Socio-constructivisme - Constructivisme Social / socio-Constructionnisme
<p class=default>
Philosophers of science should take seriously the fact, emphasized already by Peirce and
Popper, that scientific knowledge is a product of the scientific community. The
ontological and epistemological views associated with the sociology of science have often
been interpreted as forms of relativism and anti-realism. This chapter examines critically
the position of the Edinburgh school (Bloor, Barnes). It is argued that the Strong
Programme need not be in conflict with realism, but its radically nominalist doctrine of
meaning finitism should be rejected. But Latour's social constructivism, if taken
literally as an ontological view, cannot be reconciled with scientific realism.
<br/>
Keywords:
<u>anti-realism </search/query?keyword=%22anti%26%23x2010%3Brealism%22></u>
,
<u>Barnes </search/query?keyword=%22Barnes%22></u>
,
<u>Bloor </search/query?keyword=%22Bloor%22></u>
,
<u>Edinburgh school </search/query?keyword=%22Edinburgh%20school%22></u>
,
<u>finitism </search/query?keyword=%22finitism%22></u>
,
<u>Latour </search/query?keyword=%22Latour%22></u>
,
<u>Peirce </search/query?keyword=%22Peirce%22></u>
,
<u>Popper </search/query?keyword=%22Popper%22></u>
,
<u>relativism </search/query?keyword=%22relativism%22></u>
,
<u>scientific community </search/query?keyword=%22scientific%20community%22></u>
,
<u>social constructivism </search/query?keyword=%22social%20constructivism%22></u>
,
<u>sociology of science </search/query?keyword=%22sociology%20of%20science%22></u>
,
<u>Strong Programme </search/query?keyword=%22Strong%20Programme%22></u>
<br/>
</p>