Harrison Smith Infowars
---
-=-=
MMA 8 26
Right-wing media liken Massachusetts law expanding abortion access to Satanism, murder, and “human sacrifice”
Women attending the signing of the law, which will allow more patients to receive care in the Bay State, were called “witches” and “shrieking harpies”
Written by Ben Van Bloem
Research contributions from Monica Rodriguez
Published 08/21/26
Right-wing media figures are melting down over a new Massachusetts law that will widen access to abortion in the state, claiming the law paves the way for “human sacrifice” and comparing the signing ceremony to “a coven of witches celebrating depravity."
In passing the law, Massachusetts joins Washington, D.C., and several other states that have moved to prioritize the judgment of medical professionals about pregnancy and abortion care rather than setting limits based on the length of the pregnancy. Right-wing figures, however, claim without evidence that this will legalize “post-birth abortion,” and that the law was enacted to make it easier to “sell the body parts” of aborted fetuses.
The law prioritizes the judgment of medical professionals, allowing more patients to receive care in-state
- Massachusetts removed gestation-based restrictions on abortions in order to “[give] doctors the final word” on abortions after 24 weeks. The law changed language restricting abortions on a specific timeline to read “an abortion may be performed by a physician based upon the professional judgment of the physician.” While most abortions are performed in the first trimester, abortions in the later stages “often involve situations in which doctors discovered a fetal anomaly late in pregnancy.” One supporter of the law was Kate Dineen, an abortion rights activist who could not receive care in Massachusetts and was forced to travel to Maryland for an abortion after her “son died in utero at 33 weeks.” [The 19th, 8/10/26; NBC Boston, 8/10/26; AP News, 7/31/26; Mass.gov, 8/10/26]
- Several major medical groups, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, championed the law, which Gov. Maura Healey’s office says will allow patients facing serious complications to “get medically appropriate care close to home.” A press release from the Massachusetts government noted that under the previous law “some Massachusetts patients were forced to leave the state to receive care” and that doctors had been limited to “a narrow list of statutory exceptions” when determining late-term pregnancy care options. The new framework allows doctors to “exercise their professional medical judgment in accordance with accepted standards of care.” This allows “greater clarity” for doctors who are caring for “patients with complex medical needs.” Lynn M. Yee, who is the vice chair of the Health Policy and Advocacy Committee at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, argued that past laws “interfered” with the ability of providers to give “evidence-based care” to their patients. [The 19th, 8/10/26, Mass.gov, 8/10/26]
- A study looking at deaths during or within one year of pregnancy after Roe v. Wade was overturned “found a possible 9.2% increase in pregnancy-associated deaths in states with abortion bans.” One author of the study said that the findings “suggest many preventable deaths have occurred in states that banned abortion” and highlights that efforts to address the “maternal mortality crisis could be undermined by policies that restrict reproductive health care, including abortion.” [Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 4/27/26]
Figures in right-wing media have linked the new law to Satan, “human sacrifice,” or otherwise evil influences
- The host of Mucho Que Decir Jorge Diaz Diaz argued that the Massachusetts abortion law is “intrinsically something diabolical” and suggested that Healey made a “pact with the devil.” He also suggested the law allowed for “human sacrifice” and that it was “satanic.” [La Nueva Poderosa, Mucho Que Decir, 8/14/26]
- Former Infowars host David Knight suggested that Democrats who support the bill would be yelling, “Hail Satan.” Knight said, “I imagine they've got some Democrats out there in the courtyard yelling, Hail Satan, like they did in Texas when there was the pushback by the protest by the abortionists there.” [Rumble, The David Knight Show, 8/12/26]
- Conservative podcaster Steven Crowder called the law “the evil of human sacrifice.” Crowder said, “I see the practice openly of evil, of human sacrifice, which is what we're seeing as far as abortion law in Massachusetts. … It's an entire room full of women celebrating the evil of human sacrifice and they know it.” [Rumble, Louder with Crowder, 8/12/26]
Right-wing media attacked the women and providers who championed the legislation
- On Newsmax’s Rob Schmitt Tonight, guest Abby Johnson said the signing ceremony looked “like a coven of witches celebrating depravity.” She went on to say that they were “celebrating the right to kill babies.” [Newsmax, Rob Schmitt Tonight, 8/12/26]
- Radio and podcast host Megyn Kelly called the video of the bill signing “disturbing” because “all these women are so grateful for the chance to kill their own unborn child.” [YouTube, The Megyn Kelly Show, 8/12/26]
- Steven Crowder said that the group of women at the signing was “a gaggle of evil women.” [Rumble, Louder with Crowder, 8/12/26]
- Host of the War Room podcast, Harrison Smith, called the women at the signing “shrieking harpies” who want to “murder babies.” Smith said, “Here's the governor signing the law, the lesbian governor signing it into law, surrounded by a bunch of shrieking harpies clapping and giggling at the fact that they can now literally murder babies.” [Rumble, War Room, 8/12/26]
- Daily Wire host Michael Knowles speculated that Healey’s Catholic faith was “fake” and called the women at the signing “witches.” Knowles said, “Big signing, this ghastly woman signing the bill, surrounded by all sorts of witches.” He went on to say that Healey’s “Catholicism is fake” and she “is in a state of grave mortal sin” before calling her an “infanticidal lesbian.” [YouTube, The Michael Knowles Show, 8/11/26]
- Newsmax host Rob Finnerty attacked the women at the signing as “truly sick” for “clapping for murder, clapping for killing babies.” [Newsmax, Finnerty, 8/11/26]
Other figures attacked the law by comparing abortion to infanticide and downplaying potential pregnancy risks
- Harrison Smith also claimed that the bill is not designed to care for “women's health” but instead is for people to “sell the body parts” of aborted fetuses. Smith said, “So, there are a couple things that are motivating this. None of them have to do with women's health. None of them have to do with freedom of association or freedom of choice or women's empowerment. They're as sickeningly evil as you can possibly imagine. The only one you could ever possibly justify in any way, however of a stretch it is, and like I'm saying this to make a point, is you can sell the body parts. You can sell the body parts. So a liver or an arm or a leg or an eyeball from a baby that's nine months is going to be a lot more valuable than a fetus that's six months. So, if you let them gestate until they're basically human, then you've sort of found a workaround of the fact that it's illegal to sell human body parts from human beings.” [Rumble, War Room, 8/12/26]
- Megyn Kelly claimed that for “late term abortion … there are very few things that actually pose a threat to the life of the mother.” Kelly said, “Late term abortion in this country is actually not even controversial. Virtually everyone is against it. I mean it’s just only these loons would favor such a thing. And honestly, at that point in your pregnancy, there are very few things that actually pose a threat to the life of the mother. I mean, I think Lila Rose would tell you at that point, whatever happens, you would just give birth to the baby, they would do what they could to keep the baby alive. But the answer that far along in the pregnancy is not to kill the baby.” [YouTube, The Megyn Kelly Show, 8/12/26]
- While discussing the bill, Fox host Will Cain called abortion “infanticide” and asked what the difference was between a late term abortion and “killing a baby four weeks outside the womb?” His guest, executive director of Catholic Pro-Life Community Cynthia Schmidt, responded that “there is no difference.” [Fox News, The Will Cain Show, 8/11/26; Catholic Pro-Life Community, accessed 8/13/26]
- Conservative media personality and Univista TV host Sanchez Grass claimed Massachusetts is “ready to kill as many babies as necessary.” He said in full that Healey “wants to ensure that women can continue to have abortions freely, no matter how far along they are in their pregnancies. In other words, come to Massachusetts, here, by law, we’re ready to kill as many babies as necessary.” [Univista TV, Sanchez Grass En America, 8/13/26]
- Voz News panelist Alfonso Aguilar claimed abortion is “murder.” He also suggested such legislation “does justify considering whether some effort should be made at the federal level to at least ban abortion after 15 or 20 weeks.” [VOZ Media, Voz News, 8/11/26]
- Scott Jennings said that Democrats had “pushed abortion extremism to its logical and horrifying conclusion.” He added that this “opens the door to ending the life of a healthy, viable baby right up until the moment of birth.” [YouTube, The Scott Jennings Show, 8/11/26]
-=-=
---
MMA
Right-wing figures are spreading “plandemic” conspiracy theories about the hantavirus
Written by Alex Kaplan
:{Published 05/13/26
As concerns about the spread of hantavirus emerge, right-wing and far-right figures are spreading conspiracy theories on podcasts and social media that the virus came from a lab and may be a new “plandemic” (planned pandemic) created to push vaccines, disrupt upcoming elections, or achieve other nefarious goals.
The conspiracy theories are similar to those spread among the right during the COVID-19 pandemic that harmed efforts to mitigate the spread of the virus and contributed to declining vaccination rates.
Hantavirus concerns arise after outbreak on cruise ship}:
- In early May, a cruise ship sailing the Atlantic Ocean experienced an outbreak of hantavirus, a typically rodent-borne virus, causing at least three deaths and at least eight others to become ill or test positive for the virus. In response, passengers from more than 20 countries were flown home and quarantined, including an American who “was suspected of infection after initial testing.”
Nevertheless, the World Health Organization has said that “the risk of hantavirus spreading to the general population is ‘absolutely low,’” with the organization’s head of epidemic and pandemic preparedness saying, “This is not the start of an epidemic, this is not the start of a pandemic.”
A hantavirus vaccine is currently in development, though it could be years before it is released.
- ## “Plandemic” conspiracy theories about hantavirus are spreading online
- Some right-wing and far-right figures on podcasts and social media have been baselessly claiming that hantavirus is the beginning of a planned outbreak.
For instance, David Niño Rodriguez, a podcaster whom The Daily Beast described as “a vocal QAnon supporter,” posted on Truth Social about hantavirus, claiming that “they’re moving into desperate territory” and that the death of late actor Gene Hackman’s wife from the virus “was just the beginning. … Here we go again.”
Some were more specific about who they thought was responsible for the spread of the virus — like the World Health Organization — and their alleged nefarious reasons, which include forcing vaccines on people and “rig[ging] elections.”
Sherri Tenpenny, a podcaster with a history of spreading vaccine misinformation, suggested that the WHO may have had a role in the outbreak to help secure a treaty, claiming that “they can’t agree” on “how countries … ensure equitable access to vaccines and treatments,” and questioning if the ship outbreak was a “coincidence.”
On conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ network, host Harrison Smith said, “If I was the bad guy, you know what I would do? I’d really release the hantavirus. I would really have an actually super deadly virus spreading from person to person, and then I would release a real vaccine.”
- :{Video
Citation
From the May 7, 2026, edition of The Alex Jones Network's War Room
- An account for the far-right podcast X22 Report suggested in a social media post that this could be “another manufactured event to push vaccines.”
“Pepe Deluxe,” whom Vice described as an “influential QAnon promoter,” shared a social media post — which said “LMAO - incoming plandemic” in response to news of WHO’s media briefing on hantavirus — with Pepe Deluxe also writing, “I’m sure they already have a vaccine ready 🙄.”
On another podcast, The Shannon Joy Show, gynecologist James Thorp, who has spread vaccine misinformation, claimed that “this hantavirus event and future events will be used to scare the population into taking the vaccines,” and told viewers, “Don’t ever take a vaccine for the hantavirus.”
- :{Video
Share
Citation
From the May 11, 2026, edition of The Shannon Joy Show, streamed on Rumble
- Mikki Willis, the filmmaker behind the viral *Plandemic* film that helped popularize the conspiracy theory that the COVID pandemic was planned, suggested that “they are … gonna try this again” with hantavirus, falsely adding that “Pfizer already has a vaccine ready.”
:{Meanwhile, Judy Mikovits, who was featured in Plandemic, spoke with Rodriguez about hantavirus, somehow bringing vaccine boosters into it.
}:
- :{Video
Citation
From a May 8, 2026, video from Ninoscorner.tv, uploaded to Rumble
JUDY MIKOVITS: So, here we are on a — here we are on a — on a cruise ship. Oh, okay. So, you've got — you've — and you're testing now not with an antibody. Take those five people and say, show me an antibody to hantavirus, meaning you've been exposed. Because if you're injected with the virus, that's the only way you can get it.
...
DAVID NIÑO RODRIGUEZ (HOST): No. Wait. Hold on. Hold on. If you get — if you're injected with it, it would tell me that the vaccinated are going to be the ones —
MIKOVITS: Correct, and it's the vaccinated from the coronaviruses. The only way you will test positive for an antibody and it is to be injected with the virus. And it would have come from every booster. It would have come from the monkey mouse, cow, pig, from 1993. The last time they tried to play the hanta game was right after my PhD thesis.
- Several figures suggested that the virus was released to disrupt the 2026 elections. Podcast host Tim Pool said that the “hantavirus pandemic panic” was “just in time for a midterm election” (though he also said the virus was “no big story”). And a fellow podcaster, Benny Johnson, called the virus “an op to rig elections." A Newsmax host later similarly said, “They are doing it all over again on purpose. COVID started in March 2020, impacted the November elections. Hantavirus started in May of 2026.”
A user on the far-right forum previously known as TheDonald wrote that “the best condition for a virus to spread, is an election year.”
And an article on the The Gateway Pundit for a “Contagion Emergency Kit” mused about whether hantavirus was “another plandemic” and a “transparent effort to terrorize Americans and swing the mid-terms against President Trump.”
Some social media users also pointed to a 2022 post with the text “2023: Corona ended 2026: Hantavirus” and claimed the post was proof of a “White Hat exposure operation.” A user on the conspiracy subreddit called the post “predictive programming” and said it “feels like yet another planned out, manufactured ritual.” (Pool mentioned it on his podcast as well.)
Some figures also suggested the hantavirus outbreak was caused by a lab leak in Australia. Podcaster Seth Holehouse said, “Three hundred and twenty-three vials containing deadly viruses go missing from a lab in Australia. … Two vials contain the hantavirus. Imagine that. … So, is this kind of like the precursor? Is this like the Wuhan lab leak?”
- ## Why does this sound familiar?
- These claims about hantavirus are essentially recycled versions of what the right and far right pushed during the coronavirus pandemic: that the pandemic was planned, that it was a ploy to overthrow Trump or help Democrats win the 2020 election, and that “the vaccine was invented before the COVID-19 pandemic to advance vaccine sales.”
Conspiracy theories and misinformation about COVID-19 helped drive down COVID vaccination rates and primed people to reject other vaccines as well. This has had other long-term consequences, possibly contributing to declining vaccine rates and outbreaks of measles, which may lead to the U.S. losing its measles elimination status. Recycling the same claims could help further entrench that vaccine hesitancy and erode public trust in health institutions at a time when the Trump administration has already been cutting federal resources for pandemic preparedness.
//
05/07/20 5:33 PM EDT
05/12/26 10:47 AM EDT
01/12/22
---
// CRM, FASCISM
Right-wing media have long called for Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act, he's now considering it
Written by Gideon Taaffe & Sage Hodil
Research contributions from Reed McMaster, Jane Lee & Alex Kaplan
Published 10/09/25 MMA
President Donald Trump recently suggested he may be willing to invoke the Insurrection Act as protests continue in Chicago and Portland against Immigration and Customs Enforcement activity and deployment of National Guard troops.
Right-wing media figures have called on Trump to use the law — which allows the military to be used for domestic law enforcement activities — in response to various demonstrations since at least as far back as 2020.
Conservative media figures endorsed using the act to “put down” Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 and “restore order” to cities where demonstrations were occurring. Starting in June of this year, right-wing media renewed their support for the act's use over anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles, and as similar protests broke out in Chicago and Portland, calls to “invoke” the act in Democratic-run cities grew.
Trump once again says he might invoke the Insurrection Act in Democratic-run cities
- Protests in Chicago and Portland broke out as National Guard members were deployed to aid ICE officers.Authorities have used tear gas, pepper balls and more against protesters at ICE facilities in both cities. Several people were arrested in both cases, with some facing federal charges. PBS News, [10/6/25]
- On October 6, while talking to reporters about the legal issues with sending in the National Guard to cities around the country, Trump said he would consider invoking the Insurrection Act.He stated, “I’d do it if it was necessary. So far it hasn’t been necessary. But we have an Insurrection Act for a reason. … If people were being killed and courts were holding us up or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I'd do that.” He also said, “If you take a look at what’s been going on in Portland, it’s been going on for a long time, and that’s insurrection. I mean, that’s pure insurrection." NBC News, [10/6/25]
- The Insurrection Act allows the military to act as a police force and make arrests.Reuters explained: “The law enables troops to take part in domestic law enforcement activities like making arrests and performing searches, functions they are generally otherwise prohibited from engaging in. The Insurrection Act can be invoked when there are ‘unlawful obstructions, combinations or assemblages or rebellion’ against the U.S. government's authority. When the president deems those conditions have been met, the law gives the president the power to use the armed forces to take actions ‘to enforce those laws or suppress the rebellion.’” Reuters, [10/7/25]
- Trump deployed the National Guard and Marines during anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles earlier this year and called the protesters “insurrectionists,” saying, in response to a question about whether he would invoke the Insurrection Act, “Depends on whether or not there’s an insurrection.”Axios noted, “Without the Insurrection Act, the troops' mission is legally limited to protecting federal agents and property.” Axios, [6/10/25]
- ## Right-wing media figures are calling for Trump to use the Insurrection Act “more liberally” in Democratic-run cities, claiming protesters are “insurrecting”
- Fox News contributor Lisa Boothe claimed Trump “should look at using the Insurrection Act more liberally in cities like Chicago or in cities like Portland, Oregon.” Boothe also remarked that “Portland is a hellhole. … Homeless everywhere, it’s disgusting.” Fox News, *Fox & Friends Weekend*, [10/5/25]
- Right-wing podcaster Benny Johnson discussed his ride-along with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in Portland and stated, “I hope they invoke the Insurrection Act. I hope that's something that happens here because these people are clearly insurrecting.”Johnson also claimed that Portland “has been conquered by antifa.” Newsmax, *Finnerty*, [10/7/25]
- Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said Trump “should invoke the Insurrection Act and deploy military assets to protect life and limb and property.”Fitton reacted to protests in Chicago, writing, “This is an insurrection, and @GovPritzker is implicated.” Twitter/X, [10/4/25]
- On Steve Bannon’sWar Roompodcast, right-wing pundit Jack Posobiec said that “the president has black-letter law, Title X authority to be able to deploy the National Guard” to “suppress an insurrection or a rebellion.”Bannon also claimed California Gov. Gavin Newsom is a “neo-Confederate” and claimed Los Angeles is also in “open defiance of the federal government about immigration laws, Jack. I mean, this is going to come down [to] we control the country, they control these big metropolitan areas.” Real America’s Voice, *War Room*, [10/6/25]
- Posobiec also posted, “If Trump were to invoke the insurrection act for reasons like the situation in Portland, Americans would support it.” Twitter/X, [10/6/25]
- In response to a report of a hit put out on a Border Patrol commander, right-wing podcaster Tim Pool posted, “Insurrection Act.”Twitter/X, [10/6/25]
- QAnon influencer Clandestine said of whether Trump should invoke the Insurrection Act: “I’d argue that we are already at that point, and this is soft disclosure of what is to come.” Telegram, [10/6/25; Anti-Defamation League, 4/5/22]
- Fox News contributor Paul Mauro claimed Trump is on “very, very safe ground” to enact the Insurrection Act.Mauro claimed that the Insurrection Act is “a carve-out to posse comitatus. You can use it to protect facilities and you can use it when federal law is being obstructed — that's the operative phrase right there. ICE is trying to enforce federal law. If they’re being obstructed, you can do this. What it means is he’s on very, very safe ground.” Fox News, *The Five*, [10/1/25]
- Fox Business correspondent Charles Gasparino said Trump would be “on pretty solid grounds” to invoke the Insurrection Act “if it is to protect the ICE facilities” from protesters.Gasparino added, “I would love to see federal troops in downtown Manhattan — I don’t care.” Fox News, *Fox News Sunday*, [9/29/25]
- ## In June, right-wing media similarly advocated for the Insurrection Act to crack down on anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles
- Fox News host Laura Ingraham argued it would be Trump’s “right” and “obligation” to invoke the Insurrection Act if he feels the U.S. “is being threatened from within.”She said, “Now Democrats are pretending to be outraged about the prospect of Trump invoking the Insurrection Act, which, of course, is his right. I’d say it's his obligation to do if — and it’s his call — if he feels the United States is being threatened from within by violent, seditionary forces.” Fox News, *The Ingraham Angle*, [6/10/25]
- Infowars host Harrison Smith argued for utilizing the act during anti-ICE protests in LA, saying, “The Constitution actually provides for solutions to this. It is the Insurrection Act.” He stated, “The Constitution is being destroyed by these people making it unsafe, depriving the people of LA of the ability to live their lives and express themselves, pursue happiness, and all the other freedoms that we're supposed to enjoy are being destroyed by these people. The Constitution actually provides for solutions to this. It is the Insurrection Act. It is shutting down what’s going on with rapidity and aggressiveness to uphold the rights of the American people against this invading foreign force.” [Infowars, American Journal, 6/9/25]
- Students for Trump National Chairman Ryan Fournier posted, “TIME FOR THE INSURRECTION ACT!” in response to a post by Trump about LA.Twitter/X, [6/9/25]
- Conservative podcaster Vince Coglianese said the way to crack down on anti–ICE protests in Los Angeles is “the president wielding the Insurrection Act.”Coglianese: “It strikes me that if we're going to crack down on this using law enforcement, it's just going to have to be the president wielding the Insurrection Act. He's going to have to go in and save American cities from the leadership that's betraying them.” Rumble, *Vince*, [6/9/25; RadioLink, 4/17/25]
- Mackubin T. Owens wrote for Blaze Media that the Insurrection Act empowers the president “to act when mobs attack federal law” and the president “has the duty to restore order.”In a September opinion piece, Owens defended Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to LA, claiming he had the “duty -- and the power -- to act.” Blaze Media, [9/8/25]
- ## Right-wing media hosts and guests also advocated for Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act to quell protests in 2020
- Ahead of the 2020 election, Fox host Mark Levin shared his hope Trump would win and then utilize the Insurrection Act to “put down” protests.On September 11, 2020, Levin speculated that if Trump wins “he will dust off the Insurrection Act” and “he will have to use it to put down the enemy. The enemy is antifa, the enemy is Black Lives Matter.” On September 15, 2020, Levin said protesters “need to be put down” and claimed, “It's not illegal, it's not unconstitutional, it's not unethical, it's not immoral for the President to use the Insurrection Act to put down insurrections.” On September 23, 2020, Levin stated, “I pray to God Donald Trump is reelected. And I pray to God that he uses the Insurrection Act and puts this down.” And on October 28, Levin said, “These lootings and riotings and arsons need to be put down. God willing the President will be re-elected, and he'll use the Insurrection Act to bring safety, and peace." Westwood One, *The Mark Levin Show*, [9/11/20, 9/15/20, 9/23/25, 10/28/20]
- Writing for the National Review, Fox News contributor Andrew McCarthy discussed the Insurrection Act — saying it “expressly” empowers the president “to suppress domestic violence” — and called on Trump to “restore order” to cities where Black Lives Matter protests were underway, “including by deployment of the military where that is necessary.”McCarthy dismissed concerns about federalism, writing: “Although the Constitution calls for a state to request federal assistance to combat domestic violence before the president acts, that condition is more apparent than real. … When it comes to violent uprisings, though, federalism concerns are beside the point. Washington has an express constitutional obligation to protect the people of the states, and the republican form of government, from attack.” National Review, [5/31/20]
- Conservative lawyer Jeffrey Clark said onWar Roomthat former Attorney General Bill Barr “participated in using the Insurrection Act” in 1992 in LA and asked, “Why wasn’t that same aggressiveness used against the riots that were used all across the country in the summer of 2020?”Real America's Voice, *War Room*, [7/3/23]
- Right-wing podcaster Benny Johnson urged Trump to “invoke the Insurrection Act immediately” during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020.Twitter/X, [5/31/20]
- Daily Wire host Ben Shapiro suggested in 2020 that Trump should invoke the act if states failed to get protests under control.He said: “The Insurrection Act is generally invoked when local authorities are not doing their jobs and protecting the civil rights of their citizens. So the president does have the authority to do this sort of stuff. … And the president, by the way, didn’t say he was going to do it. He said if you don’t get your cities and states under control, then I will do it. And guess what? He should. He should. Because guess — because you're an American taxpaying citizen. You have civil rights. Your civil rights are being abridged and violated when you are locked in your home so rioters and looters can roam free.” The Daily Wire, *The Ben Shapiro Show*, [6/2/20]
- Blaze Media senior editor Daniel Horowitz wrote that “Trump should use the Insurrection Act” and “deadly force” against Black Lives Matter protesters.Blaze Media, [6/1/20]
- Ryan Fournier posted, “President Trump should invoke the Insurrection Act to stop the terrorism happening in Seattle.”Twitter/X, [6/11/20]
//
10/08/25 1:26 PM EDT
10/08/25 5:11 PM EDT
10/08/25
---