Footnotes, 79.

In another post, Defendant Somerville redacted identifying information about a voter he names “Dave.” PX 34, 1. The post suggests “Dave” is registered to vote in Georgia and North Carolina. PX 34, 1. While it appears that Somerville is referencing an actual voter, the redactions remove all personal identifying information except “Dave’s” race and gender. There is no evidence that Somerville otherwise publicly disclosed this voter or any other voter’s personal information. Thus, the Court concludes this one heavily redacted post, while not encouraged, is insufficient to show voter intimidation.