"What is a record ?
<p class=default>
<b>"What is a record? </b>
I believe we must follow the reasonable assumption that the first records were
<br/>
in single molecules, since that is the way they occur in modern cells. The essentially new
condition in
<br/>
this origin of life formulation of the recording or measuring problem is that no human
observer, no
<br/>
physicist, no philosopher, nor any macroscopic measuring instrument designed by biological
organisms
<br/>
can exist in the beginning. We imagine only the motions and interactions of the elementary
matter, so
<br/>
we can only ask, how does matter record its own behavior without the intervention of a
physicist. Or in
<br/>
other words: How does the motion of matter lead to
<i>records </i>
of these motions?
<br/>
Someone will probably object that the observer has not really disappeared in this
formulation, and
<br/>
that I have only hidden the observer by imagining the existence of an objective recording
process
<br/>
which is operationally meaningless, since it is still the human observer who decides when
a record has
<br/>
been made. Here I shall simply admit to being a realist, that is, a person who believes
that there are
<br/>
aspects of the world which exist independent of this observer's description of the world.
I must accept
<br/>
as a meaningful concept supported by empirical evidence that life did not always exist on
the earth, and
<br/>
that it was the accumulation and transmission of hereditary records at the molecular level
that
<br/>
eventually led, only after billions of years, to observers like myself. But I must
therefore add-and this is
<br/>
the central point- that not only matter, but also
<i>records </i>
existed long before physicists started thinking
<br/>
about matter and making large measuring devices." (Pattee 1971a,p. 310)
</p>