🍓An integral Analysis of these present discontents.
"This secret, internal, and domestic evil not only exists but even overwhelms you before you can foresee it or examine into it."—Cicero, *Against Verres*, second pleading, I, 39, translated by Charles Duke Yonge (1903).
Burke called it a behind-hand review when in hisfamous* pamphlet** he said that it is rare to find supporters of past failed tyrannies. When he spoke those words Burke was referring to the failed Establishment of his time, we are living in a time of another failed Establishment and that is why his words are so extant in our present times.
quote ship money, Edmund Burke These present discontents
* On the Going Direct Paradigm Mindmap
** Wikiquote source,
“Few are the partisans of departed tyranny; and to be a Whig on the business of a hundred years ago ( )
https://goingdirectparadigm.com/2023/06/24/cui-bono-the-interests-of-sunaks-whig-junto/
is very consistent with every advantage of present servility. This retrospective wisdom and historical patriotism are things of wonderful convenience, and serve admirably to reconcile the old quarrel between speculation and practice. Many a stern republican, after gorging himself with a full feast of admiration of the Grecian commonwealths and of our true Saxon constitution, and discharging all the splendid bile of his virtuous indignation on King John and King James, sits down perfectly satisfied to the coarsest work and homeliest job of the day he lives in. I believe there was no professed admirer of Henry the Eighth among the instruments of the last King James; nor in the court of Henry the Eighth was there, I dare say, to be found a single advocate for the favourites of Richard the Second.
No complaisance to our Court, or to our age, can make me believe nature to be so changed but that public liberty will be among us, as among our ancestors, obnoxious to some person or other, and that opportunities will be furnished for attempting, at least, some alteration to the prejudice of our constitution. These attempts will naturally vary in their mode, according to times and circumstances. For ambition, though it has ever the same general views, has not at all times the same means, nor the same particular objects. A great deal of the furniture of ancient tyranny is worn to rags; the rest is entirely out of fashion. Besides, there are few statesmen so very clumsy and awkward in their business as to fall into the identical snare which has proved fatal to their predecessors. When an arbitrary imposition is attempted upon the subject, undoubtedly it will not bear on its forehead the name of Ship-money. There is no danger that an extension of the Forest laws should be the chosen mode of oppression in this age. And when we hear any instance of ministerial rapacity to the prejudice of the rights of private life, it will certainly not be the exaction of two hundred pullets, from a woman of fashion, for leave to lie with her own husband.
Every age has its own manners, and its politics dependent upon them; and the same attempts will not be made against a constitution fully formed and matured, that were used to destroy it in the cradle, or to resist its growth during its infancy.”
So in our own “Behind Hand Review” it is sufficient to take our reference frame of the Past fifty years, 1975-2025 plus or minus 5 years so 1970-2020 or 1980-2030.