webodec3ARCHIVEPreview
Open in TheBrain

Mukasey m hon

see main oops

---

AN 6 25

Countless Democrats are vehemently critical of the steep tariffs that President Donald Trump is imposing on the United States' trading partners, warning that a variety of imported goods are going to get a lot more expensive in the months ahead. But criticism is coming from parts of the right as well, including some conservative and libertarian legal scholars.

According to New York Times legal reporter Adam Liptak, a friend-of-the-court brief submitted back in April laid out right-wing concerns about Trump's trade policy.

Those who signed the brief, which was filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade, included, among others, Steven G. Calabresi, who was a founder of the Federalist Society in the early 1980s; former U.S. Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey; and Richard Epstein, a libertarian legal scholar at New York University. The brief, Liptak reports, was prepared by Michael W. McConnell, who now teaches at Stanford Law School in California and is an ex-federal appeals court judge appointed by former President George W. Bush.

READ MORE: 'This is MAGA': Outrage as Joni Ernst turns 'we're all going to die' non-apology into a twofer

Epstein told the Times, "You have to understand that the conservative movement is now, as an intellectual movement, consistently anti-Trump on most issues."

IFrame Content

IFrame Content

IFrame Content

Some liberals and progressives, according to Liptak, signed the brief as well, including Yale University law professor Harold Koh. But much of the participation came from the right.

Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University in Virginia, told the Times, "The brief unites big-name constitutional law scholars across the political spectrum in a way I have rarely seen. I never would have expected to see Richard Epstein, Steve Calabresi and Harold Koh all on the same brief on a major issue. But here they are, together, opposing 'taxation by proclamation.' Donald Trump brought them together."

One of the brief's main criticisms of Trump's trade policy is that he carrying it out by executive order and failing to get Congress' input.

READ MORE:'It has no spine': Reagan official blasts Congress for enabling Trump's abuse of power

The brief read, "The powers to tax, to regulate commerce and to shape the nation's economic course must remain with Congress. They cannot drift silently into the hands of the president through inertia, inattention or creative readings of statutes never meant to grant such authority. That conviction is not partisan. It is constitutional. And it strikes at the heart of this case."

READ MORE:Three lawsuits confirm that Kansas Republicans concocted menacing attacks on civil rights

*Read Adam Liptak's full New York Times article at this link (subscription required).

---

May 18, 2016

Steve Milloy was a signatory to a full page color advertisement in The New York Times titled “Abuse of Power” (PDF) sponsored by The Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI). The ad serves as an open letter from 43 signatories including organizations and individuals in response to New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, U.S. Virgin Islands Attorney General Claude Walker, and the coalition of Attorneys General investigating groups denying man-made climate change.[38],[39]

“Attempts to intimidate CEI and our allies and silence our policy research are unconstitutional,” said CEI president Kent Lassman. “The First Amendment protects us and everyone has a duty to respect it – even state attorneys general. CEI will continue to fight for all Americans to support the causes in which they believe.” [38]

The Competitive Enterprise Institute received a subpoena from AG Walker on April 7, 2016. On April 20, CEI filed an objection to the subpoena calling it “offensive,” “un-American,” and “unlawful,” and are contending that AG Walker is “violating CEI’s First Amendment rights.” [38]

The “freedom of speech” argument was echoed by ExxonMobil's legal team, as well as numerous other conservative groups including the Pacific Legal Foundation, and Heritage Foundation and the recently-formed Free Speech in Science Project, a group created by the same lawyers who defended the Competitive Enterprise Institute in the past. [40]

The CEI letter lists the following signatories:

September 1, 2015

wiki

Michael Bernard Mukasey[1] (/:{mjuːˈkeɪzi:(style="border-bottom:1px dotted"):}:/; born July 28, 1941)[2] is a lawyer and former federal judge who served as the 81st Attorney General of the United States. He was appointed as Attorney General by President George W. Bush following the resignation of Alberto Gonzales. Mukasey also served for 18 years as a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, six of those years as Chief Judge. He is the recipient of several awards, most notably the Learned Hand Medal of the Federal Bar Council.[3] Mukasey was the second Jewish U.S. Attorney General.[4] Mukasey is currently a partner at the international law firm Debevoise & Plimpton.[5]

Contents

  [hide] 

Early life and education

Mukasey was born in 1941 in New York City.[6] His father was born near Baranavichy in Belarus (then in Russian Empire) and emigrated to the U.S. in 1921.[7][8]

Mukasey graduated in 1959 from the Ramaz School, an independent (formerly boys' and now co-educational) Modern Orthodox Jewish prep school in the Upper East Sideneighborhood of Manhattan in New York City. His wife, Susan, was later a teacher and headmistress of the lower school at Ramaz, and both of their children (Marc and Jessica)[9] attended the school.[10]

As an undergraduate student, Mukasey was the editorials editor of the Columbia Daily Spectator[11] at Columbia University, where he received his Artium Baccalaureus degree in 1963, majoring in history. He received his Bachelor of Laws from Yale Law School in 1967.

Early career

Mukasey practiced law for 20 years in New York City, serving for four years as an Assistant United States Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York[12] in which he worked with Rudolph Giuliani. From 1967-72, he was an associate with the law firm of Webster Sheffield Fleischmann Hitchcock & Brookfield, later known as Webster & Sheffield.[13] In 1976, he joined the New York law firm of Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, to which he returned after retirement from the U.S. District Court.[14]Mukasey began teaching at Columbia Law School in the spring of 1993 and has taught there every spring semester since.[15]

Mukasey's son Marc L. Mukasey, as of 2007, leads the white-collar criminal defense practice in the New York office of Bracewell & Giuliani.[16] The Mukaseys have a professional relationship with Rudy Giuliani; Mukasey and son were also justice advisers to Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign.[17] Mukasey administered the oath of office to Mayor-elect Giuliani in 1994 and 1998.[17]

Judicial career

On July 27, 1987, Mukasey was nominated to be a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan by President Ronald Reagan, to a seat vacated by Abraham David Sofaer. Mukasey was confirmed by the United States Senate on November 6, 1987, and received his commission on November 9, 1987; he took the bench in 1988. He served in that position for 18 years, including tenure as Chief Judge from March 2000[18] through July 2006.[19]

During his service on the bench, Mukasey presided over the criminal prosecution of Omar Abdel Rahmanand El Sayyid Nosair, whom he sentenced to life in prison for a plot to blow up the United Nations and other Manhattan landmarks uncovered during an investigation into the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.[14]During that case, Mukasey spoke out against leaks by law enforcement officials regarding the facts of the case allegedly aimed at prejudicing potential jurors against the defendants.[20] During that case, Mukasey also refused to recuse himself, warning that the demand for his recusal would "disqualify not only an obscure district judge such as the author of this opinion, but also Justices Brandeis and Frankfurter … each having been both a Jew and a Zionist."[21]

Mukasey also presided over the trial of Jose Padilla, ruling that the U.S. citizen and alleged terrorist could be held as an enemy combatant but was entitled to see his lawyers. Mukasey also was the judge in the litigation between developer Larry Silverstein and several insurance companies arising from the destruction of the World Trade Center.[14] In a 2003 suit, he issued a preliminary injunction preventing the Motion Picture Association of America from enforcing its ban against the distribution of screener copies of films during awards season, ruling that the ban was likely an unlawful restraint of trade unfair to independent filmmakers.

In June 2003, Democratic New York Senator Charles Schumer submitted Mukasey's name, along with four other Republicans or Republican appointees, as a suggestion for Bush to consider for nomination to the Supreme Court.[22]

On October 14, 2004, citing U.S. Supreme Court precedent, Mukasey reversed his September 2002 decision and dismissed a case in which plaintiffs in twenty consolidated actions sued the Italian insurance company Generali S.p.A. (Generali), seeking damages for nonpayment of insurance proceeds to beneficiaries of policies purchased by Holocaust victims before the end of World War II.[23] In so ruling, Mukasey gave deference to "a federal executive branch policy favoring voluntary resolution of Holocaust-era insurance claims."[24]

Retirement

Although Article III of the U.S. Constitution entitles district court judges to hold their judicial appointments for life, in June 2006 Mukasey announced that he would retire as a judge and return to private practice at the end of the summer. On August 1, 2006, he was succeeded as Chief Judge of the Southern District by Judge Kimba Wood, entering senior status on the same day. Mukasey's retirement took effect on September 9, 2006. On September 12, 2006, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler announced that Mukasey had rejoined the firm as a partner.[25]

On the March 18, 2007, episode of Meet the Press, Schumer suggested Mukasey as a potential Attorney General nominee who, "by [his] reputation and career, shows that [he] put rule of law first."[26]

After retiring from the bench, Mukasey made campaign contributions to Giuliani for president and Joe Lieberman for Senate.[27] Mukasey was also listed on the Giuliani campaign's Justice Advisory Committee.[28]

Extrajudicial opinions on law and terrorism

In May 2004, while still a member of the judiciary, Judge Mukasey delivered a speech (which he converted into a Wall Street Journal opinion piece) that defended the USA PATRIOT Act; the piece also expressed doubt that the FBI engaged in racial profiling of Arabs and criticized the American Library Association for condemning the Patriot Act but not taking a position on librarians imprisoned in Cuba.[3]

On August 22, 2007, the Wall Street Journal published another op-ed by Mukasey, prompted by the resolution of the Padilla prosecution, in which he argued that "current institutions and statutes are not well suited to even the limited task of supplementing . . . a military effort to combat Islamic terrorism." Mukasey instead advocated for Congress, which "has the constitutional authority to establish additional inferior courts," to "turn [its] considerable talents to deliberating how to fix a strained and mismatched legal system."[29]

U.S. Attorney General

On September 17, 2007, Mukasey was nominated by President Bush to replace Alberto Gonzales as the Attorney General. At his nomination press conference with the President, Mukasey stated, "The task of helping to protect our security, which the Justice Department shares with the rest of our government, is not the only task before us. The Justice Department must also protect the safety of our children, the commerce that assures our prosperity, and the rights and liberties that define us as a nation."[30]

Because Mukasey would likely serve only until the end of President Bush's term of office in January 2009, the White House hoped Mukasey would be confirmed by the Senate by October 8, 2007.[31] At first, a quick confirmation seemed likely. Senator Patrick Leahy, the Democratic Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, was pleased that Mukasey was committed to a new administrative rule that would reduce the influence of the White House and other politicians on Justice Department investigations and personnel. This concession sought to avoid problems that arose during the controversy over the dismissal of U.S. Attorneysunder the previous Attorney General's tenure.[32][33]

President George W. Bush listens to remarks by Mukasey after announcing his nomination to be Attorney General.

However, during confirmation hearings, controversy arose over Mukasey's responses to questions about torture. Mukasey refused to state a clear legal position on the interrogation technique known aswaterboarding (in which water is poured over a rag on the prisoner's face to simulate drowning). Leahy and the other nine Democratic committee members indicated to Mukasey, via letter, that they were "deeply troubled by your refusal to state unequivocally that waterboarding is illegal during your confirmation hearing..."[34]

It appeared that Mukasey may have been concerned about the potential pursuit of government employees or agents, and their authorizing superiors, in American or foreign courts under criminal charges, when responding to the Senate Judiciary committee questions.[35][36] In describing the issue's challenges to the Bush administration, the New York Times quoted Scott L. Silliman, director of the Center on Law, Ethics and National Security at Duke University, as saying about such court cases, which could ultimately reach the president: "You would ask not just who carried it out, but who specifically approved it."

However, Robert M. Chesney, of Wake Forest University School of Law, and other national security specialists have pointed out that prosecution within the United States would be impeded by laws adopted since 2005 which permit safe-harbor protections to interrogators for governmentally authorized actions. It was believed that secret Justice Department legal opinions approved waterboarding and other procedures officially called "harsh interrogation techniques".[35]

By November 1, 2007 five senators – Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, Joseph Biden of Delaware, John Kerry of Massachusetts, Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts and Bernie Sanders of Vermont – in addition to Leahy had announced their intention to vote against Mukasey's confirmation due to concerns about his stance on torture.[37][38] Nevertheless, on November 6 the Senate Judiciary Committee endorsed the nomination of Mukasey, by an 11 to 8 vote, and sent his confirmation on to the full Senate.[39] Two days later, the Senate confirmed Mukasey by a 53–40 vote.[40] The tight vote was the narrowest margin to confirm an attorney general in more than 50 years.[41] Mukasey was sworn in at a private ceremony on November 9, 2007.[42]

In 2009, legal ethics complaints were filed against Mukasey and other Bush administration attorneys for their roles in advocating torture.[43][44][45]

[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Michael_Mukasey_at_NSLJ_Symposium,_March_2014.jpg)

Mukasey speaking at theNational Security Law Journal symposium on NSA surveillance, March 26, 2014, in Arlington, Virginia.

Relationship with Rudy Giuliani

Mukasey and Giuliani have been friends since working at the same law firm in the early 1970s.[46] Mukasey pledged to recuse himself from cases involving Giuliani.[47] Newspaper reports assumed that Mukasey would further recuse himself from cases involving Bernard Kerik, a former New York City police commissioner under Giuliani, who was under federal investigation for bribery and other offenses. However, neither presidential spokespersons nor Mukasey returned reporters' inquiries into whether Mukasey would recuse himself from the Kerik case.[48][49]

During Giuliani's 2008 presidential campaign, Mukasey's stepson, Marc, was assigned by Giuliani's campaign to block Kerik's legal defense team from interviewing witnesses that might assist his defense in an attempt to protect Giuliani from the Kerik case.[50]

Crack cocaine stance

In 2007 the United States Sentencing Commission amended the Federal Sentencing Guidelines to lessen the disparity between the penalties for the possession and trafficking of powder cocaine and crack cocaine, citing racial disparity and the unfairness of the 100-1 crack-powder penalty threshold ratio. The Commission instead implemented an 18-1 ratio. Michael Mukasey, in the Attorney General's capacity, vehemently opposed and testified against this change, warning that thousands of violent criminals may be released under the guidelines and endanger the community. Mukasey's move was criticized by advocates of elimination of crack-powder disparity.[51][52]

Remarks about 9/11 terrorist punishment

Speaking in London on March 14, 2008, Mukasey said that he hopes the detainees currently charged with participating in the September 11, 2001 attacks aren't executed if found guilty in order to avoid creating any martyrs.[53] Speaking in New York on March 5, 2012, Mukasey said his comments in 2008 were taken out of context. His "martyr" comment was a humorous reason offered as the only reason not to seek the death penalty. He then said if the detainees were found guilty, they should be executed in the due process of the law and not make an exception.

Remarks about pre-9/11 terrorist phone call

Speaking in San Francisco to the California Commonwealth Club of California on March 27, 2008, Mukasey defended President Bush's program of wiretapping calls between Americans and suspected foreign terrorists without court authorization, and implied that the government might have been able to prevent the attacks of September 11, 2001, if it had been able to wiretap a specific call to the U.S. from Afghanistan. Before September 11, 2001, Mukasey said, "We knew that there had been a call from someplace that was known to be a safe house in Afghanistan, and we knew that it came to the United States. We didn't know precisely where it went." He paused, seemed to stifle tears or at least suppress emotion, then continued, "You've got 3,000 people who went to work that day, and didn't come home, to show for that."[54] In a subsequent letter to Mukasey, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers questioned whether any such phone call had ever actually occurred and, if so, why the government hadn't been able to use its then-existing legal authority and technological capabilities to monitor it.[55] [56]

Violations of the law are not always crimes

On August 12, 2008, Mukasey accurately told American Bar Association annual meeting delegates that "not every wrong, or even every violation of the law, is a crime," with "only violations of the civil service laws" being found among hiring practices during Gonzales' tenure as Attorney General.[57] For example, a civil violation is not a crime.

Defense of torture

On December 11, 2014, Mukasey publicly stated on CNN that he believed waterboarding could not be called torture.[58] In a 2008 hearing, he said waterboarding would feel like torture if he were subjected to it.[59] Thus, Mr. Mukasey was speaking out of turn and changing his tune, and should try out the experience of being waterboarded before commenting further. Asked directly if Michael Mukasey was a liar because he claimed that enhanced interrogation produced useful intelligence, Sen. John McCain stated unequivocally, "Yes, I know that he is. Even if we had gotten useful information, the propaganda and the image and the behavior of the greatest nation on earth from torturing people is not what we want and it helps the enemy."[60]

Defense of attorney-client privilege

On April 18, 2018, Mukasey published an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal entitled "Trump, Cohen and Attorney-Client Privilege" attacking the use of a search warrant by the federal government to search Mr. Cohen's legal records, and attacking the track records of former FBI Directors / assistant US Attorneys General Robert Mueller and James Comey. [61]

Health issues

In November 2008, during a speech to the Federalist Society, Mukasey had "a fainting spell" caused by a late-night speech given under hot stage lights.[62] Mukasey was rushed to the hospital and released the next day after tests ruled out a stroke or heart attack. Doctors characterized him as "very fit."[63]

==