Low Intensity Operations
<p>Bloody Sunday
A new study of the events leading up the Bloody Sunday
killings in Northern Ireland, ‘Bloody Sunday: Error or Design?’
by Niall Ó Dochartaigh, concludes:
‘ ...the killings were the outcome of a calculated
confrontation carried out in the face of strong opposition
from some elements within the security forces. At the
heart of these events is a clearly planned
confrontational initiative devised by one of the most
senior military commanders in Northern Ireland. At the
very least, a foreseeable consequence of the operation
was the killing of civilians. If those involved in devising
and implementing this confrontation calculated that they
could act as they did with impunity, the Widgery tribunal
proved their assumptions correct. The British
Government may not have planned and approved a
massacre in advance, but they sanctioned it in
retrospect.’
The essay shows – no two ways about it, shows – that
General Ford, Commander Land Forces in Northern Ireland,
supported by Brigadier Frank Kitson and others, decided that
they should stop pussyfooting about, sod the peace-keeping
and instructions from the government, and shoot some
people.
Why has this article not produced major ink since its
publication? Is the article’s implication, that the responsibility
for the thousands of deaths and the billions of pounds worth
of destruction lies in part with the British Army and the
politicians who failed to control it, too difficult for the major
media to accept?
‘Bloody Sunday: Error or Design?’ is published in the
130 Summer 2010
March 2010 issue of Contemporary British History, volume 14,
no. 1, pp. 89-108. It can be purchased on-line at
<www.informaworld.com/>.
Psy-ops in Northern Ireland
Not unrelated to Bloody Sunday, in as much as the British
state’s colonial psy-ops techniques, introduced into Northern
Ireland after the shootings helped provoke a kind of
insurgency, the BBC broadcast on 22 March a radio
documentary, ‘The spin war in Northern Ireland’ about the
British state’s psychological operations in Northern Ireland.
This may still be available via iPlayer but if not a text,
containing bits of the programme, was published on the BBC
News website at <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8577087.
stm>. It included this:
‘There have long been claims that elements in the Army
and British government were behind a widespread
propaganda campaign throughout the early 1970s -
mostly aimed at undermining the IRA.’
Nearly 30 years after this story was first discussed, when we
know a great deal about the operations and personnel, the
BBC is still talking about ‘claims’. How much evidence will it
take before this is simply reported as fact?</p>