Footnotes, 53.

Fair Fight indicated that it had received calls from “voters who were being challenged . . . [who] felt this activity was threatening.” Tr. 52:20–22. The Court finds this one statement by Fair Fight’s representative without more specific information of the voter’s circumstances to be insufficient evidence to show that TTV’s efforts were intimidating Georgia voters. Indeed, this one assertion gives no detail about how many voters had called Fair Fight with the challenges in mind, any voter’s circumstances of being challenged, how they discovered he or she was challenged, or other relevant information to assess the reasonableness of one’s fear or intimidation. This statement cannot, and does not, carry Plaintiffs’ burden in this case.