Accounting
<p>===
e & y,
Rival “Big Four” accounting firm KPMG KPMG.UL has also been under scrutiny for tax shelters. In 2005, KPMG agreed to pay $456 million, accept an outside monitor and admit to wrongdoing to resolve a federal investigation into questionable tax shelters it sold to wealthy individuals.</p>
<p>
Sixteen of the KPMG’s former employees are due to face trial over the shelters in September.
(Additional reporting by Martha Graybow)
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN3041538520070530">Read full article</a>
==</p>
<p>
GANGS OF AMERICA
The answer can be found by following the money. In the ten years
preceding the scandal, corporations had doled out over $1.08 billion in
campaign contributions: $636 million to Republicans and $449 million
to Democrats. No one, it seemed, had any incentive to rock the boat. In
the decade prior to the Enron scandal, there had been three major fights
in Congress having to do with the accounting industry practices and
accountability. In all three cases, big business lobbying overwhelmed
potential reforms:
<b>Stock Options: </b>In 1993, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) attempted to close the loophole that allowed
companies to reward stock options to employees and executives
without reporting those options as expenses. Big business
mounted a huge lobbying effort, and Congress, led by Democratic
Joseph Senator Lieberman, pressured the FASB not to
treat stock options as a corporate expense.
<b>Tort Reform:</b> Part of the “Contract with America” that fueled
the Gingrich Revolution of 1994, in which Republicans gained
a majority of the House of Representatives, was “tort reform.”
Proponents of tort reform denounced the prevalence of frivolous
lawsuits and passed legislation making it much more difficult
for investors and others to sue corporations and their accounting
firms. In 1995, Congress passed (over President
Clinton’s veto) the Private Securities Legislative Reform Act
limiting the rights of investors to sue management. It also
shielded accounting firms from being charged with aiding and
abetting fraudulent activities. The result was a slack environment
with little fear of lawsuits.
<b>Conflicts of Interest within Auditors: </b>In April, 2000, SEC
chairman Arthur Levitt proposed that auditing firms not be allowed
to consult with the same companies that they were auditing,
since wearing both hats puts auditing firms in a position
where they have an interest in not rocking the boat. Levitt was
not speculating about problems that might happen as a result
of such conflicts. Already, he had ample evidence that the
practice of issuing “managed earnings” had “absolutely exploded.”
And Arthur Anderson had already been fined $7 million
for its role in advising Waste Management Inc., which
paid $457 in penalties for overstating its earnings between
1993 and 1997. To defeat the proposal, Anderson was joined
by two other major accounting firms, KPMG and Deloitte &
Touche, in an all-out lobbying campaign that included nearly
$23 million in campaign contributions to both parties. One
well-positioned Congressman, <b>Billy Tauzin </b>of Louisiana, had
received $300,000 from the accounting industry over the prior
decade. Seven lobbying firms worked on Capitol Hill to kill
the proposal. The committee that oversees the SEC put pressure
on the agency to abandon the proposal. This despite multiple
convictions of Arthur Anderson and other firms. gangs of america
</p>