Open in TheBrain

Truth

<p><b>Truth</b> is most often used to mean being in accord with <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact" title="Fact">fact</a> or <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality" title="Reality">reality</a>,<sup id="cite_ref-Merriam-Webster-def_1-0" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#cite_note-Merriam-Webster-def-1">[1]</a></sup> or fidelity to an original or standard.<sup id="cite_ref-Merriam-Webster-def_1-1" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#cite_note-Merriam-Webster-def-1">[1]</a></sup> Truth may also often be used in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modernity" title="Modernity">modern</a> contexts to refer to an idea of "truth to self," or <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authenticity_%28philosophy%29" title="Authenticity (philosophy)">authenticity</a>.

The commonly understood <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_bivalence" title="Principle of bivalence">opposite</a> of truth is <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsity" title="Falsity">falsehood</a>, which, correspondingly, can also take on a logical, factual, or ethical meaning. The <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept" title="Concept">concept</a> of truth is discussed and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debate" title="Debate">debated</a> in several contexts, including <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy" title="Philosophy">philosophy</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art" title="Art">art</a>, and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion" title="Religion">religion</a>. Many human activities depend upon the concept, where its nature as a concept is assumed rather than being a subject of discussion; these include most (but not all) of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science" title="Science">sciences</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law" title="Law">law</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism" title="Journalism">journalism</a>, and everyday life. Some philosophers view the concept of truth as basic, and unable to be explained in any terms that are more easily understood than the concept of truth itself. Commonly, truth is viewed as the correspondence of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language" title="Language">language</a> or <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought" title="Thought">thought</a> to an independent <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality" title="Reality">reality</a>, in what is sometimes called the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correspondence_theory_of_truth" title="Correspondence theory of truth">correspondence theory of truth</a>.

Other philosophers take this common meaning to be secondary and derivative. According to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Heidegger" title="Martin Heidegger">Martin Heidegger</a>, the original meaning and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essence" title="Essence">essence</a> of "Truth" in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Greece" title="Ancient Greece">Ancient Greece</a> was unconcealment, or the revealing or bringing of what was previously hidden into the open, as indicated by the original Greek term for truth, "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aletheia" title="Aletheia">Aletheia</a>."<sup id="cite_ref-2" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#cite_note-2">[2]</a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-3" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#cite_note-3">[3]</a></sup> On this view, the conception of truth as correctness is a later derivation from the concept's original essence, a development Heidegger traces to the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin" title="Latin">Latin</a> term "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veritas" title="Veritas">Veritas</a>."

<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatists" class="mw-redirect" title="Pragmatists">Pragmatists</a> like <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C.S._Pierce" class="mw-redirect" title="C.S. Pierce">C.S. Pierce</a> take Truth to have some manner of essential relation to human practices for inquiring into and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovering" class="mw-redirect" title="Discovering">discovering</a> Truth, with Pierce himself holding that Truth is what human <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquiry" title="Inquiry">inquiry</a> would find out on a matter, if our practice of inquiry were taken as far as it could profitably go: "The opinion which is fated to be ultimately agreed to by all who investigate, is what we mean by the truth..."<sup id="cite_ref-4" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#cite_note-4">[4]</a></sup>

Various theories and views of truth continue to be debated among scholars, philosophers, and theologians.<sup id="cite_ref-PUP32014_5-0" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#cite_note-PUP32014-5">[5]</a></sup> Language and words are a means by which humans convey <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information" title="Information">information</a> to one another and the method used to determine what is a "truth" is termed a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criteria_of_truth" title="Criteria of truth">criterion of truth</a>. There are differing claims on such questions as what constitutes truth: what things are <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truthbearer" class="mw-redirect" title="Truthbearer">truthbearers</a> capable of being true or false; how to define and identify truth; the roles that faith-based and empirically based <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge" title="Knowledge">knowledge</a> play; and whether truth is <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjectivity" title="Subjectivity">subjective</a> or <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivity%28philosophy%29" title="Objectivity (philosophy)">objective</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_relativity" class="mw-redirect" title="Knowledge relativity">relative</a> or <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute%28philosophy%29" title="Absolute (philosophy)">absolute</a>.

<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Nietzsche" title="Friedrich Nietzsche">Friedrich Nietzsche</a> famously suggested that an ancient, metaphysical belief in the divinity of Truth lies at the heart of and has served as the foundation for the entire subsequent <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_intellectual_tradition" class="mw-redirect" title="Western intellectual tradition">Western intellectual tradition</a>: "But you will have gathered what I am getting at, namely, that it is still a <i>metaphysical faith on which our faith in science rests--that even we knowers of today, we godless anti-metaphysicians still take</i> our <i>fire too, from the flame lit by the thousand-year old faith, the Christian faith which was also Plato's faith, that God is Truth; that Truth is '<b>Divine'</b>..."<sup id="cite_ref-6" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#cite_note-6">[6]</a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-7" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth#cite_note-7">[7]</a></sup></i></p>

Attachments