Footnotes, 75.

Even if the Court were to admit the Crusade for Freedom social media post threatening to release challenged voters’ names if the counties did not act on the challenges (PX 45), it would not change the Court’s conclusion. While, as a matter of adverse inference, the Court has found a connection between Time for a Hero (an organization Engelbrecht founded and was, at one point, affiliated with) and Crusade for Freedom, there is no evidence that Crusade for Freedom ever released any voters’ names or that any voter in Georgia saw this post to be intimidated by it. In the alternative, therefore, that the Court considers this inadmissible hearsay evidence (see Section (II)(C)(1)(c)(3) supra), the Court does not find it proves a Section 11(b) violation here.