Footnotes, 45.

Defendants attempted to impugn Burton’s report and testimony by emphasizing Burton’s lack of statistical analysis and taking issue with his reference to newspapers and news articles in reaching his conclusions. Tr. 600:20–601:1, 695:3–22. However, the Court is persuaded by Burton’s explanation that he was not retained in this case to provide quantitative analysis and that news articles (in paper or electronic form) are legitimate sources for reaching his conclusions based on historians’ professional standards. Thus, the Court does not find Burton’s methods to be lacking in this case.