Enron
<p>excerpt via <b><i>Disaster of Chemtrail Geoengineering Worse Than Carbon Dioxide:</i></b>
"The potential military benefits to the wartime deployment of weather modification technologies are self-evident. In fact, they are so self-evident that, as Professor Chossudovsky notes, the UN was compelled to introduce <a href="http://www.un-documents.net/enmod.htm" target="_blank">a convention</a> in 1977 prohibiting the use of environmental modification technology in warfare. The US ratified that convention in 1980.
Other potential benefits to the deployment of this technology suggest themselves in the monetary sphere. So many events in the course of human activity are predicated on short-term weather and long-term climate phenomena that the ability to determine (or even influence) either could be extremely valuable. Insurance companies, for example, stand to lose billions (and reconstruction-related industries stand to make those same billions) every time a strong storm makes landfall in populated areas.
So it should not be surprising that <a href="http://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/a-history-of-weather-derivatives.html" target="_blank">a market has evolved</a> for “weather derivatives,” effectively allowing large financial institutions to make money gambling on the weather. And it should also come as no surprise that this market was largely pioneered by that infamous globalist-connected insider corporation, Enron.
Last year I had the chance to talk to researcher <a href="http://www.corbettreport.com/corbett-report-radio-232-geoengineering-for-financial-gain/" target="_blank">Peter Kirby</a> about Enron’s involvement in weather derivatives and the vast sums that stand to be made as geoengineering projects continue to be deployed under the threshold of public awareness.
Even if we were to assume that weather modification technologies are not currently being used for the purposes of weather warfare or market manipulation, the potential for such abuses alone should be more than enough to dissuade us from pursuing these technologies. Even more worrying, perhaps, are the true unknown environmental ramifications of the long-term effects of these technologies on our environment.
Ironically enough, those who are warning us of the potentially disastrous consequences of manmade climate change may be exactly right in their assessment after all. But in the end, it may not be the man-made CO2 they are worried about that is the real culprit of this coming catastrophe, but the geoengineering technologies that are being proposed as the “solution” to this problem."
source: <a href="http://www.aircrap.org/2015/03/04/disaster-of-chemtrail-geoengineering-worse-than-carbon-dioxide/">http://www.aircrap.org/2015/03/04/disaster-of-chemtrail-geoengineering-worse-than-carbon-dioxide/</a></p>