Open in TheBrain

enactivism

<p><b>Enactivism</b> argues that <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognition" title="Cognition">cognition</a> arises through a dynamic interaction between an acting <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organism" title="Organism">organism</a> and its environment.<sup id="cite_ref-Evan_Thompson_1-0" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-Evan_Thompson-1">[1]</a></sup> It claims that our environment is one which we selectively create through our capacities to interact with the world.<sup id="cite_ref-Rowlands_2-0" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-Rowlands-2">[2]</a></sup> "Organisms do not passively receive information from their environments, which they then translate into internal representations. Natural cognitive systems...participate in the generation of meaning ...engaging in transformational and not merely informational interactions: <i>they enact a world</i>."<sup id="cite_ref-Jaegher1_3-0" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-Jaegher1-3">[3]</a></sup> These authors suggest that the increasing emphasis upon enactive terminology presages a new era in thinking about cognitive science.<sup id="cite_ref-Jaegher1_3-1" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-Jaegher1-3">[3]</a></sup> How the actions involved in enactivism relate to age-old questions about <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will" title="Free will">free will</a> remains a topic of active debate.<sup id="cite_ref-Manetti_4-0" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-Manetti-4">[4]</a></sup>

The term 'enactivism' is close in meaning to 'enaction', defined as "the manner in which a subject of perception creatively matches its actions to the requirements of its situation".<sup id="cite_ref-Tascano0_5-0" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-Tascano0-5">[5]</a></sup> The introduction of the term <i>enaction</i> in this context is attributed to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Varela" title="Francisco Varela">Francisco Varela</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Thompson" title="Evan Thompson">Evan Thompson</a>, and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eleanor_Rosch" title="Eleanor Rosch">Eleanor Rosch</a>,<sup id="cite_ref-Tascano0_5-1" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-Tascano0-5">[5]</a></sup><sup id="cite_ref-RWilson_6-0" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-RWilson-6">[6]</a></sup> who proposed the name to "emphasize the growing conviction that cognition is not the representation of a pre-given world by a pre-given mind but is rather the enactment of a world and a mind on the basis of a history of the variety of actions that a being in the world performs".<sup id="cite_ref-Varela_7-0" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-Varela-7">[7]</a></sup> This was further developed by Thompson and others,<sup id="cite_ref-Evan_Thompson_1-1" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-Evan_Thompson-1">[1]</a></sup> to place emphasis upon the idea that experience of the world is a result of mutual interaction between the sensorimotor capacities of the organism and its environment.<sup id="cite_ref-RWilson_6-1" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-RWilson-6">[6]</a></sup>

The initial emphasis of enactivism upon sensorimotor skills has been criticized as "cognitively marginal",<sup id="cite_ref-ClarkA_8-0" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-ClarkA-8">[8]</a></sup> but it has been extended to apply to higher level cognitive activities, such as social interactions.<sup id="cite_ref-Jaegher1_3-2" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-Jaegher1-3">[3]</a></sup> "In the enactive view,... knowledge is constructed: it is constructed by an agent through its sensorimotor interactions with its environment, co-constructed between and within living species through their meaningful interaction with each other. In its most abstract form, knowledge is co-constructed between human individuals in socio-linguistic interactions...Science is a particular form of social knowledge construction...[that] allows us to perceive and predict events beyond our immediate cognitive grasp...and also to construct further, even more powerful scientific knowledge."<sup id="cite_ref-Rohde_9-0" class="reference"><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactivism#cite_note-Rohde-9">[9]</a></sup>

Enactivism is closely related to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situated_cognition" title="Situated cognition">situated cognition</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embodied_cognition" title="Embodied cognition">embodied cognition</a>, and is presented as an alternative to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitivism_%28psychology%29" title="Cognitivism (psychology)">cognitivism</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computationalism" class="mw-redirect" title="Computationalism">computationalism</a>, and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_dualism" class="mw-redirect" title="Cartesian dualism">Cartesian dualism</a>.</p>

Attachments