methodist protestant
sessions rebuked
---
AN 7 25
Delegates at the United Church of Christ’s (UCC) 35th General Synod overwhelmingly passed an emergency resolution this week, condemning the ongoing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids as “domestic terrorism” and accusing President Donald Trump's administration of “weaponizing the Constitution.”
Religious News Service reported Tuesday that the resolution targets immigration enforcement operations “carried out by ICE agents working without uniforms, wearing masks or refusing to identify themselves,” condemning these tactics as threatening and abusive.
Titled “Responding to the federal government’s attack on immigrants, migrants, and refugees,” the resolution urges the church to divest from for-profit private detention firms, specifically naming CoreCivic, GEO Group, and Management and Training Corp.— while allowing congregations to go further if they choose, according to the report.
READ MORE:Devastating CNN poll shows just how much Trump has fallen — even among his biggest supporters
Presented as an emergency motion by the Rev. Clara Sims of First Congregational UCC in Albuquerque on behalf of the Southwest Conference, the move reflects the church’s urgent response to escalated immigration enforcement under the Trump administration.
Meanwhile, First Congregational UCC has opened housing and provided food and aid to immigrants arriving from the border, actions its minister says stem from the denomination’s theological commitment to protect the vulnerable.
“Our faith has always called us into spaces of risk on behalf of the vulnerable,” said Sims, “especially when people are being made vulnerable by really corrupt systems of power.”
The Southwest Conference fast-tracked the resolution after national church leaders and regional partners voiced deep concerns about human rights violations in detention facilities, per the report.
READ MORE:Trump 'very irritated' with GOP senator whose reelection bid could decide Senate control
Last month, Bishop Alberto Rojas of the Diocese of San Bernardino, California, released a letter addressing recent reports that ICE agents had entered Catholic churches.
As head of the sixth-largest Catholic diocese in the U.S., Bishop Rojas strongly criticized the escalation of ICE operations.
In his communication to Catholics, he highlighted that “authorities are now seizing brothers and sisters indiscriminately, without respect for their right to due process and their dignity as children of God.”
He conveyed his solidarity with immigrants “who are bearing the trauma and injustice of these tactics,” and assured them that “we join you in carrying this very difficult cross.”
---
===
mma
1 25
During the inaugural prayer service, Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde urged President Donald Trump to “have mercy” on undocumented migrants and LGBTQ kids, and right-wing media responded by calling her a “fake bishop” with “deranged political beliefs,” saying her sermon was “heretical” and “satanic,” and claiming she was “forcing left-wing platitudes down everyone’s throat.”
Budde’s comments about mercy provoked Trump
| :{ |
|
- Trump attacked Budde the next day and demanded an apology. He wrote on Truth Social: “The so-called Bishop who spoke at the National Prayer Service on Tuesday morning was a Radical Left hard line Trump hater. … She was nasty in tone, and not compelling or smart. She failed to mention the large number of illegal migrants that came into our Country and killed people. Many were deposited from jails and mental institutions. It is a giant crime wave that is taking place in the USA.” Rolling Stone, [1/22/25]
- Appearing onThe View, Budde clarified that her responsibility “was to reflect, to pray with the nation for unity” and that her remarks were an attempt to “say we need to treat everyone with dignity, and we need to be merciful.”She stated, “I also realized that unity requires a certain degree of mercy, mercy and compassion and understanding and so knowing that a lot of people, as I said, in our country right now, are really scared, I wanted to take the opportunity in the context of that of service for unity, to say we need to treat everyone with dignity, and we need to be merciful.” She also said she would be open to a one-on-one with Trump, saying, “I could assure him and everyone listening that I would be as respectful as I would with any person, and certainly of his office, for which I have great deal of respect.” Deadline, [1/22/25]
- ## Right-wing media attacked Budde’s sermon as “heretical” and “satanic”
- Fox News host Laura Ingraham called Budde a “radical leftist.” Ingraham claimed it was “not compassionate to have an open border, violent crime, murders of Americans, human and drug trafficking that kills hundreds of thousands and brutalizes others.” Fox News, *The Story with Martha MacCallum*, [1/21/25]
- Fox News’ Sean Hannity said the bishop “made the service about her very own deranged political beliefs with a disgraceful prayer full of fearmongering and division.”He then dismissed her concerns about the demonization of migrants, saying, “If you come in the country illegally, you didn't respect our laws, our borders, and our sovereignty, that would make you a criminal by definition.” Fox News, *Hannity*, [1/21/25]
- Daily Wire host Matt Walsh said that “hell exists for people like Mariann” and called her “exhibit A for why women should not be pastors, priests, or bishops."He added that “she would rather engage in emotional blackmail and blasphemy than preach the word of God” and said that trans kids “fear for their lives because they've been exploited and brainwashed by wicked witches like Mariann.” [The Daily Wire, The Matt Walsh Show, 1/22/25]
- Walsh also said that, “If evil had a face and a haircut, this is what it would look like. It would look exactly like Mariann Budde, the fake bishop of Washington for the Episcopal church.”The Daily Wire, *The Matt Walsh Show*, [1/22/25]
- Fox anchor Martha MacCallum said Budde’s call for compassion was “really a gotcha moment on her part, which I find very uncharitable.” She added, “I thought it was massively inappropriate.” Fox News, *America’s Newsroom*, [1/22/25]
- The Daily Wire’s Michael Knowles belittled the bishop, calling her a “fake priestess lady” and her sermon “heretical.” He said, “It is no wonder that a woman who would mistake herself for a bishop might also confuse a foreign national for an American citizen, or even a little boy for a little girl.” The Daily Wire, *The Michael Knowles Show*, [1/22/25]
- Fox & Friendsco-host Lawrence Jones said Budde “went into some political radical leftist” rhetoric and suggested she “speak to any of the families that were killed by illegals” about mercy.Co-host Ainsley Earhardt declared that people who share Budde’s opinion “are reading the whole border situation in the wrong way,” adding, “It’s not that he [Trump] doesn’t have compassion. … Everyone is God’s child. It’s not about that. It’s about taxpayers paying so much for other people — we’re pouring into the tax base and they’re giving that money to people who are not here legally and are not contributing.” Fox News, *Fox & Friends*, [1/22/25]
- Fox host Jesse Watters said Budde is “the new face of the resistance: woke bishops and insufferable blue hairs.”After playing the clip of Budde asking Trump to have mercy, Watters joked, “I’m sorry, is that the National Cathedral or the DNC?” Fox News, *Jesse Watters Primetime*, [1/22/25]
- Fox’s Will Cain accused Budde of using “a house of worship as a place to project her own politics."He continued: “It wasn't honest. She wasn't seeking to have a conversation out of real earnestness or concern. I think most offensive, Ainsley, is that her concerns were so cliched and wrong. It’s like it was written by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. I mean, it wasn’t sincere in that no one believes LGBTQ kids should be fearing for their lives today. There’s no grounding for that. To go on from that to talking about the human dignity of illegal immigrants, which is not something disputed by Donald Trump — simply their right to remain in America — shows a real dishonesty, and from the pulpit, from that bishop.” [Fox News,Fox & Friends, 1/22/25]
- Right-wing Rumble host Dan Bongino called Budde a “fake bishop” who was “forcing left-wing platitudes down everyone's throat on a moment of supposed national unity.”Rumble, *The Dan Bongino Show*, [1/22/25]
- Right-wing podcaster Steven Crowder called the bishop’s sermon “satanic.”He then attacked her for “chastizing a sitting president over things that he’s never done and threats of actions that will never happen.” *Louder with Crowder*, [1/22/25]
- Anti-LGBTQ social media account Libs of TikTok posted a photo of Budde and wrote, “This is the Bishop who lectured Trump today with trans propaganda. Always the eyes.”Twitter/X, [1/21/25]
- Right-wing radio host Bill Mitchell shared Libs of TikTok’s post and commented, “Good Lord. This Bishop looks demon-possessed.”Twitter/X, [1/21/25]
- Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk called Budde’s sermon “disgraceful,” adding, “She embarrassed herself.” Twitter/X, [1/21/25]
- White nationalist podcaster Stew Peters demanded, “Why does the Episcopal Church allow bull-dykes as bishops?” Telegram, [1/21/25]
- Priest and conservative commentator Calvin Robinson claimed that Budde was “breaking the Church law, by being at the pulpit in the first place,” and accused her of lecturing Trump on “her leftist, radicalist, extremist politics, which just goes to show the mess the Church is in at the moment.” Robinson said, “The Scriptures are very clear on this, that women cannot become bishops. … It goes as far as saying, ‘A woman should be silent in church.’ I know some people with modern ears will cringe at that. But this is what the Scriptures teach us. If we follow the Scriptures, we wouldn’t be in the mess we’re in right now.” Salem News Channel, *The Charlie Kirk Show*, [1/22/25]
- Fox News contributor Mollie Hemingway blamed Budde’s speech on the Episcopal Church as a whole: “We’ve seen a church that really used to be quite large and dominant in American culture that has lost a lot of membership as it traded a clear teaching on Jesus Christ and his life, death, and resurrection for left-wing, usually Democrat Party associated politics." Fox News, *The Story with Martha MacCallum*, [1/22/25]
- Fox host Will Cain said Budde is “somewhat symbolic” of the “woke virus,” which “hasn’t just, you know, government and sports and every other aspect of American culture. It has also infected the church.” His guest and Fox & Friends Weekend co-host Charlie Hurt claimed, “You have a situation where you have the president of the United States who comes in to church to be prayed for and then this is what he’s had to listen — some stupid political lecture from some tinpot politician who couldn’t succeed … in the real political world.” Fox News, *The Will Cain Show*, [1/22/25]
- OnThe Five, co-host Jeanine Pirro called Budde a “nasty clergy woman.” Watters later added, “She's lucky this didn't happen on day one when he was a dictator because he would have put her in prison.” Fox News, *The Five*, [1/22/25]
- Fox's Greg Gutfeld called Budde “Satan.”Gutfeld: “Satan isn't going to show up in red tights holding a pitchfork. It's going to show up like that. She's an imposter, she exploits compassion for terrible, terrible beliefs.” Fox News, *The Five*, [1/22/25]
- OANN host Matt Gaetz attacked Budde, saying she “chose a time honored national and religious tradition to make a noxious political speech.” OAN, *The Matt Gaetz Show*, [1/22/25]
- Fox contributor Tyrus: “She's an activist, and she was pretending to be a person of God.”Fox News, *Gutfeld*!, [1/22/25]
===
yale calvin and capitalism
Bruce Gordon
On John Calvin’s 500th birthday, July 10, 2009, BBC News’ web site ran a story on the interest of young Dutch businessmen and women in Calvinism, a faith once prevalent in their land.Why, the reader was encouraged to ponder, might this unfashionable form of Protestantism be making a comeback in the heart of secular, modern Western Europe where church attendance is almost invisible? An answer could be found in the headline:“Economic Crisis Boosts Dutch Calvinism.”
Have we not been here before? Have we not always assumed some sort of relationship between Calvinism, with its busy transformation of the world, and the marketplace? But wait: is this relationship now being rediscovered, rewritten, intensified? Are people looking again to Calvinism and its ethics to fire the engines of the economy, rather than simply offer consolation and refuge?
The appearance of the article on Calvin’s birthday was a play on the seeming dissonance between modern Euro-sophistication and its supposedly abandoned religious past. What these young women
What these young women and men claimed to have found in Calvinism were moral certainties, an ethical compass in a world on the brink of financial Armageddon.
and men claimed to have found in Calvinism were moral certainties, an ethical compass in a world on the brink of financial Armageddon. Lives devoted to work and adorned by the promises of material reward were proving hollow. Where people thought they would find fulfilment, there was only anxiety.
No doubt, as the Dutch pastor interviewed for the article says, the attraction will prove passing, and should the economic ship be righted most will return to their previous habits of thought. Yet we are left with something very serious to consider in the assumptions of this story: the connection of Protestantism and the economy, and the role of Christianity in the secular world.
Age of Anxiety
The sense of dislocation felt by those Dutch citizens interviewed, an inability to make moral connections between their work and what might constitute a meaningful life, pervades our society and raises old questions in new forms. We struggle both to under- stand the nature of the financial and moral crisis that has come upon us and to find a vocabulary for faith in the midst of the storm. As people of faith, if we are to engage with the problems of the financial turmoil we need to understand more clearly the historical roots of the issues.
An informed discussion requires us to return to the changing world of late medieval/early modern commerce and religion. During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries Catholic and Protestant theologians were at the forefront in the attempt to resolve the moral dilemmas posed by the changing economies of the Mediterranean, the Atlantic world, and the Baltic. They notably agonized over how to square Christian doctrinal and legal positions with banking ethics and the prohibition of usury. Figures as diverse as Calvin and Cardinal Cajetan did not reject the emerging banking houses and their place in society, with their increasingly sophisticated forms of credit, but they strove to define what constituted ethical commerce.
Thinkers of that era grappled as well with an emotion that clearly preoccupies the young twenty- first century Dutch in the news story – anxiety. It lay at the heart of the Protestant Reformation, and of Calvinism in particular, and formed the basis of Max Weber’s understanding of the “Protestant work ethic.” Weber shrewdly perceived that the radical separation of the spiritual and material in the Re- formed tradition, a “disenchantening” of the world, left humanity worried that there was no discernable path to the divine. He saw the anxiety engendered by this shattering realization as transformative.
Signs of Salvation
Weber primarily looked to seventeenth-century Pu- ritans, but the story begins earlier. Following Martin Luther, John Calvin’s conversion experience in the 1530s arose from a deep sense of spiritual anxiety. Calvin never questioned his own election, though he chose not to write about it, and when dealing with parishioners wracked by doubt he directed them to the love of Christ. Outward actions and events – he was emphatic – could never be taken as signs of salvation. Pastorally, however, this proved deeply troubling to the Reformed faith, and Calvin’s successor, Theodore Beza, made greater accommodation by allowing human deeds to be at least partial indicators of God’s love.
The question of certainty and its attendant pastoral issues remained in tension within the Reformed churches as they emerged in the Netherlands, England, and New England. The matter was not abstract, but hotly contested in terms of how the Bible was to be read, of relations of the church to temporal authority, and of the Christian in the secular world. The Reformation principle of sola scriptura had thrown open the question of how the Bible should be interpreted. Calvin and the Reformed leaders sought to ground interpretation once more within the church, but in so doing they faced fierce criticism that they were doing little more than restoring Ro- man authority. The Reformation made Christianity’s sacred text a battleground over contesting claims to authority – another source of the new anxiety.
With regard to the state, the issues were no less momentous. Although Calvin did not anticipate the separation of church and state, there can be little doubt that in Geneva during his lifetime significant developments began the process of secularization. Drawing on the Augustinian model of the separation of the two kingdoms, Calvin passionately believed
that the church should be free in questions of doc- trine and discipline. He fiercely resisted what he regarded as the unwarranted intrusion of the magistrates in the central affairs of the church.
In Geneva, however, he lost this battle. The Swiss model of churches ruled over by secular authorities prevailed, and Calvin was bitterly disappointed. Nevertheless, what emerged from his thinking is highly significant for modernity. Calvin increasingly conceived of a state where the rulers were limited in order to ensure protection of religion. They were expected to preserve the circumstances in which true religion could be practised. This was the resolution of the devastating Thirty Years’ War in 1648 when the Peace of Westphalia essentially removed religion from the political equation.
Building on medieval models, Protestantism of the sixteenth century named and sanctified work and commerce as part of the godly life. Calvin viewed economics as a way of linking the life of the community with the divine will. In many respects his perspective was entirely practical: as the leading author in Geneva he was responsible for the growth of its printing industry. He involved himself in the commercial life of the city, while his brother Antoine
Calvin argued for moderation in business ethics. Lending and profit-making should be permitted only insofar as they were useful, never simply to build personal wealth.
controlled his financial affairs. Calvin understood that loans and lending were an essential part of the market and of Geneva’s place as a trading center at the heart of Europe. He approved of the charging of interest and rejected older notions of usury on the condition that it not be abused. The poor, for instance, should not be forced to pay interest.
Theology of Work
Calvin argued for moderation in business ethics. Lending and profit-making should be permitted only insofar as they were useful, never simply to build personal wealth. All of this fell within his understanding of work and labor as vocations. In performing useful work a person served both God and humanity, and the rewards should be commensurate. His arguments were not new or radical in themselves, but they formed part of his larger theology that sought to understand the relationship of the human and divine. Work and service were for the honor of God, but once more the door was opened to a new, more secular view, that work might exist for its own sake.
This gathering tension in the relationship between the fruits of labor and vocation became explicit after Calvin’s death, during the golden age of the Dutch Republic. In his magisterial account, The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age (Vintage, 1997), Simon Schama has related how the prosperous Calvinists of the Republic were deeply unsettled about their material success, seeing it less as a sign of election than as a form of reprobation. The enormous
The good of the civil society is not an exclusively Christian claim, but it is a good to which Christians should dedicate themselves.
wealth generated by the Republic’s trading empire financed the nation’s protection against enemies. At the same time, however, it brought material temptations that could destroy the godly society from within. The result was an unresolved anxiety that, in Schama’s interpretation, deeply troubled any sense that capitalism and Protestantism were easy companions.
Revisiting Weber
This returns us to Max Weber’s famous account Protestantism and the Spirit of Capitalism (1904/5), in which he interpreted the Calvinism of the seventeenth-century as an important source of modern economic practice. The broad outlines of the argument are familiar, though more often than not crudely caricatured. Weber was a subtle and perceptive student of history, theology, and economics. He never argued for a simple causal relationship between Protestantism and capitalism. Rather he identified the ways in which Calvinism contained a “spirit” or “ethic” that made possible the rise of capitalism and granted it legitimacy.
In brief, he wrote that the God of Calvinism is remote and inscrutable, leaving humans uncertain of their salvation. He focused his analysis on the doctrine of predestination and its effects. It is salvation anxiety that drives the desire to pursue with rigor a secular calling in the world. The pastoral literature of English Puritans revealed to him the depth of this uncertainty. The unknowable nature of God pushed Calvinists to seek signs of election in the world, yet, as the Dutch of the seventeenth century experienced, believers did not allow themselves to enjoy the fruits of acquisition. To ease the tension between their piety and their prosperity, wealth was instead to be reinvested in society, promoting an ascetic discipline in which commerce could be con- verted to the service of God. This “ethical” form of capitalism was seen to be consonant with Reformed teaching. As Weber himself fully understood, such conduct was not limited to Protestant lands alone, but it was here, in particular the Anglo-American world, that he cast his gaze.
Weber was clear that by the nineteenth century the religious dimensions of this asceticism had vanished in the increasingly secular and godless soot of the Industrial Revolution. His contemporary, the Dutch minister and politician Abraham Kuyper, responded to this secularization by attempting to cre- ate a Christian society that could embrace diversity. It was this vision, delivered in the Stone Lectures in Princeton in 1898, that spurred the growth of Neo-Calvinism in the United States, a movement currently enjoying widespread renewal. This is a movement that takes many forms, but its guiding principle holds to Kuyper’s view that the whole of creation is sacred (including secular institutions, higher education, science, etc) in which Christians are called to participate. It is an attempt to embrace diversity while preserving the hope of creating a Christian society.
Protestant Work Ethic?
The concept of the Protestant work ethic, which Weber understood to be part of a complex historical process, has been vulgarized into a descriptor for our modern culture of “workaholism.” Stripped now of any real religious content, it imagines a connection between the endless pursuit of goals, the denigration of meaningful leisure, the acquisition of material goods, and some vestige of Protestant con- science. The result, as we know, and as the young businesspeople in Amsterdam realize, is a culture of unhappiness, self-doubt, and fear of failure.
In speaking of doubt, anxiety, and fear we seem to have come full circle. Perhaps, but this is be- cause we have not been attentive to what Weber and others have argued. What the Dutch business- women and men are seeking represents the aspirations of many in our world of Lehman Brothers and subprime mortgages – a connection of ethics with commerce. This cannot be achieved by a return to some sixteenth-century polity or any other supposed golden age; we live in multicultural, pluralistic societies. Christians need to reconsider their relation- ship to the secular, questioning whether this word, so often demonized in our vocabulary, represents something to be embraced.
A post-Christian society in which the churches have no monopoly on ethics or a dominant voice in the public space requires us to accept that there are places where we as Christians have no expertise. We must live and work in conversation with others. This includes government, economics, and social policy. The good of the civil society is not an exclusively Christian claim, but it is a good to which Christians should dedicate themselves.
As Christians we must respect the integrity of civil society as a place where a plurality of voices and views can and must coincide. That does not require us to sacrifice our beliefs in any form. It challenges
This opens possibilities for navigating the relations between the moral and financial economies – the very issues debated in early-modern Europe and in contemporary Dutch cafes.
us to find ways of speaking and acting that enable us to translate our beliefs into the public domain. In our own churches our tasks are different: we are called to bear witness to the teaching of Christ, to preach the Word, administer the sacraments, and provide pastoral care.
To an extent we live as people divided, with commitments to church and society, where the ideal of the good is differently expressed. This is where the development of neo-Calvinism presents the Reformed tradition with exciting possibilities. A person doesn’t have to share all of its strictest doctrinal positions to see its value: It brings the Reformed back into conversation with Catholics and other Christians who take seriously the concept of a civil society – a world that recognizes religious boundaries but which also issues a clear invitation to participate in public life.
This opens possibilities for navigating the relations between the moral and financial economies – the very issues debated in early-modern Europe and in contemporary Dutch cafes. The moral vacuums exposed by recent financial disasters require us to act. We cannot afford to leave it to the banks.
Bruce Gordon, a native of Canada, is Titus Street Professor of Ecclesiastical History at YDS. He received a Ph.D. from the University of St. Andrews, Scotland, where he taught from 1994 to 2008. He is the author of the acclaimed biography, Calvin (Yale University Press, 2009). At Yale, he also holds a secondary appointment in the Department of History and teaches in the Renaissance Studies program.
Draining a Dream
Unemployment among African Americans is at its highest rates in twenty-seven years, threatening generations of progress since the era of martin Luther King Jr.
A report called “State of the Dream 2010: Drained” was issued in February by the organization united for a fair Economy. It says the Great Recession’s damage – the joblessness and foreclosures – has especially punished ethnic minorities and intensified divisions of wealth. The report calls for targeted policies of economic recovery that reunite the nation “by a shared destiny and a shared prosperity.”
Among the findings:
blacks earn 62 cents for every dollar of white income; Latinos earn 68 cents for every dollar of white income.
Since 1968, the gap between white and black median family incomes has widened. median family income for whites was $69,937 in 2007; for African Americans, $40,143.
The poverty rate for children under eighteen rose to 19 percent in 2008, the highest level since 1997. more than one-third of African American children were living in poverty.
blacks and Latinos are nearly three times more likely to live in poverty than whites.
In 2008, less than three out of every ten jobs in the u.S. met the criteria of “good job.” A good job is defined as one that pays at least $14.51 an hour and provides health insurance and a pen- sion plan.
Policy recommendations include:
Identify communities with the highest unemployment rates and target job-creation initiatives there. This policy direction will lift up working- class white communities while narrowing the racial income gap.
Recommit to affirmative action policies.
Commit to a moratorium on foreclosures.
Strengthen financial regulation to end predatory
practices.
Tax capital gains and dividends the same as ordinary income. Preserve the estate tax.
Strengthen the federal income tax. Congress
should examine the feasibility of a new top tax bracket of 50 percent for incomes over $5 million.
Source: www.faireconomy.org
Issue Title: Money and Morals after the Crash
Issue Year: 2010
==