Encompassing system dynamics: learning
<p class=default>
<b>Encompassing system dynamics: learning</b>
<br/>
The learning dimension is introduced by Arthur Young in attempting to formalize how a free
agent "interferes" with any system. The resulting freedom or unpredictability is then part
of the system He points out that a minimum of six observations are then required to
determine the behaviour of the free agent:
<br/>
To know the position of a body in space, we need one instantaneous observation (for
instance, the photo finish of a race).
<br/>
To know its velocity, which is computed from the difference in position of the body and
the difference in time between the two observations, we need two such observations.
<br/>
To know its acceleration, we need three observations.
<br/>
To know that a body, for example, a vehicle, is under control, and thus distinguish it
from one in which the controls are stuck, we need at least four observations. That is, we
need three to know acceleration and one more to know that acceleration has been changed.
(This still does not tell us the body's destination or goal).
<br/>
To know the destination, provided the operator does not change his mind or try to fool us,
we need five observations.
<br/>
To know the operator has changed his mind or is trying to fool us, we need six
observations." (1978,p.18).
<br/>
Young noted that observation "categories five and six repeat the cycle", the fifth falling
into a position category (like the first), and the sixth falling into a velocity category
(like the second). This shows the relationship between the minimum of four categories
required for any analytical grasp and the six observational elements to encompass the
behavioral complexity.
<br/>
</p>