Consensus Statement Regarding Critical Thinking and the Ideal Critical Thinker

<h1>Consensus Statement Regarding Critical Thinking and the Ideal Critical Thinker</h1>

<p>We understand critical thinking [CT] to be purposeful, self-regulatory judgment which results in interpretation, analysis, evaluation, and inference, as well as explanation of the evidential, conceptual, methodological, criteriological, or contextual considerations upon which that judgment is based. CT is essential as a tool of inquiry. As such, CT is a liberating force in education and a powerful resource in one’s personal and civic life. While not synonymous with good thinking, CT is a pervasive and self-rectifying human phenomenon. The ideal critical thinker is habitually inquisitive, well-informed, trustful of reason, openminded, flexible, fair minded in evaluation, honest in facing personal biases, prudent in making judgments, willing to reconsider, clear about issues, orderly in complex matters, diligent in seeking relevant information, reasonable in the selection of criteria, focused in inquiry, and persistent in seeking results which are as precise as the subject and the circumstances of inquiry permit. Thus, educating good critical thinkers means working toward this ideal. It combines developing CT skills with nurturing those dispositions which consistently yield useful insights and which are the basis of a rational and democratic society.</p>

<p style="padding-left: 30px;">— American Philosophical Association, “Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. “The Delphi Report.” Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.” p. 2.</p>