Prep 10
. Learning & Memory.
5 Things:
Forgetting
Balrick
Memory systems
Interference
Unreliable memory
Class 10 Notes

Forgetting Overview
- Some things are easier to forget than others
- How much you forget depends on the knowledge domain
- store things in various memory systems
- retrieve them with various levels of success
- Ebbinghaus
- Not good at remembering nonsense syllables or isolated words
- verbal learning is linear
- forgetting verbal learning is nonlinear
- Learning is a function of time spent
- longer you study the more you learn
- Forget the majority of facts very quickly
- within the first few hours
- after the first day, decline is more gradual
- Not good at remembering nonsense syllables or isolated words
Bahrick (1975)
- Better at remembering names and faces
- memory for names and faces depends on the task
- studied nearly 400 people
- Ss varied in age from 17 to 74
- Foreign language memory can last for years
- takes a dip between 40-50 years old
- better initial learning, longer the knowledge remains
- similar Ebbinghaus’ syllables
- tend to forget a language we don’t use
- forgetting starts rapidly before it tapers off
- some memories remain = permastores (mental permafrost)
- Picture-name memory can last for years
- takes a dip between 40-50 years old
- Picture recognition: very good; given a picture, tell if former classmate
- Name recognition: quite good; given a name, tell if former classmate
- in contrast, college teachers remember names of their students more than faces
- Name matching: fairly good; given a name, find name
- Picture matching: fairly good; given a picture, find picture
- Picture cuing: not very good; given picture, find name
- Free recall: not very good at recalling names with no cues
Memory Systems
Declarative Memory
- knowledge you know that you know (can declare)
Semantic Memory
- Long-term memory of world knowledge & general information
- nonsense syllables
- foreign languages
- Requiresconscious thought to learn
- soon becomes automatic
- your name
- Episodic Memory
- long-term memory ofevents, experiences and autobiographical information
- stories of your life
- Semantic & episodic memory systems work together
- semantic memory = Austin is the capital of Texas
- episodic memory = whether or not you have ever been there
- appears to decrease at about 5% per year (Linton, 1975)
- similar to forgetting how to ride a bike
- Implicit Memory (procedural memory)
- automatic
- can’t explain how you do these tasks
- learned “how” to do something, instead of “what”
- brush your teeth, put on your clothes and walk across street
Muscle memory
- not stored in muscles
- uses cerebellum and limbic system of brain
- continuous movement of muscles
- hop, twirl and play video games
- Complex skills are very resistance to forgetting
- two years after flying a virtual airplane, very little forgetting (Fleishman & Parker, 1962)
- any loss is quickly recovered with a few warm up trials
- Amnesia patients
- keep their implicit memories
- can still write, conduct music and dance
- can learn or improve on implicit memory tasks
- non-declarative systems remain after declarative systems no longer work
- Continuous movement are easily retained
- Discrete motor movements
- typing & playing piano: each strike is separate event
- no remarkable retention for discrete skills (Baddeley, 1974)
- Mixed tasks involving both continuous and discrete components
- CPR
- survival of patient drops from 100% to about 15% in a year (McKenna & Glendon, 1985)
Interference
- Predominant approach in N. America for 30 yrs
- Based on associationism
- learning = formation of associations between previously unrelated events
- Developed in Chicago in the 1930s (Carr, Robinson and McGeoch)
- relatively atheoretical
- good research, not much theory
- McGeoch (1932)
- First to propose interference theory
- Time-based decay theories not valid explanations
- Iron rusts over time
- time does not cause rust
- oxidation causes rust
- Memories are forgotten over time
- time does not cause forgetting; caused by something else
- 2 kinds of interference
- Proactive interference
- previous info impacts new
- Retroactive interference
- new info impacts old
- retrieval errors occur because wrong memories found
3 Mechanisms
- Response competition
- when 2+ potential responses to a memory query
- Melton & Irwin (1940) showed errors could not be attributed solely to intrusion items
- Altered $ conditions (altered context)
- performance declines because of changes in environment from study to test
- functional $ is cue + environment
- forget if entire functional $ not present
- Mental set
- use an inappropriate mental set
- search through wrong list
Part-set cuing
- Ss recall list worse if some items (part of the set) are provided for them (Slamecka, 1968)
- Ss hear a word twice
- control Ss wrote as many words as could
- experimental Ss were given a paper with some of the words on it
- Ss who receive some words did worse
- maybe the cues interrupt retrieval strategy
- Predictor but not cause of forgetting
- McGoeoch & McDonald (1931)
- systematically vary similarity of interfering activity & recall material
- learn list of adjectives
- 10 min rest or learn new material
- as similarity increases, recall drops
- but even resting Ss forgot some too
- (Slamecka, 1960): sentences
- 2, 4, 8 trials
- followed by rest or 4 or eight trials learning another literary genre
- amount learned is a function of # of initial learning trials
- amount of forgotten is function of number of interfering trials
Unreliable Memory
False memories
- photographs
- vividness
- eye-witness testimony
- smashed or bumped
- store recipe, not meal
- source monitoring
Loftus (1977)
- Film of car crash
- contacted, hit, bumped, collide or smashed
- estimated speed of car (31.8, 34.0. 38.1, 39.3 and 40.8, respectively)
- week later, asked if any evidence of broken glass
- smashed reported broken glass
- green car went past accident without stopping
- 12 questions (item 10 referred to blue car)
- 20 minutes later, Ss asked color of car
- Ss given false info, more likely remember green or bluish green car
- Possible interpretations
- Overlays but not destroy it
- destruction of earlier info
- Social pressure
- offered rewards, no better accuracy
- Speed of response as fast for false as original
- just as confident for false or original
- Concluded:
- memory trace distorted or destroyed
- What not affect learning
- No difference in forgetting rate as a function of type of material
- # of items lost per unit time not depend on level of initial learning
- Rate of forgetting not related to type of amnesia
- What affects learning
- High-frequency words easier than low-frequency words
- English-like easier than not English-like (bal versus zij)
- Baddeley concludes
- Items are lost at a constant rate, regardless of how well initially learned
Memory Failures
- Time-Gap
- no conscious recollection of trip
- driven home late at night
- driving well-traveled route
- highway hypnosis; driving long stretches
- Cryptomnesia
- unintended plagiarism
- believe have made a novel creation but it’s based on earlier works
- failure to recognize it as familiar
- usually of others
- Nietzsche, Freud, Helen Keller
- George Harrison
- My Sweet Lord by the Beatles
- He’s So Fine by the Chiffons
- How guard against it
- can’t but can try to minimize by searching literature & peer review
Amnesia
- forgetfulness; without memory
- Caused by
- brain damage
- disease
- drugs (sedatives & hypnotic)
- can be either wholly or partially lost
- Two main types (not mutually exclusive)
- Retrograde amnesia
- inability to retrieve info acquired before a particular date
- loss can extend back decades
- lose can last for months+
- Anterograde amnesia
- inability to transfer new info to long-term memory
- can’t remember things for long periods of time
- Post-traumatic amnesia
- Major trauma
- usually head injury (fall, football, boxing)
- often transient but may be permanent
- Mild trauma
- car crash
- no memory of moments before accident
- Childhood amnesia (infantile amnesia)
- can’t remember before age 2-3
- brain not developed enough to hold cognitive structures
- Transient global amnesia
- unknown cause
- memory loss for less than a day
- reduced blood flow, seizure or migraine?
- Source amnesia
- can’t remember where learned information
- poor source monitoring
- source not encoded
- Hyped but Non-Existent
- Dissociative amnesia
- can’t remember because of psychological trauma
- Types:
- Repressed memory (psychogenic amnesia)
- inability to recall info about stressful or traumatic events
- rare or doesn’t exit
- Dissociate fugue (psychogenic fugue)
- cannot recall some or all of past
- extremely rare or doesn’t exist
- Posthypnotic amnesia
- failure to remember suggestions made under hypnosis
- extremely rare or doesn’t exist
- Dissociative amnesia
- Major trauma
- Retrograde amnesia
Other Theories
Cue Dependent Theory (Retrieval Failure)
- Forgetting is lack of retrieval cues, not overwriting existing info (Tulvig & Postka, 1971)
- Ss given list of 24 words (4 items in six categories)
- try to recall as many as possible
- Learn 0, 1, 2, 3 or 5 further lists (3 trials), immediate free recall
- Recall as many words from any lists
- Clear evidence of RI
- more lists in the middle, worse did
- Ss tend to forget whole categories
- 10 minute break
- give categories, asked to recall
- Performance as good as original free recall
- no effect of interpolated lists
- Can’t recall because $ is missing
- present at time of encoding
- not erased; not available
- proper cue can retrieve it
- like searching for a book in the library
- no reference number
- no subject
- no author
Good retrieval cue
- consistent with encoding situation
- If a word is emphasize during encoding
- Should be emphasized at test time
State Dependent Cues
- retrieval depends on state of mind
- at encoding & at testing
- Memory triggered or facilitated by:
- inebriated
- anxious
- happy
Context Dependent Cues
- retrieval depends on environment
- at encoding & at testing
- Memory triggered or facilitated by:
- under water
- weather
- location
- smell
Trace Decay Theory
- Learning causes neuro connection
- trace degrades over time, recall is worse
- except notice that if brain is injured, old memories more resistant than new ones (Brower, 1967)
- crumbling into parts; loss of components
- both interference and decay
- Problem:
- time has both decay & interference (aren’t doing nothing over time)
Consolidation
- Learning is not complete when practice ends (Muller and Pilzecker (1900)
- perseveration occurs for awhile afterward
- perseveration = continued processing of an item after practice or rehearsal ends.
- If anything interrupts perseveration
- memory trace may not consolidated
- recall not possible
- storage problem
- Longer perseveration continues, stronger the memory
- if process is interrupted, no storage
- Assumptions
- mental inactivity helps consolidation (Ebbinghaus, 1885)
- rate of forgetting is slowed when sleep between study & test (Jenkins & Dallenbach, 1924)
- Ss can recall more after a period of sleep
- Interference model would say the same thing
- if interrupted, nothing stored
- Ss with retrograde amnesia:
- can’t remember events right before trauma
- perseveration interrupted by the trauma
- consolidation not completed
- Rats with induced retrograde amnesia show better memory performance if allowed perseveration time
- If prevented, no storage
- No good studies with humans on the issue
- Not easy to prevent unless remove hippocampus
Notes
Principles
- Some things are easier to remember than others
- positive
- distinctive
- meaningful
- related to you
- Memories stored in different media
- Two phases
- availability
- accessibility
- Cluster
- Creative Memory
- memory is generative
- Misinformation
- memory is actively updated
Memory Systems
- sensory
- procedural
- prospective
- declarative
- semantic
- episodic
- implicit
- muscle memory
Encoding
- encoding
- structuring
- retrieving
- forgetting
- not good at remembering nonsense syllables
- some things easier to forget than others
- loss depends on context
Forgetting
False memories
- photographs
- vividness
- eye-witness testimony
- smashed or bumped
- store recipe, not meal
- source monitoring
Class 10 Terms
- accessible memories
- amygdala
- anterograde amnesia
- Atkinson & Shiffrin
- automatic processing
- available memories
- Baddeley
- basal ganglia
- cerebellum
- chunking
- deep processing
- déjà vu
- distributed practice
- Ebbinghaus
- echoic sensory store
- effortful processing
- emotional coding
- encoding
- encoding failure
- encoding specificity principle
- episodic memory
- explicit memories
- external mnemonics
- false memory
- flashbulb memories
- forgetting
- forgetting curve
- herpes encephalitis
- hierarchies
- hippocampus
- iconic sensory store
- implicit memories
- improving memory
- interference
- levels of processing
- long-term memory
- long-term potentiation
- match context and mood cues with when coded them
- meaningful
- memory
- memory retrieval
- misinformation effect
- mnemonics
- mood congruent
- motivated forgetting
- personally meaningful
- priming
- proactive interference
- recall
- recognition
- reconsolidation
- recovered memories
- recovered with hypnosis
- rehearse repeatedly
- relearning
- repression
- retrieval
- retrieval cues
- retrieval failure
- retroactive interference
- retrograde amnesia
- savings
- semantic memory
- sensory memories
- serial position effect
- shallow processing
- short-term memory
- sleep more
- source amnesia
- spaced practice
- split brain
- storage
- storage decay
- synaptic changes
- technical mnemonics
- test your knowledge
- testing effect
- tip of the tongue
- unreliable memories
- Wearing, Clive
- working memory