Redhead, CS

<h2 style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">see 2ndhand smoke</font></h2><h2 style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">=</font></h2><div style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">CYA?</font></div><div style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">
</font></div><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><span style="text-align: start;">In 1996, an attempt in Waterloo, Ontario, to pass a regional smoking bylaw came under attack by council members, who cited an article that appeared in a hospitality establishment journal.</span><b style="text-align: start;"> The article stated that a new study by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) did not find secondhand tobacco smoke to be a health hazard. <span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">Stephen Redhead </span>of the CRS disputed this statement, and stated that, in fact, his report does not dispute the claim that secondhand smoke is a "known, class A (human) carcinogen."</b><span style="text-align: start;"> </span><i style="text-align: start;">(<b>Source: </b>Jalsevac, P., "Second-hand smoke study misused, scientist says," Kitchener-Waterloo Record: B1, February 8, 1996.)</i></font></div><div style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">
</font></div><div style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"></font></div><h2 style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/crs-publishes-report-on-aca-repeal-legislation/" style="text-decoration: none; line-height: 18px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><b>Efforts to Change or Repeal the ACA</b></a><span style="line-height: 18px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"> </span><span class="date" style="line-height: 18px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">- November 9, 2014</span></font></h2><div><div class="article_excerpt" style="padding: 2px 2px 7px 15px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The Congressional Research Service issued a report summarizing legislative actions to repeal, defund, delay, or amend the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The report...</font></div></div><div style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">
</font></div><div style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">--</font></div><div style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">amazon</font></div><div style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" /><div style="font-weight: normal;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">Budget Control Act: Potential Impact of Sequestration on Health Reform Spending Nov 22, 2012</font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></div><div style="">by <b>C. Stephen Redhead</b></div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Paperback</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$14.99Prime</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Get it by Thursday, Dec 31</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">More Buying Choices</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$10.97used & new(10 offers)</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Kindle Edition</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$0.99</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Auto-delivered wirelessly</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">FREE Shipping on orders over $35</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Product Details</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Genetic DiscriminationApr 15, 2008</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">by Nancy Lee Jones and C. Stephen Redhead</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Hardcover</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$95.00Prime</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Temporarily out of stock. Order now and we'll deliver when available.</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">More Buying Choices</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$66.91used & new(17 offers)</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">FREE Shipping on orders over $35</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Product Details</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA): Overview and AnalysesAug 2004</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">by Hinda R. Chaikind and Jean Hearne</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Paperback</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$33.16used & new(8 offers)</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Product Details</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Submission of Mental Health Records to NICS and the HIPAA Privacy RuleApr 15, 2013</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">by Edward C. Liu and C. Stephen Redhead</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Kindle Edition</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$0.99</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Auto-delivered wirelessly</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Product Details</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">PPACA: A Brief Overview of the Law, Implementation, and Legal ChallengesMar 2, 2011</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">by Hinda Chaikind and Curtis W. Copeland</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Kindle Edition</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$0.99</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Auto-delivered wirelessly</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Product Details</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">ACA: A Brief Overview of the Law, Implementation, and Legal Challenges Mar 23, 2013</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">by Vanessa K. Burrows and Jennifer Staman</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Kindle Edition</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$0.99</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Auto-delivered wirelessly</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Product Details</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Public Health Service Agencies: Overview and FundingNov 12, 2013</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">by Amalia K. Corby-Edwards and C. Stephen Redhead</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Kindle Edition</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$0.99</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Auto-delivered wirelessly</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Product Details</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the Appropriations Process: FAQs Regarding Potential Legislative Changes and Effects...Oct 5, 2013</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">by Charles S. Redhead and Edward C. Liu</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Kindle Edition</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$0.99</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Auto-delivered wirelessly</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Product Details</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Budget Control Act: Potential Impact of Automatic Spending Reduction Procedures on Health ReformOct 17, 2011</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">by C. Stephen Redhead</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Kindle Edition</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$0.99</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Auto-delivered wirelessly</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Product Details</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Legislative Actions to Repeal, Defund, or Delay the Affordable Care ActNov 23, 2013</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">by C. Stephen Redhead and Janet Kinzer</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Kindle Edition</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$0.99</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Auto-delivered wirelessly</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Product Details</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Public Health Service (PHS) Agencies: Overview and Funding, FY2010-FY2012Jul 15, 2011</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">by C. Stephen Redhead and Pamela W. Smith</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Kindle Edition</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$0.99</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Auto-delivered wirelessly</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Product Details</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Public Health, Workforce, Quality, and Related Provisions in PPACA: Summary and TimelineSep 2, 2010</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">by C. Stephen Redhead and Erin D. Williams</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Kindle Edition</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">$0.99</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">Auto-delivered wirelessly</div><div style="font-weight: normal;">
</div></div><div style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">==</font></div><h2 style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">C Stephen Redhead    </font><span style="widows: auto;"><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">http://sciencecorruption.com/ATN182/00272.html</font></span></h2>

</center>

<h4 style="text-align: left;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">A physiologist at the Congressional Research Center who became friends with Steven Milloy. He was embroiled in controversy over the Granvelle CRS report attacking the EPA's anti-tobacco stance. —  </font></h4>

</center>

<h4 style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Some key documents</font></h4>

</center>

<p class="dater" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">• Redhead was a physiologist working with the Congressional Research Center,</font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1993 Apr 20:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Congressional Research Service. Mortality and Economic Costs Attributable to Smoking and Alcohol Abuse, Report 93-426 SPR by C. Stephen Redhead,<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/zse23d00" target="blank"><img src="/b991d2bb-b5ce-52c9-9499-b2ba3ae5cbba.jpg"/></a><a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/zse23d00/pdf" target="blank"><img src="/b91913f4-477d-5602-9855-442eabb49411.jpg"/></a>

 </font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1994 Mar 8:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>The Report on the economic costs of ETS are presented to Congress by the report's authors, economists Jane G Gravelle and Dennis Zimmerman. This is dealing with the fairness of funding health care reform via cigarette taxes.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/flj95a00" target="blank"><img src="/e98e16da-5c06-503a-99a4-e00a7c5f0ec9.jpg"/></a><a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/flj95a00/pdf" target="blank"><img src="/cfb1ef9f-fb22-52e0-b705-bae0a053cd97.jpg"/></a>

 </font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1994 Mar 23:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Gravelle and Redhead answer a request for information as to the source of the estimated premature 50,000 deaths from passive smoking. The EPA says these number 3,000 — but this refers only to lung cancer. The figure of 50,000 came from the 21 July 1993 testimony of AMA's Health & Environment Subcommittee to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, and they apparently took it from A Judson Wells estimates made in 1988.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/jwq91a00" target="blank"><img src="/4882c639-d00f-5483-b96f-8d1542deb660.jpg"/></a><a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/jwq91a00/pdf" target="blank"><img src="/4ff7fee2-d4a1-5426-b799-cd017fa0a61b.jpg"/></a>

 </font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1995 May 24::<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Meeting over CRS report - [<a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/action/search/basic?fd=0&q=517496564&df=er&c=at&c=ba&c=bw&c=ct&c=da&c=ll&c=lm&c=mg&c=mm&c=pm&c=rj&c=ti&c=ub&c=us" target="_blank">517496564</a>]</font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1995 May 22:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Worked on Draft report on the Second CRS workshop s with Dr Rowberg. They are formulating another CRS report into ETS and meeting with tobacco people for data. [<a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/action/search/basic?fd=0&q=528170134&df=er&c=at&c=ba&c=bw&c=ct&c=da&c=ll&c=lm&c=mg&c=mm&c=pm&c=rj&c=ti&c=ub&c=us" target="_blank">528170134/0136</a>]</font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1995 Jun 13::<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">good friends with Steve Milloy </span>- [<a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/action/search/basic?fd=0&q=525312064&df=er&c=at&c=ba&c=bw&c=ct&c=da&c=ll&c=lm&c=mg&c=mm&c=pm&c=rj&c=ti&c=ub&c=us" target="_blank">525312064</a>]</font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1995 Jun:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>A workshop to evaluate the draft turned into a "shouting match" — The CRS had relied on unpublished, industry-funded data on workplace exposure,<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>

    and one of the sponsors, Senator Ford, planned to use it to "kill OSHA's rule"<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/fgs01c00" target="blank"><img src="/b62daa37-2914-5aad-9ef4-047b882c9840.jpg"/></a><a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/fgs01c00/pdf" target="blank"><img src="/80fd1b14-a9b2-57f6-8789-8871802797d1.jpg"/></a>

 </font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1995 Jun:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>CRS Workshop Draft on ETS and lung-cancer. This focuses on three epidemiological studies not considered by the EPA - Brownson, Stockwell and (1994) Fontham (1991 Fontham was considered by EPA)<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>

    It"departs from previous CRS analysis of the ETS issue in that it concludes that:</font></p>

<li style=" padding-top: 0.1cm;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">ETS satisfies the criteria for causality in relation to lung cancer risk,</font></li>

<li style=" padding-top: 0.1cm;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">There is a discernable risk of lung cancer for non-smoking spouses (with "heavy" smokers)</font></li>

<li style=" padding-top: 0.1cm;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">possible to calculate approx 700 to 1780 lung cancer deaths from ETS exposure in US.</font></li>

</ul>

<span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 244);">    Says C Stephen Redhead and Richard E Rowberg did this Draft analysis, Previous reports and testimony were principally authored by Jane Gravelle.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span><a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/voa01c00" target="blank" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><img src="/7fc2d27f-6587-5c30-852d-2b47457f6a17.jpg"/></a><a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/voa01c00/pdf" target="blank" style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><img src="/a95eec57-91f8-539d-b5f7-10df21c62419.jpg"/></a><br style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" />

 </font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1995 June 2:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Brown & Williamson Tobacco have received a draft copy of a cover-note of the CRS Workshop's review of EPA's risk assessment on ETS, by C Stephen Redhead and Richard E Rowberg. This is a CRS internal audit, they are reviewing the original report made by their associate Jane Gravelle about the quality of the EPA's risk assessment of passive smoking. They say:</font></p>

<blockquote class="Q" style="font-variant: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style=""><b>The main conclusions of the EPA risk assessment are:</b><oltype style="font-weight: normal;">

<li style="padding-top: 0.1cm;">ETS causes lung cancer in nonsmoking adults;</li>

<li style="padding-top: 0.1cm;">ETS is responsible for approximately 3,000 nonsmoker lung cancer deaths per year in the US;</li>

<li style="padding-top: 0.1cm;">ETS is classified as a Group A ("known human") carcinogen, and</li>

<li style="padding-top: 0.1cm;"><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 204, 102);">ETS exposures are causally related to respiratory symptoms and disease in children.</span></li>

</ul></oltype>

</font></blockquote>

<p><span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 244); display: inline !important;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="">They also <b>characterise the previous Gravelle & Zimmermann report as:</b></font></span></p>

<blockquote class="Q" style="font-variant: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style=""><b>Previous CRS analyses of the EPA's position concluded that the statistical data relied upon by the EPA do not support the claim that ETS is a Group A carcinogen.</b></font></blockquote>

<p><span style="font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 244); display: inline !important;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">They then examine the evidence used by the EPA.</font></span></p>

<blockquote class="Q" style="font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="">The report was heavily criticized for a number of shortcomings. One criticism, pertinent to the currant CRS workshop Draft, was that the EPA did not include in its analyses the data from two publicly available spousal smoking studies. Those studies were conducted by Brownson, at al. (1992) and Stockwell, at al. (1992).<span class="Apple-converted-space" style=""> </span>

    It was argued that had the EPA included the data from the Brownson, et al. and Stockwell, et al. studies, it would have been unable to reach its conclusion on ETS.</font></blockquote>

<p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: none; display: inline !important; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 244);">It then focussed on these two studies, and included a third, the 1994 Fontham study.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span><br style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;" />

<li style=" padding-top: 0.1cm;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">passive smoking can be said to cause lung cancer</font></li>

<li style=" padding-top: 0.1cm;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">heavy smokers can give their non-smoking spouses lung-cancer</font></li>

<li style=" padding-top: 0.1cm;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">this probably results in between 700 and 1780 lung-cancer deaths each year in the US.</font></li>

</ul>

 </font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="">[B&W and BAT would probably have received this draft via the APCO/Steve Milloy's <b style="">Issueswatch</b><span class="Apple-converted-space" style=""> </span>operation]</font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1995 Jun 13:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>good friends with Steve Milloy - [<a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/action/search/basic?fd=0&q=525312064&df=er&c=at&c=ba&c=bw&c=ct&c=da&c=ll&c=lm&c=mg&c=mm&c=pm&c=rj&c=ti&c=ub&c=us" target="_blank">525312064</a>]</font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1995 Nov:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>Reference: "Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer Risk"<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>

    C. Stephen Redhead, Analyst in Life Sciences and Richard E. Rowberg, Senior Specialist in Science and Technology. Science Policy Research Division. Congressional Research Service, November 1995</font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1995 Nov 17:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>(Faxed from CIAR) "A report to be released withing a few days.. cast doubt on ETS serious cancer risk "An early draft of the CRS report, done at the request of Waxman and Ford, came down hard on OSHA, concluding the risks are significant only for highly exposed groups such as spouses of heavy smokers<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/fgs01c00" target="blank"><img src="/0d04d07d-f869-5b12-a843-414ff0ba80d3.jpg"/></a><a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/fgs01c00/pdf" target="blank"><img src="/da283690-9924-5367-8c48-c8aa84b28a92.jpg"/></a>

 </font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1996 Jan:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>/E In early 1996 the CRS had written to Philip Morris wanting to know what they were doing about underage access to cigarettes.</font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1996 Jul:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></b>/E An<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i><b>Americans for Non-Smokers's Rights (ANR)</b></i><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>newsletter reports that Redhead told a Canadian newspaper that the tobacco industry was mis-using his report paper. He said the report agreed with the EPA's carcinogenic classificiation.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><b>[Actually, they confuse two CRS reports, one which does and one which doesn't.

      Redhead appears genuine, but he initially supported Gravelle in the dubious initial pro-tobacco CRC report on ETS, and he may later have been conned by his friendship with Steve Milloy.]</b><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>[<a href="http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/action/search/basic?fd=0&q=2057980926&df=er&c=at&c=ba&c=bw&c=ct&c=da&c=ll&c=lm&c=mg&c=mm&c=pm&c=rj&c=ti&c=ub&c=us" target="_blank">2057980926</a>]</font>

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>1996 Feb 9.:<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">S Katherine Hammond</span></b><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);"><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, writes a scathing commenary in her peer review of the<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><i><b>Workshop Draft of ETS and Lung Cancer</b></i><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>(which had been written by C Stephen Redhead and Richard E Rowberg) at the CRS:</span></font></p>

<blockquote class="Q" style="font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style=""><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">The May 24 Draft of the Congressional Research Service report on<span class="Apple-converted-space" style=""> </span><b>Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer</b><span class="Apple-converted-space" style=""> </span>is superficial, inaccurate, and careless in the extreme. It will require extensive revision before it is of acceptable quality to be released anywhere.<span class="Apple-converted-space" style=""> </span></span>

    As the report is currently written, I would reject it if it were submitted to a peer-reviewed journal; furthermore, I would find this I unacceptable work from a graduate student. This document is an embarrassment to the Library of Congress and the Congressional Research Service. As a taxpayer , I am shocked and deeply disturbed by this shoddy, sloppy report from the Congressional Research Service of the Library of Congress.<span class="Apple-converted-space" style=""> </span>

    The report reflects an inadequate understanding not only of epidemiology and risk assessment, but, more fundamentally, of science itself.</font></blockquote>

<p class="noter" style="font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">[There are another 13 pages of detailled criticism in the same vein]</font></p>

Redhead, CS

Attachments