SentientPreview

Open in TheBrain

Sentient Knowledge Map (SKM) Home
Role’s responsibilities/duties - Director of Community Engagement
Community engagement surveys
If current policies do not specifically reward community engagement, is there work in progress to revise promotion and tenure guidelines to reward faculty scholarly work that uses community-engaged approaches and methods?

Ctrb: e. reviewed regularly and equitably based on written, disseminated, clear, and fair criteria, expectations, policies, and procedures;

Parents

Are there college/school and/or department level policies for promotion (and tenure at tenure-granting campuses) that specifically reward faculty scholarly work that uses community-engaged approaches and methods?
Average faculty scores on the service components of the supervisor evaluation rubric
Average rubric scores on the advising components of faculty ePortfolio conducted annually by the department chair
Average rubric scores on the research/scholarship components of faculty ePortfolio conducted annually by the department chair
Average rubric scores on the service components of faculty ePortfolio conducted annually by the department chair
Average rubric scores on the teaching components of faculty ePortfolio conducted annually by the department chair
Average scores on annual faculty evaluation rubric
Average scores on the faculty scholarship components of the chair evaluation rubric
Ctrb: 2. student learning experiences that are designed, delivered, and assessed by faculty (full-time or part-time) and/or other appropriate professionals who are:
Ctrb: Are there institutional level policies for promotion (and tenure at tenure- granting campuses) that specifically reward faculty scholarly work that uses community-engaged approaches and methods?
Faculty and staff average score on the survey question "Fair and impartial merit raise evaluation process is in place for faculty and staff which makes expectations clear"
Faculty and student satisfaction with the usefulness and ease of use of the end of course surveys.
Faculty average score on survey question "Fair and impartial faculty promotion and tenure processes are in place and make expectations clear".
Hist: “Promotions in my department are based on a person's ability”
If current policies do not specifically reward community engagement, is there work in progress to revise promotion and tenure guidelines to reward faculty scholarly work that uses community-engaged approaches and methods?
Number of rubrics created, reviewed and re-approved at least every three years, and available to all faculty that are used to assess faculty on productivity expectations (teaching, research, professional service, advising)
Three year running average of Percent of TT faculty who receive tenure

Children

Ctrb: Please indicate the importance/satisfaction with “Assessment and evaluation procedures are clear and reasonable”

Made with TheBrain