DzogchenPreview
Open in TheBrain

Detailed Outline

Here’s a detailed outline of The Emptiness of Emptiness: An Introduction to Early Indian Madhyamika based on the provided document:


Front Matter


Part One: Candrakīrti and Early Indian Madhyamika

1. Methodological Considerations [[21]]–[[31]]

  1. Historical Background of Asian Religious Studies in the West
    • Nineteenth-century European philology roots.
    • Philology and historiography in Buddhist studies.
    • The parallel "proselytic" approach.
  2. Description of Two Main Models
    • Philological/Text-critical Model
      • Rigorous critical editions, annotated translations, historical contextualization.
      • Focus on defining a coherent tradition; meaning often sidelined [[22]].
    • Proselytic Model
      • Less rigorous philology.
      • Reliance on single sources, uncritical historical accounts.
      • Focus on recovering a supposed timeless meaning [[22]]–[[23]].
  3. Commonalities of Both Models
    • Presume an objectively present tradition.
    • Dependence on approved methodology [[23]].
  4. Critiques from Hermeneutics and Philosophy
    • Gadamer’s hermeneutics; rejection of objectivism [[23]]–[[24]].
    • Nietzsche, James, Dewey, Wittgenstein, Derrida, Foucault.
    • Ruegg’s caution against anachronism [[24]].
  5. The Concept of “Aesthetic Depth”
    • Becker’s idea: need to reconstruct the original context beyond translation [[25]]–[[26]].
  6. Madhyamika’s Unique Challenges
    • Rejection of foundational empirical propositions [[26]].
    • Need for alternative questions when engaging claims.
    • Wittgenstein parallels; shifting conceptualizations [[27]].
  7. Holistic Interpretation
    • Intellectual, ethical, and practical aspects of Madhyamika [[28]].
    • Crossing disciplinary boundaries; critique of philology’s hegemony [[28]]–[[29]].
  8. Soteriological Context
    • Relationship of philosophy to liberation from fear and suffering [[31]].
    • Avoiding fixation on “one Truth” or “one Reality”.

2. Candrakīrti's Historical and Doctrinal Context

  1. The Entry into the Middle Way as a Mahayana Text [[7]]
  2. Bodhisattva Ideal and Thought of Awakening
  3. Stages in the Path to Full Awakening
  4. Perfections of the Bodhisattva’s Path

3. Philosophical Language of the Madhyamika

  1. Sources for Study of Madhyamika Thought
  2. Major Figures in Its Development
    • Nāgārjuna: works like Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, Vigrahavyāvartanī [[48]].
  3. History and Doctrine of the Middle Way
  4. Major Philosophical Themes in The Entry into the Middle Way
    • Dependent Origination
    • Dependent Designation
    • Emptiness [[38]]
  5. Debate with Yogācāra
    • Yogācāra doctrine of “three marks” [[254]].
    • Prāsaṅgika critique.

4. The Ten Perfections of the Bodhisattva Path


5. Detailed Philosophical Analysis

  1. Linguistic Interpretation Phase in Western Scholarship
    • Move away from ontological/epistemological debates [[46]]–[[47]].
    • Gimello’s nonreferential language insight.
  2. Prāsaṅgika Approach to Language
    • Truth as context-dependent usage.
    • Avoidance of external, ahistorical reference points [[51]].
  3. Analysis of Causation
    • Critique of necessary connection concepts [[57]]–[[58]].
    • Feyerabend on “natural interpretations” [[62]].
  4. Soteriological Implications
    • Emptiness as practical liberation.
    • Avoidance of nihilism and absolutism [[46]].

6. Commentary on The Entry into the Middle Way


Part Two: Translation of Candrakīrti’s Madhyamakāvatāra


Epilogue [[212]]

  1. Candrakīrti’s unique approach within Madhyamika.
  2. Misinterpretations due to fear of profundity.
  3. Importance of prior meditative practice for comprehension.
  4. Rejection of fascination with external philosophical theses.
  5. Dedication of merit to liberation of all beings.

Notes [[215]]–[[279]]


Bibliography [[213]]

Index [[213]]


Inference Note:

Some subsections (e.g., sections 2–4 in Part One) are reconstructed from the table of contents and scattered references, as the full text for those sections was not present in the excerpts. The outline integrates these inferred components with the detailed philosophical discussion available in the provided pages.