Wardell Pomeroy

The Institute for the Advanced

Study of Human Sexuality (IASHS) – thereafter called the “Sex Institute”‑ which offers

extensive training and advanced degrees originally directed by Penthouse Forum Board

member and Kinsey co‑author, Dr. Wardell B. Pomeroy, and Hustler Magazine contributors,

Drs’. Ted Mcllvena and Erwin Haberlae. The accreditation curricula includes a wide variety of

Kinsey inspired material such as the Sex Institute’s degree program which includes:“

‘advanced graduate’ studies such as: ‘erotic sensate and massage therapy,’ and focuses most of

its scholarly training on student viewing, using and even making, ‘erotic’ films … And the

“training in the design and implementation of ‘sex education curricula’ for all ages.”

(https://infrakshun.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/kinsey6.jpg)Alfred C. Kinsey

So, we have Dr. Pomeroy, co‑author and a Kinsey Institute principle, who recommended incest

as beneficial to the juvenile to adult readers of Penthouse, Chic, and other magazines and for

whom a belief in “positive incest” allows him to still teach child sexuality.

What is more interesting is that:

“These now‑accredited Sex Institute experts commonly testify for sex offenders and for businesses

which specialize in the production of … pornography. ‘Experts’ from the American Sex

Establishment regularly testify in courts and provide their expertise to legislatures and other public

agencies. For example, in 1980, Wardell Pomeroy testified for a pornographer in Happy Day v.

Kentucky, a court case in which Pomeroy admitted under oath to seeking funds from the sex industry

to produce his own child pornography.”

One particular form of sexual education in the San Francisco “Sex Institute” and in other

universities comes under the formal sounding Sexual Attitude Restructuring

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_Attitude_Reassessment) (SAR) (now known as

“Restructuring”). According to wikipedia entry SARS “is not a traditional academic experience

designed to disseminate cognitive information, nor is it psychotherapy directed toward the

resolution of personal problems”. What apparently SARS proposes to do – though this is

without a citation – is to provide: “… an opportunity for participants to explore and

understand their beliefs, attitudes, values and biases within the realm of sex and sexuality.”

And according to Kinseyian principles, of course.

Promulgated by Pomeroy himself this process is said to achieve a shift in pedagogical attitude

and teaching by incorporating specific images of a hard and soft‑core nature which also

happens to: “scars the viewer’s brain as it short circuits his and her conscience.” This is

particularly interesting in light of ponerological aspects of psychopathy

(https://infrakshun.wordpress.com/2014/02/01/the‑psychopath‑a‑different‑species‑vi/) that

inflict a progressive dissonance that effectively cuts off the ability to express higher feelings

such as empathy. The entrainment of SAR is said to erode “emotional refinements by using

high resonance images that “psychopharmacologically and neurochemically mold, coarsen and

reform viewer’s brains, minds and memories.” In effect, it channels sexual energy to a strictly

[2]

(https://infrakshun.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/eatenawareness1.jpg)

reform viewer’s brains, minds and memories.” In effect, it channels sexual energy to a strictly

mechanical and animalistic perception of sexuality and in Pomeroy’s words: “The SAR is

designed to ‘desensitize,’ that is to disinhibit, all viewers.”

This has a particular resonance with the CIA‑led mind programming operations under the

generic term of MK‑ULTRA in the 1950s and 60s. Kinsey himself was indirectly associated with

some of the main proponents of such mind experimentation. With Rockefeller funding, one

cannot help but wonder if these are offshoots of that same secret research which became

purposely mainstreamed into academia.