by the sweat of his brow . After he began his

public ministry, he went about doing good, particularly to those who

were sick, blind, deaf , dumb, halt, maimed, and possessed of devils .

To the poor, to publicans, and to sinners, he also preached the

Gospel; and with supreme patience, labour, and benignity, invited

them to eternal life. Samaritans, hated by the Jews beyond ex-

ample, he brought into the divine kingdom ; and, after warning,

instructing, and exhorting Jerusalem, to the last limits of hope, he

wept with the deepest compassion over its unbelief and ruin.

In his death, the same glorious attribute was still more wonder-

fully manifested. His death, like his incarnation and life, was

wholly voluntary : for he, who drove the money- changers and

their companions out of the temple ; at whose presence the guards

fell backward to the ground ; whose voice, diseases, demons, and

elements obeyed; and who re-summoned life to the breathless

corpses of others ; could undoubtedly have prolonged his own life,

prevented every assault upon his person, and forbidden by his

power the approach of danger and harm. Accordingly, he in-

forms us, that he laid down his life for his sheep, and that no man

took it from him, but that he laid it down of himself .

At the same time, his death was the most humiliating, which can

be conceived, or suffered. It was the death of a malefactor, and

that of the most scandalous kind ; a death, also, pronounced by the

voice of God to be accursed ; and preceded and attended by every

circumstance of contempt, abuse, and shame, which a furious rab-

ble, and their more malignant masters, could devise, or inflict .

Nor was it less distressing than humiliating. The clear foresight

of it, in the garden of Gethsemane, threw even him, with all his

lion-like fortitude, into an agony ; and forced sweat from his body

in the form of great drops of blood. The sufferance of it on the

cross extorted from him that bitter cry, My God, my God, why hast

thou forsaken me ? It is, however, to be remembered, that he made

his soul an offering for sin, and that, in his soul , his peculiar dis

THE MERCY OF GOD.

SER. XII . ] 221

tresses were chiefly suffered. This death, together with all the an-

guish which it involved, he perfectly foresaw, and predicted ; and

in the full sight of this anguish devoted himself to the suffering. In

the midst of his agonics, also, he prayed for the forgiveness of his

murderers ; and with such efficacy, that within fifty days from his

crucifixion, several thousands ofthem believed on his name, through

the preaching of St. Peter; and are now in the heaven of heavens,

celebrating with songs of transport the divine compassion of their

Redeemer.

The incarnation, life, and death, of Christ, were undertaken, and

accomplished, by him, with a complete knowledge, not only of the

distresses, which he was to undergo, but also of the character of

those, for whom they were to be undergone. He knew perfectly,

that they were sinners, rebels, and apostates, condemned and ru-

ined; utterly indisposed to believe his testimony, to accept his

person , or to become interested in his mediation. He perfectly

knew, that to make them even reconciled to him, or grateful for

the immense benefits which he proffered, it would be necessary ,

after all he had done, to send the SPIRIT OF GRACE into the world,

to give them a new heart, and a better mind. Of course, he en-

gaged in this wonderful employment from compassion only, to the

miserable beings whom he came to redeem. As his own charac-

ter and conduct are, therefore, the strongest possible exhibition of

mercy; so God, who gave him up to all these sufferings for this

end, and to whom he was plainly the dearest object in the Uni-

verse, has in this transaction equally exhibited mercy as his own

character.

From these summary considerations on this subject, I remark,

1st. The Glory of this divine attribute .

No moral characteristic has ever been esteemed so lovely as this ,

or so honourable to an Intelligent being . To love virtue, and the

virtuous, is undoubtedly excellent and commendable ; and includes

all which we intend by justice, candour, or complacency, as exer-

cised towards the character of others . In those, who exercise this

disposition, it is both honourable and lovely ; and to those, who

are thus loved, it is an eminent ingredient of happiness .

To love those, whose character has not been exhibited to us, as

either virtuous or sinful ; to love, for example, absolute strangers,

merely because they are rational beings ; seems plainly to be a

still higher exercise of a virtuous and amiable character. But to

love those, who are known to be enemies to us , as well as vile and

hateful in themselves ; and to endeavour, with peculiar self -denial,

or with great efforts, to render them virtuous and happy ; is a still

nobler exercise of goodness, than either of the former. This, as

mankind in the calm exercise of Reason have ever determined, and

as the Scriptures have abundantly declared, is the crown, the

splendour, the glory, of moral excellence.

In considering this subject, it is difficult to refraincrom calling

THE MERCY OF GOD.

222 [ SER. XII .

to mind the views of it, which angels have formed, and expressed.

At the birth of the Redeemer, these exalted and benevolent beings

left their happy residence, and directed their flight immediately to

this sinful world. Here, for four thousand years, they had in the

course of their ministry witnessed little else in the conduct of men,

beside rebellion against God, injustice to each other, and the de-

basement of themselves. Still, with a divine sympathy, they re-

joiced in the prospect of seeing the guilty mind renewed, the impi-

ous and deformed life purified from its stains, and the salvation of

the ruined children of Adam certainly accomplished . Eagerly

they hastened to proclaim the glad tidings of greatjoy, that a Sa-

viour was born unto men in the city of David. One soul animated

them all ; and with one voice, inspired by the same exalted bene-

volence, they sung, Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace ;

Good-will towards men.

How different have been the feelings of mankind, for whom this

Mediation has been accomplished ! Mankind, when Christ appear-

ed in the world, rejected, persecuted, and slew him. From that

day to the present, they have discovered the same disposition, with

evidence which cannot be questioned, in their unbelief and rejec-

tion of the Redeemer. We, as well as others, possess and prove

this character. Were Christ now to be born, there is but too much

reason to fear, that we like the Jews, should leave him in a stable,

consign him to a manger, persecute him through life, and compel

him to a violent death. The Jews began their warfare against him

with disbelieving and rejecting him; and ended with his crucifix-

ion. Our disbelief and rejection of Christ are but too fearful

indications, that, were our circumstances the same with theirs , we

should unite with them in nailing Him to the cross . In the single

act of refusing to commemorate his death, how many, here present,

declare, that even in their own view they are not his friends. Let

every such person remember the declaration of Christ himself , that

he who is notfor him is against him .

Let us all remember also, that Christ was infinitely rich, in all

good, before he became poor for our sakes . Ofcourse, he needed

not us, nor any thing which is ours. With infinite ease, and by the

mere exercise of his will, he could have blotted us out of being,

and then have raised up millions of virtuous, obedient and glorious

creatures; all of whom would, throughout eternity, have employed

themselves in his service with unchanging faithfulness and joy.

Whence then, and let Reason answer the question, did he choose

to become Man ; to suffer, and to die, for the lost race of Adam ;

for you, and for me ? The only answer he himself has long since

given: God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son,

that whosoever believeth on him, should not perish, but have ever-

lasting life . God was so benevolent, so disposed to show kind-

ness, so full of long suffering and tender mercy, that even this ex-

ertion was not too great for him to make.

THE MERCY OF GOD.

SER. XII . ] 223

2dly. From these considerations we also learn the absolute neces-

sity of divine Revelation to mankind.

On the question, Whether God willforgive sin, and accept sinners ,

evidently depends every hope of happiness beyond the grave .

The question is, therefore, infinitely important to us ; and needs ,

in the highest degree, to be satisfactorily answered. The doc-

trine , that God is merciful, is, I think, in the view of Reason, suffi-

ciently probable to command our faith. But that it is, or can be

proper for God to forgive sin in any case, Reason is utterly unable

to evince. In what manner this conduct on the part of God would

affect the government, and welfare, of the Universe, man, without

Revelation, is utterly unable to determine. It is one thing to dis-

cern, that God is merciful ; and wholly another, to know the ob-

jects, to which the divine mercy can with propriety be extended ,

or the cases, in which it can with propriety interfere ..

IfReason can know, that God will forgive the sins of men, it

must derive this knowledge either,

1st. From the nature of this attribute ; or

2dly. From the fact, that he has, in some one instance at least,

forgiven sin ; or

3dly. From some declaration, that he will forgive it ; or

4thly. From some argumentfounded on analogy.

From the nature of the Divine Mercy, we cannot conclude, that

God can, or will, forgive the sins of Mankind. Whatever is best,

and on the whole, most proper to be done, we are warranted to

conclude he will certainly do ; but what this is can never be de-

termined by our minds. Two things place this assertion beyond

debate. The one is the extent of the divine kingdom, and of all its

immense and eternal concerns, which must of course demand far

other measures, than such, as we are able to comprehend, or de-

vise : the other is, that God, in fact, does innumerable things , utter-

ly contrary to all that we should expect, and wholly removed beyond

the limits of our understanding . These furnish the most ample

proofs, that he will do innumerable other things, equally contrary

to our expectation, and decision ; and, of course, that we cannot

pre-determine what he will do.

Revelation apart, we know no instance in which he has forgiven,

and possess no declaration, that he willforgive, the sins ofMen.

Equally destitute are we of any analogy, from which this con-

clusion can be rationally derived. The only ground even of hope,

furnished by his Providence, is the patience with which he endures,

and the blessings with which he surrounds us, notwithstanding our

provocations. But this conduct seems to be connected by neces-

sity with a state of trial ; and furnishes no solid argument of a fu-

ture and favourable reward. The gloomy and distressing circum-

stances, which attend our removal from this World by death, ex-

hibit, on the contrary, awful premonitions of an unhappy allotment

to us beyond the grave.

THE MERCY OF GOD.

224 [SER. XII .

Independently ofRevelation, Man is left to the sentence of mere

justice and rigid laws . By these he is of course condemned. He

is in fact a sinner ; and must therefore be pronounced guilty , in the

day of trial. In this situation, Reason finds, and leaves him ; and

to this situation, Infidelity conducts him again. Without the me-

diation of Christ, there is no escape from the sentence of the divine

law ; and Revelation itself furnishes no other way in which mercy

canbe extended to sinning man.

According to the most comfortable scheme of Infidelity, you

must go to the Judgment on the footing of your own righteousness ;

and be tried by your own obedience. Ifyou have faithfully obeyed

God, you will be acquitted ; if not, you must be condemned. If ,

then, Justification, acceptance, and future happiness ; if deliver-

ance from wrath, and escape from ruin, are necessary to you ; the

Mediation of Christ, and the Revelation which alone brings this

mediation to your knowledge, or furnishes you with a hope of sha-

ring in its blessings, are equally necessary.

3dly. These considerations strongly enforce the guilt and danger

ofCruelty.

Amerciful God, who esteems this attribute as the glory and con-

summation of his own excellence, cannot fail to detest supremely

the opposite character, wherever it is found. These are the two

extremes of the moral Nature : the former supremely lovely; the

latter supremely hateful. Thus God has declared in the Scrip-

tures ; and thus mankind have also testified in all ages and nations .

The awful parable of the servant who owed ten thousand talents ,

brings this subject home to the heart with the greatest force, of

which language is capable. His debt to his Lord, great as it was,

was freely forgiven. But, for his cruelty to his fellow-servant, he

was thrust into prison, and delivered over to the tormentors, until

he should pay the ten thousand talents, which he owed. In what

an affecting manner does this story exhibit the indignation of God

against unkindness and oppression ? How plainly does he here

teach us, that this sin is pre-eminently provoking in his sight, and

beyond most, if not all, others, the cause of absolute rejection and

endless suffering. Let every cruel, every unfeeling, man tremble

at this terrible exhibition of the views, entertained by a merciful

God concerning his odious and detestable character .

4th. These considerations furnish the strongest inducements to the

exercise ofMercy.

In the great kingdom of Providence, how many blessings are

continually provided by the hand of God for the evil and unthank-

ful race of Adam ! In spite of all their innumerable provocations ;

in spite of their impiety, idolatry, lewdness, falsehood, oppressions,

wars and devastations ; notwithstanding this great world has been

from the beginning a temple ofidols, a house of pollution, and a

field of blood ; the sun continually arises ; the rain descends ; the

fields blossom; the harvests ripen : the seasons are fruitful ; and

THE MERCY OF GOD.

SER. XII .] 225

the hearts of men are filled with food and gladness. In the divine

precepts, the same glorious disposition reigns ; and mankind are

required, with infinite obligation, to imitate and assume this exalted

character ; to be merciful as their Father who is in heaven is merci-

ful. In the promises of the Gospel, we are allured to this most

amiable of all conduct by the reward of immortal life and glory ;

and hear God himself declaring, Blessed are the merciful, for they

shall obtain mercy .

In the threatenings, we are deterred from the contrary conduct

by the fearful denunciation of eternal wo.

In the Mediation of our Redeemer, we are presented with a

perfect example of the nature and effects, of this most lovely attri-

bute; furnished by a life, of which this attribute was the soul and

spirit ; a life pure and excellent beyond all precedent, and all

praise ; and closed by a death full of shame and agony, voluntarily

undergone from mere compassion to this perishing world, and

beautified and adorned with this consummation of benevolence in

its most divine form. In this we indeed behold the glory of the only

begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth . Here we are drawn

with cords of love, that we may run after him.

With these motives, with this example, before us, can we fail to

forgive men their trespasses against us, and be kind to the evil and

unthankful ? Can we fail to deal our bread to the hungry, and to

bring the poor, that are cast out, into our houses ? When we see the

naked, must we not be willing to cover him : must we not be unable

to hide ourselves from our own flesh ?

Whenthis importunate and seductive world intrudes itself into

the mind, and is insidiously busy in establishing its ascendency

over the heart ; when wealth is riveting its chains to fasten us in

bondage ; when ambition invites us to the high places of power and

distinction, and promises, that we shall be as Gods in grandeur and

glory ; when pleasure informs us, that we have much goods laid up

for many years , and bids us take our ease , eat, drink and be merry ;

in a word, when a temptation, sense, and sin, crowd around us, and

prepare us to absorb all our affections in selfish gratification ; let

us look to the table of Christ, and remember, and behold, there,

what he has done for us . If we are not hardened indeed ; if we

are not literally dead in trespasses and sins ; we shall find it difficult,

and I hope impossible, not to go, and in some measure do likewise.

We shall, like him, love our enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping

for nothing again : we shall bless them that curse us, and pray for

them who despitefully use us and persecute us . Then shall we indeed

be the children of our Father who is in heaven, who maketh his Sun to

arise on the evil, as well as on the good. Then shall our light break

forth as the morning , and our health spring forth speedily : our

righteousness shall go before us, and the glory of the Lord shall be

our rereward.

VOL. I. 29

SERMON XIII.

THE WISDOM OF GOD .

1 Тім . і. 17. Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God , be

honour, and glory, for ever and ever. Amen.

IN this passage of Scripture, glory and honour are ascribed to

God , in the character of the eternal, immortal, and invisible Ruler

of all things, and also in that of God the only wise ; with a solemn

Amen subjoined to the ascription. When God is called the only

Wise, it is not intended, that there is no other wisdom, beside that

which is inherent in him ; but that he is the source of all Wisdom,

and wise to such a degree, as to render all other wisdom nothing in

comparison with his. The Wisdom of God is, in other words,

infinite ; and shall now be the subject of our consideration.

The word Wisdom, is applied indifferently to the character, and

to the conduct, of an Intelligent being. As applied to the latter, it

denotes the choice of good ends , and the selection and adoption of

good means for the accomplishment of them . As applied to the

former, it denotes that Attribute, which thus chooses, selects and

adopts . Wisdom is, therefore, a compound attribute ; being made up of

the knowledge to discern, and the disposition to choose, the ends and

means, which I have mentioned. The Wisdom of God is formed,

therefore, of his Omniscience and Benevolence, united in planning,

and accomplishing, all real good, in the progress of his immense and

eternal kingdom.

It will not unnaturally be supposed, that, as the Omniscience and

Benevolence of God have already been separately discussed, an

examination of them, when combined in the attribute of wisdom,

must be superfluous. I have at times adopted this opinion ; but

upon considering the propensity of our minds to dwell on these at-

tributes, in this combination ; a propensity encouraged abundantly

bythe Scriptures ; and the frequency , with which the divine wisdom

recurs, in forms very various and interesting , both in the conversa-

tion and writings of men, and the word of God, I have concluded,

that a particular discussion of this subject would, if properly con-

ducted, hold a useful place in this system of discourses.

After the arguments, adduced to prove the existence of these

attributes , separately considered, it must, I presume, be unnecessa-

ry to allege any proofs of their existence in this combination. This

discourse will , therefore, be employed only in illustrating this dig-

nified subject , as it is exhibited in the various conduct of the Most

High. From this vast field, also, a few examples only will be select-

THE WISDOM OF GOD.

SER. XIII . ] 297

ed; it being neither necessary, nor possible, on this occasion, to

extend such an investigation to any great length. The scheme of

discourse, which I propose to pursue, is to mention,

1st. Summarily, such exemplifications of the divine wisdom, as

are commonly insisted on ; and

2dly. More particularly, some others, which have been less the ob-

jects of public attention ; or which, at least, I have seen either very

little, or not at all, discussed by others .

1st. I shall mention summarily such exemplifications of the divine

wisdom, as are commonly insisted on .

Among the numerous subjects, included under this head, the hea-

vens by their magnificence undoubtedly strike the eye with the

greatest force and splendour. In allages, contemplative men have

regarded the illustrious objects, presented to us in this great field

of observation, as eminently indicating the wisdom of God. O give

thanks, says the Psalmist, unto Him, who alone doeth great wonders ;

who by wisdom made the heavens ; who made great lights ; the Sun

to rule by day, and the moon and stars to rule by night ; for his mer-

cy endureth for ever. The Lord by wisdom, saith Solomon, hath

founded the earth ; by understanding hath he established the heavens .

When he prepared the heavens, says Wisdom itself , speaking by the

Voice of the same writer, I was there ; when he set a compass on the

face of the deep.

To us, whose views are enlarged, and rectified, by the modern

astronomy, this subject is presented with an importance, which it

could not have assumed in the mind of the ancients . To them,

the size, proportions, distances, and uses, of the heavenly bodies

were in a great measure unknown ; and, where this was not the

fact, were so partially known, as to leave the mind in many re-

spects perplexed and lost. With our superior advantages, we dis-

cern the Sun to be a vast, luminous world, astonishingly greater

than all the others united, which compose the solar system. All

these we behold arranged around this glorious world as their com-

mon centre. To them the Sun communicates motion, light, regu-

larity, and harmony ; and to their inhabitants, life, and the means

of sustaining it ; food, raiment, warmth, and activity ; and their

consequences, usefulness, and enjoyment. This amazing scene of

wonders, we have the most satisfactory reason to believe, is in a

sense endlessly repeated in the stellary systems, diffused through-

out the boundless expansion ; and repeated with a similar display

of divine wisdom in their regularity, harmony, and beauty. Even

anAtheist must be compelled to confess, that in this scene there is

a perfect and glorious accomplishment of just such things, as, in

the view of the human mind, appear to be suited to the most per-

fect operations of the most perfect ectwisdom .

In the revolution of the Seasons, intimately connected with this

subject, we behold an inferior, but still a splendid, display of the

same magnificence ; and an exhibition , not less affecting, of the

THE WISDOM OF GOD.

228 [SER . XIII.

same glorious attribute. From the present position of the earth,

aré derived, in the different parts of its annual circuit, Summer and

Winter, Seed- time and Harvest. It cannot be necessary for me to

attempt a detail of the various methods, in which the divine Hand

provides, through the instrumentality of the seasons, for the sup-

ply of our wants, the relief of our distresses, and the uninterrupted

succession of our enjoyments. A child needs not to be informed,

that all creatures wait upon God, that he may give them their meat

in due season ; and that he opens his hand, and satisfies the wants of

every living thing.

Nearly allied to the revolution of the Seasons, is that, by which

the world enjoys the vicissitude of day and night. The diurnal ro-

tation of the earth, connected with the position of its axis, furnishes

to all its parts an equal enjoyment of these two great affections of

our globe ; just as its annual revolution, connected with the same

position, distributes the seasons, alternately, in a regular succession,

over all the regions from the equator to the poles. By the day,

man is enabled to pursue successfully all the business of life ; and

by the night is, at the necessary and most proper intervals, furnish-

ed with seasons of refreshment and rest. It ought to be remarked,

that by means of the refrangibility of light, and the refractive power

of the atmosphere, a portion of day is added to us every morning

and every evening ; and the light of the Sun conveyed to us, and

withdrawn from us, in that gradual manner, which, while it is emi-

nently beautiful and delightful, is at the same time the only manner,

in which it could be comfortable, or perhaps tolerable, to our eyes .

A philosopher has made it an argument of the wisdom of God,

and in my view justly, that the earth is clothed in green ; a colour

eminently easy, refreshing, and delightful to the eye.

In the provision made for the wants of men and animals , there

are innumerable, as well as wonderful proofs of the Wisdom of

God. The means, by which an ample supply for all these wants

is continually furnished, were they not the objects of our daily in-

spection, and thus rendered so familiar, as to be in a great measure

unregarded, would awaken in our minds , not approbation merely,

but amazement. A single plant produces yearly a great number of

seeds ; so many as to furnish, in the ordinary course of providence,

abundant assurance, that that kind of plant shall be continued

throughout the successive ages of the world. As a further secu-

rity, these seeds are, to a great extent at least, and in all probability

universally, incorruptible, when lodged below the depth , within which

vegetation springs ; notwithstanding they are so easily dissoluble

above that limit. By the latter circumstance, an easy, certain, and

abundant vegetation is secured: by the former, seeds are treasur-

ed inthe earth for long periods of time ; whence by deep ploughing,

digging, and other means, they are brought again within the region

of vegetation, and spring in the same manner, as fresh seeds. I

have been satisfactorily informed of the vegetation of seeds, which

THE WISDOM OF GOD.

SER. XIII . ] 229

had in this manner been certainly kept in the earth no less than two

hundred years . The diffusion of these seeds over the face of the

earth is accomplished by means, which are perhaps still more won-

derful. Such seeds as are heavy, and immoveable by more ob-

vious means ; such, for instance, as the stones and seeds of fruits ;

are commonly swallowed both by birds and beasts, and conveyed

in their stomachs whithersoever they rove ; and are ultimately

planted, not only in the neighbouring fields, and countries, but also

inmore distant regions . Others, of considerable weight, are lodged

permanently in a large and light husk ; which, together with the

seed contained in it , is easily separated, after the seed has become

ripe, and blown by the wind over extensive tracts . Others, still ,

are winged, and feathered, in such a manner, as to be easily waft-

ed in the breeze, and spread through all the surrounding country .

A young gentleman, once in my presence examining a seed of a

particular kind ofgrass, and finding a beautiful feather thus adher-

ing to it, was so struck with this contrivance for the dispersion of

such seeds over the earth, that he exclaimed, " The man must be a

brute, who does not believe in the existence of God. "

The most necessary and useful things are also, with the most

perfect wisdom, generally diffused ; while those which are less in-

teresting to human happiness, are more rare and solitary. Food,

raiment, drink, and fuel, are spread every where. Gold and gems,

wines and spices, are found only in particular places. Wheat and

grass, the most useful of all vegetables, grow in more soils and

climates than any other. Water and air exist throughout the

world; and are placed beyond the control of man. Could any

one of our race command either of these elements, he would pos-

sess an absolute dominion over every inhabitant of those regions,

to which this command extended. Animals, useful for food, or

other important purposes of man, are multiplied easily to any ex-

tent. Fish, which furnish so considerable a part of human suste-

nance, multiply, in a sense, endlessly. Other animals, of inferior

use, are by various causes limited to a very moderate increase.

The clothing of animals changes with the change of climate. When

removed to a cold latitude, it becomes thick, soft, and warm ; when

to a hot latitude, it becomes thin, coarse, and cool. Without these

changes, the animals thus removed would be unable to live .

Both the body and mind of man are astonishing exhibitions of

wisdom, and that in ten thousand different ways. As I have dwelt

on this subject, for a purpose somewhat different, in a former dis-

course ; and as it is so often insisted on by others ; I shall dismiss it

with only two or three observations . The eye, says Nicholson ,

were all other arguments for the existence of God unknown, or

lost, would remain an unanswerable proof of the wisdom of God.

The self -restoring power of our bodies, when diseased, or

wounded, is among the most extraordinary evidences of this attri-

bute.

THE WISDOM OF GOD.

230 [SER. XII) .

2dly. I shall now mention some other exhibitions of the Wisdom

ofGod, less frequently insisted on than those already specified .

A wonderful exhibition of this nature is found, in the first place,

in the accomplishment of many ends by few and simple means . The

great principle ofgravitation , for example, unites and holds together

the corpuscles, which constitute worlds ; combines in one vast

union the worlds which compose a system; generates the motions

of the planets, and comets, round the Sun, and of their satellites

round the planets ; and governs, universally, their regularity and

harmony; levels the surface of the ocean, and prevents it from

overflowing the land ; produces, as one cause at least, the ascent

of vapour, and the descent of rain ; gives birth to the continuance

of all bodies on the surface of the earth ; regulates the motions of

animals, and of mankind, together with all mechanical powers and

operations ; and thus extends a governing, necessary, and most

useful influence over all worlds, and all their inhabitants. The

mean here is one ; the ends are innumerable : and the influence of

the mean is every where necessary, and all that is necessary.

Water in the ocean, is the great storehouse of vapour.

Hence

are formed mists and clouds ; which, beside presenting the eye with

innumerable, ever-varying, and delightful prospects ; sheltering,

in intense heats, the bodies of men and animals from the blaze of

the Sun; pointing out various approaching changes of weather ;

and thus warning mankind both on the land, and on the sea, of

approaching danger, or announcing the arrival of safety ; become

the sources of rain, dews, hail, and snow, and the origin of foun-

tains , brooks, lakes, and rivers. By these, the earth is watered,

enriched, and beautified ; and man supplied with food and drink,

with raiment and fuel. By these, also, all animals are supplied

with sustenance and enjoyment. Water, also, is not only the gene-

ral nourishment, but the chief component part of all vegetables,

and a principal one of all animal bodies. At the same time, it

moves innumerable machines of different kinds, abridges in a won-

derful degree the labour of man ; and performs a vast variety of

important purposes, which without it would be impossible. In the

ocean it is, moreover, a menstruum, in which salt, being dissolved,

is raised to the surface, and thereby crystalizing becomes a part of

the food of men and animals, without which their sustenance would

be uncomfortable and precarious, if not impossible. Water is also

an indispensable material in a vast multitude of chymical, medical,

economical, and other artificial processes ; and has in this way

wonderfully enlarged, and is still in this way daily enlarging, the

comfort and the knowledge, of mankind. Finally, it is the basis

ofall navigation ; and thus the chief medium of the commerce, and

ofthe geographical and natural, as well as much other knowledge,

possessed by men.

The same doctrine might be extensively illustrated by the almost

innumerable purposes, of which fire, air, and light, are the means ;

THE WISDOM OF GOD.

SER. XIII . ] 231

as well as by a great multitude of other subjects. Generally, it

may be observed, that the few elements,to which all material sub-

stances have been already reduced, constitute all the bodies, and

are the causes of all the immensely numerous operations, which

exist in the material world ; and, in their combination, and their

efficacy, gloriously display the wisdom, and the goodness, of their

Creator.

2dly. The unceasing and universal Variety, introduced into the

works of Creation and Providence, is a strong exemplification of the

Wisdom of the Creator.

The Creation of a single being, or the production of a single

event, furnishes a complete exhibition of the ideas, existing in the

creating Mind, of which either is a copy, and in conformity to

which, each was brought into existence. A repetition of the same

event, or the existence of a second being exactly resembling the

first, would barely exhibit the same ideas a second time, anddis-

cover nothing new concerning the Creator. Hence, were two or

more beings, or events, exactly like each other, to be brought into

existence ; none, except the first, would at all enlarge our concep-

tions of the Mind, by which they were effectuated. Every variety

in beings, or events, is a new disclosure of the character, skill,

and contrivance, of the Creator ; and, where we understand the

end for which it exists, of his goodness also. For this , as one

great reason, God undoubtedly has formed, and conducted, all

things on the plan of universal variety. No two beings, or events ,

appear precisely alike. The leaves of trees, the blades of grass,

and the particles of sand, as well as other more important and

more complicated objects, exhibit, even to the naked eye, an end-

less diversity. This characteristic extends through the mineral,

vegetable, animal, and rational kingdoms, and throughout the whole

progress of events .

In every one of the individuals, composing these, may be seen

something, which is peculiar ; and which, in a peculiar manner,

unfolds the ideas, the contrivance, the wisdom, of the Infinite Mind.

As the diversity is literally boundless, so we are presented by it

with a picture of the endlessly diversified views and conceptions

of Him, in whose mind all existed from the beginning.

By this scheme of things, a field is opened to Intelligent beings

for learning and understanding this glorious part of the divine cha-

racter. By the love of variety, and novelty, which he has im-

planted in the minds of rational creatures, he has with the same

wisdom prompted them voluntarily to an unceasing, unwearied,

and delightful study of his works ; which are only displays of

himself. Thus an effectual, and most wise, provision is made for

our knowledge of the divine character , on which alone is ulti-

mately founded our admiration, reverence, love, and obedience.

Avirtuous mind, surveying this wonderful subject, can scarcely fail

to exclaim, O Lord ! how manifold are thy works ! In wisdom

hast thou made them all.

THE WISDOM OF GOD.

232 [ SER. XIII .

Further : Variety is the foundation of all discernment and discri-

mination in rational beings ; and this, again, is the directory of all

our various conduct. For example, if the features of the human

face, and the figure of the human person, were not perpetually va-

rious; we could not know one man from another, nor distinguish

our parents, children, friends, neighbours, or enemies. The judge

would not be able to discriminate between the criminal and his in-

nocent neighbour, nor between the witness and a stranger. The

parties would become twins. The right of the judge himself to sit

upon the bench would be safely doubted, and denied ; and the

child of a beggar, or a foreigner, might successfully dispute the

title to a throne with the lawful heir. Were the varieties even of

the human voice to cease, a great part of the important concerns

of mankind would be immediately so perplexed, and disturbed, as

to be necessarily given up. Nor could any clue be found, to guide

us out of the labyrinth, in which we should be lost. Nay, if the

handwriting of men were to become uniform, there would be an

end of all certainty in our correspondence ; in our instruments of

conveyance and obligation ; in signatures of testimony, agency, and

office : in public and private records ; and, in a word, in every

thing which was the work of the pen. From these few instances,

we learn, what indeed might be illustrated by thousands of others ,

the supreme wisdom, with which this variety has been introduced

into the creation of God.

3dly. The divine Wisdom is eminently conspicuous in spreading

over the Creation certain kinds , and degrees, of Resemblance and

Uniformity.

Under the last head I have observed, that all things differ from

each other. It is still true, and a truth of immense importance,

that there is an extensive series of resemblances, every where dif-

fused, and not less wonderful than the variety, which I have spe-

cified. These resemblances are the foundation of what logicians

term the genera and species, or the kinds and sorts, under which

all the objects of our perception are arranged. Were there no

such resemblance, there could be no such arrangement : and,

were there no such arrangement, we should scarcely know any

thing beyond the present object. Our knowledge is composed al-

most entirely of general truths ; and every such truth is a propo-

sition, declaring what is true concerning a vast number of indivi-

duals . One general truth, therefore, contains all the knowledge,

which would be conveyed by a number of propositions, declaring

the same thing, equal to the whole number of the individuals in-

cluded. But, if we could not arrange individuals into such classes,

or sorts , every proposition, which we formed, must be of the kind,

which logicians call singular, or must respect one individual only ;

and nothing would be communicated, or learned, by means of it,

but what respected merely that individual. Of course, every at-

tribute of every other individual must still be learned anew. The

1

THE WISDOM OF GOD.

SER. XIII. ] 233

multitude of such propositions, which would be necessary to cx-

press what is now declared by one general truth, would in a short

time overburden the memory, patience, and strength, of the mind ;

and fatigue it to listlessness and despair. Men would, in this case,

always be children; necessarily ignorant of the nature, qualities ,

and uses, of almost every thing, with which they were concerned.

But, if there were no such resemblance or uniformity ; there could,

as I have remarked, be no such arrangement made by the mind.

The ideas of kinds and sorts would never be formed. No general

propositions could be made ; and no general truths exist : for ,

every such truth is merely a declaration concerning resemblance

or uniformity. Of course, men, as to their knowledge, would be

infants for ever.

As, therefore, by the variety found in all things, and the differ-

ences which they every where exhibit, God has opened his charac-

ter boundlessly to our view, and prompted us to study it for ever ;

so by their uniformity and resemblance he has enabled us to know

it ; and prepared us for an everlasting progress in intellectual

improvement. In both united, he has displayed consummate Wis-

dom.

4thly. The Wisdom of God is strongly conspicuous in the com-

munication of language to mankind.

Language is the medium, by which we convey our thoughts to

each other, and record them for personal, and common use. If

we could not convey our thoughts to each other ; they must of course

be confined to our own bosoms ; and each man would know noth-

ing except what he gained from his own observation. His charac-

ter and situation, in such a case, can be very imperfectly imagined

byus. But it is perfectly clear, that he must be sunk far below

the state of a savage ; and dwindle into a character, incapable of

existing, except in that rude wilderness, fancifully sytled a state of

nature. Even the acquisitions, which he would make in this situa-

tion, he could not leave behind him ; but, however inclined, must

carry them with him to the grave. Every generation, if successive

generations could exist, would begin exactly where their fathers

began ; and not an improvement would be made in the affairs of

men. Bacon and Newton, Locke and Berkely , Addison and John-

son, would then be distinguished, if distinguished at all, as we now

mark a shrewder ape, or a more sagacious dog.

By the communication of language to mankind, God has enabled

us to unfold to each other all our thoughts, emotions, and designs ;

to treasure up what we know for the benefit of our posterity ; to

diffuse the knowledge of common danger and suffering, of common

safety and happiness ; to spread the same sentiments and improve-

ments, over a country, a continent, or a world; to embark in a sin-

gle, useful, and great design, all whose labours are necessary to the

accomplishment ; to publish systems of laws for the preservation

of the common rights, and the effectuation of the common duties ;

VOL. I. 30

THE WISDOM OF GOD.

234 [ SER. XIII.

to unitenations in the great purposes of internal and external de-

fence ; to control the vast concerns of empires ; to preserve, and

enlarge, the science of preceding ages ; to spread the Gospel of

salvation through the habitable world ; to advance knowledge and

virtue onthis earth towards the Millennial standard ; and to prepare

endless multitudes of mankind for immortal happiness and glory.

Inthe promotion of these mighty purposes, language is a principal

and indispensable ingredient. How strong an impression does it

bear of the wisdom of God !

By the contrivance of the same wisdom, which communicated it,

is language so formed, as to be easily learned in very early child-

hood : the period, in which necessity most demands, that it should

be learned. Nay, it is obviously acquired at this period with far

less difficulty, than at a more advanced age. At the same time,

the great body of words is so formed, that they possess an appel-

lative, or common nature ; so as to denote the kinds and sorts of

things above mentioned, and to include all individual beings and

events, comprised by a sort or kind, under one common name.

Thus the noun, Man, denotes all men ; the adjective, Good, denotes

that which is good in every instance ; the participle, Loving, signi-

fies the exercise of that affection in every case ; the verb, Hate,

includes all exertions of hatred ; and the adverb, Swiftly, indicates

a rapid progress wherever it exists . Hence, as in the former case

we are enabled to conceive clearly of things, so by the correspon-

dence of language with our conceptions, we are enabled to speak

of them clearly. A few words in this manner are sufficient to ex-

press an immense multitude of beings and events, without any per-

plexity or confusion. Were this not the structure of language ;

words must be multiplied to such a degree, for the purposes of

communication even to a moderate extent, as to render it impossi-

ble, that they should be either learned or remembered. Nothing,

but the familiarity of this object, can prevent us from admiring the

wonderful wisdom, which it displays .

5thly. The wisdom of God is gloriously seen in constituting one

great class of his creatures Moral Agents .

By the term, Moral Agent, I wish it to be understood, that I in-

tend a real agent, a being whose thoughts , affections , and actions ,

are his own. Of such agents the divine kingdom is eminently

composed.

Byforming such agents in innumerable multitudes, God has made

beings, capable, with intelligence and choice, of coinciding, and

co-operating with him, in his own infinitely desirable and excellent

purposes . They, with a distant, but real, resemblance to himself,

can know, love, hate, choose, reject, design, and act ; and all this ,

to great and good ends. Particularly, they are capable of under-

standing , in some good degree, his character, designs, dispensa-

tions, law, and government ; and the glory and excellence discov-

ered in them all. These also, and Him as the Author of them ,

THE WISDOM OF GOD.

SER. XIII . ] 235

they are capable of regarding with wonder, veneration, and love.

Him they are capable of worshipping, and obeying. To each

other , at the same time, they are able to extend every useful

thought, every amiable affection, and every beneficent action ; and

can thus become the means of mutual improvement, worth, and

happiness. In forming these beings, the Wisdom of God is in

many respects gloriously manifested. Particularly , as they are

capable of being the subjects of real, though finite benevolence ,

and of directing this disposition by their understanding to an un-

ceasing variety of desirable and useful purposes ; as they are ca-

pable of promoting their own excellence and enjoyment, and that

of each other; as they are capable of knowing, loving, and glori-

fying him, and of possessing the exalted worth, and expansive hap-

piness, which result from all these as causes ; and as immense

multitudes of them actually do all the things, which I have men-

tioned: so they can become, and do in fact become, delightful ob-

jects both of the benevolence and complacency of God. All

these things, also, they can, and will, do in a never-ceasing pro-

gress throughout eternity. In forming such agents, therefore, God

has made for himself a kingdom supremely glorious and divine ;

composed of subjects, whom his eye regards with infinite compla-

cency; to whom his hand is stretched out with eternal bounty ;

who, as a vast mirror, reflect, as the ocean reflects the splendour

of the Sun, the boundless beauty and glory of their Creator ; and

whom his voice with awful but delightful accents pronounces to be

a work worthy of JEHOVAH.

My audience will undoubtedly observe, that there are two great

manifestations of divine Wisdom, which have usually been alleged

by preachers, but which have been omitted in this discussion ; the

Redemption of mankind, and the Word of God. These are, beyond

a question, the prime exhibitions of this Attribute. The Word of

God is called by itself the Word of Wisdom; the Gospel is justly

declared to be the wisdom of God. By the same illustrious title, is

Christ known in the Scriptures ; and to disclose the manifold Wis-

dom of God in the most wonderful work of Redemption, is ex-

pressly asserted to be the end, for which all things were created.

But there is not opportunity, at this time, to exhibit either of

these subjects in such a light, as they both indispensably demand.

On a future occasion, should Providence permit, I may consider

them at large.

The illustrations, which have been produced in this discourse,

although a very few , out of an endless multitude, actually and daily

existing, are, it is presumed , amply sufficient to impress upon the

mind a full conviction, an affecting sense, of the Wisdom ofGod.

REMARK.

Asingle remark, intended as a general comment on the several

discourses concerning this most sublime and wonderful of all sub-

THE WISDOM OF GOD.

236 [ SER. XIII.

jects, the Existence, and Character of the Creator, shall conclude

this Sermon .

When we call to mind even those views of this subject, which

have been here succinctly and imperfectly given ; we cannot, I

think, fail to exclaim, How great and glorious a being is God !

I have now finished the observations, which I proposed to make

on the existence and perfections of God ; and considered this vast

subject, as it is presented to us both by Reason and Revelation .

What an amazing character is here manifested to our view ! JEHO-

VAH, the self - existent, eternal, immutable, omnipresent, omniscient,

almighty, and independent ; the only good, just, faithful, true, mer-

ciful, and wise ; the Maker, the Preserver, the Benefactor, and the

Ruler, of all things : to whom be glory for ever and ever . What a

Character, what a Being, is this ! How do all creatures in his pre-

sence, and in comparison with his greatness and perfection, shrink

into nothing, and become justly counted to him, as less than nothing

and vanity ! How truly, how suitably to his character, does he say,

Iam; and there is none else ! How wonderful a Cause must He be,

from whom all things are derived ! How divine an Architect must

He be, who with his finger laid the foundation of the earth, and

built his stories in the Heavens ! How amazing a Ruler, who doth

according to his will in the armies of Heaven, and among the inha-

bitants of the earth ; whose hand none can stay ; and to whom no be-

ing may say, What doest thou ? How exalted a Benefactor, who

giveth unto all, life and breath, and all things ! How perfect a God,

who conducts his immense kingdom along the ages of eternity,

with ever increasing glory, happiness, and perfection !

How infinitely different is the JEHOVAH of the Scriptures from

the Gods of the Heathen, of Philosophy, and of Infidelity ! How

many weaknesses disgrace, how many passions pollute, how many

vices deform, these objects of man's device, applause, and homage!

All of them are vanity and a lie ; and they that make them are like

unto them, and so is every one that putteth his trust in them . There

is none of them, that considereth in his heart ; in none of them is

there knowledge or understanding . They feed on ashes ; a deceiv-

ed heart hath turned them aside, that they cannot deliver their souls ,

nor say, Is there not a lie in our right hands ? Lift up your eyes on

high, and behold, Who hath created these things ? Who bringeth

out their host by number ? Who calleth them all by names ? Who

hath measured the waters in the hollow of his hand, and meted out

heaven with a span ? Who hath comprehended the dust of the earth

in a measure ; and weighed the mountains in scales, and the hills in

abalance ?

But thou, O Zion ! that bringest good tidings , lift up thy voice ;

and rejoice with joy and singing . Thou shalt see the glory of the

Lord, and the excellency of thy God. He shall come with a strong

hand, and his arm shall rule for him. Behold, his reward is with

him, and his work before him ! He shall feed his flock like a shep

THE WISDOM OF GOD.

SER. XIII . ] 237

herd ; he shall gather the lambs with his arm, and carry them in his

bosom. For thus saith the High and Lofty One that inhabiteth eter-

nity , whose name is Holy, I dwell in the high and holy place ; with

him also, that is of a contrite and humble spirit ; to revive the spirit

of the humble, and to revive the heart of the contrite. For Iwill not

contend for ever, neither will I be always wroth : for the spirit should

fail before me, and the souls which I have made .

Seraphim and Cherubim, Thrones, Dominions, Principalities and

Powers, feel no employment, no honour, no happiness, so great, as

to worship, serve, and glorify, God for ever and ever. With won-

der, awe, adoration, and transport, they surround his throne, veil

their faces , cast their crowns at his feet, and cease not day nor night,

crying, Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty, who wast, and who

art, and who art to come.

If men possessed the disposition of angels ; their employments,

their views, and their happiness, would in substance be the same.

No Polytheists, no Atheists, no Infidels, would ever have disgraced

the human name. To this end, no enlargement of our understand-

ing is necessary. A mere change of disposition would convert this

world into one great temple of Jehovah ; in which one faith would

command and control, and one worship ascend, as the odour of

sweet incense , from the rising of the Sun to the going down of the

same. Holiness to the Lord would be written on the hearts, the lips ,

the employments, and the pleasures, of the great family of Adam.

Every heart would glow with love and rapture ; and every hill and

valley become vocal with praise. In all his wonderful works, God

would be sought and seen, acknowledged, and glorified. Every

being and event would be viewed only as a manifestation of God;

and the universe contemplated as a vast picture, exhibiting, in forms

and varieties innumerable, the wisdom and power, the benevolence

and amiableness, the beauty and glory, of JEHOVAH.

SERMON XIV.

THE DECREES OF GOD .

Јов ххііі. 13. But he is in one mind, and who can turn him ? and, what his soul

desireth , even that he doeth.

IN this passage of Scripture, Job asserts , that the mind, or will

of God, is one, and unchangeable, or incapable of being turned ; and

that all its dictates , or desires , are carried by him into execution. As

God does whatsoever he chooses ; it is hardly necessary to ob-

serve, that he does nothing but what he chooses. As his mind is

unchangeable, and but one ; so, this being admitted, it is intuitively

certain, that it has always been but one. As all things were ori-

ginated, are preserved, directed, and controlled, by God; so it is

plain, that they all come to pass exactly according to his pleasure.

This doctrine is therefore clearly contained in the text :

That all things , both beings and events, exist in exact accordance

with the purpose, pleasure, or what is commonly called The Decrees ,

ofGod.

Before I begin the direct discussion of this doctrine, I shall make

a few preliminary observations .

It is well known to the Christian world at large, that no subject

has been the foundation of more, or more strenuous, controversy,

than this . By various classes of Christians, and some of them very

numerous, it has been roundly, and steadily, denied in form. The

things, which have been written concerning it with heat and obsti-

nacy, would fill many volumes. It has been asserted to be injuri-

ous to the divine character, and destructive of all finite moral agen-

cy. Those, who have holden the doctrine, have been charged by

their antagonists with denying the free agency of God himself;

and with introducing into the Christian system the Stoical doctrine

of Fate, and making an iron-handed Necessity, or blind Destiny,

the ultimate and irresistible disposer of all things. At the same

time, it has been alleged, that they shroud all human hopes in mid-

night darkness ; and prevent, or destroy, every effort of man to

become finally virtuous and happy.

Such things , as these, certainly prove, that there is, in the hu-

man mind, a strong bias against the doctrine. This appears often

in the conduct of those, who believe it ; many of whom seem de-

sirous, that it should either rarely , or never, be brought into the

desk. Multitudes appear utterly unwilling even to converse con-

cerning it ; and perhaps equal multitudes decline to make it a sub-

ject ofcontemplation.

It must be acknowledged, that this doctrine has been indiscreet

DECREES OF GOD .

SER XIV.] 239

ly handled, both in Sermons, and in other discourses. As many

things, pertaining to it, are in their nature very abstruse; and many

others lie without the reach of the human understanding ; so it will

be easily believed, that in the ardour of investigation, disputants

will, of course, be in danger of asserting many things, which are

neither satisfactorily evinced, maturely considered, nor well under-

stood, by themselves ; and extend their inquiries to many other

things , about which inquisition is fruitless, because discovery is im-

practicable . The bounds of the human mind, as well as of the hu-

man race, arefixed ; and beyond them it cannot pass. They are,

however, distant enough from each other to leave a field of investi-

gation so ample, as to allow of the utmost employment of the

greatest talents . Every attempt to push our inquiries beyond them

is unwise ; both because it is vain, and because it is a waste of that

time, which might be usefully employed on things within our reach .

But, if the doctrine, which I have stated, is true ; if it is a doc-

trine revealed in the Scriptures ; it cannot fail to be a proper sub-

ject of thought, of conversation, and of preaching : for all Scripture

is given by inspiration of God : and is profitable for doctrine, for

reproof , for correction, and for instruction in righteousness. Per-

haps it is unnecessary, and would not be useful, to make it a sub-

ject of very frequent discussion in the pulpit. A considerable

number of persons in every congregation must be regarded, as

being imperfectly competent to judge advantageously of such a

subject from such discussions. Such persons, to say the least ,

would fail of being instructed ; and , if not instructed, would pro-

bably be bewildered. At the same time, though frequently assert-

ed, it is very little discussed, in the Scriptures : and the Apostle

Paul, alluding to it, breaks out into this exclamation : O the depth

of the riches, both of the wisdom and knowledge of God ! how un-

searchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out !

No occasion can be more proper for the introduction of this doc-

trine into the desk, than the present. I have just finished a series

of Sermons on the Being, and Perfections, ofGod. His decrees , or

counsels, are the next subject of inquiry in a system, professedly

comprising all the important doctrines of Theology. That the

doctrine concerning this subject, which is true, and scriptural,

whatever it may be, is one, and a very important one, of such a

system, will not be questioned either by those who believe, or those

who disbelieve, the doctrine, advanced as the principal subject of

the present discourse. The controversies about it, and the senti-

ments expressed by the several disputants, prove this point beyond

any necessity ofdebate.

In considering this doctrine, I shall attempt,

I. To explain it ;

II. To prove it ; and

III. To answer the Objections , commonly made against it .

I. I shall attempt to explain this doctrine.

DECREES OF GOD.

240 [ SER . XIV.

This is peculiarly necessary ; because, if I mistake not, both its

friends and enemies have perplexed it, not a little, by the manner,

in which they have represented the doctrine, and each others' opi-

nions.

It has been frequently said, that the Decrees of God are the con-

sequence of his knowledge, and that his foreknowledge is in conse-

quence of his decrees : and it is asked, how it is possible, that God

should foreknow the existence of any thing, until he has decreed, that

it should exist . This phraseology, if applied to men, or other finite

beings, might be correct. Such beings usually consider ; then de-

termine ; and then, so far as is applicable to their nature and cir-

cumstances, foresee, or foreknow, the event. But, when applied

to God, it is necessarily erroneous . In the divine Mind, succes-

sion is impossible. There is not, there cannot be, one act, by

which God knows any or all things ; another following it, by which

he determines their existence ; and then another, by which he

foreknows , that they will exist. Whatever exists in the divine

Mind exists co- etaneously, and co-eternally, with all other things

which exist in it. God, in this respect, is no more the subject of

variableness , or any shadow of turning, than in other respects .

Whatever is intended by knowledge, foreknowledge, or decrees,

all is simultaneous or absolutely co-existent. St. Paul exhibits

this subject in a happier manner. Whom he foreknew, says this

Apostle, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image ofhis

Son . By this declaration, we are not to understand, that the pre-

destination, spoken of , followed the foreknowledge, any more than

that the foreknowledge followed the predestination. The Apostle

says, Whom He foreknew, not, After He had foreknown them .

Should it be said, that this phraseology is adopted merely in

condescension to human infirmity ; and that it is intended to ex-

press these things as they exist in the order of nature and not in

the order of time : I answer, that the language is still dangerous ,

because it is incorrect in itself ; and so liable to be misunderstood,

that it leads both those who use it, and those to whom it is used,

into very serious errors. The act, or state, of the divine Mind,

which gave birth to the existence of all things, is one ; and there

never was a period in duration, not even an indivisible moment, in

which it was not absolutely and inseparably one.

The decrees of God are often said to be general and special ; the

special decrees being those, which respect the acceptance, or re-

jection, ofmankind ; and the general decrees, those which respect

other things. This language is, also, in my view erroneous ; and

leads those, who adopt it, into mischievous consequences. There

is no metaphysical, or real, distinction in the nature of the several

decrees of God. Nor are they distinguishable from each other,

except either numerically, or by means ofthe objects, which they re-

spect. Nor is there any more specialty pertaining to one of them

than to another. God wills, or chooses, the existence, conversion,

DECREES OF GOD.

SER . XIV. ] 241

or salvation, of a man, the fall of a sparrow, or the descent of rain,

with a volition in every sense metaphysically, or in its own nature ,

the same. The strict truth is, that one, indivisible act, perhaps it

might be as properly called state, of the Divine Mind, gave birth to

the existence of all things .

The decrees of God are frequently styled eternal. They are

truly eternal, in the same sense in which God is eternal : viz.

they are eternally present, and incapable of being compared, me-

taphysically, with a successive state ofbeing. In this sense they

are always, like God himself , possessed of an existence eternally

present ; being no other than an unchangeable state of the divine

mind.

Further, the decrees of God are said to be sovereign. In ex-

plaining this term, some persons speak of God, as willing, decree-

ing, &c. , because he wills , chooses , or pleases , &c .: while others ,

on the contrary , suppose that the Decrees of God, in whatever

sense understood, must, if they exist, be arbitrary, and therefore

unreasonable ; and hence they conclude, that there are no such de-

crees . Both, in my view, think, and speak, erroneously . To say,

that God wills a thing, because he wills it, is to speak without

meaning. It is impossible, that any thing should be the cause

of itself ; nor can an act be any more the cause of its own ex-

istence, than a being. This doctrine, it is to be observed, is

equally true of the final, as of the efficient cause. Nothing can

be the end, for which itself exists . The assertion is also inju-

rious to God ; because it exhibits him as choosing, or decreeing,

without any reason and to no end. This conduct in men, if

we suppose it possible, would be folly in the extreme : it can

therefore never be imputable to the only wise God. The Decrees,

and the conduct, of God, are sovereign, in the true and Scriptural

sense ; viz. that he does according to his will, independently and

irresistibly ; and that he gives no account of any of his matters , any

farther than he pleases. Still it is equally true, that he wills nothing

without the best reason ; whether the reason be disclosed to his

creatures, or not. Real glory to himself , and real good to his cre-

ation, not otherwise attainable, furnish the Reason of the divine

choice, whether it respects the existence or motions of an insect,

or the conversation and salvation of a man. The kind, the degree,

the manner, and many other things, are either wholly, or partially,

unknown to us : but the good is always in view, and always the

reason of the divine determination .

It is observable, that the Scriptures rarely speak of this subject,

under the name Decree . This word, and others derived from it,

are used in the Old Testament twelve times with a reference to God.

In each of these instances , a particular determination, or sentence ,

concerning a particular thing, is spoken of; and in no instance, that

general determination, or system of determinations, usually denoted

by this term in Theological discussions. In the New Testament ,

VOL. I. 31

DECREES OF GOD.

242 [ SER. XIV.

the word, as referring to God, is not used at all. Whenever the

subject of this doctrine is mentioned in the Scriptures, the words

counsel, purpose, choice, pleasure, will, or some other equivalent.

words, are employed to express it. These words are, in my view,

more adapted, in the exact metaphysical sense, to the subject, than

the word decrees ; and naturally lead the mind to more just concep-

tions of its nature. In accordance with this fact, I shall express

my own views of it in this manner. What is commonly intended

by the Decrees of God, is that choice, or pleasure, of the divineMind,

eternally and unchangeably inherent in it, by which all things are

brought into being .

Having thus explained my views of the Doctrine, I shall now

attempt,

II. To prove it .

Under this head, I shall

1st. Allege several direct Arguments in support of the doctrine ;

and

2dly. Suggest several Difficulties , which result from denying it.

1st. I shall allege several direct arguments in support of the doc-

trine.

It will be admitted by all persons, beside Atheists, that there

was a time, when created, or finite, beings began to exist ; and of

course, that, antecedently to this time, there was nothing, except

God. It will also be admitted, that God was the Cause of their

existence ; or that all originally derived their being from him in

some manner or other. With these things in my view, I ob-

serve,

  1. That all things, both beings and events, were eternally and

perfectly known to God.

By this I intend alike all things possible, as well as actual ; and

the nature, qualities , and operations, of all ; together with all sup-

posable connexions, dependencies, and relations . I mean also, that

these were seen with one single view, and that completely compre-

hensive and perfectly clear, by the divine Mind ; so that nothing

pertaining to them in any respect was, in any degree, unperceived

in this perfect manner. This view I consider, also, as being abso-

lutely one invariable, and eternal. It never began; it will never

terminate. It never has been, it never will be, in the least degree

changed. All this is involved in the Omniscience of God; and

has, I flatter myself , been proved to be a part of the Divine Char-

acter.

  1. In the nature and operations of things there is, inherent, a

foundation for preference, or choice .

By this I intend, that some of the things, which were thus known

by the Divine Mind, were better , or upon the whole more desira-

ble; and that others were less desirable. This, I presume, cannot

be denied. It will not be denied, that a multitude of those things

which we can imagine, and which God , if he pleased , could create.

DECREES OF GOD.

SER. XIV .] 243

are much less desirable, and certainly so, even in the view ofsuch

minds as ours, than other things, which he has actually created .

Beyond this, it will, I presume, be admitted without a question, that

many things, which we can imagine, are absolutely undesirable ;

and that others, still, would, if brought into existence, be incalcu-

lably noxious to the universe. That an individual man, for exam-

ple, should possess the strength of an elephant , the ferocity of

a tiger, the sight and wings of an eagle, and the sagacity of a

fiend ; or that another individual should possess the power of con-

trolling the elements, with the spirit, and invulnerability, of a fiend ;

would be things absolutely fatal to the inhabitants of this world .

That the Apostles, when employed to publish the Gospel, and erect

the Christian Church, should have possessed the fraudulent and

impious spirit of Voltaire, would, as every sober man must neces-

sarily see, have been a fact incalculably injurious to mankind.

These three instances may serve as representatives of millions

more, imaginable even by the limited faculties of the human mind.

Should it be said, that in the multitude of possible things, there

were many equally desirable ; and that between these, there is no

foundation for a choice ; I answer, that this is said gratuitously, and

cannot be known to be true. Should the person who says it,

intend, that the things specified are in all respects exactly alike,

and only numerically different ; it will be necessary to inquire ,

whether the object of choice proposed, is to create only one of

these similar things , and for that end to select one only. If this be

the thing intended, I answer ; that he amuses himself with words ;

for as the things differ only numerically, one of them, when cre-

ated , is equally the archetype of each of these images, and no more

of one than of any other ; and whatever is included in the nature,

and operations, of them all, is completely realized in the existence

of one. But, if the object of choice intended be, whether only one

or more than one , of these similar beings shall be created ; then I

answer; that the objector has himself furnished a complete founda-

tion for a preference: the cases now differing from each other, as

an unit differs from two , three , or more ; or a single manfrom many ;

a difference not only perceptible, but capable of being important,

to any supposable degree. Should it be said, that things may dif-

fer in some minute particulars, and yet furnish no solid foundation

for a preference : I reply, that it cannot be wisely, or warrantably,

said , We, indeed, may not, and usually do not, perceive why things ,

differing very little, admit of such a preference ; but to the intuitive,

and all -comprehensive, view of God, a little difference between

two things may, in the eternal progress of his dispensations, be such

as to produce an influence on the Universe, so diverse, as to ren-

der one entirely beneficial, and the other wholly noxious. Few

differences can be more minute, or trifling, to the human eye, than

the existence of one hair more, or one less, on the human head ,

yet God has informed us, that these are all numbered by him; and

that he sees a reason for preferring the number actually existing.

DECREES OF GOD.

241 [SER. XIV

But should it be granted, that things , materially differing, exist-

ing in any numbers , and making up, in several instances, complete

and diverse systems, or universes, may yet be equally desirable in the

view of God : I answer further, that, in this case, the object of choice

would be to create one of these systems, and carry it into complete

execution ; and, it being perfectly indifferent which of them should

be brought into being, there would nothing remain to be resolved

on, but the act of creating . That, which was begun in pursuance

of this determination, would thenceforth for this very reason be

preferable to the others, and be the most perfect possible system.

  1. This foundation for choice cannot but be perfectly known to

God.

As this position will not be questioned by any person, who admits

the doctrine under the preceding head, and plainly cannot, but in

defiance of reason; I proceed to observe,

  1. That God cannot but have chosen the existence of all those

things , whose existence was on the whole desirable, and of no others .

The benevolence of the divine character furnishes complete evi-

dence of the truth of this position. The benevolence of God is

boundless and perfect. It is the nature of benevolence to desire ,

and delight in, the existence of good ; of perfect benevolence, to

desire the existence of perfect good ; and of boundless benevo-

lence, to desire the existence of infinite good ; or, in other words,

of all which upon the whole is good. If , therefore, the existence

of any thing is desirable, God cannot but have chosen it, because

its existence was necessary to this perfect good ; which is the su-

preme object, and delight, of his benevolence. The existence of

any being, or event, is desirable, upon the whole, only because it

is necessary to the perfect good, which I have mentioned, either by

contributing to the existence, or by being itself a part, of that

good. It is, therefore, completely evident, that God cannot but

have chosen the existence of every thing, whose existence is upon

the whole desirable .

  1. This choice of God, that things should exist, is the only divine

energy, and the only cause of existence .

The energy of a mind is its will ; and this is synonymous with

its choice , generally understood ; each act of the will, being no other

than an act of choice. What is thus true of every finite mind,

is eminently true of the Infinite Mind. In the Infinite Mind, there

are no successive acts of choice ; but one universal and unchange-

able pleasure, which gives birth to every thing. It is metaphysic-

ally proper to say, that God wills all things into existence ; or that

they are produced by his choice; in the full sense, in which any

effect is said to be produced by its efficient cause. This I suppose

will not be denied, so far as the existence of beings is concerned.

The only question will probably respect events ; and particularly

those, which are called the actions of moral or voluntary creatures .

With respect to these I observe, that it makes no difference, as to

DECREES OF GOD.

SER. XIV.] 245

the truth of this doctrine, whatever difference it may make as to

others , whether we suppose God to will the existence of these be-

ings, furnished with those faculties, which enable them to act in any

givenmanner, and in the possession of which they will really act

in that manner ; or whether we suppose him to will the existence

of their actions immediately. The pleasure, or choice, of God,

in the former case, is the productive cause of the existence of these

beings, and of their faculties. With these faculties, these beings,

of course, will certainly, although without any necessity, except

what is attributable to inclination, act in a given manner in every

case. All the actions, of which they will thus be the subjects,

were, antecedently to the existence of the beings in question, per-

fectly discerned by the Omniscience of God ; and, so far as they

will ever have existence, were objects of his choice or preference .

He, therefore, willed into existence such beings, possessed of such

faculties, as he knew would certainly give birth to the existence of

their actions . Although, therefore, he may have chosen, that their

actions should be the result of their energy, without a direct exer-

tion of his own ; it is clear, that he chose the existence of such be-

ings, possessed of such faculties, with a perfect knowledge, that

they would be the authors of such actions ; and that the actions

would exist. As, therefore, he chose, that beings, who, he certain-

ly knew, would perform these actions, should exist ; it is evident,

that he also chose, upon the whole, the existence of the actions

themselves.

It may, perhaps, be objected, that this doctrine makes God the au-

thor of sin ; ; I answer, for the present, that it makes God the author

of a universe, in which he knew, that sin would exist . A further an-

swer will be given, when this subject comes to be particularly con-

sidered under the third head.

  1. The Scriptures directly assert the doctrine of this discourse.

The text is a strong example of this nature. As it has been suf-

ficiently illustrated already, I shall leave it to your consideration.

In Isaiah xlv. 10, God says, My counsel shall stand ; and I will do

all my pleasure . This will be admitted to be a complete assertion

of the doctrine, unless it should be supposed, that there are things

done, and existing, in the universe, which are without, and beyond,

the counsel of God . According to this supposition, it must be ad-

mitted, that a part of the system of things in the universe was not

contrived by him ; was not agreeable to his pleasure ; nor accom-

plished with his permission. In Isaiah xliii . 13, God says, Iwill

work ; and who shall let it ? and in Daniel iv . 35, it is declared, He

doth according to his will in the armies of heaven, and among the

inhabitants of the earth ; and none can stay his hand, or say unto

him, What doest thou ?

In both these passages, it is asserted, that there is no possible op-

position , or hindrance, to the universal agency of God; which ope-

rates alike in heaven and in earth ; and in both according to his

DECREES OF GOD.

246 [SER. XIV .

will, or pleasure. In Revelation iv. 11, The four and twenty el-

ders , falling down before Him, that sitteth on the throne in the hea-

vens, say, Thou art worthy , O Lord, to receive glory, and honour,

and power : for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they

are, and were created. In this passage it is asserted, that all things

were created, and exist, for the pleasure ofGod. It is irresistibly

inferred, therefore, that they exist according to his pleasure. In

Acts xv. 18, it is said, Known unto God are all his works from the

beginning of the world : and, in Psalm civ. 31, The Lord shall rejoice

in his works. It cannot be true, that God will rejoice in his works ,

unless they are agreeable to his pleasure ; nor any farther than

they are agreeable to his pleasure ; for this would be to sup-

pose, that he takes pleasure in that, which is not agreeable to his

pleasure; or is pleased with that, which does not please him . As

all his works were known to him from the beginning ; so they were

certainly agreeable to his pleasure from the beginning: else it could

not be foreknown, and foretold, that he will rejoice in them .

That the actions of moral beings are foreknown by God is unan-

swerably evident from the fact, that almost all the prophecies in the

Scriptures are either predictions of the voluntary acts of such be-

ings ; or of events, accomplished by their voluntary actions ; or of

events, which without these actions could never exist. The deluge

was absolutely predicted to Noah, one hundred and twenty years

before it took place ; but, had mankind repented in that period, the

deluge would not have existed. If , then, God had not certainly

foreknown, that men would not repent ; he could not have certainly

foretold the deluge. Godpredicted the apostacy of the Edomites ;

the sojourning of the Israelites in Egypt ; the refusal of Pharaoh to

let them go ; their return to the land of Canaan ; the revolt of ten

Tribes from Solomon ; the ruin of their empire by Nebuchadnez-

zar; their captivity ; their return; and their final destruction by

the Romans ; the life and death of CHRIST ; the erection and pro-

gress of the Christian Church ; and a vast multitude of other events,

which cannot now be mentioned. These events were not only the

voluntary actions of men, or the result of them, but involved thou-

sands of millions of such actions, which preceded them, and were

necessary to their existence. All these must have been perfectly

foreknown by God; or the events could not, with either truth, or

certainty, have been foretold. These actions, thus foreknown,

were either agreeable, or contrary, to the pleasure of God ; that

is, upon the whole. If they were contrary to his pleasure ; it was

contrary to his pleasure, that they should exist. Either, then, the

cause of their existence was sufficiently powerful to bring them in-

to being, when he chose that they should not exist or he chose

that they should exist, contrary to his own pleasure ; or, in other

words, his own choice.

Christ is said by St. Peter to have been delivered to the Jews by the

determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God. If this declaration

DECREES OF GOD.

SER. XIV. ] 247

can need proof ; it is found abundantly in the numerous predictions

of this event, contained in the Old Testament. CHRIST is said to

have been slain, that is, in the purpose of God, from the founda-

tion of the world. The calling, sanctification, conversion, and sal-

vation, of the Christian Church, are said to be according to the eter-

nal purpose of God. A vast multitude of declarations, importing

the same things generally, might be added to these, were it neces-

sary. But I shall only observe further, under this head, that the

works of Creation and Providence are exhibited in the Scriptures

as parts of one great plan, universally devised, and conducted, ac-

cording to the good pleasure of God; extending to the clothing of

grass and the falling of sparrows, the government of this world and

the regulation of the heavens.

2dly. I shall now consider some of the Difficulties , which result

from a denial of this doctrine.

That God made all beings, will not here be questioned. When

he made them, he either made them with, or without, a design. If

he acted without design, he acted without wisdom ; and was there-

fore originally unwise, or unpossessed of wisdom: for nothing is

more absolute folly , or indicates more an entire destitution of wis-

dom, than to act without design ; or without an end ; and especial-

ly to do such great and wonderful things, for so long a period,

without any end in view.

If God acted with design in the Creation of all things ; he either

provided for the certain accomplishment of the end, which he had in

view ; or he did not. If he did not, it was because he was either

unable, or unwilling, to do it. If he was unable, it was either be-

cause he knew not the means of doing it, or because he had not

power to bring them to pass. In the former case, we deny his

Omniscience ; in the latter, his Omnipotence. When we behold

the wonderful contrivance of the endless multitude of things in

Creation and Providence, we cannot, in the exercise of Reason.

doubt his Omniscience. When we call to mind, that they were

brought into existence by his power, we cannot doubt his Omni-

potence. He, who contrived the Universe, plainly knows all

things : He, who made it, can plainly do all things, which in their

nature are possible .

If God was unwilling to provide for the accomplishment of the

end, which he proposed in the Creation of all things ; it was either

because that end was not sufficiently dear to him, or because the ac-

complishment of it required more labour and self- denial than its

importance would justify. The end could not but be sufficiently

dear to him. God certainly could propose to himself an end of

infinite value ; viz. the promotion of infinite good. If he did not

propose this end; it was not because he was unable to propose it,

but because he was unwilling. If he was unwilling to propose this

end, when it was in full view before him; he was not only desti-

tute of infinite benevolence ; but, I apprehend, wholly destitute of

DECREES OF GOD.

248 [ SER. XIV.

all benevolence ; since, in this case, he preferred a good, which

was comparatively nothing, (as being finite) to that which was in-

finite. If he is infinitely benevolent, and did actually propose, as

the end of creating and governing the universe, an infinite good ;

then to him this end was infinitely dear.

He was not prevented from providing for the accomplishment of

this end because of the labour, or self- denial, which it would require.

To infinite benevolence, no effort of choice can be laborious , or

self -denying ; to Omniscience, no effort of contrivance ; and to Om-

nipotence, no effort of execution. The Infinite Mind acts, of course,

with perfect ease. The Creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth

not, neither is weary .

If Goddid provide for the accomplishment of the end, which he had

in view ; then it will either be accomplished, or it will not. If it

will be accomplished, the means, provided for this purpose, are all

of the proper nature, and will operate in the proper manner, for

its accomplishment. In other words, they will sustain precisely

that nature, and operate in that manner, which was intended by the

Infinite Mind, when the end was proposed, and the means were

selected for bringing it to pass . Of course, both the end, and the

means, were from the beginning known, proposed, chosen, and de-

termined, by God.

He, therefore, who denies this doctrine, will, I think , find the de-

nial followed by the immoveable difficulty of being obliged, at the

same time, to deny the absolute perfection, and infinity, of the di-

vine power, knowledge, or goodness .

Further; if the actions of voluntary beings are not, upon the

whole, such as God originally chose they should be; it must be

either because he did not know what they would be ; or, knowing

this , did not choose to prevent their existence. If he did not origin-

ally know what they would be ; then his creatures communicate to

him continually new ideas ; and those, in endless multitudes. Of

course, his views change daily ; and, instead of being Omniscient

originally, and eternally, he is not now, nor will he ever be Omnis-

cient ; but will, throughout Eternity, receive continual and vast ac-

cessions of knowledge, communicated to him by his voluntary

creatures ; who, in this case, devise what before he did not know,

and act what before he never conceived. In this case also, his

knowledge must, like ours, be successive, and mutable. Nay, as

his mind is the greatest of all minds, and must, according to this

supposition, continually imbibe knowledge ; so, from its extent and

comprehension, it must imbibe knowledge incalculably faster, and

be more rapidly mutable, than that of any other being whatever.

Further ; as the views of God continually enlarge, and change ;

so it is plain, that, together with his views, his disposition must

change with respect to particular things, and ultimately with re-

spect to his whole system ; and that his administrations, and his

measures, must in the same manner also change. New objects

DECREES OF GOD.

SER. XIV.] 249

sustain new characters, and new relations ; and infer new proprie-

ties of conduct, and of consequence new measures . The conduct,

which it would be proper for God to adopt towards a being, whose

character and actions are unknown to him, must be also unknown .

Every creature, whose character and actions are new, and different

from any thing before known, or conceived, must, if he be proper-

ly treated, receive a treatment differing from any, before exhibited,

or contrived. As voluntary beings are, in a sense, endlessly nu-

merous, and exist throughout eternity ; so their actions, being, ac-

cording to the supposition, unknown to God before they exist, must,

in a multitude of instances, literally endless, demand a new treat-

ment, or new measures, repeated in a manner, also literally end-

less . Of course, not only in his views, but also in his disposition

and conduct, God must, according to this supposition, be the most

unceasingly, and absolutely, changeable of all beings .

Abeing, whose conduct is, and must be, regulated by the actions

of others, is plainly dependent on others, with respect to this prime

part of his character. He cannot act, as he would originally, and

absolutely, choose to act ; but must act as their conduct requires

him to act. God, therefore, being intimately, and inseparably,

connected with all voluntary beings, is in this respect more de-

pendent, according to this supposition, than any other being what-

ever.

But, if God did know, originally, all the actions of voluntary bc-

ings, and did not choose to prevent their existence in any case ; then

they were, upon the whole, agreeable to his pleasure ; or he chose, that

they should exist, when, upon the whole, they were contrary to his

pleasure. That he could have prevented the existence of any ac-

tions whatever, if he pleased, we certainly know ; because he could

have prevented the existence of the beings, whose actions they

were. If they were upon the whole contrary to his pleasure, and

he yet chose that they should exist ; then he chose, that actions

should exist, whose existence was upon the whole contrary to his

choice ; which is no other than a self - contradiction.

Again; if God proposed infinite good as the end of all his con-

duct ; and this end was infinitely dear to him, and is yet not cer-

tainly and completely accomplished ; it must be because he is not

able to accomplish it. This will not be pretended. But, if God

does not foreknow the actions of voluntary beings, he cannot be

certain of the accomplishment of this end . To the accomplishment

ofperfect and infinite good, it is plainly necessary, that every thing,

pertaining to the system, should be in time, place, nature, and ope-

rations, exactly that , and only that, which contributes directly, as

well as ultimately, its own proper efficacy to the promotion of this

end. Aperfect system plainly demands, that every part of it be

necessary , and entirely fitted for the place, and operations, assign-

edto it; and that there be nothing contrary to, or aside from, the

general purpose ; nothing out of place, or time; nothing super-

VOL. I. 32

DECREES OF GOD.

250 [ SER. XIV.

fluous, and nothing defective ; in a word, that there be just such

means, and so many of them, as will perfectly accomplish the end,

and that there be nothing more. But , in the case supposed, the

actions of voluntary beings, unless accordant with the pleasure of

God , can in no wise sustain the character of proper parts of a per-

fect system. Just so far, as they vary from this pleasure, they

vary from the character specified. It will not be denied, that God

is both able, and disposed, to plan a perfect system of good. It

follows, therefore, that he certainly has planned such a system.

Whatever accords not with his pleasure, upon the whole, accords

not with this system; this being the thing , which is agreeable to

his pleasure ; but must be defective, or superfluous ; out of place ,

or out of time ; aside from, or contrary to, the perfection of the

system. Consequently, if the actions of voluntary beings be not,

upon the whole, accordant with the pleasure of God; he was not

only unassured of the accomplishment of the end, which he pro-

posed in creating and governing the universe ; but he entered upon

this great work without knowing, that it would be accomplished ;

and was originally certain, that the perfect good, which he pro-

posed, would never exist.

Those, who deny this doctrine, are therefore, unless I am de-

ceived, forced by their denial to acknowledge, that God is a limit-

ed, mutable, and dependent being ; and that he orignally was, and

ever must be, uncertain of the accomplishment of the great end,

proposed in his works ; or rather that he ever was, and will be

certain, that it can never be accomplished. The magnitude of

these difficulties I need not explain.

SERMON XV.

THE DECREES OF GOD .

Јов ххііі. 13. -Butheisinonemind; and who can turn him ? and what his soul de-

sireth, even that he doeth .

IN my last discourse I asserted, from these words, the follow-

ing Doctrine :

That all things , both beings and events, exist in exact accordance

with the purpose, pleasure, or, what is commonly called the Decrees ,

ofGod.

In discussing this doctrine, I mentioned, that I should attempt,

I. To Explain it ;

II. To Prove it ; and

III . To answer the objections, commonly made against it.

Under the first head, after having mentioned several erroneous

opinions, and forms of phraseology, frequently adopted concern-

ing this subject, I expressed my own views of it in this manner :

What is commonly intended by the Decrees of God, is that choice , or

pleasure, of the Divine Mind, eternally and unchangeably inherent

in it, by which all things are brought into being .

Under the second head, I alleged several direct arguments in

support of the doctrine ; and then suggested several difficulties ,

which result from denying it. These, by proving the converse of

the doctrine to be false, indirectly proved the doctrine to be true :

according to the general axiom, that every proposition, or its con-

verse , is true .

I shall now, as I proposed, attempt,

III. To answer the Objections , commonly made against this doc-

trine.

These, I think, may be reduced to the following :

1st. That it is equivalent to the Stoical doctrine of Fate, or Des-

tiny : 2dly. That it exhibits God as the Author of sin :

3dly. That it destroys the Free Agency of rational creatures :

and, 4thly. That it discourages all the Efforts of mankind towards

Reformation .

I will not say, that no other objections are brought against this

doctrine ; but I think of no others, which appear to be regarded,

as material, by those who allege them ; or which, ifthese be fairly

obviated, would be supposed sensibly to affect the question in de-

bate . These, therefore, I shall now proceed to consider in the

order proposed.

DECREES OF GOD

252 [SER. XV

1st. It is objected , that the general doctrine of this discourse, is

equivalent to the Stoical doctrine of Fate or Destiny.

The Fate of the Stoics, as explained by Cicero, was of this na-

ture . These Philosophers supposed a series, and it would seem

an eternal one, in which each link of the vast chain was the effect

of the preceding, and the cause of the succeeding, one : every link

being alternately a cause and effect. These causes, so far as I

understand the subject, (for it is not very clear, that we understand

precisely what was the Stoical doctrine, nor that the Stoics under-

stood, or united in, it themselves) were not considered by them as

either intelligent, or voluntary ; but as merely coerced by those

which preceded, and as coercing those which followed. In other

words, the doctrine was substantially the same with that of Atheists

concerning an eternal series, which was exploded in a former Dis-

course. * To the irresistible efficacy of this series of causes, the

Gods, acknowledged by the Stoics, were absolutely subjected;

and Jupiter himself , their supreme Ruler, was utterly unable to re-

sist, divert, or at all change, the order of things, brought to pass

by the compulsion of this Fate, or Destiny.

He, who can find any resemblance between this doctrine, and

that on which the present discourse is founded, must find it by the

aid of an ingenuity, to which I can make no claim. I freely own,

that I cannot perceive any similarity between an unintelligent and

involuntary series of causes, compelling by natural necessity, or

coercion, the existence of their consequent effects, and controlling

by inevitable necessity the actions of both Gods and Men ; and

the free, wise, and voluntary, agency of the infinitely intelligent

and benevolent Mind, originally planning, and steadily executing,

a system of infinite good, according to the dictates of his bound-

less wisdom, and perfect pleasure. I cannot perceive a similarity,

sufficient to enable me to discern in what the professed difficulty

lies ; or what the real objection is, which I am required to answer.

I shall take the liberty, therefore, of waiting until I shall find the

objection so stated, as either to induce me to acknowledge its

force, or enable me to attempt a refutation.

2dly. It is objected, that this doctrine exhibits God as the Author

of sin .

To the phrase, Author of sin, very different meanings are an-

nexed by different persons. In order to meet this objection, there-

fore, with any hope of success, it will be necessary, in the first

place, to determine the true meaning of the phraseology. Some

persons understand by it the immediate and efficient Cause of sinful

volitions : others, not only mean the efficient, but the guilty, Cause of

such volitions : others, still, such a Cause, as in any manner, how-

ever remote, lays a foundation for the existence of sin : and others, a

Cause, supposed to be intelligent, which, when possessed of sufficient

*

See Sermon II .

DECREES OF GOD.

SER. XV. ] 253

power to prevent the existence of sin , did not interfere to prevent it .

When it is said, that this doctrine exhibits God as the Author of

sin ; I shall, for the present, consider the phrase, as used in one, or

both, of the two first of these senses ; and regard the objector as

intending, that, according to this doctrine, God is either the guilty,

or guiltless , immediate, and efficient, cause of sinful volitions in his

creatures : In other words, that he constrains , or compels them to

sin . That the doctrine, which I have defended, involves this con-

sequence, I cannot perceive, nor admit.

To support the objection, it must be shown, that God cannot

will, and accomplish, the existence of voluntary agents, who, act-

ing freely, shall nevertheless act in exact accordance with what is ,

upon the whole, his pleasure ; and who, in the circumstances in

which they are severally placed, and with the attributes which

they severally possess, will , with perfect freedom, contribute, each

his proper part and efficiency, towards the promotion of the infinite

good, originally proposed as the end of the divine system. But

this, I apprehend, has never been, and never will be, shown. It

must be proved, that in the infinite multitude ofpossible free agents ,

present to the view of the divine Mind, there were none, possessed

of such attributes, and capable of being placed in such circum-

stances , as , while they acted with perfect freedom, would also per-

fectly accomplish the purposes of the divine pleasure. No man

will , I presume, attempt to prove this position. If it be granted,

that such agents were possible, and that the Infinite Mind discerned

their nature and character ; it must, in order to support the objec-

tion, be proved, that God, having these agents in full view, chose

not to select them, and bring them into existence. But this, I pre-

sume, will not be admitted by the objector himself . Till this can

be done, however, the objection cannot be maintained.

That Sin is in the world, and that the world, with all which it

contains, is under the government of God, in some sense or other,

must be acknowledged by the objector himself ; unless, on the one

hand, he denies the divine government absolutely, or, on the other,

the distinction between moral good and evil. Sin has, therefore,

entered the world in some manner or other, while it was under the

divine government. There are three ways, in which men have at-

tempted to explain the difficulty, involved in this fact. Some per-

sons assert, that by his direct efficiency, God caused ; others , that he

permitted ; and others still, that he could not prevent it's existence .

That God could not prevent the existence of sin cannot be

maintained. He has prevented it in the angels, who kept theirfirst

estate . He prevented it in the person of Christ; who in his human

nature knew no sin. He has promised, that he will prevent it, and

hewill therefore certainly prevent it , in the spirits ofjust men made

perfect in the heavens. Should it be said, that these beings, by

their own voluntary agency, and without any interference or influ-

ence on the part of God, continue in a state of holiness ; I an

DECREES OF GOD.

254 [SER. XV .

swer, that this supposition affects not the point at all; for God

plainly could have created every moral agent with exactly the

same attributes, and placed them in exactly the same circumstan-

ces, with those several virtuous beings, who persist in holiness .

Whatever we suppose to be the means, by which they are pre-

served from sin ; those very means he certainly could have used,

to preserve in the same effectual manner all others .

Beyond this, he has not only continued holiness in the minds of

many of his creatures ; but has restored it to vast multitudes, who

had fallen into a state of hopeless guilt and pollution. This fact

is a proof , that he could have continued it in the minds of these

creatures , if he had judged this conduct to be, upon the whole, wise

and good for him to pursue.

That God by an immediate agency of his own, creates the sinful

volitions of mankind, is a doctrine, not warranted, in my view,

either by Reason, or Revelation. There are, I know, many re-

spectable men in modern times, and particularly in our own coun-

try, as there have been at other times, and in other countries ,

who have thought this the easiest way of arriving at satisfaction

concerning this abstruse subject. I cannot, as some persons have

thought it proper to do, attribute to these men evil designs. In

many instances, at least, they appear to give as unquestionable

proofs of piety and virtue, as are given by any others ; and to de-

vote their labours as cheerfully, and faithfully, to the promotion of

truth and righteousness, in the world. Still , I cannot accord with

this doctrine ; nor hesitate to believe, that they have in several in-

stances darkened counsel by words without knowledge. There is a

bound, as I have remarked before, beyond which the mind cannot

pass; and it is as easily found in investigating this subject, as in

any course of human inquiry. The metaphysical nature of Moral

Agency, both in God and his creatures, is a subject, perhaps as

tenuous, as difficult to be fastened upon, and as easily evanescent

from the mind, as any, which we attempt to examine. This, I

think, is unanswerably evident from the fact, that no attempt

thoroughly to explain it, has given extensive satisfaction, even to

philosophical men, for any length of time.

The Theology of a part of this countryappears to me to be

verging, insensibly, perhaps, to those who are chiefly concerned,

but with no very gradual step, towards a Pantheism, differing, ma-

terially, in one particular only, from that of Spinosa. He held,

that the Universe, which he supposed to be matter, and which he divi-

ded into cogitative or intelligent , and incogitative , was God ; and

that the several parts of it were no other than separate parts of the

same great and Universal Being . Thus he excluded the existence

of all creatures ; and of any work of creation, as well as all that,

which is usually meant by the providence and government of the

Creator. The Theology, to which I have referred, teaches, that

God is immaterial, intelligent and infinite ; but denies, with Spinosa,

DECREES OF GOD.

SER. XV. ] 255

the existence offinite, intelligent beings, as well as of those, which

we call bodies ; declaring, that what men usually call minds, or spi-

rits, are no other than continued chains , or successions , of ideas and

exercises , created immediately, and successively, by the Infinite

Mind. The same reason is alleged by this system for the exclu-

sion of finite agents from existence, which was alleged by Spinosa

for excluding the existence of such agents, as well as an Infinite,

Immaterial One, from his system; viz. that mankind cannot con-

ceive of such things, nor comprehend their nature : a reason, which ,

if admitted, will indeed exclude from our belief , and reception, al-

most every doctrine. Particularly, on this ground we ought cer-

tainly to deny the existence of the Infinite Agent.

As I propose to consider the principal subject of these remarks

in a discourse, devoted to it, it will be improper to anticipate, here ,

the things which I design to include in that discourse. It will be

sufficient, for the present purpose, to observe, that the Scriptures

directly inform us, that God is the Author of holiness, and this in

many forms, and with great emphasis ; that they no where assert,

that he is the Author of sin, in the sense now under consideration ;

and that they every where attribute blame to man, as the guilty,

and, in my view, the efficient, cause, of his own sins. A plain

man, reading the Scriptures, never, I presume, derived from them

the doctrine, that God creates the sins of men. Nor can he, with-

out great pains- taking, and previous perplexity, be induced to ad-

mit it as a part of his creed. And let it be remembered, as a very

just and very important remark of Doddridge, that the plain sense

ofthe Scriptures, or that which naturally strikes the minds ofplain

men as the real meaning, is almost of course the true sense .

The existence of finite agents is at least as conceivable, and ad-

missible, as that of an infinite Agent; and certainly involves no

greater difficulties . Accordingly, this has been the universal doc-

trine of the human mind, as well as the only obvious exhibition of

the Scriptures, concerning this subject. The common objection

concerning this doctrine, is certainly trifling and groundless ; viz .

that it makes creatures independent of their Creator. Can he be in-

dependent, whose existence, attributes, and consequently actions,

depend absolutely on the will of another ; and who can be, anddo,

nothing, but what that other is pleased to permit ?

Satisfied with this view of the subject, on which, however, I mean

to dwell more particularly hereafter, I adopt without hesitation the

second of these methods of explaining the introduction of Sin into

the world ; and unite with those, who assert, that God permitted the

existence of Sin ; or in the Scriptural language, that he has in times

past suffered all nations to walk in their own ways . It has not ever

beenproved , that these ways are not their own, in the most abso-

lute sense ; nor in the strictest metaphysical language, that God

has not suffered all nations to walk in them ; nor that this, connect-

ed with such a superintendence and control, as invariably directs

DECREES OF GOD.

256 [ SER . XV

their conduct to ultimate good, and prevents it from terminating in

ultimate evil , is not the whole of the immediate agency of God, so

far as sin is concerned. That this scheme does not in any degree

exhibit God as the Author of Sin, in either of the two first senses,

must, I think, be acknowledged by every man, who believes in the

perfections and government of God. That he has permitted Sin,

and has not prevented its existence, are facts so evident, that they

cannot become the subject of serious debate. At the same time, I

cannot but observe, that those, who, when they speak of God as

the Author of Sin, mean to indicate these facts as the import of this

phrase, use language in an unwarrantable, and, in my view, dan-

gerous and mischievous manner.

3dly. It is objected, that this doctrine destroys the Free Agency of

rational creatures .

It will be easily perceived, that many of the observations, made

under the last head, materially affect this also. Indeed these two

objections are so connected in their nature, that it is impossible to

consider one of them, to any extent, without anticipating, in some

degree, the consideration of the other. To the observations, which

I have already made, I shall, however, add several others, pecu-

liarly referring to this objection.

There are but two ways, in which the agency of God can be sup-

posed by the objectors to lessen, or destroy, the free agency of his

creatures. One is by compelling, or constraining, their actions : the

other, by rendering the existence of their actions certain, before they

takeplace . That God compels, or constrains, the actions of his

creatures ; of men for example ; certainly cannot be shown, nor

even pretended ; unless the compulsion exists in his decrees. Nor

can it be shown to exist in his decrees, unless it is involved in the

nature of his decrees, as such ; or, in other words, unless the doc-

trine of this discourse is inconsistent with the nature of free agency

in creatures . This, I presume, is the real opinion of those, who

bring the objection, now under consideration . They regard the

supposition, that God has planned a certain system of things accord-

ing to his own pleasure, and that he has made, and placed, men in

such a manner, as that they will certainly do those things , and those

only, which will accord with that pleasure, as inconsistent with the

doctrine, that they are free agents .

To this objection, to which I have intended to give its true im-

port, and full force, it is commonly answered, that the doctrine, which

Ihave attempted to support, is capable of being clearly proved, both

from Reason and Revelation ; and that men are intuitively conscious

of their own free agency, being irresistibly sensible, that they act

spontaneously, and without any coercion, or constraint. Both doc-

trines being, therefore, true, and certain, it is justly alleged, that they

are of course consistent with each other .

It would seem, that this answer might as well satisfy the mind in

the present case, as in numerous others, in which we perceive pro-

DECREES OF GOD

SER. XV . ] 257

positions to be true, but are unable to discern the nature of their

mutual connexion. But, as the objection is still insisted on, and

seems to have no small weight in the minds of many persons, it

will not be improper for me to offer some further considerations on

the subject.

All those, who make the objection, agree as well as others, that

it is possible for a finite agent, possessed of certain supposable attri-

butes , and placed in certain supposable circumstances , to be free in

the absolute sense . I shall take this for granted ; because, other-

wise, the objection itself , and the debate founded on it , can have

neither place, nor meaning. We will suppose, then, such an agent

to exist ; and to act, while he lived, in a manner perfectly free :

while, at the same time, no being knew at all, in what manner he

would act in any case whatever, until his actions had existed. In this

case, he would undoubtedly be allowed to possess all possible

advantages for acting with perfect freedom. Lest I should not be

thought to be sufficiently particular, I will suppose his actions to be all

absolutely contingent ; because some Philosophers suppose contin-

gency to be an indispensable and inseparable attribute of a free

action. We will, now, in the second place, suppose this agent,

without any change in his powers , or his circumstances , in any other

respect, to have all his actions, which , according to the former sup-

position are the freest possible, foreknown by God, or some other be-

ing. I ask, whether they would be at all the less free, in conse-

quence of being thus foreknown ? The powers, the circumstances,

and the actions, of this agent, remain exactly the same as before :

the agent himself (for that is included in the supposition) being per-

fectly ignorant, that his actions are thus foreknown. Can it be per-

ceived , that this foreknowledge affects the nature ofthe actions in

any manner, or the freedom of the agent ? To me it is clear, that

it cannot; because, in the case supposed, the foreknowledge has

not the remotest influence on the agent, nor on his actions: both

he and they continuing to be exactly the same, in every respect

whatever. On the contrary, all the possible influence of this fore-

knowledge is confined to the bosom of him, by whom it is pos-

sessed.

But if this agent would thus continue free, and his actions would

still be perfectly free, notwithstanding they were foreknown ; then

it is clear, that a preceding certainty, that the actions of a voluntary

agent will exist, does not at all, of itself , lessen, or affect, their free-

dom. Foreknowledge renders the future existence of that, which

is foreknown, certain : therefore the actions of the agent supposed

are all rendered certain, and will of course exist : yet it is, I think,

unquestionably clear from this statement , that their freedom will

not be affected. Lest I should be thought guilty of an absurdity

in supposing events absolutely contingent to be capable of being

foreknown ; I shall justify myself by observing, that Dr. Gregory

has asserted, that the voluntary actions of mankind are foreknown

VOL. I. 33

258* [SER . XV

DECREES OF GOD.

as mere contingencies ; and is declared by a writer of respectability

to have merited the thanks ofthe learned world for this discovery.

For myself , I confess , that I not only discern no indispensable con-

nexion between contingency and freedom of action; but no con-

nexion at all , nor any possibility, that human actions, or any thing

else, should be contingent. So far as I can see, the admission of

casual, or contingent, existence, must, if we would make our prin-

ciples consistent,be by consequence the admission of it in all cases

whatever.

Again; we will suppose, that the actions of the agent already spe-

cified, which are thus foreknown by God, are perceived by him, also,

to be exactly agreeable to his pleasure. Will this circumstance af-

fect the freedom of agency ? Surely it will not be asserted, nor

believed, that actions, in order to be free, must contravene the plea-

sure of God. As I presume this proposition was never advanced

by any man ; and as it is an obvious absurdity in itself ; I shall

take the liberty to consider it as being an absurdity. It is therefore

clear, that the actions of a voluntary agent may be certainly fore-

known by God to be exactly agreeable to his pleasure, and yet be at-

tended with the highest possible freedom.

That God knows all things, the knowledge of which involves not

a contradiction ; and that the foreknowledge of human actions does

not involve a contradiction ; I here consider as undisputed.

I have, I flatter myself , made it sufficiently evident, that God's

foreknowledge of voluntary actions does in no respect lessen, or

affect, their freedom; although it renders their future existence ab-

solutely certain. But it will be said, by some persons at least,

that the difficulty does not lie here ; but in the fact, that God has

willed the existence of human agents, and their actions ; and that it

is his formation of them in such a manner, as to accomplish certain

purposes of his own, which prevents , or destroys , the freedom in ques-

tion.

To remove the difficulty, presented by this observation, I will

suppose once more a voluntary agent either self- existent, or exist-

ing casually, possessing powers of understanding, similar in their

extent to those of angels , or of men ; and at the same time free in the

highest sense, annexed to that term . Let him be also supposed to

beknown, and comprehended, by God in the same perfect manner,

in which any angel, or man, is known by him ; so that God can

foresee with an omniscient survey, and absolute certainty, all his

future actions. At the same time, let it be supposed, that God

exercises over him no government, or influence, whatever. This

being will undoubtedly be acknowledged to be free, even by those,

who make this objection ; because he was neither brought into ex-

istence by the will of God; nor is controlled, nor influenced, in any

manner whatever, by any will , beside his own. Let me further

suppose, what, as it must be granted, cannot lessen, nor affect, his

freedom; that all his actions, thus foreseen, are agreeable to the

DECREES OF GOD.

SER. XV. ] 259

divine pleasure . Now let me ask, whether the divine omniscience

could not contrive, and the divine power create, a being exactly

resembling this, which I have here supposed, in every respect ;

except that he was not self -existent, nor casually existent ; and so

perfect a copy, that he would differ from this supposed being nu-

merically only ; would possess the same attributes ; be in the same

circumstances ; and perform, both in substance and mode, exactly

the same actions. Were this supposed being, for example, to be

placed by God in his kingdom, in certain circumstances, and act-

ing a certain part, in the system, which was exactly agreeable to

the divine pleasure ; would not the created being who was his

perfect counterpart, if substituted in his place, perform precisely

the same actions, with the same faculties, and the same freedom !

The only difference between them would be, that he, who was ca-

sually existent, would perform these actions in consequence of

possessing such and such attributes , without having been created

for this purpose ; while the other would perform them, in conse-

quence of having been thus created with the very same attributes .

In their origin, I grant, these beings differ: in their nature, charac-

ter, and attributes , they are precisely the same. But their origin,

it is plain, cannot, even in the most distant manner, affect their at-

tributes, or their actions . These, by the supposition, are exactly

alike. If , therefore, the former of these beings is free ; the latter

is equally free. If the actions of the latter are foreknown by God;

equally so are those of the former; and they both alike fulfil his

pleasure.

With these things in view, it must, I think, be evident, that God

can create a free agent, whose actions shall be all foreknown by him,

and shall exactly accomplish what is , upon the whole, his pleasure.

If these things are just , and true ; the doctrine of this discourse

does not destroy, lessen, nor affect in any manner, the free agency

of rational creatures ; unless it can be shown, as I am well assured

it never can be, that God has not created agents , whose attributes

are agreeable to this representation. There was not, indeed, pre-

sent to his eye a self -existent, nor a casually existent, agent, such

as I have supposed ; but there were present to the view of his om-

niscience all the attributes and circumstances, which can enter into

the existence and character of such an agent. If , then, he did not

create beings of such a character ; it was solely because he did

not choose to create them.

4thly. It is objected, that this doctrine discourages all the Efforts

ofmankind towards reformation .

That this doctrine has often been used to discourage such efforts ,

I readily acknowledge. This is not unfrequently the tenor of

books, and of conversation ; nor is it an uncommon thing for per-

sons to make it the source of discouragement to themselves ; and

to entertain gloomy and distressing apprehensions concerning their

own final condition, when referred in their minds to the decrees of

DECREES OF GOD.

260 [ SER. XV .

God. Still I cannot see, that this conduct is wise, rational , or de-

fensible; nor that the doctrine includes in itself any discourage-

inent, which will not, with as good reason, flow from that , which is

opposed to it. It cannot result from the consideration, that the

pleasure of God controls this subject, rather than our own pleasure .

On the one hand, the pleasure of God is more wisely and benevo-

lently formed than our own ; more disposed to promote our salva-

tion; and more able to contrive the best means, by which it may

be accomplished. This we never could have done ourselves ; nor,

if we were able, should we be willing : as is clearly proved by the

fact, that, after the wonderful and difficult things, which have been

done to provide salvation for us, and while it is proffered to us

freely on the easiest of all terms, we are not willing to accept it.

How much less willing should we have been to go through the la-

bour and sufferings, could we have gone through them, which were

necessary to procure it for ourselves.

Onthe other hand, if we please to be saved, we shall now be

saved. This is one great part of the divine pleasure. There is

nothing, which prevents us from being saved, but our own inclina-

tion ; and this would as effectually prevent us in any supposable

circumstances . Nor could we in any circumstances possess a

greater freedom of choice, or action, with respect to this or any

other subject, than we now possess. Nor is there, so far as I

know, any influence from God, which at all hinders us from choos-

ing salvation with all that freedom of action, which moral beings

can possess . It will be observed, I speak not here of persons , for

their incorrigible obstinacy, punished with judicial blindness, and

hardness of heart ; though it is to be questioned, whether, even in

this case, God does any thing more, than leave them to themselves .

The language of God to eve every sinner is , As I live, saith the Lord,

Ihave no pleasure in the death of the sinner ; but would rather, that

he would return, and live . His invitations to sinners are, Ho !

every one that thirsteth ; come ye to the waters ; and he that hath

no money : yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and with-

out price : and, Whosoever will, let him come, and take the water of

life freely. This language is perfectly sincere, and exactly de-

scriptive of the disposition ofGod.

This discouragement cannot arise from the certainty of the event,

as established by this doctrine. The event is equally certain, if the

doctrine is given up. It is equally certain in fact, with what Mr.

Locke calls Certainty of truth, in distinction from Certainty of

knowledge, concerning any man, that he either will, or will not, be

saved, whether it be foreknown or not. One of these assertions ,

either that he will, or that he will not, be saved, is now certainly

true . Which of them is true, I grant, does not appear ; and will

not, until time shall disclose it. Still , one of the events will take

place, whether decreed, or foreknown, or not. God will then

judge, and punish the wicked ; and will punish them for exactly

DECREES OF GOD.

SER. XV.] 261

the same reasons, on either supposition ; viz . for their impenitence,

unbelief, and disobedience. A person may, therefore, with exact-

ly the same propriety, whether he admits the decrees of God, or

not ; or whether God has, or has not, formed any decrees ; say, If

Ishall be saved, I shall be saved, whether I try to obtain salvation or

not : and, however earnestly I may try, if I am to perish, I shall

perish. The certainty, in either case, is the same, and equally ab-

solute. Even the foreknowledge of God will not alter this fact at

all ; for though it affects him, it affects not the certainty of the

event. All that can be truly said is, that an event, which would

otherwise take place , is now foreseen by him. To us in both

cases, also, it is equally unknown. The causes, which will bring

it to pass, will in both cases be exactly the same. The language

in both cases, therefore, may be adopted with exactly the same

propriety. But the truth is, the language cannot be proper in either

case. In my apprehension, it is never true, that the attempts

of the man concerned, towards the attainment of salvation, make

no difference as to the event. On the contrary it is clear, that of

those, who are saved, few, very few, indeed, can be found, who

have not made such attempts ; nor is there any satisfactory rea-

son to believe, that those, who make them with persevering ear-

nestness and zeal, ultimately fail.

I know no reason, why the same language should not be used,

with the same propriety and force, concerning our secular, as con-

cerning our spiritual, business. But the farmer, who should loiter

at home, and say, " If I am to have a crop the present year, I shall

have one; and, if I am not to have a crop, I shall not have one,

whether I plough , and sow, and reap, or lie down in my bed : "

the student, who should spend his time in dress, sports , and gaming,

and say, " If I am to be a scholar, or to get my lesson, I shall ac-

complish it ; and, if I am not, it will never be accomplished, whe-

ther I study diligently, or lose my time in idleness :" would be

pronounced, and justly, a fool or a madman. But the decree of

God extends to each of these subjects as absolutely, as to our sal-

vation. Men are as really chosen to be farmers, and scholars, as

Christians: and learning and harvests are as truly appointed, as

holiness : although from the comparative unimportance of the for-

mer, and the amazing moment of the latter, we are apt to apply

the doctrine to one of the cases, and not to the other.

The kingdom of God, as established by his pleasure, is a king-

dom of means, regularly connected with their ends. I do not per-

ceive, that this is less true, when applied to spiritual, than to natu-

ral, things . The real discouragement, which men generally labour

under with respect to their spiritual concerns, is their indisposition

to make any efforts for the attainment of salvation. In truth, this

indisposition itself suggests the discouragement, which I have ob-

viated, and then admits it. To a dispassionate, unbiassed mind,

it would never gain admission. By sober Reason it was never de-

vised, and can never be supported.

DECREES OF GOD .

262 [SER. XV

Were God really unwilling, that men should strive ; had he dis-

countenanced efforts ; had he established no means of grace ; or

had those means, when anxiously and perseveringly used, failed of

success ; there would, indeed, be ample room for well- founded dis-

couragement. But, when we find, as in my view we do in fact find ,

all these things reversed in the good pleasure, and providence, of

God; we have every inducement to hope, and to labour ; much

more, it would seem, than from any supposable situation, in which

all things were left to fluctuation and casualty. Stupid sinners

have indeed, according to this and every other scheme, the most

fearful reason for discouragement and terror. But such as are

awakened, anxious, and engaged, to seek eternal life, have solid

and abundant reason for hope .

Mankind seem, in many instances, to suppose, that the decrees

of God produce the event without means ; according to the Mo-

hammedan doctrine of predestination. Whereas, if they be-

lieved, that the pleasure of God formed the system, and selected

the means and agents, by which all events are accomplished ; if

they believed those agents to be endued with all the powers of the

freest possible agency, and to be selected, and formed, so that

they might act with perfect freedom ; if they believed, that God

always furnishes them with the necessary means of obedience,

and with motives to obedience, more and greater than any, which

they can find, to disobey ; if they believed, that God, by a direct

agency of his own, does not constrain them to any act whatever,

but leaves them in all instances to act, with perfect freedom, just

as they please ; I think they would also believe, that there is no

more difficulty, attending the fact, that he has chosen, and formed,

such agents, as he knew would unitedly do all his pleasure, than

would attend his choice and formation of such agents, as would

act in any other manner whatever. But allthis, for ought that

appears, is true. The contrary doctrine has never been evinced

to be true ; at least in my apprehension ; and I fully believe never

will be.

On the other hand, it will be proper, for a moment, to turn our

thoughts to the influence of the supposition, that God has not fixed

the system of things according to his Pleasure. It cannot but be

acknowledged, that he knew what system was, upon the whole,

most desirable, wisest, and best. If he did not resolve on it, it

was plainly because he did not desire, or choose, to bring it to

pass. In plain English, then , he did not desire the chief good of

his creation, or the supreme glory of himself , with sufficient good-

will to resolve on it . Can this be infinite good-will ? Can it be

moral perfection ? It was certainly as easy for him to accomplish

it, as to accomplish an inferior system of good. If , then, he did

not resolve on the superior system; it was plainly because he

loved the inferior systém better, and chose to do less good, rather

than greater. His disposition, therefore, is on this scheme, imper

DECREES OF GOD.

SER. XV. ] 263

fectly good in itself; how imperfectly, it is impossible, according

to this supposition, to determine.

According to this supposition, it is further to be observed, all

things are left by God in a state of absolute uncertainty. The

whole happiness of his intelligent creatures is committed to the

casual influence and efficacy of their own views, feelings, and con-

duct. God cannot, in the nature of the case, interfere, either by

determination, or influence, without destroying the free agency, or

discouraging the efforts, of his Intelligent creatures, for the attain-

ment of happiness. The whole system of the universe, so far as

these creatures are concerned, must of course be regulated wholly

by them. Does not this scheme evidently set all their interests

afloat, and leave them eternally to the uncertain and hazardous di-

rection of finite wisdom and goodness ? From the experience,

which we have had of the character and conduct of such creatures,

is there a person in this assembly, who would willingly commit his

eternal interests to this perilous direction, and trust his all to the

disposal of beings so weak, and so often wicked ? Can this be

safe for creatures ? Can it consist with the perfect character of

God? To the wisdom and forecast of his own mind, a man might,

through overweening self -confidence, be willing perhaps to com-

mit the guidance of any interest, and feel that his Soul itself would

be safe in his own hands . But would the same person trust him-

self to the final direction of others ? Would he venture his eternal

welfare upon the wisdom and benevolence of any, or all, of those

by whom he is encircled ? Their fitness for this mighty trust is,

however, not inferior to his own ; and they would as justly refuse

to confide their souls to his care, as he would refuse to entrust his

soul to them. Were he not blinded, therefore, by an unwarrant-

able partiality for himself , he would no sooner, no more willingly,

trust himself in this mighty concern, than he would trust those

around him . To do either, he would clearly discern, would be

foolish and dangerous in the extreme . Wisdom, on the contrary,

would teach both him and them to commit themselves, and their

whole well-being, implicitly to God.

On the connexion of prayer with this subject, I design to dwell

particularly, when I shall come to the consideration of that duty.

I have purposely omitted the examination of it at the present time,

because several things relating to it, belong to Prayer only, and

demand a separate discussion .

Whether the observations, which I have made on the general

doctrine of this discourse, will be viewed by others as possessing

the importance, which I have attached to them, I cannot determine.

To me, they have appeared to possess real weight. If they should

contribute in any measure to remove difficulties, to settle doubtful

opinions, to establish truth, and to communicate satisfactory views

concerning a subject so often attended with perplexity and alarm ;

I shall esteem my labours amply rewarded.

SERMON XVI.

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD .

JEREMIAH X. 23-0 Lord, I know, that the way of man is not in himself ; it is not

in man, that walketh, to direct his steps .

IN this passage of Scripture, the prophet , after uttering a va-

riety of sublime declarations concerning the perfections and pro-

vidence of God, and the follies and sins of men, exhibits the pro-

gress of life as a Way. In this Way, all men are considered as

travelling. We commence the journey at our birth ; pass on

through the several stages of childhood, youth, manhood, and

old age, and finish it when we enter eternity. The accommoda-

tions, and the fare, are greatly varied among the various travel-

lers . Some find their entertainment plentiful, and agreeable ; and

some, even luxurious and splendid. Others are slenderly provided

with food, raiment, and lodging ; are almost mere sufferers ; and

literally, have not where to lay their heads.

In the mean time, sorrow and disease, dangers and accidents,

like a band of marauders, lie in wait for the travellers ; and harass ,

and destroy, a great proportion of their number. Of the vast

multitude, who continually walk in the path of life, almost all

disappear long before they reach the goal, at which it terminates.

A very few arrive at the end. Of these, every one, dragging

heavily his weary feet over the last division of the road, teaches

us, that this part of his progress is only labour and sorrow .

A remarkable fact, universally attendant on our journey, is

recited in the text. O Lord, says the deeply humbled prophet,

Iknow, that the way of man is not in himself; it is not in man, that

walketh, to direct his steps. The enterprise is not contrived by

ourselves . We are placed in it, and necessitated to accomplish

it, by a superior, and irresistible, hand. It cannot but seem

strange, that in such a journey we should originally be prevented

from the ability to direct ourselves ; and that, while we are com-

pelled to the undertaking, we should be furnished for it in a man-

ner so imperfect. Yet such is unquestionably the fact. Nor is

the explanation so difficult, or so unsatisfactory, as we are prone

to believe. GOD originally intended, that all his creatures should

be dependent on him for aid, guidance, and protection. Nor can

it be rationally supposed, that such a dependence on his perfec-

tions , and providence, is either unreasonable or undesirable. The

Sovereignty ofGOD, which is so clearly, and strongly, visible in

this interesting subject, has ever been questioned, and very often

denied , by mankind. To establish this doctrine in the minds of

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD.

SER. XVI. ] 265

my audience, is the peculiar design of the present discourse. In

a sermon, lately delivered in this place on the decrees of GOD, I

explained what I intend by the divine Sovereignty. It was then

observed, that the conduct ofGOD is sovereign, in this sense ; that

he does according to his will, independently and irresistibly , without

giving an account of any of his matters any farther than he pleases ;

but that he wills nothing without the best reason, whether that reason

be disclosed to his creatures, or not ; that real glory to himself , and

real good to his creation, not otherwise attainable, are universally

the object, to which his pleasure is directed, whether it respects the

existence, and motions , of an insect, or the salvation of a man.

It

was remarked, also, at that time, that, in the ordinary sense of

the word, God never acts arbitrarily ; and that to say, he wills a

thing because he wills it, is to speak without meaning. All his

pleasure, all his determinations, are perfectly wise and good ;

founded on the best of all reasons, and directed to the best of all

purposes. Were he to act in any other manner, his providence

would be less wise, and less desirable.

It will not be questioned, that this doctrine is deeply interesting

to man. On this life is suspended that, which is to come. Con-

sequences, eternal and incomprehensible, will flow from those

doctrines, which we adopt in the present world. All our conduct

will then be examined ; and will either be approved, or con-

demned. If we have chosen the strait, and narrow way, prescribed

to us, the termination will be happy. If we have preferred the

broad and crooked road, it will be deplorable.

Few of this audience will probably deny the truth of a direct

Scriptural declaration. With as little reason can it be denied, that

most of them apparently live in the very manner, in which they

would live, if the doctrine were false or that they rely, chiefly at

least , on their own sagacity, contrivance, and efforts , for success

in this life, and that which is to come. As little can it be ques-

tioned, that such self -confidence is a guide, eminently dangerous ,

and deceitful . Safe as we may feel under its direction, our safety

is imaginary. The folly of others in trusting to themselves we

discern irresistibly. The same folly they perceive, with equal

evidence, in us . Our true wisdom lies in willingly feeling, and

cheerfully acknowledging, our dependence on GoD ; and in com-

mitting ourselves with humble reliance to his care and direction .

With these observations, I will now proceed to illustrate the

truth of the doctrine. The mode which I shall pursue will, pro-

bably, be thought singular. I hope it will be useful. Meta-

physical arguments, which are customarily employed for the pur-

pose of establishing this, and several other doctrines, of theology,

are, if I mistake not, less satisfactory to the minds of men at large,

than the authors of them appear to believe. Facts, wherever they

can be fairly adduced for this end, are attended with a superior

power ofconviction; and commonly leave little doubt behind them .

VOL. I. 31

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD.

266 [ SER. XVI.

On these, therefore, I shall at the present time rely for the accom-

plishment ofmydesign. In the

1st. place, The doctrine of the text is evident, from the great

fact, that the birth, and education, of all men, depend not on them-

selves .

The succceding events of life are derived, in a great measure

at least, from our birth. By this event , it is in a prime degree

determined whether men shall be princes or peasants, opulent or

poor, learned or ignorant, honourable or despised ; whether they

shall be civilized or savage, free men or slaves, Christians or

Heathen, Mohammedans or Jews .

Achild is born of Indian parents in the western wilderness. By

his birth he is, of course, a savage. His friends, his mode of life,

his habits, his knowledge, his opinions, his conduct, all grow out of

this single event. His first thoughts, his first instructions, and all

the first objects, with which he is conversant, the persons whom he

loves, the life to which he addicts himself , and the character which

he assumes , are all savage. He is an Indian from the cradle : he

is an Indian to the grave. To say, that he could not be otherwise,

we are not warranted ; but that he is not, is certain.

Another child is born of a Bedouin Arab . From this moment

he begins to be an Arabian. His hand is against every man ; and

every man's hand is against him . Before he can walk, or speak, he

is carried through pathless wastes in search of food ; and roams in

the arms of his mother, and on the back of a camel, from spring

to spring, and from pasture to pasture. Even then he begins his

conflict with hunger and thirst; is scorched by a vertical sun ;

shrivelled by the burning sand beneath ; and poisoned by the

breath of the Simoom. Hardened thus through his infancy and

childhood, both in body and mind, he becomes, under the exhorta-

tions, and example, of his father, a robber from his youth ; attacks

every stranger, whom he is able to overcome ; and plunders every

valuable thing, on which he can lay his hand.

Athird receives his birth in the palace of a British nobleman ;

and is welcomed to the world as the heir apparent of an ancient,

honourable, and splendid family. As soon as he opens his eyes on

the light, he is surrounded by all the enjoyments, which opulence

can furnish, ingenuity contrive, or fondness bestow. He is dandled

on the knee of indulgence ; encircled by attendants, who watch,

and prevent, alike his necessities and wishes ; cradled on down ;

and charmed to sleep by the voice of tenderness and care. From

the dangers , and evils, of life, he is guarded with anxious solici-

tude. To its pleasures, he is conducted by the ever-ready hand

of maternal affection. His person is shaped, and improved, by a

succession of masters ; his mind is opened, invigorated, and refined,

by the assiduous superintendence of learning and wisdom. While

a child, he is served by a host of menials, and flattered by succes-

sive trains of visiters . When a youth, he is regarded by a band

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD.

SER. XVI . ] 267

oftenants with reverence and awe. His equals in age bow to his

rank; and multitudes of superior years, acknowledge his distinc-

tion by continual testimonies of marked respect. When a man, he

engages the regard ofhis sovereign; commands the esteem of the

Senate; and earns the love, and applause, of his country .

A fourth child , in the same kingdom, is begotten by a beggar,

and born under a hedge. From his birth, he is trained to suffer-

ing and hardihood . He is nursed, if he can be said to be nursed

at all, on a coarse, scanty, and precarious pittance ; holds life only

as a tenant at will ; combats from the first dawnings of intellect

with insolence, cold, and nakedness ; is originally taught to beg,

and to steal ; is driven from the doors of men by the porter, or the

house-dog; and is regarded as an alien from the family of Adam.

Like his kindred worms, he creeps through life in the dust; dies

under the hedge, where he is born ; and is then, perhaps, cast into

a ditch, and covered with earth, by some stranger, who remembers ,

that, although a beggar, he still was a man.

A child enters the world in China ; and unites , as a thing of

course, with his sottish countrymen in the stupid worship of the

idol Fo. Another prostrates himself before the Lama, in conse-

quence of having received his being in Thibet, and of seeing the

Lama worshipped by all around him.

Athird, who begins his existence in Turkey, is carried early to

the mosque; taught to lisp with profound reverence the name of Mo-

hammed; habituated to repeat the prayers, and sentences, of the

Koran, as the means of eternal life ; and induced, in a manner irre-

sistibly, to complete his title to Paradise by a pilgrimage to Mecca.

The Hindoo infant grows into a religious veneration for the cow;

and perhaps never doubts, that, if he adds to this a solemn devo-

tion to Juggernaut, the Gooroos, and the Dewtahs, and performs

carefully his ablutions in the Ganges, he shall wash away all his

sins, and obtain, by the favour of Brahma, a seat among the

blessed.

In our own favoured country, one child is born of parents, devo-

ted solely to this world. From his earliest moments of understand-

ing, he hears, and sees, nothing commended, but hunting, horse-

racing, visiting, dancing, dressing, riding, parties, gaming, acquiring

money with eagerness and skill, and spending it in gayety, pleas-

ure, and luxury. These things, he is taught by conversation, and

example, constitute all the good of man. His taste is formed, his

habits are riveted, and the whole character of his soul is turned,

to them, before he is fairly sensible, that there is any other good.

The question, whether virtue and piety are either duties or bless-

ings, he probably never asks. In the dawn of life, he sees them

neglected, and despised, by those, whom he most reverences ; and

learns only to neglect, and despise, them also. Of JEHOVAH he

thinks as little , and for the same reason, as a Chinese or a Hindoo .

They pay their devotions to Fo, and to Juggernaut he, his to

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD.

268 [SER . XVI.

money, and pleasure . Thus he lives , and dies, a mere animal ; a

stranger to intelligence and morality, to his duty and his GOD.

Another child comes into existence in the mansion of Knowledge,

and Virtue . From his infancy, his mind is fashioned to wisdom

and piety. In his infancy he is taught, and allured, to remember

his Creator ; and to unite, first in form, and then in affection, in the

household devotions of the morning and evening. God he knows

almost as soon, as he can know any thing. The presence of that

glorious being he is taught to realize almost from the cradle ; and

from the dawn of intelligence, to understand the perfections, and

government, of his Creator. His own accountableness, as soon as

he can comprehend it, he begins to feel habitually, and alway.

The way of life through the Redeemer is early, and regularly, ex-

plained to him by the voice of parental love ; and enforced, and

endeared, in the house of God. As soon as possible, he is enabled

to read, and persuaded to search, the Scriptures . Of the approach,

the danger, and the mischiefs, of temptations, he is tenderly warn-

ed. At the commencement of sin, he is kindly checked in his dan-

gerous career. To God he was solemnly given in baptism. To

God he was daily commended in fervent prayer. Under this

happy cultivation he grows up, like an olive tree in the courts of the

Lord; and, green, beautiful, and flourishing, he blossoms ; bears

fruit ; and is prepared to be transplanted by the Divine hand to a

kinder soil in the regions above.

How many, and how great, are the differences in these several

children. How plainly do they all, in ordinary circumstances,

arise out of their birth . From their birth is derived, of course, the

education, which I have ascribed to them; and from this education

spring in a great measure both their character, and their destiny.

The place, the persons, the circumstances, are here evidently the

great things, which in the ordinary course of Providence appear,

chiefly, to determine what the respective men shall be ; and what

shall be those allotments, which regularly follow their respective

characters. As, then, they are not at all concerned in contriving,

or accomplishing, either their birth, or their education ; it is certain,

that, in these most important particulars, the way of man is not

in himself . GOD only can determine what child shall spring from

parents, wise or foolish, virtuous or sinful, rich or poor, honourable

or infamous, civilized or savage, Christian or Heathen.

I wish it to be distinctly understood, and carefully remembered,

that in the moral conduct ofall these individuals no physical necessity

operates . Every one of them is absolutely a free agent ; as free,

as any created agent can be. Whatever he does is the result of

choice, absolutely unconstrained.

Let me add, that not one of them is placed in a situation, in

which, if he learns, and performs, his duty to the utmost of his

power, he will fail of being finally accepted.

2dly. The doctrine is strikingly evident from this great fact also ;

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD.

SER . XVI ] 269

that the course of life, which men usually pursue, is very different

from that, which they have intended.

Human life is ordinarily little else than a collection of disap-

pointments. Rarely is the life of man such as he designs it shall

be. Often do we fail of pursuing, at all , the business, originally

in our view. The intentional farmer becomes a mechanic, a sea-

man, a merchant, a lawyer, a physician, or a divine. The very

place of settlement, and of residence through life, is often different,

and distant, from that, which was originally contemplated. Still

more different is the success, which follows our efforts .

All men intend to be rich and honourable ; to enjoy ease ; and

to pursue pleasure . But how small is the number of those, who

compass these objects. In this country, the great body of mankind

are, indeed, possessed of competence ; a safer, and happier, lot,

than that, to which they aspire ; yet few, very few are rich. Here

also, the great body of mankind possess a character, generally re-

putable; but very limited is the number of those, who arrive at the

honour which they so ardently desire, and of which they feel as-

sured. Almost all stop at the moderate level, where human efforts

appear to have their boundary established in the determinations of

GOD. Nay, far below this level, creep multitudes of such as began

life with full confidence in the attainment of distinction and splen-

dour.

The Lawyer, emulating the eloquence, business, and fame.

of Murray or Dunning, and secretly resolved not to slacken his

efforts, until all his rivals in the race of glory are outstripped, is

often astonished, as well as broken-hearted, to find business and

fame pass by his door, and stop at the more favoured mansion of

some competitor, in his view less able, and less discerning, than

himself.

The Physician, devoted to medical science , and possessed of

distinguished powers of discerning, and removing, diseases, is

obliged to walk ; while a more fortunate empiric, ignorant and

worthless, rolls through the streets in his coach.

The Legislator beholds with anguish and amazement, the suf-

frages of his countrymen given eagerly to a rival candidate, devoid

of knowledge and integrity; but skilled in flattering the base pas-

sions ofmen, and deterred by no hesitations of conscience, and no

fears of infamy, from saying, and doing, any thing, which may se-

cure his election .

The Merchant often beholds with a despairing eye his own ships

sunk in the ocean; his debtors fail ; his goods unsold; his business

cramped; and himself , his family, and his hopes, ruined : while a

less skilful, but more successful, neighbour, sees wealth blown to

him by every wind, and floated on every wave.

The crops of the Farmer are stinted; his cattle die ; his mar-

kets are bad ; and the purchaser of his commodities proves to be

a cheat who deceives his confidence, and runs away with his pro-

perty.

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD.

270 [SER . XVI .

Thus the darling schemes, and fondest hopes, of man, are daily

frustrated by time. While sagacity contrives, patience matures ,

and labour industriously executes ; disappointment laughs at the

curious fabric, formed by so many efforts, and gay with so many

brilliant colours ; and, while the artists imagine the work arrived

at the moment of completion, brushes away the beautiful web, and

leaves nothing behind .

The designs of men, however, are, in many respects, not unfre-

quently successful. The Lawyer and Physician acquire business

and fame ; the Statesman, votes ; and the Farmer, wealth. But

their real success , even in this case, is often substantially the same

with that, already recited. In all plans, and all labours, the su-

preme object is to become happy. Yet, when men have actually ac-

quired riches and honour, or secured to themselves popular favour,

they still find the happiness, which they expected, eluding their

grasp. Neither wealth, fame, office, nor sensual pleasure, can

yield such good, as we need. As these coveted objects are accu-

mulated ; the wishes of man always grow faster than his gratifica-

tions . Hence, whatever he acquires, he is usually as little satisfied,

and often less, than before .

A principal design of the mind in labouring for these things is

to become superior to others . But almost all rich men are obliged

to see, and usually with no small anguish, others richer than them-

selves ; honourable men, others more honourable ; voluptuous men.

others, who enjoy more pleasure. The great end of the strife is

therefore unobtained ; and the happiness, expected, never found.

Even the successful competitor in the race utterly misses his aim .

The real enjoyment existed, although it was unperceived by him,

*in the mere strife for superiority. When he has outstripped all his

rivals , the contest is at an end : and his spirits, which were invigo-

rated only by contending, languish for want of a competitor.

Besides, the happiness in view was only the indulgence of pride,

or mere animal pleasure. Neither of these can satisfy, or endure .

Arational mind may be, and often is, so narrow, and grovelling, as

not to aim at any higher good, to understand its nature, or to believe

its existence. Still , in its original constitution, it was formed with

a capacity for intellectual , and moral, good ; and was destined to

find in this his good its only satisfaction. Hence, no inferior good will

fill its capacity, or its desires. Nor can this bent of its nature ever

be altered. Whatever other enjoyment, therefore, it may attain ;

it will, without this, still crave, and still be unhappy.

No view of the ever-varying character, and success, of mankind,

in their expectations of happiness, and their efforts to obtain it,

can illustrate this doctrine more satisfactorily than that of the pro-

gress, and end, of a class of students in this Seminary. At their

first appearance here, they are all exactly on the same level.

Their character, their hopes, and their destination, are the same .

They are enrolled on one list ; and enter upon a collegiate life with

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD.

SER . XVI. ] 271

the same promise of success . At this moment they are plants, ap-

pearing just above the ground ; all equally fair and flourishing.

Within a short time, however, some begin to rise above others ; in-

dicating by a more rapid growth a structure of superior vigour, and

promising both more early and more abundant fruit .

Some are studious ; steadfast ; patient of toil ; resolved on dis-

tinction ; in love with science ; and determined, with unbroken am-

bition, never to be left behind by their companions. Of these a part

are amiable, uniform in their morals, excellent in their dispositions,

and honourable by their piety. Another part, although less amia-

ble, are still decent ; pleasant in their temper ; uncensurable in their

conduct ; and reputable in their character.

Others are thoughtless ; volatile ; fluttering from object to object,

particularly, from one scene of pleasure to another ; alighting only

for a moment ; never settling ; regardless of every thing, except

the present gratification ; andmost regardless of their time , their

talents, their duty, and their souls .

Others, still, are openly vicious ; idle ; disorderly ; gamblers ;

profane ; apparently infidels ; enemies to themselves ; undutiful to

their parents ; corrupters of their companions ; and disturbers of

the collegiate peace.

Whenthe class, which these individuals originally constituted,

leaves this seat of science ; a number of them will always be miss-

ing. Some of these have been sent away by the mandate of law ;

some have voluntarily deserted their education ; and some, not

very unfrequently, have gone to the grave. Of those who remain,

the character, and the prospects, have usually become widely dif-

ferent. The original level is broken, and broken for ever.

How different from all this, were their parents' expectations, and

their own !

Still, when they enter the world, they all intend to be rich, hon-

ourable, and happy. Could they look into futurity, and discern the

events, which it will shortly unfold; how changed would be their

apprehensions !

One, almost at his entrance into life, knowing but inexperienced,

discerning but not wise, urged by strong passions, and secure in

self - confidence, pushes boldly forward to affluence, and distinction ;

but, marked as the prey of cunning, and the victim of temptation,

is seduced from prudence and worth, to folly, vice, and ruin. His

property is lost by bold speculation; his character by licentious-

ness ; and the man himself by the disappointment of his hopes, and

the breaking of his heart.

Another, timid, humble, reluctant to begin, and easily discouraged

from pursuing, insensible to the charms ofdistinction, and a stran-

ger to the inspiration of hope, without friends to sustain, and with-

out prospects to animate, begins to flag, when he commences his

connexion with the world; creeps through life, because he dares

not attempt to climb ; and lives, and dies, scarcely known beyond

the limits ofhis native village .

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD.

272 [ SER. XVI.

Athird yields himself up a prey to sloth ; and shrinks into insig-

nificance for want of exertion.

A fourth, possessed of moderate wishes, and preferring safety to

grandeur, steers of design between poverty and riches, obscurity

and distinction ; walks through life without envying those who ride ;

and finds, perhaps, in quiet and safety, in an even course of enjoy-

ment, and in the pleasure of being beloved rather than admired,

the happiness, which his more restless companions seek from opu-

lence, power, and splendour, in vain.

Afifth, cheerful, fraught with hope, and assured by the gayety

and bustle, which he sees around him, that the world is filled with

good, moves onward to acquire it, without a suspicion ofdisappoint-

ment, or danger. At once he is astonished to find, that men, who

look pleasantly on him, are not his friends ; that a smile of appro-

bation is no evidence of good- will ; and that professions, and prom-

ises, convey to him no assurance of aid, or comfort. To be de-

pendent, he soon learns, is to be friendless ; and to need assistance ,

a sufficient reason for having it refused. The business, which he

expected to court his acceptance, flies from him; the countenance,

on which he reposed, is withdrawn ; and the hopes, which he gayly

cherished, begin early to wither. Alone, forgotten, unprepared for

struggles, and never mistrusting that struggles would be necessary ;

he is overset by the suddenness, and violence, of the shock ; and

either falls into listlessness, and stupor, or dies of a broken heart .

A sixth, from imbecility of constitution, or the malignant power

of accident, sickens, and expires, when he has scarcely begun to

live.

A seventh, with vigorous industry, effort, and perseverence, goes

steadily forward to wealth and distinction. Yet even he finds the

void of his mind unsupplied by real good. He is rich, and great ;

but not happy. That enchanting object, happiness, wrought into

such elegance ofform, and adorned with such brilliant colours, has

ever fascinated his mind. Lost in wonder and delight, and gazing

with an eager and bewildered eye, he never considered, that in

this world the rainbow, with all its splendour, was only painted on

a cloud ; and, while he roves from field to field, and climbs from

one height to another , in pursuit of the fairy vision, is astonished to

behold it still retreat before him, and finally vanish for ever.

Were I to ask the youths, who are before me, what are their de-

signs, and expectations, concerning their future life ; and write

down their several answers ; what a vast difference would ultimately

be found between those answers, and the events, which would

actually befal them! To how great a part of that difference would

facts, over which they could have no control, give birth ! How

many of them will in all probability be less prosperous, rich, and

honourable, than they now intend: how many, devoted to employ-

ments, of which at present they do not even dream ; in circumstan-

ces, of which they never entertained even a thought ; behind those,

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD.

SER. XVI. ] 273

whom they expected to outrun ; poor, sick, in sorrow or in the

grave. 3dly . The doctrine is further evident from the fact, that Life

does not depend upon man.

All intend to live ; and feel secure of many years : but how often

does death frustrate this intention, and dissolve the charm of this

security ! How many leave the world at an immature age ! How

many, in the midst of bold projects, sanguine desires, and strenu-

ous exertions ! How many asterisks appear with a melancholy as-

pect even in the younger classes of the triennial catalogue : mark-

ing solemnly, to a considerate mind, the termination of parental

hopes, and the vanity of youthful designs ! Where now are multi-

tudes of those, who a little while since lived, and studied, and wor-

shipped, here, with fond views of future eminence and prosperity,

and with as fair a promise, as can be found, of future success, use-

fulness, and honour ?

As we are unable to assure ourselves even of a single day ; much

more, of a long life ; it is plain, that our eternal state lies beyond

our control. As death finds us, so the Judgment will certainly find

us. He therefore, who kills , as well as makes alive, at his pleasure ,

must of course hold in his hands, only, all our allotments, which lie

beyond the grave .

I have not called up this doctrine, at the present time, for the

purpose of entering into any of those metaphysical disquisitions,

which restless curiosity, rather than sound wisdom, has commonly

founded on it ; but on the one hand to give it its proper place in

this system of discourses, and on the other to derive from it several

practical observations, which, there is reason to hope, may, by the

blessing of God, be useful to those, who hear me; especially to

those, who are students in this Seminary.

REMARKS.

1st. You see here, my young friends , the most solid reasons for

Gratitude to your Creator.

GOD, only, directed, that you should be born in this land, and in

the midst of peace, plenty, civilization, freedom, learning, and reli-

gion; and that your existence should not commence in a Tartarian

forest, or an African waste. God alone ordered, that you should be

born of parents, who knew, and worshipped, Him, the glorious, and

eternal JEHOVAH ; and not of parents, who bowed before the Lama,

or the ox, an image of brass or the stock of a tree. In the book of his

counsels, your names, so far as we are able to judge, were written

in the fair lines of mercy. It is of his overflowing goodness, that

you are now here ; surrounded with privileges, and beset with

blessings ; educated to knowledge, usefulness, and piety, and pre-

pared to begin an endless course of happiness and glory. All these

delightful things have been poured into your lap ; and have come,

unbidden, to solicit your acceptance. If these blessings awaken

VOL. I. 35

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD.

274 [SER . XVI .

not gratitude ; it cannot be awakened by blessings in the present

world. If they are not thankfully felt by you ; it is because you know

not how to be thankful. Think what you are, and where your are ;

and what, and where, you just as easily might have been. Remem-

ber, that, instead of cherishing tender affections, imbibing refined

sentiments, exploring the field of science, and assuming the name,

and character, of the sons of GOD, you might as easily have been do-

zing in the smoke of a wigwam, brandishing a tomahawk, or danc-

ing round an embowelled captive ; or that you might yourselves

have been embowelled by the hand of superstition, and burnt on the

altars of Moloch. If you remember these things ; you cannot but

call to mind, also, who made you to differ from the miserable beings,

who have thus lived, and died.

2dly. This doctrine forcibly demands of you moderate desires ,

and expectations .

There are two modes, in which men seek happiness, in the en-

joyments of the present world. Most persons freely indulge their

wishes ; and intend to find objects sufficient in number, and value, to

satisfy them . A few aim at satisfaction by proportioning their de-

sires to the number, and measure, of their probable gratifications .

By the doctrine of the text, the latter method is stamped with the

name of wisdom ; and on the former is inscribed the name of folly .

Desires, indulged, grow faster, and farther, than gratifications ex-

tend. Ungratified desire is misery. Expectations eagerly indulged,

and terminated by disappointment, are often exquisite misery. But

how frequently are expectations raised, only to be disappointed ;

and desires let loose, only to terminate in distress ! The child pines

for a toy: the moment he possesses it, he throws it by, and cries

for another. When they are piled up in heaps around him, he

looks at them without pleasure, and leaves them without regret.

He knew not, that all the good, which they could yield, lay in ex-

pectation ; nor that his wishes for more would increase faster than

toys could be multiplied ; and is unhappy, at last, for the same rea-

son, as at first : his wishes are ungratified. Still indulging them,

and still believing that the gratification of them will furnish the en-

joyment for which he pines, he goes on, only to be unhappy.

Men are merely taller children. Honour, wealth, and splendour,

are the toys, for which grown children pine ; but which, however

accumulated, leave them still disappointed, and unhappy. GOD

never designed, that intelligent beings should be satisfied with

these enjoyments. By his wisdom and goodness, they were form-

ed to derive their happiness from Virtue.

Moderated desires constitute a character, fitted to acquire all the

good, which this world can yield. He, who is prepared, in what-

ever situation he is , therewith to be content, has learned effectually

the science of being happy ; and possesses the alchymic stone,

which will change every metal into gold. Such a man will smile

upon a stool; while Alexander, at his side, sits weeping on the

throne of the world.

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD

SER. XVI. ] 275

The doctrine of the text teaches you irresistibly, that, since you

cannot command gratifications, you should command your desires ;

and that, as the events of life do not accord with your wishes , your

wishes should accord with them. Multiplied enjoyments fall to

but few men ; and are no more rationally expected than the high-

est prize in a lottery. But a well regulated mind, a dignified inde-

pendence of the world, and a wise preparation to possess one's

soul in patience, whatever circumstances may exist, is in the power

of every man ; and is greater wealth than that of both Indies, and

greater honour than Cæsar ever acquired.

3dly . As your course, and your success , through life, are not un-

der your control ; you are strongly urged to commit yourselves to

GOD, who can control both.

That you cannot direct your course through the world ; that

your best concerted plans will often fail ; that your sanguine ex-

pectations will be disappointed ; and that your fondest worldly

wishes will terminate in mortification ; cannot admit of a momen-

tary doubt. That God can direct you ; that he actually controls

all your concerns ; and that, if you commit yourselves to his care,

he will direct you kindly, and safely; can be doubted only of

choice. Why, then, do you hesitate to yield yourselves, and your

interests, to the guidance of your Maker ? There are two reasons ,

which appear especially to govern mankind in this important con-

cern : they do not , and will not, realize the agency of God in

their affairs ; and they do not choose to have them directed as they

imagine he will direct them. The former is the result of stupidity ;

the latter, of impiety. Both are foolish in the extreme ; and not

less sinful than foolish .

The infinitely wise, great, and glorious, Benefactor of the uni-

verse, has offered to take men by the hand, lead them through the

journey of life, and conduct them to his own house in the heavens .

The proof of his sincerity in making this offer has been already

produced. He has given his own Son to live, and die, and rise,

and reign, and intercede, for our race. Herein is love, if there

ever was love ; not that we have loved him, but that he has loved us .

That he, who has done this, should not be sincere, is impossible .

St. Paul, therefore, triumphantly asks, what none can answer: He,

that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how

shall he not with him also freely give us all things ? Trust, then,

his word with undoubting confidence ; take his hand with humble

gratitude ; and with all the heart obey his voice, which you will

every where hear, saying, this is the way, walk ye therein. In

sickness and in health, by night and by day, at home and in crowds,

he will watch over you with tenderness inexpressible. He will

make you lie down in green pastures ; lead you beside the still wa-

ters ; and guide you in paths of righteousness ; for his name's sake .

He will prepare a table before you in the presence of your enemies ;

Whenand cause your cup to run over with blessings . When you pass

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD.

276 [SER . XVI.

through the waters of affliction , he will be with you ; and through

the rivers , they shall not overflow you. When you walk through the

fire, you shall not be burned ; neither shall the flame kindle on you.

Fromtheir native heavens, he will commission those charming twin-

sisters , Goodness and Mercy, to descend, and follow you all your

days. But if you wish God to be your guide, and your friend, you must

conform to his pleasure. Certainly you cannot wonder, that the

infinitely Wise should prefer his own wisdom to yours ; and that

he should choose for his children their allotments, rather than leave

them to choose for themselves. That part of his pleasure, which

you are to obey, is all summed up in the single word, Duty ; and

is perfectly disclosed in the Scriptures. The whole scheme is so

formed, as to be plain, easy, profitable, and delightful ; profitable

in hand; delightful in the possession. Every part, and precept,

of the whole, is calculated for this end ; and will make you only

wise, good, and happy.

Life has been often styled an ocean ; and our progress through

it, a voyage. The ocean is tempestuous and billowy, overspread

by a cloudy sky, and fraught beneath with shelves and quicksands.

The voyage is eventful beyond comprehension ; and at the same

time, full of uncertainty, and replete with danger. Every adven-

turer needs to be well prepared for whatever may befal him, and

well secured against the manifold hazards of losing his course ,

sinking in the abyss, or of being wrecked against the shore.

These evils have existed at all times. The present, and that

part of the past, which is known to you by experience, has seen

them multiplied beyond example. It has seen the ancient, and

acknowledged, standards of thinking violently thrown down. Re-

ligion, morals, government , and the estimate formed by man of

crimes and virtues, and of all the means of usefulness and enjoy-

ment, have been questioned, attacked, and in various places, and

with respect to millions of the human race, finally overthrown. A

licentiousness of opinion, and conduct, daring, outrageous, and

rending asunder every bond, formed by GOD or man, has taken

place of former good sense, and sound morals ; and has long

threatened the destruction of human good. Industry, cunning,

and fraud, have toiled with unrivalled exertions, to convert man

into a savage, and the world into a desert. A wretched, and

hypocritical, philanthropy, also, not less mischievous, has stalked

forth as the companion of these ravagers : a philanthropy born in

adream, bred in a novel, and living only in professions. This

guardian genius of human interests, this friend of human rights, this

redresser of human wrongs, is yet without a heart to feel, and with-

out a hand to bless. But she is well furnished with lungs, with

eyes, and a tongue. She can talk, and sigh, and weep, at plea-

sure; but can neither pity, nor give. The objects of her attach-

ment are either knaves and villains at home, or unknown sufferers ,

THE SOVEREIGNTY OF GOD.

SER . XVI. ] 277

beyond her reach abroad. To the former, she ministers the sword

and the dagger, that they may fight their way into place, and power,

and profit. At the latter, she only looks through a telescope of

fancy , as an astronomer searches for stars, invisible to the eye.

To every real object of charity, within her reach, she complacent-

ly says, Be thou warmed ; and be thou filled ; depart in peace.

By the daring spirit, the vigorous efforts , and the ingenious cun-

ning, so industriously exerted on the one hand, and the smooth and

gentle benevolence, so softly professed on the other, multitudes

have been, and you easily may be, destroyed. The mischief has in-

deed, been met, resisted, and overcome ; but it has the heads , and

the lives , of the Hydra ; and its wounds, which at times have seem-

ed deadly, are much more readily healed, than any good man could

wish, than any sober man could expect. Hope not to escape the

assaults of this enemy : To feel, that you are in danger, will ever

be a preparation for your safety. But it will be only such a pre-

paration; your deliverance must ultimately, and only, flow from

your Maker. Resolve, then, to commit yourselves to him, with a

cordial reliance on his wisdom, power, and protection. Consider

how much you have at stake ; that you are bound to eternity ; that

your existence will be immortal ; and that you will either rise to

endless glory, or be lost in absolute perdition. Heaven is your

proper home. The path, which I have recommended to you, will

conduct you safely, and certainly, to that happy world. Fill up

life, therefore, with obedience to GOD; with faith in the Lord Jesus

Christ, and repentance unto life ; the obedience to the two great com-

mands of the Gospel ; with supreme love to God, and universal

good-will to men ; the obedience to the two great commands of the

law. On all your sincere endeavours to honour him, and befriend

your fellow-men, he will smile : every virtuous attempt he will

bless : every act of obedience he will reward. Life in this man-

ner will be pleasant amid all its sorrows ; and beams of hope will

continually shine through the gloom, by which it is so often over-

cast. Virtue, the seed that cannot die, planted from heaven, and

cultivated by the divine hand, will grow up in your hearts with in-

creasing vigour, and blossom in your lives with supernal beauty.

Your path will be that of the just; and will gloriously resemble the

dawning light , which shines brighter, and brighter, to the perfect day.

Peace will take you by the hand, and offer herself as the constant

and delightful companion of your progress. Hope will walk be-

fore you, and with an unerring finger point out your course ; and

Joy, at the end of the journey , will open her arms to receive you.

You will wait on the Lord, and renew your strength ; will mount up

with wings, as eagles ; will run, and not be weary ; will walk, and

notfaint.

SERMON XVII.

CREATION.-AIR. -STARRY AND SUPREME HEAVENS .

GENESIS i. 1. -In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

IN the preceding discourses I have considered the existence

and perfections of God ; his decrees , or that pleasure, or choice, with

which he willed the existence of all things ; and the sovereignty with

which he disposes of them. The next subject in such a system of

discourses is the Works of God ; which are no other than the execu-

tion of that pleasure. These are generally and justly distributed

under two great heads, Creation and Providence. Under these

heads I propose to consider them.

In the text it is asserted, that, In the beginning, God created the

heaven and the earth . The phrase, In the beginning, is universally

expressive, in the Scriptures, of the commencement of created, or

finite existence. Whether it is intended to be applied in the pre-

sent case to both the heavens and the earth, with exactly the

same meaning, is uncertain ; as will be evident from the proper im-

port of this phraseology. The word, created, denotes, brought into

existence. The heaven and the earth, is a Jewish phrase, denoting

the Universe and all things which it contains . As some of these

things, particularly the souls of men, were not created at the same

time with the earth, it is evident, that the phrase, in the beginning ,

cannot be particularly, and strictly applied to every created being.

In the text, thus explained, the following doctrine is evidently

asserted;

THAT ALL THINGS WERE BROUGHT INTO EXISTENCE BY GOD.

The truth of this doctrine has been already sufficiently evinced

in the two first of these discourses ; so far as arguments from Rea-

son are concerned. That it is the real doctrine of the text ; and

that the word, created, does not mean merely moulded, or fashioned,

is completely evident from the explanation of Moses himself; who

undoubtedly will be allowed to be his own Commentator. In

Gen. ii . 3, he says, And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified

it : because that in it he had rested from all his work, which God

created and made. In the original language it is, which God cre-

ated, to make ; that is, which he created or brought into being,

first ; and made or fashioned afterwards, into all the innumerable

forms and beings, with which the Universe is, in a sense endlessly,

replenished.

This truth has by various persons, of , no small note in the world,

as men of science, been called in question . It seems so evident

HEAVENS.

SER. XVII. ] 279

that all things , which do not involve a contradiction, are possible

with the Omnipotent God; that a sober man can scarcely fail to

wonder, how these persons can hesitate to believe, that the act of

creating or giving being, is within the limits of his power. The

acts of preserving and governing the universe, also seem to be

equally evidential of Omnipotence, and equally to demand its ex-

ertions. I cannot easily conceive how any man can admit, that

God governs the Universe, and doubt whether he brought, or was

able to bring, it into being. At the same time, the several modes,

adopted by these very men to account either for the existence,

preservation, or government, of all things, are attended with in-

comparably more difficulty : being indeed palpable absurdities,

and involving evident contradictions. This, it is believed, has

been proved in a former discourse . *

But the formation of the human Soul, is itself a continual exhi-

bition of creating power. It is, unquestionably, as difficult to cre-

ate Minds, as to create Matter. But that God creates Minds is cer-

tain ; because Matter, being unintelligent, cannot communicate in-

telligence , and therefore, even if admitted to possess active power,

cannot bring into existence a Mind. Nor ought it to be forgotten,

that this opinion rests upon no evidence. On the contrary, it is a

doubt, or denial, gratuitously assumed. The abettor of it merely

doubts, or denies, the fact, that God created all things ; and to

justify himself , alleges , that he cannot conceive such an act to be

possible. But he ought to show, that he does see it to be impossible .

That he cannot discern what Omnipotence can do, any farther

than God discloses it, either by his acts, or his declarations, is

very obvious ; but that this ignorance should be a foundation of

doubt to himself ; or of conviction, or even of attention, to others ;

is, I think, explicable only by the supposition of extreme folly in

either case .

As this amazing Work is in the text divided into two great parts ;

the Heavens , and the Earth ; I shall adopt this natural, and perti-

nent, division in my discourses ; I shall begin my consideration of

it with the subject, mentioned first in the text, viz. the Heaven.

The word Heaven, in the text, is used to denote what is else-

where called the Heavens ; as is evident from the first verse of the

following chapter ; in which it is said, with a reference to exactly

the same subject, Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and

all the host of them. As the term is variously applied in the

Scriptures ; it will be proper in this place to mention the objects,

to which this application is made. In the first place, Heaven, or

Heavens, (for the word is used indifferently in either the singular or

plural number) is applied to God. Until thou know, that the Hea-

vens do rule . Dan. iv. 26 .

2dly. To Angels . The heavens are not clean in his sight. Job

xv. 15.

See Sermon II.

HEAVENS ..

280 [SER. XVII.

3dly . To the church. There was war in heaven. Rev. xii. 7.

4thly. To a great height. Cities walled up to heaven . Deut. i . 28 .

5thly. To distinguished glory. How art thou fallen from hea-

ven, O Lucifer, son of the morning ! Isai . xiv. 12.

All these are plainly figurative senses of this word. In a literal

sense, it seems to have been used by the Jews to denote,

1st. The Air. As when the Scriptural writers speak of the dew,

winds, andfowls, of heaven.

2dly. The Firmament, or expansion over our heads . Thus it is

said in the context, verse 17, God set them, that is, the sun, moon,

and stars, in the firmament of heaven to give light upon the earth .

3dly. The supreme Heaven ; styled also the Heaven of Heavens .

Behold the Heaven, and the Heaven of Heavens, is the Lord's .

Deut. x. 14. God also is styled the God of Heaven ; and St. John

beheld a door opened in Heaven, and was directed by a voice to go

up thither ; and was immediately carried in the spirit before the

throne of God.

From these, and many other passages, it is evident, that the

Jews acknowledged three heavens ; and considered all things, be-

side the earth and that which it contains, and the world of punish-

ment, as being included under the word, heaven. As this is the

common language of Scripture, I shall consider the subject in the

same manner, and in the order already specified.

I. The Air, or Atmosphere, by which the earth is surrounded, is

replete with wonderful displays of the power and wisdom of God.

Particularly it has ever engaged the attention of wise and ob-

servant men, and merits our own attention :

1st. As it is the immediate mean of life to mankind, and to the

animal and vegetable kingdoms .

The nature of life, and the manner in which it is maintained, are

both very imperfectly understood ; nor will it be expected from

me, that I should here attempt to give an account of such discove-

ries , as have been made by inquisitive men concerning these mys-

terious subjects. The remarks of a Minister of the Gospel, and

not those of an Anatomist, the views of common sense, and not

those of chymical, or medical science, will be expected in the pre-

sent discussion. All men know, that living beings depend, in this

world, for the continuance of life, on respiration ; and that the me-

dium of respiration is Air. Among the wonders, which pertain to

this subject, this is one ; that, although the Air is a compound sub-

stance, made up of very diverse materials, one of them noxious ,

and a second by itself perfectly unproductive of life ; yet these

are so blended with the third, in which alone the power of main-

taining life resides, that in their combination they are better fitted

to continue life, than even the life- giving principle would be, if it

existed pure and unmixed. Another is, that this combination is

maintained in such a manner, that the proportional quantities of

these materials are at all times substantially, if not exactly, the

HEAVENS.

SER. XVII. ] 281

same . When we consider the innumerable revolutions, of which

the Air is the subject, and the perpetual fluctuations ; it seems

scarcely less than a miracle, that this equability, so necessary for

the continuance of life, should be always, and every where, pre-

served. Nothing less than the wisdom of God could have contri-

ved the means, by which this fact is accomplished .

2dly. As it is the great instrument of dissolution .

This world is formed to be a theatre of successive existence .

The beings which exist in it, are intended to fulfil the end, for which

they exist, and then to leave the stage vacant to those, who suc-

ceed them . Of course they dissolve ; and return to their original

Just. Of this dissolution, Air is acknowledged by Philosophers to

be the primary means. If we had never been witnesses of the

fact; few things could seem more strange and improbable to us,

than that the same element should be, at once, the chief means of

preserving life , and the chief means of dissolution ; and that both

these processes should, without any confusion, go on from age to

age in perfect harmony, and as indispensable parts of a complete

system.

3dly. As it is a principal mean of heat and cold.

These great effects are both produced by different operations of

the same element, hitherto inexplicably mysterious, but without any

discord or confusion. The manner, in which Air withdraws heat

from other objects, and again gives it out to those objects, must be

confessed, familiar as the fact is, to be eminently wonderful : while,

at the same time, the operation is absolutely necessary. On it,

depends a great part of the activity, comfort, and usefulness, of

mankind. From it, spring in a great degree, those changes of the

seasons, those varieties of temperature, which are so pleasing, ne-

cessary, and useful, to the world. In a word, from this source, in

a great measure, arise the growth and perfection of the vegetable

world, the existence of a great part of the comforts and necessa-

ries of life, and apparently the continuance of our being.

4thly . As it is the medium, by which are conveyed to us rain, dew ,

hail, and snow ; and, as it is, also, the source of drought, in its va-

rious degrees .

The attraction between air and vapour, existing in such a man-

ner as to diffuse the vapour, in a sense equably, throughout the

lower regions of the atmosphere, seems to be indispensable to that

great and mysterious process in the natural world, which is called

evaporation. Every person knows, that without this process, rain

and dew, snow and hail, could not exist ; and that without these

there could be neither vegetation, food, raiment, nor even existence ,

to mankind. At the same time, by a mysterious process of nature,

respecting, especially, a peculiar state of the Atmosphere, the sea-

sons become dry ; the rain, in the emphatical language of the

Scriptures, is changed into powder and dust ; the heavens are as

brass over our heads ; and the earth as iron under our feet . Drought

VOL. I. 36

HEAVENS.

282 [ SER. XVII.

and famine then spread their baleful influence over the world ; and

mankind are compelled by thousands to the grave.

5thly. As it is eminently the source of health and sickness .

Among the various exhalations, accomplished on the surface of

the earth by means of the Atmosphere, there are many, which are

impure, noxious, and fraught with poison and death. Of this na-

ture, in an eminent degree, is that suffocating vapour, conveyed

over the deserts of"Nubia in the fatal blast, which is called the Si-

moon. Of a similar nature, are numerous other exhalations ; not

so immediately, but often more extensively, destructive, to human

life ; which arise from marshes, ponds, and other stagnations of

water ; as well as many more, ascending from decayed vegetables,

and other masses of putrefaction. All these, but for the Atmos-

phere, would be confined to the surface ; and fail of their malig-

nant influence on human life. At the same time, Air is the great

source of health ; and, wherever it passes freely, contributes per-

haps to the preservation, or restoration, of this essential blessing.

In its purest state, it seems, in the ordinary circumstances of man,

to promote health only ; and often restores such as are languishing

and decayed, more than all other causes united.

6thly. As it is the seat, and in an important sense, the cause, of

many highly magnificent displays of divine workmanship .

Storms, clouds, thunder, lightning, combustion, volcanoes, earth-

quakes, the magnificent rainbow, and the delightful breeze, are all

dependent on air for their existence. All of them, also, are deep-

ly interesting to man in many ways. Besides their obvious influ-

ence in promoting our daily health and comfort, our frequent de-

light and sorrow, the continuance of our life, and the arrival of

death , they are in no small degree interesting to us, as displays of

the divine presence and character, eminently beautiful, various,

awful, and majestic, and productive of important and extensive

moral influence on mankind.

7thly. As it is in many respects an important aid to Vision.

No small part of the beautiful, majestic, and interesting scenes

of nature depend, for their peculiar appearance, upon the atmos-

phere. Such, in an eminent manner, is the twilight, which so use-

fully and beautifully returns, every morning and every evening.

Such, also, is the sky, or firmament ; that magnificent, azure con-

cave, which apparently bends in so glorious a manner over this

great world. Such, also, are all those scenes, in which the refrac-

tion of light is concerned. Without the aid of the Atmosphere,

none of these things would appear to us at all.

These summary hints will be sufficient to exhibit the importance

of this wonderful subject, so far as is necessary for the present de-

sign. I proceed therefore to observe,

II. That the Starry heaven is a still more wonderful, and mag-

nificent, part of the Creation of God.

To themostuninstructed mind, and the most vulgar eye, the firm-

HEAVENS .

SER . XVII.] 233

ament , with the innumerable and glorious bodies which it con-

tains, has ever been far the most wonderful part of the visible cre-

ation : while minds of superior intelligence, especially when the

subjects of piety, have ever regarded this amazing scene with

study, admiration, and awe, as pre-eminently displaying the wisdom

and greatness of God. When, says David, I consider the heavens ,

the work of thy finger, the moon, and the stars , which thou hast or-

dained ; Lord ! what is man, that thou art mindful of him ; or the

son of man, that thou visitest him ?

Of all material objects, the Sun is beyond measure the most glo-

rious and magnificent, and the noblest emblem of its Creator. This

great world of light is, beyond every thing else, the most perfect

symbol ofthe exaltation, unchangeableness, perpetuity, life- giving

power, benevolent influence, omnipresence, omniscience, dominion,

and greatness, of God.

The Moon, a softer , but not less beautiful, object, returns, and

communicates to mankind, the light ofthe Sun in a gentle and de-

lightful manner, exactly suited to the strength of the human eye :

an illustrious and most beautiful emblem, inthis and several other

respects, of the divine REDEEMER of mankind ; who, softening the

splendour of the Godhead, brings it to the eye of the understand-

ing, in a manner fitted to the strength of the mind ; so that without

being overwhelmed, or distressed, it can thus behold the light of

the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

The Stars, also, by their endless multitude, and their unceasing

variety and beauty, with which they every where replenish the vast

expansion, astonish, and delight, the mind, while they manifest the

greatness and wisdom ofJehovah. No stronger proof can be given

of the nature, or degree, of the impressions, with which these mar-

vellous objects have affected the mind of man, than the fact, that

in very early ages of the world they began, and through every suc-

ceeding period have continued, to be, objects of religious adoration ;

and by a great proportion of our race, have been directly acknow-

ledged as Gods .

Such have been the views, formed by the human mind, with the

mere light of uninstructed reason, concerning this glorious part of

the Creation. But, when the eye is permitted to look out of the

window of Science into this vast field, it assumes an entirely new,

and immensely nobler, character. Instead of a great and splen-

did luminary, hung up in the heavens to communicate light, and

warmth, to this world, and to measure the returns of day and night

to its inhabitants, the Sun is seen by the eye of the Astronomer

to be a vast world of itself ; possessed of the wonderful power of

emitting this equally wonderful element in immeasurable quantities

to immeasurable distances ; and the centre of many other worlds ,

which receive from this, their light and warmth, their motion, re-

gularity, and harmony. To the same eye, the planets no longer

appear as gems of inherent and immortal lustre, adorning the con-

HEAVENS .

284 [SER. XVII .

cave with unrivalled elegance and beauty, but as vast worlds , re-

sembling this globe in their various affections, and moving round

the Sun with a rapid, regular, and mysterious circuit ; surrounded

by other inferior worlds, by which they are wonderfully beautified

and adorned; and inhabited, in all probability, by endless multi-

tudes of beings, rational and immortal. Ofthese inferior worlds ,

the Moon is one ; and to us, far the most interesting. How many

important purposes, which are known, does this beautiful attendant

ofour earth continually accomplish ! How many more, in all pro-

bability, which are hitherto unknown, and which hereafter may be

extensively disclosed to more enlightened, virtuous, and happy

generations of men. At the same time, it is most rationally con-

cluded, that Intelligent beings in great multitudes inhabit her lucid

regions, beings probably far better and happier than ourselves.

The Comets, of which the number already discovered is very

great, are still more extraordinary parts of this amazing work.

Man no longer beholds them as occasional and flaming meteors,

wandering through the sky as mere omens to the human race of

convulsions, famines, and pestilences ; but sees them, with unques-

tionable certainty, to be worlds, which, like the planets, regularly

move round the Sun in orbits of extreme eccentricity and incon-

ceivable extent .

Concerning the Stars our views have undergone a still greater

change. The mind no more regards them as feeble but beautiful

tapers, twinkling, merely for the gratification of mankind, with an

innate and perpetual lustre. On the contrary, they are known,

with absolute certainty, to be universally Suns, resembling our

own; and apparently so much less, only because they are removed

to a distance incomprehensibly greater. The same science, which

and

has detected their nature, size, and distance, has also to a great

extent disclosed their numbers. Instead of the comparatively small

collection, visible to the naked eye in any given night, they are

proved to be in a sense innumerable, and to fill with an immense

army the immeasurable fields of Ether .

It cannot be rationally believed, that worlds so great and glori-

ous, as the Sun, were made in vain. Yet of the endless millions of

stars, less than three thousand have been seen by the naked eye of

man ; and, till within a few years, all the vast multitudes, which

have been since discovered, had been secreted from every inhabit-

ant of this globe. Herschell first detected almost all, which are

now known, or have ever been visible to the human eye. So far

as mankind are concerned, then, the stars, ever since the Creation,

have, in far the greatest number of instances, existed in vain. Of

course, they were formed for other purposes, than any, in which

we can be directly concerned. But for what purposes can we

suppose such worlds of light were created? The only rational

answer is, They were formed for the same purposes, which are

accomplished by our own Sun ; to give light, and motion, and life,

HEAVENS .

SER. XVII . ] 285

and comfort, to systems of worlds, of which each star severally, is

the common centre . Such worlds, therefore, are with the highest

reason supposed to exist; and to be, like the earth, the residence

of Intelligent beings, of incalculable numbers, and endless diver-

sities of character ; all supported, governed, and blessed, as the

worlds, which they inhabit, are sustained, regulated, and moved,

by the hand of that Almighty Being, who created them, and whose

kingdom ruleth over all. Thus the universe is the immense and

glorious empire of JEHOVAH ; an empire formed of Suns and sys-

tems ; the families , cities , and provinces, of the vast kingdom, ruled

by him, who telleth the number of the Stars, and calleth them all by

their names .

III. The Heaven of Heavens is a still more edifying object of

our attention .

On this sublime subject I shall discourse only in a very summary

manner, at the present time, as I expect, God willing, to consider

it more extensively at a future period.

The high superiority of this happy and glorious world is strong-

ly marked in the Scriptures, whence alone we derive any know-

ledge of it, by that peculiar epithet, The Heaven of Heavens . As

the God of Gods is distinguished by this phrase above all other

Gods, so the Heaven of Heavens is, in a manner indefinitely similar,

intentionally exhibited as wholly superior to all other Heavens . In

the same Scriptures, we are taught, that this glorious world is the

house of God ; or the peculiar and favourite place of his residence ;

the place, where those manifestations of himself are seen, which he

is pleased to make, as the most especial displays of his presence

and character. Present in all other places, he is peculiarly pre-

sent here.

It is also, as we are further informed by the same Scriptures, the

throne of God ; the seat of universal and endless dominion ; where

the divine authority is peculiarly exercised, and made known, and

the splendour of the divine government exhibited with singular ef-

fulgence and glory.

It is the residence of his most favoured creatures ; of the saints ,

who are redeemed by the blood of his Son ; and of the Angels ,

who, innumerable in multitude, stand round about his throne.

It is the everlasting seat of consummate holiness , or virtue ; where

that divine principle shines without allcy, flourishes in immortal

youth, and reigns, and triumphs, with eternal glory .

It is the place, in which are seen all the finishings of divine work-

manship : and in which the beauty and greatness of the Infinite

Mind, and the endless diversities of Omniscient skill , appear in all

their most exquisite forms, and in the last degrees of refinement

and perfection .

It is the centre of all divine communications ; the city, in which

all the paths of Providence terminate ; the ocean, from which all

the streams of infinite wisdom and goodness proceed, and into

which they return, to flow again, and for ever.

HEAVENS .

286 [SER. XVII.

It is the theatre, in which an eternal providence of progressive

knowledge, power, and love, rendered daily more and more beauti-

ful and amiable, wonderful and majestic, is begun, and carried on

through ages, which will never approach towards an end.

It is the place, where all the works of God are studied, and under-

stood, through an eternal progress of knowledge ; where all the di-

versities of virtuous Intelligence, all the forms and hues of Moral

Beauty, brighten in an unceasing gradation ; and where gratitude,

love, enjoyment, and praise, resound day and night, in a more and

more perfect harmony throughout the immense of duration.

Thus have I finished the observations, which I designed to make

on this subject ; and shall now conclude the discourse with some

practical

REMARKS .

1st. With what entire propriety is God exhibited in the very first

verse of the Scriptures, as the Creator of all things !

This verse may be regarded as an introduction, or preface, to

the whole Bible, and to the system of doctrines which it contains .

Accordingly it announces to us in few and simple, but those most

sublime and affecting, terms, the two great subjects, about which

the Bible and its doctrines are employed : God, and his immense

kingdom . Him it exhibits to us in the character of Creator, and

all things else as created by him .

Onthe act of creating is founded a great part of that character,

in which especially he calls for the obedience of Intelligentbe-

ings. As the Creator of the Universe, he appears irresistibly to

every eye, as a being possessed of infinite power, wisdom, and

greatness ; and therefore able to preserve, and govern, the vast

work, which he was thus able to make ; of power, which nothing

can resist, or escape ; of wisdom, which nothing can circumvent ,

or elude; and of greatness, with which nothing can be compared.

As the Creator of the Universe, he is exhibited as the absolute

Proprietor of the work, which he has made. Creation is the highest

ground of property, which can exist. All is his ; and his, in a

sense superior to that, in which any thing can be ours. All, there-

fore, is rightfully required to be employed supremely and solely in

his service, for his purposes, and according to his pleasure.

Intelligent creatures, particularly, have no property in any thing,

except as he has given it ; and on no terms, and for no uses, be-

side those which he has established. They themselves are as ab-

solutely his property, as any thing which he has made. Their fa-

culties, and their time, are as truly his : for they were made by

him , and therefore are not their own. Of course, they are justly

required by him, and ought to be devoted by themselves, to what-

ever services he is pleased to enjoin. Of course, also, to refuse,

or neglect, to render to him themselves, and whatever they do, or

possess, is plain and gross injustice, and refusing, or neglecting to

render to God the things which are God's .

HEAVENS .

SER . XVII. ] 287

By his character of Creator, also, they are called upon, in the

most solemn and affecting manner, to regard him with unceasing

admiration, reverence, and awe. There is something singularly

awful, something singularly fitted to inspire profound reverence, in

the character of God, as our Creator ; in the consideration of him ,

as the Being, by whom we were made. On this Being, we cannot

but feel, if we feel at all, that, as we derived our existence from

him, so we absolutely depend for our continuance in being, and for

all which can render that being comfortable or desirable. In this

view, we can scarcely fail to realize, that we are nothing, and that

He is all.

At the same time, the amazing nature of the works themselves ,

their number, their variety, their beauty, their grandeur, their mag-

nificence, the glory of the end for which they are made, and the

astonishing fitness of the means by which it is accomplished, ne-

cessarily excite in every sober and contemplative mind the highest

possible admiration ; an admiration, which will continue, and in-

crease, for ever.

2dly. With what reason does God, as the Creator of all things,

claim the entire Confidence of his creatures ?

He, who is the Author of the Creation, can do all things ; is

every where ; knows every thing ; and controls the Universe with

an absolute and irresistible dominion. He, who has made such

various, rich, and abundant provision for the wants of his crea-

tures, can provide for all their wants. He, who was willing to

provide in the bountiful manner, which we actually see existing, is

reasonably argued, and expected, to provide all other things ,

which are either necessary or useful . If they please him, he can-

not but be expected to give to them freely ; if they obey him,

they will certainly please him ; and if they are willing to do that,

which their own minds, candidly employed, and enlightened by his

Word, must of course declare to be right , they will certainly obey

him. The path, therefore, which leads to the most ample supplies

ofall their real wants, and the attainment of all real good, is open,

direct, and certain. Nor can any reason be given, why they should

refuse, or neglect, to pursue this highway to the divine and eternal

possession. How rich, how vast, how glorious a work is the visi-

ble creation ! With what endless multitudes of creatures is it re-

plenished ! With what innumerable blessings is it stored ! All

these sprang from the mere goodness and bounty of the Creator.

Who can limit such bounty, even in thought ? Who can imagine a

real want, which it is not able, and willing, to supply ? How plain-

ly, then, ought all those creatures, not only to wait on him, but to

trust in him also, that he may give them all blessings in due season !

Particularly, when his children remember , that he has created

the Heaven of Heavens for their reception, and adorned and en-

riched it with every thing, which can contribute to their happiness

and glory; they cannot but discern, and feel, that he claims from

HEAVENS .

288 [SER. XVII.

them, on the most solid grounds, all possible confidence, as well as

reverence and love. In the Scriptures, he has disclosed to them,

that here there is made all the provision, which they can need, and

far more than they can ask, or conceive ; and that, however en-

larged may be their faculties and views, they will through eternity

receive all, which they can ever desire. Of the power of God to

fulfil these promises they are completely assured by the effects ,

which it has produced in the visible Creation. Of his willingness

to perform them, and to satisfy every reasonable wish, they are

furnished with no unhappy evidence, in the provision, which he so

bountifully makes for rebels and apostates, in the present world.

When they add to this the gift of his own Son, whom he did not

spare, but delivered him up for us all ; they are completely assu-

red that he will also with him freely give them all things .

3dly. How amazing and glorious a Being does God appear in the

character of Creator !

Of what power, knowledge, and goodness, must He be possess-

ed, who has done all these things ; who is, who lives, and who acts ,

through all the worlds in immensity ; who contrived them, and

brought them into being ; who stored them with such abundant

furniture, and filled them with such multitudes of inhabitants ; who

controls them with an omnipotent hand, and with an omniscient

eye; and who will advance them for ever in their progress towards

perfection! All these things are only displays of the Godhead.

În them all, JEHOVAH is seen in forms of beauty, wisdom, good-

ness, life, joy, loveliness, and greatness, which transcend both num-

ber and comprehension.

4thly. How ought this great and awful Being to be feared by his

Intelligent creatures !

How ought we, particularly, to realize his presence, agency,

character, and will, the obligations which we are under to obey,

and the supreme interest which we have in doing, his pleasure !

His right to dispose of us cannot be denied. The rectitude of his

pleasure cannot be questioned. At the same time, on him our all

depends . How indispensable is it , therefore, that we act in all

things, in such a manner, as to secure his favour, and, in this, the

only possible manner, to obtain his blessing.

Onthe contrary , what madness must it be to forget, disobey, and

provoke him ! Think what it is to be found fighting against God.

Hast thou, says JEHOVAH to Job, an arm like God; or canst thou

thunder with a voice like him ? Then I will confess unto thee, that

thine own right hand can save thee . What evil is not to be expect-

ed from his anger ? What terrible proofs have been given of its

dreadful efficacy, in his ancient dispensations to the Antediluvians ,

to Sodom and Gomorrah, to the Egyptians, and to the Israelites, both

in the wilderness, and the land of Canaan ! What awful specimens

are even now continually seen of his displeasure against this pol

HEAVENS.

SER. XVII . ] 289

luted world, in the ravages of the storm, the earthquake, and the

volcano, and the more extensive evils of pestilence and famine !

5thly. How miserable must be the condition ofthose, who have no

interest in the favour ofGod !

God is the source of all the good, which is found, or will ever

be found, in the Universe. Every good gift, and every perfect gift,

is from above ; and cometh down from the FATHER of lights, with

whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning. Wherever,

then, he refuses to give, it is certain, that no enjoyment can be

found. Howdreadful, of course, how solitary, how friendless ,

how forlorn , must the situation of a creature be, if he were banish-

ed for ever from the presence, favour, and love, of God! Were

the Sun, as the Heathen supposed, an intelligent being, capable of

being pleased or displeased, and of communicating and withhold-

ing his light and warmth at pleasure ; how lonely, dark, and wretch-

ed , would be the condition of men, if he should withdraw his beams

from this world, and permit them never more to shine! of men con-

signed to everlasting night, and everlasting winter ; who should yet

live, in this cold and dreary solitude, and know, and feel, their

wretched condition : while at the same time they also knew, that

other favoured and happy beings, in all other respects resembling

themselves , were in full possession of the life-giving influence, and

cheering splendour, of this glorious luminary. God is the Sun of

the intelligent and immortal world. Wherever he shines, there is

light, and peace, and hope, and joy : wherever he withdraws his

beams, all is darkness and desolation for ever.

On this subject, I am apprehensive, that Christians do not medi-

tate, nor converse, nor Ministers preach, so frequently and so fer-

vently, as their interest, and their duty, plainly require. The Apos-

tles have dwelt often , and extensively, on the prospects, the joys ,

and the glories, of Heaven. In this respect they are obviously

patterns to all succeeding Preachers . Christians are in the Scrip-

tures often invited to meditate on heavenly things ; and presented

with the most sublime, alluring, and delightful, objects of a heaven-

ly nature, to engage them in such meditations. They are directed,

also, to set their affections on things above ; commanded to have

their conversation in heaven, and not on the earth; and reminded

that in a humble and figurative sense, they are already come to the

New Jerusalem, and to the glorious beings by whom it is inhabited ,

by entering the Church of God in the present world. All these

precepts they are bound implicitly to obey.

When we approach the table of Christ, we are by the strongest

motives compelled to remember, that the exalted end of his Me-

diation was to open this happy world for the reception of his fol-

lowers ; an end, purchased with tears, and blood. This end is the

most illustrious, and delightful, of which we can form a conception :

And the means, by which it has been accomplished, are the most

VOL. I. 37

HEAVENS .

290 [SER. XVII.

sublime display of infinite good-will, which the Universe has ever

beheld.

When Christians approach the table of their communion, they

approach it, to commemorate their Saviour. What do they com-

memorate ? His life, and death, and resurrection, and exaltation :

a life of humiliation, suffering, and sorrow ; a death of shame, and

agony ; a resurrection to endless life ; an exaltation to infinite glory.

Whither has he gone ? To Heaven. Whither are they going ? To

the same happy world. In my Father's house, said this Divine

Person, as he was advancing near to the grave, are many mansions .

If it were not so, Iwould have told you. I go to prepare a placefor

you . And if I go, and prepare a placefor you, I will come again, and

receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also. Can

Christians, then, fail to look often to that delightful world, where

their Saviour dwells, and where they are all finally to be assembled

in his presence ? Will not the remembrance of the fulness of joy,

the pleasures which flow for ever in this region of Immortality,

awaken in the most ardent manner, their admiration, their love,

their gratitude, and their praise, to Him, who formed it in the be-

ginning ; who stored it with glory, life, and joy ; who ascended the

cross, that he might open its everlasting doors, for their admission

to its infinite blessings .

To enhance all these views and affections, let them remember

also, that in the same wonderful manner he redeemed them from

the deplorable character of sin, and the miseries of perdition.

That Divine Spirit, who renews them in righteousness , and true ho-

liness, unto every good work, entered upon this benevolent office ,

only in consequence of the Mediation of Christ. But for this Me-

diation, no child of Adam would ever have been renewed. Sin

unmingled, unrestrained , and endless, would have prevailed

throughout all the nations of men, and all the ages of time. The

way to Heaven would have been unknown. The only path from

this world would have gone down to the chambers of death.

In how interesting a manner, then, is heaven now brought be-

fore our eyes, as the end of the great sacrifice of the Cross ! Here

Christ dies again, in a figure pre- eminently affecting ; and shows

us his broken body, and bleeding wounds, as the price which he

paid to procure for us an inheritance in the kingdom prepared for

his followers before the foundations of the world. No other hand

could have opened the gates of life. No other Atonement could

have expiated our sins. No other means could have procured the

sanctification of our Souls by the Spirit of grace ; and thus fitted

us to enjoy the blessings of heaven, and made them blessings to us.

But for him, the best of men would have gone down to the world of

wo. By him, every good man will be raised to the glory, which he

had with the Father before ever the world was .

SERMON XVIIL.

CREATION .--ANGELS .

COLLOSSIANS i. 16. For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that

are in earth, visible and invisible , whether they be Thrones , or Dominions, or Prin-

cipalities, or Powers : all things were created by him andfor him.

IN my last discourse, I began the examination of the works of

God , with some considerations on the Heavens. I shall now pur-

sue the same subject, in several observations concerning those be-

ings , who were originally inhabitants of the highest heavens .

As all our knowledge concerning this subject is derived from the

Scriptures, I shall confine myselfin this discussion to the informa-

tion, which they communicate ; reserving such views, as Reason

has been able to form of it, to the discourse, which I propose to

devote to a consideration of the existence and character of Fallen

Angels .

In the text it is asserted, that Thrones, Dominions, Principalities ,

and Powers ; names, which are fairly supposed to denote different

orders of the Angelic host, and to indicate,in the words of St. Paul,

things in heaven ; were created by Jesus Christ, for his own use and

purposes . Among other things, conveyed to us by this assertion,

the following Doctrine is evidently one :

That the Angels are a part of the Creation of God.

It is a fact worthy of observation, that the Scriptures teach us

scarcely any thing concerning any of the worlds, included under

the general name of heavens , except the supreme Heaven. The

reason is , I think, not difficult to be divined. With other heavenly

worlds, we have no direct concern . Whatever knowledge, there-

fore, we might be supposed to attain about them, or their inhabit-

ants, would be a mere gratification of curiosity, and incapable of

being directed to any valuable end. Under the influence of this

powerful principle, we should in all probability have been led

away by such communications, if they had been made, from those

things, which we need, and ought, to know. Few affections of the

human mind have more influence over its conduct, than curiosity .

Well - directed, and carefully kept within proper bounds, it is emi-

nently profitable to man, by prompting him unceasingly to useful

inquiries, and improvements in knowledge ; but, when suffered to

wander without restraint, it conducts to mere gratification, and de-

mands the soul of real good.

But with the Heaven of Heavens, we have a continual and most

important concern. This glorious and delightful world is the

place, to which all our ultimate views are directed by our Maker ;

ANGELS.

292 [ SER . XVIII.

the home, to which he invites us to look, as our final rest from

every trouble ; and the final seat of all the enjoyment, which we

are capable of attaining. With its inhabitants, we shall, if we are

wise , become familiarly acquainted, and intimately united ; and

shall live in the midst of them, through ages which cannot end.

Of this world, therefore, and those who dwell in it, we need inform-

ation, various and extensive. Accordingly, God has in the Scrip-

tures, to a considerable extent, opened heaven to our view ; and

furnished us, in many particulars , with an account of the happy

beings, who inhabit it ; of the Rank, or Station, which they hold in

his great kingdom ; the Attributes , ofwhich they are possessed ; and

the Employments, to which they are devoted. Under these three

heads, I propose to consider them, at the present time. To an

audience, possessed of so many advantages for estimating the com-

parative importance of subjects of contemplation, and particularly

the comparative worth of Intelligent beings, it is reasonably hoped,

that a subject of such inherent dignity cannot be indifferent. Espe-

cially , as this subject is scarcely at all introduced into the Desk,

and is but too unfrequently, a topic of private contemplation; and,

as it will of course have in some degree the advantage of novelty,

as well as of nobleness ; it ought to be expected to gain, at least,

the transient attention, which such a discussion demands .

That Angels are the beings, intended by the phraseology of the

text, will not be questioned. The four titles, by which they are

here denoted, probably indicate four different orders of these

heavenly beings ; or, perhaps, may be used as a general repre-

sentation of all the orders, into which they are divided. Beside

the general name of Angels, or Messengers, derived from their

peculiar employment, they are called in the Scriptures by the fol-

lowing : Θρονοι, Thrones ; Κυριοτητες, Dominions ; Aρχαι, Principali-

ties , or Governments ; Δυναμεις, Powers ; Εξεσίαι , Authorities ; Ζωα,

Living Ones ; Cherubim, Knowing Ones, or those in whom is fulness

of knowledge ; Seraphim, or burning ones ; Elohim, Gods ; beside

the name of Princes, used by the Angel in Dan. x. 13, and pro-

bably equivalent to one of the five first appellations. All these

names, as will be evident to the slightest attention, are plainly,

and strongly, significant of their great importance. With the

greatest probability, however, they are names, very imperfectly

descriptive of their natures ; although, without a doubt, they are

the most suitable which human language contains. As words are ,

of necessity, expressive of such ideas as those who use them pos-

sess ; and as men, from a want of correspondence with Angels ,

have no direct, or original, ideas, concerning them; it is plain, that

all words, chosen from human language, to describe the nature of

these celestial beings, must exhibit them very inadequately and

imperfectly. Still, these names are very forcible declarations of

their supreme distinction among created Intelligences, and the im-

portant character, which they hold in the Universe .

ANGELS.

SER. XVIII. ] 293

It is scarcely necessary to remark, that the names given to An-

gels in the text, are used metonymically : the adjunct being all

along chosen to denote the subject ; or the thing possessed, the

possessor . Thus Thrones are substituted for those who sit on

them ; Dominions and Principalities , for those who hold them ; and

Powers and Authorities, for those by whom they are exercised.

It ought to be observed, that Angels are also called Morning

Stars, to denote their peculiar beauty and splendour of character ;

and not improbably as Harbingers of Christ, the SUN ofRighteous-

ness : and Sons ofGod, to teach us, that they are nearly connect-

ed with the Creator, dwell in his house as children, and enjoy his

parental presence, care, and love.

From all these observations, united, it is evident, that Angels

are possessed of pre-eminent dignity, importance, and distinction,

in the divine kingdom : since all these names are given to them by

God himself ; and are used, therefore, to indicate their true and

proper character. This character I shall now attempt summarily

to exhibit, as it is presented to us by the Scriptures ; and accord-

ing to the scheme of discourse, which has been already mentioned.

I. Angels are the highest order of Intelligent creatures .

The truth of this assertion is manifest, from a consideration of

the several names given to them in the text, and in other parts of

the Scriptures . As these names respect the kingdom of God at

large, without a limitation to any particular part of that kingdom ;

so they are to be understood, as being Thrones, Dominions, Prin-

cipalities, and Powers, in the immense and eternal empire of JE-

HOVAH. Angels, therefore, who are called by these names, are

the beings who, under God, the supreme Ruler, hold, throughout

his dominion, authority and power. All other finite beings are,

therefore, beneath them in dignity, and subordinate to them in

station.

The same truth is also completely evident from the place as-

signed them for their residence. I am Gabriel , said the Angel,

who appeared to Zachariah in the temple ; Iam Gabriel, who stand

in the presence of God. And before the throne, says St. John, there

was a sea ofglass, like unto chrystal ; and in the midst of the throne ,

and round about the throne, were four Living Ones , full of eyes

before and behind. And they rest not, day and night, saying,

Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty, who was, and who is , and

who is to come ! Rev. iv . 6, 8. And again, Rev. vii . 11 , All the

Angels stood round about the throne, and worshipped God, saying,

Amen. In the year that King Uzziah died, says the Prophet Isaiah,

I saw also JEHOVAH sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up ; and

his train filled the temple. Above it stood the Seraphim ; each one

had six wings ; and one cried to another, and said, Holy, Holy,

Holy, is JEHOVAH of Hosts ! the whole earth is full of his glory.

Inthe same manner, is the same subject exhibited to us, and with

a sublimity not inferior, by the Prophet Ezekiel, concerning the

ANGELS .

294 [SER. XVIII.

Cherubim ; and by the Prophet Daniel, concerning the myriads

ofthe heavenly host. Angels, then, surround the throne ofGod,

stand in his immediate and awful presence, and worship continually

at his feet. What beings, let me ask, can we rationally suppose

would be admitted to a communion so intimate with their Creator,

an access to him so near, a distinction so wonderful ? To this

there can be but one answer. Every man will without hesitation

say, " None, but those who sustain the first character, and the

highest station among created beings ."

Nor is the same truth much less evident from the glory and

splendour, with which these celestial beings have customarily ap-

peared in the present world. When the Angel came to roll away

the stonefrom the sepulchre of Christ, his countenance was like light-

ning, and his raiment white as snow ; andfor fear ofhim, the keepers

became as dead men . And Isaw, says St. John, another mighty

Angel come down from Heaven, clothed with a cloud ; and a rain-

bow was upon his head, and his face was as it were the Sun, and his

feet as pillars offire. All these circumstances of splendour, great-

ness, and awfulness, surrounded these illustrious beings, while em-

ployed as the Ministers of God in executing his commands. They

were, therefore, the proper emblems of their character, and the

proper accompaniments of their station. But we cannot be at a

loss concerning the suitableness of these circumstances to beings

of a character and station, superior to every created thing, which

we are able to conceive. Beings, of whom this is the ordinary

dress, and characteristical splendour, must undoubtedly be exalted

above all others, hitherto supposed by the mind of man.

II. Angels are endowed with the noblest created Attributes .

They are endowed,

1st. With wonderful Power.

This perfection ofAngels is forcibly indicated by the fact, that

the name Power, or Might, is in several places given to them in the

Gospel. No stronger testimony of their high possession of this

attribute can be conveyed by a single word; for it is a direct de-

claration that their nature is power itself . In Psalm ciii. 20, David

exclaims, Bless the Lord, ye his Angels, who excel in strength. A

strong Angel, and a mighty Angel, are also phrases in the Apoca-

lypse, expressive of the same character.

Proofs of the Power, with which these exalted beings are en-

dowed, and of the amplest kind, are in several instances recorded

in the Scriptures. An Angel destroyed, in three days, threescore

and ten thousand persons out of Judah and Israel, in consequence

of the sin of David in numbering the people. AnAngel destroyed,

in one night, of the army of Sennacherib, an hundred fourscore and

five thousand men. Angels also are exhibited in the Revelation of

St. John, as holding the four winds of Heaven; and as executing in

a long succession, the judgments of God upon this evil world, with

a series of efforts, demanding power utterly incomprehensible by

ANGELS.

SER. XVIII . ] 295

us. In the twentieth chapter of this book, particularly, one of

them is exhibited as binding that fierce and strong Spirit, the Prince

of the power of the air, who has so extensively and dreadfully dis-

tressed this unhappy world ; as casting him into the bottomless pit ;

and as setting a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no

more, until the thousand years should be fulfilled. In all these in-

stances, Angels are exhibited as endowed with might, to which

other Intelligent creatures can make no pretensions, and of which

men cannot even form any adequate conception .

2dly. Angels are also possessed of Activity equally wonderful.

In Psalm civ. 4, quoted Hebrews i. 7, their nature, in this parti-

cular, is summarily described in this remarkable declaration: Who

maketh his Angels spirits , and his Ministers a flaming fire. The

word here rendered spirits most usually signifies winds . In either

sense, the phraseology forcibly declares the eminent activity ofthe

beings described by it , who are thus represented as moving with

the swiftness of winds, or spirits, and operating with the astonish-

ing energy of flaming fire .

The same doctrine is also emphatically taught in the frequent

attribution of many wings to the Cherubim, Seraphim, and other or-

ders of Angels . This, we know, is a representation merely sym-

bolical ; and the language of the symbol cannot be misconstrued .

But the following story, in the Prophet Daniel , exhibits this

doctrine with unrivalled force ; and will preclude the necessity of

any further illustration . Chapter ix. verse 3, and 20-23 . And I

set my face unto the Lord God, to seek by prayer and supplication,

with fasting, and sackcloth , and ashes . And while Iwas speaking,

and praying, and confessing my sin, and the sin of my people Israel,

andpresenting my supplication before the Lord my God, for the holy

mountain of my God; Yea, while Iwas speaking in prayer, even the

man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision at the beginning, being

caused to fly swiftly , touched me about the time of the evening obla-

tion. And he informed me, and talked with me, and said, O Daniel,

Iam now come forth to give thee skill and understanding . At the

beginning of thy supplications , the commandment came forth ; and

Iam come to show thee ; for thou art greatly beloved : therefore un-

derstand the matter, and consider the vision .

From this remarkable story, we learn, that some time in the day,

Daniel set himself to seek the Lord in fasting and prayer ; that, af-

ter his prayer was begun, the commandment was given to Gabriel

to explain to him the vision and the prophecy. In verses 20 and

21, we are told, that Gabriel came to him, while he was speaking ;

that this was his evening prayer ; and that during the time, in

which he was employed in uttering his prayer, Gabriel came from

the supreme Heaven to this world. This is a rapidity exceeding

all the comprehension of the most active imagination; surpassing,

beyond any comparison, the amazing swiftness of light. Light,

we know, is several years in coming from such fixed stars, as are

ANGELS .

296 [ SER. XVIII .

visible to the eye of man. But there is the best reason to believe,

that the Heaven of Heavens is at a much greater distance than

those stars ; so as, not improbably, to be a Heaven to them, as the

starry firmament is to us. The Poet, therefore, is justified by this

wonderful fact in that forcible expression,

" The speed of Gods, (Angels) time counts not."

No stronger exhibition can be asked, or given, of the activity of

these celestial beings .

3dly. Angels are endued with unfading and immortal Youth .

Of this doctrine, we have many most decisive testimonies in

the Scriptures . Particularly, it is beautifully exhibited in the

name Zwa, Living Ones, given them by St. John in the Apocalypse,

and by Ezekiel in the first Chapter, and several other parts of his

prophecy. By this name, we are taught, that life is the proper

nature, a pre-eminent and glorious characteristic, ofAngels ; life in

a peculiar and distinguishing degree ; the most perfect manifesta-

tion of that quickening energy, which Christ attributes to the Fa-

ther, and challenges to himself , as an exclusive, appropriate, and

wonderful, attribute of the Godhead.

The same doctrine is also beautifully exemplified in the Angels,

who appeared to Mary, in the tomb of our Saviour. These illus-

trious persons were then, at the least, four thousand years old.

Still they appeared as young men; and in all that long succession

of ages had undergone no decay. Their youth, a bright and beau-

tiful blossom, still shone with all its lustre, and fragrance ; and di-

rectly indicated, that it was superior both to accident and time ;

and would, after many such flights of years, survive in all its vi-

gour; being destined, as well as fitted, for immortality. Even this

is probably an imperfect representation of this glorious subject.

The youth of Angels is, like their other attributes , formed to refine,

improve, and brighten for ever.

4thly. Angels are endowed with the greatest Intellectual Facul-

ties , and are of course possessed of Knowledge, superior to that of

any other created beings .

This character of these heavenly inhabitants is presented to us,

in the Scriptures in many forms. The Living Ones, mentioned by

the Apostle John, in the book of Revelation, are declared to have

beenfull of eyes within ; that is, to have been all sense, all intel-

lect, all consciousness ; turning their attention every way ; behold-

ing at once all things within the reach of their understanding ; and

discerning them with a clearness of perception, which is the most

perfect created semblance of the intuitive, and boundless, views of

the Omniscient Mind.

Theface, also, of a Man, attributed to one of these illustrious

beings by St. John, and to all those, who appeared to Ezekiel, by

that prophet , is another ascription of this character to Angels.

The face of Man was, among the Jews and other eastern nations

ANGELS .

SER. XVIII. ] 297

the standing symbol of Intelligence; and denotes, here, the supe-

rior possession of this attribute by those, to whom it is ascribed .

Angels were originally formed with an entire freedom from sin,

the only source of prejudice, and the chief source of error.

Their faculties were, at first, such as become the Morning stars of

the highest Heavens ; the Sons of God, intended to surround the

throne of JEHOVAH, and to hold the chief places of power, dis-

tinction, and glory, in his eternal kingdom. They were such, as

to become those, to whom, in the beginning,* was given by God

himself the name Cherub , or fulness of knowledge. They were

such, in a word, as to become their other transcendent attributes

of power, youth, and activity ; and the exalted stations, which

they were destined to fill for ever.

With the nature, and extent, of their faculties, has the place of

their residence in this respect exactly accorded. They have ever

dwelt in the world, where truth reigns without opposition ; where

knowledge is the universal state and character ; where all myste-

ries are continually disclosed ; and where the nature and propriety

of both the means, and the ends, of providence are, more than in

any part of the universe, unfolded. There, day and night for six

thousand years , they have been unceasingly employed in studying

the works ofGod. Weariness and decay they know not. Strength

of understanding in them is incapable of being impaired. Every

object of investigation is to them delightful ; and every faculty , by

its nature, susceptible of improvement. What, then, must be the

extent of their attainments at the present time ?

Beyond this, the favour of God is extended to them in a degree,

incomprehensible by such minds as ours . To communicate just,

and extensive, views of his works to these glorious beings, is de-

clared to be his especial intent in the creation of all things by Jesus

Christ ; † and peculiarly his manifold wisdom in his dispensations

to the Church. No communication on his part, and no attainment

on theirs, can be imagined too great for this divine purpose, or the

goodness by which it was formed.

In Matthew xxiv. 36, our Saviour declares, that of that day, viz .

the day of his coming to the destruction of Jerusalem, knoweth no

one, not even the Angels of heaven . This appeal, if we understand

the passage in the common acceptation, can have force, and perti-

nence, only on the supposition, that nothing, which is known, ofthe

works and ways of God, is hidden from Angels ; and is, therefore ,

a complete proof of the entire superiority of their intellectual na-

ture, and attainments, to those of any other created being.

5thly. Angels are possessed of consummate Holiness .

The evidence of this truth is so multiform, and so abundant, in

the Scriptures, that no particular proof , or illustration, seems to be

necessary. Their joy and praise at the Creation, their divine trans-

See Gen. iii. 24. See Eph. iii . 9, 10.

VOL. I. 38

ANGELS.

298 [ SER. XVIM.

port at the birth of the Redeemer and the union ofglory to God in

the highest, and good-will towards men, disclosed by that wonder-

ful event, and their noble and disinterested exultation in the repent-

ance of ruined sinners, are all sublime manifestations of the unal-

loyed holiness, of the pre-eminent beauty of mind, possessed by

this dignified order of beings . The name Seraphim, or burning

ones , is also, a most forcible representation of this exalted charac-

ter. In this name, the mind of an angel is exhibited as enkindled

with one intense and eternal flame of divine love, burning with a

clear, unceasing, perpetual ardency and splendour. Such a love,

we cannot but see, is entirely suited to the character of those, who

stand before God, dwell in his house, enjoy his favour, and exercise

the glorious offices of his kingdom. In accordance with this cha-

racter, the four Living Ones, who are exhibited as Representatives

of the Angelic host in the heavens, manifest their exalted love to

the great Author of their blessings, by celebrating, with an unceas-

ing voice, his infinite holiness and excellency, throughout the never-

ending progress of their being. In this glorious employment, also,

all the innumerable company of Angels are declared to unite with

them, to be animated by the same perfect character, and to har-

monize with them in their hearts, as well as in their songs.

REMARKS .

1st. How delightful an object of contemplation is this glorious

Order of beings !

All things, pertaining to this illustrious subject, are cheering, lu-

minous, animating, and sublime. The very names, assigned to An-

gels by their Creator, convey to us ideas pre-eminently pleasing,

fitted to captivate the heart, and exalt the imagination; ideas only

cheerful, refined, and noble ; ideas, which dispel gloom, banish

despondency, enliven hope, and awaken sincere and unmingled

joy. They are Living Ones ; beings, in whom life is inherent and

instinctive ; who sprang up under the quickening influence of the

Sun of Righteousness, beneath the morning of everlasting day ;

who rose, expanded, and blossomed, in the uncreated beam, on the

banks of the river of life, and were nourished by the waters of im-

mortality. They are Spirits ; winged with activity, and informed

with power, which no labour wearies, and no duration impairs :

their faculties always fresh and young ; their exertions unceasing

and wonderful ; and their destination noble and delightful, without

example, and without end. They are Burning Ones, glowing with

a pure and serene, an intense and immortal, flaine of divine love ;

returning, without ceasing, the light and warmth, which they have

received from the great central Sun of the Universe ; reflecting

with supreme beauty the image of that divine Luminary ; and uni-

versally glorious, although differing from each other in glory.

The place, in which they dwell , is perfectly suited to their il-

Justrious character. It is no other than the Heaven of Heavens ;

ANGELS .

SER . XVIII. ] 299

the first and best world, that will ever be created; the place, where

God himself delights peculiarly to dwell ; the house, where virtue,

peace, and joy, dwelt in the beginning, and will dwell for ever ;

the throne of boundless dominion ; the parent city ofthe great em-

pire of JEHOVAH ; the happy region, where all things are verdant

with life, and blossom with immortality .

The Station, which they hold, is of the same cheerful and ele-

vated nature. It is the first station, allotted to created existence .

These sublime Intelligences, are the immediate attendants of JE-

HOVAH ; the nobles and princes of the Universe. All their em-

ployments, all their allotments, are honourable and happy ; all

their destiny, dignified and divine .

Angels, then, present us with an object of contemplation, replen-

ished with inherent light, beauty, and greatness, with nothing to

tarnish, nothing to impair, its lustre ; nothing to alloy the pleasure

of the beholder : a vivid landscape, formed of all the fine varie-

ties of novelty and greatness, without one misshapen, decayed, or

lifeless object, to lessen its perfection : a morning of the spring.

without a cloud to overcast it : a sun, without a spot , shining or ly

with the various colours of unmingled light .

When we cast our eyes on this charming and transporting scene,

we instinctively ask, What is the source of this unrivalled assem-

blage, this unmixed group of objects so delightful ? The answer

is at hand. Holiness is the well-spring, whence all these streams

of beauty and pleasure are derived. If a single doubt arises in

our minds concerning this truth, it may be removed in a moment.

Fallen Angels were once possessed of all these illustrious attri-

butes, and held the exalted station , which is now exclusively en-

joyed by their fellows. Fallen Angels are still possessed in an

eminent degree of power, life, activity, and knowledge ; but they

yielded up their holiness, when they revolted from their Maker ;

and changed for ever their character, and their destiny, by sinning

against God. Sin converted them into Fiends, and made Hell their

habitation. From Sin, that dark and dreadful word derives all its

gloom, sorrow , and despair. Sin ushered it into being ; raised its

prison walls ; barred its iron gates ; shrouded its desolate regions

in the blackness of darkness ; kindled the fires, by which it is

gloomily enlightened, and awakened all the cries, and groans, and

curses, and blasphemies, which echo through its regions of sorrow.

Sin changed Angels, once surrounding the throne, and harmonizing

in the praise ofGod, into liars, accusers, calumniators, adversaries,

and destroyers . How amazing and dreadful the change ! How

loathsome, how detestable, the spirit, by which it was accom-

plished!

2dly. How different from these glorious and unspotted beings are

Men!

Numerous are the ways, in which we may, if we please, derive

instruction, improvement, and delight, from the contemplation of

ANGELS.

300 [SER. XVII !

this illustrious race of beings. A comparison of ourselves with

them, and of our circumstances with theirs, will particularly teach

us our own littleness and depravity ; and happily, as well as natu-

rally, prepare us for humility and reformation.

Man is of the lowest order of Intelligent beings ; kindred to ani-

mals ; often raised very little above their level ; possessed in the

humblest degree of rational attributes ; the subject of extreme

weakness, sluggishness, and ignorance ; hastening with a rapid

tendency to decay, old age, and death ; without love to God, or his

fellow-men ; depraved throughout with sin ; and voluntarily yield-

ed by himself to final perdition.

What an affecting contrast is here presented to our view ! An-

gels so great, virtuous, and happy : Man so little, sinful, and mise-

rable. How deeply humbled ought we to be by the sight of this

picture, presenting so just, as well as forcible, a delineation of our

real character ! How ashamed ought we to be of our impiety, de-

ccit, injustice, unkindness, pride, and vanity ! For in this humble

state, we are vain : possessed of this guilty character, we are proud.

Of what are we proud ? Of what are we vain ? Of our sin, our

disgrace, our folly, our frailty, our diseases, or our death ? What

beside these things can we find to excite our pride ?

Yet we are proud and vain : wonderfully proud ; deplorably

vain. We are proud of a body fattening for worms, and pamper-

ed for corruption and the grave ; of clothes, which we borrow from

the sheep and the silk- worm; of endowments, given us by God ;

of wealth, amassed by fraud and avarice ; and of stations, confer-

red by base favouritism, and popular frenzy. Nay, we are proud

of profaneness, cursing, and blasphemy. We boast of bargains,

made only by the cunning of fraud, or the violence of oppression .

We glory in the infernal arts and infamous success of seduction.

We murder our fellow- creatures in duels, and wreathe our temples

with garlands dyed in blood. We slaughter thousands and millions

in war ; plant laurels amid the bones , and nourish them with the

blood, of those, whom we have destroyed. We raise our thrones

on the cemetery of buried nations ; and mistake the groans and

shrieks of surviving parents, widows, and orphans, for the trumpet

of Fame. In a word, all that ought to humble us in the dust, all

that ought to clothe us in sackcloth, and cover us with ashes, all

that blackens us with disgrace and guilt, all that makes us deform-

ed and loathsome in the sight of God, is converted by us into the

means of pride and exultation !

Angels, although so greatly exalted above men, are neither

proud , nor vain. The plain reason is, they are not sinful. Pride

and Vanity are derived from sin only ; or rather sin is the root and

stem, of bitterness, of which they are the branches. To be proud,

or vain, then, is not to resemble the holy Angels, but the fallen

ones . Can this resemblance flatter any man ? a resemblance to

the worst and most odious of all the creatures of God ? Who would

ANGELS.

SER . XVIII. ] 301

not eagerly drop this wretched likeness, this tattered garb of guilt

and shame, assume a resemblance to the glorious beings, whom we

have been contemplating, and adorn himself with the unspotted,

spiritual, and never fading robe of humility and righteousness ?

The faith, repentance, and love, of the Gospel, are the fine linen

of the saints, wrought, and made white, in the heavens ; and with

this best robe, in his father's house, every repenting and returning

prodigal will be clothed.

3dly. What a happy change would be accomplished in this world,

if men would assume the spirit and conduct ofAngels !

Angels never indulge sloth, deceit, wrath, malice, envy, or im-

piety. Angels never cheat, corrupt, betray, nor oppress. Angels

never profane the name of God, perjure themselves, ridicule sacred

things, insult the Redeemer, resist the Holy Ghost, nor deny the

being, the perfections, the word, or the government, of God. An-

gels never consume their time in idle amusements, or guilty plea-

sures ; never slander each other, never quarrel ; never make wars ;

and never desire, nor plunder each other's blessings. How mise-

rable have men, by all this conduct, rendered this unhappy world !

With what a prodigal hand do we waste the blessings, given to us

by God ; pervert our talents , and frustrate the end of our being.

With what rapacity and violence do we plunder the blessings, and

destroy the lives, of our fellow -creatures ? In an existence, natur-

ally accompanied by many evils, we are impatient to create and

multiply sufferings ; to lessen the good, which God has given ; to

shorten the period of life, already so little ; and to surround it with

miseries of our own creation. In this manner, and by ourselves,

the evils which we suffer have been immensely multiplied ; and the

world, destined for our habitation, which, if we were pious, just,

sincere, and kind, would be a comfortable residence, has been con-

verted into a region of sorrow and mourning. Private dwellings ,

the proper mansions of peace and love, have been disturbed by

domestic broils : the father contending against his son, and the son

against his father ; the mother with parental unkindness provoking

her daughter to wrath, and the daughter, with filial impiety, revolting

from her mother: Brethren have become strangers to each other ;

and for such a length of time, and with such violence of passion,

that they have been harder to be won than the bars of a castle .

Neighbourhoods have been distracted with divisions and conten-

tions ; and nations rent asunder by faction and discord. Empires

have become fields of war and slaughter ; and the earth has been

changed into a vast receptacle of misery and ruin. All this wretch-

edness is the consequence of sin ; its immediate product ; its genu-

ine offspring. Should we, then, drop this character ; would not

our consciences be more serene, our lives more pleasant, our fami-

ilies more harmonious, and the world more quiet and happy ?

The mighty difference between Heaven and earth, angels and

men, lies in holiness and sin. Angels are holy; we are sinful :1

302 [SER. XVIII .

ANGELS.

their residence is happy; ours in many respects wretched. This

world was originally formed to be a delightful habitation ; and at

the close ofthe creation, was by God himself pronounced to be

very good. Man was once immortal and happy ; because he was

just , kind, sincere, humble, and pious. What has the world, what

has man, gained by the change? The afflicting answer may be

summed up in a word. God made the earth abeautiful image of

Heaven ; Man, by his apostacy, has changed it into no obscure re-

semblance of Hell. God made man a little lower than the Angels ,

and crowned him with glory and honour : Man, being in honour,

abode not, but became like the beasts which perish.

SERMONΝ ΧΙΧ.

CREATION. ANGELS .

COLOSSIANS i . 16. -For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that

are in earth, visible and invisible , whether they be Thrones, or Dominions, or Prin-

cipalities , or Powers : all things were created by him and for him.

IN the preceding discourse, I began a consideration of the na-

ture and circumstances of Angels . After examining these things

generally, as imported by the several names, given to these illus-

trious beings in the Scriptures, I proposed to mention whatever

was necessary to my design under the following heads :

I. Their rank or Station ;

II . Their Attributes ; and

III. Their Employments .

The two first of these subjects I then considered at some length .

Under the second head I observed that they are possessed,

1st. Of Wonderful Power ;

2dly . Of Wonderful Activity ;

3dly. Of Immortal Youth ;

4thly. Of the noblest Intellectual faculties , and of Knowledge, su-

perior to that of any other created beings ; and

5thly. Of consummate Holiness .

I shall now proceed to a further consideration of this branch of

the general subject ; and observe,

6thly. That Angels are possessed of distinguished Loveliness of

Character .

In the view of passion, and taste, beings are lovely, when pos-

sessed of external beauty of form, and gracefulness of deportment.

Acomplexion finely coloured and blended, a figure finely fashion-

ed, features happily turned and adjusted, and a demeanour elegant-

ly exhibited, are to our fancy, and our passions, so engaging and

lovely, as not unfrequently to engross the affections of the mind.

Yet even we are sensible that these are very imperfect objects of

our attachment. Accordingly, we speak ofthem in customary lan-

guage, as things of mere fancy ; unsolid ; unenduring ; of little

value ; and, therefore, incapable of claiming, or receiving, the sin-

cere approbation of the judgment, the full testimony of unbiassed

Reason, on account of any inherent, or essential excellence.

But there are objects of a nobler kind, claiming, in a far higher

degree, both our affections and our esteem. All the diversities of

virtue, or holiness, are in their nature pre-eminently lovely. Vir-

tue is the beauty of the mind ; and as superior to that of the form,

as the soul is superior to the tenement, in which it dwells. On this

ANGELS .

304 [SER. XIX.

delightful object, the understanding, in spite of every human pre-

judice, fixes its eye with unqualified approbation ; and the heart, if

not wholly destitute of candour, with sincere delight. Virtue is

the beauty of the heavenly world ; and, while it engrosses the at-

tachment, and the homage, of Angels themselves, is regarded with

entire complacency by its divine Author.

In exact accordance with the supreme value of this inestimable

object, mankind customarily speak of it under its various names ,

as more excellent, more noble, more solid, more desirable, and as

demanding, in a higher degree than any other attribute, the regard

and complacency of every Intelligent being. In this manner we

show, that, partial as we are, we still prefer worth to external

beauty and grace .

' There is, then, even in our view, a higher and nobler loveliness ,

than that which engages our fancy, or our taste ; a foundation in

the nature of things for more rational, more pure, and more endur-

ing attachment. In what does this loveliness consist ? In some-

thing, plainly, which is not found in external form, complexion, or

gracefulness ; something, which belongs to mind, and not to person.

It does not consist in intelligence. Men of the greatest understand-

ing, and information, are often odious, injurious, and deformed with

all the turpitude, ever found in the human character. The fallen

angels, also, are unquestionably possessed of intelligence, in de-

grees far superior to our comprehension ; and are, notwithstanding,

the most hateful of all beings.

In the disposition, then, the only remaining characteristical fa-

culty of the mind, must its amiableness reside. But the disposition

is lovely, either as it is sinful, or virtuous ; either as it hates, or

loves, God, and other Intelligent beings. To determine in which

of these cases the mind is lovely, demands not even a question.

In virtue, then, according to the decision of mankind, sinful as

they are, is found the true loveliness of Intelligent beings ; that which

unbiassed Reason approves ; which is always excellent ; which is

uniformly the object of delight ; which will never change ; and

which will never cease to be desired.

Ofthis loveliness, Angels are above all created beings supreme-

ly possessed. Angels are sincere, gentle, meek, kind, compas-

sionate, and perfectly conformed to that great moral principle, com-

municated in the words of the Lord Jesus , which he said, It is more

blessed to give, than to receive . This sublime excellence, incom-

parably more precious than gold which perisheth, has in them been ,

from the beginning, debased with no alloy, tarnished with no spot,

impaired by no length of years, and changed by no weakness or

imperfection. Free from every defect, and every mixture, it has

varied with length of years merely towards higher and higher per-

fection , and shone, not only with undiminished, but with increased

beauty and lustre . There is no good, which it is proper for Angels

to do, which they are not habitually prepared to do. There is no

ANGELS.

SER. XIX . ] 305

kindness, capable of being suitably exercised by them, which they

do not in fact exercise. The more their faculties are enlarged ;

the more their knowledge is increased ; the more their means of

usefulness are multiplied ; the more exalted is their excellence ,

the more disinterested and noble their disposition, the more intense

their benevolence, and the more lovely and beautiful their charac-

ter. The good, which they have already done, has only prepared

them to do more and greater good ; and the disposition, with which

it was done, has only become stronger by every preceding exer-

tion .

Let me pause, here, with a momentary digression ; and persuade

you to call to mind how delightful an intimate connexion must be

with even a single rational being, who always spoke that which

was true, and always did that which was just and kind ; in whom

confidence could be reposed without a fear, and from whom every

kind office might be expected, without even a suspicion of disap-

pointment. If the friendship of one such being would be a rich

possession ; how inestimable must be the privilege of living for ever

in a world of such friends !

7thly. Angels are invested with high personal Dignity and Glory.

Dignity originally denoted the same with worth ; but is now gen-

erally used to signify that kind of worth, which is elevated and great ;

which inspires reverence and admiration ; rather than that, which

is more gentle and familiar ; as well as the manifestations of it in

the conduct, and the honours, with which it is considered as suit-

ably rewarded. The spirit and character, formed by the magnani-

mous and sublimer virtues , are here intended by personal dignity ;

and all the honour, with which God has invested this character in

angels, is intended by personal glory. In these respects, Angels

are totally distinguished from all other created beings .

This truth cannot but be evident from the account, already sum-

marily given, of the attributes, both natural and moral, of these ex-

alted Intelligences. Their minds, it has been shown, were origin-

ally formed with vast capacities, and with an unmingled and intense

love of truth. Truth is an account of the character and works of

God; subjects elevated above all height, and extended above all

limits ; possessed of inherent grandeur and sublimity literally infi-

nite ; fitted to awaken in every mind, formed with an understand-

ing to perceive, and a taste to relish them, great ideas, and exalted

conceptions ; and calculated to inspire habits of thinking and feel-

ing, of the most dignified nature. To these subjects, Angels have

already devoted themselves, throughout a vast period of time, with

supreme intenseness and fervour. Their views have been all

formed without error, decay, or weariness ; and their relish for the

objects of their knowledge has only been strengthened by indulg-

ence .

Ofcourse, their progress in understanding has been rapid,

and their attainments have been very great. Of course, also, their

minds have been continually expanded, and ennobled, by all the

VOL. I. 39

ANGELS.

306 [ SER. XIX.

conceptions, which they have entertained concerning these won-

derful subjects.

In the mean time, the conscious exercise of such vast power

and activity, and the possession of ever -vigorous, ever-blooming

youth, destined to survive, and triumph, over time and labour,

must carry with them a sense of personal importance, which, tem-

pered and refined by perfect humility, cannot but be elevated in

a manner to which there is no parallel. To this character, their

stations, their residence, and their employments, all powerfully

contribute. Highly favoured, exalted, and happy, in these great

particulars, Angels have the nearest access to their Creator, for

understanding the mysteries, and contemplating the greatness, of

his dispensations, and for learning from them his infinitely majestic

and glorious character. Heaven is the centre, and the seat, of all

that is great and wonderful, all that is refined and exquisite, all

that is splendid and glorious. To Angels, these magnificent things

are habitually familiar ; and by them their taste is formed, and

their character established. Their exertions, also, are of a kind

wonderfully sublime. The being, who can bind the four winds of

Heaven, imprison the prince of the power of the air, or wing his

flight in a moment to a distant world, possesses an inherent impor-

tance, to which our imaginations cannot extend ; a sublimity of

character, elevated beyond the utmost stretch of human sight.

Exactly accordant with these views of the subject are the splen-

dour and majesty of appearance, frequently assumed by Angels in

their visits to this lower world. Ishall not detail the facts, of

which this splendour has been composed ; nor repeat the unrival-

led descriptions of it, given to us in the Word of God. It will be

sufficient for my present purpose to observe, that in their presence

mankind have trembled, shrunk, and fallen ; and, scarcely able to

survive their impressions, have felt themeselves to be nothing, and

less than nothing.

How abashed, how amazed, how dumb, should we be in the pre-

sence of Gabriel, known by us to be an inhabitant of the heavenly

world ; to stand in the presence of God ; to be exalted above all

human weakness, error, and sin ; and to be wise, and great, and

good, in the sight of God himself! How great must he seem to

us ; how dignified ; how glorious ! How little, on the contrary,

should we appear to him ; how unworthy ! Would not our pride

wither in a moment, and our vanity flee away ? Should we not,

like Peter, and his companions, in the presence of Moses and Elias,

be instantly lost and bewildered ; and utter, if we spoke at all, that

which we did not understand ?

Ofall these attributes, it is to be remembered further, that they

are eternal. Angels live for ever ; and are hence termed, by way

ofdistinction, Living Ones, or Living Creatures. With their being,

their excellencies are all co-extended ; and are in the same man-

ner immortal. Nor are they merely immortal ; but are perpetu-

ANGELS.

SER. XIX . ] 307

ally improving. Every day, they study, and understand, more and

more, the wonders of creation and Providence, and the character

of their great Author. With their knowledge, their love to God is

continually enlarged, and enraptured ; their benevolence to their

fellow- creatures, their amiable conduct, their sweetness, loveliness,

and dignity of character, are all enhanced and refined. Great,

wise, noble, and excellent, at first, they have regularly advanced

in this divine progress of improvement to the present time .

How excellent did Paul become in the short period of his life,

which elapsed after his conversion ! How much more excellent

and glorious have angels become ; who, never stained with sin,

weakened by prejudice, nor wearied by labour, have, with en-

larged understanding, intense love oftruth, and unmingled holiness

of disposition, regularly and rapidly advanced in the attainment

of all that is great and good through a period of six thousand

years ! How superlatively and universally excellent will they then

become hereafter ! To what a height of glory will they rise in

the exercise of these faculties, in the pursuit of these objects, and

in the indulgence of this disposition, throughout endless ages!

III. Angels hold the first Employments, and Offices, in the Uni-

verse.

In every government there must be, of course, public offices .

These offices must also increase in number and importance, as

the government becomes more extensive. In a town, they will

naturally be few ; in a province, more numerous ; and in a king-

dom, far more numerous still. In such an empire as Rome or

China, a vastmultitude of concerns continually exist ; all of which

must be the immediate business of persons, devoted to them only.

Were this world under a single administration of government, the

public offices would become numerous, important, and dignified,

proportionally to the number, greatness, and complication, of its

mighty interests. The kingdom of God, if I mistake not, is plainly

exhibited both in his Word and Works, as a kingdom of means.

Under his universal government, secondary causes, and subordi-

nate agents, are employed with a real instrumentality, and efficacy,

in accomplishing his pleasure. In such an empire, the concerns

are necessarily immense, both in their number and their import-

ance. Ofthese, some, however, are greater, and others less :

while all are, in their respective places, proper and useful. These

concerns, according to this scheme, are, to an extent undefinable,

committed to such of his Intelligent creatures, as he has formed to

conduct them under his own superintendency : and the offices ,

which they of course sustain, must, to our view, be, in a vast

multitude of instances, invested with a greatness, dignity, and im-

portance, incomprehensible.

The Intelligent beings, to whom the greatest and noblest of

these concerns are entrusted, and by whom the most illustrious of

all these offices are sustained, are undoubtedly the Angels ofGod.

1

ANGELS .

308 [SER. XIX.

Whatever demands the employment of created power, activity,

knowledge, and virtue, of high distinction ; whatever is in an emi-

nent degree complicated, vast, or sublime ; can with propriety be

committed only to beings, eminently invested with these illustrious

attributes. In the amazing extent of creation, in the eternal pro-

gress of providence, fields, sufficiently ample, are furnished for

the employment of immense numbers of these glorious beings in

business of high import, and inestimable dignity. To this scheme

of things, accord, not only their attributes, but their numbers ; as

they are exhibited in the Scriptures : for we are there told, that

thousand thousands minister unto God, and ten thousand times ten

thousand stand before him.

That Angels are actually thus employed, can scarcely be doubt-

ed by any man, who remembers the illustrious attributes, of which

they are possessed; and who believes, that these attributes were

not given in vain. Should he, however, doubt, he may be fur-

nished with proofs from the Scriptures, which cannot rationally be

questioned.

1st. Their Names clearly indicate their high employments .

They are styled Angels ; that is, the immediate messengers of

God. They are styled Thrones, Dominions , Authorities , Princi-

palities or Governments , and Powers ; to denote, that they sit

upon thrones, exercise dominion, hold authority, preside in go-

vernment, and are invested with the power, necessary for these

great purposes .

They are called chief Princes ; to indicate, that they are the

first order of rulers in the Universe, under him, who has prepared

his throne in the heavens, and whose kingdom ruleth over all. They

are called Sons of God ;to teach us, that they are beings nearly

related to God in character, favour, place, and authority. They

are called Morning Stars, to teach us the splendour and glory,

with which they outshine all other Intelligent creatures. They

are named Cherubim, and Seraphim ; to inform us, that they are

beings, furnished with superior knowledge to discern, and with

superior holiness to pursue, whatever is good and right, honourable

to the Creator, and useful to his creatures.

All these names are descriptive either of the nature and attri-

butes of these exalted beings, or of the stations and employments,

for which, by this nature, they are qualified.

2dly. The Scriptures, in many instances, exhibit them as thus

employed.

(1st.) Angels are in the Scriptures declared to be extensively en-

gaged in the immediate business ofglorifying God and celebrating

his praise.

At the Creation, the Morning Stars, in the dawn of theirbeing,

surrounded their Maker during the progress of that great work ;

and, when it was finished, in the celebration of that peculiarly di-

vine Sabbath, observed, consecrated, and blessed , by God him-

ANGELS.

SER. XIX. ] 309

self , as an infinitely solemn and authoritative example to mankind.

sang together, and shoutedfor joy .

When the Lord Jesus Christ descended on Mount Sinai, to pub-

lish , amid thunders and lightnings , and aflame of devouring fire,

his most holy law, to the children of men, the chariots ofGod, even

thousands of Angels, * attended him at this awful solemnity, and

glorified him by their ministry in this sublime dispensation.

When the same divine Person became incarnate, Gabriel an-

nounced his birth to Zachariah and to Mary. An Angel, also,

proclaimed these glad tidings of great joy to the shepherds of

Bethlehem : and a multitude of the heavenly host praised God on

the same occasion, in the noblest hymn ever heard in this lower

world; and sang, Glory to God in the highest ! and on earth, peace :

good will towards men !

When he ascended on high, and led captivity captive, having

finished the work of Redemption, and triumphed over all his ene-

mies ; the same exalted beings, with renewed transport and ado-

ration , surrounded him with the same magnificent attendance as

at Sinai , singing, as he approached the heaven of heavens, Lift

up your heads , O ye gates ! and be ye lift up, ye everlasting doors !

and the King of Glory shall come in.t

At the end ofthis earthly system, when he shall come to judge the

quick and the dead, and blot out from under heaven this world of

iniquity and rebellion ; an Archangel, preceding him, will call the

dead out of their graves : while the multitude of the heavenly host

will shout to the Universe the awful wonders of the final day, and

subjoin, to all its amazing transactions, their solemn Amen.

In the Heaven of Heavens, the four Living Ones rest not, day

and night, saying, Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God Almighty ! who was,

and who is, and who is to come.

And I beheld, says St. John, and I heard the voice of many An-

gels round about the throne, and the Living Ones , and the Elders ;

and the number of them was ten thousand times ten thousand, and

thousands of thousands, saying with a loud voice, Worthy is the Lamb

that was slain, to receive power, and wisdom, and riches , and strength,

and honour, and glory, and blessing .

(2dly. ) Angels are employed in studying the works of God, and

in learning from them his perfections .

Who created all things, says St. Paul, by Jesus Christ ; to the in-

tent, that now unto the Principalities , and Powers, in heavenly places ,

might be known by the Church the manifold wisdom ofGod.

Which things, says St. Peter, the Angels desire to look into ; or

more literally, Into which things, Angels earnestly desire to look

with the deepest attention . The original word, παρακύψαι, denotes

the action of stooping down to inspect minutely, and pry critically

into, an object of investigation .

Psalm lxviii. 17, 18.

Psalm lxviii. 17, 18, compared with Ephes. iv. 8, See also Psalm xxiv .

ANGELS.

310 [SER. XIX.

In the former of these passages, we are presented with one

great end of the Creation of all things ; viz. the disclosure of the

manifold wisdom of God, in his dispensations to his Church, unto

Principalities and Powers in heavenly places . As this disclosure

was one great end of the Creation of all things ; so it is evident,

that Angels were created with the especial design, that they should

attain the knowledge, which it conveys. In the second of these

passages, we are taught, that the disposition of Angels is perfectly

accordant with this design ; and that they earnestly desire to inves-

tigate, and are, therefore, unceasingly employed in investigating,

those things , for the knowledge of which they were especially

created.

For this great purpose, these glorious beings are in the most

eminent manner fitted by all their other employments, their won-

derful attributes , and their exalted station. Particularly, in their

employment as Messengers of God, in which they visit, not only

this world, but the Oυρανια of the Scriptures ; the innumerable rc-

gions of the Heavens; they are furnished with the most ample and

perfect opportunities of understanding the endless multitude, and

the astonishing nature, of the works of Creation and Providence.

' Throughout these incomprehensible tracts, there is every reason to

believe, that the same unceasing diversity is continually pursued in

all the divine works, which prevail so perfectly in this world. The

nature, attributes, and real importance, of all things, are learned,

not by inspection only, but also, in an extensive degree, by com-

parison. The relations, which they bear to each other, can be

known in no other manner: and the knowledge of these is a most

extensive and important part of all that is known. From the ad-

vantage, furnished him, of beholding many objects, and making

numerous and accurate comparisons between them, a rational trav-

eller, who has visited many countries, is universally acknowledged,

not only to possess a more enlarged knowledge of the world than

other men, but also to be a more sound and thorough judge of the

things, with which he is acquainted. Angels visit distant worlds ,

probably with more ease and expedition than men, the towns in

their neighbourhood ; and compare systems with more perfect com-

prehension and accuracy, than we, states and kingdoms. At the

same time, their strong and unmingled relish for all the objects of

their contemplation, the unwearied and undiminished vigour of their

minds, and the length of years, through which they have been em-

ployed in this illustrious pursuit, have, on the one hand, given it the

peculiar power of habit ; and, on the other, increase, beyond cal-

culation, the pleasure which it originally and naturally yields .

Man, by the limited nature of his powers, is almost of course

obliged , whenever he studies, to confine himself to study; and,

whenever he acts, to action. Angels, by their superior energy,

seem fitted to pursue both courses at once ; and to be able to

study, and act, without hindrance, confusion, or any other disad-

vantage.

ANGELS .

SER. XIX . ] 311

( 3dly.) Angels are employed in executing the judgments of God

upon this world.

The first judgment upon Man, which was excluding him from

Paradise, appears to have been committed to the execution of these

ministering spirits . In the same manner, they were the immediate

instruments of inflicting the vengeance ofGod on the Israelites ; on

the army of Sennacherib ; on Nebuchadnezzar ; and on Herod. In

the same manner also, they are exhibited in the Revelation of St.

John, as pouring out the vials of divine wrath upon the nations of

this guilty world, and especially upon the Antichristian Hierarchy,

as the peculiar ministers of the justice ofGod. To us, with our lim-

ited views, and strong partialities, this office may seem undesirable,

and a diminution of that perfect felicity, which I have attributed to

this distinguished order of beings. The decision, however, will

easily appear to be unfounded, if we remember, that they possess

an entire and unchangeable confidence in God, and in the perfect

rectitude of all his dispensations ; and, in innumerable instances, a

clear comprehension of the nature, and import, of the dispensations

themselves ; the wisdom and goodness, with which they are brought

to pass ; and the valuable and glorious ends, which they are in-

tended to accomplish. In exact accordance with this view of the

subject, is sung in heaven the song ofMoses and the Lamb. Great

and marvellous are thy works , Lord God Almighty ! Just and true

are thy ways , thou King of Saints ! Who shall not fear thee , O Lord,

and glorify thy name ? for thou only art holy : for all nations shall

come and worship before thee ; for thy judgments are made mani-

fest.

( 4thly . ) Angels are also employed in ministering Blessings to the

children of God in this world.

Are they not all ministering spirits, says St. Paul, sent forth to

minister for them, who shall be heirs of salvation ? In this passage,

we are plainly taught, that ministering to the saints, is a standing

employment ofAngels, throughout the ages of Time. According-

ly, they are exhibited in Jacob's vision of the ladder, as ascending ,

and descending, from Heaven to earth, and from earth to Heaven,

continually, in the discharge of this great duty. According to this

declaration, also, we are furnished by the Scriptures with numerous

examples of their actual ministry to the children of God. Thus

Angels delivered Lot from Sodom ; Jacob from Esau ; Daniel from

the lions ; his three companions from the fiery furnace ; Peter from

Herod , and the Jewish Sanhedrim ; and the nation of the Israelites ,

successively, from the Egyptians, Canaanites , and Assyrians . Thus

they conducted Lot, Abraham, and the Israelites, in seasons of great

difficulty and danger, to places, and circumstances, of safety and

peace. Thus they conducted Gideon to the destruction of the Mi-

dianites , Joseph and Mary to Egypt, Philip to the Eunuch, and

Cornelius to Peter, to the knowledge of the Gospel through him,

and to the salvation of himself , his family, and his friends. Thus

312 ANGELS.

[ SER . XIX .

Angels instructed Abraham, Joshua, Gideon, David, Elijah, Daniel,

Zechariah the prophet, Zachariah the father of John the Baptist,

the Virgin Mary, the Apostles, and their fellow- disciples. Thus

they comforted Jacob at the approach of Esau ; Daniel in his pe-

culiar sorrows and dangers ; Zachariah in the sufferings of his na-

tion ; Joseph and Mary in their perplexities ; CHRIST in his agony ;

the Apostles and their companions after his resurrection ; Paul

immediately before his shipwreck ; and the Church, universally,

by the testimony and instruction, given in the Revelation of St.

John.

Generally, the Scriptures inform us, especially in the visions of

Ezekiel, Daniel, and John, that they are employed in executing va-

rious, great, and wonderful purposes of divine Providence. Here

we behold them controlling evil spirits ; wielding the elements of

this world ; producing, directing, and terminating, the great con-

vulsions of time ; conveying the souls of the just to the Paradise of

God; serving the wicked from the good at the day of Judgment ;

and performing the duties of other dignified and glorious missions .

All these are instances, either of wonderful power and skill, or of

singular benevolence and excellency of character ; both eminently

honourable to them, and eminently important to the Universe. By

these facts, we cannot fail to be convinced, that their employments

are wholly noble and magnificent, and wholly suited to their digni-

fied stations and exalted titles ; as well as to the attributes of power,

knowledge, and goodness, of which they are so transcendently

possessed. Nor can we rationally doubt, that they visit every other

habitable world, with messages and designs of the same sublime

import ; execute the great purposes of God in all the parts of his

vast kingdom ; and thus become, in an extensive sense, illustrious

benefactors of the Intelligent Creation .

REMARKS.

1st. These considerations furnish us with a strong presumptive

argument, that the Scriptures are a divine Revelation.

In the Scriptures we find an Order, or rather a Kind, of beings

described, which were never known, nor imagined, by any person,

who did not derive his acquaintance with them from that book.

They are beings, who have a character, as appropriate as that of

man, and differing from that of man as far, as finite Intelligences

can be supposed to differ from each other. Yet the character is

complete, entire, and of a piece with itself . Every attribute is

suited to every other : all are angelic : all are heavenly. Asta-

tion is also assigned to them, of dignity and importance perfectly

fitted to their character, and worthy of being filled by such beings.

Employments are also marked out for them, altogether becoming

both the station and the character ; angelic employments ; suited

to the Sons of God, the Morning Stars of Heaven. Can it be rea-

sonably supposed, that these things were devised by human ima

ANGELS.

SER. XIX . ] 313

gination ? Have similar things been ever thus devised ? The fancy

ofman has, in all nations and ages, delighted itself with the em-

ployment of fashioning imaginary beings, of a nature superior to

ours. What have been its productions ? The Gods, demons, and

Genii, of ancient; and the elves , sylphs, and fairies, of more mod-

ern, times . But how do all these shrink from a comparison with

Angels ? They are little, base, trifling, sordid, and sinful, enough

to have been copied, with a few easy additions , from the depraved

characteristics of men. But where does this world furnish mate-

rials for the composition of an angelic character ? What originals

has it presented, from which the portrait could be drawn ?

Amultitude ofwriters in the Scriptures, fifteen at least, have de-

scribed these glorious beings with the most perfect harmony, and

without a single discordant idea. In the mean time, their descrip-

tions are extensively various, comprising many particulars, and

wholly independent of each other. All the writers are in this re-

spect, as well as others, originals. Not one is a copier ; not one

a plagiary : yet their representations are universally noble, sublime,

dignified, beautiful, and lovely, beyond any thing, found in the most

perfect writings of uninspired men.

How came these things to pass ? Whence did these writers, in so

distant ages, and differing so widely in education, genius, charac-

ters, interests, and views, unite with such perfect harmony in so

difficult an object of conception ; while writing for so diverse pur-

poses, and on so diverse occasions ? Whence is it, that not an in-

dividual of them has made a single slip; that not a thought is ut-

tered, not a fact asserted, nor a doctrine declared, but such as is

perfectly free from fault, impurity, littleness, and defect ; such as

is entirely noble, refined, and becoming so exalted and spotless a

character ? All heathen writers have stained even their Gods

with great defects, and deformed them with gross crimes ; and,

wherever they have exhibited their Gods as acting, have filled up

their history with weakness and depravity. The Angels of the

Scriptures, on the contrary, are every where, by every writer, and

and in every attribute and act alike, pure and perfect. The only

answer, which can be given, is, God directed the one class of wri-

ters, and human reason and imagination the other.

2dly. How wonderful, and how amiable, do these considerations

exhibit the humility of angels !

In the observations, which have been made, we have seen their

character to be great and glorious without a parallel ; their station

exalted above that of all other created beings ; and their employ-

ments the first in the kingdom of God. Yet they do not disdain,

nor grudge, to minister to the wants and relief , to the instruction

and the comfort, of men ; who, compared with them, are only

worms of the dust.

Asingle fact will set this subject in a stronger light, than any

train ofgeneral observations. Call up to your view, then, a choir

VOL. I. 40

ANGELS.

314 [SER . XIX :

ofthese illustrious beings, cheerfully leaving the glory of Heaven,

and directing their flight to this forlorn and sinful earth, to accom-

pany the departing spirit of poor, despised, forgotten Lazarus, to

the world of happiness ; to point the way to that distant and de-

lightful region ; and to aid his trembling wing to the house and

presence ofhis Father and his God. What monarch, what noble,

what gentleman, what plain man, would, willingly, have even at-

tended his funeral ? Who would have received him, when alive,

into his house ; powerfully as his sufferings pleaded for charitable

relief? Who, much more, would have consented to become his

companion ? Who, still more, would have acknowledged himself

his friend ? Yet all this , Angels did not disdain .

Let us take to ourselves shame and confusion of face, at the

remembrance of our pride and haughtiness of heart. How often

do we despise, neglect, insult and trample under foot, those who,

in the sight of God, are far better than ourselves ! For what do

we despise them ? Because, perhaps, their houses, their persons ,

their dress , their wealth, or their talents, are inferior to our own.

We might, indeed, sometimes pity them for these reasons, and be

justified . But where shall we find an excuse for despising them ?

Nor is the meekness of Angels less contrasted to our wrath and

revenge . They do not even bring railing accusations. Much less

do they, like ourselves, indulge furious resentment, and seek in-

satiable revenge. There is not a single reason to believe, that

they ever exercised, even in one instance, personal resentment

against the basest and most guilty child of Adam ; or a revenge-

ful thought against the most depraved inhabitant of hell. No pro-

vocation is able to disturb the serenity of their minds. No cloud

ever overcasts their smiles, or intercepts the clear sunshine of

their benevolence ..

3dly. How are the meek and humble virtues dignified by his great

example! These virtues are the constant character, the essential attri-

butes, the peculiar glory, of Thrones , Dominions, Principalities, and

Powers. But these virtues, and those in whom they are found on

carth, man, who is a worm, and the son of man, who is but a worm,

regards with contempt. Men glory in being proud, in being wrath-

ful , in being revengeful ; in being tyrants and oppressors, in being

heroes and butchers. To men of these characters , statues are

erected; nay, temples have been built, and altars smoked with

victims . To them, the page of the historian and the harp of

the poet are consecrated. To their praise, the sculptor bids the

marble breathe, and the painter teaches his canvass to glow. They

live in palaces, and are entombed in mausoleums. Shouts and ho-

sannas follow them through life ; and, at their death, nations re-

echo the cries of lamentation, and kingdoms are covered with sack-

cloth and ashes. How strange is all this to the eye of Reason !

Dives arrayed in purple and fine linen, and faring sumptuously

ANGELS.

SER . XIX.J 315

every day : while Lazarus lies at his gate, under the naked heavens,

coveting only to be fed with the crumbs , which fallfrom his table !

Nay, Pilate and Herod on the seat of judgment, and Christ on the

cross!

In the invisible world , these things are wonderfully inverted.

Dives expires ; but no Angels convey him to Abraham's bosom.

There the meek and lowly virtues claim the esteem and love, and

engross the kind offices, of beings, possessed of the highest wis-

dom and excellence ; and obtain the everlasting favour of the

infinite God. On these virtues, Angels smile with complacency ;

while fools and sinners regard them with hatred and scorn.

But ,

if we would be like Angels ; if we would secure their good- will ; if

we would be admitted to their glorious company ; if we would share

in their immortal blessings ; if we would dwell in the house of their

Father and our Father, of their God and our God ; we must esteem

the things which they esteem; love the things which they love; and

do the things which they do. We must renounce the haughty,

angry, revengeful character, which we are so pleased to assume ;

become meek and lowly of heart, like the divine Redeemer ; and in

the midst of provocations, however great, must be ready cheerfully

to say, Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do !

4thly. What exalted views does this subject present to us of the

future state of the Righteous !

In the Resurrection, says our SAVIOUR to the Sadducees , the chil-

dren of God shall be ισαγγελοι, equal to the Angels ; or, perhaps

more properly, they shall be like the Angels in attributes, station ,

and employments. Like the Angels, they will possess endless

youth, activity, power, knowledge, and holiness ; enjoy the same

immortal happiness, dignity, and divine favour ; be lovely, beauti-

ful, and glorious, in the sight of God; and shine forth as the Sun

in the kingdom of their Father. Like the Angels, shall they be

sons , and kings , and priests, to God ; and live and reign, with him

for ever and ever.

What a change must this be from the present weakness and

guilt of man ; from sluggishness and ignorance, decay and death,

sin and misery ! What a wonderful display of the boundless com-

passion of God, to raise us from such a depth to such a height !

Can we hesitate to exclaim, " This is love passing all understand-

ing ? " Who would not, for these divine blessings, renounce the

pleasures of sin; and cheerfully bid adieu to all that avarice, am-

bition, and sensuality can boast? Who would not, with all the

wise and good, cease at once from the sordid pursuits of sinners ,

and direct every view, desire, and effort, towards the state and

character ofAngels, and the attainment of the same residence, em-

ployments, happiness, and glory ?

5thly. What sublime views does this subject furnish us of the

greatness of Christ !

By him, says the text, were all these illustrious beings created,

4

ANGELS .

316 [SER. XIX .

together with all their attributes, importance, and dignity. The

character of every workman is seen, of course, in the nature of

the work, which he has made. Ifthis be insignificant and worth-

less ; it exhibits nothing but the insignificance and worthlessness

of the maker. If curious and excellent, if sublime and wonderful,

it unfolds strongly, and certainly, his greatness, wisdom, and glory.

Ofwhat faculties are Angels the subjects ! Of what intelligence,

purity, power, loveliness, and elevation of mind! What then

must be the perfections of Him, who contrived and formed Angels ;

who with a word called them into being; who preserves, informs ,

directs, controls, and blesses them forever ? Great and excellent

as they are, they are exhibited as unclean in his sight, and as

charged with folly before him. How amazing, then, must be the

perfection of his character ! how great; how wise ; how good !

SERMON XX.

CREATION. FALLEN ANGELS .

JUDE 6. -And the Angels, who kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation,

he hath reserved, in everlasting chains, under darkness, unto the judgment of the

great day .

IN this passage, we have a concise, but very interesting, ac-

count of certain Angels, who once dwelt in Heaven. Created, at

first, with all the excellencies of the Angelic nature, placed in cir-

cumstances of the highest honour, and enjoying the greatest hap

piness, they are here represented as having lost their character,

and forfeited their honour and happiness. The nature and allot-

ments of these Angels furnish the subject, which next demands our

attention in this System of discourses .

Before I enter on the consideration of this subject, it will be pro-

per to take some notice of an opinion, which has, chiefly within the

two past centuries, been adopted concerning it, and advanced with

confidence by persons of various descriptions : an opinion, which,

if true, would preclude the present discourse , as groundless and

nugatory. It is this ; that thereare no such beings as Fallen Angels .

Infidels have made the Scriptural account of these beings, a formal

objection against the truth and credibility of the Scriptures. Not

a small number of men, professing themselves to be Christians,

have partly yielded to the objection, and partly considered the con-

trary doctrine as necessary to their particular systems of Theology.

Thus, here, as in other cases, men apparently opposed to each

other in the belief , and the denial, of the Scriptures, have yet

united in overthrowing their authority, and unsettling their charac-

ter as a revelation .

From the manner, in which the doctrine has been opposed, we

should naturally argue unfavourably concerning the opposition.

It has been most usually opposed, not with sober argument, but

with ridicule and sneers . Acause, which needs this support, is

bad of course ; and is by its abettors seen to be bad: for no man

of common sense, will ever resort to this feeble and ineffectual

mode of attack, or defence, when the surer, more rational, and

more efficacious, resort of sober argument, is in his power.

If the existence of fallen Angels is incredible ; it must be so for

one of the following reasons .

1st. That it is not revealed sufficiently to command belief; and

that, as we have no direct knowledge of invisible beings , aside from

Revelation, so in this case, Revelation does not warrant us to admit

their existence : or,

FALLEN ANGELS.

318 [SER . XX

2dly. There is some evidence in the nature of things , which dis-

proves their existence , or at least, renders it highly improbable .

Concerning the first of these Methods of opposing the existence of

fallen Angels, I observe, that it has been very little resorted to, by

the opposers of this doctrine. Here, as in many other cases, Re-

velation has been tried before the tribunal of Philosophy. Men

have supposed, that their ownjudgment was a more unerring stand-

ard of faith and truth, than the Scriptures . That Infidels should

thus act, is certainly to be expected; for this opinion is the basis

of their system. However irrational, therefore, and indefensible,

their conduct may seem to us ; we are certainly to feel no surprise,

when they resort to it, or rely upon it, with confidence. But for

this opinion, they could not retain their system for a moment.

But, that men, professing to believe in the Scriptures as a divine

Revelation, should adopt this method of establishing, or refuting,

their declarations, is, to say the least, wonderful. Still, it has in

every age been more or less the conduct of persons, who have pro-

fessed this belief . It began to exist in the time of the Apostles ;

and was boldly adopted in defiance of their authority and inspira-

tion. The declaration of St. Paul, relative to this subject, are am-

ple proofs of the fact. The two first chapters of the first Epistle

to the Corinthians, are, in a great measure, employed on this sub-

ject . In them he informs us, that to the Philosophical Greeks, who

arrogated to themselves the titles of Σοφοι and Φιλοσοφοι, Wise Men and

Philosophers , the doctrine of the cross was foolishness . This , there-

fore, was then a general decision of Philosophy. Against the adop-

tion of that Philosophy, and the imitation of the men who profess

ed it, he strongly cautions the Corinthian Christians ; who were in

no small danger from its imposing and deceitful influence. At the

same time, he informs them, that this foolishness, as they termed it,

ofGod, was wiser than Men ; that God had not chosen men of this

character to call them to salvation, but men of an opposite character,

who disclaimed the very words , as well as the spirit, of this Phi-

losophy ; men, who, although despised and accounted as nothing

by these vain, arrogant Philosophers, and their followers, were yet

beloved of God, and the instruments of their salvation. He farther

informs them, that the wisdom of this world, is foolishness with God ;

and again declares, that the Lord knoweth the reasonings of the wise,

that they are vain. To the Colossians he writes, Beware lest any

man spoil you through Philosophy and vain deceit ; that is, vain and

deceitful Philosophy; which, he declares, accorded with the tradi-

tions of men, and the rudiments of this world, but not with Christ.

Of course, it merited contempt, on the one hand, and was fraught

with danger, on the other.

From the age of the Apostles to the present time, almost every

existing heresy has been derived fromthis source. The Scriptures

were found by many men, and men, too, who were often distin-

guished for their ingenuity, not to agree with their Philosophy ; and

FALLEN ANGELS.

SER. XX . ] 319

of course could not, in their opinion, be true, unless they could be

bent to such an agreement. Those, therefore, who chose still to

acknowledge the Revelation of the Scriptures, employed them-

selves in helping out their character, as a system of truth, and re-

moving their supposed inconsistencies, by new constructions, alle-

gorical explanations, and generally, by substituting what they ought

to mean for that, which, according to the natural and proper force

of language, they must mean. Those, on the contrary, who cared

little about them, finding the doctrines, which they contain, to dis-

agree with their own Philosophy, denied their authority at once.

Men of this class were, in my view, more rational, more self -con-

sistent, and less injurious to the character of the Scriptures, than

those of the other. For nothing can be more irrational, inconsist-

ent , or injurious to the Scriptures, than to profess to receive them

as a divine Revelation, and at the same time to make human opin-

ion the standard, by which their declarations are to be tried. This

is no other, than to sit in judgment upon God himself , (who, in this

case, is acknowledged to be the Author of the declarations) and to

determine whether he has spoken truth or falsehood. Must not

Angels wonder to see Men thus employed ?

The truth is ; the doctrine in question is so often, and so clearly,

asserted in the Scriptures, that the denial of it cannot be founded

on them alone. All men act in this case, as Dr. Priestly has acted

in questioning the existence of the holy Angels. In pursuing the

doctrines of his peculiar system, he was led to doubt, and ultimate-

ly to deny, the immateriality of the human soul ; and roundly de-

cided , that it was nothing but organized matter. Angels, he saw

plainly, stood in the way of his arguments concerning this subject :

for no mind possesses sufficient ingenuity to render it even remote-

ly probable, that Angels are material. And, as the human soul

may as easily be supposed to be immaterial, as an Angel can be ,

there was no resort left to Dr. Priestly, but to question the exist-

ence of Angels altogether. This, therefore, he chose to do, not-

withstanding the numerous express declarations of God to the con-

trary ; declarations as express as language will admit ; rather than

give up a doctrine, which he thought necessary to the support of

his system. In this manner, the Scriptures may be made to de-

clare any thing.

With respect to the second of these reasons, on which the exist-

ence of Fallen Angels is denied, viz. that there is some evidence in

the nature of things , which disproves the existence of such beings , or

at least, renders it highly improbable ; I observe ,

1st. That the existence of Angels , generally considered, is ori-

ginally less improbable than that of Men .

To a rational being, unacquainted with the existence of either

Angels or Men, pure spirits would seem more likely to be a part

ofthe Creation of God, than spirits united to bodies; beings wholly

rational, than beings partly rational and partly animal. God is a

FALLEN ANGELS .

320 [SER. XX .

pure spirit. It is not rationally supposed, that, in creating Intelli-

gent beings, he would unite them to Matter, in such a manner as to

form one being of both matter and mind; but it is rationally sup-

posed, that, delighting as he does in his own manner of existence,

he would create beings as much like himself, as might be. In crea-

ting men, a new difficulty concerning existence, a new mystery of

Philosophy, is presented to our contemplation : viz. the union of

soul and body, so accomplished, as to constitute one percipient

being. Should it be here observed, that Philosophers, in denying

the existence of Angels, whether virtuous or fallen, avoid this dif-

ficulty , by denying also the existence of an immaterial soul in

Man; I acknowledge, that the objection is fairly alleged, as being

founded in truth ; but I beg leave to subjoin, that in this very man-

ner, they introduce to us a new, more mysterious, and more per-

plexing doctrine ; a doctrine so mysterious, as to be no other than

a gross absurdity : viz. the doctrine of cogitative, or thinking mat-

ter. As I propose hereafter to discuss this subject at length ; I

shall dismiss it for the present without any further remarks .

2dly. That Angels after their creation, fell, involves no more dif-

ficulty, than that which is involved in the fall of Man .

All, that in the nature of the case, appears necessary to accom-

plish the fall of any finite being, is a sufficient temptation. Temp-

tation, for aught that appears, may rise to any degree, beneath in-

finite ; and there is no more reason to suppose, that the strength

of anAngel, or his habits of virtue, are sufficient to resist all possi-

ble temptation, than to suppose, that the strength of a man is suffi-

cient. I speak, here, of such a man as Adam ; who antecedently

to the first temptation, was absolutely free from sin. The same

temptation, which would overcome the man, might not, and proba-

bly would not, overcome the Angel ; but a temptation, sufficiently

increased to bear an equal proportion to his disposition to resist,

might overcome him; and undoubtedly would : nor is there any

apparent proof , that God is any more obliged to secure an Angel

from falling, than to secure a man.

3dly . That fallen Angels, if permitted, should act in the affairs

of mankind, is attended with no more improbability, than that vir-

tuous Angels should thus act.

Virtuous Angels are declared to be all ministering spirits, sent

forth to minister to the heirs of salvation ; and are, throughout the

Scriptures, exhibited as being really, continually , and extensively,

concerned in the affairs of the present world. With the same clear-

ness, are fallen Angels also declared to be thus employed.

Nor is there any presumption against this interference of either.

We, it is true, could not know this fact, unless it were declared to

us ; or unless we were to become acquainted with it by experi-

mental evidence. But, that the rational inhabitants of one world

should be interested in the concerns of another, and, if allowed by

God thusto act, interfere in them, in a manner suited to their re-

FALLEN ANGELS .

SER. XX. ] 321

spective dispositions, is in a high degree probable. We, certainly,

ifwe were able, and were permitted, to visit the planetary worlds ,

should take such a part in the important concerns of their inhabit-

ants, as suited our dispositions. If we were governed by benevo-

lent motives ; we should save, or relieve, them, so far as was in our

power, from dangers and sufferings ; if by malevolent ones, we

should promote their distress and ruin. We do in reality thus act

in this world ; not in our own affairs only, but in those of others ;

in the affairs of strangers, as well as of friends ; and of those in

distant nations and countries, as well as our own. But there is

nothing more unnatural, or improbable, in our interference, if it

were permitted, in the concerns of distant worlds, than in those of

distant nations .

4thly. There is no more difficulty in supposing, that the fallen

Angels accomplish evil in the divine kingdom, than that fallen men

do the same .

It is, indeed, originally improbable, that either men or Angels

should accomplish evil in the divine kingdom ; or, universally, that

evil should exist at all. But, since we know, that it does exist,

there is no more perceivable difficulty in attributing it to one class

of Intelligent creatures, than to another. Nor is there any expla-

nation of the agency of men in producing evil, which may not be

applied in a manner, equally satisfactory, to that ofAngels .

5thly. That Angels should communicate thoughts , either good or

evil, to mankind, is originally no more improbable, than that we

should communicate them to each other. We do this, daily and

hourly, in many ways, which are familiar to us by experience, but

which were originally unimaginable by ourselves, an and probably by

any other finite beings. We show our thoughts to each other, by

words, tones, gestures, silence, hieroglyphics, pictures, letters,

and many other things. All these, antecedent to our experience

ofthem, were hidden in absolute darkness, from our conception.

If all mankind had been born dumb, no man would have entertain-

ed a single thought concerning the communication of ideas by

speech . The conveyance ofthought by looks, also, if never expe-

rienced by us, would have been necessarily deemed mysterious and

impossible. Yet very many thoughts are thus conveyed by every

person living; and with very great force ; and frequently with en-

tire precision. Nay, the countenance often discloses the whole

character at once.

The Angels communicate their thoughts to each other, we know,

because the Scriptures have declared the fact : that they may

communicate them to us, we have no solid reason to doubt. Of

the mode of communication, in either case, we know nothing ; and

are unable to conjecture any thing, but what is idle and useless .

But, that they may convey thoughts into our minds, as well as un-

derstand those, which arise in them, contravenes no analogy, and

no evidence.

VOL. I. 41

FALLEN ANGELS.

322 [ SER . XX.

Should it be said, that, when we communicate thoughts to each

other, we are conscious of the act, by which the thoughts are comти-

nicated to us , and of the presence, and agency, of the communicator ;

but that we are conscious , in no instance, of communication from

Angels, and never perceive their presence, or agency : whence it is

reasonably concluded, that Angels do not convey thoughts to our

minds : I admit the declaration as just ; but deny the inference,

derived from it by the objector. There is no proof from any thing,

with which we are acquainted, that thoughts cannot be conveyed to

us by a being, of whose presence, and agency, in conveying them,

we are not conscious .

In the Scriptures we are informed abundantly, that God, by his

Holy Spirit, communicates thoughts to mankind. But it is certain ,

that we have no consciousness of his presence, andagency, in com-

municating them. Of the thoughts themselves, we are indeed con-

scious ; but not of the source, whence they are derived. The

same doctrine, for ought that appears, is equally applicable to our

reception of thoughts from Angels.

6thly. If good Angels may with propriety be supposed to promote

our obedience ; evil Angels may with the same propriety be supposed

to prompt us to disobedience .

If the Agency of these two classes of beings should be exactly

balanced; it is plain, that we could suffer no injury. There is no

reason to conclude, however, that the influence of good Angels

does not, upon the whole, overbalance that of evil ones . But all ,

that is necessary to vindicate God, in the case supposed, ( if even

this is necessary) is, that we be not, upon the whole, subjected by

their joint agency to any disadvantage. That we are thus sub-

jected, the Scriptures furnish us not a single reason to believe ;

nor can it be reasonably believed, unless, perhaps, where judicial

blindness is inflicted as a punishment on an obstinate sinner. On

the contrary, there is sufficient reason to conclude from the mercy

of God, as unfolded in the Scriptures, that he always causes the

Scale in this case to preponderate in our favour.

Thus have I considered all the material objections, which I

think of , against the existence, and agency, of Angels, particular-

ly evil ones, suggested by human Philosophy ; and, if I mistake

not, have proved them to be unfounded. I proceed, therefore, to

a particular consideration of the doctrines, contained in the text.

In this passage of Scripture, we are informed,

I. That after the Angels were created, a part of them kept not

their first estate :

II. That they left their own habitation :

III. That they are confined in chains under darkness : and,

IV. That they are reserved in this state unto the judgment of the

great day.

These propositions I shall briefly examine in the order specified.

I. After the Angels were created, a part of them kept not their

first estate.

FALLEN ANGELS .

SER. XX .] 323

The Angels, who fell , were, in their first estate, of the same rank

and character, engaged in the same employments, and possessed

of the same happiness, which were enjoyed by their virtuous com-

panions. Accordingly, they are described by the same names in

1 Cor. xv. 24, and Ephes. vi. 10. This doctrine is also clearly

indicated in the text : where, in the original, it is said, that they

kept not their principality ; instead of their first estate ; as it is im-

properly rendered in our Bible. All these blessings, however, they

lost by rebelling against God. Ofthis great and wonderful event ;

a revolt in the heavenly world, and among the highest order of cre-

ated beings ; we have no regular history in the Scriptures. Still ,

we are abundantly assured by them, that it actually took place.

By various declarations, allusions, and hints, contained in them, we

are taught that Satan, an Angel of pre-eminent distinction in hea-

ven, rebelled, under the influence of pride and ambition, against

'his Maker. In this deplorable enterprize, we further learn, that

multitudes of the heavenly host united with him ; and with the same

disposition, violated the law, and revolted from the government, of

God. That pride and ambition were especially the sins, by which

Satan and his companions fell, is, I think, sufficiently evident from

1 Tim. iii . 6 : where St. Paul, speaking of a Bishop, says, he must

not be a novice, νεοφυτον, a new convert, lest, being puffed up with pride,

he fall into the condemnation of the Devil. In this passage it is

plainly asserted, that the Devil was condemned for his pride, and

it is fairly presumable, that the same sin was the source of condem-

nation to his companions. The revolt appears to have been but

one ; to have existed at one time ; and to have united those, who

shared in it, in the same guilt, as well as in the same undertaking.

II. They left their own habitation .

By this phraseology, heaven is perhaps intended ; or that happy

world, in which all the angels were originally united together

around the throne, and in the peculiar presence, of God. If this

sense be admitted, as by most persons it probably will be ; then it

would seem, that they voluntarily deserted this happy place, and

chose to withdraw themselves from its glorious blessings, rather

than continue under the government, from which they were derived.

If οικητήριον, the Greek word which is rendered habitation, denotes,.

as some divines have supposed, some other residence, or station,

assigned them in some other world: then it would seem, that they

left this residence, and the principality, or government, that is, the

office , or station, which they held ; refusing to perform the duty,

assigned them by their Creator. In either case, they were shut out

of Heaven ; and, as St. Peter informs us, were cast out by a final

banishment from God; and were never more permitted to return

to their former habitation. They had despised, and disturbed, the

happiness of heaven ; and therefore were permitted to enjoy it no

more. They were discontented with their blessings ; therefore

they were taken from them. They had revolted from their God;

therefore he cast them off.

FALLEN ANGELS.

324 [ SER. XX.

III. They are confined in chains under darkness .

Darkness is a state, obviously suitable for beings, to whom the

light of heaven was unsatisfactory and odious ; and chains are most

proper for beings, whose proud and wanton wishes were discontent-

ed with the glorious liberty of the sons of God. Both, also, united,

form a degradation, eminently fitted for beings, who, at the head of

the created universe, were impatiently ambitious of a higher station .

Both, at the same time, constitute a proper temporary punishment

for beings, who rebelled against the government of God himself ;

who kindled discord, even in heaven ; and to whom all their exalt-

edblessings stood for nothing, while any higher and richer bless-

ings remained.

IV. They are reserved unto the judgment of the great day.

The punishment and degradation of these evil beings, are not

completed.. They will hereafter be tried , and condemned, for all

the evils, which they will have wrought, or attempted, during the

continuance of this earthly system. These evils, however grati-

fying to them in the perpetration, will, after the judgment, return

upon their own heads : and, instead of the triumph for which they

hoped, and laboured, will cover them with eternal shame, and over-

whelm them in endless ruin. The chains, which they now wear,

are literally everlasting ; and will confine them unto the judgment,

so that they cannot escape ; and will confine them for ever in the

sufferance of that misery, to which they have destined themselves

by a voluntary devotion.

Such, generally, is the Scriptural account of the character and

allotments of evil Angels. It will be proper to add a few more

particulars, derived from the same source. The Leader or Prince,

of these evil beings, was the tempter of our first parents ; the au-

thor of all the miseries, and an instrumental cause of all the sins ,

which have followed that dreadful event. The same disposition ,

which manifested itself in his rebellion in the heavenly world, was

here directed in the same manner against the government of his

Maker : a disposition compounded of malice, baseness, and treach-

ery. Hence he is styled in the Scriptures, the adversary ; the ca-

lumniator ; the father of lies ; the destroyer ; a murderer, and a

liar, from the beginning. All his followers sustain the same dread-

ful and detestable character. So far as has been in their power,

they have deceived, betrayed, and destroyed the race ofmen ; have

been uniformly the enemies of God and mankind; have tempted

them unceasingly to sin: and have especially persecuted and dis-

tressed the children of God. They powerfully excited the perse-

cution, and crucifixion, of the Redeemer ; and the sufferings of

his Apostles and their followers. From that time to the present,

they have unceasingly pursued the same malignant course ; and

will hereafter, so far as they are permitted , delude, distress, and de-

stroy, unto the end of the world .

FALLEN ANGELS.

SER. XX. ] 325

REMARKS.

I. In this passage, we find a short, but affecting account of one

of the most stupendous events, which have taken place in the Uni-

verse.

Avast multitude of Intelligent beings, of the first order in the

divine kingdom, excelling all other orders in knowledge, power,

and splendour, and unrivalled in the favour of God, rose up in re-

bellion against their Creator, Benefactor, and Sovereign ; lost their

pristine honour and happiness, their primeval virtue and dignity ;

sunk down to the depths of sin, shame, and misery ; and incurred

the endless hatred and contempt of all good beings.

From this singular and amazing event, many interesting truths

may be learned by us.

1st. No created faculties, no finite holiness or happiness, furnish

sufficient inducements to prevent creatures from apostacy.

Angels fell. All others, therefore, may fall ; and, if left to them-

selves, will fall. The true reason, why the spirits of just men made

perfect, and the innumerable company of holy Angels, persevere in

their obedience, is evidently, I think, not their own inherent per-

fection, but the promise ofGod and his almighty power, especially

exerted to secure them from sin. Without this safeguard, they

would, at least in my view, be utterly unsafe, and plainly exposed

to destruction . We cannot but see, therefore, with what forcible

propriety our Saviour has taught us to pray after this manner.

Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil ! If Angels

needed a continual exertion ofdivine power to preserve them from

falling ; how much more do we, frail and feeble as we are, prone

bynature to sin, and easily overcome by temptation, need the same

exertions for our daily and hourly safety ! How constantly, and

earnestly, ought we to offer up these petitions ! How unceasingly

ought we to beseech God to keep our feet from falling, our eyes

from tears , and our souls from death ; and to implore the influence

of his Holy and Good Spirit to make the meditations of our hearts ,

and the words of our mouths , acceptable in his sight. He only can

preserve the bruised reed from falling asunder, and the dimly burn-

ing flax from being extinguished in everlasting darkness .

2dly. We are here taught, that pride could disturb the peace and

happiness of heaven, and prove the cause of endless ruin to a mul-

titude of inhabitants.

How great an evil then , is pride ! It overcast, in a moment, all

the beautiful and eternal prospects ; it eclipsed, in a moment, all the

splendour, virtue, and dignity, of Angels. What a vast, what an im-

measurable ruin did it here accomplish ! What a change did it make

inthe Universe ! What an amazing change did it produce in those,

bywhom it was exercised! How ought we, then, to tremble at the

indulgence ofpride ; the sin, to which we are probably more prone

than to anyother! More, or less, it occupies every heart ; manifests

ייי

326 FALLEN ANGELS. [ SER. XX .

itself in all the conduct of the children of men ; and intrudes itself

into their piety, their benevolence, their prayers, their songs, their

alms, their humility, and their repentance. If Angels were so

odious in the sight of God, on account of their pride ; how odious

*must we be ! If they were ruined by it for ever; what will be-

come of us ?

3dly. We are further taught, that no creatures are so necessary

or important, to God, as to be securefrom his anger when they sin

against him.

Angels sinned , and were destroyed. Who, then, if found of the

same character, will escape ?

Men often satisfy themselves, that they are safe in the falsely in-

tended reflection, that God never made men to damn them. I have

used the words, which I have frequently heard used to express this

miserable refuge of lies . It is undoubtedly true, in the strictest

sense, that God never created either men, or any other beings, for

this end ; but it is equally true, that he has created men, and An-

gels also, who, after they were created, sinned ; and who, for their

sin, were condemned to final perdition. The phraseology, appar-

ently true, is substantially false ; and is used only for the purpose

of deceiving ourselves and others. The Angels might certainly

have used this language with more seeming force, and justice, than

we can; but it could not save them, and, therefore, certainly can-

not save us .

The number of wicked men, often relied on in no small degree as

a foundation of hope and safety, is merely a foundation of sand.

The number of the wicked Angels did not avail them at all. Every

one of the rebels was destroyed as absolutely, as if no other had

been concerned in the rebellion. Their number, also, was im-

mensely great ; and one of them was of more worth and import-

ance, than many men united.

5thly. The punishment of the evil Angels is not disciplinary .

They have been already punished at least six thousand years;

yet, instead of being reformed, they have grown worse continually ;

and will grow worse, not only till the day ofjudgement, but proba-

bly for ever. The Scriptures inform us, that the punishment of

evil Angels is the same with that of evil men. The punishment of

evil men, therefore, is not disciplinary, but punishment properly so

called ; punishment designed to reward the sins, not to amend the

characters , of either Angels or men. Both are hopeless of amend-

ment ; yet both may be useful, although dreadful, examples to the

rest of the universe. There is not a reason to believe, that sin

was ever renounced, or a sinner reformed, except by the almighty

power of the Spirit of Grace.

II. We learn from these observations, that opposition to God, is

supremely odious and deformed.

This is the fundamental characteristic of Apostacy in both An-

gels and Men. Of this, the diabolical character is made up. How

FALLEN ANGELS. 327

SER. XX.Ji

odious and deformed is it most justly accounted ! How false ; how

malicious ; how cruel ; how base ; how detestable ! Let it be

remembered, that all opposition to God, is, in nature and sub-

stance, the same ; and that it differs not in kind, but merely in

degree.

III. In how many respects do wicked men resemble wicked An-

gels! Like them, do wicked men exalt themselves against God, hate

his government , oppose his designs, and revile his character ; in-

flate themselves with pride ; murmur at their own allotments ; covet

the enjoyments of others ; corrupt their fellow -creatures ; tempt

them to iniquity; and defraud them of endless life. Like them,

do they hate, envy, injure, calumniate, and destroy. How much

of the history of this great world has resembled a history of

fiends ! How much of it has been a history of falsehood, fraud,

treachery, pollution, slanders, contentions, murders, oppression ,

slaughter, irreligion, impiety, profaneness, and blasphemy! How

readily have evil men, like evil angels, undertaken to rival God;

and demanded the homage, worship, and obedience, due to him

alone!

How laboriously do Infidel writers, even now, oppose their

Maker, and their Redeemer ; an and strive to shut both their fellow-

men and themselves out of heaven ! Particularly, with what fre-

quency, and constancy, do they repeat the very falsehood, which

was first told to the parents of mankind : Although ye disobey God,

ye shall not surely die. How continually do wicked men, by ar-

gument, ridicule, eloquence, and example, tempt each other to sin

against God ! How great a part of their life and labours do multi-

tudes spend in this employment ! Where can we find a moral dis- *

tinction between this conduct, and that of fallen Angels ?

IV. The same punishment, which is reserved for evil Angels, is

accordingly reservedfor evil men.

This punishment was prepared, at first, for the Devil and his

Angels. But Christ, the final Judge of the quick and the dead, has

informed us, that impenitent men shall, at the great day, stand with

them on the left hand ; be included in the same sentence ; and de-

part to the same place pla of torment. Both will have been embarked

in one cause ; will have sustained one character ; and will, there-

fore, share in one allotment of wo. Perhaps there is not a more

affecting, more overwhelming consideration to a serious mind, than

this : that evil men will hereafter be confined in the same habita-

tion with these hateful beings ; who are possessed of a disposition

to do every thing, which is injurious to God, and their fellow-crea-

tures, and to perpetrate all the crimes dictated by malice, cruelty,

deceit and revenge. To be imprisoned in this world with a collec-

tion of abandoned villains ; to be hated and despised, deceived and

betrayed, oppressed and insulted, wounded to the soul with un-

ceasing cruelty and treachery, and broken down by scorn and in-

FALLEN ANGELS.

328 [ SER. XX.

solence, even for our present momentary life ; would, I think, be a

lot sufficiently dreadful to lacerate the soul with agony. What then

must be the nature and misery of a confinement with these power-

ful, active, sagacious beings ; whose minds are all malice, fraud,

and cruelty ; and whose endless being is only a succession ofrage,

revenge, and despair !

SERMON XXI.

CREATION. THE EARTH.

GENESIS i . 1. In the beginning God created the Heaven and the earth.

IN the four preceding sermons, I have briefly considered the

several things, intended in the Jewish use of the word Heaven ;

and made some observations concerning the character and circum-

stances of those beings , who either are, or have been, Inhabitants of

the Supreme Heaven. The next subject of examination in our

progress, is the World, which we inhabit.

In the history, given by Moses of this great work, we are in-

formed ,

In the first place, that, together with the rest of the material sys-

tem, it was made of nothing ; or, in other words, the materials were

brought into existence, of which the world was afterwards composed.

That we might be at no loss concerning this truth, Moses has

taught it distinctly in Genesis ii . 3 ; where he informs us, that God

rested from all his works, which he created, and made ; or, as in the

original, created, to make. Of the energy, by which this mighty

effort was accomplished, the Psalmist gives us a most sublime

conception, when he says, concerning the Creator, that He spake,

and it was done ; he commanded, and it stoodfast. These mate-

rials, after they were first brought into being, were, originally, a

mere mass of confusion, in the language of the Divine Writer,

without form, and void ; and are styled, successively, the earth,

the waters , and the deep.

Secondly. The first element, separated from the Chaos, was light ;

the most wonderful, and the most useful, of all material objects.

At this time, it seems not to have been gathered into any common

receptacle ; as, according to the received philosophy, it is at the

present time ; but to have been diffused extensively through the

universe. It is possible, that this may now be its real state; and

that the sun, and stars, instead of being in themselves luminous,

may merely possess the power of originating its motion, and di-

rection. That period of darkness, which intervened between the

creation of the Chaos, and the production of light ; and that pe-

riod of light, which preceded the next return of darkness, consti-

tuted the first day. In reference to this event, the Israelites were

commanded to celebrate their Sabbath from evening to evening : this

being the true course of a natural day.

Thirdly. The next event in this great work was the constitution

ofthe Firmament, and a division of the chaotic mass into two great

VOL. I. 42

EARTH.

330 [ SER. XXI

parts, one beneath and one above the Firmament. This was the

work of the second day.

Fourthly. This was followed by the separation of the landfrom

the waters ; the land being named Earth; and the great collections

ofwater, Seas .

To this, immediately succeeded the creation of grass and herbs ,

of shrubs and trees . These were all formed with the power of re-

production, and of continuing their respective kinds in this manner

to the end of the world. By a wonderful process of vegetation ,

they were enabled to yield, each its own proper seed : a minute

particle, which being committed to the earth, a plant of the same

nature and properties regularly springs up, and gradually advances

to its perfection. Thus vegetables have existed in every age, of

the same kinds, which were formed on the third day of the Crea-

tion; and have ever constituted much of the food of both men and

animals, and not a little part of the pleasures, enjoyed by both.

With the creation of these, terminated the third day.

Fifthly. On the fourth day were created the lights of heaven, par-

ticularly the sun and moon .

As I have heretafore considered these, in the discourse on the

Heavens; it will be unnecessary to repeat here what I have so

lately said. I shall, therefore, confine myself to a few additional

observations .

These luminaries were set in the firmament of heaven, to divide

the day from the night ; and to be for signs and for seasons, for

days and for years. Accordingly, they have been the great means

of distributing time, from the beginning, into all its important divi-

sions ; enabling us to form the chronology ofthe world, to ascertain

the order and connexion of all historical events, and to regulate,

by correct dates, our various useful business.

The Sun, at the same time, is the great fountain of light to this

world, and to all those, which are united in our system ; and thus

enables the inhabitants to pursue successfully their necessary em-

ployments. It is the Parent, also, of that universal vegetation,

with which the earth is so beautifully adorned, and on which, we

are so obviously dependent for the existence of health, comfort,

and life. Not less absolutely, and still more immediately, is our

life, together with our activity, dependent on the presence, warmth,

and energy, of this fountain of light. In a word, whatever lives

and moves, lives and moves by the influence of the sun ; and with-

out his presence, eternal night, and eternal winter, would reign with

boundless desolation over this habitable globe .

The moon, also, is inestimably useful to mankind in the beauti-

ful light which she gives by night, in the important changes, which

she accomplishes in the ocean, and the atmosphere ; and in be-

coming, in connexion with the other luminaries of heaven, the

source of a great part of our skill in Navigation, and our knowledge

of Geography, and Astronomy.

EARTH.

SER. XXI . ] 331

Sixthly. When the earth was thus prepared to be a habita-

tion of living beings ; God said, on the morning of the fifth day,

Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath

life ; and fowl, that may fly above the earth in the open firmament

of heaven. Immediately the ocean, and the air, were filled with

their respective inhabitants. The innumerable useful and delight-

ful purposes, which they were destined to accomplish, and which

accordingly they have accomplished to the present time, it will be

unnecessary to particularize on the present occasion.

Seventhly. On the sixth, and last, day of the creation , the Earth

was replenished with the four- footed beasts , and creeping things, by

which it has been ever since inhabited. These, also, so useful to

man, and so indispensable to his comfortable existence, are so

well known, as not to demand any account of their nature or des-

tination, from me.

Eighthly. All these works of the Divine hand were severally pro-

nounced by their great Author to be very good. Such indeed was

the original nature of them all. This world was formed to be a

delightful residence. Its surface was beautiful ; its soil fertile with-

out decay ; its seasons vernal ; its atmosphere, waters, and pro-

ductions, pregnant with life ; and all its inhabitants, pacific, useful,

and happy. In the country of Eden, the Lord God planted also

a garden, to become the appropriate residence of the first man,

and here he made to grow every tree, that is pleasant to the sight,

and good for food. This Paradise, was the beautiful Metropolis

of a beautiful world.

REMARKS.

From these observations, we learn,

1st. How mighty and majestic a work was the creation of this

world!

The Earth is a vast and solid globe, composed of particles, so

small as to be imperceptible to us, united by the energy which

calledthem into being, and holden together by the same energy

in a manner wholly incomprehensible. This globe is hung upon

nothing ; and moved through the fields of Ether with amazing ve-

locity, and yet with infinite ease,by the hand of its Creator. Too

great to be moved at all, perhaps, by all created Intelligences, it

has yet for many thousand years been rolled on with perfect ease

by Him, who fainteth not, neither is weary. It has also moved al-

ways in its own place, and in perfect harmony with other worlds .

Its motion, at the same time, is so regular and undisturbed, as to

be imperceptible to its inhabitants ; and yet so rapid, as to outrun

every human conception.

In a manner not less wonderful, it turns its face continually to

the sun; and derives light, and warmth, and energy, for the com-

fort of its inhabitants, the production of its fruits, and the accom-

plishment of the business, allotted to the race of man.

EARTH.

332 [SER. XXI .

How expressive ofinfinite Power, were the acts of calling it into

being, uniting its parts, preserving its structure, moving it through

the boundless void, and regulating with perfect harmony all its

various affections !

How expressive of infinite Wisdom is the endless diversity of

beings, which it contains ; their structure, qualities, and uses ; their

relations, and dependences ; their wants, and supplies ; their end-

lessly various beauty, novelty, and grandeur !

Nor is infinite Goodness less wonderfully manifested by the boun-

ty, every where displayed, in providing for the least as well as the

greatest ; in making the least, that it might be providedfor ; and in

giving to each its own peculiar happiness. How evidently are all

these things the work of a God!

2dly. How wonderful is the Order of things, which was establish-

ed at the Creation .

This subject may be advantageously divided into two parts :

The order of things , which is permanent ; and that, which is sub-

ject to perpetual revolutions .

Ofthe former class , are the stable position of the globe at given

distances from the heavenly bodies ; the position of its poles ; its

regular motions round its axis, and round the sun, by which the

revolutions of the seasons, and the returns of day and night, are

accomplished ; the steady attractions of gravitation and cohesion,

which produce the stability of the earth itself , and all its great

affections . All these are indispensable to the existing state of the

world and its inhabitants. The order of these things I call perma-

nent, although subject to many changes, and in several instances a

mere series of changes ; because they are stable, regular, and un-

varying in their nature.

The other and more mutable course of things respects the ani-

mal, vegetable, and mineral, kingdoms ; the state of the atmosphere,

the ocean, and the surface of the earth. These all are subjects

ofunceasing changes ; and several of them ofcontinual decay, and

continual renovation . Plants and animals are formed to renew and

perpetuate their kinds through an indefinite period ; and, were the

date of the earth to be sufficiently protracted, to continue them for

ever. Nor are mineral substances, so far as they are liable to

decay, unprovided with the means of re-production. Stones decay,

and return to earth ; and earth is petrified, or hardened into stone.

Ores are supposed to be exhausted and renewed. Gems, and

other beautiful substances, are multiplied ; and worn out. Soils

are furnished anew for the most luxuriant vegetation. The ocean

is also, in a sense, emptied, and filled again. From that great store-

house of waters, vapour perpetually ascends, and is discharged on

the earth, in rain, snow, and hail, in mists and dews : while the

earth, through its various channels, returns again its tribute of

waters to the ocean. Thus, in the language ofthe wisest of men ;

"Generation goeth, and generation cometh ;

But the earth doth ever abide .

EARTH .

SER. XXI .] 333

The Sun also riseth, the Sun also setteth ,

And hasteth to the place where it rose ;

It passeth to the south : again it circleth to the north .

Round and round goeth the wind,

And ever repeateth its circuits.

All the rivers run down into the sea ;

Yet the sea doth not overflow :

To the place , whence the rivers go forth ,

To the same, to flow again , do they return.

All the things , thus at their task, no man can recount ;

The eye would not be able to behold them,

Nor would the ear be competent to hear them. "

3dly. How wonderful are the Uses of the various things , which

constitute this earthly system !

How important to mankind is the Mineral Kingdom ! How indis-

pensable is the soil for vegetation ; the stones and clay for build-

ing ; the peat and coal for fuel ; the metals for all the necessary

and ornamental arts of life, and for the existence of almost every

thing, which we name a convenience, or a comfort. Iron, alone ,

is indispensable to the employments, and even to the existence, of

civilized life. Without it, Agriculture, Commerce, arts, and science,

would dwindle speedily into nothing ; and, but for its aid, would

never have been.

To minerals, also, we are indebted for medicines, of the most

valuable nature ; indispensable to the restoration of health, and the

continuance of life .

What, then, shall be said of the Vegetable Kingdom ; of grass, as

food for cattle ; and herbs, and grains, as the food of men ; of the

flax, cotton, and hemp, with which we are clothed ; of trees, as the

materials of fuel, building, and fencing ; and as the means of accom-

plishing a multitude of other purposes, equally demanded by ne-

cessity and comfort ?

Finally, What shall be said of the Animal Kingdom ? of the horse,

the ox, the cow, the camel, and the sheep, of the furry tribes, and

the silk- worm ; all of which so largely contribute either to the hus-

bandry of man, his food, his clothing, or his pleasure ?

Nor ought we, in considering the nature of earthly things, to

forget them, as the delightful means of Beauty and Grandeur.

Were all the interesting diversities of colour, and form, to disap-

pear; how unsightly, dull, and wearisome, would be the aspect of

the world! The pleasures, conveyed to us by the endless varieties ,

with which these sources of beauty are presented to the eye, are

so much things of course, and exist so much without intermission,

that we scarcely think either of their nature, their number, or the

great proportion, which they constitute in the whole mass of our

enjoyment. But were an inhabitant of this country removed from

its delightful scenery to the midst of an Arabian desert ; a bound-

less expanse of sand ; a waste, spread with uniform desolation, en-

livened by the murmur of no stream, and cheered by the beauty of

no verdure ; although he might live in a palace, and riot in splen

EARTH.

334 [ SER. XXI .

dour and luxury, he would, I think, find life a dull, wearisome ,

melancholy round of existence ; and amid all his gratifications ,

would sigh for the hills and valleys of his native land, the brooks ,

and rivers, the living lustre of the Spring, and the rich glories of

the Autumn. The ever-varying brilliancy and grandeur of the

landscape, and the magnificence of the sky, sun, moon, and stars,

enter more extensively into the enjoyment of mankind, than we,

perhaps, ever think, or can possibly apprehend, without frequent

and extensive investigation . This beauty and splendour of the

objects around us, it is ever to be remembered, is not necessaryto

their existence, nor to what we commonly intend by their useful-

ness. It is, therefore, to be regarded as a source of pleasure, gra-

tuitously superinduced upon the general nature of the objects

themselves; and, in this light, as a testimony of the divine good-

ness peculiarly affecting.

Still more deeply, ought we to regard this part of the Creation ,

as exhibiting, inthe most convincing manner, the Being and Agency

ofGod.

How plainly, how delightfully, how solemnly, is this glorious

Being seen every where in these works of his hands ! All these

changes are the result of a cause, adequate to their production .

The living, acting thing, called Man, is never directly perceived

by other men. We see motions ; and know that there is one who

moves . We hear a voice ; and know that there is one who speaks .

We perceive actions ; and know that there is an agent who gives

them birth. This agent we denominate Man. So in every place,

in every thing, and during every moment, we behold throughout

the creation, a perpetual progress of most wonderful events ; and

know that an Agent, to us invisible, but adequate to their produc-

tion, effectuates them all. This agent, we call God ; and discern

his being, character, and presence, as directly, and clearly, as we

discern the being, character, and presence, of man. Thus all

things hold out to every attentive eye, the living, acting, governing,

Jehovah .

At the same time, this earthly system strongly displays the An-

ger of God against the sins of men.

Amidst all these pleasing manifestations of the Creator, the

world around us furnishes, also, many proofs of his displeasure .

The storm plunges multitudes in the deep. The lightning destroys

its victims in a moment. The famine sweeps its millions to the

grave. The volcano overwhelms towns and cities with deluges of

fire. The pestilence, walking in darkness, drives before it whole

nations into eternity : While death, both with and without the aid

of these ministers, empties, once in thirty years, the world of its

inhabitants . What awful, as well as decisive proofs , are here

furnished, that the Maker of all things regards our race with

severe and terrible displeasure ! How solemnly do they impress

this humiliating truth upon every serious mind ! How forcibly

EARTH.

SER . XXI .] 335

do they summon us to repent, and reform, that we may find

mercy! There is still another point of view, in which these works ought

to be remembered on the present occasion. Every thing in crea-

tion and providence, appears not only to be useful, but to have many

uses , and to answer very many purposes. God, so far as we can

understand his agency, accomplishes his ends by the most direct,

the simplest, and the fewest means.

" In human works, though laboured on with pain,

Athousand movements scarce one purpose gain ;

In God's, one single can its end produce,

Yet serves to second too, some other use . "*

Thus Water and Iron become means of ends innumerable .

The latter enters, to a vast extent, into almost all human arts and

concerns : while the former is almost every where diffused through

the great system of benefits, which God has provided for mankind.

Agreat part of the usefulness, found in the objects of this world,

arises from the Order established among them, and mentioned un-

der a former head of discourse. From this order, springs all the

forecast of the human mind. By observing the regular succession

of causes and effects around us, we learn to judge, with a good de-

gree of correctness, from past events, concerning those which are

future. The nature of the seasons, exhibited in their past revolu-

tions , teaches us how to prepare ourselves against both heat and

cold ; to sow our seed in the spring, and gather our harvests in the

summer and autumn ; to shelter ourselves from the inclemencies of

the sky; to make the necessary provision for ourselves and our fa-

milies ; and to adjust, universally, the arts and business of life .

By the regularity of the system, all our profitable employments are

wholly directed . Without this guide, we could plan nothing ; we

could accomplish nothing ; and should literally be unable to con-

jecture what a day, an hour, or a moment, would bring forth. Our

existence would be a mere succession of accidents . Nor can we

conceive how, in such a state, any means could be furnished, by

which we might either enjoy comfort, or prolong our lives .

From the same source, arises, in a chief measure, that full, un-

answerable proof of the existence , and character, of God, which is

presented by these works of his hands . The wisdom ofGod is prin-

cipally seen in the design, and contrivance, exhibited throughout

the globe. But contrivance and design, appear only in the adap-

tation of means to ends : and wisdom is visible only in the choice

of good ends, and of fit means to accomplish them. I have alrea-

dy remarked, that without this regularity, our existence would be a

mere succession of accidents . This would be equally true of the

whole course of events . There would be, visibly, neither means,

nor ends. If second causes existed, they would be unperceived ;

and their efficacy, being continually variable, could never be dis-

Essay on Man, part i. line 53.

EARTII .

336 [SER. XXI

cerned. All things, therefore, would naturally be attributed to

chance. Who, then, would be able to refute the doctrines ofEpi-

curus ; or to prove satisfactorily the perfections, or even the ex-

istence, ofGod?

4thly. How interesting an object is the destination of this world !

The Earth was designed to be the habitation of immortal beings,

whose numbers, the human mind is unable to limit. Every one of

these is an heir either of endless happiness or endless wo. All of

them, also, have apostatized from God, and exposed themselves to

final condemnation. In this state of things, this world became the

theatre of the most wonderful work, which, so far as our knowledge

extends, has ever existed. The Son of God descended from Hea-

ven , and, passing by the angels, took upon him the seed of Abraham ;

suffered the distress of a humble, persecuted life; died on the cross ;

and was buried in the grave ; to expiate the sins of men. Incon-

sequence of this expiation, the Spirit of truth has here shed his re-

newing influence on the human soul; and has sanctified, and will

hereafter sanctify, a multitude, which no man can number, of all na-

tions , kindreds, and tongues . All these, by a patient continuance in

well- doing , will seek for glory , honour, and immortality ; and will

find, a new, eternal life. By their union to Christ, and their in-

terest in his mediation, they will hereafter become, together with

the angels who kept their first estate, inhabitants of the Supreme

Heaven, and attendants upon the throne of God. This is a desti-

ny, to which, so far as we are informed, no other virtuous beings

will ever be raised. Thus this world is a scene of transactions ,

such as probably never existed in any other : and its inhabitants

are heirs of glory and happiness, in which they will be rivalled only

by the Angels of God.

5thly . These considerations exhibit the unreasonableness of seve-

ral Objections , made against the Divine origin of the Scriptures .

First. The representation of the Scriptures , that the Creation was

accomplished progressively, and not instantaneously, is declared to

be unworthy of God.

It will be admitted, that Moses has taught, not only in the most

explicit, but in the most sublime manner, that it was perfectly easy

for God to create the world in an instant. Let there be light , said

this glorious Being, and there was light : Let there be a firmament,

and there was a firmament. Let the waters be separated from the

waters, and they were separated. He, who can do these things in

this manner, can do any thing in any manner, that shall please him .

No other representation of power was ever to be compared with

this. Nor has any one of those, who have followed Moses, whether

inspired or uninspired, rivalled him in sublimity of narration.

But, while he exhibits the omnipotence of God in so impressive

a manner, he gives us an account of the Creation, which is both

intelligible , and useful. Had the work of Creation been instanta-

neously performed; it would have been totally incomprehensible

EARTH.

SER . XXI.J 337

even by the Angels, who were witnesses of it and the history of it

would have been totally useless to ourselves ; except merely as

settling the point, that the world was created. The first verse in

the Bible, would have contained the whole. Nor could any thing

have been added to it with propriety, unless that God called the

universe into existence by his word. How much more interesting,

comprehensible, and delightful, is the whole chapter, in which that

verse is contained ! In a far higher proportion was the actual pro-

gress, and order, of this great work intelligible, interesting, and de-

lightful , to the Sons of God, who were witnesses of its accomplish-

ment. They saw, and understood, much of what was done : we

read, and understand, not a little. The history of the Creation, as

written by Moses, is the noblest history, which was ever written by

man.

With perfect simplicity it unites supreme grandeur ; and

has accordingly received the highest testimony of Criticism, from

the time of Longinus to the present day.

It is further to be remembered, that by means of this order of

Creation, the Sabbath, the great source of piety, and eternal life, to

man, was ushered into the world with a solemnity , unrivalled and in-

finite. God rested, say the divine writers, from all his works, which

he created and made ; the morning stars sang together, and all the

sons of God shouted for joy. What a Sabbath was this ! Who,

with such an example before him, can refuse to keep this day holy

unto the Lord ? Who does not see, that the very existence of this

example, and all its consequent influence, arose out of the order

of the Creation, recited by Moses ?

Secondly . Another objection, urged by Infidels against the Divine

origin of the Scriptures , is derived from the date, assigned by them

to the Creation.

" Can it be supposed," say these men, " that God existed so

many millions of ages , alone ; and began the work of creating, on-

ly six thousand years ago ? " This question has been often asked

with confidence, and even with triumph. But it has been always

asked without good sense, or consideration. Yet, as there are per-

sons, who will ask it, and others who will suppose it to possess

real weight ; it will not be improper to give it a momentary atten-

tion. I answer then,

( In the first place) That the Scriptures do not assert the existence

of created things to have been begun at the time, when this world

was made ; and there is no presumption against the formation of

this world at the time specified. There is no more reason to con-

clude, a priori, that worlds may be created at different times, but

must all be brought into existence co-etaneously, than there is to

form the same decision concerning trees, animals, or men.

( 2dly .) If all things were created at the time, specified by Mo-

ses ; then it is certain, that the Creation existed as soon as was pos-

sible. Between the eternity of God, and any supposable date of

Creation , or commencement of time, there is, there can be, no pos-

VOL. I. 43

EARTH.

338 [ SER. XXI .

sible relation ; and therefore no possible comparison. To the

eternity of Him, with whom one day is exactly as a thousand years ,

and a thousand years as one day ; who inhabiteth eternity at once ;

whose duration is an omnipresent Now ; our successive existence,

and the periods by which it is reckoned, have no reference what-

ever. To Him, time and date have no relation, and are obviously

nothing.

(3dly. ) Had the world been created at the commencement ofany

imaginablepast period ; suppose a billion of years ; at the end of six

thousand years from its first creation, the same objection would

have been made against the date of its existence with exactly the same

force. It might then have been asked, with exactly the same pro-

priety, " Can it be supposed, that God existed so many millions of

ages alone ; and began the work of creating, only six thousand

years ago ? " The objectors appear not to perceive, that by reced-

ing into past duration, they approach no nearer to a goal ; but that

while they amuse themselves with the dream of advancing towards

a satisfactory limit, the same vast still expands immeasurably be-

fore them.

From the regular order of things, Infidels have also determined,

Thirdly, That the Universe is eternal, and have hence denied the

revelation of the Scriptures .

St. Peter has taught us, that in the last days there shouldbe scoff-

ers , walking after their own lusts , and saying, Where is the promise

of his coming ? For, since the Fathers fell asleep, all things con-

tinue as they were from the beginning of the World. This predic-

tion, we ourselves see verified. There have long been, there are

now, just such scoffers, just such objectors. The regular order of

things, established in this world, has long been the source of per-

tinacious opposition to the word, the government, and even the ex-

istence, of God ; and the design of the opposition has uniformly

been to overthrow the promise, and the probability, ofhis coming

to Judgment.

The general doctrine of these men has been this : " The mate-

rials of the universe were self - existent and eternal. By means of

these materials, fate, necessity, destiny, or a blind succession of

causes, have produced such beings and events, as have hitherto

existed. " At the same time, another class of Infidels pronounce

all such beings and events to be the result of mere chance. Regu-

lar as the present system is ; they professedly find in it sufficient

irregularity to warrant them in making this conclusion. Singular,

indeed, must be that state of things, which is sufficiently regular to

support the former of these doctrines, and sufficiently irregular to

warrant the latter. According to these schemes, taken together,

there neither is, nor can be, any proof of the existence and govern-

ment of God, either in the present, or in any supposable, state of

things. The only remaining mode, by which the Creator can

make himself known to mankind, is Revelation ; and the possibility

EARTH .

SER. XXI . ] 339

of this, several of these men roundly deny. Men, indeed, make

known themselves to each other, every day, by speaking, moving,

and acting. Even common modesty, as well as common sense,

could not, one would think , believe this to be beyond the power,

and skill , of the omnipotent and omniscient Creator of men.

The two schemes of existence, here specified, have been suffi-

ciently examined in the second of these discourses. All that I have

intended here, was barely to remind you of the manner, in which

men of this character have thought proper to reason ; and to show

you, that their views of the universe, and its Author, flow from the

heart, and not from the head.

Fourthly. Infidels object the Miracles , recorded in the Scriptures,

against their divine origin ; on the ground, that there is an univer-

sal presumption against the existence of a miracle .

Those, which are styled the laws of nature, were, it will be re-

membered, subsequent in their existence to the Creation. This

work could not, therefore, be in any sense conformed to them ; but

was an immediate act of Divine power ; absolutely new, conform-

ed to no analogy, and existing in a manner wholly miraculous .

What'is thus true of the work of Creation, at large, is equally true

of the act, by which each individual thing, originally created, was

brought into being. There have, therefore, been many millions

of miraculous productions ; and in this vast number of instances ,

miracles have been certainly wrought. Of course, there is the

strongest presumption of their existence in other cases. We know

that they have been actually wrought, when there was a sufficient

occasion ; and cannot rationally doubt, that on every other such

occasion they would be wrought again. Nothing more, therefore,

can be necessary to prove their existence, than fair unexceptiona-

ble testimony.

6thly. If this great work is thus wonderful ; how wonderful, how

glorious must be its Author !

All these things, He contrived and executed. All of them are

merely pictures, or archetypes, of the thoughts, originally existing

in the Uncreated Mind. Whatever is beautiful, useful, majestic ,

or exalted, is only a display of the beauty, excellence, greatness,

and sublimity, of Divine perfection. How naturally do our first

Parents exclaim, in the language of the great English Poet,

" These are thy glorious works, Parent of good,

Almighty! thine this universal frame,

Thus wondrous fair ; thyself how wondrous then,

Unspeakable ! "

What an astonishing act must it have been to create a world, its

furniture and its inhabitants, together with all their natures and

qualities ; and to prepare them for all their successive operations

many of these inhabitants destined to live, and many of these ope-

rations destined to affect them, throughout eternity.

What a Mind must that be, which could contain an exact, as

EARTH.

340 [SER. XXI.

well as comprehensive, scheme of all the parts , characteristical

qualities, and operations, of such a work ; which, without confu-

sion, or mistake, could see through the whole, and discern every

consequence, even in the remotest ages of being, which could so

exactly prescribe the nature, determine the operations, and limit

the number of parts, however great, however minute ; and in the

progress of duration find no cause for the least change in the work,

or the least deviation from the system !

Such are the views, whichjustly arise from the contemplation of

our world, as it now is . How much more forcibly would they have

been impressed on our minds, had we lived in the same world, as it

came fresh and fair from the hands of the Creator, when He sur-

veyed every thing, that he had done, and pronounced it very good !

How delightfully should we have been affected by the objects, con-

tained in the present world, had we been superior to death, and des-

tined to live for ever; had we been planted in Eden, where the air, the

earth, and the waters, teemed with life ; and immortality breathed in

the winds, flowed in the streams, ripened in the fruits, and exhaled

from the flowers ! At the side of our first Parents , and encircled by

Paradise, how instinctively should we have exclaimed, Worthy art

thou, O Lord, to receive blessing, and glory, and honour, and power,

for thou hast made all things , and for thy pleasure they are, and

were created !

The source of all these wonders, is the Lord Jesus Christ. For

by Kim were all things created, that are in Heaven and that are in

earth, visible and invisible, whether they be Thrones , or Dominions,

or Principalities , or Powers ; all things were created by him, and

for him ; and he is before all things ; and by him all things consist.

To him, therefore, is this admiration and glory due ; and to him

the bedience, confidence, and worship, which the Creator of the

uni ersejustly challenges from his Intelligent Creation.

SERMON XXII.

CREATION. -MAN.

GENESIS i . 26, 27. -And God said, Let us make Man in our image, after our like-

ness; and let them have dominion over thefish of the sea, and over the fowl ofthe air,

and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creep-

eth upon the earth. So God created Man in his own image ; in the image of God

created He him : male and female, created He them.

IN several preceding discourses, I have considered the forma-

tion of the Heavens , the Character and Circumstances of Angels ,

both Virtuous and Fallen, and the Creation of the World, in which

we dwell. The next subject of our investigation, is Man. This

subject, though far less splendid than several of the preceding

themes of contemplation, is yet peculiarly interesting to us. Every

thing that relates to it, must directly and intimately concern our-

selves ; and nothing of this nature can be, to us, uninvested with

serious importance, or undeserving of our particular attention .

Nor is this the only point of view, in which Man claims a high re-

gard. God himself has bestowed an attention upon them, which has

not been given even to angels themselves. Angels, when they fell,

were banished for ever from the presence and favour of their Crea-

tor. But, when Man had fallen, the Son of God descended from

Heaven ; assumed our nature ; lived in this world a suffering life ;

and died a shameful death ; that we might be saved. From the

grave, also, He arose on the third day ; ascended to Heaven ; sat

down at the right hand of God the Father ; and became Head over

all things for the benefit of his Church. Angels themselves are

employed by Him in promoting this mighty work ; and are all mi-

nistering spirits , sent forth to minister for them, who shall be heirs

of salvation . For men, Heaven, shut to the Apostate Angels, is

again opened. For Man, also, when the earth and all the works

that are therein, shall be burnt up, and the heavens being onfire shall

be dissolved; new heavens , and a new earth, like the fabled Phœnix

out of its ashes, shall arise, in which righteousness shall dwell for

ever.

Man, therefore, notwithstanding his humble origin, and guilty

character, is an object, rendered highly important on account of

the peculiar regard, exhibited to him by his Maker. At the same

time , we ought, in every general estimate of man, to remember,

that at his creation, he was endued with powers, placed in circum-

stances, and destined to enjoyments, of no inconsiderable distinc-

tion and glory. This reference we are, in every such case, taught

to make by St. James ; who, speaking of the abuses of the tongue,

and of cursing our fellow-men as one of those abuses, mentions the

original character of human nature as a consideration, plainly en-

MAN .

342 [ SER. XXII .

hancing both the absurdity, and the guilt , of this evil conduct.

Therewith, says this Apostle, bless we God, even the Father, and

therewith curse we men who ARE, or, as in the Greek, who WERE,

made in the similitude of God.

In the text, the Author of all things is exhibited as holding a

consultation, concerning the creation of man. And God said, Let

us make Man in our image, after our likeness . The work of Crea-

tion is in the Scriptures indifferently attributed to the FATHER, the

SON, and the HOLY SPIRIT. That it is attributed to the FATHER,

will not be questioned. That it is attributed to the Son, and to the

SPIRIT, can no more be questioned, if we allow the Scriptures to

speak the customary language of men ; or, indeed, if we allow

them to speak language, that has any defensible construction, or

any meaning.

The text declares to us, in a clear and decisive manner, that

more persons than one were concerned in the design of creating

Man ; and that some Person, or Persons, were addressed by the

Speaker. Various attempts have, indeed, been made, to avoid the

proof , furnished by this passage to the doctrine of the TRINITY ;

and in this manner to force out of view the obvious, and only,

meaning of the terms . But none of these attempts, which I have

seen, will bear examination .

In the first place, the style royal is not adopted here. This is

the use of the plural personal pronoun, instead of the singular, to

denote an individual ; a practice, adopted by modern Princes with

an intention to distinguish themselves from inferior mortals. Не,

who can believe, that JEHOVAH would in this manner violate the

propriety of language, to distinguish himself , and countenance hu-

man pride and folly, in its ridiculous labours for the acquisition of

personal superiority ; must, to say the least, have formed extraor-

dinary views, concerning the character of his CREATOR.

That

God has not acted in this manner, is unanswerably clear from the

universal tenor of the Scriptural language. Only a single speci-

men, and that a doubtful one, of the style in question, can be found

in the sacred writings. Nor is this in the Hebrew style ; but co-

pied from the decree of a Persian monarch, many hundred years

after the Pentateuch was written. The simplicity of the Scriptural

language, is supreme. Every thing is spoken of as it is ; and in

the mere phrascology of nature. A Jew, if the passage had been

intended to speak in this manner, would hardly have been able to

discover its signification .

But what places the point in question out of dispute, is the de-

claration of the same gloricus Being, in the third chapter and

twenty- second verse ; And the Lord God said, Behold, the man has

become as one of Us , to know good and evil. It will not be pre-

tended, that even a modern Prince, when declaring that one of his

subjects had become like himself , would say, " This man has be-

come as one of Us. "

MAN.

SER . XXII. ] 343

Our Saviour, who understood this subject incomparably better

than these Commentators, has explained to us this phraseology in

a manner, which solves every rational doubt. Speaking, as St.

John declares, John xii. 41, in Isaiah vi. 8 ; He says, Whom shall

I send, and who will go for Us ? Again, addressing his FATHER,

John xvii . 21 , He says, That they all may be one ; as thou Father

art in me, and I in thee ; that they also may be one in Us. And

again, verse 22, That they may be one , even as we are one . Inall

these instances, the same Person uses the same language with the

same, and that both obvious and exact, propriety.

Secondly. This phraseology, also, is not addressed to Angels .

Angels could not be addressed in this manner ; for such an ad-

dress would have had neither truth nor meaning. In the work of

creating Man, Angels had as little agency, as the Man who was to

be created. Suppose, instead of the proposal to Angels to unite

with God in creating Man, we were to substitute a history of this

transaction . We should then say, that God and his Angels created

Man ; and, therefore, that Angels performed a part of this work ;

or were, in some sense and degree, the Creators of man. The ab-

surdity of this account needs no explanation. It is as really, it is

equally, absurd to suppose, that God would address Angels in this

manner; and propose to them to occupy themselves, or to be in

any way concerned, in this work ; in which both He and they

knew it was neither proper, nor possible, for them to be at all

concerned ; as to suppose, that they actually performed a part of

it . It was also, according to every Scriptural account of the Crea-

tor, and of Angels, wholly improper for Him to associate them with

himself in a work, which was exclusively his own. Nor will it be

asserted, that God here proposes to create man in the image of An-

gels. In verse 2, it is said, God created man in his own image. In

addition to this, it is to be remembered, that Angels are not men-

tioned in this history, till a considerable time afterwards ; and,

therefore, if they had been intended, this could not be known :

Whereas, in the sense in which these words have been customari-

ly interpreted, the Persons, spoken of in the text, are expressly

named. In the beginning Aleim, (the Covenanters * ) created the

heaven, and the earth .

I have observed, that the Author of all things is exhibited in the

text as solemnly consulting concerning the creation of Man. Let

us make man, said the Divine Workman, in our image, after our like-

ness ; not, " Let man exist, " or " Let there be man ; " as He had

before said, Let there be light, Let there be a firmament, Let the

earth bring forth grass : and so on, with respect to every thing

else, which was made. This solemn manner of introducing Man

into being, was strongly expressive of his importance, and very

honourable to his character. The distinction, made between him

Parkhurst

MAN.

344 [ SER. XXI.

and all the preceding objects of creation, was intentional ; and de-

clared him to be of more consequence than them all .

This subject I will now endeavour to illustrate in the following

observations.

I. The Time, at which Man was created, is strongly expressive of

the importance of his character .

The Creation of the world was now completed. The heavens

were finished, and all the host ofthem. The sun was constituted

a perpetual fountain of light ; and set in the firmament to rule over

the day, and to distribute warmth and life, activity and enjoyment,

to all the sentient inhabitants of this world. Inhis absence, the

moon walked in brightness , to rule the night ; and shed on the earth

a softer, but not less beautiful, splendour, than that of the day.

The stars, also, spreading their glory throughout the sky, delight-

fully illustrated the wisdom of the Creator, and rejoiced over the

inferior works of his hands .

The whole process, also, of forming the earth, of clothing it

with verdure, of replenishing it with animals, of providing the

means of their subsistence and comfort, and of arraying it with

beauty and magnificence, was brought to an end. Fresh from the

perfect hand of its Creator, it was a work of such excellence, that

the eye of infinite Wisdom, surveying all its parts, saw that it was

very good. It was a habitation, which Angels beheld with delight ;

a palace fitted for the residence of an immortal, virtuous, happy

being ; of him, who was to be made in the image of God ; of him,

who was to have dominion over the earth, and every thing which

it contained.

This mighty preparation conveys to us high ideas concerning

the object, for which so much was done. God does nothing but

with the strictest propriety. The bounty, which here flowed in

such copious streams, was directed by infinite wisdom, as well as

poured out by infinite goodness . While, on the one hand, it was

glorious to its Author ; it was, on the other, perfectly suited to the

character of the recipient. The recipient, therefore, was of such a

character, as to be the proper object of these illustrious communi-

cations.

II . The Nature of Man is a still more interesting object of our at-

tention.

Man is a compound existence, made up of two great parts ; the

Body and the Soul, or Spirit. The Body was formed of the dust of

the ground ; and can claim no higher origin, than that of the ani-

mals, by which we are surrounded ; is possessed only, of the same

life and activity ; and is the subject of the same suffering, and en-

joyment. Still, it is a frame of a most wonderful nature. The

parts, of which it is composed; their number ; their various na-

tures, dependencies , operations, and uses ; the arrangement, by

which they are formed into a system, a world within itself; the facul-

ties, attached to it, of seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and feeling ;

MAN .

SER. XXII . ] 345

its capacity of pain and pleasure ; the warnings, which it is fitted

to give of approaching or commencing evil ; and the power, which

it so variously possesses of self -restoration ; are all wonderful,

mysterious, and strongly declaratory of the skill and goodness of

the Creator. Nor ought we, on this occasion, to forget the pecu-

liar structure of the person ; the beauty of the complexion ; the

symmetry of the members ; particularly, that, displayed in the fca-

tures of the face ; the gracefulness, and dignity of the motions ;

nor the power of the countenance to express the thoughts and feel-

ings of the mind. By this last mentioned attribute, the face be-

comes an index to the character of the invisible man ; and shows,

not only his ideas, but his emotions also ; his virtue and vice, his

loveliness and deformity ; and, in a word, whatever his fellow-men

are interested to know.

All these things were at first formed for endless duration. The

Body, like the mind, was originally incapable of decomposition or

decay. Its life was a mere progress of youth, and bloom, and

beauty ; and disease, and death, had not yet marked it for their

prey. Of a still more wonderful nature, was the human Soul , or Spirit .

This, indeed, would naturally be expected, from the peculiar de-

scription of it given in the text. Let us make man in our image,

after our likeness . And again, So God created man in his own image ;

in the image of God created He him. It will not be doubted, that

the image of God was impressed, and was capable of being im-

pressed on the soul only, and not on the body. As little ought

it to be doubted, that this phraseology attributes to the soul a dis-

tinguished importance ; not a little enhanced by these repetitions .

Since this peculiar language embodies all the important character-

istics of the human soul, I shall conform the observations, which it

will be necessary to make at the present time on this subject, to the

single scheme of explaining these declarations in the text.

The Image of God, in which Man is here said to have been cre-

ated, denotes especially the following things .

1st. That the Soul, or Spirit, was created a pure uncompounded

substance .

It is impossible, that thought should be the act ofa plurality of

subjects ; since it is, in its own nature, perfectly simple and indi-

visible. It will be readily acknowledged, that such is the Nature

of God; and that the same nature is also possessed by Angels.

There is as little reason to deny, that it is also the nature of the hu-

man soul. On this subject, however, I shall dwell more extensively

in the following discourse ; and shall here consider it as granted.

In this important particular, it will be seen, that the soul differs

entirely from all material substances. These are, universally,

collections of innumerable atoms ; and therefore become, whenever

the bond, which unites them, is destroyed, subjects of dissolution.

Nothing more is necessary to the destruction of the material form,

VOL. I. 44

MAN.

346 [SER. XXII .

than the mere separation of its parts . The Soul, being perfectly

simple, is incapable of suffering this process, and cannot perish,

unless by annihilation. As there is no example of annihilation

within the experience of man, no reason can be drawn from anal-

ogy to support the supposition, that the existence of the Soul will

ever be terminated .

2dly. The Soul was formed a THINKING substance .

St. Paul, Col. iii. 10, says, And have put on the new man, which

is renewed in knowledge, after the image of Him that created him.

To know, therefore, the great exercise of thought, is, in one respect

ofhigh importance, to be like God. Thinking beings, are the only

beings, who are active ; who originate changes in the universe ;

who commence operations ; who contrive useful purposes ; who

direct unconscious objects to their proper uses ; and who are the

subjects of enjoyment or suffering .

Bare thought is not, however, all that is here to be understood.

Animals think ; but are not, still, created in the image of God.

The broad distinction between Men and animals is, that the former

discern the nature of moral good and evil, and can, therefore, be

made, and are actually made, subjects of law and moral govern-

ment; of both which, the latter are absolutely incapable.

Even this is not the whole of what is intended, either by Moses,

or Paul. The knowledge which they consider as comprised in the

image of God, is that of a sanctified, or virtuous mind; such a mind

as Adam possessed at his creation. It is the knowledge, possessed

by that love, which rejoiceth in the truth ; which is, of course, un-

prejudiced and impartial ; which allows argument and evidence

their true weight ; and which, therefore, perceives, and admits,

truth, especially moral truth, as it is. This, and this only, is the

manner, in which Adam knew ; and in which, to a considerable

extent, every sanctified mind also knows. But this knowledge is ,

in some respects, essentially different from that, possessed by men

in, what the Scriptures call, their natural state . The natural man,

says St. Paul, or as it is rendered by Dr. Macknight, the animal

man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God ; for they arefool-

ishness unto him ; neither can he know them, because they are spirit-

ually discerned.

Amost important characteristic of this knowledge is, that it dis-

cerns the glory and excellence of God, displayed in his Works,

and especially in his Word. By the natural man, every thing of

this nature is unknown. To the renewed man, every such thing

is real and obvious, whenever the objects, in which it exists, are

presented to his eye, and placed within the grasp of his understand-

ing. This difference does not arise from difference of capacity.

The capacity of the natural man is, in innumerable instances,

greater, and his power of discerning, stronger, than that of the re-

newed man. The reason, why he views spiritual objects in so im-

perfect and unhappy a manner, lies supremely in his disposition.

MAN .

SER. XXII .] 347

His biasses against their true nature, are intense ; and his views ,

therefore, always oblique and delusive. WhenAdam was created,

he was a friend of God; saw his character with friendly eyes ;

and therefore, discerned its excellence.

3dly. That the soul was formed with Dispositions or Affections .

Godhimself is possessed of infinite affections ; of infinite love

to good, and of infinite hatred to evil ; and is the subject of infinite

joy in himself , his designs, and his works.

In this respect, also, the Soul was formed to resemble its Maker :

an endowment of more importance, than even knowledge itself.

These are the great spring, whence proceed all the action of minds ;

the directory of our contemplation ; the cause of our knowledge ;

and the source of our virtue, usefulness, and enjoyment.

without them, would be a clod ; and the world a desert. Man,

4thly. That the Affections of the Soul were duly attempered and

directed ; or, in other words, were Virtuous .

In Eph. iv. 24, St. Paul says, And that ye put on the new man,

which, after God, (κατα Θεου, after the image of God) is created in

righteousness , and true holiness . Holiness is that state of the af-

fections, in which the soul loves what God loves. God loves him-

self , his creation, its interests, and every thing which promotes

them ; on the contrary, He hates every thing, by which they are

destroyed, or injured. Such is the Virtue of the human soul ; such

its love; such its hatred ; whenever it is enstamped with the image

of God. Such was the character of Adam at his creation.

5thly. That the Soul had Dominion over the world.

God is the Infinite Ruler. Man was constituted the ruler of this

lower world, with a delegated dominion over all its inhabitants .

' The government of God is wholly righteous, reasonable, and be-

nevolent. Such only was that, which Man at his creation was dis-

posed to exercise. All creatures under his government, were un-

invaded, uninjured, and happy.

6thly. That the Soul of the first Man was possessed of Spiritual

Enjoyment.

By this I intend, that enjoyment, which springs from affections

harmonizing with the conscience, and with each other. In such a

soul, every affection is delightful ; and all its views, purposes, and

pursuits, are just, sincere, benevolent, and lovely. Love, the con-

trolling affection, however various may be its exercises, is only a

succession of varied pleasure. Its two great constituents are, de-

light in the objects beloved, and a desire to do them good. The more

excellent, dignified, and enduring, these objects are, the more noble ,

pure, and rapturous, is the enjoyment, which it derives from them.

Love to God, therefore, transcendently the greatest and most ex-

cellent of all objects, is capable of becoming in itself , and in its

consequences , higher enjoyment than any other. At the same time,

every other affection is, in such a mind, perfectly accordant with

this commanding one. Other objects are all duly loved ; and every

MAN .

348 [SER. XXII

exercise of the heart is attended by the delightful sense of recti

tude .

To such a mind, also, all the various displays of wisdom, power,

and goodness, in the works of creation and providence, are illus-

trious sources of pleasure. Wherever the eye turns its glance,

God is seen ; and, wherever He is seen, He is seen with delight.

The endlessly diversified forms of beauty, grandeur, and glory, in

the works of God are, and are regarded as being, only exhibitions

of infinite excellence, made to delight, improve, and ennoble, the

Intelligent system.

7thly. That the soul was created Immortal.

Both the Body and Mind of Man, were originally formed, and

destined, for Immortality. After the apostacy, however, the Body

was sentenced to return to the dust ; as being rendered wholly un-

fit to exist in the new creation. But the soul was left possessed of

the never-dying principle, with which it was originally endowed ;

was incapable of dissolution ; and was indestructible, except by

the exertions of Almighty Power.

Thus was man, as he came from the hands of his Maker, a crea-

ture, endued with high and glorious perfections . To complete his

happiness, God created him Male and Female : and this not only

for the multiplication of his species, but also for the interchange of

those amiable affections, and those offices of kindness, which arise

from the inherent diversity of character in the sexes . Inthe em-

phatical language of the Scriptures, they were made help- meets for

each other; and were designed to furnish, mutually, a social and

superior happiness, of which solitude is incapable. Amore deli-

cate and beautiful form was united in the Woman, to a mind, pos-

sessing gentler and lovelier affections, a more refined taste, and

more elegant sentiments. Inthe Man, a firmer and stronger frame

was joined to a mind more robust, more patient of toil, and more

equal to difficulties. In each, the other was intended to find that,

which was wanting in itself; and to approve, love, and admire,

both qualities and actions, of which itself was imperfectly capable :

while in their reciprocations of tenderness, and good-will, each be-

held every blessing mightily enhanced, and intensely endeared.

From these considerations, are naturally derived the following,

REMARKS.

1st. How illustrious a being was Man, as he camefrom the hands

ofhis Maker !

With what dignified attributes was he endued! For what high

pursuits was he qualified ! To what sublime enjoyments was he

destined ! In him was found, in an important sense, the End of this

earthly system. Without Man, the world, its furniture, and its in-

habitants, would have existed in vain. Whatever skill, power, and

goodness, were displayed by the Creating Hand ; there was, before

the formation of Man, none to understand, admire, love, enjoy, or

MAN.

SER. XXII. ] 349

praise , the Creator. The earth was clothed with beauty : the land-

scape unfolded its delightful scenes : the sky spread its magnificent

curtains : the sun travelled in the greatness of his strength : the

moon and stars solemnly displayed the glorious wisdom of their

Author : without an eye to gaze, or a heart to contemplate. A

magnificent habitation was, indeed , built and furnished; but no

Tenant was found. Brutes were the only beings, which could en-

joy at all ; and their enjoyment was limited to animal gratification .

But Man was separated from all earthly creatures, by being form-

ed an Intelligent being. His mind could trace the skill and glory

of the Creator in the works of his hands ; and, from the nature of

the work, could understand, admire, and adore the Workman.

His thoughts could rise to God, and wander through eternity. The

universe was to him a mirror, by which he saw reflected every mo-

ment, in every place, and in every form, the beauty, greatness, and

excellence, of JEHOVAH. To Him, his affections and his praises

rose, more sweet than the incense of the morning ; and made no

unhappy harmony with the loftier music of Heaven. He was the

Priest of this great world; and offered the morning and evening

sacrifice of thanksgiving for the whole earthly creation. Of this

creation, he was also the Lord: not the Tyrant ; but the rightful,

just, benevolent Sovereign. The subjection of the inferior crea-

tures to him, was voluntary ; and productive of nothing but order,

peace, and happiness. With these endowments and privileges, he

was placed in Paradise ; no unhappy resemblance of Heaven it-

self : and surrounded by every thing, which was good for food, or

pleasant to the eye, or fragrant to the smell. In an atmosphere,

impregnated with life ; amid streams in which life flowed ; amid

fruits, in which life bloomed, and ripened ; encircled by ever-living

beauty and magnificence ; peaceful within ; safe without ; and con-

scious of Immortality ; he was destined to labour, only that he

might be useful and happy, and to contemplate the wonders of the

universe, and worship its glorious Author, as his prime and profes-

sional employment. He was an image of the invisible God; cre-

ated to be like him in knowledge, righteousness, and holiness, his

most illustrious attributes ; and like him, to exercise dominion over

the works of his hands .

In this situation also, removed far from death and disease, from

sorrow and fear, he was formed for endless improvement. His

mind, like that of Angels, was capable of continual expansion, re-

finement, and elevation; and his life, of perpetual exaltation in

worth, usefulness, and honour. God was his Visiter : Angels were

his companions.

To complete this system of delight, he was created, to be the

Parent of countless millions, who, like himself , were all to be sin-

less . They were also to inhabit the same world of peace, life,

and happiness ; to possess the same immortality ; and to share in

the same endless enjoyment. At the head of this lower creation,

MAN.

350 [SER. XXII .

he was to stand, and survey this great globe, filled with his own

offspring ; and to see the whole immense family, like himself , chil-

dren of God, and heirs of his everlasting love.

2dly. How greatly has Man fallen from his original state !

What proofs of humiliation are visible in every thing, found in

the present world !

In our bodies, particularly, what seeds of weakness, distress,

and decay! The first proofs that we possess life, are the cries of

pain and suffering, inarticulately uttered by the Infant, just entered

into the world. How often does even that infant agonize, and

expire, in the cradle ! If he passes into Childhood, how many

pains does he undergo ; how many fears ; how many sorrows !

How frequently is he carried, while a child, to the grave ! Should

he arrive at Youth, what a train of new evils is he obliged to en-

counter ! and in how many instances does the canker-worm, or

the frost, nip the blossom, and wither it beneath the fond eye of

parental love ! Should he become a Man : sickness, pain, and

sorrow, still hunt him through every course of life ; and not un-

frequently infix their fangs in his heart-strings : while Death, al-

ways watching for his prey, descends when he is least aware, and

seizes, and bears away, the miserable victim ! Should he live to

OldAge: his strength declines, his face is furrowed with wrinkles,

and his head whitened with hoary locks ; his body bends toward

the earth, from which it was taken ; and, exhausted by suffering,

he resigns his breath, and is conveyed to the dark and narrow

house ; devoured by worms, dissolved by corruption, and changed

into his original dust !

His mind, in the mean time, the sport of evil, ungovernable

passions, is ignorant, wild , wayward ; the the seat of a thousand er-

rors , weaknesses, and follies . With its follies, its sins keep at

least an equal pace. Selfishness in manyforms, all of them odious,

distresses the parental eye, even in infancy. In childhood, in

youth, in manhood, it is seen in new varieties of operation, and

new appearances of deformity. Pride and ambition, avarice and

sensuality, pollute and debase the man in early stages of life ; and

all increase their savage, brutal control, as he advances in his

progress . At the same time, envy, fraud, deceit , violence, and

cruelty, mould him into a monster ; and scarcely permit us to

believe, that he was once formed in the image of God. Where is

now the mild, benevolent, equitable, dominion, exercised by our

great Progenitor over his happy empire ? Where the peace be-

tween Man and the inferior inhabitants of the earth ? The chief

traces of his footsteps through the animal world, are oppression,

blood, and death .

In the Moral World, what scenes of pollution, fraud, and tyran-

ny, ofwar and ravage, are every where displayed ! What groans

of anguish have been heard from one end of heaven to the other,

and from the apostacy to the present hour !

MAN.

SER. XXII. ] 351

In the Natural World, what a host of enemies to Man are ar-

rayed by famine and disease, the storm, the earthquake, and the

volcano ! Even his breath, his food, his pleasure, are all means

of his destruction .

Where is his purity, justice, truth, and good-will ? Where his

piety; his morning praise ; his evening incense ? Where his con-

verse with God ; his familiarity with Angels ? Men are now the

family of Adam ; but how different a family from that, which has

been described ! Were the great Ancestor of Mankind to rise

from the dead, and cast his eyes over this earth ; what a race of

children would he behold ! Accompany him in your imagination

to the retreats of drunkenness, gluttony, and pollution. Could he

believe, that the wretches, burrowed in these foul recesses, sprang

from him, who once offered up the worship of Paradise ? Enter

with him into a hall ofjustice ; and see him ponder in silent amaze-

ment the terrible exhibitions of fraud and falsehood, private injus-

tice, and personal cruelty. Behold him mark with a failing eye

the lowering gloom of the gibbet, the horrid recesses of the Gaol,

and the felon crimes which they were destined to reward. Follow

him to the throne of Tyranny ; and see his bosom heave with

emotions unutterable, while he watches the devastation of human

happiness, and human hope, accomplished by the iron- hand of

Power; man, blasted and withered by its touch; and the fiend

himself rioting on sorrow, tears, and death. Finally, adventure

with him to the field of battle ; and see him tremble and faint at

the shouts and groans, at the sight of immeasurable fury, carnage,

andwo. How would his heart rend asunder with agony ; how

would his eyes weep blood ; at such a view of this miserable

world! at the remembrance, that both the Authors, and the sub-

jects, of these sufferings were his own offspring. Where would he

now find his Eden ; his virtue ; his Immortality ?

3dly. How desirable would it be to regain the blessings , origin-

ally bestowed on Man !

The Paradisiacal state has been an object of high estimation to

allmen. Our first parents were wise, virtuous and happy. They

were at peace with God; enjoyed his presence ; and received,

continually, communications of his favour. They were compan-

ions of Angels ; and shared their conversation, their friendship ,

and their joys. Alike were they free from pain, sickness, sorrow,

and death ; safe from fear and hatred, injustice and cruelty ; and

superior to meanness, sloth, intemperance, and pollution. They

were also immortal; were destined to dwell in a perpetual Eden ;

were surrounded always by beauty, life, and fragrance ; and were

employed only in knowing, loving, and enjoying. To regain all

these things, would, indeed, " be a consummation, devoutly to be

wished. " But God has offered them all to us ; has commanded,

has besought us to receive them; and has given his Son to die,

that we might obtain the glorious possession. We may, therefore,

MAN.

352 [SER. XXII

regain the blessings of that Paradise, the loss of which we so

deeply lament, and the splendour of which is, at times, the delight-

ful theme of our contemplation, and the most fascinating ornament

ofdescriptive song.

The best of its blessings we may in a great measure regain,

even here. Sin blasted all the bloom and beauty of the primitive

state, and changed the garden of God into a desolate wilderness.

This happy place was formed to be the residence of virtue ; and

virtue can again call forth all its glories, even on the face of this

dreary world. Godliness has the promise of the life that now is ,

as well as of that which is to come. The piety, truth, and benevo-

lence, which adorned our first Parents, would again call down sim-

ilar blessings from Heaven. What a world would this become, if

such were again the disposition of man ! How transporting a de-

liverance, to be freed from all the sins and sufferings of this me-

lancholy state ; and to enjoy, wherever we roved, an approving

conscience, serenity of soul, an unspotted life, kindness inter-

changed with all men, universal peace, mild and equitable govern-

ment, and the pure, constant, and delightful worship of the Infinite

Benefactor. To escape from our present, melancholy, stormy,

bloody world, to such a state, would be to quit, for a palace

of splendour and delight, the gloom of a vault, hung round with

midnight, and peopled with corpses ; a bedlam, where the eye of

frenzy flashed, the tongue vibrated with malice, and chains clanked,

in dreadful concert, to rage and blasphemy ; a dungeon, haunted

with crimes, teeming with curses, filled with fiends in the human

shape, and opening its doors only to the gibbet and the grave .

4thly. How glorious does the Redeemer appear in the contempla-

tion of this subject !

Christ formed our first Parents, endued them with unspotted ho-

liness ; and invested them with immortal life. Christ planted Eden

for their possession ; and placed them in the enjoyment of all its

felicity. Christ gave them the dominion of this lower world ; and

entitled them to the company of the heavenly host. All these

blessings they lost by their apostacy ; and, with their apostacy,

the loss, also, has descended to their posterity. To restore our

ruined race to the enjoyment of these blessings, Christ, with infi-

nite compassion, left his own glory , lived in our world a frail, suf-

fering man, and died a death of shame and agony.

He, who created Paradise at first , can create it again . He, who

gave immortal life and youth ; He who communicated spiritual

knowledge, refined affections, and spotless holiness, to our first

Parents, can communicate them to us . By creating them at first,

He has proved, that he is able ; by becoming incarnate, living and

dying for our sakes, He has proved, that he is willing.

For this end, He has assumed the government of all things . In

his Father's house, He has told us, are many mansions . To that

happy residence, He has gone before to prepare a place for us .

MAN.

SER . XXII. ) 353

Nay, He has declared, that He will create new heavens and a new

earth, for the reception of those, who trust in him, and love his ap-

pearing. In this new world, He has assured us, there shall be no

more death nor sorrow, nor crying, nor any more pain : for all

theseformer evil things shall then have passed away. In this hap-

py region, the righteousness, which the Paradise below the Sun was

destined to reward, will dwell for ever . There the Tree of life

blossoms, and bears anew : and there Immortality flows again in

the pure river oflife. There the sun no more goes down ; neither

does the moon withdraw itself ; for Jehovah is the everlasting light

of his children, and their God their glory. From that delightful

world the Redeemer cries, Behold I come quickly, and my reward

is with me. Oh! that every heart present may answer , Even so,

Come , Lord Jesus. Amen.

VOL. I. 45

SERMON XXIII.

THE SOUL NOT MATERIAL.

GENESIS ii 7. -And the LordGod formed man of the dust of the ground, and

breathed into his nostrils the breath of life ; and man became a living soul.

IN my last discourse, I considered the creation of man, under

these two heads :

1st. The character of the Creator ; and,

2dly. The nature of the Being which was created.

Under the latter head, I observed, that man, the Being which

was created, was composed of two entirely distinct parts, commonly

termed the body and soul. Of the latter, I also observed, that it

was a simple, uncompounded, immaterial substance : being in this

respect, as well as in others , made in the image, or after the likeness ,

ofGod. This assertion, I regard as being the amount of that,

which is contained in the text. I am well aware, that the text

itself has been variously construed. Instead, however, of con-

sidering these different constructions, I shall attempt to settle the

true meaning, by appealing directly to an interpreter, whose opi-

nions will not be disputed. The Apostle Paul quotes this passage

in the following manner : For thus it is written, the first man,

Adam, εγενετο εις ψυχην ζωσαν, τυas made or became a living soul.

This quotation determines, in my view, absolutely, that the text is

accurately rendered into our language by the translators .

The doctrine, which I consider as contained in the text, has

also been abundantly disputed. Three entirely different opinions

have been formed on this subject.

The first is, that which I have already advanced ; viz. that

man is an Immaterial substance, an Intelligent, Voluntary being ;

the subject of attributes , the author of actions , and destined to im-

mortality.

The second is , that man is a Material, thinking, voluntary being ;

differing in nothing, but his modification and its effects , from other

material substances . Some of those who hold this scheme, believe

him immortal ; while others limit his existence to the present

world.

The third is, that man is neither of these, but a mere succession,

or Chain, as the abettors of it express themselves. of Ideas and

Exercises.

That something is true with regard to this subject, must be ad-

mitted ; and that all these schemes cannot be true. I would wil-

lingly have avoided the discussion of a subject so metaphysical ;

but , when I observe the importance which it has assumed in

THE SOUL NOT MATERIAL.

SER . XXIII. ) 300

modern times ; and especially when I see theological doctrines of

very high import derived from the two last of these schemes, as

their proper consequences ; I feel myself obliged to give the sub-

ject aplace in this system of discourses .

In the discussion , upon which I am entering, I shall pursue the

following plan : viz.

Ishall attempt to disprove the two last of these doctrines, and in

that way, to establish the first. One of the three is undoubtedly

true. If the two last are false, the first is of course true .

I. Then, I assert that the soul is not material.

It will be necessary, in order to exhibit the truth of this propo-

sition in the most convincing light, to prove the falsehood of the

opposite doctrine, in all the forms in which it has been maintained.

This, therefore, I shall attempt .

1st. Atoms, in their original state, do not think.

Our senses give us the amplest evidence of this fact ; so ample,

that no man ever disbelieved it, who was not an idiot, or a maniac .

At the same time, the proposition admits of a direct demonstration .

Thought is in its nature perfectly simple and indivisible. But, if

each atom were a thinking being, millions of thoughts would exist

in such a compound ofthem, as man.

2dly. Atoms do not think in any Aggregate, or under any Organ-

ization .

( 1st. ) That a mere Accumulation of atoms cannot think, unless

the original atoms were possessed of thought, is self - evident. If

they do not think, when separate, we are intuitively certain, that

mere juxta- position cannot give them the power of thought .

( 2dly. ) Atoms cannot derive thought from any Relative Position.

Suppose one atom placed above, beneath, or on either side of

another: it is intuitively certain, that, if they did not think before

they were thus posited, neither of these positions, nor any other,

can have the least influence towards producing thought in either of

them. What is thus true of two, is equally true of every sup-

posable number.

3dly. Matter cannot derive thought from Attenuation.

The attenuation of matter is made up wholly of the distance and

the minuteness, of its particles . That distance has no influence on

this subject, has been already shown. That the miniteness of

the corpuscles has no influence on it , is clear from this fact : that

the original atoms, which have been proved to be unpossessed of

thought, are the most minute divisions of matter, which are possi-

ble. That the distance and minuteness compounded, do not influ-

ence it, is certain, because, if thought depends on neither of these ,

it cannot depend on both united : for nothing, repeated ever so

often, is still nothing . It is also evident to our senses from the

facts, that air, heat, and light, approximate no nearer to thought,

than stones, lead, or earth. When, therefore, men speak of the

soul as a material substance, eminently refined, tenuous, subtile, or

THE SOUL NOT MATERIAL.

356 [SER. XXIII

etherial, they speak without meaning : for all these are still the

descriptions ofmere attenuations of matter, or matter attenuated ;

and it is clearly certain, that no attenuation of matter can have the

least efficacy towards enabling it to think.

4thly. Thought cannot be the result of the Chymical properties of

matter.

It is not inherent in any of the elements, which chymistry has

hitherto discovered. All these are mere collections of Atoms ; and

are, therefore, absolutely incogitative : no one of their attributes

having the least resemblance to thought.

It cannot be the result of their operations. The elements of

matter operate by their powers, or attributes . These powers, by

whatever names they are called, and however diversified in their

operations, are only two ; attraction and repulsion. But it is cer-

tain, that the only influence, which these powers can have on cor-

puscles, must be originally contained in the powers themselves.

But nothing is more certain, than that there is no resemblance to

thought, either in the operation of drawing one particle of matter

to another, or in that offorcing one particle of matterfrom another ;

nor in the capacity of thus drawing, or being drawn, nor in that of

thus repelling , or being repelled. But, if the powers themselves,

and the particles in which they inhere, possess no resemblance of

thought, they can never communicate thought to each other. What

they have not, they cannot give.

Further, the only possible results of chymical attraction and re-

pulsion, arise solely from motion, relative position, condensation,

and attenuation. But it has already been shown, that neither of

the three last can have the least influence towards enabling matter

to think. Every result of chymical powers and operations, hither-

to explained, has been satisfactorily explained to be the effect of

attraction and repulsion ; nor is there the least reason to believe,

that there is any other chymical power.

5thly. Thought is not the result of Motion .

Motion is a change of place, or relative position ; or a continued

succession of such changes . It has been already shown, that no

relative position can have any possible influence towards the pro-

duction ofthought ; and that particles, if not originally cogitative,

cannot become so by any possible relative position ; nor by any

distance from each other, whether greater or less . Of course, it

is certain, that no change of position, which is nothing but the mere

assumption of a new position, or a variation of distance, and, there-

fore, that no succession of such changes, can have any influence :

for motion is nothing but this succession of changes . Accordingly,

a cannon ball approximates no nearer to thought by moving at the

rate of four hundred and twenty miles anhour, than when lodged in

the chamber of a cannon : the air when moving with the swiftness

ofsound, than when at rest: the electrical fluid , or the rays of

light, than brass, marble, or dust.

THE SOUL NOT MATERIAL,

SER . XXIII.J 357

Asmotion cannot contribute at all to thought; so no combina-

tion of motions, however complicated and diversified, can have any

such efficacy . Organic motion, therefore, though so multiform and

mysterious, as to perplex our minds, and to leave us, in a sense,

lost , when contemplating it , in admiration, being only a combina-

tion of simple motions, each ofwhich has no tendency towards the

production of thought, has not in any degree this tendency, how-

ever diversified , or however mysteriously combined.

6thly. Thought cannot be superadded to matter, so as, in any

sense, to render it true, that matter can become cogitative .

If thought be superadded to matter, the thought must be first

created, and exist separately, and independently of the matter.

Should it be said, that the creation of an attribute, without any sub-

ject, or being, in which it inheres, is an absurdity : I readily grant

it ; but it is an absurdity, of which the persons whom I oppose, are

the authors. They must, therefore, charge it to themselves, and

not to me.

But the thought, or consciousness existing by itself ,

and independently, before it is annexed to the matter, must exist al-

so in the same independent manner afterwards . It may be annex-

ed, or joined, to the matter ; but it cannot be inherent in it. The

thought may exist within, or without, the matter, as an appendage ;

but it is not, and cannot be, a property, or attribute, of the matter .

The matter was perfect in all its essential properties , antecedently

to the annexation of thought ; and thought was not one of those

properties. Thought is no more one of the properties of matter,

after being annexed to it, than it was before; and, if separated

from it again, will leave the matter still perfect, or possessed of all

its properties. Before the thought was annexed to it, it could not

betruly said, that the matter was cogitative : It can be no more

truly said now, after it is annexed : for the matter itself thinks no

more, than before. The supposition, therefore, that thought may

be superadded to matter, is a palpable absurdity.

7thly. This doctrine intends, either that the properties of matter

and mind are the same ; or that the substratum of mind is the same

with the substratum of matter ; and, in either intention, is an absur-

dity. That thought, volition, and motivity, the properties of mind, are

the same things with solidity, extension, and mobility, the proper-

ties of matter, is a proposition, which contradicts intuitive certain-

ty; and is therefore intuitively false. The substrata, in both cases,

are absolutely unknown, by us. But it is a palpable absurdity to

say , that an unknown thing in one case, a thing of which we have

no conception, is the same with a thing, in another case, equally

unknown. I grant, that a proposition concerning things unknown

may be true; but it can never be known by us to be true. Ideas,

which we have not, we cannot possibly compare ; and therefore

cannever discern whether they agree, or disagree. To form pro-

positions about them, therefore, so long as this is the fact , is ab

THE SOUL NOT MATERIAL.

358 [SER. XXIII .

surd and ridiculous. But, if both these proposititions are absurdi-

ties, then the proposition, that mind is material, is also an absurdi-

ty: for it is formed either of one, or both, of these.

The only mode of legitimate argumentation on the subject, con-

sidered in this manner, is the following. Mind and Matter present

to us two totally diverse sets of properties . The substratum, in

which these properties co-exist, is, in each case, rationally regard-

ed as the cause of this difference. The properties ( you will

observe, I speak of essential properties only) are commonly, and

justly , considered as a part, and an inseparable part, ofthe nature,

or constitution, of the substratum, in which they are inherent ; not as

merely annexed, or arbitrarily adjoined, to the substratum ; but as

inseparable from it in such a sense, that the destruction of the pro-

perties would be also the destruction of the substratum. Thus if

matter should cease to be extended, solid, or moveable, it would

cease to be matter. Thus, if minds ceased to be perceiving, con-

scious, voluntary, and active, they would cease to be minds. This

part of their nature, therefore, which we call their properties, is so

absolutely dependent on the constitution of the substratum, or that

part of their nature which lies beyond our reach, that both neces-

sarily exist, or cease to exist, together. The substratum is, there-

fore, by its constitution, the necessary and inseparable cause of the

properties; that is, the properties are what they are, because the sub-

stratum is what it is. As, therefore, the effects are totally unlike,

it is rationally argued, that the causes are unlike, from the well

known and intuitive truth, that unlike effects cannot proceed from

the same cause .

Sthly. The existence of the substratum itself cannot be proved.

This truth is so well known to every metaphysician, and even

to every person tolerably acquainted with logic, as customarily

taught in schools of science, that it would seem hardly to demand

an illustration. Still it may be proper to observe, that as this sup-

posed substratum, if it exist, is a thing, of which we do not, and

cannot, form a single idea ; we can, of course, neither affirm, nor

deny, any thing concerning it, with any possible knowledge, that

either the affirmation, or negation, is true. All that we can do is

to render one, or the other, in a certain degree probable. Of

course, every discussion, and every doctrine, tending to establish

the materiality of the soul, is founded originally in uncertainty,

and absolutely incapable of proof: for, if it cannot be proved,

that such a substratum exists, it plainly cannot be proved, that the

soul is such a substratum, connected with its properties .

I have hitherto considered this doctrine, as it is presented to us

by reason .

I shall now proceed to examine the account, which is

given of it in the Scriptures .

Here I observe,

1st. That all other thinking beings, ofwhich we have any know-

ledge, are exhibited in the Scriptures as being Immaterial.

SER . XXIII . ] THE SOUL NOT MATERIAL.

359

Beside ourselves, we have no knowledge of any other thinking

beings, except God and Angels. Both these are expressly de-

clared to be spirits, in the Scriptures ; in a plain and directdistinc-

tion from matter. That God is an immaterial being, will not be

questioned. That Angels are immaterial, as represented in the

Scriptures, is so obvious, that, so far as I know, it never has been

questioned. Dr. Priestly, the principal modern champion for the

materiality of the soul, was so sensible, that this is the Scriptural

exhibition of this subject , that he has laboured hard to disprove the

existence of any such beings, as Angels; because he saw their

existence, as separate spirits, would prove an insurmountable ob-

stacle to the establishment of his scheme ; and because he thought

it easier to disprove their existence absolutely, than to evince that

they were material. Indoing the former he had, however, to face

agreat multitude of express assertions, contained in the Bible, de-

claring the existence of such beings ; and a multitude of historical

accounts, affirming, in the same direct manner, their character,

stations, and employments ; together with their appearance, and

agency, often repeated in the affairs of this world. If he thought

this the easier task of the two ; as he evidently did; it is clear,

that the latter, viz. the proof , that Angels are material, was, in his

view, a task absolutely hopeless. In truth, every thing, attributed

toAngels in the Scriptures, refutes , and destroys, every supposition

of their materiality.

But, if God, if Angels, are thinking beings, and at the same time

immaterial, the argument from analogy strongly leads us to con-

clude, that all other thinking beings are immaterial also. Nor is

there one valid objection against the immateriality of the human

soul, which will not lie, with equal force, against that of Angels,

and that of the Creator. It is true, neither of these beings is united

to a body; but both God andAngels are possessed of the power

ofacting upon matter, and controlling it, to a far greater extent

than we. This being admitted, as it plainly must be, without a

question; the only real difficulty, concerning the connexion of soul

and body, is removed, and there can remain no solid objection

against the immateriality of the soul, derived from this source.

2dly. The souls of men are in the Scriptures declared to be imma-

terial.

The Scriptures exhibit this doctrine in two ways :

1st. In express Assertions ; and,

2dly. In Facts.

1st. In express Assertions .'

In Psalm xxxi. 5, David says, Into thine hand I commit my spirit.

These words were repeated by our Saviour on the cross, immedi-

ately before he expired. In the same manner St. Stephen, imme-

diately before his death, prayed to CHRIST in these words : Lord

Jesus, receive my spirit ! That both these forms of phraseology

have areal and important meaning, cannot be disputed; nor that

THE SOUL NOT MATERIAL.

360 [SER. XXII

those , who uttered them, understood what that meaning was, and

used them with the most exact propriety : one ofthem being CHRIST ;

the other two, David, an inspired prophet, and Stephen, a man full

of the Holy Ghost. Let me then ask, What is this meaning ? What

does the word, Spirit, in these passages, signify ? Certainly it does

not signify the body. It will not be pretended , that this can be the

meaning. Much less does it signify that organization of the body,

which Dr. Priestly considers as being especially the soul. Cer-

tainly it does not intend the breath : for it cannot be supposed, that

either of these persons wished to commend to God the last portion

breathe

of air, which he breathed. What then does it intend? There is no

other alternative, but this ; that it intends the immaterial Soul ; the

thinking, conscious being.

This is completely evinced by that remarkable phraseology,

with which the Hebrews customarily declared the death of a man:

He gave up the ghost. That this phrase denoted, in the mouths of

those who used it , the yielding up of the immaterial spirit into the

hands of God, cannot be doubted , unless it be voluntarily doubted .

Should it be doubted, Solomon has determined the point beyond a

debate. Then, says he, (that is, immediately after death) shall the

dust, or body, return to the earth as it was, and the spirit into the

hands ofGod who gave it. Here the whole Hebrew doctrine is de-

clared on this subject; and the distinction between the soul and the

body completely established : for of the one it is asserted, that it

shall return to the earth ; and, of the other, that it shall return to

God . As the dust, or body, contains all that is material in man ;

so it is certain, that all this, after death, returns to the earth. But

it is equally certain, that the spirit does not return to the earth, but

unto God; and is therefore something, totally distinct from the

body, or the material part of man. This is , therefore, unquestiona-

bly the true meaning of the Hebrew phrase, Giving up the Ghost ;

and of these expressions of our SAVIOUR, David, and Stephen.

This phraseology, it should be remembered, is always used by THE

SPIRIT OF TRUTH ; and is chosen by himto convey to us just ideas

concerning this subject. It is, therefore, really just ; and is exactly

expressive of that which is true.

In Isaiah xxxi . 3, the prophet says, For the Egyptians are men,

und not God ; and their horses flesh, and not spirit. Here the dis-

tinction between flesh, or body, and spirit , is so plainly, as well as

intentionally, marked, that the passage can need no comment.

In Genesis xxv. 8, it is said, Then Abraham gave up the ghost

_ and was gathered to his people. This by a thoughtless reader

maybe supposed to mean, that Abraham was buried with his fathers.

But this is an entire misconception: for the fathers of Abraham

were buried several hundred miles from him; some in Chaldea ;

and Terah in Haran, in Mesopotamia : whereas Abraham was buried

in the cave of Macpelah, in Canaan. The true meaning of the

passage is, that he was gathered to the assembly ofthe blessed , and

THE SOUL NOT MATERIAL.

SER. XXIII. ] 361

particularly to those good men, among his ancestors, who were

united to that assembly. In this manner the prophets themselves ex-

plain it . Job says, The rich man shall lie down, but he shall not be

gathered. CHRIST, in Isaiah xlix. 5, says, Though Israel be not

gathered, yet shall I be glorious, in the eyes of the Lord. In the

same manner is the phrase explained by Jeremiah and Ezekiel.

But the body ofAbraham was changed to dust, in the cave ofMac-

pelah : while something beside that body, that is, the immaterial

spirit, was gathered to this divine assembly. Accordingly, Christ

announces to his Disciples, that they shall sit down in the Kingdom

of God, with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob ; concerning

each of whom it was also said, that he was gathered unto his people.

Accordingly also, God says to Moses, I am the God of Abraham, the

God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob . Christ alleges these words, as

unquestionable proof of the αναστασίς, or future separate existence

of spirits ; and subjoins to his proof this unanswerable argument,

which the Sadducees , the materialists of that day, durst not attempt

to dispute ; for God is not the God of the dead, but of the living . In

other words , Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob , were living beings, when

this declaration was made by God to Moses.

Accordingly also, Christ, in the parable of Dives and Lazarus,

informs us, that Lazarus was , after his death, carried by Angels to

Abraham's bosom : Lazarus being gathered to his people, as Abra-

ham was to his; and both being united to the assembly of the

blessed.

This parable is itself the most explicit declaration of the doc-

trine, for which I contend. In it Dives and Lazarus are both as-

serted to have died, and to have entered the future world, as sepa-

rate spirits, while the five brethren of Dives were living, and, of

course, while their bodies were both masses of putrefaction in this

world. No exhibition can be clearer, or more unexceptionable,

than this.

It has, however, been objected, that this is a parabolic represent-

ation ; and that, therefore, it is not to be considered as decisive on

this point. Nothing could more strongly prove the decisive influ-

ence of this parable on the question, in the eye of the objector

himself , than his recourse to this pitiful subterfuge. It is acknow-

ledged on all hands, that the truth of a parable does not demand

the reality of the persons, or the historical facts, which it contains .

But, that the doctrines , contained in it, are equally true with those

of the literal texts, must be admitted by every man, who does not

choose to say, that Christ in his parables is a teacher of falsehood.

The doctrine, therefore, that spirits exist in a separate state, is as

certainly declared here, as it can be by words .

To the thief , just ready to expire on the cross, our Saviour said,

To-day shalt thou be with me in Paradise. The body of the thief

was that day either on the cross, or in the grave. Of course his

soul, or spirit, was that, which went to Paradise with the Redeemer.

T

THE SOUL NOT MATERIAL

362 [SER. XXIII

The objectors to this doctrine have attempted to escape from the

irresistible force of this text by two comments, still more pitiful

than the subterfuge above mentioned. The first is, that the word,

To-day, refers to the time of our Saviour's speaking, and not to the

time when the thief was to be with him in Paradise. On this I

shall only ask my opponent, Whether he really believes, that our

Saviour said thus : I speak to thee to-day, and not yesterday, nor

to-morrow ? The other explanation is , that, as in the eternity of

God one day is the same thing as a thousand years, and a thousand

years as one day, Christ meant by the word, to- day, the same thing

with that eternity. On this comment I shall only ask, Whether the

dying Saviour spoke to the dying man language, which he intended

he should understand, and which he could understand ; or whether

he spoke to him language, which he could not possibly understand,

and by which Christ knew he would certainly be deceived ?

St. Paul, in 2 Corinthians v. 6, says, Therefore we are always

confident, knowing, that while we are at home in the body, we are ab-

sent from the Lord. We are confident, I say, and willing rather to

be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord. In this

passage the Apostle declares expressly, that to be at home in the

body, is to be absent from the Lord; and that to be absent from the

body, is to be present with the Lord. But according to the scheme

which I am opposing, the body is the whole man ; and therefore,

if the man is ever to be present with the Lord, his body must be

present ; and if his body be absent, the man must be absent also ;

in direct contradiction to the assertion of the Apostle. To be ab-

sent from the body is, on this plan, phraseology without meaning ;

because there is nothing but the body. This passage is, therefore,

an explicit declaration that man is something beside body ; distinct

from it ; capable of being separated, or absent from it ; and, in

consequence of this separation, of being present with the Lord.

This something, also, he elsewhere declares to be conscious, and

capable of enjoyment : for he says, that to be thus present with

Christ, is a far better state than the present. This something,

therefore, thus capable of being absent from the body, is an imma-

terial spirit : for beside body, or matter , my opponents will agree,

that there is nothing, except spirits .

2dly. The Scriptures give an unanswerable proof , by Facts, that

the soul is immaterial.

Ast. The Revelation of St. John furnishes many specimens of this

nature.

In the fourth chapter ofthis prophesy he sawfour and twenty

elders, surrounding the throne ofthe majesty in the Heavens. In

the seventh chapter he informs us, that he beheld a great multitude,

which no man could number, of all nations , and kindreds , and peoples,

and tongues, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed

in white robes , with palms in their hands, uniting with theAngels, the

Elders, and the four Living Ones, in the worship of God , and the

THE SOUL NOT MATERIAL.

SER. XXIII . ] 663

everlasting ascription ofpraise and glory to his name. Upon this he

asked the Angel interpreter , Who these persons were. TheAngel

informed him, that they were those, who came out of great tribula-

tion, and who had washed their robes , and made them white in the

blood of the Lamb ; that, therefore, they are before the throne of

God, and serve him day and night in his temple; that they shall

neither hunger, nor thirst, nor suffer, any more; but shall be fed

by the Lamb with living bread, and led unto fountains of living

waters. No ingenuity of interpretation, no skill at evasion, will en-

able any man to satisfy even himself , if he will take all the parts

ofthese accounts together, that they can mean any thing less , or

more, than that these persons were all separate spirits . Elders

are men ; Those, who are redeemed by the blood of the Lamb,

are men ; and can be no other than men. Men, who are around

the throne of God, and before his throne ; who are brought out of

great tribulation ; who serve him day and night in his temple ; who

hunger, thirst, and suffer, no more ; who feed on the bread, and

drink the water, of life ; and who sustain all these characters, and

do all these things, while the world yet remains, and many ages

before its termination, are men in the Heavens . They are, there-

fore, the bodies of men, or their separate spirits . I leave my an-

tagonists to choose which side of the alternative they please.

But if a doubt can remain, St. John has himself settled it ; for in

the sixth chapter, and ninth verse, he says, And when he had open-

ed the fifth seal I saw under the altar the Souls of them, that were

slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held ;

and white robes were given unto every one of them. The like phra-

seology is also used, Revelations xx. 4. Now let me ask, What

was it which John saw ? That they were persons, or intelligent

beings, cannot be doubted ; that they have been once slain, and

are therefore men, is equally certain ; that they are glorified per

sons, is also certain ; that they are Souls, or separate spirits, is cer-

tain; because the Apostle has said so, and the Spirit of God has

said so. It is, therefore, true. It is also certain, from the whole

account, given by the Scriptures at large, concerning this subject :

for we know, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of

God . Should it be said, that these things passed in vision, and that

they were not real exhibitions of facts ; the book being a symbolical

representation, and not a real account of facts : I answer, that I

have no difficulty in granting it ; although I have not a doubt, that

every one of the things, which I have mentioned, was strictly a

matter of fact . At the same time, the argument stands on the same

basis, upon either scheme. If the representation be considered as

strictly symbolical ; still the doctrines, which it contains, are all ex-

actly true . This is all, for which I contend ; and this must be con-

cededby my opponents, unless they are willing to charge God

with having taught falsehood to mankind.

In exact accordance with these observations, St. Paul observes ,

THE SOUL NOT MATERIAL.

664 [ SER. XXIII .

1 Thessalonians iv. 14, For if we believe, that Jesus died, and rose

again ; even so them also, who sleep in Jesus, will God bring with

him : that is, when the Lord shall descend, as he mentions in the

next verse but one, from Heaven with a shout, with the innumera-

ble company ofAngels ; God shall bring with him to this world the

spirits of just men made perfect, and re-unite their bodies to them :

and they , and those followers of Christ, who shall remain alive at

the end of the world, shall be caught up together to meet the Lord in

the air. A great multitude of these very persons are those glorified

Saints, whom John saw, when he was admitted to that happy world.

I shall not insist on the facts, specified in the parable of Dives

and Lazarus , as an example under this head ; although I think they

might be fairly insisted on as furnishing such an example. Instead

ofdwelling on this, I shall proceed to another specimen, which is

certainly secured, if in the view of prejudice any thing can be se-

cured, from evasion and cavil.

When Christ was transfigured on the Mount ; there were present

with him Moses and Elias, who appeared in glory, and talked with

him, and spake of his decease, which he should accomplish at Jerusa-

lem. The body of Elias was changed, when he was conveyed to

heaven in a chariot of fire . But the body of Moses was buried

by the hand of God in a valley in the land of Moab , over against

Beth- Peor; and will rise, hereafter, with other bodies of the saints ,

at the general resurrection. Yet Moses was actually on this Mount

in company with Elias. If Moses when he thus appeared, was not

a separate spirit , I leave it to my antagonists to tell us what he

was.

Thus have I summarily considered this subject, as it is present-

ed to us both by Scripture and reason. If the things, which I

have said, have the same weight and conclusiveness in the minds

of others, which they have in my own, it must be admitted by them

as unquestionably evident from both sources of proof , not only that

the soul is not material, but that the doctrine of its materiality is

sustained by no solid argument whatever. Reason furnishes none :

the Scriptures furnish none. I cannot help adding, that, had the

doctrine been considered by itself only, and not been thought ne-

cessary for the support of some system, it would probably never

have been adopted by any man living. I know not, that it was

ever adopted by itself , or on account of any evidence which was

supposed to attend it, when considered singly, or as unconnected

with other doctrines. It seems always to have been taken up,

either as subsidiary to the support of other parts of a system, or as

necessarily flowing from other doctrines, considered as already

established, and as being inconsistent in themselves with the imma-

teriality of the soul. Dr. Priestly appears to have adopted this

scheme for the former of these reasons; viz. because he thought

the materiality of the soul necessary to the support of those parts of

his system, which respect the character of the Redeemer. This.

THE SOUL NOT MATERIAL.

SER. XXIII . ) 365

at least, is the fact , if I understand his own language. Atheists

have embraced this doctrine, because they were driven to it by the

fundamental principles of their system. There is always a rational

suspicion concerning the soundness, and evidence, of doctrines ta-

ken up on these grounds .

Asingle observation shall conclude this discourse.

We see, here, one remarkable instance of the agreement of the

Scriptures with Common sense.

All nations have united in the opinion, that the human soul is an

immaterial being, wholly distinct from the Body. I do not intend,

that ignorant nations have formed a system, or a science, on this

subject ; nor that a savage could correctly define, or explain, his

views of it, so as to leave them unobjectionable in the eye of a Phi-

losopher. But I intend, that Immateriality, and distinction from

the Body, are essential parts of all his opinions concerning the

Soul. When I mention this as the doctrine of all nations, I would

be understood to mean, not that there are no exceptions, but that

the existing exceptions are, at least so far as hitherto known, few,

and insignificant with respect to this question. The Aborigines of

this country, for example, believed, that, although they buried the

body of a friend , and left it to moulder into dust, the friend, the

man, lived still, and went to a happier world. This man, there-

fore, was not the body, for that was in the grave ; but was an im-

material and separate spirit ; the living, thinking thing, which con-

trolled and actuated that Body.

Exactly the same in substance, and altogether more perfect in

manner and degree, is the doctrine of the Scriptures. This har-

mony between the Scriptures and common sense, was indeed to be

presumed: for God is the origin of both. Hence, in all cases, so

far as the views of common sense extend, they are exactly ac-

cordant with the Scriptures. Philosophy has opposed the Scrip-

tures, often: common sense never. Accordingly the common peo-

ple of the Jewish nation, gladly heard Christ in the great body of

instances, and his Apostles, after him; in spite of all their preju-

dices, and the influence of their Rulers ; and often awed those

Rulers, so as to restrain them from the violence which they intend-

ed: On the other hand, the Scribes and Pharisees, and still more,

the Sadducees, rejected their doctrines almost absolutely, notwith-

standing the confirmation of them by their own Scriptures. In the

same manner have the common people in Christian countries ge-

nerally, when left to themselves, adhered to the genuine scheme of

the Gospel : while the numerous heresies, which have disturbed

the Church, and misled mankind, have been, almost without an

exception, the offspring of Philosophy.

SERMON XXIV.

THE SOUL NOT A CHAIN OF IDEAS AND EXERCISES .

GENESIS ii. 7. -And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breath-

ed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul .

IN my last discourse, I proposed to consider the nature of the

human soul . Concerning this subject; I remarked, that there were

three entirely different opinions .

The first of these in the order, in which they were then mention-

ed, is, that man is an immaterial substance, an Intelligent, voluntary

being ; the subject of attributes , the author of actions , and destined

to immortality.

The second is , that man is a material, thinking, voluntary being ;

differing in nothing, but his modification and its effects , from other

material substances . Some of those, who hold this scheme, believe

him immortal : while others limit his existence to the present world.

The third is , that man is neither of these, but a mere succession ,

or chain, as the abetters of it express themselves, ofideas and ex-

ercises .

In discussing this subject, I proposed the following plan, viz . to

prove thefirst of these doctrines , by disproving the two last : observ-

ing , that, as one of the three is unquestionably true, if the two last

are false, the first is true of course.

The second, which asserts the soul to be material, I then consi-

dered at length . I shall now proceed to the consideration of the

third, which asserts that the soul is a mere succession , or chain, of

ideas and exercises .

Before I commence the direct arguments against this doctrine in

form, it will be proper to say something on the principal reason,

alleged against the reception of the first of these schemes ; or that,

which I consider as the true one, and made particularly the foun-

dation of the reception of the third. This reason, so far as I have

been informed of it, (and I have heard it alleged by the ablest

philosopher among all those, whom I have known to adopt this

scheme, on this side of the Atlantic) is the following : that we can

form no conception of any thing in ourselves , beyond our ideas and

exercises . Of these we are conscious and certain ; but of a sup-

posed substance, in which these are inherent ; a cause, whence

they proceed; an agent, who is the author of them; we have no

conception. This argument, reduced to a general form, will stand

thus : That nothing exists, of which we have no conception. For,

undoubtedly, if the argument is conclusive, or has weight, when

alleged against the existence of man, as an agent, substance, or

IDEAS AND EXERCISES .

SER. XXIV ] 367

cause ; it will have the same weight, or conclusiveness, against the

existence of every other agent, cause, or substance ; and, in a

word, against the existence of every thing, of which we cannot

form a conception .

Let us now, briefly consider the length, to which we shall ne-

cessarily be carried by the adoption of this supposed principle.

OfGod, the original Existence, from whom all things else are

derived, it is said in the Scriptures ; and Reason subjoins her fullest

attestation to what is said : Canst thou, by scarching, find out God;

canst thou find out the Almighty, unto perfection ? It, that is, this

subject, is high as heaven, what canst thou do ? deeper than hell,

what canst thou know ? The measure thereof is longer than the earth,

and broader than the sea. Concerning the Omnipresence and Om-

niscience of this great Being, David exclaims, Such knowledge is

too wonderfulfor me, it is high, I cannot attain unto it . According

to the abovementioned principle, all that, which we cannot under-

stand concerning God, has no existence, and must stand for nothing.

But how little do we understand concerning God; particularly, of

the nature of that exalted Being ; his influence as a cause ; and

his mode of operating. To apply the argument to the case in

hand; it is, undoubtedly, at least as difficult to conceive of an In-

finite agent, as afinite one. If , then, we are to deny the existence

of a finite agent, because we can form no conception of the sub-

stance of such a being ; or the modes, in which he operates ; or

the power, which he possesses of producing effects ; then we must

also deny the existence of an Infinite agent, for exactly the same

reason; since it is perfectly plain, that we can no more form any

conception of these things in Him.

Nor shall we have anyhappier success in our inquiries concern-

ing Attributes and Operations . God styles himself merciful, gra-

cious , true, faithful, and just ; and we uniformly attribute to him,

mercy , grace, wisdom, truth, faithfulness, and justice. These

names are supposed to stand for certain things, which they indi-

cate; things, which in fact exist. In the same manner, also, they

are considered by God himself ; as is evident from this plain rea-

son; that he adopts them to express his views to mankind, as they

adopt them to express theirs to each other ; and does not indicate,

what, if the case were otherwise, veracity plainly demands; that

he uses them in a manner, diverse from that , in which they are

used by men. What, then, is the meaning of these words ? What,

for example, is Truth in God ? There are but two answers, which

canbe given to this question. One is, that he has invariably spoken

truth; and the other, that there is in him a cause, disposition, or pro-

pensity, which induces , or inclines him to speak truth. It hardly

needs to be observed, that the former of these is very rarely in-

tended, when we speak of the Veracity of God ; and the latter,

almost always. As this cannot but be admitted by every man ; so

it is expressly declared in many parts of the Scriptures. St. Paul,

THE SOUL NOT A CHAIN OF

368 [SER. XXIV.

speaking concerning the oath of God to Abraham, says, that it was

impossible for God to lie. Now it is perfectly evident, that the mere

fact, that God has invariably spoken truth heretofore, infers not in

any degree an impossibility, that he should lie hereafter. All,

which can be said concerning this fact, is, that it gives us satisfac-

tory reason to conclude, that he will not. The impossibility of his

speaking falsehood is supposed by us to exist, where it must ne-

cessarily exist, if at all, in the cause, which induces him to speak

truth ; that is, in the moral attribute of his nature, commonly called

Truth, or Veracity. If there be nothing in his nature, which, as a

cause, influences him to speak truth ; then his speaking truth here-

tofore has been, and his speaking truth hereafter, if he should in

fact speak it, will be, a mere contingency. If , then, it is impossi-

blefor God to lie ; it is so, for this reason only; that there is in his

nature a cause, which invariably produces truth in him, as its proper

and uniform effect ; viz. the moral attribute of Truth, or Vera-

city . But of this cause, what conception are we able to form ? Plain-

ly, none at all. Its effects are all, that we know ; and from these

only, or from its connexion with other moral attributes, do we

argue even its existence. Shall we, then, deny this attribute to

God; and say, that all which we mean, and all which he means,

when he is called a God of truth, is, that he has invariably spoken

truth hitherto ? There was a period in duration, when he had not

spoken at all ; because there was no being, beside himself , and

therefore none, to whom he could speak . But will any man say,

he was not then, as truly and entirely as at any period afterwards,

a God of truth ?

Nor shall we be materially more successful in our inquiries con-

cerning Operations, than concerning attributes and agents . Christ

declares, that every man, who sees the kingdom of God, must be

born again of the Spirit of God. But what conception are we

able to form of Regeneration, beyond the mere fact ? Christ him-

self teaches us in his allusion to the wind, in the same discourse,

that we are unconscious, alike, of the manner in which, and the

Agent by whom, it is produced. Shall we then deny the fact, that

man is thus regenerated ? What is true of the attribute of truth,

thus considered, and of the operation, by which the new birth is

thus formed in man, is equally true of other attributes, and other

operations . Universally, substance, causation, and the modus ope-

randi, lie wholly beyond our reach. But shall we on this account

deny the facts ; or assert, that there are no causes to produce

them ? In the former case, we shall annihilate the universe at once ;

and, in the latter, pronounce every fact to be a mere contingency.

Thus it appears, that the general argument, on which the scheme

concerning the human soul, opposed in this discourse, is founded,

does not contribute, even in the remotest manner, to support it . It

appears also, that according to this argument, the very fundamental

IDEAS AND EXERCISES .

SER. XXIV . ] 369

principles of all science must be given up, as a collection ofpal-

pable absurdities.

Having premised these things, I shall now proceed to offer some

direct arguments against this scheme.

1st. It is directly contrary to the natural conceptions ofmankind,

and is therefore false .

Every man living, naturally and originally conceives, that he

himself is a being ; a substance ; an agent ; immediately the sub-

ject of his own thoughts ; and the cause, and author, of his voli-

tions and actions. By his preceding thoughts, volitions, and ac-

tions, he feels conscious to himself , that he influences, in a great

variety of ways, those which succeed ; and that by his past and

present conduct he so influences his future conduct, that it would

never be what it is, but for such influence. At the same time, he

is equally conscious, that he was the subject of past thoughts, and

the author of past conduct, during a period, which he denominates

his life. This he considers himself as knowing, by means of the

evidence termed remembrance ; and regards himself , as havinghad

from the utmost limit of that period, a continued being. This he

witnesses, every day, by saying, " I was the subject of such and

such thoughts, and the author of such and such conduct and de-

signs, at such and such times : " denoting, that the something, which

he calls I , and which he considers as a living, acting, existence,

was in being at these several times ; and has had a continued be-

ing, to the present time. He does not say, " Such an idea existed

at such a time ; such a volition ; such an exercise , or action : " but

that " I , " a certain something, totally distinct from the idea, or the

exercise, " was the subject of that idea , or exercise, the author ofit ;

the agent, by whom it was performed, or brought to pass. " Whether

this be not the only course ofthinking, adopted by us with respect

to this subject, I appeal to every member of this assembly to de-

cide: for he will find the proof complete in his own mind. This

mode of thinking is so natural and necessary to man, that no other

mode can, without great labour and pains-taking, be pursued, for

any length of time, by any man ; if , indeed, it can be thus pursued

at all.

But the mode ofthinking, natural to man, was constituted by God

himself , and inwrought in our very nature. If , then, this mode is

erroneous ; God has produced the error by his own creative act ;

and is himself the author of a standing, universal delusion, of which

man is the subject alway; not by any bias of inclination, but by

the original constitution of his nature. Is such conduct reconcile-

able with the divine character ; with that perfect sincerity, with

that infinite love of truth, which on the best grounds we attribute

to our Maker ? If by his own voluntary act he deludes us in this

instance, and necessitates us to be deluded; is it not rationally to

be supposed, that he may delude us in any and every other ?

Further; Th The real works of God, whatever they are, are un

VOL. I. 47

THE SOUL NOT A CHAIN OF

370 (SER . XXIV .

doubtedly the best and most perfect displays ofhis character. When,

therefore, Intelligent creatures conceive of his works, as they real-

by are; they conceive of Him, the author of them, in the manner

most honourable to himself , and most agreeable to his pleasure.

For such conceptions, then, he undoubtedly formed them. Ac-

cordingly, if they exercise their faculty of understanding, and em-

ploy their powers of conceiving, in the manner in which they were

constituted , faithfully, and without negligence ; their conceptions,

it ought to be presumed, will be right, and true, so far as they ex-

tend. Their conceptions may be very few; but they will not be

necessarily erroneous. They may mistake, as they must be igno-

rant, with regard to things beyond the limits of their capacity.

But their original mode of conceiving, cannot be supposed to lead

them of course to misconception. If the contrary be true ; then

Godhas, by the constitution of their minds, led them necessarily

to misconceive of his works ; and to regard him as having made,

not the things which he has really made, but totally other things ;

and necessarily to conceive of him in a totally other light, than

that in which he would be exhibited by the real works of his hands.

In this case, they are prevented from knowing his real character

by his works ; the only medium, through which it can be known at

all ; and are led to form a false character of him, from that consti-

tution, which he has given to their minds.

This argument is not a little illustrated by the nature of Lan-

guage. Language was originally given to mankind by God, as the me-

dium of communicating their thoughts to each other. It is, there-

fore, unquestionably a just and true medium of communication.

This is further proved by the fact, that he has himself used it to

communicate his own thoughts to mankind ; and used it in exactly

the same manner, in which it is customarily used by them. But

all languages are formed on the scheme of the existence, and

agency, of real beings, called men. Such beings, particularly, are

denoted in all languages by the personal pronouns. Each of these

expresses a being, an agent, who thinks, and acts ; and who is uni-

formly spoken of as a thinking, acting being ; the subject of quali-

ties and powers, and the author of consequent actions . Every

man uses language in this manner. In the same manner, God uses

the language of men ; and not only speaks of himself , as an exist-

ing , living agent, thinking and acting in such and such manners ;

but of men also, as existing, thinking, and acting, as really as him-

self . To this scheme every part of language is so conformed, that

no man can possibly discourse, even for a few minutes, in such a

manner, as to conform his language to the scheme, which I am op-

posing. The very abettors of it are obliged , in spite of their phi-

losophy, to speak in the same manner with that of other men ; and

mustform a new language, if they would discourse in a manner

accordant with their philosophy.

IDEAS AND EXERCISES .

SER. XXIV. ] 371

That language is truly expressive of the manner, in which men

really think, cannot be questioned. Men, therefore, unquestion-

ably think, and ever have thought, in the manner, thus clearly ex-

hibited by the very nature of their language. As this language

was originally communicated, and has since been extensively used,

by God himself; it is rationally concluded, that the thoughts which

it expresses are just and true.

2dly. Attributes cannot be conceived to exist independently of sub-

stances , or of something in which they inhere.

No man conceives, that extension, solidity, and mobility, make up

what he calls matter; but all men regard matter, as being an ex-

tended, solid, moveable something ; which something, is entirely dis-

tinct from these attributes ; and is the subject, in which they are

inherent. By the abettors of this scheme it is thought to be an ob-

jection against the existence of substance, that we cannot conceive

ofits nature. Let them try, whether they can form a conception

of an idea, possessing an independent existence ; of consciousness,

without a being to be conscious ; of an exercise, without any thing

exercised, or without a subject ofthat exercise. If they can form

distinct conceptions, of this kind, they must undoubtedly be pro-

nounced to possess minds of a very peculiar structure .

3dly. This scheme destroys personal Identity.

An idea is a mere event ; having a momentary existence, and

then perishing for ever. Should another idea afterwards exist, ex-

actly resembling it in every thing, but the period in which it exists,

it would not, and could not, be the same ; but would differ from it,

in consequence of being separated from it by time, just as if the

two ideas were to co-exist, and were separated from each other by

place, and number. As we could not say, in the latter case, that

the two ideas were but one, or the same ; so we could no more

truly say this , in the former case. An example will make this subject .

perfectly familiar. Two equal parts of space, separated from each

other by intervening space, are numerically different, and cannot

be said, with even the appearance of truth, to be the same ; but

are intuitively discerned to be distinct from each other. In the

same manner, two equal parts of duration, separated by interven-

ing duration, are intuitively discerned not to be the same; but are

perfectly distinct from each other. The hour between eleven and

twelve, which existed yesterday, cannot re-exist to-day, or here-

after ; but has perished for ever ; and cannot be recalled even by

God himself , since its re-existence would involve a contradiction .

In the same manner it involves a contradiction to suppose, that

an idea, which existed yesterday, should re-exist to- day. On this

plan, therefore, the soul of man has no continued existence, except

for an indivisible moment; and is not the same thing, which it was

the preceding hour, day, or year; but has varied, and become an

absolutely new soul, through every moment, which has passed

since it was created; and will continue to be a new thing, every

moment throughout eternity

THE SOUL NOT A CHAIN OF

372 [SER. XXIV .

Should it be alleged , that personal Identity consists in Conscious-

ness ; that present or future ideas may be attended with a Conscious-

ness of the existence of those which are past ; andthat thus Identity

may be preserved : I answer, that Bishop Berkeley has demonstra-

ted , andany man of reflection may easily perceive the demonstra-

tion, that personal Identity does not, and cannot, consist in con-

sciousness. Consciousness, instead of being personal identity, is

only the evidence of it ; as may be easily and unanswerably proved.

But no evidence can exist of that which is not. As in the case sup-

posed, therefore, there is no such identity in fact ; no evidence of

it can exist.

4thly . According to this scheme, it follows, that there is nothing,

which can be punished, or rewarded by God.

According to the Scriptures, God will reward, and punish, that,

and that only, which is the subject of guilt ; and, according both

to the Scriptures and Common Sense, this is the only equitable

mode of administration. But the guilt, or the virtue, if either be

imputable to a mere idea, or exercise, is imputable only to those

ideas , and exercises, which existed at the time, when the guilt, or

the virtue, existed. But these, even if we should allow them to be

capable of punishment, or reward, have all perished before the

day of trial, and can never exist again. That part of the chain of

ideas and exercises, which will exist at the judgment, will have be-

gun to exist after the day of probation is ended ; and cannot be

chargeable with guilt , which existed before themselves existed.

These very ideas, also, will perish before the punishment will be be-

gun ; and will not be the ideas actually punished. Other ideas ,

not eventhen in existence, but which will have begun to exist after

the trial, and after the sentence, will be the things, by which the

✔ punishment will be experienced. Thus the whole of what is in-

tended by trial, reward, and punishment, according to this system ,

amounts to this : that there are many chains of ideas and exercises,

successively existing, partly during a period, called a state of pro-

bation, and partly during another period, called a state of reward.

In one case, the beginning of a chain is formed of virtuous ideas

and exercises ; and the end, of happy ones : in another, the begin-

ning is formed of sinful ideas and exercises ; and the end, of miser-

able ones . I presume this will be admitted to be a strange con-

ception of the Creation and Providence of God.

5thly. According to this scheme, neither guilt, nor virtue, can

exist.

In all the views, which have been formed by the human mind

concerning vice and virtue, or ( if this is saying too much) in those

which have been formed by common sense, it has been universally

deemed indispensable to the existence of either, that a natural

ability to choose either to obey, or disobey, the law of God, should

precede, or accompany, the virtue, or the vice ; and that the obe-

dience, or disobedience, should not be, in the natural sense , necessary.

IDEAS AND EXERCISES.

SER. XXIV.J 373

Accordingly, a finite agent has been supposed to exist, possessed

of understanding to perceive, and ability to choose, that which was

good, or evil; that which was conformed, or not conformed, to the

law, under which he was placed. Whenever he was unpossessed

of such an ability ; it has been rather supposed, that he was in-

capable of either virtue or vice. According to this view of com-

mon sense, the scheme of the Scriptures seems every where to be

formed. But according to the scheme, which I am opposing, each

idea and exercise in the chain, is produced by an immediate crea-

tive act of God, and must, by natural necessity, be what it is. How,

let me ask, can it, in the natural sense of possibility, be otherwise

than it is ? In the first place, an idea or exercise, itself an attri-

bute, can never be the subject of the attribute of power ; and can,

therefore, do nothing towards rendering itself any thing beside

what it is . Secondly, it is not in existence, to prevent itself from

being what it is, until it actually becomes possessed of its proper

character ; and, therefore, could not on this account have prevent-

ed the existence of this character. And thirdly, it is made what it

is by Omnipotence, which nothing can resist, or oppose ; and, there-

fore, is what it is by the most perfect natural necessity. In what

manner an idea, or exercise, thus created, can be guilty for having

an existence, and character, which it has no natural power to avoid ,

and for being what it is by a direct act of creation, I confess my-

self wholly unable to comprehend. It ought here to be remem-

bered, that all preceding volitions, and ideas, have perished, an-

tecedently to the present volition or idea ; and, therefore, if we

concede, that they were capable of influence, while they existed,

they could have no influence on that which is present, because it

had not begun to exist until after they had perished. Each idea

and exercise is, on the contrary, created what it is, independently

of all which precede it.

6thly. This scheme annihilates the influence of Motives .

Motives in their nature are addressed to beings, supposed to be

capable of being moved, or influenced, by them. But according

to this scheme, each idea and exercise is immediately created, what

it is ; and derives its nature and character, not from any preceding

motive, but from Omnipotence. Motives can be addressed only to

things, existing at the time when they are addressed. But the idea

or exercise, which exists at that time, instantly perishes ; and can

have no possible influence on the nature, or character, of the new

one which succeeds it. This, therefore, which the motive is intend-

ed to affect, is removed by the nature of the case, beyond the pos-

sibility of being affected by it. Still, God addresses motives in his

word to mankind; commends them for being influenced by them,

and blames them for not being thus influenced. How can this be

consistent with the justice ofGod, when he has himself made it ab-

solutely impossible, that any such influence should exist ? Besides,

if the influence of a motive really affected the preceding idea, and

THE SOUL NOT A CHAIN OF

374 [SER. XXIV .

in the nature of things it were possible, that the influence should

extend to the succeeding one ; yet , since he creates the succeeding

one such as it is, it is plain, that on this account, also, no such in-

fluence can affect it, unless in direct opposition to an act of Omni-

potence. Motives, therefore, can have no possible influence on

man, according to this scheme ; and yet God proposes them to

man, and blames, and punishes him for not being influenced by

them. Can this be supposed of the Creator ?

7thly. Mankind receive impressions from each other, both of

thought and volition, or of idea and exercise : but ideas and exer-

cises can never communicate a consciousness of their existence to any

thing.

To communicate is an act; and is the result of power. But

ideas and exercises, which are themselves mere acts, cannot be the

subjects of powers, and become themselves active. That other

men communicate to us many thoughts and volitions, is too certain

to admit either of doubt, or illustration . The communication cer-

tainly exists, and exists continually. Either, then, the Idea, which

forthe time being is the Soul, the Man, communicates the apprehen-

sion of itself to another Idea, which for the time being is another Soul :

or God by a direct act of his power conveys this apprehension .

That an Idea, a thing, merely passive, should act in this manner,

or any manner, is plainly impossible. That God should convey to

us an apprehension of an Idea, and so convey it as to give us irre-

sistible conviction that it is conveyed to us, always, by a finite

agent, is, so far as I can perceive, the same thing as merely, and

uniformly, to delude us. Certainly this cannot be attributed to God.

Yet, as every such communication is unquestionably an act, it cer-

tainly is performed by an agent. An Idea ; a mere attribute ; is

intuitively not an agent, but an effect of agency. God is an agent ;

but he cannot delude his creatures .

Further, a great multitude of these communications are fraught

with moral turpitude ; are lies, slanders, sophisms ; are full of ma-

lignity, and blasphemy ; are direct, and designed, temptations to

sin . Can these be the immediate acts of JEHOVAH ? Is it possible,

that, where such is the act, He should be the agent ? Can we at-

tribute this conduct to our Creator, and feel ourselves to be guilt-

less ? I will leave it, therefore, to my antagonists, to explain how

ideas and exercises can communicate Knowledge of themselves, to

other ideas and exercises ; or how this communication can be

charged to God .

8thly. According to this scheme, the Scriptural doctrine of the

perseverance of saints is false.

According to this scheme, many links in the chain of ideas and

exercises are, as they plainly must be acknowledged to be, acts of

mere disobedience ; and are therefore absolutely, and only sinful :

while others in the same chain, are considered as acts of mere obe-

dience; andare therefore absolutely, and only, virtuous or holy.

IDEAS AND EXERCISES .

SER. XXIV . ] 375

Inthis manner, then, such men, as we call good men, or Christians,

are alternately perfectly holy, and perfectly sinful . St. John, in

his first epistle, fifth chapter, and eighteenth verse, says, We know ,

that whosoever is born ofGod, sinneth not ; but he that is begotten of

God, keepeth himself; and that wicked one toucheth him not. As

this is said by the Spirit ofGod, it is true. But in what sense is it

true ? Certainly not in the absolute sense, that he who is born of

God , does not commit any sin : for the same apostle says, chapter

i. 8, If we say, that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves ; and the

truth is not in us . In this sense only, then, is it true, viz. that he,

who is born of God, does not become absolutely a sinner. Yet in the

case supposed, every such person becomes absolutely a sinner.

For many such ideas and exercises in the long chain, which ex-

tends through life, are absolutely sinful, during their existence ; and

each of these, during its continuance, is the Man, for the time be-

ing. For according to this scheme, there is, during each such pe-

riod, nothing else existing.

Thus, if the scheme be true, man in his best estate falls from

grace, and rises to it again, alternately ; becomes absolutely a

saint, and absolutely a sinner ; is perfectly an object of the divine

abhorrence, and the divine complacency, by turns ; in thousands

and millions of instances . How this doctrine is to be reconciled

with the declarations of the Scriptures on this subject, I shall leave

to the abettors of the scheme to determine.

9thly. This scheme contradicts intuitive certainty.

So far as I know, it is agreed by all philosophers, and, if the sub-

ject were fairly proposed, would be by every man, that we are all

intuitively certain of our own existence. But I am not more cer-

tain, that Iexist, than that I act ; that I perceive, think, speak,

reason, choose, and carry my choice into execution. I am as in-

tuitively certain, that a something, denoted by the word Ior my-

self ; is a cause of certain effects ; an agent, performing certain

actions ; as I am of any possible proposition. These effects , I also

intuitively know , would not exist, were there not such an agent, or

cause. My actions are intuitively seen by me not to be effects of

an extraneous cause, or of something beside myself . It is meta-

physically true, and is seen by me with the highest possible cer-

tainty to be true, that the thoughts and volitions, which I call mine,

are really mine; and are brought into existence by an active power,

which I intuitively perceive myself continually to exercise. They

are not the thoughts, or volitions, of another ; but are certainly

discerned by me to be mine alone.

Whether this account of the subject be not exactlyjust, I ap-

peal to every individual, to determine for himself . The propriety

of this appeal will be evident from the consideration , that there is

no other possible mode of presenting this subject to the view of

mankind : since, whatever any . man can know concerning it, he

canknow only by recurring to what passes within himself . As the

THE SOUL NOT A CHAIN OF

376 [ SER. XXIV .

heart ofman answers to the heart ofman, just as the face answereth

to the face in the water ; I am warranted to conclude, that every

other man, with respect to this subject, experiences just such views,

as I experience ; and possesses the same evidence, which I pos-

sess.

But if this evidence does not assure me, that I exist as an agent,

an active cause, originally and spontaneously operating, it will, I

think, be impossible for me to be assured, that there is any such

agent. The highest evidence of causation, or efficiency ; of the

necessity of a cause to the existence of an effect, of the production

ofbeings, and changes in being, as effects, and therefore of the

necessity of an Original cause, to account for the existence and

government of all things, is found by me in the consciousness of

my own agency. The certainty, perceived by mere mental in-

spection, that the changes passing in my own mind are producedby

my own active power ; is a higher certainty, than that , with which

I perceive any other changes to be accomplished by any other ac-

tive power. All other certainty of the production of such changes

is presented by sensitive experience, or derived from reasoning,

founded on this experience. But it is clear , that sensitive expe-

rience furnishes evidence, of a kind always less certain and indu-

bitable, than that, which is seen by mental inspection. If , then,

we cannot rely on the fact , that we are such agents, when it is ex-

hibited with the certainty of mental inspection ; we shall be much

less warranted to rely on the fact, that there are any other such

agents ; because it must always be supported by evidence, in its

own nature inferior, and in a less degree requiring, or warranting,

our assent. The admission, therefore, of this scheme will directly,

and fundamentally, weaken, ifnot destroy, the evidence, by which

we prove the being ofGod.

Besides, if we are not agents, or active causes, possessing active

powers, by which we can originate certain changes in the state of

things, but are mere chains of ideas and exercises, it will be diffi-

cult to assign a reason, why God is not, also, a mere chain of ideas

and exercises . Every argument against the existence of man, as

a substance, and agent, must, I think, lie with the same force

against the fact, that God is a substance, and an agent. On the

one hand, there is at least as little difficulty in supposing, that an

Omnipotent agent may create a finite one, as that such an agent

can be self -existent ; and, on the other, that God can create finite

agents and substances, as that he can create chains of ideas and

exercises ; mere attributes, existing separately, and independently

ofany subject.

The Scriptures every where exhibit man as an agent, such as I

have described. St. Paul, speaking of himself , and his fellow-apos-

tles , says, 2 Corinthians vi. 1, We then , as workers together with

God, beseech you also, that ye receive not the grace ofGod in vain.

And again, 1 Corinthians iv. 15, For though ye have ten thousand

IDEAS AND EXERCISES.

SER. XXIV . ] 377

instructers in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers : for in Christ

Jesus have I begotten you through the Gospel. In the first of these

passages, the Apostle directly asserts, that he and his companions

are workers together with God in the great business of promoting

the salvation of men : In the second, that he has been an agent, or

active instrument, that is, he has been active, in conjunction with the

Spirit of God, in producing the regeneration of the Corinthians . As

he spoke this by the inspiration of that Spirit, it cannot but be true ;

and true in that sense, in which it naturally strikes the minds of the

great body of mankind; because it was written chiefly for them ;

and because they could understand the words to mean nothing else.

These specimens may serve as examples of thousands more, in

which the same thing is declared, in substance, throughout the

Scriptures . I know not, that there is any particular advantage in

selecting these rather than any others . Every page of the Bible,

almost, will furnish many, as expressive of the same thing, as those

which I have selected. But these are sufficient ; and, ifthese will

not be admitted, I presume no others will be. If the Apostles were

workers together with God ; then they were not merely passive.

If St. Paul really begat the Corinthian Christians, in the spiritual

sense ; then he was not merely passive. IHe was not merely an

effect; but, while he was formed by Creative power, and was in

this sense an effect of that power ; he was also formed an agent, a

cause, possessed in its own nature of active power, capable of

spontaneous exertion ; of volitions which were its own ; and of mo-

tivity, by which it could commence motions and actions in itself ,

and changes of many kinds in other beings.

Ihave thus considered this subject at length, in the manner in

which it has appeared to my own view ; and, if I mistake not, have

shown, that the scheme, which I have opposed, is erroneous in itself ,

and is followed by consequences plainly and eminently absurd.

Each member of my audience must now be left to decide for him-

self , whether the doctrine, contended against, be true or false ,

Scriptural or anti-scriptural ; whether the soul of Man be a chain

of ideas and exercises ; each created for the moment , and then

perishing for ever ; a concatenation of mere events, in their nature

fleeting and vanishing, and incapable of any permanent existence,

even for an hour; or whether it is a spirit ; a substance ; a per-

manent being ; the subject of a continued existence ; an agent,

possessed of active powers ; capable of voluntarily originating im-

portant designs, and carrying them into execution ; and thus be-

coming a worker together with God in the interesting purposes of

his eternal kingdom. According to the latter of these schemes ,

the soul of man is one ; created at one time ; and continuing the

same, as to its substance and nature, throughout eternity : accord-

ing to the other, the soul, for the time being, is the idea, or exer-

cise, existing at that time ; commencing its existence with the ex-

istence of the idea, and perishing with it. Of course, instead of

VOL. I. 48

THE SOUL NOT A CHAIN, &c.

378 [SER. XXIV.

one soul, there are in each chain as many, as there are ideas and

exercises in that chain : that is, millions literally innumerable. If

this scheme can be seriously adopted, rationally understood, and

satisfactorily realized, by any man; it must be done in a manner,

which I confess myself unable to comprehend, and by a mind,

possessed of views and reasonings, to which I can make no pre-

tension.

SERMON XXV.

THE CHIEF END OF MAN.

1 COR. x. 31. -Whether , therefore, ye eat , or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to

the glory of God.

IN the three last discourses, I have considered the Creation, and

Nature of Man. The next subject, naturally offered to our view

by a system of Theology, is The End, for which man was made.

By this I mean the principal purpose, which he is fitted to answer ;

the thing, which God had principally in view in bringing Man into

existence.

The importance ofthis subject can need very little illustration.

The question, For what end was I made ; or what end are my exist-

ence andfaculties designed to answer ; is instinctively realized by

every sober man to import all, that is of any real moment to him-

self .

In the text, we are required to do whatsoever we do to the glory

ofGod. This precept I consider as disclosing to us the true end,

for which we were made. In examining it , I shall attempt to

show,

I. What it is to glorify God:

II. That this is constituted by Him the chief end ofman : and,

III. The Propriety of this divine constitution.

I. Ishall attempt to show what it is to glorify God.

In the Scriptures, mankind are frequently required to glorify their

Creator. But it is perfectly plain, that they cannot, in any manner,

or degree, change his nature, or the state of his perfections : these

being absolutely without variableness , or shadow of turning. It may,

I think, be said, not only with truth, but with the highest reverence,

that God himself cannot alter his perfections. Indeed this is di-

rectly declared in the text, which I have partially quoted. Yet it

will not be denied, that God can glorify himself; that is, make him-

self glorious, by acting in such a manner, as is approved by his own

infinite wisdom, and as will display the glory ofhis character to the

view of his Intelligent creatures . In a manner, generally resembling

this, those creatures, and among them mankind, can also glorify

him : that is, they can act in such a manner, as to show his glory

to each other, and in this way to please him, and gain his approba-

tion .

To glorify God, in this sense, is,

1st. To know him.

The perfections of God are the glory of his character. In order

THE CHIEF END OF MAN.

380 [ SER . XXV

that these may be disclosed by one Intelligent creature to another,

it is plainly necessary, that he should first know them, or under-

stand what they are : this knowledge being the basis, on which all

other regard to them must be founded. Without this knowledge,

mankind might indeed glorify God, as he is glorified by the mute,

passive, incogitative works of his hands ; such as earth, plants, and

trees ; that is, by being displays of his power and skill to conscious

beings ; but they cannotinthis manner glorify him, as Intelligent

beings.

It is to be observed, that knowing God, so as to glorify him, de-

notes, that we have just conceptions of his character, and not those

which are false and imaginary. All the imaginary views, which we

form of God, are views, not of the real God, but ofa God fashioned

by our own minds. In every erroneous conception, which we

form of the Creator, we may be said, with a small alteration of the

language of Scripture, to change the glory of the incorruptible God

into an image made by corruptible man ; and an image, also, usually

made like unto him; always debasing the character of JEHOVAH,

and robbing it of its real and infinite perfection.

The knowledge of God is gained wholly, either from his Works,

or from his Word. To himself only is he known in the abstract.

In creation and providence, however, and especially in the Bible,

his intelligent creatures can behold, as in a glass, the glory of the

Lord. This knowledge we acquire just so far, as we understand

the true nature of his works, and the true meaning of his word ; and

no farther. Erroneous schemes of Philosophy, and false systems of

Divinity, contain and convey, so far as they are erroneous, no know-

ledge of God at all ; and can never, by themselves, be the means of

glorifying him. Therefore they can never become of any real

value to us. As this knowledge can be gained only by study ; so,

if we love to glorify God, we shall devote ourselves, as much as

may be, to the study both of his works and of his word.

2dly. To think of him in a manner, suited to his character.

The perfections of God are immensely great, glorious, and won-

derful ; andjustly claim, to be thought of by us in a manner, cor-

responding with their exalted nature. They claim, particularly, to

be thought of by us frequently, daily many times a day, and in a

sense alway. Nothing else deserves in any measure so great a

share of our thoughts : nothing else, therefore, should in any

ineasure engross them to so great a degree. God is infinitely great-

er , wiser, andbetter, than his creatures ; andjustly demands, that

we should devote ourselves to him, in a preference to them, which

is proportioned to his character. It is one charge against the wick-

ed, and one part of their wickedness, that God is not in all their

thoughts. It is one attribute of good beings, who voluntarily glorify

him, that God is in all their thoughts. If we would belong to the

number of such beings ; he must be in all our thoughts ; that is, we

must think of him, in a sense, unceasingly.

THE CHIEF END OF MAN.

SER . XXV .] 381

To this end it is necessary, that we think of him willingly, or with

pleasure ; that we find him in all his works, both of Creation and

Providence ; that we regard him as the original and universal Agent ;

as present, acting, and visible, in every thing, which is great, or

good; as particularly visible in the things, with which we are con-

versant in our own personal afflictions, and blessings, in those of

our friends, and in those of our country ; in his dispensations to his

church, and in his government of the world. As these things are

chiefly explained to us in the Scriptures ; so we should especially

think of God, as his character is there unfolded ; and labour pecu-

liarly to find him there.

To the same end it is still more necessary, that we think of him

justly: that is, that our thoughts of him be noble and exalted ;

suited, so far as our capacities will allow, to the great and wonder-

ful character, which he has discovered of himself in his works, and

inhis word.

3dly. To love him.

Godis infinitelythe greatest and most excellent of all beings. In

order to glorify him, it is necessary, that we not only discern, but

also relish, this character ; that we wish well to the furtherance

and completion of his designs, and rejoice in the perfect happiness,

which he enjoys in the contemplation of his own excellence and

the accomplishment of his pleasure, with supreme benevolence to

him; that we delight in the beauty, loveliness, and glory, of his

character, with supreme complacency ; and that we feel the benefits,

bestowed on us and ours, with supreme gratitude. Love, in the

general sense, is the sum and substance of all the exercises ofpiety;

of reverence, submission, dependence, resignation, confidence,

hope, and joy. When, therefore, it is here said, that it is neces-

sary to love God, in order to glorify him ; it is intended, that, to

this end, we must become the subjects of all these exercises. Nor

is this all, which is necessary. We must also become the subjects

of them habitually, and unceasingly ; and, the more we know of

his character, the more we must delight in it ; and thus render to

him a continually increasing tribute of piety. All this, and this

only, is glorifying God with the heart ; the most exalted and noble

of our moral faculties; for this is that conduct of the heart, which

is suited to the nature of the object beloved.

4thly. To serve him .

God is originally obeyed in the correspondence of the heart with

his precepts ; and is never in the proper sense obeyed, except in

those cases , where such a correspondence exists. But to serve

him, in the full sense, denotes also, the conformity of our external

conduct to his mostholy will. Accordingly, he has prescribed to

us, not only the general spirit of obedience which is seated in the

heart, but also the various modes, in which this spirit operates use-

fully towards Him, our fellow creatures, and ourselves. Towards

him immediately, it operates usefully, and amiably, in the several

THE CHIEF END OF MAN.

382 [SER. XXV.

acts of worship, public and private, enjoined in the Scriptures ;

towards our fellow creatures, in the several duties of patriotism,

kindness, truth, forgiveness, and charity ; and towards ourselves in

the duties of diligence, meekness, humility, temperance, and gen-

eral self -denial. In these things , at large, we are especially em-

ployed as active beings ; and glorify God, both by conforming our

conduct to his character and pleasure, and by exhibiting this con-

formity to the view of our fellow men.

5thly. To enjoy him.

To enjoy God, is to take pleasure in his character. This charac-

ter is one, unchangeable, and perfect ; yet it is formed of perfec-

tion endlessly diversified. On the one hand, it is infinitely great ;

on the other , it is infinitely beautiful. It involves, also, all the

varieties of greatness and beauty. Innumerable displays and di-

versities of both greatness and beauty, are made to us in those

parts of Creation and Providence, with which we are acquainted ;

of greatness and beauty both natural and moral, of matter and of

mind. All these are merely diversified images of beauty and great-

ness, originally existing in the divine Mind ; feeble reflections of

the beams of the Sun of Righteousness. Moral greatness and

moral beauty are especially that, which is called the image ofGod

in the Scriptures ; that , in which man was originally created ; that,

to which he is restored by the truth of the Gospel, and the Spirit

of Grace ; that, in which God himself especially delights ; and that,

which, therefore, ought to be especially relished by us.

The

greatness of God is properly the object of reverence and admira-

tion : the beauty of his character is properly the object of love :

names, which in different modes are expressive only of pleasure,

or delight , existing in different forms. This delight is spontane-

ously experienced by all Intelligent beings, who are disposed to

glorify their Maker. All these find their happiness ultimately in

him; and, whether that happiness is gained from the contempla-

tion of his character, or found in his works and dispensations ;

whether it springs up in peace and self -approbation, or in the re-

ciprocated benevolence of our fellow -creatures ; whether it is fur-

nished by present enjoyment, or is anticipated in the delightful

foretaste of hope ; it is all finally referred to him alone, as its sole

Author. By every such mind he is regarded as the fountain of

living waters, whence flows every stream of pleasure to the un-

numbered creatures, which he has made.

I have considered the enjoyment of God, as one of the means of

glorifying him, under a distinct head, because it is usually consid-

ered as a separate exercise of the mind ; and not because I do

not suppose it to be in a great measure included under the former

heads. Our enjoyment is really and chiefly found in the exercises

already specified ; and, whenever we are the subjects of those ex-

ercises, we are also the subjects of corresponding enjoyment.

Even in this world, such enjoyment is experienced, in no small

THE CHIEF END OF MAN.

SER. XXV. ] 383

degree, by good men. In the future world, it will fill the minds of

allglorified beings. There they will behold their Maker face to

face, and know, in some measure, as they also are known. Here

they taste , and see , that the Lord is good; here they rejoice in the

Lord, and joy in the God of their salvation. There they will find

fulness ofjoy, and pleasures for ever more ; and there, God will be

all in all.

That in all these ways God is glorified , hardly needs illustration .

When we study to know God, we show, that he is, in our view,

deserving ofbeing thus studied and known. When we entertain

high and noble thoughts of his character, we declare, in the most

direct manner, that his perfections are sufficiently great and glo-

rious to claim such thoughts of us . When we love him, we show,

in the most decisive manner, that he is lovely. When we serve

him, we acknowledge, in the strong language ofpractice, that he is

a sovereign, who ought to be served, and served voluntarily.

When we enjoy him, we prove, that in our view, he is an object,

great and good, beautiful and desirable. When we exercise our-

selves in all these ways with supreme devotion of heart, and make

God the object of a regard, which admits of no comparison with

any other, we testify, that he is greater, better, and more desira-

ble, than all things ; a Being, to whom none can be equal, none

can be second.

II. To glorify God is constituted by him, the chief end of Man.

This truth is easily evinced in two ways.

1st. God has, in the Scriptures, enjoined this conduct as the only

duty ofMan. WhateverGod designed as the great end of the creation of man,

he himself perfectly knew, unquestionably chose, and has cer-

tainly enjoined on man, if he has enjoined any thing. But this he

has enjoined, and this is all which he has enjoined. This, at the

same time, he has required with the promise of eternal life to obe-

dience, and the threatening of eternal death to disobedience : both

showing in the strongest manner, that he esteemed this End of

sufficient importance to be secured, on the one hand, by the al-

lurement ofan infinite reward ; and, on the other, by the terror of

an infinite punishment. From this it appears, that he regarded

the end as of infinite value ; and that, since he has commanded

nothing else, he esteemed nothing else as being comparatively of

any value. :

2dly. From the nature of the case, it is evident, that this is the

highest and noblest end, which man can accomplish.

As this position will be rendered clearly certain by the consider-

ations, suggested under the following head ; I shall only observe

here, that, admitting it to be true, the consequence follows in a

manner, which allows of no debate.

III. I shall now attempt to exhibit the propriety ofthis divine con-

stitution.

384 THE CHIEF END OF MAN .

[ SER . XXV .

This, I think, will plainly appear, from the following observa-

tions.

1st. When God created the Universe, he created it, that he might

glorify himself.

That this was the end of all the works of God, has, it is appre-

hended, beenmade sufficiently evident in a former discourse ; and

will, therefore, need no illustration at the present time. It ought

to be remembered, that no addition to the inherent glory, or ex-

cellence, of the Creator, was possible ; or is in this assertion sup-

posed to have been possible. This, therefore, was not, and could

not be, a part of the end, which he proposed in this great work.

But his glory could be manifested; and the manifestation of it is

what, both in the Scriptures, and in all sound theological discourses ,

is intended by the glorification of God. To show his own charac-

ter , to unfold his power, knowledge, and goodness, to creatures

capable of understanding them, was the supreme object, which he

had in view, in the production of all beings, and all events .

St. John declares, that God is love. In other words, benevo-

lence is the sum of his moral character, and the peculiar and dis-

tinguishing glory of his nature . This is that, which he himself

esteems his glory; that, for which he chiefly values himself; that,

which is the prime object of his own complacency. This perfec-

tion, then, he intended especially to manifest to his Intelligent

Creation .

It is the essence of benevolence to love, and to produce, hap-

piness ; and, of infinite benevolence, to love, and to produce, in-

finite happiness . As, therefore, benevolence is the moving prin-

ciple in the divine Mind, whence all its operations spring, and to

which they are all conformed ; it is evident, that , with knowledge

sufficient to contrive, and power sufficient to execute, whatever it

dictates, co- existing in the same Mind, all its dictates will of

course be accomplished. The good, therefore, in which infinite

benevolence delights, was originally chosen, has been actually

begun, is uninterruptedly pursued, and will be absolutely com-

pleted . 2dly. For the accomplishment ofthis end, he has created innume-

rable Creatures , capable of voluntarily co-operating with him in this

great design .

Angels and men, and probably many other beings, are formed

in the image of God; and, like him, are possessed of the three

great powers of understanding, will, and motivity. They are,

therefore, capable, not only of being passive subjects, on which

the glory of God can be displayed, and discerned ; but of being

also Agents, by whom his glory may be perceived, loved , enjoyed ,

and voluntarily promoted. The end, therefore, for which these

beings were made, though generally the same with that for which

inferior creatures were created, is essentially different, as to the man-

ner in which it is to be accomplished by them. Inferior creatures,

THE CHIEF END OF MAN.

SER. XXV . ] 385

such as exist in the mineral, vegetable, and animal kingdoms, are

means of the glory of God, merely as it is displayed in their na-

ture, structure, and uses ; while they, at the same time, are per-

fectly unconscious of being such means, and perfectly inactive

towards promoting it : contributing to it merely as passive effects ;

just as a watch is a medium of displaying the skill of the maker.

Intelligent beings, on the other hand, being possessed of active

powers, are not only such displays of the divine glory in their na-

ture and structure : but are able, also, to discern, so far as their

powers extend, the desirableness of the divine glory, to choose it

as the supreme object of all their designs and efforts, and to conse-

crate to the promotion of it, all their labours, throughout eternity.

Such creatures, are of course capable of glorifying God in a two-

fold manner ; viz. by the elevated and important endowments, of

which they are possessed, and in the voluntary exertion of their

active powers towards the accomplishment of the same end. Thus

they are far more noble, exalted, and estimable, in the eye of God,

than any other creatures .

3dly. God only can direct all things to the accomplishment of this

illustrious end .

That there is a possible good, capable of involving all , which

upon the whole is good and desirable ; that immensity furnishes

sufficient room, and eternity a sufficient duration, for its accom-

plishment ; that God in his Omniscience comprehends this system,

by his Omnipotence is able, and by his Goodness, or Benevolence,

is disposed, to bring it into existence ; and that consequently he

has begun, and will accomplish it ; are, unless I am deceived,

truths too clear to be rationally doubted. I shall, at this time,

take them, therefore, for granted.

But nothing is more plain, than that God only could originally

have devised such a system : all other minds being, without a

question, infinitely too limited for such a work. The beings and

events, which it demands and contains, are innumerable and

endlessly diversified ; and one of them is far too difficult a contri-

vance to have been formed by any mind, less than Omniscient.

As God only could have devised this immense and glorious sys-

tem at first ; so none but God is, at the present or any other period

of its existence, possessed of sufficient Wisdom to direct the innu-

merable parts of the vast machine, and their innumerable opera-

tions, to this great end. All the parts, and all their operations ,

are absolutely necessary to its perfect accomplishment. The

failure of either, even in a single instance, would be a defect ; and

a defect attended with an importance, inconceivable by any mind,

but His. The mischiefs, which would flow from such a defect in

the progress of eternity, can be comprehended by no finite under-

standing. Accordingly he has informed us, that the least event

does not come to pass ; that a sparrow does not fall to the ground ;

that a hair does not fall from our heads ; without his direction .

VOL. I. 49

386 THE CHIEF END OF MAN. [ SER . XXV.

How evident is it then , that the management of the whole system

demands his constant oversight, and control.

At the same time, his Power, as every man will readily acknow-

ledge, is at least equally necessary for this purpose. The hand,

which has ever rolled through the Universe the worlds of which it

is composed, must still continue to roll them. The power, by

which seasons revolve ; days and nights return ; light, and warmth,

and rains descend ; vegetation springs ; animal and rational energy

is quickened ; the sunshine of Intelligence, and the flame of Virtue,

are lighted up ; by which the wheels of the universe were set in

motion; and the regions of immensity and eternity peopled with

being; must still continue its unremitted exertions, or the whole

system would dissolve, and crumble into ruin.

Nor is the divine Benevolence less absolutely necessary for the

same end. No finite good-will is sufficiently vast, sufficiently inva-

riable, so superior to prejudice and provocation, so unassailable

by temptation, so incapable of weariness, so unsusceptible of decay,

as to be safely trusted with the ultimate conduct of so numerous,

varying, and important interests .

Thus it is evident, that unless God devise, direct, and control,

or, in a single word, manage with his power, wisdom, and good-

ness, the vast machine of the universe ; the great and divine pur-

pose, for which it was formed, can never be accomplished. This

immense good, therefore, infinitely desirable to the eye of wisdom

and goodness, and involving in itself all that is desirable, must

otherwise fail of course ; and nothing be left in its place, but deso-

lation and ruin.

4thly. Unless Intelligent beings voluntarily co- operate with God

in promoting this great end, it can never be accomplished.

This truth is easily evinced. God has assigned to Intelligent

beings their voluntary co-operation with him, as a part, and a pri-

mary part, of the end itself . There is in such beings no other vir-

tue, beside this voluntary co-operation . But the virtue of Intelli-

gent creatures is, beyond all comparison, far the most important

part of the whole end of Creation and Providence ; the chief con-

stituent of the divine glory ; and the chief object of the divine com-

placency in created existence. At the same time, it is, underGod,

the supreme and indispensable source of all that happiness, which

they were intended to enjoy throughout eternity. It is evident,

therefore, that unless Intelligent creatures thus co-operate with

their Creator ; the end of their existence, and that of all things ,

can never be accomplished.

It may, perhaps, be objected here, that this doctrine makes God

dependent on his creatures for the execution of his pleasure. This

objection has, at least in my opinion, extensively deceived and mis-

guided Christians ; and among them , not a small number ofdivines .

Ihave heretofore obviated it on a different occasion ; but it may be

useful to consider it again .

THE CHIEF END OF MAN

SER XXV . ] 387

The Independence of God does not at all consist in thefact, that

creatures are unnecessary to his purposes ; for by making them , he

has shown us, that they were thus necessary ; nor in the fact, that

his happiness would have been equally perfect, ifhe had never begun

the works of Creation and Providence ; for the Scriptures inform

us, that the Lord shall rejoice in all his works . But, if he had form-

ed no works, this part of his joy would have had no existence ;

and therefore his happiness would have been just so far incomplete .

The independence of God consists in his absolute sufficiency for

the accomplishment of all his purposes ; and in the absolute certain-

ty, which that sufficiency furnishes , that all his purposes will be ac-

complished. So long as these remain, he cannot but be absolutely

Independent. The necessity of the existence, and voluntary co-

operation, of Intelligent creatures to the purposes of God, affects

not, therefore, his independence, in any manner whatever. On the

contrary, it is a part, and a most important part, of those very work

ofGod, which he has chosen and brought into existence, in which

he rejoices, and will for ever rejoice .

It may be further objected, that many Intelligent beings do not

thus co- operate with their Maker ; and that, therefore , he will, thus

far, be disappointed, as to the accomplishment of his designs . If this

should be seriously said, I would refer the objector, for an answer,

to the case of Joseph's brethren, together with his comment upon

their conduct : Ye meant it for evil ; but God meant it for good.

From this case, as well as that of the Assyrian Monarch, as ex-

plained by God himself, Isaiah x. 5, to the end of the eleventh

Chapter, andfrom many others, recorded in the Scriptures, the ob-

jector may learn, that evil beings by their disobedience as truly

accomplish the divine purposes, as good beings by their obedi-

ence; and that, notwithstanding all their opposition, he will bring

good out of the evil which they design; that still his counsel will

stand, and he will do all his pleasure. But his pleasure would not

bedone, and his glory would not be displayed , in the same per-

fect manner, if no Intelligent creatures were to obey him by volun-

tarily co-operating with him in his designs. In this case, the whole

face of the universe would be changed, and a new, gloomy , and

distressing aspect be spread over the system of Creation and Pro-

vidence.

5thly. Intelligent creatures cannot thus co- operate with the designs

ofGod, but by conforming to his direction .

The coincidence of the heart with the general purpose of God ,

is undoubtedly the prime constituent of their obedience, or co-ope-

ration. But this is far from being all, that is necessary. As none,

but God, can know, or direct, the things which are to be done ; so

it is evident, that his Intelligent creatures, in order to the promo-

tion of his designs, must coincide with his directions. It has been

already observed , that they cannot direct themselves ; and that he

alone can direct them. As every part of his designs is necessary

THE CHIEF END OF MAN.

388 [ SER . XXV

to their perfection; so it is plain, that he, who alone knows what is

necessary, should universally direct the conduct of them, who do

not. All their thoughts, desires, designs, and labours, must, there-

fore, be guided by him ; and with an implicit confidence in his wis-

dom and rectitude, be entirely conformed to whatever he pre-

scribes . To his direction , the heart must implicitly conform itself ,

as well as to his general will ; and be disposed not only to glorify

him, but also to glorify him in exactly that manner, which he is

pleased to point out. Unless this manner be pursued ; the object

itself must eventually fail of its perfect accomplishment.

6thly. In such a conformity of heart, and of effort, consists all

the worth, and all the happiness of Rational creatures .

God is the source, and sum, of all good, both moral and natural.

To know and love him, is to know and love, in a sense, all that is

excellent, great, and lovely. To serve him, is to do all that is

amiable or desirable, all that is good or honourable, all that is

pleasing to God or profitable to his rational creatures .

True

happiness, and true worth, are attained in the same manner, and

by the same conduct. It is more blessed, says our Saviour, to give,

than to receive . It is not merely more amply rewarded by God,

but more happy in itself; necessarily, and in the nature of things ,

more happy. In other words, to do good is a more happy condi-

tion of being, than to receive good. But all worth consists in do-

ing good, and in the disposition by which it is done. In this course

of conduct, therefore, both happiness and worth are found with the

highest certainty , and in the greatest degree ; or, in better lan-

guage, both are found here only. But doing good and glorifying

God , are convertible phrases ; denoting exactly the same thing,

with one trifling exception : viz. that the former is sometimes used

in a sense less extensive, than that which is commonly attached

to the latter.

It is further to be observed, that in glorifying God, the mind is

engrossed by an object, which knows no limit, and in which, there-

fore, its efforts may be for ever repeated, enlarged, and exalted.

No law, nor consideration, demands, that it should limit its views,

desires , or labours. Excess, here, is impossible. Approved al-

way by itself , and by its Maker, the more, the greater its efforts

are, it sees no bound set to them, except by its capacity.

Beyond this, as doing good is the entire employment of every

rational being, whose heart, and labours, are thus conformed to the

pleasure of his Maker, the good, actually done, cannot fail, in the

progress of the system, of becoming immensely great. Where the

joint labours of any society are directed solely to the purpose of

producing happiness, these labours, if wisely directed, must of

course furnish happiness, proportioned to their extent, energy, and

duration. In the divine kingdom, a society, greater than the human

mind can estimate, all the members of which direct their labours

by the unerring wisdom of God, contributing its united efforts

THE CHIEF END OF MAN.

SER. XXV. ] 389

throughout eternity to the mere production of happiness, must ef-

fectuate this glorious object in a degree, transcending the compre-

hension of every mind, except the Omniscient. These efforts, it

is to be remembered, are all made in circumstances the most au-

spicious, and with provision the most ample, for the great end of

effectuating happiness . Happiness is the end of the whole system .

The circumstances, and the means, by which it is to be produced,

were devised by the Omniscience of God ; and are better suited

to the end, than any other, which Omniscience could devise.

At the same time, this good is enjoyed in a manner wholly pecu-

liar. The excellent and disinterested spirit, which is thus em-

ployed in promoting the design of God, in the formation of the uni-

verse; the manifestation of his own glory in the accomplishment

of the supreme good of his creatures ; rejoices of necessity in all

the happiness which is produced in other individuals , as in its own ;

and in that of the vast whole, with an ecstasy supereminent, and in-

capable of limitation. Thus both the spirit, which produces, and

the spirit which enjoys, contribute, each in its own way , to the

eventuation of more happiness, than can be originated by any

other cause, or enjoyed in any other manner.

All this , however, is only the one, combined, immense, and divine

effect of Infinite wisdom, power, and goodness. God is the original

and glorious cause ofall. To him, therefore, the eye instinctively

looks, as the ocean, whence all these innumerable, and perennial,

streams of enjoyment flow, and into which they return. His hand

began , and will for ever continue, this amazing work; and will be

seen, daily , and more and more clearly , uniformly, and divinely, in

every thing, which takes place, both within and without the mind.

Ofthe increase of His government and their peace ; of the splen-

dour and beneficence of his administrations, ofthe activity of their

efforts, and the intenseness of their enjoyment ; there will be no

end. More and more beautiful and lovely in his sight, more and

more approximating towards his sublime perfection, he will behold

them with supreme and eternal complacency ; will look with an

unclouded smile on the illustrious work, which he has made ; and

with the voice of infinite approbation will pronounce it very good.

Such is the end, which God proposed in the creation of Man ;

such its nature ; and such its propriety. How plainly is it the best

and most glorious end, which can be aimed at by man or accom-

plished by his Creator !

From this fruitful theme many more important and practical re-

flections naturally arise, than can be even mentioned at the pre-

sent time. It will, however, be highly proper to suggest a few of

them; and these will be only suggested. Inthe contemplation of

this subject, we can hardly fail to remark,

1st. The pitiful nature ofthe ends of human existence, and hu-

man labour, proposed by heathen Philosophy, and modern Infidelity.

The great ends of our being, exhibited by heathen philosophy,

THE CHIEF END OF MAN .

390 [ SER. XXV.

were the gratification of pride, the establishment of apathy, the

acquisition of power, wealth, and fame, and the enjoyment of ani-

mal pleasure. All these, except the second, are the ends, pro-

posed also by modern Infidelity. By all except the last, they la-

boured to convert man into a fiend; and by that, to change him

into a brute. Barely to descend from the divine object, which is

the theme of this discourse, to these miserable purposes, is to fall

from heaven to earth .

2dly. It is plainly impossible, that these systems should guide man

to his best good; and, therefore, that they should direct his moral

conduct, either with rectitude, or profit. The true end of his being,

that which is really his supreme good, they knew not ; and there-

fore could not point it out.

3dly. These systems are hence evidently seen to be false. There

is a real supreme good to man. Truth will certainly guide us to

this all-important object. But none of these philosophers have

guided us to it. On the contrary, they have only led mankind

away from it. Their systems, therefore, are essentially false.

4thly. We see , here, the benevolent design of the Scriptures . The

whole design of the Scriptures is to teach man what is his supreme

good , to show the way, in which he may attain it, and to require

him to devote his efforts to the attainment. How infinitely supe-

rior are they, in this respect, to all human systems !

5thly. The Scriptures are fairly presumed, from this considera-

tion, to be of divine origin. They alone disclose this great object

to mankind; and in this respect, differ immensely from all other

writings. Whence this difference ? How can it be explained, but

by supposing the writers of them to have been inspired ?

6thly. We learn hence the true dignity of man .

The dignity of man has been always a favourite topic of his

thoughts, conversation, and writings. When he looks into his own

bosom, and discerns the nature and extent of his powers ; or casts

his eye abroad, and beholds what he has done ; it is not strange,

that he should form elevated ideas concerning his own character

anddestination. Unhappily, however, he has always formed, when

left to his own speculations, erroneous opinions concerning this

subject; and has placed his dignity in things, of which it can never

be constituted. Personal accomplishments, brilliant or profound

talents, extensive acquisitions of learning and science, ingenious

inventions or improvements of art, bold achievements, and heroic

exploits, have ever been the objects, in which he has supposed his

dignity to consist, and of which he has ever been inclined to boast.

Some of these are, indeed, both desirable and commendable ; but

all of them, by themselves, are utterly insufficient to constitute real

dignity. This is found in the mind only. Intelligence is neces-

sary to it ; but of intelligence alone it cannot be constituted. Its

real seat is in the disposition. Virtue, moral excellence, the beauty

and loveliness ofthe mind, is the real and only dignity of an Intel

THE CHIEF END OF MAN

SER. XXV. ] 391

ligent being. To devote all the faculties and labours to the glory

ofthe Creator, in the pursuit of the supreme good of the universe ,

is the true worth, honour, and glory, of every Intelligent creature :

and, compared with it , all things else, of which we are capable,

are nothing, less than nothing, and vanity.

7thly. We cannot but see in these considerations , the obligation,

which we are under to devote all our faculties and labours to the pro-

motion of this end. This observation needs no comment.

8thly. We also see, here, in a clear light, the necessity ofRegene-

ration.

The native disposition of man, is opposed to the end of his be-

ing. This disposition nothing has ever changed essentially, ex-

cept the power of the Spirit oftruth. As necessary, therefore, as

it is, that Man should answer the end of his creation, so necessary

is it, that he should become the subject of this change in his moral

character.

9thly. We discern in this subject the transcendent Excellence and

Glory ofGod.

All things display the glory of God; but some display it much

more than others. In the scheme of creation, which has been

now discussed, there is a splendour, wholly peculiar, attributed to

JEHOVAH. In the end, proposed by Intelligent Beings in their de-

signs, and displayed in their conduct, their proper character is

especially manifested. The end, proposed by God, and displayed

in his works of creation and providence, is unquestionably the no-

blest and most important of all possible ends, and the strongest

proofofthe best ofall possible characters. It is the most finished,

and the most ample, manifestation, of all that is great, exalted,

lovely, and divine. Out ofit, springs created Intelligence, virtue,

and enjoyment, enlarged, refined, and brightened, for ever. Hea-

ven and its immortal glory are its fruits ; Angels, and the Spirits of

just men made perfect, are its offspring. The Sun of Righteous-

ness here rises on the astonished sight, without a cloud, and shines

with the clear effulgence of eternal day. In the future world, that

Sun shall no more go down, neither shall that Glory withdraw itself;

but with a presence ever enjoyed, a lustre ever increasing, shall

enlighten, warm, and quicken, the universe of virtuous minds with

oneunceasing day, one everlasting spring ; while all that is beauti-

ful, fragrant , and delightful, lovely in the eye of God, and a resem-

blance of his transcendent perfection, shall rise, and bloom, and

flourish, beneath the life - giving influence, for ever and ever. Amen.

SERMON XXVI.

PROVIDENCE . THE PROBATION OF MAN .

GENESIS ii. 15-17.....And the Lord God took the man, and put him into the garden

ofEden, to dress it, and to keep it. And the Lord God commanded the man, say-

ing, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat ; But of the tree of the

knowledge of good and evil thou shalt not eat of it for in the day that thou

eatest thereof , thou shalt surely die .

IN several preceding sermons, I have considered the work of

Creation ; including the heavens and the earth, their inhabitants and

their furniture . The next subject in a theological system, is the

Work of Providence.

From the text, which is an account of the first act of Providence

towards mankind, we learn the following things :

I. That the Providence of God towards man began immediately

after he was created.

In the great and wonderful work of Creation, provision was effect-

ually made for the production, subsistence, and comfort, of such

beings, as were afterwards to exist in this world. By this ob-

servation, I do not intend absolutely, that no being has been, in the

strict sense, created since the conclusion of the period, in which

the Scriptures exhibit this work as having been accomplished.

Whether this has, or has not, in the strict sense, been the fact, is

not material to the present design. I intend, in the Scriptural lan-

guage, that the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host

ofthem. The beings, which, during succeeding ages, were to ex-

ist in this world, whether in the rational, animal, or vegetable,

kingdoms, were all, together with the changes in the mineral or in-

animate kingdom, to be produced by the instrumentality of second-

ary causes . As man was the last creature, which was made;

when he was formed, the work of Creation was finished . From

this time, that superintending and controlling agency ofGod, com-

monly called Providence, commenced ; and has ever since been

unceasingly extended over all the works of his hands .

The Providence of God is two-fold ; ordinary and miraculous .

Miraculous Providence, is an immediate agency of God in the pro-

duction of events , adopted, at times, to accomplish certain ends, which

would be less advantageously accomplished in any other manner.

The ordinary Providence of God is an agency, directing the several

creatures , which he has made, to the several purposes , for which they

were made ; and conducted according to certain rules, which he has

been pleased to establish, and which are commonly, although impro-

perly enough, called Laws of nature. In the Scriptures, with much

THE PROBATION OF MAN.

SER. XXVI.] 393

more propriety as well as beauty, they are termed Ordinances of

Heaven. In the succession of things, according to these ordinances,

the power, wisdom, and goodness of God, are gloriously manifested

in a series of events, beautiful and harmonious, wonderful and

sublime, beyond any limit, assignable by the thoughts of man .

Before the Apostacy, these laws, and their effects, were, beyond

a doubt, exceedingly different from those, which prevail at the pre-

sent time. Man was then immortal, holy, and happy ; and was

destined to breathe in air, to feed on fruits, and to pursue employ -

ments, suited to the perpetuation of this delightful state .

The

world was beautiful and pleasant. All things were peaceful, friend-

ly, and means of unceasing and undisturbed enjoyment. The

sources of pain, hunger, and thirst , of disquiet, disease, and death,

were unopened, and unknown. To a single end, was directed the

whole energy of nature ; and that end was the immediate good of

man.

After the apostacy, a state of things began, which was in many

respects new ; a state suited to fallen beings, who were to live un-

dermany manifestations of the divine wrath against sin ; and who

in the end were to die, and thus cease from all future connexion

with the place of their former residence.

After the Deluge, the state of the world appears to have been

still further changed. More, and more painful proofs of the anger

of God against Sin, were introduced into the system. Life, with-

in a little time, was shortened from one thousand yearsto seventy.

Labour, sorrow , and disease, were greatly enhanced. The bloom

of immortality, already deeply faded , now withered away. Food,

together with the whole train of necessaries, lost its power ofpro-

longing life ; sickliness overspread the vegetable kingdom ; storms

convulsed the air and the ocean; earthquakes and volcanoes shook

the land ; and decay and disorder impaired the whole face of the

system.

II. We learn also, that man, immediately after his creation, was

placed in a state of active employment.

The text declares, that the Lord God took the man, and put him

in the garden of Eden to dress it, and to keep it. Activity of body,

and of mind, is the sole means of doing good, and of glorifying

God; and is, therefore, indispensable to the end, for which Intelli-

gent beings were created. Hence man , like the Angels, was des-

tined to be active ; and was directed to industrious business, im-

mediately after he was brought into the world.

III. That he was, at the same time, placed in a state of Trial.

By this I intend, that he was put into such a condition, as to show

whether he would obey, or disobey, his Maker. The rectitude

and reasonableness of this dispensation are easily evinced.

Man, as I flatter myself has been heretofore proved, was created

a moral Agent, possessed of understanding and will, and therefore

free , andcapable of obeying. Of course, inability to obey could

VOL: I. 50

THE PROBATION OF MAN.

394 [ SER. XXVL

not be pleaded by him, as a reason why he should be exempted

from obedience.

At the same time, his Creator had an entire and indisputable

right to his services. No property is so high, or so perfect, as that

which the Creator has in the thing created; and no right so com-

plete, as that which arises out of this property. God, therefore ,

having created man, had the most perfect property in him and the

most perfect right to dispose of him according to his own righteous

pleasure.

God, also, being possessed of infinite greatness and excellence,

is infinitely deserving of the supreme love, reverence, and obe-

dience of man.

To serve, love, and honour God, is the most rational, and desira-

ble employment, which is possible. It was, therefore, man's high-

est interest, as well as indispensable duty, to obey. In no other

manner, could he be either virtuous or happy. Of course, it may

with the utmost reverence and propriety be concluded, that God

would not have acted in a manner , conformable to perfect recti-

tude, if he had not required obedience from all his rational crea-

tures : since they could neither do, nor enjoy, the good, of which

they were made capable, in any other manner.

IV. That the situation, in which man was placed, furnished him

with eminent Inducements , and Advantages, to obey.

The truth of this proposition will, I think, appear evident from

the following particulars .

1st. Man was created holy, without any mixture of sinful affec-

tions .

This needs no proof , because it will be generally acknowledged,

and because it has already been sufficiently proved in a former

discourse. His understanding admitted truth without prejudice,

and without any necessary error, except such as proceeded from

mere ignorance. He did not know all things ; but those, which he

knew, he knew truly, or as they really existed. His will also was

perfectly conformed to the dictates of his understanding.

2dly. He was placed in a situation, in which eternal things were

most favourable to his obedience.

His habitation was delightful, and only delightful. Plenty, ease,

and peace, fragrance, beauty, and joy, sprang up spontaneously

around him ; and accompaniedhim whithersoever he went. He was

the lord and proprietor of a world ; and that world was an Eden ; a

paradise of improvement and pleasure.

His employments were all innocent, virtuous, and delightful. In

the happy and unlaborious agriculture, to which he was summon-

ed, he found business congenial to his nature, powers, and wishes.

Every thing flourished under his hand ; and furnished him the pe-

culiar pleasure of seeing his efforts contribute to his own enjoy-

ment, and to the beauty and perfection of the objects, by which he

was surrounded. He felt, that he was useful ; that he was employ

THE PROBATION OF MAN.

SER. XXVI . ] 395

ed in amanner chosen by his Maker; and that he therefore pleased,

and obeyed Him ; while he also daily contributed to the advance-

ment of his own happiness. This consciousness, united with an

employment of the same general nature, is probably necessary to

all extensive and permanent good .

All things, also, daily manifested to him the presence of God ;

and exhibited this glorious Being only as great, wise, and good;

reminding him unceasingly of the Benefactor, to whom alone he

was indebted, and of the immense extent of the obligations, under

which he was laid by the overflowing kindness of this benefactor.

Thus every thing with a continual voice called on him to persist in

his obedience, and in this manner to preserve the happiness, which

it insured.

3dly. God immediately revealed himself to man in several ways ,

which are recorded, and in many more, which are necessarily im-

plied . God taught man to dress the garden of Eden ; or, in other words,

communicated to him the knowledge of an agriculture, suited to

the nature and circumstances of the spot, in which he was placed.

It was necessary for man to be employed. Idleness, even in Para-

dise, would, not improbably, have proved fatal to his innocence

and peace. Equally necessary was it , that the nature of his em-

ployment should be revealed to him ; the manner, in which it

might be pursued with ease to himself; and the means, by which

it might be rendered most effectual to every desirable purpose .

Without such a revelation, ages must in all probability have pass-

ed away, before he would have discovered how to employ himself

with either convenience or profit.

At the same time, God revealed himself to him immediately ; and

conversed with him freely, often, and familiarly ; directing him by

an audible voice, and in a manner wholly intelligible, to whatever his

duty required. To enable him to derive the whole benefit, flow-

ing from such communications, God endowed him immediately with

the power of speech, and the knowledge of language, to an extensive

degree. This is clearly evinced by the fact, that he was able to un-

derstand the converse of God, with him, exhibited in the Scriptures

as carried on by an audible voice, and significant terms ; of the same

nature with those, which are in use among men. It is proved, also,

by the fact, that our first parents were created social beings,

and made to be helps meet for each other. Without speech, we

cannot conceive a social state to exist ; nor imagine the mutual as-

sistance, aimed at in the creation of the first pair, to be in any pos-

sible manner accomplished. Without speech, millions crowded

together, would, for this very reason, find themselves in a more

perfect solitude. Without speech, mutually understood, mankind

even now are strangers and aliens to each other; and are not only

unable, and uninclined to render to each other any material assist-

ance, but are even ready mutually to suspect, hate, and separate.

THE PROBATION OF MAN.

396 [ SER. XXVI .

Confidence is never reposed; friendship never springs up ; where

language is not understood, and where communications are not

intelligibly, and definitely made.

It is further proved, by the record of the fact itself . Adam, im-

mediately after his creation, gave names to every beast of the field,

and to every fowl of the air ; names suited to their respective na-

tures, and conveyed down, as their appropriate names, to his pos-

terity. He also named Eve, when she was first brought to him ;

and assigned his reason for the name, which he had chosen. Both

he and she, also, conversed easily, and freely ; as appears abun-

dantly from the account, given of them, notwithstanding its brevity.

That language was revealed to man is, as an abstract proposi-

tion, abundantly proved by the impossibility, that the fact can have

been otherwise. Without society, language could not be formed ;

and without language, society could not commence.

God also revealed to man, in direct and definite terms, his whole

duty ; and disclosed to him the law, by which his life was to be

governed. With the same clearness, was he taught the rewards

annexed to obedience, and the punishments due to disobedience.

Of this truth we have a remarkable exemplification in the text ;

where we are presented with one of the principal rules, given to

our first parents for the regulation of their conduct. Man, there-

fore, was not left to find out either his duty, or his danger, by the

critical and doubtful decision of slow discovery, and distant infer-

ence ; but received the knowledge of both in the same plain and

certain manner, in which children are taught obedience by pa-

rental instruction .

4thly. The immediate means of trial were reasonably, and bene-

volently selected.

In the garden of Eden, the Lord God made to grow every tree,

that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food. Man lived in the

midst of spontaneous abundance. The palate and the eye were

alike gratified ; and the wishes seemed to have nothing left to ask .

One fruit only was forbidden ; and this merely for the purpose of

trying his fidelity . Had man been placed in hard and difficult cir-

cumstances, encircled by few enjoyments, exposed to great tempt-

ations, and the subject of much ignorance and doubt concerning

his duty ; he would still have been indispensably bound to obey.

But his real situation was the reverse of all this. God had given

to him with the bounty of a God. Nothing was denied, which was

either necessary or useful. A trifling gratification of either taste ,

or curiosity, was the utmost, which he could expect from disobedi-

ence. The continuance of all his enjoyments, endless life, andthe

favour of God, whom he saw both able and inclined to bless him,

was the certain reward of obedience. No situation can be devised

by our minds, in which man could have been placed more favoura-

bly for persevering in his duty. All motives, which we should

think likely to influence, urged him to obey ; and none, of this de

THE PROBATION OF MAN.

SER. XXVI.J 397

scription, prompted him to disobey. The motives to obedience,

were many; and in their moment infinite : those to disobedience,

were few, poor, and trifling .

The law, under which our first parents were placed, is styled in

the Scriptures, the first, or old, Covenant ; and is commonly called

by divines, the covenant of works ; in distinction from the new or

second covenant, of which Christ is the Mediator, and which is

called the covenant of grace . A covenant of works is no other

than a law requiring obedience, and prohibiting disobedience, pro-

mising a reward to the former, and threatening punishment to the

latter. It takes, in this case, the name of a covenant, rather than

that of a law, (although it has all the nature and sanctions of a

law) because God was pleased to communicate his will to man in

the form of a covenant : a mode gentle, condescending, and highly

expressive of the divine benignity.

No being, already sinful, can be possibly holden guiltless under

such a covenant ; or, in better language, when tried for his con-

duct, be justified. His former crimes render it impossible, that it

should become a covenant of life to him. To offer the conditions

of such a covenant to beings of this character, would be merely to

tantalize them; since by the very terms of it they would be ori-

ginally fixed in a state of condemnation. Accordingly, when God

proposed to place mankind, anew, in a state of probation, he set

forth Christ as a propitiation for the remission of sins , already

past; and offered to accept of his obedience in their stead, as the

ground of their justification .

But sinless creatures are, with perfect and obvious propriety,

placed under such a covenant. Their character, being spotless,

is such, as to admit of their justification on the ground oftheir own

obedience. If that obedience should, during the time of trial, be

perfect ; their justification and reward must follow, of course, from

the conditions of the law itself ; and no atonement could be neces-

sary for them. Thus the holy Angels obeyed, and were justified .

Thus Adam would have been justified, had he continued obedient.

Thus, also, the evil Angels fell , and were condemned.

V. We learn, also, that the obedience of Adam, as prescribed by

this law, was concentered in a single point ; and was thus rendered

easy, and, so far as might be, secure, in a manner, strongly express-

ive of the goodness of God.

If he ate not of the forbidden fruit ; he was approved.

I do not intend, that he was not required to obey God in all

things. This, unquestionably, was demanded of him, as well as

of every other creature ; and was, beyond adoubt , his indispen-

sable duty. But I mean, that God absolutely suspended his accept-

ance, justification, and reward, on the single point of his abstain-

ing from the forbidden fruit. This mode of dealing with Adam

rendered his obedience peculiarly easy. It brought the duty,

which he was especially required to perform, up to his view, in the

398 [SER . XXVI .

THE PROBATION OF MAN.

most distinct manner possible ; and rendered it too intelligible to

be mistaken. No room was left for doubt, or debate. The object

in question was a sensible object, perfectly defined, and perfectly

understood. No metaphysical or philosophical discussion was de-

manded, or admitted. No uncertainty existed, as to the degree, in

which his obedience was required. He was left at no loss con-

cerning the time, the manner, or the nature, of that conduct, which

it was proper for him to observe. He knew the whole extent of

what was commanded, and what was forbidden ; and therefore

could not but know whether he obeyed, or disobeyed. This

knowledge, always of high importance, was especially important

to him, so lately brought into existence, so unversed in argumen-

tation, acquainted only with plain facts, and under the guidance of

nothing, but mere common sense.

Besides, as his obedience was confined to a single point, he was

taught , and enabled, to summon all his watchfulness, resolution,

and strength, to this point only ; to keep it supremely in view ;

and to be continually guarded against every thing, which might

lead him to transgress, here. In making this the medium of trial ,

God secured him, of course, against all other dangers ; so that he

was left at full leisure to watch against all possible temptations to

this single evil. Were an earthly parent to try the obedience of a

child, and make his right to the inheritance of an estate depend on

the performance of his filial duty : such a mode of trying him

would be thought not only reasonable, but generous, noble, and

strongly indicative of parental affection .

VI. We learn from the text, that the rewards, promised to him,

were infinitely great, and furnished, therefore, an infinite motive to

obedience.

That Adam, if faithfully obedient, would have inherited immor-

tal life, and its various blessings, is evidently involved in the words

of the law . If thou eatest thereof , thou shalt die. If thou eatest

not, thou shalt not die, but live for ever ; is the necessary counter-

part ; without admitting which, the threatening expressed would

mean nothing, and the law become a mere nullity. For, in this

case, his situation, whether he obeyed or disobeyed, would be ex-

actly the same ; and he would be left without a single motive to

obedience. That the posterity of Adam have been essentially af-

fected by his apostacy is not often denied ; and, I think, cannot be,

with even the appearance of reason. As I propose to discuss this

subject hereafter, I shall, for the present, take this point for grant-

ed. If it be admitted ; it must also be admitted, that they would

have been equally interested in the benefits, which would have re-

sulted from his obedience ; and would, like him, have lived for ever .

After the Apostacy, he begat a son in his own moral likeness ; sin-

ful and miserable, like himself . Had he obeyed, the children, be-

gottenby him, would, without a reasonable doubt, have been born

in his likeness also, and been destined, like himself , to unceasing

THE PROBATION OF MAN.

SER . XXVI. ] 399

holiness and immortal life. It will not be denied, that the motives ,

here presented to obedience, were in themselves of infinite magni-

tude. They were also motives, coming directly to his heart ; af-

fecting him, as far as might be, with their whole importance ; daily

forced upon his view; and reasonably expected, if any thing could

be expected, to prevail.

VII. We learn, that motives equally powerful, lent their whole

force to deter him from disobeying .

The reward promised was immortal life ; the punishment threat-

ened was, I apprehend, eternal death. These two appear to be

the only reward and punishment, ultimately promised and threat-

ened, in the divine law, as the proper retribution of obedience and

disobedience, in the great kingdom of JEHOVAH. As this subject

will naturally be brought up to view, when I come to consider the

sentence, pronounced on the offenders ; I shall dismiss it for the

present. What motives could possibly have greater influence on

a thinking mind, than these ? With what force, especially, must

they be addressed to such a mind, as that of Adam; unbiassedby

any influence of sin, loving obedience entirely, accustomed only to

happiness, entitled to immortal life, and yet capable of losing finally

this glorious state ! What a contrast between these two objects :

how affecting, how amazing .

REMARKS.

From these summary considerations it appears,

1st. That God acted, in establishing the probation of ourfirst pa-

rents , not only justly, but kindly and bountifully.

In forming our own estimate of this subject, we are prone to

consider chiefly, and often solely, the issue of their trial ; which we

cannot but acknowledge, as well as feel, to be, in the most striking

point of view, incomprehensibly melancholy and dreadful. In this

consideration, also, we are partial; as being deeply interested

judges ; since we are involved in the calamities, flowing from their

transgression. But neither of these things ought to have any in-

fluence on our judgment concerning this subject. We ought to

inquire only concerning the circumstances, in which they were

placed, and the conditions prescribed to them. If these were rea-

sonable and just ; then God was reasonable and just in prescribing

them ; and that they were so, even we cannot deny.

That it is, in the nature of the case, right for God to try all his

Intelligent creatures, cannot, I think, be rationally doubted; and

that the trial of our first Parents was eminently reasonable in all

its circumstances , appears to me unquestionable.

Their situation was clearly a strong proof of the bounty and

kindness of their Maker; and was composed of abundance, peace,

ease, and enjoyment, and attended by the living and delightful

hope ofsuperior good, unceasingly filling their continually enlarg-

ing faculties, views, and desires. It was necessary, that they

THE PROBATION OF MAN.

400 [SER . XXVI .

should be employed; and their employment was such, as ever

since, notwithstanding the toil and suffering, by which it has been

accompanied, has been most congenial to human nature, and most

delightful to the human heart. How much more desirable must it

have been in a state, to which toil and suffering were absolute

strangers . Idleness would render even virtuous beings useless ,

and so far as I see, worthless. Virtuous action is all the real

worth of Intelligent beings. Without it, there can exist no self -ap-

probation, no peace ofmind, no inherent dignity, no consciousness

of excellence, no desert of esteem. To be employed, therefore,

was indispensable both to the character, and to the happiness, of

our first parents .

Their advantages for obeying, and their inducements to obedi-

ence, seem to have been in the best manner suited to such beings ,

as they were, and peculiarly expressive of the goodness of God.

It is difficult to imagine how creatures, so lately introduced into

existence, could have been, in this respect, placed in a more ad-

vantageous situation .

Ofthe circumstances of their trial, we are bound to judge, inde-

pendently of its consequences. Had Adam stood, we should have

never questioned the equity of the trial. We cannot, consistently

with reason, any more question it now. Our estimate of this sub-

ject ought clearly to be formed on the conditions and circumstan-

ces themselves ; as we should have formed it, had the conditions

and circumstances been presented to us before the issue. In this

case, we should not have hesitated to acknowledge either the

justice, or the goodness, of the Creator. Whenever we nowjudge

otherwise, our judgment does not proceed from reason and evi-

dence; but is the mere offspring of prejudice and feeling.

2dly. These considerations teach us, also, the extreme error and

perverseness of those men, who, in the language of sneer and con-

tempt, declare, that God cannot be supposed to have condemned man-

kindfor the mere eating of an apple.

I have here adopted the language, which has been often used

concerning this subject, not by Infidels only, but by multitudes of

such, as profess to believe the Scriptures. It is, however, not the

language of reason and common sense, but of partiality and pas-

sion; of a most unhappy nature, and existing in a very censurable

degree . Nothing, in whichGodis concerned, or is supposed to have been

concerned , can be the proper object of contempt or sneers, of

sport or ridicule. Every thought concerning this great, pure, and

awful Being, ought to spring from the most profound reverence ;

and, whenever expressed, ought to be uttered only in the most

reverential terms. Especially are we bound to exclude all levity

ofmind from a case of such deep importance, and amazing con-

cern, as the Apostacy of man: an event, which not only exposed

the immediate subjects of it to the divine wrath, and the final sen-

THE PROBATION OF MAN.

SER. XXVI . ] 401

tence of reprobation, but entailed also an endless multitude of mi-

series, as well as an endless course of depravity, on their sinning

progeny. The exposure of a single human soul to the anger of

God , and to the miseries of perdition, is a subject, too solemn to

be taken up by a trifling mind, or discussed with a thoughtless

tongue. When we are considering Sin and Condemnation, the

guilt and miseries of the present life, or the endless corruption and

sufferings of the life to come ; whatever else may be in unison with

these subjects, sport and sneer are only discordant ; and jar, and

grate, upon the ear of a sober man with a harshness, equally

unsuited to the nature of the subjects, and distressing to every

rational feeling. He, who can adopt sentiments of contempt and

ridicule ; and, still more, he who can utter them ; in a case, where

his all is at stake, is a madman, much fitter to grope in Bedlam, than

to mingle with rational society .

The phraseology, here adopted, is totally unjust and unfounded,

totally false and hollow. It insinuates, and intentionally insinuates,

that God was influenced in his condemnation of our first parents

by a resentment, excited only by the value, which he placed on

the forbidden fruit ; and that, as exhibited in this part of the Scrip-

tures, he was moved by those weak and pitiful passions, with which

men, at times, violently and foolishly resent the loss of their own

property. As the value of the fruit was insignificant, and in a

sense nothing ; these men conclude, that God could not prize it so

highly, as to be angry at the transgression, or to inflict punishment,

much less so dreadful a punishment, on the transgressors. Were

the principle just, on which they profess to argue ; I readily admit,

as every other man will admit, that God cannot be supposed to

have punished them at all, for the reason alleged .

But the principle itself has no connexion with the subject : the

argument, derived from it , is, therefore, without a foundation . The

Scriptures neither here, nor elsewhere, present us with any such

views ofGod. Nothing is more remote from the story actually

told, or from the doctrines really expressed. Every thing, which

is taught by the Bible concerning this subject , is highly solemn

andaffecting.

Our first parents were condemned, because they disobeyed

their Maker, revolted from his authority, and rebelled against his

government. Whatever was the mode, whatever was the instru-

ment, of the rebellion ; the sin was substantially the same.

The

same authority was denied ; the same obligation broken ; and, of

course, the same guilt was thus far incurred. There is, however,

a difference in transgressions, and a plain one, which renders the

guilt greater in proportion to the smallness ofthe temptation. That

disposition, which disobeys under the influence of a small tempta-

tion, is certainly worse than that, which, resisting such a tempta-

tion, yields only to inducements, which are very great. This rule

ofjudging is universal; and in other cases, is acknowledged with-

VOL. I. 51

THE PROBATION OF MAN .

402 [ SER. XXVI.

out a question. It ought to be acknowledged here. HadAdam

disobeyed, to gain the dominion of the Universe, or admission into

Heaven; these men would have pronounced the trial unreasona-

ble; because the temptation was evidently too great for his facul-

ties, and disproportioned to his ability to resist. On the same

principle, they ought now to acknowledge, that the trial was wholly

equitable; because it allowed of no temptations, except such as

were insignificant and trifling. Thus the argument is directly

against them, and unanswerably refutes their favourite doctrine.

The fruit, whatever it was, was plainly of no importance, in the

possession, to Him, who at his bidding, can in a moment call into

existence a world, or a million of worlds, with all their furniture

and beauty. Nor has it, in this sense, the most remote relation to

the subject in hand. The guilt of our first parents lay solely in

rebelling against the will of God ; their Creator, Sovereign, and

Benefactor. For this rebellion, they were justly condemned, if

God canjustly condemn a rebellious creature.

3dly. We are taught by this passage of Scripture, in one import-

ant particular, the views which God entertains of sin .

The sentence, here denounced against disobedience, is denoun-

ced against the first act. In the day that thou eatest thereof , thou

shalt surely die. The death, threatened in this law, is threatened

to a single transgression. Accordingly, for a single transgression

they were afterwards condemned.

How different is this exhibition of the mind of God, concerning

this subject, from the views, which we are accustomed to cherish !

We are prone to believe, that, even after numerous transgressions ,

nay, after the sins of a whole life, God will still regard us with so

much favour, that we shall scarcely be condemned. Our first pa-

rents ate the forbidden fruit, and were condemned. How many

things, apparently much more aggravated, have we done ? Yet

how greatly are we at ease concerning the divine anger, and our

approaching destination. Under the persuasion, that we are not

so sinful as others, and, indeed, that we are scarcely sinful at all ,

we hear the law, the transgression, and the penalty, awfully re-

sounded in our ears ; and hardly suppose ourselves interested in

either. To the final judgment, and the final condemnation, of

the wicked, we turn a careless self - satisfied eye ; as objects, which,

however interesting to others, have little or no reference to our-

selves . Thus flattered, and supported, by views of our guilt ut-

terly opposed to the Scriptures, and wholly contrary to those of

God, we go on in the commission of Sin, without any serious

alarm ; and persuade ourselves, that, whether the Lord will do

good to us, or not, he certainly will never do evil. In this deplora-

ble manner, life is spent ; the day of repentance trifled away; and

the hope of redemption and forgiveness lost for ever.

But,let every sinner in this house remember, that he was con-

demned for his first sin; for the second ; for the third; and for

THE PROBATION OF MAN.

SER. XXVI. ] 403

every one which has followed. Call to mind then, I beseech you,

the amazing number of transgressions, actually charged to the ac-

count of every sinner present . Think how many have been com-

mitted in a sin single day ; how many more in a week ; in a month ;

in a year. How astonishing must be the sum of those, which are

committed in a whole life ! The same God, who condemned Adam

for one transgression, regards every sin, of which you have been

guilty, with the same abhorrence. How awful was the sentence of

condemnation pronounced on him ! What then can remain for you

in your present condition, but a fearful looking for ofjudgment

andfiery indignation ?

SERMON XXVII.

PROVIDENCE . THE TEMPTATION AND FALL .

GENESIS iii . 1-6. -Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field,

which the Lord had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said , Ye

shall not eat of every tree of the garden ? And the woman said unto the serpent,

We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden : But of the fruit of the tree

which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither

shall ye touch it , lest ye die . And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not

surely die : For God doth know, that in the day ye eat thereof , then your eyes shall

be opened and ye shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil. And when the woman

saw, that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a

a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof , and did eat ; and

gave also unto her husband with her ; and he did eat .

INthe last discourse, I considered the situation of our first pa-

rents in the state of trial, in which God was pleased to place them :

and the conditions of the law, or covenant, under which they were

placed. These, I endeavoured to show, were just and reasonable ;

and such, as clearly spoke the benevolence of God.

In the text, we are informed of the result of this trial ; viz . that

they transgressed the law, fell from their original purity, forfeited

the favour and blessing of God, and were condemned to suffer the

penalty of the law.

In this remarkable passage of Scripture, four things especially

claim our serious attention :

I. The Character of the Tempter :

II. The Manner of the Temptation :

III. The Character, and Circumstances , of the Persons Tempted :

and, IV. The Consequences of the Temptation.

I. The Character of the Tempter demands our attention.

The Tempter is exhibited to us, here, by the Name of the Ser-

pent : or, as in the Hebrew, that Serpent. This phraseology na-

turally leads us to imagine, that a part of this discourse, as origin-

ally written, has beenlost ; altered , perhaps, by Moses, according

to the commands of God ; or, afterwards, by some prophet, ac-

cording to the same command ; because the passage had answered

the end intended by it, and was not henceforth a necessary part of

the canon of Scripture. Or, perhaps, it was originally differently

written ; and the present language is owing to some mistake of a

transcriber. Of this Serpent, St. John declares, that he was Satan ;

the head, or leader, of those angels who kept not their first estate,

but revolted from God, and threw off their subjection to his go-

vernment.

THE TEMPTATION AND FALL.

SER. XXVII. ] 405

This exalted being, unsatisfied with his dignity and glory in hea-

ven, appears to have aspired to a station still higher, and to have

chosen to hazard the loss of all which he possessed, rather than to

continue in that, in which he was placed ; a station, not improba-

bly, the first in the created Universe. In thus aspiring, he fell

from this height to the lowest depth of degradation, guilt, and

misery ; and completely verified the declaration of Christ, that

such as have been first will, in various instances, be last in the

great kingdom of God.

After his fall , the evil passions, which began to influence him in

heaven, appear to have gained an entire ascendency. All his pur-

poses have, since that event, been evil, mischievous, and abomina-

ble; and the means, by which he has laboured to accomplish

them, have been base, grovelling, and suited to the nature of the

purposes .

That, upon which he now entered, was probably as base, as hate-

ful, as unjust, and as cruel, as was ever formed; and will, perhaps,

be more remembered with horror, hereafter, than any other ; unless

we are to except the Rebellion, to which he successfully solicited

his companions in heaven, and the Crucifixion of the Redeemer.

The motives, by which he was influenced to this work of death

and destruction, were probably such as these.

His Envy was naturally and highly provoked at the sight of so

humble a race ofbeings, as Men, possessing a character, and lot,

plainly superior to his own ; because they were immortal and holy ,

and consequently happy also ; because they stood higher in the

approbation of God, and the estimation of Angels ; and because

they were, in prospect, the heirs of immortal life and endless en-

joyment.

His Resentment against God, which fired his rebellious spirit at

all times, now saw, and seized, what he thought an advantageous

opportunity, to disappoint his great ENEMY of his favourite design ;

to overcast the face, and glory, of his new creation ; to dishonour

his name ; to disturb again the peace of his kingdom ; and to

frustrate purposes, which seemed to be near, if not nearest, to his

heart.

His Pride, also , was, doubtless, greatly gratified with the pros-

pect of being able to disappoint his Maker ; to counteract his de-

signs ; and to prove, that his wisdom was not so great, as to secure

him from being thwarted, and vanquished, by this sagacity of his

enemy.

Nor was his Malevolence probably less concerned in this enter-

prise. He had now become the professed, habitual, and eternal

enemy of God, and of his creation. Good he regarded, wherever

he saw it, with an evil and malignant eye, and an aching heart.

That others were happy, was, to his debased feelings, a certain

source of misery. The only emotions, which resembled happiness,

in his mind, were now those, which, in the true fiend-like manner,

1

THE TEMPTATION AND FALL.

406 [ SER. XXVII.

exulted in overcoming others, in destroying or lessening their en-

joyments, and in reducing them to the same level of deformity and

wretchedness with himself . These emotions could not but be

strongly excited by the prospect of ruining a world of happy

beings; such as were, and were to be, our first parents and their

offspring.

For the gratification of these abandoned dispositions, he was

prepared to employ any means. Accordingly, he chose rather to

inhabit, and animate, a serpent, and ally himself to the brutes,

than to fail of his design. In the body of this serpent he ap-

proached, and accosted, Eve ; doubtless expecting, what actually

took place, that both himself and his purposes would, in this way,

be effectually concealed.

II . The manner of the Temptation was remarkably distinguished

by art and subtlety.

He accosted the general Mother of Mankind, when she was

alone, and of course most unguarded. Had Adam been present,

it seems unquestionable, that both would have assisted each other ;

and that their mutual strength might have resisted, with success,

the insidiousness, which was sufficient to prevail over one.

He began his address to her, with a question, which involved in

it, apparently, not impiety, but surprise ; and which was calculated,

in the highest degree, to excite her attention and curiosity, without

raising in her mind any alarm, or even suspicion. Yea, hath God

said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden ? " Can this be

possible ? What end can it answer ? For what purpose were

these fruits created, but to be eaten, and eaten by you ? Whence

then the prohibition ? Or is it possible, that such a prohibition

should exist ? "

Had he directly opposed God, it is probable, that the honest

mind of Eve would have revolted at the conduct ; and fled from

the temptation, with horror. But now, he said just enough to

awakenher curiosity, and no more. Hence she was prepared to

listen to him, to go on with him in his sentiments ; and, in the end,

to imbibe them all. The Question, in a manner not naturally

seen, nor suspected, by her, awakened a train of thoughts, in

themselves dangerous, and leading easily to a fatal issue .

Eve, in the native simplicity and integrity of her heart, replied,

We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden. But of the fruit

of the tree , which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye

shall not eat of it , nor shall ye touch it , lest ye die.

This answer brought the subject immediately to the point, which

the tempter wished; and gave him a fair opportunity, without di-

rectly denying the divine prohibition, to seduce the heart of his

victim . He replied accordingly, Ye shall not surely die. For

God doth know, that, in the day ye eat thereof , then your eyes shall

be opened ; and ye shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil.

Nothing could, in such circumstances, be more artfully conduct-

J

THE TEMPTATION AND FALL.

SER. XXVII. ] 407

ed. It was not a difficult thing, in itself , to persuade Eve, that she

should not die. Death was an evil, whose nature she could but

very imperfectly comprehend, and of which she had known no ex-

ample. But of the pleasantness of the fruit, its fragrance, and

beauty, she had a distinct comprehension. She also, in all proba-

bility , knew , in some degree, the character of those gods ; Elohim ,

that is, Angels ; to whose nature, knowledge, and dignity, she was

to rise by eating the prohibited fruit. At the same time, he ap-

plied directly to the only object which was likely to be to her an

object of desire. She and her husband were surrounded with

good; and had nothing to regret, and nothing to fear. Their

only danger seems to have been on the side of coveting more, be-

cause they already had so much; and of wishing, because they

were now so wise and happy, to become wiser and happier. The

Tempter, by his own experience, perfectly understood the power

of this mode of attack, and the proper avenue, through which to

introduce the temptation. Eve knew, that Angels were superior

to her, as she was superior to the brutes ; and probably knew not,

but that this was the way in which they became Angels. These

views would naturally make her consider the tree, as wholly to

be desired to make one wise ; and lead her to forget the danger of

disobedience.

At the same time, the boldness and impudence of the Tempter's

assertions, probably astonished and confounded her. There is

something in the confidence, with which, at times, assertions are

made, which has always more or less commanded belief in the ig-

norant and inexperienced ; such as she was at this time. To her

he appeared to understand the subject in a manner, of which she

had never before formed a conception ; and the boldness and pe-

remptoriness of his declarations gave them such an air of truth

and wisdom, as she was unprepared to resist. Nor did he fail to

avail himself of the influence of that passion, which is so univer-

sal, so easily kindled, and so powerfully operative, in the minds of

all her descendants ; viz. Jealousy. God doth know, that in the

day ye eat thereof , your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as

Gods. In this speech, he artfully, but evidently, insinuated, that

the true reason, why the tree was forbidden, was, that God knew

this to be its nature and efficacy ; that the prohibition was, there-

fore, insincerely and unkindly made ; and that the whole proceed-

ing , on the part of God, was sinister, selfish, and oppressive.

This procedure gave an entirely new aspect to the character

and conduct of God; and to a mind, beginning to be tinctured

with jealousy, rendered that character unamiable, and that conduct

suspected and unworthy.

When this was accomplished, and Eve had let go her hold on

her glorious benefactor, till then absolutely loved, venerated, and

trusted; she was prepared for every thing, which could follow.

Alittle contemplation of the fruit itself , after she had begun the

408 THE TEMPTATION AND FALL.

[ SER . XXVII ,

course of infidelity in her heart, led her, as temptations have always

led the heart of unbelief , to direct transgression and open rebel-

lion. To eat it, she now perceived, would at once gratify her

taste, and raise her to the envied distinction, which was promised.

Such is the summary account, which God has thought proper

to give us in his word, of one of the two most important transac-

tions, which this world has ever seen. A part only, and not im-

probably a small one, of the events, which actually took place, is

recorded. That various other things passed on this occasion, can-

not be doubted. Beside the abruptness of the introduction, the

first question appears to be asked in consequence of something,

which had preceded. These outlines the great English Poet has

filled with several natural and interesting circumstances, which, or

something like which, may not improbably have happened.

It is

not difficult to believe, that the serpent may have alleged, that he

himself had eaten of the fruit, and had not died; but, on the con-

trary, had gained, from its mysterious and happy influence, the

powers of understanding and speech, with which he appeared to

be elevated above his kindred brutes .

Be this as it may ; it seems evident, that the story, as here told,

is either the close, or the epitome, or both, of a full account of the

transaction . Yet, as it is, it is a specimen of consummate art, in-

sidiousness, and fraud. The manner of address, on the part of

the serpent, is calculated insensibly to insinuate, and inspire, jea-

lousy and irreverence towards God ; uneasy and repining thoughts

of the condition, in which man was placed by him ; ardent ambi-

tion to be like Angels in knowledge, happiness, and glory ; and

longing desires to eat the forbidden fruit for this end; together

with strong hopes, that no evil consequences would follow the

transgression.

III. The character of the persons tempted, was probably singular.

They were newly created ; were innocent ; were holy ; and,

considering the short period of their being, were undoubtedly pos-

sessed of no small discernment in divine things. They loved truth ;

were free from all biasses and prejudices ; possessed a vigorous un-

derstanding ; and thus were prepared for a ready reception of every

truth , and for a rapid progress in useful knowledge. The progress,

which they actually made, must have been great, under such ad-

vantages, compared with what, at first thought, may seem probable.

Still they were imperfect beings ; without experience ; and des-

titute of knowledge in many particulars, which would naturally be

wished in a case, where art and falsehood were employed against

them; and, although furnished with a clear comprehension of their

own duty, were totally ignorant of the character, and unable readi-

ly to conjecture the designs, of their Adversary. The first deceit,

which they ever knew, was now practised on themselves ; and the

first falsehood, of which they ever heard, was now directed to their

own destruction. Of the rebellion of the Angels, they probably

THE TEMPTATION AND FALL.

SER. XXVII . ] 409

knew nothing ; and of the character of the Tempter, they would

not naturally form even a suspicion. Accustomed to hear only

truth, they would not easily expect a lie ; and, habituated only to

faithfulness and friendship, fraud and malevolence were, in their

approach to them, assured of a necessary, and sufficient, disguise.

That artless, child- like simplicity , which so delights the mind, and

embellishes the pictures of the historian and the poet ; which

adorned the life, and endeared and enforced the lessons of the Re-

deemer himself ; and which now constitutes no small part of evan-

gelical excellence ; was then a principal trait of their character.

In the peculiar kind of wisdom, which we call prudence, they cer-

tainly had made little progress ; and caution must have been known

to them, only in lessons of instruction.

Thus they were, in several important respects, beings fitted for

imposition, and not unnaturally the victims of insidiousness and

cunning. The same means, at the present time, ensnare persons

of the same character ; and it is not in the nature of things, that

superior sagacity, however employed, should not possess the

power of influencing, more or less, the same simplicity. Firm

obedience, such as they were bound to render to their God, a

prompt undeliberating refusal, and an original, steadfast deter-

mination not to listen, would have secured them from yielding ;

but , when they began to hear, and to investigate, they began to be

exposed ; and their danger increased with every step of their pro-

gress in inquiry.

In the mean time, it seems, that neither of them thought of sup-

plicating the aid of their Creator. A single prayer would have

put the Tempter to flight, and dissolved the charm of the Tempta-

tion. A single recollection, also, of his commands, his kindnesses,

and his instructions, might easily have produced the same effect.

But neither prayer nor recollection was summoned to their assist-

ance. Like their descendants, when forgetful of God, and, in a

sense, forgotten by him, they were weak, frail, and exposed to

everydanger.

IV. The consequences of the temptation were, as you well know,

eminently unhappy.

Eve, pleasedwith the appearance of the prohibited fruit, and

warmed with the thought of becoming wise, of leaving her present

humble station, and assuming that of an Angel, rashly ventured on

the forbidden ground ; disobeyed the command of her Creator ;

defiled herself with sin; and yielded her title to immortal life. In

the same manner Adam, also, partook of the transgression, and of

all its miserable effects ; lost his innocence ; and resigned his do-

minion, glory, and happiness. The remoter consequences of this

event, I shall have occasion to consider in a future discourse. The

remainder of this, I shall occupy with some considerations on two

great questions, often and earnestly asked, concerning this subject ,

andwith a few practical remarks.

VOL. I. 52

THE TEMPTATION AND FALL.

410 [ SER. XXVII .

The first of the questions, to which I have referred, is this ;

Since ourfirst Parents were entirely holy, how could they become

sinful ?

This question, in its simple and proper form, is no other than,

How can a holy being become sinful ? or,

How can a holy being transgress the law of God ?

This question, to which, perhaps, no satisfactory philosophical

answer can be given, has been unnecessarily embarrassed by the

modes, in which answers to it have been attempted. The language,

often adopted, has been in a great measure abstract ; and, being

supposed to have meaning, when it had none, and to convey ideas,

which it did not contain, has served only to bewilder, where it was

intended to instruct .

The common method of conducting the investigation of this sub-

jecthas been to seek for some cause in the nature of man, styled

aprinciple of action, to which this effect might be fairly attributed.

As the principles of moral action in Adam, must have been holy,

and could in no degree have been sinful ; it is inquired, How could

a holy principle be the cause of a sinful action ?

It will be obvious to a careful examiner, that in this inquiry, the

word principle, is intended to denote a fixed, unchangeable cause ;

productive only of effects , of the same moral nature ; and is sup-

posed to exist, and to operate, during the interval of transgression.

On this foundation, the inquiry is made ; and, if the foundation be

solid and just, the inquiry cannot be answered : because, in the

actual case, viz. the case of our first Parents, there was no other

principle of action, beside a holy principle.

Butin this scheme of thought, there is a plain and important fal-

lacy; not improbably originated, and certainly established, by

the use of the word Principle. I do not deny ; on the contrary, I

readily admit ; that there is a cause ofmoral action in Intelligent

beings , frequently indicated by the words Principle, Affections, Ha-

bits , Nature, Tendency, Propensity, and several others. In this

case, however, as well as in many others, it is carefully to be ob-

served, that these terms indicate a cause, which to us is wholly un-

known; except that its existence is proved by its effects . There

is, as every man, who does not embrace the doctrine of casual, or

contingent, existence, must admit, a reason, why one being is holy

and another sinful ; or why the same being is holy at one time and

sinful at another; as truly, as that there is a reason, why he exists .

There is also a reason, why a being is, at some times , more strongly

inclined to a regular practice of sin or holiness, than at others . Our

judgment concerning moral beings, is customarily formed in ac-

cordance with these truths. We speak of human nature as sinful ;

intending not the actual commission of Sin, but a general character-

istic ofman, under the influence of which, he has committed Sins

heretofore, and is prepared, and is prone, to commit others . With

the same meaning in our minds, we use the phrases, sinful propen

THE TEMPTATION AND FALL.

SER. XXVII . ] 411

sity, corrupt heart, depraved mind; and the contrary ones, holy or

virtuous disposition , moral rectitude, holiness of character, and many

others of the like import. When we use these kinds of phraseolo-

gy, we intend that a reason really exists, although undefinable,

andunintelligible, by ourselves, why one mind will, either usually,

or uniformly, be the subject of holy volitions, and another, of sin-

ful ones. Wedo not intend to assert, that any one, or any num-

ber, of the volitions of the man, whom we characterize, has been,

or will be, holy, or sinful ; nor do we, indeed, design to refer im-

mediately to actual volitions at all . Instead of this , we mean to

indicate a state of mind, generally existing, out of which holy vo-

litions may, in one case, be fairly expected to arise, and sinful ones ,

in another : such a state, as that , if it were to be changed, and the

existing state of a holy mind were to become the same with that

of a sinful mind, its volitions would thenceforth be sinful ; and vice

versa . This state is the cause, which I have mentioned ; a cause,

the existence of which must be admitted, unless we acknowledge it

to be a perfect casualty, that any volition is sinful , rather than holy.

This cause is what is so often mentioned in the Scriptures, under

the name of the heart ; as when it is said, The heart is deceitful

above all things, and desperately wicked. I have already remarked,

that this cause is unknown, except by its effects . From these ,

however, we learn, that it is not so powerful, nor so unchangeable ,

as to incline the mind, in which it exists, so strongly to holiness, as

to prevent it absolutely from sinning, nor so strongly to sin, as to

prevent it absolutely from acting in a holy manner. Both Reve-

lation and facts, the only sources, from which we derive any know-

ledge of the subject, place this truth beyond a reasonable debate.

Beings, who have sinned, have afterwards become holy ; and be-

ings, who have been holy , have afterwards sinned ; and nothing

more seems necessary to explain this subject to us sufficiently, than

barely to suppose, what we cannot avoid supposing, that a temp-

tation, actually presented to the mind, is disproportioned in its power

to the inclination of that mind towards resistance .

I have now , I flatter myself , prepared the way for introducing

the only intelligible, and in any degree satisfactory, method of ex-

amining this subject ; which is, to consider the man, and the facts;

and not the abstract principles .

Inthis view, the case stands thus: God created amoral being,

capable, in the nature of things, of either sin or holiness. Ori-

ginally, this being was holy ; that is, disposed to obey the will of

GoD; possessing a state of mind propense to virtuous, and oppo-

sed to sinful, conduct. Fitted by his moral nature to be operated

onby motives, as all moral beings are, he was placed in a world,

filled with motives ; of which some induced to obedience, and

others to disobedience. Wherever the means of happiness and

misery exist, such motives exist of course ; and ofboth kinds ; for

these means, themselves. are the motives ; or perhaps more pro .

}

THE TEMPTATION AND FALL.

412 [SER. XXVII.

perly the happiness and misery are the motives. Now it is plain,

that in such aworld, (and all possible worlds, except a world of

perfect misery, must be such) motives of both kinds must , at times,

be present to the view of such a being. It is equally evident,

thatsome of the motives to sin, may, considered by themselves,

become to such a being stronger inducements to action, than some

of the motives to holiness . In other words, higher enjoyment

may be found, or expected, in some courses of sin, than in some

courses of holiness. That to a mind, capable of contemplating

one or a few things, only, at once, and of feeling with different

strength, at different times, the motives to sin may chiefly, or

alone, be present, will not be doubted. For, it is apprehended, no

finite watchfulness is sufficient to realize, with absolute certainty,

the full presence of the motives to holiness at all times ; nor to

keep out of view all the motives to sin. Of course, every such

mind may, for aught that appears, be induced by some supposable

motive, or combination of motives, at some times, and in some cir-

cumstances, at least, to yield to temptation, and disobey.

There is no proof from the nature of things, that finite strength

and stability are sufficient to resist all possible motives to sin.

From facts , we are irresistibly led to admit the contrary doctrine.

Angels, though entirely holy, yielded to such motives ; as did our

first Parents also, who possessed the same virtuous character.

These facts furnish a strong presumption, at least, that it is not

within the limits of created perfection to resist temptation in all

possible cases ; and that the final perseverance of saints and An-

gels, both in a state of trial, and in a state of reward, is derived

ultimately from the Almighty Power of GOD.

In a former discourse, I observed, that there were three methods,

in which sin, or moral evil, is supposed to have been introduced into

the universe. The first is, that he permitted it to exist. One of the

remaining two is, that God could not, without destroying the free

agency of his creatures , prevent them from sinning : the other, that

he creates their sinful volitions .

To the former of these methods of accounting for the introduc-

tion of sin, it is unanswerably objected, that God has actually pre-

served some of the angels from falling ; and that he has promised

to preserve, and will, therefore, certainly preserve, the spirits ofjust

men made perfect ; and that this has been, and will be, done without

infringing at all on their moral agency. Of course, he could just

as easily have preserved Adam from falling, without infringing on

his moral agency. To the second scheme, I object in the

1st. Place, That it is wholly without proof.

But a doctrine of this magnitude, ought not to be admitted with-

out the most ample evidence.

2dly. It is unnecessary .

All the satisfaction, which this subject admits, is capable of be-

ing derived as completely from attributing this event to the agency

THE TEMPTATION AND FALL.

SER. XXVI. ] 413

of creatures, as to the agency of God. At the same time, it is as

easy to conceive, to evince, and to admit, that man is an agent, as

thatGod is an agent. No difficulty attends the former case, which

does not in an equal degree attend the latter. If man is an agent,

then there is no necessity of tracing his actions beyond himself .

We find no necessity, when we think of God as an agent, of tra-

cing his actions beyond himself . There is no more necessity of

tracing human actions beyond man; nor is there, so far as I can

perceive, any additional light thrown on the subject of human

agency , by referring our actions to God. That God created us ;

that he can, and does, influence our actions in various ways, as he

pleases ; and that even we can in various ways influence the ac-

tions of each other ; must be admitted on all hands. But I see no

proof , that God is the author, or agent, of human actions ; nor the

least difficulty in believing that he has made us capable of being

the agents, and authors, of them, ourselves .

3dly. It increases the difficulties , which it professes to remove.

It is at least as difficult to conceive how God can be the author

of actions, existing in a human mind, as how that mind can be the

author of them. Here, therefore, no advantage is gained. On the

other hand, difficulties are multiplied without end. No conception

is more perplexing, or distressing, than this ; that God creates our

sin by an act of his Omnipotence, and then punishes it.

4thly. The Scriptures no where assert this doctrine .

The passages, commonly alleged in support of this doctrine, ap-

pear, to me at least, to be forced from their natural, obvious inter-

pretation, for this purpose. Nor ought it to be admitted, that a

doctrine of this importance would be taught in ambiguous and ob-

scure passages only. Astrong support of this opinion, is found in

the copiousness, variety, and explicitness of the passages, in which

the Scriptures teach us the agency of God in our sanctification.

This important distinction between the two cases, ought to have its

-full weight with our minds ; and should, I think, be considered as

decisive.

Should it be here objected, that the scheme, which I am contend-

ing for, is opposed to the doctrine of God's agency in our sanctifi-

!

cation : I deny the objection to be true. The Scriptural doctrine

of sanctification does not, I apprehend, teach us, that he is the au-

thor, or Creator, even of our holy volitions. On the contrary,

Scriptural regeneration is the creation, not of our volitions , but of

such a state, temper, or disposition, that the mind itself produces

other volitions , than those which it would have produced in its for-

mer state . After regeneration, GOD affects the mind in sanctifying

it , in the manner commonly denoted by the word influence ; and not

by a work of creation , continually carried on in the mind. Hence

GOD is said to sanctify his children by his Word, as well as by his

Spirit . But it is impossible, that his Word should any way be

concerned with the creation of new volitions .

THE TEMPTATION AND FALI .

114 [SER, XXVII.

To these observations it ought to be added, that several of the

objections, heretofore alleged against the doctrine, that the soul is

a mere chain of ideas and exercises, lie with equal weight against

this. These have, however, been too lately mentioned,to demand

a repetition.

The second question, to which I have referred, and which, like the

other, affects not the sin of Adam only, but all sin, is this : Why did

Godpermit ADAM to fall ?

Before I attempt to answer this question, it will be proper to ob-

serve, that according to all the schemes of accounting for the in-

troduction of moral evil, which have been mentioned , the fall of

Adam was permitted, that is, was not hindered , by God. It may

be also proper to state the difference, which in my own view exists,

between permitting, or not hindering, sin , and creating it. It is

this. In the former case, man is the actor of his own sin. His sin

is , therefore, wholly his own ; chargeable only to himself; chosen

by him unnecessarily, while possessed of a power to choose other-

wise ; avoidable by him; and of course guilty, and righteously

punishable. Exactly the same natural power is in this case pos-

sessed by him, while a sinner , which is afterwards possessed by

him, when a saint ; which Adam possessed before he fell ; and

which the holyAngels now possess in the Heavens. This power

is, also, in my view, perfect freedom ; a power of agency, as abso-

lute as can be possessed by an Intelligent creature.

In the latter case, the volitions ofman are immediately produced

by Omnipotence ; are the acts of God himself , and not at all ofman ;

are merely annexed to man, as accidents ; are in the natural sense

necessary, and irresistible ; and, so far as I can see, are in no sense

chargeable to man.

Inthe former case, God is supposed to create beings, possessed

ofthe full power to originate any, and every, moral action; in the

natural sense, able to stand, as well as liable to fall; and falling,

only because they did not make the best use, which they could, of

their power to stand. In the latter case, he created their apostacy.

Their fall, therefore, was irresistible ; unless it should be proved

that a creature can resist Omnipotence.

With these things premised, I observe in answer to this question,

that a state of trial supposes of course a capability of falling, and

cannot exist without. That, in this state, God is obliged to secure

his creatures from falling, has not hitherto been proved; and cer-

tainly ought not to be admitted, without proof . If he rewards them

with happiness, proportioned to their obedience, so long as they

continue obedient ; I see not how any thing further can be de-

manded at his hands. tisfied.

Perfect justice seems in this case to be sa-

Still it will be asked, why God suffered a thing, so evil and dis-

tressing, as sin, to exist.

Probably the best answer, ever given to this question in the pre-

THE TEMPTATION AND FALL.

SER. XXVII.] 415

sent world, is that, which was given by Christ, concerning one

branch of the divine dispensations to mankind : Even so, Father ;

for so it seemed good in thy sight . It was a dispensation approved

by infinite Wisdom, and seen by the Omniscient eye to be neces-

sary towards that good , which God proposed in creating the uni-

verse. The restless and roving mind of man is, however, often unsatis-

fied with this answer. I will, therefore, add by way of explana-

tion, and, I hope, with that profound reverence, which all creatures

owe to their Creator, and that diffidence, which becomes a creature

ofyesterday, that if Adam had not fallen, Christ would not have

redeemed mankind: for had there been no Apostates, there could

have been no Redeemer, and no Redemption. The mercy of God,

therefore, the most perfect of his attributes, and the consummation

ofhis excellence, would have been unknown to the universe. All

the blessings, bestowed on mankind, would have been the reward

of the obedience ofAdam, and his posterity. But the blessings ,

bestowed on glorified saints, are the rewards of the obedience of

the Eternal Son of God. These rewards could not have been

given, had not Christ obeyed : and Christ could not have obeyed,

had he not become the Substitute for sinners, or the Mediator be-

tween God, and apostate creatures. These rewards, also, will

differ from those in the former case, as the respective persons, who

obeyed, differed in the excellence of their characters, and the va-

lue of their obedience .

HadAdam obeyed ; it is, I think, highly probably, that the ori-

ginal world would have continued, and the present Heavens. The

new Earth, and the new Heavens, which will be created after the

Mediatorial Kingdom is finished, would never have been. No hu-

man beings would have been admitted into Heaven. None of that

joy would have been experienced, which now springs up in hea-

venly minds over the repentance and salvation of sinners, and

which will increase and brighten for ever. None of those things,

into which Angels desire to look,* would have been brought into

being; nor would that glorious purpose of the creation of all things,

mentioned by the Apostle, the knowledge, acquired by principali-

ties and powers in heavenly places, concerning the manifold wisdom

of God, disclosed in his dispensations to his Church,† have ever

been accomplished.

By the redemption of Christ , Heaven as well as Earth, Angels

as well as men, are materially changed from their former circum-

stances, and character. Nay, the whole immense and eternal

kingdom of JEHOVAH, by means of this amazing work, assumes a

new aspect ; and both Creation and Providence, are invested with

a new character. God is seen by his Intelligent creatures in new

manifestations of beauty, glory, and loveliness. Throughout never-

See 1 Pet. i. 12 . † SeeEph . ii. 9, 10.

THE TEMPTATION AND FALL.

416 [SER. XXVII,

ending ages, virtuous minds will be enlarged with knowledge, ex-

alted in holiness, and improved in dignity, and happiness, beyond

all, which would have otherwise been proper, or possible ; and

their affections , obedience, and praise, become more refined, and

more elevated, in a rapid and regular progress. The former legal

system, therefore, ofwhich the primitive state ofAdam was a part,

had comparatively no glory, by reason of the excelling glory of the

system of Redemption .

How far these observations may contribute to the satisfaction of

the inquirer, I will not presume to determine. That the system of

divine dispensations is now, and will for ever be, widely different

from what it would have been, had the work of Redemption not

taken place, must, I think, be acknowledged. I will only add,

that, as we are of yesterday, and consequently know nothing, it is

not, andcannot be, strange, that things of this extent should be so

high, and so vast, that we cannot attain to them.

Should an emmet, from the top of his mole-hill, undertake to sur-

vey the world around him ; and to descant on the beauty, or deform-

ity of the landscape, the suitableness of the soil, climate and ac-

commodations, for the settlement, health, husbandry, and com-

merce, of men ; and propose plans for the improvement of some

of these things, and the reformation of others ; we should proba-

bly consider him as a very imperfect judge of such subjects ; and

smile both at his presumption, and his philosophy. With respect

to the subject in hand, we are emmets ; and take our surveys only

from the top of a mole-hill. When it is considered, that the con-

sequences ofthis event reach through eternity, and that such won-

derful consequences, have already followed it , a small share of

modesty will induce us to confess our inability to judge concerning

it, and to take the station of humble learners, at the feet of our

Divine Instructer, rather than to ascend the chair of philosophical

judgment, and haughty decision.

REMARKS .

1st. In this difficult part of the history of man, we cannot, Ithink,

fail to see , how superior the Scriptural account of the introduction of

Moral evil, into the world, is to every other.

The Scriptural account is summarily this . Two beings, the pa-

rents ofmankind, created holy, and placed by God in a paradise

of good, were deceived, and seduced , by the insidious art of an

evil and superior being, permitted for wise and good purposes, to

have access to them .

The two principal schemes of philosophy on this subject, are

these:

First ; That the soul was created holy, and was contaminated by

being united to Matter ; because Matter is the seat of sin, and pollu

tion:

THE TEMPTATION AND FALL.

SER. XXVII. ] 417

Secondly ; That the soul was created holy, but apostatized in a

pre- existent state.

Ofthefirst, it is sufficient to say, that it is contrary, not to truth

only , but to possibility : since it is clearly impossible that any be-

ing, except a thinking, voluntary one, should be the subject of

either virtue or sin.

On the second, it is to be observed, that all the difficulties attend

it, which attend the supposition of an apostacy, in the present state.

The difficulty does not at all lie in the fact, that man apostatized

here, but, in the fact, that he apostatized at all. Ofcourse, wheth-

er we suppose the apostacy to have taken place in this world, or

in another , the difficulties involved in it, still remain possessed of

their full strength, and without being, in the least degree, obvi-

ated.

Besides, that man did pre-exist, is a mere assumption, of which,

there is not a shadow of evidence; and against which, even the light

of nature furnishes strong probability.

2dly. In this story, we see the amazing evil of sin, manifested in

the conduct of the Tempter.

What a disposition was that, which was exhibited, in the seduc-

tion of our first parents from their obedience ! From what a state

of innocence and happiness, did it plunge them and their poster-

ity ! At the same time, no personal resentment operated, no re-

venge burned in his breast against them ; for between him and them,

there had never been a controversy, nor even a connexion. They

were ignorant that such a being as himself existed, and had never

done, nor wished him, any evil whatever.

But he envied, he hated their virtue, their happiness, and their

prospects . Under the influence of these infernal feelings, he la-

boured to destroy them, and a world with them; and voluntarily

entailed on countless millions of Intelligent beings, sin, and wrath,

and ruin. How vast, how wonderful, how dreadful, is this malice !

How hateful is he in whom it resided ! Such is the true nature of

all Sin. In degree, it may differ: in kind, it is the same.

Let it be here remembered, that every Tempter is employed,

substantially, in the same manner. Every Tempter, in seducing

a fellow -creature, is influenced by sin; and tempts to sin. The

person tempted is induced to disobey God ; to become guilty and

odious ; to incur his anger ; and to expose himself to the miseries

of the second death. What a dreadful employment is this ! Yet

how common ! how evidently universal ! No language seems suf-

ficiently forcible to describe the turpitude of a murderer, or a trai-

tor. But how guiltless does the murder of the body seem, when

compared with the murder of the soul! What treachery can be

named with that , which cheats an immortal being out of heaven,

and deceives him into hell ?

Nor is the mode , in which temptations are usually conducted ,

anyother, than that recited in the text. In every temptation, the

VOL. I. 53

THE TEMPTATION AND FALL .

418 [ SER. XXVII .

truth of God is denied; his wisdom or goodness questioned ; his

conduct exhibited as strange, and his commands as unreasonable.

Obedience is always represented as exposed to disadvantages ;

and sin, as the true road to real and exquisite enjoyment. Jea-

lousy is thus naturally kindled ; discontent excited ; and the man

induced to repine at his lot, to murmur, in thought at least, against

his Maker, and to covet and seek forbidden enjoyments .

In the meantime, the soul is flattered perpetually with the hope

of safety in sin ; is taught to expect exemption from punishment ;

and is boldly informed, that it shall not surely dic. Thousands

and millions of times has this story been told ; and repeated

through every age, from the apostacy to the present hour. Thou-

sands and millions, also, of foolish and unhappy wretches, listen to

the tale, because it is loved ; and receive it on a tenth part of the

evidence, which they would demand, to enforce on their minds a

single truth, or a single duty : or rather, they receive it first ; and

wait for the evidence, till some future time. Eve is often censured

for yielding to a tempter, of finished cunning. How many of her

descendants yield to fools and blockheads, to gross and blunder-

ing solicitations ; unfurnished with even a plausible pretence, or

thatmiserable consolation to sinners, an apology for the compli-

ance! Let no one cast the first stone at our common Parent, who

is not conscious that he himself has not sinned in the same manner.

3dly. We learn from this story, that the only time of successful

resistance to temptation, is the moment, when it is presented.

I have already remarked, that had our first parents promptly

refused to listen, they would, in all probability, have escaped the

snare . What is true of them, is true of all their posterity. The

very act of deliberating, results from want of sufficient faith in

GOD, and sufficient firmness in our duty. In our deliberations,

also, we are exposed to many dangers. We are ignorant, yet be-

lieve ourselves knowing ; foolish, yet are vain of our wisdom ;

weak, yet are always ready to confide in our strength. Hence we

form false conclusions from miserable premises : yet we think both

the premises and conclusions sound, because they are devised by

such sagacious beings, as ourselves. In our love to sin, we have

an enemy within us, of whose presence, or even existence, we are

usually not aware, ever ready to aid the assaults of the enemy

without. From our ignorance, we are easily perplexed ; from our

vanity, easily flattered ; and from both, easily overcome. Of our

perplexity, every tempter takes advantage, while he covers the

hook with a bait for our vanity. The more we reason, the more

we plunge ourselves into difficulties ; and the less hope do we find

of an escape. The longer the assault continues, the more feeble,

embarrassed, and irresolute do we become ; and the more bold,

powerful, and assured, our seducer : till, at length, that resolution

and understanding, which at first would have gained an easy and

certain victory, become an unresisting prey. Resist then the De-

THE TEMPTATION AND FALL.

SER. XXVII. ] 419

vil, resist every tempter, at first; at the moment of solicitation ;

and he will flee from you.

4thly. We are also taught by this passage of Scripture, that the

ultimate safety of mankind, when they are tempted, lies in GOD only.

HadEve sought the protection of God, when she was assailed

by the Adversary; she had never fallen. Had she remembered

the character of GOD ; she had never believed the declarations of

the Tempter. Had she admitted no jealousy, no suspicion, of the

divine Wisdom and goodness ; she had, in all probability, kept her

happy state.

The same dangers attend all her descendants. Ifwe wish to

overcome, or escape, temptations; it is indispensable, that we

remember the presence, and acknowledge the character, of God ;

thatwedistrust in no degree his sincerity or kindness ; and that we

go directly to him for the succour, which we need. The closing

petition in the prayer, taught by Christ to his disciples , is, Lead us

not into temptation : but deliver usfrom evil : that is, Suffer us not

to be led into temptation ; but, should this danger betide us at any

time, deliver us from the evil to which we shall be then exposed.

Of six petitions only, of which this prayer consists ; a prayer

taught by him, who knew all the dangers and necessities of man ;

this is one. So necessary did he determine this assistance and

guardianship to be ; and so necessary our continual prayer, that it

might be afforded.

In the first temptation, we see the doctrine strongly illustrated.

Here no prayer ascended for aid. Here, therefore, no aid was

given; and here, left to themselves, the miserable victims were of

course destroyed. Let us, then, learn wisdom, both from their ex-

ample and their end. Let us avoid the one, that we may escape

the other. For protection from tempters, and temptations, both

within us and without us, let our prayers unceasingly rise with

fervent repetition. Especially, when the Serpent approaches, when

the charm is about to begin ; and when his mouth is ready to

open and swallow us up, let our cries for help ascend to Heaven ;

that He, who is swift to hear, and always prepared to pity and re-

lieve, may mercifully extend his arm, and snatch us from thejaws

of destruction.

SERMON XXVIII.

PROVIDENCE , THE SENTENCE PRONOUNCED ON ΜΑΝ.

GENESIS iii. 14-19. -And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast

done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field : upon

thy belly shalt thou go ; and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life. And I

will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed :

it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. Unto the woman he said,

Iwill greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception : in sorrow thou shalt bring

forth children ; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife ,

and hast eaten of the tree , of which I commanded thee , saying, Thou shalt not eat

of it ; cursed is the groundfor thy sake ; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days

of thy life : Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forthto thee ; and thou shalt

eat the herb of the field. In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou

return unto the ground ; for out of it wast thou taken for dust thou art, and unto

dust shalt thou return.

IN my last discourse, I considered at length the temptation of

our first parents , and their consequentfall from holiness, andfrom

the favour of God. The next subject, which, in a system of the-

ology, invites our attention, is the sentence which followed their

transgression.

This sentence is contained in the Text, and naturally divides

itself , for our consideration, into three parts :

I. The Sentence pronounced on the Tempter :

II. That pronounced on the Woman : and,

III . That pronounced on the Man.

The order, in which this subject is exhibited to us, is the same

which existed in the Temptation itself , and in the transgression

also. The Serpent first sinned in tempting the Woman ; the

Womansinned next, in yielding to his solicitations, and eating the

forbidden fruit ; and the Man last, in yielding to the solicitations of

the Woman.

On the sentence, as here pronounced, it will be proper to re-

mark, generally, that it is not a mere repetition of the words of

the Law. Nor is it to be considered, as in fact involving the whole

of the sentence, contained in the law. That sentence seems to

have been left by God as it was originally denounced; and nothing

more to have been now intended as a threatening, except to dis-

close to our first parents various evils, attendant on the state of

guilt and degradation, to which they had reduced themselves, and

to remind them of the mortal condition, in which they were now

finally fixed. On the Serpent, indeed, a sentence new, and be-

fore undisclosed, was declared. The evils, which he was to suffer

in consequence of this sin, were announced: while in the same

THE SENTENCE, & c.

SER. XXVIII .] 421

threatening was included, also a promise of great and singular

benefits to those, whom he had most wickedly seduced.

The original threatening of the Law, or Covenant, under which

our first parents were placed, involved all the evils, which they

and their posterity were ever to suffer. The sentence, now passed

on the transgressors, unfolded, particularly, several distresses,

which they were hereafter to experience under this original threat-

ening; and, at the same time, furnished them with consolations of

high importance.

I. The Sentence, passed on the Serpent, claims a two - fold consid-

eration : in its literal meaning, and in its principal meaning.

In the literal meaning of this denunciation, the Serpent is cursed

beyond all other beasts , is doomed to creep on the ground, and to

eat dust all the days of his life . Perpetual war, it is declared,

shall exist between his seed and that of the Woman ; in which he

shall bruise the heel of his adversary ; while his adversary shall

bruise his head.

This, which I have chosen to call the literal meaning ofthe sen-

tence, is, I acknowledge, rather an application of it to the literal

serpent. The language, in which it is explained, is , I think, plainly

figurative ; and involves, generally, a state of peculiar degrada-

tion and suffering. It has been supposed, and I apprehend justly,

that the original condition of the Serpent, as an animal, was supe-

rior and distinguished. Ancient opinions considered the serpent

as winged, beautiful and privileged, above other animals. If these

opinions be allowed to be just ; it will be easily seen, that the de-

gradation was remarkable, and altogether calculated to convince

our first parents of the miserable tendency and influence of trans-

gression. In every view, the condition specified, is a condition

deeply degraded, and suited, obviously, to show the proper effect

ofsin on all the instruments, by which it was accomplished. What-

ever the serpent lost, as well as whatever he suffered, was an in-

fliction, properly evincing the hatred of God to every thing, con-

cerned in the seduction of mankind ; and to show to their progeni-

tors, in immediate consequence, both the evil of which they had

been guilty, and the certainty of their future punishment.

The enmity, which was announced, and which has existed be-

tween the seed of the woman generally, that is, mankind, and the

seed of the Serpent, has been a source of innumerable evils to the

Serpent. Animals of this kind have ever been peculiarly hated

and hunted, peculiarly attacked and destroyed, from the beginning.

Even the harmless ones do not escape. A war of extermination

has plainly been declared against them, and carried on through all

generations with unrelaxing and unceasing animosity. In conse-

quence of this hostility, millions of them have probably perished,

which otherwise might have continued through the date, allotted

by Providence to their being. In the mean time, not a small num-

ber of the human race have fallen victims to the enmity of these

422 [ SER. XXVIII ,

THE SENTENCE

venomous beings ; and have usually been wounded in every part

ofthe Body, mentioned in this prediction.

The principal meaning of this sentence, or its application to the

allegorical Serpent, the real Tempter, is, however, of infinitely

more importance, and has a totally superior claim to our attention.

The Tempter and the Woman were, in the transgression, united

together as rebels against their Creator. In the eye of the Temp-

ter , this union was begun, only to be strengthened, and perpetuated.

He had once sinned and was finally rejected by God. He, there-

fore, naturally , and in a sense necessarily, concluded, that rebel-

lious manwould be rejected also. No event had hitherto happened

in the Universe, which, to the view of a created being, rendered it

possible for a rebel against his Maker to be restored. Satan,

therefore, of necessity concluded, that sinning man would never

be restored ; and that God, who had created man holy, and destined

him to endless enjoyment, would be wholly disappointed of his

own favourite designs. At the same time, he confidently saw the

whole race added to his own kingdom, and the regions of sin and

misery enlarged, and peopled, by the inhabitants of another ruined

world.

But he now, for the first time, was solemnly informed, that a

part, at least, of his expectations would perish. Man, he was here

told, would on the one hand, be still his enemy, throughout succeed-

ing ages ; and himself , on the other, be made to suffer new and un-

known, yet very alarming, evils , from a descendant, or descend-

ants, of this very woman, whom he had beguiled into sin. His head,

the chief , the vital, the percipient, part of himself , was to be bruised,

or crushed, by some one, or other, of the progeny of those, whom

he had ensnared. That he understood the real and full import of

this threatening, cannot be supposed ; but it is obvious, that he

could not but perceive some very great and alarming punishment

to be in store for his new and flagrant guilt. Thus all his hopes,

like those of every hypocrite, were blasted in a moment ; and were

changed into that painful suspense, and constant alarm, which are

always more dreadful than any misery, except final and eternal wo.

From the actual fulfilment of this prediction, and the comments

ofthe Scriptural writers on the threatening contained in it, we are

able to determine its full import with precision and certainty. The

seed of the Woman, we know, was the Lord Jesus Christ ; the Son

of God, and the Redeemer of mankind. We are expressly taught,

that he, although by the instigation of the original Tempter nailed

to the Cross and bruised thus in his heel, his inferior part, his flesh ,

yet triumphed and made an open show of principalities and powers

in his Crucifixion, and thoroughly led captivity captive, after he had

effectually spoiled them of all their glory. In this great event, he

not only vanquished Death, but destroyed also him that had the

power of Death ; that is , the Devil.

In this great event, he disappointed, and ruined , all the hopes

PRONOUNCED ON MAN .

SER. XXVIII. ] 423

and designs of this proud and malicious spirit. His future lot he

rendered far more shameful and wretched than before ; lowered

his pride for ever in the dust ; turned his malevolence backward

on himself; mortified his envy anew, and inexpressibly ; and made

the race, whom he had seduced, the instruments of completing his

degradation, and ruin.

From Man, that is, from penitent, returning, and reformed man,

this divine person took away the sting of the threatened Death ;

and chiefly, the Death itself , which was threatened. The grave

he opened anew, and forced it to surrender its captives to him-

self . For all those of this numerous race, who are willing to con-

fide in him as their Redeemer, he opened the gates of immortality ;

of a new and far more glorious immortality than that which they

had lost. He purchased for them the sanctification of the Soul,

the forgiveness of their sins, and an inheritance undefiled and eter-

nal among the very Angels, to whose rank and character Eve, by

eating the forbidden fruit, expected to arise. They indeed, in a

manner, however, far different from that which was in the Tempt-

er's thoughts, will become as Gods, or Angels ; as the same Sa-

viour has informed us ; and will, together with them, receive feli-

city in a Body, fashioned like unto his glorious Body, and incon-

ceivably superior to the refined dust which composed the forms of

our first parents . In a state, perfectly sanctified and cleansed,

they will enjoy a happiness, ennobled and expanded beyond all

that heaven itself imagined, before the Mediation of the Son of

God; a happiness, suited to reward his infinitely meritorious obe-

dience in the work of Redemption. Thus the sum of happiness to

the universe, will be undoubtedly increased, and to an immense

extent, by the very means which this haughty, malignant Spirit em-

ployed for its destruction.

The Character, the station, the residence, the employments, the

honour, and the happiness, of Man will be wonderfully exalted ;

the exhibitions of the divine glory will be supremely enhanced;

and the Mercy of God, before unknown and unimagined, will be

displayed with infinite and eternal splendour. God, in the new,

peculiar, and most endearing relations of Father, Redeemer, and

Sanctifier, far more intimate and affecting than those of Creator ,

and Ruler, will be more nearly united to his Intelligent creatures ;

and will be seen in more venerable and lovely exhibitions of his

supreme excellence : while the themes of contemplation, gratitude,

and praise, will be far more noble and interesting than could have

beenproper or possible, had not our first Parents lost their primi-

tive station and happiness . Thus the Providence of God will

wear a new and more glorious aspect ; the divine kingdom assume

a splendour and importance before unknown ; and the Universe

become a different , and incomparably more exalted scene of

being .

In the mean time, the Tempter himself , at the close of this

THE SENTENCE

424 [ SER . XXVIII.

earthly system, when all his wickedness shall have been acted,

and all his wiles exhausted, will together with his debased and

wretched companions, be consigned to everlasting chains, to total

disappointment, to extreme humiliation, to eternal darkness, and

to wo and despair, endless and inexpressible.

II. The sentence pronounced on the Woman, next demands our

attention .

This consisted of two parts : The pain and sorrow, which were

to attend her in bearing and bringing forth children ; and her sub-

jection to her husband . Neither of these would have had any be-

ing , had she resisted the temptation. She would have been a

mother ; but without pain and anguish : and she would have been

a wife ; but without any humiliating inferiority to her husband.

Now her state in both respects was entirely changed. Her

life became full of sorrow, and largely acquainted with grief; and

a great proportion of all her sufferings were to arise from these

peculiar sources.

III . The sentence on the Man is the last proposed subject of con-

sideration .

This consists of four distincts parts : Toil, Sorrow, Humiliation,

and Death .

In the original state of Man, he laboured, but without toil. The

Earth brought forth its fruits spontaneously, and abundantly ; and

supplied him with food, without any necessary care or exertions of

his own. He was formed to industry, that he might be useful, and

of course dignified and virtuous ; and not merely that he might eat.

His faculties, also, were firm, and undecaying, unsusceptible of

weariness, and incapable of suffering. His labour was, therefore,

voluntary and delightful ; a privilege, and not a calamity. The

sources of sorrow, also, were not then opened; and man had not

learned to drink of its bitter streams . Fear, scorn , disease, be-

reavement, and all the moral causes of distress, were not yet ap-

pendages of this new world. Intemperance, sloth, impurity, false-

hood, treachery, broken friendship, and iron-handed oppression,

together with a long train of their miserable companions, were yet

strangers to Man.

His station, as well as his character, was, in the mean time, no-

ble and dignified. Angels did not disdain to own, and converse

with him, as their friend and fellow-servant. All his views, pur-

suits, wishes , and employments, were refined and elevated ; and

were suited to the immortal life, and unspotted holiness, in which

he was created.

Death, the offspring of Sin, had hitherto been an entire stranger

to the great kingdom ofGod. All his creatures, and Man as truly

as any of them, were possessed of life literally endless ; and look-

ed forward through the perpetual succession of ages without anx-

iety , and without fear.

In all these great particulars, Man was now destined to a total

PRONOUNCED ON MAN.

SER. XXVIII.] 425

change of being. He was condemned to hard and painful toil ; to

a course of life, in which a great proportion of the changes were

merely varieties of suffering; to a degradation from all his honours

and hopes ; to a state of deep humiliation ; and to Death as the

end of his earthly being, accompanied with a train of the most af-

fecting distresses and horrors. In this toil, these afflictions, this

degradation, and this melancholy end, both sexes shared in most

respects alike. Both were henceforth sinful ; both were degraded;

both were unhappy; both were mortal .

Aquestion of no small importance in Theology, and often can-

vassed by Divines, as well as other Christians, will very naturally

be asked, in this place ; viz. What was the extent of the curse, or

original penalty, threatened in the Covenant made with Adam ?

That temporal death was threatened in this sentence, will not be

questioned. In my own opinion, Spiritual Death, and Eternal

Death, were also included.

That Eternal death constituted a part of this sentence, appears

to me evident, because in the

1st. place, Adam was plainly threatened with the loss of immor-

tal life . Whatever else was contained in the threatening, this must be

allowed to be a part of it. It follows, therefore, that either Eter-

nal death was threatened ; or Annihilation ; or temporal death, fol-

lowed by eternal happiness. The last will not be pretended. The

second, viz. Annihilation, could not be threatened, because it was

certainly no part of the design of God in the creation of Man. It

seems evident, therefore, that the first is the true and only scheme

ofthis part of the Scriptures, because these three are the only pos-

sible interpretations of the passage .

2dly. In the sentence, a direct promise is made ofthe redemption

of Christ ; as the remedy for the curse, which is here denounced.

But the redemption of Christ was not a remedy for that part of

the curse, which denounced temporal death, as the reward of the

apostacy. Men still die ; Adam died; notwithstanding the re-

demption of Christ. The remedy, therefore, mentioned in the

sentence, did not refer to any thing contained in it, if temporal

death was all which it contained. On the contrary, it referred to

something, ofwhichAdam had heard, and at the time, knewnothing.

Yet it is plain, that both he and his wife, in some good measure,

knew the import of the remedy for he, immediately after the sen-

tence was pronounced, called his Wife Eve, or Chavoh, because she

was the Mother of all living ; that is, of all, who should live for

ever, by means of the seed of the Woman: and she, at the birth of

Cain, says, Ihave gotten a Man, the Lord ; that is, the promised

Lord, or seed, who was to bruise the Serpent's head. As, then, they

knewwhat was meant by the remedy; so I think it clear, that they

knew what the curse intended ; and this, according to the view of

the subject here presented, can be no other than eternal death.

VOL. 1. 54

THE SENTENCE

426 [SER . XXVIII.

That they understood, in some good measure, the meaning of

both the remedy and the curse, is also evident from the fact, that

they became penitents, and were accepted ofGod. There can be

no repentance, where there is no hope of acceptance. Despair,

here , is the only predominant emotion ; and with despair, repent-

ance cannot, in the physical sense, co-exist. Without an atone-

ment repentance cannot be accepted. As an atonement was here

promised, I cannot see how the repentance of our first parents

could be accepted, or offered, unless with a direct reference, in

their minds, to that atonement, as the ground of their acceptance .

3dly. The Apostle Paul appears to me to have settled this point,

in the fifth Chapter ofhis Epistle to the Romans. *

As I cannot comment, at this time, on the passage at large ; I

shall refer you only to a single verse, which appears to me, in this

respect, a summary of the whole. In verse sixteenth, he says ,

And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift : for the judgment

was by one to condemnation ; but the free gift is ofmany offences

unto justification. The judgment, here mentioned, is, unquestion-

ably, the judgment originally passed on the one that sinned ; viz .

Adam, and, subsequently, on all others, who have sinned after him.

This is said to have been unto condemnation ; a condemnation,

from which we are delivered by the justification specified, and

styled, in the next verse but one, the justification of life. By this

justification we are delivered from eternal death. Of course, this

is the death, to which we, and Adam before us, were condemned by

the judgment mentioned in this passage.

4thly. The death, which rewards sin, in fact, and which would

have rewarded the sin of Adam, if CHRIST had not become a Media-

tor, and he a penitent, is eternal death.

The true import of the threatening is, I think, certainly learned

from its execution. But this is an infliction of eternal death. The

consequence is obvious and irresistible .

I do not, indeed, suppose our first parents to have been distinct-

ly possessed of the exact meaning of the sentence. I consider

them as only informed of the general import ; and as being taught,

that they were to suffer, if disobedient, the perpetual loss of the

favour and blessing of God, and to undergo the manifestations of

his anger throughout their future existence. To this they were

able to come as near in their views as they could, to adequate con-

ceptions of temporal death.

That spiritual death was also threatened in this sentence, ap-

pears to me sufficiently evident for the reasons, to be alleged, after

I shall have mentioned the chief objection, which, so far as I am

informed, has been made to this doctrine. It is this : Spiritual Death

is the state which Sinners , as such, love ; the prime object of their

See from verse 12 to the end, i

PRONOUNCED ON MAN.

SER. XXVIII. 427

choice ; and what especially constitutes them sinners. To this I

answer,

1st. Spiritual Death ought, in relation to this question, to be con-

sidered as threatened to Adam, and not as threatened to those who

were already sinners .

Spiritual Death, or habitual and immoveable sin , in the view of

Adam, a holy, spotless being, and hating wholly every sin, might,

I think, be regarded, not only as not chosen, or loved, by him, but

as an object of supreme dread and horror. Let it be, for a mo-

ment only, considered, how such a being must feel, under a sense

of losing his holy character for ever, and of being confirmed,

beyond recall, in a perpetual hatred of God, and a perpetual love

and practice of sin ; and I believe all serious persons will agree,

that this debased, odious, and contemptible character must appear

to him an evil literally infinite. To sin, once, was to him an object

of horror; but to be consigned for that sin to habitual and eternal

rebellion and iniquity, and to become thus for ever hateful, vile, and

despicable, must be, on the one hand, a loss ; and on the other, a

suffering, dreadful beyond all conception, except that of expe-

rience. It was, therefore, capable of being the subject of threat-

ening, or penalty ; and that to any supposable degree .

2dly. Spiritual Death is plainly the chief evil, which is, or perhaps

canbe, suffered by guilty beings .

Perpetual and habitual sin, or that depraved state of soul, which

operates only in sinful actions, is an evil, greater, if considered only

as mere suffering, than, perhaps, all others .

It is, in the first instance, the source of all the opposition, or

rather is itself all the opposition, of the Soul to God; the aliena-

tion from God ; consciousness of his disapprobation and wrath ;

fear of his vengeance; and that miserable murmuring and repining

against his government and dispensations, which is felt by every

sinful being.

It is, also, the source of the hatred, malevolence, envy, revenge,

deceit, violence, and injustice, which so universally and dreadfully

⚫ distress, and destroy, Intelligent creatures, in the present world;

and in every world, where these dispositions prevail. It also cuts

upby the roots, all inclination in rational beings to befriend each

other ; and prompts them to become, as much as possible, the

means of each other's misery.

Finally; the several emotions of the soul, in this state, are in

themselves misery. This will readily be acknowledged concern-

ing many of these emotions . It is true of them universally. If

we suppose them to be increased to a given degree, and to rage

without gratification, nothing more is, or can be, necessary to com-

plete the misery of a creature. Is not envy alone sufficient tomake

wretchedness complete ? Is not murmuring against God ? Is not

the consciousness of being perfectly, and eternally, hateful and

despicable ? Is not any vehement and ungratified desire ; if , atthe

THE SENTENCE

428 [ SER. XXVIII .

same time, that desire is felt to be unlawful, base, and vile ? Con-

sider all such affections as invariable and endless ; and, what they

are clearly known to be, most unworthy and abominable ; and so

inwrought into the Soul, that they cannot be separated from it, but

by annihilation ; and, I think, you will acknowledge readily, that

a more perfect curse cannot be named.

3dly. The things which, in various places, are said in the Scrip-

tures, concerning the state of damnation, in which this penalty is

actually inflicted , seem fully to imply, that spiritual Death is a part

ofthe curse.

In the first Chapter of Proverbs, Wisdom, that is, Christ, in de-

nouncing the same curse against the impenitent, particularly under

theGospel, closes the threatenings with this remarkable declaration :

Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way, and be filled

with their own devices .

In this passage, the curse may be said to be repeated, and ex-

plained : and here, one part of the explanation is, that the impeni-

tent shall be filled with their devices . The devices of a man are

his aims, pursuits, and plans, in which his affections are all exerted.

With these, and all of them, the very pursuits and plans, which are

their own ; that is, which have in this life been their own ; Christ de-

clares, the impenitent shall not only be afflicted , butfilled. Thus

also, Solomon says, The Backslider in heart shall be filled with his

own ways ; and the good manfrom himself; that is, from his own

mind, affections and character ; from the remembrance of what he

was, and the consciousness of what he is ; the wicked and the good

man shall either suffer or enjoy, hereafter, in an eminent manner.

Again; Wisdom, or Christ, addressing himself to sinners, in the

eighth Chapter, says, All they that hate me, love Death. It can

hardly be said, that Sinners love either temporal or eternal Death ,

considered as mere suffering ; but that they love spiritual death is

unquestionable. But the Death, here loved, is, I think, clearly the

Death beyond the grave.

The fact is also undoubted, that the damned are not only unhap-

py, but wicked. Nor will it be denied, that they are thus judicial-

ly; that they are given over by God to this character in the same

manner, as persons are judicially given up to blindness, hardness

of heart, and final ruin, in the present world. It will also, I pre-

sume, be readily conceded, that their misery will , in a great mea-

sure, arise from their own sinful affections and pursuits, and those

of their companions in wo. These facts appear to be a com-

ment on the curse of the Law, and to explain to us in this particu-

lar its true import.

REMARKS.

1st. This subject affords strong proof of the divine Origin of the

Scriptures .

The manner, in which the declarations in this sentence have

PRONOUNCED ON MAN.

SER . XXVIII.] 420

been already fulfilled , is certainly a very interesting testimony to

the truth of the history, of which it is a part ; a history of vast

comprehension, and involving a great proportion of all the things

contained in the Bible; and a history probably more objected to

by Infidels than any other found in Revelation.

Of the fulfilment of the sentence on the Serpent, literally under-

stood, there cannot be a question. Ahostility, totally singular, has

always existed between him and mankind ; and a war has always

been carried on with peculiar enmity. To destroy this animal ,

has been a settled pursuit in the heart of man, through every age

and every country. The manner, in which this destruction has

been accomplished, has also been continually that, which is here

predicted; and the extent of the destruction has been in a sense

without bounds. It has not been originated by a spirit of self-

defence, but of hatred. It has been a war of the kind, which the

Romans describe as carried on ad internecionem ; or to the final

destruction of one or the other of the combatants . The cause of

this will in vain be sought for in conviction and contrivance. Ser-

pents are certainly far less mischievous to mankind than many

other animals, which, yet, are not thus hunted and destroyed.

Their shape is such, and their whole appearance, as in other cases

is regarded not only without disgust, but with pleasure. Yet the

sight of a serpent is instantly productive of a dread, a horror, a

chill, totally singular, and extending to all the race of Adam. An

enmity innate and irremoveable exists between us and them, felt

even at the mention of the name, and strongly and proverbially

expressed in a great variety of forms. Even those serpents which

are known to be harmless, are, like the rest, hated in the same

manner, seen with the same horror, and killed with the same ea-

gerness. How striking an exhibition is this of the reality of the

sentence ! How strong a proof , from fact, of the truth of the

history !

Ofthe fulfilment of this sentence on the Serpent, figuratively con-

sidered, we have no knowledge, except from the Scriptures them-

selves. In them, as I have already shown, we have a full account

ofthe complete and wonderful accomplishment of it in the Re-

demption of Man. In this account, although contained in the Scrip-

tures, we are presented with high evidence of their divinity. It is

not conceivable, it is not possible, that Moses, unless inspired,

should have written this prediction, with even a conjecture, that it

would afterwards be thus fulfilled. Nor is it much more consist-

ent with possibility, that the Apostles should have contrived the

subsequent story so, as thus wonderfully to have accorded with

this singular prophecy. The fulfilment is here as complete as

it is wonderful ; and, although dependent on myriads of events,

these all appear in one perfect system, tending always to this end,

and in this end consummating the scheme of the prophecy. He,

who can believe these things to have been accidental, or to have

THE SENTENCE

430 [SER. XXVIII.

been contrived by mere human ingenuity, must have a peculiar fa-

cility of believing at his pleasure ; and must be wholly freed from

the shackles of evidence, whether certain or probable.

Nor is the fulfilment of the sentence on the Woman less remark-

able. In all ages, countries, and climates, of the world, Women

have been distinguished, from every species of animals, by the pains

and sorrows , which they have experienced in bearing, and bring-

ing forth, their offspring ; a striking proof , that the human race

have forfeited, and lost their original supremacy over the inferior

inhabitants of the Earth. A great part of all the dangers and suf-

ferings of the tender and delicate sex, are plainly derived from

this source. No experience, no watchful observation, no medical

skill, however laboriously exerted, and however long continued,

have been sufficient to lessen this great portion of human wo, or

materially to prevent the entire fulfilment of the sentence, pro-

nounced on the general mother of mankind. The same sorrow,

pain, and fear, still remain ; the same dangers still betide ; the

same diseases still ravage ; and Death, in the same humiliating

and distressing forms, and in the same proportion and number of

instances, still triumphs over one half of our species ; in exact ac-

cordance with the threatening of the Text.

Nor has the other part of the prediction been less wonderfully,

or much less affectingly, accomplished. Throughout all savage

nations, (and savage nations have constituted a great part of man-

kind, in every age of the world, with which we are acquainted)

women have been reduced to extreme humiliation, dependence,

and distress, by the stronger sex. Brutal strength and agility are

the only attributes valued by savages ; and women being inferior

to men, in these attributes, have, by savages, been universally de-

pressed. Of course, they have been destined, and compelled, to

all those employments, which men disliked, or contemned. The

very feebleness of frame, which, in the view of Men, rendered them

inferior to themselves, might, one would think, naturally excuse

them from the fatigue and hardship of severe labour, and plead for

them an exemption from business, to which their strength was

totally unequal. Still it has pleaded in vain. They have been

made mere drudges, and doomed to the most toilsome, distressing,

and servile offices, for the mere convenience of men. Men , when

not roused to the pleasures and glories ofhunting and war, have,

in the savage life, spent their time in sloth , in sleep, and in diver-

sion ; while women have been forced to plant, and gather their

corn ; to make their utensils ; and to perform, besides, all the do-

mestic business. They have also been obliged to bear most of the

burdens, and to carry the children, while infants, in their various

journeys .

All the savages, of the several parts of the globe, have pursued

one course of life, in this respect. In some nations, women have

been condemned to such wretchedness, in consequence of their

PRONOUNCED ON MAN

SER . XXVIII.] 431

subjection, as to expose their female children to destruction, in or-

derto prevent them from suffering the same misery with themselves ;

esteeming an untimely and violent death a happier lot than life,

when doomed to suffer such dreadful oppression.

In all the Mohammedan nations, also, and throughout the vast

empires of Hindostan and China, women have suffered, in a man-

ner not much less humiliating. In Mohammedan countries, they

are bought and sold like cattle ; are considered as mere property ;

are imprisoned, as they are in China also, for life ; and are regard-

ed, universally, and only, as instruments of amusement, and plea-

sure, by their brutal masters .

Christianity has indeed, in a great measure, in this as well as in

other respects, reversed the curse. In 1 Tim. ii . xv. the Apos-

tle, speaking of women, says, Nevertheless she shall be saved in

( that is, by means of) child-bearing, if they continue in faith, and

charity, and holiness, with sobriety. I apprehend the true meaning

of this passage to be, that child-bearing shall eminently prove the

means of salvation to the sex, through the influence of that system

of Christianity, which was intended to be the general reversion of

the curse. According to this declaration of the Apostle, we ac-

tually see that the danger and distress, to which women are pecu-

liarly exposed, are the means of their piety and salvation. Women

are usually pious, in far greater numbers, than men. The late

President Edwards, of Nassau Hall, considered the proportion ,

within the limits of his information, as at least two to one ; and va-

rious other Divines, of great knowledge in the religion of mankind,

have concurred with him in this opinion. This interesting fact is

probably owing, chiefly, if not wholly, to the danger, sorrow, and

death, to which the sex are especially exposed ; and which, always

before their eyes, operate as solemn, and effectual monitions of their

speedy departure to the eternal world. In this way they are usu-

ally more sober-minded, more attentive to spiritual and eternal

things, and more disposed to give them their due influence, than

men; and, thus far oftener become the subjects of piety, and the

heirs of endless life .

In Christian countries , also , Women have risen from the misera-

ble state of humiliation and servitude, which I have described, to

their proper importance and dignity. In such countries, to a great

extent, they are educated, informed, refined, and elevated to the

character of respectable, rational, and moral beings . The cha-

racter which they sustain, and the treatment to which they are en-

titled, in the Gospel, are highly becoming its refined and noble

character. Refined and elegant tenderness was unknown, until it

was made a part of the revealed system. There it is enjoined in

the strongest of all terms, and by the noblest of all allusions .

Husbands love your wives, even as Christ loved the Church, and gave

himself for it, is the affecting language of the great Apostle of the

Gentiles, on this interesting subject; and such language, as was

THE SENTENCE

432 [SER. XXVIII.

never used by any other man. Accordingly, in Christian nations,

and in Christian nations only, are women restored to the blessings,

which, among the rest of mankind, they have lost ; and in many of

them, are as far restored to them, as, in so imperfect a state of be-

ing, can be rationally expected.

The sentence, passed on the man, is also fulfilled in the same

perfect manner.

We see the ground cursed, and bringing forth thorns and briars ,

instead of the living fruits of Paradise. We see man destined to

labour for his bread, and to eat that bread in the sweat of his brow .

We see him, also, offew days andfull of trouble. Fears of ten

thousand dangers and distresses haunt him every day, and on every

side ; pain and disease derived from Earth, Air, and Ocean, from

his birth and his food, his exercise, and his rest; and affecting

every nerve, and every pore ; sorrow for every disappointment of

his hopes, and for every frail and vanishing enjoyment which he

attains , and extending through all the days of his life ; embitter

theirwhole progress, and render his continuance in this world often

so undesirable, that, with Job, he is ever ready to cry out, Iwould

not live always.

Nor do we see him less fallen in his character, station, employ-

ments, happiness, and universal condition. Of a prince, the lord

ofa world, he is become a drudge, a poor, dependent wretch ; de-

pendent on every person and thing around him ; and in the evils

which betide, and those which threaten him, daily, is reduced far

below the condition of the brutes. In the happiest countries of

the world, how clearly is this the state of man ! How much more

strikingly in those, which are scorched with heat, or stiffened with

frost, around the year ; in those, which are cursed with drought

and sterility ; and in those, which are haunted by the pestilence,

and all its dismal attendants ? This part of the sentence is, how-

ever, less commonly regarded, as a strong exhibition of the truth

of this history, than the others : I think without propriety or jus-

tice. The real reason undoubtedly is, that we consider the present

condition of man as his only condition, and are reluctant to admit,

that he was ever placed in any other. Of this, however, there is

no evidence, and no substantial probability. The tradition of all

ancient nations teaches directly the contrary doctrine, and amply

supports the history of Moses. Nor is it reasonable to believe,

that man came from the hands of God the same frail, miserable

being, which we now behold him ; or the world, that mass of in-

clemency, barrenness, and confusion, which we see in its present

state. A paradise is, to the first view of the mind, the proper

state of a world ; and unspotted virtue and happiness, the proper

state of rational beings, as they come from the hands of the Crea-

tor. All things betoken a world, and a race of inhabitants, in ru-

ins ; and such has been the decision of all the ancient nations : a

decision, unquestionably derived by tradition from the real facts.

11

PRONOUNCED ON ΜΑΝ.

SER . XXVIII.] 433

In this view, every thing, which respects man, is a lively fulfil-

ment of the prediction in the text: a fulfilment exact and com-

plete ; and exhibiting, in the strongest manner, the truth of the his-

tory in which it is contained.

2dly. In this story is presented to us a glorious manifestation of

the Mercy of God.

Before God proceeded to utter the sentence of condemnation on

the man and woman, and while he was declaring the punishment

of the Tempter, he disclosed the future designs of Redeeming and

Forgiving Love.

The Lord Jesus Christ was the person, who here passed sen-

tence on these offenders. As the Father judgeth no man, but hath

committed all judgment to the Son ; as no man hath seen God, the

Father, at any time, nor can see him and live ; it is certain that God,

as here spoken of , was no other than the Second Person of the

Trinity ; the Redeemer of Mankind. This divine Person even

nowbegan the work of Redemption, in the very moment, when the

first objects of it first existed ; thus early showing, that the Lord

is gracious, and full of compassion ; slow to anger, and of great

mercy. What a divinely amiable character does the Redeemer here ex-

hibit ! The first opportunity, the first moment of that opportunity,

he seizes, to make known to apostate man his design to save his

people from their sins . As if he feared, that the sentence would

overwhelm the poor, unhappy culprits, he prepared them to sup-

port the terms of it, by publishing their recovery before he decla.

red their condemnation and ruin.

Adam and Eve appear to have clearly understood, that they and

theirs , although under sentence of Death, were even, by this sen-

tence, to find life. As soon as the denunciation is made ; Adam,

who in the paradisiacal state had called his wife Woman, even

when immortal life was secured to them, now, as I have before ob-

served, called her Eve; which signifies living, or communicating

life; and adds this reason for the name ; because she was the mother

ofall the living ; that is, of all, who, according to the gracious de-

clarations of this sentence, were to be restored to immortal life .

Eveherself , also, on the birth of her first son, expresses her full

faith in the prediction, when, after naming him Cain, she says, as

has been already observed, " I have gotten a Man, the Lord; " not

from the Lord, as in our translation ; but a Man, who is the Lord;

the seed of the Woman, who is to bruise the serpent's head. Thus

it is evident, that they well understood the prediction, and realized

the consolation, which it conveyed.

What instance of divine Mercy can be conceived of , more ten-

der , more condescending, more like Redeeming Love, than this ?

How much does the Saviour of mankind appear like himself!

How early he began to seek, and to save, that which was lost ! He

perfectly knew, that he himself was to die on the Cross, to accom-

VOL. I. 55

434 [ SER. XXVIII.

THE SENTENCE, &c.

plish this Redemption ; yet he utters the glad tidings to mankind,

with eagerness and haste ; as if impatient to make known to them

the salvation, which he was to purchase with his blood.

As when he came in sight of Jerusalem, at the mount of Olives,

he wept over that guilty, ruined city; so here he may be naturally

considered as taking a solemn and compassionate view of a ruined

World, and all the lost myriads of the race of Adam; as weeping

over their destruction ; and as saying, not, How often would Igather,

but, Iwill gather you, fallen and perishing sinners, as a hen gather-

eth her chickens under her wings . Behold, Ibring you glad tidings

ofgreatjoy. For unto you shall be born a Saviour, even Christ the

Lord. Beautiful on the mountains shall he come, bringing good ti-

dings, publishing Peace, bringing good tidings of good, publishing

Salvation, and saying unto Zion, Thy God reigneth, Lost as ye are,

O ye children of Adam, unto you I call ; I rejoice in the habitable

parts of the Earth, and my delights are still with the sons of men.

Glory, still, shall be to God in the highest, and on Earth peace, and

good-will towards men. Sing, O heavens, and be joyful, O Earth ;

and break forth into singing, O mountains ; for the Lord hath com-

forted his people, and will have mercy upon his afflicted. The hea-

vens shall drop down from above, and the skies shall pour down

Righteousness ; the Earth also shall open, and bringforth Salvation .

SERMON XXIX .

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN PROVED FROM REVELATION AND FROM FACTS .

ROMANS V. 12. -Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by

sin ; and so death hath passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.

IN the three preceding discourses, I have considered the Trial.

Temptation, Apostacy, and Sentence, of our first parents. The next

subject in a Theological system, is the Effect of the Apostacy

on their

descendants . The consideration of this subject I shall, therefore ,

begin in the following discourse.

In the Text, independently of all comments and criticisms, three

things are directly asserted.

I. That by one Man Sin entered the world :

II. That in consequence of this event all men have sinned :

III. That Death, as the consequence of sin , hath passed upon all

men.

Concerning the last of these assertions there is no debate . The

two first, therefore, will occupy the present discussion; and these,

for the sake ofconvenience, I shall reduce to the single, following

proposition :

That in consequence of the Apostacy ofAdam, All Men have sinned.

Before I enter on the examination of this doctrine, I shall premise

a few observations, which, I hope, will, in some degree, be use-

ful towards accomplishing the general design, proposed in this

sermon .

Perhaps no doctrine is more reluctantly received by the human

mind, than that, which I have just now stated. Accordingly, it

has been strenuously contended against, and resolutely rejected, not

onlyby Infidels , but by a considerable part of the Christian world,

ever since it became a topic of public debate. Nor, when we re-

member the present character of man, can we think it strange, that

such opposition should exist. The doctrine in question, more than

any other, humbles the pride, awakens the fears, and lessens the

happiness, of every child ofAdam. A common interest, therefore,

naturally summons all men to oppose it ; and not unfrequently

bears down the evidence, by which it is supported. Christians

feel this interest as truly as other men ; and under the influence of

this feeling resist , or forget, the proof of the doctrine. At the

same time, the doctrine itself , it must be acknowledged, is connect-

ed with manythings very mysterious, and very perplexing. These,

adding embarrassment to reluctance, have, in many instances, per-

suaded men to refuse the doctrine, in spite ofthe testimony of Ex-

perience and Revelation. For myself , I readily confess . that if

136 [ SER. XXIX

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

I saw any mode ofavoiding the evidence by which it is established,

Iwould certainly reject it also.

But it can neverbe wise , it can never be vindicable, to deny

truth, or reject evidence. Ifthe doctrine be true ; it is our interest

to know it: if it be clearly evinced; it is our duty to receive it ;

and that, however reluctant we may be, and however mysterious

*the doctrine. To every sober man this duty will appear of high

importance, and indispensable obligation, ifhe finds, that God has

taught him this doctrine, as one ofthe truths, which he has been

pleased to require mankind to believe. To the interest, always

involved in the performance of our duty, he will find also, super-

added, the solemn concern of coming to the knowledge of his own

guilt and danger, that he may be induced to avail himself of the

only means of pardon and safety. While he feels himself whole,

he certainly can never suspect his need of a physician : while he is

unaware of his guilt , he cannot be supposed ever to look to Christ

for deliverance.

With these things in view, I hope, that every member of this

audience will readily open his mind to the discussion of this subject,

melancholy and painful as it is ; whilst, in proof of the doctrine, I

allege the following arguments , derived partly fromfact, andpart-

ly from Revelation .

From Revelation I allege,

1st. The Text, as decisive proof of this doctrine .

This proof is two - fold. First, the doctrine is directly asserted,

All have sinned. Lest there should be any doubt, whether an ab-

solute universality is intended in this place, the Apostle has ex-

hibited his intention in the most decisive manner : So death hath

passed upon all men, for that all have sinned. Here we are taught,

that all sin, who die. As, therefore, every child ofAdam dies ; so,

according to the sentence of the Apostle,every child of Adam is a

sinner. Secondly, the Apostleproves the doctrine by argument, and

in my view unanswerably. Death cannot be the reward, or allot-

ment, of virtuous beings. It is plainly a punishment, and a dread-

ful one ; and can of course be, in no possible sense, a testimony

ofthe divine approbation . But the approbation of God is invaria-

bly given to obedience. If , then, all men were obedient only ; not

one of them could suffer death, or any other evil. Accordingly,

Adam, while obedient, was assured of immortal life. In the same

manner, also, the Angels who kept their first estate, are immortal,

andhappy.

But death befalls all the race of Adam : therefore every one is a

sinner.

2dly. After Adam had lost the image ofGod, we are informed,

that he begat a son in his own likeness .

The image of God, in which Adam was created, has been here-

tofore shown to be divine knowledge, righteousness , and true holi-

wess, The likeness of Adam is, by unquestionable analogy, the

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

SER. XXIX. ] 437

moral character which he possessed after his apostacy. In this like-

ness Seth is said to have been begotten. That Cain was begotten in

the same likeness will notbe disputed. The same thing is indirectly,

but decisively asserted also concerning Abel : for he is declared to

have lived, and died, in faith, that is, in the future Redeemer. But

Christ, as the Redeemer, could not have been an object of faith to

Abel, had he not been a sinner; or , in other words, had he not

borne the likeness of apostate Adam. But, if this was the nature

of the immediate children of Adam, it cannot even be suspected,

that it is not equally the nature of his remoter progeny; or that they

do not all bear the likeness of their common parent. Not a sha-

dow of reason can be given, why one law should have governed

the birth and character of his immediate descendants, and another,

the birth and character of the rest .

3dly. St. Paul, in the three first chapters of the epistle to the Ro-

mans, has argued this point, at large, concerning both Jews and

Gentiles.

Onthis argument he himself is, undoubtedly, the best commen-

tator ; and his comment is given to us in the following terms : What

then ? are we (Jews) better than they ? (Gentiles) No, in no wise ;

for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all

under sin ; As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one.

There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after

God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become

unprofitable ; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.

4thly. The same Apostle declares, that by the works of law, no

flesh shall be justified in the sight of God.

But if sinless men, ifeven one sinless man, existed in this world ,

he could not fail to be justified by the works of law: for the law

itself says, He who doth these things, that is, the things required in

the law, shall live by them. As, therefore, no flesh, no child of

Adam, shall be justified by the works of law ; it follows irresistibly,

that every one is sinful.

On the same purport is the declaration of Christ to Nicodemus .

Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom ofGod..

The only use, or effect, of the new birth is, that in it holiness is

implanted in the mind. But if any man were sinless, he could not

need regeneration, nor be regenerated. He would already per-

fectly possess that holiness, which is imperfectly communicated in

regeneration ; and, ofcourse, would see the kingdom of God as cer-

tainly, and easily, at least, as those who possessed less holiness

thanhimself.

In the like manner, St. Paul argues, 2 Cor. v. xiv. For, says

he, we thus judge ; that if one died for all, then were all dead, that

is, in trespasses and sins .

To these Scriptural exhibitions on this subject I might add a vast

multitude of others. In truth, no doctrine of the Scriptures is ex-

pressed in more numerous, or more various, forms ; or in terms

more direct, or less capable of misapprehension.

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN .

438 [SER. XXIX .

What the Scriptures declare in so pointed and ample a manner,

Facts elucidate with such clearness and force, as to be, at least in

my opinion, incapable of being rationally resisted .

1st. The Laws of all nations are a strong proof , that the human

character is universally sinful.

Human laws are made, only to repress press and restrain sin ; are de-

rived only from experience ; and are forced upon mankind by iron-

handed necessity. They exist in every country ; and restrain sin

of every kind, which human laws can affect, or human tribunals

canprove, and punish. The penalties, by which they attempt this

restraint, are various and dreadful; are the most efficacious, which

experience can suggest, or ingenuitydevise ; and are changed con-

tinually, as they are found to fail of their effect, by the substitution

of others, which promise greater success . Still they have always

fallen short of their purpose. The propensity to evil in the

heart of man, has defied all their force and terror ; and boldly

ventured on the forbidden perpetration, in the sight of the pil-

lory and the prison, the gibbet and the rack. No ingenuity on

the onehand, and no suffering on the other, has, in any country,

been sufficient to overcome this propensity, and so far to change

the character of man, as to exterminate even a single sin .

To this head ought to be referred all the means, furnished by

law, of safety to our persons and our property : the bolts, bars ,

and locks, by which we endeavour to defend our houses and their

contents, our persons and our families, especially in the night,

against the inroads of theft and violence : the notes, bonds, and

deeds, by which we endeavour to secure our contracts, prevent

the mischiefs of fraud, and compel dishonesty to fulfil its engage-

ments : the gaols and dungeons, the chains and galleys, by which

we endeavour to confine villains, and prevent them from disturbing

by their crimes the peace of society: the post, the pillory, and

the gibbet, by which we punish some culprits, and labour to deter

others from repeating their perpetrations. All these, and the like

things, are gloomy and dreadful proofs of the corruption of the

world , in which they exist. They exist wherever men are found,

of sufficient capacity, and in proper circumstances, to attempt a

regular opposition to crimes, a continued preservation of peace,

and a general establishment of personal safety. The sinfulness ,

therefore, which they intend to resist, is equally universal. In a

world of virtue they could have no place ; because they could not

be ofany possible use : the spirit of the inhabitants supplying, infi-

nitely better, the peace and safety, which they so imperfectly secure .

2dly. The Religion of all nations is a forcible proof of the same

doctrine.

The Religion of every nation has been expiatory ; that is, it has

been so formed, as intentionally to make satisfaction for sin, and to

obtain reconciliation with a God, acknowledged to be offended.

Of this nature, obviously, are sacrifices . The victim was always

1

..

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

SER. XXIX . ] 439

intended to be an offering for sin, and the means of regaining for-

feited favour. The more valuable the victim, the more efficacious

was supposed to be the atonement, and the more certain the favour

solicited . Accordingly, when inferior offerings were found, orbe-

lieved, to fail, human sacrifices were substituted for them ; and

these, not unfrequently, of the highest estimation : youths nobly

born, possessed of eminent endowments, and educated in the man-

ner, most advantageously fitted to ensure mental distinction. Sac-

rifices of this general nature were offered by all the ancient hea-

then nations, and have been offered by many still existing. In

Hindoostan, they appear to be offered at the present time.

Nor did the other offerings of the Heathen speak any other lan-

guage. The fragrance, the beauty, the costliness, the frequency,

and the multitude, of these, were plainly intended to conciliate the

good-will of the god, who was supplicated ; a good-will confess-

edly estranged, but supposed to be capable of being acquired anew.

According to the same scheme, also, were formed their prayers ;

which either implicitly, or explicitly, acknowledged the sins of

the suppliant, and besought the restoration of the favour, which he

had forfeited.

On the same principle, tedious pilgrimages, consuming, at times,

a length of years, and traversing no trifling part of the breadth of

the globe, were undertaken, and executed. The burning heat, the

parching drought, and the excessive perils, of an Arabian or a

Nubian desert, were quietly, and even cheerfully, sustained by

hosts of wanderers, who had voluntarily exiled themselves from

their friends, families, and country, with the hope of obtaining the

remission of sin , considered as absolutely necessary, and supposed

to be unattainable by any means less dangerous and distressing.

Ablutions speak the same design in a manner still more direct

andunequivocal. To wash away his guilt, the Egyptian plunged

himself in the Nile ; and the Hindoo in the Ganges. From these

waters, invested by popular superstition with the transcendent

power of removing moral pollution, each expected to come out

cleansed from his turpitude, and entitled anew to the complacency

ofthe god, whom he was conscious of having offended. On this

ground, the holy streams were resorted to by immense multitudes

with incredible eagerness and anxiety ; and were supposed to fur-

nish a certain passport to future blessings .

To ablution was added Penance, as very hopeful means of ob-

taining the same desirable object. This unnatural resort existed

in a great variety of forms ; all of them humiliating, forbidding, and

dreadful. Hunger, thirst, the heat of summer, and the frost of

winter, nakedness, weariness, extreme want, and excruciating pain,

have been undergone by millions of the human race without a

groan , amurmur, or a sigh, from an expectation, that this voluntary

suffering would shelter the criminal from the demands of future

justice. It ought to be remarked, that the length to which this

440 [ SER. XXIX,

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

self -denial has often proceeded, shows in the strongest manner not

only the reality , but the intense degree, of guilt, with which the

subject of it supposed himself to be stained.

All these were regarded as essential duties of Religion, and as

indispensably demanded of every man. In performing them, every

man confessed, that he was stained with the common guilt , and

that he needed an expiation .

3dly. The same doctrine is proved by the Writings of all nations,

among whom writings are found.

The history both of nations and individuals, is professedly a true

account of their actions and characters . It is also rarely writtenby

men, who are not at least candid towards those, concerning whom

they write ; and often by those, who are strongly prejudiced in their

favour : men of the same nation ; or party ; or for some other rea-

son partially inclined towards the individual, or the cause, which is

the subject of their history. There is also, in most historians, a

strong, prevailing inclination to cover the defects, and crimes, of

those, whose actions they record; lest by a full disclosure of them

they should render the history less entertaining, than they wish, to

their readers . From all these causes, History is often a mere

panegyric; and almost always, perhaps always, a much more fa-

vourable account of the conduct of men, than truth would warrant .

The history of the Bible, being dictated by Inspiration, presents

its subjects more generally darkened, and deformed, in a great

proportion of instances ; both because it was designed to unfold

the moral characters of men in an especial manner, and because it

is true. Hence, we commonly suppose the people of Israel to

have been more depraved than other nations. This, however, is

an erroneous opinion; as any man, who reads the first Chapter of

the Epistle to the Romans, will easily discern. Had Prophets

written the history of the rest of mankind, there is but too much

reason to believe, that nations and individuals, generally, who

have been the subjects of history, would have presented features

equally disgusting, and monstrous, with those ofthe Israelites .

But favourable as all these causes are to the human character,

powerfully as they have influenced writers to present, and that

with many adventitious ornaments, only the bright, and to conceal,

as much as possible, the dark, side ofman; History is still a satire

upon our race, scarcely less severe than any of those, professedly,

written under this name. Should we, contrary to all probability,

or, in better language, to absolute certainty, acknowledge the por-

trait to be an exact, unflattering likeness ; we must still be obliged

to confess the whole aspect to be misshapen and monstrous ; with-

out symmetry, beauty, or loveliness. Man, as described by His-

tory , is undeniably, and always has been, an evil, odious being ;

disobedient and ungrateful to his Maker ; unjust , insincere, and

unkind, to his fellow Man ; and far removed from the character,

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

SER . XXIX.J 441

which the Scriptures demand , which Conscience approves, or

which, even in our opinion, God can be supposed to love.

With History, moral and philosophical writings, have abundantly

concurred. I will here pass all those, which have been immedi-

ately directed to the point in question, and have either declared, or

argued, it in form ; their aid being unnecessary for the presentpur-

pose. Those which have been conducted with other designs, nay,

those which have intentionally opposed this doctrine, have never-

theless served to establish it. This they have done in many ways ;

particularly by the feebleness of their arguments advanced in op-

position to it ; by the pains which they have have taken to disguise hu-

man turpitude by fair names, flattering ascriptions, and false justi-

fications ; by the gross moral sentiments which they have abetted ;

andby the deformed dispositions, which they have thus disclosed

to the public view. Their very confessions, also, of what they in

vain attempt to deny, furnish no small evidence of its truth : while

their efforts not unfrequently wear the appearance of a concerted

design to carry a point, scarcely supposed to be tenable ; of an art-

ful and insidious struggle to gain converts, and achieve a victory ;

rather than of an honest endeavour to establish a truth, of which

the author is sincerely convinced. Upon the whole, in spite of all

the exertions, made to cover this humiliating truth, and hide from

the perception of man an object so offensive, the fœtor still es-

capes ; and forces itself upon the senses in a manner so disgust-

ing , as to compel a conviction of its existence.

Poems, Plays, Novels, and other books of entertainment, written

professedly only to amuse and please, are necessitated to unfold

the same truth in a still clearer manner. All the characters , almost,

are characters mixed with sin; and the few unmixed ones, which

they have attempted , are perceived by mere taste, unaccompanied

with intellectual examination, to be dull, lifeless, and unnatural.

Accordingly, rational criticism has every where condemned them,

as improperly introduced, because they have no originals in fact.

The sentiments, also, thrown out in these productions, are eviden-

tial of the same truth. In innumerable forms they declare, and

appeal to, the universal corruption of mankind, as the object,

about which they are extensively occupied ; and the only source,

in a great multitude of instances, from which they are derived.

Were not human nature corrupted ; a great part of them could

never have had either existence, or meaning.

4thly. The Conversation of all men abundantly declares the same

truth.

All men continually ascribe sin to all men, except themselves ;

and few, very few, have ever dared to deny even themselves to be

sinners. The best of mankind readily confess, and deeply lament,

their own sins, in terms of the greatest humiliation and sorrow.

Paul declares himself to be encompassed with a body of sin and

death. Jacob, Job, Moses, David, Hezekiah, Daniel, Jeremiah, Pe

VOL. I. 56

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN

442 [ SER. XXIX.

ter, James, and John, all acknowledged their own guilt without

hesitation, or concealment. Good men, in every succeeding age,

have followed their steps, in this frankness and integrity, so suited

to their general character, and have with a single voice declared

their own share in the common corruption . Could this fact have

takenplace, if the corruption were not universal ? If Job , Daniel,

Paul and John, were not sinless, we must seek in vain for persons

of this character among men: for no men have by their conduct

ever proved themselves to approximate nearer to this enviable

character. If the doctrine of this discourse be not true ; on what

principles shall this conduct be explained ? Can it be supposed,

that men, distinguished for their virtue, have thus violated their in-

tegrity by confessing guilt, with which they were not chargeable ;

and become gratuitously wicked, merely for the sake of persuading

others, that they were wicked ? Have men of the fairest reputa-

tion assumed a scandalous character, merely for the sake of acqui-

ring that character ? Nothing is more clear, than that men would

never ascribe sin to themselves, and voluntarily pronounce them-

selves deformed and hateful ; especially men of distinguished sin-

cerity, and possessing the fairest means of escaping such an impu-

tation; unless they were compelled to this ascription by the real

state of the fact, and the irresistible conviction of their own con-

sciences . Another class of persons, however, at times deny themselves to

be sinful, and employ various expedients to support themselves in

this denial ; such as labouring to prove, that they are mere ma-

chines, the subjects of no moral attributes, and utterly incapable

of any moral action ; and attempting to disprove all distinction

between right and wrong. But this denial , instead of proving the

authors of it to be sinless, is an unquestionable proof , that they are

peculiarly sinful . Their general sinfulness of character is, in all

instances, unanswerably evident from the general tenor of their

conduct. Were they not the subjects of that blindness, which is

the result of sin only, they could not fail to confess their true

character ; a character, to all with whom they have intercourse so

obvious, that they never deceive any one by this denial, except

themselves . Accordingly, no one gives credit to their assertions.

On the contrary, all around them regard them as more sinful than

other men, and as unanswerably proving their peculiar depravity

by this very denial.

In the mean time, the conversation of mankind, proves the truth

of the doctrine, with the same clear evidence, in another manner.

All men ascribe sin to all other men. The sin either exists in

those, to whom it is ascribed ; or it does not. If it be acknow-

ledged thus to exist ; the debate is at an end. If it do not exist in

those, to whom it is ascribed ; the ascription itself , being a gross

act of injustice, is sin in the ascriber. As all are concerned in

making this åscription, all are certainly sinful ; whether one or the

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN,

SER. XXIX. ] 443

other side of this dilemma be chosen. Indeed, if our fellow-men

were not too evidently sinful to admit of any debate, all men would

regard such an ascription with horror and detestation. So palpa-

ble and malignant an act of injustice could not be tolerated for a

moment. Ministers particularly, when preaching in a solemn and

pungent manner on this subject , would be considered only as de-

signing to slander and abuse their audiences ; and, to saythe least,

would never be able to assemble a congregation a second time.

Still , few, very few, of mankind pretend to be offended with them

for the plainest exhibitions of this subject. On the contrary,

hardly any sermons are more popular , or better received, than

those, which portray the human character as deformed, guilty, and

odious ; if , at the same time, they wear evident proofs of sincerity,

solemnity, and concern, and are not conducted in a strain of invec-

tive. Whence can this arise, but from the fact, that the Preacher

commends himself to every man's conscience in the manifestation of

the truth?

Very few men, also, think of resenting this ascription, as made

in the common intercourse of mankind ; unless when made with

some appearance of contempt , or malignity. All men hear it con.

tinually ; yet no man ordinarily conceives it to be unjust or false,

unkind or uncivil ; nor even as extraordinary or unexpected. On

the contrary, it is plainly considered as a thing of course ; and is

listened to without emotion. Could this be, were the doctrine

untrue ?

To the evidence, furnished by the consideration of these facts , it

ought to be added, that they contain the direct confession of the

whole human race, that the doctrine is true : a confession, made in

several different forms ; all of them unequivocal, solemn, and de-

cisive. Of course, it expresses the real opinion of the whole human

race concerning this subject. But it is undoubtedly true, that in all

cases, where mankind have sufficient ability and opportunity to un-

derstand a subject, where they examine, and decide, without par-

tiality, and especially where they decide against every bias of hu-

man nature, their decision is true, and to be admitted without a

question. The present case is absolutely of this nature. We

have sufficient opportunity, and discernment, to determine whether

we ourselves, and our fellow -men, are sinners, or not. It is cer-

tain, that every bias of our minds inclines us to believe ourselves

free from sin; and that in pronouncing ourselves sinful, we oppose

every prejudice, and every personal interest. But all men have

thus pronounced. The decision is therefore just ; and is expressed

in such a manner, as to admit neither of doubt , nor misconstruction.

5thly. No man has been ever yet produced as an example of com-

plete holiness in the present world.

Amid a race of beings, so generally sinful as mankind, a person

perfectly holy, could not fail of being distinguished, as wholly ex-

traordinary, by his fellow- men. Amid the numerous, flattering,

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

444 SER. XXIX .

panegyrical accounts, which have been given, and which have

strongly evinced the disposition of their authors, to say the most

favourable things concerning human nature, it is incredible, that we

should not find some one spotless subject of their panegyric, i

such an one had ever existed. Such a character in the present

world would be so extraordinary, as to excite the utmost attention

of our race ; and the story could not fail of being recorded. Par-

ticularly, the opposers of the doctrine, which I am attempting to

establish, must certainly know the fact, had any such character

existed : for many of them are very industrious an and learned men.

But no such character has ever been mentioned by them, or by any

other person. Yet, according to their system, many such ought

to appear in every country, and in every age. Their system is ,

therefore, false : otherwise, these facts could not exist.

The Lord Jesus Christ is the only person, that ever appeared in

this world, who knew no sin. Accordingly, he is totally distin-

guishable in his character from all the children of Adam ; and has

actually been thus distinguished, to such a degree, that no other

personhas been imagined to approximate at all towards his per-

fection. In the whole history of man no single, solitary instance

of this nature has been ever found. Time has rolled on for six

thousand years ; the world is, and long has been, filled with my-

riads of myriads of inhabitants ; yet even now a spotless man would

be regarded as a prodigy ; and the knowledge of so extraordi-

nary a person would be carefully treasured up for the instruction

of succeeding generations .

6thly. This doctrine is proved to every man, who examines his

own character, by the state of his own Heart and Life .

The evidence, furnished to the doctrine from this source, may

be advantageously exhibited under the following heads .

1st. Every such man is , at times , the subject of serious apprehen-

sions concerning his future state .

These apprehensions certainly prove the mind, in which they

exist , to be sinful. No man probably ever believed, that God will ,

or can, make sinless beings unhappy hereafter ; particularly, that,

if himself were sinless, God would make him unhappy. It is, I

think, discernible by Reason, that perfect love, or holiness, neces-

sarily casteth out fear ; or, in other words, that these apprehen-

sions cannot exist in a sinless being. However disposed, therefore ,

any man may be to combat this doctrine, and however satisfied

with his arguments against it ; he will find, if he attends to his own

thoughts, that that he he still secretly believes it ; and proves that he be-

lieves it by his fears concerning his own future existence. Were

an Angel from Heaven to declare to him, that he is free from sin,

and that through life he would preserve this character ; all his

fears would unquestionably vanish, and leave him perfectly un-

disturbed concerning every thing which lies beyond the grave.

2dly. Every man is conscious, that he does not perform all his

duty.

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

SER. XXIX.J 445

It will be observed , that I here suppose all men to acknowledge,

in their minds, the distinction between right and wrong. There are

those indeed, as I before observed, who openly deny this distinc-

tion ; but as these men use exactly the same language with others,

when speaking of their own excellencies and those of their friends,

or complaining of the conduct of their enemies ; I consider them

as admitting this distinction, in their thoughts, equally with the rest

of mankind. Certainly, no persons more strenuously insist on

their own rights, or complain more bitterly of the wrongs, which

they suppose themselves to suffer .

It cannot be denied, that we are fairly bound to do all the good

which is in our power. But there is not a man living, who will

soberly assert, that he has acted in this manner. The knowledge

of those around him concerning his life would refute the assertion,

and cover him with blushes for the folly and disingenuousness ,

which it evinced. The testimony of his Conscience also, concern-

ing his thoughts, would declare it to be false; and accuse him of

having added to his former guilt by the insincerity of this assertion.

3dly. Every man living is conscious ofhaving committed many

positive sins .

This truth may be sufficiently established by two obvious modes

of illustration .

No man living durst recite every transaction of his life even to

his nearest and best friend. There are things in the story, which

story,

he cannot bring himself by any considerations to disclose. This

is true concerning his external conduct. Still more is it true con-

cerning his thoughts : because in still greater numbers, and higher

degrees, they have violated his sense of moral obligation ; and

contravened what he secretly believes to be the will ofGod. Nor

is there probably a man living, who has not often rejoiced, that

some, both of his thoughts and actions, are now known tohimself

only, and concealed effectually from his fellow-men.

Again, no man can go into his closet, and solemnly declare to

his Maker, that he has not been guilty of positive sins. Even the

impudence and pride of the self -righteous Pharisee, who went into

the temple to pray, did not stretch so far as this. The utmost,

which he ventured upon, was to thank God, that he was not as other

men, extortioners , unjust, adulterers , or publicans. He durst not

thank God, that he was not so sinful as Abraham, Job, or Moses ;

all of whom he still knew to be sinful. Much less durst he, or any

other man, declare himself , before God, to be absolutely free from

moral pollution.

But were we sinless, it would be perfectly easy , safe, and natu-

ral, for us to declare the inmost thoughts of our hearts, so far as

their moral nature only was concerned, to our fellow- creatures :

for we are never afraid to disclose to them, unless in cases where

mere prudence prevents, any of our conduct, which we are assured

has been right. With the same ease, and consciousness of pro

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

446 [SER. XXIX,

priety , should we also assert before God, that we were without sin :

ifwe felt assured, that this was our true character.

Were anyman, who was taught the nature of the final judgment,

informed by an Angel, that it would commence this day and find

him in his present state; he would tremble at the information. If

anexception ought to be made, it must be of him only, who, by a

lively faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, a sincere repentance of his

sins, and a laborious preparation to give up his account with joy,

has acquired strong confidence towards God, and a vigorous hope

of Evangelical justification. It hardly needs to be observed, that

every such person acknowledges , in the fullest manner, his own

sinfulness, and that of all men.

4thly. Every man, who makes the attempt to do his duty, and ab-

stain from sin , finds the attempt attended by many difficulties .

When he would do good, evil, very frequently at least, will be

present with him; and he will find a law in his members, warring

against the law of his mind, and bringing him under captivity. The

good, which, for some reason or other, he is desirous to do, he will

often fail ofdoing, and the evil, which, for some reason or other, he

wishes not to do, he, still, will often do . To say the least, he will

often find an uncomfortable and guilty reluctance to do his duty,

and an equally unhappy and guilty disposition to practise sin.

Often, very often, do the best of men, when summoned by their

circumstances, and warned by their consciences, to perform acts

of piety to God, or beneficence to mankind, of opposition to their

lusts, or resistance to temptations, find one sin and another easily

besetting, and many a weight hanging heavily upon them. The

character of God appears less lovely and venerable, than it has

done at other times; and the heart is less open to acts of justice,

truth, charity, and forgiveness. Temptations approach with more

charms ; and sin is stripped of no small part of its deformity. The

world assumes new importance, beauty, and power. Evil exam-

ples solicit with stronger influence ; and evil suggestions awaken

doubt, uneasiness, and discouragement. Mysteries, at such sea-

sons, become converted, without much difficulty, into errors ; and

that, which is inexplicable, is suspected to be untrue. Self -denial

is felt , in many instances, to be hard, unnecessary, and scarcely a

duty ; while indulgence, on the other hand, seems not only inviting,

but excusable ; not only pleasant, but safe. Accordingly, the duty

in hand is left undone ; or performed with difficulty, and by halves .

The feet drag heavily in the strait and narrow path ; or turn aside

to find relief in a way, less steep, rough, and forbidding.

If such is the case with the best men; it will not be wondered

at, that others find their difficulties still greater. In all Christian

countries there are multitudes, who are not sanctified, and who yet

intend to obtain eternal life : men taught in their childhood to know

and fear God ; to reverence their duty, and to perform it in every

external manner; to attend on the worship ofGod; to read, and

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

SER. XXIX . ] 447

believe, his word; to deal justly, kindly, and truly, with their fel-

low-men ; to watch, and resist, their spiritual enemies within and

without ; and universally to respect the dictates of their own con-

sciences. Men, habituated to such a course of life from the begin-

ning, are often decent, amiable, and highly respected. Yet every

such man, when convinced of sin, will, in unbosoming himself to a

Minister of the Gospel, in whom he confides, freely confess, that

he has never really done his duty in a single instance ; but has al-

ways been a sinner merely ; that he finds not in his heart a dispo-

sition ever to pray in such a manner, as his conscience tells him

God requires, and much less a preparation of soul to perform his

dutyat large.

Men of profligate characters are in still more deplorable circum-

stances. They do not even attempt to perform their duty at all ;

find no struggle between conscience and inclination ; slide down

the declivity of sin without an effort to stop their dangerous career ;

and satisfied with the smoothness and slipperiness of their course,

give themselves no concern about the gulf , which yawns at the

bottom.

Whence do these things arise ? Certainly not from external cir-

cumstances . The profligate has no more external difficulties than

the conscientious man ; and might, if he pleased, be equally de-

cent and amiable. The conscientious man has no more external

difficulties than the man of piety ; and might, if he pleased, be a

Christian also . The Christian has no more external difficulties at

one time, than at another ; and might, if he pleased, perform his

duty with the same exactness and ease, and be always equally vir-

tuous. By this I do not mean indeed, that, in the metaphysical

sense, their external difficulties are precisely the same ; but that

they are so much the same, as in no case to prevent them at all from

performing their duty, if they were suitably inclined ; or, in other

words, if they possessed the disposition ofAngels. The heart un-

doubtedly is in each of these cases the only essential bar to obe-

dience. Were the heart right with God, the Christian would be

perfect at all times ; the conscientious man would become a Chris-

tian; and the profligate would cease from his abandonment, and

become not only decent and amiable, but a Christian also. This

reluctance to duty, therefore, these difficulties found in attempts to

abstain from sin, prove the character to be corrupt, and the heart

to be sinful. As they attend all men; they prove the common na-

ture to be polluted ; and evince, unanswerably, the sinful charac-

ter of all the children of Adam .

SERMON XXX.

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN PROVED BY MAN'S REJECTION OF THE WORD

OF GOD.

JEREMIAH viii. 9. -The Wise Men are ashamed; they are dismayed and taken : lo ,

they have rejected the Word of the Lord, and what Wisdom is in them ?

" The Wise ones are confounded,

They are dismayed, and ensnared;

Behold, they have spurned at the Word of Jehovah;

And as for Wisdom, what is there in them ? " Blayney's Translation.

INmy last discourse, I proposed to consider, at length, the fol-

lowing Scriptural doctrine :

That, in consequence of the Apostacy of Adam, all Men have

sinned.

In pursuing this design I exhibited the Universality of sin,

I. From Revelation ; and,

II. From Facts .

From each of these sources I adduced a series of proofs, which

appeared to me to furnish a complete establishment of the doctrine.

Still it will be useful to examine so important a subject in a variety

ofmodes ; and to learn in what manner other sources furnish evi-

dence ofthis great Scriptural declaration. I propose, therefore, to

illustrate the doctrine, at the present time, from another Fact; viz.

the rejection of the Word of God by Mankind.

In the verse preceding the Text, the people ofJudea are exhibit-

ed as saying, in the midst of all their apostacy and wickedness,

We are wise, and the Law of the Lord is with us : that is, We are

holy, or virtuous ; and the Law of the Lord is possessed, under-

stood, and obeyed, by us; is in our hands, in our minds and in

our hearts. To this arrogant declaration the prophet replies, Lo,

certainly in vain made he it ! the pen of the Scribes is in vain ; that

is, " To you God has given his Law or Word, in vain ; The false

pen of the Scribes hath converted it into falsehood. " *

" The false

interpretations of the Law by the Scribes have changed the Law

itself in the form, in which they teach, and you receive it, into false-

hood; and to you, therefore, notwithstanding its excellence, it is

in vain. "

*Blayner .

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN .

SER. XXX. ] 449

The wise men, themselves, he proceeds to observe in the text,

are by these means ashamed, or confounded, and taken, or ensnared,

in their own false interpretations and reasonings on the Law ;

and can form no consistent, no safe, scheme either of doctrine or

practice. Nay, their mode of understanding, and explaining, the

word ofGod is, in effect, an absolute rejection of it. Consequently

there is no Wisdom, no holiness, or virtue, in them. Their rejec-

tion of the word of the Lord is a plain proof , that they are totally

destitute of all moral good.

What was true of these Wise men, or Scribes, is unquestionably

true of all other men in the like circumstances. To the Scribes the

word of God was offered ; and was enjoined on them with divine

authority. They disliked and rejected it. This conduct proved

them to be void of holiness. In like manner it has been offered to

immense multitudes of other men, who have disliked and rejected it

also. The consequence follows irresistibly, that they as well as

these Isrealites , are void of holiness .

Holiness is plainly the only virtue, or moral excellence ; the only

character, which can recommend Intelligent beings to God. The

Scriptures know of no other ; and, although they call this charac-

ter by different names, such as holiness, righteousness, goodness,

and wisdom, they still mean, always, the same thing. Nor can

Reason devise any other excellence of this nature. Holiness and

Virtue are, therefore, synonimous .

The Doctrine of the Text, then, generally expressed, is this :

The Rejection of the Word of God, is decisive proof , that those,

who reject it, are destitute of Virtue, or moral excellence .

To illustrate this Doctrine, will be the object of the present Dis-

course; and the illustration will be derived from three considera-

tions.

I. The Nature of the Word, which is rejected :

II. The Manner, in which it has been rejected :

III . The Doctrines , which those, who have rejected it, have prefer-

red to it .

I. The Nature of the Word which is rejected, strongly illustrates

this doctrine.

Under this head I observe,

1st. The Word, which is thus rejected, is the Law, or preceptive

Will, of the Creator, and Ruler, ofall things .

As God created us, he has the highest possible property in us,

and the most absolute right both to us and our services. This right

can be bounded by nothing but his pleasure. Whatever is his, he

has an unlimited right to dispose of as he pleases ; nor can any

one warrantably say to him, in this respect, What doest thou ?

Hence his right to prescribe the manner, in which we and all other

creatures shall be employed and disposed of , is plainly supreme.

If , then , we refuse to render to him the obedience, which he re-

quires in all, or any, of the cases, or degrees, prescribed by him ;

VOL. I. 57

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

450 [SER . XXX

we are guilty of refusing to render to him that, which is his own.

No injustice, no fraud, no robbery, can be more palpable, or ex-

treme, than this . No injustice to man can be compared with it :

for nothing is man's, by a right, which can be compared with this

right ofGod.

2dly. This Law, in all its requisitions, is perfectly reasonable and

just . Itis contained in the two great commands, Thou shalt love the

Lord, thy God, with all thy heart ; and Thou shalt love thy Neigh-

bour as thyself.

Both these precepts are in the highest degree, and in the most

obvious manner, just and reasonable ; and would demand our obe-

dience with unanswerable propriety, if the nature of the precepts

only were regarded. Men, in obeying them, would act in the best

manner possible for themselves ; and would most promote both

public and personal happiness. Nay, there is no other manner,

of acting, which can bejustly called desirable. Every departure

from conformity to these precepts is, of course, evil, and of malig-

nant influence on the well-being of the universe.

God is infinitely excellent, as well as infinitely great and awful ;

and on account of this excellence most clearly deserves, and most

justly claims, the highest Love of his Intelligent creatures . No-

thing more is, therefore, demanded by this Law, than ought cheer-

fully to be done, if no such Law existed.

3dly. The Law ofGod is good, as well as just ; profitable to those

who obey, as well as honourable to him who is obeyed.

Obedience to this Law constitutes the only real worth of rational

Beings; and is the sum of all those affections, and their conse-

quences, which form the internal happiness of man ; the most es-

sential and valuable part of his happiness . The true loveliness ,

dignity, and excellence of Man is nothing, beside that state of the

mind, which is exact conformity to this Law. From this charac-

ter , and from this alone, spring the peace and self -approbation, the

internal harmony and delight, which are the proper " prize of Vir-

tue ;" the independent and eternal possession of every good mind.

In the same degree is the Usefulness of rational beings formed.

Man is useful, only when he is voluntarily useful. Obedience to

the Law of God is all, that is intended by voluntary usefulness .

Love to God, is the great and only source of usefulness to him, in

his kingdom ; and Love to Man is the only source of voluntary

beneficence to Man. The Love, which is the fulfilling of the Law,

is a vital and immortal principle of doing good to all men, both

friends and enemies, at all times, and in every manner. Nor is

there any real and voluntary beneficence, beside what springs from

this principle. Rational Beings, wholly under its influence, would

form a perfect state of happiness in any world; and such beings,

freed from all restraints, would , if destitute of it, create consum-

mate misery. He, then, who refuses obedience to this Law, is

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

SER. XXX . ] 451

guilty of gross injustice to God, relinquishes all personał excel-

lence, peace, happiness, and worth ; and, renouncing all voluntary

usefulness on the one hand, prepares himself , on the other, to be-

come a nuisance to the Universe .

4thly. To this obedience an endless and perfect Reward is an-

nexed.

Were the Law hard in its requisitions, and Obedience to it severe

and distressing ; yet, if crowned in the end with a reward ample

and abundant, the whole of the Requisitions, taken together, would

not be unreasonable, nor undesirable. The time, during which

we are here required to obey, is but a moment : the Reward, on

the contrary, is eternal. The hardship of obedience must, there-

fore, be transient and trifling ; while the reward would be endless,

and therefore immense in its value.

To obedience, then, Reason and Wisdom direct, and urge, with

motives of infinite power; and from disobedience, with similar mo-

tives, deter. Nothing, of course, can be a reason for disobedience,

were our present happiness only concerned, except a disposition

so depraved, as to prefer sin without a future reward, to holiness ,

with immortal glory.

5thly. To disobedience a Punishment is threatened, which is also

endless .

Every creature who disobeys, therefore, chooses to hazard end-

less wo for the pleasure of disobeying, rather than to gain eternal

life with the pain found, or supposed to be found, in obeying.

So plainly do Men choose death rather than life ; and in sinning

against God wrong their own souls .

In this state of sin and wretchedness, however, God did not

leave them to perish, as they chose ; but he sent his own beloved

Son, the brightness of his glory, and the express image ofhis person,

to become their Atonement, and Intercessor. Through his Media-

tion he proposed to them to repent of their former disobedience

and to return to obedience, to virtue, and to his everlasting favour.

On these conditions he promised to receive and bless them, not-

withstanding their Apostacy.

In this situation he placed them in his word; and commanded

them, in what may be called a New Law, a Law of grace and

mercy, to believe in Christ, to repent of their sins, and return to

holiness. The Gospel is a Law ; and of equal authority and obli-

gation with the moral Law. God commandeth all men every where

to repent. And this , saith John, is his commandment, that we be-

lieve on him whom he hath sent . The proposals of the Gospel are,

therefore, not merely declarations, or promises ; but a Law ; com-

pliance with which is the highest duty of Mankind.

What, then, is the nature of this duty? In the most summary

language, it is this : That we renounce our sins, and return toGod,

and to obedience ; committing ourselves with an affectionate confi-

dence to Christ, as our Instructer, Intercessor, and Lord ; and as

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN

452 [ SER. XXX.

an all- sufficient and acceptable Propitiation to God the Father.

This done, our sins will be forgiven; and our title to endless life

renewed, enlarged, and made sure beyond defeat and danger.

To beings ruined and destroyed, as we are, Reason would

naturally conclude, any escape from the terrible evils, to which we

are certainly exposed without hope by our apostacy, would be not

only acceptable, but transporting. Nothing, it would seem, would

be asked, or wished, but to have the way pointed out, and the con-

ditions made known. This, only, being done, all the miserable be-

ings who are thus exposed, must, one would expect, hasten with

rapture and amazement to comply with the terms of reconciliation ,

and lay hold on the hope set before them.

But the terms, instead of being thus hard, are the easiest, which

can be wished, and the most reasonable of which we can form a

conception. They are in the highest degree desirable for their

own sake, even if they were to be followed by no reward. The

Faith, the Repentance, and the Holiness, required, are themselves

the beginning, and the consummation, of the best of all characters,

and the springs of a happiness, far more exquisite, and sincere,

than any other. Besides, they are indispensably necessary to all

other good. No permanent, no sincere good can be enjoyed by

him, who does not thus believe, repent, and obey. God cannot love,

nor bless him. He cannot be approved and peaceful within, nor

useful and happy without. Nor can a World, inhabited by such

beings, be a happy World at all. On the contrary, all the mis-

chiefs, found in this world, would revive beyond the grave, and

disturb and desolate Heaven itself , were impenitent, unbelieving,

and disobedient Men to become its inhabitants. Happiness springs

from the voluntary exertions of rational beings. But beings not

holy, as none ofthe human race can be without Faith and Re-

pentance, never voluntarily do good, but always evil. Thus God

requires nothing, but what is necessary, absolutely necessary, for

Man; when he demands these, as the conditions of their accept-

ance and happiness.

In the mean time, this happiness is not merely offered, but en-

joined. All the authority of the Eternal God is employed to en-

force compliance. Nay, he goes farther ; and daily condescends

to entreat us to be thus reconciled to him. But to all these we re-

turn a peremptory refusal, and a scornful, indignant rejection of

this benevolent and glorious Word of the Lord.

What Reason can be assigned for this Conduct ? Not Argu-

ment; for all Arguments plead most powerfully for our compli-

ance. Not common Prudence, or a wise regard for our Well-

Being : for we disregard and destroy it . Nothing but Sin, and

the Love of sinning ; mere corruption ; mere depravity. No

higher evidence can be given, that there is no Wisdom, or Virtue,

in Men.

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

SER. XXX . ] 453

II . The Manner, in which the Word of God is rejected by Man, is

another striking proof of his destitution of Virtue .

Particularly, The Word of God is rejected with Unbelief.

Unbelief, with respect to any object of our Faith, has no ra-

tional, no vindicable ground, except the want of sufficient evi-

dence. But the Word of God is attended with all the evidence,

which can be supposed to attend such a subject ; all that ought to

be wished, or asked; and much more than could, without actual

proof , be rationally expected. Accordingly, all good men, to

whom this evidence has been proposed, have, without an excер-

tion, acknowledged the evidence itself; and admitted the Word,

which it supports, to be that of God.

When it is once admitted to be his Word, his own veracity is the

highest possible proof of the truth of every thing, which he has

spoken. Whenever it is rejected in this case, it is rejected, be-

cause it is disliked ; not because it is not proved. The Evidence

is rejected because we dislike the Truth ; not the Truth, because

we dislike the Evidence .

Unbelief is either speculative, or practical. In speculative unbe-

lief we deny the truth of the Word of God: in practical unbelief we

admit its truth, but reject its influence.

In the speculative unbelief of Men the unworthy manner of re-

jecting the Word of God is manifest in the following particulars .

1st. It is rejected on the ground of vain and deceitful Arguments .

This will appear from a variety of facts .

The arguments, on which one unbeliever relies, do not appear

to have satisfied other unbelievers. Every new Infidel Writer ad-

vances his own scheme of refuting the evidence, or rather his own

objections ; (for refutation there is none) and evidently places no

reliance on the schemes of his predecessors . This has been the

constant progress of Infidelity from the beginning to the present

time. No instance occurs, in which any Infidel has thought it

proper to come forward with a defence of the works, or Arguments ,

ofany former Infidel. The arguments of each appear important,

and perhaps satisfactory, to himself; but are visibly of little force

in the eye of his successors. All, except his own, are, tacitly at

least, acknowledged to be unavailing in the eye of each ; and his

own, in the eyes of all who follow him.

But if these arguments were sound, they would be acknow-

ledged, felt, and insisted on, by all ; and would anew be pleaded

with confidence, supported, and relied on, by others, as well as by

the inventer.

2dly. When these objections have been completely and often re-

futed, they still allege them again without taking any notice of the

refutations .

These refutations have been multiplied so much, so openly, and

so often alleged, and so triumphantly urged, that nothing but de-

spair of replying with success could prevent unbelievers from at-

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN .

454 [SER. XXX.

tempting a reply. Yet we find it wholly neglected, and unattempt-

ed, by their successors. They now allege anew the old objec-

tions ; and plainly because they can find no others : the whole

circle being exhausted; and nothing remaining to modern Infidels

but a reiteration of what has been done by those, who went before

them. While any thing new remained, they laid no stress on what

had been done before. Now they are contented to repeat the old,

threadbare objections over and over, without placing them in any

new light, or supporting them with any new evidence; although so

oftenand so completely answered, as to make the renewed ad-

vancement of them ridiculous . Were they honest men, they would

first reply to the answers, heretofore given to these objections ;

and then, but not till then, allege them anew.

3dly. They rarely attempt to argue at all ; but attack their antag-

onists, and defend themselves, chiefly, with contempt, sneers, and

ridicule .

Sneers, Contempt, and Ridicule, are not Arguments ; and were

never needed to defend a sound cause . The Cause, which can

find sound Reasons, will never be supported by these means. Yet

Infidelity has made these her chief engines throughout her whole

progress ; and relied on them supremely in all her assaults upon

Revelation .

Wherever this conduct appears ; wherever argument is deserted

and forgotten, and ridicule, sneers, and contempt, are the weapons

ofattack, or defence ; a strong suspicion of the goodness of the

cause exists of course ; and a solid reason is furnished for believ-

ing it to be unsound and false. Infidelity has always thus done ;

and has, therefore, always laboured under very strong suspicions

ofthis nature.

4thly. Men have exhibited violent Hatred to the Word of God in

this rejection .

This hatred, from the beginning to the present time, has been

manifested by all classes of men, who have rejected the word of

the Lord; and by most, if not all, the individuals, who have thus

rejected it.

This hatred has been strongly manifested in the contempt, ridi-

cule, and sneers , of which I have already spoken. It has strongly

manifested itself in an uninterrupted course of obloquy against

God, the Redeemer, the Scriptures, the Sabbath, and the Sanctu-

ary; against the Church, the Ministers, the Worship, and the Char-

acter, of God; against Religion at large ; against conscientious-

ness, morality, and duty of every kind ; against all that is virtue,

and all that are virtuous.

Nor has it been less abundantly manifested in an immense train

of oppositions, and persecutions. The Jews began the course in

the most furious cruelty against Christ and Christians. The Hea-

thens , Mohammedans, and Papists have continued it. Infidels are

now treading in their steps ; and , although perpetually railing

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

SER. XXX.J 455

against persecution, have proved the most bloody and vehement

persecutors, that have existed since the world began.

One spirit has animated them all ; and one conduct character-

ized them all, from the beginning to the present time. No more

deformed, odious, depraved exhibitions have been ever made of

the human character: no more flagrant or convincing proofs of

human corruption have been ever presented to the eye of man.

All also, who have been concerned in this rejection,have uniform-

ly displayed a vile, depraved personal character ; a love of sin, a

hatred to holiness, pre-eminent and wonderful. The more spiri-

tual and heavenly , the more holy and excellent, any doctrines or

precepts of the Word of God are, the more they have been hated,

maligned, and blasphemed. Yet all that God hath done, and spo-

ken, in his Word, has been highly glorious and becoming to a

God, highly beneficial and necessary to man, and productive of

no other end, but making man virtuous and happy. On the con-

trary, all this opposition has sprung from sin, and been marked

with gross and dreadful depravity, in every stage, and in every

form. The practical unbelief of Mankind has been substantially of the

same Character , and distinguished by the same deformity . But

here the unbeliever has openly condemned himself by acknow-

ledging the word of God in speech, and denying it in practice.

Aninconsistence and shame attend him, therefore, which do not in

the like circumstances attend the speculative Unbeliever. In the

mean time, his rejection of the Scriptures, as the rule of his obe-

dience, and the means of eternal life to himself , is as absolute as

that of the professed Infidel. His speculative views are different ;

but his heart is essentially the same. His carnal mind, as truly,

as that of the Infidel, is enmity against God; not subject to his law,

neither indeed can be. It is not strange, therefore, that we see un-

believers, of both kinds, exhibiting their rejection of the Word of

God substantially in the same manner.

III . The truth, contained in the text, is strongly illustrated by the

Doctrines , both speculative and practical, which those, who have re-

jected the Scriptures, have preferred to them .

The four great classes ofmen, who have openly rejected the

word of God, are Jews, and Mohammedans, Heathens, and Infidels .

Each of these I shall consider, summarily, in the order specified.

1st. The Jews, although professedly receiving the old Testa-

ment as the Word of God, yet, as you well know, rejected and

still reject, Christ and his Gospel, and of course the system of re-

ligion, which he has taught to mankind. In rejecting Christ they

reject, of course, all the types which shadowed, and all the pro-

phecies which foretold, his character, advent, and mediation. As

those types and prophecies terminate only in Christ ; so without

him they have no real meaning. Their true import, therefore, was

denied by the Jews . In rejecting the Gospel they set aside all the

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

456 [SER . XXX.

Evangelical declarations and doctrines, contained in the Law and

the prophets ; particularly the Gospel as preached to Abraham and

his posterity; and all those just and spiritual exhibitions of the

Law, delivered to us by Christ and his Apostles. With these

things in view, it must unquestionably be conceded, that the Jews

are fairly numbered among those, who openly reject the Word of

God ; not less truly so, than those of their Ancestors, who aposta-

tized to Heathenism .

It is unnecessary for me to dwell, in detail, on the doctrines,

substituted by these people for those in the Word of God. You

well know from the Scriptures themselves, that they placed their

holiness, and their hopes, in a mere round of external services ;

such as long prayers, ostentatious fastings, ablutions, and other

external purifications ; tything, mint, anise, and cummin ; and ma-

ny other things of the like nature. In all these the heart was ut-

terlyunconcerned; and the whole scheme of religion was confined

to a course of mere external actions ; from which integrity, justice,

benevolence, and piety, were wholly excluded. Instead of these

things, they licensed and practised the most abominable opposi-

tion to God, and the most scandalous hatred and persecution of

their fellow-men. Aconsiderable part denied a future existence ;

and justified all the indulgence of pride, avarice, and sensuality,

which have every where been connected with that denial. An-

other part openly sanctioned disobedience to the fifth command by

permitting a son to devote that part of his property, which was

necessary for the subsistence of his parents, to the service of the

Temple ; and warranting him to withhold from them, in this man-

ner, all the duties of filial piety. At the same time, they persecu-

ted , with the fury of maniacs, men of real piety; bound heavy

burdens ; shut up to their countrymen the access to religious

knowledge ; devoured widows' houses ; and wallowed in every

species of sensual pollution. For all their iniquities, at the same

time, they found a sanction in some tradition of their Elders, or

some invention of their own ; and those who taught these things,

were believed by their countrymen to be men of distinguished vir-

tue. Such were, summarily, the doctrines, both speculative and

practical , which the Jews preferred to the Word of God. The

spirit, which could even acquiesce in such doctrines as these, much

more which could deliberately prefer them to the Law and Gospel

of JEHOVAH, can plainly have been no other , than that of a sinful

nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evil doers .

2dly. Mohammed , it is well known, adopted, according to his

own testimony , the religion of Moses and Christ ; and professedly

republished it in a new form to mankind. But in this republica-

tionhe left out, wholly, the spirit of the Scriptural Religion ; and

in many respects did not preserve even the form of godliness .

His two great doctrines were, That there is but one God, and That

Mohammed is his prophet. By the latter doctrine he secured to

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

SER. XXX.] 457

himself the right of dictating to his followers just what he pleased.

Accordingly he delivered to them a collection of precepts, requir-

ing nothing but a course of external services, without the least

goodness of heart ; and promised Heaven to prayers, ablutions ,

fastings, alms, pilgrimages to Mecca, and circumcision. Religion

he considered as founded on cleanliness ; which he declared to be

the one half of Faith, and the key of Prayer. Fasting he pro-

nounced to be the gate of Religion. He allowed four wives to

every one of his followers ; and as many concubines, as each was

able to maintain . Heaven he converted into a mere mansion of

debauchery; and changed the mild and rational mode of propa-

gating Religion, taught by Christ and his Apostles, into a regular

system of the most brutal and barbarous persecution. In a word,

his doctrines flattered, and licensed every human corruption, every

sordid lust, every sinful indulgence.

3dly. The doctrines ofHeathenism are still more deformed, and

still more expressive of opposition to God.

Instead of one God, the Heathen, as you know, believed in

many. Instead of the perfect JEHOVAH, they heaped up to them-

selves Gods after their own lusts ; debased by filial impiety, fraud

theft, falsehood, injustice, treachery, murder, and lewdness, in-

dulged in every manner, which candebase an Intelligent nature.

They worshipped men, beasts, birds, fishes , reptiles, and insects .

They prostrated themselves before trees, shrubs, plants, stocks,

and stones . They sacrificed human victims ; prostituted men and

women in religious services ; and sanctioned every violation of

purity, justice, kindness, and piety. Read the first chapter of the

Epistle to the Romans ; and you will find a short, but exact and af-

fecting, account of what they not only did, but justified, licensed ,

and enjoined.

4thly. Modern Infidelity has, in various instances, strongly com-

mended the ancient Heathenism, both partially, and in the gross ;

and in publishing its own doctrines has shown, that the spirit by

which it is actuated, is no other than the very spirit of its

predecessors. It has denied the existence and perfections of

God; at times partially ; at other times wholly. It has admit-

ted his existence, and denied his providence ; the accountableness

ofman ; a future state ; the distinction between right and wrong, or

holiness and sin, piety, and rebellion ; has declared all that mencan

do with impunity to be right; has licensed wrath, revenge, murder,

pride, oppression, gluttony, drunkenness, fornication, adultery, and

incest. Surely it is unnecessary for me to observe, that the spirit,

manifested in the doctrines, which teach these things, is in the high-

est degree hostile to God, to truth, and to righteousness .

To Jews and Infidels the Gospel has been directly published in

form. To a great part of mankind it was published in the days

of the Apostles ; and has been extensively offered to many nations

in succeeding periods of time. That it has not made an universal

VOL. I. 58

458 [SER. XXX .

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

progress over the globe,has been owing to the fact, that those, to

whom it has been offered, have in so many instances refused it ac-

ceptance. Had the Ancestors of the present generation of men

giventhe Religion ofthe Bible a welcome admission to their hearts,

in the days of the Apostles ; it would long since have been preach-

ed to every family under heaven. Men, therefore, have stopped

its progress ; and not God.

But, as the fact has been, the Gospel has been published to a

great part of the human race ; and by a great proportion of these

it has been rejected. So general has been this rejection, as en-

tirely to determine the true nature of the human character : for it

cannot be pretended, that there is one original nature in those who

have heard and rejected the Gospel, and another in the rest of

mankind.

It ought to be added on this part of the subject, that many of

those who have professedly received the Word of God in the Chris-

tian world, have, in instances innumerable, in every country, and

every age, exhibited the same disposition in the same manner.

These men have almost universally denied the real import of the

book, which they have professed to receive. Its spiritual and hea-

venly doctrines they have, in forms very diverse, but in design and

spirit wholly the same, lowered continually down, so as to suit, or

at least so as not to disgust, the taste of a sinful heart. The ex-

tent also, and purity, of the Scriptural precepts they have contract-

ed, and debased, so as to license, in a professed consistency with

them, a great part of those evil practices, which are gratifying to

a polluted , sinful mind. The Doctrines of the Gospel they have

with one consent reduced to the level of mere natural Religion ;

and that the natural Religion, in substance, which was taught by

the graver heathen philosophers, and is now echoed by the more

decent Infidels . The precepts of the Gospel, also, they have

taught to speak a moral language, undistinguishable, as to its im-

port, from that of Plato, Seneca, and Herbert. Thus in truth, not-

withstanding their professed belief of the word of God, they have

rejected both the Law and the Gospel; and rejected them for the

doctrines and precepts, which they thus inculcate. That such is

the real design of all these men I am convinced by this remarka-

ble fact ; viz. that, when driven from one error, they always take

refuge in another ; and never come a whit nearer, however often

confuted, to the reception of the truth. The sum of the argument,

then, is this : God has given to mankind a law, for the government

of their moral conduct, which is not only reasonable and just in it-

self , but dictated by infinite benevolence on his part, and supreme-

ly profitable to them: a law demanding of them, that they love him

with all the heart, and that they love each other as themselves . This

character, which is no other than the Image of his moral perfec-

tion , is the supreme excellence, and the only moral excellence, of

Intelligent beings. In itselfit is high and indispensable enjoyment

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN .

SER . XXIX. ] 459

to every such being; and in its efficacy it is the only voluntary

cause of all other enjoyments : : a cause, existing originally and su-

premely in Him, and by derivation existing extensively in them .

This Law, therefore, is a perfect law ; and worthy of JEHOVAH.

Were men virtuously disposed ; were they not depraved ; were

they not sinful; their obedience to its commands would be immedi-

ate, universal, and absolute . Instead of this, wherever it has been

proposed to them, they have chosen to disobey it , notwithstand-

ing the glorious and eternal reward, promised to their obedience,

and the awful penalty, threatened to disobedience. What stronger

proof of their depravity can be demanded ?

There is, however , one proof still more affecting. In the mise-

rable situation, into which men brought themselves by their Apos-

tacy , God regarded them with infinite compassion, and undertook

to rescue them from their sin and misery. For this end he sent

his own beloved Son into the world, to live here a humble, painful,

and persecuted life, and to die an accursed and excruciating

death, to make in the human soul an end of sin , to finish transgres-

sion, to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting

righteousness . In consequence of his atonement, God has offered,

anew, to receive the fallen race of Adam into his favour, on the

conditions of Faith and Repentance in the Redeemer : conditions

in themselves indispensable to their return to God, and to obe-

dience ; indispensable to their own comfort, honour, and virtue ;

and beyond expression easy, reasonable, and desirable. As he

foresaw that they would still resist this boundless love, and would

fail of it through their corruption, ignorance, error, and prejudice ;

he published his Gospel to enlighten them, and sent his Spirit to

sanctify them, that by all means they might be saved. Still in a

multitude of instances almost literally endless, a multitude so great

as to prove this to be the common character of all the children of

Adam, they have rejected these most merciful proffers of bound-

less good, crucified his son afresh, cast contempt on his cross, ac-

counted the blood of the covenant wherewith he was sanctified an un-

holy thing, and done despite to the Spirit of Grace .

And now, my friends and brethren, judge, I pray you, between

God and his vineyard. What could have been done to his vineyard,

that he has not done in it ? Wherefore, when he looked, that it should

bring forth grapes, brought it forth poisonous berries ? * Wherefore

brought it forth the grapes of Sodom, and the clusters of Gomorrah?

Every tree is known by its fruit. Thist vine is plainly, therefore,

of the vine of Sodom, and of the fields of Gomorrah. Its grapes

are grapes of gall ; its clusters are bitter. Its wine is the poison

of dragons , and the cruel venom of asps .

Were man virtuously disposed, it is incredible, nay, it is plainly

impossible, that he should not yield himself to this Law, as soon as

Lowth. + Deut. xxxij . 32.

UNIVERSALITY OF SIN.

460 [SER. XXX

it is proposed to him. As obedience to this Law is the only ex-

cellence of conduct ; so a virtuous state of mind, a virtuous dispo-

sition, a virtuous character, by all of which phrases we intend that

unknown cause, heretofore specified, which gives birth to virtuous

rather than to vicious conduct, would so soon as this Law was pro-

posed to it, render, in a sense instinctively, an immediate, cheerful,

and universal obedience .

Were such a mind, also, to apostatize, and yet to retain a dispo-

sition in a preponderating degree virtuous ; were it afterwards to be

informed of a method, by which it might return to obedience, and

the favour of God; it would be plainly impossible, that such a

mind should not receive this information, and embrace this method

of returning, with readiness, and even with rapture. If , at the

same time, the terms of its reinstatement in obedience, and in the

divine favour, were in themselves eminently easy and reasonable,

and in their efficacy productive of its highest future amiableness,

dignity, and enjoyment ; if they were such, as rendered it pecu-

liarly lovely in the sight of God, and prepared it to be peculiarly

useful to its fellow -creatures ; such a mind would, beyond a doubt,

seize the terms themselves with delight, and the divine object,

which they secured, with ecstasy.

The rejection of the word of God, of the Law and the Gospel

alike, is, therefore, entirely inexplicable, unless we acknowledge,

that the disposition by which it is rejected, is a disposition directly

opposed to that of a virtuous mind; wholly unlike that with which

Adam was created ; and the genuine moral likeness of Adam after

his Apostacy.

SERMON XXXI.

DEPRAVITY OF MAN. ITS DEGREE .

ECCLESIASTES viii. 11. Because sentence against an evil work is not executed speed-

ily , therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil.

IN the two last discourses, I proposed for consideration the

following doctrine : That in consequence of the Apostacy ofAdam

all men have sinned ; and endeavoured to prove the Universality

ofsin in the former of these discourses ;

1st. From Revelation : and,

2dly. From Facts :

And in the latterfrom the great fact, that mankind have rejected

the Word of the Lord.

It is now my design to examine, in several particulars, the De-

gree, in which the sinfulness of man exists . On this subject I ob-

serve, 1st. That the human character is not depraved to the full extent

of the human powers .

It has been said, neither unfrequently, nor by men void of un-

derstanding, that man is as depraved a being, as his faculties will

permit him to be ; but it has been said without consideration, and

without truth. Neither the Scriptures, nor Experience, warrant

this assertion . Wicked men and seducers , it is declared, will wax

worse and worse ; deceiving and being deceived. During the first

half of human life this may, perhaps, be explained by the growth

ofthe faculties ; but during a considerable period, preceding its

termination, it cannot be thus explained : for the faculties decay,

while the depravity still increases. Nations, also, are declared, to

be at some periods of time, far worse than at others ; although it

cannot be pretended, that during the period specified their facul-

ties were superior. Saul appears to have been a man of more

talents than Jeroboam ; Jeroboam than Ahab ; and Uzziah than

either ; yet Ahab was a worse man than Jeroboam ; Jeroboam than

Saul; and Saul than Uzziah. The Young Man, who came to

Christ, to know what good thing he should do, to have eternal life ,

was certainly less depraved, than his talents would have permitted

him to be.

Like him, we see, daily, many men, who neither are, nor profess

to be, Christians, and who, instead of being wicked to a degree

commensurate to the extent of their faculties, go through life in the

exercise of dispositions so sincere, just, and amiable , and in the

performance of actions so upright and beneficent, as to secure a

high degree of respect and affection from ourselves, and from all

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

462 [SER . XXXI.

with whom they are connected. It certainly cannot be said, that

such men are as sinful as many others possessed of powers far in-

ferior; much less that they are as sinful as they can be. We also

see individuals, at times, assume, without any visible enlargement

of their faculties, a new and surprising degree of depravity at once ;

and become suddenly far more fraudulent, false, lewd, cruel, re-

vengeful, impious, and universally abandoned, than at a period not

long preceding. In the families, of which we are members, we

have abundant opportunity to learn, from so intimate a connexion,

the true characters of all who compose them ; and are furnished

daily with decisive evidence, that they are far less profligate than,

with their faculties, they might become. Those, who make the as-

sertion, against which I am contending, will find themselves, if

they will examine, rarely believing, that their wives and children,

though not Christians, are Fiends.

2dly. There are certain characteristics of human nature, which,

considered by themselves, are innocent.

Such are hunger, thirst, the fear of suffering, and the desire of

happiness ; together with several others . All these are insepara-

ble, not only from the rational, but also from the animal, nature, as

existing in this world ; and accompany the Christian through every

degree of holiness, which he attains, as truly as the sinner. The

two last ; the desire of happiness, and the fear of suffering ; are

inseparable from the rational, and even from the percipient, nature.

3dly. Some of the natural human characteristics are amiable .

Such are natural affection : the simplicity and sweetness of dis-

position in children, often found also in persons of adult years ;

compassion ; generosity ; modesty ; and what is sometimes called

natural conscientiousness; that is, a fixed and strong sense of the

importance of doing that , which is right. These characteristics

appear to have adorned the Young Man, whom I have already

mentioned. We know that they are amiable, because we are in-

formed that Jesus , beholding him, loved him. In the same manner

we, and all others, who are not abandoned, love them always, and

irresistibly , whenever they are presented to our view. They all,

also, are required, and exist, in every Christian ; enhancing his ho-

liness, and rendering him a better man. Without them it is not

easy to perceive how the Christian character could exist. Ас-

cordingly, St. Paul exhibits those, who are destitute of these attri-

butes, as being literally profligates .

4thly. These and all other qualities of the mind are, however,

means either of virtue, or sin, according to the nature of that con-

trolling Disposition , or Energy, which constitutes the moral character.

By this disposition, or energy, I intend that unknown cause,

whence it arises , that the actions of the mind are either sinful or vir-

tuous. On this energy depends the moral nature of all actions,

and the moral character of every mind. This character, and these

actions , are variously, and extensively, modified by the attributes

DEPRAVITY OF MAN

SER. XXXI. ] 463

above mentioned. But the moral nature is not changed. So far

as they have a prevailing influence , a sinful dispositior is checked,

and prevented from operating in the worst manner, and degree.

Under the prevalence of a sinful disposition, these attributes are

partly extinguished, and partly converted into instruments of sin.

In a virtuous mind they all become means of virtue, and increase

the energy of such a mind.

5thly. There is not in the Mind, by nature, or in an unregenerated

state , any real moral excellence, or Evangelical virtue .

For I know, says St. Paul, that in me, (that is, in myflesh) dwell-

eth no good thing . The carnal mind, says the same Apostle, is en-

mity against God, not subject to his law, neither indeed can be. And

again ; The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of

God; for they are foolishness unto him ; neither can he know them,

for they are spiritually discerned. That which is born, saith our

SAVIOUR, of theflesh , is flesh . Without faith, says St. Paul, it is

impossible to please God.

6thly. The heart of Man, after all the abatements are made,

which can be made, is set to do evil, in a most affecting and dreadful

manner.

Of this truth , the Text is a direct and very forcible assertion .

The word, which is rendered, fully set, in our translation, is used

by Ahasuerus, Esther vii. 5, to express the daring presumption,

with which Haman had risen up to destroy Esther and her nation .

It is also said to denote being filled with a violent propensity, as the

sails of a ship are filled, when borne along by a powerful blast. A

strong tendency to evil in the heart of the sons of men, therefore,

is here asserted in very forcible terms .

In considering the degree of iniquity, indicated in this and simi-

lar passages, it is not my design, nor within my power or wish, to

settle this point with mathematical exactness . In the Scriptures,

God has exhibited this subject in an indefinite , and yet in a more

impressive and affecting manner, than any, which mankind have

substituted. No views of human corruption are so affecting, or so

awful, as those, which are presented to us in the Word of God.

This example may be confidently followed ; and no man is required

to limit this subject more exactly, than it has been done by his

Maker.

With these observations premised, I shall proceed to adduce

several proofs of the doctrine, expressed in the text.

I. The Scriptures directly assert this doctrine in the fullest man-

ner.

Every imagination of Man's heart, saith God, is only evil, con-

tinually. Of the Gentiles, the Apostle declares, that they are with-

out excuse ; because that, when they knew God, they glorified him

not as God, neither were thankful ; but became vain in their imagi-

nations ; and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing them-

selves to be wise, they became fools . Who changed the truth ofGod

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

464 [SER. XXXI.

into a lie, and worshipped, and served the creature, more than the

Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave

them up to vile affections . And as they did not like to retain God

in their knowledge, God gave them up to a reprobate mind. Being

filled with all unrighteousness, fornication , wickedness , covetousness ,

maliciousness ; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity ,

Whisperers , backbiters , haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters ,

inventers of evil things , disobedient to parents, Without understand-

ing, covenant- breakers , without natural affection, implacable, un-

merciful : Who knowing the judgment of God ( that they, which

commit such things , are worthy of death) not only do the same, but

have pleasure in them that do them .

Of the Jews, the same Apostle says, Rom. iii . 9, What then, are

we better than they ? No, in no wise ; for we have before proved both

Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin . As it is written ,

There is none righteous, no, not one . There is none that understand-

eth ; there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of

the way ; they are together become unprofitable ; there is none that

doeth good, no, not one. Their mouth is an open sepulchre ; with

their tongues they have used deceit ; the poison of asps is under their

lips. Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness ; their feet are

swift to shed blood. There is no fear of God before their eyes.-

Now we know, that what things soever the Law saith , it saith to

them, who are under the Law ; that every mouth might be stopped,

and all the world become guilty before God. Therefore, by deeds of

Law, shall no flesh living be justified.

Such is the character of men, given in form, and in the course of

the most important logical discussion contained in the Scriptures ,

by the Apostle Paul. Consonant with this representation are all

the exhibitions, made in the Old and New Testament, of this sub-

ject. The depravity, represented, is not only declared to be uni-

versal, but also to be of this high and dreadful malignity. Man-

kind are not exhibited as prone to one sin only, but to all these,

and all other sins ; and not prone to these sins merely, but filled

with them as attributes, and executing them swiftly and dreadfully

as practices .

II . The same truth is evident to every man, if he examines the sub-

ject faithfully, from the state of his own heart and life .

This very extensive field of evidence can now be explored only

in a very imperfect manner : but a little attention to it will in no

small degree illustrate and prove the doctrine.

1st. Every Man, who scrutinizes his own heart at all, knows , that ,

naturally, he in no sense obeys the first and great command of the

Law of God: Thou shalt love the Lord, thy God, with all thy heart.

This is the first, and altogether the most important, duty of In-

telligent creatures ; and is plainly that duty, separated from which,

no other can be performed. All possible motives in the highest

possible degrees conspire to induce a rational being to perform it.

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

SER. XXXI.] 465

If , then, these motives do not influence the heart ; if we love not

our Creator, Preserver, and Benefactor, the Author of all good,

and himself the Infinite Good ; we cannot be imagined to love with

right principles any other being. If we perform not ourplainduty

to him, we cannot be supposed to perform our duty to any other.

2dly. All men are daily reproached by their own Consciences , as

being greatly and continually guilty of Sin .

The fear of the anger of God, and of future punishment, and the

pride, which every man feels in thinking himself of a good and ho-

nourable character, are biasses, which strongly influence us to re-

ject, as much as possible, so humiliating a doctrine as this. But,

in spite of both, our Consciences, irresistibly impelled by the truth,

declare the greatness of our depravity every day ; and we cannot

hide our eyes from the humiliating declaration. Were it possible

to avoid the acknowledgment, we should certainly avoid it : but

the truth is so obvious, and so undeniable, that we cannot escape.

The only exception to this remark proves the truth of the doc-

trine still more strongly. The man, whose Conscience does not

thus testify, is plainly of a peculiarly depraved character ; not

merely because his Conscience does not thus testify, but because

he is always guilty of gross sin in various other respects. So

common, or rather so universal, is this fact, as to become the sub-

ject of proverbial remark. He therefore, who is thus situated, is

still more depraved than mankind in general.

3dly. The Stupidity ofmankind, and their Hardness of Heart, are

strong exhibitions of the same doctrine .

That Men should be thus guilty, and yet be insensible to the na-

ture and degree of their depravity, is an event , certainly not to

have been expected from the Reason, of which we so continually

boast. Our sins are committed against the Infinite God, the eter-

nal and unchangeable Enemy of Sin; and are, therefore, the means

of exposing us in an awful manner to his wrath and vengeance.

Atthe same time, the character is in itself debased, deformed, and

hateful, beyond expression. Who, then , can be supposed to pos-

sess any share of Reason, and not be humbled beyond measure at

the latter of these considerations, and equally alarmed by the

former ? Yet Mankind by nature are universally, not only not

humbled, but haughty; not only not alarmed, but stupid, as to

their danger ; and cheerful, gay, exulting, and insolent, in the ca-

reer of their iniquity.

Inthe mean time, no warnings are sufficient to awaken them to

a sense of guilt, danger, or duty ; no counsels, to persuade them

to return to obedience ; no motives, to deter them from sin. The

heart is, like the nether millstone, incapable of any useful, serious,

divine, impression ; daily becoming more and more guilty, stupid,

and hardened; and wandering farther and farther from duty and

from God, from hope and from Heaven.

Eternal Life is offered, and has been offered, to those, now be

VOL. I. 59

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

466 [ SER. XXXI.

fore me, ten thousand times. Who has accepted the offer ? Their

sins have been ten thousand times reproved and condemned. Who

has repented, and forsaken them ? Their duty has in countless

instances been pressed upon them. Who has obeyed ? God has

called, Christ has entreated, the Spirit of Grace has striven. Who

has listened, complied, and yielded ? To continue in sin is to be

exposed to endless misery. To repent, and turn to God, is to secure

endless life . Every hardened, impenitent sinner declares, therefore,

that, in his view, sin, with endless misery for its reward, is more to

be chosen than holiness, or obedience, with endless life. What

greater proof of dreadful depravity can be given, or demanded ?

III. The same doctrine is most affectingly evinced by the whole

course ofhuman conduct.

This evidence will advantageously appear,

1st. From the Private Conduct of mankind, as individuals .

Ishall not here insist at large on the most private and retired

scenes of life, where we see, in multitudes of instances , notwith-

standing all the concealment and disguise, with which Vice hides

itself from the observation of the world, innumerable forms and

degrees of corruption acted out in a very painful and humiliating

manner. In spite of the veil, which night and solitude cast over the

innumerable perpetrations of the human race, how many kinds of

deformity rise up daily to our view ! How many early, bitter, and

unnatural contentions, even of little children ! What affecting to-

kens even of infantine selfishness, wrath, revenge, and cruelty !

How many proofs of filial impiety, ingratitude, and rebellion, in the

morning of Life ! What unbrotherly and unsisterly coldness and

alienation, what unkind and unforgiving hearts, appear in those,

who are bone of the same bone, and flesh of the same flesh ! How

many jealous, hard-hearted, little, base sentiments and actions af-

flict the bosom of parental tenderness in those, whom nature makes

inexpressibly beloved, in spite of every fault, as well as of every

folly !

What a task is it to rear a single family, without leaving such

faults unextirpated, as are open and infamous ! How vast a labour

to train up even one child to virtue and to duty ; or even to pre-

vent one from becoming grossly sinful, and finally lost ! What toils

and pains ; what cares and watchings ; how many reproofs ,

re-

straints , and corrections ; how many prayers, and sig sighs, and tears,

are employed and suffered, before this hard task can be accom-

plished ! How rarely is it accomplished at all! What then must

be the corruption of that heart, which makes all these efforts ne-

cessary; and which can resist and overcome them all ?

From this summary view let us turn our thoughts to the obvious

conduct of men ; as it exists in our own and every other country.

What amazing selfishness visibly appears in the general conduct of

mankind ; and how little are they, amidst all the culture of education

and humanity, all the restraints of Law, and all the illuminations,

DEPRAVITY OF MAN .

SER. XXXI . ] 467

injunctions, and threatenings, of Religion, disposed to act agreea-

bly to the dictates of truth, righteousness, and benevolence to-

wards each other ? A little property , a little power, a very huna-

ble office, or some other trifling object of ambition, will, at any

time, make those, who have been for life bosom friends, vehement

and irreconcileable enemies. A furious and long continued law-

suit is resorted to, in order to decide the unsettled property ; a

lawsuit, carried on with bitterness, fraud, and perjury ; and termi-

nated in insolent victory and sullen defeat, in riveted hatred and

gloomy retaliation. The place of honour and power is sought for

with electioneering, caballing, slander, fraud, and falsehood ; and

is enjoyed with insolence, or lost with envy, malice, and secret re-

solutions of future revenge.

In the common bargains between Men, how rarely is it the design

to exchange an equivalent for that which is received; although the

onlypossible rule of honesty ; and how generally, to make what

is called a good, and what is in reality a fraudulent, bargain ! How

perpetual are the efforts to impose on our neighbours commodities

of less than the professed value ; commodities imperfect, corrupt-

ed, and decayed! How many persons obtain their whole living,

and spend their whole lives, in this kind of fraud ! What pains are

also taken to conceal, or belie, the state of the markets ; of our

own circumstances ; our real intentions ; or our ability to fulfil the

engagements, into which we enter ! What base deceptions are

practised in cases of bankruptcy ; and what frauds perpetrated, in

order to attain legally the character, and immunities, of a bank-

rupt ! Howdifficult has it been even to make a Law, which can at

all secure to creditors an equitable share in the actual remains of a

bankrupt's property ! How strange would the observations, which

I am now making, appear in a world of honest, virtuous beings !

Friendship is plainly one of the things, most to be looked for

among rational beings ; as it is one of the most profitable, and

most pleasing, of all those, which are in our power. To this union

of affections, this perpetual correspondence of hearts, this delight-

ful harmony of life, all our interests strongly lead us, with motives

highly noble and affectingly persuasive. Yet Solomon could say,

and with plain propriety could say, A faithful man who canfind ?

Not a small part of our conversation, or of our writings, is filled

with bitter complaints of frail, alloyed, treacherous, broken friend-

ship ; and of unworthy, false, and perfidious friends . Why are we

not friends ? Can Virtue furnish any part of the reason ?

The pleasures of Men, their darling and customary pleasures,

have ever seemed to me an affecting proof of extreme depravity

in our nature.

St. James directs, Is any man afflicted, let him pray. Is any mer-

ry, ( that is, cheerful) let him sing psalms. In other words, let the

hours of cheerfulness be spent innocently, (for such is the employ-

ment recommended ) gratefully to God, and profitably to ourselves .

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

468 [SER. XXXI .

Such are the amusements, such the pleasures, recommended by an

Apostle.

In examining the pleasures, actually sought by mankind, I shall,

without any particular notice, pass by the brutal entertainments,

so greedily sought, so highly enjoyed, and so firmly established,

under the sanctions of law , in Greece, Rome, and other Heathen

countries : the public games, in which naked men contended for

superiority in feats of agility and strength ; the gladiatorial shows,

in which men, trained for the purpose, butchered each other for

the amusement of their fellow -men ; and the exposures of human

beings to the fury of wild beasts, while thousands enjoyed the

sport of seeing them torn asunder, as a mere entertainment. I

will not dwell upon the fact, that, beside the vulgar and the savage ,

men of high rank, of enlightened minds, and of polished manners,

and, what is still more humiliating and disgusting, women of the

first birth, education, and character, were regularly present. I

will pass by the Saturnalia, in whichRome sunk, for a week every

year, into the coarsest and most vulgar brutism, and all distinction

and decency were abolished. Useful as the investigation might

be, it must, for the want of time, be omitted on the present occa-

sion.

Let me then ask, What are the actual pleasures, usually sought

with eager favouritism in countries, claiming the title of Christian ?

Go to the table, where provision is professedly made for the flesh,

to fulfil the lusts thereof; and you will find one answer to the ques-

tion. What a circle is very frequently seated around it ! Or ra-

ther, what does that circle in many instances become, before the

table is deserted ? To pass the enormous expense, care, and

anxiety, with which nature and art are employed and ransacked,

to gratify the demands of a sickly and fastidious palate ; in how

many instances, throughout even the civilized and Christian world,

is a feast the mere resort of gluttony and drunkenness ! How

swinishly are the overflowing bounties of the Infinite God abused

to the prostitution of Man ; to the destruction of his health, the

waste of his time, the perversion of his talents, the neglect of his

duty, the corruption of his heart, the stupefaction of his reason ,

the loss of his usefulness, and the ruin of his Soul! How many

drunkards, think you, My Brethren, have been found in a single

century, the most enlightened and improved, since the beginning

of the world, and in the countries inhabited by Christians, around

the festive boards of the well-informed and polished members of

society ? How many more gluttons ? What a scene of low and

vulgar brutism, at the same time, is daily presented by taverns ,

ale- houses, and dram-shops; and on days of public rejoicing and

festivity!

Turn we hence to the Horse- race ; another darling diversion of

mankind; and not of the ignorant and clownish only, but of the

enlightened and polished; nay, even of the noble and dignified.

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

SER . XXXI. ] 469

ranks of men. What has gathered the concourse ? The professed

object is to see two or more horses run a race, and one outstrip the

other in his speed. Without calling in question the lawfulness of

setting these animals upon the stretch of their powers for our

amusement : what a picture is presented to our view by the bets

which are laid, the fraud and falsehood practised ; the perjuries,

oaths, curses, and blasphemies, uttered ; the drunkenness and

sloth, which are indulged ; the battles, which are fought ; and the

universal prostitution of morals, which is accomplished.

At a Cockpit, another darling scene of amusement to vast multi-

tudes of mankind, all these gross and dreadful iniquities abound;

together with a cruelty causeless, shameless, and horrid ; a cruelty

impossible to that righteous man, who is merciful to his beast, and

of course to every harmless creature in his power.

Ofthe same deplorable nature is the amusement ofBull- baiting :

an amusement warranted by the voice of law, and the deliberate

decisions of senatorial wisdom and royal dignity. The strength

and courage of this animal are here made the very means of tor-

turing him with the most exquisite agonies, which can easily be de-

vised : all not only quietly suffered, but established, for the sake

of guarding the palate of the epicure from offence and disappoint-

ment, on the one hand ; and on the other, for the purpose of sla-

king the thirst for pleasure in minds, which can find delight in fe-

rocity, anguish, and death.

From these humiliating scenes, direct your steps to the Gaming

table. I need not tell you how chosen a diversion, or set of diver-

sions, is found here ; or to what an incomprehensible extent sought

in every country, civilized and savage. Here, fraud in every form

begins, carries on, and closes, the business. Here, is the chamber

of moroseness, gloom, discontent, animosity, profaneness, conten-

tion, drunkenness, and universal depravity. Here, property is

wickedly lost, and wickedly won. Here, time is most shamefully

and sinfully wasted. Here, all duties are most dreadfully neglected ;

and here, the estate, the health, the character, the family, and the

soul, are consigned to perdition.

From the gaming table turn your researches next to the Theatre .

Think, first, of the almost uniform character of the miserable

wretches , who are trained to create the diversion. How low are

they, almost without an exception , fallen ; and how low do they

fall , of course, by the deplorable employment, to which they are

most wickedly tempted to devote themselves ! If you are at a

loss, read a history, or even a professed panegyric, of this class of

mankind. You will find it filled up with crimes, which disgrace

the name even of sinful Man, and with characters , which are a blot

even on this guilty world. Consider, next, the Performances, which

these unhappy men and women are employed to exhibit. How

few can be read without a blush, or without a sigh, by a person ,

not seduced by habit, or not lost to virtue , and even to sobriety!

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

470 LOER. XXXI.

How great a part are mere means of pollution ! What art, labour,

and genius, are engaged in them to garnish gross and dreadful

vice; to disguise its nature and effects ; to robe it in the princely

attire of virtue ; and to crown it with the rewards of well-doing !

How often is even common decency insulted, ridiculed, and put to

flight ! In how many ways, and with how much art, is corruption

softly and secretly instilled into the soul! Inhow many instances

is Virtue defaced, dishonoured, and, like the Saviour of Mankind,

crowned with thorns, sceptered with a reed, and mocked with pre-

tended and insolent homage !

Turn your eyes, next, to the Audience, whose wishes and pro-

perty give birth to the whole establishment. Of whom is this

audience composed ? Of how few persons, whom Virtue ever

knew, or with whom she would not blush to confess her acquaint-

ance! Of how many, who are strangers to all good ! Of how

many, who are ignorant even of decency ; to whom vice is pleas-

ing, and grossness an entertainment !

Accordingly, all the course of exhibition, except a little part

thrust in as a sacrifice to decency and reputation, is formed of pol-

luted sentiments, and polluted characters ; in which whatever is

not directly and openly abominable is meant merely as the white

covering intended to shroud from the eye the death and rottenness

within. Our own copious language, employed in thousands of

dramatic performances, probably cannot boast of a sufficient num-

ber of such plays, as an Apostle would have pronounced innocent,

to furnish a single stage for a single season .

From the Stage, men are directly prepared to go to the Brothel.

The corruption of the one fits the mind with no common prepara-

tion to direct its course to the other.

One of the first facts, which here strikes, and afflicts, the think-

ing mind, is, that these houses of pestilence and ruin, of sin and

perdition, are tolerated in countries, inhabited, and ruled by such

as profess themselves to be Christians, by those who have been

baptized into the name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy

Ghost. Another is, that they are frequented by vast multitudes :

and another, that these are not composed of the low, ignorant, and

despised only ; but , in great numbers, of the wealthy, the enlight-

ened, the polite, and even the noble and the princely. To this we

must add, because truth adds, that Seduction has in all instances

begun the ruin of the miserable wretches, who inhabit these walls

of Sodom. This seduction, also, has been accomplished by art,

falsehood, serpentine insidiousness, and outrageous perjury. The

endless ruin of a soul has been the price of a momentary and de-

based gratification ; and the poor and pitiable victim has been so-

licited , and induced, to sacrifice eternal Life, to the fiend-like per-

suasion of her betrayer.

In the mean time, all, or nearly all, those, who are authors of

the deception, or haunters of these tenements of prostitution, ac-

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

SER. XXXI.] 471

company to the same perdition the miserable victims of their trea-

chery. Of the strange or polluted woman, God saith, None, that

go in unto her, turn again ; neither take they hold of the paths of

life. Another fact, to which your attention is called in these dreadful

scenes, is , that here all sin springs up as in a hot-bed ; that, beside

the horrid debasement, which is here the characteristical guilt, all

possible sin is rank, luxuriant, and prosperous . Profaneness,

drunkenness, treachery, fraud, and murder, haunt these baleful

walls, as a collection of infernal beings in a second Hell. Like

that dreadful world, also, its doors are barred against all return

and repentance, against life and hope. Scarcely an example

is found, in which those, who have once entered, ever make their

escape. Sin and Perdition are marked on the gateway ; and over

the door is read, in letters of fire, This house is the way to Hell, go-

ing down to the chambers of Death.

The last subject, which, in this complicated mass of iniquity, de-

mands your investigation, is the immense extent of the pollution,

and the incomprehensible numbers of mankind which it involves, and

has ever involved. A Prophet has recorded Sodom, as a monument

of eternal infamy. Were prophets to exist in every land, Sodoms

would not improbably be portrayed on many pages of every his-

torical record. The great Capitals of most European and Asiatic

countries are, in many respects, perhaps, not a whit behind the

impurity, found in those monuments of the divine vengeance, the

Cities of the plain. I wish I could say our own had a less share

in this charge. Modern lewdness, although usually concealed

with care from the eye of the world, has yet publicly proceeded to

lengths, which amaze the mind even ofcool contemplation, sicken

the heart of delicacy, and turn back the eye of virtue with horror.

The world has become complaisant to it ; and changed its very

language , to give soft and imposing names to the wretches, who

have robbed the swine of their sty, or wallowed at their side in

the mire. The prostitute is misnamed with softening appellations,

intended to veil her odious character, and her enormous crimes.

The lewd man is styled a man of gayety, spirit, and life ; a man of

the world ; a liberal man ; a man unshackled by fanaticism or su-

perstition.

At the same time, means innumerable, tolerated by law, and

pursued with impunity, are employed to cherish this worst, this

most fatal, of all evils . Houses of pollution in immense numbers

are erected, allowed, and frequented. Abandoned women are

brought forward to places of public and honourable resort , admit-

ted without opposition to assemblies for amusement, made up of

those, who fill the upper spheres of life ; seated at tables of distinc-

tion; and rolled on the wheels of splendour. Genius prostitutes

its elevated powers to seduce the miserable victim, to varnish the

guilt of pollution, to sooth to torpor the wounded conscience, and

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

472 [ SER. XXXI .

to make the way to Hell smooth, pleasant, and unsuspected; forms

and tunes the enchanting song, to imbrute the heedless mind ; fa-

shions and animates the marble into every form of temptation :

traces on the canvass its lines of symmetry and beauty, and sheds

the splendour of its colouring, only to corrupt and to ruin. The

shop, to complete the havoc, publicly holds out the infamous book,

the alluring image, and the fascinating picture, to every passenger ;

and, in defiance of laws and magistrates, eagerly helps forwardthe

work of destruction .

All these are chosen, and customary pursuits of mankind.

Those, who follow them, are immortal beings, who have souls to

be saved, sins to be forgiven, and endless life to be secured. All

of them have heard the Gospel of Salvation ; have been exhorted

to yield themselves to the Redeemer; and have been earnestly in-

vited to enter into heaven.

The life of all is a vapour ; the day of grace and of pardon, is

bounded by that momentary life ; and each feels his time to be so

short, that he cannot find even an hour to employ on the great

work of Repentance, and the Salvation of his soul .

Such, then, are the pleasures of mankind. What, it may now be

asked, are those employments of men, which wear a more serious

aspect ? Among these, the first, which strikes the mind of a serious inves-

tigator, is their general and wonderful profanation of the name of

God. To this sin, it is generally acknowledged, there is hardly

any temptation. Wickedness here assumes, therefore, the charac-

ter of disinterestedness ; and the sin is committed from the pure

love of sinning. Yet how immensely extensive is this evil prac-

tice! The Heathen and the Mohammedan, the Jewish and the

Christian nations, professing widely different views, in other re-

spects, concerning the Ruler of all things, quietly unite in pro-

faning his awful name. Men of all ages and characters, however

discordant otherwise, harmonize here. The sage and the block-

head, the gentleman and the clown, the nobleman and the peasant ,

join their voices in unison ; and form one great chorus, not for the

praise, but for the dishonour, of God. The Prince swears on his

throne, and the beggar on his dunghill; the child lisps out the im-

perfect curse, and the tongue of the man of grey hairs trembles

beneath the faltering blasphemy. From California to Japan the

general voice of mankind rises up to Heaven, not as the odour of

sweet incense, but as one vast exhalation of impiety, infinitely

disgraceful to our reason, immensely ungrateful, and immensely

wicked.

The next dreadful effusion of this evil spirit is the multiform

falsehood, which in such an astonishing manner clouds and dis-

graces this miserable world. Truth is the foundation ofall virtue,

and consequently of all happiness. Without it, society, in the

proper sense, cannot exist. Even the dreadful bands of thieves

*

1

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

SER . XXXI. ] 473

and ruffians are proverbially acknowledged to be indebted to it for

their own horrid union. But cast your eyes over this wide world,

and mark how extensively truth has fallen in the streets of cities ,

the solitary habitations of the country, and the wild retreats of the

savage and barbarian. Mark how soon falsehood begins to blacken

the tongue of the child, and how greatly to deepen its hue with the

increase of years. Trace, if you can, without intense mortifica-

tion, the secret windings of the private slanderer ; and behold, if

you can, without amazement, in endless multitudes, the impudent,

unblushing lies of public newspapers. Survey with horror, for

without horror you cannot survey, the perjuries of testimony, the

perjuries of elections, the perjuries of the custom-house, and the

perjuries of public office. Look with still more amazement and

regret, on the falsehoods of the great and powerful. " Truth,"

said King John of France, " if banished from the rest of the world,

ought still to find a mansion in the bosoms of princes." Yet how

regularly from year to year, and from century to century, courts

and legislatures assert, and deny, successively, the same facts,

without a retraction, and without a blush. Cast your eyes, and

tell me, if they do not sicken while you cast them, on the moun-

tainous mass of falsehood heaped up by insidious Learning, and

infidel philosophy, against the Word of God, and against all the

interests , virtue, and happiness, of Man. When you have done

these things ; finish the humiliating investigation by gazing at the

whole nation of the French, swearing eternal hatred to royalty and

eternal fealty to six successive constitutions of Government, adopt-

edwithin little more than six successive years, and then bowing

down quietly at the foot of a despot!

From falsehood the transition is almost necessary tofraud. On

this subject, however, as on all the remaining ones, I can dwell but

a moment. The laws of all civilized nations have been chiefly em-

ployed in repressing this sin, and in repressing it with every suf-

fering , which ingenuity could devise, or human nature sustain.

Yet in spite of the whip, the brand, the prison, and the galley, in

spite of the gibbet and the cross, the rack and the faggot, what

commodity, what kind of dealing, is not the subject of fraud ; and

what child ofAdam is not its mortified object? All kinds of money are

counterfeited ; all kinds of instruments for conveyance, or security,

are forged. Vast multitudes of mankind gain their livelihood from

cheating. The beggar cheats you in his tale of suffering ; the man

ofbusiness in his commodity ; the statesman plunders the public ;

the prince defrauds his subjects by false representations ofhis wants,

and false representations of his expenditures. In London only, a

very corrupt, but far from being the most corrupt, city in Europe,

115,000 human beings, among whom are 50,000 abandonedfe-

males, live , according to the sagacious and upright Colquhoun, ei-

ther partly or wholly , by customary fraud ; and annually plunder

their fellow- men of Two millions Sterling ; while on the River

VOL. I. 60

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

474 [ SER. XXXI .

Thames a more systematized robbery has yearly wrested from in-

dividuals no less than 500,000 pounds of the same currency ; and

from the Crown, during a century, ten millions .

Duelling and Suicide present to our view two other kindred tes-

timonies of enormous corruption. On these, however, I cannot,

and need not, dwell. Instead of expatiating on them, I will ex-

hibit to you two official accounts of the moral state of the Capital

of France. By a public return to the Government, of births ,

deaths , &c. in Paris, in the year 1801, it appears, that there were,

Legitimate births ,σ

14,829

Illegitimate ,

4,841

}

About one quarter

of the whole.

Marriages,

3,826

Divorces,

720

}

About one sixth of

the whole.

Died in their own houses,

12,510

In poor houses and hospitals,

8,257 About two fifths of

Found dead in the streets,

2015 the whole.

}

In the Republican year, ending Sept. 23, 1803, by the report of

the Prefect of Police to the Grand Judge for the District of Paris,

the number of

Suicide was §Men, 490 657

Women, 167

Murdered persons, Men, 81 150

Women, 69

Divorces,

644

Murderers executed,

155

Condemned to the galleys ,

1210

Condemned to hard labour and imprisonment,

1626

Branded with hot irons,

• 64

Among the criminals executed were Seven Fathers , who had

poisoned their children : Ten Husbands, who had murdered their

wives : Six wives, who poisoned their husbands : and Fifteen chil-

dren, who destroyed their parents .

During that year also 12,076 lewd women had been registered,

and paid for the protection of the Police ; 1552 kept mistresses

were noted ; and 308 public brothels licensed, by the Prefect of

Police at Paris .

This tremendous recital admits no comment. The spectator

shrinks from it with horror ; and, forced to acknowledge those ,

comprised in the story, to be human beings, wishes to deny, that

himself is a man.

2dly. The doctrine is dreadfully evinced in the Public Conduct of

mankind.

DEPRAVITY OF MAN

SER. XXXI . ] 475

On this part of the subject, copious and important as it is, I shall

make a very few observations only , under the following heads.

1st. Their government.

Under a righteous administration of Government, the intense

corruption of the human character is gloomily manifested by Sub-

jects, in the violation of their allegiance, and their evasions or their

transgressions of Law. Godhas made it our duty to render tribute

to whom tribute is due ; custom to whom custom ; and honour to whom

honour. Nor has He permitted us to perform these duties with less

scrupulous exactness than any other. Compare with this precept

the reluctant payment of reasonable taxes ; the unceasing, and im-

mense, smuggling ; the innumerable frauds, practised on the Cus-

tom -house; the murmurings, the seditions, the revolts, the malig-

nant factions, and the furious civil discords, which have blackened

the annals even of the freest and happiest nations ; and you can-

not want evidence of the depravity ofthat spirit, which has given

birth to these enormities.

On the other hand, how often is the Government itself no other

than an administration ofiniquity ! The endless train of evils, how-

ever, which have flowed in upon mankind from this source, have

been, here, so long the ruling theme both of conversation and wri-

tings ; the oppression, fraud, plunder , baleful example, and de-

plorable corruption, of despotic princes, have been so thoroughly

learned by heart ; as to render a particular discussion of them, at

the present time, unnecessary. But however frequently they have

been repeated, they are not on that account less real, or dreadful,

manifestations of human turpitude. I know, that it is a common

refuge of the objectors to this doctrine to attribute both these kinds

ofevidence ofhuman corruption to the form of the government, and

not to the nature of Man. But this complaisance to human nature

is out of place. Kings and princes are mere men; and differ from

other men, only because they are surrounded by greater tempta-

tions. Their nature and propensities are precisely the same with

yours and mine. Their opportunities of doing good are, at the

same time, immensely greater ; and were they originally virtuous,

would be seized, and employed, with an avidity, proportioned to

their extent, for this great purpose only. Were human nature pure,

as is professed ; were it not dreadfully corrupted ; kings would be

the best of men; as possessing the greatest power, and the widest

means of beneficence. How unlike this has been the fact, not with

respect to kings only, but almost all men invested with high author-

ity. Republican Legislatures have been at least as oppressive to

mankindas Monarchs ; particularly to the dependencies of their

empire. Rome and Sparta ground their provinces with a harder

hand than the Persian Despot; and no human tyranny was ever

marked with such horrors as the Republican tyranny of France.

2dly. The Wars of Mankind are a still more dreadful exhibition

ofwickedness than their Government .

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

476 [SER. XXXI .

Here, as if the momentary life of Man was too long, and his

sufferings too few, and too small, men have professedly embarked

in thedesign of cutting off life, and enhancing the number and de-

gree ofsufferings. War has prevailed through every age, and in

every country ; and in all has waded through human blood, tram-

pled on humancorpses, and laid waste the fields and the dwellings,

the happiness and the hopes, of mankind. It has been employed

to empty Earth, and people Hell ; to make Angels weep, and Fiends

triumph, over the deplorable guilt and debasement of the human

character.

3dly. The doctrine is not less strongly evidenced by the Religion

of Mankind.

With this subject I shall wind up the melancholy detail. JEHO-

VAH created this world, stored it with the means of good, and filled

it with rational and immortal beings. Instead of loving, serving,

and adoring Him, they have worshipped Devils, the vilest of all

beings, and alike his enemies and their own. They have worship-

ped each other ; they have worshipped brutes ; they have worship-

ped vegetables. The Smith has molten a god of gold ; the Car-

penterhas hewn agod of wood ; and millions have prostrated them-

selves to both in praise and prayer. To appease the anger of these

gods, they have attempted to wash their sins away by ablutions ,

and to make atonement for them by penance. To these gods they

have offered up countless hecatombs; and butchered, and tortured,

and burnt, their own children. Before these gods their religion

has enjoined, and sanctioned, the unlimited prostitution of matrons

and virgins to casual lust and systematized pollution. The same

religion has also sanctioned war and slaughter, plunder and devas-

tation , fraud and perjury, seduction and violation, without bounds .

Its persecutions have reddened the world with blood, and changed

its countries into catacombs . On the pale horse, seen in the Aрос-

alyptic vision, Death has gone one before it ; and Hellfollowing after,

has exulted in its deplorable follies, its crimes without number, and

the miseries, which it has occasioned without end.

SERMON XXXII.

HUMAN DEPRAVITY ; DERIVED FROM ADAM.

ROMANS V. 12.-Wherefore , as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by

sin ; and so death hath passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.

FROM these words I proposed, in a former discourse, to dis-

cuss the following Doctrine :

That in consequence of the Apostacy of Adam all men have sinned.

In the three last discourses, I have considered the Universality

and the Degree, of human corruption. The next subject of our

inquiry is the Source, whence this corruption is derived. In the text,

as well as in the doctrine, it is exhibited as existing in consequence

of the Apostacy of Adam .

Before I proceed to a direct examination of this branch of the

doctrine, it will be advantageous to make a few preliminary obser-

vations.

1st. It will, I presume, be admitted, that there is a cause of this

depravity.

The Depravity of Man is either caused, or casual. If it be

casual ; every thing else may, for aught that appears, be casual

also. A denial of this position, therefore, becomes a direct estab-

lishment of the Atheistical scheme of casual existence .

Besides, uniformity, is, in all cases, a complete refutation of the

supposition of casualty. That mere accident should be the pa-

rent of the same moral character in all the progeny ofAdam, or of

uniformity of any kind, in so many thousand millions of cases, is

contradictory to plain mathematical certainty.

2dly. This cause, whatever it is, is commensurate with its effects .

As, therefore, the effects extend to all men; it follows, that the

cause, also, is universal.

3dly. The cause of this depravity is undoubtedly one, and the

same.

This is argued, irresistibly, from the nature of the effects , which

is every where the same.

4thly. This cause did not always exist.

Before their Apostacy, our first parents were undepraved. As

the effect did notthen exist; the cause plainly did not exist.

These observations must, I think, be admitted without a contro-

versy. It follows, therefore, that in searching for the source of hu-

man corruption we must, if we act wisely, be guided by them :

since nothing can be this source, of which all these things cannot

be truly predicated.

HUMAN DEPRAVITY ;

478 [ SER. XXXII .

5thly. In inquiring after the source of human corruption we in-

quire only after a fact.

This subject, sufficiently difficult in itself , has been almost al-

ways embarrassed by uniting with it foreign considerations. A

fact, it ought ever to be remembered, is what it is , independently of

every thing else . If it be true, that the corruption of Mankind exists

in consequence of the Apostacy ofAdam; this truth cannot be af-

fected by any reluctance in us to admit it ; by any opinions, which

wemay form, of the propriety, or impropriety, of the dispensa-

tion ; nor by any inexplicableness, arising from the efficient cause,

the moral nature, or the consequences, of the fact. These things

may be the foundation of other inquiries, and of perplexities, and

difficulties, ever so great : still, they cannot even remotely affect

the subject of the present investigation.

6thly. When I assert, that in consequence of the Apostacy ofAdam

all men have sinned ; I do not intend, that the posterity ofAdam are

guilty of his transgression .

Moral actions are not, so far as I can see, transferable from one

being to another. The personal act of any agent is, in its very

nature, the act of that agent solely ; and incapable of being parti-

cipated by any other agent. Of course, the guilt of such a per-

sonal act is equally incapable of being transferred, or participated.

The guilt is inherent in the action ; and is attributable, therefore,

to the Agent only.

So clear is this doctrine, that, I presume, no evidence was ever

supposed to be derived, originally, from Reason, to the contrary

doctrine. If , therefore, any evidence can be found to support this

doctrine, it must be found in Revelation. But in Revelation, it is

presumed, it cannot be found. Unquestionably it is no where di-

rectly asserted in the Scriptures. If it be contained in them, it

must be by implication. Let me ask, Where is this implication ?

Certainly not in any use of the term Impute, commonly appealed

to by the supporters of this scheme. I have examined with care

every passage, in which this word, and its connexions, are used in

the Scriptures ; and feel completely assured , that it is used in a to-

tally different sense, in every instance, without an exception. The

Verb λογιζομαι , which is the original word, renderedby the English

word impute, denotes originally, and always, to reckon, to count, to

reckon to the account of a man, to charge to his account ; but never to

transfer moral action, guilt, or desert, from one being to another.

Thus it is said by Shimei, Let not my Lord impute this sin unto his

servant : that is, Let not my Lord charge my sin of cursing David

against me, or to my account. Thus also it is said, Abraham be-

lieved God; and it was counted to him for righteousness : that is,

his faith was reckoned to him in the stead of that perfect legal

righteousness, in the possession of which he would have been ac-

cepted before God.

The passage, which seems the nearest to the purpose of those.

DERIVED FROM ADAM.

SER. XXXII.] 479

against whom I am contending, is 1 Cor. xv. 22, As in Adam all

die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. The words in the ori-

ginal are ' εν τῷ Αδαμ and ἐν τῷ Χρίστῳ. The Greek preposition Ev

signifies very often, as any person acquainted with the language

must have observed, exactly the same thing with the English phrase

by means of . The passage would, therefore, have been explicitly

and correctly translated, as by means ofAdam all die, even so by

means of Christ shall all be made alive . Adam is, therefore, only

asserted, here, to be an instrumental cause of the Death specified.

Aparallel passage will, I think, make the justice of these remarks

evident beyond any reasonable debate. In 1 Cor. vii. 14, it is said,

the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the believing wife, and the

unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband. No person will pre-

tend, that in this passage the Apostle declares the sanctification of

the believing wife to be transferred to the husband, so as to become

the personal state, or character, of the husband. This is evident-

ly not the fact , because he is still an unbeliever. The meaning

plainly is, that by means of his wife he is in such a sense considered

as sanctified, as to prevent his children from being unclean ; or in

more explicit terms, from being incapable of being offered to God

in baptism .

7th . Neither do I intend, that the descendants of Adam are pun-

ished for his transgression .

This doctrine is completely set aside by God himself , in Ezek.

xviii . 20 : The soul that sinneth it shall dic. The son shall not bear

the iniquity of the father ; neither shall the father bear the iniquity

ofthe son; the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him ;

and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him. In this pas-

sage it is, I think, as explicitly as language will admit, declared,

that no man shall be punished for the sin of another ; particu-

larly that the son shall not be punished for the sin of his father ;

and, by obvious, and, I think, irresistible implication , that the sons

ofAdam shall not be punishedfor the sins of this , their common,

parent.

Having thus prepared the way, as I conceive, for the direct dis-

cussion of the doctrine, I shall now proceed to adduce in support

of its truth the following proofs .

I. The Text.

Here it is asserted, that by one man sin entered into the world;

δι ' ενος ᾿ανθρωπε ; through, or by means of , one man. I will not take

upon to me to say, that the Apostle declares the sin of Adam to be

the only supposable, or possible, cause of the entrance of sin into

the world ; but he plainly declares it to be the actual cause . The

sin, which thus entered, he declares also to be universal ; even as

universal, as the death, which entered by sin. In the 18th verse,

which is separated from the text by a parenthesis only, the Apostle

teaches us in the most direct terms, that this universal sin is a con-

sequence of the transgression ofAdam. His words are, Therefore,

HUMAN DEPRAVITY ;

480 [SER. XXXII.

as by the offence of one, or as in the original, δι' ενος παραπτωματος,

by one offence, judgment came upon all to condemnation ; and in

the 19th verse, By one man's disobedience, many, in the original,

οι πολλοι the many, were made, inthe Greek, κατεςαθησαν were consti-

tuted, sinners . The meaning of these passages is, I think, plainly

the following : that by means of the offence, or transgression of

Adam, the judgment, or sentence ofGod, came upon all men unto

condemnation ; because, and solely because, all men, in that state

of things, which was constituted in consequence of the transgres-

sion of Adam, became sinners .

I have heretofore declared, that the manner, in which the state of

things became such, is not at all involved in the present discussion.

Inow observe further, that I am unable to explain this part of the

subject. Many attempts have been made to explain it ; but I

freely confess myself to have seen none, which was satisfactory to

me; or which did not leave the difficulties as great, and , for aught

I know, as numerous, as they were before. I shall not add to these

difficulties by any imperfect explanations of my own. At the same

time, I repeat, that the fact in question is not at all affected by these

difficulties ; and that a denial of this fact is perplexed with difficul-

ties, which are greater , both in number and degree.

II . The Doctrine is evident, also, from the Sentence pronounced on

ourfirst parents .

Inthis sentence God declared, that the ground was cursedfor the

sake ofAdam, or because of his transgression ; that it should bring

forth thorns and thistles : that he should eat bread in the sweat of

his brow ; and that both he and his wife should lead lives of toil,

suffering, and sorrow, until they should finally return to the dust,

from which they were taken. In a former discourse it was shown ,

that all the parts of this sentence have been regularly fulfilled,

from the beginning to the present day. All of them, therefore ,

constituted a sentence, actually pronounced on all the progeny of

Adam, and proved to be so, because it is executed on them all. The

cursing of the ground, particularly, by which it was deprived of its

former spontaneous fruitfulness, and condemned to perpetual

sterility; by which thorns and briars were substituted for the fruits

ofParadise ; and by which ease, happiness, and immortality, were

exchanged for labour, suffering, and death, inwrought into the very

constitution, now given to the Earth ; was a fact , which involved,

of course, the punishment of all men ; because all men suffer dis-

tress by means of this fact ; and because no rational beings, be-

side sinners, are in the Providence ofGod subjected to any suffer-

ing. Every descendant ofAdam must , ofcourse, be an inhabitant

ofthe world , which was thus cursed ; and must of necessity be a

partaker of the very evils, denounced in this curse. When the

sentence was declared, therefore , it was certainly foreseen, that all

those, who would afterwards share in the sufferings, which it dis-

closed ; that is, all the children of Adam ; would be sinners. As

DERIVED FROM ADAM.

SER. XXXII .] 481

all the progeny of Adam must inhabit the world thus cursed ; all

must necessarily partake of these evils ; because they were inse-

parably united to the world, in which they dwelt. If , then, it was

not foreseen, that they would be sinners ; the curse must have been

denounced against them, either when obedient and virtuous ; or

while their future moral character was uncertain. The former will

not be admitted by any man: the latter will no more be admitted

by any man, if he reflect at all on the subject : for God can no

more be supposed to condemn, and punish, those, who are not

known by him to be sinful , than those, who are known to be virtu-

ous. It follows therefore, that, as the world was thus changed in

consequence of the transgression ofAdam ; and of a paradise be-

came a wilderness of thorns and briars : so, in consequence of the

same transgression, the character of Man was also changed ; and

instead of being immortal, virtuous, and happy, he became the

subject of sin, suffering, and death. With respect to one of these

considerations, viz. the mortality of mankind , the Apostle Paul

expressly asserts the doctrine in a passage, already quoted for

another purpose. In, or by means of , Adam, all die. As neither

death, nor any other suffering, befalls virtuous beings ; this pas-

sage may be fairly considered as a full confirmation of the doctrine

at large.

III. The Doctrine is directly declared by Moses , when he informs

us , that Adam begat a son in his own likeness .

The meaning of the word likeness, that is, the meaning, inten-

tionally attached to it by Moses, cannot, I think, be mistaken. In

the first chapter of the same history he introduces God as saying,

Let us make man in our own image, after our likeness ; and subjoins,

so God created Man in his own image : in the image of God created

he him. In a former discourse I have shown, that the likeness, or

image, here mentioned, is the Moral image of God ; consisting, cs-

pecially, in knowledge, righteousness , and true holiness ; as we are

informed by St. Paul. After dwelling so particularly on the image

of God, in which Man was created, and on the fact, that Man was

created in this image ; it cannot, I think, be questioned, that Moses

intended to inform us, that Seth was begotten in the moral likeness

of Adam after his apostacy ; and sustained, from his birth, a moral

character, similar to that, which his two brothers, Cain and Abel,

also sustained. This view of the subject appears plainly to have

been adopted by Job , when he asks, Who can bring a clean thing

out of an unclean ? Not one : (Job xiv. 4.) by Bildad , when he

asks, How then can Man be justified with God ; or how can he be

clean, that is born of a woman ? (xxv. 4. ) by David, when he says ,

( Psalm li . 5. ) Behold I was shapen in iniquity, and in sin did my

mother conceive me : and by St. Paul, when he says, As we have

borne the image of the earthy , ( Adam) so we shall bear the image of

the heavenly, (Adam ) (1 Cor. xv. 49. ) But if Seth, Cain andAbel,

derived their corruption from the Apostacy of their parents ; then

VOL. I. 61

*

HUMAN DEPRAVITY ;

432 [SER. XXXH

it is true, not only that their corruption, but that of all mankind,

exists in consequence of that Apostacy.

Accordingly, our Saviour declares universally , that, that which is

born of theflesh, is flesh ; and that, that only, which is born of the

Spirit , or born again, is spirit. In this declaration he certainly

teaches us, that the fleshly character is inseparably connected with

the birth of man : it being an invariable attendant of that birth .

In other words, every parent, as truly as Adam , begets children in

his own moral likeness. It hardly needs to be observed, that the

moral character, denoted, in this observation of our Saviour, by the

termflesh, is a corrupt character. The carnal, or fleshly, mind,

says St. Paul, is enmity against God ; not subject to his Law, neither

indeed can be and again ; To be carnally, or fleshly, minded, is

Death. In the Original, the words in both passages are φρονημα

της σαρκος, the minding of the flesh : the exercise of our thoughts

and affections in that manner, which accords with the fleshly, or

native character.

IV. In exact accordance with this scriptural representation, the

Doctrine is strongly evinced by the conduct of Children, as soon as

they become capable of moral action .

Children in the morning of life are, as was remarked in the pre-

ceding discourse, unquestionably amiable ; more so in many re-

spects than at any future period; that is, whenever they do not at

some future period become the subjects of sanctification. Some

children also, as we are taught in the Scriptures, are sanctified

from the womb. Still even these in some degree, and all others in

a greater degree, exhibit, from the dawn of moral action, evil af-

fections, and evil conduct. They are rebellious, disobedient, un-

kind, wrathful, and revengeful. All ofthem are proud, ambitious,

vain, and universally selfish. All of them, particularly, are desti-

tute of piety to God ; the first, and far the most important exercise

of virtue. They neither love, fear, nor obey him ; neither admire

his divine excellence, nor are thankful for his unceasing loving

kindness. Immense multitudes of them are taught these duties

from the commencement of their childhood ; yet they can be per-

suaded to perform them by no species of instruction, hitherto de-

vised. A virtuous mind would, of course, from the mere know-

ledge of God ; without any known law ; without any other motive

except what is found in his greatness, excellency, and goodness to

us ; admire and love, reverence andglorify, Him with all the heart.

But no instance of this nature can be produced. I have been em-

ployed in the education of children and youth more than thirty

years, and have watched their conduct with no small attention and

anxiety. Yet among the thousands of children, committed to my

care, I cannot say with truth, that I have seen one, whose native

character I had any reason to believe to be virtuous ; or whom I

could conscientiously pronounce to be free from the evil attributes,

mentioned above. In addition to this, it ought to be observed, that

DERIVED FROM ADAM.

SER. XXXII . ] 483

no child, unspotted with sin, is mentioned in the records of History .

This, I think, could not be, had the fact ever existed.

Mankind therefore, according to the language of the Psalmist,

are estranged from the womb, and go astray as soon as they be born .

The opposers of the doctrine undertake to avoid the force of

this argument by attributing the corruption of children to example,

and the propensity of human nature to Imitation.

The power ofExample I readily acknowledge to be great, and

the propensity to Imitation, strong. I acknowledge, also, that from

these sources we may derive a satisfactory explanation ofmany

things, both good and evil, which are done in the world. Still, I

apprehend, the objection is a very insufficient answer to the argu-

ment in question. For,

1st. On beings, who are virtuously inclined, a good example ought

certainly to have more power than an evil one.

On beings, neither virtuously nor viciously inclined, virtuous and

vicicus examples must, of course, be equally influential ; as on be-

ings , sinfully inclined, it is acknowledged, sinful examples have an

influence entirely preponderating. All this is evident, because

virtuous beings must love virtuous conduct, and follow it ; as much

as vicious beings love, and follow, vicious conduct ; and because

neutral beings, if such are supposed to exist, can have no bias to

either. If, then, mankind were virtuously inclined ; they would

follow, with a clear and universal preponderation, virtuous exam-

ples. If neither virtuously nor sinfully inclined; they would follow

virtuous and sinful examples alike, and with an equal propensity to

imitation. But neither of these facts is found in human experience.

Virtuous examples, it is acknowledged, have some degree of in-

fluence; but all men know this influence to be exceedingly, and

distressingly, small. This truth is seen every day, in every place,

and in every person. Whence arises the superior influence of

vicious example, but from the fact, that it is more pleasing to

the human heart ? In Heaven such example could have no in-

fluence.

2dly. If thefirst men were virtuous ; as the objection supposes all

men to be by nature, and as according to the objection these must

have been ; there could have been no evil examples, and upon this

plan no sin, in the world.

Virtuous men, that is, men wholly virtuous, cannot exhibit an

evil example. If , then, the first men were virtuous, their im-

mediate successors had no vicious example to follow ; and must,

therefore, have been themselves virtuous. Of course, the exam-

ple, which they set also, was only virtuous. Hence those, who

followed them, must have been virtuous ; and in like manner all

their successors . Uponthis plan, Sin could never have entered the

world. But Sin is in the world; and is, and ever has been, the

universally prevailing character of the human race. The ob-

jectors , therefore, are reduced by their scheme to this dilemma :

HUMAN DEPRAVITY ;

484 [ SER. XXXII.

Either virtuous men set sinful examples ; which is a plain contra-

diction; or men became sinful without sinful examples.

Should it be said , that after Adam and Eve apostatized, they cor-

rupted their children by their own sinful example ; who again cor-

rupted theirs ; and thus every generation became the means of

corrupting those who followed them; and that in this manner the

existence of a sinful character in mankind may be explained : I

answer, that I readily admit the premises to a certain extent ; but

wholly deny the conclusion. Adam and Eve, speedily after their

apostacy, that is, before they had children, became penitents.

The example, therefore, which they exhibited to their children,

was such as penitents exhibit ; expressive of their abhorrence of

sin, and of their humble obedience to God. Such an example

penitents now exhibit : and such a one, without a question, they

have always exhibited. But this example, preponderating greatly

in favour of virtue, must have had substantially the same influence

with one perfectly virtuous. Of course, the perfectly virtuous

mind of Adam's children must by this example have been strongly

biassed to virtue ; and according to this scheme could not have

failed of retaining their virtuous character. But this is plainly con-

trary to the fact. The descendants of Adam, of the first, and of

every succeeding , generation, were evidently sinful beings ; and in

the course of ten generations became so universally and absolutely

sinful, that, except Noah and his family, God destroyed them all

bythe Deluge. God himselfdeclares concerning them, that every

imagination of the thoughts of their hearts was only evil continu-

ally ; that it repented the LORD, that he had made Man upon the

earth, and grieved him at his heart. In vain, therefore, do we look

for the proper influence of virtuous examples on children, born

virtuous , among the early descendants of Adam.

If mankind are born with neutral characters, not inclined either

to good or to evil, the difficulty will not be seriously lessened. In

this case men ought now to be as generally virtuous as sinful ; be-

cause this character furnishes exactly the same probability of the

prevalence of virtue, as of sin. But no such equality has at any

period of time existed. On the contrary, men are now, and ever

have been, without an exception, sinners .

Uniform sin proves uniform tendency to sin: for nothing more

is meant by tendency, in any case, but an aptitude in the nature

of a thing to produce effects of a given kind. With this meaning

only in view, we say, that it is the nature, or tendency, of an ap-

ple-tree to produce apples ; and of a fig-tree to produce figs. In

the same manner we must, I think, say, if we would say the truth ,

that it is the tendency, or nature, of the human heart to sin.

It is further objected, that the uniformity of sin in children, and

therefore in all the human race, may be fairly explained by the na-

ture of Moral Agency.

It is to be observed, that such, as make this objection, suppose

DERIVED FROM ADAM.

SER . XXXII.] 485

the Freedom of the Will to lie in self -determination ; the liberty of

indifference ; and the liberty of contingency. By persons, who

hold this scheme, a more unfortunate objection to the doctrine

could not, I apprehend, have been easily devised.

If the freedom of the will is the freedom of Contingency ; then

plainly its volitions are all accidents ; and certainly the chances ,

arithmetically considered, are as numerous in favour of virtuous

volitions, as of sinful ones. There ought therefore, on this plan,

to be, and ever to have been, as many absolutely virtuous persons

in the world, as sinful. Plainly all ought not to be sinful.

If the freedom of the will is the freedom of Indiffcrence ; the same

consequence ought to follow : for, if there be no bias in the mind

towards either virtue or sin, at the time immediately preceding each

of its volitions ; and the freedom of each volition arises out of this

fact; then certainly, there being no bias either way, the number of

virtuous, and that of sinful, volitions must naturally be equal : and

no cause can be assigned, why every man, independently of his

renovation by the Spirit of God, should be sinful only .

If the Liberty of the Will consist in Self- determination ; and the

mind, without the influence of any motive, first wills that it will

form a second volition ; and this volition depends for its freedom

on the existence of such a preceding one ; then it is plain, that

from these preceding volitions as many virtuous as sinful ones

ought to be derived ; because the preceding, or self -determining,

volitions, are by the supposition, under no influence or bias from

any cause whatever.

Thus it is evident, that according to all these suppositions there

could be no preponderancy, much less an universality, of sin in

the world. The state of facts is, therefore, contradictory to the

objection, as supported by them all .

Further; the Freedom of Will, and consequently Moral Agency,

in Man in this world, is the same with that of the Spirits of just

men made perfect in Heaven ; the same with that of Angels ; the

same with that of the Man Christ Jesus . Whence, then, does it

come to pass, that the same moral agency leads, or influences ,

these beings universally to virtue, and men in this world univer-

sally to sin ? This question the objectors are bound to answer.

V. The last proof of the Doctrine, which I shall adduce at the

present time, is the Death of Infants .

A great part of mankind die in infancy, before they are, or can

be, capable of moral action ; in the usual meaning of that phrase .

Their death is attended with all the apparent suffering, usually

experienced by persons of riper age, and with such suffering, at

least, as plainly is often intense. Their death is, also, an ordi-

nance of God ; a dispensation of his immediate government. The

language of this dispensation cannot, I think, be mistaken ; and

its meaning cannot be that of approbation. It is also the language,

literally, of the Curse, denounced against our first parents ; and

HUMAN DEPRAVITY ;

486 [SER. XXXII .

the execution of that Sentence, so far as this world is concerned.

So St. Paul has directly declared, Death has passed upon all men,

for that all have sinned. The wages of sin is death . Death then,

the fruit, or wages of sin, the punishment denounced against it in

the original sentence, must, I think, be acknowledged to be indu-

bitable evidence of the existence of depravity in every moral be-

ing; that is, every being capable of depravity ; who is the subject

of death.

It ought here to be remembered, that death arrests Infants in

every form of distress and terror, in which it befalls persons of

riper years . They, together with others, are swept away by the

immediate hand of God in those various judgments, with which He

awfully punishes Mankind. They are swept away by the silent,

awful hand of the pestilence ; are consumed by the conflagration ;

overwhelmed by the volcano ; swallowed up by the earthquake ;

and wasted by the lingering agonies of famine. At the same time,

they suffer, from Mankind, all the deplorable violence of war, and

the unnatural cruelties of persecution.

With these facts in view, we are compelled to one of these con-

clusions ; either that Infants are contaminated in their moral na-

ture, and born in the likeness of apostate Adam ; a fact irresisti-

bly proved, so far as the most unexceptionable analogy can prove

any thing, by the depraved moral conduct of every infant, who

lives so long, as to be capable of moral action : or that God in-

flicts these sufferings on moral beings who are perfectly innocent.

I leave the alternative to the choice of those, who object against

this doctrine .

There are but two objections to this argument within my know-

ledge. The first is, that beyond the grave Infants may be compen-

sated for their sufferings by receiving superior degrees of happiness .

This Objection will be easily seen to be of no validity. It is cer-

tainly unnecessary for God to make Infants unhappy, here, in or-

der to make them happy in any manner whatever, hereafter. An-

gels are made completely happy in heaven, without having suffered

any preceding unhappiness. Plainly, Infants might be made hap-

py, to any degree, in the same manner. But if the sufferings of

Infants are unnecessary, then they are causeless, on the scheme of

this Objection ; and God is supposed to create so much misery,

merely to compensate it by so much future enjoyment. I think

this conduct will not, soberly, be attributed to the Creator ; since

it would plainly be disgraceful to any of his Intelligent creatures.

The second Objection is, that God governs the Universe by Gene-

ral Laws ; and that, in their operation , inequalities and evils ought

to be expected. There are two answers to this objection. The

first is, that God cannot be supposed to establish any general law,

which produces injustice ; such as the suffering of virtuous beings

must be acknowledged to be. The second is, that this is itself a

general law ; extending probably to one third, or one fourth, of the

DERIVED FROM ADAM

SER. XXXII. ] 487

human race . The dispensation therefore, and not the exceptions,

is unequal and evil, according to this scheme . Surely the difficulty

is not lessened by such a supposition .

It will probably be farther said , that so many difficulties attend

this part of the doctrine, as to perplex, and distress , the mind no less

than the suppositions already refuted. The difficulties, attending

the existence of Moral Evil are, I readily acknowledge, very

great, and they easily become very distressing; whatever scheme

of thought we may adopt concerning this subject ; that is, if we

pursue it to any extent. But, I apprehend, the chief of those dif-

ficulties , which necessarily attend us, will be found to lie in the

Fact, that Moral Evil exists . To these we may, or may not, as we

please, add others, found in the particular scheme of doctrine,

which we choose to adopt. The doctrine, asserted in this dis-

course, is, I think, unanswerably supported by Revelation, and

by Facts . Of Course, it adds to the original difficulties, inherent

in the existence of Moral Evil, no new ones of its own. The

schemes, which I am opposing, contain, on the contrary, a new

series of embarrassments, beside those, which are common to them

and to the doctrine of this discourse. The truth is, the subject of

Moral Evil is too extensive, and too mysterious, to be compre-

hended by our Understanding. Some things, the Scriptures teach

us concerning it ; and these are usually furnished with important

evidence from facts. Many other things, pertaining to this subject,

lie wholly beyond our reach. What we can know, it is our duty,

and our interest, to know. Where knowledge is unattainable, it

is both our duty and interest to trust humbly and submissively to

the instructions of Him, who is THE ONLY WISE.

But in this so difficult and perplexing dispensation there is no-

thing more absolutely inexplicable, than in many others, which,

because we are less interested in them, we generally consider as

scarcely mysterious at all. I will mention one, out of very many.

The state of the Animal world, generally, is such, as to baffle all

human investigation. Why most animals exist at all, and why any

of them are unhappy ; are subjects, which defy and silence, the

most ingenious inquiries of Man. Nor is it originally strange, that

the dispensations of a Being, whose ways are above ours, as the

heavens are higher than the earth, should be incomprehensible, and

inexplicable, by us .

It ought to be here remembered, that that, which is true, is not

affected by any difficulty whatever, so far as its truth merely is con-

cerned ; and that that, which is known, is not rendered less certain

by that, which is unknown ; whatever connexion may exist between

them; or whatever embarrassments may arise concerning that,

which is unknown.

It was with these views, that I chose to state the doctrine of this

discourse in the words, in which it was expressed. I observed,

that in consequence of the Apostacy ofAdam, all men have sinned.

HUMAN DEPRAVITY, &c .

488 [ SER. XXXII .

The universality of sin was, I trust, proved sufficiently in two pre-

ceding discourses. In this, if I mistake not, it has been proved,

that the sin of Mankind has existed in consequence of that Apostacy.

By this language I presume my audience understand me to intend,

that ifAdam had not fallen, sin would not have entered this world.

To this single fact I have confined all my observations; because

this is the simple account, given in the Scriptures ; and because I

supposed it capable of being easily comprehended, and satisfac-

torilyproved.

I shall only add, that a Cause of human depravity is here alleged,

of which all the characteristics, mentioned in the commencement

of this discourse, may be truly predicated : viz. The corruption of

that Energy of the Mind, whence volitions flow ; and which Ihave

heretofore asserted to be the seat of moral character in Rational be-

ings. This cause must be acknowledged to be universal ; to be

every where the same ; and not to have always existed. It must also

be conceded, that it began to exist, according to the Scriptures, as

early as the effects, which have given birth to all our inquiries con-

cerning the Corruption of Mankind.

SERMON XXXIII .

DEPRAVITY OF MAN. REMARKS .

ROMANS V. 12. -Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by

sin; and so death hath passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.

IN the four preceding discourses, I have endeavoured to show

the Universality, and Extent, ofhuman corruption ; and its existence

in consequence of the Apostacy ofAdam. It is now my design to

subjoin to the observations, made in these discourses, several Re-

marks, naturally arising from the consideration of this subject, and

of no inconsiderable importance. The end ofall doctrinal preach-

ing is to persuade men cordially to receive truth, that they may be

governed by it in their conduct; and of preaching, in any particular

instance, to persuade them thus to receive one truth, in order to their

reception of others .

From doctrines so important, and so absolutely fundamental, as

those, which have occupied these discourses, very numerous infer-

ences, of great moment, cannot fail to be drawn by a mind, ad-

dicted to solemn contemplation. A small number of them, only,

can, however, be mentioned with advantage in a single sermon.

For the presentoccasion I have selected the following.

I. It is evident from the last of these discourses , that the corrup-

tion ofMan is not the result of any given form of Government, nor

ofany given character in Rulers .

At this subject I have glanced in a former discourse ; but have

reserved the more extensive discussion, which it merits, for the

present occasion.

It has been frequently and triumphantly said, particularly in

modern times, that the corruption of mankind is wholly artificial ;

and owes its existence to civilized society ; particularly to the form

and administration ofgovernment, and to the civil and ecclesiastical

rulers of mankind.

The method , in which these orders of men are supposed to have

corrupted their fellow -men, is that of oppression. At least, this is

considered as the chief instrument of the corruption ; and is sup-

posed to operate , principally, in two ways ; viz. keeping them poor,

and keeping them ignorant.

It ought, undoubtedly, to be acknowledged, that the rulers of

mankind have extensively corrupted them, that they have also

greatly oppressed them, and that by keeping them poor and igno-

rant, they have contributed in a very great and guilty degree to the

increase oftheir corruption. It ought to be further acknowledged,

that rulers, and other men of wealth and influence, have much

VOL. I. 62

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

490 [ SER. XXXIII

more effectually, and extensively, corrupted their fellow-men by

example, art, and seduction ; by exhibiting to them powerful temp-

tations ; placing within their reach the means of sin ; making the

path to perpetration smooth, easy, and safe ; and presenting to

them arguments, ingeniously and laboriously contrived to justify

them in the commission ; than they have ever done by both the

methods, alleged above. The philosophers, with whom I am con-

tending, have probably insisted less on this source of human cor-

ruption, partly because they wished to render the men in question

odious, and thought this an efficacious mean of accomplishing their

purpose ; and partly because they were sensible, that themselves

were deeply implicated in the charge of corrupting mankind in the

manner last mentioned. So far as argument and influence have

increased the turpitude of the human character, few men are

chargeable with so great a share of the guilt. Their arguments

concerning moral subjects have been commonly mere means of

seduction ; and their example has only seconded their arguments .

Ahost of ancient philosophers were banished from Rome, as a pub-

lic nuisance. Had a large proportion of modern ones lived in the

same city, at the same time, there is little reason to doubt, that they

would have shared the same fate, for the same reason .

The form of Government, also, in some cases, and the peculiar

administration of it in others, have undoubtedly contributed in a

distinguished degree to the depravation of mankind. Monarchies

have produced this effect by immense patronage ; by the opera-

tions of despotic power, demanding and effectuating a slavish de-

pendence, and a base sacrifice of principle, in their subjects ; by

splendour, luxury, war, and a general dissoluteness of manners.

Republican governments, although in certain circumstances more fa-

vourable to virtue, have yet, at times, been equally pernicious by

furnishing opportunities, and strong temptations, for the sacrifice

of integrity at elections, for caballing, bribery, faction, private am-

bition, bold contentions for place and power, and that civil discord,

which is naturally accompanied by the prostration of Morality and

Religion. Thus Rome, in the time of Marius and Sylla, degene-

rated with inconceivable rapidity. This example many other Re-

publics have been but too willing to follow. The heathen priests

and princes, also, although generally believing in the most serious

manner the miserable, demoralizing idolatry, which they professed,

found a deep interest in the establishment of their religious systems ,

and the deplorable corruption, by which they were of course at-

tended.

The Romish Hierarchy, uniting in itself all authority both secular

and ecclesiastical, presented immense inducements to the love of

wealth, power, splendour, and sensuality ; and vast means of grati-

fying these corrupt propensities of the human heart. At the same

time , it held out the most efficacious motives to the perpetuation

of these enjoyments, by keeping Mankind in a state of abject ig-

REMARKS.

SER. XXXIII. ] 491

norance, slavery, and corruption. In this manner it contributed

more to this dreadful purpose than any other political system.

which the world has ever seen . Like the mountains, piled up by

the Giants , it seemed, for a time, to menace Heaven itself with the

loss of its dominion over the Earth ; and, like the Deluge, swept

from this world almost every thing which had life .

It must further be conceded, that among protestant ministers , al-

though plainly the most unblamcable and exemplary class of men,

who in equal numbers have ever appeared in this world, there

have not been wanting those who, by means of their latitudinarian

doctrines, and loose lives , have excrcised a malignant influence

over their fellow- men, and contributed in a serious degree to the

depravation of the human character.

Finally ; Infidel Philosophers , of modern times, have surpassed,

inthe wonderful rapidity and success, with which they have dis-

solved the human character, and destroyed the very remembrance

ofprinciple, even the portentous mischiefs of the Romish Hierarchy,

Were it not, that such nuisances to the world are, in their very na-

ture , incapable of operating with such efficacy for any long con-

tinuance ; they would change the earth into a desert, where no

principle would spring, and no happiness grow. Like the Genii ,

fabled in Arabian Tales, they would enchant the towns and cities

of this world with a more than magical wand; and, where rational

and immortal beings once lived and acted, where morals flourished,

Religion scattered her blessings, and the worship ofGod ascended

to Heaven as the odour of sweet incense, leave nothing but the

forms of men ; without motion, without life, without souls ; impri-

soned beyond the hope of escape within their encompassing walls,

and surrounded by nothing but silence, solitude, and death.

These concessions will , it is presumed, be thought sufficiently

liberal and ample. Still the doctrine, against which they have

been pleaded, is not even remotely affected by them ; but stands

in full force, and on the basis of conclusive evidence. For,

1st. The subjects of virtuous rulers have been deeply depraved.

Rulers, although in a great majority of instances corrupt, and,

in many, wonderfully corrupt, have yet in many others been vir-

tuous, and in some eminently virtuous. It will not, as with truth

it plainly cannot , be denied, that virtuous rulers have had a real

and happy influence in reforming those, whom they governed.

The example, and efforts, of all men in high authority, have ever

been efficacious ; if good, to encourage virtue ; if evil, to promote

vice. The good, which virtuous rulers have done, has not been

here merely negative: that is, they have not merely ceased to

corrupt their fellow-men ; but with a positive efficacy they have

directly contributed to make them better. This is so evident from

uniform experience, that an attempt to prove it would only be a

waste of time. Example and influence are proverbially powerful,

even in private life ; and no man needs to be informed , that they

492 r DEPRAVITY OF MAN .

[ SER XXXIII .

are more effectual in the chair of authority, than in the cottage.

Nor will any man, acquainted with history, deny, that David, Heze-

kiah, and Josiah, the Maccabees , Alfred the Great , Edward VI. or

the two elder Gustavuses, reformed, in a serious degree, the nations

over whom they presided.

Still it is equally well known to all persons of information, that

no ruler, and no succession of rulers, ever changed the native cha-

racter of man in any such manner, as to make the nations, whom

they governed, generally virtuous ; or at all to lessen the evi-

dence, which supports the doctrine of universal depravity. What

they have done we style, with metaphysical exactness, Reforma-

tion; that is , forming anew the moral character, which they actually

found, and which, only, was every where the subject of their

efforts . In our very language we thus testify, unwillingly perhaps,

that the moral character of our race is such, as needs to be formed

anew: or, in other words, is depraved. Even this reformation

good rulers have accomplished with great labour and difficulty; and

it was confined to a number of instances, in a melancholy degree

moderate. Of this truth flagrant proof has been furnished in the

sudden and deplorable revival of all kinds of iniquity at the mo-

ment, when the restraining influence of a good ruler has been taken

away by death, and a new license has been given to the free in-

dulgence of the native human propensities bythe succession of a

wicked prince to the sceptre . Such a prince has had more in-

fluence to corrupt a nation in a year, than a virtuous one to amend

them during his whole reign. Manasseh pulled down in a day, what

Hezekiah had been building up through his life. Or, perhaps, in

more exact language, what virtuous princes accomplish with such

vast labour, dissolves of itself , under the malignant influence of

corruption universally experienced; and universally operating,

whenever that corruption is freed from the restraints, imposed on

it by Virtue seated on a throne. Were the mind of man originally

inclined to virtue, this would be impossible.

2dly, Those subjects , who have been raised above the oppression

and ignorance contended for, have not been more free than others

from this depravity.

If the oppression and ignorance, specified, were indeed the

causes of this corruption ; then the corruption ought not to be ex-

tended to those subjects, who were neither ignorant, nor oppressed.

But we do not find these men, in fact, any better than their fellow-

subjects.

On the contrary , the more that men have possessed the means of

pleasure and sin; the more wealth, independence, and self -control

they have enjoyed ; the more corrupt they have usually been..

How often do we see a youth, or a poor man, by coming suddenly

to opulence, and high personal independence, lose his former so-

ber, decent character, and become at once grossly immoral ? So

common is this fact, as to be proverbially remarked, and to be the

REMARKS .

SER. XXXIII.] 493

foundation of important prudential maxims concerning the manage-

ment of our children. All observing men, even of the most ordi-

nary education, hold it as a fundamental doctrine of experience,

that it is harder to bear prosperity than adversity.

Men of science, learning, and extensive information, have in the

meantime, been to a great extent exceedingly corrupt and wicked;

incomparably more so in degree, than the ignorant ; and propor-

tionally as much so in the number of instances. The ancient phi-

losophers , the most learned and intelligent men of the Heathen

world, were very generally gross examples of sin. Infidel philo-

sophers in modern times have, in this respect, certainly not fallen

behind them. Ofthe former of these assertions Cicero, Plutarch, Lu-

cian, Seneca, and Diogenes Laertius, themselves philosophers, are

ample and unimpeachable witnesses ; of the latter, the writings,

and lives, of the philosophers themselves. The truth is, as any

man, who knows any thing of the subject, readily discerns ; know-

ledge is a thing, entirely distinct from virtue, not necessarily con-

nected with it , and, without virtue, is but too often the means of

ingenious, powerful, and dreadful iniquity. There is not a reason,

furnished by experience, to induce a belief , that the increase of

knowledge is of course the increase of virtue.

3dly. In those states of society, where Rulers have the least influ-

ence which is possible in the present world, men are not less vicious,

in proportion to their power of being vuious, than they are, where

Rulers have the greatest influence .

For complete proof of this assertion I appeal to the state of the

aboriginal Americans. In the state of society existing among these

people, men are as independent, and as little influenced by power,

authority, and governmental example, as men, living together, can

be. Here, neither kings, nor nobles, nor priests, have any other

weight, or control , than that, which springs of course from the

mere gathering together of human beings. Yet no man, who

knows any thing of the morals of these people, can hesitate to ac-

knowledge them corrupt, in a degree enormous and dreadful.

Fraud, falsehood, lewdness, drunkenness, treachery, malice, cruel-

ty, and murder, acted out in the most deplorable manner, are strong

and dreadful features of the whole savage character. Here, then ,

the vice exists anterior to artificial society, and in the state, nearest

to that, which is called " The State of Nature." What is true of

the American savages is true of all others ; and universally furnishes

undeniable proof of fearful depravity, originally inherent in Man,

and wholly independent of the causes alleged in this objection.

4thly. Republics have been equally corrupt with monarchies .

In Republics the influence, and the oppression, of Kings are

unknown. If , then, Republics have been no less corrupt than mo-

narchies : regal oppression and influence are falsely alleged as the

proper and original causes of human depravity ; since, here, they

donot exist . In the most absolute freedom ever found in Repub-

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

494 [SER. XXXIII

lics, wickedness has been as truly the character of men, as in

kingdoms . This character, also, has been equally depraved ; not

in all instances, I readily grant ; but in more than enough to estab-

lish the doctrine. Carthage, Rome, Athens, Sparta, Venice, the

Grison states, and Republican France, are undeniable examples .

It ought particularly to be remarked, that Republics have usually

oppressed their provinces with more unfeeling cruelty, than mo-

narchies . Their own freedom, therefore, has not made them at all

more friendly, but less so, to the freedom and happiness of their

fellow-men. The deplorable vassalage, existing in our own coun-

try to an enormous extent, is a flagrant and melancholy, although

it may be thought an invidious, proof of this assertion. If , then,

some Republics have been distinguished by a higher degree of vir-

tue, as has undoubtedly been the fact ; the cause was not their

freedom ; for that has universally existed, and operated ; but some-

thing peculiar to themselves .

5thly. In the Republics, which have been most distinguished for

virtue, Ministers of the Gospel have had the greatest influence.

Switzerland, Holland, Massachusetts , and Connecticut, have long,

by general acknowledgment, been placed among the most virtuous

Republics . But, in all these, Clergymen have had more influence,

than in any other. On the contrary, where Clergymen have had

little influence, there has been comparatively but very little virtue .

Of this truth instances are numerous, and at hand. They are ,

also, too clear to admit of a doubt. The general voice of man-

kind has decided this point ; and from this voice there can be no

appeal. Hence it is evident, that the influence of Clergymen is so far

from contributing to the corruption of Mankind, upon the whole,

that it has meliorated their character most, where it has most pre-

vailed ; and rendered them materially better than they have been

elsewhere. I speak here, it will be observed, only of protestant

Ministers of the Gospel. I know it has been the custom of Infidels

to groupe them together with Romish Priests ; to whom of all men

they have been most opposed, and whom they, more than any other

men, have contributed to overthrow ; and with Heathen Priests ;

with whom they have nothing in common, except the essential cha-

racteristics of men, and a title, at times applied to both ; a mere

generic name ; formed by the same letters indeed, but meaning, in

the different applications, things as unlike, as folly and wisdom,

holiness and sin. As well might Newton, Locke, Butler and Boyle,

be united in a monstrous assemblage with Spinosa, Voltaire, Dide-

rot, and Condorcet, because they have all been styled Philosophers ;

Alfred twinned with Kouli Khan, because they have both been

called kings ; and Sydenham be coupled with an Indian Powwaw,

because they have both been named Physicians .

It ought further to be observed, as an universal truth, that in all

protestant countries ; the countries, where virtue has flourished

REMARKS.

SER. XXXIII ] 495

more than in any other ; the existence of virtue has been exactly

proportioned to the influence of Ministers of the Gospel. All real

virtue is the effect of the Gospel , crowned with the divine blessing.

But wherever the Gospel has the greatest effects , its Ministers are

the most respected and influential ; for the principal efficacy of the

Gospel is conveyed through their preaching, candidly and kindly

received. Scotland may be mentioned as a strong instance ofthis

general truth. In that country, under a regal government, and

amid the influence of a powerful body of Nobles, supposed by my

antagonists to be so hostile to the existence of virtue, there has

perhaps long been less vice, and more virtue, than in any European

country of equal extent. Yet, there, the influence of Clergymen

has, in all probability, been greater than in any other protestant

country.

6thly. In a state of Anarchy, virtue is uniformly at the lowest ebb ,

and vice most prevalent and dreadful.

In a state of anarchy all lawful authority and regular influence,

both civil and ecclesiastical, are extinguished ; and lose, therefore,

whatever efficacy they may be supposed to possess towards the

corruption of mankind. Yet of all situations, in which society can

be placed, anarchy is the most pernicious to the morals of men.

Of this truth we have proverbial evidence in the great practical

maxim, That no people can exist, for any length of time, in a state

of anarchy. Of the soundness of this important doctrine, our own

country, during the late Revolution, gave sufficient proof . When

the restraints of Government and Religion were only partially ta-

ken off , men became vicious in a moment, to a degree, here unex-

ampled. I myself have seen a number of men, commonly sober,

decent, moral, and orderly, in their deportment, lose, upon joining

a mob, even the appearance of these characteristics ; and exhibit

more and grosser vice in a few hours, than in many preceding

years. The restraints of Government and Religion are, therefore, so far

from making men worse upon the whole, that without them men

become so profligate, as to render it impossible for them even to

live together. All this is indeed very easily understood. Govern-

ment, in the great body of cases , restrains men only from vice ; and

Religion, that is, the Religion of the Gospel, in every case . The

sanctions of Government are protection to those who obey, and

punishment to those who disobey. The sanctions of Religion are

endless rewards to virtue, and endless punishments to sin. That

these sanctions promote vice is a paradox, which I leave to be

solved by others. He, who can solve it, will prove in his solution,

that men are disposed to be virtuous and vicious without motives

to either ; and to be virtuous, only under the influence of the strong-

est motives to vice ; and vicious, only under the influence of the

strongest motives to virtue. The honour of this discovery I shall

not dispute with any man, who is willing to claim it as his own.

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

496 [SER. XXXII .

The truth plainly is, and ever has been; Mankind, as a body,

are uniformly more or less wicked, in proportion to the means,

which they possess, of vicious indulgence ; and to the temptations,

by which they are surrounded. Kings, nobles, and all others pos-

sessed of wealth, power, talents, and influence, although having

the same nature with other men, are usually more vicious, because

these things furnish them with ampler means of sin, and stronger

temptations . Mediocrity of life, on the contrary, has ever been

believed by wise men among Heathens, as well as Christians , to

be the state most favourable to virtue ; and has, therefore, prover-

bially been styled the Golden Mean. Agur has taught this doctrine

from the mouth of God. Experience and Common Sense have

given it their fullest attestation.

Even poverty and persecution have in many instances proved

favourable to morals and religion. The poverty of Sparta was a

prime source of whatever was honourable in its character; and

Christianity flourished amid the sufferings of its Martyrs .

From these observations it is evident, that the depravity of man

exists independently of every state of society, and is found in every

situation in which man is found; that it exists wherever oppres-

sion is, and wherever it is not ; with, and without, the authority or

influence of privileged men; in the independent savage, and the

abject slave of Asiatic despotism; in the wild Arabian, and the

silken courtier ; in the prince who is above all law, and the

peasant who is subjected to every law. The scheme, which I am

opposing, is, therefore, a mere plaything of doubting Philosophy,

making for herself worlds, as children make soap-bubbles, amusing

herself less rationally, and hoping for their permanency with more

egregious credulity.

II. It is evident from these discourses, that the scheme of Human

Perfectibility is without any foundation .

There are two methods, in which this truth may be satisfactorily

evinced.

1st. From Fact.

Mankind have, in every age, laboured with great earnestness to

perfect the human character. The immense toils of education

have been intentionally directed to this end. Schools and Col-

leges without number have been erected ; multitudes of wise and

industrious men have laboured through life ; books have been

written, laws have been enacted, and magistrates have been em-

ployed, in an almost endless multitude ; for the same great pur-

pose. Nay , God has Himself revealed his own Will; requiring

with infinite authority, instructing with infinite wisdom, and urging

with infinite motives, that men should become virtuous. The Re-

deemer of Mankind was born, lived, and died ; the Spirit of Grace

has descended, influenced , and blessed; the worship of God has

regularly been celebrated through a great part of the world ; and

avast succession of wise and faithful ministers have spent life ; te

REMARKS.

SER . XXXIII. ] 497

accomplish this glorious design. Yet how little has been done!

How few have been seriously amended ! What one has been raised

to perfection ? Trace the history, search the race, of Man; and

tell me, Where is he to be found?

Shall we then believe, that the schemes of modern philosophy

will accomplish what all preceding philosophers, and men much

wiser than philosophers, what the Word of God, the Redemption

of his Son, and the communications of his Spirit, have never yet

accomplished ? Can human perfection be the result of a benevo-

lence, which, indeed, utters good words, but is a total stranger to

good actions ; which is occupied in lamenting, while it should re-

lieve ; which says to the poor, the hungry, and the naked, Depart

in peace ; be ye warmed, and be yefilled : which is exhaled in sighs,

and emptied out in tears : which shrinks from the cottage of po-

verty , and withdraws its icy hand from the supplications of dis-

tress ; which agonizes over imagined sufferers in Japan, but can

neither see, nor hear, real ones at its own door : which deplores

the disastrous fate of profligates and villains, and arraigns the jus-

tice, which consigns them to the gaol or the gibbet; but exults in

the ruin of worth, the destruction of human peace, and the con-

templated devastation of a world ? Can the perfection of man be

the result of intelligence, which dictates, as the happiest state of

society, a community of labours ; in which the idle would literally

do nothing, and the industrious nothing more than to supply their

own absolute wants : a community of property; in which little

would be earned, much of that little wasted on mere lust , and the

remainder lost ; because none would preserve what none expected

to enjoy : a community of wives ; in which affection would cease,

principle vanish, furious animosity distract, and fierce revenge as-

sassinate ; and in which children would grow up, when they did not

perish in infancy, without a known father, without comfortable

subsistence, without education, without worth, without a name.

When Men become immortal by medicine and moral energy, ac-

cording to the dreams of the same philosophy, they may perhaps

become perfect by the proposed schemes of its discipline.

To such persons, as insist, that the melioration suggested has

failed, because the means used were imperfectly fitted to accom-

plish the end ; I answer: If the end were possible ; it is reason-

able to believe, that amid so great a variety, extent, and continu-

ance, of these means, directed to this end by the highest human

wisdom, some one system would have succeeded. As these have

all failed ; it cannot be rationally doubted, that all others will fail.

Those, particularly, which are now offered as substitutes, promise

not even the remotest degree of success ; and are, on the other

hand, fraught with the most portentous threatenings of absolute

ruin. To these things I will add, that the authors of them, on

whom their efficacy ought first to be proved, are farther removed

from virtue, than mankind in general . Until their own character,

VOL. I. 63

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

498 [SER . XXXII .

therefore, is materially changed for the better, they may be unan-

swerably addressed with the forcible Jewish proverb, Physician ,

heal thyself .

2dly. It is also clearly evinced by the nature of the case.

The depravity of Man is a part of his constitution, of his nature,

of himself . To perfect his character it would be necessary to

change him into a new creature ; and separate a part of that, which

makes him what he is : viz. his moral character. It would be

equally rational to say, that Man in the present world can become

a flying creature, as that he can become a perfect creature. If he

can be turned into a Bird, he may also, perhaps, be changed into

an Angel. All that has been hitherto done, and therefore all that

will hereafter be done, is to confine one class of his desires, viz.

those which are sinful by their excess, within juster bounds ; and to

prevent in some measure the risings of the other, viz. those which

are sinful in their nature. Until more than this shall be effected,

the world willbe equally, and justly, astonished at the folly, which

could persuade Godwin, that a plough could be made to move

through a field of itself , and that man could be rendered perfect by

his scheme ofdiscipline.

III. From these discourses it is evident, that the fundamental

principle ofmoral and political science, so far as man is concerned,

is his Depravity.

It will not bequestioned, that virtuous and depraved beings differ

from each other radically ; nor that the science of the one must of

course differ in its fundamental principles from the science of the

other. A philosopher might, if possessed of competent knowledge,

describe exactly the character of an Angel; and yet scarcely say

any thing, except what pertains to a moral being as such, which

would be at all applicable to the character of man. ABook, dis-

playing the whole nature and conduct of our first parents, in Para-

dise, would contain scarcely any thing, descriptive of their apos-

tate descendants. But all science of this nature is founded in facts ;

and is formed of facts, and the relations which spring from them.

The first great fact in the science of Man is, that he is a depraved

being. This is the first and fundamental fact, because out of it

arise, and by it are characterized, all his volitions, and all his con-

duct. Hence every thing, pertaining to Man, is coloured, and

qualified, by this part of his moral nature ; and no description of

him can be true, and no doctrine sound, or defensible, into which

this consideration does not essentially enter. Equally true is it,

that no system of regulations can be practically suited to him, or

fitted to control his conduct with success, or efficacy, which is not

founded on the same principle.

From these observations it is evident, that much of what is

published, and received, as moral and political science, is only

science falsely so called. It considers man as originally a virtuous

being ; accidentally, and in some small degrees, warped from the

REMARKS .

SER . XXXIII .] 499

path of rectitude, and always ready to return to it again ; deceived ,

and abused, by insidious and peculiarly corrupted individuals ;

but, left to himself , designing nothing beside what is good, and ut-

tering nothing but what is true. This indeed is a character de-

voutly to be wished; but the picture is without an original ; in the

language of painters, a mere " fancy-piece: " and it would be as

easy to find the human character in a Gryphon of Ariosto, or the

sylphs , gnomes, and nymphs , of Rosicrucius, as in a library filled

with this species of philosophy .

Were these systems to terminate in speculation only, their au-

thors might be permitted to dream on without disturbance. But

unhappily their doctrines are made the foundation, and directory,

of personal conduct, and public administration. Rules of private

life , municipal laws, and other governmental regulations, are drawn

from these pleasing, but merely hypothetical doctrines ; and are

intended, and expected, actually to control men, and their affairs ,

so as to effectuate good order, peace, and prosperity. Here the

influence of systems, which proceed according to this scheme, be-

comes eminently dangerous, malignant, and fatal. All the mea-

sures, founded on them, are fitted for the inhabitants of some other

planet, or the natives of fairy land, or the forms which haunt the

dreams of a distempered fancy, with an incomparably better adapt-

ation, than for men. Ofcourse, they can never become practical,

or useful, to such beings, as really exist in this world ; impatient

even of necessary restraints ; selfish ; covetous ; proud ; envious ;

wrathful ; revengeful ; lewd; forgetful of God; and hostile to each

other. Open your eyes on the beings around you : cast them back

on the annals of history: turn them inward upon yourselves : and

you will find ample and overwhelming proof of the truth of these

observations .

Onthis fundamental folly were founded all those vain, empty,

miserable systems of policy, which, in a portentous succession,

deluged Republican France in misery and ruin. In the treatises ,

laws, and measures, brought into being in that nation, during its

late wonderful struggle to become free, the people were uniformly

declared to be good; honest; virtuous ; influenced only by the

purest motives ; and aiming only at the best ends. These very

people, at the same time, were employed in little else, except un-

ceasing plunder, uniform treachery, the violation of all laws, the

utterance of all falsehood, the murder of their King, Nobles, and

Clergy, and the boundless butchery of each other. In a state of

immorality, in a prostration of all principle, at which even this sin-

ful world stood aghast, this despicable flattery was continually re-

iterated ; and the miserable objects of it very naturally concluded,

that, as they were praised while they were doing these things, they

were praised for doing them. Of course they were fixed in this

conduct beyond recall. Every malignant passion was let loose,

the reins were thrown upon the neck of every sordid appetite; the

DEPRAVITY OF MAN .

200 [ SER. XXXIII .

people became a collection of wild beasts, and the country a den

of ravage and slaughter. In this situation, nothing could restrain

them, but force. The wretches, who by their songs and incanta-

tions had called up the fiends ofmischief , could not lay them ; but

became, in an enormous and horrid succession, victims of their

own spells ; and were offered up, by hundreds, to the sanguinary

Moloch, which they had so absurdly and wickedly idolized.

Sound and true policy will always consider Man as he is ; and

treat him accordingly. Its measures will be universally calculated

for depraved beings; and it will , therefore, never hesitate to estab-

lish every necessary restraint. Whatever is good in man it will re-

gard as the result of wise, careful, efficacious discipline, realized

andblessed by God. Such discipline , therefore, it will regularly

establish, protect, and encourage. Honest, well disposed, and or-

derly citizens it will protect; the violation of private rights, and

the disturbers of public peace, it will punish. Nor will its retraints

and punishments stop ,untilthey have gained in some good measure

their end.

IV. From these discourses it is evident, that the Redemption of

Christ was absolutely necessary to mankind.

If Man is a depraved creature, it is plainly impossible, that he

should be justified by the Law of God. When he comes before

his Maker, to be judged according to his works, he must be declared

to have done evil, because he has in fact done it. The Law has

declared, that the soul which sinneth shall die : by the Law there-

fore he must die ; because he has sinned. Of course, God cannot

pronounce him just , or acquit him of guilt ; because he is guilty.

Under mere law, the only situation, in which he can be, independ-

ently of the Redemption of Christ, he can never be justified, nor

rewarded; but must be condemned, and punished. In this situa-

tion, an Atonement for his sins, such as God with propriety can and

will accept, is just as necessary for Man, as his salvation. No be-

ing inthe

in the Universe could, so far as we are able to discern, render

this atonement, except Christ. All other beings are, in the nature

of things, under every possible obligation to render to God all the

services in their power, as their own proper obedience ; an obe-

dience indispensably necessary for their own justification. A su-

pererogatory service does not appear to be possible for any created

being ; as there is no service, which he can render to God, which

is not his indispensable duty. Thus, so far as we are able to dis-

cern, the Atonement of Christ is absolutely necessary for the hu-

man race; and without it we can conceive of no possible way of

salvation .

V. The same doctrine equally teaches the absolute necessity ofRe-

generation to mankind.

That without Holiness no man shall see the Lord, is a doctrine so

evidently rational, and just, that it cannot but be believed by every

sober man; even independently ofthe express declaration of the

REMARKS.

SER. ΧΧΧΙΠ. ] 501

Scriptures. But without Regeneration Man is only unholy ; and

can, therefore, never see the Lord. The first great effect of the

Redemption of Christ, is to render it possible for man to become

holy, in order to his justification, and acceptance. Had the dis-

pensation stopped here ; Man would still have been lost. The

next step in this wonderful procedure is the Renovation of man;

or that implantation of holiness in his heart, styled in the Scriptures,

Regeneration, or the New Birth. From the commencement of this

great change in his character he becomes the subject of evangel-

ical holiness ; of real piety, real benevolence, real self -government;

or, generally, of real obedience to God. All his obedience, how-

ever, is imperfect ; and could not be accepted , but for the sake of

Christ. His mediation, his righteousness, is the sweet incense which

perfumes every offering and act of man, and renders it acceptable

before that pure and awful Being, in whose sight the Heavens them-

selves are not clean. But, though imperfectly holy, man, when

renewed, is really holy. There is some good thing found in him

towards the Lord God of Isreal. This, as a seed of inestimable

worth, is seen by the All-searching Eye to promise a future and

eternal production of fruits, invaluable in their nature, and endless

in their multitude.

VI. With equal evidence we are here taught the necessity of the

Mission of the Holy Spirit.

The Holy Spirit is the only author of the Regeneration of Man .

That which is born of theflesh isflesh ; that which is born ofthe Spirit

is spirit. Except a man be born ofthe Spirit he cannot see the king-

dom ofGod. Not by works of righteousness which we have done,

but according to his own mercy, he saved us, by the washing of regen-

eration, and the renewing of the Holy Ghost. As therefore, Regen-

eration is absolutely necessary to Man ; and as Man is renewed

only by the Holy Spirit ; so the Mission of the Spirit is as necessary

to Man, as his Regeneration ; and both are no less necessary, than

his eternal life .

On these threegreat Evangelical doctrines I have here descanted

very briefly, because they will hereafter be primary subjects of

investigation. They have been now mentioned, chiefly to show

their connexion with the doctrine of human depravity, and the

manner, in which they necessarily arise out of this part of the scrip-

tural scheme.

VII. The same considerations also teach us the manner, in which

a Preacher ought to address Mankind.

Every congregation will be regarded by a Minister of Christ, who

discerns this doctrine to be, what it plainly is , a leading doctrine

ofthe Scriptures, as a collection of depraved, guilty beings, ex-

posed to endless punishment for their sins . On this basis will all

his sermons be founded ; and to this point will they all refer. He

will exhort them to repent ; because they are sinners, and there-

fore need repentance. He will exhort them to believe in Christ ;

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

502 [SER. XXXIII.

because they cannot save themselves ; and because He can, and if

they believe in him, will save them. He will teach them to seek

for pardon of God; because they are sinners, and must either be

pardoned, or lost : to rely on the grace of God for their justification ;

because they have no merit of their own; and , if they depend on

their own righteousness, cannot be saved : and to feel the necessity

ofsanctification ; because, without holiness no man shall see the Lord;

and because, without the sanctification of the Spirit of Grace no

man can become holy.

The terrors of the Law he will set before his hearers in their own

awful light ; because by these, and by nothing but these, such be-

ings can ordinarily be persuaded. The Gospel he will declare to be

Glad Tidings of great joy ; because it is the news of forgiveness,

justification, and everlasting life, to sinners, who would otherwise

perish. Mercy he will unfold as the peculiar glory ofGod in the

highest, and as eminently displayed , when peace and good-will are

published to mankind. The distinguishing excellence of the Re-

deemer he will explain to be, is willingness to seek, and save, that

which was lost . The duty of Christians, now become peculiarly

their duty, he will teach to consist in denying all ungodliness and

worldly lusts , and living soberly, righteously, and godly, in the

world. Thus, whether GOD or Man, the Law or the Gospel, Hea-

ven or Hell, morality or piety, are the themes of his preaching ;

he will make the corruption of the human heart the foundation, on

which all will be built ; the great point, to which all will be con-

tinually referred.

These are subjects of preaching, which cannot fail to interest

the Preacher, who really believes them ; or the hearers, who listen

to them with serious attention. They state to Man, they bring to

full view, they carry home to the heart, his real condition, and only

hope. He sees, if not prevented by sottish sloth, or criminal pre-

judice, that the whole is the truth of God ; truth infinitely impor-

tant to himself; commending itself to his conscience ; explaining

his danger ; disclosing the only way of escape ; unfolding deliver-

ance from hell ; and pointing out the path to heaven. The preach-

er, who utters these things, is readily believed to have a real mean-

ing, when he speaks of the solemnity and importance of Religion,

and presses upon his hearers the necessity of embracing it. They

clearly discern, that there is something,which they easily compre-

hend, to be done by them ; and a momentous reason, why it should

be done : that a change real, great , and indispensable, is to be ac-

complished in their character ; and that , unless it is accomplished,

they must perish. Christianity hence assumes a solemnity, which

can be derived from no other considerations, and accords with no

other scheme.

The Preacher, who regards man as originally virtuous, can nei-

ther explain to him his guilt or his danger ; show him the necessity

of Christ's mediation, or the importance of an interest in it ; ex-

REMARKS.

SER . XXXIII.] 503

plainto him the value of Faith, or the use of Repentance ; nor ex-

hort him to fly to the Mercy of God for forgiveness, or sanctifica-

tion. He urges, therefore, a Religion, in which both his hearers

and himself find little interest. His addresses to them are natural-

ly made up of cold, common place morality ; such as Plato taught

long since, and taught much better ; or at least with greater force.

They of course become dull and lifeless ; unfrequent visiters to the

house of God ; and, when there, are rarely of that number, who

have ears to hear.

VIII. In the same manner are all men taught how they ought to

regard themselves in their religious concerns .

The question, What will become of me hereafter ? is of infinite

moment to every child of Adam ; and is to be always determined

by the true answer to another : Am I virtuous, or sinful ?

The man who commences his moral course with a full conviction

of his guilt, his exposure to the wrath of God, and his danger of

final condemnation, will, if he goes on, direct his feet into a path,

widely distant from that, which is pursued by men, directed by the

contrary doctrines. To such a man all the accounts given in the

Scriptures, and in religious discourses built on the Scriptures, con-

cerning human guilt and danger, will be true and important. The

tidings of Redemption will be to him tidings of great joy ; because

they are directed to such a creature as himself . Christ to him will

be infinitely precious ; because he is the Saviour of sinners. The

renewing power and goodness of the Spirit of Grace will appear

to him unspeakably necessary and desirable ; because, without this

divine energy, exerted on his heart , he will be a sinner for ever.

To the atonement of Christ he will fly for refuge ; because he can-

not make an atonement for himself . To the purifying influence

of the Divine Spirit he will look for his preservation in holiness ,

and his safe arrival in the kingdom of life ; because he will know,

that he cannot preserve, nor conduct himself to that kingdom.

As a sinner, he will feel himself guilty, condemned, and ruined ;

but, as an object of the divine mercy, he will see glorious hopes

dawning upon him from Heaven. Separated from Christ, he will

feel that he can do nothing effectual toward his salvation ; but as

a candidate for Heaven by Faith, Repentance, and Holiness, he

will discern, that all things may be done for him by the Spirit of

God. Left to himself , he will perceive, that he must die for ever ;

but that in Christ he may for ever live .

With these views, all his self -examination, prayers, praises,

hopes, resolutions, and efforts , will take their peculiar character

from the great truth, that he is a depraved, ruined creature. His

whole life , therefore, will be the life of a believing, penitent, and

returning sinner, owing infinite blessings to the mere grace of God;

and he will find more to animate his love, faithfulness, and grati-

tude , than an Angel with the same powers could feel ; because he

DEPRAVITY OF MAN.

504 [ SER . XXXIII.

is a forgiven and restored creature ; forgiven an immense debt,

and restored to holiness and endless life .

But if a sinner feels himself to be originally virtuous, he will

feebly realize his guilt , his danger, or his need of a Saviour. The

necessity of being born again, of being sanctified, guided, and

quickened, by the Spirit of God, he cannot know. Justification

he will regard as due to him ; as the proper reward of his merit;

and holiness, as his original character, the native growth of his

mind. He may, indeed , admit it to be imperfect, and to require

some additions ; yet even these he will esteem rather as advanta-

geous than necessary. Christ he will consider rather as a conve-

nience, as an auxiliary to him, than as his Saviour. His ultimate

reliance will be on himself , not on the Redeemer. The Gospel,

instead of being the only and most joyful news of Salvation to

sinners, will be considered by him merely as a valuable book ;

somewhat better than any volume of philosophy ; in which some in-

teresting instructions may be found, and some useful precepts are

given ; but which is not indispensable to his eternal life. In a

word, according to his predominant feeling, both he, and others

like him, might have done very well without the Gospel here ; and,

with little danger of failure, might have obtained salvation beyond

the grave.

SERMON XXXIV.

APOSTATE MAN CANNOT BE JUSTIFIED BY WORKS OF LAW.

ROMANS iii . 20.-Therefore, by the deeds of the Law there shall no flesh be justified

in his sight.

IN several preceding discourses I have considered the Univer-

sality and Degree, of human corruption , and its existence in Conse-

quence of the Apostacy of Adam; and have also derived from the

observations, made in them concerning these subjects, several In-

ferences, which I supposed to be of serious importance to Mankind.

The next object of inquiry in a System of Theology is the Situa-

tion, in which mankind are by means of their corruption. It is im-

possible for a rational being to know, that he has offended God,

and is now the object of his displeasure, without being, if he is not

absolutely stupid, deeply alarmed by a sense of his danger at

least , if not of his guilt.

All creatures are absolutely in the hands of God, and must be

disposed of according to his pleasure. If he wills it, they are

happy ; if he wills it , they are miserable. He speaks, and it is

done; he commands, and it stands fast. From his eye there is

no concealment ; from his hand there is no escape ; from his anger

there is no refuge. What, then, will become of those, who are

found guilty at the final trial ; who can plead no excuse for their

sins, and offer no expiation for their souls ? He is not a man, as

we are, that we should answer him ; and that we should come toge-

ther in judgment. Neither is there any day's man (any mediator )

betwixt us, who might lay his hand upon us both, and make recon-

ciliation between us . When I say, that there is no day's man be-

tween us and him : you will undoubtedly understand, that I intend

this as our situation, while under Law, and independently of the Re-

demption of Christ. Of this situation it is immensely important for

us to form clear andjust views. False opinions, here, may easily

be fatal to any man. Ifhe feels safe, while he is really in danger;

as his danger, if it exist, must be immensely great, and threaten his

whole well-being; his sense of safety must of course be ruinous.

Whatever is to be done for his future good must be done in this

world; since he is to be judged and rewarded, according to the

deeds done in the body.

The text is the close of a long discourse concerning the deprav-

ity of both Jews and Gentiles ; or in other words, ofall mankind;

andcontains the great and affecting inference, drawn by St. Paul

himself , or rather given by the Spirit ofGod, from this humiliating

VOL. I. 64

APOSTATE MAN CANNOT BE

506 [SER . XXXIV.

doctrine. Therefore by the deeds of the Law shall noflesh bejusti-

fied in his sight .

In order to understand the import of this interesting declaration,

it is necessary to form distinct and correct views of the termjustify.

This word is a term of law; in the judicial proceedings of which it

denotes a sentence of acquittal, passed upon a person, who has been

tried concerning his obedience, or disobedience. The person tried,

being found to have obeyed the Law in the manner required, is

declared by the Judge to be guiltless of any disobedience. In the

language of the text , he is justified; that is, declared to be just,

or blameless, in the sight of the Law. With exactly this meaning

the word is here used by St. Paul.

There have been frequent disputes concerning the Law, here

specified. Some commentators have insisted, that the Moral, some

that the Ceremonial, and some that the Whole, Law, given by Moses,

is here intended. That neither the Ceremonial, nor Political, Law,

of the Jews is here designed by the Apostle is, I think, completely

evident from a bare consideration of the passage itself . The lan-

guage is, that NO FLESH shall be justified by means of the Law in-

tended. It can hardly be supposed, that St. Paul meant to say

this with reference to the ceremonial or political Law of the Jews ;

because, except the Jews themselves, none of the human race can

be either acquitted, or condemned, or even tried by those Laws ;

since the rest of mankind not only have never known them, but

have, in almost all instances, been absolutely unable to come to

any knowledge of them .

The truth, I apprehend, is, that this difference of opinion has

arisen only from the translation of the Text. The words in the

Original are Διότι, εξ έργων νομε 8 δικαιωθήσεται πασα σαρξ ενωπιον αυτά.

Wherefore, by works of Law no flesh, that is, no man, shall be justi-

fied in his sight, that is, in the sight of God. By works of Law in

the absolute sense; that is, no man shall be justified by any works

whatever of any Law, whether natural or revealed.

The doctrine, contained in the Text, is, therefore, That no man

can be justified on the ground of his obedience to the Law of God.

This doctrine is so absolutely asserted in the Text, that a plain

man , in the exercise of sober common sense, would naturally con-

clude all attempts to prove it to be misplaced and superfluous.

"Whom, " he would instinctively say, " shall we believe, if we do

not believe God ; and what declaration of God can be believed,

if this, so plain, so unambiguous, is not to be believed ? The ef-

forts of Reason to make it more certain, or more evident, are

merely holding a rush-light to the Sun." So much has, however,

beenwritten , and said, to explain away even this declaration, and

to avoid the truth which it contains, and the same truth, as ex-

pressed in all other similar passages of the Scriptures, that, not-

withstanding these decisions of common sense, it has become really

necessary to examine this doctrine, as well as others . Nor is it

JUSTIFIED BY WORKS OF LAW.

SER . XXXIV.] 507

only necessary to examine this doctrine, as contained in the Scrip

tures. It is also of importance to consider the manner, in which it

is regarded by Reason ; and to show, that here as well as else,

where, notwithstanding several objections suggested against the

doctrine, Reason still entirely harmonizes with Revelation.

In pursuance of the scheme, which I have thus proposed, I ob

serve,

I. That the Law ofGod demands perfect obedience to all its requi-

sitions .

This is indeed true of every law : for it is no more than saying,

that the Law demands what it demands. Yet it is true, in a pecu-

liar sense, of the divine Law. The requisitions of this Law are

two : Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with

all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thinc under-

standing ; and Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: that is,

Thou shalt devote, with supreme affection , all thy powers to the ser-

vice of the Lord thy God, throughout the continuance of thy being ;

and thou shalt do unto others, who are included under the word

neighbour, that is, all Intelligent creatures , whatsoever thou wouldest,

that they in the like circumstances should do unto thee ; and this also

thou shalt do throughout the continuance of thy being. The pecu-

liar perfection of the obedience, here required, is the universality

ofit. No other law requires the absolute consecration of all our

powers to the obedience of its precepts, or extends its demands to

every moment of our existence.

That, which is commonly called the Law of Nature, viz. that

part of the Law, which is discoverable by unbiassed Reason, with-

out the aid of Revelation, requires, that we render continual rever-

ence and gratitude to God, and that we invariably do justice, speak

truth, and show kindness , to our fellow- men. All these things are

required by the Law of Nature, because all men either do, or may,

see them to be certainly their duty.

Without inquiring at this time, whether any man, in a state of

nature, ever did any one of these duties in the manner command-

ed, I shall consider it as sufficient for the present purpose to ob-

serve, that no man ever performed them universally, as they are

here enjoined. No man, to whom the law of God was revealed,

ever loved God, uniformly, with all the heart ; or rendered, uni-

formly, to his neighbour, what he would that his neighbour, in the

like circumstances, should render to him : neither did any man,

in a state of nature, ever uninterruptedly render to God, the re-

verence and gratitude, or to his neighbour the truth, justice, and

kindness, which it required. Of this obedience every man has

plainly fallen short ; and very few can be found , who will not, in

this view of the subject, confess themselves to be sinners .

II. The only condition of Justification, known by Law, is complete

obedience to its precepts .

The language of the divine Law, generally resembling that of

گا

APOSTATE MAN CANNOT BE

508 [ SER . XXXIV.

7

every other, is , Do these things , and thou shalt live ; and Cursed is

every one, that continueth not in all things , written in the book of

the Law, to do them. The soul that sinneth shall die ; for not the

hearers of the Law are just before God, but the doers ofthe Law

shall be justified.

This condition of justification is inherent in the very nature of

Law. The Law of God, for example, requires certain things of

Mankind ; and promises, that those, who do them, shall be re-

warded. But the reward is promised to no others . On the con-

trary, those, who do them not, it declares, shall be punished. The

former it pronounces just, or guiltless ; the latter it pronounces

guilty . Obedience and disobedience are plainly the only condi-

tions, by which creatures, subject to this Law, can be justified,

condemned, or even tried. The same things, substantially, are

true of every other Law. It is presumed, no Law was ever pro-

mulged by any authority whatever, which specified any other con-

dition.

III. It is impossible for mankind, or any other rational beings, to

do more than the Law of God requires .

This Law requires, that we love him with all the heart, and

soul, and mind, and strength. Higher love, than this, cannot pos-

sibly be rendered by any creature. It requires, that we love him

thus at all times. There is no time, therefore, in which such love

is not our duty. Supererogatory love, or obedience, of course

cannot possibly be rendered by man. Hence, if Man ever fails of

obeying, he cannot atone for the sin by any future obedience ; be-

cause all his future obedience is demanded for the time being. If ,

then, he is ever guilty of disobedience, his future obedience, how-

ever perfect, cannot contribute at all to his justification.

But all men have disobeyed ; nay, all are disobedient every

day, and every hour ; and never render complete obedience, even

ina single instance. No man, therefore, is justified, even for the

timebeing.

IV. The authority of the Law is great in proportion to its impor-

tance to the Universe, and to the greatness and dignity of the Law-

giver. The Law of God is the foundation of his Government ; and of

the happiness, which it confers on his Intelligent creatures ; a

happiness partly attendant on the obedience, in its very nature,

and partly its reward from the Lawgiver. This importance of the

Law, therefore, cannot be measured.

The greatness and dignity of the Lawgiver are infinite.

That the guilt of disobedience bears, at least, a general propor-

tion to these things will not be denied. Ofcourse, it must be very

great; much greater than we can comprehend. Particularly, it is

incalculably greater, than if committed merely against human laws,

so inferior in their importance, and their capacity of producing

happiness ; or against mere human Lawgivers,infinitely inferior in

dignity and excellence.

JUSTIFIED BY WORKS OF LAW.

SER. XXXIV . ] 509

The worth of our services, at the same time , is proportioned to

the worth of ourselves, who render them. The Law of God re-

quires the obedience of Archangels, as well as that of Men. The

Law is the same ; but the difference between the subjects, and the

services, in this case, is inestimable by us . The services of the

Archangel are plainly of very great worth, in a comparative view ;

those of Man, ofvery little. The difference evidently arises from

the difference of worth in those who render them .

But the lowest created being, as truly as the highest, can sin

against any law, and any Ruler. His crimes, therefore, can be

very great, while his services must of necessity be very small, in

their importance.

Hence it is plain, that, if we could do works of supererogation,

or services not required, we still could make no atonement for our

sins. Our sins are enormous evils ; and our services in a sense

nothing.

V. The Law of God threatens punishment to the first transgres-

sion ; and, also, to every succeeding transgression.

Cursed is every one, that continueth not in all things , written in

the book of the Law to do them . He, therefore, who continues in all

things , written in the book of the Law, except one, and does them

as required, yet for the omission of that one is cursed. The soul

that sinneth shall die. The soul that sinneth once ; that sinneth at

all; not that sinneth in a long course, and to a given degree, of

transgression.

In the day that thou eatest thereof , said God to Adam, thou shalt

surely die. Adam ate the forbidden fruit once, and lost his im-

mortality. Human Laws, also, are always formed in the same manner.

The thief , the burglar, the murderer, are all punished by human

laws for the first theft, burglary, or murder. This is indeed the

very nature of Law. It forbids whatever it forbids, and requires

whatever it requires, under a penalty for every transgression.

The plea, that this is the first transgression, though often alleged

as a reason for tenderness and clemency, was, it is presumed,

never proposed to a tribunal ofjustice as a cause of exempting the

criminal from punishment, or, perhaps more properly, as a proof,

that he did not merit punishment.

These considerations plainly cut off all hope, as well as all

ground, of the justification of transgressors in the sight of God, on

the score of Justice ; and prove the absolute impossibility ofjus-

tification by works of Law. Still multitudes of mankind, and

among them no small number of divines, have thought proper,

notwithstanding this peremptory and decisive language of the Law

ofGod, to annex to it a condition, upon which, in their view , the

hope of acceptance may be rationally formed. I say a condition ;

because I know of but one ; viz. Repentance. As this has been

abundantly insisted on, it demands a particular consideration.

لد

APOSTATE MAN CANNOT BE

510 [ SER. XXXIV.

The scheme of those, who urge this condition, is, so far as my

information extends, the following : that, although the Law of God

does indeed demand perfect obedience ; yet from the benevolence of

God, it may be fairly expected, that, even under this Law, every

sincere penitent will be accepted.

On this scheme I observe,

1st. The Law itself makes no mention of any such condition .

Hence the evidence of this scheme, if it exist at all, must be ex-

traneous to the Law itself . It cannot but be seen, that a case of

this nature must demand evidence clearly decisive ; both because

it is a case infinitely interesting to every child of Adam, and be-

cause the Law is perfectly silent on this subject. This circum-

stance renders the scheme originally suspected ; for we cannot

easily conceive of a reason, why, if acceptance was intended to be

granted according to this scheme, Godin publishing his Law should

observe an absolute silence concerning this condition ; and should

couch the Law in such language, as, for aught we can see, is di-

rectly contradictory to the scheme.

2dly. Revelation is every where silent concerning this condition of

acceptance .

That Revelation no where expressly annexes the final accept-

ance of mankind to Repentance alone will, I suppose, be granted.

I have been able to find no passage of this nature, myself; and,

so far as I know, such a passage has not, hitherto, been pointed

out by any one of those, who adopt the scheme. Whatever im-

portance is annexed to Repentance, it certainly cannot be said

with truth, that Faith in the Redeemer is not considered in the Gos-

pel as absolutely necessary to the justification of the penitent. It

is no where said, that God may be just, and yet the justifier of him,

who repenteth. Until something equivalent to this can be pointed

out, as expressly declared in the Gospel, all the evidence in favour

of this scheme must be found in inference and argument.

3dly. Revelation declares the contrary doctrine.

In Galatians iii . 21 , St. Paul says, If there had been a law, which

could have given life ; verily righteousness had been by the law.

In this passage it is evident beyond denial, that no law exists, or

has ever existed, which could give life, or furnish acceptance and

consequent salvation, to men. It is further evident, also, that

Righteousness is not to Man by the Law; or, more properly as in

the original, by Law : that is, by any law whatever. But how

those, who are not the subjects of righteousness, that is of moral

excellence, or holiness, can see the Lord, or be justified and saved,

the Scriptures have no where explained.

In Galatians ii. 21, the same Apostle says, IfRighteousness come

by the Law, then Christ is dead in vain ; or, more accurately ac-

cording to the Greek, If righteousness exist by means of Law, Christ

certainly hath died in vain. If righteousness do not exist by means

of Law, in any sense whatever; then Man, as a mere subject of

JUSTIFIED BY WORKS OF LAW.

SER. XXXIV.] 511

Law, can never be accepted. If righteousness do exist by means

of Law ; then, as God himself has declared , Christ died in vain. A

serious man must find an insurmountable difficulty in receiving any

doctrine, which involves this consequence .

In Romans iii . 25, 26, the Apostle says, Whom God hath set forth

to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood, to declare his right-

eousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbear-

ance of God ; To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness , that

he might be just, and the justifier of him that believeth in Jesus .

In this passage of Scripture it is declared, that God set forth Jesus

Christ to be a Propitiation, to declare his righteousness in the re-

mission of sins, that he might be just, while justifying him that be-

lieveth in Jesus. It is therefore certain, that, if he had not set

forth Christ to be a Propitiation, he either would not have justified

any of mankind ; or, if he had done it , would not have been just.

Of course, all men, who are justified, are justified only in conse-

quence of this propitiation, and not by means of Law, in any sense

whatever.

It is also evident, that Christ becomes a propitiation to us through

faith in his blood ; and that those only are justified, who believe in

Jesus. In the same manner, in Romans v. 9, the Apostle says ,

Being justified through, or by means of , his blood. It is therefore

certain , that those, who do not believe, will not be justified ; and

that none are justified without the blood of Christ.

In Romans iii . 30, it is said, One God, who shall justify the cir-

cumcision by Faith, and the uncircumcision through Faith. There-

fore, God will justify neither circumcision nor uncircumcision

through, or by repentance. The prophet Habbakuk, Chapter ii .

verse 4th, repeatedly quoted by St. Paul, says, The just shall live

byhis Faith : More exactly, The just by Faith shall live, that is, He,

who by Faith is just, shall live . Therefore no other will live .

All these and the like considerations have, however, been un-

satisfactory to the abettors of this scheme ; not, as it appears to

me, from any want of explicitness in the declarations themselves,

but from their want of accordance with a pre-conceived system ; a

system derived, I am apprehensive, more from Philosophy, than

from the Scriptures. Let us, therefore, examine the dictates of

Reason concerning this subject ; and see, whether they do not

plainly , and exactly, harmonize with Revelation.

What, then, must be the nature and language of a Law, prescri-

bing Repentance as the condition of acceptance and justification !

Plainly it must be this : He, who disobeys the Law, shall be pun-

ished with death ; but, if he repents of his disobedience, he shall

not be punished. What would be the consequences of such a

Law!

1st. All men, who hoped to repent, would disobey .

But from universal experience we are assured beyond a doubt ,

that everyman would hope, that he should at some time or other

APOSTATE MAN CANNOT BE

512 [SER. XXXIV.

repent ; because every man would consider repentance as in his

power. The consequence, therefore, is irresistible, that every man

woulddisobey.

It is equally evident also, that from the love, and the habit, of

disobedience, every man would continue to disobey so long as he

thought Repentance was in his power. But disobedience, pro-

tracted to so late a period, would become a habit so strong, that

none would repent. Nothing is more self -deceiving than a spirit of

procrastination. We see it in every thing ; and always see it the

same. Such a Law, therefore, would frustrate itself; and prove

amere encouragement to disobedience.

2dly. The thing, punished by such a law, would not be Disobe-

dience, but Impenitence.

It is undoubtedly true, that every law designs to punish that,

which it considers as the transgression; and that only. The thing

punished , whatever it is, is in the view of the law the crime ; and

in that view nothing is a crime, except that, which is punished.

But here the law does not threaten the punishment to disobedience,

but to impenitence. Impenitence, therefore, is in the view of such

a law the only crime. Disobedience, according to the very lan-

guage of the law, is no crime. But nothing can be a crime, ex-

cept that, which is constituted a crime by the law. It may be said,

that disobedience, being forbidden by the law, is for that reason the

crime. This opinion, however, is wholly a mistake. The law,

without a penalty, or with respect to whatever it does not threaten

with a penalty, ceases to be a law ; and become mere advice. Dis-

obedience to what it thus prohibits may indeed be imprudence, or

impropriety ; but cannot be a crime in the eye of such a law. Un-

doubtedly , if the law regarded disobedience as a crime, it would

punish it ; as every law has done. As, therefore, the Divine Law

according to this scheme punishes impenitence only, it regards im-

penitence as the only crime.

But if disobedience be not a crime, it cannot be repented of:

for repentance is a sorrow for crimes, and for them only. Repent-

ance, therefore, would by such a law be rendered impossible.

3dly. In the present case , that of Man with respect to his Maker,

what Degree of repentance will excuse the transgressorfrom punish-

ment? Must it be a perfect repentance ? that is, entire, and followed

by no future sin ? On this condition who could be saved ? No

man ever has repented, no man ever will repent, in this manner.

Shall the repentance be imperfect ; a sorrow for sin, inferior in de-

gree, or continuance, to that, which the nature of the case actually

demands ; a sorrow extending only to a part of the sins actually

committed ; a confession sincerely and cheerfully made with re-

spect to some sins, and reluctantly concerning the rest ; a renun-

ciation of sin, partial in degree, partial as to the number and kinds

JUSTIFIED BY WORKS OF LAW.

SER. XXXIV.] 513

of transgressions, and never aiming at, as well as never accomplish-

ing, a thorough reformation of character !

The first difficulty, which attends this scheme, is, that it is no

where found in the Scriptures. Few men, who believe the Scrip-

tures to be the Word of God, will question the fact, that they con-

tain all the terms of Salvation . It can hardly be supposed, that,

when God unfolded his will to mankind concerning this great sub-

ject, and declared that he had taught them all things pertaining to

life and to Godliness , he omitted this , which is altogether the prin-

cipal thing; the point which they were infinitely concerned to

know. But there is not a declaration of this nature in the Scrip-

tures. At least I have never been able to find one ; nor have I

ever seen one alleged. Can it be believed, that this should be the

main term, nay, the only one, of our salvation; and yet that it

should be no where expressed in a Revelation from God, profess-

edly declaring all the terms of salvation !

This, however, is far from being all. The Scriptures teach us

in a thousand forms, both expressly and implicitly, that we have Re-

demption through the blood of Christ, even the forgiveness of our

sins. As this is the doctrine of the Scriptures, so it is plainly their

only doctrine. Indeed, nothing is more evident in the nature of the

case, than that, if we have Redemption through his blood, we have

it not without his blood ; and therefore not by a Repentance of our

own.

Nor does Reason furnish us any additional light in favour of this

scheme. Reason, indeed, finds itself at a loss to conceive in what

manner even a perfect Repentance can cancel former iniquities ;

or how an absolute penitent can be accepted of God. His sorrow

for his sins can in no respect alter their nature, or lessen their de-

merit ; and his future reformation cannot at all obliterate the guilt

of his past life. Sorrow for sin is itself the most unequivocal ac-

knowledgment of guilt. If , then, the penitent sees , and knows, him-

self to be guilty; God must see it also. What, then, should pre-

vent him from expressing his views of it in the punishment of the

sinner ?

If this Repentance is imperfect ; those difficulties are multiplied,

and enhanced. The penitent, in this case, is still a sinner ; and

does not even perform the duty of repenting, in the manner, in

which he is bound to perform it. He also still loves sin in some

degree; and still, occasionally at least, practises it. After he be-

comes a penitent, therefore, he goes on through life, accumulating

guilt, and meriting punishment. Can any man in these circum-

stances rationally expect acceptance with God? Yet these are the

best circumstances, in which Man is ever found.

It is to no purpose to allege, that such a man obeys the Law in

part. The Law knows of no such condition, as partial obedience.

Adam obeyed in part ; and, what no one of his progeny has ever

done, obeyed, for a time, perfectly. But for the first transgression

VOL. I. 65

APOSTATĖ MAN CANNOT BE

514 [SER . XXXIV.

he was condemned to death, just as if he had never obeyed at all.

So far as Law is concerned, God deals with his descendants ex-

actly in the same manner. Accordingly, in Ezekiel xviii. 24, he

says, But when the righteous turneth away from his righteousness,

and committeth iniquity, all his righteousness that he hath done shall

not be mentioned. In his trespass that he hath trespassed, and in

his sin that he hath sinned ; in them he shall die. He, therefore,

who hath continued in all things, written in the book of the Law to

do them, except one, would still be incapable, according to Law, of

being justified. Should he have repented of his first transgression ;

and should we, contrary to both Reason and Revelation, allow

Repentance to be a real ground of Justification, generally consi-

dered ; yet, if he should die in the commission of sin, or without

repentance of the sins which he had last committed, he must, ac-

cording to this passage, die without justification, and be finally

condemned.

Thus, if I mistake not, it has been rendered clearly certain, that

by deeds of Law no flesh shall be justified in the sight of God.

REMARKS.

1st. From these observations it is evident, that the atonement of

Christ was absolutely necessary in order to the salvation ofMan-

kind.

Man was originally placed under a dispensation of Law ; and

in consequence of perfect obedience was promised immortal life :

while to his disobedience was threatened eternal death. Obedi-

ence, therefore, was the only condition of his justification, and the

only source of hope to him beyond the grave. This Law was

perfect, and therefore immutable. No part of its demands or

threatenings could be changed. It was more proper, that the

Heavens and the Earth should pass away, than that one jot, or one

tittle, of the Law should pass without an exact fulfilment. The

Truth plainly is, that the Law is a direct exhibition of the perfect

character of God; and to change it would be to manifest, that his

character was changed from its absolute perfection. Such an

event is evidently impossible.

This perfect Law, however, Man has disobeyed. By his dis-

obedience he has lost the possibility of justification, and the hope

of reward ; and exposed himself , without any means of escape, or

safety, to the punishment , denounced against his transgression.

Hadhe been left in this situation ; he must have finally perished.

In this situation Christ found him, when he came to seek, and to

save, that which was lost. In this situation he assumed the char-

acter of a Mediator between God and Man ; and made his soul an

offering for sin ; a sacrifice of a sweet savour, accepted of God as a

satisfactory expiation of human guilt. In this manner he rendered

it possible ; for before it was impossible ; that Man should be re-

stored to the favour of God. The honour of the divine law was

JUSTIFIED BY WORKS OF LAW

SER. XXXIV . ] 515

maintained, and even enhanced. The immutability of the love of

God to holiness, and of the hatred of God to sin, and the perfect

harmony of the divine government in the condemnation of sin, and

the forgiveness of sinners, were all illustriously displayed to the

view ofthe Universe. To forgive such, as should repent, and re

turn to their duty, became, now, a dispensation, devested of all in-

consistency and impropriety. But , independently of this inter-

ference of the Redeemer, no method appears to the human eye, in

which the justification of Mankind could have been accomplished

without a serious and inadmissible change of the Law and Govern-

ment of God. Accordingly, we are informed in the Scriptures ,

that by his stripes only we are healed. Neither is there, nor, so far

as we can understand, can there be, salvation in any other : for

there is no Name given under heaven among men, whereby we must

be saved, but the Name of Jesus Christ .

2dly. Speculative Unbelief prevents every hope of Salvation .

BySpeculative unbelief I intend, first, the disbelief of Divine

Revelation, or what is commonly called Infidelity . Every Infidel

not only feels, but glories in feeling, a privileged exemption from

what he calls the superstition of the Gospel: by which he prima-

rily intends the great Evangelical requisitions of Repentance to-

wards God, and Faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ. It is super-

fluous for me to insist , that he, who believes not speculatively in

Christ, cannot believe in him cordially: for nothing is plainer, than

that without the assent of the understanding there can be no yield-

ing of the heart. The Infidel will very cheerfully take this labour

off my hands; and boast, that he yields neither his understanding,

nor his heart, to the Redeemer. Of course, he places himself un-

der mere Law; and must therefore find justification, and conse-

quent acceptance, to him impossible. When I say impossible to

him, you will undoubtedly understand me to mean, that it is impos-

sible for him to be justified, or accepted, in his present character, or

on his avowed principles . I do not mean, that his understanding,

or his heart, cannot be changed : for, though I regard Infidelity as

a very dangerous and alarming character, yet I do not believe

every Infidel to be of course a final reprobate. Infidel have un-

doubtedly been changed into Christians ; and in some instances

have become exemplary Ministers of the Gospel. Infidels volun-

tarily place themselves under mere law ; and reject with scorn ,

as well as obstinacy, an interest in the blessings of Redemption.

Under that Law, however, even after it is narrowed by all his own

indefensible limitations, the Infidel has still committed innumerable

sins ; sins , for which he himself cannot atone, and for which he will

not ask, nor even accept, the atonement, made by the Redeemer.

By the Law he chooses to be tried; and by the Law he cannot

fail to be condemned. The God of truth in that day will declare,

that he has sinned ; and, according with his own choice, must con-

sign him to perdition. Such is the situation, to which he volunta-

APOSTATE MAN CANNOT BE

516 [ SER. XXXIV.

rily reduces himself , and which he prefers to Christ, with all his

infiniteblessings .

Secondly, Speculative unbelief is the proper character of multi-

tudes, who admit the reality of divine Revelation. Those, who in

modern language are called Unitarians, deny the Deity ; and

therefore deny, either explicitly or implicitly, the Atonement of

the Saviour. Dr. Priestly, and, I presume all his followers, deny

the Atonement expressly: Some of the Socinians and Arians have

admitted it ; but, I think, inconsistently with their commanding

doctrines . The disbelief of the atonement of Christ has the same

practical influence with that of the disbelief of his Mediation at

large. If he is only a Prophet, and a Pattern of Righteousness ;

I see not, that he can be any more a Saviour to mankind, than

Moses, Isaiah , and Paul. He was indeed a wiser and better man.

But it will not be denied, that all these men were saved ; nor that,

therefore, their righteousness was such, as, if we faithfully imitate

it, would secure our salvation ; that is, according to this Unitarian

scheme. Nor will it be denied by any man, that the instructions

of Moses and Isaiah are such, as, if faithfully obeyed, will insure

salvation . Nor can it be doubted, that Paul has taught mankind

more of the Gospel, than Christ himself personally taught. To

believe in Christ, therefore, is substantially the same thing, as to

believe in Paul, Isaiah, or Moses. Yet, although we are required

to believe all these men, and all other Prophets and Apostles, as

being inspired by God; we are no where required to believe in

them, or on them. They are no where styled the Saviours, or

Redeemers, of Mankind. On the contrary, we are expressly told,

that there is no other Saviour of Men, but Jesus Christ ; and that

there is Salvation in no other. There is, therefore, something in

Christ, wholly different from any thing in these men; and that

something constitutes his peculiar and essential character, as the

Saviour of Mankind. As Christ is expressly declared to have been

the Propitiation for the sins of men, to have made his soul an offer-

ing for sin, and to have redeemed us with his blood ; and as we are

said to have Redemption, even the forgiveness of our sins , through

faith in his blood ; it is unanswerably evident, that in this wonder-

ful particular He differs totally from all other persons, of whom we

have any knowledge. To disbelieve his atonement, therefore, is

to refuse belief in his peculiar, distinguishing, and essential char-

acter, as the Saviour of Mankind. Of course, this scheme shuts

out all the benefits of Christ's Redemption ; and places mankind

again under Law. But by works of Law no flesh can be justified ;

and, therefore, by this scheme no flesh can be saved.

There are, indeed, Unitarians of both these classes, who ac-

knowledge the atonement of Christ ; but who yet in effect deny it ,

by the necessary consequences of their leading principles. Con-

cerning these men I have no more to say, at present, than that the

hearts of some persons are sounder than their heads ; and that, al

JUSTIFIED BY WORKS OF LAW.

SER. XXXIV.] 517

though their leading principles by their proper influence destroy

the hopes of salvation, yet , as all errors, which are imbibed, are

not obeyed, and, as among such errors the leading principles of

men may, for aught Iknow, be sometimes included ; I am disposed

to entertain better hopes concerning them, than I should feel my-

self authorized by these principles, considered by themselves, to

indulge.

3dly. Practical Unbelief , also , equally cuts off the hope of Sal-

vation.

We become partakers of the benefits of Christ's Redemption

only by exercising evangelical, or cordial, faith in him, as the Re-

deemer. It is to no purpose, that we believe the several records,

given us in the Scriptures concerning his incarnation, life, preach-

ing, miracles, death, resurrection, and exaltation. It is to no pur-

pose, that we believe him to be a Divine Person, the real and all-

sufficient Saviour ; able, willing, and faithful, to save unto the utter-

most all that will come unto God by him. All this, and all other ,

speculative faith is to no purpose ; if we stop here. It is indeed a

step towards Salvation, and a necessary step ; but it is one step

only ; and, if no more be taken, we shall never arrive at the end

of the Christian progress . In addition to this, we must with the

heart confide in Christ, and his Righteousness ; and cheerfully trust

our souls in his hands. This, the practical unbeliever does not ;

and, so long as he continues to be of this character, cannot do.

Let every practical, as well as every speculative, unbeliever,

then , remember, that by his own choice, by his voluntary refusal

to receive Christ as his Saviour, he cuts himself off from justifica-

tion, and consequently from immortal life. Every one of these

men has broken the Law of God, and sinned against him in innu-

merable instances of great and dreadful iniquity. Every one infi-

nitely needs forgiveness, and salvation. At the bar of God, how

terrible will be the remembrance of this voluntary perdition ; this

suicide of the soul!

Repent, therefore, every one of you, and believe on the name of

the Lord Jesus Christ, for the remission of your sins . Repent now.

Behold, now is the accepted time ! behold, now is the day of Salva-

tion ! If Repentance, if Faith, be not now your duty; they can

never be. Now therefore, if you intend ever to hear his voice,

even while it is called to-day, harden not your hearts . Boast not

yourselves of to-morrow ; for you know not what evils another day

may bring forth. Now you are called to repentance, faith, and

holiness ; and invited to eternal life. To-morrow you may be

summoned to the grave, and to the judgment. To-day you are

before the mercy- seat, surrounded with blessings, in the presence .

of a forgiving God, and at the feet of a crucified Saviour. To-

morrow, nay, this very night your souls may be required of you ;

your probation ended ; your account given; the final sentence

pronounced against you ; and your souls consigned to suffering and

sorrow, which shall know no end.

SERMON XXXV.

THE CHRISTIAN SYSTEM GROUNDED ON THE RELIGION OF NATURE,

AND INTRODUCED BY CHRIST.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST . -PROOF FROM THE NAMES GIVEN TO HIM .

ROMANS Viii. 3, 4. -For what the Law could not do , in that it was weak through the

flesh, God, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, con-

demned Sin in the flesh ; That the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in

us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

For God, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and of a sin- offering,

hath condemned sin in the flesh, (the thing impossible to the Law, because it was

weak through theflesh :) That the righteousness of the Law may be fulfilled by us ,

who walk not according to the flesh , but according to the Spirit.

Dr. Macknight's Translation .

IN mylast discourse I endeavoured to show, that Man could not

be justified, and of course could not be saved, by works of Law.

Theplain and necessary result of the establishment of this doc-

trine is , either that he cannot be saved at all ; that is, he cannot be

happy in a future existence ; or that he must be saved by some other,

than the Legal, Dispensation. The Scriptures inform us, that the

latter part of this alternative is the true one and declare, that

Salvation, or future happiness, is attainable by Man. This subject,

then, infinitely interesting to every child of Adam ; this subject ,

boundlessly great, sublime, and glorious; immensely honourable

toGod, and inestimably beneficialto man; becomes the next ob-

ject of our inquiry.

It ought, perhaps, to be observed here, and certainly ought to

be remembered, that our preceding investigation has been confined

chiefly to what is commonly called THE RELIGION OF NATURE.

By this I intend the same with that, which was THE RELIGION OF

ADAM in Paradise ; or, generally, the Religion of beings placed

under Law only. The truths to be believed, and the duties to be

done, by beings , placed under the Law of God, constitute the Sys-

tem , which we call NATURAL RELIGION. This Religion is found

no where, clearly explained, and solemnly sanctioned, except in

the Scriptures. In them it is presented to us in its perfect form,

and with its proper lustre. In all the exhibitions of Philosophy it

is defective, mutilated, and deformed with superadded features,

created only by the imperfect reasonings, and wild imagination, of

Man. In the Scriptures it is disclosed in its native beauty, freed

from every defect and every mixture.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXV. ] 519

On this system, CHRISTIANITY, properly so called, is erected

By Christianity I intend The Religion of fallen Beings ; a Religion

furnishing effectual means of Redemption from their Apostacy, guilt ,

and punishment ; and of their restoration to the favour of God, to

virtue, and to future happiness . The means provided for this end;

the truths to be believed, and the duties to be done, by such beings , in

order to their escape from sin, condemnation, and misery, and their

attainment of justification, holiness , and happiness ; constitute the

sum and substance of the Christian Religion .

To such beings as we are, fallen from the favour of God, pollu-

ted with immoveable guilt, and destined to die for ever, under the

Law which we have broken, such a Religion is plainly of infinite

importance. From the bare contemplation of the subject one

would think, that the tidings, communicated by such a Religion,

must be welcome to Mankind, beyond degree. Every thing which

they need; ; every thing which they can reasonably wish ; every

thing which can purify, adorn, or bless, them ; which can make

them useful and comfortable here, or happy and glorious hereafter ;

it announces from the mouth of God. By such beings it ought

certainly to be received as tidings of great joy unto all people.

In the text the great and commanding doctrines of this Religion

are briefly declared ; and these are the following :

I. That it was impossible for the Law to condemn, or, in other

words, destroy sin in men, while in the state of nature, or under

the legal Dispensation .

II. That God has accomplished this great work by sending his

own Son in the likeness of sinfulflesh, as an offering for sin .

III . That this was done, in order that the righteousness of the

law might be fulfilled by those , who under the influence of the Gos-

pel live lives of new obedience.

It will be easily seen, that these three great propositions contain

the substance of Christianity ; that they teach our Ruined Condi-

tion under the Law ; our Recovery by Christ ; and our Duty and

Obedience in the Christian Character.

The first of these propositions, that it was impossible for the Law

to destroy sin in Man, while in the flesh ; or to furnish Redemption

to apostate beings ; has been already considered at length in the

preceding discourses . This is the state, in which Christianity

found Man, and took the charge of his concerns. Onthis state

Christianity is erected, as on its proper foundation ; and but for

this state appears, in my view at least, to have neither use, expla-

nation, nor meaning.

The second proposition is now to become the subject of discus-

sion. As it is a proposition of vast extent, and contains a great

many particulars of vast importance, demanding severally a minute

examination ; it will furnish an ample field for many discourses .

In this proposition it is asserted , that God has accomplished the

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

520 [ SER. XXXV .

great work of destroying sin in Man by sending his own Son in the

likeness of sinful flesh, as an offering for sin .

The first inquiry, excited by this assertion, is, WHAT IS THE

CHARACTER OF THE PERSON, thus sent ?

The second, WHAT HAS HE DONE ? and,

The third, HoW HAS HE DESTROYED SIN IN MAN ?

In this order I propose to consider these highly interesting sub-

jects.

In the first place, I will proceed to investigate THE CHARACTER

OF THE PERSON, WHO WAS THUS SENT.

The character, given of him in the text, is plainly a singular

one. He is called God's Own Son, and is yet said to have been

sent in the likeness of sinful flesh. These two great particulars,

so unlike, so contrasted, form a character, differing altogether from

every other ; and demand a very diligent consideration. The first

ofthem shall be the immediate object of our attention.

At our entrance upon the investigation of this subject, thefirst

thing which strikes the mind is , that it is a subject of mere Revela-

tion. Without the Scriptures there is no knowledge, in this world,

that such a person exists. The Philosopher, therefore, has no

other concern with this subject, except either to believe, or dis-

believe, the testimony which the Scriptures give. By his own Rea-

son he can add nothing to what is revealed , and without impiety

he can alter nothing.

1

Secondly, As Revelation communicates to us our original know-

ledge of this subject, so it communicates to us, all , which we now

know. The things, which it testifies, were not designed to be,

neither can they become, the materials of future, philosophical in-

vestigation and improvement. The knowledge, which at this day

exists concerning this subject, is all found in the Bible.

Thirdly, The things , communicated concerning it, being commu-

nicated, not in the words which Man's wisdom teacheth, but in those

which the Holy Ghost teacheth, are communicated in the best and

wisest manner possible ; the manner which was approved by infi-

nite Wisdom. There is no error, no oversight; nothing superflu-

ous, nothing defective. That, and that only, is taught, which God

thought it proper to teach, in the manner, which God thought it

proper to adopt.

Fourthly, As the doctrines concerning this singular Person are

ofthe highest moment to plain uneducated men , as well as to men

of learning , it is certain, that the things, really revealed, are so

revealed, that such men, acting with integrity, can understand them,

sufficiently to make them proper and useful objects of their Faith.

Of course , the terms, in which they are revealed, are used in such

a manner, as these men can understand. They are, therefore,

used according to their plain, customary, obvious, meaning ; the

meaning, which they have in the usual intercourse of Mankind. Of

course, also, they have no technical, philosophical, or peculiar,

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXV.] 521

signification ' ; because, if thus used, they could never be understood

by such men; or, in other words, by almost the whole body of

Mankind.

Fifthly, Just so much is revealed concerning this extraordinary

person, as it is useful for us to know. This truth is derived, with

absolute certainty, from the Wisdom and Goodness of God. What-

ever is revealed is revealed by this wisdom and goodness ; and

whatever is withheld is by the same wisdom and goodness with-

held. That which is revealed, therefore, we are required by the

authority of God to believe ; and are bound to have no reference

in our faith to that, which is withheld. Whatever mysteries may

be inferred, or may seem to be inferred, from the things, actually

revealed, can in no manner affect them ; and ought in no manner

to affect our faith in them. All that is taught is exactly true, and

to be faithfully believed ; although all that is true is not taught ; nor

capable of being divined by such minds as ours .

Sixthly, Whatever is contained in the Scriptures concerning this

subject, as concerning every other, that is, in the Scriptures as they

now are, is to be regarded as unquestionably the Word of God, unless

proved not to be genuine by manuscript authority. Nothing is to be

admitted with respect to this subject, which would not be justifia-

bly admitted with respect to any other Scriptural subject. Par-

ticularly, all conjectural emendations of the text are to be rejected

with scorn ; as miserable attempts to mend the Word of God ac-

cording to the dictates of human philosophy. The reasonableness

of this rule is too obvious to need illustration .

With these observations premised, I proceed to examine the

Character of this singular Person, denoted by the phrase, God's

own Son .

The Scriptures are undoubtedly the best commentators on them-

selves, wherever they professedly undertake to explain their own

language. Christ has, in many instances, called himself the Son

of God; and in many more, (which is exactly equivalent ) has de-

clared God to be his father. In one of these instances the Jews

attempted to kill him for challenging this character. The words

which he used were, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.

Therefore, says the Evangelist, in the following verse, the Jews

sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the

Sabbath, but said also, that God was his father, making himself equal

with God. John v. 17, 18. We have here the comment of the

Evangelist on Christ's meaning in adopting this language ; and it is

no other than this : That in declaring God to be his Father, he made

himself equal with God. No commentcan be plainer, or more de-

cisive. But we have, further, the comment of Christ himself : for

such it ought undoubtedly to be esteemed. He had healed the

impotent man at the pool of Siloam on the Sabbath day. The Jews

sought to kill him for this action. He justified himself by this re-

markable declaration, Myfather worketh hitherto, and I work : that

VOL. I. 66

522d

DIVINITY OF CHRIST [SER. XXXV

is, My Father worketh hitherto on the Sabbath day, in his provi-

dence: I, who am his Son, work also in the same manner, and with

the same authority ; being Lord of the Sabbath even as he is. In

the following part of the context, to cut off all room for misconcep-

tion concerning the import of this phraseology, and the character

claimed in it, he informs the Jews in the verses immediately fol-

lowing, that he does all things which the Father does ; that the

Father shews him all things , which himself does ; that he has life

in himself, even as the Father has life in himself; that, as the Father

gives life to whom he pleases, so does the Son ; that it is the will of

the Father, that all men should honour the Son, even as they honour

himself ; that those, who do not thus honour the Son, do not honour

the Father ; that the Son is constituted the only Judge of the quick

and the dead ; and that all, who are in the graves, shall hear, and

obey, his voice, and come forth to the Resurrection, either of life, or

damnation. Such is the comment of the Evangelist on this phrase ;

such are the proofs, that it is uttered in its simple and obvious mean-

ing. Who would imagine, that this meaning could be differently

understood by different readers, or be mistaken by any reader ?

In John x. 30, Christ said to the Jews assembled around him, I

and my Father are one. The unity, here challenged, seems not to

have offended them; (see verse 36 ) but they attempted to stone

him, because he said Iam the Son of God; as he informs us in the

verse last mentioned. Upon being asked by him, for what good

work they stoned him; they replied, For a good work we stone thee

not, but blasphemy, because thou, being a man, makest thyself God.

It will be admitted by all men, who believe the Bible, that Christ

was a person of irreproachable benevolence and integrity. The

Jews declared to him, as the Reason why they were about to stone

him, that in saying, he was the Son of God, he being a Man, made

himself God. If then they had misapprehended his meaning, a

very moderate share of benevolence and integrity must have com-

pelled him to undeceive them ; much more must the perfect integ-

rity and benevolence of Christ have produced this effect. It is

impossible that he should be justified in voluntarily suffering this

imputed blasphemy to rest upon his good name ; and to prevent, as

it could not fail to prevent, their reception of his doctrines, pre-

cepts, and mission. This would have been voluntarily to lay afatal

stumbling -block, or offence, before them : but he himself has said,

Wo to that man, by whom the offence cometh. It would, also, have

been voluntarily to leave thefull impression of a falsehood, uttered

by himself , on their minds ; which would be the same, in a moral

view, as to utter intentionally the same falsehood. Finally ; under

this mistake they were about to murder him ; a crime which he

certainly could not fail of preventing, if they were influenced to

commit it merely by mistaking his meaning ; a thing so easily rec-

tified by his own explanation. It is certain, then, that they did

not mistake his meaning.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXV. ] 523

But , to put the matter beyond all doubt, he himself has settled

the point. If , said he, I do not the works of my Father, believe me

not ; but if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works, that ye

may know and believe, that the Father is in me, and I in him. *

The same subject of controversy arose again, when Christ stood

as a prisoner before the Sanhedrim. After attempting in vain to

prove him guilty of any crime by various means, Caiaphas put him

upon oath, to tell the Sanhedrim whether he was the Christ, the Son

of God. Christ immediately replied in the affirmative . The high

Priest then rent his clothes ; and declared, that he had spoken blas-

phemy; viz. the very blasphemy of which the Jews had before ac-

cused him for the very same declaration ; and the Sanhedrim pro-

nounced him guilty of death . Here, as in the former case, Christ

wenton to challenge, unequivocally, the character denoted by this

phrase; and said, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of Man sitting on

the right hand ofpower, and coming in the clouds of Heaven. Thus

we have the comment of St. John on this phrase ; declaring, that

Christ in using it made himself equal with God : the comment of the

Jewish people and Sanhedrim ; declaring that Christ in using it was

guilty of blasphemy, because, that, being a man, he thus made him-

self God; and Christ himself , according directly with this interpre-

tation of it, justifying his own use of it with this meaning, and bring-

ing irresistible proofs, that he applied it, thus understood, to him-

self , with the most absolute truth andpropriety. If we allow the lan-

guage,here used, to be used in the customary and obvious manner,

the only manner in which it could be understood by those to whom

it was addressed, and in which it can be understood by ninety-nine

hundredths of those who read it ; nay, further, if we do not assign it

ameaning, which each man must laboriously contrive for himself ,

because the obvious meaning does not suit his own system ; or

must receive from another, who has for the same reason contrived

it in this manner ; we must admit all this to be clearly and unques-

tionably said, and to determine the meaning of this phrase in the

text, beyond any rational debate.

If I have satisfactorily settled the meaning of this phrase, the

Text contains, among other things, the following important Doc-

trine:

THAT JESUS CHRIST IS TRULY AND PERFECTLY GOD. This doc-

trine I shall attempt to maintain by a variety of considerations, ar-

ranged in the following manner.

I. I shall attempt to show, that Christ is spoken of in the Scrip-

tures as the true and perfect God :

II. That the Deity of Christ is the only ground of consistency in

the scheme of Redemption :

III. That the Jews, according to the opposite doctrine, are unjustly

charged with guilt in putting Christ to death .

That the Jews understood Christ to confirm their construction of his words is

certain ; for St. John says that they now sought again to take him .

DIVINITY OF CHRIST .

524 [SER. XXXV .

IV. That the Prophets and Apostles, according to the same doc-

trine, cannot be vindicated from the sin of leading Mankind into

idolatry :

V. To these arguments from the Scriptures, Ipropose in another

place, to subjoin several testimonies to the same doctrine from Jews ,

Christians, and Heathens .

I. Ishall attempt to show, that Christ is spoken of in the Scrip-

tures as the true and perfect God.

This argument may be advantageously exhibited by showing,

argument may

I. That the Names of God ;

II. That the Attributes of God ;

III. That the Actions of God ; and

IV. That the Relations, which God sustains to his creatures, are

in the Scriptures ascribed to Christ ; and,

V. That divine worship is in the Scriptures required to be render-

ed, and by persons inspired was actually rendered, to Christ.

I. The Names of God are in the Scriptures ascribed to Christ.

1st. He is directly called God.

John i. 1, In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with

God , and the Word was God. In this passage St. John not only

declares Christ to be God, but to be eternal. In the beginning was

the Word. And in the following verse he declares that he is co-

eternal with God : The same was in the beginning with God : Words

exactly equivalent to those in Proverbs viii. 22, 23, where the same

truth is also asserted : The Lord possessed me in the beginning of

his way; before his works of old. Iwas set up from everlasting ;

from the beginning ; or ever the earth was. Inthe following verse

the Evangelist further declares, that Christ was the Creator of the

Universe, and that without him was not even one thing made, which

has been made. * In this passage of Scripture St. John has not

only declared , that Christ is God; but, to prevent any possible

mistake concerning what he meant by the word God , has told us,

that he is co-eternal with God the Father; and that he is the Cre-

ator of every thing, which exists. Were the Scriptures allowed

to speak their own language, this single passage would decide the

controversy : for it is impossible to declare in stronger language,

or more explicit, that Christ is God in the highest sense, originally,

and without derivation .

Romans ix. 5, Of whom, as concerning the flesh, Christ came,

who is over all, God blessed, for ever. Amen. This passage cannot

be avoided, by any means except a resolute denial.

1 Timothy iii. 16, Without controversy great is the mystery of

Godliness . God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit,

seen of Angels, preached unto the Gentiles , believed on in the world,

See the Original.

These Sermons were written before the results of Griesbach and others were

extensively known in this country. The author was satisfied from an examination

of these results, that the common is the genuine reading of the text .

DIVINITY OF CHRIST .

SER. XXXV .] 525

and received up into glory. Nothing is more evident, than that

these things are said of Christ, and that they can be said of no

other. No other person, and no attribute, can be said to be God ,

manifested in the flesh , justified in the Spirit, seen ofAngels , preach-

edunto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, and received up into

glory. Let any person make the experiment: and he will find it

impossible to make the application of all these things to any other,

than the Redeemer.

Matthew i . 23, and Isaiah vii. 14, Behold a Virgin shall conceive,

and shall bring forth a son ; and thou shalt call his name Emman-

uel ; that is , God with us . Christ, therefore, is God with us.

2 Peter i . 1, To them, that have obtained like precious faith with

us through the righteousness ofGod and ourSaviour, Jesus Christ.

According to the original, of our God and Saviour, Jesus Christ ;

τε Θες ήμων, και Σωτηρος, Ιησε, Χριςς. The common translation is a vio-

lation of the Greek; and, besides, it is through the Righteousness

of Christ only, that the precious faith of the Apostles, and other

good men, is obtained. Jesus Christ is, therefore, our God and

Saviour.

Psalm xlv. 6, 7, quotedin Hebrews i. 8, 9, Unto the Son he saith,

thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever : a sceptre of righteousness

is the sceptre of thy kingdom. Thou hast loved righteousness , and

hated iniquity : therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with

the oil of gladness above thy fellows . This is addressed by God

the Father to the Son. The Father, therefore, has thought proper

to call the Son, God. Who can question the propriety of the ap--

plication ? That we may be assured, that he is called God in the

full and perfect sense, he declares, that the throne of the Son is for

ever and ever. To whom, but God in the absolute sense, can an

everlasting throne, or dominion,be attributed ?

Revelation xxi. 5-7, And he that sat upon the throne said, be-

hold I make all things new ; and he said unto me, I am Alpha and

Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. He that

overcometh shall inherit all things, and Iwill be his God, and he

shall be my son. That it is Christ, who is spoken of in this pas-

sage, is evident by a comparison of Rev. i. 11, and Rev. iii . 21 .

In the former of these passages Christ says, Iam Alpha and Ome-

ga, thefirst and the last. In the latter he says, To him, that over-

cometh, Iwill give to sit on my throne ; even as I overcame, and am

set down with my Father in his throne. In Rev. xx. 11, 12, we are

informed, that John saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it ,

from whose face the heavens and the earth fled away, and there was

found no place for them ; and that he saw the dead, small and great ,

stand before God. He that sat upon the throne in Rev. xxi. 5, is

plainly the same person, who in chap. xx. 11, is exhibited as sit-

ting on the great white throne ; and this person we certainly know

to be Christ : because the Father judgeth no man, but hath com-

mitted all judgment unto the Son ; and because the throne, here

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

526 [SER. XXXV .

spoken of , is the throne of final judgment. In the second and third

of these passages Christ declares himself to be the Alpha and

Omega, the first and the last, or the beginning and the end; and to

be set down upon the throne of his Father. In the first passage he

declares, that he will be a God to him that overcometh. In the last

he is declared by the Evangelist to be God.

There are many other passages, in which Christ is directly called

God. But these are sufficient to establish the point.

2dly. Christ is called the GREAT GOD.

Titus ii . 13, Looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing

of the GreatGod, and our Saviour Jesus Christ. In the Greek it is

the Great God even our Saviour Jesus Christ, or our Great God and

Saviour Jesus Christ. God the Father will not appear at the

judgment. If then, Christ is not the Great God; God will not ap-

pear at the judgment at all. Και, the conjunction here used, is

rendered exactly, in many cases, by the English word Even ; par-

ticularly in the phrase God and our Father, found Gal. i. 4, 1 Thess.

i. 3, 2 Thess. ii. 16, &c. In the last of these places the Transla-

tors have rendered it even, as they plainly ought to have done in

both the others : since the present rendering makes the Apostle

speak nonsense .

3dly. Christ is called the True God.

1 John v. 20, In his son Jesus Christ. This, in the original, This

Person, is the true God and eternal life . If this passage admits

any comment, it must be that of Christ himself; who says, I am

THE life ; and that of the Evangelist : who in the first chapter of

this Epistle, and second verse, says, For the Life was manifested ;

and we have seen it, and bear witness , and shew unto you that eternal

Life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us.

4thly. Christ is called the Mighty God.

Psalms 1. 1-3, The mighty God, even the Lord hath spoken, and

called the earth from the rising of the sun unto the going down

thereof. Out of Zion, the perfection of beauty, God hath shined.

Our God shall come, and shall not keep silence ; a fire shall devour

before him, and it shall be very tempestuous round about him . This

Psalm is a prediction of the last Judgment. In the first verse, the

Person, who comes to judge the world, and who speaks the things,

recorded in this Psalm, is called AL, ALEIM, JEHOVAH ; and is ex-

hibited as calling mankind before himfrom the rising of the sun to

his going down. In the second, he is represented as shining, or

displaying his glory, out of Zion ; that is, by his dispensations to

his Church. In the third, is described the awful splendour, with

which he will appear, the fire which shall consume, and the con-

vulsion which shall rend asunder, the world, at that great and ter-

rible day. But Christ alone will appear on that day ; and at his

presence the heavens shall pass away with a great noise ; and by

the flamingfire, with which he will be surrounded, the elements will

melt with fervent heat, and the earth and the works that are therein

DIVINITY OF CHRIST .

SER. XXXV.] 527

will be burnt up . Christ, therefore, is the God, the MIGHTY GOD,

the JEHOVAH, who is here mentioned.

Isaiah ix. 6, For unto us a Child is born ; unto us a Son is given :

and the government shall be upon his shoulders : and his name shall

be called Wonderful, Counsellor , the Mighty God, the Father of the

everlasting age, the Prince of Peace. This child, this Son, is the

Mighty God; the Father of the everlasting age, and the Prince of

Peace. He who admits, that a child, a son, is the mighty God, will

certainly admit, that this can be no other than Christ. He, who

does not, will charge Isaiah with uttering falsehood.

The same name, Wonderful, is also given to him by himself ,

when appearing as an Angel; or rather as the Angel, to Manoah

and his Wife, Judges xiii. 18, And the Angel of the Lord said unto

him, Why askėst thou thus after my name ; seeing it is secret : in

the Hebrew, seeing it is Wonderful : the same word being used in

both these passages. The Hebrew words, which are translated

the Angel of the Lord, may be literally rendered THE ANGEL- JE-

HOVAH, OF JEHOVAH- ANGEL : that is, He, who, though JEHOVAH, IS

yet a MESSENGER.* For this view of the subject the Scriptures

themselves furnish the most ample authority.

In Isaiah xlviii. 12, and onward, we have these words : Hearken

unto me, O Jacob, and Israel my called. Iam He ; I am the first,

Ialso am the last. Mine hand also hath laid the foundation of the

earth, and my right hand hath spanned the heavens . Icall unto

them : they stand up together. Come ye near unto me ; hear ye

this : Ihave not spoken in secret from the beginning ; from the time

that it was , there am I. And now the LORD God and his Spirit hath

sent me.

Thus saith the LORD, thy Redeemer, the Holy One of

Israel : I am the LORD thy God. Here the Person speaking in-

forms us that he is the First and the Last ; that he has founded the

earth, and spanned the heavens ; that he is JEHOVAH God, the Re-

deemer, and the Holy One of Israel ; and yet he says, that the Lord

Jehovah and his Spirit hath sent him ; or, as Origen and Lowth

translate it , The Lord JEHOVAH hath sent me and his Spirit. The

Person sending, therefore, is JEHOVAH ; and the Person sent is also

JEHOVAH.

The same Person, under the appearance, and by the name of

a

Man, wrestled with Jacob at Peniel, and there gave him the name

Israel, or a Prince of God : assigning for it this remarkable reason :

For as a Prince hast thou power with God, and with men, and hast

prevailed. After asking his name, and receiving a blessing from

him , (upon which he departed) Jacob called the name of the place

Peniel ; for, said he, Ihave seen God face to face, and my life is

preserved.

This Person is called by Hosea, God, the Angel, and JEHOVAH.

He had power with God ; yea, he had power over the Angel, and

See Horsley's New Translation of Hosea. Appendix.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

528 [ SER XXXV..

prevailed. He had wept, and made supplication unto him. He

found him in Bethel ; and there he spake with us, even JEHOVAH,

God of Hosts. Horsley, whose biblical opinions will rarely be

disputed with success, has the following observations on this sub-

ject . " This Man, therefore, of the book of Genesis, this Angel of

Hosea, who wrestled with Jacob , could be no other than the ЈЕНО-

VAH- ANGEL, of whom we so often read in the English Bible, under

the name of the Angel of the LORD. " A phrase of an unfortunate

structure, and so ill conformed to the original, that, it is to be feared,

it has led many into the error of conceiving of the LORD as one

person, and of the Angel as another. The word of the Hebrew,

ill rendered " the LORD," is not, like the English word, an appel-

lative, expressing rank, or condition; but it is the proper name

JEHOVAH. And this proper name JEHOVAH is not, in the Hebrew,

a genitive after the noun substantive "Angel, " as the English

represent it ; but the words

הזהי

and

ראלמ

"JEHOVAH," and

"Angel," are two substantive nouns, in apposition ; both speaking

ofthe same person ; the one by the appropriate name of the Es-

sence; the other by a title of Office. " JEHOVAH- ANGEL" would

be a better rendering. The JEHOVAH- ANGEL of the Old Testa-

ment is no other than He, who, in the fulness of time, was incar-

nate by the Holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary.

According to the scheme of these observations, Manoah under-

stood the character of the Angel who appeared unto him : for he

said unto his Wife, verse 22, We shall surely die, because we have

seen God. In the same manner is the same Person presented to

us, Malachi iii . 1 , Behold, I will send my Messenger, and he shall

prepare the way, before me ; and the Lord, whom ye seek, shall sud-

denly come to his temple ; even the Angel of the covenant whom ye

delight in : behold, he shall come, saith the Lord of Hosts. In

Luke vii . 27, Christ speaking of John the Baptist, says, This is he,

of whom it is written , Behold I send my Messenger before thy face ,

who shall prepare thy way before thee. John the Baptist was,

therefore, the Messenger, who was to prepare the way ; and the Lord,

even the Angel of the covenant, was Christ. The person , also,

speaking, who is here called JEHOVAH OF HOSTS, and who says,

this Messenger shall prepare the way before himself, is also Christ.

5thly. Christ is called the God of Israel.

Exodus xxiv. 9, 10, Then went up Moses and Aaron, Nadab and

Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel. And they saw the God

of Israel. Psalm lxviii. 17, 18, The chariots of God are twenty

thousand, even thousands ofAngels . The Lord is among them, as

in Sinai, even the holy place. Thou hast ascended on high, thou

hast led captivity captive, thou hast received gifts for Men. Ephe-

sians iv. 8, Wherefore he saith, When he ascended on high, he led

captivity captive, and gave gifts unto Men. Now that he ascended,

what is it, but that he descended first into the lower parts of the

earth? He that descended is the same, also, that ascended up far

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXV . ] 529

above all heavens, that he might fill all things, and he gave some

Apostles, and some prophets , &c. Here the Apostle informs us,

that the person, who ascended on high, and led captivity captive, is

Christ. The Psalmist informs us, that the person, who ascended

on high, and led captivity captive, is the Lord, who appeared in

Sinai. And Moses informs us, that the Lord, who appeared in

Sinai, was the God of Israel. We also know, that no man hath

seen God, the Father, at any time. Christ therefore is the God

of Israel. Of course, the God of Israel, so often mentioned in

the Old Testament, is every where, peculiarly Christ .

6thly. Christ is called JEHOVAH.

On this subject Horsley observes, " The word JEHOVAH, being

descriptive of the Divine Essence, is equally the name of every

one ofthe Three Persons in that Essence. The compound JEHO-

VAH-SABAOTH belongs properly to the second Person, being his

appropriate demiurgic title ; describing, not merely the Lord of

such armies, as military leaders bring into the field , but the unmade,

self - existent Maker and Sustainer of the whole array and order of

the Universe."

Isaiah vi. 1 , and 3, In the year that King Uzziah died, I saw

JEHOVAH* sitting on his throne, high and lifted up, and his train

filled the Temple, and one of the Seraphim cried to another, and

said, Holy, Holy, Holy, is Jehovah of Hosts : and again, in the 5th,

8th, 11th, and 12th verses of the same chapter. St. John, quoting

the 9th and 10th verses of this chapter, in his Gospel, chapter xii .

40, says, 1 These things said Esaias, when he saw his, that is , Christ's

glory, and spake of him. To prove beyond controversy, that

Christ is the JEHOVAH OF Hosts, here mentioned, I observe that

no person is spoken of in the chapter, except Uzziah, JEHOVAH OF

HOSTS, the Seraphim, the prophet Isaiah, and the people of Israel.

The Seraphim and the people of Israel, being mentioned only in

the aggregate, must be laid out of the question. Christ, therefore,

being ,bythe the decision of the Evangelist, spoken of in this chapter,

must be either the prophet himself , King Uzziah, or JEHOVAH OF

Hosts. It happens also, unfortunately for Unitarians, that the

prophet saw the glory of no other person, but JEHOVAH OF HOSTS ;

yet St. John assures us, he saw the glory of Christ. St. John's

opinion on this subject we cannot mistake, if we remember, that

he commences his Gospel in this manner : In the beginning was

the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Isaiah xl. 3, The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Pre-

pare ye the way of JEHOVAH, make straight in the desert, a highway

for our God. John the Baptist, when asked by the Messengers of

the Sanhedrim, Who art thou ? answered, John i. 23, I am the

voice of one crying in the wilderness , Make straight the way of the

LORD, as saith the Prophet Esaias. St. Matthew, speaking of John

Lowth's Notes on this Verse

VOL. I.

67

DIVINITY OF CHRIST .

530 [SER. XXXV.

the Baptist , chapter iii. 3, says, This is he that was spoken of by

Esaias the Prophet, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilder-

ness, Prepare ye the way of the LORD, make his paths straight.

From these passages, compared, it is evident, that Christ, before

whom John cried , was the LORD, whose way he directed thus to

be prepared in the wilderness ; the JEHOVAH, Spoken of by the

Prophet; the Jehovah of Hosts, who said, Malachi iii . 1, Behold,

Iwill send my messenger before my face, and he shall prepare the

way before ME.

Exodus iii . 2-6, And the ANGEL- JEHOVAH appeared unto him ,

in a flame of fire, out of the midst of a bush : and he looked, and

behold the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed.

And Moses said, I will now turn aside, and see this great sight, why

the bush is not burned. And when JEHOVAH saw, that he turned

aside to see, God called unto him, out of the midst of the bush, and

said, Moses , Moses ! And he said, Here am I. And he said, Draw

not nigh hither : put off thy shoes from off thy feet ; for the place

whereon thou standest is holy ground. Moreover he said, Iam the

God of thy Father, the GOD ofAbraham, the God of Isaac, and the

GOD ofJacob. And Moses hid his face, for he was afraid to look

upon God. In this passage we are informed, that the ANGEL-JE-

HOVAH appeared to Moses, in the burning bush, and said to him, I

am the GOD of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the GOD of Jacob .

The word Angel, as you well know, denotes a person sent ; and,

of course, implies a person sending. The Person here sent is

called JEHOVAH, and styles himself the God ofAbraham. It needs

no words to show, that the Person sent cannot be God the FA-

THER ; or that he must be the Angel of the Covenant, God the

SON. Christ therefore is the JEHOVAH, mentioned in this passage,

as the GOD of Abraham, the GOD ofIsaac, and the God ofJacob.

The application of these peculiar names of the Godhead to our

Saviour furnishes, in my view, an unanswerable argument to prove

his divinity : for,

1st. In Isaiah xlii. 8, God says, I am JEHOVAH, that is my name,

and my glory Iwill not give to another.

In this passage, God declares, that he will not give his name, or

glory , both terms meaning here the same thing, to another. Yet,

in the word of this same God, his several peculiar and distin-

guishing names are given to Jesus Christ; not indeed communi-

cated to him; but applied to him, as his own original, proper ap-

pellations. This we are taught, at large, Exodus xxiii. 20, 21,

Behold I send an Angel before thee, to keep thee in the way, and to

bring thee into the place which I have prepared. Beware ofhim,

and obey his voice ; provoke him not : for he will not pardon your

transgressions, for MY NAME is IN him. Here we are informed,

that the Angel, sent before the Israelites , would not pardon their

transgressions, if they provoked him ; and are thus certainly taught,

that he possessed the right and power of pardoning sin. But who

DIVINITY OF CHRIST .

SER. XXXV . ] 531

can forgive sins , except God? We are further informed, that the

Name of God is in this Angel; not that it is given, or communicated,

to him, but that it exists in him, and belongs to him, originally .

What this Name is, the passage, last quoted from Isaiah, declares

to us ; Iam JEHOVAH, that is my Name. It is also declared, in the

same manner, to Moses, when asking of God, Exodus iii . 13,

What was his Nume, that he might declare it to the children of Is-

rael. And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM. Thus shall ye say

unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you. It is hardly

necessary to remark, that the name I AM has the same import with

JEHOVAH. All this is rendered perfectly consistent, and obvious,

by the Scriptural accounts of Christ. Iand my Father are one,

said our Saviour to the Jews .

1For God, therefore, in his own word, to give, or apply, his name,

or glory, to Christ , is not to give it to another; but to apply to

Christ names, which are his own proper appellations . But, ac-

cording to the Unitarian doctrine, this assertion, on the part of

God , cannotbe true. The doctrine therefore is false ; for Let God

be true , but every man a liar ; that is, every man, who opposes God.

2dly. In Deuteronomy xxxii. 39, in Isaiah xliii. 10, xliv. 6, 8,

and xlv. 5, 14, 21 , and in various other places , God says, that there

is no God beside him ; that there is none else ; and that he knows

not any. Yet Christ is called God, and announced by other names

ofthe Deity, in the several passages abovementioned, and in many

others ; and this by the same God, who made this declaration.

That he is not so called, in a subordinate, delegated, or derived

sense, is unquestionably evident ; first , from the titles given to him,

viz. The True God ; The Mighty God ; The Great God ; The God

of Israel ; Jehovah ; and Iam ; all of them names, never given in

the Scriptures to any being, but the Deity : secondly, from the

things ascribed to Christ in the same passages ; many of which, as

you must have observed, cannot be predicated of any being, ex-

cept the one living and true God.

Ifit be admitted , then, that the Scriptures speak language which

is to be understood in its customary sense, the only sense in which

it can be intelligible to those to whom it was addressed, and to

ninety- nine hundredths of those for whom the Scriptures were

written ; if it be admitted, that God has chosen the most proper

terms to communicate true ideas of himself to mankind ; it cannot

be denied, that Jesus Christ is truly, and perfectly, Gon.

14

SERMON XXXVI.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST. -PROOFS FROM THE ATTRIBUTES AND

ACTIONS ASCRIBED TO HIM .

ROMANS Viii. 3, 4. -For what the Law could not do , in that it was weak through the

flesh, God, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh , and for sin, con-

demned Sin in the flesh ; That the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in

us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

For God, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and of a sin -offering,

hath condemned sin in the flesh , (the thing impossible to the Law, because it was

weak through the flesh :) That the righteousness of the Law may be fulfilled by us

who walk not according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit.

Dr. Macknight's Translation .

IN the preceding discourse I observed, that the great and com-

manding doctrines of Christianity are briefly declared in this pas-

sage of Scripture ; and, as such, recited the following :

I. That the Law could not destroy Sin in Man :

II. That God has accomplished this work by sending his own Son

into the world :

III. That this was done, in order that the righteousness of the

Law might be fulfilled by Christians .

As thefirst of these propositions had been sufficiently discussed;

I proposed, in a series of Sermons, to examine the second; and to

commence the examination by inquiring into the character of him,

who is here called GOD'S OWN SON. After reciting several scriptu-

ral comments on this phrase, I asserted, that it contains the follow-

ing important Doctrine :

That Jesus Christ is truly and perfectly God.

This doctrine I proposed to illustrate under several heads of Dis-

course, then specified ; the first of which was,

That Christ is spoken of , in the Scriptures, as the True and Per-

fectGod .

The argument, contained in this proposition, I proposed to ex-

hibit by showing, that the

Names,

Attributes, and

Actions of God, together with the

Relations, which he sustains to his creatures, are in the Scriptures

ascribed to Christ ; and, That divine worship is in the Scriptures re-

quired to be rendered, and by persons inspired was actually rendered,

to him.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXVI. ] 533

The first of these subjects, viz. the Names of God, I then show-

ed, at sufficient length for my design, to be abundantly applied to

Christ in the Scriptures. I now propose to exhibit this truth con-

cerning the Attributes .

I. The peculiar attributes of God are ascribed to Christ in the

Scriptures .

1st. Eternity.

Revelation i. 10, 11. &c. Iwas in the Spirit on the Lord's Day,

andheard behind me a great voice as of a trumpet, saying, I am Al-

pha and Omega, the first and the Last, and I turned to see the voice

that spake with me ; and, being turned, I saw seven golden candle-

sticks ; and, in the midst of the seven candlesticks , one like unto the

Son of Man ; and when I saw him Ifell at his feet as dead : and he

laid his right hand upon me, saying unto me, Fear not, I am the

First and the Last, Iam he , that liveth and was dead, and behold,

Iam alive for evermore, Amen .

Revelation ii . 8, These things saith the First and the Last, who

was dead and is alive .

Isaiah xliv. 6, THUS SAITH JEHOVAH, King of Israel, and his

Reedeemer, JEHOVAH OF HOSTS, I am the First, and I am the Last,

and beside me there is no God.

Isaiah xlviii. 12, Hearken unto me, O Jacob, and Israel my call-

ed ; Iam he ; I am the First ; I also am the Last. Mine hand, also ,

hath laid the foundation of the earth, &c .

In the two first ofthese passages, it will not, for it plainly can-

not, be disputed, that the person, spoken of by St. John, and

afterwards speaking of himself , who was like unto the Son of Man

who was dead, is alive, and liveth for ever more, was Christ ; and

this person in four instances declares himself to be the First and

the Last : the strongest assertion, that Eternity past, and to come,

belongs to himself . If he is the First, none can have been before

him : if he is the Last, none can be after him .

In the two last passages, from the Prophet Isaiah, (the latter of

which has in the preceding discourse been clearly proved to be

written concerning Christ ) JEHOVAH OF HOSTS, who declares,

that beside himself there is no God, declares also, that He is the

First, and that He is the Last. This language, with mathematical

certainty, is attributable to but one being ; and that being is the

only living and true God.

Proverbs viii . 22, 23, The Lord possessed me in the beginning

of his way, before his works of old. Iwas set up from everlasting ,

from the beginning, or ever the earth was .

That the Person, here spoken ofunder the name of Wisdom, is

Christ, cannot be rationally questioned by any man, who reads this

chapter with attention ; especially, if he compares it with the ac-

count , given by the same Person, of himself , in the first chapter of

the same book; where he exhibits himself as the Judge, and Re-

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

534 [ SER. XXXVI.

warder, of mankind. To place the matter out of doubt, St. Paul

informs us, that Christ is the Wisdom of God. But this Person says ,

hewas set upfrom everlasting .

Micah v. 2, And thou, Bethlehem Ephrata, though thou be little

among the thousands of Judah , yet out of thee shall he come forth

unto me, that is to be Ruler in Israel ; whose goings forth have been

from of old , from everlasting : In the Hebrew, from the days of

eternity. This passage was, in a sense, proverbially, acknowledged

by the Jewish nation to be a prophecy of Christ. See Matt. ii. 6,

where it is quoted, as such, by the Pharisees, in answer to Herod's

inquiry concerning the birth-place of the Messiah. Besides, God,

speaking in the passage itself , says, Yet out of thee shall he come

forth unto me, &c. Here He, whose goings forth have been from

the days of eternity, is said by another Person to come forth unto

the Person speaking ; that is, unto God the Father.

John i . 1, 2, In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was

with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning

with God.

1 John v. 20, This is the True God, and or even, the Eternal

Life. The names Jehovah, Iam, and I am that I am, already proved

to belong to Christ, are also the strongest expressions of original

and eternal existence. The phrase, Iam, Christ in a peculiar

manner applies to himself . John viii . 58, And Jesus said unto

them, Verily verily I say unto you, before Abraham was I am.

John viii . 24, If ye believe not that I am, ye shall die in your sins .

Matthew xxviii . 20, Lo, I am with you alway, &c. Here Christ

does not say, Before Abraham was , I was ; or I will be with you

alway; but I am, teaching us explicitly, that past and future are

perfectly present to himself; and that his own existence is one pre-

sent time.

2dly. Both by these names , and by other ascriptions of Eternity

to Christ, he is declared to be underived, or self- existent.

He who is the First, he whose existence is one present time, ne-

cessarily exists only of himself.

3dly. Omnipotence is directly ascribed to Christ.

Rev. i. 8, I am Alpha and Omega, the Beginning and the End-

ing, saith the Lord, who is, and who was, and who is to come, the

Almighty. In the 11th verse of this chapter Christ utters these

words of himself . Either, then, there are two persons, who truly

say these things, each of himself; or Christ declares them of him-

self in both these verses . The choice in this alternative I willingly

leave to the Unitarians : for, either way, the great question in de-

bate is determined with equal certainty. If Christ speaks the

words in the 8th verse, he is the Almighty ; if not, there are two

Persons, who are the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last.

Origen comments on these words in the following manner : "And

that thou mayest know the Omnipotence of the Father and the Son

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER . XXXVI.] 535

to be one and the same, hear John speaking in the Revelation in

this manner. These things saith the Lord God, who is , and who

was, and who is to come ; the Almighty : for who is the Almighty

to come, except Christ ? " Origen supposed ῾ο " ερχομενος to indicate

the coming of Christ at the day of Judgment. Psalm xlv. 3, Gird

thy sword upon thy thigh, O Most Mighty. He who is most mighty

is plainly Almighty. Matthew xxviii. 18, And Jesus came, and

spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in Heaven and

in Earth. The Greek word here is εξεσία ; the most proper mean-

ing of which is authority, control, or dominion . But he, who has

the authority, control, or dominion, over all things, unquestionably

possesses all power, in the original and absolute sense.

This control was manifested by Christ in the obedience of dis-

eases, life, and death, the elements of this world, and Angels both

good and evil, to his command. The manner, in which he exer-

cised his control over all these things, was, it should be remembered,

the same, which he used at the creation. In both cases he spoke,

and it was done . The bread, with which he fed the two companies

of four thousand, and five thousand, men, came into existence, just

as the Heavens and the Earth had before done, in obedience to his

mere pleasure . To the leper he said, I will ; be thou clean ; to

the deaf ears , Be opened ; to the blind , Receive thy sight ; to the

demons, come out of the man; and to the winds and waves, Peace :

be still : as he had before said, Let there be light ; and was in the

same manner obeyed. The most proper mode, however, of ex-

hibiting the Omnipotence of Christ, is to appeal to those acts by

which it is peculiarly displayed. When we read John i. 3, All

things were made by him, and without him was not any thing made

which was made ; and Hebrews i. 2, Upholding all things by the

word of his power ; we are presented with the strongest possible

proofs, that his power is unlimited. He, who created, and who

upholds, the Universe, plainly can do every thing, which in its

nature is possible ; and is in the absolute sense Omnipotent.

4thly. Omniscience is also ascribed to Christ .

John xxi . 17, Peter saith unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things .

To this ascription of Omniscience Christ makes no reply ; and,

therefore, admits it in its full latitude. If it had not been true ; it

is impossible, that he should have permitted Peter to continue in

so dangerous an error.

Matthew xi. 27, All things are delivered unto me of my Father,

and no one knoweth the Son, but the Father : neither knoweth any

one the Father, save the Son ; and he, to whomsoever the Son will

reveal him . In this passage both the Omniscience and incompre-

hensibility of Christ are declared by himself . He, who knows the

Father , is Omniscient. He, who is known only by the Father, is

incomprehensible.

No exercise of Omniscience is more peculiarly declaratory of

this perfection, than searching the heart; and none more peculiarly

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

536 [ SER. XXXVI.

challenged by God as his sole prerogative. Accordingly, 1 Kings

viii . 39, Solomon, addressing himself to God in his prayer at the

dedication of the Temple, says, For thou, even thou only, knowest

the hearts of all the children of Men. Yet, Revelation ii. 23, Christ

says , And all the churches shall know, that I am he, who searcheth

the reins and the hearts : and St. John, chapter ii . 23, 24, says Now,

when he was in Jerusalem, at the passover, in the feast day, many

believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did. But

Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men.

Accordingly, in Matthew ix. 4, it is said, And Jesus , knowing their

thoughts : in Matthew xii. 25, And Jesus knew their thoughts : in

Luke v. 22, When Jesus perceived their thoughts : in Luke vi. 8,

But he knew their thoughts : in Luke ix. 47, And Jesus perceiving

the thought of their heart : and in Luke xi. 17, But he, knowing their

thoughts . In all these passages we have the most absolute proof ,

that it is the prerogative of Christ to search the heart ; and that,

therefore, he is the God, to whom Solomon prayed. The same

truth is also declared in the fullest manner by Christ in each of his

messages to the seven Churches, in the verses beginning with I

know thy works , &c. See Rev. ii . iii.

5thly. Omnipresence is ascribed to Christ .

Matthew xviii . 20, Where two or three are gathered together in

my name, there am Iin the midst of them. This fact, the gather-

ing together of persons in the name of Christ, has from the times

ofthe Apostles yearly existed in many thousands of places. Yet

Christ according to his own declaration is in the midst of all these

assemblies .

Matthew xxviii . 20, Lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end

of the world. Here Christ declares, that he is with the Apostles ,

and succeeding Ministers , alway, unto the end of the World. But

Ministers are in a sense scattered through the world. With all

these Christ has promised alway to be present.

Unitarians object against this interpretation of this passage that

"εως της συντελείας τε " αιωνος ought to be rendered unto the end of

the age. To this I answer,first, that this phrase is used three times

in the Gospel of St. Matthew by Christ himself: Matthew xiii . 39 ,

40, and 49, The harvest is the end of the World : as therefore the

tares are gathered and burned in the fire , so shall it be in the end of

this world : and again, So shall it be at the end of the world ; the

Angel shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just.

These, if I mistake not, are the only instances, in which the phrase

is used at all ; and in all these, except the passage now in dispute,

it certainly signifies the end of the World , at the general Judgment.

There is no warrant for supposing, that Christ, who used it in this

sense in three instances out of four, totally varied his meaning in

the fourth instance, without giving any notice of such variation.

Secondly, If the interpretation, contended for, be admitted ; the

passage will still equally declare the truth alleged from it. For,

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SBR. XXXVI. ) 537

if Christ was present alway with the Apostles, only to the end of

the Jewish age, he is Omnipresent. They preached throughout a

great part ofthe world. But no being could be present with them

alway, in these separate and distant regions, but he whofilleth all

things. Ephesians iv. 10.

To avoid the difficulty, which is presented to the Unitarians by

this passage, Mr. Belsham, one of the most considerable Socinian

writers at the present time, informs us, that Christ was with St.

Paul; and, I presume therefore, with the other Apostles : since

the promise was made personally to them ; by his bodily presence,

which yet was invisible. Accordingly, Christ must be supposed to

have beenconstantly, and most rapidly, flying, throughout that age,

from place to place, and from Apostle to Apostle. I cannot but

blush for human nature, to see such wretched subterfuges resorted

to by a man, styled a Minister of the Gospel, as serious comments

on the Word of God; for the sake of escaping from the plain mean-

ing ofhis direct declarations ; and for the sake of retaining a sys-

tem, palpably contradictory to those declarations. What mind does

not revolt at such a debasing representation of the Redeemer ?

Surely this gentleman might have recollected, that St. Peter said,

that the Heavens must receive Christ until the times of the restitu-

tion of all things : that St. Paul said, When he had purged away

our sins , by himself on the cross, he sate down at the right hand of

the Majesty on high : that Christ himself said to his disciples, and

now Igo my way to Him that sent me ; and to the Father, in his in-

tercessory prayer, and now I am no more in the world ; but these

are in the world ; and I come to thee .

But this interpretation will not help the Unitarians over the diffi-

culty. He could not, on this plan, be with them alway; and there-

fore his promise could not be fulfilled. Besides, this promise, thus

understood, would be scarcely at all applicable to the purpose, for

which it was given ; viz. the support and consolation of those, who

should disciple, and baptize, all nations : for these , existing in every

age, as well as in many countries , unto the real end of the world,

need alike the blessing, which is promised.

This is one of the instances, in which a meaning, laboriously

contrived to make the Scriptures accord with a preconceived sys-

tem, is substituted for the obvious and true one ; and may serve as

a representative of the rest.

6thly. Immutability is ascribed to Christ. Hebrews xiii. 8, Jesus

Christ, the same yesterday, to- day, andfor ever.

Psalm cii . 27, &c . quoted Hebrews i. 10, &c. And thou, Lord,

in the beginning, hast laid the foundations of the Earth, and the

Heavens are the works of thy hands. They shall perish, but thou

remainest ; yea, all of them shall wax old as doth a garment, and

as a vesture shalt thou change them, and they shall be changed ;

but thou art the same, and thy years shall have no end. This pas-

sage is declared by St. Paul to be spoken ofChrist, as I shall have

VOL. I. 68

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

538 [SER. XXXVI

occasion to show more particularly hereafter: and in both passages

he is declared to possess absolute immutability. On this subject

I argue in the following manner :

IfChrist is unchangeable ; he is so, either because his faculties

are so immensely great, and his character so perfectly good, as to be

incapable ofchange, either by increase or diminution ; or, if the sup-

position be possible, because he possesses a mind, which, having

originally received all its ideas , is unable, by means of its singular

constitution , either to lose any of those which it has received, or, to

receive any more ; and which, having originally possessed a certain

degree of energy, and moral worth, is, by its singular nature, also ,

made incapable in both these respects of any alteration. No words

are necessary to show , that every new idea makes a real change

in the recipient; and that, therefore, every Intelligent creature

changes of necessity every day, in the manner, which we actually

behold .

That Christ is not unchangeable, according to the latter of these

suppositions, will, I suppose, be admitted without a debate. For

though I have made the supposition, it is, I think, clearly incon-

sistent with the essential nature of an Intelligent being. No such

being , turning his mind to the objects, by which thought is excited,

can possibly fail of receiving new ideas. Besides, that Christ is

not in this manner unchangeable is certain, from Luke ii. 52, And

Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and infavour with God and

man.

Here it is asserted, not only that he changed, when twelve

years of age , but so perceptibly as to have the change dstinctly

marked by those around him.

Therefore, by necessary consequence he, concerning whom this

attribute is asserted, is infinitely different in nature from the Infant,

which was born of the Virgin Mary ; and was united to that Infant

by a mysterious union, so as to become one person, denominated ,

with strict propriety, by the one name Jesus Christ, or the Anoint-

ed Saviour.

II . The peculiar Actions of God are ascribed to Christ in the

Scriptures .

On this subject I observe,

1st. That the Creation of all things is ascribed to Christ;

John i . 3, By him all things were made ; and without him was

not even one thing made, which hath been made.

Colossians i . 16, For by him were all things created, that are in

heaven and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be

thrones , or dominions, or principalities , or powers, all things were

created by him andfor him.

Hebrews i. 10, quoted from- Psalm cii. 25, Thou Lord in the be-

ginning hast laid the foundations of the earth ; and the heavens are

the work of thy hands .

It has been denied, that this last passage is applied by the Apos-

tle to Christ; but the denial cannot , I think, have proceeded even

DIVINITY OF CHRIST .

SER. XXXVI. ] 539

from prejudice. It must have resulted from absolute inattention.

In the 7th verse the Apostle says, And of the angels he saith, Who

maketh his angels spirits, and his Ministers a flame offire . But

unto the Son he saith, What ? Two things, which follow. Thefirst,

quoted from the xlvth Psalm, beginning Thy throne, O God, is for

ever and ever ; the second , quoted from Psalm cii. and beginning

with Thou Lord in the beginning hast laid the foundations of the

earth : and these two are coupled by the conjunction Και, or and. *

In this manner the passage has meaning, and syntax ; but, without

it, has neither. If the passage be not applied to Christ by the

Apostle, he departs entirely from his discourse, begun before, and

continued after, this passage ; that is, carried through the whole

chapter ; and inserts these three verses, containing, according to

this scheme, not even a parenthetical reference to any thing in the

chapter, nor indeed to any thing in the whole book. In the mean

time, the and, by which it is connected with the former quotation,

and which determines it, beyond debate, to be a part of the speech

of the Father to the Son, makes it, according to this scheme, to be

ungrammatical nonsense. Surely such writing ought not to be at-

tributed to the Apostle Paul ; even if we regard only his charac-

ter, as a man of understanding. It ought, however, to be remark-

ed, that for the present purpose the passage may be dispensed

with, without any any disadvantage : those, which remain, being abun-

dantly sufficient to establish the point. In the two former of these

passages it is asserted, that all things in Heaven and in earth, visi-

ble and invisible ; nay, that every thing which has been made, with-

out the exception even of one ; were created by Jesus Christ : in the

latter, the heavens and the earth, the Jewish appropriate phrase to

denote the Universe, are declared to be the work of his hands .

Onthese passages I observe, that, if a person, thoroughly ac-

quainted with language, were to sit down purposely to express the

proposition, that Christ created all things, he could not find words

to express it more clearly, and decisively, than those, which con-

vey to us each of these scriptural declarations . St. John, particu-

larly , has gone the utmost length, which human language will per-

mit ; when, after saying, And by him all things were made, he

subjoins, and without him was not even one thing made, which has

been made.

2dly. The preservation of all things is also ascribed to Christ in

the most explicit manner.

Colossians i. 17, By him, that is, Christ, do all things consist .

Hebrews i. 1 , 2, God, who at sundry times, and in divers man-

ners, spake unto our fathers by the Prophets, hath in these last days

spoken unto us by his son ; Whom he hath appointed heir of all

things ; by whom also he made the worlds : Who, being the bright-

ness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and uphold-

ing all things by the word of his power, &c .

See an example of the same mode of connexion, Matt. xxiii . 16-18.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

540 [SER. XXXVI .

Onthese passages it cannot be necessary to dwell. They plainly

havebut one meaning: and that meaning is too explicit to admit

even of an ingenious misconstruction. The words make it evident, if

words canmake it evident, that Christ is the Upholder ofall things .

3dly. The Government of all things is, in the same direct and

distinct manner, applied to Christ, Psalm xlv. 6, Thy throne, OGod,

is for ever and ever.

The second Psalm, throughout, is an illustrious exhibition of the

universal dominion of Christ .

The seventy- second Psalm is a still more glorious exhibition of

the same subject. Here it is said, that his dominion shall extend

from sea to sea, and from the river to the ends of the earth ; that

all Kings shall bow down to him : that all nations shall serve him :

that they shall fear him as long as the sun and the moon endure :

that his name shall endure, and be blessed, for ever : and that the

whole earth shall be filled with his glory. Amen.

Psalm cx. 1 , The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right

hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.

Psalm viii . 5, Thou madest him a little (for a little time ) lower

than the Angels , and hast crowned him with glory and honour :

Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands.

See this passage applied to Christ, Heb. ii . 9.

Isaiah ix. 6, 7, Unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given ;

and the government shall be upon his shoulder. And his name shall

be called Wonderful, Counsellor, the Mighty God, the Father of the

everlasting Age, the Prince of Peace . Of the increase of his go-

vernment and peace there shall be no end.

Daniel vii. 13, 14, And I saw in the night visions , and behold, onc

like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to

THE ANCIENT OF DAYS ; and they brought him near before him.

And there was given him dominión, and glory, and a kingdom ; that

all people, nations , and languages , should serve him : his dominion

is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away ; and his king-

dom that, which shall not be destroyed.

The same doctrine is pursued throughout the New Testament in

the same explicit manner. Acts x. 36, The Word, which he sent to

the children of Israel, proclaiming glad tidings of peace by Jesus

Christ. This person is Lord of all things

Rom. ix. 5, Of whom, as concerning the flesh , Christ came, who

is over all things, God blessed for ever and ever. Amen.

1 Cor. xv. 25, For he must reign, until he hath put all enemies

under his feet.

Ephesians i . 20, Which he wrought in Christ, when he raised him

from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly

places, far above all principality, and power, and might, and domin-

ion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but in that

which is to come : and hath put all things under his feet ; and given

Aim to be head over all things unto the Church .

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXVI.) 541

Philippians ii . 9-11, Wherefore God hath highly exalted him,

and given him a name which is above every name : that at the name

of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in Heaven, and things in

earth, and things under the earth ; and that every tongue should

confess, that he is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

These numerous passages are, comparatively, but a few of those,

in which the Scriptures assert the absolute and universal dominion

of Christ. I have recited such a number of them, to show, that

this doctrine runs through the whole sacred volume. No words

can be conceived, which can express absolute and supreme do-

minion over all beings, and all events, more unequivocally, or more

forcibly, than these. The name of Christ is here declared to be

above every name that is named, not only in this world, but in that

which is to come, in earth and in heaven, in time and in eternity.

All things in all worlds are required to bow to him. Angels of

every order, as well as men, it is declared, shall thus bow to him,

either voluntarily, or involuntarily ; and shall confess that he is

Lord, to the glory of God the Father. This dominion also is as-

serted to be without limits, and without end. I shall only add, from

the mouth of Christ himself , Iam the first and the last and the

living one. Also I was dead, and behold, I am the living one for

ever and ever : and I have the keys of Hades and of Death. I shut,

and no one openeth ; I open, and no one shutteth : Rev. i. 17, 18,

and iii . 7; and the equivalent passage, Matthew xxviii. 18, And

Jesus came, and spake unto them, saying, All authority in Heaven

and in earth is given unto me. Here Christ asserts, that the right-

ful exercise of all power in heaven and in earth is in his possession ;

that he has the keys of Hades and of Death ; or the absolute con-

trol over the world of the dead and the region of departed spirits .

From that world, from that region, none of the numberless inhabit-

ants can escape without his permission ; but, when the gates are

unlocked by him, none can hinder them from coming forth ; as at

his call they will actually do, on the great and final day.

4thly. The act of giving and restoring Life is also expressly as-

cribed to Christ in a variety of ways .

Particularly, while he resided in this world, he raised the dead

at his pleasure. The daughter of Jairus, the son of the Widow of

Nain, and his beloved Lazarus, were illustrious examples. All

these returned again from the world of departed spirits at his com-

mand. Damsel, I say unto thee, Arise ; Young man, I say unto

thee, Arise ; Lazarus, Comeforth; were the only means, which he

employed ; and the spirits of these deceased persons instantly

obeyed the call. This amazing power he accordingly asserts of

himself in terms absolute and universal. As the Father raiseth up

and quickeneth, even so the Son quickeneth whom he will. John v. 22.

As the Father hath life in himself , so hath he given to the Son to

have life in himself . In the same manner, St. Paul declares, *

See also Phil. iii. 21, and Col. iii. 4.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

542 [SER. XXXVI .

1 Cor. xv. 45, Thefirst Adam was made a living soul ; the last Adam

was a quickening Spirit. In a still more striking manner did he

exemplify this wonderful power in raising himselffrom the dead.

That he did this cannot be doubted, unless we are disposed to

doubt the truth of his own express declaration. John x. 17, 18,

Therefore doth my Father love me because I lay down my life that I

might take it up again : no one taketh it from me, but I lay it down

of myself . I have power to lay it down, and Ihave power to take it

up again.

In this passage it is as evident, as words can make it, that Christ

laid down his life, of his own accord only, and of his own accord

took it up again ; and that no one was able to take it from him.

Accordingly St. Peter declares, Acts ii. 24, that it was not possible

for him to be holden of death .

Another most wonderful exhibition of this astonishing power will

be made by him, as he himself has told us, in raising up the dead

at the last day. And this is the will of Him that sent me, that every

one who seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting

life ; and I will raise him up at the last day. John vi. 40. And

again, verse 56, Whoso eateth my flesh , and drinketh my blood, hath

eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. See also

verses 39 and 44. John v. 28, Marvel not at this ; for the hour is

coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice,

and shall come forth ; they that have done good to the resurrection

of life, and they that have done evil to the resurrection of dam-

nation .

After Christ had ascended to Heaven, the Apostles , according to

his promise, raised the dead by his power and authority ; and thus

proved the Ubiquity of his power, as well as of his presence.

As there can be no rational doubt concerning these passages,

and no misconstruction of them except by violence; I do not sup-

pose any explanation of them to be necessary. They carry their

own meaning perfectly in themselves, and therefore demand no

comment. The united language of them all is, that Christ in him-

self perfectly possesses the power of giving life ; that in this world

he exercised it on himself , and many others; and that he will most

wonderfully display the same power, at the end of this earthly sys-

tem, by raising to life the great congregation of the dead.

5thly. The forgiveness of Sin is expressly ascribed to Christ.

Thus in Exodus xxiii. 20, 21, already quoted for another pur-

pose, it is said , Behold I send an Angel before thee to keep thee in

the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared .

Beware ofhim, and obey his voice ; provoke him not : for he will

not pardon your transgressions ; for my name is in him. In this

passage it is evident beyond a doubt, that the Angel, who was sent

before the Israelites , was possessed of the power, and right, to for-

give sins. Otherwise God could not have thus cautioned the

Israelites not to provoke him, for this reason : since the reason

DIVINITY OF CHRIST .

SER . XXXVI.] 543

would not have existed ; and would, therefore, have been alleged

insincerely. But this cannot be attributedto God. 2 Corinth-

ians ii. 10, For if Iforgave any thing , to whom I forgave it , for

your sakeforgave Iit in the person of Christ. The Apostle here

declares to the Corinthians, that he forgave the offenders, refer-

red to in his former epistle, in the person of Christ : or standing

as his representative : but, if Christ could not himself forgive sins,

the Apostle might with equal propriety have said, that he forgave

it in the person of any other : the person of Christ, here, being

equivalent to the name and authority of Christ ; but, if Christ had

not the power to forgive sins, this authority would have been no-

thing. Colossians iii . 13, Forbearing one another, and forgiving

one another, if any man have a quarrel against any, even as Christ

forgave you.

The import of this passage will be sufficiently understood, if it

canneed any explanation, by reciting the parallel passage Eph. iv.

32, Forgiving one another, even as Godfor Christ's sake hath for-

given you.

Acts vii . 59, 60, And they stoned Stephen, invocating, and say-

ing, Lord Jesus receive my spirit. And he kneeled down and cried

with a loud voice, Lord, lay not this sin to their charge .

In this affecting passage Stephen, full of the Holy Ghost, and

vouchsafed a vision of the glory of God, and of Jesus standing on

the right hand of God, prays to Christ to forgive the sin of his mur-

derers. Words, one would think, cannot be more decisive.

Matthew ix . 2-7, And, behold, they brought to him a man sick

of the palsy, lying on a bed : and Jesus, seeing their faith, said unto

the sick of the palsy, Son, be ofgood cheer ; thy sins are forgiven

thee. And, behold, certain of the scribes said within themselves ,

This man blasphemeth. And Jesus, knowing their thoughts , said,

Wherefore think ye evil in your hearts ? For, Whether is easier to

say, Thy sins be forgiven thee ; or to say, Arise and walk ? But

that ye may know that the Son of Man hath power on earth to for-

give sins, (then saith he to the sick of the palsy ) Arise, take up thy

bed, and go unto thine house. And he arose, and departed unto his

house.

In this passage Christ said to the sick of the palsy, Son, thy sins

are forgiven thee. Some of the Scribes, who were present, accused

him in their own hearts of blasphemy ; and said, as Mark informs

us, Who can forgive sin, but God only ? In this also they spoke the

truth. Christ knew their thoughts ; and asked them, Wherefore

think ye evil in your hearts ? For whether is easier, to say, Thy sins

beforgiven thee, or to say, Arise, and walk ? Both these acts be-

longing to God only, the latter is here, with supreme force, pro-

posed as a test of the former. Christ, therefore, makes it such ;

and tells the Scribes, that he will prove to them his power to for-

give sins by his power to raise up the sick of the palsy, with a

command. Accordingly, as a proof in form, that he possessed this

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

544 [SER . XXXVI

power, he says to the sick ofthe palsy, Arise, and walk. The sick

man immediately arose, and departed to his house.

Here the power of Christ to forgive sins was denied by the

Scribes, and expressly asserted by himself . Of this assertion he

undertook the proof , on the spot ; and the proof , proposed, was a

miracle. Amiracle can be wrought by none but God; and God

cannot work a miracle, to prove a falsehood. The miracle was

wrought ; the assertion, therefore, was true .

6thly. The act of giving Eternal life is abundantly ascribed to

Christ in the Scriptures .

John x. 27, 28, My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and

theyfollow me ; and Igive unto them eternal life, and they shall

never perish. Revelation xxi. 6, I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and

the end. Iwill give unto him, that is athirst, of the fountain of

the water of life freely .

Revelation ii . 7, To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the

tree of life, which is in the midst of the Paradise of God. See also

verses 17, and 28.

Revelation iii . 5, He that overcometh , the same shall be clothed in

white raiment ; and Iwill not blot out his name out of the book of

life. See, also, verses 12 and 21 .

These passages need no explanation .

7thly. To Christ is ascribed the great and awful act of Judging

the world, and of acquitting and condemning angels and men.

John v. 22, The Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all

judgment unto the Son. See also, what will preclude any further

inquiry , the account of the last judgment, given by Christ himself,

in the 25th chapter of Matthew .

All these are confessedly the acts of the infinite God alone ; and

involve the absolute possession of power, and perfection without

limits . To create, preserve, and govern, the Universe ; to give

and restore life ; to forgive sin; to bestow eternal life ; to judge

the world of angels and men, and acquit, or condemn, finally and

for ever all Intelligent beings ; is, if any thing is, to be, and to act

as being, the true God; the only, infinite, and eternal JEHOVAH.

In the great act ofjudging the world, particularly, the absolute

exercise, and the most wonderful display ever made, of Omnis-

cience, as well as Infinite Justice, will be made. To judge right-

eously in this amazing case plainly requires the most exact and

minute, as well as the most comprehensive and perfect know-

ledge of all the thoughts, words, and actions, of Intelligent beings ;

together with all the aggravations and palliations of guilt, and all

the enhancements and diminutions ofvirtue, which have existed in

the Universe. Consequently, whatever circumstances have at-

tended these innumerable beings must be perfectly known, and

actually present at once to the view of such a judge. Nor must

he be less perfectly acquainted with the precise kinds, and distri

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER XXXVI. ] 545

butions, ofpunishment and reward, which the respective works,

and characters, of these numberless individuals, in their endlessly

various circumstances, justly require.

To these things must be added, what Christ directly challenges

to himself , the power of opening and shutting heaven and hell, or

Hades, at his pleasure, and of conferring the happiness of heaven,

and inflicting the miseries of hell, on whom he pleases .

If , then, Christ be not God; the real God has so ordered things

in his providence, that the peculiar displays of divine perfection,

the greatest which will ever be made, will be made by a creature,

and not by himself . The creation, preservation, and government,

of the Universe ; the giving of life, and the restoration of it to the

dead; the forgiveness of sin ; the communication of endless life ;

and the final judgment of Intelligent beings; are the highest, the

most peculiar, and the most perfect, displays of the Godhead.

Omnipotence and Infinite Wisdom are pre-eminently manifested in

the formation and government of all things ; Infinite Benevolence,

in the forgiveness and salvation of sinners ; and Omniscience and

Infinite Justice, in acquitting and condemning, rewarding and pun-

ishing, the righteous and the wicked.

If , then, these, the most perfect, displays of the Godhead, do

not prove Christ to be the real and supreme God; let me ask, In

what manner, and by what arguments, shall we prove, that there

is such a God ? The existence and perfections of this glorious Be-

ing have, hitherto, been always evinced from the Creation, Pre-

servation, and Government, of the Universe. But these, if the

Scriptures are true, are the acts of Christ. If , then, they prove

the existence of God at all ; they certainly prove Christ to be God.

Ifthey do not prove him, whose acts they are, to be God; they

donot prove God to exist at all : for they cannot prove him to be

God, whose acts they are not. To what proofs, then, of the be-

ing ofGod are we to recur , unless we admit these to be the proofs ?

and ifwe admit them, how can we deny, or doubt, the Deity of

Christ?

Let me further ask each member of this assembly to apply this

subject to his own case ; and say, whether he is not ready fear-

lessly to commit his all to Him, who has done, and will do, all

these amazing things ? who in the Scriptures is called God, and

JEHOVAH ; and to whom all the attributes of the Infinite Mind are

ascribed ? If he is not; let me ask him, To what being is he willing

to trust this mighty deposit; himself ; his soul; his all?

Vor. I. 69

SERMON XXXVII.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST PROVED FROM DIVINE RELATIONS, SUSTAINED

BY HIM ; AND FROM DIVINE WORSHIP, AND RENDERED, TO HIM.

ROMANS viii. 3, 4. -For what the Law could not do, in that it was weak through the

flesh, God, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh , and for sin, con-

demned Sin in the flesh ; That the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in

us , who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit .

For God, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and of a sin- offering,

hath condemned sin in the flesh, (the thing impossible to the Law, because it was

weak through theflesh :) That the righteousness of the Law may be fulfilled by us ,

who walk not according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit.

Dr. Macknight's Translation.

HAVING shown in the two preceding discourses, that Christ is

spoken of in the Scriptures as the true andperfect God ; because,

1st. The Names,

2dly. The Attributes, and,

3dly. The Actions of God are ascribed to him ; I shall now pro-

ceed to consider the remaining particulars, proposed under this

head: viz.

4thly. That the Relations, which God sustains to his creatures,

are, in the Scriptures , ascribed to Christ ; and,

5thly. That Divine Worship is in the Scriptures required to be

rendered, and by persons inspired was actually rendered, to Christ.

In examining the Relations , sustained by God to his creatures , and

ascribed in the Scriptures to Christ, so copious a field is opened for

discussion, that it can only be partially surveyed at the present time.

I shall, therefore, confine my attention to the following particulars .

1st. Christ sustains to the Universe the Relation of Creator.

In the passages, quoted in the preceding discourse, to prove, that

the act of creating is ascribed to Christ in the Scriptures, it is as-

serted, that he is the Creator of the Heavens and the Earth ; of

Thrones, Dominions, Principalities , and Powers ; and of every in-

dividual thing, which hath been made. In the Relation of Creator

he stands, therefore, to every being, great and small, in the Hea-

vens and in the Earth. Atoms were called into existence by his

word: Angels owe to him their exalted being. This is a relation,

which no being, but the infinite JEHOVAH, can sustain ; and is

plainly that, onwhich all the other relations of God to his crea-

1

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXVII . ] 547

tures depend. Accordingly, God challenges this character to him-

self , as his character alone, sustained by himself only. I , saith he,

am JEHOVAH, and none else ; forming light, and creating darkness ;

making peace, and creating evil : I JEHOVAH am the author ofall

these things . * Whatever the Creator makes is in the most absolute

sense his own ; and can in no sense belong to any other, unless by

his gift. Whatever connexion, therefore, exists between God, as

God, and creatures, as such, arises originally, and entirely, from

the act of bringing them into being. All the rights which the In-

finite Mind claims, and holds, over the Universe, and all the duties

of Intelligent creatures, spring, originally, from this source only.

It is His Universe, because He made it. They are His property,

because by Him they were created. As their Creator therefore,

they look to him, and him alone, to whom they are indebted for

every thing, and to whom they owe every thing, which they can

do ; because every thing, in which they can be concerned, depends

upon their existence. But for this ; however excellent , great, and

desirable, he might be, and however deserving of their love and

admiration ; still they would not be his. This, Godhimself teaches

us in direct terms. Remember these things , O Jacob ; and Israel,

for thou art my servant. I have formed thee ; thou art my servant .

But now, saith the Lord that created thee, O Jacob, and he that form-

ed thee , O Israel, fear not, thou art mine. Out of this act of giving

existence arises, then, his property in all creatures ; and his right

to give them laws, to control their actions, to judge, reward, and

punish them, and universally to dispose of them according to his

pleasure : together with all their corresponding duties. To Christ,

then, belong all these rights. But who can possess these rights, or

sustain the Relation, out of which they arise, beside the only, living,

and true God ?

In sustaining this relation to the Universe, Christ possesses, also,

of course, all the attributes, necessary to it, and displayed in the

work of creating ; particularly the power and wisdom, manifested

in the production ofall things. This power and wisdom are plain-

ly infinite.

Iknow it is said by Emlyn, and other Arians, that we do not see

the infinity of these attributes displayed in creating the Universe ;

and that they may, for aught that appears to us, have existed in a

sufficient degree for the production of all things , andyet not have

been infinite.

On this subject I observe,

1st. That of creating power, in the abstract, or unexercised, we

have no idea at all ; and , therefore, cannot thus discern it to be in-

finite. 2dly. We cannot comprehend infinity in any sense .

Themind,

which can comprehend infinity, must itself be infinite.

When we

Isaiah xlv. 6, 7. Lowth.

1

DIVINITY OF CHRIST

548 [ SER . XXXVII.

speak of infinite power, as evident in the creation of all things, que

simply declare the fact, that this power is infinite. That infinity

exists with respect to duration, expansion, or any thing else which

is infinite, we may perceive distinctly ; and yet are perfectly unable

to comprehend eternity, or immensity.

3dly. The power of creating, or giving existence, is evidently a

subject to which limits can no more be assigned in our thoughts than

to duration, or space. Plainly, he who gave existence to one atom,

cangive existence to Atoms, and therefore to worlds, without num-

ber. He who gave intelligence, who formed men, and angels, and

archangels, can form all kinds, and degrees, of intelligence, which

can be formed ; and can raise men, and angels, and other rational

beings, to any height, to any perfection, of intelligence, which in

the nature of things is possible. To this power, therefore, no

other bound can be set, beside possibility. He who formed all

things cannot create contradictions . This, however, is no circum-

scription of his power; for if it could be done he could do it. The

only difference, which would exist, would be in the nature of the

things themselves, and not in the power of the Maker.

4thly. If Creation and Preservation be not a proof of infinite

power, there is no proof , that such power exists. Of this there

needs no illustration, but one : viz. that these are the only sources ,

whence infinite power has been hitherto argued in the present

world : for the argument a priori I consider as of no value.

5thly. We plainly cannot see, that Creating power is not infinite ;

nor can we furnish a single argument for the support of such a con-

clusion. The doctrine is, therefore, a mere gratuitous assump-

tion; and merits as little consideration, as any other such assump-

tion .

6thly. Creating power is the source ofall power that exists, ex-

cept itself . If therefore creating power is not infinite, there is no in-

finite power. Christ therefore, as the Creator of all things, pos-

sessed originally all existing power ; whether we allow it to be in-

finite, or not.

7thly. The Scriptures have determined this point so far as the

subject of this Sermon is concerned : for in Hebrews iii . 4, they

say, Every house is builded by some one : but he that built all things

is God.

It will be easily discerned, that the remarks made here, concern-

ing the power, displayed in Creation, are with equal force applica-

ble to the Wisdom, exhibited in that work.

2dly. Christ sustains also the Relation of Preserver.

By him all things consist.

Upholding all things by the word of his power.

That God is the only preserver of the Universe is unquestion-

ably evident to the eye of Reason ; and has accordingly been ac-

knowledged by all men , who have acknowledged a God. It is,

alse, in the most definite manner declared in the Scriptures. In

!

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXVII. ] 549

Nehemiah ix. 6, the Levites at the head of the Congregation, as-

sembled for a solemn, national fast, blessed God in these terms .

Thou, even thou, art Jehovah alone, thou hast made heaven, the

heaven of heavens, with all their hosts ; the earth, and all things

that are therein ; the seas , and all that is therein, and thou preservest

them all ; and the host of heaven worshippeth thee. Thou art Jeho-

vah, the God, who didst choose Abram, and brought him forth out of

Ur of the Chaldees, and gavest him the name of Abraham. In this

passage it is declared in the most explicit terms, that He, who pre-

serves all things, is the Being worshipped by the host of heaven ;

Jehovah alone ; The JEHOVAH ; The GOD ; according to Parkhurst

and Lowth, The JEHOVAH, The true, eternal, and unchangeable

GOD; the GOD who chose Abram, brought him forth out of Ur of

the Chaldees, and gave him the name of Abraham. In the subse-

quent verses we are further informed, that he is the God of Israel ;

the great, the mighty, and the terrible God ; gracious and merciful;

the Author of all the wonders in Egypt, the Red Sea, and the Wil-

derness , and of the dispensation of the law at Sinai ; the only ob-

ject of prayer, supreme love, faith, and obedience. Yet all things

consist by Christ, and he upholds them all by the word of his power.

He, therefore, is this JEHOVAH ; this GOD.

The relation of Universal Preserver is plainly a relation incapa-

ble of being sustained by any being but JEHOVAH. It involves a

knowledge of all beings, and all their circumstances ; a power pre-

sent in every place, and to every being, at every moment ; suffi-

cient in degree to hold in existence, to keep together, and to con-

tinue in order and harmony, the mighty frame of the Universe ; to

roll the innumerable worlds, of which it is composed, unceasingly,

through the expansion ; and to control, with an irresistible sway,

all their motions, affections, and inhabitants ; and a wisdom suffi-

cient to contrive the proper employments, and destinations, of this

endless multitude of beings, as well as the natures and attributes

necessary for them, so as to accomplish those ends, and those only, .

which are worthy of the incomprehensible Workman. Of this

power, knowledge, and wisdom, the Scriptures, therefore, assert

Christ to be possessed when they declare him to be the Preserver

ofall things. Our ideas of the power, exerted in the preservation,

and also in the creation, of the Universe, they exceedingly en-

hance, by informing us, that both these amazing works are accom-

plished by his word. Upholding all things by the word of his power.

He spake ; and it was done. Of course, both are performed with

perfect ease ; and he, who does them, fainteth not, neither is weary .

In the character of the Preserver of the Universe, all creatures

owe to Christ the continuance of their blessings, and their hopes .

As we should have been nothing, had we not been created, so we

should become nothing, were we not preserved. On this relation,

therefore, next after that of Creator , we depend for every thing ;

and to him who sustains it we owe every thing. Were it possible,

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

550 [SER . XXXVII .

that he, who sustains it , should be any other than God, we should

still, originally and continually, owe all things to him, and nothing

to God. To such a monstrous absurdity does the opinion, that

the Creator, and Preserver, is any other than the True and Perfect

God, ultimately conduct ; and, if they would be consistent with

themselves, does in fact conduct, those, who deny Christ to be

God.

As the Preserver of the Righteous, Christ is appropriately call-

ed, in the Scriptures, by the emphatical name of the Shepherd. I ,

saith he, of himself , am the good Shepherd. The good shepherd

giveth his life for the sheep. I am the good Shepherd and know my

sheep ; John x. 11, 14. Our Lord Jesus, that Great Shepherd of

the Sheep ; Hebrews xiii . 20. And when the chief Shepherd shall

appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory, which fadeth not away ;

1 Peter v. 4. There shall be one fold, and one Shepherd; John x.

  1. -Awake, O Sword, against my Shepherd, against the Man that

is my fellow, &c .; Zech. xiii. 7. -Behold, the Lord God will come

with strong hand, and his arm shall rule for him : behold, his re-

ward is with him, and his work before him. He shall feed his flock,

like a shepherd ; he shall gather the lambs with his arm, and carry

them in his bosom, and shall gently lead those that are with young;

Isaiah xl. 10, 11.-JEHOVAH is my Shepherd ; Ishall not want. He

maketh me to lie down in green pastures ; he leadeth me beside the

still waters . He restoreth my soul ; he leadeth me in the paths of

righteousness , for his name's sake ; Psalm xxiii . 1-3. In these

passages we are informed, that Christ is the good Shepherd, the great

Shepherd, the chief Shepherd, and The Shepherd of God, the Man

that is the fellow, or compeer, of Jehovah of Hosts. We are fur-

ther informed, that there is one Shepherd to the flock ; that he is

the final Judge of the quick and the dead ; that JEHOVAH is the

Shepherd of David, one of the Righteous, and therefore, by irresis-

tible consequence, of all the righteous ; that the Lord God will

feed his flock, like a

like a Shepherd, will gather the lambs with his arm,

and carry them in his bosom. If , therefore, Christ be not JEHOVAH ;

if he be not the Lord God, then there are two Shepherds, instead

of one ; of whom Christ is still the chief and the great Shepherd :

and, although the Shepherd of David was JEHOVAH, yet Christ is

the Shepherd of all other righteous persons. This character Christ

recognizes, when he informs us, that at the Great Dayhe will sepa-

rate the Sheep from the goats ; and this character he will for ever

sustain in the future world ; for there, we are taught, he will feed

them , and lead them to living fountains of waters .

3dly. Christ sustains the Character of the Possessor of all things .

At his entrance into this world, it is said, He came unto his own

things , τα ιδια ; and his own men, or kindred, ( ' οι ' ιδιοι ) received him

not ; that is, he came into the world, but mankind or the Jewish

nation received him not. John i. 11. All things, saith Christ, *

which the Father hath, are mine, or my things ; John xvi. 15.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXVII.] 551

Again, in his intercessory prayer, he says to the Father, All things ,

that are mine, are thine ; and the things, which are thine, are mine ;

John xvii. 10. It will be needless to add any further passages

to texts so perfectly explicit, and unambiguous, as these. It is

proper, however, to remark, that the possession of all things is

inseparably connected with the Creation and Preservation of all

things. All things are necessarily the property, and possession,

ofChrist, because he made them, and because he upholds them in

being ; as saith the Psalmist, The Earth is JEHOVAH'S, and the ful-

ness thereof , the World and they that dwell therein ; for he hath

founded it upon the seas , and established it upon the floods .

But the Possession of the Universe involves in the Possessor, to

say the least, an absolute knowledge of every thing that is thus pos-

sessed. No mind can possess any thing, to which its comprehen-

sion does not extend . Entitled to it, it may be ; in the actual

possession of it, it cannot be. But no mind, except the Omniscient,

can comprehend, or ever discern, more than a little part of the

Universe ; and therefore none but the Omniscient Mind can pos-

sess any more than this little part.

There is indeed a humbler and totally different sense, in which

it may be figuratively said, and in which it is said in the Scriptures ,

that the Saints shall inherit all things ; and in which all things are

said to be theirs ; viz. that all things shall work together for good

to them. In this manner all things cannot, with propriety, be said

to belong to Christ ; because, being the same yesterday, to - day,

and for ever, his enjoyment is, like himself , unchangeable ; and

cannot in any sense be the result of the changes, of which created

things are the subjects. The happiness of created beings results

only, and necessarily, from his government of all things for their

benefit; but his happiness existed before the things themselves,

and can be dependent on nothing, but his own mind.

Further, the possession of all things involves, inseparably, the

control over them in such a degree, as to direct them immediately

to the use, and purposes, of the possessor. That which we can-

not command for our own use, we do not in the proper sense

possess. But the power and the knowledge necessary to the pos-

session of all things, are in this view plainly infinite .

4thly. Christ sustains the relation of Supreme Ruler to the Uni-

verse.

Revelation xix. 11, &c. And I saw Heaven opened ; and behold

a white horse, and he that sat on him was called Faithful and True,

and his name is called THE WORD OF GOD. And he hath on his

vesture, and on his thigh, a name written : KING OF KINGS and

LORD OF LORDS. Rev. xvii . 14, These shall make war with the

Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them ; for he is LORD OF

LORDS, and KING OF KINGS. 1 Tim . vi. 15, Which in his times

the blessed and only potentate shall show, the KING OF KINGS, and

LORD OF LORDS. Acts x. 36, Jesus Christ : this person is Lord

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

552 [SER. XXXVII.

of all things . Romans ix. Christ, who is over all things , God

blessed for ever, Amen. Philippians ii. 10, 11, That at the name

ofJesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in

earth, and things under the earth : And that every tongue should

confess , that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

In these passages Christ is directly exhibited as the Lord, or Ruler,

ofthe Universe, in the most absolute sense ; the Lord of all things ,

whom things in Heaven, and things in earth, are respectively re-

quired to confess as their Lord.

But the government of the Universe requires, if any thing re-

quires, the attributes of an Infinite Mind: goodness to prompt,

justice to direct, knowledge to discern, and power to execute,

whatever is right, wise, and good to be done ; and to prevent the

existence of whatever is not. It demands also existence every

where present, and eternally enduring, throughout the boundless

and everlasting kingdom of God. Without these attributes Christ

must be the Lord only in name, and rule only in pretence ; and

such must undoubtedly be the character, attributed to him in these,

and the almost innumerable other, passages of Scripture, in which

he is styled Lord, and said to hold the dominion over all things ;

unless he is essentially possessed of these attributes. The Scrip-

tures are not thus deficient in their own scheme ; for, when they

attribute universal dominion to Christ, they teach us, that he is

qualified for such dominion, by declaring, that in him dwells all the

fulness of the Godhead. We are not, therefore, left at a loss by

the Scriptures themselves concerning his perfect qualifications for

the exercise of this government ; nor can we wonder, that he, who

made, and preserves, should also govern, all things .

In this relation Christ gave the Law to the Israelites, and to

Mankind, at mount Sinai ; and inthis character, as the rightful Law-

giver, he directed his own Spirit to inspire the Prophets and Apos-

tles with the knowledge of his Word, as the universal Law to man-

kind. But when the Comforter is come, whom Iwill send unto you

from the FATHER, even the SPIRIT OF TRUTH ; He will guide you

into all the truth ; for he shall not speak of himself ; but whatsoever

he shall hear, that shall he speak ; and he will shew you things to

come. He shall glorify me : for he shall receive of mine, and shall

shew it unto you. All things which the Father hath are mine ;

therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shew it unto you ;

John xv. 26. xvi. 13-15. Of which salvation the Prophets have

inquired, searching what, or what manner of time, the Spirit of

Christ, which was in them, did signify. Accordingly the Scrip-

tures are called the Word of Christ ; Let the Word of Christ dwell

in you richly, in all wisdom ; and The Law of Christ ; Bear ye one

another's burdens , and so fulfil the Law of Christ. The Law, here

referred to, is no other than the second command of the moral Law,

Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself; or that branch of this

command, which, respecting Christians peculiarly, is called the

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXVII .] 553

New commandment ; A new commandment give Iunto you, that ye

love one another ; John xiii. 34. In this character, Christ, when

he began to preach, expounded, altered, and annulled, the Law

of Moses in his own name, and at his own pleasure. All the pro-

phets, who came before him, introduced their messages to man-

kind under the name, and authority, by which they spoke ; and

prefaced them with Thus saith the Lord; Thus saith Jehovah ; and

Thus saith Jehovah of hosts . Christ, on the contrary, when alter-

ing and annulling these very things, uses no name but his own ;

and speaks directly by his own authority ; introducing his own

laws with Verily, I say unto you; plainly intended to be equivalent

to Thus saith the Lord; because the things, which were prefaced

with this latter phrase, were openly altered and revoked by him.

In this character also, he disposes of the present and future al-

lotments of all beings ; opens and shuts at his pleasure the world

ofdeath, and departed spirits ; consigns whom he pleases to end-

less suffering ; and bestows on whom he pleases immortal life. In

this character, he is the head of all principality and power ; Col. ii .

  1. Who having gone into Heaven, saith St. Peter, is on the right

hand ofGod : Angels, Authorities , and Powers , being subjected to

him. In this relation, it is obvious, that all Intelligent beings are

bound to render him their supreme and ultimate homage and obe.

dience : that his Law is the rule of all their conduct ; from obey-

ing which nothing can excuse them ; the law, by which they will

be tried, and approved, or condemned : that his Word is the only

rule of life and salvation to mankind : that his Dominion is the su-

preme and universal control, to which in this and every other world

Intelligent beings are rightfully required to bow; to which every

one of them in this and all other worlds will ultimately bow ; and

by which all things are, and will for ever be, regulated at his plea-

sure: that he is the Judge, who will finally acquit or condemn, re-

ward or punish, every Intelligent creature. I scarcely need to ask,

Who can sustain this stupendous relation to the Universe, except

JEHOVAH ?

5thly. Christ is the Last End of all things .

Colossians i. 16, All things were created by him, and for him :

that is, they were all created for his use ; that he might destine

them to such purposes, and conduct them to such an issue, as were

agreeable to his pleasure. In the same manner as it is said Prov.

xvi. 4, Jehovah hath made all things for himself .

It will, I suppose, be granted, as I do not see how it can be

questioned, that the End , for which any thing exists , under the

control of divine Wisdom, is more important than the thing itself;

or , universally, that the End is more important than the Means .

I suppose it will also be granted, that the End, for which all things

exist , is the most important of all Ends. I suppose it will further

begranted , that JEHOVAH, in making all things for himself , regard-

ed himself , and inthis design provedthat be regarded himself , as

VOL. I. 70

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

554 [ SER. XXXVII .

more important than all things else ; and his glory, or pleasure, for

which they were created, as the most important of all the Ends,

discerned by his Omniscience, and perfectly worthy to be preferred

to every other. But this plainly could not be, unless he, who

thus proposed himself as the end of all things, was in the view

of his Omniscience a more excellent, great, and glorious Being,

than any other. If there were any other being superior to him-

self , such being ought plainly to be preferred to him : otherwise,

that which was of inferior importance ,and worth, would be prefer-

red to that which was superior : a preference obviously unfound-

ed, and unjust. JEHOVAH, therefore, in making all things for him-

self , has testified in the most solemn and forcible manner possible,

that himself is more important, great, and excellent, than all other

things whatever .

But all things are declared in the passage quoted from Colos-

sians, to have been created by Christ for himself . Christ, therefore,

in this act of making himself the End of the Creation of all things,

has declared, that Himself is, in his own view, the most important,

great, and excellent, of all things. This declaration is either true,

or false. If false ; it proceeded from ignorance, or from sin. It

could not be from sin ; for Christ knew no sin ; and is declared to

be without spot, or blemish ; the Holy One, and the Just ; even the

Holy One of God. It could not be from ignorance ; because no In-

telligent creature, who knew JEHOVAH at all, could possibly sup-

pose himself to be more important,great, and excellent than JEHO-

VAH ; and because Christ will not be supposed, even by the Unita-

rians, to be capable of such ignorance. It is therefore true. But,

if it be true, it is by inevitable consequence also true, either that

Christ is greater and more important than JEHOVAH, or that he is

JEHOVAH himself.

Further, as Christ is the End of all things, if he be not JEHOVAH,

there is nothing, of which JEHOVAH is the End. As all things were

made for Christ; if Christ be not JEHOVAH, there is nothing,

which is made for JEHOVAH. The united tendency and result of

all that has been, is, or will be, in the Universe, is the accomplish-

ment of the pleasure and glory of Christ ; and if Christ be not

JEHOVAH, JEHOVAH will exist without any glory displayed ; with-

out any interest, or concern, in the Universe.

It ought also to be added, that He, who is the End of all things,

for whose glory and pleasure they are to operate, must possess

Power sufficient to direct them to his glory ; and Intelligence, to

discern, that this purpose is accomplished by them all. When we

consider the greatness and multitude of the things themselves, and

their everlasting continuance and operation, it will, I think, be im-

possible not to conclude, that this power and intelligence must be in

the strictest sense unlimited.

It is with reference to this very subject, as I apprehend, that our

Saviour, in his intercessory prayer , utters to the FATHER these re-

SER. XXXVII. ] DIVINITY OF CHRIST .

markable words : * All things , which are mine, are thine ; and all

things , which are thine, are mine : and I am glorified in them ; John

xvii. 10. Here, in two forms of expression, he declares to the

FATHER the co- extension of the property, which the FATHER and

the Son have in the Universe, and their mutual possession of all

things ; and then adds, that he is glorified in, or by means of , them

all. This may be properly styled Christ's own comment on the

declaration of St. Paul, that all things were made for him ; that is ,

for his use ; his glory for here Christ declares his glory to be

actually accomplished by them all.

This doctrine is plainly, and utterly inconsistent with the Arian

notion of Christ's being a subordinate God; to whom divine pow-

er is supposed to have been delegated; and who, in this character

of a delegate, is supposed to have created the Universe, and to be

worshipped. On this notion I propose to make some observations

hereafter. At present I shall only remark, that He, who is the first

Cause, or Creator, and the last End, of all things, is all that is, or

can be, meant by the SUPREME GOD. All things being made for

his use, and being the means of his glory ; there is nothing left to

a Being, higher and greater than himself; nor does it appear, that

such a Being can have any material concern with the Universe, in

any manner whatever.

I shall now consider the 5th, and last, particular, mentioned un-

der this head : viz . That Divine Worship is in the Scriptures requir-

ed, and by persons inspired was actually rendered, to Christ.

Divineworship is required to be rendered to Christ ; John v. 22,

23, For the Father judgeth no man ; but hath committed all judg-

ment unto the Son : That all men should honour the Son even as they

honour the Father . He that honoureth not the Son, honoureth not

the Father that sent him. In this passage of Scripture we are inform

ed, that the infinite prerogative of judging the universe is commit-

ted by the Father to the Son, for this, as at least one, if not the only,

great end, that all (that is, I apprehend, all Intelligent creatures ;

the word men not being in the original) should honour the Son even

as ( that is , just in the same manner, as, and in the same degree,

as) they honour the Father. The Final Judgment, being an act

which eminently displays the infinite perfections, is committed to

the Son, that he may be perceived with indubitable evidence to

possess these perfections, and may therefore receive that peculiar

honour, which is due to Him only, by whom they are possessed. The

honour, which is due in a peculiar sense to God, consists supremely

in religious worship ; in making him the object of our supreme affec-

tion ; and rendering to him our supreme obedience. Allthis is here

required to Christ in the same manner, in which it is required to the

FATHER. Whether it be supposed, that this passage be intended to include

See the original Greek.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

556 [SER. XXXVII.

angels, or not ; they are expressly required to worship him in

Psalm xcvii. 7: confounded be all they that serve graven images .

Worship him, all ye Gods. St. Paul quotes a part of this verse in

the following manner: And again, when he bringeth in the first -be-

gotten into the world, he saith, Let all the Angels of God worship

him. It is therefore certain, that all the angels of God are requir-

ed to worship Christ .

The onlypossible debate, which can arise here, is concerning

the kind of worship, which is to be rendered. On this I observe,

that the Greek word is προσκυνησατωδαν ; and that this word is used

twenty-four times in the New Testament, to denote the worship of

the true God ; that it is used many times more to denote the reli-

gious worship of false gods ; and that it is, so far as I have ob-

served, the only word, used to denote what is intended by worship,

when considered as an act immediately performed. The words

Θεραπευω, Λατρευω, and Σεβομαι, rendered also to worship, appear

rather to express either habitual reverence, or service, or a general

course of worship, considered as a character, or course of life.

Προσκυνες , so far as I have been able to observe, is the only term,

used to denote religious worship by St. John ; and is certainly the

appropriate word for this idea, if there is any such appropriate

word in the New Testament. It is, particularly, the word, used

by Christ in his answer to Satan ; Thou shalt worship the Lord thy

God; and in his discourse with the woman of Samaria concerning

the place where, the manner in which, and the persons by whom,

God is acceptably worshipped.

Secondly. That religious worship is here intended is certain :

because the Object of the worship, commanded, is directly opposed

in the command itself , to idols ; and the worship, required, to that

which is forbidden . Confounded be all they that serve, that is reli-

giously worship, graven images ; that boast themselves of idols . As

ifGod had said, Worship no more graven images, nor idols of any

kind ; for all their worshippers shall be confounded : Worship

him ; the Messiah ; the Son of God; and not only you, the sottish

men who are guilty of this idolatry ; but all ye Angels, also, to

whom this worship is often sottishly rendered.

In the same manner, is this worship commanded to both men

and angels . Phil. ii. 9-11 , Wherefore God also hath highly ex-

alted him, and given him a name, which is above every name ; That

at the name of Jesus every knee should bow , of things in heaven, and

things in earth, and things under the earth ; And that every tongue

should confess, that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the

Father. In this passage, all things celestial, terrestrial, and sub-

terranean, (as it is in the original) are required to bow the knee

to Christ, and to confess him to be Lord. To bow the knee is well

known appropriate phraseology to denote religious worship. I

have left me, says God to Elijah. seven thousand in Israel, all the

knees that have not bowed unto Baal, and every mouth which hath

not kissed him . 1 Kings xix. 18.* St. Paul also says, I bow my

knees to the Father of all mercies . But to place it beyond all

doubt, we need only refer to Isaiah xlv. 22, 23, whence this pas-

sage is quoted. Look unto me, and be ye saved, all ye ene ends of the

earth : for Iam God, and there is none else. By myself have I

sworn, and the truth has gone out of my mouth ; the word, and it

shall not be revoked. Surely to me shall every knee bow, shall every

tongue swear : saying, Only to JEHOVAH belongeth Salvation and

Power.t To ascribe to JEHOVAH salvation and power: (the

thing, which, the Apostle informs us, is the same with confessing

that Christ is Lord) and to bow the knee when making this as-

cription, is undoubtedly religious worship , if any thing is . Ac-

cordingly, this ascription is often made by the saints in the Scrip-

tures, and the saints and angels in heaven.

In accordance with these requisitions we find Christ actually

worshipped in great numbers of instances. I shall omit here the

numerous instances, in which we are directly told, that persons

worshipped Christ, while here in the world ; merely because they

would give birth to a critical cont controversy, too minute, and too

extended, for the present occasion. The instances, about which

such a controversy cannot, at least decently, arise, are sufficiently

numerous for my design .

1st . InGenesis xviii. we are told , that JEHOVAH appeared unto

Abraham in the plains of Mamre, as he sat in the door of his tent.

The manner of his appearance was the following : As he lifted

up his eyes , and looked ; Lo, three men stood by him ; and he ran

to meet them, and bowed himself toward the ground. To one of

them he said, My Lord, if I have now found favour in thy sight,

pass not away, I pray thee, from thy servant, &c. The person

here spoken to is called by Abraham

ינדא

This person in the

13th verse is called JEHOVAH ; and in the 1 14th, says, Is any thing

too hardfor JEHOVAH ? and informs Abraham of the destruction of

the cities of the plain, which he had determined to bring upon

them for their sins. To this person Abraham prays, repeatedly,

for the preservation of these cities . Lot also, to whom he appear-

ed in the following chapter, prayed to him for his own preserva-

tion , and that of the city Zoar, and was accepted. These persons

are in the first place called three men. One of them, whom Abra-

ham calls ADONAI, or Lord, is afterwards called by himself , by

Abraham, and by Moses, JEHOVAH ; and was worshipped by both

Abraham and Lot. The other two are afterwards repeatedly call-

ed Angels. Now it will not be pretended, that God, the Father,

appeared as a man ; or that he ate of the provision, furnished by

Abraham : for no one hath seen God, the Father, at any time. Yet

this person is here styled JEHOVAH, and was worshipped ; and this

person was Christ.

See Hosea xiii. 2, and Psalm ii. 2. + Lowth .

558 [SER. XXXVII.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST

2dly. In Judges xiii . The ANGEL- JEHOVAH appeared to Manoah

and his wife. When he departed, it is said, that Manoah knew, that

he was the ANGEL- JEHOVAH: and it is added, Manoah said unto

his wife, We shall surely die, because we have seen GOD. But his

wife said unto him, If JEHOVAH were pleased to kill us , he would

not have received a burnt- offering, and a meat -offering, at our

hands. In verse 16, the Angel had, said Manoah, If thou wilt offer

a burnt- offering, thou must offer it unto JEHOVAH ; for, it is sub-

joined, Manoah knew not, that he was the ANGEL- JEHOVAH. But

after he had ascended in the flame of the altar, then, it is declared,

Manoah knew that he was the ANGEL- JEHOVAH. The burnt- offer-

ing and the meat -offering Manoah and his wife then perceived

themselves to have offered unwittingly to Him, who had manifested

to them his acceptance of both at their hands.

Here the worship was not only presented to Christ ; but, what

is ofmuch more importance to my purpose, was accepted by him .

3dly. David worships Christ, in Psalm xlv. and lxxii. and cii .

in ascribing to him the praise, which is due to God only. In the

two first he declares, that the people shall praise him, andfear him,

andfall down before him, and serve himfor ever and ever. Inthe

last he makes to him a long- continued prayer.

4thly. In Isaiah vi. the Seraphim worshipped him, saying, Holy,

Holy, Holy, is JEHOVAH OF Hosts .

5thly. Stephen, in Acts vii. 59, 60, prayed to Christ . And they

stoned Stephen, calling upon God, or as in the original, they stoned

Stephen invoking, and saying, Lord Jesus , receive my spirit. And

he kneeled down, and cried with a loud voice, Lord, lay not this sin

to their charge ; and having said this , hefell asleep .

On this prayer of St. Stephen I make the following remarks :

First. Stephen at this time was full of the Holy Ghost, ( verse 55)

and therefore perfectly secured from error.

Secondly. He was singularly favoured of God on account of

the greatness of his faith and obedience ; and, as a peculiar testi-

mony of the divine favour, he was permitted to see the Heavens

opened, and to behold the glory of God, and Jesus standing on the

right hand of God.

Thirdly. In the full assurance, produced by this vision, and the

faith, with which he beheld it , he presented his final petitions to

Christ.

Fourthly. The first of these petitions respected the highest per-

sonal object, which can be prayed for : viz. the eternal salvation

ofhis soul ; and attributed to Him, to whom it was made, that infi-

nite power, wisdom, and goodness, which alone can bestow sal-

vation.

Fifthly. The second petition was of the same nature ; being a

prayer, that his enemies might not be finally condemned for the sin

ofmurdering him; and of course attributed to the Person, to whom

it was addressed, the power of forgiving, or condemning, these

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXVII . ] 559

murderers. No higher act of worship was ever rendered than

this; nor was any act of worship ever performed on a more solemn

occasion ; nor by a person better qualified to worship aright ; nor

with a more illustrious testimony of acceptance. Yet this act of

worship was performed to Christ.

Sixthly. This was the very worship, and these were the very

prayers , offered to God, a little before, by Christ at his crucifixion .

Stephen, therefore, worshipped Christ just as Christ worshipped

the Father.

6thly. St. Paul often prayed to ' Christ directly. * Particularly ,

1 Thess. iii . 11 , 12, Now God himself , even our Father, and our

Lord Jesus Christ, direct our way unto you. And the Lord make

you to increase, and abound, in love one toward another, and toward

all men, even as we do toward you. Here a prayer is offered up

by St. Paul, that he may be guided to the Thessalonians ; and that

they may be made to increase and abound in holiness, and estab-

lished unto the end. This prayer is offered up to God the Father,

and to our Lord Jesus Christ, in the same manner, and the same

terms : both being unitedly addressed in the same petition, without

any note of distinction. The second of these petitions is also

offered up to Christ alone. The same petition, in substance, is

presented to the Father and Son, united in the same manner :

2 Thess. ii . 16, 17. In the third chapter, verse 5, Paul prays, Now

may the Lord direct your hearts to the love of God, and to the pa-

tience of Christ : and verse 16, Now the Lord of peace himself give

you peace by all means. The Lord be with you all. Again,

2 Cor. xii . 8, Concerning this, that is, the messenger of Satan to

buffet him, St. Paul says, Thrice I besought the Lord, that it might

depart from me. But he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for

thee : for my power is made perfect in weakness . Most gladly,

therefore, will I rather glory in mine infirmities ; that the power of

Christ may rest upon me. In this passage St. Paul informs us,

that he thrice prayed to Christ, respecting the particular subject

mentioned.

7thly. St. Paul, in all his Epistles, except that to the Hebrews ;

and St. John in his second Epistle, pray to Christ, in that noted re-

quest, in which also, Silas, Timothy, and Sosthenes united, that

grace, mercy, and peace might be multiplied, or communicated, to

those to whom they wrote, from God our Father, and from our Lord

Jesus Christ. This is an express prayer to the Father and the Son,

united, to grant grace, mercy, and peace to men. These are the

highest of all blessings, and such as none, but JEHOVAH, can grant.

Yet Christ can grant them, because the Spirit of Inspiration di-

rected, that He should be prayed to for them.

8thly. The Baptismal service, directed by Christ himself , is an act

of religious worship to Christ. Baptizing them in the name of the

Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Whether this be inter-

See Bishop Burnet on the Articles, p. 48.

560 [ SER. XXXVII,

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

preted to mean, Baptizing them INTO the name, or In the name, it

makes no difference. If Christians are baptized into the name,

they are baptized into the name of God only for they are the chil-

dren ofGod, only, by adoption ; that adoption, by which they take

his name upon them; and Christ is here declared to be the God,

whose name they assume. If they are baptized in the name ; they

are baptized in the name, or authority, ofGod only : but Christ is

thisGod.

9thly. The blessing, pronounced on Christian assemblies, is an act

of religious worship, rendered to Christ. The grace of the Lord

Jesus Christ and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy

Ghost, be with you all. Amen. Peace be to the brethren, and love

with faith, from God the Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ ; Eph .

vi . 23. Or as it was more commonly, The grace of our Lord Je-

sus Christ be with you all. Amen. The first of these is equiva-

lent to the blessing, anciently pronounced by the High Priest on

the children of Israel. JEHOVAH bless thee, and keep thee : JEНО-

VAH make his face to shine upon thee, and be gracious to thee : JE-

HOVAH lift up his countenance upon thee and give thee peace. It is

the appropriate office of the Father to bless, and preserve ; of the

Son to give grace, and illumination ; and of the Spirit to commu-

nicate peace.

Finally ; so universal was the custom of praying to Christ, that

Christians were originally entitled, as their distinguishing appella-

tion, " Those who called on the name of Christ. " Thus Ananias

says to Christ , Acts ix. 14, Here he hath authority from the chief

priests to bind all those that call on thy name. The people of

Damascus, also, when they heard Paul preach, were amazed, and

said , Is not this he, who destroyed them that called on this name in

Jerusalem? 1 Cor. i. 1, Paul, called to be an Apostle of Jesus Christ,

and Sosthenes the brother, unto the Church of God which is at Co-

rinth, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the

name of Jesus Christ our Lord. -2 Tim. ii . 22, Follow righteousness ,

faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord, out of a pure

heart. -Romans x. 12, The same Lord over all is rich unto all that

call upon him. That Christ is here meant is evident from the pre-

ceding verse.

In all these instances, and in this universal manner, was Christ

worshipped. In the greater part of the instances, the persons, who

rendered the worship, were inspired; and, in the remaining instan-

ces, were plainly under divine direction ; because the worship was

approved, and accepted.

But religious worship is lawfully rendered to God only. This

weknow from the mouth ofChrist himselfquoting Deuteronomyx.

20, in Matthew x. 12, It is written, thou shalt worship the Lord

thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. The Angel also forbade

John to worship him, saying, See thou do it not ; worship God. Isa-

iah also commands, Sanctify the Lord of Hosts himself; and let

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXVII . ] 561

him be yourfear and your dread. God also in Exodus xxxiv. 14,

says to the Israelites, Thou shalt worship no other God : for JEНО-

VAH, whose name is Jealous , is a Jealous God.

Yet Christ is here directed to be worshipped, and is actually

worshipped, by persons inspired. If , then, Christbe not God,

Godhas commanded another to be worshipped ; and persons, un-

der the immediate direction of his Spirit, have worshipped another .

The whole Church, the Bride, is commanded, in Psalm xlv. by

that God, who said unto him, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and

ever, thus : Hearken, O Daughter, and consider, and incline thine

ear : so shall the King greatly desire thy beauty : for he is thy Lord,

and worship thou him . The Church has in all ages obeyed this

command, and worshipped him. Prophets have worshipped him :

Apostles have worshipped him. Men, full of faith, and of the

Holy Ghost, have besought his guidance, aid, grace, and blessing ,

while they lived; and, when they died , have besought him to re-

ceive their Spirits into his own eternal Kingdom. If Christ is

God; if he is JEHOVAH ; they have done their duty. If he is not

God; if he is not JEHOVAH ; they have violated through life, and

in death, the first of JEHOVAH's commands in the Decalogue :

Thou shalt have no other God before me.

VOL. I. 71

SERMON XXXVIII.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

PROOFS .

THIS THE ONLY GROUND OF CONSISTENCY IN THE SCHEME OF RE-

DEMPTION .

THE JEWS OTHERWISE NOT CHARGEABLE WITH GUILT IN CRUCIFY-

ING CHRIST .

THE APOSTLES OTHERWISE CHARGEABLE WITH LEADING MANKIND

INTO IDOLATRY.

ROMANS viii, 3, 4.-For what the Law could not do, in that it was weak through the

flesh, God, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh , and for sin , con-

demned Sin in the flesh ; That the righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in

us , who walk not after the flesh , but after the Spirit.

For God, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and of a sin - offering ,

hath condemned sin in the flesh , (the thing impossible to the Law, because it was

weak through the flesh :) That the righteousness of the Law may be fulfilled by us ,

who walk not according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit.

Dr. Macknight's Translation .

ACCORDING to the plan, originally proposed from these

words, I have, in the three preceding discourses, considered, at

length, the proofs of the Deity of Christ, arranged under the first

general head: viz. That Christ is spoken of in the Scriptures as the

true and perfect GOD.

I shallnow proceed to consider the three following heads of dis-

course, originally proposed ; viz .

II. That the Deity of Christ is the only ground of Consistency in

the scheme of Redemption :

III. That the Jews, according to the opposite doctrine, are unjust-

ly charged with Guilt in putting Christ to death :

IV. That the Prophets and Apostles , according to the same doc-

trine, cannot be vindicated from the sin of leading mankind into Idol-

atry. The last argument, then proposed, I shall omit to examine, un-

til I have considered the divinity of the Holy Spirit ; and shall

now proceed to the consideration of the

II. Viz. That the Deity of Christ is the only ground of Consistency

in the scheme ofRedemption.

The truth of this assertion I shall attempt to evince by showing,

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXVIII.] 563

that the Deity of Christ is the only ground of Consistency in the

things , spoken of him, as

The light of the World;

The Saviour of the World; and,

The Propitiation for Sin .

1st. As the Light of the World.

Christ is exhibited in the Scriptures as the light of the World , in

two respects :

First. As Revealing the will of GOD to mankind ; and,

Secondly, As Communicating spiritual, or divine, Light to the

soul.

Inboth respects, the things, said of Christ in the Scriptures , as

the Light of the World, are consistent, only on the supposition ,

that Christ is the true God. That the Scriptures are the Word of

JEHOVAH will not be questioned by any man, who believes in a

Revelation ; since they are called by this title, and by others equi-

valent to it, in hundreds of instances, from Genesis to the Revela-

tion of St. John. But the Scriptures are expressly declared to be

theWord of Christ: Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all

wisdom, teaching, and admonishing, one another in psalms, and

hymns, and spiritual songs . In this passage, the Old Testament

is in so many terms declared to be the Word of Christ. The Gos-

pel, every man knows, is appropriately entitled the Gospel of

Christ.

St. Mark prefaces his account of the Gospel with these words :

The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ the Son of GOD.

St. Paul informs us, that he received the Gospel immediately by

revelation from Christ ; and accordingly he every where styles it

the Gospel of Christ. The greatness of the authority, which it de-

rived from this source, he teaches us in the strongest manner, when

he says, Though we , or an angel from heaven, or any one whatever,

preach another Gospel, let him be accursed. Galatians i. 8, 9.

This Gospel , he also says, is Christ, the power, and wisdom of

Gop unto salvation .

St. Peter teaches the same truth, in a manner equally forcible,

when he says, Ofwhich salvation the Prophets have enquired, search-

ing what, and what manner oftime, the Spirit of Christ which was

in them did signify. Here the Spirit which inspired the Prophets ,

is styled the Spirit of Christ ; and this Spirit, the same Apostle

says, is the Holy Ghost. For Prophecy, saith he, came not in old

time, by the will ofman ; but holy men ofGod spake, as they were

moved by the Holy Ghost. The Old Testament, therefore, was re-

vealed to the Prophets by the spirit of Christ.

Concerning the New, Christ himself teaches us the same doc-

trine, in the same decisive manner. Howbeit, when he, the Spirit

of truth, is come ; He will guide you into all the truth ; for he shall

not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he

speak. He shall glorify me ; for he shall receive ofmine, and shall

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

564 [SER. XXXVIII.

shew it unto you. He shall teach you all things , and shall bring all

things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

All things, therefore, which Christ had said to the Apostles, the

Spirit of Truth brought to their remembrance. He taught them

all things, and guided them into all the Truth. Yet he spoke not

of himself , but that which he heard, which he received from Christ,

and that only, he declared unto them . The Gospel, therefore, is

originally, and only, derived from Christ. Yet it is repeatedly

styled by St. Paul, the Gospel of GOD.

This Character of the Revealer of the will of God, St. John de-

clares repeatedly in the introduction of his Gospel. After having

declared, that the Word was in the beginning, or eternal ; was

GOD ; and was co - eternal with GOD ; and that all things were made

by him; he goes on to say, In him was life, and the life was the

light ofmen . And the light shineth in darkness ; and the darkness

comprehended it not. He then informs us, that John the Baptist

came to bear witness of the Light ; that he was not that Light ; but

was sent to bear witness of that Light. Then he adds, That was

the true Light which lighteth every man, that cometh into the world.

To all this he adds further the testimony of John the Baptist ; the

very Witness which he bore concerning Christ as the Light. No

one, said this harbinger of the Redeemer, who was sent for the

very purpose of declaring his true character, No one hath seen

GOD at any time ; the only begotten Son of GOD, who is in the bosom

of the Father, He hath declared him. To declare the character,

and designs , of GOD, is plainly impossible, unless for him, who

knows these things intuitively ; or for him, to whom GOD is pleased

to make them known. But no other person, beside the Son, and the

Spirit, knows the things of God intuitively. This we know cer-

tainly, without inspiration ; but the Scriptures have determined the

point if it were otherwise uncertain. No one, saith our Saviour,

knoweth the Father, but the Son ; and he, to whomsoever the Son will

reveal him . The things of GOD, saith St. Paul, knoweth no one ,

but the Spirit ofGOD : and the Spirit searcheth all things, even the

deep things of GOD. From all these passages it is, I apprehend,

certain, that Christ is the sole author of Revelation ; and that the

Spirit has not, as the Spirit of Inspiration, spoken of himself ; but

has received from Christ his mind or pleasure, and declared it to

the men, whom he inspired. Accordingly, St. Paul says, speaking

of his own Inspiration, and that of the other Apostles, We have the

mind of Christ. It is, therefore, true to this day, that no one

knoweth the Father, but the Son, and those to whom the Son hath

revealed him . This knowledge thus revealed, was not revealed

to Christ, but was Possessed by him, because he dwells in the bo-

som of the Father, and has dwelt there from Eternity ; being daily

his delight, and rejoicing alway before him.

Should it be objected, that mankind know something of God by

their Reason, independently of Revelation, and therefore possess a

SER . XXXVIII . ] DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

565

knowledge of GOD, which is not derived from Christ : I answer,

that with some qualifications I admit the premises, but deny the

consequence. The very Reason of Man was formed by Christ,

as was man himself; as were, also, all those materials, from which

Reason derives whatever knowledge of this nature it possesses .

It has, I trust, been proved beyond reasonable debate, that Christ

created, preserves, and governs all things ; and therefore, is the

Author of those works of Creation and Providence, whence Reason

obtains all its knowledge of this subject. Of course, in this sense,

also, Christ is the light that lighteth every man that cometh into the

world. Thus all the knowledge, which exists, of God, is derived

from Christ; and, since he is the same yesterday, to- day, and for

ever ; and dwells in the bosom of the Father ; this knowledge was

his originally, intuitively, and eternally. I need not say, that these

things cannot be true of any mind, but the Omniscient.

Secondly, Christ is the Author of Spiritual light to mankind.

The communication of Spiritual light is spoken of in the Scrip-

tures as a work peculiar to GOD. 2 Cor . iv. 6, For God, who

commanded the light to shine out of darkness , has shined into our

hearts, to give us the light of the knowledge of the glory of GOD in

the face, or person, of Jesus Christ. John vi. 45, And they shall

all be taught of GOD: and thus in many other places. But this

office is also ascribed to Christ. Simeon says, Luke ii . 30, For

mine eyes have seen thy salvation, which thou hast prepared before

the face of all people : A light to lighten the Gentiles , and the

glory of thy people Israel. In him, says St. John, was life, and

the life was the light of men. I , said our Saviour, John viii. 12,

am the light of the World ; he that followeth me, shall not walk in

darkness , but shall have the light of life. Isaiah xlix. 6, quoted

Acts xiii. 47, I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles , that

thou mayest be my salvation to the ends of the earth. In all these

passages it is manifest, that spiritual or divine light is the light

spoken of; and that it resides in Christ, as its Source; and is by

him communicated to mankind. All this, also, is completely ex-

pressed by the Prophet Malachi in a word ; when he calls Christ

the Sun ofRighteousness : the Orb, in which righteousness is origin-

ally inherent ; in which it dwells ; and from which it emanates to

mankind. In the same manner is it said by David, the Lord Gon

is a Sun.

2dly. The things , spoken of Christ as the Saviour of the World,

are consistent, only on the supposition, that he is the true God.

Psalm lx. 16, IJEHOVAH am thy Saviour .

Hosea xiii. 4, I am JEHOVAH thy GOD ; thou shalt know no GoD

but me ; for there is no Saviour beside me .

Isaiah xliii . 11 , I , even I am JEHOVAH ; and beside me there is no

Saviour : and thus in various other places in the Old Testament.

The same thing is often declared in the New Testament. 1 Tim.

i. 1 , The commandment of GOD our Saviour; and Titus ii . 10, Adorn

the Doctrine of GOD our Saviour.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

566 [SER . XXXVIII.

Yet in the same absolute sense Christ is declared to be the Sa-

viour of Mankind. Who is this, saith the Prophet Isaiah, that

cometh from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah ; this , that is

glorious in his apparel, travelling in the greatness of his strength ?

I , saith Christ, that speak in righteousness ; mighty to save.

John

iv. 42, This is the Christ, the Saviour of the world. Acts iv. 12,

St. Peter, speaking of Christ, saith, neither is there salvation in, or,

bymeans of , any other ; for there is no other name under heaven

given among men, whereby we must be saved. And thus in very

many other places . The importance of the work of saving man-

kind , and the glory derived from it to the divine character, are

strongly exhibited by God in Isaiah lxv. 17, 18, For behold I cre-

ate new heavens, and a new earth ; and the former shall not be re-

membered, nor come into mind. But be ye glad, and rejoice for

ever, in that which I create : for behold, I create Jerusalem a rejoic-

ing, and her people a joy. In this passage it is evident, that the

New Creation is, in the view of God , so much more glorious than

the original one, that, compared with it, the original creation shall

not be remembered. But the new creation is no other than crea-

ting Jerusalem a rejoicing , and her people a joy ; that is, renovating

the souls of mankind, and thus making them holy, lovely, a re-

joicing, or foundation of joy, in the sight of God. This work,

then, is, in the sight of God, a far more glorious work, than the

formation of the heavens and the earth. Such, also, it is in the

eye of reason. One mind is of more importance, than any num-

ber of worlds, inanimate, and unconscious. The renovation of one

mind to righteousness, and its reinstatement in the divine favour, is

the production of eternal, and by us incomprehensible, worth, and

enjoyment, in that mind. This work, repeated in a multitude of

minds which no man can number, is the work, which is styled the

New Creation. How immensely more glorious a work than the

production of ever so many masses of lifeless matter !

When we consider the nature of this work, and the things in-

volved in it, we cannot hesitate to admit the peculiar importance

attached to it in the Scriptures. In this work are involved

The creation of a new heart in man ;

The communication of divine knowledge ;

The adoption of man into the divine family ;

Aperpetual presence with the souls of all, who are created anew ,

A continual communication of strength, patience, fortitude,

peace, consolation, and hope ;

The preservation of the soul from the fatal influence of tempta-

tions , lust, and all other spiritual enemies ;

The final justification of the soul at the Judgment, and its estab-

lishment in the possession of immortal life ;

Together with, what will be the subject of the next head of dis-

course, the accomplishment of such a Propitiation, as may be the

proper source of all these wonderful consequences .

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXVIII .] 567

He, who admits these things to be included in the work of saving

Man, must admit also that there can be no Saviour beside JEHOVAH.

Should it be said, that all these things, except the last, are the

work of the Holy Spirit ; and that therefore they are here errone-

ously attributed to Christ ; I answer, That they are indeed the

work of the Holy Spirit ; but, notwithstanding this, they are truly

attributed to Christ ; not only as He laid the foundation for them

all ; but as the Spirit acts not of himself , and only executes the

pleasure of Christ under his commission.

This work, then, of saving Man is in the Scriptures attributed

to Christ, in a manner so peculiar, that from it he derives his own

appropriate name, JESUS CHRIST, THE ANOINTED SAVIOUR ; and

is considered by JEHOVAH as being so much greater, and more glo-

rious, than the work of creating the heavens and the earth, that, in

comparison with it , that work shall not be remembered, nor come into

mind.

3dly. As the Propitiation for sin, the Deity of Christ is the only

ground of consistency in the Scriptural exhibitions .

As I expect hereafter to discuss Christ's atonement for sin, as

one of the great parts of the Christian system ; I shall, here, omit

every thing concerning this subject, which is not necessary to the

doctrinejust now declared.

That Christ is in some sense a Propitiation for the sins of the

World cannot be denied, unless by a direct denial of the express

words, as well as the unquestionable doctrines, of the Gospel.

1 John ii. 2, And he is the propitiation for our sins ; and not for

ours only, but for the sins of the whole world. 1 John iv. 10, He

loved us, and sent his Son to be the Propitiation for our sins . See

also Romans iii . 25, Isaiah liii. 10 , &c. The text, also, is a direct

declaration of this doctrine. GOD sending his own Son in the like-

ness of sinful flesh, and of a sin- offering, or an offering for sin, &c .

By Christ's being the Propitiation for sin it is, here, necessary to

mean only, that something, which, being done for the Sinner, the

Sinner may beforgiven, and restored ; but which, not being done, he

must be punished according to the sentence of the Law, by which he

is condemned. That so much, as is here specified, is included in

Christ's being the propitiation for the sins of mankind, is unques-

tionably evident,

First, From the name, by which it is called in the Scriptures, in

many instances ; viz. απολυτρωσίς ; translated redemption. When

a person was taken captive in war, and condemned to perpetual

slavery, or to death, a sum of money was not unfrequently paid,

and accepted, for his ransom from these evils ; this sum was called

λυτρον ; and the redemption of the captive from death, or slavery,

was called απολυτρωσίς. The redemption of mankind from the sla-

very of Sin, and the everlasting death, to which the Sinner was

exposed by it , is called by the same name. The λυτρον, or price

of redemption, was paid, not by the captive, but by another per-

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

568 [SER. XXXVIII .

son. The price of Man's Redemption, in like manner, was not

paid by himself , but by Christ : that is, Christ accomplished some-

thing, without which man would not have been redeemed from the

bondage of death and sin .

Secondly, This truth is evident from Isciah liii . 10, Yet it pleased

JEHOVAH to crush him with affliction. If his soul shall make a pro-

pitiatory sacrifice ; he shall see a seed, which shall prolong their

days ; and the gracious purpose of JEHOVAH shall prosper in his

hands. Of the travail of his soul he shall see (the fruit) and be

satisfied : by the knowledge of him shall my righteous servant jus-

tify many ; for the punishment of their iniquities he shall bear.

Therefore I will distribute to him the many for his portion ; and the

mighty people shall he share for his spoil : because he poured out

his soul unto death ; was numbered with the transgressors : and he

bare the sin of many ; and made intercession for the transgressors . *

In this passage it is clear, that, in the Covenant of Redemption

here recited, JEHOVAH promised to Christ the seed, which should

prolong their days, or be eternally blessed ; a promise here re-

peated in many forms ; on the condition, that he made his soul a

propitiatory sacrifice for sin. It is therefore certain, that if he had

not made this sacrifice, he would not have received this reward :

or, in other words, mankind would not have been saved.

Thirdly, The same truth is evident from Romans iii . 25, 26 :

Christ Jesus , whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation for sin ,

to declare his righteousness in the remission of sins , that are past ;

that he might be just, and yet the justifier of him that believeth in

Jesus .

From this passage it is evident, that, if God had not set forth

Christ as a propitiation , his righteousness in the remission of sins ,

that are past, would not have been declared ; and that he would not

have been just, in the act of justifying believers : in other words,

If Christ had not become a Propitiation, the sins of mankind could

not have been remitted, nor themselves justified.

In a former discourse it has, I trust, been proved, that, in the

literal sense, by works of law no flesh can be justified before GOD ;

and that the future obedience, and the repentance, of the sinner,

are alike, and wholly unavailing to this end. Independently of

Christ's redemption, therefore, or independently of his being the

propitiation for the sins of men, every sinner is condemned, lost,

and without hope. The Scriptures in multiplied instances teach

us, that Christ became a propitiation for sin, especially by his death .

Isaiah liii . 5, He was woundedfor our transgressions ; he was bruis-

ed for our iniquities ; the chastisement of our peace was upon him .

Romans v. 6, In due time Christ died for the ungodly. 1 Cor. xv.

3, Christ died for our sins , according to the Scriptures . 2 Cor. v.

14, One died for all. 1 Thess. v. 10, Who died for us, that we

*Lowth

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXVIII.] 569

should live with him. Col. i. 20, Having made peace through the

blood of his cross . 1 John i. 7, The blood of Christ cleanseth from

all sin . 1 Peter i. 18, 19, Ye were not redeemed with corruptible

things, but with the precious blood of Christ. Rev. v. 9, Thou hast

redeemed us to GOD by thy blood. More proofs of this point can-

not be necessary. Let me now ask, If Christ be not in the strict-

est sense God, how is it possible that he should become, in this,

or any other, manner, a Propitiation for the sins of mankind ? If

Christ be merely a man, or in any other sense a mere creature ;

how is it possible, that he should be able to perform any act, which

would not be absolutely necessary for his own justification before

GOD ? The law, by which every creature is governed, requires

him to love GOD with all the heart, soul, strength, and understand-

ing; or in other words, to consecrate all his powers supremely,

and absolutely, so long as he exists, to the service of GOD. More

than this he cannot do ; and, if all this be not done, he is a sinner ;

and cannot be justified. How then can it be possible for him to

perform any thing, which can be accepted on the behalf of another ?

It is impossible, that any service should be accepted for another,

which is entirely due for one's self . It is impossible, that the debt

due from another, should be cancelled by my Payment of Money,

due for a debt of my own. When I have paid my own debts, if I

can offer more money, I may then satisfy the Creditor for the debt

of another. The obedience, which a law requires of me, as my

obedience, will satisfy the demands of the law on me ; and prove the

means of my justification ; but cannot be transferred from me to

another subject of the same law, so as to answer the demands of the

law on him . The Law demands all his obedience of him, and all

mine of me : but , mine only being rendered ; the demands of the

Law are not, and cannot be, satisfied .

Supererogatory service, or service not required by Law, is ab-

solutely necessary to the very existence of all vicarious interfer-

ence. But no creature can possibly perform supererogatory ser-

vice ; because all that he can do is required of him by the Law.

Thus exceeding broad, in the Scriptural language, is the command-

ment ; and thus it is impossible, that any creature should become,

in any sense, a propitiation for the sins of mankind.

To avoid this immoveable difficulty, Dr. Priestly, and other So-

cinians, have denied, wholly, the doctrine of Christ's Atonement ;

and in this denial have, at least in my view, acted in the only man-

ner, consistent with the main part of their scheme ; viz. That Christ

is a mere man. But in this denial they have at the same time, con-

tradicted the main doctrine in the Christian system, after that of

the existence of GOD. According to the scheme of these men,

Christ came into the world, or was born, merely to be a Prophet, and

Example, of righteousness ; or a teacher of the will of GOD to

mankind ; and died, only to bear witness to the truth ofhis precepts.

Inthe same manner Moses, and all the succeeding Prophets, came

VOL. I. 72

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

570 [ SER. XXXVIII.

into the World to be teachers, and examples, of truth and right-

eousness ; and, in the same manner, Peter and Paul, both the

Jameses, and almost all the other apostles, together with Stephen,

and a host of Martyrs who followed him, bore witness to the truth of

the precepts which they taught, by voluntarily yielding themselves

to death. All these persons taught, the truth of God, and prac-

tised righteousness ; and a multitude of them sealed their testimony

with their blood. The only difference, according to the Socinian

scheme, between Christ and them is, that he was wiser and better than

they. Paul, however, taught more of the Gospel than Christ him-

self ; and both Paul and Peter sealed the truth of their testimony

on the cross . Ofwhat consequence, then, was the death of Christ

to markind, any more than that of Zechariah, Jeremiah, James ,

Peter, or Paul ? Each of these men died as a witness to the truth .

Christ, according to Dr. Priestly, appeared in no other character in

his death. All these men, also, taught the truth : according to Dr.

Priestly Christ did no more. Each of these men was an eminent

example of righteousness : according to Dr. Priestly Christ was

only a brighter example. With what meaning then can it be said,

that God hath set forth Christ as a propitiationfor the remission of

sins ; that Christ is said to be the propitiation for the sins of the

World; that his soul is said to make a propitiatory sacrifice for sin ;

that he bare the sin ofmany ; that we are justified, and redeemed,

by his blood; that by himself he purged our sins ; that he made

peace through the blood of the Cross ; that he reconciled both Jews

and Gentiles unto GOD in one body by the Cross ; that by his stripes

we are healed ; that the chastisement of our peace was laid upon him ;

and that we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness

ofsins ; together with many other things of the same import ; so

many, as to constitute no small part of the Scriptures ? And why

did Christ say he came to give his life a ransom for many ? and why

did Paul say, Christ gave himself a ransom for all. Could these

things be said of Moses , or Jeremiah , or Peter, or James, or Paul ?

Arewejustified by the grace of God through the redemption which

is in Moses? Did Paul make peace by the blood of his cross ? Was

Peter a propitiation ; an ιγασμος ; the means of appeasing the anger

ofGod, of reconciling him to us, and rendering him propitiatory

to sinners ?

Farther ; in what sense was the death of Christ necessary, as a

testimony to the truth of his precepts ? Were not his miracles, and

the unspotted excellency ofhis life, ample proofs of the sincerity of

his declarations, and the reality ofhis mission from GOD ? Are they

not now appealed to by Dr. Priestly, and most if not all other di-

vines, as the chief proofs ? Is not his death rarely appealed to for

this purpose ? And is it not manifest from this fact, that it is a tes-

timony , plainly inferior to his life, and miracles ?

If , then, this was the end, and amount, of Christ's death ; is it

not evident, on the one hand, that the endwas in a great measure

A

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXVIII.] 571

useless, and very imperfectly accomplished : and, on the other,

that the amount of Christ's death was no more than the amount of

the death of Paul and Peter ; that they, as truly as Christ, were a

propitiation for the sins of the world ; and that we are as truly jus-

tified by faith in them, as in him ; and by their blood, as by his ?

I shall now proceed,

III. To show, That the Jews , according to the Unitarian doctrine,

are unjustly charged with guilt in putting Christ to death .

The Law ofGOD, as given by Moses , required the blasphemer to

be stoned. Christ, in his conversation with the Jews, recorded

John v. declared himself to be the Son of God. By this phrase

the Jews, as I mentioned in a former discourse, understood him to

declare, that himself was God, or equal with God. Their own

construction they declared to him, For a good work we stone thee

not ; but because thou, being a man, makest thyselfGOD, John x.

  1. St. John also, as I then observed, understood the phrase in

the same manner. Therefore, he says, the Jews sought the more to

kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also

that God was his father ; making himself equal with God. This is

the Apostle's own construction of Christ's averment ; and is plain-

ly alleged by him as being that of the Jews also .

When Christ was brought before the Sanhedrim , after several

vain attempts to convict him of any crime, the High Priest adjured

him, that is, put him upon oath, to tell him whether he was the

Christ, the Son of the Blessed God. In answer to this question

thus solemnly put, Christ said, I am ; and, as a proof , that he said

this truly, added, and ye shall see the Son of Man sitting on the

right hand of Power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. In reply

to this declaration the High Priest rent his clothes, and declaring

all further testimony needless, pronounced him guilty of blasphe-

my for this saying ; in consequence of which, the Evangelists in-

form us, they all condemned him to death.

Now, it is evident, that Christ was understood by the Jews to

declare that he was equal to God, and was GOD, by asserting him-

self to be the Son of GOD. Of this there cannot be a doubt, be-

cause it is asserted, both by the Jews themselves, and by the Evan-

gelist. If , then, Christ was a man, merely ; he was, for aught that

I can see, truly a Blasphemer. For, when he declared himself to

be God, or equal with God, he plainly declared God to be neither

greater, wiser, nor better than himself . But, to assert in any form

ofwords, that the infinite JEHOVAH is of the same character with a

man, and possessed of no more greatness, excellency, or glory,

than that which is human, would be acknowledged in any other

case to be blasphemy; because it would be a denial of all the

perfections of God, and an ascription to him of all the frailties of

Man. If this be not blasphemy, what can be ?

But if Christ was a blasphemer, he was justly put to death.

The Law, which He as well as the Jews, acknowledged to have

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

572 [SER. XXXVIII.

been givenbyGod himself , required the blasphemer to be stoned :

as a blasphemer, therefore, he was according to the requisitions of

adivine, and therefore a just, Law, deservedly condemned todeath.

Thus according to this scheme the Jews, instead of being guilty

in putting Christ to death, acted meritoriously ; for they only obey-

ed the divine law.

But it will be said, Christ did not intend by this declaration to

assert that he was God ; nor that he was equal with GOD. This

indeed is said, and must be said, by the abettors of the Unitarian

schemes . I answer : It is clear , that the Jews thus understood

him, and that he knew them thus to understand him. They had

formerly attempted to stone him for using the same language ; and

had then told him, in express terms, the manner, in which they con-

strued the phrase. The Sanhedrim, also, sufficiently explained to

him their own views of it by pronouncing it blasphemy. In còn-

sequence of this mode of understanding the phrase, he saw them

now about to imbrue their hands in his blood. If it was a mistake

on their part, he was bound to remove it. He was bound not to

suffer his own character to be stained, in their view, with the crime

of blasphemy. He was bound to use language as he knew it would

be understood. He was bound not to lose his own life, nor suffer

them to incur the guilt of taking it away, merely through a mistake

of theirs. If , then, they are supposed in this case to have sinned

at all; they sinned only through a mistake, which Christ himself

voluntarily declined to remove. The sin, therefore, so far as I can

see, lies on this supposition, primarily at his door. What, then,

shall we say of the solemn and awful charge, brought against the

Jews by St. Peter ? Him ye have taken, and by wicked hands have

crucified, and slain ! What shall we say of the whole body of

Scriptural representations on this subject ? What shall we say of

the terrible destruction of their nation : of their judicial blindness :

and all the calamities which had befallen them, as monuments of

the divine indignation, for more than seventeen hundred years ?

IV. The Prophets and Apostles, according to the same doctrine,

cannot be vindicated from leading mankind into the sin of Idolatry.

The Prophets and Apostles have, in a great variety of places,

called Christ GOD, The true GOD, The great Gon, The mighty

GOD, JEHOVAH, and I AM. They have declared him to be Eter-

nal, self -existent, incomprehensible, Almighty, Omnipresent, Om-

niscient, and immutable. They have attributed to him the crea-

tion, preservation, and government, of all things; and the acts of

giving life, forgiving sin, judging the World, and rewarding both

the righteous and the wicked. They have ascribed to him the in-

finite relations of Creator, Preserver, Possessor, Ruler, and Final

Cause, of all things. Beyond this, they have on many occasions

worshipped him themselves ; and have taught us, that God re-

quires him to be worshipped, and that he is in fact worshipped, by

saints and angels in earth and heaven. They have also exhibited

DIVINITY OF CHRIST .

SER. XXXVIII.] 573

Christ, when on earth, as challenging these things to himself , and

as receiving them from others without reprobation or censure.

They have further declared him to be the only Saviour of the

World: a character evidently demanding infinite attributes ; and,

according to their account, challenged by JEHOVAH, as exclusive-

lyhis own.

Beyond all this, they have informed us, that he was condemned

to death, for declaring under the sanction of an oath, that he was

the Son ofGOD: a phrase which he knew was understood by them,

to be no other than a declaration, that he was GOD. Yet, though

knowing this ; and though directly charged with blasphemy ; al-

though on two occasions they attempted to stone him, and on a

third pronounced him guilty of death ; instead of explaining, soft-

ening, or at all modifying, the declaration, he proceeded directly,

in two of the instances, to allege proofs, that he used this declara-

tion with exact truth and propriety ; proofs, which in themselves

are a direct arrogation of the divine character. The Scriptures

of truth they also declare to be his Word ; and inform us, that the

Holy Ghost, who inspired them, received them from him ; and that

Christ himself , when promising them the gift of inspiration, person-

ally told them this wonderful truth. In this account they have

taught us, that the Scriptures, which they every where styled the

Word ofGod, are no other than the Law of Christ himself; partly

uttered by his own mouth, and partly taught by the HOLY SPIRIT

in conformity to his pleasure ; and accordingly in his own name,

and by his own authority, explained, altered, and annulled, by him,

as he thought proper. And that the HOLY SPIRIT, whom, as we

shall see hereafter, they pronounce to be a divine person, was

commissioned, and sent by him into the world, to execute his pur-

poses ; an act of authoriry on the part of Christ, to which there is

no parallel in the Universe, except his own mission from the

Father. Finally, in the view, which is given us of the heavenly

system in the Revelation of St. John, we find the same exalted cha-

racter completely recognized. In that world we behold him sitting

on the throne of infinite dominion, styled the Throne of GOD and

the Lamb ; unfolding, and declared by the Heavenly Host to be

worthy to unfold, the Book of God's counsels ; which, they also

declare, no being in the Universe to be worthy, or able, to do ;

being, together with the Father, the everlasting temple of Heaven ;

controlling all the affairs of this world, of heaven, and of hell; the

light and glory of heaven ; and the bestower of future and ever-

lasting happiness. In all these wonderful characters he is also

worshipped , in that glorious world, with the highest ascriptions,

which were ever made, or which can be made, to JEHOVAH. Wor-

thy, they cry, is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches ,

and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing .

Every creature, says St. John, which is in heaven, and on the earth,

and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in

574 [SER. XXXVIII.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

them, heard I saying, Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power,

be unto Him, that sitteth on the throne, and unto the Lamb, for ever

and ever. Of all these things it is to be remarked, that they are

expressed onevery occasion,which admits them, and in every form

of phraseology , which language can easily be supposed to allow ;

commence with the first chapter in the Bible ; and terminate only

with the last.

Now let me ask, Whether all these things are not a complete

exhibition of Christ, as the proper object of Religious Worship ?

But the Apostles have directly, and fully, declared all these things.

If , then , Christ is not God , have they not clearly so represented

him, as to persuade mankind, that he is God; and that he is to be

worshipped?

How is it possible, that their readers, and especially the plain

men , who constitute ninety-nine hundredths of them; how is it

possible, that any men, acknowledging the Apostles to have used

language as other men use it , and so as to be understood by those,

for whom they wrote ; (an admission absolutely necessary to ex-

culpate them from plain fraud) should distinguish between a per-

son thus described, and the Being, who alone is the proper Object

of Worship ? What can their minds, what can any mind, add to

this exhibition, to make such a Being more great, awful, lovely,

glorious, and godlike ? Do not these things include all, which we

canconceive to be included in Infinite Perfection ? Has any thing,

superior to these, been ever published to mankind ? Has any

thing been published in any other instance, which can be compared

with these ?

But if Christ be not truly God, he cannot be worshipped without

Idolatry. He himself says ; and recites it as the command ofGod ;

Thou shalt worship JEHOVAH thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve.

Can inspired men then, writing a Revelation, the great end of

which was to inculcate the Unity ofGOD, the Existence of but One

God, and the supreme obligation, incumbent on all men, to worship

him Only ; can such men have been directed by the Spirit ofGOD,

so to write as they have actually written ? Could they, being Jews,

with the Old Testament in their hands, have so written, even of

themselves, as naturally, not to say necessarily, to lead all their

followers into the sin of Idolatry ? That they have so written, as

naturally to produce this consequence, if Christ be not God, is

unquestionable : because the great body of their followers have

actually understood them to assert the Deity of Christ, and have

actually worshipped him. The Scriptures therefore, written for

the professed purpose ofpreventing idolatry, have, according to the

scheme of my opponents, been the direct cause of promoting, and

establishing it, among almost all those, who have believed them

to be the word ofGod. Mr. Belsham accordingly pronounces the

system, of which the worship of Christ is a leading principle, " a

pernicious system ; a mischievous compound ofimpiety and idola-

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

SER. XXXVIII .] 575

try." Lest it should be supposed, however, that those, who adopt

this worship, have really been impious, let it be remarked, that Dr.

Priestly himself expressly says, " he considers the principles of

Calvinism, as generally favourable to that leading virtue, Devo-

tion ; even an habitual and animated Devotion." Another Writer *

also, no way favourable to these principles, says, in the British

Encyclopedia, † " If we consider the character of the Calvinists, "

( whom he mentions together with several others) " when com-

pared with that of their antagonists ; we shall find, that they have

excelled in no small degree in the practice of the most rigid and

respectable virtues ; and have been the highest honour of their

own ages, and the best model for imitation to every age succeed-

ing . " But Calvinists to a man, have been worshippers of Christ :

as have also been almost all other members of the Church univer-

sal; and to this idolatry, if it be just , the Scriptures have led

them. Of course the guilt of leading mankind into that gross sin

is, on this scheme, chargeable to the Prophets and Apostles . But

can the Prophets and Apostles have led mankind into the abomi-

nable sin of idolatry ? Can the principles, which lead to idolatry,

be favourable to habitual and animated devotion ? Can the men,

who have excelled in the practice of the most rigid and respectable

virtues ; who have been the highest honour to their own age, and

the best models for imitation to succeeding ages ; have been re-

gularly guilty of this sin ? Can the system, which asserts, or in-

volves, these things, be truth ?

Can all, or any of , the things, which I have asserted concerning

Christ from the Scriptures, be true of a man ; or of any created be-

ing ? Can a man, can an angel, be the First Cause, or Last End,

the Preserver, Proprietor, Possessor, and Ruler, of all things ?

Can a creature be the brightness of the Father's glory, and the ex-

press Image of his person ; the Light of the world, the Propitiation

for sin, the Saviour of mankind, or the Object of religious wor-

ship ? Can any religious man, on a death-bed, say, " Gabriel re-

ceive my spirit ? " or " Lay not the sin of my murderers to their

charge ? Can Gabriel give life, raise the dead, or bestow immortal

life ? Can he judge the world, reward the righteous and the wicked,

or be the glory , light, and temple, of heaven ? What would be

the impression, were a minister of the Gospel to say, IBaptize thee

in the name of the Father, and of Gabriel, and of the Holy Ghost?

or the Grace of Gabriel, the Love ofGod, the Father, and the Com-

munion of the Holy Ghost, be with you all. Amen? Would not

these things beyond measure shock the minds of a Christian As-

sembly, as the most palpable blasphemy? Was there ever a mi-

nister , even an Arian , or a Socinian, who could bring himself thus

to speak in such an Assembly ? Would not this be, not merely

ηcomparing, or likening , one of the Angels to JEHOVAH, but placing

him on the same level? Yet these things are said of Christ.

*Robert Forsythe, Esq. †Article Predestination.

DIVINITY OF CHRIST.

576 [ SER . XXXVIII

Why are they said of hinı, if his nature be like that of Gabriel ?

Whyare they seemingly said ? Was it not perfectly easy for the

Omniscient God to have said, if he chose to say it, that Christ was

a mere man, or a mere creature ? and so to have said this, that it

would not have been misunderstood even by the plainest man ?

Did he not understand language sufficiently ? Has it not been said

in such amanner, as to be intelligible to all men, by Arius , Socinus ,

Zuicker, Price, Priestly, Belsham, and many others ? Did any man

ever mistrust, that they have not said it ? Was not JEHOVAH more

interested to say it, if it is true, than they were ? and so to say it,

as to be easily , generally, and certainly understood ? Was he not

more able ? Did he not foresee all the doubts, difficulties, errors ,

misconstructions, and consequent sins and idolatries, if they have

indeed been misconstructions and idolatries, arising from unhappy

language, used in the Scriptures ? Have not the Prophets who

spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost : have not the Apostles,

who spake the things freely given to them of God, not in the words

which man's wisdom taught, but which the Holy Ghost taught ; ex-

pressed the mind of God on this subject, and every other, in the

verymanner, chosen by God himself? Has not his infinite faith

fulness and mercy, then, sufficiently guarded every honest mind

against this erroneous sin ?

But if Christ be not the true God, the great body of Christians

have, in every age of the Church, wholly misunderstood the Scrip-

tures concerning this most important doctrine, and mistaken, infi-

nitely, the real character of their Saviour. Ofcourse, the Scrip-

tures have been so written, as that the natural interpretation of

them is a source of total and dreadful error ; even of that, which

they themselves denounce in terms of the highest reprobation ; viz.

idolatry. For the interpretation, which has been given them by

the great body of Christians, in every age and country in which

they have existed, is beyond a controversy the natural interpre-

tation. That men, who first make a philosophical system ofreligion ,

and then endeavour to reconcile the Scriptures to it, should under

stand them falsely, cannot be wondered at ; but that they should

be falsely understood by the great body of mankind, who for their

religion come to them only ; and yet the way of holiness be still a

highway, in which wayfaring men, though fools, shall not err ; is

aposition, which is yet to be explained.